Tomato SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 contribute to disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea
© Li et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 11 March 2014
Accepted: 3 June 2014
Published: 15 June 2014
Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are highly conserved signaling modules that mediate the transduction of extracellular stimuli via receptors/sensors into intracellular responses and play key roles in plant immunity against pathogen attack. However, the function of tomato MAPK kinases, SlMKKs, in resistance against Botrytis cinerea remains unclear yet.
A total of five SlMKK genes with one new member, SlMKK5, were identified in tomato. qRT-PCR analyses revealed that expression of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 was strongly induced by B. cinerea and by jasmonic acid and ethylene precursor 1-amino cyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS)-based knockdown of individual SlMKKs and disease assays identified that SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 but not other three SlMKKs (SlMKK1, SlMKK3 and SlMKK5) are involved in resistance against B. cinerea. Silencing of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea, increased accumulation of reactive oxygen species and attenuated expression of defense genes after infection of B. cinerea in tomato plants. Furthermore, transient expression of constitutively active phosphomimicking forms SlMKK2 DD and SlMKK4 DD in leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana plants led to enhanced resistance to B. cinerea and elevated expression of defense genes.
VIGS-based knockdown of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 expression in tomato and gain-of-function transient expression of constitutively active phosphomimicking forms SlMKK2 DD and SlMKK2 DD in N. benthamiana demonstrate that both SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 function as positive regulators of defense response against B. cinerea.
KeywordsTomato (Solanum lycopersicum) MAPK cascade MPK kinase SlMKK2/SlMKK4 Botrytis cinerea Defense response
During their life time, plants always suffer from invasion of potential pathogenic microorganisms in the environment. To defend themselves against pathogen attack, plants have evolved a sophisticated immune system [1–3]. Two types of innate immune responses, which are precisely regulated upon infection from different types of pathogens, have been recognized in plants so far. The first innate immune response is the pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI), which is activated by a number of PAMPs such as flagellin, EF-Tu and chitin [4–6]. The other one is the effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which is modulated by recognition of pathogen-derived avirulence effectors by plant R proteins [7, 8]. Once initiation of the innate immune responses, plant cells can often trigger a series of signaling events that lead to diverse cellular responses including changes in ion fluxes, synthesis of the defense-related hormones, transcriptional reprogramming, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and a localized form of programmed cell death (PCD) referred to as the hypersensitive response (HR) . These signals are translated from outside into plant cells by some conserved signal molecules and trigger plant downstream immune responses .
Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascades are highly conserved signaling modules downstream of receptors/sensors that transduce extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses . The MAPK cascade comprises three functional protein kinases, i.e. MAPK kinase kinases (MAPKKKs), MAPK kinases (MAPKKs) and MAPKs. Upon perception of the environmental signals by the membrane-localized receptor-like protein kinases, MAPKKKs activate via phosphorylation their downstream MAPKKs, which in turn further phosphorylate MAPKs . The input signal can be amplified through the MAPK cascade to modify a set of specific downstream target proteins by the way of phosphorylation . In Arabidopsis thaliana, 80 MAPKKKs, 10 MAPKKs and 20 MAPKs have been recognized [13, 14] and some of them have been studied extensively for their functions in plant immunity. Two entire Arabidopsis MAPK cascades, MEKK1-MKK4/MKK5-MPK3/MPK6 and MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4, have been established through genetic and biochemical studies and have been shown to act as positive or negative regulators of signaling pathways involved in immune responses such as PTI and ETI [11, 15, 16]. The components of the MEKK1-MKK4/MKK5-MPK3/MPK6 cascade can be activated rapidly upon treatment with some of PAMPs such as flg22, a peptide PAMP derived from bacterial flagellin . Knockout/knockdown of individual component in this MAPK cascade normally results in increased disease susceptibility to a range of pathogens including Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and Botrytis cinerea[18–20], whereas transient or stable expression of constitutively active phosphomimic MKK4/MKK5 in Arabidopsis leaves or transgenic plants leads to enhanced resistance to bacterial and fungal pathogens and activated defense responses including expression of defense genes, generation of ROS, accumulation of camalexin and appearance of HR-like cell death [17, 19, 21–24]. By contrast, the MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 cascade plays both positive and negative roles in regulating plant defense. The mekk1, mkk1/mkk2 double and mpk4 plants exhibit constitutively activated defense responses, i.e. accumulation of ROS, elevated level of salicylic acid (SA) expression of defense genes and HR, and display enhanced resistance to a range of pathogens [25–31]. Genetic, molecular and biochemical studies have also identified a number of components of the MAPK cascades from other plants such as tobacco and rice, which play important roles in regulating disease resistance responses against different types of pathogens (for reviews, see [11, 15, 16, 32, 33].
In tomato, a total of 16 putative SlMPKs were identified at genome-wide level  and some of them have been functionally characterized for their possible roles in regulating defense response against biotic stresses. SlMPK1, SlMPK2 and SlMPK3 were shown to participate in Cf-4/Avr4- and Pto/AvrPto-induced HR and in defense response against Ralstonia solanacearum and insect attack [35–39]. SlMPK4, a homolog of Arabidopsis MPK4 that is a negative regulator of immunity , was shown to be required for resistance against B. cinerea. SlMKK2 and SlMKK4, two out of four tomato SlMKKs identified, can phosphorylate SlMPK1, SlMPK2 and SlMPK3 and induce HR-like cell death when overexpressed in tomato leaves, unraveling a possible MAPK cascade in defense response against P. syringae pv. tomato[35, 41, 42]. Biochemical evidence has revealed that two leucines in the D-site of SlMKK2 are critical to interact with SlMPK3 and PCD elicitation . Two MAPKKKs (MAPKKKα and MAPKKKϵ) have been shown to function as positive regulators of Pto-mediated signal transduction [43, 44]. Recently, it was found that a tomato 14-3-3 protein TFT7 can interact with both SlMAPKKKα and SlMKK2 and may coordinately recruit SlMAPKKKα and SlMKK2 for efficient signaling leading to PCD [45, 46].
Despite of extensive studies on the MAPK cascades in immune response in tomato, little is known about the functions of these MAPK cascades in defense response against necrotrophic fungal pathogens such as B. cinerea. In the present study, we performed functional analyses using virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) approach of SlMKKs in resistance against B. cinerea and found that both SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 act as positive regulators of defense response against this necrotrophic fungal pathogen.
Identification of tomato SlMKKs
Expression of SlMKKs induced by B. cinereainfection and phytohormone treatment
Silencing of SlMKK2/SlMKK4 resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea
To examine the possible involvement of SlMKKs in disease resistance against B. cinerea, we performed functional analyses on all five SlMKKs identified by VIGS approach through comparing the phenotype of disease caused by B. cinerea between individual SlMKK-silenced plants with control plants. For this purpose, specific fragment for each SlMKK gene was chosen to generate VIGS construct and standard VIGS procedure with a phytoene desaturase (PDS) construct as an indicative for VIGS efficiency of each experiment was performed on 2-week-old plants . Only when >90% of the PDS construct-infiltrated plants showed bleaching phenotype, the VIGS construct of interest gene-infiltrated plants were used for experiments. The silencing efficiency and specificity for each SlMKK gene was determined by qRT-PCR analyzing the transcript level of the target SlMKK gene and other four SlMKK genes in the TRV-target SlMKK-infiltrated plants. In our experiment condition, when compared with those in the TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants, the transcript level of the target SlMKK gene was significantly reduced whereas the transcript levels of the other SlMKK genes were comparable in the TRV-target SlMKK-silenced plants (data not shown). Overall, the silencing efficiency for a target SlMKK gene was approximately 70-75% (data not shown). Therefore, the silencing efficiencies and specificity for each SlMKK gene were satisfied for further experiments.
Silencing of SlMKK2/SlMKK4 attenuated defense response against B. cinerea
We next analyzed the expression of representative marker genes regulated by the JA/ET- and SA-mediated defense signaling pathways, respectively, to explore the possible molecular mechanism associated with the reduced B. cinerea resistance in SlMKK2- and SlMKK4-silenced plants. For this purpose, two marker genes, SlPRP2 and SlPR1b, regulated by the SA-mediated signaling pathway , and another three marker genes, SlLapA, SlPI I and SlPI II, regulated by the JA/ET-mediated signaling pathway , were chosen to compare their expression changes in the TRV-SlMKK2- or TRV-SlMKK4-infiltrated plants with those in the TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants. No significant difference in expression of the four defense genes examined was observed in the TRV-SlMKK2-, TRV-SlMKK4- or TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants without infection of B. cinerea (Figure 6B), indicating that silencing of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 did not affect the expression of defense genes in tomato plants under normal healthy condition. As compared with those in the mock-inoculated plants, the expression levels of SlPRP2 and SlPR1b increased significantly after infection with B. cinerea; however, the expression levels in the TRV-SlMKK2- and TRV-SlMKK4-infiltrated plants were reduced to some extents as compared with those in the TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants (Figure 6B). Similarly, infection of B. cinerea also induced significantly the expression of SlLapA, SlPI I and SlPI II (Figure 6B); however, the expression levels of SlLapA, SlPI I and SlPI II in the TRV-SlMKK2- and TRV-SlMKK4-infiltrated plants were significantly reduced, showing >90% of reduction, as compared with those in the TRV-GUS-infiltrated control plants, at 24 hr after infection of B. cinerea (Figure 6B). These results indicate that silencing of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 attenuates significantly the expression of both SA signaling- and JA/ET signaling-regulated defense genes in tomato plants upon infection of B. cinerea.
Transient expression of SlMKK2/SlMKK4 in Nicotiana benthamiana activated defense responses against B. cinerea
The MAPK cascades, as an important module that mediates the transduction and amplification of the environmental signals from plasma membrane-localized receptors/sensors into plant cells, play critical roles in defense responses against pathogen attack (for reviews, see [11, 15, 16, 32, 33]). Regarding a large body of evidence on the functions and mechanisms of the MAPK cascades in plant innate immune responses (i.e. PTI and ETI) against biotrophic/hemibiotrophic pathogens, the function of the MAPK cascades in defense response against necrotrophic fungal pathogens, which have distinct infection styles from that of biotrophic pathogens [48, 51], is relatively limited. When searched in the literatures, only a few of studies have examined phenotypically using loss-of-function and gain-of-function approaches the functions of individual component of MAPK cascades, i.e. AtMPK3, AtMPK4 and AtMKK2, in resistance to necrotrophic fungi such as B. cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola[20, 21, 52, 53]. We previously demonstrated that the tomato SlMPK4, a homolog of AtMPK4, is required for resistance to B. cinerea. In the present study, we showed that two tomato MKKs, SlMKK2 and SlMKK4, are also required for resistance to B. cinerea and function as positive regulators of defense response against B. cinerea. Our findings provide new insights into the understanding of the molecular mechanism for the MAPK cascades in regulating tomato immune response against necrotrophic fungal pathogens.
Four SlMKKs were previously identified . In the present study, we identified the fifth SlMKK, SlMKK5, which belongs to Group B of plant MKKs  and seems to be a close homologue of Arabidopsis AtMKK3 (Figure 1). Our identification of SlMKK5 led to a total of five members for the tomato MKK family, which fall into different groups of plant MKKs . Surprisingly, the number of the SlMKK family is obviously lesser than those in other plant species such as Arabidopsis (10 AtMKKs) , rice (8 OsMKKs) , soybean (11 GmMKKs) ; popular (13 PtMKKS) ; apple (9 MdMKKs) , canola (7 BnaMKKs)  and Brachypodium distachyon (12 BdMKKs) . For instance, two close homologues of MKK2 exist in Arabidopsis and rice genomes (i.e. AtMKK4/AtMKK5 and OsMKK4/OsMKK5). However, only one MKK2 was found in three Nicotiana species (common tobacco, N. benthamiana and N. attenuate)  and in tomato (Figure 1). Relatively fewer members of the SlMKK families in tomato and probably in other Solanaceae plants may be due to species-specific diversification during evolutionary history. On the other hand, the smaller number of the SlMKK family in tomato also suggests that the tomato SlMKK proteins may have evolved to play pleiotropic roles in diverse biological processes.
Activity of the MAPK cascades can be regulated at both transcriptional level and post-translational level. Transcriptional regulation of expression of genes for MKKs was reported in a range of plants upon different biotic and abiotic stress. For instance, the Arabidopsis AtMKK3, cotton GhMKK4 and GhMKK5 and N. attenuata NaMKK1 were recently shown to be induced by different pathogens (i.e. P. syingae pv. tomato DC3000, Rhizoctnia solani, Fusariun oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum), defense signaling molecules (i. e. SA, JA and ethephon) and herbivores [58–61]. Similarly, we also found in this study that the five tomato SlMKK genes are responsive to B. cinerea and that SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 can be induced rapidly and strongly after infection of B. cinerea (Figure 2). The inducibility of the expressions of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 by SA, JA and ACC (Figure 3) indicates that these two SlMKKs may be involved in both the SA- and JA/ET-mediated signaling pathways that activate defense responses against different types of pathogens. The significance of the transcriptional regulation of MKKs is also supported by several observations that overexpression of wild type forms of the MKK genes in transgenic plants or increased expression in activation-tagged mutant plants can result in altered resistance against a range of pathogens [60–62]. However, biochemical activation of the MAPK cascades at the post-translation level, which involves phosphorylation by upstream signals, is critical to their functions as signaling modules. To this regard, further biochemical experiments are required to examine whether SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 and their involved MAPK cascades are activated in tomato plants upon infection of B. cinerea.
In our VIGS-based phenotyping of all five SlMKKs, no any altered response of the SlMKK1-, SlMKK3- or SlMKK5-silenced plants to B. cinerea was observed (Figure 4). The Arabidopsis AtMKK2, a closely related homolog of SlMKK1 (Figure 1), has been shown to function as a negative regulator of immune response against biotrophic/hemibiotrophic pathogens [28–30] and overexpression of constitutively active form AtMKK2EE resulted in enhanced susceptibility to A. brassicicola. AtMKK2 has a redundant function with AtMKK1 and both AtMKK1 and AtMKK2 act upstream of AtMPK4 in the MEKK1-MKK1/2-MPK4 cascade [29, 63]. Silencing of SlMPK4, a homolog of AtMPK4, resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea. Surprisingly, silencing of SlMKK1, a possible MKK that acts upstream of SlMPK4, did not affect resistance to B. cinerea (Figure 4). The Arabidopsis AtMKK3, closely related to SlMKK5 (Figure 1), has been demonstrated to participate in a partial MAPK cascade that plays an important role in regulating expression of a set of JA-responsive genes, which are involved in JA-mediated defense responses [59, 64]. However, in our study, silencing of SlMKK5 also did not affect the resistance to B. cinerea (Figure 4), similar to a previous observation that silencing of SlMKK3 did not affect resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, the causal agent of bacterial spot disease on tomato . The phylogenetically related members of the SlMKK3 from other plants have not been functionally analyzed for their biological functions, but the rice OsMEK1 and maize ZmMEK1, closely related to SlMKK3 (Figure 1)  were shown to be involved in primary roots and abiotic stress response [66, 67]. Thus, it is possible that SlMKK3 may not be involved in disease resistance to B. cinerea (Figure 4). Regarding to the SlMKK1 and SlMKK5, however, their involvement in resistance to B. cinerea and to other pathogens cannot be ruled out before the disease phenotypes in plants with overexpression of the constitutively active phosphomimicking forms of SlMKK1 and SlMKK5 are carefully examined.
The function of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 in resistance to B. cinerea is supported by several observations presented in this study. Firstly, silencing of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea, as shown in detached leaf disease assays and whole plant disease assays (Figure 4 and Figure 5). SlMKK2 is closely related to Arabidopsis AtMKK4 and AtMKK5 (Figure 1). The reduced resistance to B. cinerea in the SlMKK2-silenced plants is somewhat similar to the observation that the Arabidopsis mpk3 plants showed reduced basal resistance to B. cinerea[20, 21], although there is no direct experimental evidence indicating whether mutations in AtMKK4 and AtMKK5, two upstream MKKs of AtMPK3 [17, 19], affect basal resistance to B. cinerea. Meanwhile, it was found that silencing of NbMKK1, closely related to SlMKK4 (Figure 1), attenuated resistance against a nonhost pathogen Pseudomonas cichorii. Previous studies have shown that silencing of SlMKK2 resulted in reduced resistance against P. syringae pv. tomato and X. campestris pv. vesicatoria[35, 65], indicating that SlMKK2 also plays a role in disease resistance against other pathogens.
Secondly, silencing of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 attenuated defense responses, i.e. generation of ROS and expression of defense genes (Figure 6), induced by infection of B. cinerea. In our study, silencing of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 resulted in significant accumulation of ROS after infection of B. cinerea (Figure 6A), consistent with the increased disease severity (Figures 4 and 5). This is in agreement with a general hypothesis that ROS accumulated during the late stage directly benefits the establishment of infection by B. cinerea. Several studies have demonstrated that B. cinerea induces the generation of ROS in plants to the benefit of the pathogen [69–71]. Comparison of the kinetics of ROS accumulation between the abscisic acid-deficient sitiens tomato mutant plants (highly resistant to B. cinerea) and the susceptible wild type plants after infection with B. cinerea revealed that timing of ROS accumulation is critical to its role in disease development . H2O2 accumulation in wild-type tomato plants started at 24 hr while H2O2 accumulation in sitiens plants was observed as early as 4 hr after inoculation . In our study, significant accumulation of H2O2 at relatively late stage (24 hr after inoculation) in the SlMKK2- and SlMKK4-silenced plants may start to initiate cell death in the site of infection and thus facilitate growth and infection of B. cinerea. This is partially supported by the significant difference of fungal growth in the TRV-SlMKK2- and TRV-SlMKK4-infiltrated plants and the TRV-GUS-infiltrated plants at 24 hr after inoculation (Figure 5B). Therefore, ROS accumulation in B. cinerea-infected tissues of plants may contribute differentially to disease development and disease resistance response depending on the timing kinetics of ROS production and accumulation as a facilitator of cell death may promote susceptibility, but early ROS may induce resistance mechanisms . On the other hand, expression of SlPRP2 and SlPR1b, regulated by the SA-mediated signaling pathway , and SlLapA, SlPI I and SlPI II, regulated by the JA/ET-mediated signaling pathway , were significantly decreased in the SlMKK2- and SlMKK4-silenced plants after infection of B. cinerea (Figure 6B), indicating that SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 may be involved in both SA - and JA/ET-mediated signaling pathways in tomato plants upon infection of B. cinerea. This is partially supported by the observations that the Arabidopsis AtMPK3 and AtMPK6, downstream MAPK of AtMKK4 and AtMKK5, closely related to SlMKK2 (Figure 1), are implicated in B. cinerea-induced ET biosynthesis  and that overexpression of AtMKK7, related to SlMKK4 (Figure 1), leads to elevated levels of SA .
Thirdly, transient expression of the constitutively active phosphomimicking forms SlMKK2 DD and SlMKK4 DD in N. benthamiana plants led to HR-like cell death, overproduction of ROS, enhanced resistance to B. cinerea and upregulated expression of defense genes (Figures 7 and 8). These phenotypes are consistent with the observations that transient expression of constitutively active forms of Arabidopsis AtMKK4 or tobacco NtMEK2 resulted in PCD and enhanced resistance to B. cinerea[17, 19]. Generally, HR-like cell death, probably caused by ROS accumulated during the late infection stage, facilitates colonization of plants by B. cinerea[69, 70]. However, the coincidence of HR-like cell death and enhanced resistance against B. cinerea in N. benthamiana plants transiently expressed the constitutively active phosphomimicking forms SlMKK2 DD and SlMKK4 DD may indicate that not all HR-like cell death is correlated with susceptibility to necrotrophic fungal pathogens like B. cinerea. This hypothesis is supported by recent observations that the control of cell death governs the outcome of the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum-plant interaction . On the other hand, it was previously reported that expression of wild type forms of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 in leaves of tomato and N. benthamiana plants caused typical PCD . However, we failed to observe the appearance of PCD in leaves of N. benthamiana plants infiltrated with constructs of wild type of SlMKK2 or SlMKK4 (data not shown). This is similar to the observation for AtMKK3, whose overexpression in its wild type form did not affect the resistance to P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 . Interestingly, when the SlMKK2 DD or SlMKK4 DD construct was transiently expressed in one half of leaves, the opposite half of the same leaves showed enhanced resistance to B. cinerea and upregulated expression of defense genes upon infection of B. cinerea (Figure 8), indicating that SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 may have a systemic effect on activation of defense response. It was recently found that ectopic expression of AtMKK7 in local tissues could induce disease resistance in systemic tissues, demonstrating a critical role for AtMKK7 in generating the systemic signal of SAR . In our experiments, significant H2O2 accumulation due to transient expression of SlMKK2 DD or SlMKK4 DD construct in one half of the N. benthamiana leaves at 48 hr after infiltration, at the time when the opposite half of the same leaves was inoculated with B. cinerea, may mount the ROS generated during the early stage of infection. It is therefore possible that ROS generated in the half leaf that transiently expressed the SlMKK2 DD or SlMKK4 DD construct may trigger the generation of yet unknown systemic signal(s), which transduce and activate defense responses in the opposite half leaf.
Tomato genome encodes five SlMKK genes and both of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 can be induced by B. cinerea. Silencing of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 resulted in reduced resistance to B. cinerea, increased accumulation of ROS and attenuated expression of defense genes after infection with B. cinerea in tomato. Transient expression of the constitutively active phosphomimicking forms SlMKK2 DD and SlMKK4 DD in N. benthamiana plants led to enhanced resistance to B. cinerea and elevated expression of defense genes. Our results demonstrated that both SlMKK2 and SlMKK4 function as positive regulators of defense response against B. cinerea in tomato.
Plant growth, treatments and disease assays
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cv. Suhong 2003 was used for all experiments. Seeds were scarified on moist filter paper in Petri dishes for 3 days and the sprouted seeds were transferred into a mixture of perlite : vermiculite : plant ash (1:6:2). Tomato and N. benthamiana plants were grown in a growth room under fluorescent light (200 μE m2 s−1) at 22–24°C with 60% relative humidity in a 14 hr light/10 hr dark regime. For analysis of gene expression, 4-week-old tomato plants were treated by foliar spraying with 10 μM MeJA, 100 μM ACC, 100 μM SA or water as a control and samples were collected at indicated time points after treatment.
Primers used in this study for different purposes
Cloning of cDNA
Extraction and treatment of total RNA
Extraction of total RNA from leaf samples by Trizol reagent and elimination of DNA in RNA samples with PrimeScript RT reagent Kit With gDNA Eraser (Takara, Dalian, China) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA samples obtained were stored at −80°C until used.
Cloning of SlMKKsand construction of VIGS vectors
First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the AMV reverse transcriptase (Takara, Dalian, China) using oligo d(T) primer according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The coding sequences for SlMKKs were amplified using gene-specific primers (Table 1) designed based on available full-length cDNAs or predicted cDNAs and confirmed by cloning and sequencing. Fragments of 300–400 bp in sizes for SlMKKs were amplified using gene-specific primers (Table 1) from sequenced plasmids and cloned into TRV2 vector , yielding TRV2-SlMKK1-5. These constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 by electroporation using GENE PULSER II Electroporation System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
Agrobacteria carrying TRV2-GUS (control) and TRV2-SlMKK1-5 plasmids were grown in YEP medium (50 μg/mL rifampicin, 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 25 μg/mL gentamicin) for 24 hr with continuous shaking at 28°C. Cells were centrifuged and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH5.7). Agrobacteria carrying TRV2-GUS or TRV2-SlMKK1-5 were mixed with agrobacteria carrying TRV1 in a ratio of 1:1 and adjusted to OD600 = 1.5. The mixed agrobacteria suspension was infiltrated into the abaxial surface of 2-week-old seedlings using a 1 mL needleless syringe. Efficiency of the silencing protocol was examined using a tomato PDS gene as a marker of silencing in tomato plants according to the protocol described previously .
Transient expression in N. benthamiana
Constitutively active phosphomimicking forms of SlMKK2 and SlMKK4, SlMKK2DD and SlMKK4DD, respectively, were generated by replacing the conserved Thr (Thr-215 for SlMKK2 or Thr-216 for SlMKK4) and Ser (Ser-221 for SlMKK2 or Ser-222 for SlMKK4) residues between the kinase subdomains VII and VIII with Asp using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene) as described previously . The mutated sequences in SlMKK2DD and SlMKK4DD were confirmed by sequencing and cloned into pFGC-Egfp vector to make SlMKK2DD-GFP and SlMKK4DD-GFP fusion constructs. The recombinant plasmids pFGC-SlMKK2DD-GFP, pFGC-SlMKK4DD-GFP and pFGC-Egfp were transformed into A. tumefacies GV3101. Agrobacteria carrying different constructs were grown overnight in YEP medium (50 μg/mL rifampicin, 50 μg/mL kanamycin and 25 μg/mL gentamicin), collected by centrifugation and resuspended to OD600 of 0.8 in infiltration buffer (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM MES, 200 μM acetosyringone, pH5.7). Fully expanded leaves of 4-week-old N. benthamiana were infiltrated with agrobacterial suspension as described before  and leaf samples were collected at 48 hr after infiltration for disease assays and for physiological, biochemical and molecular analyses.
Leaf discs were ground in 200 μL extraction buffer (4 M uera, 100 mm DTT), followed by addition of 100 μL loading buffer. The samples were boiled for 5 min and subsequently centrifuged at 10000 g for 10 min at 4°C. Proteins in 20 μL of the supernatant were separated on a 15% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose by wet electroblotting. Detection of GFP was performed using a mouse monoclonal GFP antibody (1:1000 dilution) (No. M1210-1, Huaan Company, Hangzhou, China) and a peroxidase-conjugated antimouse antibody (1:8000 dilution (No. HA1008, Huaan Company, Hangzhou, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins in SDS-PAGE gel were detected by an ECL Plus detection system (Huaan Company, Hangzhou, China).
qRT-PCR analysis of gene expression
For gene expression analyses, qPCR was performed with three independent biological replicates using SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) in a 25 μL volume on a CFX96 Real-time System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). A tomato actin gene was used as an internal control for normalization of the data obtained. Relative expression was calculated using 2–△△CT method.
Detection of ROS
Detection of H2O2 was performed by 3, 3-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining . Leaf samples were collected from inoculated tomato plants at 24 h after inoculation or N. benthamiana plants at 48 h after infiltration for transient expression. Leaves were dipped into DAB solution (1 mg/ml, pH3.8) and incubated for 8 hr in dark at room temperature. The DAB-treated leaves were removed, placed into acetic acid/glycerol/ethanol (1:1:1, vol/vol/vol), and boiled for 5 min in a water bath, followed by several changes of the solution. Subsequently, the leaves were maintained in 60% glycerol and accumulation of H2O2 was visualized using a digital camera.
All experiments were repeated independently for at least three times. Data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis according to the Student’s t-test and the probability values of p < 0.05 were considered as significant between different treatments.
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB119005), the National Key Technology R & D Program of China (2011BAD12B04), the National High-Tech R & D Program (No. 2012AA101504) and the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20120101110070).
- Dodds PN, Rathjen JP: Plant immunity: towards an integrated view of plant–pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Genet. 2010, 11 (8): 539-548.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fu ZQ, Dong XN: Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013, 64: 839-863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schwessinger B, Ronald PC: Plant innate immunity: perception of conserved microbial signatures. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012, 63: 451-482.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bernoux M, Ellis JG, Dodds PN: New insights in plant immunity signaling activation. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011, 14 (5): 512-518.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Segonzac C, Zipfel C: Activation of plant pattern-recognition receptors by bacteria. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011, 14 (1): 54-61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang J, Zhou JM: Plant immunity triggered by microbial molecular signatures. Mol Plant. 2010, 3 (5): 783-793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Block A, Alfano JR: Plant targets for Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors: virulence targets or guarded decoys?. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011, 14 (1): 39-46.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh CS, Martin GB: Effector-triggered immunity mediated by the Pto kinase. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16 (3): 132-140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boller T, He SY: Innate immunity in plants: an arms race between pattern recognition receptors in plants and effectors in microbial pathogens. Science. 2009, 324 (5928): 742-744.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pieterse CMJ, Reyes AL, Ent SVD, Wees SCMV: Networking by small-molecule hormones in plant immunity. Nat Chem Biol. 2009, 5 (5): 308-316.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meng X, Zhang S: MAPK cascades in plant disease resistance signaling. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013, 51: 245-266.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suarez-Rodriguez MC, Petersen M, Mundy J: Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010, 61: 621-649.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ichimura K, Shinozaki K, Tena G, Sheen J, Henry Y, Zhang S, Hirt H, Ellis BE, Morris PC, Innes RW, Ecker JR, Scheel D, Klessig DF, Machida Y, Mundy J, Ohashi Y, Walker JC: Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plants: a new nomenclature. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7: 301-308.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hamel LP, Nicole MC, Sritubtim S, Morency MJ, Ellis M, Ehlting J, Beaudoin N, Barbazuk B, Klessig D, Lee J, Martin G, Mundy J, Ohashi Y, Scheel D, Sheen J, Xing T, Zhang S, Seguin A, Ellis BE: Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11 (4): 192-198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitzschke A, Schikora A, Hirt H: MAPK cascade signalling networks in plant defence. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009, 12 (4): 421-426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rasmussen MW, Roux M, Petersen M, Mundy J: MAP kinase cascades in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Front Plant Sci. 2012, 3: 169-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asai T, Tena G, Plotnikova J, Willmann MR, Chiu WL, Gomez LG, Boller T, Ausubel FM, Sheen J: MAP kinase signalling cascade in Arabidopsis innate immunity. Nature. 2002, 415 (6875): 977-983.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Menke FLH, Pelt JAV, Pieterse CMJ, Klessig DF: Silencing of the mitogen-activated protein kinase MPK6 compromises disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004, 16 (4): 897-907.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ren D, Yang H, Zhang S: Cell death mediated by MAPK is associated with hydrogen peroxide production in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (1): 559-565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galletti R, Ferrari S, De Lorenzo G: Arabidopsis MPK3 and MPK6 play different roles in basal and oligogalacturonide- or flagellin-induced resistance against Botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157 (2): 804-814.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ren DT, Liu YD, Yang KY, Han L, Mao GH, Glazebrook J, Zhang SQ: A fungal-responsive MAPK cascade regulates phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (14): 5638-5643.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han L, Li GJ, Yang KY, Mao G, Wang R, Liu Y, Zhang S: Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 and 6 regulate Botrytis cinerea–induced ethylene production in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010, 64 (1): 114-127.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mao G, Meng X, Liu Y, Zheng Z, Chen Z, Zhang S: Phosphorylation of a WRKY transcription factor by two pathogen-responsive MAPKs drives phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011, 23 (4): 1639-5163.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meng X, Xu J, He Y, Yang KY, Mordorski B, Liu Y, Zhang S: Phosphorylation of an ERF transcription factor by Arabidopsis MPK3/MPK6 regulates plant defense gene induction and fungal resistance. Plant Cell. 2013, 25 (3): 1126-1142.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Petersen M, Brodersen P, Naested H, Andreasson E, Lindhart U, Johansen B, Nielsen HB, Lacy M, Austin MJ, Parker JE, Sharma SB, Klessig DF, Martienssen R, Mattsson O, Jensen AB, Mundy J: Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 negatively regulates systemic acquired resistance. Cell. 2000, 103 (7): 1111-1120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ichimura K, Casais C, Peck SC, Shinozaki K, Shirasu K: MEKK1 is required for MPK4 activation and regulates tissue-specific and temperature-dependent cell death in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (48): 36969-36976.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suarez-Rodriguez MCS, Phillips LA, Liu YD, Wang HC, Su SH, Jester PJ, Zhang SQ, Bent AF, Krysan PJ: MEKK1 is required for flg22-induced MPK4 activation in Arabidopsis plants. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143 (2): 661-669.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Qiu JL, Zhou L, Yun BW, Nielsen HB, Fiil BK, Petersen K, MacKinlay J, Loake GJ, Mundy J, Morris PC: Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases MKK1 and MKK2 have overlapping functions in defense signaling mediated by MEKK1, MPK4, and MKS1. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148 (1): 212-222.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gao MH, Liu JM, Bi DL, Zhang ZB, Cheng F, Chen SF, Zhang YL: MEKK1, MKK1/MKK2 and MPK4 function together in a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to regulate innate immunity in plants. Cell Res. 2008, 18 (12): 1190-1198.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kong Q, Qu N, Gao M, Zhang Z, Ding X, Yang F, Li Y, Dong OX, Chen S, Li X, Zhang Y: The MEKK1-MKK1/MKK2-MPK4 kinase cascade negatively regulates immunity mediated by a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012, 24 (5): 2225-2236.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Z, Wu Y, Gao M, Zhang J, Kong Q, Liu Y, Ba H, Zhou J, Zhang Y: Disruption of PAMP-induced MAP kinase cascade by a Pseudomonas syringae effector activates plant immunity mediated by the NB-LRR protein SUMM2. Cell Host Microbe. 2012, 11 (3): 253-263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S: Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant intracellular signaling. Annual Plant Reviews, Vol. 33: Intracellular Signaling in Plants. Edited by: Yang Z. 2008, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 100-136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Song FM, Zhang HJ, Zhang SQ: Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant defence responses. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions. Edited by: Bouarab K, Brisson N, Daayf F. 2009, London: CAB International, 36-58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kong F, Wang J, Cheng L, Liu S, Wu J, Peng Z, Lu G: Genome-wide analysis of the mitogen-activated protein kinase gene family in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene. 2012, 499 (1): 108-120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ekengren SK, Liu YL, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Martin GB: Two MAPK cascades, NPR1, and TGA transcription factors play a role in Pto-mediated disease resistance in tomato. Plant J. 2003, 36 (6): 905-917.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen YY, Lin YM, Chao TC, Wang JF, Liu AC, Ho FI, Cheng CP: Virus-induced gene silencing reveals the involvement of ethylene-, salicylic acid- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-related defense pathways in the resistance of tomato to bacterial wilt. Physiol Plant. 2009, 136 (3): 324-335.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Q, Xie QG, Smith-Becker J, Navarre DA, Kaloshian I: Mi-1-Mediated aphid resistance involves salicylic acid and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19 (6): 655-664.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandoth PK, Ranf S, Pancholi SS, Jayanty S, Walla MD, Miller W, Howe GA, Lincoln DE, Stratmann JW: Tomato MAPKs LeMPK1, LeMPK2, and LeMPK3 function in the systemin-mediated defense response against herbivorous insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104 (29): 12205-12210.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stulemeijer IJE, Stratmann JW, Joosten MHAJ: Tomato mitogen-activated protein kinases LeMPK1, LeMPK2, and LeMPK3 are activated during the Cf-4/Avr4-induced hypersensitive response and have distinct phosphorylation specificities. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144 (3): 1481-1494.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Virk N, Zhang HJ, Li XH, Zhang YF, Li DY, Song FM: Tomato SlMPK4 is required for resistance against Botrytis cinerea and tolerance to drought stress. Acta Physiol Plant. 2013, 35 (4): 1211-1221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pedley KF, Martin GB: Identification of MAPKs and their possible MAPK kinase activators involved in the Pto-mediated defense response of tomato. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279 (47): 49229-49235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh CS, Hwang J, Choi MS, Kang BC, Martin GB: Two leucines in the N-terminal MAPK-docking site of tomato SlMKK2 are critical for interaction with a downstream MAPK to elicit programmed cell death associated with plant immunity. FEBS Lett. 2013, 587 (10): 1460-1465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Del Pozo O, Pedley KF, Martin GB: MAPKKKα is a positive regulator of cell death associated with both plant immunity and disease. EMBO J. 2004, 23 (15): 3072-3082.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melech-Bonfil S, Sessa G: Tomato MAPKKKϵ is a positive regulator of cell-death signaling networks associated with plant immunity. Plant J. 2010, 64 (3): 379-391.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh CS, Pedley KF, Martin GB: Tomato 14-3-3 protein 7 positively regulates immunity-associated programmed cell death by enhancing protein abundance and signaling ability of MAPKKKα. Plant Cell. 2010, 22 (1): 260-272.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oh CS, Martin GB: Tomato 14-3-3 protein TFT7 interacts with a MAP kinase kinase to regulate immunity-associated programmed cell death mediated by diverse disease resistance proteins. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286 (16): 14129-14136.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu YL, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar SP: Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J. 2002, 31 (6): 777-786.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mengiste T: Plant immunity to necrotrophs. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2012, 50: 267-294.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kawazu K, Mochizuki A, Sato Y, Sugeno W, Murata M, Seo S, Mitsuhara I: Different expression profiles of jasmonic acid and salicylic acid inducible genes in the tomato plant against herbivores with various feeding modes. Arthropod Plant Interact. 2012, 6 (2): 221-230.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang KY, Liu YD, Zhang SQ: Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is involved in disease resistance in tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (1): 741-746.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prusky D, Alkan N, Mengiste T, Fluhr R: Quiescent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2013, 51: 155-176.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brodersen P, Petersen M, Bjørn Nielsen H, Zhu S, Newman MA, Shokat KM, Rietz S, Parker J, Mundy J: Arabidopsis MAP kinase 4 regulates salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid/ethylene-dependent responses via EDS1 and PAD4. Plant J. 2006, 47 (4): 532-546.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brader G, Djamei A, Teige M, Palva ET, Hirt H: The MAP kinase kinase MKK2 affects disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2007, 20 (5): 589-596.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neupane A, Nepal MP, Piya S, Subramanian S, Rohila JS, Reese , Benson BV: Identification, nomenclature, and evolutionary relationships of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) genes in soybean. Evol Bioinform Online. 2013, 9: 363-386.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Xu R, Luo X, Jiang Z, Shu H: Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene family in Malus domestica. Gene. 2013, 531 (2): 377-387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liang W, Yang B, Yu BJ, Zhou Z, Li C, Jia M, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Wu F, Zhang H, Wang B, Deyholos MK, Jiang YQ: Identification and analysis of MKK and MPK gene families in canola (Brassica napus L.). BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 392-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen L, Hu W, Tan S, Wang M, Ma Z, Zhou S, Deng X, Zhang Y, Huang C, Yang G, He G: Genome-wide identification and analysis of MAPK and MAPKK gene families in Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7 (10): e46744-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Heinrich M, Baldwin IT, Wu J: Two mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases, MKK1 and MEK2, are involved in wounding- and specialist lepidopteran herbivore Manduca sexta-induced responses in Nicotiana attenuata. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62 (12): 4355-4365.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Doczi R, Brader G, Pettkó-Szandtner A, Rajh I, Djamei A, Pitzschke A, Teige M, Hirt H: The Arabidopsis mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase MKK3 is upstream of group C mitogen-activated protein kinases and participates in pathogen signaling. Plant Cell. 2007, 19 (10): 3266-3279.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang L, Li Y, Lu W, Meng F, Wu CA, Guo X: Cotton GhMKK5 affects disease resistance, induces HR-like cell death, and reduces the tolerance to salt and drought stress in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. J Exp Bot. 2012, 63 (10): 3935-3951.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li Y, Zhang L, Lu W, Wang X, Wu CA, Guo X: Overexpression of cotton GhMKK4 enhances disease susceptibility and affects abscisic acid, gibberellin and hydrogen peroxide signalling in transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014, 15 (1): 94-108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang X, Dai Y, Xiong Y, DeFraia C, Li J, Dong X, Mou Z: Overexpression of Arabidopsis MAP kinase kinase 7 leads to activation of plant basal and systemic acquired resistance. Plant J. 2007, 52 (6): 1066-1079.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teige M, Scheikl E, Eulgem T, Doczi R, Ichimura K, Shinozaki K, Dangl JL, Hirt H: The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell. 2004, 15 (1): 141-152.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi F, Yoshida R, Ichimura K, Mizoguchi T, Seo S, Yonezawa M, Maruyama K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K: The mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade MKK3-MPK6 is an important part of the jasmonate signal transduction pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007, 19 (3): 805-818.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melech-Bonfil S, Sessa G: The SlMKK2 and SlMPK2 genes play a role in tomato disease resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Signal Behav. 2011, 6 (1): 154-156.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hardin SC, Wolniak SM: Expression of the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase ZmMEK1 in the primary root of maize. Planta. 2001, 213 (6): 916-926.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wen JQ, Oono K, Imai R: Two novel mitogen-activated protein signaling components, OsMEK1 and OsMAP1, are involved in a moderate low-temperature signaling pathway in rice. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129 (4): 1880-1891.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi Y, Nasir KH, Ito A, Kanzaki H, Matsumura H, Saitoh H, Fujisawa S, Kamoun S, Terauchi R: A high-throughput screen of cell-death-inducing factors in Nicotiana benthamiana identifies a novel MAPKK that mediates INF1-induced cell death signaling and non-host resistance to Pseudomonas cichorii. Plant J. 2007, 49 (6): 1030-1040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Govrin EM, Levine A: The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Curr Biol. 2000, 10 (13): 751-757.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Govrin EM, Rachmilevitch S, Tiwari BS, Solomon M, Levine A: An elicitor from Botrytis cinerea induces the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis thaliana and other plants and promotes the gray mold disease. Phytopathology. 2006, 96 (3): 299-307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Temme N, Tudzynski P: Does Botrytis cinerea ignore H2O2-induced oxidative stress during infection? Characterization of Botrytis activator protein 1. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2009, 22 (8): 987-998.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asselbergh B, Curvers K, Franca SC, Audenaert K, Vuylsteke M, Van Breusegem F, Höfte M: Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in sitiens, an abscisic acid-deficient tomato mutant, involves timely production of hydrogen peroxide and cell wall modifications in the epidermis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144 (4): 1863-1877.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kabbage M, Williams B, Dickman MB: Cell death control: the interplay of apoptosis and autophagy in the pathogenicity of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9 (4): e1003287-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- AbuQamar S, Chai MF, Luo HL, Song FM, Mengiste T: Tomato protein kinase 1b mediates signaling of plant responses to necrotrophic fungi and insect herbivory. Plant Cell. 2008, 20 (7): 1964-1983.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benito EP, Ten Have A, van’t Klooster JW, Van Kan JAL: Fungal and plant gene expression during synchronized infection of tomato leaves by Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1998, 104 (2): 207-220.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thordal-Christensen H, Zhang Z, Wei Y, Collinge DB: Subcellular localization of H2O2 in plants. H2O2 accumulation in papillae and hypersensitive response during the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant J. 1997, 11 (6): 1187-1194.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.