Open Access

Two homolog wheat Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY - like kinases are involved in brassinosteroid signaling

  • Thomas Bittner1,
  • Sabine Nadler1,
  • Eija Schulze1 and
  • Christiane Fischer-Iglesias1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Plant Biology201515:247

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0617-z

Received: 18 August 2015

Accepted: 16 September 2015

Published: 13 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases (GSKs) are multifunctional non-receptor ser/thr kinases. Plant GSKs are involved in hormonal signaling networks and are required for growth, development, light as well as stress responses. So far, most studies have been carried out on Arabidopsis or on other eudicotyledon GSKs. Here, we evaluated the role of TaSK1 and TaSK2, two homolog wheat (Triticum aestivum) GSKs, in brassinosteroid signaling. We explored in addition the physiological effects of brassinosteroids on wheat growth and development.

Results

A bin2-1 like gain-of-function mutation has been inserted respectively in one of the homoeologous gene copies of TaSK1 (TaSK1-A.2-1) and in one of the homoeologous gene copies of TaSK2 (TaSK2-A.2-1). Arabidopsis plants were transformed with these mutated gene copies. Severe dwarf phenotypes were obtained closely resembling those of Arabidopsis bin2-1 lines and Arabidopsis BR-deficient or BR-signaling mutants. Expression of BR downstream genes, SAUR-AC1, CPD and BAS1 was deregulated in TaSK1.2-1 and TaSK2.2-1 transgenic lines. Severe dwarf lines were partially rescued by Bikinin beforehand shown to inhibit TaSK kinase activity. This rescue was accompanied with changes in BR downstream gene expression levels. Wheat embryos and seedlings were treated with compounds interfering with BR signaling or modifying BR levels to gain insight into the role of brassinosteroids in wheat development. Embryonic axis and scutellum differentiation were impaired, and seedling growth responses were affected when embryos were treated with Epibrassinolides, Propiconazole, and Bikinin.

Conclusions

In view of our findings, TaSKs are proposed to be involved in BR signaling and to be orthologous of Arabidopsis Clade II GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinases. Observed effects of Epibrassinolide, Propiconazole and Bikinin treatments on wheat embryos and seedlings indicate a role for BR signaling in embryonic patterning and seedling growth.

Keywords

GSK-3/SHAGGY-like kinases Triticum aestivum Brassinosteroids Embryonic patterning Seedling growth response

Background

Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3)/SHAGGY (SGG)-like-kinases regulate a broad range of fundamental biological processes in eukaryotes. Land plant GSKs are involved in flower, embryonic, stomata development, as well as in light and stress responses [15]. Plant GSKs in contrast to animal GSKs are encoded by a multigene family and have been grouped into four major clades [68].

Five out of 10 Arabidopsis GSKs (ASKs) are key signaling players in the brassinosteroid (BR) pathway. These ASKs are the three clade II ASKs, ASKiota, ASKdzeta and ASKeta/BIN2 (BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 2), the clade III ASKtheta and the clade I ASKgamma [915].

These kinases act as negative regulators of BR signaling pathway [10]. BIN2 phosphorylates BR response transcription factors BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR1 (BES1) and BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT1 (BZR1) to influence their subcellular localization [16, 17], to target BZR1 for protein degradation [18], and to impact both binding to target promoters and transcriptional activity of BES1 [12]. BES1 and BZR1 regulate the expression of numerous BR target genes leading to a whole range of BR physiological responses [19]. They influence also the expression of genes involved in other signaling pathways such as auxin and GA signaling [19].

BIN2 kinase activity and protein level are negatively regulated by BR signaling through respectively dephosphorylation of a conserved tyrosine residue and proteasome mediated protein degradation [13, 20]. The study on BIN2 kinase inactivation has closed the gap in the understanding of BR signaling from the perception of BR to the inactivation of BIN2. Indeed, upon its phosphorylation by the BR receptor kinase BRI1 (BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1), BSK1 (BR-SIGNALING KINASE 1) is released from the receptor complex and interacts with BSU1 (BRI SUPPRESSOR 1) phosphatase [13]. Binding of activated BSU1 to BIN2 is proposed to lead to the dephosphorylation of the conserved Tyr 200 and inactivation of BIN2 [13].

Two homolog wheat (Triticum aestivum) GSKs called TaSK1/TaSK2, having 88 % identity at the protein level were identified and characterized in a previous study [8]. Sequence alignment and chromosome localization using nullisomic-tetrasomic lines substantiate three expressed gene copies TaSK1-A,B,C and TaSK2-A,B,C located on homoeolog chromosomes i.e., related chromosoms deriving from different genomes of allopolyploid species. Identity at the protein level among the three TaSK1 homoeologs and among the three TaSK2 homoeologs was in both cases higher than 98 % [8]. Analysis of predicted protein sequence pointed out a clear GSK3/SGG signature for TaSK1 and TaSK2 [8]. In vitro kinase assays showed that both were functionally active kinases [8]. Phylogenetic analysis of land plant GSKs indicated that TaSK1 and TaSK2 belong to clade II of plant GSKs, the Arabidopsis members of which are all involved in brassinosteroid signaling [8].

The present study addresses the question whether TaSKs being members of clade II are involved in BR signaling as reported for Arabidopsis group II ASKs.

For this purpose, a bin2-1 like gain-of-function mutation has been inserted in TaSK1-A and in TaSK2-A. Arabidopsis plants were then transformed with the mutated gene copies. The phenotypes of the transgenic lines have been investigated and BR target gene expression levels have been analyzed in representative transgenic lines. Rescue experiments of the severe phenotypes were conducted by means of the ASK chemical inhibitor Bikinin, beforehand shown to inhibit TaSKs.

Information on the role of BR signaling in Liliopsida resp. Poaceae development in particular wheat development is so far limited. Therefore, the impact of compounds interfering with BR signaling or changing BR levels has been evaluated on different wheat developmental stages.

Results

TaSK1.2-1 and TaSK2.2-1 mutated gene copies expressed in Arabidopsis led to phenotypes reminiscent of BR-signaling mutant phenotypes

Previous phylogenetic analyses pointed out that TaSK1-A,B,C and TaSK2-A,B,C are members of plant GSK clade II [8]. All three Arabidopsis members of clade II, ASKiota, ASKdzeta and BIN2, are involved in Brassinosteroid (BR) signaling [912]. The catalytic domains of TaSKs share 90–91 % identity with the catalytic domain of BIN2 [8]. Arabidopsis lines expressing TaSKs were generated to address the question whether these clade II wheat members have a function in BR signaling. TaSKs contain the highly conserved TREE motif within their catalytic domain [8]. Bin2-1 gain-of-function mutation localizes to this motif [911]. The mutated BIN2-1 protein is more stable than the wild type protein and is not depleted by BL treatment as the wild type form [20]. The bin2-1 mutation blocks the dephosphorylation of BIN2 residue Tyr 200 by BSU1 causing BR insensitivity [13]. The phenotype of these mutants is resembling the phenotype of BR-deficient or BR-signaling mutants [911]. A bin2-1 like mutation (E263K) has been inserted in GFP:TaSK1-A and GFP:TaSK2-A transgenes via site directed mutagenesis. Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia plants were transformed with these constructs.

Besides plants having a normal size and an apparent wild type phenotype, a range of significantly shorter plants were observed in the T1 generation. Observed phenotypes were including shorter stems, reduced apical dominance, elongated thinner blade leaves, delayed flowering, shorter siliques and reduced fertility (Fig. 1b, c, e, f). In addition, severe dwarf phenotypes having compact dark green and downwards rolled thicker leaves were consistently observed, some of them developing flowers (Fig. 1g, -l). These flowers were in direct contact with the compact thicker leaves due to extremely short internodes. Few transgenic lines showed in addition an altered flower patterning (data not shown).
Fig. 1

Phenotypes of TaSK1.2-1 and TaSK2.2-1 Arabidopsis transgenic lines. a, d 26 and 22 days old wild type Columbia plants. b, c 28 and 66 days old TaSK1.2-1.P4T23 line. The 28 days old plant had leaves with thin blades. After 66 days, the plant with a reduced apical dominance had reached a size of 11 cm while wild type plants had a size of at least 40 cm. e, f 22 and 57 days old TaSK1.2-1.P6T26 line. After 57 days, the plant reached a size of 6 cm whereas wild type plants had a size of 40 cm. g 43 days old TaSK1.2-1.P3T4 severe dwarf line. h 43 days old TaSK2.2-1.P2T2 severe dwarf developing flowers. i, j 43 and 60 days old TaSK1.2-1.P3T1 dwarf line showing leaves with thin blades, and later flowers. k, l 43 and 60 days old TaSK1.2-1.P3T6 severe dwarf differentiating flowers. Bars in (a), (b), (d), (e) represent 5 mm while bars in (g) to (l) represent 1 mm

The severity of the phenotype correlated with the levels of TaSK1 and 2 transcripts (Fig. 2a, e, i; Additional file 1, A). Severe dwarfs expressed the highest TaSK1 and 2 levels while the lowest levels were measured in transgenic plants having the same size and morphology as wild type plants (Fig. 2a, e, i; Additional file 1, A). Semi-dwarf lines showed intermediate TaSK1 levels (Fig. 2a, e; Additional file 1, A).
Fig. 2

BR target gene expression levels in TaSKs.2-1 transgenic lines. mRNA level of BR-biosynthetic CPD, BR-upregulated SAUR-AC1 and BR inactivation BAS1 genes were quantified by qRT-PCR in TaSK1.2-1 (a-h) and in TaSK2.2-1 (i-l) lines. Relative expression levels in representative lines having same size and morphology as wild type plants (approx. 40 cm), in representative semi-dwarfs and in representative severe dwarfs (with and without flowers, referred as dwarf) were compared to expression levels in Columbia plants. In the recorded samples, 36 out of 180 TaSK1.2-1 transgenic plants were severe dwarfs and 69 had a normal size. Eleven out of 42 TaSK2.2-1 transgenic plants were severe dwarfs and 18 had a normal size. All results are means +/- standard deviations. Individual reactions were done in triplicate (technical replicates). Expression levels were normalized to those of Polyubiquitin10. Similar results were obtained when normalizing expression levels to those of EF-1alpha (Additional file 1)

In summary, the observed phenotypes were reminiscent of the bin2-1 mutant phenotypes observed in Arabidopsis [911].

BR target gene expression was deregulated in TaSKs.2-1 transgenic lines

RNA levels of BR-induced SAUR-AC1, BR inactivation BAS1 and BR biosynthetic CPD genes were quantified by real-time PCR to verify whether BR downstream target gene expressions were deregulated in TaSKs.2-1 transgenic lines. SAUR-AC1 and CPD have been selected respectively as BES1 and BZR1 target genes, BES1 and BZR1 being negatively regulated by BIN2 kinase [19, 2123]. Data documented in the literature indicate that SAUR-AC1 and BAS1 are up-regulated while CPD is down-regulated by application of exogenous BL on wild type Arabidopsis seedlings [14, 2426]. Furthermore bin2-3 loss-of-function mutants show an increase of SAUR-AC1 and a decrease of CPD transcript levels compared to wild type plants [14].

As already mentioned, a correlation was observed between the severity of the phenotype of TaSKs.2-1 lines and expression levels of TaSKs (Fig. 2a, e, i; Additional file 1, A). This suggests that higher TaSKs.2-1 protein levels were associated with a stronger inhibition of BR signaling.

As shown in Fig. 2, down-regulation of CPD and up-regulation of SAUR-AC1 and BAS1 by BR signaling were the strongest impaired in the lines expressing the highest levels of TaSK1 and TaSK2, and which were the most compromised morphologically. Indeed, CPD transcript levels were higher in severe dwarfs than in morphological normal transgenic plants (Fig. 2b, f, j; Additional file 1, B). Furthermore, transcripts levels of SAUR-AC1 and BAS1 were lower in severe dwarfs compared to the other transgenic lines (Fig. 2c, g, k and d, h; Additional file 1, C). The increase of CPD and the decrease of SAUR-AC1 and BAS1 levels in transgenic lines were proportional to the severity of the phenotype (Fig. 2; Additional file 1). BAS1 expression levels in the tested severe dwarf and morphologically normal TaSK2 lines were not significantly different to one another and to Columbia control plants (Fig. 2, l). Although deeper investigation is required, this observation may reflect functional differences between the two wheat homologs in the regulation of this downstream target gene.

In conclusion, expressions of SAUR-AC1, CPD and BAS1 were deregulated in TaSKs.2-1 lines. Expression patterns of these BR downstream genes were in accordance with the effect of a negative regulator of BR signaling.

Bikinin inhibited TaSK kinase activity

The activity of 7 ASKs including all clade II Arabidopsis members is inhibited by Bikinin [(4-[(5-bromo-2-pyridinyl)amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid; 27]. Bikinin activates BR signaling in Arabidopsis by directly binding to BIN2 and acting as ATP competitor [27]. Predicted TaSK1 and TaSK2 protein sequences include the motif MEYV reported to contain key residues for docking of Bikinin [8, 27].

In a previous study, we showed by means of in vitro kinase activity assays that TaSK1 and TaSK2 were functionally active kinases [8]. In the present study, in vitro kinase assays were performed in the presence and absence of Bikinin to evaluate whether this compound was inhibiting the two wheat members of clade II.

Besides TaSK1 and TaSK2 (longest ORF), Arabidopsis BIN2, and wheat TaGSK1 were overexpressed in E. coli as GST fusion proteins and affinity purified in native conditions. TaGSK1 is involved in salt tolerance and is one of the few other wheat GSK-like-kinases whose function has been so far investigated [28]. Phylogenetic analysis showed that TaGSK1 is a member of GSK clade I [8].

An almost total inhibition of BIN2 activity with less than 5 % residual activity was observed in the presence of 15 μM Bikinin (Fig. 3c) as reported previously in the literature [27]. Bikinin added at a concentration of 15 μM was clearly inhibiting the kinase activities of TaSK1, TaSK2 and TaGSK1 (Fig. 3a and b). In our experimental conditions, inhibition was ranging from very strong for TaSK2 with approx. 5 % residual activity to strong for TaSK1 and TaGSK1 with a residual activity in the range of 30 % (Fig. 3a and b). Increasing the concentration of Bikinin to 30 μM was leading to a stronger inhibition of TaSK1 with significantly less than 30 % residual activity (Fig. 3d).
Fig. 3

In vitro kinase activity of TaSKs in the presence of Bikinin. Phosphorylation activity of purified TaSK1, TaSK2, TaGSK1 and BIN2 on a myelin basic protein fragment (18.454 kDa) was determined by in vitro kinase assays using ATP γP32. Kinase activity was analyzed in the presence and absence of Bikinin added at a concentration of 15 or 30 μM. After kinase reaction, samples were loaded on a 12 % SDS PAGE gel. After migration, the gel was directly exposed to an X-ray film for either 80 min at room temperature (a), o/n at room temperature (b), o/n at -80 °C (c), o/n at room temperature (d)

In conclusion, Bikinin was inhibiting not only eudicotyledon- but also Liliopsida-GSKs as shown for three wheat GSKs belonging to clade II and I.

TaSK1.2-1 and TaSK2.2-1 severe dwarfs were rescued by Bikinin

TaSK1-A.2-1 and TaSK2-A.2-1 severe dwarf Arabidopsis lines were transferred to a Bikinin supplemented medium (Fig. 4). After 7 days of Bikinin treatment, they showed a significant increase in hypocotyl length, longer bending petioles, more blade-shaped and pale green leaves (Fig. 4d and h). This observation indicates that Bikinin was able to rescue partially severe dwarf TaSK.2-1 phenotypes.
Fig. 4

TaSKs.2-1 severe dwarf phenotypes rescued by Bikinin. a,b,c,d depict TaSK1.2-1 lines. T1-P7SevereDwarf2 at day 0 (a) and day 7 (b) on 0.3 % DMSO control medium. T1-P7SevereDwarf1 at day 0 (c) and day 7 (d) on medium containing 30 μM Bikinin. E,F,G,H depict TaSK2.2-1 lines. T2-P7SevereDwarf4 at day 0 (e) and day 7 (f) on 0.3 % DMSO control medium. T2-P7SevereDwarf1 at day 0 (g) and day 7 (h) on medium containing 30 μM Bikinin. Bars represent 1mm

Transcript levels of BR-inducible SAUR-AC1, BR biosynthetic CPD and BR inactivation BAS1 genes were quantified by qRT- PCR to determine whether Bikinin treatment affected BR target gene transcription of TaSK1.2-1 severe dwarfs (Fig. 5, Additional file 2). A strong decrease of CPD as well as a strong increase of SAUR-AC1 and BAS1 levels were recorded in Columbia wild type seedlings subjected to 30 μM Bikinin treatment (Fig. 5b-d, Additional file 2, B-D) as reported in the literature [27]. A strong decrease of CPD expression was observed in all severe dwarfs treated with Bikinin (Fig. 5b; Additional file 2, B). Up-regulation of SAUR-AC1 transcription was observed in severe dwarfs treated with Bikinin (Fig. 5c; Additional file 2, C). A significant increase of BAS1 transcript levels was recorded for line P11SD9, however levels in the same range as those of control lines were obtained for lines P11SD8 and P11SD10 (Fig. 5d; Additional file 2, D).
Fig. 5

Effect of Bikinin on BR target gene expression levels in TaSK1.2-1 severe dwarf lines. mRNA levels of TaSK1 (a), BR-biosynthetic CPD (b), BR-upregulated SAUR-AC1 (c) and BR inactivation BAS1 (d) genes were quantified by qRT-PCR in TaSK1-A.2-1 severe dwarf (SD) lines either treated with 30 μM Bikinin or grown on control medium for 8 days. mRNA levels of BR target genes were in parallel quantified in Columbia seedlings either treated with 30 μM Bikinin or grown on 0.3 % DMSO for 7 days. All results are means +/- standard deviations. Individual reactions were done in triplicate (technical replicates). Expression levels were normalized to those of Polyubiquitin10. Similar results were obtained when normalizing expression levels to those of EF-1alpha (Additional file 2)

In conclusion, Bikinin treatment of TaSK1.2.1 dwarf lines induced a change in the expression pattern of BR target genes. The expression pattern in Bikinin-rescued TaSK1.2-1 lines was opposite to the one observed previously in TaSK1.2-1 and TaSK2.2-1 severe dwarf lines (Fig. 5/Additional file 2 and Fig. 2/Additional file 1 respectively). Furthermore, observed changes were resembling or were evolving towards expression patterns observed for Arabidopsis wild type plants treated with Bikinin [27].

TaSKs were ubiquitously expressed in wheat tissues

TaSK1 and 2 expression pattern in different wheat tissues was investigated as a first step towards exploring their role and the role of BR signaling in Poaceae development.

TaSK1 and TaSK2 expression pattern were analyzed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in embryos, young endosperm, stems, roots, young and adult leaves, seeds, flowers (Fig. 6). Both genes were expressed in all tested tissues at approximately the same levels except in adult leaves where TaSK1 may be expressed at slightly lower levels (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

TaSK1 and TaSK2 expression levels in different wheat tissues. TaSK1 (a) and TaSK2 (b) expression levels in different wheat tissues were analyzed by means of semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Wheat TUBULIN was used as reference

BL, Bikinin and Propiconazole impacted the growth of wheat seedlings

BRs promote hypocotyl elongation and inhibit root growth while brassinazole (BRZ), a BR biosynthesis inhibitor, reduces hypocotyl and root length of light grown Arabidopsis seedlings [29]. A significant increase in hypocotyl length is observed when light grown Arabidopsis seedlings are treated with Bikinin [27]. However, BR response is reported to be species-dependent [29]. Information about the effects of Epibrassinolide, compounds impairing BR synthesis and compounds activating BR signaling on wheat development is so far scarce. Consequently, we tested the growth response of wheat seeds sown and cultured in vitro for 6 days on medium supplemented with different concentrations of either Epibrassinolide (epiBL), Brassinazole (BRZ) or Bikinin (Fig. 7). Exogenously applied epiBL inhibited the growth of the aerial part of the seedling in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 7a; Additional file 3). The GSK inhibitor Bikinin was even more effective in the inhibition of seedling upper part growth and acted also in a dose dependent manner (Fig. 7b). Root growth was inhibited by both, epiBL and Bikinin, particularly at higher concentrations (Fig. 7f and g). By contrast, inhibition of aerial part growth observed upon BRZ treatment was much less effective even at high concentration (30 μM) (Fig. 7c and d). Monocots are apparently less responsive to BRZ [30]. Propiconazole (PCZ) is reported as a specific and an effective BR biosynthesis inhibitor [31]. In particular, maize seedlings have impaired mesocotyl, coleoptile and true leaf elongation upon application of PCZ [31]. Therefore PCZ was used in the present study as an alternative to BRZ. The compound was far more efficient as BRZ to inhibit the growth of the aerial part of the wheat seedling, the observed effect being dose dependent (Fig. 7e).
Fig. 7

Response of in vitro grown wheat seedlings to epiBL and inhibitor treatments. Wheat seeds were sown and cultured for 6 days under white light (16h light/8h dark cycles) on ½ MS medium containing 1 % sucrose supplemented with different concentrations of epiBL (a, f), Bikinin (b, g), BRZ (c, d) and PCZ (e). Values represent mean values and standard deviations of seedling aerial part length ( n >15) measured after 6 days of culture

These results contrast with the reported effects of these compounds on Arabidopsis growth. BR growth responses depend on many factors such as plant cultivar, plant organ tested, concentration used and the method of BR application [32]. Thus, application of BR through the roots for few days is reported to decrease the growth of wheat seedlings while foliar application is stimulating the growth of the upper part of the seedlings [32]. To test whether the method of application influences the growth response, epiBL, Bikinin, and PCZ were sprayed at selected concentrations four times on the aerial part of seedlings (Fig. 8). No noteworthy change of plant size was observed at the epiBL and Bikinin concentrations tested (Fig. 8a). A slight increase of plant height may occur at 10 μM Bikinin (T.test p <0.01) whereas a small decrease may arise at 10 μM epiBL (T.test p <0.05) (Fig. 8a). Propiconazole (PCZ) treatment led as expected to a significant size reduction of the seedling aerial part (p <0.001) (Fig. 8a). However, a clear increase of the first leaf bending was observed with rising epiBL and Bikinin concentrations (Fig. 8b, d and e). This physiological response called lamina joint inclination that is the bending between the leaf blade and the leaf sheath is described as one of the most sensitive BR response in rice [3335]. The first leaf of non-treated wheat seedlings was bending with an angle smaller than 45° while the first leaf of most seedlings treated with 10 μM epiBL bent with an angle greater over 90° (Fig. 8b and e). Bikinin impacted the inclination of the first leaf at concentrations over 30 μM (Fig. 8d). In particular, upon 50 and 80 μM Bikinin treatment, 70 % and 89 % of the seedlings respectively had an inclination angle over 90° (Fig. 8d). A slightly higher percentage of seedlings had a smaller angle between the first leaf sheath and leaf blade in the presence of PCZ compared to control conditions (Fig. 8c). Indeed, 77 and 75 % of the seedlings sprayed with 5 and 30 μM PCZ respectively had an inclination angle of 10 to 20° while only 60 % of the control seedlings had such a small angle (Fig. 8c). Thirty percent of the control seedlings showed an angle over 20° while about 8 % of seedlings sprayed with PCZ had such an angle (Fig. 8e). The effect of PCZ on the lamina joint inclination was independent of the concentration tested (Fig. 8c).
Fig. 8

Response of wheat seedlings to epiBL, Bikinin and PCZ foliar spray. Selected concentrations of epiBL, Bikinin and PCZ were sprayed 4 times on the leaves of wheat seedlings grown for 14 days on vermiculite in an incubator under the same conditions as the in vitro grown seedling. Values in (a) represent mean values and standard deviations of seedling aerial part length measured after 14 days of culture. Values in (b), (c) and (d) represent the percentage of seedlings that had a given inclination angle (angle between the first leaf blade and sheath) upon epiBL (b), PCZ (c) and Bikinin (d) treatment after 14 days of culture. e shows representative inclination angles upon epiBL treatment. In independent experiments, 27–30 seedlings were monitored for each epiBL concentration and for the control. Thirty, 15, 30, 40, 43, 44, 41, 44 seedlings were recorded for respectively 0.3% DMSO, 10 and 30 μM Bikinin, 0.25 % DMSO, 40 and 50 μM Bikinin, 0.4 % DMSO, 80 μM Bikinin. Finally, 12–13 seedlings were measured for the control and each PCZ concentration. * T.test p <0.05 (p = 0.01026141 for 10 μM epiBL), ** T.test p <0.01 (p = 0.00787367 for 10 μM Bikinin).***T.test p <0.001 (p = 3.5079E-07 for 5 μM PCZ, p = 3.75455E-09 for 30 μM PCZ)

EpiBL, Bikinin, and PCZ were also sprayed at selected concentrations three times on the aerial part of plants grown in soil under greenhouse conditions (Additional file 4). The plants at the moment of the first foliar spraying were older than the seedlings tested in the previous experiment (15–22 days towards 6 days after sowing) and were observed until they reached the maximal adult size. A reduction of the plant size was observed for PCZ added at the highest concentration of 30 μM (T.test p <0.01). The other PCZ concentrations or other compounds tested had either no effect or no clear effect (T. test p <0.05). In particular, no increase of plant size was observed under these conditions regardless of the epiBL or Bikinin concentration tested except possibly a small increase with 5 μM Bikinin (T.test p <0.05).

EpiBL, Bikinin and PCZ impacted the growth response of wheat at various degrees depending on the concentration and the method of application of the compound as well as the developmental stage of the plant suggesting that BR signaling is involved in wheat growth.

Role of BR in early embryonic development

GSK3/SGG kinases are involved in embryonic patterning and axis formation in vertebrates and invertebrates [3638]. In comparison, little is found in the literature about the role of these kinases in plant embryonic patterning. The current study indicates that TaSKs were expressed in wheat embryos and were involved in BR signaling. As a first step towards understanding their function in this crucial developmental phase, we evaluated whether and to which extent BR signaling regulates Poaceae resp. Triticum aestivum embryonic development.

An in vitro culture system has been established in a previous study that enables a normal in vitro development of embryos excised from their kernels as early as at the globular stage [39]. Up to 150 μm, the embryo is globular with a hemispherical embryo-proper and a suspensor (Additional file 5, A). At 150–160 μm, the shift to bilateral symmetry is initiated with the differentiation of a scutellum and a shoot apical meristem. This shift from radial to bilateral symmetry is a major step in the embryonic development leading to the differentiation of the two major embryonic structures that are (1) the scutellum i.e., the single cotyledon of the monocotyledons and (2) the embryonic axis containing the shoot and root meristems. Over a size of 160 μm, the embryo shows a clear bilateral symmetry with a shoot meristem and a scutellum growing both axially and laterally to a shield-like structure attached to one side of the embryonic axis (Additional file 5, B-F). Gradually the shoot meristem is covered by leaf primordia and enclosed in a coleoptilar ring (Additional file 5, D -F). The root meristem differentiates embedded in the lower part of the embryo.

Embryos excised from their kernels at different developmental stages were grown in vitro on media supplemented with either epiBL, Bikinin or PCZ. A distinction has been made between embryos that underwent or were in the process to undergo the shift to bilateral symmetry (≥160μm) from those that had a radial shape (up to 150 μm) at the onset of treatment. An insight is thereby gained into the effect of these compounds during three major phases of embryonic patterning i.e., before and during differentiation of the shoot meristem and the scutellum, as well as during their subsequent development.

Most embryos isolated at sizes of up to 150 μm and then subjected to epiBL treatment developed into radial growth (RG) structures (Fig. 9a, b, g). RG structures were either ball-shaped (BS) or pear-shaped (PS) (Fig. 9a and b). These embryos grew “radially” but did not undergo a shift to bilateral symmetry. In addition, a lower (except for 0.5 μM EpiBL) but nevertheless significant percentage of embryos differentiated a shoot meristem on a RG structure, in some cases even on a rounded scutellum (Fig. 9c, d and g). In these cases, a shift to bilateral symmetry occurred even though neither the differentiation of the shoot apex nor the one of the scutellum were normal. When the embryo-proper size at the moment of isolation reached 160 μm or more, i.e., the shift to bilateral symmetry was initiated before treatment, a shoot meristem developing on a RG structure or on a rounded scutellum was observed in the majority of cases (Fig. 9c, d and g). When isolated at embryo-proper sizes of 180 μm or more, a substantial number of embryos were elongated but apparently normal (Fig. 9e and g).
Fig. 9

EpiBL treatment of wheat embryos. Embryos were isolated out of the kernel at sizes ranging from 100 to 280 μm in diameter, most of them having a diameter of 120 to 180 μm. They were then grown in vitro on media supplemented with 0 to 10 μM epiBL. The phenotypes of the in vitro grown embryos were observed after 7 to 8 days of culture and grouped into classes. Photographs of representative phenotypes after 7/8 days of culture were added directly to the figure (a-f, 1photographs not shown). Reported numbers in (g) are percentages of defined phenotypes per growing embryos. In at least 4 independent experiments, a total of 62 growing embryos were observed in control conditions, 41 for 0.5 μM epiBL, 33 growing embryos for 1 μM epiBL, 35 in the case of 2 μM epiBL, 34 for 5 μM epiBL and 29 in the case of 10 μM epiBL. apex: differentiation of a leaf primordium or/and a coleoptilar ring (both in most cases abnormal) in addition to a shoot meristem; cr: coleotilar ring; RG: Radial Growth (BS: Ball-Shaped or PS: Pear-Shaped); sc or scut: scutellum; sm: shoot meristem; sp: suspensor; wt: embryo having a wild type phenotype. The percentage of indifferentiated, abnormal or early arrested embryos for a given concentration and a given embryo size range is obtained by subtracting the sum of all indicated percentages to 100 %

The two most severe phenotypes observed upon treatment with epiBL were also observed for the majority of embryos treated with PCZ (Fig. 10). Indeed, when isolated out of their kernels at an embryo-proper size ranging from 100 to 150 μm, most embryos developed into RG (BS or PS) structures (Fig. 10a and d). When isolated with a size of 160 μm or over, the most frequent phenotype observed was a RG structure bearing a shoot meristem or a shoot meristem-like-protuberance (Fig. 10b and d). Prolongated culture on PCZ supplemented media led in many cases to the disappearance of a morphologically visible shoot meristem (data not shown).
Fig. 10

Propiconazole treatment of wheat embryos. Embryos were isolated out of the kernel at an embryo-proper diameter of 100 to 240 μm, most of them having a diameter of 120 to180 μm. The phenotypes of the in vitro grown embryos were observed at 5 to 28 days of culture and grouped into classes. Photographs of representative phenotypes were added directly to the table (a-c, 3photograph not shown). Reported numbers in (d) are percentages of defined phenotypes per growing embryos. In 5 independent experiments, 42 growing embryos were observed in control conditions (0.1 % DMSO), 61 in the case of 5 μM PCZ, 52 for 10 μM PCZ. 1days of culture. 2fewer control embryos isolated at sizes of 120–150 μm were developing in vitro into normal wild type embryos due to a higher amount of abnormal, undifferentiated or early arrested embryos. Cr: coleoptilar ring; RG: Radial Growth (BS: Ball-Shaped or PS: Pear-Shaped); sc or scut: scutellum; sm: shoot meristem; sp: suspensor; wt: embryo having a wild type phenotype. The percentage of indifferentiated, abnormal or early arrested embryos for a given concentration and a given embryo size range is obtained as in Fig. 9

A range of phenotypes with increasing severity was observed upon Bikinin treatment tested at concentrations of 2 to 30 μM (Fig. 11). At 2 and 5 μM Bikinin, most embryos isolated at older developmental stages (160 to 240 μm) showed either a wild-type phenotype or comparatively milder phenotypes (Fig. 11c, d, e and f). The latter embryos were either wild-type but had an enlarged basal embryonic region, or exhibited a shoot meristem/apex on a rounded scutellum with a potentially enlarged basal embryonic region (Fig. 11c, d). At the same concentrations, a high number of embryos isolated at younger stages (120 to 150 μm) developed, in addition to milder phenotypes, severe phenotypes such as RG or shoot meristem/apex on RG (Fig. 11a-d, f). At higher Bikinin concentrations (10–30 μM), the vast majority of embryos displayed the latter two phenotypes (Fig. 11a, b, f). The younger embryos at the moment of isolation developed rather into RG while the older rather a shoot meristem/apex on RG. Many embryos had highly turgescent cells at higher Bikinin concentrations often leading after some time to destructuration. Thus, at 30 μM Bikinin, 19-25 % embryos were even developing into completely abnormal structures with highly turgescent cells indicating that higher concentrations of the compound were damaging for the embryos (Fig. 11f; Additional file 6).
Fig. 11

Bikinin treatment of wheat embryos. Embryos were isolated out of the kernel at sizes ranging from 100 to 240 μm in diameter, most of them having a diameter of 120 to 180 μm. The phenotypes of the in vitro grown embryos were observed between 4 and 13 days of culture. Photographs of representative phenotypes were added directly to the figure (a-e, 2photograph shown in additional file 6). Reported numbers in (f) are percentages of defined phenotypes per growing embryos. In three independent experiments, a total of 29, 20, 33 37, 31 and 32 growing embryos were observed respectively for the control, 2, 5, 10, 20 and 30 μM Bikinin. 1 days of culture. apex: differentiation of a leaf primordium or/and a coleoptilar ring (both in most cases abnormal) in addition to a shoot meristem; cr: coleotilar ring; RG: Radial Growth (BS: Ball-Shaped or PS: Pear-Shaped); sc: scutellum; sm: shoot meristem; sp: suspensor; wt: embryo having a wild type phenotype. The percentage of indifferentiated, abnormal or early arrested embryos for a given concentration and a given embryo size range is obtained as in Fig. 9

Sporadically embryos subjected to an epiBL or a Bikinin treatment showed a duplicated embryonic axis and an additional ectopic scutellum (data not shown).

In conclusion, interfering with BR signaling or changing BR levels was impairing embryonic axis and scutellum differentiation.

Discussion

A phylogenetic analysis of land plant GSKs pointed out that wheat TaSK1-A,B,C and TaSK2-A,B,C belong to clade II of plant GSKs [8]. The Arabidopsis members of clade II, ASKiota, ASKdzeta and BIN2, are all three involved in BR signaling [912]. Several lines of evidence strongly suggest that TaSKs were orthologous of BIN2 and were involved in BR signaling. First, expression in Arabidopsis of TaSK1-A.2-1 and TaSK2-A.2-1 having a bin2-1 like gain-of-function mutation led to phenotypes closely resembling those of Arabidopsis bin2-1 lines and Arabidopsis BR-signaling or BR-deficient mutants [911]. Second, BR target gene expression was deregulated in TaSK1-A.2-1 and TaSK2-A.2-1 dwarf lines as expected for phenotypes due to an impaired BR signaling. Third, the severe dwarf TaSK.2-1 phenotype was rescued partially by Bikinin, an inhibitor of TaSK kinase activity. This rescue was accompanied with changes of SAUR, BAS1 and CPD transcript levels. In summary, expression of TaSK1 and TaSK2 in Arabidopsis led to responses similar to those of Arabidopsis BR signaling intermediate BIN2. These data strongly suggest that both wheat homologs were negative regulators of BR signaling. Consequently, a function of GSK clade II in BR signaling is proposed to be evolutionary conserved between Poaceae and Brassicaceae confirming our phylogenetic data.

Bikinin was identified in a chemical genetics approach as a strong activator of BR signaling [27]. This compound is a strong chemical inhibitor of group I and II Arabidopsis GSKs [27]. Total inhibition (1–2 % residual activity) is reported for clade II kinases including BIN2 while some residual activity (6–8 % residual activity) is observed for clade I kinases [27]. In addition, Bikinin inhibits 80 % of the activity of group III ASKtheta bringing the number of inhibited ASKs up to 7 out of 10 [27]. Bikinin was inhibiting all three wheat GSKs tested: clade II TaSK1 and TaSK2 as well as clade I TaGSK1. Inhibition was very strong for TaSK2 (5 % residual activity at 15μM Bikinin) to strong for TaSK1 and TaGSK1 (significantly less than 30 % residual activity for TaSK1 at 30 μM Bikinin). The specific residues M115, Y117 and Val118 are important for the binding of Bikinin to the ATP binding pocket of BIN2 [27]. This motif is also present in the two other clade II ASKs [27]. TaSK1 and TaSK2 were inhibited at different levels although they possessed both this MEYV motif [8]. In addition, inhibition levels of TaSK1 and TaGSK1 were similar even-though TaGSK1 has a different motif as TaSK1 namely the motif LEYV present in all clade I ASKs and in clade III ASKtheta. Identification of other wheat GSKs will be beneficial to study further the relevance of this motif for Bikinin inhibitory activity on Poaceae GSKs.

Treatment of wheat seedling with epiBL, PCZ, and Bikinin indicated that seedling growth was regulated by BR signaling. Growth response was depending on the method of application, on the concentration of the compound applied and on the plant developmental stage. When added to the culture medium of germinating seeds, epiBL, PCZ and Bikinin inhibited the growth of the aerial part of the seedling in a dose dependent manner. Although this response contrasts with the growth response of Brassicaceae resp. Arabidopsis [27, 29], other studies reported a similar response in Poaceae [32, 40]. EpiBL is decreasing the growth of wheat seedlings when applied through the roots [32]. This reduced growth is suggested to be due to an overaccumulation in the plant of exogenously applied BR [32]. Indeed application of 2 μM 24-epibrassinolide via the roots or seeds increases 3 to 4 times the level of 24-epiBL in the plant [32]. Similarly, reports indicated that BR oversensitivity does not always result in stem elongation and that a reduction of rice stem growth can be induced by either insensitivity or oversensitivity to BR [40]. Therefore, the height reduction of wheat seedling observed when the compounds were uptaken via the roots may be due to an oversensitivity to BR. Foliar application of epiBL is reported to stimulate the growth of the upper part of the wheat seedling [32]. By contrast, in our experimental conditions, foliar spraying of epiBL or Bikinin did not result in a noteworthy increase of wheat seedling height while as expected the aerial seedling growth was significantly reduced in the presence of PCZ. However, epiBL was increasing the bending angle between first leaf blade and sheath while PCZ treatment was decreasing this angle. Such a response is also observed in rice. Indeed, adding exogenously BRs and increasing BR biosynthesis or signaling enhances rice lamina joint bending whereas BR insensitive or deficient plants have erect leaves [34, 35, 41]. Bikinin was affecting wheat laminar joint inclination at concentrations over 30 μM. These concentrations although being very efficient were higher than the ones leading to a size reduction of wheat seedlings (via root uptake) and the ones impacting embryonic development. Foliar spraying cannot be directly compared to uptake over several days via the seedling roots or from the medium by tiny embryos. Differences in tissue permeability as well as inactivation of the compound in planta [42] may require higher concentrations if the uptake occurs via the leaves over a limited time. PCZ was used as alternative to BRZ that had little effect on wheat seedling growth. PCZ is proposed to be a specific and potent inhibitor of BR biosynthesis [31, 43]. PCZ inhibits fungal sterol synthesis by binding to lanosterol 14R-demethylase (CYP51A1) [31]. Reports indicate that the triazole may inhibit activity of obtusifoliol 14-alpha-demethylase in plants [43]. PCZ may therefore alter BR metabolic pathway by affecting sterol biosynthesis upstream of BR synthesis. However, Arabidopsis seedlings treated with PCZ phenocopied BR biosynthetic mutants and dwarfism was induced in maize seedling [31]. In addition, although triazole derivatives may affect in some cases GA biosynthesis, the expression levels of gibberellic acid regulated genes was reported as not affected by PCZ application while the expression of BR regulated genes was specifically impacted [31]. In both cases biosynthesis genes were analyzed.

TaSK1 and 2 have been isolated in the screen of an embryonic cDNA library [8]. Little is known about the role of GSKs in plant embryonic patterning. In vertebrates GSK3/SGG orthologs are negative regulators of the embryonic dorsoventral axis formation [44]. A deficiency for the activity of this protein kinase leads to the ectopic formation of a secondary body axis in Xenopus laevis embryo [37, 44]. In Invertebrates such as Hydra, inhibition of the HyGSK-3 activity results in body column adopting features of the head organizer [38]. As a consequence, ectopic heads and tentacles differentiate on the body column. Interestingly, wheat embryos are differentiating additional ectopic shoot meristems or embryonic axes as well as supernumerary scutella upon N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) or quercetin treatment, both being auxin polar transport inhibitors [45]. Multiple meristems and scutella were observed only very sporadically upon EpiBL and Bikinin treatments. Instead, deregulating BR signaling in either way, inhibition or enhancement, impaired embryonic axis and scutellum differentiation leading in extreme cases to radial growth structures that were unable to undergo the shift to bilateral symmetry. Interestingly radial growth phenotypes are also observed upon auxin treatment [46]. Previous studies reported that directed cell elongation and scutellum growth are required for normal wheat embryonic patterning [47, 48]. Thereby, a directed transport of auxin is taking place towards epidermal cells of the scutellum. Accumulated auxin is proposed to increase PM H + -ATPase expression level resulting in an apoplastic acidification of the cells in these regions, a process proposed to contribute to cell wall loosening and elongation of the scutellum [47, 48]. Present observations raise the question whether the differentiation of the scutellum and the embryonic axis may depend upon directed cell elongation regulated by auxin and BR pathways. Interfering with the production of BR (PCZ) may hamper elongation of embryonic cells. Boosting BR signaling (epiBL, Bikinin) may lead to cell elongation in general rather than to the elongation of specific cells. The consequence in both cases may be that neither an embryonic axis nor a scutellum is able to differentiate or to differentiate properly leading to a range of radial-growth-like structures. A possible role for BRs in embryonic patterning has also to be discussed in the light of emerging evidence that BRs are apparently not themselves transported over long distances but may alter the transport of auxin [27, 49]. Interactions between BR and auxin signaling, as well as an interdependence of their transcriptional response have been reported in the literature [50]. In particular, Bikinin and BL down-regulate genes involved in the auxin pathway such as the auxin efflux regulator PIN7 involved in processes underlying Arabidopsis embryonic development [27, 51]. Furthermore, BIN2 acts as a molecular link between auxin and BR signaling [52]. Information on a role of BR signaling in plant embryonic patterning is so far limited. However, recent evidences suggest a connection to auxin signaling in the control of embryonic root initiation. ACTIVATION-TAGGED BRI1-SUPPRESSOR1 (ATBS1)/TARGET OF MONOPTEROS 7 (TMO7) is an atypical basic helix loop helix (bHLH) transcription factor and is described as a positive regulator of BR signaling [53]. ATBS1/TMO7 has been identified as a direct target of the auxin-dependent transcription factor MONOPTEROS and is involved in the MP-dependent hypophysis specification and embryonic root initiation in Arabidopsis [54]. Interestingly, TMO7 is moving at the globular stage from its site of synthesis in adjacent group of embryo cells into the hypophysis precursor [54]. Embryonic root specification is thus depending on a MP-dependent intercellular movement of TMO7 in addition to MP promoted PIN-FORMED 1-dependent auxin transport [54]. Furthermore, BES1 interacting Myc-like protein 1 (BIM1), another bHLH protein implicated in BR signaling, is also contributing to the control of Arabidopsis embryonic patterning [23, 55]. BIM1 interacts with two AP2 transcription factors, DORNRÖSCHEN (DRN) and DORBRÖSCHEN-LIKE (DRNL), both controlling Arabidopsis embryonic patterning [55, 56]. Loss of function of BIM1 leads to cell division defects in the hypophyseal region and defects in the cotyledon ontogeny [55]. As DRN is involved in auxin signaling, interaction between BIM1 and DRN may be a point of hormonal crosstalk in embryonic patterning [55, 56].

BR signaling has in addition a role in root growth after germination. Indeed, BRI1 activity in the root epidermis controls the size of the root meristem [57]. Interestingly, BR –mediated control of meristem size is not associated with changes in expression levels of PIN1, PIN7 and PIN3 [57]. In addition, BR signaling has been shown recently to regulate stem cell quiescence in the Arabidopsis primary root [58].

A deeper insight into the role of BR signaling in embryonic development would include the ability to target and hamper solely BR biosynthesis. As already mentioned, PCZ may target sterol biosynthesis upstream of BR biosynthesis [31, 43]. Sterol biosynthetic mutants such as fackel and hydra 1/2 are impaired in embryonic patterning [59, 60]. However, fackel mutants accumulate low levels of BRs [61]. Mutant seedlings respond but cannot be rescued by BRs nor can the mutants be rescued by bulk sterols [59, 60]. Therefore, studies performed in Arabidopsis [62] may be complemented by the analysis of a broader range of BR-deficient mutants, and inhibitors specific for BR synthesis and efficient for Arabidopsis such as BRZ.

Conclusions

Little is known about the function of GSK-like kinases in Triticum aestivum. TaGSK1 and TaSK5, both members of clade I, have so far been investigated and reported to be involved in abiotic stress tolerance [28, 63]. The present study provides strong evidence for an involvement of two GSK homologs, TaSK1 and 2, in brassinosteroid signaling. BIN 2.1-like gain-of-function mutation of TaSK1 or 2 expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana resulted in dwarf phenotypes reminiscent of BR signaling mutants. BR downstream target gene expression was impacted in TaSKs.2-1 dwarf lines. Bikinin, shown here to inhibit TaSK kinase activity, was able to rescue partially the severe dwarfs. This rescue was associated with changes of BR downstream gene expression. Consequently, these wheat kinases expressed in Arabidopsis led to responses very similar to those of Arabidopsis autologous kinase BIN2. A function for GSK in BR signaling is therefore proposed to be evolutionary conserved between Liliopsida resp. Poaceae and eudicotyledons resp. Brassicaceae. Our previous phylogenetic analysis that classified TaSKs in clade II, the Arabidopsis members of which are all involved in BR signaling corroborates these findings. In plants, GSKs appear to be primarily involved in BR signaling although crosstalks to other hormonal signaling pathways have been reported, illustrating the complexity of signaling networks underlying plant development.

Limited information on the role of BR signaling in wheat development made inescapable its investigation in a critical developmental phase such as embryonic development. The present investigations indicate that interfering with BR signaling or changing BR levels by means of treatments with chemical compounds such as Epibrassinolides, Bikinin or Propiconazole impaired embryonic axis and scutellum differentiation. These findings lay the foundation to explore a potential function of TaSKs in wheat embryonic development and in particular to evaluate whether they may be a molecular link between auxin and BR pathway in these developmental processes.

Methods

Arabidopsis plant material and growth

Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) and the different transgenic lines generated in this study were grown at 21 °C under white light (16h light/8h dark cycles) either on ½ Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 % sucrose and 25 μg/ml hygromycin or in soil.

Generation of Arabidopsis thaliana lines expressing GFP-TaSK1.2-1 and GFP-TaSK2.2-1

TaSK-1A and TaSK-2A [8] were cloned into plasmid pGEN016 to generate eGFP:TaSK1-A and eGFP:TaSK2-A fusions. Plasmid site directed PCR mutagenesis was used to introduce the specific amino acid exchange E263K within the TREE motif of TaSKs. This site directed mutation corresponds to bin2-1 gain of function mutation [10]. Pfu DNA polymerase (Fermentas) in combination with primers T1A-bin2.1-F/T1A-bin2.1-R and T2A-bin2.1-F/T2A-bin2.1-R were used for respectively TaSK1 and TaSK2 mutagenesis (Additional file 7). eGFP:TaSK1-A.2-1 and eGFP:TaSK2-A.2-1 fusions were recloned with their C-terminus in frame with a 6XHis tag into plasmid pCAMBIA1390_2X35S. They were driven by a double-enhancer version of the CaMV35S promoter. pCAMBIA plasmids were subsequently individually introduced in Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and Arabidopsis thaliana was transformed by floral dip [64]. Similar procedure was used to introduce and overexpress BIN2-1 in Arabidopsis.

The presence of transgenes in the lines was confirmed using specific TaSK1 and TaSK2 primers (Additional file 7).

In vitro kinase activity assays

TaSK1, TaSK2, BIN2 and TaGSK1 (GenBank: AF525086) full length proteins were cloned with their N-terminus in frame with a Gluthatione-S-Transferase (GST) tag [8].

GST-TaSK1, GST-TaSK2, GST-BIN2, and GST-TaGSK1 fusion proteins were overexpressed in E. Coli. and affinity purified in native conditions on Gluthatione Sepharose 4B resin.

1.5 μg of each of the purified fusion proteins was incubated with or without Bikinin (15 or 30 μM) for 4 h at room temperature in a total volume of 15 μl.

In vitro kinase reactions were performed by adding to each of these solutions, 15 μl of the kinase activity buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 20 mM MgCl2, 1 mM DTT, 50 μM non- radioactive ATP), containing 4 μCi ATP γ32P and 1.5 μg of bovine myelin basic protein (MBP). The reactions were incubated at room temperature for 45 min. They were stopped by adding 10 μl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer. After denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, protein phosphorylation was analyzed by autoradiography after migration on a 12 % SDS/PAGE gel.

Bikinin rescue experiments

TaSK1-A.2-1 and TaSK2-A.2-1 transgenic lines were grown at 21 °C under white light (16h light/8h dark cycles) on ½ Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 1 % sucrose and 25 μg/ml hygromycin. After 15–18 days of culture, severe dwarf phenotypes were selected and transferred on ½ MS medium containing 1 % sucrose and 30 μM Bikinin (4-[(5-bromo-2-pyridinyl)amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid, ChemBridge Corporation, USA) or 0.3 % DMSO for 7–8 days under the same light and temperature conditions. Presence for the transgenes in the severe dwarf lines was confirmed using specific primers for either TaSK1 or TaSK2 (Additional file 7). Columbia seedlings were grown under the same light and temperature conditions on ½ MS medium containing 1 % sucrose for 14 days and then transferred on the same medium supplemented with either 30 μM Bikinin or 0.3 % DMSO for 7 days.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain reaction

RNA was extracted according to Oñate-Sánchez and Vicente-Carbajosa (2008) [65]. cDNA was prepared from total RNA with TaqMan® Reverse Transcription Reagents (Applied Biosystems) and analyzed on a Step One Plus LigthCycler (Applied Biosystems) with SYBR Green reagents (MESA Green qPCR MasterMix Eurogenetec) according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Transcripts of TaSK1, TaSK2 and BR signaling target genes were quantified using specific primer pairs (Additional file 7). Selected target genes were SAUR-AC1 [TAIR: AT4G38850.1], CPD [TAIR: AT5G05690] and BAS1 [TAIR: AT2G26710]. All individual reactions were done in triplicate (technical replicates). Data were analysed with StepOne™ Software v2.2.2 (Applied Biosystems). Expression levels were normalized to those of UBQ10 [TAIR: AT4G05320] or EF-1alpha [AT5G60390]. Relative quantification of gene expression was performed using the standard curve method.

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from different wheat tissues including stem, root, leaves (young and adult), embryo, endosperm, seed and flowers using TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen). One μg of total RNA (DNA free) was used for reverse transcription performed by means of the SuperScript™ II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen).

The gene specific primers SF27/SR28 were used to amplify TaSK1 while the primers SF34/SR34 were used to amplify TaSK2 (Additional file 7). Amplification of tubulin gene was used as RT-PCR reference (Additional file 7). A digestion of PCR products using BglII endonuclease confirmed the specificity of TaSK1 and TaSK2 amplification (data not shown).

Hormone and inhibitor treatments of wheat seedlings and plants

Wheat cv Sonora seeds were germinated and cultured for 6 days on ½ Murashige and Skoog medium containing 1 % sucrose at 25 °C under white light (16h light/8h dark cycles). This medium was supplemented with either epibrassinolide (epiBL - Sigma-Aldrich E1641; concentration range: 0.5 to 10 μM), Bikinin (Sigma-Aldrich SML 0094; concentration range: 5 to 30 μM), Brassinazole (BRZ – TCI B2829; concentration range: 2 to 30 μM) or Propiconazole (PCZ – Syngenta Tilt 250 EC; concentration range: 1 to 30 μM). Only seeds having germinated after 2 days were taken in account for length measurement. The length of the upper part of the seedling (without roots) was measured after 6 days.

Seeds were also germinated on filter paper that has been previously soaked with water and transferred after 2 days on vermiculite. They were grown in the incubator under the same conditions as the in vitro grown seedlings. Under these conditions, germination of the seeds and initial growing phase of the seedlings was synchronous. The aerial part of the seedlings was then sprayed 4 times (at 6, 7, 8, 9 days after sowing) with either water, 0.25–0.4 % DMSO, 2–10 μM epiBL, 5–30 μM PCZ or 10-80 μM Bikinin. Tween 20 was added at 0.02 % as surfactant to the different solutions. The length of the seedling without the root system was measured 14 days after sowing. The first leaf inclination was measured at the same time point.

In addition, seeds were germinated and grown in soil in the greenhouse under 16h light/8h dark cycles and 18/20 °C day - 12/15 °C night temperatures. The aerial part of the plants were sprayed 3 times with either water, 0.05 to 0.3 % DMSO, 2 to12 μM epiBL, 5 to 30 μM PCZ and 5 to 30 μM Bikinin. Tween 20 at 0.02 % was added as surfactant to the different solutions. Length of each plant without the root system was measured at the time of the first spraying (15–22 days after sowing) and once the maximum plant size (50–55 days after sowing) was reached.

Hormone and inhibitor treatment of wheat embryos

Wheat Cv Sonora were grown in the greenhouse under 16h light/8h dark cycles and 18/20 °C day - 12/15 °C night temperatures. Embryos were isolated and grown in vitro as described by Fischer and Neuhaus (1995) and Fischer et al., (1997) [39, 45]. EpiBL was added to the culture media at concentrations ranging from 0.5 to 10 μM, PCZ at concentrations ranging from 5 to 10 μM and Bikinin at concentrations ranging from to 2 to 30 μM.

Availability of supporting data

All supporting data are included as additional files

Notes

Abbreviations

ASK: 

Arabidopsis SHAGGY-related protein kinase

ATBS1: 

ACTIVATION-TAGGED BRI1-SUPPRESSOR1

BAS1

phyB activation-tagged suppressor 1

BES1: 

BRI1-EMS-SUPPRESSOR1

bHLH: 

basic helix loop helix

BIM1: 

BES1 interacting Myc-like protein 1

BIN2: 

BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 2

BL: 

brassinolide

BR: 

brassinosteroid

BRI1: 

BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1

BRZ: 

brassinazole

BS: 

ball-shaped

BSK1: 

BR-SIGNALING KINASE 1

BSU1: 

BRI1 SUPPRESSOR 1

BZR1: 

BRASSINAZOLE-RESISTANT1

CPD

constitutive photomorphogenesis and dwarfism

cr: 

coleoptilar ring

CYP51A1: 

lanosterol 14R-demethylase

DRN: 

DORNRÖSCHEN

EF-1alpha

elongation factor-1alpha

ep: 

embryo-proper

epiBL: 

Epibrassinolide

GA: 

gibberellin

GFP: 

Green Fluorescent Protein

GSK: 

Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase

GST: 

Gluthathione-S-Transferase

MP: 

MONOPTEROS

MPB: 

bovine myelin basic protein

MS: 

Murashige and Skoog

NPA: 

N-1-naphthylphthalamic acid

PCZ: 

Propiconazole

PIN: 

PIN-FORMED

PS: 

pear-shaped

RG: 

radial growth

SAUR-AC1

Arabidopsis Columbia Small Auxin Up RNA gene 1

sc: 

scutellum

SD: 

severe dwarf

SGG: 

SHAGGY

sm: 

shoot meristem

sp: 

suspensor

TaGSK1: 

Triticum aestivum glycogen synthase kinase - SHAGGY kinase

TaSK: 

Triticum aestivum SHAGGY-like Kinase

TMO7: 

TARGET OF MONOPTEROS 7

UBQ10

polyubiquitin 10

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Thomas Bittner was supported by a LGFG (LandesGraduiertenFörderungsGesetz) scholarship. We are very thankful to Rainer Hertel and to Marta Rodriguez-Franco for helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank Gunther Neuhaus for discussions and support. The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg in the funding programme Open Access Publishing.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cell Biology, Faculty of Biology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg

References

  1. Dornelas MC, Wittich P, von Recklinghausen I, van Lammeren A, Kreis M. Characterization of three novel members of the Arabidopsis SHAGGY-related protein kinases (ASK) multigene family. Plant Mol Biol. 1999;39:137–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Dornelas MC, van Lammeren A, Kreis M. Arabidopsis thaliana SHAGGY related protein kinases (AtSK11 and 12) function in perianth and gynoecium development. Plant J. 2000;21:419–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Jonak C, Beisteiner D, Beyerly J, Hirt H. Wound-induced expression and activation of WIG, a novel glycogen synthase kinase 3. Plant Cell. 2000;12:1467–75.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tavares R, Vidal J, van Lammeren A, Kreis M. AtSKθ, a plant homologue of SGG/GSK-3 marks developing tissues in Arabidospsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2002;50:261–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim T-W, Michniewicz M, Bergmann DC, Wang Z-Y. Brassinosteroid regulates stomatal development by GSK3-mediated inhibition of a MAPK pathway. Nature. 2012;482:419–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dornelas M, Lejeune B, Dron M, Kreis M. The Arabidopsis SHAGGY-related protein kinase (ASK) gene family: structure, organization and evolution. Gene. 1998;212:249–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yoo MJ, Albert VA, Soltis PS, Soltis D. Phylogenetic diversification of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2006;6:3–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittner T, Campagne S, Neuhaus G, Rensing SA, Fischer-Iglesias C. Identification and characterization of two wheat Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:64. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-13-64.
  9. Choe S, Schmitz RJ, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Lee M-O, Yoshida S, et al. Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid-insensitive dwarf12 mutants are semidominant and defective in a Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3-like kinase. Plant Physiol. 2002;130:1506–15.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li J, Nam KH. Regulation of Brassinosteroid signaling by a GSK3/SHAGGY- like kinase. Science. 2002;295:1299–301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Perez-Perez JM, Ponce MR, Micol JL. The UCU1 Arabidopsis gene encodes a SHAGGY/GSK3-like kinase required for cell expansion along the proximodistal axis. Dev Biol. 2002;242:161–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vert G, Chory J. Downstream nuclear events in brassinosteroid signalling. Nature. 2006;44:96–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim T-W, Guan S, Sun Y, Deng Z, Tang W, Shang J-X, et al. Brassinosteroid signal transduction from cell-surface receptor kinases to nuclear transcription factors. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11:1254–62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Yan Z, Zhao J, Peng P, Chihara RK, Li J. BIN2 functions redundantly with other Arabidopsis GSK3-like kinases to regulate brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:710–21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Rozhon W, Mayerhofer J, Petutschnig E, Fujioka S, Jonak C. ASKθ, a group-III Arabidopsis GSK3, functions in the brassinosteroid signalling pathway. Plant J. 2010;62:215–23.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ryu H, Kim K, Cho H, Park J, Choe S, Hwang I. Nucleoplasmic shuttling of BZR1 mediated by phophorylation is essential in Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signalling. Plant Cell. 2007;19:2749–62.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ryu H, Cho H, Kim K, Hwang I. Phosphorylation dependent nucleoplasmic shuttling of BES1 is a key regulatory event in Brassinosteroid signalling. Mol Cells. 2010;29:283–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. He J-X, Gendron JM, Yang Y, Li J, Wang Z-Y. The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:10185–90.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Clouse SD. Brassinosteroid signal transduction: from the receptor kinase activation to transcriptional networks regulating plant development. Plant Cell. 2011;23:1219–30.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Peng P, Yan Z, Zhu Y, Li J. Regulation of the Arabidopsis GSK3-like kinase BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2 through proteasome-mediated protein degradation. Mol Plant. 2008;1:338–46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Szekeres M, Nemeth K, Koncz-Kalman Z, Mathur J, Kauschmann A, Altmann T, et al. Brassinosteroids rescue the deficiency of CYP90, a cytochrome P450, controlling cell elongation and de-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell. 1996;85:171–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. He J-X, Gendron JM, Sun Y, Gampala SSL, Gendron N, Sun CQ, et al. BZR1 is a transcriptional repressor with dual roles in brassinosteroid homeostasis and growth responses. Science. 2005;307:1634–8.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yin Y, Vafeados D, Tao Y, Yoshida S, Asami T, Chory J. A new class of transcription factors mediates brassinosteroid-regulated gene expression in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2005;120:249–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Tanaka K, Asami T, Yoshida S, Nakamura Y, Matsuo T, Okamoto S. Brassinosteroid homeostasis in Arabidopsis Is ensured by feedback expressions of multiple genes involved in its metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2005;138:1117–25.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mathur J, Molnar G, Fujioka S, Takatsuto S, Sakurai A, Yokota T, et al. Transcription of the Arabidopsis CPD gene, encoding a steroidogenic cytochrome P450, is negatively controlled by brassinosteroids. Plant J. 1998;14:593–602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yin Y, Wang Z-Y, Mora-Garcia S, Li J, Yoshida S, Asami T, et al. BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote stem elongation. Cell. 2002;109:181–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. De Rybel B, Audenaert D, Vert G, Rozhon W, Mayerhofer J, Peelman F, et al. Chemical inhibition of a subset of Arabidopsis thaliana GSK3-like kinases activates brassinosteroid signaling. Cell. 2009;16:594–604.Google Scholar
  28. Chen GP, Ma WS, Huang ZJ, Xu T, Xue XB, Shen YZ. Isolation and characterization of TaGSK1 involved in wheat salt tolerance. Plant Sci. 2003;165:1369–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Tanaka K, Nakamura Y, Asami T, Yoshida S, Matsuo T, Okamoto S. Physiological roles of brassinosteroids in early growth of Arabidopsis: brassinosteroids have a synergistic relationship with gibberellin as well as auxin in light-grown hypocotyl elongation. J Plant Growth Regul. 2003;22:259–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Asami T, Yoshida S. Brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitors. Trend Plant Sci. 1999;4:348–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartwig T, Corvalan C, Best NB, Budka JS, Zhu J-Y, Choe S, et al. Propiconazole is a specific and accessible Brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis inhibitor for Arabidopsis and Maize. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036625.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Janeczko A, Swaczynova J. Endogenous brassinosteroids in wheat treated with 24-epibrassinolide. Biol Plant. 2010;54:477–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wada K, Marumo S, Ikekawa N, Morisaki M, Mori K. Brassinolide and homobrassinolide promotion of lamina inclination of rice seedlings. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981;22:323–5.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang LY, Bai MY, Wu J, Zhu JY, Wang H, Zhang Z, et al. Antagonistic HLH/bHLH transcription factors mediate brassinosteroid regulation of cell elongation and plant development in rice and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3767–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bai MY, Zhang LY, Gampala SS, Zhu SW, Song WY, Chong K, et al. Functions of OsBZR1 and 14-3-3 proteins in brassinosteroid signaling in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:13839–44.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Siegfried E, Chou TB, Perrimon N. Wingless signaling acts through zeste-white 3 the Drosophila homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3 to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell. 1992;71:1167–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. He X, Saint-Jeannet JP, Woodgett JR, Varmus HE, Dawid IB. Glycogen synthase kinase–3 and dorsoventral patterning in Xenopus embryos. Nature. 1995;374:617–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Broun M, Gee L, Reinhardt B, Bode HR. Formation of the head organizer in hydra involves the canonical Wnt pathway. Development. 2005;132:2907–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Fischer C, Neuhaus G. In vitro development of globular zygotic wheat embryos. Plant Cell Rep. 1995;15:186–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee S, Choi SC, An G. Rice SVP-group MADS-box proteins, OsMADS22 and OsMADS55, are negative regulators of brassinosteroid responses. Plant J. 2008;54:93–105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sakamoto T, Morinaka Y, Ohnishi T, Sunohara H, Fujioka S, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, et al. Erect leaves caused by brassinosteroid deficiency increase biomass production and grain yield in rice. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:105–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rozhon W, Wang W, Berthiller F, Juliane Mayerhofer J, Chen T, Elena Petutschnig E, et al. Bikinin-like inhibitors targeting GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases: characterisation of novel compounds and elucidation of their catabolism in planta. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:172. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-14-172.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Sekimata K, Han S-Y, Yoneyama K, Takeuchi Y, Yoshida S, Asami T. A specific and potent inhibitor of Brassinosteroid biosynthesis possessing a dioxolane ring. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50:3486–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Dominguez I, Itoh K, Sokol S. Role of glycogen synthase kinase 3ß as a negative regulator of dorsoventral axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:8498–502.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Fischer C, Speth V, Fleig-Eberenz S, Neuhaus G. Induction of zygotic polyembryos in wheat: influence of auxin polar transport. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1767–80.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Fischer C, Neuhaus G. Influence of auxin on the establishment of bilateral symmetry in monocots. Plant J. 1996;9:659–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Fischer-Iglesias C, Sundberg B, Neuhaus G, Jones AM. Auxin distribution and transport during embryonic pattern formation in wheat. Plant J. 2001;26:115–29.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rober-Kleber N, Albrechtová J, Fleig S, Huck N, Michalke W, Wagner E, et al. Plasma membrane H+-ATPase is involved in auxin-mediated cell elongation during wheat embryo development. Plant Physiol. 2003;131:1302–12.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Symons GM, Ross JJ, Jager CE, Reid JB. Brassinosteroid transport. J Exp Botany. 2008;59:17–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Halliday KJ. Plant hormones: The interplay of brassinosteroids and auxin. Curr Biol. 2004;14:R1008–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, et al. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical–basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature. 2003;426:147–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vert G, Walcher CL, Chory J, Nemhauser JL. Integration of auxin and brassinosteroid pathways by Auxin Response Factor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:9829–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang H, Zhu Y, Fujioka S, Asami T, Li J, Li J. Regulation of Arabidopsis brassinosteroid signaling by atypical basic helix-loop-helix proteins. Plant Cell. 2009;21:3781–91.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schlereth A, Möller B, Liu W, Kientz M, Flipse J, Rademacher EH, et al. MONOPTEROS controls embryonic root initiation by regulating a mobile transcription factor. Nature. 2010;464:913–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Chandler JW, Cole M, Flier A, Werr W. BIM1, a bHLH protein involved in brassinosteroid signalling, controls Arabidopsis embryonic patterning via interaction with DORNRÖSCHEN and DORNRÖSCHEN-LIKE. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69:57–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Chandler JW, Cole M, Flier A, Grewe B, Werr W. The AP2 transcription factors DORNROESCHEN and DORNROESCHEN- LIKE redundantly control Arabidopsis embryo patterning via interaction with PHAVOLUTA. Development. 2007;134:1653–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Hacham Y, Holland N, Butterfield C, Ubeda-Tomas S, Bennett MJ, Chory J, et al. Brassinosteroid perception in the epidermis controls root meristem size. Development. 2011;138:839–48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Vilarrasa-Blasi J, González-García MP, Frigola D, Fàbregas N, Alexiou KG, López-Bigas N, et al. Regulation of Plant Stem Cell Quiescence by a Brassinosteroid Signaling Module. Dev Cell. 2014;30:36–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Schrick K, Mayer U, Horrichs A, Kuhnt C, Bellini C, Dangl J, et al. FACKEL is a sterol C-14 reductase required for organized cell division and expansion in Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1471–84.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Souter M, Topping J, Pullen M, Friml J, Palme K, Hackett R, et al. Hydra mutants of Arabidopsis are defective in sterol profiles and auxin and ethylene signaling. Plant Cell. 2002;14:1017–31.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Jang JC, Fujioka S, Tasaka M, Seto H, Takatsuto S, Ishii A, et al. A critical role of sterols in embryonic patterning and meristem programming revealed by the fackel mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1485–97.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Jiang WB, Huang HY, Hu YW, Zhu SW, Wang ZY, Lin WH. Brassinosteroid regulates seed size and shape in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2013;162:1965–77.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Christov NK, Christova PK, Kato H, Liu Y, Sasaki K, Imai R. TaSK5, an abiotic stress-inducible GSK3/shaggy-like kinase from wheat, confers salt and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;84:251–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16:735–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Oñate-Sánchez L, Vicente-Carbajosa J. DNA-free RNA isolation protocols for Arabidopsis thaliana, including seeds and siliques. BMC Res Note. 2008;1:93–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bittner et al. 2015