Open Access

Discovery, distribution and diversity of Puroindoline-D1 genes in bread wheat from five countries (Triticum aestivumL.)

Contributed equally
BMC Plant Biology201313:125

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-13-125

Received: 15 November 2012

Accepted: 4 September 2013

Published: 8 September 2013

Abstract

Background

Grain texture is one of the most important characteristics in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Puroindoline-D1 genes play the main role in controlling grain texture and are intimately associated with the milling and processing qualities in bread wheat.

Results

A series of diagnostic molecular markers and dCAPS markers were used to characterize Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 in 493 wheat cultivars from diverse geographic locations. A primer walking strategy was used to characterize PINA-null alleles at the DNA level. Results indicated that Chinese landraces encompassing 12 different Puroindoline-D1 allelic combinations showed the highest diversity, while CIMMYT wheat cultivars containing 3 different Puroindoline-D1 allelic combinations showed the lowest diversity amongst wheat cultivars from the five countries surveyed. Two novel Pina-D1 alleles, designated Pina-D1s with a 4,422-bp deletion and Pina-D1u with a 6,460-bp deletion in the Ha (Hardness) locus, were characterized at the DNA level by a primer walking strategy, and corresponding molecular markers Pina-N3 and Pina-N4 were developed for straightforward identification of the Pina-D1s and Pina-D1u alleles. Analysis of the association of Puroindoline-D1 alleles with grain texture indicated that wheat cultivars with Pina-null/Pinb-null allele, possessing an approximate 33-kb deletion in the Ha locus, have the highest SKCS hardness index amongst the different genotypes used in this study. Moreover, wheat cultivars with the PINA-null allele have significantly higher SKCS hardness index than those of Pinb-D1b and Pinb-D1p alleles.

Conclusions

Molecular characterization of the Puroindoline-D1 allele was investigated in bread wheat cultivars from five geographic regions, resulting in the discovery of two new alleles - Pina-D1s and Pina-D1u. Molecular markers were developed for both alleles. Analysis of the association of the Puroindoline-D1 alleles with grain texture showed that cultivars with PINA-null allele possessed relatively high SKCS hardness index. This study can provide useful information for the improvement of wheat quality, as well as give a deeper understanding of the molecular and genetic processes controlling grain texture in bread wheat.

Keywords

Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Puroindoline-D1 genes Grain texture Primer walking Functional marker

Background

Grain texture is one of the most important characteristics determining the end-use properties of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). It is well known that grain texture is mainly controlled by the Ha (Hardness) locus on the short arm of the 5D chromosome, even though the Ha loci were identified on homologous group 5 chromosome in bread wheat [1]. Compared with the Ha loci on the 5AS and 5BS chromosome, the Ha locus on the 5DS chromosome possesses three special genes - Puroindoline a (Pina-D1), Puroindoline b (Pinb-D1) and Grain Softness Protein (Gsp-1). Puroindoline genes have been proven to play a key role in modulating the grain texture in bread wheat [24]. However, the mechanism by which Puroindoline genes soften endosperm remains unknown. Moreover, the Gsp-1 gene does not perform a significant function in determining grain texture [5, 6].

The Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 genes were shown to encode wheat endosperm-specific lipid binding proteins with a unique tryptophan-rich domain which was considered as being responsible for the strong affinity of the Puroindoline-D1 protein to polar lipids. The Puroindoline-D1 genes were identified in almost all of wheat and its diploid ancestors as well as related species, except the tetraploid Triticum species [7]. Both wild-type Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 alleles produce a soft endosperm, whereas mutations in either Pina-D1 or Pinb-D1 results in endosperm hardening in bread wheat [810]. Since the first reported mutation in Puroindoline-D1 genes was reported in bread wheat [2], many natural mutations in the Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 genes have been found (i.e. Pina-D1b ~ t and Pinb-D1b ~ ac allele (see reviewed in [1113])). All these mutations produce hard endosperm in bread wheat, and variations in Puroindoline-D1 alleles have also been associated with differences in wheat quality [1416]. In most geographic regions, bread wheat cultivars with the Pinb-D1b allele are predominant in bread wheat but there are some exceptions, e.g. the PINA null is the most popular allele in the CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center) bread wheat cultivars [17] and Pinb-D1p is prevalent in the Chinese landrace cultivars [18, 19]. Moreover, cultivars with the PINA-null allele tend to give harder endosperm than those with the Pinb-D1b[14, 18, 2022], and the former may be less preferable from a milling standpoint. Recently, a novel group of Pinb-2 variants described as Pinb-like genes [2325] demonstrated to an inability to significantly contribute to grain softening when compared to the Puroindoline-D1 genes [26, 27] and also do not have intimate association with some quality characterizations surveyed by Mohler et al. [28].

Hexaploid wheat has a 29 kb smaller Ha locus in the D genome than its diploid donator Ae. tauschii, mainly due to transposable element insertions and two large deletions caused by illegitimate recombination (Chantret et al. [1]). It is possible, a large deletion in the Pina-D1b allele occurred after the DD genome of Ae. tauschii evolved into the AABBDD genomes of bread wheat. Compared with wild type, the Pina-D1b allele possesses a 15,380-bp deletion containing most of the Pina-D1 coding region [29]. The Pina-D1r has a 10,415-bp deletion containing the entire Pina coding region and was identified in both Chinese and Japanese landraces [30, 31]. Two corresponding molecular markers (Pina-N1 and Pina-N2), which span the deletions, were developed for straightforward identification of the Pina-D1b and Pina-D1r alleles.

As the largest producer and consumer of bread wheat in the entire world, China is also a secondary origin center of bread wheat, holding a highly diverse stock of wheat germplasm. Of ten Chinese agro-ecological zones, the Yellow and Huai wheat production region covering eight provinces including all Henan is the largest and most important wheat production region, and accounts for 45% of the country’s total harvested area and 48% of the total wheat production [32]. Meanwhile, the Yellow and Huai valley is one of the secondary origin centers of bread wheat in China, and a large number of landraces have been collected or developed in this region, some of which have played an important role in improving wheat productivity. Moreover, in order to improve the genetic diversity and avoid germeplasm homogenization, a wide variety of international germplasms from abroad (e.g. CIMMYT, Australia, USA, and Europe) have been introduced or exchanged to this region for wheat breeding programs. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the distribution of Puroindoline-D1 alleles in landraces and introduced cultivars of the Yellow and Huai Valley of China, in order to further characterize the molecular mechanism of PINA-null alleles, and to develop a robustly PCR-based molecular marker approach for wheat breeding.

Methods

Plant materials

In this study, a total of 493 bread wheat cultivars and advanced lines, including 204 Chinese landrace cultivars, 104 CIMMYT cultivars, 88 Australian cultivars, 53 Chilean cultivars and 44 cultivars from the Netherlands, were used to identify SKCS (Single Kernel Characterization System) hardness and Puroindoline-D1 genes. Those cultivars or advanced lines, exchanged or introduced from different countries or regions by Seed Bank of Henan Agricultural University, possessed certain or multiple superior agronomic traits and are being popularly used as parents in wheat breeding programs in the Yellow and Huai Valleys of China. All the accessions surveyed in this study were planted at the Zhengzhou Scientific Research and Education Center of Henan Agricultural University during the 2009–10 and 2010–11 cropping seasons, and grew well under the local management practices which involved the use of a supporting net for Chinese landraces. We harvested them at the different stages according to the maturity of each accession to make sure each cultivar was fully mature.

Seven near-isogenic lines (NILs) with different Puroindoline-D1 alleles (Pina-D1b, Pinb-D1b, Pinb-D1c, Pinb-D1d, Pinb-D1e, Pinb-D1f and Pinb-D1g), kindly provided by Prof. Xia Xianchun from Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, were planted in Zhengzhou and Zhoukou in 2011–2012 cropping seasons, and were used to further examine the influence of Puroindoline-D1 alleles on grain texture. These lines were developed at the USDA-ARS Western Wheat Quality Laboratory, Pullman, Washington. The NILs were developed by crossing donor parents possessing unique Puroindoline a and Puroindoline b gene haplotypes as male to the soft white spring wheat cultivar Alpowa. Seven backcrosses were conducted such that the general pedigree of each NIL is: Alpowa/donor parent//7*Alpowa [33].

The kernel hardness index of all wheat cultivars and advanced lines were measured by the Perten Single Kernel Characterization System (SKCS) 4100, following the manufacturer’s operation procedure (Perten Instruments North America Inc., Springfield, IL). The mean, standard deviation (SD), and distribution of SKCS hardness data, were used to classify the cultivars into ‘soft’, ‘mixed’, and ‘hard’ types.

DNA extraction and PCR parameters

Genomic DNA of each hard wheat cultivar surveyed was separately extracted from three pulverized kernels following the method of Chen et al. [24]. Genomic DNA from seedlings was used for either marker development or primer walking strategy [18]. PCR amplifications were performed in a PTC-200 Peltier Thermocycler or an ABI 9700 and were conducted in 25 μl reactions using 100 ng of genomic DNA, 10 pmol of each primer, 200 μM of each dNTP mix, 1× Taq DNA polymerase reaction buffer with 1.5 μM of MgCl2, and 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase. The cycling conditions were 94°C for 5 min following 35 cycles of 94°C for 50 s, 50°C to 65°C for 50 s (primer-specific annealing temperatures, see Table 1), 72°C for 1 min, following a 10-min final extension time at 72°C. All PCR products were separated via gel-electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized by UV light.
Table 1

PCR primers used for generating Puroindoline-D1 alleles and primer walking

Primer name

Forward primer

Reverse primer

Tma

Expected PCR size

Pinb-D1b1

ATGAAGGCCCTCTTCCTCA

CTCATGCTCACAGCCGCT

58°С

250 bp

Pinb-D1b2

ATGAAGGCCCTCTTCCTCA

CTCATGCTCACAGCCGCC

58°С

250 bp

Pina-D1

CATCTATTCATCTCCACCTGC

GTGACAGTTTATTAGCTAGTC

58°С

524 bp

Pinb-D1

GAGCCTCAACCCATCTATTCATC

CAAGGGTGATTTTATTCATAG

58°С

597 bp

Pina-N1

AATACCACATGGTTCTAGATACTG

GCAATACAAAGGACCTCTAGATT

60°С

776 bp

Pina-N2

TCAACATTCGTGCATCATCA

CTTCATTCGTCAGAGTTCCAT

60°С

436 bp

Pina-N3

CATCTATTCATCTCCACCTGC

CACTATATTGCCGGGATTTT

58°С

440 bp

Pina-N4

AGTGGTCTGATGGAAGCGT

TGGAAAAAACTAGGTTGGGA

54°С

546

BsrDI_Pina-D1n

TCACCTGGCGTTGGTGGCAAT

CGGCAGGTTCTTGGCTTCTTGTAT

66°С

197

BalI_Pina-D1l

GAGTGTTGCAGTCGGCTTGG

GGCAGGTTCTTGGCTTCTTGT

61°С

143

Pina-1

TACCTGTAGCCCCCAAGTTT

GAGTCGCTGCAGGCTTACG

58°С

677 bp

Pina-2

AATGCCCAACCTATAACCCG

CCATAGCCATGCCTCTTGAT

57°С

647 bp

Pina-3

AACCAGACCGGGCTGATAGT

CCAAGACGATGGAGGGAAAG

62°С

889 bp

Pina-4

GATAACCCTAATCCGGAGTAA

CAAATCTTGCCAGTTTCAGC

54°С

1036 bp

Pina-5

ATGGCAACAGGTCCTCTTCG

ATAGCTCAATGGGCAGGCAC

60°С

579 bp

Pina-6

TGGAAGGTTGAGGTGACTGC

TTTTTATTGGCGTTCGACTG

57°С

512 bp

Pina-7

GCAGACGGCGGTTGATAGTA

GTGAGAAGAGGGCGAGGGAA

62°С

720 bp

Pina-8

GGTGGGCGTCAACTGTCGTG

ATGCTACCTTGCTTTGTCCTCC

62°С

606 bp

Pina-9

TGACCAGGGAGCGAATACG

TGACGAGTTTCACGCTTCCA

59°С

1143 bp

Pina-10

ATAATAGCACCGGAACGCA

AGTCTTTCTCTCAGCATACACG

54°С

1022 bp

Pina-11

GACCCGCATATAAGAAAACCGAT

TCCCACATGTTAGTGTCTGCAAAG

61°С

760 bp

Pina-12

CTTTTATGGCATTGTACATGGGGAG

TGTCAGTGTGTTTTGGTGCAGGTGG

65°С

950 bp

Pina-13

AGAAACATTTGACATGAACGAC

AGATGAGATGAGGCCACACC

54°С

751 bp

Pina-14

GTATGTTCTTGGTGGTGGTTT

TGGTCTGGGAGGATGAATAG

54°С

687 bp

Pina-15

CAGGACGAAATACGTTGAAA

TGGAAAAAACTAGGTTGGGA

54°С

1004 bp

Pina-16

AGAGAGTGCCCCAAAAGGTA

GGAAATCCCTTTGGTCAATG

56°С

623 bp

Pina-17

TGACCAAAGGGATTTCCGTA

AAGATGGAGATGATGATGCC

54°С

511 bp

Pina-18

CTTCAAGTTCCTCCAGACCT

CACTATATTGCCGGGATTTT

54°С

484 bp

Pina-19

TGTTGTCTGAGTCTTCCTGTTT

GCTCTGGTGGTTCGACTTCT

54°С

624 bp

Pina-20

TGAGAGGCCTTGACATTTCC

AACGATGTGTGTCAGGCGGT

57°С

962 bp

Pina-21

CTCGCCTTCTTCTTTTGTCTCG

CCAACGGACTCATCGGCTCA

61°С

890 bp

Pina-22

CGATGAGTCCGTTGGAGGTA

GAAGATGGCCTTTTCGATGC

58°С

906 bp

Pina-23

GGGTTTTTCTCTCAACTGGG

GAACAGTTTTTCACAATGGG

54°С

1114 bp

Pina-24

AGTAAACAGGCACTCTCGCT

CTGGTTTTTCCCTGTTTCAT

54°С

985 bp

Pina-25

CAGGGAAAAACCAGCAAAAC

GCAGGAAGTATGTCAAGCGT

55°С

1041 bp

Pinb-1

AGCGGGGTACTAGACAACAG

GATAAATACATACACCTGTCGTTC

53°С

950 bp

Pinb-2

CAAAAGCGACGGGCACAGAG

CTCTACTTTCCGGATGTTGCGA

62°С

757 bp

Pinb-3

ATCCTCTCCTTGTCACCCTG

GCTCACGCTTTAAGCTTTTG

56°С

527 bp

Pinb-4

CAGAAAACCACGGCTAGAAG

GGACATTGTTGAGAACCACCT

55

529

Pinb-5

CTGCGGAAAAAAAAATCTGG

CTAACATCTAAAGCCGGAGG

55

1531

Pinb-6

AGTGCGTCAGACCGGTTTGT

GGTGGTGGTGATTGGTGAAG

58

1129

Pinb-7

GGAAATTGTGTCGCCTCATC

AAAGCCGCATCTTCTTGTAG

55

942

Pinb-8

CAGAGACGTGTTTATGGGAG

GCCCTTGTTGTCTTCTTTTA

52

925

Pinb-9

TTACTCGAAGGACTCGGAAG

AGAGATAGTGTTGGCATGGA

52

1201

Pinb-10

TGCCAACACTATCTCTGCCTC

ATGATCCCGTGACTAACTCCT

55

1115

Pinb-11

ACGGGTATCTCTGAAAGTGTC

TAAGCGTACGTGTAAGGTCG

53

1458

Pinb-12

AGTCTTATCTTGTTTCGGCG

CTCATATGCTCCATGTTTCTC

52

1501

Pinb-13

TGTTCGAGGAGCTGAAAATG

TGGTTCGCACGTGTCAAAT

56

1126

a Tm = PCR annealing temperature.

Genotyping of Puroindoline-D1alleles in bread wheat

Five soft wheat cultivars were randomly selected for directly sequencing their Pina and Pinb genes with primer sets Pina-D and Pinb-D (Table 1) because they all should be wild-type Puroindoline-D1 genes, i.e. Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a. We removed all mixed wheat cultivars from this study as they possibly contained more than one genotype for each cultivar [17, 34].

For the hard wheat cultivars based on SKCS classification, we first divided them into three groups by amplifications with primer sets Pina-D (containing the whole Pina-D1 coding region) and Pinb-D (containing whole Pinb-D1 coding region) (Table 1), i.e. Group I with both expected fragments of Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1, Group II with only expected Pinb-D1 fragment and Group III without any expected fragment of Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 genes. In Group I, the Pinb-D1b allele was initially identified by a reciprocal pair of primer sets Pinb-D1b1 and Pinb-D1b2 [3]. PCR products amplified with the Pinb-D primer set were digested by restriction enzymes PvuII and Pf1MI for identification of the Pinb-D1c and Pinb-D1p alleles, respectively, following the methods of Lillemo and Morris [9] and Li et al. [19]. For the other remaining cultivars in this group, the PCR products amplified with the Pina-D and Pinb-D primer sets were directly sequenced from both strands by SinoGenoMax Co., Ltd (http://www.sinogenomax.com/) and genotypes were confirmed by alignment with either known Puroindoline-D1 alleles or the NCBI blast website (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).

In Groups II and III, the Pina-N1 and Pina-N2 markers we previously developed [29, 30] were firstly used to identify Pina-D1b and Pina-D1r alleles, respectively, and other remaining cultivars were used for the primer walking strategy illustrated below.

Development of dCAPS marker

Although the Pina-D1l and Pina-D1n alleles were discovered in previous studies [8, 18, 30], no valid detection marker existed. This promoted us to establish a dCAPS (derived Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences) technique as a detection method. Two sets of primers for amplifying fragments containing SNPs in cultivars with the Pina-D1l or Pina-D1n allele were designed using the dCAPS Finder 2.0 (http://helix.wustl.edu/dcaps/dcaps.html) software along with the appropriate restriction enzymes [35]. The restriction enzymes BalI and BsrDI were used to directly digest the PCR products amplified with primer sets of BalI_Pina-D1l and BsrDI_Pina-D1n (Table 1), respectively, for the detection of Pina-D1l and Pina-D1n alleles. Cultivars with 176-bp and 124-bp digested fragments belong to Pina-D1n and Pina-D1l alleles, respectively.

Primer walking strategy

Sequences of the Ha-5D loci (CT009735) from NCBI were used to design genome-specific primers around the Pina and Pinb coding regions again Ha-5A (CT009586) and Ha-5B (CT009585) loci. A total of 38 pairs of primer sets spanning an approximately 40-kb region (Table 1) were designed between −10,386 bp (reference to the ATG of the Pina gene) and +11,447 bp (reference to the ATG of the Pinb gene) for the primer walking strategy in order to illustrate the molecular mechanism of cultivars with the absence of the Pina gene or both Pina and Pinb genes (Figure 1). Based on the failure or success of PCR amplification, the size and position of each deletion fragment was deduced and new primers spanning estimated deletion fragment were designed for straightforward amplification of pending test samples (see schematic diagram in Figure 2). PCR products with successful amplification were sequenced to obtain the exact size and position of deletions.
Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the primer walking strategy for illustrating the molecular characterization of PINA-null allele on the DNA level.

Figure 2

Identification of six Puroindoline-D1 alleles by molecular markers. A: Digestion of restriction enzyme PvuII for detection of Pinb-D1c; B: Digestion of restriction enzyme Pf1MI for detection of Pina-D1p; C: A dCAPS marker BsrDI_Pina-D1n for detection of Pina-D1n; D: A dCAPS marker BalI_Pina-D1l for detection of Pina-D1l; E: A new marker Pina-N3 for detection of Pina-D1s; F: A new marker Pina-N4 for detection of Pina-D1u.

Sequencing and alignments of sequences

The targeted fragments were purified from the gels using Quick DNA Extraction Kit (Takara, http://www.takara.com.cn/). The products were then ligated into the pGEM-T Easy vector and transformed into Escherchia coli DH-5α strain. Plasmids with targeted fragments detected by Colony PCR were extracted by the Plasmid Rapid Isolation Kit (Biodev-tech Company, http://biodevtech.tech-food.com/). Five clones for each sample were sequenced from both strands by SinoGenoMax Co., Ltd.

Analysis and multiple alignments of sequences were performed with DNAMAN Version 6.0 and graphic data were analyzed to check sequencing results reliability with Chromas Version 1.4.5 and FinchTV version 1.4.0.

Statistical analysis

SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) 19 software and LSR (least significant ranges) multiple comparison as well as Excel 2003 software were used to calculate the average and standard deviation of the SKCS hardness index, and to examine statistical significance among various Puroindoline-Dl alleles.

Results

Distribution of Puroindoline-D1alleles in bread wheat cultivars of five countries

Based on SKCS hardness index and distribution, 139 and 354 of the surveyed 493 wheat cultivars and advanced lines were classified as soft and hard genotypes, respectively. The 139 soft wheat cultivars were assumed to possess the wild type Puroindoline-D1 haplotype (Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a) [4, 1113]. This suggests that hard wheat is predominant in surveyed Chinese landraces and cultivars of Mexico, Australia, Chile and Netherlands even though soft wheat also possesses high distribution, with a percentage of 39%, in Chinese landraces surveyed.

All 354 hard wheat in this study were genotyped for Puroindoline-D1 alleles. The results from PCR amplification of allele-specific primers, digestions with restriction enzymes PvuII and Pf1MI and sequencing indicated that 105, 4 and 47 of 354 hard wheat cultivars possessed the Pinb-D1b, Pinb-D1c and Pinb-D1p alleles (Figure 2A, 2B), respectively. Based on detection of molecular markers we developed previously [29, 30], 129 and 21 cultivars belong to Pina-D1b and Pina-D1r alleles, respectively. For the remaining 48 cultivars, we tried to amplify the coding regions of Pina and Pinb genes with Primer set Pina-D and Pinb-D (Table 1). Then we sequenced all the Pina and Pinb genes of the 15 cultivars with entire amplifying fragments. Results of alignment with reported sequences of Puroindoline-Dl alleles showed that 3, 4, 6, 1 and 1 cultivars possessed Pina-D1l, Pina-D1n, Pinb-D1d, Pinb-D1q and Pinb-D1t alleles, respectively. Two new dCAPS markers were developed for identifying Pina-D1l and Pina-D1n alleles (Figure 2C, 2D), respectively, in order to efficiently detect them in the future because they are frequently present in Chinese landraces. Restriction enzymes BalI and BsrDI were used to digest the PCR products amplified with primer sets BalI-Pina-D1l and BsrDI-Pina-D1n (Table 1) for detection of Pina-D1l and Pinb-D1n alleles, respectively.

Discovery of novel Puroindoline-D1alleles

In order to further illustrate the molecular mechanism of the remaining 33 cultivars with an absence of either Pina or Pina & Pinb, a series of primers (Table 1) were designed around the coding region of Pina and Pinb genes. Based on the primer walking strategy, we found that amplicons could be obtained with primer sets through Pina-1 to Pina-13 and Pina-19 to Pina-25 whereas no expected fragment was amplified with primer sets through Pina-14 to Pina-18 in two Chinese landrace cultivars Dahongmang and Hulutou (Table 2). A new molecular marker Pina-N3 spanning deletion fragment was developed for identifying this new allele and then a 440-bp fragment was successfully amplified in those two cultivars (Figure 2E). The sequencing results of the 440-bp fragment indicated that there is a 4,422-bp deletion from +371 to 4792 bp (reference to ATG of Pina) in landraces Dahongmang and Hulutou compared with Ha sequence on the chromosome of 5DS in Chinese Spring (NCBI No: CT009735). This mutation with a single 4,422 bp deletion of Pina gene could be designated as Pina-D1s (Table 3) according to the nomenclature of 2007 Supplement of the Wheat Gene Catalogue [36, 37], Morris and Behave [13] and Behave and Morris [11, 12]. Furthermore, the new marker Pina-N3 was used to identify the Pina-D1s allele in other cultivars and the results revealed that 28 Chinese landrace cultivars possess the Pina-D1s allele, suggesting that the Pina-D1s is prevalent in hard wheat of the Chinese landrace cultivars surveyed.
Table 2

Locations and amplifications of primers in different cultivars with PINA-null allele

Primer

Position (Reference to ATG of Pinaor Pinb)

Expected PCR product amplified

Forward primer

Reverse primer

Chinese Spring

Yunong 202

Dahongmang/Hulutou

Zuantoubaike

Yumai/Changyaomai/Yangqingke

Pina-1

−10386a

−9170

Yesc

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pina-2

−9189

−8543

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pina-3

−8951

−8062

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pina-4

−9065

−8030

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Pina-5

−8332

−7754

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-6

−7896

−7385

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-7

−7748

−7028

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-8

−6044

−5438

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-9

−5850

−4707

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-10

−4168

−3146

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Pina-11

−2225

−1625

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Pina-12

−950

0

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Pina-13

−781

−30

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Pina-D

−40

+474

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Pina-14

+654

+1340

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Pina-15

+1116

+2118

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

Pina-16

+3229

+3851

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Pina-17

+3835

+4346

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Pina-18

4283

+4821

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Pina-19

+5116

+5740

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-20

+8439

+9400

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-21

+10695

+11585

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-22

+11560

+12466

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-23

+12260

+13373

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-24

+13464

+14448

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pina-25

+14435

+15475

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pinb-1

+15380 (−2766b)

+16330 (−1816)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pinb-2

+16630 (−1516)

+17387 (−759)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Pinb-3

(−779)

(−253)

Yes

Yes

-d

-

No

Pinb-4

(−407)

(+121)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-D

(−52)

(+542)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-5

(+1024)

(+2554)

No

No

-

-

No

Pinb-6

(+2484)

(+3612)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-7

(+3539)

(+4480)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-8

(+4425)

(+5353)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-9

(+5275)

(+6475)

Yes

Yes

-

-

No

Pinb-10

(+6460)

(+7574)

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

Pinb-11

(+7427)

(+8884)

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

Pinb-12

(+8819)

(+10319)

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

Pinb-13

(+10321)

(+11447)

Yes

Yes

-

-

Yes

a and b indicate relative positions of primers referenced to ATG in the Pina and Pinb genes, respectively.

c “Yes” and “No” indicate failure and success of amplification.

d “-” indicates PCR amplification was not performed.

Table 3

Known Puroindoline-D1 alleles in bread wheat

Pina-D1

Pinb-D1

Phenotype

NCBI No.

Molecular characterization

References

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1a

Soft

DQ363911

Wild type

[2]

Pina-D1b

Pinb-D1a

Hard

AB262660

15,380-bp deletion

[29]

Pina-D1k

-

Hard

-

≈ 33-kb deletion

In this paper; [6]

Pina-D1l

Pinb-D1a

Hard

-

ORF shift: C deletion at position 265 of Pinb

[8, 18]

Pina-D1m

Pinb-D1a

Hard

EF620907

Pro-35 → Ser

[18]

Pina-D1n

Pinb-D1a

Hard

EF620908

Trp-43 → Stop codon

[18]

Pina-D1p

Pinb-D1a

Hard

AY599893

Val13 → Glu

[20]

Pina-D1q

Pinb-D1a

Hard

AB181238

Asn-139 → Lys; Ile-140 → -Leu

[20]

Pina-D1r

Pinb-D1a

Hard

HM572327

10,415-bp deletion

[30]

Pina-D1s

Pinb-D1a

Hard

-

4,422-bp deletion

In this paper

Pina-D1t

Pinb-D1a

Hard

JN680739

Trp41 → Stop codon

[38]

Pina-D1u

Pinb-D1a

Hard

-

6,460-bp deletion

In this paper

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1b

Hard

DQ363914

Gly-46 → Ser

[3]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1c

Hard

-

Leu-60 → Pro

[9]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1d

Hard

-

Trp-44 → Arg

[9]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1e

Hard

-

Trp-39 → Stop codon

[10]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1f

Hard

-

Trp-44 → Stop codon

[10]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1g

Hard

-

Cys-56 → Stop codon

[10]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1p

Hard

AY581889

ORF shift: A deletion at position 210 of Pinb

[39]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1q

Hard

EF620909

Ser-44 → Leu

[34]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1r

Hard

AJ619022

ORF shift: G insertion at position 127

[40]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1s

Hard

AJ619021

ORF shift: G insertion and C → A at positions 127 and 205, respectively

[40]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1t

Hard

EF620910

Gly-47 → Arg

[18]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1u

Hard

EF620911

ORF shift: G deletion at position 126

[41]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1v

Hard

AY598029

Leu-9 → Ile

[20]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1w

Hard

AY640304

Pro-114 → Ile

[20]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1x

Hard

AM909618

C to A at position 257 and Gln-99 → stop codon

[42]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1aa

Hard

EF620912

ORF shift: C to A at position 96 and A deletion at position 210

[19]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1ab

Hard

AB302894

Gln-99 → Stop codon

[43]

Pina-D1a

Pinb-D1ac

Hard

-

G to T at position 257 and Gln-99 → stop codon

[44]

However, there were still four cultivars remaining after the screening with the new marker Pina-N3, i.e. one landrace cultivar Zuantoubaike with the absence of a Pina gene and three landrace cultivars Yumai, Changyaomai and Yangqingke with an absence of Pina and Pinb genes. Results from the primer walking strategy showed that amplicons could be obtained with primer sets through Pina-1 to Pina-9 and Pina-16 to Pina-25 whereas no targeted fragment was amplified with primer sets Pina-10 through Pina-15 in the Chinese landrace cultivar Zuantoubaike (Table 2). A new molecular marker Pina-N4 spanning deletion fragment was developed for identifying this new allele, and then a 524-bp fragment was successfully obtained in Zuantoubaike while it could not amplify a targeted band in other cultivars (Figure 2F). Sequencing results of the 524-bp fragment indicated a 6,460-bp deletion from −4435 bp to 2024 (reference to ATG of the Pina) in Zuantoubaike when compared with the Ha sequence on the chromosome of 5DS in Chinese Spring (NCBI No: CT009735). This mutation with a single 6,460 bp deletion of Pina gene could be designated as Pina-D1u (Table 3) according to the above-mentioned nomenclature.

For four cultivars without Pina and Pinb genes, including one Netherlands wheat cultivar Pcatan and three Chinese landraces Yumai, Changyaomai and Yangqingke, expected fragment sizes could only be gained in primer sets through Pina-1 to 3 and Pinb-9 to Pinb-13. Therefore, an approximate 33-kb deletion fragment containing Pina and Pinb coding regions could be deduced to occur in those three landraces when compared with the Ha sequence on the chromosome of 5DS in Chinese Spring (Table 3, Figure 1). However, a valid marker spanning this big deletion for specifying the location of this new allele was not obtained due to high similarity with the Ha loci of A and B genome in this region, even though several primer sets spanning this deletion were designed. This mutation with a single ≈ 33-kb deletion containing Pina and Pinb coding regions was temporarily designated as Pina-null/Pinb-null due to the large deletion simultaneously related to Pina and Pinb genes. In previous reports [6, 45], some cultivars had been found to lack the Pina and Pinb coding regions, designated Pina-D1k by Morris and Bhave [13]. However, Pina-null/Pinb-null is still used for describing this allele in this study because it is not known if the above four cultivars have the same molecular characterization on the DNA level with Pina-D1k allele.

Distribution of Puroindoline-D1alleles and their association with grain texture

Amongst hard cultivars from different countries, Chinese landraces showed the highest diversity on Puroindoline-D1 genes and possessed 11 types of Puroindoline-D1 alleles in hard wheat landraces (Table 4). CIMMYT hard wheat, only composed of two kinds of Puroindoline-D1 alleles, showed the lowest diversity among the four countries surveyed and Pina-D1b was predominant with the high percentage of 94.6%, which is consistent with previous studies [14, 17]. In wheat cultivars from Australia and Netherlands, Pinb-D1b was predominant with the high percentage of 73.6% and 56.7%, respectively. In Chile, Pina-D1b and Pinb-D1b are almost equally distributed in hard wheat cultivars. Surprisingly, 4 out of 6 cultivars with scarce allele Pinb-D1d showing relative superior processing quality [15] was found in Netherlands. Pinb-D1p was only found, and prevalent, in Chinese landraces (Table 4). Notably, based on five kernels’ results, one Chinese landrace cultivar, Bailaolaibian, possesses a double mutation genotype Pina-D1r/Pinb-D1p and its SKCS hardness index is 73.2.
Table 4

Distribution of Puroindoline-D1 alleles in bread wheat from China, Mexico, Australia, Chile and Netherlands

 

Phenotype

China

Mexico

Australia

Chile

Netherlands

Total

Sample No.

-

204

104

88

51

44

493

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a

Soft

80

10

19

16

14

139

Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a

Hard

0

89

17

19

4

129

Pina-D1l/Pinb-D1a

Hard

3

0

0

0

0

3

Pina-D1n/Pinb-D1a

Hard

4

0

0

0

0

4

Pina-D1r/Pinb-D1a

Hard

21

0

0

0

0

21

Pina-D1s/Pinb-D1a

Hard

28

0

0

0

0

28

Pina-D1u/Pinb-D1a

Hard

1

0

0

0

0

1

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b

Hard

15

5

51

17

17

105

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1c

Hard

0

0

0

0

4

4

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1d

Hard

0

0

1

1

4

6

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1p

Hard

46

0

0

0

0

46

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1q

Hard

1

0

0

0

0

1

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1t

Hard

1

0

0

0

0

1

Pina-D1r/Pinb-D1p

Hard

1

0

0

0

0

1

Pina-null/Pinb-null

Hard

3

0

0

0

1

4

In this study, we divided all cultivars surveyed into two groups of Chinese landraces and introduced cultivars for analyzing the association of Puroindoline-D1 alleles with grain texture due to the obvious difference on agronomic traits between them. A two-year average of SKCS hardness index was compared by significant differences of variance analysis among different genotypes in Chinese landraces and introduced cultivars even though grain texture possessed a high heritability of more than 80% based on previous reports. In Chinese landraces, the cultivars with Pina-null/Pinb-null allele possess the highest SKCS hardness index among several genotypes (Table 5). Due to the absence of both Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 genes, those cultivars have a similar grain texture to durum wheat which also has an extremely high SKCS hardness index. Three types of Pina-D1 mutations resulting in PINA protein null do not show significant difference of SKCS hardness but they all have significantly higher SKCS hardness than Pinb-D1b genotype (Table 5). Of the introduced cultivars, PINA-null and PINB-D1c genotypes show significantly higher SKCS hardness than PINB-D1b and PINB-D1d genotypes, which are consistent with the results of Morris et al. [10], that PINB-D1c genotype possesses significantly higher SKCS hardness than PINB-D1b genotype.
Table 5

Association of Puroindoline-D1 alleles with SKCS hardness in bread wheat

  

Chinese landraces

Introduced cultivars

NILs

Protein

Genotype

Sample No.

SKCS ± SD

Sample No.

SKCS ± SD

Sample No.

SKCS

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1a

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1a

80

38.8c ± 7.06

59

34.8d ± 8.25

  

PINA-null/PINB-D1a

Pina-D1b/Pinb-D1a

  

129

85.2a ± 8.20

1

86.8a

Pina-D1l/Pinb-D1a

3

81.9a ± 7.4

    

Pina-D1n/Pinb-D1a

4

    

Pina-null/Pinb-null

3

    

Pina-D1r/Pinb-D1a

21

    

Pina-D1s/Pinb-D1a

28

    

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1b

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1b

15

73.6b ± 12.51

90

78.4c ± 7.41

1

69.4c

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1c

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1c

  

4

88.1a ± 5.63

1

77.3b

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1d

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1d

  

6

80.0bc ± 5.78

1

69.8c

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1e

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1e

    

1

74.3b

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1f

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1f

    

1

77.8b

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1g

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1g

    

1

76.8b

PINA-D1a/PINB-D1p

Pina-D1a/Pinb-D1p

46

77.2b ± 7.26

    
 

Total

200

63.7

288

72.6

  

Different letters indicated a significant difference at the 5% level.

In order to further investigate the influence of Puroindoline-D1 alleles on grain texture and obtain a clean association of Puroindoline-D1 alleles with SKCS hardness without impact of other loci in the genome, seven near-isogenic lines with different Puroindoline-D1 alleles were used to compare their SKCS hardness index (Table 5). Results indicate that PINA-null genotype possesses the significantly highest SKCS hardness, whereas PINB-D1b and PINB-D1d genotypes possess the significantly lowest SKCS hardness amongst seven different hard genotypes (Table 5). These results are consistent with above-mentioned results derived from Chinese landrace cultivar and introduced wheat cultivars.

Discussion

Grain texture, which is mainly controlled by the Puroindoline-D1 genes on the 5DS chromosome, has an important impact on the milling and processing qualities of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). It has shown mutations in either Pina-D1 or Pinb-D1 allele result in a hard endosperm in bread wheat based on discoveries of many Puroindoline-D1 alleles. However, most of the mutations identified previously in bread wheat resulted from a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in Pinb-D1 or Pina-D1 genes. In this study, we found that diverse mutations occurred in the Ha loci of bread wheat, in the form of large deletions including entire or partial Pina-D1 coding region, and caused the PINA-null allele. In the long term, the lack of a straightforward marker for identifying the PINA-null allele leads us to develop a Pina-N1 marker for detection of Pina-D1b allele [29].

The previous most common approach for detecting Pina-D1b allele was to examine the presence or absence of the PINA protein, however this approach fails to identify the status of PINA-null allele at the DNA level. Therefore, almost all of PINA-null allele was taken into account as Pina-D1b allele [17, 18, 39, 46]. However, the findings from our study show the PINA-null allele to possess a completely different molecular characterization at the DNA level. The PINA-null (Pina-D1b previously called) allele is known to be the most prevalent genotype in the CIMMYT bread wheat cultivars [14, 17]. In this study, all of PINA-null allele in CIMMYT wheat surveyed was shown to have the Pina-D1b allele. The four molecular markers (Pina-N1 and Pina-N2 we previously developed; Pina-N3 and Pina-N4 in this study) will be useful for straightforward and efficient identification of PINA-null alleles in bread wheat cultivars.

Up to now, many Pina-D1 and Pinb-D1 alleles have been identified in different geographic bread wheat cultivars from around the world. Amongst different countries or regions, that China seems to possess a relatively more diverse germplasm of bread wheat on the genotype of grain texture, based on several investigations of Puroindoline-D1 alleles [10, 17, 18, 47] because almost all of the Puroindoline-D1 alleles previously reported in other countries or regions, outside of China, have been aslo found in Chinese wheat cultivars whereas a number of Puroindoline-D1 alleles appear to be exclusive to Chinese wheat cultivars so far, e.g. Pinb-D1p, Pinb-D1q, Pinb-D1t, Pinb-D1u, Pinb-D1v, Pinb-D1w, Pinb-D1x, Pinb-D1aa, Pinb-D1ac, Pina-D1m, Pina-D1n, Pina-D1p, Pina-D1q, Pina-D1r etc. [18, 20, 34, 41, 42, 44]. In this study, Chinese landraces also showed the highest diversity of Puroindoline-D1 alleles among wheat cultivars from five different countries. Due to the PINA-null allele, which possibly result from an evolution of hexaploid wheats from Ae. tauschii[30, 31], the molecular mechanism of each cultivar with PINA-null allele has been illustrated by either known molecular markers or the primer walking strategy. The discovery of Pina-D1v and Pina-D1u showed that five types of PINA-null alleles (Pina-D1b, Pina-D1s, Pina-D1r, Pina-D1v and Pina-D1u) have different deletion sites from each other, suggesting that the deletions could have occurred independently. According to previous reports [1, 7, 10, 22] and recent work on Puroindoline-D1 genes in Ae. tauschii (Personal communicate with Craig F. Morris in Washington State University), all five of the above-mentioned Pina-D1 alleles are not found in Ae. tauschii so far, suggesting that the big deletions of the above Pina-D1 allele possibly occurred during the formation of hexaploid wheat. Interestingly, all wheat cultivars with the PINA-null allele from CIMMYT, Australia, Netherlands and Chile are further identified as Pina-D1b allele in this study, whereas Chinese landraces with PINA-null allele are shown to possess four different alleles of Pina-D1s, Pina-D1r, Pina-D1v and Pina-D1u, which is possibly because China is the secondary origin center of hexaploid wheat in the word.

The Yellow and Huai valley is the largest and the most important Chinese wheat production region and is greatly responsible for the national food security guarantee. However, wheat production and quality have not significantly improved during the past decade in this region. A potential reason for this is mainly because the narrow genetic basis of modern wheat cultivars is a serious obstacle against sustaining and improving wheat productivity due to rapid vulnerability of genetically uniform cultivars by potentially new biotic and abiotic stresses. In an attempt to improve the status quo, a large number of alien wheat germplasms were introduced to the Yellow and Huai wheat production region of China. Even though we have previously reported the wheat cultivars of the Yellow and Huai wheat production region regarding Puroindoline-D1 alleles [30], investigation in this study primarily focused on landraces and introduced cultivars that are or were being core parents during the breeding process in the Yellow and Huai wheat production region. The cultivars previously used in Chen et al. [30] were mainly historical cultivars and modern cultivars, and all accessions we used previously were excluded in this study. Therefore, the work carried out in current and previous [30] studies could provide a more comprehensive understanding of wheat germplasms, particularly as potential parents for wheat breeding programs in view of grain texture in the Yellow and Huai wheat production region.

Conclusion

In the present study, molecular characterization of the Puroindoline-D1 allele was investigated in bread wheat cultivars from five geographic regions. Two novel alleles Pina-D1s and Pina-D1u at the Pina-D1 locus were characterized at the DNA level by a primer walking strategy, and corresponding molecular markers were developed for straightforward identification of these two alleles. Analysis of the association of Puroindoline-D1 alleles with grain texture indicated that wheat cultivars with Pina-null/Pinb-null allele have the highest SKCS hardness index amongst the different genotypes, and wheat cultivars with the PINA-null allele have significantly higher SKCS hardness index than those of Pinb-D1b and Pinb-D1p alleles.

Notes

Abbreviations

SKCS: 

Single kernel characterization system

Ha: 

Hardness

Pina-D1: 

Puroindoline a-D1

Pinb-D1: 

Puroindoline b-D1

Gsp-1: 

Grain Softness Protein

CIMMYT: 

International maize and wheat improvement center

dCAPS: 

derived Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

NIL: 

Near-isogenic line.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the National Natural Science Foundations (31370031 and 31000708) and 973 projects (2014CB138105 and 2009CB118300) of China.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Agronomy College, Henan Agricultural University
(2)
Key Laboratory of Physiological Ecology and Genetic Improvement of Food Crops in Henan Province
(3)
Collaborative Innovation Center of Henan Grain Crops

References

  1. Chantret N, Salse J, Sabot F, Rahman S, Bellec A, Laubin B, Dubois I, Dossat C, Sourdille P, Joudrier P, Gautier MF, Cattolico L, Bechert M, Aubourg S, Weissenbach J, Caboche M, Bernard M, Leroy P, Chalhoub B: Molecular basis of evolutionary events that shaped the Hardness locus in diploid and polyploid wheat species (Triticum and Aegilops). Plant Cell. 2005, 17: 1033-1045. 10.1105/tpc.104.029181.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Giroux MJ, Morris CF: A glycine to serine change in puroindoline b is associated with wheat grain hardness and low levels of starch-surface friabilin. Theor Appl Genet. 1997, 95: 857-864. 10.1007/s001220050636.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Giroux MJ, Morris CF: Wheat grain hardness results from highly conserved mutations in friabilin components puroindoline a and b. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998, 95: 6262-6266. 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6262.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Morris CF: Puroindolines: the molecular genetic basis of wheat grain hardness. Plant Mol Biol. 2002, 248: 633-647.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gollan P, Smith K, Bhave M: Gsp-1 genes comprise a multigene family in wheat that exhibits a unique combination of sequence diversity yet conservation. J Cereal Sci. 2007, 45: 184-198. 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.07.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Tranquilli G: Substitutions and deletions of genes related to grain hardness in wheat and their effect on grain texture. Crop Sci. 2002, 42: 1812-1817. 10.2135/cropsci2002.1812.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gautier MF, Cosson P, Guirao A, Alary R, Joudrier P: Puroindoline genes are highly conserved in diploid ancestor wheats and related species but absent in tetraploid Triticum species. Plant Sci. 2000, 153: 81-91. 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00258-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Gazza L, Nocente F, Ng PKW, Pogna NE: Genetic and biochemical analysis of common wheat cultivars lacking puroindoline a. Theor Appl Genet. 2005, 110: 470-478. 10.1007/s00122-004-1854-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lillemo M, Morris CF: A leucine to proline mutation in puroindoline b is frequently present in hard wheats from Northern Europe. Theor Appl Genet. 2000, 100: 1100-1107. 10.1007/s001220051392.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Morris CF, Lillemo M, Simeone MC, Giroux MJ, Babb SL, Kimberlee KK: Prevalence of puroindoline grain hardness genotypes among historically significant North American spring and winter wheats. Crop Sci. 2001, 41: 218-228. 10.2135/cropsci2001.411218x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhave M, Morris CF: Molecular genetics of puroindolines and related genes: allelic diversity in wheat and other grasses. Plant Mol Biol. 2008, 66: 205-219. 10.1007/s11103-007-9263-7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bhave M, Morris CF: Molecular genetics of puroindolines and related genes: regulation of expression, membrane binding properties and applications. Plant Mol Biol. 2008, 66: 221-231. 10.1007/s11103-007-9264-6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris CF, Bhave M: Reconciliation of D-genome puroindoline allele designations with current DNA sequence data. J Cereal Sci. 2008, 48: 277-287. 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.09.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen F, He ZH, Chen DS, Zhang CL, Xia XC: Influence of puroindoline allele on milling, steamed bread, noodles and pan bread in common spring wheat. J Cereal Sci. 2007, 45: 59-66. 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.06.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma DY, Zhang Y, Xia XC, Morris CF, He ZH: Milling and Chinese raw white noodle qualities of common wheat near-isogenic lines differing in puroindoline b allele. J Cereal Sci. 2009, 50: 126-130. 10.1016/j.jcs.2009.03.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Martin JM, Frohberg RC, Morris CF, Talbert LE, Giroux MJ: Milling and bread baking traits associated with puroindoline sequence type in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2001, 41: 228-234. 10.2135/cropsci2001.411228x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lillemo M, Chen F, Xia XC, William M, Peña RJ, Trethowan R, He ZH: Puroindoline grain hardness alleles in CIMMYT bread wheat. J Cereal Sci. 2006, 44: 86-92. 10.1016/j.jcs.2006.03.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen F, He ZH, Xia XC, Xia LQ, Zhang XY, Lillemo M, Morris CF: Molecular and biochemical characterization of puroindoline a and b alleles in Chinese landraces and historical cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 2006, 112: 400-409. 10.1007/s00122-005-0095-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li GY, He ZH, Lillemo M, Sun QX, Xia XC: Molecular characterization of allelic variations at Pina and Pinb loci in Shandong wheat landraces, historical and current cultivars. J Cereal Sci. 2008, 47: 510-517. 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Chang C, Zhang HP, Xu J, Li WH, Liu GT, You MS, Li BY: Identification of allelic variations of puroindoline genes controlling grain hardness in wheat using a modified denaturing PAGE. Euphytica. 2006, 152: 225-234. 10.1007/s10681-006-9204-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Giroux MJ, Talbert L, Habernicht DK, Lanning S, Hemphill A, Martin JM: Association of puroindolines sequence type and grain hardness in hard red spring wheat. Crop Sci. 2000, 40: 370-374. 10.2135/cropsci2000.402370x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris CF, Massa AN: Puroindoline genotype of the U.S. National Institute of Standards & Technology reference material 8441, wheat hardness. Cereal Chem. 2003, 80: 674-678. 10.1094/CCHEM.2003.80.6.674.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen F, Beecher B, Morris CF: Physical mapping and a new variant of Puroindoline b-2 genes in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2010, 120: 745-751. 10.1007/s00122-009-1195-y.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen F, Xu HX, Zhang FY, Xia XC, He ZH, Wang DW, Dong ZD, Zhan KH, Cheng XY, Cui DQ: Physical mapping of puroindoline b-2 genes and molecular characterization of a novel variant in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Mol Breed. 2011, 28: 153-161. 10.1007/s11032-010-9469-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilkinson M, Wan Y, Tosi P, Leverington M, Snape J, Mitchel RAC, Shewry PR: Identification and genetic mapping of variant forms of puroindoline b expressed in developing wheat grain. J Cereal Sci. 2008, 48: 722-728. 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.03.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Chen F, Zhang FY, Cheng XY, Morris CF, Xu HX, Dong ZD, Zhan KH, Cui DQ: Association of Puroindoline b-B2 variants with grain traits, yield components and flag leaf size in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties of the Yellow and Huai Valleys of China. J Cereal Sci. 2010, 52: 247-253. 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.06.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Geng HW, Beecher BS, He Z, Kiszonas AM, Morris CF: Prevalence of Puroindoline D1 and Puroindoline b-2 variants in U.S. Pacific Northwest wheat breeding germplasm pools, and their association with kernel texture. Theor Appl Genet. 2012, 124: 1259-1269. 10.1007/s00122-011-1784-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mohler V, Schmolke M, Paladey E, Seling S, Hartl L: Association analysis of Puroindoline-D1 and Puroindoline b-2 loci with 13 quality traits in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Cereal Sci. 2012, 56: 623-628. 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.06.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen F, Zhang FY, Morris CF, He ZH, Xia XC, Cui DQ: Molecular characterization of puroindoline a-D1b genotype and development of STS marker in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Cereal Sci. 2010, 52: 80-82. 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.03.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Chen F, Zhang FY, Xia XC, Dong ZD, Cui DQ: Distribution of puroindoline alleles in bread wheat of the Yellow and Huai Valley of China and discovery of a novel puroindoline a allele without PINA protein. Mol Breed. 2012, 29: 371-378. 10.1007/s11032-011-9553-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Ikeda MT, Cong H, Suzuki T, Takaka K: Identification of new Pina null mutations among Asian common wheat cultivars. J Cereal Sci. 2010, 51: 235-237. 10.1016/j.jcs.2010.01.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhuang QS: Chinese wheat improvement and pedigree analysis. Beijing: Chinese Agric Press, 1-681. in Chinese: 2003.Google Scholar
  33. Morris CF, King GE: Registration of hard kernel puroindoline allele near-isogenic line hexaploid wheat genetic stocks. J Plant Regist. 2008, 2: 67-68. 10.3198/jpr2007.02.0099crgs.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen F, He ZH, Xia XC, Lillemo M, Morris CF: A new puroindoline b mutation presented in Chinese winter wheat cultivar Jingdong 11. J Cereal Sci. 2005, 42: 267-269. 10.1016/j.jcs.2005.03.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Neff MM, Neff JD, Chory J, Pepper AE: dCAPS, a simple technique for the genetic analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms: experimental applications in Arabidopsis thaliana genetics. Plant J. 1998, 14: 387-392. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00124.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. McIntosh RA, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Morris C, Appels R, Xia XC: Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat: 2009 supplement. 2009, published online at: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/2009upd.htmlGoogle Scholar
  37. McIntosh RA, Devos KM, Dubcovsky J, Rogers WJ, Morris CF, Appels R, Anderson OD: Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat: 2007 supplement. 2007, published online at: http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/2007upd.htmlGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramalingam A, Palombo EA, Bhave M: The Pinb-2 genes in wheat comprise a multigene family with great sequence diversity and important variants. J Cereal Sci. 2012, 56: 171-180. 10.1016/j.jcs.2012.02.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Xia LQ, Chen F, He ZH, Chen XM, Morris CF: Occurrence of puroindoline alleles in Chinese winter wheats. Cereal Chem. 2005, 82: 38-43. 10.1094/CC-82-0038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ram S, Jain N, Shoran J, Singh R: New frame shift mutation in puroindoline b in Indian wheat cultivars Hyb65 and Ni5439. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2005, 14: 45-48. 10.1007/BF03263224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Chen F, Yu YX, He ZH, Xia XC: Prevalence of a novel puroindoline allele in Yunnan endemic wheats (Triticum aestivum ssp. Yunnanense King). Euphytica. 2007, 156: 39-46. 10.1007/s10681-006-9347-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang J, Sun JZ, Liu DC, Yang WL, Wang DW, Tong YP, Zhang AM: Analysis of Pina and Pinb alleles in the micro-core collections of Chinese wheat germplasm by Ecotilling and identification of a novel Pinb allele. J Cereal Sci. 2008, 48: 836-842. 10.1016/j.jcs.2008.06.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tanaka H, Morris CF, Haruna M, Tsujimoto H: Prevalence of puroindoline alleles in wheat from eastern Asia including the discovery of a new SNP in puroindoline b. Plant Genet Resour. 2008, 6: 142-152.Google Scholar
  44. Wang L, Li GY, Xia XC, He ZH, Mu PY: Molecular characterization of Pina and Pinb allelic variations in Xinjiang landraces and commercial wheat cultivars. Euphytica. 2008, 164: 745-752. 10.1007/s10681-008-9706-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ikeda TM, Ohnishi N, Nagamine T, Oda S, Hisatomi T, Yano H: Identification of new puroindoline genotypes and their protein products among wheat cultivars. J Cereal Sci. 2005, 41: 1-6. 10.1016/j.jcs.2004.10.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ayala M, Guzmán C, Alvarez J, Peña R: Characterization of genetic diversity of puroindoline genes in Mexican wheat landraces. Euphytica. 2013, 190: 53-63. 10.1007/s10681-012-0773-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Cane K, Spackman M, Eagles H: Puroindoline genes and their effects on grain quality traits in southern Australian wheat cultivars. Aust J Agr Res. 2004, 55: 89-95. 10.1071/AR03108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Chen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.