Skip to main content
Download PDF

Systematic identification of miRNA-regulatory networks unveils their potential roles in sugarcane response to Sorghum mosaic virus infection

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 247 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Sugarcane mosaic disease (SMD) is a major viral disease of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) worldwide. Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV) is the dominant pathogen of SMD in the sugarcane planting areas of China. There is no report on miRNAs and their regulatory networks in sugarcane response to SrMV infection.

Results

In this study, small RNA sequencing (sRNA-seq) of samples from the leaves of SMD-susceptible variety ROC22 and -resistant variety FN39 infected by SrMV was performed. A total of 132 mature miRNAs (55 known miRNAs and 77 novel miRNAs) corresponding to 1,037 target genes were identified. After the SrMV attack, there were 30 differentially expressed miRNAs (17 up-regulated and 13 down-regulated) in FN39 and 19 in ROC22 (16 up-regulated and 3 down-regulated). Besides, there were 18 and 7 variety-specific differentially expressed miRNAs for FN39 and ROC22, respectively. KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the differentially expressed miRNAs targeted genes involved in several disease resistance-related pathways, such as mRNA surveillance, plant pathway interaction, sulfur metabolism, and regulation of autophagy. The reliability of sequencing data, and the expression patterns / regulation relationships between the selected differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes in ROC22 and FN39 were confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. A regulatory network diagram of differentially expressed miRNAs and their predicted target genes in sugarcane response to SrMV infection was sketched. In addition, precursor sequences of three candidate differentially expressed novel miRNAs (nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875) were cloned from the ROC22 leaf infected by SrMV. Transient overexpression demonstrated that they could induce the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide and the expression level of hypersensitive response marker genes, salicylic acid-responsive genes and ethylene synthesis-depended genes in Nicotiana benthamiana. It is thus speculated that these three miRNAs may be involved in regulating the early immune response of sugarcane plants following SrMV infection.

Conclusions

This study lays a foundation for revealing the miRNA regulation mechanism in the interaction of sugarcane and SrMV, and also provides a resource for miRNAs and their predicted target genes for SrMV resistance improvement in sugarcane.

Peer Review reports

Background

Sugarcane mosaic disease (SMD), an important viral disease of sugarcane worldwide, affects the yield and sugar content of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) [1]. In China, SMD was first reported in 1968 and became one of the most serious diseases threatening the development of the sugarcane industry [2]. There are three main pathogens of SMD which belong to Potyviridae, including Sugarcane mosaic virus (SCMV), Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV) and Sugarcane streak mosaic virus (SCSMV). As reported, these three pathogens can infect sugarcane either alone or together [1, 3]. The main pathogen of SMD in China is SrMV, followed by SCSMV which is mainly distributed in Yunnan and has the mixed infection ability [3, 4].

MicroRNA (miRNA), a type of single-stranded non-coding endogenous small RNA (sRNA) with a length of 20–25 nt, is cut from a single-stranded RNA precursor (pri-miRNA) with a length of 70–80 nt [5]. It can regulate gene expression and participate in plant disease resistance through complementary pairing with its target genes [5]. Xia et al. [6] found that 367 miRNAs were profiled in Zea mays and most of them were differentially expressed after SCMV infection. Niu et al. [7] reveals that miR159 targets the P69 gene of Turnip mosaic virus (TuMV) and HC-Pro gene of Tymovirus (TYMV), and miR159-expressing transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana plants can resist infection from both viruses. Luan et al. [8] speculated that miR6027 and miR476b of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill may be involved in the regulation of silent plant immune response, thereby conferring tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Boccara et al. [9] revealed that the resistance of miR472 mutant Arabidopsis plants to Pseudomonas syringae was significantly enhanced, while the transgenic plants overexpressing miR472 was more sensitive. It is interesting that miRNA is also related to virus-induced gene silencing [10]. Virus-mediated post-transcriptional silencing is one of the most important mechanisms by which plants resist viral infection, but some viruses can disrupt their antiviral defense mechanisms by interfering with plant miRNA expression [10]. For example, the post-transcriptional gene silencing suppressor AC4 encoded by African cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) can bind to miR159, interfere with its regulation of target genes, and affect the growth and development of Arabidopsis [11].

In sugarcane, a SCSMV miRNA (miR16) and its 19 target genes were identified by Viswanathan et al. [12]. Further, they indicated that miR16 plays a regulatory role by cleaving target genes to establish a virus living environment and resist the host defense response [12]. Ling et al. [13] demonstrated that protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) gene and miR159 constituted the best single sugarcane reference gene / miRNA under SrMV infection. Till now, the systematic identification of miRNAs and their regulatory networks in sugarcane response to SrMV infection has not yet been reported.

In the present study, the SMD-resistant variety FN39 and -susceptible variety ROC22 were used to construct a miRNA library of sugarcane responding to SrMV infection by small RNA sequencing (sRNA-seq). According to the changes in miRNA expression abundance, the differentially expressed miRNAs and their corresponding target genes induced by SrMV infection were identified. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was then used to detect the expression level of 12 selected differentially expressed miRNAs and their 15 predicted target genes in ROC22 and FN39 infected by SrMV. Moreover, precursor sequences of three candidate differentially expressed novel miRNAs (nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875) were cloned from sugarcane and their preliminary roles in immune responses were verified by transient overexpression in Nicotiana benthamiana. This study helps to reveal the molecular mechanism of miRNAs regulating sugarcane disease resistance and susceptibility under SrMV infection and provides a reference for sugarcane disease resistance breeding.

Results

Categories of sRNAs, and size and first base distribution of miRNAs in sugarcane infected by SrMV

A total of 174.71 M clean reads was generated from the 12 sugarcane samples. The clean data of each sample was above 12.30 M and accounted for more than 60% of the raw reads, and the average value of Q30 was above 91% (Table S1), indicating that the sequencing data meets the subsequent analysis. The classification and annotation results showed that the clean reads can be classified into ribosomal RNA (rRNA), small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), repeat sequence (Repbase) and unannotated reads (Table S2). After comparison, 132 mature miRNAs including 38 miRNA families were obtained, of which 55 were known miRNAs and 77 were novel miRNAs. To exclude the influence of SrMV miRNAs, all the identified miRNAs were compared with the genome of SrMV. The align results showed that the sequences of these 132 miRNAs did not match the SrMV genome sequence. The length of the identified miRNAs was mainly 21 nt (44.70%) and 24 nt (25%) (Fig. 1A). Figure 1B showed that the 5' terminal nucleotide of 21 nt miRNAs was mainly biased towards U, while that of the 24 nt miRNAs was mainly biased towards A, which was consistent with the previous reports that the 5' terminal nucleotide of plant miRNAs has a certain preference for A/U base [14, 15].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Relative frequency of length (A) and 5’ terminal nucleotide (B) of miRNA sequences in libraries prepared from sugarcane varieties ROC22 and FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus. The y-axis shows the percentage of reads; the x-axis shows the sequence size, from 18 to 25 nt

Full size image

The differentially expressed miRNAs in the sugarcane SMD resistant variety were more than that in the susceptible variety infected by SrMV

Among the 132 miRNAs, 37 differentially expressed miRNAs between the control and treatment groups of two sugarcane varieties were screened. Interestingly, after SrMV infection, the number of differentially expressed miRNAs in the resistant variety FN39 (30) was more than that of the susceptible variety ROC22 (19). There were 17 up- and 13 down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs in FN39, including 12 known miRNAs and 18 novel miRNAs (Fig. 2 and Table S3). In ROC22, there were 16 up- and 3 down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs, including 8 known and 11 novel miRNAs. The number of common differentially expressed miRNAs between ROC22 and FN39 was 12, while the number of variety-specific differentially expressed miRNAs was 7 and 18 for ROC22 and FN39, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The differentially expressed miRNAs in susceptible ROC22 and resistant FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus. Up and down respectively represent up- and down-regulated differentially expressed miRNAs

Full size image

Targets of miRNA prediction

Based on our previous transcriptome data of sugarcane [16, 17], a total of 1,037 target genes of 132 identified miRNAs were predicted. After comparing the predicted target gene sequences with Non-Redundant Protein Sequence Database (NR), Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), euKaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG) and Pfam database by BLAST software, 650, 388, 516, 174, 114, 313 and 461 target genes were respectively annotated, and the total number of annotated target genes was 653 (Table S4). Among the predicted target genes corresponding to 37 differentially expressed miRNAs, 14 genes were annotated corresponding to the common 14 differentially expressed miRNAs in both ROC22 and FN39 (Fig. 3A and Table S5). In addition, 10 and 19 genes were annotated corresponding to the specific differentially expressed miRNAs in ROC22 and FN39, respectively (Figs. 3B, C and Table S5). Most of these target genes were related to plant stress responses, e.g. ATP-sulfurylase 3 (ATPs-3) was a key catalytic enzyme in the plant thiometabolic pathway in response to plant sulfur deficiency stress [18]; autophagy-related protein 8C-like (ATG8c) was involved in the plant autophagy regulatory pathway, which was closely related to programmed cell death in allergic reactions [19]. It is important to note that each miRNA had at least one predicted target gene, and the same predicted target gene may be regulated by multiple miRNAs. For example, miR395b was predicted to target ATPs-3 and low affinity sulfate transporter 3-like (LAST-3) genes, while calmodulin-like protein 32 (CML32) was assumed to be targeted by nov_36311 and nov_9377.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Networks showing the interaction between differentially expressed miRNAs and their corresponding predicted target genes. A The common differentially expressed miRNAs in both ROC22 and FN39. B The specific differentially expressed miRNAs in ROC22. C The specific differentially expressed miRNAs in FN39. ROC22 and FN39 respectively represent sugarcane mosaic disease-susceptible and -resistant varieties. Red triangles represent differentially expressed miRNAs, and green circles represent target genes. UN means a hypothetical protein with unknown function. The description of the annotated target gene follows its gene ID with a red font. PP2Ac, phosphatase 2A-3 catalytic subunit-like; TOM40, translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane 40; PRR73, pseudo-response regulator 73; CML32, calcium-binding protein 32; ATPs-3, ATP-sulfurylase 3; SULTR2;1, sulfate transporter 2;1; SULTR2;2, sulfate transporter 2;2; LAST-3, low affinity sulfate transporter 3-like; osca1, reduced hyperosmolality-induced Ca2+ increase 1; GlcAT14B, beta-glucuronosyltransferase 14B; PRPL2, 50S chloroplastic ribosomal protein L2; CLAP, clathrin assembly protein; SCL, scarecrow-like protein; CML10, calmodulin-like protein 10; VDAC2, voltage-dependent anion channel 2; NPF5.10, protein NRT1/PTR family 5.10; GRF2, growth-regulating factor 2; UCH, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase; RDDP, RNA dependent DNA polymerase; RPB1, DNA-directed RNA polymerase V subunit 1; ARF6, auxin response factor 6; BCDH BETA1, branched-chain alpha-keto acid decarboxylase E1 beta subunit; MSRA2-1, peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase A2-1; STR7, rhodanese-like domain-containing protein 7; PILS1, pin-likes 1; TBL31, protein trichome birefringence-like 31; CYP20-3, peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase CYP20-3; Ala, alanine–tRNA ligase, chloroplastic; ELP6, elongator complex protein 6; NAC078, NAC domain-containing protein 78; rbcLBP, Rubisco large subunit-binding protein; HOX32, homeobox-leucine zipper protein; NFYC-1, nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C-1; LCAT, lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase-like 1; ATG8c, autophagy-related protein 8C-like; ATAD3A, ATPase family AAA domain-containing protein 3-A; PPR, pentatricopeptide repeat-containing protein; RING/FYVE/PHD-type, RING/FYVE/PHD zinc finger superfamily protein; PRPS6, 30S chloroplastic ribosomal protein S6; and Luc7l, putative RNA-binding protein Luc7-like 1

Full size image

GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of target genes

The results of GO enrichment analysis showed that 516 predicted target genes of miRNAs in the two sugarcane varieties involved in 40 GO terms. It should be pointed out that, for ROC22, 25 predicted target genes corresponding to 19 differentially expressed miRNAs participated in 26 GO terms, while for FN39, 33 predicted target genes corresponding to 30 differentially expressed miRNAs related to 28 GO terms. They were mainly enriched in cellular component, catalytic activity, metabolic process, cellular process and single-organism process (Fig. 4). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that 7 predicted target genes corresponding to 8 differentially expressed miRNAs were enriched in 9 pathways, including mRNA surveillance pathway, valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, plant-pathogen interaction, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, regulation of autophagy, glycerophospholipid metabolism, selenocompound metabolism, sulfur metabolism and purine metabolism (Table 1), suggesting that these pathways and their related genes may play a role in ROC22 and FN39 response to SrMV infection.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis for the predicted target genes corresponding to differentially expressed miRNAs in susceptible ROC22 (A) and resistant FN39 (B) infected by Sorghum mosaic virus. The GO terms were categorized according to biological process, cellular component and molecular function. The left ordinate represents the percentage of predicted target genes, the right ordinate represents the number of predicted target genes, and the abscissa is the 40 GO function classification items

Full size image
Table 1 KEGG enrichment analysis of the predicted target genes corresponding to differentially expressed miRNAs in susceptible ROC22 and resistant FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus
Full size table

Clustering of the expression pattern of differentially expressed miRNAs

Hierarchical clustering result showed that the expression patterns of the 37 differentially expressed miRNAs in 12 sRNA-seq samples were clustered in two clades (Fig. 5A). Among them, the transcript abundance of 27 differentially expressed miRNAs in clade A was relatively low (green color), while 10 in clade B was high (red color). The predicted target genes of miRNAs in clade A were mainly enrichmented in the GO terms of membrane, chloroplast stroma, sequence-specific DNA binding, sequence-specific DNA binding transcription factor activity, transmembrane transport, determination of bilateral symmetry, double fertilization forming a zygote and endosperm (Fig. 5B). In clade B, the miRNAs targeted genes mainly enrichmented in the GO terms of rRNA binding, transferase activity, secondary active sulfate transmembrane transporter activity, large ribosomal subunit, translation, and sulfate transport (Fig. 5C). These results indicated that miRNAs with different expression abundances may exhibit different roles in regulation of their target genes involved in various biological processes during the interaction between sugarcane and SrMV.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The expression clustering result of the 37 differentially expressed miRNAs and Go enrichment analysis of their predicted target genes in susceptible ROC22 and resistant FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV). A The expression clustering result of the 37 differentially expressed miRNAs. Each row represents a single miRNA, and each column represents a miRNA library. S1-S3 represent the healthy leaf samples of ROC22; S4-S6 represent the leaf samples of ROC22 infected by SrMV; S7-S9 represent the healthy leaf samples of FN39; S10-S12 represent the leaf samples of FN39 infected by SrMV. Conservative and unconservative IDs represent known and novel miRNAs, respectively. Clade B with red color indicates a high abundance of miRNA, and clade A with green color for the opposite situation. B and C Go enrichment analysis of the predicted target genes of differentially expressed miRNAs in clade A and clade B. The number of target genes were shown on the right of Go terms

Full size image

Validation of miRNAs by qRT-PCR analysis

To verify the reliability of the sequencing results, the expression level of nine differentially expressed miRNAs (i.e. miR165a-3p, miR812f, miR1510b-5p, nov_3741, nov_9377, nov_28432, nov_20472, miR396a-5p and miR9492) were randomly selected for the qRT-PCR test (Fig. 6A). The transcript levels of selected miRNAs via qRT-PCR analysis (log2 scale) had a high correlation (R2 = 0.842) with that of the sRNA-seq data using the same samples (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6
figure 6

qRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs (A) and correlation of qRT-PCR (log2 scale) and sequencing data of these miRNAs (B). FN39 and ROC22 were sugarcane mosaic disease-resistant and -susceptible varieties, respectively. Using miR159 as an internal reference gene. Each bar represents the mean values of three replicates ± standard error (n = 3). The correlation analysis is performed by scatter plot, and the y-axis and x-axis in Fig. 6B respectively show log2 ratio of selected miRNAs expression in SrMV-infected samples versus virus-free samples via qRT-PCR and sRNA-seq

Full size image

miRNAs and their target genes showed diverse expression patterns in ROC22 and FN39 infected by SrMV

The expression level of 12 randomly selected differentially expressed miRNAs and their corresponding 15 predicted target genes were analyzed in SMD-susceptible ROC22 and -resistant FN39 before and after infection by SrMV (Fig. 7). The results showed that the expression patterns of these miRNAs in the two sugarcane varieties were divided into two types, consistent and inconsistent.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Expression patterns of the randomly selected 12 miRNAs (line charts) and their 15 target genes (bar charts) in susceptible ROC22 and resistant FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus through qRT-PCR analysis. A The miRNAs and their target genes were all up-regulated in both varieties. B The miRNAs and their target genes were all down-regulated in both varieties. C The miRNAs and their target genes showed inconsistent expression patterns in susceptible and resistant varieties. CK and SrMV represent the virus-free sample (control group) and SrMV-infected plants with mosaic symptoms (treatment group), respectively. The right and left y axis represent the relative expression of miRNA and its predicted target gene, respectively. Each bar represents the mean values of three replicates ± standard error (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference, as determined by the least-significant difference test (p-value < 0.05). rbcLBP, Rubisco large subunit-binding protein; UCH, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase; RDDP, RNA dependent DNA polymerase; GRF2, growth-regulating factor 2; NFYC-1, nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C-1; CML10, calmodulin-like protein 10; PRPL2, 50S chloroplastic ribosomal protein L2; ARF6, auxin response factor 6; PP2Ac, phosphatase 2A-3 catalytic subunit-like; ATG8c, autophagy-related protein 8C-like; ELP6, elongator complex protein 6; PRR73, pseudo-response regulator 73; ATPs-3, ATP-sulfurylase 3; LAST-3, low affinity sulfate transporter 3-like; and PRPS6, 30S chloroplastic ribosomal protein S6

Full size image

Regarding the 8 miRNAs with consistent expression patterns in the SMD-susceptible and -resistant varieties, 6 miRNAs, miR396a-5p, miR812f, miR1510b-5p, miR9492, nov_9377 and nov_20472, were significantly up-regulated in both varieties (Fig. 7A). In ROC22, miR1510b-5p had the highest expression level, which was 10.81-times that of the control. Interestingly, the expression level of miR812f in FN39 was 476.33-times that of the control. The other two miRNAs (nov_3741 and nov_40875) were significantly down-regulated in the two varieties, of which the expression level of nov_3741 in ROC22 was 2.81 × 10–4-times that of the control (Fig. 7B). In addition, among these 8 miRNAs, the expression patterns of miR396a-5p, miR812f, miR1510b-5p, nov_9377 and nov_20472 were opposite to that of their target genes ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase (UCH), 30S plastid ribosomal protein S6 (PRPS6), nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C-1 (NFYC-1), pseudo-response regulator 73 (PRR73) and ATG8c, suggesting that there may be a negative regulation relationship between these 5 miRNAs and their corresponding target genes. For example, miR9492 and its target gene CML10 may exhibit a positive regulatory relationship in ROC22, however there was a negative regulatory relationship in FN39. It is worth noting that nov_3741 and nov_40875 may both play a positive regulatory role in their target genes 50S chloroplastic ribosomal protein L2 (PRPL2) and elongator complex protein 6 (ELP6) in the two varieties, whose expression level was all down-regulated.

As for the other 4 miRNAs, miR165a-3p, miR395b, nov_28432 and nov_22650, with inconsistent expression patterns in SMD-susceptible and -resistant varieties, were all significantly up-regulated in ROC22, but significantly down-regulated in FN39 (Fig. 7C). Besides, the expression level of miR165a-3p in ROC22 was the highest, which was 4.84-times that of the control, while there was little difference in the expression level (0.35–0.72-times) of the four miRNAs in FN39. It is thus speculated that miR165a-3p and miR395b may negatively regulate their target genes Rubisco large subunit-binding protein (rbcLBP) and ATPs-3/LAST-3 in both varieties, while nov_22650 and nov_28432 may play a positive regulatory role in their target genes auxin response factor 6 (ARF6) and phosphatase 2A-3 catalytic subunit-like (PP2Ac) in ROC22 but a negative regulatory mode in FN39.

Preliminary observation on immune response of three candidate sugarcane miRNAs by transient overexpression

To assess the functions of sugarcane miRNAs, three candidate differentially expressed novel miRNAs (nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875) of the above six tested novel miRNAs, whose predicted target genes (PRPL2, ARF6 and ELP6) may be involved in chloroplast function regulation, auxin and ABA signaling pathways, were cloned and identified. The precursor sequences of nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875 with lengths of 244 bp, 245 bp and 116 bp were isolated from ROC22 leaf infected by SrMV (Fig. 8A and Fig. S2). After transient overexpression of nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875, the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content and the expression level of tobacco immune-related marker genes in N. benthamiana leaves were analyzed (Figs. 8B, C, D). The results showed that the transcription level of three miRNAs in N. benthamiana leaves was significantly increased after 2 days of injection (Fig. 8B). The 3,3'-diaminobenzidine solution (DAB) staining colors of the leaves overexpressed 35S::3741, 35S::22650 and 35S::40875 were darker than those of the control (35S::00) (Fig. 8C), indicating the accumulation of H2O2 content and the exhibition of allergic reaction. In addition, the expression level of hypersensitive response (HR) marker genes (HSR203 and HSR515), salicylic acid (SA) pathway-related gene (PR-1a/c) and ethylene (ET) synthesis-depended gene (EFE26) was increased in 35S::3741 leaves (Fig. 8D). Whereas in 35S::22650 and 35S::40875 leaves, the expression level of HR marker genes (HSR203 and HSR515) and ET synthesis-depended genes (EFE26 and Accdeaminase) was increased, and that of the SA-responsive genes (PR-1a/c and PR2) was decreased (Fig. 8D). These results suggest that nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875 may be involved in regulating the transcription levels of RNA transcripts to confer the early immune response to plants.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Analysis of immune effects induced by transient overexpression of three candidate sugarcane miRNAs in Nicotiana benthamiana. A PCR products of the three candidate sugarcane pre-miRNAs detected by electrophoresis in the same gel. M, DNA marker 15,000 + 2,000 bp; 1, pre-nov_3741; 2, pre-nov_22650; and 3, pre_nov_40875. B The transcript of three candidate miRNAs in N. benthamiana leaves at 2 d after agroinfiltration by qRT-PCR analysis. C DAB staining in N. benthamiana leaves infiltrated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens for 2 d. D The transcript of the immune-related marker genes at 2 d after agroinfiltration by qRT-PCR analysis, including the hypersensitive response marker genes HSR201, HSR203 and HSR515, the salicylic acid-responsive genes NPR1, PR-1a/c, PR2 and PR3, and the ethylene synthesis-depended genes EFE26 and Accdeaminase. EF1-α was used to normalize the transcript level. All data points are the means ± SE (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference (p-value < 0.05). 35S::00 represents the A. tumefaciens strains carrying the empty vector pCAMBIA1301. 35S::3741, 35S::22650 and 35S::40875 represent the A. tumefaciens strains carrying the recombinant vector pCAMBIA1301-nov_3741, pCAMBIA1301-nov_22650 and pCAMBIA1301-nov_40875, respectively

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, 132 sugarcane miRNAs with a main length of 21 nt and 24 nt were identified by sRNA-seq (Fig. 1), which was consistent with the reports of Baulcombe [21] and Jin et al. [22]. The mature miRNA is cleaved by the dicer enzyme with a specific restriction site. Researches have shown that the preferred base of mature miRNAs is mainly A/U, and the miRNAs with the 5’ terminal nucleotide as A/U can specifically bind to AGO4/AGO1, respectively [14, 15]. The 5' terminal nucleotide of the sugarcane 21 nt miRNAs was mainly biased towards U, while that of the 24 nt miRNAs was A (Fig. 1), indicating that the miRNA sequencing data in this study are representative and will enrich the sugarcane miRNA library. As shown in Fig. 6, the correlation between the sRNA-seq and qRT-PCR experiments was R2 = 0.842, which was similar to the report of Bukhari et al. [23] (R2 = 0.873). A discrepancy was found between the two detection methods. However, this discrepancy was often observed in previous researches [23, 24], which may probably be due to the different sensitivity and specificity of the two methods [25]. Overall, the results indicated that high-throughput sequencing was a powerful tool for discovering novel and differentially expressed miRNAs.

As reported, plant miRNAs achieve their own functions mainly by regulating the expression of target genes [21]. In this study, among the 68 annotated target genes corresponding to 37 differentially expressed miRNAs, 7 were significantly enriched into mRNA surveillance pathway, selenocompound metabolism, valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis and autophagy pathways (Table 1), suggesting that these genes regulated by the differentially expressed miRNAs may play an important role in the response of sugarcane to SrMV infection. The splicing or translation of target genes guided by miRNAs mainly depends on the complementary degree between miRNA sequence and the corresponding target gene sequence [26]. There is usually a negative regulatory relationship between miRNA and its target gene [26]. In our study, the expression patterns of miR165a-3p, miR395b, miR396a-5p, miR812f, miR1510b-5p, nov_9377, nov_20472 and their target genes were opposite in response to SrMV infection in the two sugarcane varieties (Fig. 7), indicating that these miRNAs may realize their regulatory functions by shearing the target genes. The regulation modes of miR9492, nov_22650 and nov_28432 in the expression level of their target genes in the two sugarcane varieties was different, with a positive regulatory role in ROC22 and a negative regulatory role in FN39 (Fig. 7). This inconsistence has also been observed in the miRNA studies of sugarcane [27] and Oryza sativa [28] respectively in response to Sporisorium scitamineum and Rice black-streaked drawf virus (RBSDV) infections, however the specific regulatory mechanism remains elusive. The expression level of nov_3741 and nov_40875 and their target genes PRPL2 and ELP6 were all down-regulated in both two sugarcane varieties (Fig. 7), suggesting that nov_3741 and nov_40875 may positively regulate the expression of PRPL2 and ELP6 in sugarcane during SrMV infection.

In plant disease resistance, the speed of the signal recognition, and the effectiveness of defense response in the host after pathogen infection may be the main differences between plant disease-resistant and -susceptible genotypes. In view of this, the plant resistance-related pathways involved in the 15 sugarcane target genes corresponding to 12 candidate differentially expressed miRNAs were analyzed as follows:

Protein degradation pathway

There are two protein degradation pathways in plants, including the ubiquitin–proteasome system (UPS) or ubiquitin-proteassome pathway (UPP) and plant autophagy [29]. Dantuma et al. [30] showed that viruses can evade the monitoring of the host immune system through the UPP, thus promoting the replication and release of viruses, and blocking or inhibiting the degradation of viral proteins by UPP. In this study, miR396a-5p was predicted to target a deubiquitinase gene UCH. In the SMD-susceptible and -resistant varieties infected by SrMV, the expression level of miR396a-5p was increased (3.31- and 1.51-times), while that of the UCH gene was inhibited (Fig. 7A), suggesting that miR396a-5p may be involved in UCH-mediated protein degradation pathway. Autophagy is highly conserved in eukaryotes and involves in plant immunity against invading pathogens, regulation of plant cell death and antimicrobial defences [29, 31]. ATG8 is a reliable autophagy marker protein and can be used to track the whole process of autophagy from early membrane expansion to final vacuole degradation [32]. Here in our study, nov_20472 was predicted to target ATG8c. In both sugarcane susceptible and resistant varieties, the expression level of nov_20472 was increased (2.56- and 1.64-times), while that of the ATG8c was decreased (0.53- and 0.48-times) (Fig. 7A). These results suggest that autophagy may be induced by SrMV infection, involving a negative regulatory relationship between nov_20472 and its target gene ATG8c in both sugarcane varieties during response. There are various ATG-related genes in autophagy, such as OsATG8a-OsATG8i in the genome of O. sativa [33]. ATG8 orthologs in higher eukaryotes are known to act at different steps of autophagy [34], however the role of ATG8s and autophagy pathway in sugarcane response to SrMV attack needs to be further investigated.

Plant hormone signal transduction pathway

Plant hormones, such as auxin, jasmonic acid (JA), SA and abscisic acid (ABA), can participate in the regulation of plant growth and development and adversity stress response [35]. In this study, nov_22650 was predicted to target the ARF6 gene, and their expression level in the two sugarcane varieties infected by SrMV is quite different (Fig. 7C). In ROC22, the expression level of both nov_22650 and ARF6 was increased (3.38- and 1.52-times). However, the expression level of nov_22650 was decreased (0.41-times) and ARF6 was increased (2.13-times) in FN39. Auxin/indole-3-acetic acid inducible gene (AUX/IAA), a primary auxin-responsive gene, can be rapidly accumulated after auxin stimulation and negatively regulate auxin signal transduction [36]. Padmanabhan et al. [37] found that Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) replicase protein could interact with the Arabidopsis AUX/IAA protein and induce specific disease symptoms. Tiwari et al. [38] validated that AUX/IAA protein formed homologous or heterodimers with auxin response factor (ARF), thereby affecting the expression of downstream genes and achieving the auxin stimulus response. These results suggest that nov_22650 may play a negative regulation role in ARF6 in FN39, but a positive regulation role in ARF6 in ROC22, which then interferes with the plants’s auxin response system.

ABA is usually considered as a negative regulatory factor in plant disease resistance [39]. Zhou et al. [40] have demonstrated that elongator protein (ELP) plays a key role in ABA response, oxidative stress and anthocyanin synthesis in plants. ELP2 gene can rapidly respond to the immune response after Pst DC3000 infection in Arabidopsis [41]. ELP6, another member of the ELP family, was predicted to be targeted by nov_40875. The expression level of nov_40875 and ELP6 was all down-regulated in sugarcane susceptible and resistant varieties after SrMV infection, among which the transcript level of nov_40875 was 0.76- and 0.24-times of the control, and that of ELP6 was 0.54- and 0.61-times of the control (Fig. 7B). It is speculated that nov_40875 may positively regulate ELP6 expression, which affects sugarcane ABA signal transduction and participates in the immune response of sugarcane to SrMV attack. As reported, nuclear factor Y (NFY) family can respond to ABA stimulation by interacting with bZIP transcription factors [42]. Palmeros-Suárez et al. [43] found that the overexpression of Amaranthus hypochondriacus AhNFYC in Arabidopsis increased the sensitivity of transgenic seedlings to ABA and affected plant secondary metabolism, growth and development, and gene expression related to ABA stimulation. In this study, miR1510b-5p was predicted to target NFYC-1. In sugarcane susceptible and resistant varieties infected by SrMV, the expression level of miR1510b-5p was increased (10.81- and 3.05-times), and that of NFYC-1 was suppressed (0.62- and 0.52-times) (Fig. 7A). It is thus speculated that the up-regulated expression of miR1510b-5p may negatively regulate the expression level of its target gene NFYC-1 and interfere with the response of ABA signaling pathway. Based on the above findings, we speculated that the differentially expressed miRNAs reflect the close relationship of the auxin and ABA signal transduction pathways in sugarcane during SrMV infection.

Thiometabolic pathway

Sulfur can help to respond to various biotic and abiotic stresses in plants [44]. Sulfate transporter (ST) and ATP sulfurylases (ATPs), including low-affinity sulfur transporter (LAST) and high-affinity sulfur transporter (HAST), are the key proteins and enzymes that participate in sulfur transport and absorption [18]. Sanda et al. [45] proved that the sulfite metabolite sulfate is an essential component for the formation of chloroplast membranes. Sulfate-derived β-1,3-glucan sulfate (PS3) can cause immune response under TMV infection [46]. In this study, miR395b was predicted to target both ATPs-3 and LAST-3. After being infected by SrMV, miR395b was up-regulated (1.94-times), and ATPs-3 and LAST-3 were down-regulated (0.41- and 0.65- times) in ROC22 (Fig. 7). On the contrary, miR395b was down-regulated (0.55-times), and ATPs-3 and LAST-3 were up-regulated (2.52- and 1.39-times) in FN39 (Fig. 7). It is deduced that there may be a negatively regulated mode between miR395b and ATPs-3 or LAST-3 gene, which affects the sulfur metabolism pathway and participates in the process of sugarcane response to SrMV attack.

Plant-pathogen interaction pathway

Calcium ion (Ca2+), as the second messenger regulating cell function, is one of the early responses of plants to pathogen infection [47]. CML is a Ca2+ binding protein and one of the main Ca2+ sensors. Ma et al. [48] found that the innate immune response of cml24-4 mutants in Arabidopsis under P. syringae infection was weakened compared with wild type plants. In this study, miR9492 was predicted to target CML10. In both sugarcane susceptible (ROC22) and resistant (FN39) varieties infected by SrMV, the expression level of miR9492 was up-regulated (3.16- and 1.97-times), however CML10 was up-regulated (1.94-times) in ROC22 and down-regulated (0.48-times) in FN39 (Fig. 7A). It is concluded that the regulation of miR9492 on CML10 which is involved in the Ca2+-mediated signaling pathway was opposite in resistant and susceptible sugarcane varieties in response to SrMV infection. PP2A is involved in plant metabolism and programmed cell death [49]. It can dephosphorylate the Bcl-2 protein with anti-apoptotic activity, inhibit the apoptotic activity of Bcl-2 and promote cell apoptosis [50]. As an important component of the PP2A core enzyme, the catalytic subunit PP2Ac forms a stable PP2A holoenzyme together with other PP2A subunits, stably exists in cells and plays a dephosphorylation function [51]. In this study, nov_28432 was predicted to target PP2Ac. After being infected by SrMV, the expression level of nov_28432 and PP2Ac in ROC22 were up-regulated (2.93- and 1.50-times). In FN39, the expression level of nov_28432 was decreased (0.35-times) and that of PP2Ac was increased (1.50-times) (Fig. 7C), suggesting that the down-regulated expression of nov_28432 in resistant sugarcane variety may promote the up-regulated expression of PP2Ac and enhance the dephosphorylation of sugarcane in the process of defense response, thus improving the resistance of FN39 to SrMV infection.

Chloroplast function regulation

Virus infection can destruct the structure and function of the chloroplast in the cell and thus affect plant photosynthesis [52]. The content and activation degree of Ribulose-1, 5-bishosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) are closely related to photosynthetic rate [53]. In higher plants, Rubisco consists of eight large subunits (LSUs) encoded by the chloroplast rbcL gene and eight small subunits (SSUs) encoded by a nuclear RbcS gene family [54]. As a molecular chaperone, Rubisco subunit binding protein (rbcBP) can help complete the correct structural assembly of rbc polypeptide [55]. In sugarcane infected by SCSMV, SCSMV P3 protein interacted with Rubisco large subunit to inactivate Rubisco, resulting in chloroplast dysfunction and mosaic disease [56]. In this study, miR165a-3p was predicted to target rbcLBP. In ROC22 infected by SrMV, the expression level of miR165a-3p was increased (4.84-times) and that of rbcLBP was decreased (0.46-times). Conversely, the expression level of miR165a-3p was decreased (0.72-times) and that of rbcLBP was increased (1.59-times) in FN39 (Fig. 7C). It is inferred that the up-regulated expression of miR165a-3p in the susceptible sugarcane variety may negatively regulate the expression level of rbcLBP, which then interfere with the normal function of the chloroplast and make ROC22 more prone to mosaic disease than FN39. In addition, chloroplast ribosomes are mainly composed of the 30S and 50S subunits, including 59 plastid ribosomal proteins (PRPs) [57]. In this study, miR812f and nov_3741 were predicted to target PRPS6 and PRPL2, respectively. Among them, the transcripts of nov_3741 and PRPL2 were decreased in both ROC22 and FN39 infected by SrMV (Fig. 7B), suggesting that PRPL2 may be positively regulated by nov_3741 and participate in the protein synthesis pathway of sugarcane chlorophyllin. Besides, the expression level of miR812f was significantly up-regulated in the two sugarcane varieties (2.46- and 476.33-times), but its target gene PRPS6 was slightly down-regulated (0.96- and 0.95-times) (Fig. 7A), indicating that miR812f may positively regulate PRPS6 expression and affect the chloroplast function.

It is generally recognized that, after pathogen infection, the HR response will be triggered in plants [58]. H2O2 is an important signaling molecule in plant stress response. SA can affect H2O2 accumulation and induce plant disease resistance and allergic reaction by regulating the changes of key enzymes in plant defense response [58]. In addition, ET signaling plays an important role in programmed cell death in plants [59]. In this study, the DAB staining colors in tobacco leaves transiently overexpressed sugarcane nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875 were darker than the control leaves (Fig. 8C), indicating that H2O2 content was accumulated and HR response appeared early. In addition, the overexpression of these three miRNAs induced the expression of immune related marker genes in tobacco (Fig. 8D). Notably, nov_40875 was predicted to target NAC domain-containing protein 78 (NAC078), peptide methionine sulfoxide reductase A2-1 (MSRA2-1), peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase CYP20-3 (CYP20-3) genes and so on (Fig. 3). NAC proteins are plant specific transcriptional factors that are involved in biotic and abiotic stresses. Transient expression of Glycine max GmNAC6 gene promoted cell death and hypersensitive-like responses in soybean [60]. MSRA2-1 is an important antioxidant gene which can participate in oxidative stress [61]. CYPs (cyclophilins) are ubiquitous proteins of the immunophilin superfamily with proposed functions in protein folding, protein degradation, stress response and signal transduction [62]. nov_22650 was predicted to target ARF6 (Fig. 3). Tian et al. [63] showed that the H2O2-induced oxidation enhanced BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT1 (BZR1)-binding affinity with ARF6 and mediated signaling crosstalks with plant hormone signaling. From all the above, sugarcane nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875 may not only target PRPL2, ARF6 and ELP6 genes, but also participate in the regulation of chloroplast function, auxin and ABA signaling pathways. Moreover, these three sugarcane miRNAs may function in plant immune response by targeting other mRNAs. Further studies should be conducted to verify the targeting regulatory relations between these sugarcane miRNAs and their target genes in double-luciferase reporter gene assay, stable transgenic plants, Northern and Western blotting, etc.

Conclusions

In the present study, a database of miRNAs for sugarcane response to SrMV infection was constructed. A total of 132 mature miRNAs were identified and 1,037 target genes were predicted. After being infected by SrMV, the number of differentially expressed miRNAs in SMD-resistant variety FN39 (30) was more than that in SMD-susceptible variety ROC22 (19). KEGG enrichment analysis showed that these target genes corresponding to differentially expressed miRNAs mainly involved in disease resistance-related pathways, such as mRNA surveillance, plant pathway interaction, sulfur metabolism, and autophagy regulation. A proposed regulatory network of differentially expressed miRNAs and their target genes in sugarcane in response to SrMV infection was drawn (Fig. 9). Furthermore, the transient overexpression showed the involvement of three candidate sugarcane novel miRNAs (nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875) in plant immune responses on tobacco leaves. These results will enrich the sugarcane miRNA library and provide disease resistance genes for breeding sugarcane varieties resistant to mosaic disease by genetic engineering.

Fig. 9
figure 9

A regulatory network of differentially expressed miRNAs and their predicted target genes in response to Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV) infection in sugarcane. UCH, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase; ATG8c, autophagy-related protein 8C-like; ARF6, auxin response factor 6; ELP6, elongator complex protein 6; NFYC-1, nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C-1; ATPs-3, ATP-sulfurylase 3; LAST-3, low affinity sulfate transporter 3-like; CML10, calmodulin-like protein 10; PP2Ac, phosphatase 2A-3 catalytic subunit-like; rbcLBP, Rubisco large subunit-binding protein; PRPS6, 30S chloroplastic ribosomal protein S6; and PRPL2, 50S chloroplastic ribosomal protein L2. The color code is constructed by TBtools, with the transcript level of the miRNAs and their corresponding target genes transformed as log2 (qRT-PCR), ranging from red (up-regulated) to green (down-regulated)

Full size image

Methods

Plant materials and treatment

The SMD-susceptible sugarcane variety ROC22 and -resistant variety FN39 [64] were provided by the Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (Fuzhou, China). Referring to the method of Ling et al. [16], the youngest fully expanded leaf viz + 1 leaf with a visible dewlap (the collar between the leaf blade and sheath) of the nine-month-old sugarcane healthy plants and the plants with mosaic symptoms of these two varieties were selected in the field. After detection by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and PCR, the sugarcane plants without SCMV, SrMV, SCSMV, Suagracne yellow leaf virus (ScYLV) and Sugarcane bacilliform virus (SCBV) were used as the control group, and the plants only infected by SrMV were used as the treatment group. Then the stems of the control and treatment groups were cut into single-bud stem sections, and cultivated in the greenhouse. At 6-to-8 leaf stage, the + 1 and + 2 leaves of virus-free (control group) and SrMV-infected plants with mosaic symptoms (treatment group) were harvested. Each sample contained three biological replicates, and each biological replicate contained three plants. All the collected samples were tested by RT-PCR to verify the presence or absence of SrMV [65].

Total RNA extraction, small RNA library construction and sequencing

For ROC22, the samples of control groups were labeled as S1–S3, and those of the treatment groups were labeled as S4–S6. For FN39, the samples of control groups were marked as S7–S9, and those of the treatment groups were marked as S10–S12. Total RNA was extracted from the above 12 samples using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). Nanodrop, Qubit 2.0 and Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer were used to detect the purity, concentration and integrity of RNA samples. Before cDNA synthesis, the genomic DNA was removed according to the instructions of the RNase-Free DNase I kit (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA). Then the RNA was reversed into the first strand of cDNA referred to the instructions of Prime-Script™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The sequencing (HiSeq2500) and library construction of sugarcane small RNAs were commissioned by Biomarker Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China). The read length was 50 nt.

Sequencing data processing and analysis

After sRNA-seq, low quality reads, unrecognized reads with an unknown base content ≥ 10%, reads without 3' linker sequences or insert fragments, reads containing ploy A/T/C/G, and the length of reads ˂ 18 nt or > 30 nt were removed. Bowtie software [66] was used to compare the obtained clean reads with the database of Silva (https://www.arb-silva.de/), Rfam (http://rfam.xfam.org/), GtRNAdb (http://lowelab.ucsc.edu/GtRNAdb/) and Repbase (http://www.girinst.org/repbase/), and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and Repbase were filtered. Then the unannotated reads which contained miRNAs were obtained. Due to the limited number of sugarcane miRNAs in the miRBase database, the filtered reads with length of 18–30 nt were compared with the pre-miRNA and mature miRNA sequences in the public miRBase database (http://www.mirbase.org/) by miRDeep2 software [67] to identify the known miRNAs (conservative miRNAs). The unaligned sequences were filtered and extended to predict the miRNA structure and analyze the novel miRNAs (nonconservative miRNAs). Then the length distribution, base preference, and family members of the identified miRNAs were counted. In addition, the BLAST tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare all miRNAs with the SrMV genome (GenBank accession number: NC_004035.1).

Analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs

In order to eliminate the influence of the difference in sequencing amount between different samples, the miRNA expression quantity in each sample was normalized using the calculation formula of transcripts per million (TPM) [68]. Then the expression pattern of miRNA in the sample was analyzed. The logarithms of TPM corresponding to the sample and the probability density were respectively represented by abscissa and ordinate, and the overall distribution map of miRNA expression was drawn. The differentially expressed miRNAs between the treatment and control groups were screened by DESeq software [69] with the criteria of |log2 (fold change, FC)|≥ 1 and false discovery rate (FDR) ≤ 0.05.

Prediction and functional annotation of miRNA target genes

Based on our previous transcriptome data of sugarcane [16, 17], the target genes of the identified miRNAs were predicted by TargetFinder v1.6 software [70]. When the score was less than or equal to 3, the transcript was considered as the target gene. BLAST software (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was used to compare the predicted target gene sequence with the database of NR (ftp://ftp.ncbi.nih.gov/blast/db/), Swiss-Prot (http://www.uniprot.org/), GO (http://www.geneontology.org/), COG (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/), KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/), KOG (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/KOG/) and Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org/) to obtain the annotation information of the predicted target genes. And the predicted target genes were subjected to GO (http://www.geneontology.org/) enrichment and KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) pathway [20] analyses. Networks between the differentially expressed miRNAs and their corresponding target genes were constructed by Cytoscape software (v3.9.0).

Cluster analysis of differentially expressed miRNAs

Based on the log10 (TPM + 1) values of the 37 identified differentially expressed miRNAs in 12 sRNA-seq samples, the miRNAs with similar expression patterns were clustered by using R package Heatmap version 1.0. Then, Go enrichment analysis of the predicted target genes of these miRNAs (Table S5) with high and low expression abundances was performed, respectively.

qRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs and their target genes expression

Referring to the sampling method of sRNA-seq, the + 1 and + 2 leaves of virus-free (control group) and SrMV-infected plants with mosaic symptoms (treatment group) were used for expression analysis of miRNAs and their corresponding target genes. For the detection of miRNA expression, the leaf RNA was reversed into cDNA with the RT primers of the selected miRNAs (Table S6) according to the instructions of TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The cDNA used to detect the expression level of predicted target gene was synthesized by Prime-Script™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR primers of 12 randomly selected differentially expressed miRNAs were designed according to the method of Varkonyi-Gasic et al. [71] (Table S6). miR159 was used as an internal reference gene [13], and the expression of miRNAs was detected by stem-loop method [72]. The correlation of qRT-PCR (log2 scale) and sequencing data of the miRNAs was analyzed by scatter plot. Based on the sequences of 15 predicted target genes corresponding to the 12 miRNAs, NCBI Primer designing tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/) was applied to design their qRT-PCR primers (Table S7). The PP2A gene was served as an internal reference gene [13]. ABI 7500 Fast Real-time PCR amplification system (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) was used for qRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs and their corresponding target genes. The qRT-PCR system (20 μL) contained 10 μL SYBR Primix Ex Taq™ (2 ×), 0.8 μL 10 μmol/L forward/reverse primer, 2.0 μL cDNA and 6.4 μL ddH2O. The qRT-PCR program was 50 °C 2 min, 95 °C 10 min, 95 °C 15 s and 60 °C 1 min for 40 cycles. Three biological and technical replicates were set for each sample, and sterile ddH2O was used as the blank control. The qRT-PCR data was calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt algorithm [73], and DPS software was used to analyze the significant difference of the data (p-value < 0.05).

Cloning and transient expression analysis of candidate sugarcane miRNAs

According to the precursor sequences of three candidate novel miRNAs, nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875, their cloning primers were designed using the NCBI Primer designing tool (Table S8). The cDNA of ROC22 leaf infected by SrMV was synthesized by Prime-Script™ RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and used for the miRNA cloning. The PCR reaction system (25 μL) contained 2.5 μL 10 × Ex Taq buffer, 2.0 μL 10 mmol/L dNTPs, 1.0 μL 20 μmol/L forward/reverse primer, 0.125 μL Ex Taq enzyme (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1.0 μL cDNA template and 17.375 μL ddH2O. The PCR program was 94 °C 4 min, (94 °C 30 s, 55 °C 30 s, 72 °C 30 s) 35 cycles, 72 °C 10 min. The PCR products were verified by electrophoresis, purification, cloning and sequencing.

Primers of nov_3741, nov_22650 and nov_40875 (Table S8) for constructing the plant overexpression vectors, and the three plasmids of the cloned pre-miRNAs were used for PCR amplification. Then the purified PCR products and the plasmids of plant overexpression vector pCAMBIA 1301 were digested with the enzymes BamH I and Spe I and ligated with T4 ligase to construct the recombinant plasmids. The positive plasmids verified by double enzyme digestion were transferred into Agrobacterium GV3101 cells (35::3741, 35::22650 and 35::40875), and the Agrobacterium contained the empty vector pCAMBIA 1301 was used as the control (35::00). According to the transient overexpression method [74], the Agrobacterium solution with a concentration of OD600 = 0.8 (plus 200 μmol/L acetosyringone) in MS liquid medium was injected into 8-leaf-stage N. benthamiana leaves. The agroinfiltrated plants were cultivated at 24 °C for 2 days for DAB staining and expression level analysis of the target genes and nine tobacco immune-related marker genes [74]. The N. benthamiana immune-related marker genes were hypersensitive response marker genes HSR201, HSR203 and HSR515, SA-responsive genes NPR1, PR-1a/c, PR2 and PR3, and ET synthesis-depended genes EFE26 and Accdeaminase (Table S8). EF1-α was used to normalize the transcript level (Table S8). The qRT-PCR system, program and data statistics referred to the above method of qRT-PCR analysis of target genes expression.

Availability of data and materials

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors. The sequencing reads are deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information under the BioProject number PRJNA793396.

Abbreviations

SMD:

Sugarcane Mosaic Disease

SCMV:

Sugarcane Mosaic Virus

SrMV:

Sorghum Mosaic Virus

SCSMV:

Sugarcane Streak Mosaic Virus

miRNA:

MicroRNA

sRNA:

Small RNA

TuMV:

Turnip Mosaic Virus

TYMV:

Tymovirus

ACMV:

African Cassava Mosaic Virus

PP2A:

Protein Phosphatase 2A

sRNA-seq:

Small RNA Sequencing

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative Real-Time PCR

rRNA:

Ribosomal RNA

snoRNA:

Small Nucleolar RNA

tRNA:

Transfer RNA

Repbase:

Repeat Sequence

NR:

Non-Redundant Protein Sequence Database

GO:

Gene Ontology

COG:

Clusters of Orthologous Groups

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KOG:

EuKaryotic Orthologous Groups

ATPs-3:

ATP-Sulfurylase 3

ATG8c:

Autophagy-Related Protein 8C-Like

LAST-3:

Low Affinity Sulfate Transporter 3-Like

CML:

Calmidulin-Like Protein

UCH:

Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase

PRPS6:

30S Plastid Ribosomal Protein S6

NFYC-1:

Nuclear Transcription Factor Y Subunit C-1

PRR73:

Pseudo-Response Regulator 73

PRPL2:

50S Chloroplastic Ribosomal Protein L2

ELP6:

Elongator Complex Protein 6

rbcLBP:

Rubisco Large Subunit-Binding Protein

ARF6:

Auxin Response Factor 6

PP2Ac:

Phosphatase 2A-3 Catalytic Subunit-Like

H2O2 :

Hydrogen Peroxide

DAB:

3,3'-Diaminobenzidine Solution

HR:

Hypersensitive Response

SA:

Salicylic Acid

ET:

Ethylene

RBSDV:

Rice Black-Streaked Drawf Virus

UPS:

Ubiquitin-Proteasome System

UPP:

Ubiquitin-Proteassome Pathway

JA:

Jasmonic Acid

ABA:

Abscisic Acid

AUX/IAA:

Auxin/Indole-3-Acetic Acid Inducible Gene

ARF:

Auxin Response Factor

TMV:

Tobacco Mosaic Virus

ELP:

Elongator Protein

NFY:

Nuclear Factor Y

ST:

Sulfate Transporter

ATPs:

ATP Sulfurylases

LAST:

Low-Affinity Sulfur Transporter

HAST:

High-Affinity Sulfur Transporter

PS3:

Sulfate-Derived β-1,3-Glucan Sulfate

Ca2+ :

Calcium Ion

Rubisco:

Ribulose-1, 5-Bishosphate Carboxylase/Oxygenase

LSUs:

Rubisco Consists of Eight Large Subunits

SSUs:

Small Subunits

rbcBP:

Rubisco Subunit Binding Protein

PRPs:

Plastid Ribosomal Proteins

MSRA2-1:

Peptide Methionine Sulfoxide Reductase A2-1

CYP20-3:

Peptidyl-Prolyl Cis–Trans Isomerase CYP20-3

NAC078,:

NAC Domain-Containing Protein 78

RT-PCR:

Reverse Transcription-PCR

ScYLV:

Suagracne Yellow Leaf Virus

SCBV:

Sugarcane Bacilliform Virus

ncRNA:

Non-Coding RNA

TPM:

Transcripts Per Million

FC:

Fold Change

FDR:

False Discovery Rate

References

  1. Bagyalakshmi K, Viswanathan R. Development of a scoring system for sugarcane mosaic disease and genotyping of sugarcane germplasm for mosaic viruses. Sugar Tech. 2021;23:1105–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen J, Chen J, Adams MJ. Characterisation of potyviruses from sugarcane and maize in China. Arch Virol. 2002;147:1237–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang YL, Huang QX, Yin GH, Jia RZ. Genetic diversity of viruses associated with sugarcane mosaic disease of sugarcane inter-specific hybrids in China. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2015;143:351–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu DL, Park JW, Mirkov TE, Zhou GH. Viruses causing mosaic disease in sugarcane and their genetic diversity in southern China. Arch Virol. 2008;153:1031.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baskerville S, Bartel DP. Microarray profiling of microRNAs reveals frequent coexpression with neighboring miRNAs and host genes. RNA. 2005;11:241.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xia ZH, Zhao ZX, Li MJ, Chen L, Jiao ZY, Wu YH, et al. Identification of miRNAs and their targets in maize in response to Sugarcane mosaic virus infection. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2018;125:143–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niu QW, Lin SS, Reyes JL, Chen KC, Wu HW, Yeh SD, et al. Expression of artificial microRNAs in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana confers virus resistance. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:1420–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luan YS, Cui J, Zhai JM, Li J, Han L, Meng J. High-throughput sequencing reveals differential expression of miRNAs in tomato inoculated with Phytophthora infestans. Planta. 2015;241:1405–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boccara M, Sarazin A, Thiébeauld O, Jay F, Voinnet O, Navarro L, et al. The Arabidopsis miR472-RDR6 silencing pathway modulates PAMP- and effector-triggered immunity through the post-transcriptional control of disease resistance genes. Plos Pathog. 2014;10:e1003883.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman EJ, Prokhnevsky AI, Gopinath K, Dolja VV, Carrington JC. Viral RNA silencing suppressors inhibit the microRNA pathway at an intermediate step. Gene Dev. 2004;18:1179–86.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chellappan P, Vanitharani R, Fauquet CM. MicroRNA-binding viral protein interferes with Arabidopsis development. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:10381–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Viswanathan C, Anburaj J, Prabu G. Identification and validation of Sugarcane streak mosaic virus-encoded microRNAs and their targets in sugarcane. Plant Cell Rep. 2014;33:265–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ling H, Huang N, Xu LP, Peng Q, Liu F, Yang YT, et al. Suitable reference genes/miRNAs for qRT-PCR normalization of expression analysis in sugarcane under Sorghum mosaic virus infection. Sugar Tech. 2019;21:780–93.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dezulian T, Palatnik JF, Huson DH, Weigel D. Conservation and divergence of microRNA families in plants. Genome Biol. 2005;6:P13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mi SJ, Cai T, Hu YG, Chen YM, Hodges E, Ni FR, et al. Sorting of small RNAs into Arabidopsis argonaute complexes is directed by the 5’ terminal nucleotide. Cell. 2008;133:116–27.

  16. Ling H, Huang N, Wu QB, Su YC, Peng Q, Ahmed W, et al. Transcriptional insights into the sugarcane-sorghum mosaic virus interaction. Trop Plant Biol. 2018;11:163–76.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Que YX, Su YC, Guo JL, Wu QB, Xu LP. A global view of transcriptome dynamics during Sporisorium scitamineum challenge in sugarcane by RNA-seq. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106476.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hawkesford MJ, Kok L. Managing sulphur metabolism in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2006;29:382–95.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu YL, Schiff M, Czymmek K, Tallóczy Z, Levine B, Dinesh-Kumar SP. Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant innate immune response. Cell. 2005;121:567–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D545–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin SB, Fu HT, Jiang SF, Xiong YW, Qiao H, Zhang WY, et al. Identification of androgenic gland microRNA and their target genes to discover sex-related microRNA in the oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense. Genet Mol Res. 2015;14:18396–406.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bukhari SAH, Shang SH, Zhang M, Zheng WT, Zhang GP, Wang TZ, et al. Genome-wide identification of chromium stress-responsive micro RNAs and their target genes in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) roots. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2015;34:2573–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun W, Xu XH, Wu X, Wang Y, Lu XB, Sun HW, et al. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs and their targets in wild type and phyB mutant provides a key link between microRNAs and the phyB-mediated light signaling pathway in rice. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:372.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Tang HM, Chen H, Jing Z, Ren JY, Ning X. Application of next generation sequencing in microRNA detection. Hereditas. 2012;34:784–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwab R, Palatnik JF, Riester M, Schommer C, Schmid M, Weigel D. Specific effects of microRNA on the plant transcriptome. Dev Cell. 2005;8:517–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Su YC, Xiao XH, Ling H, Huang N, Liu F, Su WH, et al. A dynamic degradome landscape on miRNAs and their predicted targets in sugarcane caused by Sporisorium scitamineum stress. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li YW. Identification and functional analysis of miRNA related to resistance to rice black streaked dwarf virus. Disseration for Master’s Degree of Najing Normal University. 2015. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=3uoqIhG8C475KOm_zrgu4lQARvep2SAk6nr4r5tSd-_pTaPGgq4znNRgmCDb2ToGvSfzYfU-DaTl6RJZ7LDP6Bj-QB7uF0av&uniplatform=NZKPT.

  29. Ismayil A, Yang M, Liu Y. Role of autophagy during plant-virus interactions. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2020;101:36–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dantuma NP, Heessen S, Lindsten K, Jellne M, Masuccie MG. Inhibition of proteasomal degradation by the Gly-Ala repeat of Epstein-Barr virus is influenced by the length of the repeat and the strength of the degradation signal. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8381–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leary AY, Sanguankiattichai N, Duggan C, Tumtas Y, Pandey P, Segretin ME, et al. Modulation of plant autophagy during pathogen attack. J Exp Bot. 2018;69:1325–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakatogawa H, Ichimura Y, Ohsumi Y. Atg8, a ubiquitin-like protein required for autophagosome formation, mediates membrane tethering and hemifusion. Cell. 2007;130:165–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xia K, Liu T, Ouyang J, Wang R, Fan T, Zhang M. Genome-wide identification, classification, and expression analysis of autophagy-associated gene homologues in rice (Oryza sativa L.). DNA Res. 2011;18:363–77.

  34. Shpilka T, Weidberg H, Pietrokovski S, Elazar Z. Atg8: an autophagy-related ubiquitin-like protein family. Genome Biol. 2011;12:226.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Denancé N, Sánchez-Vallet A, Goffner D, Molina A. Disease resistance or growth: the role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:155.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rouse D. Changes in auxin response from mutations in an AUX/IAA gene. Science. 1998;279:1371–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Padmanabhan MS, Goregaoker SP, Golem S, Culver JN, Shiferaw H. Interaction of the Tobacco mosaic virus replicase protein with the Aux/IAA protein PAP1/IAA26 is associated with disease development. J Virol. 2005;79:2549–58.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tiwari SB, Hagen G, Guilfoyle T. The roles of auxin response factor domains in auxin-responsive transcription. Plant Cell. 2003;15:533–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fan J, Hill L, Crooks C, Doerner P, Lamb C. Abscisic acid has a key role in modulating diverse plant-pathogen interactions. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:1750–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou XF, Hua DP, Chen ZZ, Zhou ZJ, Gong ZZ. Elongator mediates ABA responses, oxidative stress resistance and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;60:79–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Defraia CT, Zhang XD, Mou ZL. Elongator subunit 2 is an accelerator of immune responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2010;64:511–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Siriwardana CL. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopis nuclear factor-Y transcription factor family. Disseration for PhD’s Degree of University of Oklahoma. 2014. https://hdl.handle.net/11244/10367.

  43. Palmeros-Suárez PA, Massange-Sánchez JA, Martínez-Gallardo NA, Montero-Vargas JM, Gómez-Leyva JF, Délano-Friera JP. The overexpression of an Amaranthus hypochondriacus NF-YC gene modifies growth and confers water deficit stress resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2015;240:25–40.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leustek T, Martin MN, Bick JA, Davies JP. Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2000;51:141–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sanda S, Leustek T, Theisen MJ, Garavito RM, Benning C. Recombinant Arabidopsis SQD1 converts udp-glucose and sulfite to the sulfolipid head group precursor UDP-sulfoquinovose in vitro. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3941–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ménard R, Kauffmann S. β-1,3 glucan sulfate, but not β-1,3 glucan, induces the salicylic acid signaling pathway in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004;16:3020–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang L, Du L, Poovaiah BW. Calcium signaling and biotic defense responses in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9:e973818.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ma W, Smigel A, Tsai YC, Braam J, Berkowitz GA. Innate immunity signaling: Cytosolic Ca2+ elevation is linked to downstream nitric oxide generation through the action of calmodulin or a calmodulin-like protein. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:818–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Máthé C, Garda T, Freytag C, M-Hamvas M. The role of serine-threonine protein phosphatase PP2A in plant oxidative stress signaling-facts and hypotheses. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3028.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ruvolo PP, Clark W, Mumby M, Gao FQ, Stratford MW. A functional role for the B56 alpha-subunit of protein phosphatase 2A in ceramide-mediated regulation of Bcl2 phosphorylation status and function. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:22847–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Silverstein AM, Barrow CA, Davis AJ, Mumby MC. Actions of PP2A on the MAP kinase pathway and apoptosis are mediated by distinct regulatory subunits. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:4221–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ling H. Transcriptome analysis of sugarcane response to Sorghum mosaic virus infection and mining pf pathogenesis related genes. Disseration for PhD’s Degree of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. 2017. https://t.cnki.net/kcms/detail?v=3uoqIhG8C447WN1SO36whLpCgh0R0Z-iVBgRpfJBcb4JAybTo8M4lgYYxKYm9xb6PotXS-E7zLdnJDoE-vRr1GY8FLAjCtvk&uniplatform=NZKPT.

  53. Portis AR. The regulation of rubisco by rubisco activase. J Exp Bot. 1995;46:1285–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Andersson I, Backlund A. Structure and function of Rubisco. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2008;46:275–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Roy H, Cannon S. Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase assembly: what is the role of the large subunit binding protein? Trends Biochem Sci. 1988;13:163–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhu HL, Cheng GY, Peng L, Cai Z, Guo JL, Xu LP, et al. Interaction between sugarcane streak mosaic virus P3 and Rubisco large subunit from sugarcane. Acta Bot Boreal Occident Sin. 2014;34:0676–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yamaguchi K, Knoblauch KV, Subramanian AR. The plastid ribosomal proteins. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:28466–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Dalio RJD, Paschoal D, Arena GD, Magalhães DM, Oliveira TS, Merfa MV, et al. Hypersensitive response: From NLR pathogen recognition to cell death response. Ann Appl Biol. 2020;178:268–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. He CJ, Morgan PW, Drew MC. Transduction of an ethylene signal is required for cell death and lysis in the root cortex of maize during aerenchyma formation induced by hypoxia. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:463–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Faria JA, Reis PA, Reis MT, Rosado GL, Pinheiro GL, Mendes GC, et al. The NAC domain-containing protein, GmNAC6, is a downstream component of the er stress- and osmotic stress-induced NRP-mediated cell-death signaling pathway. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:129.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Oh JE, Hong SW, Lee Y, Koh EJ, Kim K, Seo YW, et al. Modulation of gene expressions and enzyme activities of methionine sulfoxide reductases by cold, ABA or high salt treatments in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2005;169:1030–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mokryakova MV, Pogorelko GV, Bruskin SA, Piruzian ES, Abdeeva IA. The role of peptidyl-prolyl cis / trans isomerase genes of arabidopsis thaliana in plant defense during the course of Xanthomonas campestris infection. Genetika. 2014;50:157–66.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Tian YC, Min F, Qin ZX, Lv HJ, Wang MM, Zhang Z, et al. Hydrogen peroxide positively regulates brassinosteroid signaling through oxidation of the brassinazole-resistant1 transcription factor. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1063.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Li WF, Shen K, Huang YK, Wang XY, Zhang RY, Shan HL, et al. Evaluation of resistance to Sorghum mosaic virus (SrMV) in 49 new elite sugarcane varieties/clones in China. Crop Prot. 2014;60:62–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Wang HX, Zhang YL, Wang JH, Zhang SY, Xiong GR, Liu ZX. Detection of sugarcane yellow leaf virus and Sorghum mosaic virus by multiplex SYBR green-I real time PCR. Chin J Trop Agri. 2012;32:52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009;10:R25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Friedländer MR, Mackowiak SD, Li N, Chen W, Nikolaus R. miRDeep2 accurately identifies known and hundreds of novel microRNA genes in seven animal clades. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:37–52.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Fahlgren N, Howell MD, Kasschau KD, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Cumbie JS, et al. High-throughput sequencing of Arabidopsis microRNAs: Evidence for frequent birth and death of miRNA genes. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e219.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R106.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Allen E, Xie Z, Gustafson AM, Carrington JC. MicroRNA-directed phasing during trans-acting siRNA biogenesis in plants. Cell. 2005;121:207–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Varkonyi-Gasic E, Wu R, Wood M, Walton EF, Hellens RP. Protocol: a highly sensitive RT-PCR method for detection and quantification of microRNAs. Plant Methods. 2007;3:12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Varkonyi-Gasic E, Hellens RP. Quantitative stem-loop RT-PCR for detection of microRNAs. In: Kodama H, Komamine A, editors. RNAi and Plant Gene Function Analysis. Humana Press: Methods Mol Biol; 2011. p. 145–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-△△CT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Su YC, Wang ZQ, Feng L, Li Z, Peng Q, Guo JL, et al. Isolation and characterization of ScGluD2, a new sugarcane beta-1,3-glucanase d family gene induced by Sporisorium scitamineum, ABA, H2O2, NaCl, and CdCl2 stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1348.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the people who participated in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD1000503), the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-17), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31801424).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Yachun Su, Qibin Wu, Liping Xu & Youxiong Que

  2. Fuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, 350018, Fujian, China

    Qiong Peng

  3. College of Agriculture, Yulin Normal University, Yulin, 537000, Guangxi,, China

    Hui Ling

  4. College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, 350002, Fujian, China

    Chuihuai You

Authors
  1. Yachun Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qiong Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Ling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chuihuai You
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qibin Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liping Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Youxiong Que
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YS and LX conceived and designed the research. HL prepared materials. YS, QP, and HL conducted the experiments. QP, CY, and QW analyzed the data. YS wrote the manuscript. LX and YQ helped to revise the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Liping Xu or Youxiong Que.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The sugarcane materials used in this study were supplied by the Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University. They are widely planted in China, and no permits are required to collect plant samples. Our work reported here did not contain any studies with human participants or animals and did not involve any endangered or protected species. The experimental research on plants performed in this study complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The targeting sites of the selected 12 miRNAs and their 15 target genes predicted by TargetFinder v1.6 software. When the score of miRNA that matches the mRNA is less than or equal to 3, the transcript sequence is considered as the miRNA target gene. Range represents the interval of mRNA used for alignment. Black lines indicate matched RNA base pairs, and two dots show a GU mismatch whereas none dot represents other types of mismatch. The gene ID follows the name of miRNAs and their target genes. Figure S2. The original image of PCR products of the three candidate sugarcane pre-miRNAs detected by electrophoresis. M, DNA marker 15,000 + 2,000 bp; 1, pre-nov_3741; 2, pre-nov_22650; and 3, pre_nov_40875.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

The statistic result of sRNA-seq data in 12 samples. Table S2. The statistic result of annotation and classification of the small RNAs (%). Table S3. The differentially expressed miRNAs in sugarcane varieties ROC22 and FN39 infected by SrMV. Table S4. List of 653 annotated predicted target genes corresponding to 132 identified miRNAs. Table S5. List of predicted target genes corresponding to the differentially expressed miRNAs. Table S6. The quantitative primers ofthe 12 selected miRNAs. Table S7. The quantitative primers of the 15 predicted target genes. Table S8. Primers used for cloning the candidate miRNAs and expression analysis of the Nicotiana benthamiana immune-related marker genes.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, Y., Peng, Q., Ling, H. et al. Systematic identification of miRNA-regulatory networks unveils their potential roles in sugarcane response to Sorghum mosaic virus infection. BMC Plant Biol 22, 247 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03641-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03641-6

Keywords

  • Sugarcane
  • Sorghum mosaic virus
  • miRNA
  • Target gene
  • Regulatory network

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us