Skip to main content
Download PDF

Mycorrhizal colonization and Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 synergistically up-regulate the polyphenol biosynthesis genes in wheat against stripe rust

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 388 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Stripe rust is considered one of the most devastating diseases of wheat all over the world, resulting in a high loss in its production. In this study, time-course changes in expression of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat against stripe rust were investigated. The defense mechanisms triggered by mycorrhizal colonization and/or spraying with Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 against this disease were also investigated.

Results

Results obtained revealed that C3H, which is considered the key gene in lignin biosynthesis, was the most expressed gene. Furthermore, most of the chlorogenic acid and flavonoid biosynthesis genes were also overexpressed. Volcano plots of the studied genes reveal that the dual treatment led to a high significant overexpression of 10 out of the 13 studied genes. Heatmap of these genes showed that the most frequent expressed gene in response to all applied treatments along the study period was DFR, the key gene in the biosynthesis of anthocyanidins. Gene co-expression network of the studied genes showed that HQT was the most central gene with respect to the other genes, followed by AN2 and DFR, respectively. Accumulation of different flavonoids and phenolic acids were detected in response to the dual treatment, in particular, cinnamic acid, coumarin, and esculetin, which recorded the highest elevation level recording 1000, 488.23, and 329.5% respectively. Furthermore, results from the greenhouse experiment showed that application of the dual treatment led to an 82.8% reduction in the disease severity, compared with the control treatment.

Conclusions

We can conclude that the biosynthesis of lignin, chlorogenic acid, and flavonoids contributed to the synergistic triggering effect of the dual treatment on wheat resistance to stripe rust.

Peer Review reports

Background

The cosmopolitan pathogenic fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the causal agent of stripe rust, represents one of the highest devastating pathogens that threatens wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) worldwide. The annual global losses in wheat production due to stripe rust, commonly known as yellow rust, was estimated at around 6 million tons of wheat [1]. The disease appears as yellow to orange streaks of elongated pustules arranged in prominent stripes on the plant leaves and surrounded by chlorosis or necrosis area [2]. Once the uredospore is deposited on a wheat leaf, under favorable weather conditions, it needs few hours to germinate toward the leaf stomata. The grown mycelium penetrates the mesophyll cells and forms a balloon-shaped feeding structures, called haustoria, inside the cells. As the penetrating mycelium grows, a uredinium pustule is developed producing thousands of uredospores that can spread by wind repeating the infection many times through the field [3].

Different fungal and bacterial bio-agents have been studied for controlling various fungal plant diseases [4]. Among the studied bacterial biocontrol agents, members of the genus Streptomyces have the largest share in this regard. They can produce varied antagonistic bioactive metabolites such as antibiotics, siderophores, and lytic enzymes [5, 6]. In this concern, Rashad et al., [7] found that the antifungal activity of S. griseorubens E44G against the tomato wilt pathogen (Fusarium oxysporum) was attributed to its chitinolytic potential.

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), phylum: Mucoromycota, subphylum: Glomeromycotina, are biotrophic symbionts that live in a mutualistic relationship with roots of the majority of the land plants [8]. One of the most crucial benefits achieved due to mycorrhizal colonization is induction of the host-defense responses against different attacking pathogens [9,10,11]. In this regard, multiple utilized mechanisms have been reported to be triggered due to the host mycorrhization including the cell wall thickening, cytoplasmic granulation, activation of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, induction of the transcriptomic expression of many defense-responsive genes, and accumulation of various fungitoxic polyphenolic compounds [4, 12].

The biosynthesis pathway of polyphenols is composed of three main metabolic routes: phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and chlorogenic acid pathways. L-phenylalanine produced from the shikimate pathway in plastids represents the first step in the phenylpropanoid pathway, where it converts to trans-cinnamate by the action of the phenylalanine ammonia-lyase encoding gene (PAL). Using cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and 4-coumaroyl CoA-ligase (4CL), trans-cinnamate can be converted to p-coumarate then p-coumaroyl-CoA, the central intermediate in the polyphenol biosynthesis pathway. p-coumaroyl-CoA can be converted to chlorogenic acid via the coumaroyl quinate route by hydroxycinnamoyl Co A: quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HQT), and p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase (C3H). Chlorogenic acid can also be produced via the coumaroyl shikimate route by hydroxycinnamoyl Co A: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) [13]. For flavonoid biosynthesis, chalcone can be produced from p-coumaroyl-CoA by chalcone synthase (CHS). Chalcone is the structural precursor for many flavonoids and isoflavonoids [14]. By the action of chalcone isomerase (CHI), chalcone can be converted to flavanone, from which flavanones, flavones, and flavanols can be formed by the help of the flavanone 3-hydroxylase (F3H) and flavonoid 3’-hydroxylase (F3’H) encoding genes. In addition, flavonol synthase (FLS) and dihydroflavonol-4-reductase (DFR) encoding genes contribute in the flavonol and anthocyanin biosynthesis [15].

Based on a previous study that was conducted by the authors [16], it was found that mycorrhizal colonization of wheat plants and their spraying with S. viridosporus HH1 had an effective biocontrol effect against stripe rust disease on different defensive, physiological, growth, and ultrastructural levels. However, the triggered defensive mechanisms due to this treatment are not clear, particularly on the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate (1) the time-course transcriptomic patterns of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes, (2) the polyphenol profiles, (3) the probable defensive modes of action, and (4) the disease severity in wheat plants infected with stripe rust in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1.

Results

Time-course transcriptomic patterns of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes

Transcriptomic patterns of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust at 1, 3, and 7 days post infection (dpi) in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1 are illustrated in Fig. 1. In this study, expression of thirteen genes that regulate the three main parts of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways: phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and chlorogenic acid (Fig. 2) was investigated.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Line curves show the transcriptomic patterns of thirteen genes that regulate the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust at 1, 3, and 7 dpi in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1. Where, P: infected and non-treated, M + P: infected and colonized with AMF, S + P: infected and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1, and S + M + P: infected, colonized with AMF, and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1. Each value is the mean of 3 biological replicates

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Pathway diagram of the polyphenol biosynthesis in the plant cell. Where, red arrows represent the chlorogenic acid pathway, blue arrows represent the flavonoid pathway, while arrows in black represent the phenylpropanoid pathway. PAL: phenylalanine ammonia lyase, C4H: cinnamic acid 4-hydroxylase, 4CL: 4-coumarate-CoA-ligase, CHS: chalcone synthase, CHI: chalcone isomerase, IFS: isoflavone synthase, IFR: isoflavone reductase, FS: flavone synthase, F3H: flavanone 3-hydroxylase, F3’H: flavonoid 3’ hydroxylase, DFR: dihydroflavonol-4-reductase, FLS: flavonol synthase, AN1: anthocyanin 1, AN2: anthocyanin 2, HQT: hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA quinate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase, C3H: 4-coumarate 3-hydroxylase, and HCT: hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (based on André et al. [38] and Falcone Ferreyra et al. [39])

Full size image

Time-course transcriptomic patterns in the phenylpropanoid pathway

Results obtained from the qPCR analysis indicated that infection of wheat plants with P. striiformis induced the expression level of PAL1 in their leaves at 3 dpi. The expression level increased at 7 dpi (32-fold), while no effect was recorded at 1 dpi. Treatment (S + P) considerably upregulated PAL1 at 1 dpi (73-fold), while no effect was observed at 3 and 7 dpi. While treatment (M + P) induced PAL1 expression at 1 dpi but not at 3 dpi. A downregulation in the gene expression level was observed at 7 dpi. Application of the dual treatment (S + M + P) recorded no effect on PAL1 expression at the three studied times. Regarding C4H, a downregulating effect was observed at 1 dpi due to infection with P. striiformis, this effect increased at 3 dpi, while at 7 dpi, an upregulation was recorded for this treatment. The same scenario was recorded for treatment (M + P). Treatments (S + P) and (M + P) triggered the expression of C4H at 1 dpi, while suppressed the gene expression at 3 dpi. No effect for both treatments was recorded at 7 dpi.

Time-course transcriptomic patterns in the flavonoid pathway

Data from Fig. 1 showed that all the applied treatments downregulated the expression level of CHS at 1 dpi. At 3 dpi, infection with stripe rust down regulated the gene expression, while treatments (S + P) or (S + M + P) induced the gene expression. No change in the CHS expression was observed for the treatment (M + P) at 3 dpi. No effect was recorded for all applied treatments on the gene expression at 7 dpi. For CHI2, no significant change was observed in the gene expression in wheat leaves due to the infection at 1, 3, and 7 dpi. Treatment (S + P) had no effect on the CHI2 expression at 1 and 3 dpi, but upregulated the gene expression at 7 dpi (6.9-fold). Treatment (M + P) induced the expression level of CHI2 at 1 and 7 dpi (3- and 3.7-fold, respectively), but not at 3 dpi. Application of the dual treatment (S + M + P) upregulated CHI2 expression at 1, 3, and 7 dpi, recording 4.9-, 3.5-, and 3-fold, respectively. Regarding F3H, the gene expression was downregulated in wheat leaves due to infection with P. striiformis at 1 dpi, while no change was observed at 3 and 7 dpi. Results revealed that treatment (S + P) induced F3H expression level at 1 dpi (9.3-fold), but not at 3 and 7 dpi. While treatment (M + P) induced also the gene expression at 1 dpi (32.9-fold), but not at 3 and 7 dpi. A high upregulation in F3H expression was observed for the infected wheat plants, which treated with the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 1 and 3 dpi, recording 326- and 19.7-fold, respectively. While, no change was observed in the gene expression at 7 dpi. For F3’H, no change in the gene expression was recorded for wheat plants untreated-infected with stripe rust at all studied times. Treatment (S + P) led to a considerable downregulation in the expression level of F3’H at 1 dpi, and an upregulation at 3 dpi (2.7-fold), while no change was observed at 7 dpi. Treatment (M + P) resulted in induction of the gene expression at 1 and 3 dpi (7.7- and 4.7-fold, respectively), while no change in the gene expression was recorded at 7 dpi. The dual treatment (S + M + P) highly downregulated the expression of F3’H at 1 dpi, while this treatment led to an upregulation in the gene expression level at 3 and 7 dpi (9.4- and 2.4-fold, respectively). For DFR, the results obtained indicated that infection of wheat plants with stripe rust had no effect on the gene expression in their leaves at 1 and 3 dpi, but upregulated the gene expression at 7 dpi (8.5-fold). No change in the expression of DFR was recorded for the treatment (S + P) at 1 dpi, while an upregulation in the gene expression was observed at 3 and 7 dpi (3.2- and 3.5-fold, respectively). The treatment (M + P) induced the DFR expression at 1, 3, and 7 dpi (148.7-, 7.5-, and 40.1-fold, respectively). The dual treatment (S + M + P) also considerably triggered the expression level of DFR at 1, 3, and 7 dpi, recording 260.5-, 46.1-, and 297.7-fold, respectively. For FLS1, infection of wheat plants decreased the gene expression at 1 and 3 dpi, but induced it at 7 dpi (2.3-fold). Treatment (S + P) downregulated the gene expression at 1 dpi, but upregulated it at 3 and 7 dpi (2.3-, and 10.7-fold, respectively). Application of treatment (M + P) led to suppression of the FLS1 expression at 1 dpi, and induced the expression at 7 dpi (31.8-fold), while did not affect the gene expression at 3 dpi. Application of the dual treatment (S + M + P) downregulated the FLS1 expression at 1 dpi, but induced it at 3 and 7 dpi, recording 57.2- and 67-fold, respectively. For AN1, all treatments suppressed the gene expression at 1 dpi. At 3 dpi, no effect was observed for all treatment, except (S + P) which highly triggered the gene expression (573-fold). At 7 dpi, no change in the gene expression was observed for all applied treatments. For AN2, all studied treatments inhibited the gene expression at 1 dpi. At 3 dpi, treatments (P) and (S + P) downregulated the gene expression, and the dual treatment (S + M + P) upregulated it (10.1-fold). No effect was recorded for the treatment (M + P). At 7 dpi, the treatments (P) and (S + P) had no effect on the gene expression, while the treatments (M + P) and (S + M + P) upregulated the gene expression (8.6- and 34.6-fold, respectively).

Time-course transcriptomic patterns in the chlorogenic acid pathway

Three genes (HQT, HCT, and C3H) were studied in this pathway. Regarding HQT, application of the three treatments (P), (S + P), and (M + P) led to a downregulation of the gene expression at all studied times. In contrast, application of the dual treatment (S + M + P) upregulated the expression of this gene, recording 73-, 7.5-, and 99.4-fold, respectively. For HCT, all applied treatments induced the gene expression at 1 and 3 dpi, except for the treatment (P) at 3 dpi which had no effect on the gene expression. At 7 dpi, both treatments (P) and (S + P) downregulated the gene expression, while treatments (M + P) and (S + M + P) triggered the gene expression (5.2- and 9.8-fold, respectively). For C3H, treatments (S + P) and (S + M + P) induced the gene expression (6.5-and 8.8-fold, respectively) at 1 dpi, while no change in the gene expression was observed for the treatments (M + P) and (P). At 3 dpi, the treatment (P) downregulated the gene expression, while the treatment (S + P) had no effect in this regard. In contrast, application of the treatment (M + P) and the dual treatment (S + M + P) led to a high upregulation in the C3H expression, recording 64- and 1977-fold, respectively. At 7 dpi, application of the treatment (S + P) induced the gene expression (15.5-fold), while the treatment (M + P) downregulated it. No change in the gene expression was observed for the treatments (P) and (S + M + P).

Statistical significance of the differential gene expression

Volcano plots were generated for all studied genes to investigate the statistical significance of the fold change in the gene expression in response to different applied treatments along the study period, compared to the untreated-infected wheat plants (Fig. 3). For the treatment (S + P) at 1 dpi, the volcano plot revealed that six genes were significantly upregulated (PAL1, C3H, C4H, CHI2, HQT and F3H). Among them, HQT and F3H showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). One gene (F3’H) was significantly downregulated, while expression of six genes unchanged, compared to the untreated-infected wheat plants (Fig. 3a). For the treatment (S + P) at 3 dpi, the volcano plot showed that nine genes were significantly upregulated (C4H, CHS, F3’H, DFR, FLS1, AN1, AN2, HCT, and C3H). Among them, AN1, CHS, HCT, and F3’H showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). In contrast, one gene (PAL1) showed a very high significant downregulation (p ≤ 0.001), while three genes showed unchanged expression, compared to the untreated-infected wheat plants (Fig. 3b). For the treatment (S + P) at 7 dpi, expression of four genes (CHI2, FLS1, HCT, and C3H) exhibited a significant upregulation. Among them, FLS1, HCT, and C3H showed a very high significant elevation in their expression (p ≤ 0.001). Four genes showed a significant down regulation (PAL1, C4H, DFR, and AN1). Among them, two genes (PAL1 and DFR) showed a very high significant downregulation (p ≤ 0.001). The remaining 5 genes did not show any significant change in their expression, compared to the control treatment (P) as illustrated in Fig. (3c).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Volcano plots of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust showing the significance and magnitude of change in the genes expression in response to the applied treatments, compared to the nonmycorrhizal-untreated-infected treatment. Where (a) infected plants and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + P) at 1 dpi, (b) treatment (S + P) at 3 dpi, (c) treatment (S + P) at 7 dpi, (d) infected plants and colonized with AMF (M + P) at 1 dpi, (e) treatment (M + P) at 3 dpi, (f) treatment (M + P) at 7 dpi, (g) mycorrhizal-infected plants and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + M + P) at 1 dpi, (h) treatment (S + M + P) at 3 dpi, and (i) treatment (S + M + P) at 7 dpi. Red numbers represent the upregulated genes; blue numbers represent the downregulated genes, while numbers in black represent the unaffected genes

Full size image

Volcano plot (Fig. 3d) demonstrated that mycorrhizal colonization of the infected wheat plants (M + P) at 1 dpi led to a significant upregulation of nine genes (PAL1, CHI2, F3H, F3’H, DFR, AN1, HQT, HCT, and C3H). Three of these genes (F3H, DFR, and HCT) showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). On the contrary, one gene (FLS1) was significantly downregulated, while three other genes showed no change in their expression, compared to the control treatment (P). For treatment (M + P) at 3 dpi, results from the volcano plot (Fig. 3e) indicated that nine of the studied genes (CHS, F3H, F3’H, DFR, FLS1, AN2, HQT, HCT, and C3H) were significantly upregulated due to mycorrhizal colonization of the infected wheat plants, compared to the nonmycorrhizal-untreated-infected plants (P). Four of these genes (C3H, DFR, F3’H, and HCT) exhibited a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). One gene (PAL1) showed a significant downregulation, while three genes showed an unchanged expression, compared to the control treatment (P). Volcano plot of treatment (M + P) at 7 dpi (Fig. 3f) showed that seven of the studied genes (CHI2, F3H, F3’H, DFR, FLS1, AN2, and HCT) were significantly upregulated due to this treatment. All of them, except DFR and HCT, showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, three of the studied genes (PAL1, AN1, and C3H) were significantly downregulated in response to this treatment. In this regard, PAL1 and AN1 exhibited a very high significant downregulation (p ≤ 0.001). Expression of three other genes was unchanged.

Volcano plot of the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 1 dpi (Fig. 3g) revealed that nine of the studied genes (C4H, CHS, CHI2, F3H, DFR, AN2, HQT, HCT, and C3H) were significantly upregulated due to spraying of the mycorrhizal-infected wheat plants with S. viridosporus HH1, compared to the treatment (P). Five of these nine genes (C4H, F3H, HQT, HCT, and C3H) showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, two genes (F3’H, and AN1) were significantly downregulated, while two other genes showed unchanged expression, compared to the control treatment (P). For treatment (S + M + P) at 3 dpi, volcano plot (Fig. 3h) demonstrated that ten of the thirteen genes included in this study (CHS, CHI2, F3H, F3’H, DFR, AN2, HQT, HCT, FLS1 and C3H) were significantly upregulated due to this treatment. All of the ten genes, except DFR and AN2, showed a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, two genes (PAL1 and AN1) were significantly downregulated, while one gene showed an unchanged expression, compared to the control treatment (P). Volcano plot (Fig. 3i) revealed that six genes (F3’H, DFR, FLS1, AN2, HQT, and HCT) were significantly upregulated due to the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 7 dpi. Four of these genes (DFR, FLS1, AN2, and HQT) exhibited a very high significant upregulation (p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, three genes (PAL1, C4H, and AN1) were significantly downregulated due to this treatment, while four genes were unaffected, compared to the control treatment (P).

Hierarchical clustering of the differentially expressed genes

Heatmap of the studied genes in wheat leaves showing their differential expression in response to the applied treatments along the study period is illustrated in Fig. 4. The hierarchical cluster analysis showed that all the applied treatments at different times are clustered in two main clusters. The first one includes all treatments at 1 dpi, in addition to treatment (P) at 3 dpi (early stage), while the other main cluster includes the remaining treatments at 3 and 7 dpi (late stage). The first main cluster is divided into two sub-clusters; one of them includes a single treatment (S + M + P) at 1 dpi, while the other is divided into two sub-sub-clusters. Treatments (S + P) and (M + P) at 1 dpi are clustered in one sub-sub-cluster, while treatments (P) at 1 and 3 dpi are clustered in the other one. The second main cluster is divided into two sub-clusters; each of them includes four treatments in two sub-sub-clusters. In the first sub-sub-cluster, treatments (M + P) and (S + M + P) at 3 dpi are clustered, while the other sub-sub-cluster includes (M + P) and (S + M + P) at 7 dpi. The second sub-cluster includes three treatments in two sub-sub-clusters. One sub-sub-cluster includes (S + P) and (P) at 7 dpi, while the second sub-sub-cluster includes one single treatment (S + P) at 3 dpi.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Hierarchical cluster heatmap shows degree of the transcriptomic expression of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust at 1, 3, and 7 dpi in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1. Where, P: infected and non-treated, M + P: infected and colonized with AMF, S + P: infected and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1, and S + M + P: infected, colonized with AMF, and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1

Full size image

Regarding the studied genes, the hierarchical cluster analysis revealed that all genes are clustered in two main clusters; seven genes in one and six genes in the other one. The first main cluster includes three sub-clusters; one of them contains (C4H, PAL1, and CHI2), the second sub-cluster contains (F3H, DFR, and HCT), while the third one contains one gene (C3H). The second main cluster includes two sub-clusters; one of them contains five genes (FLS1, AN2, F3’H, AN1, and CHS), while the other includes one gene (HQT). Data obtained showed that all treatments at 1 dpi, in addition to treatment (P) at 3 dpi, led to a downregulation, at varied degrees, of six genes in the polyphenol synthetic pathways (HQT, FLS1, AN2, F3’H, AN1, and CHS) (the black square). In contrast, the heatmap showed that the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 3 and 7 dpi led to upregulation of the majority of the studied genes. The most frequent expressed gene in response to all applied treatments along the study period was DFR, while the highest upregulated gene was C3H in response to the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 3 dpi.

Correlations between the studied genes

Values of the pairwise correlation between the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust in response to the applied treatments are presented in Table 1. Data obtained demonstrated many significant correlations between them, at varied degrees. Results in Table 1 showed that AN2-FLS1, HQT-DFR, and HQT-HCT had positive very-high-significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001). In addition, AN2-HQT, AN2-DFR, F3H-CHI2, F3H-DFR, FLS1-CHS, and AN1-CHS had a positive high-significant correlation (p ≤ 0.01), while F3’H-C4H showed a negative high-significant correlation (p ≤ 0.01). Furthermore, various positive significant pairwise-correlations (p ≤ 0.05) were also recorded such as AN2-CHS, AN2-CHI2, F3’H-CHS, F3’H-HCT, F3H-HCT, F3H-HQT, FLS1-DFR, and DFR- CHI2. In contrast, F3H-AN1 and HCT-AN1 exhibited a negative significant correlation (p ≤ 0.05). The other pairs showed no significant correlation with each other.

Table 1 Kendall’s Tau rank correlations (r) matrix between the polyphenol biosynthetic pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust in response to the applied treatments
Full size table

The gene co-expression network, based on Kendall’s Tau rank correlation matrix, is illustrated in Fig. 5. Results obtained from the gene co-expression network show that HQT was the most central gene with regard to the other genes, which means that it had the highest number and degree of significant correlations with the other genes, followed by AN2, and DFR, respectively. On the contrary, C3H and PAL1 were peripheral in the co-expression network showing no significant correlation with the other genes. Furthermore, the gene co-expression network reveals that the genes DFR, HQT, HCT, F3H, F3’H, AN2, CHS, and FLS1 form one community, which means that they have positive significant interrelationships with each other a way from C3H, AN1, PAL1, and C4H.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Gene co-expression network shows the correlations between the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1. Where the blue edges represent the positive correlations, while the red edges represent the negative correlations. The edge thickness represents the correlation degree between two genes, and length of the edge represents the degree of separation between the nodes pair, while the node size represents the degree of centrality of the gene

Full size image

Disease severity and infection type

Disease severity of stripe rust in wheat plants in response to colonization with AMF and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1 two weeks after infection is presented in Table 2; Fig. 6. Results from the greenhouse experiment indicated that all applied treatments significantly reduced the disease severity, compared to the nonmycorrhizal-untreated-infected plants. No significant difference was observed between the single treatments (S + P) and (M + P), while the least severity was recorded for the dual treatment (S + M + P) recording 16.6% and infection type (MR), compared with the nonmycorrhizal-untreated-infected treatment (P), which recorded 96.7% and infection type (S).

Table 2 Disease severity of stripe rust in wheat plants in response to colonization with AMF and/or treating with Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 two weeks after infection
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Photographs show severity of stripe rust in wheat leaves, where (a) untreated-infected leaf and (b) infected leaf and treated with mycorrhizal fungi and S. viridosporus HH1

Full size image

HPLC profiling of the flavonoids and phenolic acids

HPLC profiles of some flavonoids and phenolic acids in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust in response to colonization with AMF and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1 at 7 days after infection are presented in Table 3 and illustrated in Fig. 7. Results from the HPLC analysis revealed that all the estimated flavonoids and phenolic acids, except pyrocatechol, significantly increased in leaves of the infected wheat plants colonized with AMF and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + M + P), compared to the nonmycorrhizal-untreated-infected plants (P). Furthermore, the single treatments (S + P) and (M + P) led to a significant accumulation of most of the analyzed polyphenolic compounds, compared with the control treatment (P). However, the increment in their concentrations due to the dual treatment (S + M + P) mostly was higher than that due to the single treatments (S + P) and (M + P). The highest increment in accumulation of the analyzed compounds was recorded for cinnamic acid (1000%), followed by coumarin (488.23%) and esculetin (329.5%), while the least one was recorded for pyrocatechol (11.32%), compared with the control treatment (P). On the contrary, the analysis data showed that the single treatments (S + P) and (M + P) led to a decrease in, or not affected, vanillic acid and protocatechuic acid concentrations, compared with the treatment (P).

Table 3 HPLC profiling of some polyphenolic compounds (mg mL− 1) in wheat leaves infected with stripe rust in response to the applied treatments at 7 days after infection
Full size table
Fig. 7
figure 7

HPLC chromatograms show the flavonoid profiles in leaves of wheat plants infected with stripe rust in response to mycorrhizal colonization and/or treating with S. viridosporus HH1 at 7 dpi. Where, (a) mixture standard solution of different flavonoids and phenolic acids, (b) nonmycorrhizal-infected-untreated wheat plants (P), (c) nonmycorrhizal-infected wheat plants, which were sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + P), (d) mycorrhizal-infected-untreated wheat plants (M + P), and (e) mycorrhizal-infected wheat plants, which sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + M + P)

Full size image

Colonization with AMF

Mycorrhizal colonization in wheat plants infected with stripe rust in response to treating with S. viridosporus HH1 two weeks after infection is presented in Table 4; Fig. 8. Microscopic observations revealed that treatments (S + P) and (P) showed no mycorrhizal colonization, while the treatments inoculated with AMF (M + P) and (S + M + P) exhibited a considerable mycorrhization recording 52.2 and 55.4% colonization intensity, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed between the treatments (M + P) and (S + M + P) regarding the evaluated colonization parameters.

Table 4 Mycorrhizal colonization in wheat plants infected with stripe rust in response to treating with Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 two weeks after infection*
Full size table
Fig. 8
figure 8

Microscopic images show mycorrhizal colonization in wheat roots, (a) non mycorrhizal root and (b) mycorrhizal roots, where Im: intraradical mycelium, V: vesicle, and Hr: host root

Full size image

Discussion

In this study, the time-course changes in the transcriptomic expression of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in stripe rust-infected wheat plants were investigated. The defense mechanisms triggered by the mycorrhizal colonization and/or spraying with S. viridosporus HH1 were also studied. Polyphenols, particularly flavonoids, and chlorogenic acid, play important roles in enhancing the defense responses to different invading pathogens [17]. Results obtained in this work revealed that the dual treatment (S + M + P) had superiority over the single treatments in triggering the addressed genes, particularly at 3 dpi. At this time, ten of the thirteen genes were significantly upregulated, and most of them showed a very high significant upregulation as illustrated from the volcano plots. This result supports the synergism between the tested bio-agents and their overexpression of the studied genes, at varied degrees. In addition, it supports the significant reduction in the disease severity due to the dual treatment. Results from the qPCR in this study demonstrated that C3H was the highest upregulated gene (1977-fold), which indicated its importance as the probable main defense mechanism against P. striiformis. C3H has a pivotal role in the monolignols biosynthesis, the monomers of lignin molecule [18], and chlorogenic acid [19]. In this case, thickening of the cell wall via deposition of lignin leads to reinforcement of the cell wall rigidity and improvement of its imperviousness to act as a physical barrier to restrict penetration of P. striiformis and prevent nutrients transport from the cell cytoplasm to its haustorium and therefore starvation to death occurs [20]. C3H encodes an enzyme that catalyzes the key step (conversion of 4-coumarate to caffeate) in lignin and chlorogenic acid biosynthesis [18]. Anterola and Lewis [21] reported that downregulation of C3H resulted in a reduction in the lignin deposition. Induction of lignin deposition in the infected plant cells in response to mycorrhizal colonization has been widely reported [4, 22]. In addition to C3H, results from the present study showed that HQT and HCT were also overexpressed due to the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 3 dpi. HQT and HCT have key roles in the chlorogenic acid biosynthesis. HQT encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of caffeoyl-CoA and quinic acid to chlorogenic acid, while HCT encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of coumaroyl shikimate to caffeoyl-CoA [13]. Chlorogenic acid is a potent polyphenol, which acts as antioxidant (free radical scavenger) and plays an important role in the plant resistance against pathogenic fungi. Martínez et al. [23] reported that chlorogenic acid showed a full suppression of the mycelial growth and spore germination of various fungal pathogens. Results recorded in this study regarding upregulation of lignin and chlorogenic acid-related genes due to mycorrhizal colonization are in consistence with that obtained by Rashad et al. [24] on the mycorrhizal sunflower plants, which were infected with Rhizoctonia solani.

In the same time, data obtained in this study indicated the overexpression of the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway-related genes CHS, CHI2, F3H, F3’H, DFR, and AN2 due to the dual treatment (S + M + P) at 3 dpi. CHS encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of 4-coumaroyl-CoA to chalcone. It is considered the structural precursor and a pivotal intermediate for biosynthesis of many flavonoids, isoflavonoids, flavones, and anthocyanins [14]. In this concern, CHI2 encodes for an enzyme that catalyzes conversion of chalcone to flavanone that can be converted to different flavonoids compounds. F3H and F3’H encode for enzymes that catalyze conversion of flavanone to form dihydroxyflavonol, and conversion of dihydroxyflavonol to dihydroquercetin, respectively [25]. In this regard, Hammerbacher et al. [26] found that F3H had a key role in the biosynthesis of multiple resistance-related polyphenolic compounds (taxifolin and catechin) in Picea abies against the bark beetle-associated fungus Endoconidiophora polonica. Furthermore, downregulation of this gene resulted in a significant reduction in production of dihydroflavonols and flavan-3-ols. DFR encodes an enzyme that catalyzes conversion of flavanone to flavan-4-ols, and the key enzyme, which catalyzes reduction of dihydroquercetin to anthocyanidin in the anthocyanin biosynthesis [15]. A downregulation of DFR in sweet potato was found to lead to a dramatic reduction in the anthocyanin production in their leaves and stem [27]. AN2 is a MYB transcription factor-encoding gene, which coordinately regulates expression of the structural genes in anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway PAL, CHS, CHI, F3H, F3’H, and DFR [28]. In tobacco, upregulation of AN2 was found to overexpress these structural genes in addition to FLS, ANS, An1a, and An1b genes and enhance anthocyanin accumulation [29]. Anthocyanins are flavonoid pigments, which have multiple physiological roles in the plant including the defense against different biotic and abiotic stresses [30]. Their fungitoxic potential was reported against different pathogenic fungi and overexpression of anthocyanin biosynthesis genes in response to plant fungal infection was also reported [31]. These results were supported by the high accumulation of the detected flavonoids and phenolic acids via HPLC analysis in this study, especially cinnamic acid (1000%), coumarin (488.23%), and esculetin (329.5%). Upregulation of lignin, chlorogenic acid, and flavonoid biosynthesis genes, which was reported in this study, indicates their contribution in the wheat resistance against P. striiformis, particularly in restricting penetration of its haustoria in their leaves cells in order to starve them to death. The obtained results are in agreement with that reported by El-Sharkawy et al. [16] who reported the biocontrol activity of mycorrhizal colonization and S. viridosporus HH1 against stripe rust in wheat plants. They recorded a triggering effect of these bioagents on expression of different defense-related genes and accumulation of the phenolic content as well as an increment of activity of various antioxidant enzymes.

Heatmap and hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that all applied treatments were clustered in two main groups, where all treatments at 1 dpi and treatment (P) at 3 dpi were categorized in one group and all other treatments in the second main group. One of the most interesting results obtained in the heatmap is the noticed downregulation of around half of the studied genes (six out of thirteen) in response to all treatments at 1 dpi and treatment (P) at 1 and 3 dpi (the black square). This phenomenon can be discussed in the light of the dominance of the pathogen effect in the first stages of infection, at which it intended to obstruct the plant resistance genes in order to make a successful penetration. In other words, the pathogen surprised the plant and prevented it to defend himself at this stage of infection. The same is valid for the treatment (P) at 3 dpi, in absence of the two-biocontrol agents (S) and (M). This may explain the fast spread of P. striiformis in the infected plant in a short period, especially in this susceptible cultivar (cv. Sids12). In contrast, the second group of the clusters included the other treatments where the applied biocontrol agents induced the plant resistance genes, at different degrees to fight the pathogen. Among the applied biocontrol treatments, the treatments (S + M + P) and (M + P) at 3 dpi were clustered in one sub-sub-cluster, and the treatments (S + M + P) and (M + P) at 7 dpi were clustered in the other sub-sub-cluster indicating the dominance of the mycorrhizal effect on that of S. viridosporus HH1 at both times. In the same time, grouping of those treatments at 3 and 7 dpi in one sub-cluster demonstrated that they were similar, to some extent, in their triggering effects on expression of the majority of the studied genes. On the other hand, downregulation of the six genes (HQT, FLS1, AN2, F3’H, AN1, and CHS) at the 1 dpi by all treatments resulted in their clustering in one main group, while all the other genes clustered in the other main group. Among all studied genes, the most frequent expressed gene in response to all applied treatments along the study period was DFR.

Pairwise correlation among the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes under the applied treatments revealed many significant correlations among them, at varied degrees. Among the noticed correlations, AN2-FLS1, HQT-DFR, and HQT-HCT were found positively correlated at a very high significance. This result indicates the coordination in their expression and the coherence in the total biosynthetic pathway in response to the tested treatments. The highly significant positive correlation between HQT-HCT is anticipated as they share the same pathway of chlorogenic acid biosynthesis. In the line with these results, Rashad et al. [24] observed a correlation between upregulation of different flavonoid biosynthesis genes and resistance of sunflower to R. solani. The high correlation between AN2-FLS1 is also expected, where AN2 is a transcription factor that regulates many genes in the flavonoid pathway including FLS1. Other high significant correlations, recorded in this study, between the studied genes in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway indicate the coordination between them in this pathway.

The gene co-expression network was generated for the studied genes to detect which of them had a tendency to exhibit a coordinated expression pattern in these pathways in response to the applied treatments. Results obtained revealed that HQT was the most central gene with respect to the other genes. This means that it had the highest number and degree of significant correlations with the other genes, followed by AN2, and DFR, respectively. This indicates their key roles in the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways. One of the interesting results obtained from the co-expression network was the community which was formed by DFR, HQT, HCT, F3H, F3’H, AN2, CHS, and FLS1. This means that they have positive significant interrelationships with each other a way from C3H, AN1, PAL1, and C4H. In other words, when some genes show similar expression patterns, it means that they have a high probability of sharing the regulation mechanisms for their expression. On the contrary, C3H and PAL1 were found to be peripheral in the co-expression network showing no significant correlation with the other genes, which indicates their independent expression.

Conclusion

This study indicated that application of AMF and S. viridosporus HH1 synergistically triggered most of the polyphenol biosynthesis genes in wheat leaves against infection with P. striiformis. C3H was the most expressed gene indicating its importance as the main defense mechanism. Furthermore, most of the chlorogenic acid and flavonoid biosynthesis genes were also overexpressed. Up-regulation of these genes due to the treatment (S + M + P) enhanced resistance of wheat plants to stripe rust. Accumulation of different flavonoids and phenolic acids were detected in response to the dual treatment application, in particular, cinnamic acid, coumarin, and esculetin.

Methods

Wheat cultivar and microbial inocula

The wheat grains (cv. Sids12, bread wheat), used in this study, were obtained from Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt. Three types of AMF (in equal ratio) were utilized in the greenhouse experiment, namely Rhizoglomus clarum (Nicolson and Schenck) Sieverd., Silva and Oehl, Gigaspora gigantea (Nicol. and Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe, and Rhizophagus irregularis (Blaszk., Wubet, Renker and Buscot) Walker and Schüßler. The AMF inoculum was obtained from Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt. The AMF were propagated under sudangrass (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) for six months in a sterilized soil. The AMF inoculum (77% colonization index) was composed of spores, mycelia, root pieces, and rhizospheric soil.

The bacterial inoculum was prepared by culturing an isolate of S. viridosporus HH1, obtained from Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt, on nutrient broth (Biolab Zrt., Budapest, Hungary) at 37 °C for 10 days. The bacterial culture was used to prepare the inoculum at 106 CFU mL− 1.

For the pathogen inoculum, a fresh spore suspension (105 spore mL− 1) was prepared using uredospores of P. striiformis f. sp. tritici, obtained from Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. Tween 80 (0.5 mL L− 1) was added to the uredospore suspension as a surfactant agent to decrease clumping of the uredospores and enhance their dispersion on wheat leaves.

Greenhouse experiment

Wheat grains were surface-sterilized using NaOCl solution (0.5%) and ethyl alcohol (70%) before sowing in pots (25 cm diameter) filled with sterilized soil at 5 grains per pot. For AMF application, 10 g of the mycorrhizal inoculum were added under each grain at the sowing time. No fertilization was applied in this experiment. For application of S. viridosporus HH1, some plants were sprayed with the bacterial inoculum 30 days after planting until run-off. Three days after application of the bacterial inoculum, all plants were sprayed with the uredospores suspension until run-off occurred. All plants were regularly irrigated. For each treatment, ten replicates were used. The complete randomized design was used to arrange the pots. The pots were preserved in a plastic hood at 20 °C and 85% humidity for two days, then kept in a greenhouse at 25/20°C (day/night) and 70% humidity. The tested treatments were as follows: infected and non-treated (P), infected and colonized with AMF (M + P), infected and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + P), and infected, colonized with AMF, and sprayed with S. viridosporus HH1 (S + M + P).

Transcriptomic patterns of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes

Wheat leaves of the tested treatments were sampled 1, 3, and 7 (dpi). Total RNA of each sample was extracted using Spectrum Plant Total RNA Kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). cDNA was synthesized from the extracted RNA using High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA) based on the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR mixture composed of RNA (3 µL, 33 ng), dNTPs (2.5 µL, 11 mM), oligo (dT) primer (5 µL, 6 pmol µL− 1), 5X-buffer (2.5 µL), reverse transcriptase (Qiagen, Valencia, USA) (0.3 µL) and distilled water (6.7 µL). The amplification was occurred at 42 °C for 1 h and 95 °C for 10 min using a thermocycler (Promega, Germany).

The real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis was performed using CFX Connect Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, Feldkirchen, Germany). The qPCR mixture composed of cDNA (3 µL), SYBR Green Master Mix (Bioline, Germany) (12.5 µL), sterilized RNase-free water (1.5 µL), and 1.5 µL of each primer (forward and reverse, 12 pmol µL− 1). Sequences of 13 primers of the polyphenol biosynthesis pathways genes in wheat plants, used in this study, are presented in Table 5. Two reference genes, α-tubulin and β-actin, were used in this study due to their high stability during the mycorrhizal colonization [32]. The qPCR was performed as follows: a cycle at 95 °C for 3 min and 45 cycles (95 °C for 15 s, 56 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s). Each treatment was analyzed in triplicates (biological and technical). Relative expression levels were calculated using the comparative CT method (2−ΔΔCT) according to Livak and Schmittgen [33]. The expression values were then transformed into log2FC due to the overdispersion of the data (not normally distributed).

Table 5 Primer sequence of the studied polyphenol biosynthetic pathways genes
Full size table

Disease assessment

Two weeks after infection, five wheat plants in each treatment were scored for the severity of stripe rust using a scale ranged between 1 and 100% [34]. The field response of the samples was evaluated according to Stakman et al. [35], where immune (I): no infection, resistant (R): small uredial pustules with necrosis, moderately resistant (MR): medium uredial pustules with necrosis, moderately susceptible (MS): large uredial pustules with chlorosis, and susceptible (S): large uredial pustules without necrosis or chlorosis).

Estimation of colonization level

Two weeks after infection, five roots of wheat plants in each treatment were evaluated for the mycorrhizal colonization level. For each sample, wheat roots were cut into 1 cm pieces, treated with potassium hydroxide solution at 90 °C for 60 min, and stained with trypan blue. Using light microscope, frequency and intensity of root colonization, and frequency of arbuscules were determined [36].

Profiling of selected phenolic acids and flavonoids

Ten selected phenolic acids and flavonoids were estimated in wheat leaves of the applied treatments using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Agilent 1100, Agilent Technologies Inc., CA, USA). The chromatographic separation was performed using the column (Eclipse Plus C18, 4.6 mm x 150 mm, (5 µm particle size, Agilent Co.) at 1 mL min-1, 35°C, and UV 280 nm. A mixture standard solution contained ten selected phenolic acids and flavonoid compounds (gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, cinnamic acid, naphthylacetic acid, vanillic acid, 4,3-indole butyl acetic acid, catechin, esculetin, pyrocatechol, and coumarin) was used in this analysis.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using R software version 4.2.2, where volcano plots were generated based on t-test using ggplot2 package, gene co-expression network was generated using qgraph package based on Kendall’s Tau correlation coefficient, and the heatmap was produced using pheatmap package based on log2 fold change of gene expression [37]. Data were tested for their normality, and subjected to analysis of variance. Their means were statistically compared according to Tukey’s HSD test at p ≤ 0.05 using CoStat software version 6.4.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Beddow JM, Pardey PG, Chai Y, Hurley TM, Kriticos DJ, Braun HJ, et al. Research investment implications of shifts in the global geography of wheat stripe rust. Nat Plants. 2015;1:15132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hovmøller MS, Sørensen CK, Walter S, Justesen AF. Diversity of Puccinia striiformis on cereals and grasses. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:197–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen W, Wellings C, Chen X, Kang Z, Liu T. Wheat stripe (yellow) rust caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15:433–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Rashad YM, Moussa TAA. Biocontrol agents for fungal plant diseases management. In: El-Wakeil N, Saleh M, Abu-hashim M, editors. Cottage Industry of Biocontrol Agents and their applications: practical aspects to deal biologically with pests and stresses facing strategic crops. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 337–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Askar AA, Abdulkhair WM, Rashad YM, Hafez EE, Ghoneem KM, Baka ZA. Streptomyces griseorubens E44G: a potent antagonist isolated from soil in Saudi Arabia. J Pure Appl Microbiol. 2014;8:221–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pereira PM, Santana FM, Van Der Sand S. Evaluation of Streptomyces spp. strains as potential biocontrol agents for Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Biocontrol Sci Technol. 2022;32:1095–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rashad YM, Al-Askar AA, Ghoneem KM, Saber WIA, Hafez EE. Chitinolytic Streptomyces griseorubens E44G enhances the biocontrol efficacy against Fusarium wilt disease of tomato. Phytoparasitica. 2017;45:227–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Spatafora JW, Chang Y, Benny GL, Lazarus K, Smith ME, Berbee ML, et al. A phylum-level phylogenetic classification of zygomycete fungi based on genome-scale data. Mycologia. 2016;108:1028–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rashad YM, El-Sharkawy HHA, Elazab NT. Ascophyllum nodosum Extract and Mycorrhizal colonization synergistically trigger Immune responses in pea plants against Rhizoctonia Root Rot, and enhance Plant Growth and Productivity. J Fungi. 2022;8.

  10. Rashad YM, Abbas MA, Soliman HM, Abdel-Fattah GG, Abdel-Fattah GM. Synergy between endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GGA and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi induces plant defense responses against white rot of garlic and improves host plant growth. Phytopathol Mediterr. 2020;59:169–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. El-Sharkawy HHA, Rashad YM, Elazab NT. Synergism between Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 and Rhizophagus irregularis effectively induces defense responses to Fusarium Wilt of pea and improves Plant Growth and Yield. J Fungi. 2022;8.

  12. Abdel-Fattah GM, El-Haddad SA, Hafez EE, Rashad YM. Induction of defense responses in common bean plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiol Res. 2011;166:268–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreira EA, Pilon AC, Andrade LE, Lopes NP. New Perspectives on Chlorogenic Acid Accumulation in Harvested Leaf tissue: impact on Traditional Medicine Preparations. ACS Omega. 2018;3:18380–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rudrapal M, Khan J, Dukhyil AA, Bin, Alarousy RMII, Attah EI, Sharma T et al. Chalcone scaffolds, bioprecursors of flavonoids: Chemistry, bioactivities, and pharmacokinetics. Molecules. 2021;26.

  15. Liu W, Feng Y, Yu S, Fan Z, Li X, Li J et al. The flavonoid biosynthesis network in plants. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22.

  16. El-Sharkawy HHA, Rashad YM, Elazab NT. Induction of multiple defense responses in wheat plants against stripe rust using mycorrhizal fungi and Streptomyces viridosporus HH1. BioControl. 2023; 68(4):1-11.

  17. Rashad Y, Aseel D, Hammad S. Phenolic Compounds against fungal and viral Plant Diseases. In: Lone R, Shuab R, Kamili AN, editors. Plant Phenolics in Sustainable Agriculture. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020. pp. 201–19.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Barros J, Escamilla-Trevino L, Song L, Rao X, Serrani-Yarce JC, Palacios MD, et al. 4-Coumarate 3-hydroxylase in the lignin biosynthesis pathway is a cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1994.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen Z, Tang N, You Y, Lan J, Liu Y, Li Z. Transcriptome analysis reveals the mechanism underlying the production of a high quantity of chlorogenic acid in young leaves of Lonicera macranthoides Hand.-Mazz. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0137212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Miedes E, Vanholme R, Boerjan W, Molina A. The role of the secondary cell wall in plant resistance to pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5 AUG:358.

  21. Anterola AM, Lewis NG. Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry. 2002;61:221–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendoza-Soto AB, Rodríguez-Corral AZ, Bojórquez-López A, Cervantes-Rojo M, Castro-Martínez C, Lopez-Meyer M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis leads to differential regulation of genes and miRNAs associated with the cell wall in tomato leaves. Biology. 2022;11.

  23. Martínez G, Regente M, Jacobi S, Del Rio M, Pinedo M, de la Canal L. Chlorogenic acid is a fungicide active against phytopathogenic fungi. Pestic Biochem Physiol. 2017;140:30–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rashad Y, Aseel D, Hammad S, Elkelish A. Rhizophagus irregularis and Rhizoctonia solani differentially elicit systemic transcriptional expression of polyphenol biosynthetic pathways genes in sunflower. Biomolecules. 2020;10:1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dai M, Kang X, Wang Y, Huang S, Guo Y, Wang R et al. Functional characterization of Flavanone 3-Hydroxylase (F3H) and its role in anthocyanin and flavonoid biosynthesis in Mulberry. Molecules. 2022;27.

  26. Hammerbacher A, Kandasamy D, Ullah C, Schmidt A, Wright LP, Gershenzon J. Flavanone-3-hydroxylase plays an important role in the biosynthesis of spruce phenolic defenses against bark beetles and their fungal associates. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:208.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang H, Fan W, Li H, Yang J, Huang J, Zhang P. Functional characterization of dihydroflavonol-4-reductase in anthocyanin biosynthesis of purple sweet potato underlies the direct evidence of anthocyanins function against abiotic stresses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e78484.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Butelli E, Martin C. Engineering anthocyanin biosynthesis in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;19:81–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang W, Khaldun ABM, Lv H, Du L, Zhang C, Wang Y. Isolation and functional characterization of a R2R3-MYB regulator of the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway from Epimedium sagittatum. Plant Cell Rep. 2016;35:883–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Butelli E, De Stefano R, Schoonbeek HJ, Magusin A, Pagliarani C, et al. Anthocyanins double the shelf life of tomatoes by delaying overripening and reducing susceptibility to gray mold. Curr Biol. 2013;23:1094–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sicilia A, Catara V, Scialò E, Lo Piero AR. Fungal infection induces anthocyanin biosynthesis and changes in dna methylation configuration of blood orange [citrus sinensis l. (osbeck)]. Plants. 2021;10:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fuentes A, Ortiz J, Saavedra N, Salazar LA, Meneses C, Arriagada C. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR in Solanum lycopersicum L. inoculated with the mycorrhizal fungus Rhizophagus irregularis. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;101:124–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-∆∆CT method. Methods. 2001;25:402–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson RF, Campbell AB, Hannah AE. A diagrammatic scale for estimating rust intensity on leaves and stems of cereals. Can J Res. 1948;26c:496–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stakman EC, Stewart DM, Loegering WQ. Identification of physiologic races of Puccinia graminis var. tritici. USDA Washington; 1962.

  36. Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V. du taux de mycorhization VA d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. In: Mycorhizes: physiologie et génétique. 1986. p. 217–20.

  37. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/. 2022.

  38. André CM, Schafleitner R, Legay S, Lefèvre I, Aliaga CAA, Nomberto G, et al. Gene expression changes related to the production of phenolic compounds in potato tubers grown under drought stress. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1107–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Rius S, Casati P. Flavonoids: biosynthesis, biological functions, and biotechnological applications. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB) for providing the open access fees.

Funding

This research did not receive specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Protection and Biomolecular Diagnosis Department, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute (ALCRI), City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City), New Borg El-Arab City, Egypt

    Younes M. Rashad & Sara A. Abdalla

  2. Department of Mycology Research and Plant Diseases Survey, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

    Hany H. El-Sharkawy

  3. Department of Plant Production, Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute, City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications, Alexandria, Egypt

    Omar M. Ibrahim

  4. Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt

    Nahla T. Elazab

Authors
  1. Younes M. Rashad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hany H. El-Sharkawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sara A. Abdalla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Omar M. Ibrahim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nahla T. Elazab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.R. contributed to the idea and designing of the study, molecular investigation, mycorrhizal evaluation, HPLC analysis, and editing of the manuscript and photos. H.E. contributed to the greenhouse experiment and the disease severity assessment. O.I. contributed to the statistical analyses. S.A. contributed to the molecular investigation, and N.E. contributed to statistical analyses of the data and manuscript editing and revision. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Younes M. Rashad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Wheat grains were obtained and are freely available from the Agricultural Research Centre, Egypt. Permission to plant at the greenhouse was granted by Arid Lands Cultivation Research Institute. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashad, Y.M., El-Sharkawy, H.H., Abdalla, S.A. et al. Mycorrhizal colonization and Streptomyces viridosporus HH1 synergistically up-regulate the polyphenol biosynthesis genes in wheat against stripe rust. BMC Plant Biol 23, 388 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04395-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04395-5

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us