Skip to main content
Download PDF

Differential transcription pathways associated with rootstock-induced dwarfing in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) scions

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 261 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) is a traditional staple tree crop throughout the tropics. Through interspecific grafting, a dwarf phenotype with over 50% reduction in plant height was identified when marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) rootstocks were used. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the rootstock-induced breadfruit dwarfing is poorly understood.

Results

An RNA-sequencing study of breadfruit scions at 22 months after grafting identified 5409 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of which 2069 were upregulated and 3339 were downregulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks compared to those on self-graft. The DEGs were predominantly enriched for biological processes involved in carbon metabolism, cell wall organization, plant hormone signal transduction and redox homeostasis. The down-regulation of genes encoding vacuolar acid invertases and alkaline/neutral invertases, was consistent with the decreased activity of both enzymes, accompanying with a higher sucrose but lower glucose and fructose levels in the tissues. Key genes of biosynthetic pathways for amino acids, lipids and cell wall were down regulated, reflecting reduction of sucrose utilisation for stem growth on dwarfing rootstocks. Genes encoding sugar transporters, amino acid transporters, choline transporters, along with large number of potassium channels and aquaporin family members were down-regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks. Lower activity of plasma membrane H+-ATPase, together with the predominance of genes encoding expansins, wall-associated receptor kinases and key enzymes for biosynthesis and re-modelling of cellulose, xyloglucans and pectins in down-regulated DGEs suggested impairment of cell expansion. Signalling pathways of auxin and gibberellin, along with strigolacton and brassinosteroid biosynthetic genes dominated the down-regulated DEGs. Phenylpropanoid pathway was enriched, with key lignin biosynthetic genes down-regulated, and flavonoid biosynthetic genes upregulated in scions on marang rootstocks. Signalling pathways of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene and MAPK cascade were significantly enriched in the upregulated DEGs.

Conclusions

Rootstock-induced disruption in pathways regulating nutrient transport, sucrose utilisation, cell wall biosynthesis and networks of hormone transduction are proposed to impair cell expansion and stem elongation, leading to dwarf phenotype in breadfruit scions. The information provides opportunity to develop screening strategy for rootstock breeding and selection for breadfruit dwarfing.

Peer Review reports

Background

Trees with reduced stature facilitate high-density planting, tree management and harvesting. In temperate fruit tree cultivation, tree dwarfing has been achieved through the widespread use of dwarfing rootstocks. Despite the importance of rootstock-induced dwarfing, the underlying mechanism of the phenomenon is not well understood. Breadfruit [Artocarpus altilis (Parkinson) Fosberg)] is a tropical tree crop from 15 to 20 m. The species is principally grown as an energy food, a source of complex carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals, and is regarded as a food security crop in the tropics [1]. Transition toward high-density commercial planting, as well as tree loss due to intense tropical windstorm in the regions has driven an interest in small size breadfruit trees [2]. Breadfruit has hundreds of cultivars with great diversity in morphological and agronomic characteristics [1], but the dwarf variety of the species has not been reported. Through interspecific grafting, rootstock of marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus Blanco) was identified as a size-controlling rootstock conferring over 50% reduction in breadfruit scion size, with over 70% shorter internode length compared to those on self-graft and the standard, non-grafted breadfruit plants [3, 4]. Breadfruit plants on marang rootstocks grows normally except for being dwarf, providing a potential solution for tree vigour control in commercial cultivation [3]. Under the same genus of Artocarpus, marang is also a large tropical fruit tree to 25 m, no dwarf phenotype has been identified. Little is known about the intriguing interactive processes by which marang greatly reduces the tree size of its grafted scions when used as rootstocks.

Several physiological mechanisms have been proposed to explain rootstock-induced dwarfing. First, the anatomical change surrounding graft union has been assumed to act as a barrier for movement of nutrients, hormones or other signals between rootstock and scion [5]. Reduction in solute and water transport across graft union has been implicated as causal factors for rootstock-induced dwarfing [6, 7]. The hydraulic conductance was shown to increase with the vigour of apple rootstocks [7]. The reduction in stem extension rate of peach trees was correlated to the decreased water potential in stems of dwarfing rootstocks [6]. Graft union of dwarfing cherry rootstocks has been shown to limit soluble sugar transport or starch mobilization, leading to decrease in vegetative growth [8]. Another hypothesis includes the altered hormone signalling occurred between scions and rootstocks [9, 10]. Reduction in auxin transport from aerial parts of grafted plants has been proposed to limit root growth and cytokinin production supplied for shoot growth [9]. Dwarfing apple rootstocks have been shown to limit root-produced gibberellic acid (GA) precursor, GA19 to scions [10,11,12], as a result, application of GA to apple scions on dwarfing rootstocks restores the node number of both the primary axis and secondary shoots [13]. Previously exogenous GA treatment was also shown to restore the stem elongation rate and the internode length of breadfruit scions growing on marang rootstocks [4]. On the other hand, abscisic acid (ABA) concentration is higher in scion tissues on apple dwarfing rootstocks [10]. Over-accumulation of flavonoids has also been suggested to affect auxin level and scion growth on dwarfing apple rootstocks [9, 14]. Several of these mechanisms have been tested many times, inconsistent results have also been shown [15].

As a first step toward understanding the molecular mechanism underlying breadfruit dwarfing induced by marang rootstocks, we undertook an RNA-sequencing study in combination with comparative biochemical analysis to identify biological processes involved in the phenotype variation of breadfruit scions growing on different rootstocks. To better characterize differential gene expression associated with rootstock response, scion stem transcriptome was de novo assembled and transcriptome comparison was used to identify gene cohorts and regulatory pathways associated with stem elongation growth. The work provides insight into the signal transduction pathways regulating breadfruit dwarfing by interspecific rootstocks, also generates a valuable gene resource for functional study and rootstock breeding for dwarfism of the species.

Results

Effect of rootstocks on growth characteristics of breadfruit scions

Breadfruit plants on marang rootstocks displayed significantly shorter stature than the standard non-grafted plants as well as the self-grafted plants, with about 58% reduction in scion stem height compared to those on self-graft in the period from 18 to 26 months after grafting (Fig. 1a and b). There was no difference in the growth habit between the self-graft and the non-graft. Except for being dwarf, breadfruit plants on marang rootstocks grew normally under current glasshouse condition. Same as those of the self-graft, all these plants displayed progressive development of new internodes from apical buds or axillary buds and continuous emergence of green leaves from the apex (see example image in Figure S1). Compared with the growth parameters from 3 to 18 months after grafting [3], growth analysis at 26 months (Table S1) showed plants of both graft types had significant growth with increase in scion height, stem diameter and node number. However, plants on marang rootstocks continued to display shorter stature and reduced stem thickness, but no change in stem node number. Although with smaller leaves, these plants showed no change in other leaf characters, such as leaf colour and leaf shape (Fig. 1; Figure S1). As the performance of a grafted plant and the commercial application of the rootstock not only depends on the genotype of scion and rootstock, but also the compatibility of the rootstock with scion [16,17,18], it is necessary to examine the graft combination of breadfruit/marang for graft compatibility. Anatomy examination of a scion/rootstock union has been a method that unambiguously identifies graft incompatibility in woody species [19,20,21]. Anatomy examination of graft interface was first carried out on the graft unions of three interspecific grafts at 26 months after grafting. The results revealed that the breadfruit/marang grafts had good compatibility with hardly visible graft lines in bark and wood (category ‘A’, see Methods, also [22]) and there was no discontinuities along the graft lines between bark and wood in all the graft unions examined (see example image in Figure S2). The ratio of the stem diameter above and below the graft union has often been used to correlate growth characteristics with graft incompatibility [19,20,21]. In consistent with the anatomy assessment, the ratio of scion to rootstock stem diameter in the breadfruit/marang combination was very close to 1, and there was no significant difference between those of the self-graft and the interspecific graft (Table S1). Scion leaf chlorophyll (Chl) concentration, reflecting the capability of carbon assimilation and proper functioning of a composite grafted plant, has also served as a non-destructive tool to identify graft incompatibility [19,20,21]. Here, concentration of scion leaf chlorophyll on marang rootstocks, including Chl a, Chl b, Chl a + Chl b, and Chl a/b was not significantly different from those of the self-graft (Table S1). Consistent with the results, a previous monthly measurement of chlorophyll by a non-destructive method also showed no difference in total chlorophyll of scion leaves on different rootstocks at any time point [3]. Furthermore, there were no difference in the 1-year and 2-year compatibility rates between the interspecific graft and the self-graft (Figure S1). Taken together, these evidences confirmed that the grafts of breadfruit/marang combination had good compatibility in the period up to 26 months after grafting. The dwarf phenotype of breadfruit scions on marang rootstocks was therefore not associated with graft incompatibility.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Rootstock effect on the phenotype of breadfruit scions. a Height of breadfruit scion main stems growing on different rootstocks in the period up to 26 months after grafting. b Representatives of breadfruit plants growing on different rootstocks at 22 months after grafting. BM, breadfruit plants on marang rootstocks; BB, self-graft; N, non-graft. c Non-structural carbohydrate contents of scion stems on different rootstocks at 22 months after grafting. All values represent mean ± SE of five biological replicates (* p < 0.05)

Full size image

Non-structural carbohydrate contents (NSC) were further measured at 22 months after grafting (Fig. 1c). Scion stems on marang rootstocks showed significantly lower levels of glucose and fructose, but higher levels of sucrose, with 84.5% reduction in glucose and 74.7% reduction in fructose, but over 214% increase in sucrose compared to those on self-graft. There was no significant difference in starch content across all samples (Fig. 1c).

Breadfruit scion stem transcriptome analysis

First, a transcriptome library was de novo assembled for breadfruit scion stems. It included a total of 520.6 million paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp) generated from sequencing across all samples. After filtering raw reads, a total of 516.2 million clean paired-reads were produced, with 95.0% having a Phred quality score of ≥ Q20. All clean reads were de novo assembled into 212,878 contigs (> 297 bp), with N50 of 2928 bp and 96.8% complete Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) in the final transcriptome assembly (Table S2). The unigenes were annotated by query against various public databases (see Methods). As a result, 77,390 (61.41%) unigenes were matched to one or more of these databases. The assembled unigene sequences are available at NCBI BioProject database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/) with BioProject ID: PRJNA679862.

To identify global gene expression patterns related to rootstock-induced dwarfing, total RNA from the second internodes growing on different rootstocks at 22 months after grafting, was processed for RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) on an Illumina platform (see Methods). Between 32 to 45 million clean paired-end reads were generated for each biological replicate, with 92.9% to 95.5% mapped back to the assembled transcriptome (Table S2). Using the cut-off of adjusted p < 0.05 & |log2 fold change|≥ 1, a total of 5409 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, including 2069 upregulated and 3339 downregulated genes in scion stems growing on marang rootstocks compared to those on self-graft (Fig. 2). The top major DEGs included up-regulated genes encoding Bet_v1-like pathogenesis-related protein, peroxidase 10, chitinase and WUSCHEL-related homeobox 1, all of which had log2FC > 6, and down-regulated genes encoding vacuolar-like acid invertase, potassium channel AKT1, beta-carotene isomerase (DWARF27) and polygalacturonase, all of which had Log2FC < -5 (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Rootstock effect on global gene expression pattern revealed by RNA-sequencing. a Scatter plots comparing all expressed genes of scion stems on marang rootstocks vs. those on self-graft. Differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05 and |log2FC|≥ 1) are donated in red or blue. b Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed genes among biologic replicates of graft combination. Heatmap was constructed with Heatmapper (http://www.heatmapper.ca/). Values of gene expression level are converted to Z-Score. C1-C3, replicates of self-graft (control); T1-T3, replicates of breadfruits on marang rootstocks. c Heatmap and hierarchical clustering of top major DEGs constructed by ClustVis (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/clustvis/). Colour codes represent standardized gene expression levels. Euclidean distance and Ward linkage were used to construct dendrograms against genes and samples. DEGs, differentially expressed genes

Full size image

Analysis of gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment was performed for DEGs. In GO analysis, all DEGs were annotated with GO terms and categorized into three ontologies: biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. Of the top 20 enriched GO terms (Fig. 3), the carbohydrate metabolic process and cellular response to stimulus were the most enriched biological processes. Biological processes regulating vegetative growth were highly enriched, including response to blue light and cell wall organization or biogenesis. Cell protective processes, such as phosphorelay signal transduction system, defense response and cellular detoxification were also enriched (Fig. 3a). DEGs were predominantly enriched for molecular function associated with oxidoreductase activity on peroxide, peroxidase activity and antioxidant activity, with cell periphery and extracellular region being the main cellular components (Fig. 3b). GO enrichment was further analyzed among the up- or down-regulated DEGs. These revealed biological processes related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolic process, response to oxidative stress and cellular oxidant detoxification were the most enriched GO terms in the upregulated genes, and biological processes participating in nucleic acid metabolic process, macromolecule modification and cell wall organization or biogenesis were predominantly enriched in the down-regulated genes (Fig. 3c). Among the top 20 enriched KEGG pathways were biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, carbon metabolism and plant hormone signal transduction (Fig. 3d). The highly enriched pathways also included plant-pathogen interaction, MAPK signalling pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and NOD-like receptor signalling pathway, consistent with the enriched GO terms associated with cell protective processes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

GO and KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes. a Top 20 enriched GO terms in biological process; b Enriched GO terms in molecular function and cellular component; c Enriched GO terms in biological process among up- and down-regulated genes; d Top 20 enriched KEGG pathways. The number of genes enriched is displayed on top of each bar graph. DEGs, differentially expressed genes

Full size image

Genes involved in nutrient transport and primary metabolism

Membrane transporters play pivotal roles in facilitating translocation of ions and solutes in plants, and their activities impact carbon allocation and plant growth [23]. A total of 161 out of 246 DEGs identified as member transporter genes were down regulated in stems growing on marang rootstocks compared to those on self-graft (Table S3, Table 1). These included genes encoding sucrose/H+ symporter SUT1, tonoplast‐localized SUT4-like, SWEETs, choline transporter-like, along with large numbers of amino acid transporters (8 DEGs), tonoplast dicarboxylate transporters (11 DEGs), aquaporin/major intrinsic protein family (26 DEGs) and potassium channels (AKT1, 5 DEGs; AKT2/3, 4 DEGs; potassium channel SKOR, 11 DEGs, Table S3). High number of genes encoding plasma membrane (PM) H+-ATPase was down-regulated (13 out of 18 DEGs, Table S3). Lower activity of PM H+-ATPase was previously found in scion stems growing on marang rootstocks at 12 and 18 months after grafting [3], decreased activity of the enzyme was also found at 22 months, with 36.6% reduction compared to that of the self-graft (Fig. 4a).

Table 1 Genes involved in nutrient transport and metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids and lipids
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Activity of plasma membrane H+-ATPase and sucrose-degradation enzymes of breadfruit scion stems on different rootstocks at 22 months after grafting. The activity of plasma membrane H+-ATPase, represented as the vanadate-sensitive ATPase, was calculated from the difference between activities in the absence and presence of 1 mM Na3VO4. PM H+-ATPase, plasma membrane H + -ATPase; SAI, soluble acid invertase; NIV, neutral invertase. All values represent mean ± SE of three biological replicates (* p < 0.05)

Full size image

In sucrose metabolism, a total of 29 DEGs identified as invertase genes, including genes for vacuolar acid invertases (SAIs, 20 DEGs) and alkaline /neutral invertases (NIVs, 9 DEGs), were down-regulated, but 10 DEGs encoding sucrose synthase (SUSY) were up regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table S3). There were no change in the expression of sucrose phosphate synthase genes (Table S3). Consistently, significantly lower activity of SAI and NIV, but higher activity of SUSY was found in these tissues, with 77.9% reduction for SAI, 54.2% reduction for NIV but 40.8% increase for SUSY compared to that of the self-graft (Fig. 4b).

Key genes for biosynthesis of starch, amino acid and fatty acids were down regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table 1, Table S3). These included genes for starch synthase (8 DEGs, Table S3) and granule-bound starch synthase in starch biosynthesis; genes for 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate–homocysteine methyltransferase (metE), serine hydroxymethyltransferase and Shikimate pathway (DAHP synthase, 3-DHQase, aroK, aroC) in amino acid biosynthesis; genes for 3-oxoacyl-synthase II and fatty acyl-ACP thioesterase B in fatty acid biosynthesis (Table 1). In contrast, genes involved in degradation of these compounds were generally up-regulated, such as genes for α-amylase, NADP-specific glutamate dehydrogenase and enoyl-CoA hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Table 1).

Genes involved in phytohormone metabolism and signalling

Auxin-activated signalling pathway was enriched in the down-regulated DEGs (Fig. 3). A YUCCA gene encoding a flavin monooxygenase that converts indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) to indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) [24], was down regulated (Table 2). Other down-regulated auxin-related genes included an auxin efflux carrier PIN3 gene together with seven PIN-like genes (Table S3), two auxin influx carrier AUX/ LAX genes, two phytochrome-interacting factor 4 (PIF4) genes and an auxin response factor ARF gene (Table 2). By contrast, genes participating in auxin catabolism and homeostasis, including genes for 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase DAO and indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetase GH3.6 were up regulated (Table 2). The DEGs included groups of early auxin responsive genes, Aux/IAA (8 DEGs up, 6 DEGs down), Grechen Hagen GH3 (3 out of 4 down) and small auxin upregulated RNA (SAUR) genes (SAUR50, 1 DEG, up; SAUR21, 2 DEGs, down; SAUR36, 2 DEGs, down; Table S3).

Table 2 Genes involved in phytohormone metabolism and signalling
Full size table

Genes encoding gibberellin 20 oxidases (GA20oxs, 3 DEGs) converting GA12 or GA53 to GA9 or GA20, and genes encoding ent-kaurene oxidases (GA3s, 2 DEGs) catalyzing the oxidation of ent-kaurene to ent-kaurenoic acid [25], were down regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table 2). In contrast, genes encoding DELLA proteins (2 DEGs), and GID1b proteins (6 DEGs, Table S3), the GA receptors that interact with DELLA proteins [26], were upregulated.

Three isopentenyltransferase genes (IPTs) encoding the rate-limiting enzymes in cytokinin (CK) biosynthesis [27], together with genes encoding histidine-containing phosphotransfer proteins and the type B ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR (ARR), were up-regulated in stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table 2). A gene encoding transcription factor WUSCHEL, the downstream target of type-B ARRs [28], was highly upregulated (Fig. 2c).

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are growth-promoting steroid hormones regulating multiple aspects of physiological processes, and disruption in BR signalling is often characterized by profound morphological defect such as dwarfism [29]. Stem tissues on dwarfing rootstocks exhibited down-regulation in four genes participating in BR biosynthesis, including three brassinosteroid-6-oxidase genes and one CYP90A1 gene (Table 2). However, expression of most genes related to BR transduction was not significantly changed. Strigolactones are a group of carotenoid-derived hormones that control shoot branching and diverse aspects of plant growth [30]. The strigolactone biosynthetic genes, DWARF27 (5 DEGs) were highly down-regulated (log2FC ranged from -7.8 to -4.5) in stems on marang rootstocks (Fig. 2c; Table S3). The DWARF14 genes that encode the α/β-hydrolase protein receptors involved in both strigolactone perception and deactivation Seto et al. [31], were differentially regulated in these tissues (Table 2).

Of the stress-related hormones, genes related to key components in ethylene transduction were up regulated in stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table 2, Table S3). These included the upregulation of 3 DEGs encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidases (ACOs) and 20 DEGs encoding ethylene-responsive transcription factors, such as ERFs (6 DEGs), AP2/ERF (11 DEGs) and RAP2-3 (3 DEGs). In jasmonic acid (JA) signalling, genes encoding jasmonic acid-amino synthetases (JAR1, 5 DEGs) participating in the production of bioactive jasmonyl-L-isoleucine (JA-Ile), were up-regulated, while genes encoding jasmonate ZIM domain-containing proteins (JAZ, 3 DEGs), the negative regulators of JA signalling [26], were down-regulated in these tissues (Table 2). In salicylic acid (SA) signalling, two genes encoding isochorismate synthases, and a gene encoding salicylic acid 3-hydroxylase, an enzyme involved in biosynthesis of 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid [32], together with two PR-1 genes, were up-regulated in scions stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table 2).

A down-regulated gene encoding zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) was the only ABA biosynthetic gene detected in DEGs (Table 2). However, a total of 10 DEGs encoding abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylases, the enzyme involved in ABA catabolism [33], were down-regulated (Table S1). A gene encoding ABA responsive element binding factor (ABF) was down-regulated, along with genes encoding the basic leucine zippers (b-ZIP, 8 out of 11 DEGs, Table S4).

Genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis and cell expansion

Genes encoding cellulose synthase CesA1 (4 DEGs), CesA2 (3 DEGs), CesA3 (2 DEGs) and CesA6 (1 DEG) were down regulated in scions on marang rootstocks (Table 3). The down-regulated DEGs included three genes encoding xyloglucan galactosyltransferases (XLT2 or MUR3) participating in xyloglucan biosynthesis and two genes encoding xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolases (XTH6), the wall re-modellling enzymes [34]. There were 5 DEGs encoding galactan beta-1,4-galactosyltransferases, the pectin biosynthetic enzymes, and 11 DEGs encoding pectin acetylesterases, the enzymes involved in pectin deacetylation, all were down-regulated in these tissues (Table S3). The mannan endo-1,4-beta-mannosidase genes (2 DEGs) and the pectate lyase genes (17 DEGs) were also down-regulated (Table 3, Table S3). However, two DEGs encoding glucan endo-1,3-beta-glucosidases, the enzymes involved in degrading callose (ß-1,3 glulcan), were up-regulated.

Table 3 Genes involved in cell wall biosynthesis and cell expansion
Full size table

Expansin is a family of cell wall proteins that mediate the acid-induced cell expansion through their non-enzymatic cell wall loosening ability [34]. There were 29 DEGs identified as expansins, all were down-regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table S3). Five DEGs encoding the wall-associated receptor kinases (WAKs), a family of pectin receptors required for cell expansion [35], and 4 DEGs encoding the fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins (FLAs), were down-regulated in the same tissues (Table 3). Genes involved in cell separation and cell wall modification [34], such as the polygalacturonase (20 out of 21 DEGs) and pectinesterase genes (8 DEGs) were also down-regulated (Tale S2).

Genes involved in secondary metabolism

The phenylpropanoid pathway provides precursors for numerous secondary metabolites, including monolignols and flavonoids [36]. KEGG analysis indicated enrichment of the pathway in DEGs (Fig. 3). Specially, genes encoding p‐coumaroyl ester 3‐hydroxylases (C3′H, 3 DEGs) and quinate/shikimate p-hydroxycinnamoyltransferases (HCT, 5 DEGs) were down regulated in stems on marang rootstocks, while genes involved in the latter steps of the phenylpropanoid pathway were upregulated (Table 4, Fig. 5). The activity of both C3’H and HCT provides entry into the main lignin biosynthetic pathway leading to the formation of G‐ and S‐type monolignols [37]. Flavonoids are crucial for plant growth and stress tolerance. A total of 12 DEGs involved in flavonoid biosynthesis were upregulated (Table 4) in stems on dwarfing rootstocks. These included a chalcone synthase (CHS) gene involved in the first committed step in flavonoid biosynthesis [38], a bifunctional dihydroflavonol 4-reductase/flavanone 4-reductase gene participating in the late key step for the biosynthesis of anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins [38], a flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H) gene and an anthocyanidin synthase gene.

Table 4 Genes involved in secondary metabolism
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Differentially expressed genes in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways. RNA-sequencing data were analysed by KEGG. Up-regulated genes, red; down-regulated genes, green; [EC:1.14.11.61] feruloyl-CoA 6-hydroxylase; [EC:1.2.1.44] cinnamoyl-CoA reductase; [EC:1.1.1.195] cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase; [EC:2.1.1.104] caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; [EC:3.2.1.21] beta-glucosidase; [EC:1.2.1.68] coniferyl-aldehyde dehydrogenase; [EC:2.3.1.133] shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase; [EC:2.1.1.68] caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase; [EC:1.14.14.96] p-coumaroyl ester 3'-hydroxylase

Full size image

Genes involved in isoprenoid biosynthesis were generally down-regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks, such as genes encoding myrcene synthase, pinene synthase, squalene synthase and linalool synthase, together with 6 DEGs encoding ß-caryophyllene synthases / sesquiterpene synthases (Table 4, Table S3).

Genes involved in redox homeostasis and defense response

Large numbers of ROS-related genes were upregulated in scion stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table 5), such as the peroxidase (4 DEGs, one with logFC > 7), glutathione transferase GST23 (2 DEGs) and thioredoxin 1 (4 DEGs) genes. The upregulated DEGs also included a gene encoding a heme oxygenase (HO-1) involved in heme cleavage and production of biliverdin, a strong antioxidant cytoprotectant [39], and 2 genes encoding peroxygenases, a group of hydroperoxide-dependent oxygeneases involved in oxylipin production [40]. Key genes for biosynthesis of thiamine, a potent antioxidant, were also up-regulated in these tissues (Table 5, Table S3), including genes encoding thiamine thiazole synthases (THI1, 3 DEGs), cysteine-dependent adenosine diphosphate thiazole synthase (THi4, 1 DEG) and phosphomethylpyrimidine synthases (thiC, 8 DEGs).

Table 5 Genes involved in redox homeostasis and defense response
Full size table

Genes encoding key components in the MAPK cascade, calcium signalling and the NOD-like receptor signalling pathway were upregulated in stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table S4, Table S3). These included genes encoding the calmodulin-like protein CML29, the calcineurin B-like proteins, the cyclic nucleotide gated channels participating in stress-induced Ca2+ influx [41], the voltage-dependent anion channels, the serine/threonine-protein phosphatase 2B regulatory subunit (Table 5), along with large numbers of WRKY transcription factors (16 DEGs), the cathepsins family members (14 DEGs) and the basic endochitinase / chitinase family members (6 DEGs, Table S3). A total of 25 out of 28 DEGs identified as disease resistance (R) genes were upregulated in these tissues, including R gene candidate RGA (oases_423898 and trinity_250424), RPS2 (rnaspades_2531, rnaspades_118057), RPS5 (rnaspades_11681) and RPM1 (oases_397796, oases_397788 and oases_261017), and a total of 30 genes encoding subtilisin-like protease family members were deferentially expressed (Table S3).

Validation of DEGs using qRT-PCR

A random selection of 21 DEGs analysed above was validated by qRT-PCR. These relative expression levels were presented as log2FC (fold change of marang rootstocks vs. self-graft), and plotted against the log2FC value of each gene detected by the RNA-seq method (Fig. 6). The results showed both qRT-PCR and RNA-seq displayed similar expression patters for the genes tested, with the correlation coefficient, r = 0.9083, P < 0.01, indicating a high correlation between both methods.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Correlation of gene expression pattern between RNA-Sequencing and qRT-PCR

Full size image

Discussion

Breadfruit plants growing on marang rootstocks were characterised by significant inhibition in stem elongation growth leading to a dwarf phenotype with over 50% reduction in plant height (Table 1, also see [3]). Transcriptome analysis in scion stems showed these plants displayed down-regulation in key genes for biosynthesis of amino acids, lipids, and cell wall, reflecting a reduction in carbon utilisation for stem growth. In sink organs sucrose is hydrolysed by invertase and/or sucrose synthase in order to make hexose for energy production, metabolism and macromolecule biosynthesis [42]. The higher sucrose levels but lower hexose levels in stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Fig. 1) were consistent with the fact that these tissues exhibited significantly lower transcription and enzyme activity of both SAI and NIV (Fig. 4), reflecting a disruption in sucrose utilisation. The increase in the relative contribution of sucrose synthase to sucrose degradation as indicated by higher sucrose synthase activity (Fig. 4) may represent an adaptation strategy for energy conservation in these tissues, as conversion of sucrose to hexose phosphates via sucrose synthase uses only half the ATP needed for conversion via invertase [43]. However, the build-up of sucrose in these tissues suggests the gross increase in sucrose synthase activity is not able to compensate for the loss of hydrolysis. Furthermore, normal plant growth could be adversely impacted by the repression of SAIs that are associated with elongation growth [44, 45]. Reduction in SAI activity as a result of disruption in a WAK gene leads to loss of cell expansion [35]. Notably, four WAK genes were down regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table 3). Suppression of NIVs also leads to sever defects in cell elongation [43, 46].

High sucrose concentration has been shown to negatively regulate sucrose influx through repressing the transcription and activity of sucrose transporters [47,48,49]. Concurrently, a large array of genes encoding nutrient transporters/facilitators, including sugar transporters (SUT1, SUT4, SWEETs), amino acid transporters, choline transporters-like, K+ channels and aquaporins were down-regulated in scion stems on marang rootstocks (Table 1). Many nutrient transporters function as secondary active transporters coupled with proton electrochemical gradient generated by the activity of PM H+-ATPase. The down-regulation of these genes, together with the decreased activity of PM H+-ATPase (Fig. 4, also see [3]) could affect passage of nutrients (sucrose, hexose, amino acids) across cell membranes. Specifically, during the long-distance transport of sugars, SUTs or SWEETs together with K+ channel AKT2/3 facilitate sucrose retrieval to maintain the hydrostatic pressure along the phloem pathway [23, 50]. Sucrose unloading to stem tissues in woody species may also be impacted by SUTs that pay active role in sucrose release to adjacent phloem parenchyma cells and sucrose exchange between xylem and phloem cells [51, 52]. The subcellular compartmentation of sucrose could be impaired by the suppression of a gene encoding the tonoplast‐localized SUT4 that functions in retrieving sucrose from vacuole for downstream processing [53]. Furthermore, the symplastic transport could be impacted by the suppression of the choline transporter-like genes that are involved in plasmodesmata maturation and sieve plate development [54, 55]. The downregulation of these nutrient transporter genes, together with the decrease of invertase activity, point to the role of carbon partitioning in the development of dwarf phenotype on marang rootstocks.

PM H+-ATPase plays a central role in promoting cell expansion via the acid growth mechanism [56]. Scion stems on marang rootstocks displayed decreased PM ATPase activity accompanying with down-regulated genes for key players [34] involved in the acid growth mechanism. These included genes encoding invertases and K+ channel AKT1 that provide turgor pressure to drive cell expansion [35, 57], expansins, WAKs, and key enzymes for biosynthesis and re-modelling of cellulose, xyloglucans and pectins (Table 3, Table S3). It has been shown that transcript abundance of some FLAs is positively correlated with the onset of secondary-wall deposition and wood properties in xylem fibres of various tree species [58]. Noticeably, four FLAs were expressed at lower levels in stems on dwarfing rootstocks (Table 3). Consistent with the impact on secondary-cell wall, down-regulation of lignin biosynthetic genes, HCT and C3’H, was shown in these tissues (Table 4), suppression of HCT or C3’H limits the flux to coniferyl and sinapyl alcohols (Fig. 5), leading to decreased lignin content and stunted growth [37]. The down-regulation of lignin biosynthesis pathway in breadfruit scions on marang rootstocks is consistent with findings reported for scions of apple trees grafted on dwarfing rootstocks ‘M27’ and ‘M9’ [14].

Cell expansion could be inhibited by the down-regulation of the SAUR21 genes that regulate the activity of PM H+-ATPase [59]. Auxin biosynthesis could be suppressed by the down-regulated YUCCA gene that regulates a rate-limiting step in IAA biosynthesis via IPA pathway [24]. Polar auxin transport was likely disrupted by the down-regulation of both auxin efflux and influx carrier genes (Table 2). The results are consistent with the role of auxin in rootstock-induced dwarfing of other species [9, 13]. GA biosynthesis in scion stems on marang rootstocks could be inhibited by the down-regulation of both GA20oxs and GA3s. The results agree with our previous findings showing increased abundance of DELLA proteins, repressors of GA signalling, in the tissues [4]. Both the transcription of auxin efflux carrier PIN3 and the activity of PIFs could be inhibited by the over-accumulation of DELLA proteins [26, 60]. The up-regulation of the three CK biosynthetic genes, IPTs suggests the capacity of stem-localised synthesis of CK could be elevated to compensate for the under-supply of CK suggested from dwarfing rootstocks [9]. Transcription of IPTs could be mediated by the down-regulation of auxin signalling [27]. On the other hand, both auxin efflux and influx carriers are among the downstream targets of type-B ARRs [28]. The roles of strigolactones in breadfruit dwarfing could be suggested by the three strongly repressed DWARF27 genes (Table S3). Plants with disrupted DWARF27 display dwarf habit [30]. The down-regulation of genes encoding brassinosteroid-6-oxidases and CYP90A1 may suggest disruption in BR biosynthesis, as both proteins catalyse multiple oxidative conversions essential for BR biosynthesis, suppression at either brassinosteroid-6-oxidase or CYP90A1 gene exhibits severe dwarf phenotype with defective cell elongation and very short internodes [29].

The upregulated genes from stems on marang rootstocks were enriched for ROS-related genes and signalling pathways of SA, JA and ethylene. The upregulation of MAPK cascade, calcium signalling and the nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) proteins encoding by R genes has been described as an innate immune response in plant similar to the NOD-like receptor signalling used in animal for amplification of defence signals [61, 62]. While these pathways are often involved in quick and robust responses to stress signals such as activation of defense-related genes, localized programmed cell death and stress adaptation, growth inhibition is often observed as a trade-off in plants with strong defense response [62]. Repression of auxin signalling has been demonstrated as part of the SA-mediated response [63]. The JAZ repressors in the JA signalling pathway interact with DELLA proteins to prioritize defense over growth [26]. The NOD-like innate immune response was also shown to suppress growth through DELLA stabilization [64]. Suppression of lignin biosynthetic gene HCT was shown to trigger SA signalling pathway [65]. On the other hand, repression of lignin biosynthesis has been linked to the redirection of metabolic flux toward flavonoids [66, 67]. Flavonoids are natural inhibitors of auxin transport [68]. Sucrose also induces the accumulation of anthocyanin (a kind of flavonoids) [69, 70], and this induction was found to be positively mediated by DELLA proteins which was also stabilized by sucrose [71]. Sucrose acts on carbon partitioning and regulation of phloem transport [47, 49], also interacts with various hormones such as GA, JA and SA signalling [72]. Therefore, disruption in the efficient invertase-mediated conversion of sucrose to glucose and fructose, not only limits nutrient and energy supply, but also disrupts the complex hormone interaction and the crosstalk between growth and defence.

Conclusion

Combined RNA-seq transcriptomic profiles and biochemical analysis suggest breadfruit plants growing on marang rootstocks exhibit disruption in nutrient transport and sucrose utilization for stem elongation growth. Decrease in the activity of PM-H + -ATPase, in combination with the down-regulation of genes encoding various cell wall proteins and enzymes involved in turgor regulation, biosynthesis/re-modelling of cellulose, xyloglucans, pectins, and lignin is proposed to impair cell expansion and cell wall biosynthesis of both primary and secondary cells, leading to a dwarf phenotype. Auxin and GA signalling pathways, together with brassinosteroid and strigolactone biosynthetic genes dominated the differentially down-regulated genes, suggesting disruption of these transduction networks play a role in the rootstock-included dwarfing. The large numbers of upregulated genes involved in defence response, including stress-related hormone signalling pathways, the MAPK cascade and the NOD-like receptor signalling, are proposed to suppress plant growth, and contribute to the development of dwarf phenotype.

Rootstock-induced dwarfing is a complex mechanism. Our results support that networks of multiple pathways integrated with carbon partitioning disrupt the balance of growth and defence leading to inhibition of cell elongation growth. Assessment for the long-term effect of marang rootstocks on breadfruit phenotype is required in the future. The valuable gene resource generated in the current work can help facilitate the functional study and continuous characterisation of the underlying molecular processes involved in the interspecific scion/rootstock interaction that leads to breadfruit dwarfing. Furthermore, the information provides opportunity to design screening strategies to assist in breeding and selection of potential size-controlling rootstocks. Although in orchard practice, breadfruit tree height may be controlled though the use of plant growth retardants, such as paclobutrazol [73], for woody species, this generally involves a long-term, repeated application of these chemicals in order to achieve effective tree-size reduction. Development and characterisation of dwarfing rootstocks provides a sustainable solution to breadfruit tree vigor control.

Methods

Plant materials

Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis cv. Noli) and marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) plants were obtained from a commercial nursery at Cairns, northern Queensland. Breadfruit plants, as rooted cuttings, and marang plants as seedlings, were grown under glasshouse condition at 25–28 °C with natural daylight and daily water supply. Plants were grown in pots containing vermiculite and soil mixture as described previously [3]. Breadfruit scions selected from plants of 30 ~ 50 cm tall were grafted onto marang seedlings of similar sizes through approach grafting [74]. As a control, breadfruit scions were also grafted onto breadfruit rootstocks of the same cultivar (self-graft). Each established grafted plant was transferred to an 85-Litre pot six months after grafting, and continued to grow under the same condition. For growth comparison, the own-rooted breadfruit plants (non-graft) were also grown alongside under the same condition.

Growth parameters including elongation rate of scion main stems and branches, final scion height, scion stem diameter, node number, branch number, internode length, leaf size and leaf number, were examined at 26 months after grafting as previously described [3]. Ratio of stem diameter above and below graft union was calculated from the stem circumference measured at 5 cm above and below the graft union. Leaf characters, including leaf colour and vein colour, shape of leaf base, apex and margin, and lobe number were also examined at the same time. Three fully expanded leaves (source leaves) of each biological replicate were selected for measurement of chlorophyll concentration. Three circular disks were punched from each leaf and immediately extracted with 96% ethanol. Concentration of chlorophyll a and b was calculated from the absorbance at 648 nm and 664 nm according to the method of Lichtenthaler [9]. Assessment of graft compatibility was carried out every 12 months in the period from 3 to 26 months after grafting. Results from two independent trials (each with 8 replicates for each graft combination from the start) were recorded as 1-year and 2-year graft compatibility rates out of the survivals at 3 months after grafting. Collected data from different rootstocks were tested with Fisher’s exact test. Only compatible grafts were used for down-stream analysis, including growth comparison, biochemical and gene expression analysis. Plants displaying graft compatibility were defined as showing active growth with progressive development of new internodes from apical buds or axillary buds, and continuous emergence of green leaves from the apex (Figure S1). Visual inspection of graft union revealed no fissure across all grafts. Anatomy examination of graft interface was further carried out on three interspecific grafts at 26 months, after their internode and leaf samples were collected for downstream assay. To achieve this, graft unions were sawed to reveal both the cross-sections and longitudinal sections. Graft incompatibility was visually evaluated using a five-category rating (from A to E) according to Mosse and Herrero [22]. Category A represented a perfect union with the graft line between bark and wood hardly visible. Category B indicated good unions, with continuous bark and wood, although the line of union in the wood was often distinguished by excessive ray formation. Category C was characterized by bark discontinuities and category D by vascular wood discontinuities. Category E involved breakage of graft unions [22].

Non-structural carbohydrate analysis

Upon removal from plants, stem tissues at the second internode sections were snap-frozen in liquid N2. Thereafter, soluble sugars of each stem sample (50 mg) were triple-extracted in 80% ethanol at 60 °C for 2 h. Supernatants were evaporated and dissolved in sterile water. Levels of soluble sugars were determined enzymatically, with glucose and fructose according to D-Fructose/D-Glucose Assay Kit (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland), and sucrose according to Birnberg and Brenner [75]. The pellets of ethanol extraction were resuspended in 0.1 N NaOH and boiled for 30 min. After adjusting the pH to 5, starch was digested overnight at 50 °C with 1000 U of amyloglucosidase and 20 U of α-amylase, and determined enzymatically for glucose units according to a starch-determination kit (Megazyme, Bray, Ireland).

Enzyme assay

For the extraction of sucrose-metabolizing enzymes, fresh stem tissues (0.5 g) of the second internodes counted from the top were immediately frozen and ground to powder under liquid N2, homogenized with 1.5 mL extraction buffer following the procedure of Mirajkar et al. [76]. The activity of invertase was measured at 37 °C by adding 50 µL of dialysed enzyme to an assay mix containing 90 mM sodium acetate buffer pH 4.5 (acid invertase) or pH 7.5 (neutral invertase), and 60 mM sucrose as previously described [76]. Glucose assay was then performed as above. One unit of invertase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that formed 1 µmol of glucose in 1 min under the assay condition. The activity of sucrose synthase was measured according to Tomlinson et al. [77]. Fructose assay was then performed as above. Sucrose synthase activity was expressed in µmol fructose min−1 mg−1 Protein. For extraction of plasma membrane H+-ATPase, microsomal fraction was prepared from the same stem tissues following a previous protocol [74]. ATP hydrolytic activity was measured at 38 °C with microsomal suspension added into a reaction mix [50 mM Tris-MES, pH 6.5 with 3 mM Tris-ATP, 50 mM KCl, 3 mM MgSO4, 0.5 mM ammonium molybdate, 50 mM KNO3 and 0.1% (w/w) Triton X-100], followed by inorganic phosphate assay as previously described [74]. The activity of vanadate-sensitive ATPase was calculated from the difference between activities in the absence and presence of 1 mM Na3VO4. Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford [78].

RNA isolation, cDNA-library construction and Illumina sequencing

RNA extraction for transcriptomic profiling was performed from the main stems of breadfruit scions at 22 months after grafting. A stem section at the second internode of each grafted plant was sampled as one biological replicate. Three replicates were performed for each graft combination. Upon removal from plants, stem tissues were immediately immersed in RNAlater (Life Technologies, Australia), before stored at -80 °C. Total RNA was extracted by using RNeasy kit with on-column DNase digestion (Qiagen, Australia). Since there was no reference genome for breadfruit species, a reference library was prepared at the same time to assist de novo assembly. To achieve this, a mixed RNA library was generated with equal combination of total RNA of stem sections at the apex, and of every internode from the top to the sixth internode of each replicate. Total RNA quality was verified by the integrity of the 25S and 18S RNA with an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, USA). cDNA libraries were prepared using a TruSeq® Stranded Total RNA Library preparation kit with Ribo-Zero Plant (Illumina, USA) and indexed with unique nucleic acid identifiers (Illumina TruSeq V2 index sequence). All the indexed cDNA libraries were pooled to generate one multiplexed sample for one lane of a SP flow cell (Illumina, USA). An unequal sample pooling was performed so that the reference library took half of the lane, and the six libraries (three from marang rootstocks and three from the self-graft) evenly shared another half of the lane. The final mixed cDNA pool was sequenced using 150 bp paired-end sequencing strategy on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Ramaciotti Centre for Genomics, University of New South Wales, Sydney).

De novo assembly and annotation of transcriptome library

Filtered reads from cDNA libraries were pooled and assembled de novo into contigs by Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF, Brisbane) following the protocol described by Cerveau and Jackson [79]. Briefly, three independent assemblies were performed with Trinity (k-mer = 55 [80]), Oases (k-mer = 53, 63, 73 [81]) and rnaSPAdes (k-mer = 55, 77 [82]). Results from each assembly were clustered with CD-HIT-EST with parameters: -G 0 –c 1.00 –aS 1.00 –aL 0.005 [83] and representative transcripts from each assembly were pooled. Transdecoder [84] was used to extract open reading frames (ORF) longer than 100 amino acids. The coding sequences were further clustered using CD-HIT-EST with parameters: -c 0.98 -G 0 -M 16,000 -T 16 -aS 1.0 -aL 0.05 [83]. Representative coding sequences were used for annotation in downstream analysis and the contigs where they originated were used as the final transcriptome assembly. Benchmarking Universal Single-Copy Orthologs (BUSCO) was used to identify universal single copy orthologs and to estimate the completeness of the assembly. Reads were mapped back to the assembly to assess mapping efficiency.

Peptide sequences obtained from the final transcriptome assembly were used for functional annotation using software InterProScan v5.28–67.0 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/). KEGG annotation was carried out in KAAS (https://www.genome.jp/tools/kaas/). Additionally, assembled unigene sequences were annotated by alignment to the public databases: NCBI nr (non-redundant, see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih); Swissprot (http://www.uniprot.org/), and COG (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) with a threshold of e ≤ 10–5. A BLAST search was also performed against the genome of Morus indica L. (Moraceae), the most related species with a well-annotated and publicly available genome sequence in NCBI database.

Differential gene expression and pathway analysis

EdgeR package v. 3.16.5 (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/edgeR.html) was used to perform differential expression analysis. Only genes displaying at least 1 cpm (count per million reads) in any 3 samples were retained for further analysis. A generalized linear model (GLM) was used to perform differential expression comparison between the groups. Genes were considered differentially expressed if their FDR < 0.05 and |log2 fold change|≥ 1. R package topGO v2.36.0 (https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/topGO.html) was used to perform pathway analysis on differentially expressed genes. Analysis of Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment was tested by Fisher’s exact test.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Aliquots of RNA samples were converted to cDNA with SuperScript reverse transcriptase and oligo(dT) (Life Technologies, Australia). Real-time PCR was performed on a Corbett Research Rotor-Gene 6000 cycler with the QuantiFast SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Australia) as previously described [4]. Thermocycling was initiated with a 5-min incubation at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles (95 °C for 10 s; 60 °C for 30 s). The specificity of amplification was confirmed by high-resolution melt curve analysis at the end of each run. The efficiency of each primer set (see Table S4 for primer sequences) was evaluated by standard curves using serial dilutions of cDNA samples. Each reaction was carried out in duplicate (technical repeat) with non-reverse-transcribed cDNA (RT–) as negative controls (non-template control). Four housekeeping gene candidates, elongation factor 1-a, actin, α-tubulin and γ-tubulin were tested for stability in scion stem tissue as previously described [4]. The expression of each gene was an average of three biological replicates.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analysis of all data was performed in SPSS (IBM Statistics version 24). Significant differences related to growth rate, stem height and diameter, metabolite concentration, enzyme activity and gene expression levels were tested using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test at P < 0.05. Significant differences in number of nodes, branches and leaves were tested with Kruskal–Wallis test. Pathway enrichment and significant differences of 1-year and 2-year compatibility rates were tested by Fisher’s exact test.

Availability of data and materials

The raw reads of RNA-sequencing and the de novo assembly of the reference transcriptome library supporting this article are available in NCBI BioProject database (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/bioproject/SUB8554792/overview) with accession number: PRJNA679862. Lists of differentially expressed genes related to scion stems are provided in Supplementary Table S3.

References

  1. Jones AMP, Ragone D, Tavana NG, Bernotas DW, Murch SJ. Beyond the bounty: breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) for food security and novel foods in the 21st century. Ethnobot Res Appl. 2011;9:129–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou Y, Taylor MB, Underhill SJR. Dwarfing of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) trees: opportunities and challenges. Am J Exp Agric. 2014;4:1743–63.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou Y, Underhill SJR. A dwarf phenotype identified in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) plants growing on marang (A. odoratissimus) rootstocks. Horticulturae. 2019;5:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Underhill SJR. Expression of gibberellin metabolism genes and signalling components in dwarf phenotype of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) plants growing on marang (Artocarpus odoratissimus) rootstocks. Plants (Basel). 2020;9:634.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Soumelidou K, Battey NH, John P, Barnett JR. The anatomy of the developing bud union and its relationship to dwarfing in apple. Ann Bot. 1994;74(6):605–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Basile B, Marsal J, Solar LI, Tyree MT, Bryla DR, Dejong TM. Hydraulic conductance of peach trees grafted on rootstocks with differing size-controlling potentials. J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2003;78(6):768–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Atkinson CJ, Else MA, Taylor L, Dover CJ. Root and stem hydraulic conductivity as determinants of growth potential in grafted trees of apple (Malus pumila Mill.). J Exp Biol. 2003;54(385):1221–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Olmstead MA, Lang NS, Lang GA. Carbohydrate profiles in the graft union of young sweet cherry trees grown on dwarfing and vigorous rootstocks. Sci Hortic. 2010;124(1):78–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lochard RG, Schneider GW. Stock and scion growth relationships and the dwarfing mechanism in apple. Hortic Rev. 1981;3:315–75.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tworkoski T, Fazio G. Hormone and growth interactions of scions and size-controlling rootstocks of young apple trees. Plant Growth Regul. 2016;78(1):105–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. van Hooijdonk B, Woolley D, Warrington I, Tustin S. Rootstocks modify scion architecture, endogenous hormones, and root growth of newly grafted ‘Royal Gala’ apple trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2011;136(2):93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Richards D, Thompson WK, Pharis RP. The influence of dwarfing interstocks on the distribution and metabolism of xylem-applied [3H]gibberellin A4 in apple. Plant physiol. 1986;82(4):1090–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Hooijdonk BM, Woolley DJ, Warrington IJ, Tustin DS. Initial alteration of scion architecture by dwarfing apple rootstocks may involve shoot-root-shoot signalling by auxin, gibberellin, and cytokinin. J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2010;85(1):59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Foster TM, McAtee PA, Waite CN, Boldingh HL, McGhie TK. Apple dwarfing rootstocks exhibit an imbalance in carbohydrate allocation and reduced cell growth and metabolism. Hortic Res. 2017;4:17009–17009.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory P, Atkinson C, Bengough A, Else M, Fernández-Fernández F, Harrison R, Schmidt S. Contributions of roots and rootstocks to sustainable, intensified crop production. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:1209–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pina A, Cookson S, Calatayud A, Trinchera A, Errea P. Physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying graft compatibility. In: Colla G, Perez-Alfocea F, Schwarz D, editors. Vegetable grafting: principles and practices. Cambridge: CAB International; 2017. p. 132–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Baron D, Esteves Amaro AC, Pina A, Ferreira G. An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species. Sci Hortic. 2019;243:84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gautier AT, Chambaud C, Brocard L, Ollat N, Gambetta GA, Delrot S, Cookson SJ. Merging genotypes: graft union formation and scion-rootstock interactions. J Exp Bot. 2019;70(3):747–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zarrouk O, Gogorcena Y, Moreno MA, Pinochet J. Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and prunus rootstocks. HortScience. 2006;41(6):1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Reig G, Salazar A, Zarrouk O, Forcada CFI, Val J, Moreno MA. Long-term graft compatibility study of peach-almond hybrid and plum based rootstocks budded with European and Japanese plums. Sci Hortic. 2019;243:392–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tedesco S, Pina A, Fevereiro P, Kragler F. A phenotypic search on graft compatibility in grapevine. Agronomy. 2020;10(5):706–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosse B, Herrero J. Studies on incompatibility between some pear and quince grafts. J Hortic Sci. 1951;26(3):238–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Milne RJ, Grof CP, Patrick JW. Mechanisms of phloem unloading: shaped by cellular pathways, their conductances and sink function. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018;43:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kasahara H. Current aspects of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2016;80(1):34–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hedden P, Phillips A. Gibberellin metabolism: new insights revealed by the genes. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:523–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Davière JM, Achard P. A pivotal role of DELLAs in regulating multiple hormone signals. Mol Plant. 2016;9(1):10–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Showk S, Ruonala R, Helariutta Y. Crossing paths: cytokinin signalling and crosstalk. Development. 2013;140(7):1373–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zubo YO, Schaller GE. Role of the cytokinin-activated type-B response regulators in hormone crosstalk. Plants. 2020;9(2):166.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujioka S, Yokota T. Biosynthesis and metabolism of brassinosteroids. Annu Rev Plant biol. 2003;54:137–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin H, Wang R, Qian Q, Yan M, Meng X, Fu Z, Yan C, Jiang B, Su Z, Li J, et al. DWARF27, an iron-containing protein required for the biosynthesis of strigolactones, regulates rice tiller bud outgrowth. Plant Cell. 2009;21(5):1512–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seto Y, Yasui R, Kameoka H, Tamiru M, Cao M, Terauchi R, Sakurada A, Hirano R, Kisugi T, Hanada A, et al. Strigolactone perception and deactivation by a hydrolase receptor DWARF14. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):191.

  32. Zhang Y, Zhao L, Zhao J, Li Y, Wang J, Guo R, Gan S, Liu C-J, Zhang K. S5H/DMR6 encodes a salicylic acid 5-hydroxylase that fine-tunes salicylic acid homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 2017;175(3):1082–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Finkelstein R. Abscisic acid synthesis and response. Arabidopsis Book. 2013;11:e0166–e0166.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Majda M, Robert S. The role of auxin in cell wall expansion. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(4):951.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kohorn BD, Kobayashi M, Johansen S, Riese J, Huang LF, Koch K, Fu S, Dotson A, Byers N. An Arabidopsis cell wall-associated kinase required for invertase activity and cell growth. Plant J. 2006;46(2):307–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xie M, Zhang J, Tschaplinski TJ, Tuskan GA, Chen J-G, Muchero W. Regulation of lignin biosynthesis and its role in growth-defense tradeoffs. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Vanholme R, Demedts B, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W. Lignin biosynthesis and structure. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(3):895–905.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Halbwirth H. The creation and physiological relevance of divergent hydroxylation patterns in the flavonoid pathway. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(2):595–621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shekhawat GS, Verma K. Haem oxygenase (HO): an overlooked enzyme of plant metabolism and defence. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(9):2255–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hanano A, Bessoule J-J, Heitz T, Blée E. Involvement of the caleosin/peroxygenase RD20 in the control of cell death during Arabidopsis responses to pathogens. Plant Signal Behav. 2015;10(4):e991574–e991574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kaplan B, Sherman T, Fromm H. Cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(12):2237–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruan Y-L, Jin Y, Yang Y-J, Li G-J, Boyer JS. Sugar input, metabolism, and signaling mediated by invertase: roles in development, yield potential, and response to drought and heat. Mol Plant. 2010;3(6):942–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Barratt DHP, Derbyshire P, Findlay K, Pike M, Wellner N, Lunn J, Feil R, Simpson C, Maule AJ, Smith AM. Normal growth of Arabidopsis requires cytosolic invertase but not sucrose synthase. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(31):13124–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sergeeva LI, Keurentjes JJB, Bentsink L, Vonk J, van der Plas LHW, Koornneef M, Vreugdenhil D. Vacuolar invertase regulates elongation of Arabidopsis thaliana roots as revealed by QTL and mutant analysis. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(8):2994–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang L, Li X-R, Lian H, Ni D-A, He Y-K, Chen X-Y, Ruan Y-L. Evidence that high activity of vacuolar invertase is required for cotton fiber and arabidopsis root elongation through osmotic dependent and independent pathways, respectively. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(2):744–56.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Welham T, Pike J, Horst I, Flemetakis E, Katinakis P, Kaneko T, Sato S, Tabata S, Perry J, Parniske M, et al. A cytosolic invertase is required for normal growth and cell development in the model legume. Lotus japonicus J Exp Bot. 2009;60(12):3353–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Vaughn MW, Harrington GN, Bush DR. Sucrose-mediated transcriptional regulation of sucrose symporter activity in the phloem. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(16):10876–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Chiou T-J, Bush DR. Sucrose is a signal molecule in assimilate partitioning. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1998;95(8):4784–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou Y, Chan K, Wang T, Hedley C, Offler C, Patrick J. Intracellular sucrose communicates metabolic demand to sucrose transporters in developing pea cotyledons. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:71–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Deeken R, Geiger D, Fromm J, Koroleva O, Ache P, Langenfeld-Heyser R, Sauer N, May ST, Hedrich R. Loss of the AKT2/3 potassium channel affects sugar loading into the phloem of Arabidopsis. Planta. 2002;216(2):334–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Decourteix M, Alves G, Bonhomme M, Peuch M, Ben Baaziz K, Brunel N, Guilliot A, Rageau R, Améglio T, Pétel G, et al. Sucrose (JrSUT1) and hexose (JrHT1 and JrHT2) transporters in walnut xylem parenchyma cells: their potential role in early events of growth resumption. Tree Physiol. 2008;28(2):215–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tang C, Huang D, Yang J, Liu S, Sakr S, Li H, Zhou Y, Qin Y. The sucrose transporter HbSUT3 plays an active role in sucrose loading to laticifer and rubber productivity in exploited trees of Hevea brasiliensis (para rubber tree). Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(10):1708–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Payyavula RS, Tay KHC, Tsai C-J, Harding SA. The sucrose transporter family in Populus: the importance of a tonoplast PtaSUT4 to biomass and carbon partitioning. Plant J. 2011;65(5):757–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kraner ME, Link K, Melzer M, Ekici AB, Uebe S, Tarazona P, Feussner I, Hofmann J, Sonnewald U. Choline transporter-like1 (CHER1) is crucial for plasmodesmata maturation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2017;89(2):394–406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Dettmer J, Ursache R, Campilho A, Miyashima S, Belevich I, O’Regan S, Mullendore DL, Yadav SR, Lanz C, Beverina L, et al. CHOLINE TRANSPORTER-LIKE1 is required for sieve plate development to mediate long-distance cell-to-cell communication. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Falhof A, Pedersen JT, Fuglsang AT, Palmgren M. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase regulation in the center of plant physiology. Mol Plant. 2016;9:323–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Philippar K, Ivashikina N, Ache P, Christian M, Lüthen H, Palme K, Hedrich R. Auxin activates KAT1 and KAT2, two K+-channel genes expressed in seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2004;37(6):815–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. MacMillan CP, Mansfield SD, Stachurski ZH, Evans R, Southerton SG. Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan proteins: specialization for stem biomechanics and cell wall architecture in Arabidopsis and Eucalyptus. Plant J. 2010;62(4):689–703.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Spartz AK, Ren H, Park MY, Grandt KN, Lee SH, Murphy AS, Sussman MR, Overvoorde PJ, Gray WM. SAUR inhibition of PP2C-D phosphatases activates plasma membrane H+-ATPases to promote cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26(5):2129–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Willige BC, Isono E, Richter R, Zourelidou M, Schwechheimer C. Gibberellin regulates PIN-FORMED abundance and is required for auxin transport-dependent growth and development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2011;23(6):2184–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Ryan CA, Huffaker A, Yamaguchi Y. New insights into innate immunity in Arabidopsis. Cell Microbiol. 2007;9(8):1902–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Huot B, Yao J, Montgomery BL, He SY. Growth–defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol Plant. 2014;7(8):1267–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wang D, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Culler AH, Dong X. Salicylic acid inhibits pathogen growth in plants through repression of the auxin signaling pathway. Curr Biol. 2007;17(20):1784–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Navarro L, Bari R, Achard P, Lisón P, Nemri A, Harberd NP, Jones JDG. DELLAs control plant immune responses by modulating the balance of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid signaling. Curr Biol. 2008;18(9):650–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Gallego-Giraldo L, Escamilla-Trevino L, Jackson LA, Dixon RA. Salicylic acid mediates the reduced growth of lignin down-regulated plants. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(51):20814–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Besseau S, Hoffmann L, Geoffroy P, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Legrand M. Flavonoid accumulation in Arabidopsis repressed in lignin synthesis affects auxin transport and plant growth. Plant Cell. 2007;19(1):148–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Mouradov A, Spangenberg G. Flavonoids: a metabolic network mediating plants adaptation to their real estate. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:620–620.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Brown DE, Rashotte AM, Murphy AS, Normanly J, Tague BW, Peer WA, Taiz L, Muday GK. Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(2):524–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Solfanelli C, Poggi A, Loreti E, Alpi A, Perata P. Sucrose-specific induction of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(2):637–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Xie Y, Tan H, Ma Z, Huang J. DELLA proteins promote anthocyanin biosynthesis via sequestering MYBL2 and JAZ suppressors of the MYB/bHLH/WD40 complex in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant. 2016;9(5):711–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Li Y, Van Den Ende W, Rolland F. Sucrose induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis is mediated by della. Mol Plant. 2014;7:570–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Tauzin AS, Giardina T. Sucrose and invertases, a part of the plant defense response to the biotic stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:293–293.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Zhou Y, Underhill S. Breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) gibberellin 2-oxidase genes in stem elongation and abiotic stress response. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;98:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhou Y, Underhill SJR. Plasma membrane H -ATPase activity and graft success of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) onto interspecific rootstocks of marang (A. odoratissimus) and pedalai (A. sericicarpus). Plant Biol. 2018;20(6):978–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Birnberg PR, Brenner ML. A one-step enzymatic assay for sucrose with sucrose phosphorylase. Anal Biochem. 1984;142:556–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Mirajkar SJ, Suprasanna P, Vaidya ER. Spatial distribution and dynamics of sucrose metabolising enzymes in radiation induced mutants of sugarcane. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;100:85–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Tomlinson KL, McHugh S, Labbe H, Grainger JL, James LE, Pomeroy KM, Mullin JW, Miller SS, Dennis DT, Miki BLA. Evidence that the hexose-to-sucrose ratio does not control the switch to storage product accumulation in oilseeds: analysis of tobacco seed development and effects of overexpressing apoplastic invertase. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(406):2291–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitative microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Cerveau N, Jackson DJ. Combining independent de novo assemblies optimizes the coding transcriptome for nonconventional model eukaryotic organisms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016;17(1):525.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Schulz MH, Zerbino DR, Vingron M, Birney E. Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(8):1086–92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Bushmanova E, Antipov D, Lapidus A, Prjibelski AD. rnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data. GigaScience. 2019;8(9):giz100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Fu L, Niu B, Zhu Z, Wu S, Li W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(23):3150–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Haas BJ, Papanicolaou A, Yassour M, Grabherr M, Blood PD, Bowden J, Couger MB, Eccles D, Li B, Lieber M, et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(8):1494–512.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Plant Pathology and Horticulture group at Ecosciences Precinct, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, provided continuous laboratory support. The authors are indebted to the Reviewers whose comments improved the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Australia Centre for International Agriculture Research (ACIAR) through project HORT 2014/077.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Centre for Pacific Islands Research, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD, 4556, Australia

    Yuchan Zhou & Steven J. R. Underhill

  2. Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia

    Yuchan Zhou & Steven J. R. Underhill

Authors
  1. Yuchan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven J. R. Underhill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and project design, YZ and SU; methodology, YZ; investigation and data analysis, YZ; draft of manuscript, YZ; revive and review, Y.Z. and S.J.R.U. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuchan Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1

. Morphological assessment of breadfruit plants growing on different rootstocks*. The 1-year and 2-year compatibility rates represent mean ± SD of two independent trials, each with eight biological replicates in each graft combination from the start. All other values represent mean ± SE of six biological replicates. Values with different letters from the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05). * Final measurement at 26 months after grafting.

Additional file 2: Table S2

. de novo transcriptome assembly metrics.

Additional file 3: Table S3

. Gene annotation and expression levels showing all differentially expressed genes (FDR < 0.05 and |logFC| ≥1)*. *LogFC, Log2-fold change of expression from samples on marang rootstocks vs those on self-graft; FDR, adjusted p-value for multiple hypothesis testing; logCPM, average log count for the gene across all samples; F, quasi-likelihood F-statistic for genes across all samples; C1-C3, raw gene counts for replicates of self-graft control; T1-T3, raw gene counts for replicates on marang rootstocks.

Additional file 4: Table S4

. Quantitative real-time PCR primers.

Additional file 5: Figure S1

. Representatives of graft-compatible phenotype of breadfruit plants growing on marang rootstocks (a) and self-graft (b) in the period from 3 months to 26 months after grafting.

Additional file 6: Figure S2

. Representative images of longitudinal and cross sections through a graft union of breadfruit scion grafted on marang rootstock. a) Graft union from approach graft; b) Longitudinal section of a graft union; c) Cross-section of a graft union. Graft lines are indicated by arrows.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Underhill, S.J.R. Differential transcription pathways associated with rootstock-induced dwarfing in breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) scions. BMC Plant Biol 21, 261 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03013-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03013-6

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us