Open Access

Loss-of-function mutations affecting a specific Glycine max R2R3 MYB transcription factor result in brown hilum and brown seed coats

  • Jason D Gillman1Email author,
  • Ashley Tetlow2,
  • Jeong-Deong Lee3,
  • J Grover Shannon4 and
  • Kristin Bilyeu1
BMC Plant Biology201111:155

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-155

Received: 15 July 2011

Accepted: 9 November 2011

Published: 9 November 2011

Abstract

Background

Although modern soybean cultivars feature yellow seed coats, with the only color variation found at the hila, the ancestral condition is black seed coats. Both seed coat and hila coloration are due to the presence of phenylpropanoid pathway derivatives, principally anthocyanins. The genetics of soybean seed coat and hilum coloration were first investigated during the resurgence of genetics during the 1920s, following the rediscovery of Mendel's work. Despite the inclusion of this phenotypic marker into the extensive genetic maps developed for soybean over the last twenty years, the genetic basis behind the phenomenon of brown seed coats (the R locus) has remained undetermined until now.

Results

In order to identify the gene responsible for the r gene effect (brown hilum or seed coat color), we utilized bulk segregant analysis and identified recombinant lines derived from a population segregating for two phenotypically distinct alleles of the R locus. Fine mapping was accelerated through use of a novel, bioinformatically determined set of Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers which allowed us to delimit the genomic region containing the r gene to less than 200 kbp, despite the use of a mapping population of only 100 F6 lines. Candidate gene analysis identified a loss of function mutation affecting a seed coat-specific expressed R2R3 MYB transcription factor gene (Glyma09g36990) as a strong candidate for the brown hilum phenotype. We observed a near perfect correlation between the mRNA expression levels of the functional R gene candidate and an UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UF3GT) gene, which is responsible for the final step in anthocyanin biosynthesis. In contrast, when a null allele of Glyma09g36990 is expressed no upregulation of the UF3GT gene was found.

Conclusions

We discovered an allelic series of four loss of function mutations affecting our R locus gene candidate. The presence of any one of these mutations was perfectly correlated with the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in a broadly distributed survey of soybean cultivars, barring the presence of the epistatic dominant I allele or gray pubescence, both of which can mask the effect of the r allele, resulting in yellow or buff hila. These findings strongly suggest that loss of function for one particular seed coat-expressed R2R3 MYB gene is responsible for the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in soybean.

Background

Domestication of Soybean

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] is a remarkable plant, producing both high quality oil and protein and is one of the primary row crops in the United States. Although soybean is relatively new to western agriculture, it has been under cultivation for > 3000 years [1, 2]. The transition from wild Glycine soja to cultivated Glycine max was the result of ancient plant breeders/farmers selecting for a large number of domestication-specific traits (photoperiod insensitivity, lack of shattering, lack of lodging, seed size increases, seed set increases, etc.). Dramatic changes in seed oil/protein content and fatty acid composition have apparently also been selected for during domestication, either directly or indirectly [3, 4].

Genetics of soybean seed coloration

The visual appearance of the soybean seed itself has also been altered as a result of domestication: All Glycine soja accessions in the USDA GRIN germplasm collection possess black seed coats, whereas the majority of Glycine max germplasm (12880/18585 Soybean entries, accessed 06/07/2011) possess yellow seed coats. Although a small market exists for black soybeans, all modern high yielding cultivars feature yellow seed coats, with a range of hila colors present (brown, black, imperfect black, buff, yellow). Cultivars with pale hila are highly prized for natto and tofu production [5]. Because hilum coloration is controlled by a small number of genes [6], this trait is frequently used by breeders as a readily assayed visible marker for the presence of "off-types" in soybean seed lots. Seed coat and hilum color are relatively simple epistatic multi-genic traits, and variation in hilum and seed coat pigmentation appears to be due to the interaction of four independent loci: Inhibitor (I), Tawny (T), an unnamed locus termed R, and the flower color locus W1 [68](Table 1). Other loci with minor effects have been described, but these have not been mapped and the genetics have been incompletely discerned [68].
Table 1

Simplified description of phenotypic effects of three different genetic loci affecting seed coat and hilum colors, adapted from [8].

Inhibitor

Tawny

R

W1

Seed coat color

Hilum color

Pubesence

Flower color

I

T

R

W1/w1

yellow

gray

tawny

purple/white

I

t

R

w1

yellow

yellow

gray

white

I

t

R

W1

yellow

gray

gray

purple

I

T

r

W1

yellow

yellow

tawny

purple/white

I

t

r

W1

yellow

yellow

gray

purple/white

i i

T

R

W1/w1

yellow

black

tawny

purple/white

i i

T

r

W1/w1

yellow

brown

tawny

purple/white

i i

t

R

W1

yellow

imperfect black

gray

purple

i i

t

R/r

w1

yellow

buff

gray

white

i i

t

r

W1/w1

yellow

buff

gray

purple/white

i

T

R

W1/w1

black

black

tawny

purple/white

i

t

R

W1

imperfect black

imperfect black

gray

purple

i

t

R

w1

buff

buff

gray

white

i

T

r

W1/w1

brown

brown

tawny

purple/white

i

t

r

W1/w1

buff

buff

gray

purple/white

The compounds responsible for soybean seed coat and hilum color in soybean are derivatives of phenylpropanoid pathway [911] (Figure 1). The wild type condition of black seed coats is primarily due to two anthocyanidin glycosides (anthocyanins): cyanidin-3-monoglucoside and delphinidin-3-monoglucoside [10, 11]. In lines which feature brown seed coats, only cyanidin is apparently present at maturity [10]. Aside from the cosmetic and aesthetic aspect of coloration, anthocyanins are thought to have diverse human health promoting capabilities [12].
Figure 1

Simplified representation of the biosynthetic pathway of anthocyanins. Enzymes are indicated by bold text, intermediates are indicated by plain text, and gene locus designations are in italics. Enzymes are abbreviated as follows: 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL), Anthocyanin Reductase (ANR), Chalcone Synthase (CHS, Inhibitor locus), Chalcone Isomerase (CHI), cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase (C4H), Dihydroxyflavone Reductase (DFR), Flavanone 3-Hydroxylase (F3H, Wp), Flavonoid 5' 3' Hydroxylase (F3'5'H, W1), Flavonoid 3' Hydroxylase (F3'H, Tawny) Leucoanthocyanidin Reductase (LAR), Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase (PAL). The chemical structures to the right of the pathway correspond to eriodictyol, dihydroquercetin, leucocyanidin, cyanidin, and cyanidin-3-glucoside (from top to bottom, respectively).

The action of UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase enzymes is a critical step in anthocyanin accumulation

Two anthocyanin glycosides form the predominant colored compounds in black seed coats: cyanidin-3-monoglucoside and delphinidin-3-monoglucoside [10]. These are formed through the action of UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UF3GT) enzymes, which specifically transfer a glucose moiety from UTP to the 3' position of cyanidin and delphinidin (recently reviewed in [13], Figure 1). This glycosylation is thought to increase the stability and solubility of the cyanidin molecule [14]. In lines with brown seed coats (r), cyanidin accumulates, though high levels of proanthocyanidins are also present [10]. Recently, two highly similar co-expressed UF3GT genes (Glyma07g30180 and Glyma08g07130) were determined to be expressed in seed coats of black seeded soybean lines, and these genes have been demonstrated to specifically transfer a glucose moiety to the cyanidin molecule at the 3'-hydroxyl group, resulting in the formation of cyanidin-3-glucoside [15].

The Inhibitorlocus

Seed coat color is primarily under control of the Inhibitor locus, which has at least four classically defined genetic alleles [8], listed here from the most dominant to the least: I (largely colorless seeds) > i i (color restricted to hilum) > i k ("saddle;" color in hilum and spreading slightly beyond the hilum) > i (seeds completely black). Inhibitor acts in a dominant, gain-of-function manner with maternal-effect inheritance, and results in seed coats appearing pale yellow due to the absence of anthocyanins [10]. Both the dominant Inhibitor allele (I) and the i i alleles have been shown to be due to naturally occurring, gene-silencing effects derived from linked but independent Chalcone Synthase (CHS) gene clusters (chromosome 8, LG A2) that generate siRNA which target CHS gene transcripts specifically within the seed coat for degradation [1622].

The genetics of soybean hilum coloration

Lines which have the dominant I allele can still exhibit some traces of color within the hilum, with the specific hilum coloration due to the allelic status at three other genetic loci: Tawny, R, and W1 [6, 8] (Table 1). Hilum tissue is not maternally-derived, in contrast to the seed coat [23]. In lines with the recessive (i) allele, seed coat color is brown, imperfect black, buff or black, dependent on the allelic status of the Tawny, R and W1 loci (Table 1).

The Tawny locus has two pleiotropic effects: homozygosity for the gray (t) allele results in gray pubescence at maturity and, in lines carrying the combination of the i i allele of the Inhibitor locus, a functional R gene, and purple flowers (W1), seed which feature "imperfect black" hila (Table 1). Alternatively, gray pubescent (t) lines carrying the i i allele of the Inhibitor locus, a functional or nonfunctional R, and white flowers (w1) produce seed which feature buff hila [8] (Table 1). The phenotypic effects of the recessive allele of Tawny have been discerned to be due to loss of function mutations affecting a flavonoid 3' hydroxylase gene (Glyma06g21920) [24]. At the chemical level, this is the result of a reduction in the accumulation of anthocyanins within the hilum, and the presence of pelargonidin (Figure 1), which does not accumulate in lines carrying the wild type version of the Tawny locus [10].

The recessive allele of the Rlocus is responsible for brown hilum/seed coats

Another locus, classically termed R, also interacts epistatically with the Tawny and Inhibitor loci (as well as the W1 locus) to control hilum and seed coat colors [8] (Table 1). Lines with a functional Tawny gene and homozygous for the recessive allele of the R locus possess either brown seed coats or brown hilum, dependent on the allelic status of the Inhibitor locus (i or i i respectively). Although the genetics behind this trait were well resolved shortly after the rediscovery of Mendel's work in the 1920s [6], the molecular genetic basis has not been ascertained. Despite this, the ease of phenotyping has resulted in the inclusion of this locus in the development of genetic maps for soybean [2527].

Epistasis for genes involved in soybean coloration

Epistatic and pleiotropic interactions are the norm for genes involved in soybean coloration (Table 1). For example, loss of function mutations affecting a flavonoid 3'5'-hydroxylase gene (w1, F3'5'H, Figure 1) have been demonstrated to result in two phenotypes: white flowers and loss of purple pigment in hypocotyls [28]. The allelic status of the W1 locus, when combined with the recessive gray allele of the Tawny locus, determines if seed coats or hila are colored "imperfect black" or "buff" (Table 1) [8].

Approaches to identify the r locus, which results in brown hilum/seed coats

Loss of function mutations affecting a gene involved in the terminal end of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway have been suggested as the cause of the recessive brown seed coat/hilum phenotype (Figure 1). Possible candidates have included UF3GT, Anthocyanidin Synthase (ANS) and/or Dihydroxyflavone Reductase (DFR) genes. However, no correlation has been found between the genomic locations of any UF3GT, DFR or ANS gene and the location of the R gene [29]. Alternately, a transcription factor or other regulatory element could be responsible for the brown hilum/seed coat phenomenon. The objective of this work was to identify the specific gene and causative basis behind the phenomenon of brown hilum/seed coat coloration, historically defined as the R locus, in soybean.

Methods

RIL population development

The generation of the F6 RIL mapping population, derived from a cross between Jake X PI 283327, was previously described [30]. Jake (PI 643912) has tawny pubescence, purple flowers, and shiny yellow seed with black hila (i i T R W1)[31]. The brown hila line, PI 283327 has tawny pubescence, purple flowers, and yellow seed with brown hila (i i , T, r, W1) (USDA GRIN germplasm collection, accessed 06/22/2011 (http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/). The reference cultivar Williams 82, for which the genome sequence was determined [32], has tawny pubescence, white flowers and yellow seed with black hila (i i , T, R, w1) [33].

Bulk segregant analysis of selected RIL lines

A total of 100 F6 RIL lines were selected from a Jake X PI 283327 cross in which segregation for hilum color had occurred (50 possessed black hila, 50 had brown hila) and seed from each were pooled to form two bulks. Only RILs that were definitively black or brown were used in the bulks, with ambiguous or mixed RILs not included. The seeds (1 per RIL) were ground utilizing a coffee grinder to generate a fine powder. The grinder was cleaned thoroughly between grindings. DNA was isolated using a DNeasy Plant Maxi Kit (Qiagen, Inc., Valencia, CA) according to manufacturer's recommendations. Bulk DNA was concentrated using standard ethanol precipitation procedure to yield a final concentration of 3.52 micrograms mL-1 (black bulk) or 2.40 micrograms mL-1 (brown bulk). Bulk DNA was used with Universal Soybean Linkage Panel (USLP) as previously described [34].

Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) markers

All SSR primer pairs from within the newly delimited R locus region, drawn from a bioinformatically defined list, were also examined for potential utility in fine-mapping [35]. Fine mapping PCR was performed in 20 microliter reactions as previously described [36] and PCR products were separated on 2% agarose gels. Genotypic classes were assigned by visual comparison to PCR reactions using DNA from parental lines. Only those SSR primer pairs which showed obvious, easily scored size polymorphism between the two parents (PI 283327 and Jake) were used in subsequent analysis. SSR primers pairs which displayed polymorphism within the newly defined R region, and which could theoretically be used to select for this trait, are listed in Additional File 1.

DNA isolation, PCR and sequencing of candidate genes from pureline seed

DNA was isolated using a DNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen), and 5-50 ng of DNA were used in PCR with Ex taq (Takara) with gene specific primers (Additional File 1) under the following conditions: 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 59°C for 30 seconds, and at 72°C for 1 minute per 1 kbp of predicted product size. Following PCR, products were examined on a 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis and sent for sequencing at the University of Missouri DNA core facility. Sequence traces were downloaded, imported into Contig Express model of the VectorNTI Advance 11 software (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), assembled and manually evaluated for polymorphisms. Putative polymorphisms were verified by a second, independent PCR and sequencing reaction.

Selection of diverse lines from the germplasm repository

136 lines were selected for sequencing of the putative R gene, drawn either from a previously established list of diverse germplasm [37] or were individually selected from the USDA GRIN germplasm collection (http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/) to ensure a broad geographic distribution with a range of hilum and seed coat colors. Certain color classes were only minimally investigated, due to epistatic interactions which precluded novel information (e.g. yellow seed coat with buff hila, see Table 1). A full listing of the 136 lines examined for the allelic status of the R gene/Glyma09g36990 is listed in Additional File 2. For a subset of ten lines, all three exons were examined by sequencing (including the 5' UTR, 3'UTR, the 1st intron and the majority of the 2nd intron, although portions of the 2nd intron are highly repetitive AT-rich and recalcitrant to PCR and sequencing). These lines were: PI 84970 (Hokkaido Black, black seed coats), PI 518671 (Williams 82, yellow seed coats, black hila), PI 643912 (Jake, yellow seed coats, black hila), PI 548461 (Improved Pelican, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 548389 (Minsoy, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 438477 (Fiskeby 840-7-3, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 180501 (Strain #18, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 283327 (Pingtung Pearl, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 240664 (Bilomia No. 3, yellow seed coats, brown hila), PI 567115 B (MARIF 2782, black seed coats). Because all mutations identified were found to affect the 1st or 2nd exons, we elected to only sequence the first and second exons (as well as 5' UTR, the 1st intron, and a portion of the 2nd intron) in the remaining 126 lines.

qRT-PCR

Expression analysis on seed coat, cotyledon or leaf total RNA (DNAse-treated using Turbo DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA)) was performed as described [38] with minor modifications. The RT-PCR mix was supplemented with 0.2X Titanium Taq polymerase (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA) to improve primer efficiency. Following the reverse transcriptase reaction, amplification was 95°C for 15 min, then 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 seconds, 60°C for 20 seconds, and 72°C for 20 seconds. Primers used in this work are listed in Additional File 1. The reference gene used to normalize data was CONS6 [39] and raw Ct values were first applied to efficiency curves developed for each primer set utilizing Williams 82 genomic DNA, then normalized to the expression of the reference gene and expressed as a percent of CONS6.

Numerous researchers have reported reliable data from qRT-PCR utilizing RNA from mature yellow seed coat tissue. However RT-PCR using RNA derived from brown seed coat tissue was challenging, likely owing to the known effect of interference due to proanthocyanins [10]. The use of a simple PCR Inhibitor removal column (Zymo, Irvine, CA, USA) remedied this difficulty, resulting in acceptable qRT-PCR data derived from mRNA isolated from maturing brown seed coat tissue.

We also investigated CHS7/8 using a primer pair previously described [18]; however the results were highly variable in both cotyledon and seed coat tissues with no significant expression level differences detected between the brown and black seed coat samples (data not shown).

Results

Bulk Segregant Analysis

In order to identify the gene responsible for the r locus effect (brown hilum or seed coat color), we initially utilized the bulk segregant analysis (BSA) [40] method on RILs from a population derived from the cross of soybean cultivar Jake with the PI 283327 which had segregated for the R gene alleles with the USLP array [34]. Although this technique confirmed the previously identified location of the R locus [25, 26], the extremely broad window identified (data not shown, ~4.2 Mbp, based on the Williams 82 sequence) failed to further delimit the boundaries of the R locus.

We then assayed a novel SSR set [35] derived from bioinformatic analysis of the whole genome shotgun sequence (WGSS) for Williams 82 corresponding to the region containing the R locus. The use of DNA from the two bulks with polymorphic markers allowed us to refine the R region to ~1.35 Mbps as tightly linked to the locus responsible for brown hila (Table 2).
Table 2

Polymorphic markers used in BSA to identify lines featuring recombination near the R locus.

Polymorphic marker

Complete linkage using BSA?

Recombinant RIL identified

Gm09 marker start position

Gm09 marker end position

BARCSOYSSR_09_1445

no

numerous

41776033

41776086

BARCSOYSSR_09_1453

no

numerous

41890948

41891009

BARCSOYSSR_09_1458

no

numerous

41990780

41990801

BARCSOYSSR_09_1475

yes

yes

42289944

42290027

BARCSOYSSR_09_1489

yes

yes

42537113

42537168

BARCSOYSSR_09_1492

yes

no

42548681

42548700

BARCSOYSSR_09_1501

yes

no

42635803

42635834

BARCSOYSSR_09_1504

yes

no

42678917

42678946

BARCSOYSSR_09_1506

yes

yes

42730901

42730932

BARCSOYSSR_09_1512

yes

yes

42848842

42848903

BARCSOYSSR_09_1514

yes

yes

42871791

42871814

BARCSOYSSR_09_1535

yes

yes

43185760

43185810

BARCSOYSSR_09_1563

no

numerous

43586131

43586156

BARCSOYSSR_09_1566

no

numerous

43644804

43644847

All markers indicated are drawn from the recently described list of Simple Sequence Repeat markers determined by bioinformatics analysis [35] of the Williams 82 whole genome shotgun sequence [32].

Identification of lines featuring recombination events within the delimited Rregion

Three primer pairs from the novel SSR set (BARCSOYSSR 09_1475, 09_1501 and 09_1566 were examined for all 100 RIL lines. For the majority, the hilum color phenotype was correlated with the expected parental polymorphic band. We also observed seven individual RILs which possessed recombination events within the region identified on chromosome Gm09/LG K (Figure 2A). We examined these seven RILs using all novel polymorphic SSRs markers within this region, and compared the marker genotype to the RIL phenotype (Table 2 Figure 2A). Our methodology allowed us to fine-map the location of the R gene to a predicted region of less than 200 kbp with only 100 RIL lines. This region in Williams 82 contains 23 predicted open reading frames, with another 3 genes annotated as pseudogenes (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

Diagram of genetic mapping of the gene responsible for brown hilum in PI 283327. 2A: Diagram depicting the phenotype and allelic status of SSR markers within F6 RIL lines used to fine map the locus responsible for brown hilum color in soybean cultivar PI 283327. 2B: Screen capture of generic genome browser version 1.71, displaying the region identified which contained the locus responsible for the brown hilum color in soybean cultivar PI 283327(http://www.soybase.org, accessed 03-15-2011). Arrows indicate the location of the four candidate R2R3 MYB transcription factor genes. The genomic location of the only R2R3 MYB gene expressed in seed coats, which features a deletion from within exon 2 (C377-) in the brown hilum line (PI 283327) is indicated.

Identification of four R2R3 MYB genes as candidates for the Rlocus

BLAST searches using the 26 candidate genes were performed against NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org) databases to search for candidate genes. BLAST searches revealed four tandem genes which featured homology to the R2R3 MYB transcription factor gene family: Glyma09g36970, Glyma09g36980, 09g36990 and Glyma09g37010. R2R3 MYB genes have been shown to control flux through the phenylpropanoid pathway, and mutants in multiple species are associated with changes in fruit, flower and/or seed color (recently reviewed in [41]). These four tandem R2R3 MYB genes are highly similar (~80-90% nucleotide identity, excluding presumed intronic sequence) and may have arisen due to a tandem gene amplification event(s). Strikingly, none of these genes appears to have been identified in recent seed focused studies using RNAseq methods [42, 43].

Expression analysis of R2R3 gene candidates

Because soybean hilum tissue is extremely small and difficult to accurately dissect from seeds in non-pigmented stages, we utilized a large seeded soybean line with brown seed coats (PI 567115 B) and a large seeded line with black seed coats (PI 84970) to examine mRNA expression. In order to assess whether a subset of these four tandem genes were pseudogenes and/or expressed in seed coat tissue (Glyma09g36970 is annotated as a pseudogene in the current whole genome shotgun sequence build), we utilized qRT-PCR. Only one of these candidate R2R3 MYB genes, Glyma09g36990, was expressed in any of the tissues examined (leaf, seed cotyledons, and seed coats). Gene transcripts from Glyma09g36990 were present in the seed coats of both a brown seeded and a black seeded cultivar. However, this gene was not expressed in either cotyledon tissue (Figure 3A) or in leaves (data not shown). It is not clear if the other three R2R3 MYB genes in the cluster are expressed in other tissues. Nor is the role these genes play in soybean physiology known, if any.
Figure 3

Quantitative RT-PCR of RNA isolated from seed coat and cotyledon tissue at four stages of development. Each data point represents the average gene expression for two biological replicates, with three technical replicates for each biological replicate. Vertical bars represent one standard deviation. X-axis indicates days prior to seed maturity. Y-axis indicates gene expression relative to CONS6. 3A: qRT-PCR of R gene candidate Glyma09g36990, expressed as a relative measure of CONS6. 3B: qRT-PCR of anthocyanidin synthase gene expression (ANS, non-gene specific), relative to CONS6. 3C: qRT-PCR of UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UF3GT, Glyma08g07130) gene expression, relative to CONS6.

Curiously, the Williams 82 Glyma09g36990 gene model was predicted to possess four exons, in contrast to the canonical 3 exons identified for authentic R2R3 MYB transcription factor genes [44, 45]. To characterize the authentic expressed sequence, RT-PCR was used to analyze full length cDNA for comparison to the reference Williams 82 gene model. The authentic gene is slightly larger than that the predicted Glyma09g36690 gene model and possesses three exons (Additional File 3), in concordance with that reported for other R2R3 MYB genes [44, 45].

Analysis of Glyma09g36990 for potential causative polymorphisms

PCR and Sanger sequencing of exons (and partial intronic sequence) was used to evaluate the Glyma09g36990 gene for polymorphisms in a selection of lines: Jake (black hilum), PI 283327 (brown hilum), Williams 82 (black hilum), PI 84970 (black seed coats) and PI 567115 B (brown seed coats). We discovered a single-base deletion within exon 2 in PI 283327 and PI 567115 B that results in a frameshift mutation (C377-, relative to the start codon) (Figure 4, details in Additional File 3). The open reading frame for Glyma09g36990 was allelic between Williams 82, Jake and PI 84970.
Figure 4

Genetic alleles of the R locus/Glyma09g36990 gene. Summary of four loss of function alleles identified from 136 soybean cultivars, with one example of commonly used soybean accessions listed. The full list of cultivars examined, and allelic status, is listed in Additional File 2.

We then elected to examine a broad geographic distribution of lines (136 in total, Additional File 2) from the available soybean germplasm corresponding to all of the known seed coat and hilum color classes. From this pool, we identified three additional presumed loss of function mutations: G343-, resulting in frameshift; G95C TGG > TCG (W32S) missense in conserved residue; AGgt > AGtt (g404t) disrupts conserved mRNA splice recognition site (Figure 4, further details in Additional File 3).

In all cases where we observed an intact open reading frame, we noted the phenotype of imperfect black hilum (i i R t W1), buff hilum (i i R t w1), black hilum (i i R T) or black seed coat (i R T), dependent on the allelic status of the Inhibitor and Tawny loci (Additional File 2). Any of these four loss of function alleles resulted in either brown hilum (i i r T), brown seed coat (i r T) or buff hila (i i r t). In all cases, we observed a perfect association between the presence of one of the four loss of function alleles and brown hilum or brown seed coats, barring the presence of the epistatic dominant I allele or gray pubescence, both of which can mask the effect of the r allele, resulting in yellow or buff hila (Additional File 2). These epistatic interactions (and masking in the case of Inhibitor) are due to the placement of the step affected by the R2R3 MYB gene at the terminal end of the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway (Figure 1). Any one of the loss of function mutations affecting the R gene are necessary and sufficient for brown seed coat and/or hilum coloration. However, the phenotypic effect can be masked or modulated by the presence of certain alleles of the Inhibitor and Tawny loci (Table 1 Additional File 2).

Time-course of mRNA expression for Glyma09g36990 and two phenylpropanoid biosynthetic enzymes

If the candidate R gene is controlling expression of a gene which forms a rate limited step in anthocyanin production, we hypothesized that a correlation would exist between 1) R gene expression levels, 2) the appearance of color compounds, and 3) the expression of ANS and/or UF3GT genes in developing seed coats. We examined a time course of seed coat and seed cotyledons by qRT-PCR (Figure 3) for expression of three genes: the R gene candidate, ANS, and UF3GT. Seed coats from the large seeded line with brown seed coats (PI 567115 B) and one with black seed coats (PI 84970) were investigated for quantitation of steady state transcripts. We selected four time-points corresponding to the development of pigmentation during seed growth and maturation for PI 84970 (black seed coats) and PI 567115 B (brown seed coats) (Additional File 4).

Although there are apparently two UF3GT genes expressed in seed coats in soybean (Glyma07g30180 and Glyma08g07130), only one of these genes (Glyma08g07130) is not expressed in cotyledon tissue [15]. We elected to focus on this gene for qRT-PCR, as we noted a virtual absence of ANS or R gene expression in cotyledons (Figure 3A and 3B).

We observed a near-perfect coefficient of correlation (R2 = 0.96) between the level of expression (relative to an internal control CONS6) of the putative R gene and a UF3GT gene (Glyma08g07130) (Figure 3A and 3C). In contrast, we observed a weak correlation between expression of the R gene and ANS gene expression (R2 = 0.66) in the black seed coat line (Figure 3A and 3B). In the brown seeded line PI 567115 B, no significant correlation was found between R gene expression levels and either ANS or UF3GT expression levels (Figure 3A-C). During early and mid-development stages R gene expression is similar in both black and brown seed coat lines, though R gene expression declined during the last stages of development of the brown seeded line, in contrast to the high expression noted for the black seed coat lines (Figure 3A). In striking contrast to the increase in expression of ANS and UF3GT during seed coat maturation of the black seed coat line, only negligible ANS and UF3GT expression was observed in the brown seed coat line as seeds approached maturity (Figure 3B and 3C).

These findings confirmed our hypothesis that loss of function mutations within Glyma09g36690, an R2R3 MYB gene, are correlated with reduced expression of a UF3GT gene and ANS genes and with the brown hilum/seed coat phenotype. It remains to future work to determine the specific DNA sequence targeted by the soybean R2R3 MYB R gene product and its specific interactions in complexes with basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors and WD40 proteins. It is unclear if the R gene product acts to promote transcriptional activation of both ANS and UF3GT genes, or if activation of ANS gene expression is due to an indirect effect.

Discussion

Understanding the genetic factors controlling the accumulation of different colored, easily categorized exterior pigments (both plant and animal produced) became one of earliest models for the confirmation and expansion of Mendel's laws of inheritance. Indeed, modern genetics owes a strong debt to the white color trait in pea, which was exploited by Mendel in the original determination of basic genetic theory [46]. The specific genetic cause of the white flower phenotype in pea has been ascertained as a point mutation disrupting a splice site within a bHLH transcription factor [47]. The study of variation in seed coat colors in many plant species has continued to be an area of active research for nearly a century. Over time, a mechanistic understanding of the enzymes responsible for the individual steps involved in pigment formation, the chemistry of the pigments, and also the regulation of those enzymes and pathways by coordinated interaction of transcriptional activators have largely been resolved.

One of the characteristic features of the accumulation of plant pigments that has emerged is the regulation of critical structural genes by R2R3 MYB transcription factors in complexes with bHLH transcription factors and WD40 proteins [48]. R2R3 MYB genes tend to display limited homology (aside from the highly conserved DNA binding region), and the code by which R2R3 MYB genes bind to specific sequences has not been well elucidated [45, 48]. These difficulties can complicate phylogenetic analysis and the assignment of genes to paralogous functions. Nevertheless, the soybean R gene candidate Glyma09g36990 shows homology to R2R3 MYB genes (Additional File 3). In the past few years a plethora of R2R3 genes have been found which directly impact expression of UF3GT and/or phenylpropanoid pathway derived color compound accumulation in seed coats [49], fruits [41, 5052], flowers [50, 53, 54] and other tissues [5557]. Aside from the aesthetic appeal of colored compounds, many of these color compounds may have roles as nutraceuticals [12]. Loss of function mutations within R2R3 genes have also been discerned as causative for loss of anthocyanin accumulation in other plant species [57, 58]. Although an R2R3 MYB gene(s) would be logical a priori candidates for the underlying basis of the R locus, the low level of overall homology among R2R3 MYB genes, the presence of at least 448 MYB genes within the soybean genome [59] and the relatively poorly defined genetic map location for the R locus [2527] precluded candidate gene analysis prior to our fine-mapping effort.

Here we used genetic mapping and candidate gene association in a RIL population and a panel of soybean lines with defined coloration (seed coat and hilum, pubescence, and flower) to determine the R gene controlling black or brown seed coat in soybean is the R2R3 MYB gene Glyma09g36990. Indirect evidence supports a model in which a functional R gene acts to promote transcription of the anthocyanidin late pathway structural genes U3FGT as well as ANS. These results are consistent with many other instances of a transcriptional regulatory activation control point for genes in the anthocyanidin pathway [41, 4958].

All of the Glycine soja accessions in the USDA germplasm collection have black seed coats and thus functional versions of the R gene, while Glycine max has both functional and mutant alleles of the R gene. Three null alleles of the R gene and one allele with a presumed severely deleterious missense mutation were present in our survey of a subset of the soybean germplasm, all of which are correlated with brown hilum or seed coat colors in our survey. Of the lines containing a mutant R gene, the three null alleles had frequencies of ~53%, ~21%, and ~19%, while the missense mutation allele had a frequency of ~6% in our limited survey of 136 divergent lines. This result suggests that multiple independent occurrences of natural mutations from R to r were selected after soybean domestication but prior to full dispersion of the crop across Asia, since no clear geographical association can be made for any particular allele. The absence of selection pressure for seed coat or hilum color may have allowed broad dispersal of the different alleles. The recently discovered gene for the determinate growth habit in soybean, dt1, is an ortholog of the Arabidopsis terminal flower 1 gene [37]. Coincidentally, the dt1 gene also has an identified functional allele as well as four mutant alleles associated with a determinate growth phenotype. The mutant dt1 alleles are present only in Glycine max, but these alleles appear to have been undergoing selection pressure at early stages of soybean landrace radiation [37].

Future work may involve targeted overexpression of R2R3 MYB gene in various cotyledon, seed coat and other tissues in soybean. Because the R gene appears to be exquisitely limited in expression to seed coats, overexpression of this gene in other tissues may result in accumulation of anthocyanins in tissues which lack visible pigments, such as seed cotyledons. Potentially, expressing this R2R3 MYB gene under control of a seed storage protein promoter could increase the anthocyanin content of soybean seeds, in contrast to the wild type restriction of anthocyanins to seed coats. Though hypothetical, this may represent a viable, alternate means to visually select for transgene integration and/or a visual means to assist in containment of transgenic lines.

Conclusions

We performed bulk segregant analysis (BSA) [40] on a F6-RIL population which had segregated for hilum color [30], derived from a cross between a commercial cultivar with black hila (Jake) and a plant introduction line with brown hila (PI 283327). We utilized a novel set of bioinformatically derived SSR markers [35] to fine map the R gene to less than 200 kilobasepairs, despite using a RIL population of less than 100 individual F6 lines. Analysis of the Williams 82 whole genome shotgun sequence [32] corresponding to this region revealed four tandem R2R3 MYB genes as likely candidates for the authentic R gene. R2R3 MYB transcription factors are one of the largest transcription factor families in plants [41, 44], and specific R2R3 genes have been identified in a number of species which activate phenylpropanoid biosynthetic genes [13, 29, 41, 50, 54, 56, 60, 61]. Only one of the four candidate R2R3 MYB transcription factor genes (Glyma09g36990) in the genomic region containing R proved to be expressed in any of the tissues we examined. The seed-coat specific expression of the functional version of this gene was strongly correlated with the level of expression of a UF3GT gene (Glyma08g07130), which encodes a gene product that carries out the final step in anthocyanin biosynthesis [15]. We discovered an allelic series of loss of function mutations affecting our R2R3 gene candidate, and the presence of any of the four loss of function mutations was perfectly correlated with the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in a broad distribution of soybean cultivars divergent in seed coat, hilum and flower color. These findings strongly suggest that loss of function for this particular R2R3 MYB gene is responsible for the brown seed coat/hilum phenotype in soybean. The presence of multiple independent alleles suggests that this gene was selected during domestication either directly for brown coloration or indirectly for pale hilum colors (due to its epistatic effects with Inhibitor and Tawny).

Abbreviations used

4CL: 

4-coumarate: CoA ligase

ANR: 

Anthocyanin Reductase

BSA: 

Bulk Segregant Analysis

CHS: 

Chalcone Synthase

CHI: 

Chalcone Isomerase

C4H: 

cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase

DFR: 

Dihydroxyflavone Reductase

F3H: 

Flavanone 3-Hydroxylase

F3'5'H: 

Flavonoid 5' 3' Hydroxylase

F3'H: 

Flavonoid 3' Hydroxylase

LAR: 

Leucoanthocyanidin Reductase

PAL: 

Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase

PI: 

Plant Introduction line

RIL: 

Recombinant Inbred Line

SSR: 

Simple Sequence Repeat

USLP: 

Universal Soybean Linkage Panel.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank David Hyten (USDA-ARS, Beltsville, Maryland) for performing the Golden Gate Illumina 1536 USLP assay on the brown and black Jake X PI 283327 bulks. Although this method did not allow mapping, it did confirm the previously known location of the R/r gene within the soybean genome for the Jake X PI 283327 population. We would also like to acknowledge the expert technical contribution of Paul Little.

Mention of a trademark, vendor, or proprietary product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the USDA and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that may also be suitable.

The US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Midwest Area, is an equal opportunity, affirmative action employer and all agency services are available without discrimination.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
USDA-ARS, Plant Genetics Research Unit
(2)
University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences
(3)
Division of Plant Biosciences, Kyungpook National University
(4)
University of Missouri, Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri-Delta Research Center

References

  1. Hymowitz T: On the domestication of the soybean. Econ Bot. 1970, 24 (4): 408-421. 10.1007/BF02860745.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Hymowitz T, Newell CA: Taxonomy, speciation, domestication, dissemination, germplasm resources, and variation in the genus Glycine. Advances in legume science. Edited by: Summerfield RJ, Bunting AH. Kew,England: Royal Botanical Garden; 1980:251-264.Google Scholar
  3. Pantalone V, Rebetzke G, Burton J, Wilson R: Genetic regulation of linolenic acid concentration in wild soybean Glycine soja accessions. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1997, 74 (2): 159-163. 10.1007/s11746-997-0162-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pantalone V, Rebetzke G, Wilson R, Burton J: Relationship between seed mass and linolenic acid in progeny of crosses between cultivated and wild soybean. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 1997, 74 (5): 563-568. 10.1007/s11746-997-0181-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu K: Food use of whole soybeans. In Soybeans: chemistry, production,processing, and utilization. Edited by: Johnson LA, White PJ, Galloway R.Urbana, IL: AOCS Press; 2008:441-481.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Owen FV: Inheritance studies in soybeans. III. Seed-coat color and summary of all other mendelian characters thus far reported. Genetics. 1928, 13 (1): 50-79.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Williams LF: The inheritance of certain black and brown pigments in the soybean. Genetics. 1952, 37 (2): 208-215.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Palmer RG, Pfeiffer TW, Buss GR, Kilen TC: Qualitative genetics. In Soybeans:improvement, production, and uses.. 3 edition. Edited by: Boerma HR, SpechtJE. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, and SSSA; 2004:137-214.Google Scholar
  9. Nagai I: A genetico-physiological study on the formation of anthocyanin and brown pigments in plants. Tokyo Univ College Agric Journal. 1921, 8 (1): 1-92.Google Scholar
  10. Todd JJ, Vodkin LO: Pigmented soybean (Glycine max) seed coats accumulate proanthocyanidins during development. Plant Physiology. 1993, 102 (2): 663-670.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Buzzell RI, Buttery BR, MacTavish DC: Biochemical genetics of black pigmentation of soybean seed. Journal of Heredity. 1987, 78 (1): 53-54.Google Scholar
  12. He J, Giusti MM: Anthocyanins: natural colorants with health-promoting properties. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. 2010, 1 (1): 163-187. 10.1146/annurev.food.080708.100754.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Kovinich N, Arnason JT, Luca V, Miki B: Coloring soybeans withanthocyanins? In The Biological Activity of Phytochemicals. Volume 41. Editedby: Gang DR. Springer New York; 2011:47-57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hostel W: In The Biochemistry of Plants. Volume 7. Edited by: Stumpf W,Conn PM. Academic Press; 1981:725-753.Google Scholar
  15. Kovinich N, Saleem A, Arnason JT, Miki B: Functional characterization of a UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase from the seed coat of black soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Phytochemistry. 2010, 71 (11-12): 1253-1263. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.05.009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Clough SJ, Tuteja JH, Li M, Marek LF, Shoemaker RC, Vodkin LO: Features of a 103-kb gene-rich region in soybean include an inverted perfect repeat cluster of CHS genes comprising the I locus. Genome. 2004, 47 (5): 819-831. 10.1139/g04-049.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Tuteja JH, Clough SJ, Chan WC, Vodkin LO: Tissue-specific gene silencing mediated by a naturally occurring chalcone synthase gene cluster in Glycine max. The Plant Cell. 2004, 16 (4): 819-835. 10.1105/tpc.021352.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Tuteja JH, Zabala G, Varala K, Hudson M, Vodkin LO: Endogenous, tissue-specific short interfering RNAs silence the chalcone synthase gene family in Glycine max seed coats. The Plant Cell. 2009, 21 (10): 3063-3077. 10.1105/tpc.109.069856.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Senda M, Masuta C, Ohnishi S, Goto K, Kasai A, Sano T, Hong J-S, MacFarlane S: Patterning of virus-infected Glycine max seed coat is associated with suppression of endogenous silencing of chalcone synthase genes. The Plant Cell. 2004, 16 (4): 807-818. 10.1105/tpc.019885.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasai A, Kasai K, Yumoto S, Senda M: Structural features of GmIRCHS, candidate of the I gene inhibiting seed coat pigmentation in soybean: implications for inducing endogenous RNA silencing of chalcone synthase genes. Plant Molecular Biology. 2007, 64 (4): 467-479. 10.1007/s11103-007-9169-4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckardt NA: Tissue-specific siRNAs that silence CHS genes in soybean. The Plant Cell. 2009, 21 (10): 2983-2984. 10.1105/tpc.109.072421.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasai A, Ohnishi S, Yamazaki H, Funatsuki H, Kurauchi T, Matsumoto T, Yumoto S, Senda M: Molecular mechanism of seed coat discoloration induced by low temperature in yellow soybean. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2009, 50 (6): 1090-1098. 10.1093/pcp/pcp061.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Thorne JH: Morphology and ultrastructure of maternal seed tissues of soybean in relation to the import of photosynthate. Plant Physiology. 1981, 67 (5): 1016-1025. 10.1104/pp.67.5.1016.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zabala G, Vodkin L: Cloning of the pleiotropic T locus in soybean and two recessive alleles that differentially affect structure and expression of the encoded flavonoid 3' hydroxylase. Genetics. 2003, 163 (1): 295-309.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Song Q, Marek L, Shoemaker R, Lark K, Concibido V, Delannay X, Specht J, Cregan P: A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2004, 109 (1): 122-128. 10.1007/s00122-004-1602-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Cregan PB, Jarvik T, Bush AL, Shoemaker RC, Lark KG, Kahler AL, Kaya N, VanToai TT, Lohnes DG, Chung J, et al: An integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean genome. Crop Science. 1999, 39 (5): 1464-1490. 10.2135/cropsci1999.3951464x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lark KG, Weisemann JM, Matthews BF, Palmer RG, Chase K, Macalma T: A genetic map of soybean (Glycine max L.) using an intraspecific cross of two cultivars: 'Minsoy' and 'Noir 1'. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 1993, 86 (8): 901-906.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Zabala G, Vodkin LO: A rearrangement resulting in small tandem repeats in the F3'5'H gene of white flower genotypes is associated with the soybean W1 locus. Crop Science. 2007, 47 (S2): S-113-S-124.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang K, Jeong N, Moon J-K, Lee Y-H, Lee S-H, Kim HM, Hwang CH, Back K, Palmer RG, Jeong S-C: Genetic analysis of genes controlling natural variation of seed coat and flower colors in soybean. Journal of Heredity. 2010, 101 (6): 757-768. 10.1093/jhered/esq078.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pham A-T, Lee J-D, Shannon JG, Bilyeu K: Mutant alleles of FAD2-1A and FAD2-1B combine to produce soybeans with the high oleic acid seed oil trait. BMC Plant Biology. 2010, 10 (1): 195-10.1186/1471-2229-10-195.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Shannon JG, Wrather JA, Sleper DA, Robbins RT, Nguyen HT, Anand SC: Registration of 'Jake' Soybean. J Plant Registrations. 2007, 1 (1): 29-30. 10.3198/jpr2006.05.0347crc.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J, Mitros T, Nelson W, Hyten DL, Song Q, Thelen JJ, Cheng J, et al: Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean. Nature. 2010, 463: 178-183. 10.1038/nature08670.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bernard RL, Cremeens CR: Registration of 'Williams 82' soybean. Crop Science. 1988, 28 (6): 1027-1028.Google Scholar
  34. Hyten DL, Choi I-Y, Song Q, Specht JE, Carter TE, Shoemaker RC, Hwang E-Y, Matukumalli LK, Cregan PB: A high density integrated genetic linkage map of soybean and the development of a 1536 universal soy linkage panel for quantitative trait locus mapping. Crop Science. 2010, 50 (3): 960-968. 10.2135/cropsci2009.06.0360.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Song Q, Jia G, Zhu Y, Grant D, Nelson RT, Hwang E-Y, Hyten DL, Cregan PB: Abundance of SSR motifs and development of candidate polymorphic SSR markers (BARCSOYSSR_1.0) in soybean. Crop Science. 2010, 50 (5): 1950-1960. 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Gillman JD, Pantalone VR, Bilyeu K: The low phytic acid phenotype in soybean line cx1834 is due to mutations in two homologs of the maize low phytic acid gene. Plant Genome. 2009, 2 (2): 179-190. 10.3835/plantgenome2008.03.0013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tian Z, Wang X, Lee R, Li Y, Specht JE, Nelson RL, McClean PE, Qiu L, Ma J: Artificial selection for determinate growth habit in soybean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010, 107 (19): 8563-8568. 10.1073/pnas.1000088107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Dierking EC, Bilyeu KD: Association of a soybean raffinose synthase gene with low raffinose and stachyose seed phenotype. Plant Genome. 2008, 1 (2): 135-145. 10.3835/plantgenome2008.06.0321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Libault M, Thibivilliers S, Bilgin DD, Radwan O, Benitez M, Clough SJ, Stacey G: Identification of four soybean reference genes for gene expression normalization. Plant Genome. 2008, 1 (1): 44-54. 10.3835/plantgenome2008.02.0091.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Michelmore RW, Paran I, Kesseli RV: Identification of markers linked to disease-resistance genes by bulked segregant analysis: a rapid method to detect markers in specific genomic regions by using segregating populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1991, 88 (21): 9828-9832. 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Allan A, Hellens R, Laing W: MYB transcription factors that colour our fruit. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13 (3): 99-102. 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.11.012.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Severin A, Woody J, Bolon Y-T, Joseph B, Diers B, Farmer A, Muehlbauer G, Nelson R, Grant D, Specht J, et al: RNA-Seq atlas of Glycine max: A guide to the soybean transcriptome. BMC Plant Biology. 2010, 10 (1): 160-10.1186/1471-2229-10-160.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Bolon Y-T, Joseph B, Cannon S, Graham M, Diers B, Farmer A, May G, Muehlbauer G, Specht J, Tu Z, et al: Complementary genetic and genomic approaches help characterize the linkage group I seed protein QTL in soybean. BMC Plant Biology. 2010, 10 (1): 41-10.1186/1471-2229-10-41.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Stracke R, Werber M, Weisshaar B: The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001, 4 (5): 447-456. 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00199-0.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Feller A, Machemer K, Braun EL, Grotewold E: Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors. The Plant Journal. 2011, 66 (1): 94-116. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04459.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mendel G: Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verhandlungen des naturforschenden Vereines, Abhandlungen, Brünn. 4: 3-47. Brünn; 1866.Google Scholar
  47. Hellens RP, Moreau C, Lin-Wang K, Schwinn KE, Thomson SJ, Fiers MWEJ, Frew TJ, Murray SR, Hofer JMI, Jacobs JME, et al: Identification of Mendel's white flower character. PloS one. 2010, 5 (10): e13230-10.1371/journal.pone.0013230.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Hichri I, Barrieu F, Bogs J, Kappel C, Delrot S, Lauvergeat V: Recent advances in the transcriptional regulation of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011, 62 (8): 2465-2483. 10.1093/jxb/erq442.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Nesi N, Jond C, Debeaujon I, Caboche M, Lepiniec L: The Arabidopsis TT2 gene encodes an R2R3 MYB domain protein that acts as a key determinant for proanthocyanidin accumulation in developing seed. The Plant Cell. 2001, 13 (9): 2099-2114.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Lin-Wang K, Bolitho K, Grafton K, Kortstee A, Karunairetnam S, McGhie T, Espley R, Hellens R, Allan A: An R2R3 MYB transcription factor associated with regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway in Rosaceae. BMC Plant Biology. 2010, 10 (1): 50-10.1186/1471-2229-10-50.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Espley R, Hellens R, Putterill J, Stevenson D, Kutty-Amma S, Allan A: Red colouration in apple fruit is due to the activity of the MYB transcription factor, MdMYB10. The Plant Journal. 2007, 49 (3): 414-427. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02964.x.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Bogs J, Jaffe F, Takos A, Walker A, Robinson S: The grapevine transcription factor VvMYBPA1 regulates proanthocyanidin synthesis during fruit development. Plant Physiology. 2007, 143 (3): 1347-1361. 10.1104/pp.106.093203.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Quattrocchio F, Wing J, Woude K, Souer E, de Vetten N, Mol J, Koes R: Molecular analysis of the anthocyanin2 gene of petunia and its role in the evolution of flower color. The Plant Cell. 1999, 11 (8): 1433-1444.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Nakatsuka T, Haruta K, Pitaksutheepong C, Abe Y, Kakizaki Y, Yamamoto K, Shimada N, Yamamura S, Nishihara M: Identification and characterization of R2R3-MYB and bHLH transcription factors regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in gentian flowers. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2008, 49 (12): 1818-1829. 10.1093/pcp/pcn163.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Mano H, Ogasawara F, Sato K, Higo H, Minobe Y: Isolation of a regulatory gene of anthocyanin biosynthesis in tuberous roots of purple-fleshed sweet potato. Plant Physiology. 2007, 143 (3): 1252-1268. 10.1104/pp.106.094425.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Matsui K, Umemura Y, Ohme-Takagi M: AtMYBL2, a protein with a single MYB domain, acts as a negative regulator of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal. 2008, 55 (6): 954-967. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03565.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Chiu L-W, Zhou X, Burke S, Wu X, Prior RL, Li L: The purple cauliflower arises from activation of a MYB transcription factor. Plant Physiology. 2010, 154 (3): 1470-1480. 10.1104/pp.110.164160.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Kobayashi S, Goto-Yamamoto N, Hirochika H: Retrotransposon-induced mutations in grape skin color. Science. 2004, 304 (5673): 982-10.1126/science.1095011.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Z, Libault M, Joshi T, Valliyodan B, Nguyen H, Xu D, Stacey G, Cheng J: SoyDB: a knowledge database of soybean transcription factors. BMC Plant Biology. 2010, 10 (1): 14-10.1186/1471-2229-10-14.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Palapol Y, Ketsa S, Lin-Wang K, Ferguson I, Allan A: A MYB transcription factor regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis in mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana L.) fruit during ripening. Planta. 2009, 229 (6): 1323-1334. 10.1007/s00425-009-0917-3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwinn K, Venail J, Shang Y, Mackay S, Alm V, Butelli E, Oyama R, Bailey P, Davies K, Martin C: A small family of MYB-regulatory genes controls floral pigmentation intensity and patterning in the genus Antirrhinum. The Plant Cell. 2006, 18 (4): 831-851. 10.1105/tpc.105.039255.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gillman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.