Skip to main content

Season, storage and extraction method impact on the phytochemical profile of Terminalia ivorensis



Terminalia ivorensis (TI) is used in West African ethnomedicine for the treatment of conditions including ulcers, malaria and wounds. Despite its widespread use, the phytochemical profile of TI remains largely undetermined. This research investigated the effects of extraction method, season, and storage conditions on the phytochemical composition of TI to contribute towards understanding the potential benefits.


TI bark was collected in September 2014, September 2018 and February 2018 during the rainy or dry seasons in Eastern Region, Ghana. Samples were extracted sequentially with organic solvents (petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate and ethanol) or using water (traditional). Metabolites were identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry and compared statistically by ANOVA.


A total of 82 different phytochemicals were identified across all samples. A greater yield of the major phytochemicals (44%, p < 0.05) was obtained by water as compared with organic extraction. There was also a higher concentration of metabolites present in cold (63%, p < 0.05) compared with hot water extraction. A significantly (p < 0.05) higher number of phytochemicals were identified from TI collected in the dry (85%) compared to the rainy season (69%). TI bark stored for four years retained 84% of the major phytochemicals.


This work provides important information on composition and how this is modified by growing conditions, storage and method of extraction informing progress on the development of TI as a prophylactic formulation or medicine.

Peer Review reports


Plant secondary metabolites are of interest to the food and pharmaceutical industries due to their potential use in the prevention and treatment of various health disorders, as well as their use as dietary supplements [1]. Analysis of the molecular structures of secondary plant metabolites in plants can provide a potential mechanism for observed health benefits, as well as a route to isolation and/or synthesis at lower production cost than by isolating them from natural sources [2]. It also aids in the study of their efficiency, absorption, solubility, and stability in the human body [2, 3]. One notable example was the structural elucidation of salicylic acid which led to the synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid, the widely use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory [3].

Terminalia ivorensis (TI, Ivory Coast almond) of the family Combretaceae, is found in tropical and sub-tropical zones of the world [4, 5]. It is a large forest tree that grows up to 15–50 m in height and is branchless for up to 30 m [4]. TI trees are used commercially as a supply of solid timber for the building and construction industries and the wood for firewood and the production of charcoal [4,5,6]. Ghana’s economy benefited from exports of timber and timber products worth 73.35 million US dollars in 2021 and 134 million US dollars in 2020 [7]. The yellow extract from the bark is used as dye in the textile industry while the leaves have been reported to be a good material for producing conductive composites and an adsorbent for the sequestration of pollutants from the environment [4, 8].

Besides its economic usage, TI also serves as a good source of phytochemicals for ethno-medicinal purposes [9]. In in vitro studies, TI has been reported to show antibacterial, antifungal, antioxidant and anti-plasmodial effects [10,11,12,13]. Whereas several in vivo studies have found TI to possess anti-inflammatory, anti-nociceptive, anti-psychotic, hepatoprotective and nephroprotective properties in mice and rats [14,15,16,17]. In traditional medicine, TI is used in the West African region for the treatment of diuresis, general body pains, haemorrhoids, malaria, wounds and yellow fever [18,19,20]. However, there are limited data on the metabolite profile of TI and no information comparing the phytochemical profiles derived from traditional or more controlled chemical methods of extraction of TI. There are also no data showing the effect of herbalists’ preferential use of cold or hot extraction procedures as well as time of sampling on metabolites extracted from TI and hence the need to understand practice.

Practitioners of traditional medicine in Ghana usually employ the use of various solvents for extraction of plant products for therapeutic purposes including the proportional mixing of available solvents (such as alcohol, vinegar and water) soaking plant samples, such as flowers, leaves, bark or roots in these solutions at ambient temperatures overnight or boiling in water for several hours.

The climate of Ghana is tropical and characterised by rainy and dry seasons [21]. The northern part of the country has only one rainy season which occurs from April to September while the southern part of Ghana, where the study samples were obtained, has two rainy seasons which occur from April to July and from September to November. The national mean annual rainfall in Ghana is 1100–1900 mm. The dry season spans November to April [21,22,23]. There is approximately 12 h of daylight daily, and the temperature in the country fluctuates with season, with mean temperatures generally between 21 ºC and 35 ºC [24].

It is well established that seasonality impacts on the life cycle, distribution and composition of phytochemical in plants [25]. Changes in season, which are characterised by changes in light intensity, temperature, rain and wind patterns, affect plant morphology, flowering, fruiting, phytochemical profile and ability to compete with other species for survival [25, 26]. Being relatively immobile organisms, plants have developed alternative defence mechanisms to overcome stress conditions resulting from changes in weather, herbivory and microbial attack [26]. The production of a wide variety of secondary metabolites, including anthocyanins, cinnamic acids and flavonoids, is a major adaptation used by plants to overcome stressful conditions [25, 26]. The synthesis of secondary metabolites is closely regulated and restricted to specific plant tissues and developmental stages and is produced in response to stimuli such as reduced water, high temperature or decreased light intensity [27, 28]. Several studies have reported changes in secondary plant metabolites at the genetic or protein level due to stressful conditions [29,30,31]. For instance, decreased irrigation increased red beet total phenolics by 82% and by 98% in lettuce when copared with dequate water provision [32, 33]. Soil pollution with heavy metals such as cadmium, chromium and lead, have been shown to increase total phenolics (by 18 and 6%) and flavonoid content (by 12 and 7%) in Ficus carica and Shinus molle resectively when compared with samples from less polluted soils [34]. Aloe vera collected across different locations of India at varying altitudes, temperatures and rainfall patterns contain different amounts of alkaloids, flavonoids, glycosides, phenolic compounds, reducing sugars, saponins, steroids, tannins and terpenoids [25].

Herbalists usually store medicinal plant samples from days to several months in the chain of production of their medicines, particularly herbal bitters [35]. However, many plant metabolites are unstable and easily degraded or metabolised during storage [36]. For instance, flavonones are modified into anthocyanins in raspberry [37]. Moreover, phytochemical metabolites, such as α-tocopherol, benzoic acid, catechin, cyclohexen-1-carboxylic acid, lycopene, myoinositol and stigmasterol can be depleted during storage in Cosmos caudatus stored at room temperature for more than 12 h [36]. Investigating the impact of storage on metabolites within plant samples will provide important information for herbalists for designing sustainable plant harvesting, processing and storage techniques for medicine production [35] and will provide evidence-based knowledge on the “shelf-life” of plants used in traditional medicine [38].

This research investigated the comprehensive metabolite profile of TI and compared the aqueous method of extraction commonly used by traditional medical practitioners in Ghana with typical organic solvent extraction (i.e., sequential Soxhlet extraction). The research also compared the two commonly used traditional extraction methods: hot and cold-water extraction. This study further investigated the effects of season and storage on the phytochemical profile of TI.


Collection and preparation of plant material

Fresh TI bark samples were collected from a forest in Asakraka Kwahu in the Eastern region of Ghana in both the dry (February) and wet (September) seasons of 2018. An additional sample from September 2014 which was stored for 4-years was also included to investigate the effect of long-term storage. Appropriate permissions were obtained for the collection of the plant and its use was executed in accordance with relevant guidelines. The samples were collected from trunks of TI trees assessed by a certified herbalist to be of approximately the same size and age and collected in an ethical and sustainable manner. The samples were authenticated by Dr George Henry Sam at the Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana and assigned a voucher herbarium specimen number KNUST/HEB/TI/SB/10/12 which was prepared and deposited in the department’s herbarium. The initial preparation of the samples was carried out at the Department of Pharmacology, KNUST and then transported at room temperature to the United Kingdom (Robert Gordon University and Rowett Institute) for further analysis. Immediately after harvesting the fresh TI bark samples, they were initially processed by washing them thoroughly with tap water and air drying them at room temperature for 2 weeks. They were then sent to the Rowett Institute for further processing and analysis. The dried samples were broken down into smaller pieces with a domestic food processor and then fine-powdered using a freezer mill (SPEX sample prep 6870, Fisher Scientific, Loughborough, UK). The fine powdered samples were vacuum sealed to minimise evaporation, oxidation and microbial growth and stored at -80 °C until required for extraction of phytochemicals.

Extraction and identification of phytochemicals from TI samples

Hot water extraction of phytochemicals from TI

To mimic the traditional hot water extraction, TI sample (25 g, n = 3) collected in February 2018 was weighed into a conical flask and 250 mL of distilled water at ambient temperature was added with gentle swirling of the flask for 2 min to ensure that the sample was soaked properly without forming bubbles. The sample was heated on a hot plate (FB 15001, Fisher Scientific, UK) at 100 °C for 1 h. The extracted sample in the water solution was allowed to cool to room temperature and then filtered under vacuum through a 70 mm filter paper (FB 59017, Fisher Scientific, UK). The filtrate was frozen at -20 °C and freeze-dried (freeze-drier: Virtis Advantage EL, Biopharma Process Systems, Hampshire, UK) over 2 days to obtain dried powdered TI hot water extract for further analysis. After the completion of the hot water extraction, the residual TI was discarded and a new sample from the same batch of TI was used to repeat the extraction process. The samples were extracted in triplicates. These extracts were stored at -20 °C until required for analysis.

Cold water extraction of phytochemicals from TI

TI sample collected in February 2018 was prepared and soaked in distilled water as described earlier (Sect. 2.1) and extracted similarly to the traditional cold-water extraction. The conical flask containing the sample was covered with aluminium foil and allowed to stand for 48 h and extraction was carried out at ambient temperature. The content of the flask was filtered, freeze-dried, and stored as described earlier (Sect. 2.2.1).

Extraction of phytochemicals from TI samples using organic solvents

Sequential Soxhlet extraction is a common scientific method to extract and characterise secondary plant metabolites. Using automated Soxtherm equipment (Gerhardt Soxtherm, SX PC 1.40, Gerhardt, Germany) the procedure was performed for all three TI samples as described previously with some modifications [39]. Solvents were used in order of increasing polarity: petroleum ether (40–60 °C, extra dry, Fischer Scientific), chloroform (99.8+%, stabilized with ethanol, Fischer Scientific), ethyl acetate (99.98%, HPLC grade, Fischer Scientific), and ethanol (99.8%, absolute, Fischer Scientific). The freeze-dried TI sample (6 g) was weighed into each of the six cellulose thimbles and extracted with 140 mL of petroleum ether for 118 min at 150 °C. The remaining solvent was allowed to cool to room temperature and each of the extracts transferred into pre-weighed 25 mL round bottom flasks. Each replicate was evaporated under vacuum at 40 °C using a Buchi rotavapor (R-200, Sigma-Aldrich, UK) to obtain the petroleum ether extract of TI. The dried extracts were weighed separately to record yield before being pooled into a pre-weighed bottle, wrapped with tin foil to prevent light degradation and stored at -80 °C for further analysis. The TI residue left in the thimbles after the petroleum ether extraction was vacuum dried for 18 h at room temperature using a Heraeus vacutherm (VT 6025, Kendro, Germany) and reweighed. The drying was carried out in a vacuum to minimise oxidation. Using the specific extraction program on the Soxtherm machine for each solvent, the residue was sequentially extracted with chloroform (125 min extraction) with rotary evaporation at 62 °C, ethyl acetate (110 min extraction) with rotary evaporation at 77 °C and ethanol (115 min extraction) with rotary evaporation at 78 °C. After the completion of the sequential extraction, the residual TI was discarded and a new sample from the same batch of TI was used to repeat the extraction process. All samples were extracted in triplicates.

Identification of phytochemicals isolated from TI samples

The method used for the identification of phytochemicals was as described previously [40]. Extracts from samples (10 mg/mL) were prepared in methanol (with 0.1% cetic acid) and 20 µL of each suspension was added to 40 µL of an internal standard and 40 µL of methanol. The internal positive standard was 2-amino-3,4,7,8-tetramethylimidazol [4,5-f] quinoxaline (100 ng/µL) and the negative standard was 13 C benzoic acid (400 ng/µL). The samples were centrifuged for 3 min at 10,000 x g at 4 °C, and the supernatant was subjected to liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy / mass spectroscopy (LC MS/MS) analysis. Phytochemicals were separated by liquid chromatography using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system with Zorbax Eclipse 5-µm, 150 × 4 mm column (Agilent Technologies, Wokingham, UK).

Three-gradient elution method was used with the mobile phase solvents as water and acetonitrile containing 0.1% acetic acid. An injection volume of 5 µL was used with a flow rate of 300 µL/min. The liquid chromatography eluent was directed into an ABI 3200 triple quadruple mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) fitted with a turbo ion-spray source. The mass spectrometer was run in a negative-ion mode for the analysis of indoles and phenolics with the settings: ion-spray voltage of -4500, source temperature of 400 °C, gases 1, 2 and curtain gas were set at 15, 40 and 10 respectively. For the analysis of heterocyclic amines, the mass spectrometer was run in positive ion mode with the settings: ion-spray voltage of 5500 V, source temperature of 400 °C, gases 1, 2 and curtain gas were set at 14, 40 and 10 respectively. All metabolites were quantified by multiple-reaction monitoring and ion transition for each of the analytes determined based on their molecular ion and a strong fragment ion. Differing elution times were used to overcome similarities in molecular ions and fragment ions for the different categories of compounds. Declustering potential, voltage variables, collision energy, collision cell entrance potential and collision cell exit potential were individually optimized for each analyte and the molecular weight were quantified in relation to the internal standards [40].

Data analysis

The identity and quantity of phytochemicals from TI (freshly obtained in February 2018) by organic solvent extraction was compared with phytochemicals recovered from aqueous extraction with the two commonly used traditional methods: hot and cold-water. Venn diagrams are used to visualise the relationship between the metabolites from the different extraction methods and to show the common phytochemicals that were compared by further statistical analysis (Figs. 1 and 2). Comparisons were made between the samples collected in September 2018 (rainy season) versus February 2018 (dry season) to assess the impact of season on phytochemical profile, and in September 2014 versus September 2018 to assess the impact of storage on phytochemical profile. These comparisons were made for the organic solvent extraction methods using petroleum ether, chloroform, ethyl acetate or ethanol. The concentration of phytochemicals present in the different samples were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test, with p < 0.05 considered as significant. TI samples obtained in September 2014, February 2018 and September 2018 were represented as 1, 2 and 3 respectively and a principal component analysis was carried out to determine the differences between the samples when extracted with the different solvents.


Effect of extraction solvent on the phytochemical profile of TI

Effect of organic versus water extraction on the phytochemical profile of TI

There was a total of 82 phytochemicals identified using both organic (chloroform, ethanol, ethyl acetate and petroleum ether) and water (cold and hot) extraction of TI obtained during the dry season. There was a greater number of metabolites isolated by organic solvent extraction as compared to water extraction. Phytochemicals including some amines (serotonin, spermine and tyramine), cinnamic acids (3,4-dimethoxycinnamic acid), flavonoids (biochanin A, eriocitrin, formononetin and hesperidin), indoles (indole and indole-3-carboxylic acid), mandelic acids (particularly 3-hydroxymandelic acid) and phenylpyruvic acid (phenylpyruvic acid) were found exclusively using water extraction. Conversely, certain as amines (spermidine), benzoic acids (2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid and p-anisic acid), benzenes (particularly 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene and 1,2-hydroxybenzene), coumarins (coumarin), flavonoids (bergapten, ethylferulate, imperatorin and niacin) and phenylpropionic acids (4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylpropionic acid and 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid) were exclusive to the organic extracted fractions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of phytochemicals between aqueous (combined hot and cold) extraction shown in green and all six organic solvents extraction shown in grey from the TI sample collected in the dry season (February 2018). Metabolites common to both extraction procedures is shown in gold

Common to both extraction procedures, catechin was found to be the most abundant phytochemical present at a concentration of 12248.7 ± 1594.3 ng/mg in the organic fraction, which was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in all six of the organic fractions than the aqueous fractions (cold and hot) at 40,220 ± 17790.8 ng/mg (Table 1). Also, significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the aqueous fractions were 3,4-dimethoxybenzaldehyde, 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid, apigenin, benzoic acid, epigallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin, genstein, indole-3-carboxaldehyde, indole-3-pyruvic acid, kaempferol, luteolin, myricetin, naringenin, phloretin, phloridzin, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatachaldehyde, protocatechuic acid, quercetin, quercetin-3-glucoside, resveratrol, scopoletin, syringaresinol and taxifolin. On the other hand, significantly (p < 0.05) lower amounts of anthranilic acid, phenyllactic acid and salicylic acid were found in the aqueous extracts (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison of phytochemical profile from TI sample obtained in February 2018 and extracted using organic solvents or traditional (both cold and hot water) extraction methods

Effect of hot water versus cold water extraction on the phytochemical profile of TI

There was a total of 67 phytochemicals identified using both cold and hot water. There was a greater number of phytochemicals extracted using cold water compared to hot water extraction. Metabolites including cinnamic acids (3,4-dimethoxycinnamic acid and cinnamic acid), mandelic acids (3-hydroxymandelic acid), flavonoids (hesperidin, morin and neohesperidin), indoles (indole-3-carboxylic acid) and phenylpyruvic acids (phenylpyruvic acid) were present only in the cold-water extract, while amines (spermine), benzoic acids (anthranilic acid), flavonoids (eriocitrin and psoralen) or indoles (indole-3-pyruvic acid) were absent in the cold-water extract (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Distribution of phytochemicals between cold (blue), metabolites found in both extracts (green) or hot (pink) water extraction from TI sample (February 2018)

Again, catechin was the most abundant phytochemical detected using both cold (52,800 ± 13,200 ng/mg) and hot water (27,640 ± 6910 ng/mg) extracts (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison of phytochemical profile from TI sample obtained in February 2018 and extracted using cold versus hot water traditional extraction methods

Significantly (p < 0.05) higher concentrations of 3,4,5-trimethoxyacetophenone, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyacetophenone, 4-hydroxyacetophenone, apigenin, benzoic acid, caffeic acid, catechin, ferulic acid, gallic acid, genstein, hydroxytyrosol, indole, indole-3-acetic acid, indole-3-carboxaldehyde, kaempferol, naringenin, p-coumaric acid, phenylacetic acid, phenyllacetic acid, phloretin, p-hydroxybenzaldehyde, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatachaldehyde, protocatechuic acid, quercetin, quercetin-3-glucoside, scopoletin, sinapic acid, syringic acid, syringin, taxifolin, vanillic acid and vanillin were found in the cold water extract. In contrast, significantly (p < 0.05) higher concentrations of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid and tangeretin were found in the hot water extract (Table 2).

Effect of season on the phytochemical profile of TI

There was a total number of 77 phytochemicals were identified across TI samples obtained in both the dry and rainy seasons. Certain metabolites were absent from the TI sample obtained in the rainy season. These included certain amines (spermidine), acetophenones (3,4,5-trimethoxyacetophenone), benzaldehydes (protocatachaldehyde), benzenes (1,2-dihydroxybenzene and 1,2,3-trihydroxybenzene), benzoic acids (2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid and anthranilic acid), cinnamic acids (sinapic acid), coumarins (coumarin), flavonoids (ethylferulate, epigallocatechin, kaempferol, niacin and), indoles (indole-3-acetic acid), phenols (hydroxytyrosol), phenylacetic acids (phenylacetic acid), phenyllactic acids (phenyllactic acid) and phenylpropionic acids (4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid). Only 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, biochanin A, didymin, dopamine, formononetin, hesperidin and indole were detected exclusively in the TI sample obtained in the rainy season (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of phytochemical profile from TI samples obtained in February 2018 (dry season) or September 2018 (rainy season) extracted using different organic solvents

Again, catechin was the most abundant phytochemical measured in TI samples obtained from both seasons (dry season 18,800 ± 4286.1 ng/mg, rainy season 16,280 ± 3621.3 ng/mg) although the differences were not significant. Significantly (p < 0.05) lower concentrations, of some phytochemicals, however, were found in the TI sample obtained in the rainy season as compared to TI obtained in the dry season. These included certain acetophenones (4-hydroxy-3-methoxyacetophenone), benzoic acids (gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid, salicylic acid and vanillic acid), cinnamic acids (caffeic acid, ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid), flavonoids (epicatechin, gallocatechin, hesperitin, quercetin, resveratrol and scopoletin), indoles (indole-3-pyruvic acid), lignans (secoisolariciresinol) and phenylacetic acids (phenylacetic acid). Conversely, the TI sample obtained in the rainy season showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher concentrations of 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenylpropionic acid, benzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, morin, naringenin, phloridzin and syringin as compared to the sample obtained in the dry season (Table 3).

Effect of storage on the phytochemical profile of TI

There was a total of 69 phytochemicals identified in both the fresh (September 2018) and stored (September 2014) TI samples obtained in the rainy season. Relative to the fresh TI sample, phytochemicals including 3,4-dihydroxyphenylpropionic acid, 3,4-dimethoxybenzoic acid, 4-hydroxyphenylpropionic acid, caffeine, eriocitrin, ethylferulate, indole-3-carboxylic acid, kaempferol, kynurenic acid, protocatachaldehyde, spermidine and spermine were found only in the stored TI sample. Moreover, storage of TI sample resulted in the loss of certain phytochemicals found in the fresh TI sample. These included certain benzoic acids (chlorogenic acid and p-anisic acid), cinnamic acid, flavonoids (biochanin A, didymin, epicatechin, formononetin, hesperidin, imperatorin and neohesperidin), 2-hydroxybenzyl alcohol and phenylacetic acid which were lost due to storage of the TI sample (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of phytochemical profile from TI samples obtained in September 2014 (stored) or September 2018 (fresh) extracted using different organic solvents

Again, catechin was the most abundant phytochemical measured in fresh TI sample (16,280 ± 3621.3 ng/mg) and gallic acid was the most abundant phytochemical present in stored TI sample (14,720 ± 1525.6 ng/mg) although the differences were not significant.

The stored TI sample showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher concentrations of acetophenones (4-hydroxyacetophenone, benzaldehydes p-hydroxybenzaldehyde), benzoic acids (gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, protocatechuic acid and syringic acid), cinnamic acids (ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid), flavonoids (phloretin and tangeretin) and indoles (indole-3-pyruvic acid). Conversely, the stored TI sample showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower concentrations of certain flavonoids (catechin, epigallocatechin gallate, gallocatechin, hesperitin, morin, scopoletin, and taxifolin), indole and indole-3-carboxaldehyde when compared with the fresh sample (Table 4).

Principal components analysis of TI samples

Principal component analysis (PCA) on a univariate scale was used to assess differences in the main phytochemical metabolites extracted from the TI samples (obtained in September 2014, February 2018 and September 2018 which were represented as 1, 2 and 3 respectively). Similarity in phytochemicals between samples was shown by how closely clustered they were to each other in the same quadrant of a plot. From the PCA plot (Supplementary Fig. 1A), sample obtained in February 2018 (2) was different from those obtained in September 2014 and September 2018 when extracted using water (hot and cold), ethanol or ethyl acetate. Looking across the 3 samples, similar metabolites were obtained from petroleum ether extraction. Metabolites from samples obtained in September 2014 and September 2018 were observed to be more similar by using all the solvents: water (hot or cold), ethanol, ethyl acetate except chloroform.


Plants are essentially immobile in nature and cannot escape unfavourable environmental conditions. However, they produce secondary metabolites through various physiological and biochemical processes that improve their chances of survival and growth in response to changes in the environment [41, 42]. The type and concentration of secondary metabolites produced by a plant are species-dependent, are influenced by developmental stage, and by environmental conditions during growth [43]. The physiological processes involved in the synthesis of phytochemicals result in alterations in gene expression, regulation of protein activity, ion homeostasis and endogenous levels of phytochemicals [42]. For centuries, humans have exploited such physiological changes in plants for drug discovery or by directly using the plants as medicines or using metabolites from the plants to produce synthetic drugs [44]. TI is a tree that grows in the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world and is mostly used for medicinal purposes [43]. This study focused on the impact of solvent (aqueous versus organic solvent) extraction on the phytochemical profile of TI and also investigated the influence of change in season (dry and rainy) and storage on secondary metabolites for its implication on traditional medicine.

Successful isolation of biologically active compounds from a plant material is principally dependent on the type of solvent used in the extraction procedure [45]. In scientific research, samples are frequently extracted with organic solvents like acetone, chloroform, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, ethanol, petroleum ether [46,47,48]. Different solvent extracts of plant samples contain different phytochemicals and hence, have different biological activity [46, 47]. For example, water and ethanol extracts of several plants including Hypoxia hemerocallidea, Ocimum basilicum and Senna petersiana have higher antibacterial and antioxidant activity than other extracts such as chloroform or dichloromethane [47, 49] Traditional medicines are not generally extracted with chemical solvents but are rather routinely extracted using available solvents such as water or alcohol, and this results in differences in biological activity between extracts from traditional and chemical methods [50]. Therefore, this study compared phytochemicals isolated using traditional method of aqueous extraction (hot and cold water) with organic sequential solvent extraction.

The organic solvent extraction produced a wider profile of phytochemicals as compared to aqueous extraction, with 20% and 14% of the total phytochemicals being identified exclusively in the organic or aqueous extracts respectively. However, for the phytochemicals common to both extraction methods, water extraction showed an approximately 44% higher concentration of phytochemicals than the organic solvent extraction method (Table 1). Assuming the bioactive constituents are present using the traditional extraction methods, then no further benefits are likely to be realised by utilising solvent extraction.

Selection of a good solvent for extraction should be based on a high yield of target compounds, but should also allow for ease of subsequent handling of the extracts and minimal deterioration or metabolism of the compounds present [45]. Traditional extraction with cold and hot water showed higher amounts of several phytochemicals, while the sequential organic extraction with chloroform, ethanol, ethyl acetate and petroleum ether showed a wider profile of phytochemicals extracted. This could suggest metabolism of parent compounds during the extraction procedure, again advocating benefits of the traditional extraction methods. In addition to polarity of the extraction solvent, composition and yield of phytochemicals are highly dependent on temperature and duration of extraction [51, 52]. For this reason, the two most commonly used traditional extraction methods: hot and cold-water extraction. There was a greater number of secondary metabolites detected following cold-water extraction with significantly (p < 0.05) higher amounts of certain acetophenones, benzaldehydes, benzoic acids, cinnamic acids, flavonoids, indoles, lignans and and only a few compounds (4-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid and tangeretin) being significantly (p < 0.05) lower in the cold-water extract. The decrease in number of secondary metabolites detected with hot water extraction, as for sequential Soxhlet extraction again could be due to the loss or metabolism of thermo-unstable compounds.

Analysis of the influence of season on TI secondary metabolites showed that 82 phytochemical metabolites were commonly identified from TI samples obtained in both the dry and the rainy seasons. Four organic solvents were used to obtain different phytochemical profiles from the TI samples. A total number of 85 and 69% of the phytochemicals were isolated from the TI sample obtained in the dry and rainy seasons respectively. As many as 24% of the 82 phytochemicals were found exclusively in the sample obtained in the dry season, while only 8% were identified exclusively in TI sampled in the rainy season.

During the dry season, there is a decrease in water and nutrient supply to plants [53]. Nutritional stress can result in the accumulation of osmo-protectants to stabilise proteins structure and maintain membrane integrity and scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), with biomass and secondary metabolites production [53, 54]. Phenolic compounds are involved in plant reproduction, growth and tolerance of stress [55, 56]. Moreover, plants that produce phenolics with allelopathic activity can compete with and suppress the growth of surrounding plants [57]. Phenolics also play other essential functions in plants such as indicators of stress, nutrient uptake, photosynthesis, and protein synthesis [58, 59]. There are a wide variety of compounds classified as phenolics which include coumarins, flavonoids, cinnamic acids and lignans [60].

Plant hormones such as auxins, salicylic acid, cytokinin, ethylene, gibberellic acid and jasmonic acid act to modulate developmental processes in plants and determine plant responses to environmental stresses [42, 59, 61]. In agreement with previous findings, this study observed higher levels of salicylic acid in TI collected in the more stressful dry season when compared to that obtained in the rainy season. The characteristic water deficit of the dry season has also been associated with induction of the synthesis of flavonoids, anthocyanins and phenolic acids in fruits and vegetables such as grape, lettuce, pomegranate and red beet [37]. This work also found that certain amines, acetophenones, benzaldehydes, benzenes, benzoic acids, cinnamic acids, coumarins, flavonoids, indoles, phenols, phenylacetic acids, phenyllactic acids and phenylpropionic acids exclusively in the TI sample obtained in dry season. Absence of adequate amounts of water or higher transpiration rates also result in drought stress in plants and changes secondary metabolite production [42, 61]. In contrast, a deficit in irrigation has been observed to reduce total anthocyanins and total phenolics in pomegranate [62].

Conversely, the rainy season is characterised by cloudy weather and relatively lower temperatures as compared to the sunny and high temperatures (up to 35–40 °C) observed in the dry season [23]. In this study, significantly (p < 0.05) higher amounts of cinnamic acids (chlorogenic acid), among other compounds were measured in TI sampled in the rainy season showed as compared to dry season.

In agreement with this study, a previous study reported that cooler weather was linked with the production of high levels of chlorogenic acid [63]. Plants growing in lower temperatures develop significant adjustments in several physiological and biochemical processes that enable them to survive under low temperature stress, and this causes inhibition in the synthesis and storage of secondary metabolites [64]. Moreover, water uptake, dehydration and metabolism in plants are reduced at low temperatures [65]. The light intensity and exposure period also have significant influence on the production and storage of secondary metabolites [66]. Coumarin levels have been shown to significantly decrease in different plant parts due to shorter light period [67].

Medicinal plant gatherers or traders usually wait to collect sufficient plant stock before supplying the market [68]. In the chain of production of medicinal products, herbalists usually store medicinal plant samples for days up to several months before use [35, 38]. Many of the bioactive compounds from these medicinal products may degrade during storage and where possible, it is recommended that plant samples should be extracted and analysed shortly after collection, as secondary metabolites can decompose even when stored under liquid nitrogen [69]. Analysing fresh and stored (4 years) TI samples, a total of 69 metabolites were identified common to both obtained in the rainy season. Further 12 different phytochemicals were detected exclusively in the fresh TI sample (Table 4) suggesting that these may be degraded during storage.

To the best of our knowledge, there are no data investigating metabolite profiles in fresh and stored TI, and hence, published findings describing the effect of storage on phytochemicals come from other plant sources. Storage of Lilium bulbs for 30 days results in a decrease in free amino acids, total polysaccharides and reducing sugars by approximately 39, 63 and 18% respectively [70]. It has also been reported that storage of Cosmos caudatus at room temperature for 12 h causes depletion of phenolic compounds (such as α-tocopherol, benzoic acid, catechin, cyclohexen-1-carboxylic acid, lycopene, myoinositol and stigmasterol) with phenolic compounds degraded into free sugars such as α-D-galactopyranose, sucrose and turanose, [36]. The depletion of phenolic compounds on storage is attributed to plant dehydration which occurs postharvest [71]. In the presence of oxygen, polyphenol oxidase converts phenolic compounds to quinones [72]. The activity of polyphenol oxidase in Lilium bulbs has been shown to increase by approximately 100% after 30 ays of storage [70]. Traditional healers commonly prefer fresh plant material because of doubts around the degree of biological activity of stored plants [49].

Contrary to the negative considerations about storage of plant material, modification of secondary metabolites during storage is not always detrimental and the increased activity or levels of specific compounds may be associated with a higher value product [47]. This study observed that higher levels of gallic acid (a natural antioxidant), and caffeine (a central nervous system stimulant) were present in the stored TI sample. Monribot-Villanueva et al. (2019) also found that gallic acid levels were elevated in some varieties of mango fruits after 6 days of storage [73].

Many traditional medical practitioners consider that the efficacy of stored plant material does not vary [50]. The results obtained from this current study, and other published findings confirms this since this study showed that 84% of the metabolites are still present after 4 years of storing TI bark sample.

Plant parts such as bark, roots or underground storage organs (such as bulbs, corms, rhizomes and tubers) may have a longer storage life compared to fruits or leaves while the compounds present within are more stable [49]. Moreover, these organs are better suited to protect the stored phytochemicals from degradation due to their lower surface area to volume ratio [47]. This confirms the findings of this study where TI bark that was stored for 4 years retained most of its secondary metabolites. However, while stored TI bark retained approximately 84% of econdary metabolites, fresh TI sample contained higher amounts. It was also found that the two TI samples obtained in the rainy season were more similar to each other but different from the TI sample obtained in the dry season.


Method of extraction including temperature and solvent selection impacted on both the profile and quantity of metabolites measured in the extracts. In general, the cold water extracted sample had the highest amount of phytochemicals, albeit it with a narrower profile (compare to organic extracted) indicating different solubilities and thermo-stability of the metabolites. Higher phytochemical levels were also measured in the TI sample collected in the dry rather than wet season, likely due to harsher environmental conditions which is known to induce the synthesis and storage of secondary protective metabolites. TI that was stored for 4 years retained the majority of secondary metabolites measured in freshly collected TI, which could suggest a longer shelf-life for TI. This may be due to the ability of stem bark to provide a greater protection of the secondary metabolites thereby offering the metabolites more stability against the environment and hence, offering the medicinal product more stability. However, until the bioactive molecule (or molecules) responsible for the desired therapeutic effect are identified, optimal conditions for preparation cannot be fully demonstrated. This work, however, provides important information on composition and how this is modified by growing conditions, storage and method of extraction informing progress on the development of TI as a prophylactic formulation or medicine.

Data Availability

The data can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Kinghorn AD, Pan L, Fletcher JN, Chai H. The relevance of higher plants in lead compound discovery programs. J Nat Prod. 2011;74(6):1539–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ji HF, Li XJ, Zhang HY. Natural products and drug discovery. Can thousands of years of ancient medical knowledge lead us to new and powerful drug combinations in the fight against cancer and dementia? EMBO Rep. 2009;10(3):194–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Buss AD, Cox B, Waigh RD. Natural products as leads for new pharmaceuticals. Burger’s medicinal chemistry and drug discovery 1995.

  4. Burkill HM. The useful plants of west tropical Africa. Edition 2. Volume 1. families AD. Kew; Royal Botanic Gardens 1985.

  5. Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S. Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0. Agroforestry tree database: a tree reference and selection guide version 4.0 2009.

  6. Smith AC. Studies of pacific island plants, XXIV. The genus Terminalia (Combretaceae) in Fiji, Samoa, and Tonga. Brittonia. 1971;23(4):394–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sasu DD. Export value of timber and timber products from Ghana between 2015 and 2021. Statista 2023.

  8. Adeniyi AG, Amusa VT, Iwuozor KO, Emenike EC. Thermal recycling strategy of Coca-Cola PVC label films by its co-carbonization with Terminalia ivorensis leaves. Clean Eng Technol. 2022;11:100564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Annan K, Sarpong K, Asare C, Dickson R, Amponsah K, Gyan B, Ofori M, Gbedema S. In vitro anti-plasmodial activity of three herbal remedies for malaria in Ghana: Adenia cissampeloides (Planch.) Harms., Termina liaivorensis A. Chev, and Elaeis guineensis Jacq. Pharmacognosy Res. 2012;4(4):225–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kipré GR, Agré DJ, Djyh BN, Ouattara L, Joseph DA. Evaluation of the antioxidant potential and phytochemical analysis of Terminalia mantaly and Terminalia ivorensis two plants of the ivorian pharmacopoeia. J Drug Delivery Ther. 2023;13(1):57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Claudine T, Pambu A, Mwanza F, Mbadiko C, Makengo G, Iteku J, Tshilanda D, Mpiana P, Mbemba T, Kazwala R. Comparative anti-mycobacterial activity on Lowenstein-Jensen Slants of selected Medicinal plants used in the congolese Pharmacopeia. J Dis Med Plants. 2017;3(5):88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolou GE, Konan Y, Agre DJ, Nguessan DRC, Zirihi GN, Djaman AJ. Evaluation of the antifungal powers of five plant species of the genus Terminalia on strains responsible for candidiasis. J Drug Delivery Ther. 2022;12(3–S):73–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tali MBT, Dize D, Wouamba SCN, Fokou PVT, Keumoe R, Ngansop CN, Njionhou MSN, Mbouna CDJ, Tchokouaha LRY, Maharaj V. In vitro antiplasmodial activity-directed investigation and UPLC–MS fingerprint of promising extracts and fractions from Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev and Terminalia brownii Fresen. J Ethnopharmacol 2022, 296:115512.

  14. Ben-Azu B, Aderibigbe AO, Adeoluwa OA, Iwalewa EO. Ethanol Extracts of Terminalia ivorensis (Chev A.) Stem bark attenuates the positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of psychosis in experimental animal models.Journal of Pharmaceutical Research International2016,:1–14.

  15. Ansah C, Moomin A, Boadu K. Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev. Ethanolic stem bark Extract protects against Gentamicin-Induced Renal and hepatic damage in rats. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2016;6(04):175–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moomin A, Mensah KB, Forkuo AD, Adu-Gyamfi PKT, Ansah C. Ethanolic stem bark extract of Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev. Protects against potassium dichromate–induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Sci Afr. 2020;8:e00410.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Avoseh ON, Lawal OA, Adebayo MA, Zinzu MH, Ogunwande IA. Study on the Anti-inflammatory and Anti-nociceptive Activities of Methanol Extracts of Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev.South Asian Research Journal of Natural Products2018,:1–8.

  18. Etukudo I. Ethnobotany: conventional and traditional uses of plants. Volume 1. Uyo: The Verdict Press; 2003. p. 191.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sitapha O, Elisee KK, Joseph DA. Antifungal activities of Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev bark extracts against Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus. J Intercultural Ethnopharmacol. 2013;2(1):49–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Akinyemi KO, Oluwa OK, Omomigbehin EO. Antimicrobial activity of crude extracts of three medicinal plants used in south-west nigerian folk medicine on some food borne bacterial pathogens. Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2006;3(4):13–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Logah FY, Obuobie E, Ofori D, Kankam-Yeboah K. Analysis of rainfall variability in Ghana. Int J Latest Res Eng Comput. 2013;1(1):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abbam T, Johnson FA, Dash J, Padmadas SS. Spatiotemporal variations in rainfall and temperature in Ghana over the twentieth century, 1900–2014. Earth and Space Science. 2018;5(4):120–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Asante FA, Amuakwa-Mensah F. Climate change and variability in Ghana: Stocktaking. Climate 2015, 3(1):78–99.

  24. Dickson KB, Benneh G, Essah RR. A new geography of Ghana. Longman London; 1988.

  25. Kumar S, Yadav A, Yadav M, Yadav JP. Effect of climate change on phytochemical diversity, total phenolic content and in vitro antioxidant activity of Aloe vera (L.) Burm. F. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Holopainen JK, Gershenzon J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(3):176–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Osbourn AE, Qi X, Townsend B, Qin B. Dissecting plant secondary metabolism–constitutive chemical defences in cereals. New Phytol. 2003;159(1):101–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wink M. Evolution of secondary metabolites from an ecological and molecular phylogenetic perspective. Phytochemistry. 2003;64(1):3–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dangl JL, Jones JD. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 2001;411(6839):826–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Szathmary E, Jordan F, Pal C. Molecular biology and evolution. Can genes explain biological complexity? Science. 2001;292(5520):1315–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lawal IO, Uzokwe NE, Igboanugo A, Adio AF, Awosan EA, Nwogwugwu JO, Faloye B, Olatunji BP, Adesoga AA. Ethno medicinal information on collation and identification of some medicinal plants in Research Institutes of South-west Nigeria. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;4(1):1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stagnari F, Galieni A, Speca S, Pisante M. Water stress effects on growth, yield and quality traits of red beet. Sci Hort. 2014;165:13–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sahin U, Kuslu Y, Kiziloglu FM, Cakmakci T. Growth, yield, water use and crop quality responses of lettuce to different irrigation quantities in a semi-arid region of high altitude. J Appl Hortic. 2016;18(3):195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Radwan AM, Reyad NF, Ganaie MA. Comparative studies on the effect of environmental pollution on secondary metabolite contents and genotoxicity of two plants in Asir area, Saudi Arabia. Trop J Pharm Res. 2018;17(8):1599–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chan EWC, Lim YY, Wong SK, Lim KK, Tan SP, Lianto FS, Yong MY. Effects of different drying methods on the antioxidant properties of leaves and tea of ginger species. Food Chem. 2009;113(1):166–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Javadi N, Abas F, Mediani A, Abd Hamid A, Khatib A, Simoh S, Shaari K. Effect of storage time on metabolite profile and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity of Cosmos caudatus leaves–GCMS based metabolomics approach. J Food Drug Anal. 2015;23(3):433–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Xu J, Su X, Li Y, Sun X, Wang D, Wang W. Response of bioactive phytochemicals in vegetables and fruits to environmental factors.European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety2019,:233–247.

  38. Suvarnakuta P, Chaweerungrat C, Devahastin S. Effects of drying methods on assay and antioxidant activity of xanthones in Mangosteen rind. Food Chem. 2011;125(1):240–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu Q, Wu L, Pu H, Li C, Hu Q. Profile and distribution of soluble and insoluble phenolics in chinese rapeseed (Brassica napus). Food Chem. 2012;135(2):616–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Russell WR, Gratz SW, Duncan SH, Holtrop G, Ince J, Scobbie L, Duncan G, Johnstone AM, Lobley GE, Wallace RJ. High-protein, reduced-carbohydrate weight-loss diets promote metabolite profiles likely to be detrimental to colonic health–. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(5):1062–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kliebenstein DJ. Making new molecules—evolution of structures for novel metabolites in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(1):112–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wani SH, Kumar V, Shriram V, Sah SK. Phytohormones and their metabolic engineering for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Crop J. 2016;4(3):162–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ncube B, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Quality from the field: the impact of environmental factors as quality determinants in medicinal plants. S Afr J Bot. 2012;82:11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wurtzel ET, Kutchan TM. Plant metabolism, the diverse chemistry set of the future. Science. 2016;353(6305):1232–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Eloff JN. Which extractant should be used for the screening and isolation of antimicrobial components from plants? J Ethnopharmacol. 1998;60(1):1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ponou BK, Teponno RB, Ricciutelli M, Quassinti L, Bramucci M, Lupidi G, Barboni L, Tapondjou LA. Dimeric antioxidant and cytotoxic triterpenoid saponins from Terminalia ivorensis A. Chev Phytochemistry. 2010;71(17):2108–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Laher F, Aremu AO, Van Staden J, Finnie JF. Evaluating the effect of storage on the biological activity and chemical composition of three south african medicinal plants. S Afr J Bot. 2013;88:414–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Ben-Azu B, Aderibigbe AO, Ajayi AM, Iwalewa EO. Neuroprotective effects of the ethanol stem bark extracts of Terminalia ivorensis in ketamine-induced schizophrenia-like behaviors and oxidative damage in mice.Pharm Biol2016,:1–9.

  49. Stafford GI, Jäger AK, Van Staden J. Effect of storage on the chemical composition and biological activity of several popular south african medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;97(1):107–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Griggs JK, Towers G, Taylor R. The effects of storage on the biological activity of medicinal plants from Nepal. J Ethnopharmacol. 2001;77(2–3):247–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ncube NS, Afolayan AJ, Okoh AI. Assessment techniques of antimicrobial properties of natural compounds of plant origin: current methods and future trends.African journal of biotechnology2008, 7(12).

  52. Tiwari P, Kumar B, Kaur M, Kaur G, Kaur H. Phytochemical screening and extraction: a review. Int Pharm sciencia. 2011;1(1):98–106.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Niinemets Ü. Uncovering the hidden facets of drought stress: secondary metabolites make the difference. Tree Physiol. 2016;36(2):129–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rejeb IB, Pastor V, Mauch-Mani B. Plant responses to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress: molecular mechanisms. Plants. 2014;3(4):458–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Bakker MG, Sugiyama A, Manter DK, Vivanco JM. Root exudation of phytochemicals in Arabidopsis follows specific patterns that are developmentally programmed and correlate with soil microbial functions. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e55731.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Giménez MJ, Valverde JM, Valero D, Guillén F, Martínez-Romero D, Serrano M, Castillo S. Quality and antioxidant properties on sweet cherries as affected by preharvest salicylic and acetylsalicylic acids treatments. Food Chem. 2014;160:226–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lincoln T, Zeiger E. Secondary metabolites and plant defense. Plant Physiol Fourth Ed Sinauer Associates Inc Capítulo. 2006;13:125.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Achakzai AKK, Achakzai P, Masood A, Kayani SA, Tareen RB. Response of plant parts and age on the distribution of secondary metabolites on plants found in Quetta. Pak J Bot. 2009;41(5):2129–35.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Fayez KA, Bazaid SA. Improving drought and salinity tolerance in barley by application of salicylic acid and potassium nitrate. J Saudi Soc Agricultural Sci. 2014;13(1):45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fang X, Yang C, Wei Y, Ma Q, Yang L, Chen X. Genomics grand for diversified plant secondary metabolites. Plant Divers Resour. 2011;33(1):53–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Wolters H, Jürgens G. Survival of the flexible: hormonal growth control and adaptation in plant development. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(5):305–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mena P, Galindo A, Collado-González J, Ondoño S, García‐Viguera C, Ferreres F, Torrecillas A, Gil‐Izquierdo A. Sustained deficit irrigation affects the colour and phytochemical characteristics of pomegranate juice. J Sci Food Agric. 2013;93(8):1922–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Pérez-Ilzarbe J, Hernández T, Estrella I, Vendrell M. Cold storage of apples (cv. Granny Smith) and changes in phenolic compounds. Z für Lebensmitteluntersuchung und-Forschung A. 1997;204(1):52–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Verma N, Shukla S. Impact of various factors responsible for fluctuation in plant secondary metabolites. J Appl Res Med Aromatic Plants. 2015;2(4):105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Chinnusamy V, Zhu J, Zhu J. Cold stress regulation of gene expression in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(10):444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Ahmad P, Ahanger MA, Singh VP, Tripathi DK, Alam P, Alyemeni MN. Plant metabolites and regulation under environmental stress. Academic Press; 2018.

  67. de Castro EM, Pinto J, Bertolucci SK, Malta MR, de Cardoso MdG FA. Coumarin contents in young Mikania glomerata plants (Guaco) under different radiation levels and photoperiod. Acta Farm Bonaer. 2007;25(3):387.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Mander M. Marketing of indigenous medicinal plants in South Africa: a case study in KwaZulu-Natal. 1998.

  69. Cronin G, Lindquist N, Hay ME, Fenical W. Effects of storage and extraction procedures on yields of lipophilic metabolites from the brown seaweeds Dictyota ciliolata and D. menstrualis.Mar Ecol Prog Ser1995,:265–273.

  70. Zhao K, Xiao Z, Zeng J, Xie H. Effects of different storage conditions on the Browning Degree, PPO Activity, and content of Chemical Components in Fresh Lilium bulbs (Lilium brownii FE Brown var. viridulum Baker). Agriculture. 2021;11(2):184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zamboni A, Di Carli M, Guzzo F, Stocchero M, Zenoni S, Ferrarini A, Tononi P, Toffali K, Desiderio A, Lilley KS. Identification of putative stage-specific grapevine berry biomarkers and omics data integration into networks. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(3):1439–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Segovia-Bravo KA, Jaren-Galan M, García-García P, Garrido-Fernández A. Browning reactions in olives: mechanism and polyphenols involved. Food Chem. 2009;114(4):1380–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Monribot-Villanueva JL, Elizalde-Contreras JM, Aluja M, Segura-Cabrera A, Birke A, Guerrero-Analco JA, Ruiz-May E. Endorsing and extending the repertory of nutraceutical and antioxidant sources in mangoes during postharvest shelf life. Food Chem. 2019;285:119–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to thank the laboratory technical staff of the School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University (especially Stephen Williamson and Chris Fletcher) and University of Aberdeen, the Analytical Department of Rowett Institute (especially Gary J. Duncan) for their support.


Ghana Education Trust Fund (GETFund) for providing funding for the studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All the authors contributed to the drafting and preparation of the manuscript. LS, KBM, PKTA, AM and WRR did the sample collection, preparation and extractions. WRR, RMK, AM and SJD planned the study design and carried out the analysis of TI extracts. SJD, RMK and AM drafted the manuscript. RMK, SJD, AM and WRR read and edited the final manuscript. The final manuscript was approved by all the authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Aliu Moomin, Wendy R. Russell, Rachel M. Knott, Lorraine Scobbie, Kwesi Boadu Mensah or Susan J. Duthie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moomin, A., Russell, W.R., Knott, R.M. et al. Season, storage and extraction method impact on the phytochemical profile of Terminalia ivorensis. BMC Plant Biol 23, 162 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Terminalia ivorensis
  • Soxhlet extraction
  • Secondary metabolites
  • Phytochemicals
  • Season
  • Storage
  • LC MS/MS