Skip to main content
Download PDF

The PPO family in Nicotiana tabacum is an important regulator to participate in pollination

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 102 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) are type-3 copper enzymes and are involved in many biological processes. However, the potential functions of PPOs in pollination are not fully understood. In this work, we have screened 13 PPO members in Nicotiana. tabacum (named NtPPO1-13, NtPPOs) to explore their characteristics and functions in pollination. The results show that NtPPOs are closely related to PPOs in Solanaceae and share conserved domains except NtPPO4. Generally, NtPPOs are diversely expressed in different tissues and are distributed in pistil and male gametes. Specifically, NtPPO9 and NtPPO10 are highly expressed in the pistil and mature anther. In addition, the expression levels and enzyme activities of NtPPOs are increased after N. tabacum self-pollination. Knockdown of NtPPOs would affect pollen growth after pollination, and the purines and flavonoid compounds are accumulated in self-pollinated pistil. Altogether, our findings demonstrate that NtPPOs potentially play a role in the pollen tube growth after pollination through purines and flavonoid compounds, and will provide new insights into the role of PPOs in plant reproduction.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) are common nuclear-coded copper-containing enzymes found in all insects, fungi, vertebrates, and plants [1, 2]. PPOs belong to the oxidoreductase family and are mainly located in the thylakoid membrane of chloroplast [3]. Generally, PPOs can be categorized into catechol oxidase (EC 1.10.3.1), tyrosinase (E.C.1.14.18.1) and laccase (EC 1.10.3.2) according to their substrate specificity and structure [3]. Catechol oxidases catalyze two distinct reactions involving molecular oxygen: the o-hydroxylation of monophenols to o-diphenols (cresolase activity) and the oxidation of o-diphenols to o-quinones (catecholase activity). Tyrosinases always catalyze the hydroxylation of monophenols, and laccases oxidize o-diphenols and p-diphenols to form their corresponding quinones [2].

In plant tissue, PPOs may exist in a latent form containing transit peptides, and they are activated by proteolytic cleavage until they are incorporated into the plastid [2, 4]. Transit peptides generally contain three evident regions: an uncharged amino-terminal domain, a central domain lacking acidic residues, and a carboxy-terminal domain with the potential to form an amphiphilic P-strand [5]. Transit peptides with conserved domains have been found in most of the identified PPOs [5].

PPOs are a class of oxidoreductases among the six major defensive enzymes, and play important roles in defense mechanisms, and also have function in metabolic pathways and biosynthesis [6, 7]. Antisense down-regulation of PPOs expression can result in hyper-susceptibility to pathogens, suggesting that PPO-mediated phenolic oxidation plays a critical role in plant defense [8]. Over-expressing the PPOs in tomato plants increases their resistance to P. syringae [9]. Wound- and herbivore-induced expression of PPOs in hybrid poplar supports the defensive role of this protein against insect pests [10, 11]. In the phenylpropanoid pathway, PPOs are assumed to be responsible for hydroxylation of p-coumaric acid to caffeic acid [12]. In the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), PPOs have a central role in the biosynthesis of the creosote bush 8–8’ linked lignans, which have potent antiviral, anticancer, and antioxidant properties [13]. Aureusidin synthase (the plant polyphenol oxidase family) specifically catalyzes the oxidative formation of aurones, and plays a key role in the yellow coloration of snapdragon flowers [14,15,16]. The biosynthesis of flavones in MicroTom tomato is related to a tomato polyphenol oxidase (SlPPOF), which possesses a flavone synthase-like activity [17]. In addition, PPOs are also involved in betalain biosynthesis [18], and contribute to several biological processes, including plant development [19, 20], cell differentiation and death [21, 22], mehler reaction, electron cycling and oxygen regulation [23].

Previous studies have shown that the reproductive signaling pathways might co-evolve with that of defense responses, the interaction between the pollen and the style shared similarities to that of bacterial defense responses [24], such as the majority of known defensing-like (DEFLs) proteins have been confirmed to be predominately expressed in reproductive organs, and play numerous roles in reproduction [22]. As the member of plant defense systems, one PPO member (tobP1) is reported to be specially expressed in the flower of tobacco [25]. Furthermore, PPOs exert an important role in pollen development through modulating flavonoids homeostasis in tobacco [26]. These studies suggest that PPOs play a significant role in plant reproduction. However, the potential functions of PPOs in the pollination are, as of yet, unclear.

In this work, we identify the characteristics of PPO family in Nicotiana (an essential model system for studying the reproduction and development), detect their tissue expression profile and distribution, and explore their potential function and mechanism in pollination. Our research will contribute to deepen the scientific knowledge on PPOs in Nicotiana, and provide new insights into the role of PPOs in plant reproduction.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

In this study, RNAi lines against all NtPPOs and wild-type (WT, the allotetraploid cultivar N. tabacum L. K326 (2n = 24II = 48TTSS)) plants from Biocontrol Engineering Research Center of Plant Diseases & Pests, Yunnan University were seeded in humus and cultured in a climatic room (28 °C, 16 h light, 8 h dark) for about 7–8 weeks. All plants were transplanted into soil in the greenhouse with average temperature of 25 °C and natural sunlight, watered twice a week, and fertilized with water-soluble fertilizer (N:P:K = 20:20:20 + 0.5% trace elements) (Demei, Sichuan, China) once a month.

Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis

NtPPO protein sequences were retrieved from the genomic data of N. tabacum using HMM searching program. PPO proteins from other species were retrieved from NCBI. Multiple sequence alignments of the all protein sequences were carried out using ClustalW in MEGA 7.0 [27]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7.0 with the maximum-likelihood (ML) method and bootstrap values was set to 1000 [27]. The phylogenetic tree was estimated using iTOL [28].

Analysis of cis-acting elements in NtPPOs promoters

The promoter sequences (upstream regions of ATG, 1.5-kb) [41, 42] of NtPPOs were obtained from NCBI, and the cis-acting regulatory elements were identified by PlantCARE [29]. Visualization was performed using GraphPad Prism 7 (Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the root, stem, leaf, pistil, mature anther (stage8) [30] using MiniBEST Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). The cDNA was reverse transcribed by PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara). All of the operational procedures were performed following the manufacturer’s protocols. For further RT-qPCR analysis, 1 µL of cDNA was diluted with 9 µL of nuclease-free water. Gene-specific primer pairs were designed by Primer Premier 5.0 and tested by NCBI Primer BLAST for specificity, and the products were 80 to 200 bp in length (Table S1). All RT-qPCR were conducted using Super Real PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) (TIANGEN, Beijing, China) with a total volume of 10 µL reaction system on the ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 (Ntubc2) was used as an internal reference, as it has been proven to express itself at relatively stable levels in different tissues [31]. Relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method [32]. The data was processed with GraphPad 7.0, with means ± standard deviation (SD). Three technical replicates were used for each of the three biological replicates.

Antibodies preparation

A monoclonal antibody library against the pistil and anther of Nicotiana was constructed according to the previously described [33]. A total of 300 N.tabacum flowers from five plants were manually emasculated before anthesis, and 150 were pollinated with N.tabacum pollen and Nicotiana. stocktonii, respectively. The pistils (without ovary) were collected for protein extraction at 10 h after pollination (HAP). Total proteins were extracted as previous report [34]. Antibody microarray screening and processing of mAb array data were performed according to the previously described [33]. Then, the expression patterns of proteins with the most significant differences in the antibody slides were analyzed further by western blot (WB). Immunoprecipitation (IP), and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry/mass-spectrum (LCMS/MS) assays were performed as previously described [35]. The LCMS/MS data was searched against the NCBI N.tabacum and Hyoscyamus niger cybrid databases, containing 1, 520, 274 entries. IP-LC-MSMS assays showed that one of the differentially expressed proteins was PPO. Therefore, the monoclonal antibody against PPO (anti-mouse IgG) was successfully screened and identified from the monoclonal antibody library of Nicotiana. Theoretically, the antibody can recognize all of NtPPOs. The secondary antibody IgG H&L (ab150113, Alexa Fluor®488) was obtained from Abmart (Shanghai, China).

Sample preparation and immunofluorescence microscopy

Approximately 40 N.tabacum flowers were emasculated before anthesis and artificially pollinated with N.tabacum pollen. The flowers were then incubated at 28 °C, and ten pollinated pistils were collected at 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 HAP. Mature anthers, fresh pollen grains, N.tabacum un-pollinated pistils were collected. These samples were immediately fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in 20 mM PBS (pH 7.4). After fixation for 24 h, samples were dehydrated in an ethanol series, rinsed several times with cacodylate buffer, embedded in LR White resin, and sectioned as previously described [36].

Before IF staining, a series of treatments were performed. First, the sections were dried at 65 °C for 30 min, de-waxed with xylene, rehydrated with different concentrations of ethanol and distilled water, then washed three times with 1× PBS buffer. After treating with 200µL of endogenous peroxidase potent blocking solution (Beyotime P0100B) for 10 min at 25 °C, the sections were boiled in 1×antigen repair solution (Beyotime P0083) for antigen repair and blocked with immunostaining blocking solution (Beyotime P0260) for 10 min. Next, the slides were incubated with the primary antibody (1: 500) at 4 °C for 12 h. After the antibody was washed off with 1× PBS buffer, the slides were incubated with a second antibody (1: 400, Abmart ab150113, Alexa Fluor ® 488) for 3 h at 25 °C and washed five times with 1× PBS buffer. Finally, the slides were observed on an Olympus BX51 (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan) and photographed with an Olympus DP73 (Olympus, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan). For the control, the primary antibody was replaced with 1× PBS buffer.

To detect the expression and localization of NtPPOs in pollen tubes, the fresh and mature pollen grains were cultivated on the adherent slide with pollen germination medium (10% sucrose, 0.005% boric acid, and 0.08% agarose) for 3 h at 28 °C. The medium was naturally air-dried for 24 h, and the slide was subjected to IF staining.

NtPPOs activity assays

Pistils of N.tabacum were pollinated artificially with N.tabacum pollen, and collected at 2.5, 5, 10 and 15 HAP. Then, the total proteins in these samples were isolated respectively. The total protein isolation and NtPPOs activity assays were performed following the PPO enzyme activity assay kit protocol (Solarbio, Beijing, China) using L-3, 4-dihydroxy-Phe (L-DOPA) as substrate.

Semi in vitro test and aniline blue dying

WT and transgenic lines were self-pollinated and incubated at 28 °C for 5, 8 and 12 h. Some pollinated pistils were collected at 5 and 8 HAP, and softened in 1 M NaOH for 3 h at 60 °C, then dyed with 0.1 M aniline blue in 0.1 M K2HPO4 for more than 2 h. Pistils were squashed and observed under a fluorescence microscope (Olympus BX51) [37]. Remaining pollinated pistils (12 HAP) were cut from the middle of the style with a sharp blade and immediately immersed into a pollen germination medium (10% sucrose, 0.005% boric acid, and 0.08% agarose) on glass slides. The samples continue to be cultivated for 12 h at 28 °C, and pollen tubes growing out of the cutting end of pistil were observed under an Olympus BX51 (Olympus, Japan).

Untargeted metabolomics analysis

Self-pollinated Nicotiana pistils with six biological replicates for metabolomics analysis of WT and NtPPO-RNAi lines were collected at 24 HAP and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C, un-pollinated pistils served as control. Then gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, data processing and analysis, and screening for metabolic differences were performed as previously described [38].

Statistical analysis

Homoscedasticity of variances were tested in SPSS, and then the data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 (Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Student’s t-test or ANOVA was performed to detect statistical differences.

Results

Phylogenetic and conserved domain analysis of the PPO family in N. tabacum

Our previous study screened 13 NtPPO members in the N. tabacum genome designated NtPPO1-13 [26]. To understand their evolutionary relationships, an un-rooted phylogenetic tree was constructed using the NtPPO sequences, PPOs from their ancestor genomes and published PPOs from other plants (Table S2). Bootstrap values and phylogenetic relationships divided these PPOs into four groups (I, II, III, IV), and the NtPPO members were distributed in group I (nine NtPPOs) and II (four NtPPOs) (Fig. 1a). NtPPOs and PPOs from their ancestor genomes formed paralogous pairs, indicating that NtPPO5, NtPPO6, NtPPO8, NtPPO9, NtPPO11 and NtPPO13 were originated from the female parent-Nicotiana sylvestris, and NtPPO1, NtPPO2, NtPPO3, NtPPO4, NtPPO7, NtPPO10 and NtPPO12 were traced back to the male parent-Nicotiana tomentosoformis (Fig. 1a). PPOs in Solanum lycopersicum gemome (PPO A/A’, PPOB, PPOC, PPOD, PPOE, PPOF), Lycopersicon esculentum genome (LePPO), and Solanum tuberosum genome (StPPO) were assigned to the same group as NtPPOs (group I) (Fig. 1a), indicating the close relationship between them. Other PPOs (pMD-PPO2, pAPO5, VfPPO, VvPPO, PaPPO, PtPPO) and NtPPOs were in different groups, suggesting a distant genetic relationship (Fig. 1a).

PPOs are nuclear-encoded copper-containing enzymes that move from the cytoplasm to thylakoid lumen of the chloroplast, and finally localize in the plastids [4, 39]. As is typical for thylakoid lumen proteins, PPOs may exist in the latent form containing ubiquitous transit peptides at their N-terminal. These transit peptides have conserved domain structures, and are activated by proteolytic cleavage [40]. We further analyzed the conserved domain of NtPPOs by multiple sequence alignment, and found that most of NtPPO members showed common structural characteristics except NtPPO4 (Fig. 1b). The N-terminal of NtPPOs was a hydroxy A.A.-rich domain, and contained many hydroxylated Ser and Thr residues, but very few acidic amino acids (Fig. 1b). The highly conserved thylakoid transfer domains (the typical feature of thylakoid lumen protein) were distributed in NtPPOs, and Region I (‘n-region’) was located between the Hydroxy A.A.-rich and thylakoid transfer domains (Fig. 1b). The predicting putative cleavage sites were presented between Ala and Asp (Fig. 1b). Particularly, we have found that NtPPO4 had no thylakoid transfer domain and putative cleavage site (Fig. 1b). There were two His-rich copper binding domains (CuA, CuB) distributed in the protein sequences responsible for the catalytic function of NtPPO proteins (Fig. 1b). Furthermore, all of NtPPOs shared conserved domains, including tyrosinase domain, PPO1_DWL domain and PPO1_KFDV domain (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic tree and conserved domains of PPOs in N. tabacum and other plant species. (a) Phylogenetic tree of NtPPOs and other PPOs in different plant species. PPOs are divided into four groups (I, II, III, IV). NtPPO members are marked with an orange circle. Red branches indicate the pairs of paralogous PPOs. PPO sequences obtained from other plant species genomes are as follows: Fugi apple pMD-PPO2, Solanum lycopersicum PPO A/A’, PPOB, PPOC, PPOD, PPOE, PPOF, apple pAPO5, Lycopersicon esculentum LePPO, Solanum tuberosum StPPO, Vicia faba VfPPO, Vitis vinifera VvPPO, Prunus armeniaca PaPPO, Populus trichocarpa PtPPO. Ntom, Nicotiana tomentosoformis L.; Nsyl, Nicotiana sylvestris L. (b) Putative transit peptide and function domain analysis by multiple sequence alignment. Gaps were introduced to achieve maximum homology among the sequences. The hydroxy A.A.-rich, Region I (‘n-region’) and thylakoid transfer domains are underlined with red lines, respectively. Putative cleavage sites are marked by a red box. His-rich copper binding domains CuA, CuB are underlined with red lines. His residues predicted to be copper-binding sites are marked by red star. KFDV domain is marked with black squares. (c) Conserved domain analysis. T, tyrosinase domain; D, PPO1_DWL domain; K, PPO1_KFDV domain

Full size image

Diversity of cis-acting elements in the promoter regions of NtPPOs

To study the potential regulatory mechanisms involved in NtPPO transcriptions, the 1.5-kb upstream promoter regions from the translation start sites of all of NtPPO members were analysed with PlantCARE [29]. Ten plant hormone-responsive elements and twelve abiotic stress-response-related elements were predicted, and their distribution in promoters of NtPPOs was analysed and displayed (Fig. 2, Table S3). The 10 plant hormone-responsive elements were distributed in the most of NtPPO members, including abscisic acid responsiveness element (ABRE), auxin-responsive elements (TGA-element), MeJA-responsive element (CGTCA-motif, TGACG-motif), ethylene-responsive element (ERE), auxin and salicylic acid responsiveness element (as-1), and gibberellin-responsive elements (P-box) (Fig. 2a). In addition, salicylic acid responsiveness element (TCA-element), auxin-responsive elements (AuxRR-core) and other gibberellin-responsive elements (GARE-motif,) were also found in the promoters of NtPPOs (Fig. 2a). Abiotic stress-response-related elements—such as MBS, MYB, MYC, WUN-motif, WRE3, W-box, STRE, ARE, and LTR were abundant in NtPPO promoters (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, defence and stress responsiveness elements (TC-rich repeats) were also found in the promoters of some NtPPO members (Fig. 2b). The above results display that the expression of NtPPOs may be associated with hormone signals and environmental stress.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Function prediction of the cis-elements detected in the NtPPO promoters. (a) Predicted plant hormone-responsive elements in NtPPOs promoter regions. (b) Predicted stress-inducible and defense-related elements in NtPPOs promoter regions

Full size image

Expression profiles of the NtPPOs are likely to be tissue-specific

In order to investigate the tissue specificity of NtPPOs in Nicotiana tissues, we detected the expression profiles of NtPPO members in the root, stem, leaf, pistil, and mature anther of N.tababum by reverse transcription-quantitative real-time (RT-qPCR). The results showed that, except NtPPO1 and NtPPO3, 11 out of 13 NtPPOs can be detected in N.tababum tissues (Fig. 3). The expression levels of NtPPO2 and NtPPO4 were relatively low in various tissues, while NtPPO12 and NtPPO13 had the highest relative expression in the root in comparison with the other NtPPO members (Fig. 3a). In the stem and leaf, the expression levels of NtPPO5, NtPPO6, NtPPO7, NtPPO9 and NtPPO10 were high (Fig. 3b, c). Particularly, NtPPO9 showed the highest expression levels in the stem and leaf. Moreover, the expression levels of NtPPO9 and NtPPO10 were also high in the pistil and mature anthers, especially NtPPO10 (Fig. 3d and e). It is noted that NtPPO9 (A0A1S3YVF2) and NtPPO10 (A0A1S4B7N5) were the only two PPO members identified in the N.tabacum self-pollinated pistil by IP-LC-MS/MS analysis (Table S4). These results indicate that NtPPO9 and NtPPO10 are the most likely the candidate PPO members functioning in the pistil and pollen, and may play a role in pollen tube growth and pollination.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The expression profiles of NtPPO members in different tissues. RT-qPCR detcetion of NtPPOs expression in the root, stem, leaf, pistil and mature anther of N.tababum

Full size image

NtPPOs are abundantly expressed in the reproductive tissues

The expression and distribution of PPOs in different tissues provided possible clues to the function of them in these tissues. By using immunofluorescence microscopy (IF), we further explored the expression and distribution of NtPPOs in the reproductive tissues. Strong green fluorescence signals were observed at the tips of the growing pollen tubes (in the apical zone and subapical (or clear region) and shank regions (or shear region) (Fig. 4a). In the stigma, weak green fluorescence signals were detected in the papillae cell layers (Fig. 4b). NtPPOs were expressed in the trans-mitting tissue (TTS) and parenchymatous cell layers of the stigma and style (Fig. 4c). In the ovary, green fluorescence signals were observed in the ovary wall and ovule, and were mainly accumulated surrounding the periphery of the embryo sac (Fig. 4d). In the pistil and pollen tubes, the rich expression and wide distribution of NtPPOs demonstrated their potential function in pollination.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Expression and distribution analysis of NtPPOs in the reproductive tissues by IF. For negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with 1×PBS buffer. (a) In vitro growing pollen tubes. The arrow indicates NtPPOs in the pollen tube tip. (b) Stigma micrograph. The arrow shows the NtPPOs in the interface of the papillae cell layer and transmitting tissue. (c) Style micrograph. The arrow shows the NtPPOs in the transmitting tissue and parenchymatous tissue. (d) Ovary micrograph. The arrow shows NtPPOs in the ovary wall and ovule. Ct, connective tissue; Aw, anther wall; Pc, papillae cell; Pt, parenchymatous tissue; TTS, transmitting tissue

Full size image

The expression of NtPPOs are activated in self-compatible stigma/style

In order to further explore if NtPPOs play a role in pollen tube growth after pollination, their expression in the N.tabacum self-pollinated (self-compatible) stigma/style was detected via IF and enzyme activity assay at 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 h after pollination (HAP). The results showed that the difference of NtPPO signals (green fluorescence) intensity between un-pollinated stigma/style and self-pollinated stigma/style at 2.5 HAP was not significant, and NtPPO signals in the un-pollinated stigma/style were weaker than that in the self-pollinated stigma/style at 5, 10, and 15 HAP (Fig. 5a1-a3, b and c). In the stigma, NtPPO signals were rarely observed in the papillae cell layer, and were mainly distributed in the parenchymatous tissue (Fig. 5a1). NtPPO signals were distributed in the TTS of stigma at 2.5, 5 and 15 HAP (Fig. 5a2). Interestingly, after 10 h of pollination, NtPPO signals were rarely detected in the TTS, while distributed at the boundaries of the TTS (Fig. 5a2). In the style, NtPPOs were mainly distributed at the boundaries of the TTS, and rarely detected in the middle of the TTS (Fig. 5a3). The enzyme activity of NtPPOs in the N.tabacum self-pollinated pistil was the highest at 15 HAP (Fig. 5d). These results indicated that the expression of NtPPOs was activated after pollination, and the NtPPOs were accumulated more and the enzyme activity was also increased after pollination, and further corroborated the potential role of NtPPOs in pollen tube growth after pollination.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression and distribution analysis of NtPPOs in the N.tabtacum self-pollinated stigma/style. For negative control, the primary antibody was replaced with 1×PBS buffer. (a) The morphology of stigma and style in N.tabtacum and IF analysis of NtPPO contents and distribution in the un-pollinated stigma/style, and in the N.tabtacum self-pollinated stigma/style at 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 HAP. NP, un-pollinated; HAP, hours after pollination; Pc, papillae cell; TTS, transmitting tissue; Pt, parenchymatous tissue. The red box indicates the observation sites. Red arrow indicates NtPPO fluorescent signals. Scale bar: 50 μm. (b-c) Quantification of green fluorescence signals intensity. The error bar represents standard deviation from three repeats, ** P < 0.01, Student’s t-test. (d) NtPPOs activity in the N.tabtacum NP stigma/style and self-pollinated stigma/style.Three biological replicates were performed. Error bars with different letters are significantly different from each other (P < 0.05). Data were analyzed by ANOVA

Full size image

Knockdown of NtPPOs affects pollen growth after pollination and fruit weights

To investigate the function of NtPPOs in plant reproduction, we have constructed RNAi lines against all NtPPOs in N. tabacum [26]. WT and two NtPPOs silencing lines (NtPPO-RNAi3/6) were self-pollinated 5 and 8 h, and stained with aniline blue and observed on an optical microscope. The results showed that NtPPO-RNAi3/6 lines pollen tubes grew significantly less rapidly in the pistil of NtPPO-RNAi3/6 lines than that in the WT pistil at 5 and 8 HAP (Fig. 6a, b and c). Semi in vitro test also showed that pollen tube growth rate reduced in the pistil of NtPPO-RNAi3/6 lines compared to WT (Fig. 6d and e). The fruit weights of NtPPO-RNAi3/6 were significantly lighter than WT (Fig. 6f and g). These data collectively suggested that NtPPOs are involved in pollination and fruit development.

Fig. 6
figure 6

NtPPOs affect pollen growth in the pistil and fruit weights. (a-b) The pollen tube in the style at 5 and 8 HAP. HAP, hours after self-pollination. Bars = 500 μm. (c) Quantification of pollen tube length in the self-pollinated pistil. n = 15 pollinated pistils were measured across three biological replicates, and the error bar represents the standard deviation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, P < 0.05. (d-e) The semi in vitro test of the pollen tube growth in the pistil at 24 HAP. Bars = 500 μm. n = 15 pollinated pistils were measured across three biological replicates, and the error bar represents the standard deviation. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, P < 0.05. (f-g) Mature fruits and quantification of fruit weight. Bars = 1 cm. n = 30 fruits were measured across three biological replicates; each group contains 10 fruits. Error bars indicate standard deviation of three biological replicates. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, P < 0.05

Full size image

Purine and flavonoids compounds are accumulated in pollinated-pistils after knockdown of NtPPOs

As a class of enzymes, PPOs play a role by catalyzing substance synthesis and metabolism. Therefore, to explore the mechanism of NtPPOs in pollination, we used non-targeted metabolomics technology to detect the differences of metabolites in N. tabacum pollinated-pistils between NtPPO-RNAi lines and WT. The results showed that a total of 211 differential metabolites were identified, and 169 and 42 of them were accumulated and reduced respectively (Table S5, Fig. 7a). There were significant differences between NtPPO-RNAi lines and WT in three pathways, including purine metabolism, flavone and flavonols biosynthesis, and glycerophospholipid metabolism (Fig. 7b). Differential metabolites including dAMP, guanosine, guanine, adenine, 3 ‘5’ -cyclic GMP and kaempferol, astragalin, auercetin, isoquercetin were mainly enriched in purine metabolism pathway, and flavone and flavonols biosynthesis pathway. In phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway, the differential metabolites choline phosphate and acylglycerol choline phosphate were reduced (Fig. 7c). Altogether, these results suggest that NtPPOs play a role in pollination mainly through purines and flavonoid compounds.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Differential metabolites analysis in pollinated-pistils after knockdown of NtPPOs. (a) Volcano plots present differential metabolites in pollinated-pistils between NtPPO-RNAi lines and WT. (b) Bubble plots show the KEGG pathway enrichment of differential metabolites in pollinated-pistils between NtPPO-RNAi lines and WT. Red box indicates the difference of KEGG pathway between NtPPO-RNAi lines and WT is significant, P < 0.05. (c) Differential metabolites in the differential significant pathway. Metabolites are colored to represent changes in abundance in the NtPPO-RNAi lines relative to the WT: red indicates increased abundance and up-regulation; blue indicates decrease and down-regulation; black indicates no change. Quantitative values after metabolites represent fold change (NtPPO-RNAi lines/wild type). Dashed arrows represent multiple enzyme-catalyzed reactions. dAMP, Deoxyadenosine monophosphate; AMP, Adenosine 5’-monophosphate; IMP, Inosine monophosphate; GMP, Guanosine monophosphate

Full size image

Discussion

Pollen development, pollination and fertilization are key processes in plant reproduction. In our previous work [26], we screened 13 PPO members in Nicotiana genome and investigated their physiological functions and regulatory mechanisms in pollen development, and found that NtPPOs affected pollen development by modulating flavonoids homeostasis. Moreover, we explored the expression profile and distribution of NtPPOs in developing anthers at transcript and protein levels, and analyzed relationship between NtPPOs and PPOs in their ancestor (N. sylvestris and N. tomentosoformis). However, the expression characteristics of NtPPOs in different tissues, especially in female gametophyte are not clarified, and their effects in pollination and fertilization are still unclear. In this work, we detect the expression profiles and distributions of NtPPOs in root, stem, leaf and female gametophyte, and explore the functions of NtPPOs in pollination and fertilization, and find that NtPPOs play an important role in pollination and fertilization by affecting the metabolism of flavonoid compounds (an important class of PPOs substrates) and purine compounds (non-PPOs substrates). In addition, we further analyse the phylogenetic relationships and compare the structural characteristics between NtPPOs and PPOs from other species.

Phylogenetic analysis and multiple sequence alignment show that PPOs in S. lycopersicum, L.esculentum and S. tuberosum are closely related to NtPPOs, which may be related to their membership belonging to the Solanaceae family. NtPPOs contain two conserved copper-binding domains with histidine residues, a His-rich region is found at the C terminus. Previous studies also reveal that PPO is a type-3 copper enzyme containing two copper ions, each coordinated by three histidine residues to form two conserved domains, which have a high degree of homology among divergent species [1, 43]. In addition to the two known copper-binding domains among various species, PPO may contain a third His-rich region at the C terminus but it is unclear if this region has any catalytic significance in the function [5, 44].

Excepting NtPPO4, the thylakoid transfer domain is detected in 12 out of 13 NtPPOs. NtPPOs are predicted to mainly localize in the chloroplast, and this result is consistent with previous studies [45, 46]. Meanwhile, NtPPOs may be diversely localized in other cell compartments or organelles. For example, IF analysis show that NtPPOs signals are detected in the tip of growing pollen tubes (cells without chloroplast), and at the periphery of the embryo sac (extracellular spaces). However, no chloroplasts are distributed in pollen cell and embryo sac. Previous studies also reveal that the diversity of PPOs location, such as AmAS1 (a PPO in Antirrhinum majus ) and PtrPPO13 (a PPO in poplar) have been found to locate in the lumen of vacuole [47], AcPPO in Annona cherimola is located in Golgi apparatus [48, 49]. Furthermore, several plant PPOs are not located in the chloroplast, and the subcellular localization of these PPO remains undetermined [50].

Differential expression patterns of PPOs in different tissues have been observed in the case of eggplant [51], tomato [52], and potato [53], indicating that different PPO members may be involved in different biological functions depending on the tissue. In this study, RT-qPCR analysis reveals that NtPPO9 and NtPPO10 are accumulated in the pistil and mature anther, particularly NtPPO10. Previous study found a PPO member, tobP1, had been isolated from a tobacco stigma/style cDNA library, which has been reported to be present exclusively in flower organs (petals, stamens, and, predominantly, pistils) [25]. Amino acid sequence alignment shows that tobP1 corresponds to NtPPO10. Moreover, NtPPO signals are detected in the pollen tube, TTS and the embryo sac, revealing their potential function in regulating pollen tube growth in the pistil.

The interaction between the pollen and the style is similar to that of bacterial defense responses—namely, pollen grains might induce comprehensive pathogen defense-like responses during self-/cross-pollination [24]. In this study, higher NtPPOs expression levels in the pollinated-pistil are also detected, indicating that pathogen defense-like responses are activated, which is consistent with the report that the expression of defensin and resistance protein genes is high at the beginning of compatible pollination [54]. However, the activity of NtPPOs is increased at 15 HAP, unsynchronized with NtPPOs expression, while in the developing anther, the activity and expression of NtPPOs are at the same pace [26]. The lag time between the activity and expression of NtPPOs may be due to a pronounced persistence of PPOs. This same phenomenon has been observed in apricot where PPO protein is still present and active at a late stage of fruit development, but its mRNA is no longer detectable [55]. In contrast, in tomato, the PPO accumulation patterns mirrors the PPO transcript patterns [56].

PPO is widely involved in accumulating and cycling secondary metabolites, such as phenolic monomers (mainly phenols and flavonoids), quinines, aurones, and tyramines, which may directly function in pollen tube growth [14, 21, 57]. In this work, NtPPOs knockdown affected pollen growth in post-pollinated pistils and fruit weight, and purines and flavonoids accumulated in pollinated-pistils of the NtPPOs-RNAi lines, indicating that NtPPOs play an important role in pollination and fertilization, and may directly or indirectly affect the metabolism of flavonoid compounds and purine compounds. Some other reports also found that PPO is involved in biological processes by the metabolism of its substrates, such as flavonoids play an important role in regulating pollen germination and growth by regulating ROS levels [58], caffeic acid (one of PPO substrates) causes P. patens growth reduction [59]. Moreover, it was reported that the substances induced by immune reaction have a promoting effect on pollen hydration, germination, growth, and orientation [60], although some substances have inhibitory effects on pollen tubes in a time dependent way [61]. Normally, the phenolic monomers are spatially separated from the PPOs at various subcellular sites [62]. The mechanism of NtPPOs and their substrates in pollinated–pistils is worth to be investigated in the future.

Conclusion

Taken together, we analyzed the phylogenetic relationship, conserved domain and cis-acting elements of NtPPOs, and explored their expression, distribution, and localization in the reproductive tissues of Nicotiana. After knockdown of NtPPOs, the pollen tube growth rate in the pistil and fruit weights are reduced, and the purine and flavonoids compounds are accumulated in pollinated-pistils. Our experimental results have demonstrated that NtPPOs are important regulators to participate in pollination, and would offer new insights into the role of PPOs in reproduction.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available in the supporting information of this article.

References

  1. Mayer AM. Polyphenol oxidases in plants and fungi: going places? A review. Phytochemistry. 2006;67:2318–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang S. Recent advances of polyphenol oxidases in plants. Molecules. 2023;28:2158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Panadare D, Rathod VK. Extraction and purification of polyphenol oxidase: a review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:431–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sommer A, Ne’Eman E, Steffens JC, et al. Import, targeting, and processing of a plant polyphenol oxidase. Plant Physiol. 1994;105:1301–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. McLarin M-A, Leung IKH. Substrate specificity of polyphenol oxidase. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2020;55:274–308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu Q, Wang C, Cui Q, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the polyphenol oxidase gene family in Olea europaea provides insights into the mechanism of enzymatic browning in olive fruit. Antioxidants. 2023;12(9):1661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang J, Sun X. Recent advances in polyphenol oxidase-mediated plant stress responses. Phytochemistry. 2021;181:112588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thipyapong P, Hunt MD, Steffens JC. Antisense downregulation of polyphenol oxidase results in enhanced disease susceptibility. Planta. 2004;220:105–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li L, Steffens JC. Overexpression of polyphenol oxidase in transgenic tomato plants results in enhanced bacterial disease resistance. Planta. 2002;215:239–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Constabel CP, Yip L, Christopher PME. Polyphenol oxidase from hybrid poplar. Cloning and expression in response to Wounding and Herbivory. Plant Physiol. 2000;124:285–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim JY, Seo YS, Kim JE, et al. Two polyphenol oxidases are differentially expressed during vegetative and reproductive development and in response to wounding in the Fuji apple. Plant Sci. 2001;161:1145–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kojima M, Takeuchi W. Detection and characterization of p-coumaric acid hydroxylase in mung bean, Vigna mungo, Seedlings. J BioChem. 1989;105:265–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cho MH, Moinuddin SGA, Helms GL, et al. (+)-Larreatricin hydroxylase, an enantio-specific polyphenol oxidase from the creosote bush (Larrea tridentata). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:10641–6.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakayama T, Sato T, Fukui Y, et al. Specificity analysis and mechanism of aurone synthesis catalyzed by aureusidin synthase, a polyphenol oxidase homolog responsible for flower coloration. FEBS Lett. 2001;499:107–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ono E, Fukuchi-Mizutani M, Nakamura N, et al. Yellow flowers generated by expression of the aurone biosynthetic pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:11075–80.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakayama T, Aureusidin Synthase. A polyphenol oxidase homolog responsible for flower coloration. Science. 2000;290:1163–6.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei S, Xiang Y, Zhang Y, et al. The unexpected flavone synthase-like activity of polyphenol oxidase in tomato. Food Chem. 2021;377:131958.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Steiner U, Schliemann W, Böhm H, et al. Tyrosinase involved in betalain biosynthesis of higher plants. Planta. 1999;208:114–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Webb KJ, Cookson A, Allison G, et al. Polyphenol oxidase affects normal nodule development in red clover (Trifolium pratense L). Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. He F, Shi YJ, Zhao Q, et al. Genome-wide investigation and expression profiling of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) family genes uncover likely functions in organ development and stress responses in Populus trichocarpa. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Araji S, Grammer TA, Gertzen R, et al. Novel roles for the polyphenol oxidase enzyme in secondary metabolism and the regulation of cell death in walnut. Plant Physiol. 2014;164:1191–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Bircheneder S, Dresselhaus T. Why cellular communication during plant reproduction is particularly mediated by CRP signalling. J Exp Bot. 2016;67:4849–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trebst A, Depka B. Polyphenol oxidase and photosynthesis research. Photosynth Res. 1995;46:41–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shi D, Tang C, Wang R, et al. Transcriptome and phytohormone analysis reveals a comprehensive phytohormone and pathogen defence response in pear self-/cross-pollination. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36:1785–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldman MHS, Seurinck J, Marins M, et al. A tobacco flower-specific gene encodes a polyphenol oxidase. Plant Mol Biol. 1998;36:479–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei X, Shu J, Fahad S, et al. Polyphenol oxidases regulate pollen development through modulating flavonoids homeostasis in tobacco. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;198:107702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:W293–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Liao J, Chen Z, Wei X, et al. Identification of pollen and pistil polygalacturonases in Nicotiana tabacum and their function in interspecific stigma compatibility. Plant Reprod. 2020;33:173–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schmidt GW, Delaney SK. Stable internal reference genes for normalization of real-time RT-PCR in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) during development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genomics. 2010;283:233–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmittgen TD. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3:1101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng W, Niu L, Wang Z, et al. Application of an antibody chip for screening differentially expressed proteins during peach ripening and identification of a metabolon in the SAM cycle to generate a peach ethylene biosynthesis model. Hortic Res. 2020;7:31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jorrin-Novo JV. Plant Proteomics methods and protocols. Humana Press. 2014;1072:3–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang Z, Li Y, Hou B, et al. An array of 60,000 antibodies for proteome-scale antibody generation and target discovery. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. 2019;16:2271.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brennan M, Fakharuzi D, Harris PJ. Occurrence of fucosylated and non-fucosylated xyloglucans in the cell walls of monocotyledons: an immunofluorescence study. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;139:428–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang H, Liao J, Chen S, et al. Plasticity in the self-incompatibility system of cultivated Nicotiana alata. Int J Plant Breed. 2016;208:129–41.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tian M, Xu X, Liu F, et al. Untargeted metabolomics reveals predominant alterations in primary metabolites of broccoli sprouts in response to pre-harvest selenium treatment. Food Res Int. 2018;111:205–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaughn KC, Duke SO. Tentoxin stops the processing of polyphenol oxidase into an active protein. Physiol Plant. 2010;60:257–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. McLarin MA, Leung IKH. Substrate specificity of polyphenol oxidase. Biochem Mol Biology. 2020;55:274–308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Peng Z, Wang D, Wang R, et al. Genome-wide analysis of the potato Hsp20 gene family: identification, genomic organization and expression profiles in response to heat stress. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vatansever R, Koc I, Ozyigit II, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of sulfate transporter (SULTR) genes in potato (Solanum tuberosum L). Planta. 2016;244:1167–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zekiri F, Molitor M, Gerner C, et al. Purification and characterization of tyrosinase from walnut leaves (Juglans regia). Phytochemistry. 2014;101:5–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Rw J, Fukuda H, Komamine A, et al. Cloning and characterization of polyphenol oxidase cDNAs of phytolacca americana. Plant Physiol. 1995;107:1083–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Emanuelsson O, Nielsen H, Brunak S, et al. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins based on their N-terminal amino acid sequence. J Mol Biol. 2000;300:1005–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu F, Zhao JH, Wen X, et al. Purification and structural analysis of membrane-bound polyphenol oxidase from Fuji apple. Food Chem. 2015;183:72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tran LT, Constabel CP. The polyphenol oxidase gene family in poplar: phylogeny, differential expression and identification of a novel, vacuolar isoform. Planta. 2011;234:799–813.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Olmedo P, Moreno AA, Sanhueza D, et al. A catechol oxidase AcPPO from cherimoya (Annona cherimola Mill) is localized to the golgi apparatus. Plant Sci. 2018;266:46–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ono E, Hatayama M, Isono Y, et al. Localization of a flavonoid biosynthetic polyphenol oxidase in vacuoles. Plant J. 2006;45:133–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tran LT, Taylor JS, Constabel CP. The polyphenol oxidase gene family in land plants: lineage-specific duplication and expansion. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Shetty SM, Chandrashekar A, Venkatesh YP, et al. Eggplant polyphenol oxidase multigene family: cloning, phylogeny, expression analyses and immunolocalization in response to wounding. Phytochemistry. 2011;72:2275–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Thipyapong P, Steffens JC. Tomato polyphenol oxidase (differential response of the polyphenol oxidase F promoter to injuries and wound signals). Plant Physiol. 1997;115:409–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Thygesen P. Polyphenol oxidase in potato: a multigene family that exhibits differential expression patterns. Plant Physiol. 1995;109:525–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Li K, Wang Y, Qu H, et al. RNA-Seq analysis of compatible and incompatible styles of Pyrus species at the beginning of pollination. Plant Mol Biol. 2020;102:287–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chevalier T, Mbeguie-A-Mbeguie D, Gauillard F, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of apricot fruit polyphenol oxidase. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:1261–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Piyada T, Daniel M, et al. Differential expression and turnover of the tomato polyphenol oxidase gene family during vegetative and reproductive development. Plant Physiol. 1997;113:707–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nicolas JJ, Richard-Forget FC, Goupy PM, et al. Enzymatic browning reactions in apple and apple products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1994;34:109–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Muhlemann JK, Younts TLB, Muday GK. Flavonols control pollen tube growth and integrity by regulating ROS homeostasis during high-temperature stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E11188–97.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Richter H, Lieberei R, Strnad M, et al. Polyphenol oxidases in Physcomitrella: functional PPO1 knockout modulates cytokinin-dependent development in the moss Physcomitrella patens. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:5121–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Chae K, Lord EM. Pollen tube growth and guidance: roles of small, secreted proteins. Ann Botany. 2011;108:627–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Covey PA, Subbaiah CC, Parsons RL, et al. A pollen-specific RALF from tomato that regulates pollen tube elongation. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:703–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Blaschek L. PE. Phenoloxidases in plants: how structural diversity enables functional specificity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2021; 12:754601.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work received financial support from the Doctor Research Supporting Fund of Dali University (KYBS2023002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Dali University, Dali, 671000, Yunnan Province, China

    Xuemei Wei, Zhengmei Liu, Boyuan Qin, Yanbi Luo, Chunwen Zhao & Junpeng Zhang

  2. School of Life Science, Biocontrol Engineering Research Center of Plant Diseases & Pests, Biocontrol Engineering Research Center of Crop Diseases & Pests, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650091, Yunnan Province, China

    Keliang Tao, Jie Su & Jugou Liao

Authors
  1. Xuemei Wei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keliang Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhengmei Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Boyuan Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jie Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanbi Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chunwen Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jugou Liao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Junpeng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JG L and XM W planned and designed the research. XM W, KL T collected the data and contributed equally to the manuscript writing. XM W, KL T, J S, ZM L, BY Q, YB L, CW Z analyzed the data. JP Zand JG L revised the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript and gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jugou Liao or Junpeng Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The plant material used in this study is the standard Nicotiana species. No particular permissions were necessary to use this plant species.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, X., Tao, K., Liu, Z. et al. The PPO family in Nicotiana tabacum is an important regulator to participate in pollination. BMC Plant Biol 24, 102 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04769-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04769-3

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us