Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Patterns of genetic variation and QTLs controlling grain traits in a collection of global wheat germplasm revealed by high-quality SNP markers

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 455 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Establish a molecular breeding program involved assembling a diverse germplasm collection and generating accurate genotypes to characterize their genetic potential and associate them with agronomic traits. In this study, we acquired over eight hundred wheat accessions from international gene banks and assessed their genetic relatedness using high-quality SNP genotypes. Understanding the scope of genomic variation in this collection allows the breeders to utilize the genetic resources efficiently while improving wheat yield and quality.

Results

A wheat diversity panel comprising 39 durum wheat, 60 spelt wheat, and 765 bread wheat accessions was genotyped on iSelect 90 K wheat SNP arrays. A total of 57,398 SNP markers were mapped to IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 assembly, over 30,000 polymorphic SNPs in the A, B, D genomes were used to analyze population structure and diversity, the results revealed the separation of the three species and the differentiation of CIMMYT improved breeding lines and landraces or widely grown cultivars. In addition, several chromosomal regions under selection were detected. A subset of 280 bread wheat accessions was evaluated for grain traits, including grain length, width, surface area, and color. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed that several chromosomal regions were significantly linked to known quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling grain-related traits. One of the SNP peaks at the end of chromosome 7A was in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with WAPO-A1, a gene that governs yield components.

Conclusions

Here, the most updated and accurate physical positions of SNPs on 90 K genotyping array are provided for the first time. The diverse germplasm collection and associated genotypes are available for the wheat researchers to use in their molecular breeding program. We expect these resources to broaden the genetic basis of original breeding and pre-breeding materials and ultimately identify molecular markers associated with important agronomic traits which are evaluated in diverse environmental conditions.

Background

Wheat is the most widely grown cereal crop species in terms of cultivation area, ranking third in yield production and accounting for approximately 20% of the total daily calories and protein supply worldwide [1, 2]. Wheat provides important nutrients, including vitamins, dietary fiber, minerals, and phytochemicals, that are beneficial for human health [3]. The domestication of wheat occurred approximately 10,000 years ago. Specifically, two interspecific hybridization events were involved in the evolution of the modern hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum (2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD). Cultivation and selection of wild emmer wheat led to the formation of the domesticated emmer wheat T. turgidum ssp. dicoccum (2n = 4x = 28, AABB), from which tetraploid durum wheat T. turgidum ssp. durum (2n = 4x = 28, AABB) evolved [4,5,6]. The origin of hexaploid spelt wheat (T. aestivum Ssp. spelta; 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) has been debated; it is not known whether spelt wheat is the ancestral form of hexaploid wheat or is derived from the hybridization of free-threshing hexaploid wheat and emmer wheat [7,8,9]. However, recent studies have suggested that spelt wheat emerged from the hybridization between hexaploid T. aestivum and emmer wheat [5, 6, 10].

The sequencing of the high-quality reference genome of the bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (International Wheat Genome Sequencing Consortium [IWGSC] RefSeq v1.0) [11] has enabled the genome-wide discovery of high-density markers, the study of the transcriptional landscape [12], the comparative analysis of structural variations [13], and the characterization of evolutionary history [6, 14, 15]. An improved genome sequence version, IWGSC RefSeq v2.1, was recently released. Sequencing gaps remaining in v1.0 were filled using PacBio long reads, and correction of scaffold orientation and ordering using a whole-genome optical map were achieved in this assembly [16]. With advancements in high-throughput genotyping technology, molecular marker discovery has accelerated. Detection of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) via microarrays was applied to analyze the genome of tetraploid and hexaploid wheat species [17] and identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with agronomic traits [18,19,20,21,22], physiological traits [23], resistance to disease [24, 25], and resistance to preharvest sprouting [26].

Since the Green Revolution, significant breeding efforts have been made to increase wheat yields. Grain size and grain weight are components that determine yield potential, and several genes controlling grain-related traits have been identified and isolated via comparative genomics methods, including TaGS5 [27], TaGW7 [28], TaGS3 [29], TaCYP78A3 [30], and TaWTG1 [31]. In recent years, genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have been applied to wheat to identify trait-controlling variants [22, 32,33,34] by exploiting the historic recombinant events that have accumulated over generations in wheat germplasms [35]. Several chromosomal regions associated with grain-related traits have been discovered in various wheat populations via association mapping approaches [22, 33, 36, 37]. Therefore, identifying QTL/genes or molecular markers associated with grain-related traits is a prerequisite when applying marker-assisted selection, especially for pyramiding beneficial alleles in elite cultivars, to improve wheat yield and quality.

In this study, a diversity panel consisting of 765 bread wheat, 60 spelt wheat, and 39 durum wheat accessions was genotyped using the Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K SNP array. The physical positions of array probe sequences were mapped to IWGSC RefSeq v2.1, which was released in early 2021. SNP quality, including call rate and call score, was evaluated by several criteria and compared with the SNP quality of the variants detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The population structure of this diverse wheat panel was assessed using SNPs with updated genomic positions, and a series of GWASs were then conducted to identify chromosomal regions associated with grain-related traits of bread wheat.

Methods

Plant material and SNP array genotyping

A wheat diversity panel comprising 39 durum wheat (T. turgidum ssp. durum), 60 spelt wheat (T. aestivum ssp. spelta), and 765 bread wheat (T. aestivum ssp. aestivum, spring wheat type) accessions were mainly obtained from the Wheat Germplasm Bank of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT, Mexico) and the Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN) of the USDA-ARS (Supplementary Table S1). This collection included landraces (142), breeding materials (33), breeders lines (430), advanced/improved cultivars (20), cultivars (197), genetic material (2), wild material (1), and some with uncertain improvement status (40), the number of lines is indicated in parenthesis. Among four hundred and thirty breeders lines developed by CIMMYT’s wheat breeding program, three hundred and seventy lines have been evaluated in international and regional wheat trials such as Elite Selection Wheat Yield Trial (ESWYT, 24 lines), Semi-Arid Wheat Screening Nursery (SAWSN, 20 lines), High Rainfall Wheat Yield Trial (HRWYT, 12 lines), International Bread Wheat Screening Nursery (IBWSN, 44 lines), Fusarium Head Blight Screening Nursery (FHBSN, 98 lines), High Rainfall Wheat Screening Nursery (HRWSN, 126 lines), High Temperature Wheat Yield Trial (HTWYT, 46 lines).

The seeds used in this study were harvested from at least two-rounds of selfed propagation to ensure purity. The genomic DNA of each accession was extracted from fresh leaf tissue using a DNeasy 96 Plant Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and checked for quality. The purified DNA was subsequently hybridized to an Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K SNP array, and array processing and fluorescent signal detection were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina, San Diego, USA).

Assignment of the physical positions of iSelect 90 K SNP markers to the reference genome

The Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K SNP array involves 81,587 functional assays [17]. To obtain the physical positions of each SNP marker, the flanking sequences of the markers were obtained from this study [17] and searched against the content TRansposable Elements Platform (TREP) database (v2016) [38] with the following parameters: evalue 1e-10, best hit_score_edge 0.05, and best_hit_overhang 0.25. Markers highly similar to repetitive sequences were removed due to their difficult assignment to a specific chromosomal region.

The flanking sequences of the unique markers were mapped against the IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 [11] and IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 [16] assemblies of the bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). The parameters applied in the BLASTN algorithm were as follows: evalue 1e-10, best hit_score_edge 0.05, and best_hit_overhang 0.25. The chromosomal assignments of markers with multiple BLAST hits were determined based on the lowest E-value. The distribution of 90 K SNPs on the two assemblies was compared, the event involved in inconsistent SNPs orientation or order was defined by at least four adjacent markers, the interval sizes delimited by markers at distal ends were calculated in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1. Gene annotation of SNP was retrieved from IWGSC RefSeq Annotations (https://wheat-urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Seq-Repository/Annotations).

Development of a SNP calling pipeline to genotype diverse wheat accessions

The image files of fluorescent signals, generated by the Illumina iSelect genotyping assays, were analyzed using the Polyploid Genotyping Module implemented in GenomeStudio v2.0.4 (Illumina, San Diego, USA). For each SNP marker, allele clustering was performed on the selected samples using the parameters included with the density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) clustering algorithm. The most important parameters were “cluster distance” and “minimum number of points in the cluster”. To determine the best combination of parameters, five cluster distances (0.02, 0.03, 0.05, 0.07, and 0.09) and three minimum numbers of points in clusters (5, 8, and 10) were tested and evaluated for their performance. Because the wheat accessions used in this study had undergone several generations of selfing, the “inbred population” option was selected because only two allelic clusters representing homozygous AA or BB groups were considered.

Determination of the best parameter combination was based on the sample call rate, sample p10 GC score (the 10th percentile of the distribution of GenCall scores for all SNPs), SNP call frequency, and SNP 10% GC score (the 10th percentile of the GenCall scores across all called genotypes). The genotype calls of Chinese Spring in our diversity panel were also used to evaluate SNP clustering performance. For markers with assigned physical positions, the corresponding genotypes at the same position in the Chinese Spring reference genome were extracted. The genotypes of Chinese Spring from our clustering results and the genotypes extracted from the reference genome sequence were then compared. Genotype calls (AA and BB) were converted to International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) nucleotide codes based on the information in Supplementary Table S5 in the study by [17]. Only SNPs assigned to unique physical positions were included in the final genotype table, which was subsequently converted to HapMap file format.

Principal component analysis (PCA) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis

SNP markers with a minor allele frequency (MAF) smaller than 0.01 and a missing percentage greater than 10% were removed. PCA was conducted in TASSEL v5.2.26 [39]. The software automatically converted the genotype data to numeric scores, and the missing data were imputed with the average score for each marker. Intrachromosomal LD was calculated using Plink v1.90 [40]. The window size for the calculation of LD was set to 25 Mb, and the LD between each pair of markers within the window was measured according to r2 values. To investigate LD decay in our diversity panel, the r2 values were plotted against the physical distance between each pair of markers, and a trend line was fitted using the Hill and Weir expectation of r2 [41], which was later modified by Remington et al. (2001) [42]. LD decay across the whole genome and within each subgenome was calculated for the three wheat species (durum wheat, spelt wheat, and bread wheat) in our dataset. The most commonly used threshold to declare no correlation between markers is an r2 of 0.1 or 0.2 [43]. For comparisons with the results of previous studies, values of LD decay using thresholds of r2 = 0.1 and 0.2 were reported.

Model-based clustering analysis and genetic diversity index

The number of underlying subpopulations (K) in our diversity panel was determined using ADMIXTURE software [44]. The K value ranged from 1 to 12, and 10-fold cross-validation was performed. FST was calculated via GenoDive v3.04 to assess the genetic differentiation between subpopulations [45]. The mean pairwise difference (𝜋) for each subpopulation was calculated with TASSEL v5.2.56 [39]. We further detected genome-wide selection signals using BayeScan v2.1 [46] with the default parameter settings. A false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05 was used as the threshold to identify significant SNPs.

Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)

A subset consisting of 96 bread wheat lines from the diversity panel was subjected to GBS. The GBS library was prepared according to the protocol developed by Elshire et al. [47]. Briefly, genomic DNA was digested with ApeKI, followed by ligation of barcode sequences and common adapters. The barcoded samples were pooled and amplified by PCR, and the library was sequenced with a single-end length of 100 bp on an Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform. The quality of the sequence reads was assessed using FastQC v0.11.8 [48]. SNP calling was conducted via the TASSEL-GBS pipeline [49]. The reads were trimmed to 64 bp (not including the barcode) and subsequently mapped to the bread wheat reference genome IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) [50].

Grain phenotyping and statistical analysis

The selected wheat accessions were grown over 2 years in the same experimental field. Within the same year, around 300 accessions were grown in the field with size around 0.1 ha, 18 individuals per accession were planted on one plot (plot size is 1 m × 1.2 m), two plots per accession were randomly arranged in the field. Mature grains of each accession were bulked, the dry and clean seeds (at least 100 grains and up to 600 grains per accession) harvested in two separate years (I and II) were scanned independently by an Epson Perfection V600 flatbed scanner at a 24-bit and 300 dpi resolution, a black cardboard box was used to cover the scanner to reduce internal reflection from the light emitted during scanning. The scanned image was saved as a JPG file for processing. Color calibration was performed by using the color Palette and histogram functions in Epson Perfection V600 Professional Mode. The grain size and color were measured from scanned images using GrainScan software developed by CSIRO [51]. The measurements included the area (mm2), perimeter (mm), grain length (mm), grain width (mm) and values representing three independent color channels. The value of each color channel was considered a proxy for the RGB color model. Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated between traits. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all the traits was performed using R. The broad-sense heritability was calculated as H2 = σ2G/(σ2G + σ2E); where σ2G was calculated as (MSgenotype − MSresidual)/2 and σ2E was MSresidual.

GWASs, local LD estimation and orthologous genes identification

Marker-trait associations were performed in TASSEL v5.2.56 [39]. The general linear model (GLM) estimates only SNP effects while controlling trait variation, and the mixed linear model (MLM) includes the centered identity-by-state (IBS) kinship matrix as a cofactor to reduce false-positive signals due to the relatedness among wheat accessions. Incorporating principal components (PCs) into the GLM and MLM could correct for the confounding effect caused by population structure. A total of four statistical models, the GLM, GLM + PC, MLM, and MLM + PC, were applied to estimate associations between markers and grain traits. The LD between peak SNP and neighboring SNPs was calculated and visualized using the R package “LDheatmap” [52].

The sequence of previously cloned rice genes controlling grain size traits (Supplementary Table S1 in [53]) was BLAST to search for wheat orthologs in LD block harboring peak SNP. For wheat orthologs identification, the coding sequence (CDS) of the cloned rice genes annotated to grain morphological traits in the Q-TARO database [54] were retrieved from the RAP-DB database [55] and BLAST against the wheat genome assembly IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 using the parameters: evalue 1e-10, best hit_score_edge 0.05, and best_hit_overhang 0.25.

Results

Anchoring the Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K markers to IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1

The Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K array includes 81,587 SNP detection assays corresponding to 517,587 hybridization sites in the wheat genome. The flanking sequences of each assay were obtained from a previous study [17], and 277 assays showing high similarity to repetitive sequences in the TREP database were removed. The remaining ~ 81,000 assay sequences were searched against the IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1 assemblies using the BLAST, which yielded 242,632 and 380,430 hits, respectively. Excluding the assays without any hits, assays with a single hit or with hits with the lowest E-value were selected, which resulted in 57,851 markers (together named as “90K_Refv1”), and 57,398 markers (together named as “90K_Refv2”) (Table 1). A similar marker distribution was observed in the two datasets, and a reduced number of total markers and markers assigned as “unknown” in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 that the genotype call accuracy had improved. Comparing the two datasets (90K_Refv1 and 90K_Refv2), we found that 56,597 markers (98.98%) were commonly assigned to the same chromosomes, while 583 markers (1.02%) were mapped to different chromosomes in the two genome assemblies. Gene annotation of 56,597 SNP markers was retrieved from IWGSC RefSeq v2.1, 50,006 markers were located in the genic region, 901 and 1666 markers were within 2 kb upstream and downstream of annotated gene, respectively (Supplementary Table S2). Most of the inconsistent chromosomal assignments involved markers that were assigned to the unknown chromosome in IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 but assigned to real chromosomes in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 (417, 71.53%), and the second most occurred within homoeologous groups (104, 17.84%) (Supplementary Fig. S1). Only 22 markers (3.77%) were mapped to the real chromosomes in IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 but were mapped to the unknown chromosome in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1. When analyzing the order and orientation of markers on the same chromosome between IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1, we detected 63 events that ranged from 1.03 kb to 2.46 Mb in size, which could be the result of contig orientation errors (Supplementary Fig. S2). Eleven events ranging from 1.20 to 329.76 Mb in size were related to a contig ordering problem. Eighteen events ranging from 652.18 kb to 550.38 Mb were due to problematic orientation and ordering of contigs. The physical positions of array markers in IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1 are provided in Supplementary Table S2. A total of 44,803 markers anchored to IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 were also reported in a previous study [56], and we found that the genomic positions of 43,642 markers (97.41%) were in agreement (Supplementary Table S2).

Table 1 Number of Illumina iSelect 90 K SNP markers assigned to wheat chromosomes according to two IWGSC RefSeq genome assemblies
Full size table

Determine SNP genotypes for 864 wheat accessions

To determine accurate SNP genotypes for each wheat accession, we developed a customized SNP clustering pipeline based on Illumina GenomeStudio Software v2.0.4 (Fig. 1). Within the GenomeStudio polyploid genotyping module, we applied the DBSCAN algorithm to cluster the samples. By comparing the number of samples or the number of markers meeting the specific threshold of the call rate (0.9) and call score (0.4) (the result of each threshold was presented in separate sheet in Supplementary Tables S3), we determined that the best setting to generate high-quality genotypic information was a cluster distance of 0.05 and minimum number of points in a cluster of 5 for markers in the A and B genomes as well as a cluster distance of 0.07 and minimum number of points in a cluster of 5 for SNPs in the D genome. To evaluate the accuracy of SNPs detected by the 90 K array, we sequenced, via genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), the genome of 96 bread wheat accessions, including that of the Chinese Spring variety. After filtering the low-coverage reads, 12,763,672 unique sequences were aligned to IWGSC RefSeq v2.1, and variants were identified using the TASSEL-GBS pipeline [49]. Comparing the genotype calls of the 96 wheat accessions obtained from GBS and 90 K SNP array detection, at shared loci without missing values, we found that 97.98% was in agreement (Table 2 and Supplementary Table S4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

In-house pipeline developed for clustering SNPs in wheat subgenomes. Each box contains information describing the functionality, parameters, input samples and output results

Full size image
Table 2 Consistency of genotype calls between the GBS and 90 K arrays of 96 wheat accessions. The SNPs with MAF > 0.01 and missing rate < 20% were used for comparison
Full size table

Population structure, selection signal and LD in wheat species and improved breeding lines

After removing SNPs with MAF < 0.01 and missing rate > 10%, a total of 28,836 polymorphic SNPs in the A and B genomes were used to analyze the population structure of 864 tetraploid and hexaploid wheat germplasms. The first PC separated tetraploid durum wheat from hexaploid wheat; bread wheat and spelt wheat were further differentiated by other PCs (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2
figure 2

PCA of the diversity panel. a 3D scatter plot of the first three PCs representing 864 wheat accessions based on 28,836 SNPs in the A and B genomes. b Distribution of 825 hexaploid wheat accessions on the basis of 31,854 SNPs in the A, B, and D genomes. c Distribution of the 765 bread wheat accessions on the basis of 29,803 SNPs in the A, B, and D genomes. The proportion of the total variance explained by each PC is shown on the axis label. The color of each point represents the species or origin of accession

Full size image

When the polymorphic markers in the D genome were included, which resulted in total 31,854 polymorphic SNPs in the A, B and D genomes, to analyze the population of 825 hexaploid wheat accessions, the results showed that the first two PCs could differentiate spelt wheat from bread wheat and could differentiate bread wheat accessions (Fig. 2b). To better characterize the 765 bread wheat accessions, the origin of genotypes was retrieved from the GRIN database (https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/search). Interestingly, the accessions developed at CIMMYT were grouped together and separated from others by PC1 based on 29,803 polymorphic SNPs (Fig. 2c). The accessions separated by PC2 were somewhat correlated with geographical origin, and one group of accessions collected in Asia was genetically differentiated from the accessions collected in Europe, Australia, and America.

To characterize the genetic ancestry of various wheat accessions, the model-based clustering software ADMIXTURE was applied to calculate an individual accessions’ ancestry coefficient. By the use of SNPs in the A and B genomes, the majority of durum wheat, spelt wheat, and bread wheat accessions could be clustered into species-specific groups (Fig. 3a). Some samples had mixed ancestral compositions, suggesting that gene flow or introgression events had occurred. Ancestry analysis of 825 hexaploid wheat and 765 bread wheat accessions using markers on A, B, and D genome separated cultivars developed at CIMMYT from the rest of the accessions at K = 2 (Fig. 3b and c). The CIMMYT germplasms shared a high proportion of ancestral components, which was in agreement with the PCA results (Fig. 3c). To assess the level of subpopulation differentiation (via a fixation index [FST]) within the bread wheat group, individual accession was assigned to a specific subpopulation when the proportion of a single ancestry was larger than 0.8, a total of 259 individual accessions were assigned to subpopulation Pop1 (red dots), 354 genotypes belonged to subpopulation Pop2 (blue dots), and 152 accessions were considered admixtures (Supplementary Fig. S3). Pop1 mainly consisted landraces (119 accessions) and cultivars (110 accessions) from worldwide countries, Pop2 is dominated by 339 breeders lines. The pairwise FST between Pop1 and Pop2 was 0.201, suggesting moderate differentiation (Table 3). The mean pairwise difference (𝜋) of Pop1 was 0.30, while that of Pop2 was only 0.21. Although Pop2 comprised more accessions than Pop1 did, the mean pairwise difference in Pop2 was lower than that in Pop1, which could result from 92.09% of the accessions in Pop2 being improved lines developed by CIMMYT, and many of them shared the same parents or have similar pedigree history (Supplementary Table S1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ADMIXTURE ancestry coefficient (K = 2) for diverse wheat accessions. a Eight hundred sixty-four durum wheat, spelt wheat and bread wheat samples analyzed by SNP markers on the A and B genomes. b Eight hundred twenty-five hexaploid wheat samples analyzed by markers on the A, B, and D genomes. c Seven hundred sixty-five bread wheat samples analyzed by markers on the A, B, and D genomes. Each stacked bar represents one genotype, and the color and length are proportional to the ancestral components. The origin of the accessions is denoted below each stacked bar

Full size image
Table 3 FST value between subpopulations within the bread wheat group
Full size table

We applied BayeScan v2.1 [46] to detect genome-wide selection signals. Our results showed that 88 SNPs with an FDR < 0.05 significantly differentiated between Pop1 (cultivars or landraces) and Pop2 (CIMMYT improved germplasms). The FST values of these significant signals ranged from 0.32870 to 0.42347 (Table 4 and Supplementary Table S5), and the SNPs were located on chromosomes 1A, 1B, 1D, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 4D, 5D, 6A, and 6D (Supplementary Fig. S4). A cluster of significant SNPs was identified on chromosome 1A in the region between 345 Mb and 377.5 Mb, suggesting that this region might have been subject to strong selection. All the significant loci had a positive alpha value, suggesting that these loci were under diversifying selection.

Table 4 Results of Bayescan showing putative genomic regions differentiated between Pop1 and Pop2
Full size table

LD was analyzed in durum wheat, spelt wheat, and bread wheat separately. Among the three species, bread wheat exhibited the fastest genome-wide LD decay, and the physical distances at which genome-wide LD (r2) decayed from the initial value of ~ 0.45 to 0.2 were 1.76 Mb in bread wheat, 4.11 Mb in spelt wheat, 7.21 Mb in durum wheat (Fig. 4a). When comparing the decay of subgenome LD among the three species, we found that the LD of subgenomes A and B was greatest in durum wheat, and the highest extent of LD was detected in the D genome (r2 = 0.2 at 21.08 Mb) in spelt wheat (Fig. 4b-d). LD in Pop 1 (cultivars or landraces) decayed faster than that in the Pop 2 and admixture groups when the SNPs in the A or B genome or three genomes together were analyzed (Supplementary Fig. S5); however, a long range of LD was observed in Pop 1 when the D genome alone was analyzed, followed by the Pop 2 and admixture populations.

Fig. 4
figure 4

LD of bread wheat, spelt wheat, and durum wheat. a Genome-wide LD decay of three wheat species. b LD decay of subgenome A of the three species. c LD decay of subgenome B of the three species. d LD decay of subgenome D of spelt wheat and bread wheat. The physical distance (in megabases) is plotted against the LD estimate (r2) for pairs of markers

Full size image

GWASs revealed chromosomal regions controlling grain-related traits

To validate the efficacy of high-quality SNPs genotyped in diverse accessions, we performed genome-wide association study using grain-related traits known for their high heritability characteristics. Analyzing 2 years of grain phenotypic data in 280 wheat accessions showed grain trait across years (I and II) was highly correlated (i.e., grain length is 0.83, grain color is 0.86), the broad-sense heritability of each trait was then calculated, which ranged from 0.62 to 0.86 (Supplementary Table S6). A total of 29,467 polymorphic SNPs with MAF greater than 0.01 and a missing percentage of less than 10% were used to identify genotypic associations with grain-related traits in 280 bread wheat accessions. A Manhattan plot and Q-Q plot generated from the statistical models for each grain trait are shown in Fig. 5b and Supplementary Figs. S6, S7, S8, S9, S10 and S11, the p-value of significant SNPs smaller than 10− 6 or 10− 4 detected in GLM or MLM model and their associated R2 for each grain trait was presented in Supplementary Table S7. For the normally distributed grain length trait, a major SNP peak was identified at the end of chromosome 7A across all analytical models (Fig. 5a and b), suggesting that this SNP peak is adjacent to a QTL for grain length. Interestingly, this region was also significantly associated with grain surface area and grain perimeter (Supplementary Figs. S7 and S8). This candidate region was further refined by analyzing the local LD between the peak marker (BS00021657_51) and neighboring markers spanning a 10 Mb region, and the results suggested that the interval was located between 676,603,251 and 678,873,631 bp on chromosome 7A (Fig. 5c). Wheat chromosome 7A is known to harbor several genes related to grain traits, including TaWTG1 [31], TaGASR7-A1 [57], TaTGW-7A [58], TaTEF-7A [59], and WAPO-A1 [60]. Among these genes, WAPO-A1 was located within the region identified in this study. WAPO-A1 was previously identified as a candidate gene involved in spikelet number per spike, but additional experiments are needed to determine whether WAPO-A1 has a pleotropic effect or whether there is a novel gene that regulates grain length. For grain color, one significant SNP cluster located at the end of long arm of chromosome 3B was commonly detected in three color channels across all models examined (Supplementary Figs. S9, 10 and S11), the significant SNP (Excalibur_rep_c97324_623) at 771,937,474 bp was previously reported to associate with grain color in the U.S winter wheat [61].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Genome-wide association mapping for grain length. a Distribution of the grain length of 280 bread wheat accessions. b Manhattan plot of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plot representing the statistical association between each SNP and grain length. c The pairwise LD of SNPs surrounding the peak marker on chromosome 7A was calculated. The position of peak marker BS00021657_51 and WAPO-A1 is labeled

Full size image

Grain size-related traits have been investigated extensively in rice. Therefore, we extracted the sequences from functionally characterized rice genes known to control seed morphological traits from Q-TARO database [54] and a review paper [53] to search for the wheat orthologs, the identified orthologs (total 191) were then mapped to our GWAS detected regions. The results showed that TraesCS3A03G0430300 on chromosome 3A, the ortholog of rice grain-size associated gene Rdd1 [62] was near a significant SNP wsnp_Ex_c1538_2937905 controlling grain length (Supplementary Table S8). The orthologs of rice grain length controlling genes GL3 and OsPPKL3 [63] were located on wheat chromosome 5A and 5D. Three significant SNPs, Kukri_c28080_887 and RAC875_rep_c112205_166 associated with grain perimeter and BS00073670_51 for grain length, were located near TraesCS5A03G0897900 on chromosome 5A. SNP IAAV9053 was overlapped with TraesCS5D03G0859400 on chromosome 5D. Other significant SNPs such as wsnp_Ex_c1538_2937905 on chromosome 3A, BS00022800_51 on chromosome 3B, and Tdurum_contig11827_678 on chromosome 7B, were colocalized with wheat orthologs of rice genes controlling grain morphological traits (Supplementary Table S8).

Discussion

Identification of the physical positions of 90 K SNP markers on the IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 assembly

Seven years since the release of the Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K SNP array to the public [17], more than one thousand articles have cited the original publication, which suggested that a substantial number of research experiments have been conducted via this genotyping array. With the recent release of the IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 assembly [16], it is necessary to update the physical position of molecular markers to the current version. In this study, the flanking sequences of 90 K SNP markers were mapped to the IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1 independently, and most mapped markers were located on the B genome, followed by the A genome and D genome, which is consistent with previous findings [17, 64]. Thousands of SNPs located in problematic contigs were corrected, and their genomic positions are now accurate. Moreover, 279 previously unplaced scaffolds (74.96 Mb) were anchored onto pseudomolecules, which reduced the number of array markers assigned to the unknown chromosome. These refinements contributed to the improved sequence and assembly quality of IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 [16].

Controlling the accuracy of array-anchored genotypes

Fluorescence intensity generated by hybridization between genomic DNA and array probes is the source of allele clustering, which often requires manual curation for error-prone SNPs in polyploid species [17, 65]. It is extremely time consuming and challenging to manually inspect SNP clusters without predefined cluster files, especially for diverse wheat accessions. In this study, we developed a customized allele clustering pipeline to avoid manual curation, and several indices were used to evaluate the clustering performance. In general, a larger cluster distance and a smaller minimum number of points in the cluster lead to a higher number of samples and SNPs with call rates > 0.9. Compared to cluster distance, the minimum number of points showed variable effects on genotype quality. Therefore, we selected an optimal cluster distance to obtain superior clustering performance, resulting in a relatively high call rate and call score.

Array-based genotyping has been compared to GBS in various contexts [56, 66, 67]. In this study, the genotypes detected at shared loci from two platforms were highly concordant, which supported the ability of our in-house SNP calling pipeline to generate accurate genotype sequences. Array-based systems provide a unique advantage for easy integration of genotypes from samples processed in different laboratories, and the fixed genomic positions of assayed markers could help streamline downstream applications, such as comparing detected QTLs for the same traits and developing trait-associated markers for selection. It is also important to consider the tradeoff between the cost of genotyping and bioinformatic infrastructure establishment when deciding which genotyping platform to use.

Population structure and differentiation of diverse wheat accessions

When SNP genotypes of the A and B genomes were used, PCA could easily separate our diversity panel into three main clusters corresponding to bread wheat, spelt wheat, and durum wheat, which was in agreement with the results from phylogenetic and ADMXITURE analyses. In the analysis, some accessions were placed between defined clusters, and the admixed accessions might be the result of gene flow between wheat species. Complex historical events of hybridization have led to frequent gene flow or introgression between wheat species and their wild relatives [6, 14]. Using SNPs in the A, B, and D genomes to characterize the population structure within 765 bread wheat lines, we found that the improved wheat lines developed at CIMMYT were separated from accessions collected in other countries. A recent study analyzed the diversity of 56,342 domesticated hexaploids, including landraces, widely grown cultivars, elite breeding lines and nursery germplasm, from CIMMYT [68]. The authors found that a large group of elite materials clearly differentiated from landraces and genetic stocks, those elite lines had the varieties “Kauz”, “Pastor” and “Veery” in their pedigree history, apparently, these three varieties were also found in 31% of CIMMYT breeders lines of our collection, Kauz and Pastor were appeared in 97 and 68 records respectively (Supplementary Table S1). Improved varieties developed by CIMMYT wheat breeding program could have undergone different levels of artificial selection, and the shared parentages could cause the allele frequency of these accessions to differ from that of materials collected from diverse geographical regions. We noticed that wheat accessions collected from Asia formed a cluster distinct from those of other European and Australian accessions, suggesting that accessions might have adapted to the local environment or have been bred for specific objectives. Similarly, Muqaddasi’s study [69] reported that spring wheat accessions originating from Asia were distinguished from European accessions by PCA, and a similar pattern was also detected in [70] in which wheat varieties from the same origins clustered together.

LD in diverse wheat species

LD between two independent loci is known to be affected by mutation, effective population size, mating system, gene flow, genetic drift, and selection [71]; therefore, the rate of LD decay can vary between subgenomes, species or analyzed populations. In our study, among the three species, bread wheat had the most rapid genome-wide LD decay; specifically, the A genome decayed the most rapidly, followed by the D genome and B genome. The fastest LD decay in the A genome has been reported in several studies [33, 72].

Spelt wheat was estimated to diverge from modern bread wheat several thousand years ago; interestingly, the genome-wide LD decay patterns in the A and B genomes (but not the D genome) were quite similar between the two hexaploid wheat lines, where r2 = 0.2 occurred at 21.08 Mb as opposed to 1.67 Mb in bread wheat. Such long-range LD decay was also observed in 293 Swiss spelt wheat and 123 European spelt accessions [73, 74]. Würschum’s results [73] suggested that the results obtained should be treated with caution due to the lower marker density in the D genome compared with the other genomes. In our study, the number of polymorphic markers in the D genome was four times lower in the 60 spelt wheat accessions compared with the 765 bread wheat accessions; however, considering that the number of polymorphic markers in the A or B genome in the 60 spelt wheat accessions was three times lower than that in the 765 bread wheat accessions, the LD pattern was not dramatically different; as such, we suspect that other factors contributed to the extended LD of the D genome in spelt wheat. It is widely accepted that the D genome is derived from diploid Aegilops tauschii and is the youngest genome in hexaploid wheat [7, 10, 75, 76]. It is possible that the D genome in spelt wheat has not accumulated a significant number of mutations or recombination events that could contribute to the degree of LD decay.

Association between grain traits and SNP markers

Wheat chromosome 7A is known to harbor genes related to grain traits, among these genes, WAPO-A1 was shown to colocalize with the QTL region identified in this study and was identified as a candidate gene for a QTL responsible for spikelet number per spike [60]. Another significant SNP detected in the present work, Kukri_c2912_2029, was found on chromosome 2A (S6.1-Grain length in Supplementary Table S6) in the vicinity of TaGW7, which regulates grain length and grain width [77], and the significant SNP marker BS00073670_51, on chromosome 5A (S7.1-Grain length in Supplementary Table S7), was found near TaGL3-5A, which is associated with grain length and thousand-kernel weight [78]. Co-localization of significant SNPs on chromosome 7A associated with grain surface area, grain perimeter, and grain length was found in this study (Supplementary Fig. S9, S10 and S11). The phenotypic correlation between these traits is high (Pearson correlation coefficient ranges between 0.53–0.95), however traits distribution varies (Supplementary Fig. S12), this suggested the candidate gene in the QTL region on chromosome 7A could have different effects, highlighting the importance to identify the causal genes or variants controlling grain traits. Rice genes controlling grain morphological traits have been studied extensively [53], wheat genes TaGW7 and TaGL3-5A were found to be orthologous to the rice GW7 [79, 80] and GL3.1 [63, 81]. Another important trait determining wheat quality is grain color. The long arm of chromosome 3B is known to carry a grain color locus “R” [82], a candidate gene “Tamyb10-B1” encoded R2R3-type MYB domain protein was further investigated for its allelic diversity and effect on grain color [83], Tamyb10-B1 gene was found to locate in the LD block calculated from the significant associated-SNPs detected in this study (Supplementary Fig. 13). The agreement between our GWAS results and those concerning previously identified genes governing grain-related traits not only validated the SNP quality resulting from our in-house pipeline but also suggested that diagnostic markers for grain traits could be potentially developed by the use of 90 K SNP markers. Wheat breeders could identify the elite germplasm carrying a beneficial allele for the trait of interest from this study. Pyramiding several QTLs in the target variety’s background through diligent crossing or inter-mating and marker-assisted selection could improve yield or quality significantly.

Conclusions

With the recent release of IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 in 2021, this study reported an updated and accurate physical position of 57,398 SNP loci on a high-density 90 K wheat genotyping array. Using the information gained in this work, we anticipate that wheat researchers who previously applied 90 K array markers for QTL mapping can seamlessly update their findings to RefSeq v2.1. In addition, the diverse wheat germplasms analyzed in this work constitute great resources for investigating population differentiation between and within hexaploid wheat accessions, and the genetic variation inherent within each population reflects its evolutionary and breeding history. Finally, considering our materials and genotypes are available to the public, we anticipate more QTLs or trait-linked SNP markers will be discovered in different environmental conditions, which could also increase our understanding of genetic architecture controlling quantitative traits.

Availability of data and materials

The genotype dataset generated and analyzed in this research are included within the article and its supplementary files. All wheat accessions used in this study are housed in Taichung District Agricultural Research and Extension Station (TDAIS) seed bank and available on reasonable request. These accessions were originally collected from USDA and CIMMYT genebanks, USDA PI number and CIMMYT number are listed in the Supplementary Table S1. The authors declare that all that permissions or licenses were obtained to collect the wheat germplasm from public depositories.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020a) FAOSTAT statistics database, crops. In: FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 10 July 2020.

  2. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2020b) FAOSTAT statistics database, new food balances. In: FAOSTAT. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FBS. Accessed 10 July 2020.

  3. Shewry PR, Hey SJ. The contribution of wheat to human diet and health. Food Energy Secur. 2015;4:178–202 https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science. 2007;316:1862–6 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143986.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. El Baidouri M, Murat F, Veyssiere M, Molinier M, Flores R, Burlot L, et al. Reconciling the evolutionary origin of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytol. 2017;213:1477–86 https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14113.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pont C, Leroy T, Seidel M, et al. Tracing the ancestry of modern bread wheats. Nat Genet. 2019;51:905–11 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0393-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McFadden ES, Sears ER. The origin of triticum spelta and its free-threshing hexaploid relatives. J Hered. 1946;37:81–9 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a105590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y-G, Tsunewaki K. Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis in wheat. II. Linkage maps of the RFLP sites in common wheat. The Japanese Journal of Genetics. 1991;66:617–33 https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.66.617.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesbitt M, Samuel D. From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats: 21–22 July 1995; Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany. 1996. pp. 41–100.

  10. Dvorak J, Deal KR, Luo MC, You FM, von Borstel K, Dehghani H. The origin of spelt and free-threshing hexaploid wheat. J Hered. 2012;103:426–41 https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esr152.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Appels R, Eversole K, Feuillet C, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(eaar7191) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar7191.

  12. Ramírez-González RH, Borrill P, Lang D, et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science. 2018;361(eaar6089) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar6089.

  13. Thind AK, Wicker T, Müller T, et al. Chromosome-scale comparative sequence analysis unravels molecular mechanisms of genome dynamics between two wheat cultivars. Genome Biol. 2018;19:104 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1477-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng H, Liu J, Wen J, et al. Frequent intra- and inter-species introgression shapes the landscape of genetic variation in bread wheat. Genome Biol. 2019;20:136 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1744-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. He F, Pasam R, Shi F, et al. Exome sequencing highlights the role of wild-relative introgression in shaping the adaptive landscape of the wheat genome. Nat Genet. 2019;51:896–904 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0382-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu T, Wang L, Rimbert H, et al. Optical maps refine the bread wheat Triticum aestivum cv. Chinese spring genome assembly Plant J. 2021;107:303–14 https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15289.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang S, Wong D, Forrest K, et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 12:787–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12183

  18. Ain QU, Rasheed A, Anwar A, Mahmood T, Imtiaz M, Mahmood T, et al. Genome-wide association for grain yield under rainfed conditions in historical wheat cultivars from Pakistan. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:743 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00743.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao F, Wen W, Liu J, Rasheed A, Yin G, Xia X, et al. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for yield components, plant height and yield-related physiological traits in the Chinese wheat cross Zhou 8425B/Chinese spring. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:1099 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01099.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sukumaran S, Dreisigacker S, Lopes M, Chavez P, Reynolds MP. Genome-wide association study for grain yield and related traits in an elite spring wheat population grown in temperate irrigated environments. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128:353–63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2435-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhai S, He Z, Wen W, Jin H, Liu J, Zhang Y, Liu Z, Xia X. Genome-wide linkage mapping of flour color-related traits and polyphenol oxidase activity in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129:377–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2634-6.

  22. Sun C, Zhang F, Yan X, Zhang X, Dong Z, Cui D, et al. Genome-wide association study for 13 agronomic traits reveals distribution of superior alleles in bread wheat from the yellow and Huai Valley of China. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15:953–69 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao F, Liu J, Yang L, Wu X, Xiao Y, Xia X, et al. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for physiological traits in a Chinese wheat population using the 90K SNP array. Euphytica. 2016;209:789–804 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1682-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, He Z, Wu L, Bai B, Wen W, Xie C, et al. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for adult-plant resistance to stripe rust in a Chinese wheat population Linmai 2 × Zhong 892. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0145462 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145462.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng B, Gao X, Cao N, Ding Y, Gao Y, Chen T, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of stripe rust resistance loci in wheat accessions from southwestern China. J Appl Genet. 2020;61:37–50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13353-019-00533-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu Y, Wang S, Wei W, et al. Genome-wide association study of pre-harvest sprouting tolerance using a 90K SNP array in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:2947–63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03398-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang S, Zhang X, Chen F, Cui D. A single-nucleotide polymorphism of TaGS5 gene revealed its association with kernel weight in Chinese bread wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2015a;6:1166 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01166.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ma J, Ding P, Qin P, et al. Structure and expression of the TaGW7 in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Growth Regul. 2017;82:281–91 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-017-0258-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang J, Zhou Y, Zhang Ye HW, Wu Q, Chen Y, Wang X, et al. Cloning, characterization of TaGS3 and identification of allelic variation associated with kernel traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Genet. 2019a;20(98) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-019-0800-6.

  30. Ma M, Wang Q, Li Z, Cheng H, Li Z, Liu X, et al. Expression of TaCYP78A3, a gene encoding cytochrome P450 CYP78A3 protein in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.), affects seed size. Plant J. 2015;83:312–25 https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12896.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang H, Ma J, Liu J, Mu Y, Tang H, Liu Y, et al. Molecular characterization of the TaWTG1 in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Gene. 2018;678:23–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu J, Xu Z, Fan X, Zhou Q, Cao J, Wang F, et al. A genome-wide association study of wheat spike related traits in China. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1584 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhatta M, Shamanin V, Shepelev S, Baenziger PS, Pozherukova V, Pototskaya I, Morgounov A. Marker-trait associations for enhancing agronomic performance, disease resistance, and grain quality in synthetic and bread wheat accessions in Western Siberia. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2019;9:4209–4222. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.119.400811.

  34. Alemu A, Feyissa T, Tuberosa R, Maccaferri M, Sciara G, Letta T, et al. Genome-wide association mapping for grain shape and color traits in Ethiopian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum). Crop J. 2020;8:757–68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2020.01.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu Y, Li P, Yang Z, Xu C. Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops. Crop J. 2017;5:175–84 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li F, Wen W, Liu J, et al. Genetic architecture of grain yield in bread wheat based on genome-wide association studies. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:168 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1781-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Yan X, Zhao L, Ren Y, Dong Z, Cui D, Chen F. Genome-wide association study revealed that the TaGW8 gene was associated with kernel size in Chinese bread wheat. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2702 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38570-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wicker T, Matthews DE, Keller B. TREP: a database for Triticeae repetitive elements. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:561–2 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02372-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2633–5 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:559–75 https://doi.org/10.1086/519795.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill WG, Weir BS. Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1988;33:54–78 https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(88)90004-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Remington DL, Thornsberry JM, Matsuoka Y, Wilson LM, Whitt SR, Doebley J, et al. Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:11479–84 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201394398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Vos PG, Paulo MJ, Voorrips RE, Visser RGF, van Eck HJ, van Eeuwijk FA. Evaluation of LD decay and various LD-decay estimators in simulated and SNP-array data of tetraploid potato. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130:123–35 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-016-2798-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19:1655–64 https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.094052.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Meirmans PG. Genodive version 3.0: easy-to-use software for the analysis of genetic data of diploids and polyploids. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20:1126–31 https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Foll M, Gaggiotti O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a bayesian perspective. Genetics. 2008;180:977–93 https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.092221.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19379 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2020. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/. Accessed 31 May 2020.

  49. Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, Harriman J, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, et al. TASSEL-GBS: a high capacity genotyping by sequencing analysis pipeline. PLoS One. 2014;9:e90346 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698.

  51. Whan AP, Smith AB, Cavanagh CR, Ral J-PF, Shaw LM, Howitt CA, et al. GrainScan: a low cost, fast method for grain size and colour measurements. Plant Methods. 2014;10:23 https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-10-23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Shin J-H, Blay S, Graham J, McNeney B. LDheatmap: anRFunction for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J Stat Softw. 2006;16:1–9 https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v016.c03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang L, Ma B, Bian Z, et al. Grain size selection using novel functional markers targeting 14 genes in Rice. Rice. 2020;13:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-020-00427-y

  54. Yamamoto E, Yonemaru J, Yamamoto T, Yano M. OGRO: the overview of functionally characterized genes in Rice online database. Rice. 2012;5(1):26 https://doi.org/10.1186/1939-8433-5-26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sakai H, Lee SS, Tanaka T, Numa H, Kim J, Kawahara Y, et al. Rice annotation project database (RAP-DB): an integrative and interactive database for Rice genomics. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:e6. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs183.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Sun C, Dong Z, Zhao L, Ren Y, Zhang N, Chen F. The wheat 660K SNP array demonstrates great potential for marker-assisted selection in polyploid wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:1354–60 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Dong L, Wang F, Liu T, Dong Z, Li A, Jing R, et al. Natural variation of TaGASR7-A1 affects grain length in common wheat under multiple cultivation conditions. Mol Breed. 2014;34:937–47 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0087-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hu MJ, Zhang HP, Liu K, et al. Cloning and characterization of TaTGW-7A gene associated with grain weight in wheat via SLAF-seq-BSA. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1902 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Zheng J, Liu H, Wang Y, Wang L, Chang X, Jing R, et al. TEF-7A, a transcript elongation factor gene, influences yield-related traits in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Exp Bot. 2014;65:5351–65 https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Kuzay S, Xu Y, Zhang J, et al. Identification of a candidate gene for a QTL for spikelet number per spike on wheat chromosome arm 7AL by high-resolution genetic mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132:2689–705 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03382-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lin M, Zhang D, Liu S, et al. Genome-wide association analysis on pre-harvest sprouting resistance and grain color in U.S. winter wheat. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(794) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-3148-6.

  62. Iwamoto M, Higo K, Takano M. Circadian clock- and phytochrome-regulated Dof-like gene, Rdd1, is associated with grain size in rice. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32:592–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01954.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Zhang X, Wang J, Huang J, et al. Rare allele of OsPPKL1 associated with grain length causes extra-large grain and a significant yield increase in rice. PNAS. 2012;109:21534–9 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1219776110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Wen W, He Z, Gao F, Liu J, Jin H, Zhai S, et al. A high-density consensus map of common wheat integrating four mapping populations scanned by the 90K SNP array. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1389 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01389.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Tinker NA, Chao S, Lazo GR, Oliver RE, Huang YF, Poland JA, et al. Jackson EW (2014) a SNP genotyping array for hexaploid oat. Plant Genome. 2003;7(plantgenome2014):0010 https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2014.03.0010.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Elbasyoni IS, Lorenz AJ, Guttieri M, Frels K, Baenziger PS, Poland J, et al. A comparison between genotyping-by-sequencing and array-based scoring of SNPs for genomic prediction accuracy in winter wheat. Plant Sci. 2018;270:123–30 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.02.019.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Negro SS, Millet EJ, Madur D, Bauland C, Combes V, Welcker C, et al. Genotyping-by-sequencing and SNP-arrays are complementary for detecting quantitative trait loci by tagging different haplotypes in association studies. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19:318 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1926-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Sansaloni C, Franco J, Santos B, et al. Diversity analysis of 80,000 wheat accessions reveals consequences and opportunities of selection footprints. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4572 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18404-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Muqaddasi QH, Brassac J, Börner A, Pillen K, Röder MS. Genetic architecture of anther extrusion in spring and winter wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:754 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00754.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Dong H, Wang R, Yuan Y, Anderson J, Pumphrey M, Zhang Z, et al. Evaluation of the potential for genomic selection to improve spring wheat resistance to fusarium head blight in the Pacific northwest. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:911 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Flint-Garcia SA, Thornsberry JM, Buckler ES. Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:357–74 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Molero G, Joynson R, Pinera-Chavez FJ, Gardiner LJ, Rivera-Amado C, Hall A, et al. Elucidating the genetic basis of biomass accumulation and radiation use efficiency in spring wheat and its role in yield potential. Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17:1276–88 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Würschum T, Leiser WL, Longin CFH. Molecular genetic characterization and association mapping in spelt wheat. Plant Breed. 2017;136:214–23 https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Müller T, Schierscher-Viret B, Fossati D, Brabant C, Schori A, Keller B, et al. Unlocking the diversity of genebanks: whole-genome marker analysis of Swiss bread wheat and spelt. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131:407–16 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-017-3010-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Kihara H. Discovery of the DD-Analyser, one of the ancestors of Triticum vulgare. Agric Hortic. 1944;19:889–90.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Feldman M, Levy AA. Origin and evolution of wheat and related Triticeae species. In: Molnár-Láng M, Ceoloni C, Doležel J, editors. Alien introgression in wheat: cytogenetics, molecular biology, and genomics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 21–76.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wang W, Pan Q, Tian B, He F, Chen Y, Bai G, et al. Gene editing of the wheat homologs of TONNEAU 1-recruiting motif encoding gene affects grain shape and weight in wheat. Plant J. 2019;100:251–64 https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Yang J, Zhou Y, Wu Q, et al. Molecular characterization of a novel TaGL3-5A allele and its association with grain length in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2019b;132:1799–814 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03316-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wang S, Li S, Liu Q, et al. The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality. Nat Genet. 2015b;47:949–54 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.335.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wang Y, Xiong G, Hu J, et al. Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice. Nat Genet. 2015c;47:944–8 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3346.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Qi P, Lin Y-S, Song X-J, et al. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating cyclin-T1;3. Cell Res. 2012;22:1666–80 https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2012.151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Himi E, Nisar A, Noda K. Colour genes (R and Rc) for grain and coleoptile upregulate flavonoid biosynthesis genes in wheat. Genome. 2005;48:747–54 https://doi.org/10.1139/g05-026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Himi E, Maekawa M, Miura H, Noda K. Development of PCR markers for Tamyb10 related to R-1, red grain color gene in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122:1561–76 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-011-1555-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the High Throughput Sequencing Core hosted in the Biodiversity Research Center at Academia Sinica for performing the NGS experiments. We thank the GeneTech Biotech Company and Health GeneTech Corp. for the Illumina iSelect wheat 90 K SNP array processing.

Funding

This research work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan (MOST grant numbers 105–2321-B-002-039, 106–2321-B-002-014 and 108–2628-B-002-021). The funding body had no role in the design of this study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, 10617, Taiwan

    Chia-Hui Chou, Hsun-Shih Lin, Chen-Hsin Wen & Chih-Wei Tung

Authors
  1. Chia-Hui Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hsun-Shih Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chen-Hsin Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chih-Wei Tung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CHC, HSL and CWT conceived and designed the experiments; CHC, HSL, CHW and CWT optimized and performed the experiments; CHC and CWT analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chih-Wei Tung.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Fig. S1.

The distribution of 583 markers revealed inconsistent chromosomal assignments between the two genome assemblies. The left hemisphere colored light blue represents IWGSC RefSeq v2.1, and the right hemisphere colored pink indicates IWGSC RefSeq v1.0. The orientation in IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 is counterclockwise, and that in IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 is clockwise. Each line in the middle of the Circos plot connects the physical positions in the IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and v2.1 reference genomes of each marker. The colors of these lines are assigned according to which homoeologous group each marker belongs to in IWGSC RefSeq v1.0.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Fig. S2.

Distribution of markers with the same chromosomal assignment but different orientations or order between IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 and IWGSC RefSeq v2.1. The x axis indicates wheat chromosomes, and the y axis shows the physical position along the chromosome. The chromosomes of IWGSC RefSeq v1.0 are shown in black, and chromosomes of IWGSC RefSeq v2.1 are colored blue. The red line connects the physical positions of each marker between the two RefSeq assemblies.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Fig. S3.

PCA of 765 bread wheat accessions on the basis of 29,803 SNPs in the A, B, and D genomes. The proportion of the total variance explained by each PC is shown on the axis label. The color of each point indicates the subpopulation assigned based on an ADMXITURE analysis.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Fig. S4.

Genome-wide scan for selection signal between two subpopulations, Pop1 and Pop2. The points colored blue indicate outliers detected according to a significance threshold of a FDR < 0.05.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Fig. S5.

LD in subpopulations Pop1 and Pop2. (a) LD decay at the whole-genome level. (b) LD decay of subgenome A. (c) LD decay of subgenome B. (d) LD decay of subgenome D. The physical distance (in megabases) is plotted against the LD estimate (r2) for pairs of markers.

Additional file 6: Supplementary Fig. S6.

Genome-wide association mapping for grain width. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and grain width.

Additional file 7: Supplementary Fig. S7.

Genome-wide association mapping for the grain perimeter. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and grain perimeter.

Additional file 8: Supplementary Fig. S8.

Genome-wide association mapping for grain area. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and grain area.

Additional file 9: Supplementary Fig. S9.

Genome-wide association mapping for color channel 1. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and color channel 1.

Additional file 10: Supplementary Fig. S10.

Genome-wide association mapping for color channel 2. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and color channel 2.

Additional file 11: Supplementary Fig. S11.

Genome-wide association mapping for color channel 3. Manhattan plots of the four models (GLM, GLM_PC, MLM, MLM_PC) and associated quantile-quantile (Q-Q) plots representing the statistical association between each SNP and color channel 3.

Additional file 12: Supplementary Fig. S12.

Phenotypic distribution of six grain traits and correlation analysis.

Additional file 13: Supplementary Fig. S13.

LD heatmap of the grain color locus. The pairwise LD of significant SNPs associated with three color channels on chromosome 3B was calculated and plotted. The position of significant SNPs and Tamyb10-B1 gene was labeled.

Additional file 14.

Additional file 15.

Additional file 16.

Additional file 17.

Additional file 18.

Additional file 19.

Additional file 20.

Additional file 21.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chou, CH., Lin, HS., Wen, CH. et al. Patterns of genetic variation and QTLs controlling grain traits in a collection of global wheat germplasm revealed by high-quality SNP markers. BMC Plant Biol 22, 455 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03844-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03844-x

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us