Open Access

ocsESTdb: a database of oil crop seed EST sequences for comparative analysis and investigation of a global metabolic network and oil accumulation metabolism

  • Tao Ke1, 2,
  • Jingyin Yu1,
  • Caihua Dong1,
  • Han Mao1,
  • Wei Hua1 and
  • Shengyi Liu1Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Plant Biology201515:19

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0399-8

Received: 12 June 2014

Accepted: 22 December 2014

Published: 21 January 2015

Abstract

Background

Oil crop seeds are important sources of fatty acids (FAs) for human and animal nutrition. Despite their importance, there is a lack of an essential bioinformatics resource on gene transcription of oil crops from a comparative perspective. In this study, we developed ocsESTdb, the first database of expressed sequence tag (EST) information on seeds of four large-scale oil crops with an emphasis on global metabolic networks and oil accumulation metabolism that target the involved unigenes.

Description

A total of 248,522 ESTs and 106,835 unigenes were collected from the cDNA libraries of rapeseed (Brassica napus), soybean (Glycine max), sesame (Sesamum indicum) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea). These unigenes were annotated by a sequence similarity search against databases including TAIR, NR protein database, Gene Ontology, COG, Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). Five genome-scale metabolic networks that contain different numbers of metabolites and gene–enzyme reaction–association entries were analysed and constructed using Cytoscape and yEd programs. Details of unigene entries, deduced amino acid sequences and putative annotation are available from our database to browse, search and download. Intuitive and graphical representations of EST/unigene sequences, functional annotations, metabolic pathways and metabolic networks are also available. ocsESTdb will be updated regularly and can be freely accessed at http://ocri-genomics.org/ocsESTdb/.

Conclusion

ocsESTdb may serve as a valuable and unique resource for comparative analysis of acyl lipid synthesis and metabolism in oilseed plants. It also may provide vital insights into improving oil content in seeds of oil crop species by transcriptional reconstruction of the metabolic network.

Keywords

Database Expressed sequence tag Metabolic network Oil crop seeds

Background

Oil crop seeds are important sources of fatty acids (FAs) and proteins for human and animal nutrition as well as for non-dietary uses [1]. As a major goal of oil crop seed research, studies focusing on engineering seeds with enhanced oil quantity and quality has prompted efforts to better understand the processes involved in seed metabolism, especially in the accumulation of storage products [2]. There are four major oil crops with different oil content in seeds: rapeseed (Brassica napus), soybean (Glycine max), sesame (Sesamum indicum) and peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Accumulation levels of seed storage compounds, such as triacylglycerol (TAG), proteins and carbohydrates, show significant species-specific variations. Sesame and peanut have heterotrophic oilseeds (non-green oilseeds) that contain up to 60% FAs of dry seed, whereas soybean and rapeseed have autotrophic oilseeds (green seeds) that contain up to 20% and 40% FAs of dry seed, respectively [3]. Although non-green seeds of sesame and peanut can accumulate oil without the benefit of photophosphorylation, they have the highest oil content among oilseeds. This suggests that there are many differences in terms of carbon flow, carbon recapture and ATP and NADPH production between non-green seeds and green seeds [4,5].

cDNA and/or genome sequence data of these important oil crops are becoming publicly available. To date, the soybean reference genome has been released. Progress has been made in genome sequencing projects for peanut (the international peanut genome initiative [IPGI]) and sesame [6,7] and Brassica napus [8]. Large-scale expressed sequence tag (EST) collections are also making valuable contributions to the investigation of genetic traits of crops. More than 2,328,985 EST sequence entries are available in the public database (dbEST database of NCBI, as of October 2013) for the important oil crops B. napus (643,944), G. max (1,461,723), S. indicum (44,820) and A. hypogaea (178,498). However, these huge data sets are under-utilised due to the scarcity of informatics databases. A handful of such informatics resources are currently available, which provide high-level analysis of crop functional genomics in searchable forms [9-11].

Genome-scale metabolic network models have been successfully used to describe metabolic processes in various microbial organisms [12]. These system-based frameworks enable systematic biological studies and have the potential to contribute to metabolic engineering. Reconstruction of a complete, genome-scale metabolic network is usually based on annotated genomic sequences [13], but the activities of many proteins and enzymes are highly tissue-specific, and therefore, metabolic networks should be tissue-specific as well [14]. The biochemical pathways and metabolisms in specific plant tissues are more complicated than those in bacteria. For example, during the development of oilseeds, the synthesis of large quantities of stored TAG relies on sucrose and hexose transport from the mother plant. Recent studies have revealed that a broad range of metabolites are taken up and utilised by plastids for FA synthesis; this process depends on the plant species, organs and stage of development [15]. As a result, whole genome metabolism network construction of oilseeds from multiple oil crops in specific developmental stages is quite essential as well as based on the whole genome data. Based on such a resource, protein coding sequences (CDSs) can be identified, annotated by Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers, and linked to specific biochemical reactions. The reactions can then be connected and further interpreted as a network and analysed using the Cytoscape program [16].

Some comprehensive repositories of plant resources have been established. PlantGDB is a popular site for plant genomic and EST data. This site provides tools and data of plant EST assemblies and genome annotation [17]. Plant Metabolic Network (PMN) consists of plant metabolic pathway databases [18] (http://www.plantcyc.org/). In recent years, numerous studies on oilseed development and lipid metabolism have integrated extensive data sets. Most studies have focused on the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana and have included projects such as Microarray Analysis of Developing Arabidopsis Seeds [19-21], ARALIP: Arabidopsis Acyl-Lipid Metabolism [22], and Quizzing the Chemical Factories of Oilseeds (NSF-Plant Genome Grant) (http://bioinfolab.unl.edu/oilseeds/databases.html). Each of these databases and websites not only provide information on Arabidopsis seed lipid metabolism and the network of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed filling but also include EST data and seed transcriptional profiling data of some other oilseed species.

The ‘-omics’ data of oil crops in publicly available databases are usually far from comprehensive and integrated. Comparative analyses between oil crop tissues to identify species- or tissue-specific genes involved in lipid and oil metabolic are absent. Also, there is a lack of databases that assemble oil crop species together with annotations based on comparative genomics. To understand molecular metabolism involved in oil crop propagation, the accumulation of a storage product and oil biosynthesis, we collected EST sequences on a large scale from seeds at different developmental stages for rapeseed, soybean, sesame and peanut. To understand the EST sequence and full-length CDSs of seeds of four oil crops and to facilitate research on comparative metabolic networks, we constructed a new database called ‘ocsESTdb’ (oil crop seed EST database) with seed EST sequences and metabolic networks of four oil crop species with different objectives. The first objective is to provide large-scale EST sequences and complete amino acid sequences from full-length CDSs and to provide information on clusters, annotations and pathways. The second objective is to provide comparative annotations of four oil crops and metabolic pathways. The third objective is to develop a genome-scale metabolic network model based on the large-scale sequencing of oilseeds at different developmental stages. The ocsESTdb database integrates knowledge of seed EST sequences and full-length CDSs of four oil crops seeds and reconstructs of the metabolic network with insights into comparative oil crop genomics. ocsESTdb can be accessed via the Web interface at http://www.ocri-genomics.org/ocsESTdb/.

Construction and content

Implementation

The ocsESTdb database was developed using Perl/CGI, Python and JavaScript on a platform with the Apache Web server on CentOS 5.4 and the MySQL 5.0 database management system. We developed a pipeline (Figure 1) to organise data. The pipeline provides a schematic of the steps involved in data processing and database construction. For the schematic of steps in database construction, the pipeline is composed of a series of fully integrated, open resource software and will automatically process, analyse and import data into a MySQL database management system. Major modules of the database construction pipeline include the following three steps. First is to process data for ocsESTdb: logical relationships among sequence data, annotation information, pathways and networks are constructed based on unigenes assembled with clean raw ESTs. Second is to prepare the MySQL database for ocsESTdb: unigenes serve as primary keys in the data table to create logical relationships among the data tables in MySQL database. Third is to visualise the interface for ocsESTdb: a Web-based, searchable and downloadable database is constructed to provide a high-level data resource on processed sequence information, functional annotation and biological meaning assigned to total clean raw EST sequences based on logical relationships. The ocsESTdb database is divided into different sections to satisfy different functional needs and to provide users with the flexibility to access, search and download all analysis results separately.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the informatics workflow used to generate ocsESTdb and related annotation. (A) Part of this workflow is described as a procedure for processing ESTs raw data of oilseeds at different developmental stages. (B) Part of this workflow is the pipeline of unigene annotation in ocsESTdb as well as the procedure of developing ocsESTdb.

Data source

Combined with SMART techniques (Clontech), three normalized cDNA libraries enriched in full-length sequences were constructed for the generation of ESTs by using mRNA isolated from immature seeds of three high-oil content cultivars (soybean, peanut and sesame) at three prominent different oil accumulation stages after pollination [23-25]. The cDNA library of B. napus was constructed from immature seeds of two rapeseed lines, B. napus cv. ZY036 (high-oil contents, HO) and B. napus cv. 51070 (low-oil contents, LO), by 454 sequencing (2 weeks after flowering) [26] (Table 1).
Table 1

Raw data source for EST sequences

Species

Representative

Database

Series of Seq.

Arachis hypogaea

Ahy

EST-NCBI

JK146921-JK167516

Brassica napus

Bna

SRA-NCBI

SRX006869, SRX006870

Glycine max

Gma

EST-NCBI

HO008567-HO045222

Sesamum indicum

Sin

EST-NCBI

JK045130–JK086377

Raw data processing and clustering analysis

Combined with SMART techniques (Clontech), three normalised cDNA libraries enriched in full-length sequences were constructed for the generation of ESTs using mRNA isolated from immature seeds of three high-oil content cultivars (soybean, peanut and sesame) at three prominent different oil accumulation stages after pollination [23-25]. The cDNA library of B. napus was constructed from immature seeds of two rapeseed lines, B. napus cv. ZY036 (high-oil content, HO) and B. napus cv. 51070 (low-oil content, LO) by 454 sequencing (2 weeks after flowering) [26] (Table 1). Quality control of raw DNA sequences was performed by using Phred program [27] to remove sub-standard reads, the vector and adapter sequences, followed by EST-trimmer (http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.De/misa/download/est_trimmer.pl) to eliminate 3' polyA and 100 bp EST reads. After screening of low-quality DNA and trimming of vector sequences, Phrap program was used to cluster the overlapping ESTs into contigs [27]. Groups that contained only one sequence were classified as singletons.

Comprehensive annotation of oil crop unigenes

ESTs and unigenes were translated into six reading frames and analysed against the Arabidopsis genomic databases TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org/), UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, UniProtKB/TrEMBL and GenBank NR using the default setting of BLASTX program (NCBI, ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast). The results of BLASTX and BLASTN with E-values equal to or less than 10−5 were treated as ‘significant matches’, whereas ESTs with no hits or matches and with E-values more than 10−5 were treated as ‘no significant matches’. ESTs and unigenes were annotated according to the top BLASTX match (Table 2). The results were then parsed and stored in the ocsESTdb database. Using the same protocols, the unigene/EST sequences were further annotated using the COG database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/) [28] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway database [29].
Table 2

Summary of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from the five oil crops seed cDNA libraries

Categories

No. of sequences generated

No. of high-quality sequences

Average size of high-quality sequences (bp)

Singletons

Contigs

No. of unigene

No. of ORF

Unabundancy

full length gene (%)

A. hypogaea

21,998

20,596

579

13,678

2,040

15,718

14,906

66.4%

57.0%

B. napus (HO)

78,332

69,938

216

14,582

7,130

21,712

7,658

20.9%

 

B. napus (LO)

57,870

50,656

213

9,734

4,165

13,899

4,028

19.2%

 

G. max

44,753

36,656

624

24,245

3,737

27,982

26,878

66.1%

55.0%

S. indicum

45,569

41,248

570

23,863

3,661

27,524

25,043

57.9%

45.0%

Total

248,522

219,094

 

86,102

20,733

106,835

78,513

  
GO annotations of all the seed unigenes were performed using the Blast2GO program [30] (Table 3). These sequence libraries had different significant matches ratios to sequences in TAIR, the non-redundant protein database (Nr), Swiss-Prot and TrEMBL database based on an E value cut off which was equal or less than 10–5. A total of 62,220 unigenes were successfully annotated with GO terms. The lowest annotation ratio is rape most attributed to the more short sequence from the 454 sequence method. This software performed a BLASTX similarity search against the GenBank non-redundant protein database, retrieved GO terms for the top 12 BLAST results, and annotated the sequences based on defined criteria. Additional information on unigenes was obtained using InterProScan [31,32] and KEGG (KO number and EC number) annotation, and additional sequences were then annotated. GO enrichment analysis was compared and visualised using WEGO (http://wego.genomics.org.cn) [33].
Table 3

Statistics of annotation result for unigenes from the five oil crops seed cDNA libraries

Species

No. of unigenes

Hit to A. thaliana (%)

Hit to Nr (%)

Hit to Swiss-Prot (%)

Hit to TrEMBL (%)

Annotated to GO (%)

B. napus (LO)

13899

7681(55.3%)

5377(38.7%)

3638(26.2%)

5336(38.4%)

1870(13.5%)

B. napus (HO)

21712

13076(60.2%)

9925(45.7%)

6733(31.0%)

9293(42.8%)

3358(15.5%)

A. hypogaea

15718

12618(80.3%)

13561(86.3%)

10714(68.2%)

13479(85.8%)

13114(83.4%)

G. max

27982

24439(87.3%)

25090(89.7%)

20745(74.1%)

26880(96.1%)

25403(90.8%)

S. indicum

27524

15236(55.4%)

21193(77.0%)

15797(57.4%)

27173(98.7%)

18475(67.1%)

Total

106835

73050

75146

57627

82161

62220

Reconstruction of a global metabolic network of four oil crops

A metabolic network was constructed based on the list of enzymes, especially EC numbers, which were extracted from the unigene annotation and the corresponding reactions of which were acquired by searching in an established biochemical reaction database [13,34]. Biochemical reactions were then connected to each other with metabolics as the node and reactions as the edges. The reaction database was based on the KEGG LIGAND database (http://www.genome.jp/ligand). The organism-specific metabolic networks were reconstructed from the enzyme–gene relation and the reaction–enzyme information. The connection matrix of reactions [34,35] was substantially improved in this work by updating the enzyme reaction database to the newer version of KEGG Ligand (Status August 2009). Finally, the new version contained 7,908 reactions compared with the 6,442 reactions in the former version (Additional file 1: ReactionDB_20090524.xls). The programs Cytoscape [36] (http://www.cytoscape.org) and yEd (a Java Graph Editor from the company yWorks) (http://www.yworks.com) were used as layout tools for the genome-wide network. We constructed metabolic networks of five oil crop seeds. The metabolic network of peanut (Figure 2) has the highest number of biological reactions and metabolites, containing 2337 biological reactions and 1923 metabolites.
Figure 2

The genome-scale metabolic network of Arachis hypogaea. Nodes are metabolites whereas links are reactions. The colours of the nodes represent different functional categories. The sizes of the nodes are proportional to the number of reactions from or to that node (metabolite) in the genome-wide network. For a detailed and clickable version, see the net pages in the database.

Utility

The ocsESTdb database provides a user-friendly interface that is divided into five main functional tabs: ‘Home’ , ‘Browse’ , ‘Search’ , ‘Document’ and ‘Help’. Each functional tab provides a specific capability for users to retrieve information on oil crop seed ESTs or unigenes from the database or to view the oil crop seed ESTs or unigenes in the context of participating in the either the acyl-lipid metabolism pathways or networks constructed by metabolites of oil crop seed unigenes.

Major friendly interface provided by ocsESTdb

The ‘Browse’ tab contains three functional units: species, pathway and network. The ocsESTdb database supplies convenient browse functions to help users retrieve statistics of raw EST sequences, clustering reads, assembling contigs and unigenes, unigene list, and gene ontology enrichment analysis for different oil crop species. Users can see all assembled unigenes by clicking the hyperlink of unigene lists and can then obtain the comprehensive annotation of unigenes for this species by clicking the unigene’s name. For each unigene, this database also offered a useful interface to allow users to download cleaned ESTs for corresponding unigene by referring to DFCI Gene Index (http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/). The ocsESTdb database supplies a comprehensive annotation on the unigene detail page, including unigene basic information, functional annotation and sequence information (Figure 3). Through the Browse functional section, users can obtain the pathway information on unigenes that participate in different pathways of the four oil crop species. The pathways in ocsESTdb were classified into two types to detect the functions of lipid metabolic pathways for oil crop seed unigenes. One type was curated by Arabidopsis acyl-lipid metabolic pathways, and the other type was based on KEGG pathways. According to different contents of pathways, ocsESTdb collects all unigenes that participate in different pathways and allows the users to make further comparative analyses. Through user-friendly and efficient browsing capabilities of the database, users can obtain information on unigenes involved in different species (Figure 4).
Figure 3

Typical example of the detailed annotation of ocsESTdb unigenes. (A) Basic information on unigenes in ocsESTdb, including the unigene type and ESTs information that clusters the corresponding unigenes; (B) Annotation information on unigenes in ocsESTdb, including conserved domains predicted by InterProScan, list of GO terms, best hit in Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins, Non-redundant Protein Sequences Database, Swiss-Prot, TrEMBL as well as comparisons to the model species Arabidopsis thaliana. Especially, for unigenes of Glycine max, comparative analysis with gene data sets of the G. max genome was added in this section; (C) Nucleotide sequence and deduced open reading frame (ORF) sequence and peptide sequence for unigene in ocsESTdb.

Figure 4

Typical example of a KEGG pathway that four oil crop seed unigenes participated in. (A) Lists of putative pathways that ocsESTdb unigenes referred to. (B) Lists of putative reactions that ocsESTdb participated in, including reaction, metabolites and KEGG orthology. (C) Detailed pathway information that ocsESTdb unigenes referred to, including KEGG entry, reaction code in KEGG database, reaction, metabolites, KEGG orthology and metabolism classification. (D) KEGG pathway.

In the network, different colours represent different metabolic types, and each node point represents the meridians involved in the metabolism of possible metabolites.

The ocsESTdb database also supplies a pipeline of data processing and database construction, statistics of data collected in this database, literature and open resource in this field. Users can employ the ‘Help’ functional unit to access and download data of EST and unigene sequences, annotations and pathways.

General search in database by names or identifiers

The ocsESTdb database provides a full-featured searching function. The user can retrieve information of interest from the search module. Users can obtain detailed annotation information on the target unigene by entering the ID of the specific unigene and corresponding type of unigenes from different species by entering the relevant GO terms, InterPro entry or COG ID. For further comparative research and analysis, users can determine unigenes participating in different pathways of different species by entering the target pathway entry.

Searching sequence similarity using BLAST

To implement the sequence similarity searching function, ocsESTdb supplies a customised BLAST search from standard NCBI BLAST module for users to retrieve similar or identical sequences from the database with different interests. Users can offer nucleic acid or amino acid sequence via directly pasting or file uploading to match against the oil crop seed ESTs or unigenes database from B. napus, G. max, S. indicum and A. hypogaea. Through comparisons using the BLAST search, users can get the annotations of their query sequences with the deposited data in ocsESTdb quickly.

Discussion

ocsESTdb collects oil crop seed ESTs and unigenes from B. napus, G. max, S. indicum and A. hypogaea and supplies a public resource for researchers to comparatively analyse and investigate oil accumulation metabolism. Analyses of these four oilseed EST sets have helped to identify similar and different gene expression profiles during seed development. The BLAST and annotation results could be chosen as an example to comparatively analyse the differences in functional genes between four oilseeds. The comparative results of COG annotation and functional genes of four oilseeds can be found at the ‘Statistics’ pages. There is an obvious difference in ratio of functional category between the green and non-green seeds, especially in the metabolism-related gene category. Two non-green seeds (sesame and peanut) have the same ratios in all categories. The ‘metabolism’ category of the non-green seeds of the two crop species was approximately two times higher than that of soybean seeds. Four oil crops have similar ratios of ‘lipid transport and metabolism’.

A comparison of the seed metabolic networks was also performed. Most of the reactions are connected to the central metabolism in almost the same ratios among the four oilseeds, such as carbohydrate metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lipid metabolism and energy metabolism (Table 4). Acetyl-CoA and pyruvate belong to the metabolites with the highest connectivity in the five metabolic networks. The sesame metabolic network comprises 36 and 41 biochemical reactions involved in Acetyl-CoA and pyruvate, respectively (Table 5).
Table 4

Distribution of reactions of the inferred genome-wide metabolic network in different functional categories

 

G. max

B. napus (LO)

B. napus (HO)

A. hypogaea

S. indicum

Functional category

Reactions

Metabolites

Reactions

Metabolites

Reactions

Metabolites

Reactions

Metabolites

Reactions

Metabolites

Carbohydrate Metabolism

319(13.7%)

269(13.8%)

183(14.4%)

168(10.7%)

221(14.3%)

261(14.5%)

323(13.8%)

275(14.3%)

316(15.65%)

303(13.97%)

Energy metabolism

52(2.2%)

69(3.5%)

28(2.2%)

72(4.6%)

33(2.1%)

79(4.4%)

51(2.2%)

66(3.4%)

29(1.44%)

52(2.40%)

Lipid metabolism

467(20.1%)

412(21.1%)

246(19.3%)

340(21.7%)

280(18.1%)

361(20%)

478(20.5%)

408(21.2%)

350(17.34%)

391(18.03%)

Nucleotide metabolism

170(7.3%)

125(6.4%)

62(4.9%)

88(5.6%)

122(7.9%)

115(6.4%)

124(5.3%)

107(5.6%)

150(7.43%)

120(5.53%)

Amino Acid metabolism

380(16.3%)

367(18.8%)

230(18.1%)

336(21.5%)

291(18.8%)

384(21.3%)

437(18.7%)

344(17.9%)

373(18.47%)

432(19.92%)

Metabolism of other amino acids

91(3.9%)

120(6.1%)

42(3.3%)

106(6.8%)

54(3.5%)

126(7%)

92(3.9%)

45(2.3%)

72(3.57%)

122(5.62%)

Glycan biosynthesis and metabolism

71(3%)

95(4.9%)

37(2.9%)

89(5.7%)

43(2.8%)

94(5.2%)

57(2.4%)

122(6.3%)

85(4.21%)

143(6.59%)

Biosynthesis of polyketides and nonribosomal peptides

8(0.3%)

17(0.9%)

8(0.6%)

19(1.2%)

8(0.5%)

19(1.1%)

8(0.3%)

86(4.5%)

10(0.50%)

20(0.92%)

Metabolism of cofactors and vitamins

131(5.6%)

180(9.2%)

64(5%)

133(8.5%)

95(6.1%)

176(9.8%)

121(5.2%)

17(0.9%)

141(6.98%)

194(8.94%)

Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites

324(13.9%)

332(17%)

222(17.4%)

303(19.3%)

235(15.2%)

327(18.1%)

327(14%)

508(26.4%)

203(10.05%)

287(13.23%)

Xenobiotics biodegradation and metabolism

320(13.7%)

399(20.4%)

151(11.9%)

284(18.1%)

164(10.6%)

304(16.9%)

319(13.6%)

384(20%)

289(14.31%)

421(19.41%)

Total

2333

1954

1273

1565

1546

1803

2337

1923

2019

2169

Table 5

Pathway and unigenes statistics of five oilseeds metabolic network

 

Unigenes in total pathway

Unigene in fatty acid metabolism pathway

Reactions involved in Acetyl-CoA

Reactions involved in pyruvate

A. hypogaea

3481

639

26

24

B. napus (HO)

2753

333

35

27

B. napus (LO)

1519

196

22

22

G. max

5425

710

25

24

S. indicum

5234

1285

36

41

FAs and oils are the main accumulation products of these four oil crops, and their biosynthesis is crucial to the development of oil crop seeds. Thus, the pathways related to FA biosynthesis and elongations were extracted from the genome-wide metabolic network directly connected to these pathways to compare the different network structures of the four seeds. Among the total 106,835 unigenes in the cDNA data of oil crop seeds, 333, 196, 710, 1,285 and 639 are related to lipid metabolism in high-oil content rapeseed, low-oil content rapeseed, soybean, sesame and peanut, respectively (Table 5). Structural disparity among the seeds of four crops was analysed based on annotated pathways. The FA synthesis sub-networks of five seeds have similar structures (Figure 5). However, small differences can still be noted between them (reactions marked as red in Figure 5).
Figure 5

Network of fatty acid synthesis and fatty acid elongation. (A) Important enzymes involved in FA synthesis sub-networks; (B) peanut (A. hypogaea); (C) rapeseed (Brassica napus) HO; (D) rapeseed (B. napus) LO; (E) soybean (G. max) and (F) sesame (Sesamum indicum).

Conclusions

The ocsESTdb database is the first integrated comparative analysis database of EST sequences from the seed of four oil crops. This database supplies a user-friendly interface, in which data can be freely accessed and downloaded. ocsESTdb is a uniquely comprehensive world-wide oil crop seed EST database, which also includes sufficient information on unigenes that represent the characteristics of oil crops in terms of oil content. Information necessary to investigate the properties of oil crop genes at the molecular and function levels is also supplied in the database. Moreover, the ocsESTdb database is a tool for information retrieval, visualisation and management. The large set of full-length cDNA clones from oil crops reported in this study will serve as a useful resource for gene discovery and will aid in the precise annotation of the oil crop genome. In addition, this database also serves as a platform to visualise and analyse ‘omics’ data. Furthermore, the overall topology of metabolic networks provides insight into the properties of the network, whereas flux analysis permits phenotype predictions at the metabolic level to guide metabolic engineering. The ocsESTdb database will supply a model to derive new non-trivial hypotheses for exploring plant metabolism. Integration of large EST sequences, metabolic pathways and metabolic network data during oil crop seed development gives us insights into the comparative metabolic networks and their difference between green and non-green oilseeds responsible for the synthesis and metabolism of seed oil.

Availability and requirements

The database is freely available at: http://www.ocri-genomics.org/ocsESTdb/. All data sets are free to use and can be downloaded via the Web interface. There are no restrictions on use of the database or all stores of data sets.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by grants from the China National Basic Research Program (2011CB109300), the Genetically modified organisms breeding major projects (2009ZX08004-002B), the Open Project of Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Biology, the Ministry of Agriculture, PR China (201202) and the Core Research Budget of the Non-profit Governmental Research Institution.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory for Oil Crops Biology, the Ministry of Agriculture, PR China, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
(2)
Department of Life Science and Technology, Nanyang Normal University

References

  1. Harwood JL. What's so special about plant lipids? In: Harwood JL, editor. Plant lipid biosynthesis: Fundamentals and agricultural applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 1–26.Google Scholar
  2. Thelen JJ, Ohlrogge JB. Metabolic engineering of fatty acid biosynthesis in plants. Metab Eng. 2002;4(1):12–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Weiss EA. Oilseed Crops. 2nd ed. Oxford; Malden, MA: Blackwell Science; 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Houston NL, Hajduch M, Thelen JJ. Quantitative proteomics of seed filling in castor: comparison with soybean and rapeseed reveals differences between photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic seed metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2009;151(2):857–68.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwender J, Goffman F, Ohlrogge JB, Shachar-Hill Y. Rubisco without the Calvin cycle improves the carbon efficiency of developing green seeds. Nature. 2004;432(7018):779–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang H, Miao H, Wang L, Qu L, Liu H, Wang Q, et al. Genome sequencing of the important oilseed crop Sesamum indicum L. Genome Biol. 2013;14(1):401.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Wang L, Yu S, Tong C, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Song C, et al. Genome sequencing of the high oil crop sesame provides insight into oil biosynthesis. Genome Biol. 2014;15(2):R39.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, et al. Plant genetics. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science. 2014;345(6199):950–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng KC, Stromvik MV. SoyXpress: a database for exploring the soybean transcriptome. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:368.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Grant D, Nelson RT, Cannon SB, Shoemaker RC. SoyBase, the USDA-ARS soybean genetics and genomics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(Database issue):D843–846.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu GZ, Shi QM, Niu Y, Xing MQ, Xue HW. Shanghai RAPESEED Database: a resource for functional genomics studies of seed development and fatty acid metabolism of Brassica. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D1044–1047.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Francke C, Siezen RJ, Teusink B. Reconstructing the metabolic network of a bacterium from its genome. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(11):550–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ma H, Zeng AP. Reconstruction of metabolic networks from genome data and analysis of their global structure for various organisms. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(2):270–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hao T, Ma HW, Zhao XM, Goryanin I. The reconstruction and analysis of tissue specific human metabolic networks. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8(2):663–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rawsthorne S. Carbon flux and fatty acid synthesis in plants. Prog Lipid Res. 2002;41(2):182–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Cline MS, Smoot M, Cerami E, Kuchinsky A, Landys N, Workman C, et al. Integration of biological networks and gene expression data using Cytoscape. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(10):2366–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong Q, Lawrence CJ, Schlueter SD, Wilkerson MD, Kurtz S, Lushbough C, et al. Comparative plant genomics resources at PlantGDB. Plant Physiol. 2005;139(2):610–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bassel GW, Gaudinier A, Brady SM, Hennig L, Rhee SY, De Smet I. Systems analysis of plant functional, transcriptional, physical interaction, and metabolic networks. Plant Cell. 2012;24(10):3859–75.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruuska SA, Girke T, Benning C, Ohlrogge JB. Contrapuntal networks of gene expression during Arabidopsis seed filling. Plant Cell. 2002;14(6):1191–206.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. White JA, Todd J, Newman T, Focks N, Girke T, de Ilarduya OM, et al. A new set of Arabidopsis expressed sequence tags from developing seeds. The metabolic pathway from carbohydrates to seed oil. Plant Physiol. 2000;124(4):1582–94.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Girke T, Todd J, Ruuska S, White J, Benning C, Ohlrogge J. Microarray analysis of developing Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 2000;124(4):1570–81.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Li-Beisson Y, Shorrosh B, Beisson F, Andersson MX, Arondel V, Bates PD, et al. Acyl-lipid metabolism. Arabidopsis Book. 2013;11:e0161.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ke T, Dong C, Mao H, Zhao Y, Chen H, Liu H, et al. Analysis of expression sequence tags from a full-length-enriched cDNA library of developing sesame seeds (Sesamum indicum). BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:180.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang J, Yan L, Lei Y, Jiang H, Ren X, Liao B. Expressed sequence tags in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea): discovery of genes in seed development and response to Ralstonia solanacearum challenge. J Plant Res. 2012;125(6):755–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sha AH, Li C, Yan XH, Shan ZH, Zhou XA, Jiang ML, et al. Large-scale sequencing of normalized full-length cDNA library of soybean seed at different developmental stages and analysis of the gene expression profiles based on ESTs. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39(3):2867–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu Z, Huang S, Sun M, Wang H, Hua W. Development and application of single nucleotide polymorphism markers in the polyploid Brassica napus by 454 sequencing of expressed sequence tags. Plant Breeding. 2012;131(2):293–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Gordon D, Green P. Consed: a graphical editor for next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(22):2936–7.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):33–6.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D480–484.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Conesa A, Gotz S, Garcia-Gomez JM, Terol J, Talon M, Robles M. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(18):3674–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Bateman A, Binns D, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(Database issue):D211–215.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R. InterProScan–an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001;17(9):847–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Ye J, Fang L, Zheng H, Zhang Y, Chen J, Zhang Z, et al. WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W293–297.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sun J, Lu X, Rinas U, Zeng AP. Metabolic peculiarities of Aspergillus niger disclosed by comparative metabolic genomics. Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):R182.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma H, Zeng AP. The connectivity structure, giant strong component and centrality of metabolic networks. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(11):1423–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ke et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.