Fig. 7From: Systematic identification of miRNA-regulatory networks unveils their potential roles in sugarcane response to Sorghum mosaic virus infectionExpression patterns of the randomly selected 12 miRNAs (line charts) and their 15 target genes (bar charts) in susceptible ROC22 and resistant FN39 infected by Sorghum mosaic virus through qRT-PCR analysis. A The miRNAs and their target genes were all up-regulated in both varieties. B The miRNAs and their target genes were all down-regulated in both varieties. C The miRNAs and their target genes showed inconsistent expression patterns in susceptible and resistant varieties. CK and SrMV represent the virus-free sample (control group) and SrMV-infected plants with mosaic symptoms (treatment group), respectively. The right and left y axis represent the relative expression of miRNA and its predicted target gene, respectively. Each bar represents the mean values of three replicates ± standard error (n = 3). Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference, as determined by the least-significant difference test (p-value < 0.05). rbcLBP, Rubisco large subunit-binding protein; UCH, ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase; RDDP, RNA dependent DNA polymerase; GRF2, growth-regulating factor 2; NFYC-1, nuclear transcription factor Y subunit C-1; CML10, calmodulin-like protein 10; PRPL2, 50S chloroplastic ribosomal protein L2; ARF6, auxin response factor 6; PP2Ac, phosphatase 2A-3 catalytic subunit-like; ATG8c, autophagy-related protein 8C-like; ELP6, elongator complex protein 6; PRR73, pseudo-response regulator 73; ATPs-3, ATP-sulfurylase 3; LAST-3, low affinity sulfate transporter 3-like; and PRPS6, 30S chloroplastic ribosomal protein S6Back to article page