Skip to main content

Variability in ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of historic herbaria and extant (fresh) Phalaris species (Poaceae)

Abstract

Background

Phalaris species (Poaceae) occupy diverse environments throughout all continents except Antarctica. Phalaris arundinacea is an important forage, ornamental, wetland restoration and biofuel crop grown globally as well as being a wetland invasive. The nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region has been used for Phalaris barcoding as a DNA region with high nucleotide diversity for Phalaris species identification. Recent findings that P. arundinacea populations in Minnesota USA are most likely native and not European prompted this analysis to determine whether Eurasian vs. native North American P. arundinacea differed in ITS regions. Our objectives were to amplify and compare ITS regions (ITS1 and ITS2) of historic herbaria (1882–2001) and extant (fresh) Phalaris specimens; analyze ITS regions for species-specific polymorphisms (diagnostic SNPs) and compare ITS regions of historic Phalaris specimens with known, extant Phalaris species.

Results

We obtained complete ITS1 and ITS2 sequences from 31 Phalaris historic (herbaria samples, 1908 to 2001) and five extant (fresh) specimens. Herbaria Phalaris specimens did not produce new SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) not present in extant specimens. Diagnostic SNPs were identified in 8/12 (66.6%) Phalaris species. This study demonstrates the use of herbaria tissue for barcoding as a means for improved species identification of Phalaris herbaria specimens. No significant correlation between specimen age and genomic DNA concentration was found. Phalaris arundinacea showed high SNP variation within its clade, with the North American being distinctly different than other USA and most Eurasian types, potentially allowing for future identification of specific SNPs to geographic origin.

Conclusions

While not as efficient as extant specimens to obtain DNA, Phalaris herbaria specimens can produce high quality ITS sequences to evaluate historic genetic resources and facilitate identification of new species-specific barcodes. No correlation between DNA concentration and age of historic samples (119 year range) occurred. Considerable polymorphism was exhibited in the P. arundinacea clade with several N. American accessions being distinct from Eurasian types. Further development of within species- and genus-specific barcodes could contribute to designing PCR primers for efficient and accurate identification of N. American P. arundinacea. Our finding of misidentified Phalaris species indicates the need to exercise stringent quality control measures on newly generated sequence data and to approach public sequence databases in a critical way.

Peer Review reports

Background

From the 1980s onwards, sequence-based molecular phylogenetic studies in plants relied primarily on plastid genome spacers and genes, particularly rbcL (ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase in the chloroplast genome) [1]. Risks of using such uniparentally inherited sequences for phylogenetics necessitated the development and implementation of nuclear markers to reflect biparental trait inheritance [2]. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal cistron, 18S–5.8S-26S, initially used by Baldwin’s laboratory [3,4,5] quickly became the universally applied tool for molecular-based phylogenetic research for several reasons [6], not least of which included that 18S–26S rDNA arrays and their products are essential components of eukaryotic nucleolus organizing regions (NORs). Consequently, numerous plant families, genera and species have been analyzed for variance in ITS sequence differences, particularly for phylogenetic studies, species identification (barcoding) as well as ascertaining cultivar or genotype identities.

Such is the case with the genus Phalaris L. which is an important forage, ornamental, birdseed, wetland remediation/restoration and biofuel crop grown across the globe as well as being recognized as an invasive wetland species [7,8,9]. The genus Phalaris (Poaceae, grass family), classified in the Aveneae-Poeae section of the subfamily Pooideae, contains 20 species in the latest taxonomic treatises [10,11,12,13,14,15], although it previously included as many as 25 taxa. All Phalaris species in this monophyletic genus are cool-season grasses, with either annual or perennial life histories, from both the New and Old Worlds, varying in basic chromosome numbers of x = 6 and x = 7 and include a polyploid series from 2x to 8x [16,17,18]. Polyploid Phalaris exist in both Europe and North America, in fact polyploidy predominates throughout Europe and Asia. The species are widely adapted across the globe and are not restricted to one hemisphere [19]; six floret types distinguish the species as well as other diagnostic traits such as the presence of characteristic ligules [15]. The centers of origin and diversity are the Mediterranean Basin while a secondary center of diversity exists in western North America [7, 17,18,19]. The most cosmopolitan species is P. arundinacea L., circumpolar in distribution in the northern hemisphere. Most likely, a diploid ancestor of P. arundinacea came across on the land bridge of the Bering Strait into the present-day State of Alaska, USA [20] during the late Tertiary period [21].

Phalaris has a lengthy taxonomic history with the earliest references arising in the first Century CE (common era), with P. canariensis being described by Dioscorides with an accompanying drawing from the Byzantine period (~ 525 CE) [22], although [7] argued that the drawing did not clearly delineate this species. Two species were given scientific names in quadrinomial nomenclature early in the 1600s: P. major semine albo (cf. P. canariensis L.) and P. major semine nigro (cf. P. minor Retz.), prior to the Linnaean era of binomial nomenclature [23, 24].

Of particular importance within the genus, two species are of primary commercial value as cultivated crops, i.e. P. arundinacea L. (reed canarygrass; grown for ornamental, forage, biofuel and remediation/restoration efforts) [7,8,9] and P. canariensis L. (canarygrass; grown for birdseed) [25], although additional species are also cultivated: P. aquatica, P. minor [17, 18] and P. xdaviesii [26]. Seed of both P. arundinacea and P. canariensis are commercially produced in Roseau, Minnesota USA [25], the state with the highest concentration and wetland surface area coverage (50–100% of wetland area) of native, yet invasive, P. arundinacea in the continental USA and in North America [27]. The species also is native to Eurasia [7, 28] and North America [29]. As a widely adaptable species, it is able to withstand a variety of conditions including frost, drought, partial shade and poorly drained soil [30]. While minor variation, i.e., plant height and biomass, exists due to genetic and environmental factors, both the native P. arundinacea North American types and those native to Eurasia are virtually indistinguishable for any morphological trait [31], since all possess ligules [7] and the same floret type, “Floret Type 4” [15], although the floret type cannot be used when collecting vegetative genotypes for analyses. The North American and Eurasian types (using both extant and historic or herbaria specimens) have been separated, however, using biochemical (allozymes) [28] and molecular markers, such as ISSRs (inter-simple sequence repeats) [32], AFLPs (amplified fragment polymorphisms) [33,34,35], SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) [29, 36], as well as ITS regions [11, 15, 19, 20].

Herbarium specimens are museum-quality, pressed and dried plant samples deposited and preserved in global herbaria to serve in future research [37]. Plant specimens are typically mounted on acid-free paper with the primary goal of preserving specimen integrity and visual quality to allow for future systematic and taxonomic studies [37]. Herbaria contain an extensive collection of Phalaris species past germplasm (pre-1900), that were collected by early land surveyors during European settlement [38, 39]. Those herbarium specimens can serve as an informative resource for comparative genetics, genomics and systematics, to describe changes of Phalaris species germplasm over time. Less than optimal early specimen preservation methods can lead to various degrees of DNA degradation [29]. Estimation of the genetic distance between individuals and populations is based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and depends on the proper nucleotide base calling. Nucleotide misincorporations were found during amplification of ancient DNA and could cause false SNP recognition [40, 41]. False SNP recognition in herbaria specimens can be highly problematic when proper relatedness needs to be determined in comparison to fresh tissue collection. Here we compared SNPs found in genomic DNA obtained from herbaria specimens (collection years from 1882 to 2001) and fresh tissue (June 17th, 2019) to determine if amplification of DNA obtained from herbaria specimens resulted in varying SNP differences in comparison to DNA obtained from fresh tissue.

Plastid trnT-F, trnL-F and the nuclear ribosomal ITS region (ITS1–5.8S-ITS2) were amplified/sequenced in the core tribe Aveneae (oats) for taxonomic reconstruction of the Aveneae-Poeae-Seslerieae complex in the Poaceae [11]. That study included the genera Anthoxanthum, Hierochloe and Phalaris, which reside in the Phalarideae (sub Panicoideae). Alignment or clustering vs. bootstraps of ITS showed Phalaris canariensis and P. truncata to be very strongly supported (100/100; posterior probability support or PPS/bootstrap support) whereas P. coerulescens scored 100/95 in relation to these two Phalaris species [11]. The use of plastid and nuclear ribosomal markers provided highly accurate taxonomic delineation of the associated genera and species in the Aveneae-Poeae-Seslerieae complex wherein Phalaris was classified as a “small, less-diversified satellite lineage” [11]. Chloroplast DNA (13 intergenic sequence regions) and AFLPs were subsequently used to distinguish among North American and European Phalaris arundinacea herbaria samples [9]. Chloroplast markers supported AFLP findings that North American races of P. arundinacea were distinctly different from European types (which had higher genetic diversity) plus the added finding of a separate Scandinavian chloroplast race from the rest of Europe. Subsequently, Voshell et al. [19] were the first to use ITS with plastid trnT-F in Phalaris to infer a phylogenetic tree for the genus as well as determine floret evolution and polyploidy relationships. The shortest ITS region length was 588 bases in P. rotgesii to the longest of 602 bases in P. arundinacea (both of which are closely related) and 142 of 169 variable characters were parsimony-informative [19]. ITS sequencing differentiated two main clades in the genus with an additional subclade, proving the utility and robustness of ITS in taxonomically distinguishing among species and within species’ genotypic differences as well as discerning ploidy and floret type variation. Subsequent studies using ITS in Phalaris [15, 20] were used to determine historic dispersal routes from the center of origin in the Mediterranean Basin into the Americas via the Bering land route. Phalaris arundinacea appeared in two ITS clades with one embedded in Europe while the other was distinctly North American; the mid-Miocene was identified as the epoch in which Phalaris species diversification occurred [20].

The recent discovery that, based on SNPs, all historic herbaria and extant riparian and cultivated populations of P. arundinacea in the State of Minnesota are most likely North American natives [29, 36] provided impetus for the present study to examine specific Minnesota / North American native P. arundinacea genotypes for their identity with reported ITS for the species as well as for comparison with additional Phalaris. The objectives of this study were to: 1) amplify and compare ITS regions (ITS1 and ITS2) of historic herbaria and extant (fresh) Phalaris specimens; 2) analyze ITS regions for species-specific polymorphisms (diagnostic SNPs) and 3) compare ITS regions of historic Phalaris specimens with known extant Phalaris species. Associated null hypotheses tested, respectively, were: 1) Ho = There is no differences in ITS region between herbaria and fresh Phalaris specimens due to herbarium sample age; 2) Ho = There is no ITS region polymorphism found within Phalaris species and 3) Ho = There is no additional polymorphism between herbaria genotypes and currently known extant Phalaris species in GenBank, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) [42].

Results

Historic specimen DNA degradation

Sampling of historic specimens showed variable levels of DNA degradation when compared to DNA obtained from extant Phalaris tissue (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. 1), similar to previous sampling [29]. Extant tissue DNA extracted from P. aquatica (PI 476288) and P. arundinacea (PI 241065) (lanes 1 and 2, respectively, Fig. 1) have a majority of higher molecular weight DNA fragments (< 10 kb). Among representative historic samples P. canarensis (PI 619107; lane 3, Fig. 1), P. paradoxa (ISC-V-0021361; lane 5, Fig. 1), P. canarensis (PI 71229; lane 7, Fig. 1) and P. minor (PI 229774; lane 8, Fig. 1), all have highly degraded DNA fragments (< 0.7 kb) when compared with other historic specimens, P. brachystachys (ISC-V-0021035; lane 4, Fig. 1) and P. coerulescens (ISC-V-0021204; lane 6, Fig. 1) with less degraded DNA (2–8 kb).

Fig. 1
figure1

Gel electrophoresis of genomic DNA (200 ng DNA/lane) providing a visualization of DNA degradation. Fresh tissue produced high molecular weight DNA with herbarium specimens producing variable range of DNA degradation, from samples that had DNA highly degraded (< 0.7 kb; 3, 5, 7, 8) to less degraded (fragments in 2–8 kb; 4, 6). Genomic DNA from fresh tissue: (1) P. aquatica (PI 476288) and (2). P. arundinacea (PI 241065), both > 10 kb; from herbarium: (3) P. canarensis (619107) and (4) P. brachystachys (ISC-V-0021035); herbarium specimens that were PCR re-amplified (5) P. paradoxa (ISC-V-0021361) and (6) P. coerulescens (ISC-V-0021204). Herbarium specimens with unsuccessful PCR amplifications (7) P. canarensis (71229) and (8) P. minor (229774). ITS region amplification (fresh and herbarium samples) and re-amplification is presented on Fig. 3. M – DNA size marker; CT – no sample loaded. Full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. 1

A standard DNA purification kit (OPS Diagnostics Laboratory, Lebanon, NJ) provided high quality and quantity of genomic DNA that allowed amplification of all extant tissue and most of the historic specimens (41/52 or 78.8%; Table 1). For the majority of herbaria samples, the Optical Density (OD)260/280 values were within the expected range for high quality DNA (2.10 ± 0.79, mean ± standard deviation; Table 1) and the second measure of DNA purity (OD 260/230) had higher variation (1.64 ± 1.41; Table 1). Fresh specimens yielded high quality DNA, based on both the OD260/280 (1.93 ± 0.05) and OD 260/230 (1.93 ± 0.24; Table 2) markers. Both herbaria and fresh specimens have a wider range in OD260/230 purity measures. However, for both purity measurements, herbaria specimens were less consistent than fresh specimens.

Table 1 Phalaris species historic herbaria specimen data from leaf sample collections at the Bell Museum Herbarium (MIN; University of Minnesota) and Ada Hayden Herbarium (ISC; Iowa State University), DNA concentration (ng/μl) of extracted samples, their corresponding DNA quality readings from the spectrophotometer (optical densities [OD] at two ratios: OD 260/280 and OD 260/230), amplification success (+/−), herbaria accession codes and the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank accession numbers sequences
Table 2 Extant (fresh) Phalaris species specimens (USDA - GRIN) used for ITS sequencing, DNA concentration (ng/μl) of extracted samples, their corresponding DNA quality readings from the spectrophotometer (optical densities [OD] at two ratios: OD 260/280 and OD 260/230), amplification success (+/−), GRIN accession numbers and the published National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank accession numbers

Concentration of DNA from historic Phalaris specimens varied widely, from 2.5 ng/μl (P. paradoxa, ISC-V-0021415; Table 1) to 87.7 ng/μl (P. canariensis, 619,107; Table 1), despite similar amounts of tissue used for extraction. No correlation between the age of the historic samples over a 119 year range and DNA concentration was found, based on the insignificant slope of the linear regression, y = 0.095x + 14.7 and a small but insignificant r2 = 0.0177 (p-value = 0.4; Fig. 2a). Extant specimens exhibited much more consistent values with a range of 28.5 to 80.7 ng/μl (Table 2). No regression was fit to the concentration of fresh specimens (Fig. 2b) due to an inadequate sample size (n = 7). One of the oldest samples collected 29 July 1886 (P. canariensis; 71,229, lane 7, Fig. 1; Table 1) produced 41.9 ng/μl of DNA of relatively good quality. This specimen did not, however, yield a successful amplification or sequence of the ITS regions.

Fig. 2
figure2

a Scatter plot and linear regression of the relationship between DNA concentration (ng/μL) and sample age among herbarium specimens (orange) of Phalaris species ordered by relative age (collection year from 1882 to 2001). b Extant (fresh) samples harvested on June 17th, 2019; linear regression was not performed due to small sample size

ITS amplification and sequencing of Phalaris specimens

Plant-specific ITS-P5 and ITS-U4 primers were efficient in PCR amplification of the ITS regions across a diverse set of Phalaris species, including a majority of Phalaris tissue extracted from herbarium specimens, producing complete sequences of both the ITS1 and ITS2 regions (31/52 or 59.6%, Table 1). The oldest specimen fully sequenced was collected in 1908: P. californica (ISC-V-0021043, MN811182.1; Table 1). In addition, most of the ITS amplifications were suitable for direct sequencing after clean up. Overall, 31/41 (75.6%) herbarium (+; Table 1) and 5/7 (71.4%) fresh specimens (+; Table 2) produced full sequences of the ITS region for 12 Phalaris species. An additional six sequences of fresh (n = 2; P. arundinacea PI 241065 and P. aquatica PI 476288) and herbaria samples (n = 4; P. arundinacea 71,166, P. canariensis 619,107 and 71,226 and P. caroliniana ISC-V-0021166) produced partial sequences of the ITS region but were not used for sequence analysis. High PCR amplification success for fresh specimens were evidenced across the sampling, i.e. P. canariensis (lane 1; Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 2), P. aquatica (lane 2; Fig.3a; Supplementary Fig. 2) and P. arundinacea (lane 3; Fig. 3a; Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 3
figure3

a Examples of PCR amplification results of the plant specific ITS specific region [43] on genomic DNA from panel a. fresh Phalaris canarensis (1; 53.6 ng; PI 578800), P. aquatica (2; 60.7 ng; PI 476287) and P. arundinacea (3; 28.5 ng; PI 422030); b herbarium specimens with a uniform quantity of 50 ng P. canarensis (4; 71,226), P. californica (5; ISC-V-0021043), P. californica (6; ISC-V-0021040), P. caroliniana (7; ISC-V-0021097), P. paradoxa (8; ISC-V-0021360), P. coerulescens (9; ISC-V-0021199), P. minor (10; ISC-V-0021338); c PCR re-amplification result of purified PCR reaction of P. canarensis, 1/50 of previous PCR reaction (B4) as a PCR template. M – DNA ladder, CT – Control. Full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. 2

The low PCR amplification success rate of herbaria specimens is most likely caused by DNA degradation that did not allow amplification of the ITS DNA, as found for samples P. californica (ISC-V-0021040), P. paradoxa (ISC-V-0021360) and P. minor (ISC-V-0021338; lanes 6, 8,10, respectively; Fig. 3b; Supplementary Fig. 2). Overall, herbaria specimens that were collected before 1915 ± 28 (mean ± S.D.) years did not amplify the full ITS region, wherein most of the Phalaris herbaria samples collected later, in 1953 ± 23 years, were successful in ITS region amplification (Table 1). The 50 ng/μl DNA template was used as a standard DNA concentration for PCR amplification of all Phalaris herbarium specimens (Fig. 3b). However, due to variable degradation of DNA from herbarium specimens, ITS amplification did not always allow use of those products for direct sequencing based on sequencing requirements (Fig. 3b, lane 8; University of Minnesota Genomics Center – Sanger Sequencing Classic). For some herbaria samples it was necessary to reamplify PCR products, which allowed for later product sequencing (Fig. 3c; Supplementary Fig. 2).

Polymorphism analysis of Phalaris species

Reconstruction of genetic distance from newly sequenced herbaria and fresh Phalaris specimens with combination of those available in GenBank showed proper specimen classification and grouping within the same species (Fig. 4a; Supplementary Fig. 3). Generally, the sequences produced in this study matched with previous sequences of the same species. Shared SNPs from the matching sequences created unique clades by species in the distance tree (Fig. 4a). Some species (P. brachystachys and P. canariensis) are more closely related than others and the distance between clades suggests that the ITS region was insufficient to separate those two species into separate branches. Both species share nine unique SNPs that distinguish the two from the rest of Phalaris (Supplementary Fig. 3; Table 3).

Fig. 4
figure4

Distance tree representing distance between GenBank sequences of complete ITS region for the twelve Phalaris species included in this study and sequences generated from herbaria and fresh samples in this investigation through sequence alignment (Supplementary Fig. 3); a displays the whole tree with GenBank sequences that do not follow proper species branching assignment in red text and green text signifies sequences generated in this investigation from herbarium specimens that do not follow proper species branch assignment. b The P. arundinacea clade is expanded with specimen geographic collection location indicated from available location information on GenBank

Table 3 Diagnostic, species-specific, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions (with the species-specific letter code followed by the regions numbered 1–9) for Phalaris species, within each species-specific site, specifying the nucleotide substitution (A/C, A/G, A/T, C/A, C/G, C/T, G/A, G/C, T/A, T/C, T/G) and the relative position each site on the ITS1 and ITS2 multialignments (Supplementary Fig. 4). Two species (P. lemmonii, P. angusta) lack diagnostic SNPs, while two species (P. brachystachys, P. canariensis) are indistinguishable (N/A)

A large Phalaris species sequence collection allowed us to identify species-specific SNPs that identified selected Phalaris species, based on single SNPs found within ITS1 and ITS2 (Table 3). Two additional species (P. lemmonii and P. angusta) lacked species-specific SNPs, based on their sequence alignment (Table 3).

Considerable polymorphism was exhibited in the P. arundinacea clade (Table 3; AR1, AR2, AR3, AR4, AR5 and AR6 diagnostic, species-specific, SNP sites in the ITS1 and ITS2 regions), particularly among Asian and those of N. American origin (Fig. 4b). We did not observe sequence abnormalities between herbaria specimens and fresh tissue specimens of the same species despite suspected misidentified samples. Collection locations of P. arundinacea specimens reflect the relatedness within or distinctiveness among P. arundinacea genotypes (Fig. 4b). The P. arundinacea ITS sequences identified three clusters, the first with P. arundinacea originating in the United States which are N. American in origin [29, 36]: MN81175.1, MN811200.1, MN811176.1 (herbarium) and MN811174.1 (fresh) clustered tightly together (Fig. 4b), although they were grouped in between Korean accessions KF713257.1 and FJ766174.1. The second cluster of P. arundinacea was an adjacent clade, on one side of the N. American natives, which included one genotype from Korea (KF713257.1, Fig. 4b) and two others from the United States and the east coast USA State of Virginia (KF753779.1, JF951077.1). On the other side in closely related clades were four Eurasian genotypes from Taebaek-si and Yungyang-gun, S. Korea, specifically FJ766174.1, KF713256.1, KU883517.1 and KF13255.1 (Fig. 4b). A third, more distant cluster of two inter-related clades contained strictly Eurasian types from S. Korea (n = 5), China (n = 2) and Germany (n = 1) (Fig. 4b). The relatedness, based predominantly on geographic distribution, illustrates high variation of the P. arundinacea samples within the ITS region along with the possibility to distinguish among P. arundinacea from different geographic locations on a continental scale (Fig. 4b).

The composition of the Phalaris distance tree also indicates that there are GenBank sequences and herbaria specimens that may have been misidentified (Fig. 4a). In addition to proper classification and groupings, multiple ITS sequences found in GenBank did not follow the species branch assignment: P. angusta (KX873129.1) was classified with the P. aquatica clade; P. paradoxa (JF951070.1) was assigned to P. minor clade; P. caroliniana (JF951065.1) was assigned to P. angusta clade; P. minor (JF951086.1) and P. aquatica (KU883516.1) assigned to the P. paradoxa clade (Fig. 4a). Three of the sequences produced in this research did not group with a specific clade: P. coerulescens (MN811190.1; ISC-V-0021199), P. aquatica (MN811171.1; ISC-V-0021399) and P. angusta (MN811166.1; ISC-V-0020920), which clustered with P. minor, P. angusta and P. caroliniana, respectively. Both MN811189.1 and MN811190.1 (that did not group with a species clade) were P. coerulescens herbarium specimens grown from Turkish seed at Iowa State University but did not have the same SNPs, further suggesting possible misidentification. The misidentification is likely due to the similar morphological characteristics of the Phalaris genus and highlights the need for ITS barcoding to distinguish among and between extant and historic Phalaris species. It also highlights the need to exercise stringent quality control measures on newly generated sequence data and to approach public sequence databases in a critical way.

Discussion

Historic specimen DNA degradation

Efficient DNA amplification (barcoding) requires the DNA template to be of high quality (measured by OD260/280 and OD260/230), quantity (ng of DNA template/μl) and integrity (visualized on agarose gels). High DNA quality equates to the DNA being free from protein and chemical contaminants with a sufficient quantity of DNA template to start PCR amplification of targeted DNA regions [44]. A measure of DNA quality is the ability to be amplified. A second round of PCR can reduce inhibitors, as sometimes found in extracted DNA [45]. The potential effect of PCR inhibitors is reduced during the PCR reaction, in that isolated DNA from each reaction was diluted 1/25 in volume prepared for PCR in our experimentation. One of the most critical aspects when working with herbaria specimens is physical DNA degradation (fragmentation) that directly impacts amplification of selected DNA regions, such as the ITS regions.

In the case of historic Phalaris specimens [29], the additional factor of varying levels of genomic DNA degradation also affect DNA amplification [45]. Choi [46] demonstrated that trends between age and purity were not generally significant in four evolutionarily, geographically and ecologically different plant lineages. Therefore, DNA purity of specimens is likely due to the post-harvest and storage techniques used. Historic samples that are preserved and stored in traditional herbaria cases maintain the plant tissue appearance and overall specimen condition to minimize tissue degradation and maintain the phenotype of the type specimens as illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 4 [38]. However, the process and conditions of tissue preservation (harvest and post-harvest tissue storage) may not preserve DNA integrity [29, 47], leading to degradation of DNA in herbarium specimens which reduces amplification of ITS regions for samples with significantly degraded DNA [48]. Other factors, such as sample age, are also inadequate assessors of DNA quality [49]. Nonetheless, despite obtaining ODs with high purity and DNA concentrations of 2.5 to 87.7 ng/μl (Table 1), only some of the Phalaris herbaria samples were extracted with high molecular weight DNA (Fig. 1) which was not as consistent as with fresh (extant) specimens, yielding 28.5 to 80.7 ng/μl (Table 2).

It is not sufficient to obtain a certain quantity of DNA template (i.e. 50 ng/PCR reaction), but evaluation of DNA degradation should also be taken into account as a major factor limiting proper PCR amplification [43, 50]. Another tactic to be considered is to amplify the genetic marker in a stepwise fashion when the DNA template is highly degraded [48]. Additionally, DNA reconstruction is a method that could be employed early on to increase DNA quality (OD 260/280 ratios) and later PCR success and sequence length [51]. While an exhaustive study was not performed on reamplification options (nested PCR, whole genome amplification, or others) with the purpose of increasing the concentration of the PCR product to the required concentration for Sanger sequencing, it was found that a visible band was needed for sequencing. This method could be useful when working with old or precious tissue, such as herbarium, as a means to increase sequencing success.

The lack of consistency in herbaria specimens may be due to increased degradation and/or minor levels of contaminants, although the wide age range of 119 years across herbaria samples was not correlated with DNA concentration (Fig. 2a). When using the ITS region for barcoding herbaria specimens within the Juncaceae, a significantly negative association between age and sequencing success was found [47]. Therefore, the age relation to sequencing success may vary by species as well as storage treatments for herbarium specimens, rather than age – at least in the case of our Phalaris herbaria samples.

ITS amplification and sequencing of Phalaris specimens

Complete ITS1 and ITS2 sequences were obtained in 59.6% of the accessions across 12 species in the genus Phalaris (Tables 1, 2) and were within the expected range of 757 ± 140 bases [52]. The oldest herbarium specimen that was fully sequenced was P. californica collected in 1908 (Table 1). Six fresh and herbarium partial sequences of P. arundinacea, P. aquatica, P. canariensis and P. caroliniana (Tables 1, 2) were not used in the sequence analyses. The occurrence of partial sequences is not unusual, as previous researchers had difficulties with P. peruviana producing low quality sequences with missing data [15]. Design of a new set of ITS PCR primers that would be located farther from the beginning (and end) of the ITS region would most likely provide more high quality ITS sequences. Sanger sequencing tends to produce low quality sequences, just after the end of the sequencing primer position [53], that should be removed during sequence quality review.

Other factors can contribute to sequencing success such as age, preservation procedure, specimen color, the climate collected in and taxon related plant characteristics [53,54,55]. While Brewer et al. did not investigate the Poaceae family, they did determine that sequencing success can be related to taxon-specific traits in relation to the preservation technique used (herbaria vs. silica gel-dried specimens) [54]. The Poaceae family that the Phalaris genus belongs to was found to have a decreased sequence recovery of the ITS2 region with age and silica gel vs. herbaria preservation method [55]. This calls for the optimization of taxon-specific traits for species-focused studies such as this to achieve maximized sequence retrieval for barcoding.

Polymorphism analysis of Phalaris species

Multiple sequence alignment of the ITS region from historic herbaria and fresh Phalaris species showed that sequences and DNA polymorphisms found in newly sequenced Phalaris species resemble those previously reported [19, 56]. The similarity among the phylogenetic tree of the ITS region constructed by Voshell et al. [19] (fresh Phalaris tissue) and the distance tree constructed in this study (mainly herbaria Phalaris tissue) verifies the relatedness found among the Phalaris species and the genetic distinctions that can be extrapolated from SNPs in the ITS region with the use of herbarium tissue as old as 119 years.

Two species (P. lemmonii, P. angusta) lacked species-specific SNPs based on their sequence alignment (Table 3). Their relatedness may be expressed in flower morphology and may be due to geographic separation [19, 56]. In other instances, some Phalaris species, like P. brachystachys and P. canariensis, were too closely related such that the ITS region was insufficient to separate them (Fig. 4a). To separate both species we recommend using other barcoding regions, such as atpF–atpH, matK, rbcL, rpoB, rpoC1, psbK–psbI and trnH–psbA to see if a SNP can be found [57].

When comparing the phylogenetic tree constructed by Voshell et al. [19] to our distance tree (Fig. 4) of predominantly herbarium based ITS regions, similar clade groupings can be identified. A separation of clades (P. canariensis, P. brachystachys and P. truncata) and remaining species was identified in our study (Fig. 4), similar to [19]. The trees from Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 3 and Voshell et al. [19] form a consistent cluster of the species P. lemmonii, P. angusta, P. caroliniana, P. californica and P. arundinacea interpreted to resemble lineages 1 and 2 of the Phalaris genus [19]. The divergence of lineage 3 including P. coerulescens, P. minor, P. paradoxa and P. aquatica was also found in this analysis [19]. The similarity between the ITS inferred distance in this study (mainly herbaria Phalaris tissue) and by Voshell et al. [19] (fresh Phalaris tissue) verifies the relatedness found among Phalaris species and the genetic distinctions that can be extrapolated from SNPs in the ITS region with the use of herbarium tissue as old as 112 years (MN811182.1). No false SNPs were produced in sequence alignment (Supplementary Fig. 3) and distance tree construction due to the age of tissue and relatedness [19], indicating the versatility of herbarium specimens in ITS barcoding (Fig. 4a). Nucleotide polymorphism exists among most Phalaris species that were shared among historic and extant tissue types.

The clustering of P. arundinacea ITS sequences into predominantly regional clades from the USA and Asia is a notable grouping (Fig. 4b). All genotypes from N. America were in a single clade, distinct from most other ones of Eurasian origin. Despite considerable polymorphisms in the species (AR1-AR6, Table 3), a tight and adjacent clustering of the four native N. American P. arundinacea accessions from Minnesota (extant and historic MN811175.1, MN811200.1, MN811176.1, MN811174.1; Fig. 4b) was unexpected. These were grouped among two accessions of Korean origin (KF713257.1 and FJ766174.1; Fig. 4b) which could be the original ancestors of P. arundinacea germplasm that came across the land bridge of the Bering Strait into the State of Alaska, USA [20] during the late Tertiary period [21]. Other genotypes of USA origin (either native N. American or of Eurasian ancestry) were separated in the clade from the four N. American (Minnesota) natives. While the separation of USA and Asia P. arundinacea was not 100% consistent, most of the Eurasian types were in distinct clades; the use of additional barcoding markers would most likely allow proper geographic association of P. arundinacea. The relatedness of N. American vs. most Eurasian types illustrates the possibility to distinguish among P. arundinacea from different geographic locations on a continental scale (Fig. 4b). Future research is essential with our large germplasm base of native riparian, roadside, lakebed and cultivated N. American types in the Midwest (> 3000 genotypes) [29, 36] to potentially provide substantive confirmation of this distinction or a melding of all N. American types.

The high variation within the P. arundinacea and the detection of variants, forma and subspecies (Fig. 4b) further justifies the sequencing of more specimens within the ITS region and other barcoding regions [56,57,58,59,60] to better understand the relatedness and variation within this species and the genus as a whole. Herbaria curators at The Consortium of California Herbarium have recognized the P. arundinacea species to contain the subspecies picta and typica, four varietas (arundinacea, colorata, geuina, and japonica) and nine forma (Arundinacea, coarcta, luteo-Picts, minor, pallens, pallida, Ramifera, Ramosa, variegata; http://www.cch2.org/portal/taxa/index.php?taxon=Phalaris+arundinacea&formsubmit=Search+Terms). Further genetic structure analysis of P. arundinacea will provide the potential ability to genetically distinguish P. arundinacea by continents, even though it is morphologically indistinguishable. More exhaustive analysis of the ITS region may provide SNPs to discriminate the native vs. exotic status in N. American populations. Furthermore, the secondary structure of the ITS1 and ITS2 regions may provide a more accurate and detailed idea of the relatedness, sequence evolution and barcodes of the Phalaris species – especially when used in combination with sequence data [61].

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that most Phalaris herbaria specimens can be used to produce high quality ITS sequences that are useful to evaluate past genetic resources. The methods used in this study are relatively simple to replicate and, most importantly, do not require specific protocol modifications. Overall, the use of a standard DNA isolation protocol, PCR amplification method and direct PCR product sequencing were sufficient to sequence the majority of the collected herbarium specimens. The lack of amplification of some specimens is most likely due to high DNA degradation. Furthermore, herbaria can provide the plant tissue and taxonomically identified specimens, facilitating the identification of new species-specific barcodes and evaluation of past genetic resources. The ITS region (ITS1 and ITS2) was sufficient to distinguish eight out of twelve Phalaris species in this study. In addition, separation of the genus and within species was possible, implying that subsampling of multiple genotypes of this same species is necessary. The ITS region distinguished among most Eurasian vs. N. American accessions of P. arundinacea. A further development of within species and genus specific barcodes could contribute to designing PCR primers for efficient and accurate plant identification. Our finding of misidentified Phalaris species indicates the need for the DNA sequence database curation for proper specimen identification.

Methods

Germplasm collection

Extant (fresh) and historic herbaria samples of the Phalaris species were used for genomic DNA extraction. A total of n = 52 historic specimens were collected from the Bell Museum Herbarium, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN (MIN; n = 9; Table 1) and the Ada Hayden Herbarium, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (ISC; n = 43; Table 1). Formal identification of each voucher specimen had already been accomplished by each herbaria curator. Destructive sampling of ~ 2.5 × 0.63 cm of leaf tissue was performed on each herbarium specimen for leaf samples positioned in the back of the specimen to not decrease their visual integrity, similar to our previous methodology [29]. Permission for destructive tissue sampling was obtained from each herbarium curator in advance. Specimen notes were added to delineate the specimen-specific sampling. This herbarium collection represents a range of North American Phalaris herbarium specimens with collection dates ranging from 1882 (P. minor Retz.; ISC-V-0021344) to 2001 (P. arundinacea L.; 484,712; Table 1). Selection of the P. arundinacea herbaria samples were already tested for SNP genetic variation and provided sufficient and high quality nuclear DNA could be extracted, were determined to be most likely native North American genotypes [29, 36].

For additional sampling purposes, seeds were obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Germplasm Resources Information Network (USDA GRIN; https://www.ars-grin.gov/). Formal identification of each seed specimen had already been accomplished by the USDA GRIN taxonomist; no voucher specimens were deposited since the seed is part of the national USDA GRIN system. Germinated seedlings were used as extant specimens of the Phalaris species. Fresh samples served as an amplification and SNP detection validation. Extant specimens included three P. aquatica (PI 476287; PI 476288; PI 303825), two P. arundinacea (PI 241065; PI 422030) and two P. canariensis (PI 578800; PI 578798; Table 2). Seeds were sown in 10 cm square pots filled with Sungro Professional Growing Mix (Sun Gro Horticulture; SKU:5105, Agawam, MA) and placed in a mist house (greenhouse with an intermittent mist system). Once the seedlings germinated and true leaves were developed, plants were moved to the greenhouse for continued growth and leaf harvest. Environmental conditions in both greenhouses were 24.4 ± 3.0/18.3 ± 1.5 °C day/night daily integral and a 16 h long day photoperiod (0600–2200 HR) lighting (400 W high pressure sodium high intensity discharge lamps, HPS-HID) at a minimum of 150 μmol m− 2 s− 1. Plants were fertilized twice daily, between 0700 and 0800 and 1600–1700, using a constant liquid feed (CLF) of 125 ppm N from water-soluble 20 N–4.4P–16.6 K (Scotts, Marysville, OH). Fungicide drenches were applied in monthly rotations. Leaf tissue of matured, fully-expanded leaf trips were harvested and stored at − 20 °C in sealed plastic bags.

GenBank ITS resources

National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GenBank database searches were performed to collect existing ITS region sequences for comparative purposes from the twelve Phalaris species included in this study (Table 1). In this research, only Phalaris ITS sequences that contained full ITS1 and ITS2 regions were included and partial sequences were not compared. Partial sequences were not included because missing sequences could contain SNP polymorphism(s) that would contribute to less accurate distance analysis. Multiple ITS sequences from twelve Phalaris species were found (n = 68, full sequences): P. angusta (KX873129.1, KF753774.1, JF951055.1, JF51054.1), P. aquatica (KU883516.1, KF753775.1, JF951056.1, KF753776.1, KC512901.1, JF951076.1, KX873130.1), P. arundinacea (KF753779.1, JF951077.1, KF713257.1, FJ766174.1, KF713256.1, KU883517.1, KF713255.1, HQ600518.1, KP711073.1, KF713254.1, KF713253.1, FJ821785.1, KF713251.1, HF564628.1, KF713250.1, KF753778.1), P. brachystachys (KC512902.1, KF753780.1, JF951057.1), P. californica (JF951078.1, JF951064.1, KF753781.1), P. canarensis (KX147547.1, DQ539580.1, FJ178782.1, JF951058.1, KX147537.1, KP296086.1), P. caroliniana (JF951065.1, JF951080.1, JF951079.1), P. coerulescens (JF951081.1, JF951066.1, DQ539581.1, KC512900.1, HE802172.1, KF753782.1), P. lemmonii (MF964010.1, JF951082.1), P. minor (JF907187.1, JF951084.1, JF951069.1, JF907187.1, KX873131.1, KU883518.1, JF951086.1), P. paradoxa (JF951070.1, JF951071.1 KX873133.1, KX873132.1, JF951088.1, KF753783.1, JF951089.1, KC512899.1) and P. truncata (L36522.1, KC512903.1, JF951059.1). The geographic source of the P. arundinacea specimens were recorded if information was available on GenBank or in the associated published work.

DNA extraction

Nuclear DNA was extracted from historic and extant Phalaris samples using Synergy 2.0 Plant DNA Extraction Kit (OPS Diagnostics Laboratory, Lebanon, NJ) with minimal adjustments to the protocol [29]. Tissue was loaded using scissors and forceps that were washed in soapy water, rinsed twice in distilled water and dried with paper towels. Extant samples, unlike historic ones, were kept cool on dry ice throughout the loading process. Samples were ground for a total of 15 min at 1500 rpm in homogenizer (Geno/Grinder; SPEX SamplePrep, Metuchen, NJ). Once purified, DNA was suspended in molecular grade water and stored at − 20 °C. DNA quality and quantity were checked with a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). Quality guidelines were followed as recommended by Thermo Fisher Scientific as ~ 1.8 O 260/280 and 1.8–2.2 O 260/230 considered as “pure” DNA (NanoDrop 2000/2000c Spectrophotometer V1.0 User Manual, 2009). Genomic DNA was visualized on 1% (w/v) agarose gels (1 × Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer) and stained with ethidium bromide, 6X loading dye (New England BioLabs; Ipswich MA) and a DNA ladder (FullRanger 1 kb; Norgen Biotek Corp, Thorold, ON, Canada). Only herbarium specimens with the highest quantity of DNA were used to visualize degradation (200 ng / lane on an agarose gel) due to the limited DNA.

To calculate correlation between herbarium tissue age and the concentration of genomic DNA obtained and to the PCR amplification success from herbarium tissue Microsoft Excel 365 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) with Regression function was used to estimate p-value.

PCR amplification

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using 10 μM of ITS-P5 and ITS-U4 primers [52]. PCR master mix (GoTaq Green Master Mix, M712; Promega, Madison, WI) plus 1 μL of DNA (with a minimum concentration > 50 ng/μL) or DNA volume was adjusted to obtain 50 ng total DNA. The PCR protocol followed previous methodology [52]: 94 °C for 4 min, then 34 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 40 s at 55 °C and 1 min at 72 °C, finishing with 10 min at 72 °C. PCR reactions were visualized using electrophoresis on a 1% (w/v) agarose gel (1 x Tris-acetate-EDTA buffer) with ethidium bromide and a DNA ladder (FullRanger 100 bases; Norgen Biotek Corp, Thorold, ON, Canada). Expected DNA amplification product of ITS-P5 and ITS-U4 primers was 757 ± 140 bases [52]. If a single amplification product was observed, amplified products were directly purified using PureLink™ Quick PCR Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) and prepared for Sanger sequencing at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center, following UMGC sample requirements (University of Minnesota Genomics Center – Sanger sequencing Classic, http://genomics.umn.edu/sanger-sequencing-classic.php). If the purified PCR reaction yielded less than the total DNA required for Sanger sequencing (25 ng/μL), the PCR product was diluted in water (1/50) and 1 ul of diluted product was used and re-amplified following the same procedure (ITS-P5 and ITS-U4, primer set, PCR reaction composition, PCR program).

Sequence analysis

Sequencing results were edited and quality-checked using 4Peaks software (Nucleobytes, Alsmeer, Netherlands; http://nucleobytes.com/4peaks/) with additional manual sequence trimming. Sequence editing, alignments, annotations and manipulations were done using Geneious 11.1.5 software (Biomatters, Ltd., New Zealand; https://www.geneious.com) [58]. The Arabidopsis thaliana (× 52320.1) ITS sequence was initially used to annotate full ITS regions of the newly obtained (n = 36) Phalaris DNA sequences (Tables 1, 2). Genetic distance among Phalaris species was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method [59] and a bootstrap test was performed for each tree (with 100 replicates) among newly obtained and GenBank ITS sequence collection. A multiple sequence alignment was performed with use of MUSCLE alignment with version 3.8.425 on Geneious software [60]. Diagnostic, species-specific SNPs that differentiate among Phalaris species were determined based on multiple alignment of full-length ITS (ITS1 and ITS2 regions) sequences with exclusion of 5.8S ribosomal subunit. Sequences obtained in this study were deposited into the GenBank database. Accession numbers can be found in Tables 1 and 2.

Availability of data and materials

The DNA sequences produced are deposited in the NCBI GenBank data (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/). Sequence lists can be found in the Materials and Methods section (Tables 1 and 2) and are listed in the format below of, “Phalaris Species: herbarium accession code or GRIN accession number, GenBank accession number;”. Specimens without a GenBank accession number are labeled with “n/a”.

P. angusta Nees ex Trin: ISC-V-0020926, MN811167.1; ISC-V-0020921, MN8111655.1; ISC-V-0020922, MN811168.1; ISC-V-0020920, MN811166.1; ISC-V-0020919, MN811169.1.

P. aquatica L.: ISC-V-0021399, MN811171.1; ISC-V-0020927, MN811170.1; ISC-V-0021398, MN811172.1; PI 476287, MN811177.1; PI 476288, n/a; PI 303825, MN811173.1.

P. arundinacea L.: 71166, n/a; 532148, MN811175.1; 753216, MN811176.1; 484712, MN811200.1; PI 241065, n/a; PI 422030, MN811174.1.

P. brachystachys Link: ISC-V-0021036, MN811180.1; ISC-V-0021039, MN811179.1; ISC-V-0021035, MN811178.1; ISC-V-0021037, MN811181.1.

P. californica Hook. & Arn.: ISC-V-0021040, n/a; ISC-V-0021044, n/a; ISC-V-0021043, MN811182.1; ISC-V-0021041, n/a; ISC-V-0021042, n/a.

P. canariensis L.: 71226, n/a; 71229, n/a; 367474, MN811185.1; 619107, n/a; PI 578800, MN811183.1; PI 578798, MN811184.1.

P. caroliniana Walter: ISC-V-0021097, MN811188.1; ISC-V-0021081, MN811187.1; ISC-V-0021166, n/a; ISC-V-0021080, MN811186.1.

P. coerulescens Desf.: ISC-V-0021199, MN811190.1; ISC-V-0021198, n/a; ISC-V-0021204, n/a; ISC-V-0021203, MN811189.1.

P. lemmonii Vasey: ISC-V-0021333, n/a; ISC-V-0021334, n/a; ISC-V-0021329, MN811192.1; ISC-V-0021336, MN811191.1; ISC-V-0021328, n/a.

P. minor Retz.: ISC-V-0021344, n/a; 229774, n/a; ISC-V-0021338, n/a; ISC-V-0021342, n/a; ISC-V-0021341, MN811193.1.

P. paradoxa L.: ISC-V-0021360, n/a; ISC-V-0021363, n/a; ISC-V-0021361, MN811195.1; ISC-V-0021362, n/a; ISC-V-0021415, MN811194.1.

P. truncata Guss. ex Bertol.: ISC-V-0021377, MN811198.1; ISC-V-0021384, MN811199.1; ISC-V-0021395, MN811197.1; ISC-V-0021373, MN811196.1.

References

  1. 1.

    Chase MW, Soltis DE, Olmstead RG, Morgan D, Les DH, Mishler BD, et al. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1993;80:528–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Rieseberg LH, Wendel JF. Introgression and its consequences in plants. In: Harrison R, editor. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 70–109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baldwin BG. Phylogenetic utility of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA in plants: an example from the Compositae. Mol Phylogenetic Evol. 1992;1:3–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Baldwin BG. Molecular phylogenetics of Calycadenia (Compositae) based on ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA: chromosomal and morphological evolution reexamined. Am J Bot. 1993;80:222–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard. 1995;82:247–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alvarez I, Wendel JF. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003;29:417–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00208-2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Anderson DE. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Phalaris. Iowa State Collect J Sci. 1961;36:1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Casler MD, Cherney JH, Brummer EC. Biomass yield of naturalized populations and cultivars of reed canary grass. BioEnergy Res. 2009;2:165–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9043-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Casler MD, Phillips MM, Krohn AL. DNA polymorphisms reveal geographic races of reed canarygrass. 2009. https://pubag.nal.usda.gov/catalog/37445. Accessed 1 Oct 2019.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Doering E, Albrecht J, Hilu KW, Roeser M. Phylogenetic relationships in the Aveneae/Poaceae complex (Pooideae, Poaceae). Kew Bull. 2007;62:407–24.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Quintanar A, Castroviejo S, Catalan P. Phylogeny of the tribe Aveneae (Poideae, Poaceae) inferred from plastid TRNT-F and nuclear ITS sequences. Am J Bot. 2007;94:1554–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schneider J, Doering E, Hilu KW, Roeser M. Phylogenetic structure of the grass subfamily Pooideae based on comparison of plastid matK gene-3’trnK exon and nuclear ITS sequences. Taxon. 2009;58:405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Saarela JM, Wysocki WP, Barrett CF, Soreng RJ, Davis JI, Clark LG, et al. Plastid phylogenetics of the cool-season grass subfamily: clarification of relationships among early-diverging tribes. AoB Plants. 2015;7:plv046. https://doi.org/10.10903/aobpla/plv046.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Soreng RJ, Peterson PM, Romaschenko K, Davidse G, Zuloaga FO, Judziewicz EJ, et al. A worldwide classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae). J Syst Evol. 2015;53:117–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Voshell SM, Baldini RM, Hilu KW. Infrageneric treatment of Phalaris (canary grasses, Poaceae) based on molecular phylogenetics and floret structure. Aust Syst Bot. 2015;28:355–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jenkin TJ, Sethi BL. Phalaris arundinacea, Ph. Tuberosa, their F1 hybrids and hybrid derivatives. J Genet. 1932;26:1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Baldini RM. The genus Phalaris L. (Gramineae) in Italy. Webbia. 1993;47:1–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.1993.10670531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Baldini RM. Revision of the genus Phalaris L. (Gramineae). Webbia. 1995;49:265–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Voshell S, Baldini R, Kumar R, Tatalovich N, Hilu K. Canary grasses (Phalaris, Poaceae): molecular phylogenetics, polyploidy and floret evolution. Taxon. 2011;60:1306–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.605007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Voshell SM, Hilu KW. Canary grasses (Phalaris, Poaceae): biogeography, molecular dating and the role of floret structure in dispersal. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:212–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Abbott RJ, Smith LC, Milne RI, Crawford RMM, Wolff K, Balfour J. Molecular analysis of plant migration and refugia in the Arctic. Science. 2000;289:1343–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1343.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Matthioli PA. Petri Petri Andreae Matthioli medici senensis commentarii. In: Libros sex pedacii dioscoridis anazarbei, de materia medica, adjectis quam plurimis plantarum & animalium imaginibus, eodem authore; 1554.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bauhin C. Pinax Theatri botanici. Basileae: Ludovici Regis; 1623.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Baldini RM, Jarvis CE. Typification of some Linnaean names in Phalaris (Gramineae). Taxon. 1991;40:475–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Anderson NO. Throwing out the bathwater but keeping the baby: Lessons learned from purple loosestrife and reed canarygrass. HortTech. 2019. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04307-19.

  26. 26.

    Blake ST. A synthetic new species of Phalaris (Gramineae). Proc R Soc Qld. 1956;67:27–9.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD. Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands. 1999;19:733–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lavergne S, Molofsky J. Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Crit Re Plant Sci. 2004;23:415–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490505934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Noyszewski AK, Anderson NO, Smith AG, Kilian A, Dalbotten D, Ito E, et al. Challenges of establishing native versus exotic status of herbarium specimens. HortTech. 2019;29:549–53. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH04313-19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nelson MF, Anderson NO. Variation among genotypes and source habitats in growth and fecundity of the wetland invasive plant Phalaris arundinacea L. Wetlands. 2015;35:1175–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-015-0704-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Akiyama Y, Kimura K, Kubota A, Fujimori M, Yamada-Akiyama H, Takahara Y, et al. Comparison of genome size in reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) exotic and putative native Japanese genotypes by flow cytometry. Jpn Agric Res Q. 2015;49:345–50. https://doi.org/10.6090/jarq.49.345.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Nelson MF, Anderson NO, Casler MD, Jakubowski AR. Population genetic structure of N. American and European Phalaris arundinacea L. as inferred from inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Biol Inv. 2014;16:353–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0525-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jakubowski A, Jackson R, Casler M. The history of reed canarygrass in North America: persistence of natives among invading Eurasian populations. Crop Sci. 2014;54:210. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2013.05.0342.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Jakubowski AR, Casler MD, Jackson RD. Genetic evidence suggests a widespread distribution of native north American populations of reed canarygrass. Biol Inv. 2013;15:261–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0300-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Anderson NO, Jocienė L, Krokaitė E, Rekašius T, Paulauskas A, Kupčinskienė E. Genetic diversity of Phalaris arundinacea populations in relation to river regulation in the Merkys basin, Lithuania. River Res Appl. 2018;34:300–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Noyszewski AK, Anderson NO, Smith AG, Kilian A, Dalbotten D, Ito E, et al. Riparian populations of Minnesota reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) are most likely native, based on SNPs (DArTseqLD). Wetl Ecol Mgt. 2020; [In Review].

  37. 37.

    Besnard G, Bianconi ME, Hackel J, Manzi S, Vorontsova MS, Christin P-A. Herbarium genomics retraces the origins of C4-specific carbonic anhydrase in Andropogoneae (Poaceae). Bot Let. 2018;165:419–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2018.1469429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Lavoie C, Dufresne C, Delisle F. The spread of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) in Québec: a spatio-temporal perspective. Écosci. 2005;12(3):355–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Merigliano MF, Lesica P. The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland northwest, USA. Nat Areas J. 1998;18:223–30.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sawyer S, Krause J, Guschanski K, Savolainen V, Pääbo S. Temporal patterns of nucleotide misincorporations and DNA fragmentation in ancient DNA. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e34131. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stiller M, Green RE, Ronan M, Simons JF, Du L, He W, et al. Patterns of nucleotide misincorporations during enzymatic amplification and direct large-scale sequencing of ancient DNA. PNAS. 2006:13578–84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605327103.

  42. 42.

    Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Karsch-Mizrachi I. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1):D84–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz956.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wandeler P, Smith S, Morin PA, Pettifor RA, Funk SM. Patterns of nuclear DNA degeneration over time--a case study in historic teeth samples. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:1087–93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01807.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Knebelsberger T, Stöger I. DNA extraction, preservation, and amplification. In: Kress WJ, Erickson DL, editors. DNA barcodes: methods and protocols; methods in molecular biology. Totowa: Humana Press; 2012. p. 311–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_14.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Savolainen MK, Loikkanen J, Naarala J. Amplification of glutamate-induced oxidative stress. Toxicol Let. 1995;82–83:399–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(95)03490-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ribeiro RA, Lovato MB. Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols in fresh and herbarium specimens of the genus Dalbergia. Genet Mol Res GR. 2007;6:173–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Staats M, Cuenca A, Richardson JE, Ginkel RV, Petersen G, Seberg O, et al. DNA damage in plant herbarium tissue. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028448.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Do D, Záveská DL. Herbarium tale: the utility of dry specimens for DNA barcoding Juncaceae. Plant Syst Evol. 2018;304:281–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1476-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Erkens RHJ, Cross H, Maas JW, Hoenselaar K, Chatrou LW. Assessment of age and greenness of herbarium specimens as predictors for successful extraction and amplification of DNA. Blumea Biodiv Evol Biogeo Plants. 2008;53(2):407–28 (22). https://doi.org/10.3767/000651908X608052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP. Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood. Genetics. 2002;160:357–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Xu C, Dong W, Shi S, Cheng T, Li C, Liu Y, et al. Accelerating plant DNA barcode reference library construction using herbarium specimens: improved experimental techniques. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15:1366–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12413.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Cheng T, Xu C, Lei L, Li C, Zhang Y, Zhou S. Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;16:138–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Metzker ML. Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res. 2005;15:1767–76. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3770505.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Brewer GE, Clarkson JJ, Maurin O, Zuntini AR, Barber V, Bellot S, et al. Factors affecting targeted sequencing of 353 nuclear genes from herbarium specimens spanning the diversity of angiosperms. Front Pl Sci. 2019;10:1102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kuzmina ML, Thomas WA, Braukmann AJ, Fazekas SW, Graham SL, Roodrigues A, et al. Using herbarium-derived DNAs to assemble a large-scale DNA barcode library for the vascular plants of Canada. Appl Pt Sci. 2017;5(12):1700079. https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1700079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Winterfeld G, Becher H, Voshell S, Hilu K, Röser M. Karyotype evolution in Phalaris (Poaceae): the role of reductional dysploidy, polyploidy and chromosome alteration in a wide-spread and diverse genus. PLoS One. 2018;13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192869.

  57. 57.

    CBOL Plant Working Group, Hollingsworth PM, Forrest LL, Spouge JL, Hajibabaei M, Ratnasingham S, et al. A DNA barcode for land plants. PNAS. 2009;106:12794–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905845106.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2012;28:1647–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4:406–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:1792–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Wolf M. ITS so much more. Trends Gen. 2015;31(4):174–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2015.02.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Drs. Timothy Whitfeld and Deborah Lewis for their time and work spent in preserving and providing the availability of the herbaria specimens. Furthermore, we thank the University of Minnesota Bell Museum Herbarium and Iowa State University Ada Hayden Herbarium for the institutional lending services provided.

Funding

Funding for this research was from a University of Minnesota Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program Grant which paid for Allison Graper’s salary, limited lab supplies and the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, MAES21–0045, which funded sequencing and greenhouse charges.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NOA directed the entire research project. NOA, AKN and AGS designed the research. ALG and AKN performed the experimentation, AKN and ALG analyzed the data. ALG, NOA, AKN wrote the complete manuscript with equal contributions; AGS edited the manuscript along with NOA, AKN and ALG. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil O. Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All Phalaris plant material was obtained from either herbaria leaf or seed samples. Dried leaf samples were hand sampled from herbaria voucher specimens archived at the Bell Museum Herbarium (MIN; University of Minnesota) and Ada Hayden Herbarium (ISC; Iowa State University). The accession numbers of each herbarium voucher specimen are listed in Table 1. Approval for destructive leaf sampling was provided by the respective curators of each herbarium. Seed samples were obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Germplasm Resources Information Network with permission granted by this agency for conducting genetic (molecular) research.

Experimental research on these plant materials (either cultivated or wild) comply with relevant institutional, national and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Figure 1.

Original uncropped image of gel electrophoresis of 200 ng of genomic DNA in Fig. 1. Where lanes 2 and 3 are fresh tissue P. aquatica (PI 476288) and P. arundinacea (PI 241065) respectively. Remaining lanes (4–9) are from herbarium tissue consisting of P. canarensis (619107), P. brachystachys (ISC-V-0021035), P. paradoxa (ISC-V-0021361), P. coerulescens (ISC-V-0021204), P. canarensis (71229) and P. minor (229774). Lanes 1 and 11 are a DNA size marker (FullRanger DNA ladder 1 kb) while lane 10 is a control lane with no sample loaded. Dotted white line over image illustrate where the image was cropped to form Fig. 1.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure 2.

Original uncropped image of gel electrophoresis of PCR amplification examples of the plant specific ITS region in Fig. 3 [51] where panel labels (a, b, c) correspond. Panel a consist of fresh P. canarensis in lane 2 (53.6 ng; PI 578800), P. in lane 3 (57.8 ng; PI 578798), P. aquatica in lane 4 (60.7 ng; PI 476287), P. aquatica in lane 5 (80.7 ng; PI 476288), P. aquatica in lane 6 (59.9 ng; PI 303825), P. arundinacea in lane 7 (52.2 ng; PI 241065), P. arundinacea in lane 8 (28.5 ng/μl; PI 422030), P. canarensis in lane 11 (20 ng; PI 578800), P. canarensis in lane 12 (20 ng; PI 578798), P. aquatica in lane 13 (20 ng; PI 476287), P. aquatica in lane 14 (20 ng; PI 476288), P. aquatica in lane 15 (20 ng; PI 303825), P. arundinacea in lane 16 (20 ng; PI 241065) and P. arundinacea in lane 17 (20 ng; PI 422030). Panel b consists of herbarium specimens of uniform 50 ng quantity where lane 21 is P. canarensis (71226), lane 22 is P. californica (ISC-V-0021043), lane 23 is P. californica (ISC-V-0021040), lane 24 is P. caroliniana (ISC-V-0021097), lane 25 is P. paradoxa (ISC-V-0021360), lane 26 is P. coerulescens (ISC-V-0021199) and lane 27 is P. minor (ISC-V-0021338). Panel c contains PCR re-amplification results of 1/50 dilutions of purified PCR reactions with P. canarensis in lane 31 (484712), P. californica in lane 32 (ISC-V-0021043), P. californica in lane 33 (ISC-V-0021040), P. caroliniana in lane 34 (ISC-V-0021081), P. truncata in lane 35 (ISC-V-0021373), P. truncata in lane 36 (ISC-V-0021384) and P. paradoxa in lane 37 (ISC-V-0021361). Lanes 9, 18, 28 and 38 are control lanes with no sample loaded. Lanes 1, 10, 19, 20, 29, 30 and 39 are a DNA size marker (FullRanger DNA ladder 100 bases). Dotted white line over image illustrate where the image was cropped to form Fig. 3.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure 3.

Sequence alignment used for the distance tree in Fig. 4 with indication of specific single nucleotide polymorphism for Phalaris species.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure 4.

Contrast between fresh P. arundinacea (PI 422030; MN811174.1) in panel a with a historic herbarium specimen of P. arundinacea (753,216; MN811176.1) from the University of Minnesota Herbarium in panel b.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Graper, A.L., Noyszewski, A.K., Anderson, N.O. et al. Variability in ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of historic herbaria and extant (fresh) Phalaris species (Poaceae). BMC Plant Biol 21, 515 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03284-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Herbarium specimens
  • DNA barcoding
  • PCR amplification
  • Diagnostic SNPs