Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular cytogenetics and development of St-chromosome-specific molecular markers of novel stripe rust resistant wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium and wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum substitution lines

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 111 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Owing to their excellent resistance to abiotic and biotic stress, Thinopyrum intermedium (2n = 6x = 42, JJJsJsStSt) and Th. ponticum (2n = 10x = 70) are both widely utilized in wheat germplasm innovation programs. Disomic substitution lines (DSLs) carrying one pair of alien chromosomes are valuable bridge materials for transmission of novel genes, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) karyotype construction and specific molecular marker development.

Results

Six wheat–Thinopyrum DSLs derived from crosses between Abbondanza nullisomic lines (2n = 40) and two octoploid Trititrigia lines (2n = 8x = 56), were characterized by sequential FISH–genome in situ hybridization (GISH), multicolor GISH (mc-GISH), and an analysis of the wheat 15 K SNP array combined with molecular marker selection. ES-9 (DS2St (2A)) and ES-10 (DS3St (3D)) are wheat–Th. ponticum DSLs, while ES-23 (DS2St (2A)), ES-24 (DS3St (3D)), ES-25(DS2St (2B)), and ES-26 (DS2St (2D)) are wheat–Th. intermedium DSLs. ES-9, ES-23, ES-25 and ES-26 conferred high thousand-kernel weight and stripe rust resistance at adult stages, while ES-10 and ES-24 were highly resistant to stripe rust at all stages. Furthermore, cytological analysis showed that the alien chromosomes belonging to the same homoeologous group (2 or 3) derived from different donors carried the same FISH karyotype and could form a bivalent. Based on specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq), two 2St-chromosome-specific markers (PTH-005 and PTH-013) and two 3St-chromosome-specific markers (PTH-113 and PTH-135) were developed.

Conclusions

The six wheat–Thinopyrum DSLs conferring stripe rust resistance can be used as bridging parents for transmission of valuable resistance genes. The utility of PTH-113 and PTH-135 in a BC1F2 population showed that the newly developed markers could be useful tools for efficient identification of St chromosomes in a common wheat background.

Peer Review reports

Background

Intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium Barkworth & D.R. Dewey, JJJsJsStSt, 2n = 6x = 42) and tall wheatgrass (Th. ponticum (Podp.) Barkworth & D. R. Dewey, 2n = 10x = 70) are important allopolyploids of Thinopyrum species. Because of their desirable tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses, both have been widely used in wheat chromosome engineering for decades [1, 2]. The chromosomal composition of Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum have not been fully characterized. For Th. intermedium, the chromosomal composition is generally regarded as JJJsJsStSt [3] or JrJrJvsJvsStSt [4]. The subgenome J or Jr is highly homologous with genome J (Th. bessarabicum, Jb, Eb)/E (Th. elongatum, Je, Ee) [5], and the main controversy has been whether genome V originating from Dasypyrum villosum (2n = 2x = 14, VV) was involved in the recombinant subgenome Js [6, 7]. Additionally, it was determined that Th. intermedium contained a set of St chromosomes probably derived from diploid Pseudoroegneria spicata or P. strigosa (2n = 2x = 14, StSt) [8,9,10]. However, it is still unclear whether Th. ponticum contains St chromosomes and if the St genome or the J/E genome were affected by recombination during the allopolyploidization process [11, 12].

Although aspects of the Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum genomes remain undiscovered, numerous partial amphiploid lines have been successfully developed [13,14,15,16,17,18]. Octoploid Trititrigia with advantageous traits is a significant cytogenetic resource for developing alien introgression lines that can be further applied to wheat breeding programs [19,20,21,22,23]. Generally, octoploid Trititrigia lines carry a synthetic genome inherited from Th. intermedium or Th. ponticum. Therefore, the chromosomal compositions of Thinopyrum allopolyploids can be understood according to the defined genome compositions of partial amphiploids based on molecular cytogenetic methods. TAF46 is an important wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid with a common wheat Vilmorin 27 background, and six disomic addition lines (DALs), L1, L2, L3, L4, L5 and L7, were developed from TAF46 [24]. Subsequently, molecular cytogenetic identification of TAF46 as well as the six derived DALs revealed that the genome composition of TAF46 was 14A + 14B + 14D + 2(1 J) + 2(2St) + 2(3 J) + 2(4St) + 2(5 J) + 2(6St) + 2(7 J) [25,26,27], which suggested that chromosomes of the St genome contained in Th. intermedium could be stably inherited, and that it is feasible to introduce the St chromosomes into a common wheat background for wheat genetic improvement.

Stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici, Pst) is a recurrent disease that causes serious annual decreases in wheat yields [28, 29]. Development and transfer of novel resistance genes contained in related wild wheat species is one of the most efficient and environmentally-friendly approaches to fighting stripe rust. According to previous studies, St chromosomes originating from Th. intermedium carry several new stripe rust resistance genes, which are potentially optimal genetic resources for wheat breeding. In addition to the named wheat–Th. intermedium DALs, L4 (DA4St) and L7 (DA6St), a DS1St (1D) with stripe rust resistance was produced [30]. Moreover, a DA3St [31] and a DA7St [32] were characterized, both carrying stripe rust resistance gene(s). In our previous study, ES-12 (DS3St (3D)) containing chromosome 3St derived from Th. ponticum also conferred stripe rust resistance [33]. However, at present no wheat–Thinopyrum 2St disomic substitution lines (DSLs) with stripe rust resistance have been reported.

Xiaoyan784 and Zhong4 are both significant octoploid Trititrigia lines conferring stripe rust resistance. Xiaoyan784 (2n = 8x = 56) was produced from distant hybridization between common wheat and Th. ponticum [34], while Zhong4 (2n = 8x = 56) was developed from distant hybridization between common wheat and Th. intermedium by Sun in 1965 [35]. Abbondanza nullisomic lines (2n = 40) were developed by Xue in 1991, and have been used as valuable plant materials to efficiently create substitution alien lines for several decades [36]. In the present study, four wheat–Th. intermedium DSLs, ES-22, ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26, were generated from crosses between Abbondanza nullisomic lines and Zhong4 with consecutive self-crosses for several years. Two wheat–Th. ponticum DSLs, ES-9 and ES-10, were derived from Xiaoyan784.Molecular cytogenetic analysis was used to determine and compare the genome compositions of the six alien lines. In addition, stripe rust resistance and potential value of the morphological characteristics for wheat breeding were evaluated. Finally, St-chromosome-specific markers were developed by specific-locus amplified fragment sequencing (SLAF-seq) and validated. These markers could be useful tools for efficient identification of St chromosomes in a common wheat background.

Results

In situ hybridization of the six substitution lines

Alien chromosomes derived from Th. ponticum or Th. intermedium were traced using GISH analysis of somatic cells. All six alien lines, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, and ES-26 contained 42 chromosomes (Fig. 1 and Fig S1). ES-9 and ES-10 both carried two Th. ponticum chromosomes with a bright-green hybridization signal based on using the Th. ponticum genome DNA as a probe (Fig. 1, a1 and a2). Whereas ES-23 (Fig. 1, a3), ES-24 (Fig. 1, a4), ES-25 (Fig. 1, a5), and ES-26 (Fig. 1, a6), carried two Th. intermedium chromosomes with a bright-green hybridization signal, based on the GISH probe of Th. intermedium. Therefore, ES-9 and ES-10 were wheat–Th. ponticum DSLs, and ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, and ES-26 were wheat–Th. intermedium DSLs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

In situ hybridization patterns of the six alien substitution lines. a GISH patterns of ES-9 (a1) and ES-10 (a2): Th. ponticum genomic DNA (green) as probe and CS genomic DNA as a blocker; GISH patterns of ES-23 (a3), ES-24 (a4), ES-25 (a5), and ES-26 (a6): Th. intermedium genomic DNA (green) as probe and CS genomic DNA as a blocker. b FISH patterns of ES-9 (b1), ES-10 (b2), ES-23 (b3), ES-24 (b4), ES-25 (b5), and ES-26 (b6): Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) and Oligo-pTa535 (red) as probes. c Mc-GISH patterns of ES-9 (c1) and ES-10 (c2): Th. bessarabicum (J) genomic DNA (green) and tetraploid P. spicata (St) genomic DNA (red) as probes, CS genomic DNA as a blocker; ES-23 (c3), ES-24 (c4), ES-25 (c5), and ES-26 (c6): Th. bessarabicum (J) genomic DNA (green) and diploid P. spicata (St) genomic DNA (red) as probes, CS genomic DNA as a blocker. The arrows indicate the alien chromosomes of the six substitution lines

Full size image

Two oligonucleotide probes of pTa535 and pSc119.2 were combined for sequential FISH–GISH to simultaneously examine the elimination of wheat chromosomes in the six substitution lines. Comparisons of the FISH results between substitution lines and the corresponding parent lines, Abbondanza, Zhong4, and Xiaoyan784, were conducted. Chromosome 2A was eliminated in ES-9 and substituted by one pair of Th. ponticum chromosomes with three specific signal bands, including the terminal pTa535 hybridization sites detected on short arms and long arms as well as an interstitial pTa535 signal on the long arms, which was different from the FISH patterns of other wheat chromosomes (Fig. 1, b1). ES-10 lost chromosome 3D and contained one pair of Th. ponticum chromosomes carrying terminal pSc119.2 hybridization sites on short arms with terminal pTa535 hybridization segments both on the long arms and short arms (Fig. 1, b2). Wheat chromosomes 2A, 2B, and 2D were eliminated in ES-23 (Fig. 1, b3), ES-25 (Fig. 1, b5), and ES-26 (Fig. 1, b6), respectively, and replaced by the same pair of Th. intermedium chromosomes with identical FISH patterns to that detected in ES-9. Moreover, the telomeric region of chromosome 5B carrying a bright-green fluorescence signal was eliminated in ES-25 compared with other related materials. For ES-24, chromosome 3D was substituted by a pair of Th. intermedium chromosomes with the FISH patterns almost consistent with the alien chromosomes detected in ES-10 (Fig. 1, b4).

According to the multicolor GISH (mc-GISH) results, each of the six derived lines contained two alien chromosomes carrying a bright-red fluorescence signal originating from the P. spicata (St) genome DNA (Fig. 1, c1-c6). Combined with the sequential FISH-GISH analyses results, ES-9 and ES-10 carried two different pairs of St chromosomes derived from Th. ponticum. ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26 contained the same pair of St chromosomes from Th. intermedium which was different from the alien chromosomes of ES-24.

Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of the six substitution lines

The chromosomal compositions of the six substitution lines were further determined based on genotype data using a wheat 15 K SNP array (Table S1). Generally, compared with Th. ponticum or Th. intermedium, the number of common SNP sequences detected between the substitution lines and Abbondanza was much higher. However, an obvious point of intersection was found in each of the substitution lines (Fig. 2a-f). For ES-9 (Fig. 2a), the intersection point was distinct in chromosome 2A, and ES-9 had mostly the same SNP marker loci as Th. ponticum but few SNP marker loci as Abbondanza. These results suggested that chromosome 2A in ES-9 was replaced by the alien chromosomes of Th. ponticum, which was consistent with the FISH result. In ES-10 (Fig. 2b), the intersection point was detected in chromosome 3D, and ES-10 had mostly the same SNP marker loci as Th. ponticum but shared few SNP marker loci with Abbondanza, suggesting that chromosome 3D of ES-10 was substituted by the pair of Th. ponticum chromosomes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of the six alien substitution lines. a Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-9. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 2A. b Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-10. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 3D. c Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-23. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 2A. d Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-24. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 3D. e Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-25. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 2B. f Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis of ES-26. Obvious crossing points were detected in terms of the position of chromosomes 2D

Full size image

In terms of the wheat–Th. intermedium alien lines, the intersection point was detected in chromosome 3D of ES-24, and ES-24 had mostly the same SNP marker loci as Th. intermedium. Thus, chromosome 3D of ES-24 was replaced by the pair of Th. intermedium chromosomes (Fig. 2d). The intersection points of ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26 were respectively identified in chromosomes 2A (Fig. 2c), 2B (Fig. 2e), and 2D (Fig. 2f). Combined with the FISH results, it was revealed that chromosome 2A in ES-23, chromosome 2B in ES-25, and chromosome 2D in ES-26 were substituted by the same pair of Th. intermedium chromosomes.

PLUG marker analysis of the six substitution lines

The 135 PLUG markers were screened to validate the homoeologous groups for the alien chromosomes. Four PLUG markers (TNAC1142-HaeIII, TNAC1142-TaqI, TNAC1132-TaqI, and TNAC1140-TaqI) were mapped to the second homoeologous group in ES-9, ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26 (Fig. 3a-d, Table S2 and Fig. S2). Three pairs of primers (TNAC1326-HaeIII, TNAC1326-TaqI, and TNAC1359-TaqI) were distributed in the third homoeologous group in ES-10 and ES-24 (Fig. 3e-g, Table S2 and Fig. S2). Combined with the mc-GISH results of each substitution line, the 2St-chromosome-specific bands could be amplified in ES-9, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, Th. intermedium, and Th. ponticum. 3St-chromosome-specific bands were identified in ES-10, ES-24, Th. intermedium, and Th. ponticum. The above polymorphic bands could not be amplified in Abbondanza.

Fig. 3
figure 3

PLUG markers analysis of Abbondanza, the six alien substitution lines, Th. intermedium, and Th. ponticum. aTNAC1142-HaeIII; bTNAC1142-TaqI; cTNAC1132-TaqI; dTNAC1140-TaqI; eTNAC1326-HaeIII; fTNAC1326-TaqI; gTNAC1359-TaqI. Lane M: DL2000; lane 1: Abbondanza; lane 2: ES-9; lane 3: ES-23; lane 4: ES-25; lane 5: ES-26; lane 6: ES-10; lane 7: ES-24; lane 8: Th. intermedium; lane 9: Th. ponticum. The * indicates specific band of Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium 

Full size image

Based on chromosomal composition analysis (Fig. 4 and Fig. S3), the genome composition of ES-25 (Fig. 4a) was 14A + 12B + 14D + 2(2St), and ES-26 (Fig. 4b) was 14A + 14B + 12D + 2(2St). ES-23 and ES-9 had the same genome composition of 12A + 14B + 14D + 2(2St), while ES-24 and ES-10 had the same genome composition of 14A + 14B + 12D + 2(3St). Remarkably, the alien chromosomes contained in ES-23 (Fig. 4c) and ES-24 (Fig. 4d) were derived from Th. intermedium, while the alien chromosomes carried by ES-9 (Fig. 4e) and ES-10 (Fig. 4f) were derived from Th. ponticum. Although the alien chromosomes belonging to the same homoeologous groups were derived from two different donors, identical FISH karyotypes of the alien chromosomes were detected between ES-23 and ES-9 (2St), as well as ES-24 and ES-10 (3St). Additionally, FISH result of Abbondanza was shown in Fig. 4g, and the FISH pattern comparisons of above materials were shown in Fig. 4h. Notably, ES-10 has a similar chromosome composition to our previously reported ES-12 [33], but the common wheat background is different in the FISH karyotype (as shown in Figs. S3 and S4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Karyotypes of the six alien substitution lines with genomic composition variations. a Karyotype analysis of ES-25. Wheat chromosomes 2B were replaced by Thinopyrum intermedium chromosomes 2St. b Karyotype analysis of ES-26. Wheat chromosomes 2D were replaced by Th. intermedium chromosomes 2St. c Karyotype analysis of ES-23. Wheat chromosomes 2A were replaced by Th. ponticum chromosomes 2St. d Karyotype analysis of ES-24. Wheat chromosomes 3D were replaced by Th. intermedium chromosomes 3St. e Karyotype analysis of ES-9. Wheat chromosomes 2A were replaced by Th. intermedium chromosomes 2St. f Karyotype analysis of ES-10. Wheat chromosomes 3D were replaced by Th. intermedium chromosomes 3St. g FISH analysis of Abbondanza. h FISH pattern comparisons of chromosomes 2St, chromosomes 3St, chromosomes 5B, and chromosomes 2B between the six alien substitution lines and their parent lines Abbondanza, Xiaoyan784, and Zhong4. The telomeric region of chromosome 5BS carrying a bright-green fluorescence signal was eliminated in ES-25. Chromosomes 2B are metacentric in all the above-mentioned materials except ES-25

Full size image

Evaluation of agricultural performance and resistance to stripe rust of the six substitution lines

The agronomic traits of the six substitution lines as well as their parents Abbondanza and Xiaoyan784 (Table 1; Fig. 5) or Zhong4 (Table 2; Fig. 5) were compared. On average, the tiller number of ES-9 was higher and the spikes were longer than Abbondanza. In terms of the substitution lines derived from Zhong4, both ES-23 and ES-26 showed many more tillers, and the number of spikelets per spike in ES-26 was higher than Abbondanza and Zhong4. Surprisingly, the average thousand-kernel weights of the alien lines containing chromosome 2St (ES-9, ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26) were more than 43 g. This indicated that chromosome 2St increased thousand-kernel weight whether originating from Th. ponticum or Th. intermedium.

Table 1 Agronomic traits of the alien substitution lines ES-9, ES-10, as well as their parents (Abbondanza, Xiaoyan784)
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Evaluation of agronomic traits and stripe rust resistance. a Adult plants; b seeds; c symptoms in response to inoculation with the mixture of Pst races at the adult stage; d seedling stage reactions to Pst race CYR32. (1) Huixianhong; (2) Abbondanza; (3) ES-9; (4) ES-23; (5) ES-25; (6) ES-26; (7) ES-10; (8) ES-24; (9) Xiaoyan784; (10) Zhong4; (11) Th. ponticum; (12) Th. intermedium

Full size image
Table 2 Agronomic traits of the substitution lines ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, as well as their parents (Abbondanza and Zhong4)
Full size table

At the adult stage, a stripe rust reaction test of the six substitution lines was carried out with the susceptible control (HXH). Sequentially, the infection type (IT) scores of the six substitution lines, Abbondanza, Xiaoyan784, Zhong4, as well as Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium were recorded under field conditions. The IT scores of the above-mentioned materials were as follows: Th. ponticum, IT = 0; Th. intermedium, IT = 0; Xiaoyan784, IT = 0; Zhong4, IT = 0; ES-9, IT = 1; ES-10, IT = 0; ES-23, IT = 1; ES-24, IT = 0; ES-25, IT = 1; ES-26, IT = 1; Abbondanza, IT = 3; HXH, IT = 4 (Fig. 5c). Furthermore, stripe rust infection of the seedling stage was conducted in the greenhouse, and the IT scores were recorded at 24 days post-inoculation (Fig. 5d). With an IT score of 0, Zhong4 and Xiaoyan784 were immune to the disease. Additionally, ES-10 and ES-24 were nearly immune (IT scores of 1). In contrast, Abbondanza, ES-9, ES-23, ES-25, and ES-26 were susceptible (IT scores of 3). The results suggested that chromosome 2St originating from Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium both conferred resistance to stripe rust at the adult stage, while chromosome 3St of Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium both carried remarkable resistance at all stages.

Meiotic chromosome pairing analysis of F1 hybrids

Crosses were made between the alien lines with the same genome compositions. Fifteen F1 plants were obtained from the cross between ES-9 and ES-23, and 11 F1 plants were obtained from the cross between ES-10 and ES-24. Meiotic chromosome pairing analysis of the F1 hybrids was conducted to further validate the related genome constitution (Table 3). Mostly, the alien chromosomes derived from Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum but belonging to the same homoeologous group (2/3) could form a bivalent at metaphase I, and no trivalent or quadrivalent was observed at meiosis anaphase I. These results further revealed the close homoeologous relationship between the alien chromosomes derived from the two different donors.

Table 3 Chromosome pairing in the meiotic and meiotic phases for the hybrid F1 individuals
Full size table

Comparisons of genomic polymorphism analyses and St-chromosomes-specific molecular markers development

After high-throughput sequencing, a SLAF library was constructed with the sequencing details (Table S3). A total of 1,055,234 (ES-9), 938,861 (ES-10), 524,288 (ES-23), 1,026,271 (ES-24), 974,634 (Abbondanza), 572,791 (Th. intermedium), and 513,056 (Th. ponticum) SLAFs were obtained. By bioinformatics analysis, 3,203 (ES-9), 4,455 (ES-23), 2,775 (ES-10), and 3,148 (ES-24) specific sequences were selected for further sequence alignments. There were 78 out of 263 sequences from ES-24 with homology of more than 90% with ES-10 (78/153). In addition, 114 out of 221 sequences from ES-23 were more than 90% homologous with ES-9 (114/177). To some degree, these results revealed the possible genomic similarity between the alien chromosomes of Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum.

According to the above sequence alignment results, 110 SLAFs from ES-23 regarded as 2St chromosome-specific fragments and 73 SLAFs from ES-24 regarded as 3St chromosome-specific fragments were selected. Subsequently, 183 pairs of primers were designed to amplify fragments from CS, Abbondanza, Zhong4, Xiaoyan784, ES-9, ES-23, ES-10, and ES-24. Specificity of the primers was further confirmed by analysis of Th. ponticum, Th. intermedium, tetraploid P. spicata, diploid P. spicata, Th. bessarabicum, Th. elongatum, and the wheat–Th. intermedium 1-7St addition line. In total, two 2St-chromosome-specific molecular markers, PTH-005 and PTH-013, and two 3St-chromosome-specific molecular markers, PTH-113 and PTH-135, were developed (Fig. 6, Table 4 and Fig. S5).

Table 4 Specific amplification markers of chromosome 2St and chromosome 3St
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Specific amplification markers of chromosome 2St (a and b) and chromosome 3St (c and d). a PTH-005; b PTH-013; c PTH-113; d PTH-135. Lane M: DL2000; lane 1: Chinese Spring; lane 2: Abbondanza; lane 3: Th. ponticum; lane 4: Th. intermedium; lane 5: tetraploid P. spicata; lane 6: diploid P. spicata; lane 7: Th. bessarabicum; lane 8: Th. elongatum; lane 9–15: wheat–Th. intermedium disomic addition lines (DALs), DA1St, DA2St; DA3St; DA4St; DA5St; DA6St; DA7St; lane 16: ES-9 (a and b), ES-10 (c and d); lane 17: ES-23 (a and b), ES-24 (c and d)

Full size image

Utility of the 3St-chromosome-specific markers in a BC1F2 population

In order to validate that the stripe rust resistance gene(s) at all stages were carried by chromosome 3St, 60 BC1F2 individuals of ES-24 and HXH were used for a genetic analysis. The evaluation of stripe rust resistance at the seedling stage revealed that Zhong4, ES-24, and the 33 F2 individuals were highly resistant to Pst race CYR32 (Fig. 7a). Subsequently, ten resistant F2 individuals as well as ten susceptible individuals were randomly selected for FISH analysis. Compared with the FISH karyotype of ES-24, susceptible individuals had undetectable FISH patterns of chromosome 3St (Fig. 7b), while chromosome 3St was detected in all the resistant individuals (Fig. 7c). These results demonstrated that the novel stripe rust resistant gene(s) originated from the alien chromosome 3St of Th. intermedium.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Stripe rust resistance evaluation and FISH analysis in BC1F2 individuals of ES-24 and Huixianhong (HXH). a Reactions to inoculation with the Pst race CYR32 of the BC1F2 individuals at the seedling stage; b FISH patterns of susceptible BC1F2 individuals; c FISH patterns of resistant BC1F2 individuals. (1) HXH; (2)-(4) susceptible BC1F2 individuals; (5)-(7) resistant BC1F2 individuals; (8) Zhong4; (9) ES-24. The arrow indicates the chromosome 3St of Th. intermedium

Full size image

Furthermore, the specificity of PTH-113 and PTH-135 was confirmed by PCR analyses of the 60 BC1F2 individuals (Fig. 8 and Fig. S6). Combined with the result of seedling stage stripe rust resistance evaluation, Xiaoyan784, Zhong4, ES-9, ES-24, and the 33 BC1F2 plants conferring strong resistance to Pst race CYR32 also carried 3St chromosome-specific markers. In contrast, the other 27 BC1F2 plants, the parental line Abbondanza, and susceptible control HXH, without specific amplification, were seriously susceptible to Pst race CYR32. Hence, the new developed chromosome-specific molecular markers could be used to rapidly trace the alien chromosome 3St in a common wheat background.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Utility of newly developed 3St-chromosome-specific markers in 60 BC1F2 individuals of ES-24 and HXH. a PTH-113; b PTH-135. Lane M: DL2000; lane 1: Chinese Spring; lane 2: Abbondanza; lane 3: HXH; lane 4: Xiaoyan784 (wheat–Th. ponticum partial amphiploid with stripe rust); lane 5: Zhong4 (wheat–Th. intermedium partial amphiploid with stripe rust); lane 6: ES-10; lane 7: ES-24; lane 8–67: 60 BC1F2 individuals

Full size image

Discussion

Chromosome manipulation for distant hybridization has been widely utilized for wheat improvement programs, especially for breeding novel disease-resistant wheat lines. Over the past few decades, numerous disease-resistance genes carried by wild species related to wheat have been successfully transferred to a common wheat background by developing introgression lines [37,38,39,40,41,42]. DSLs containing one pair of alien chromosomes with desirable resistance genes are vital bridge materials for small segments of introgression [43,44,45], and serve as valuable germplasm resources for wheat disease-resistance breeding. In the current study, six stable wheat–Thinopyrum derived lines were developed using a nullisomic backcross method. Molecular cytogenetic analysis confirmed that ES-23 (DS2St (2A)), ES-24 (DS3St (3D)), ES-25 (DS2St (2B)) and ES-26 (DS2St (2D)) are wheat–Th. intermedium DSLs, while ES-9 (DS2St (2A)) and ES-10 (DS3St (3D)) are wheat–Th. ponticum DSLs. The four alien lines, ES-9, ES-23, ES-25 and ES-26 carrying chromosome 2St conferred higher thousand-kernel weight and stripe rust resistance at adult stages, while ES-10 and ES-24 both containing chromosome 3St were highly resistant to stripe rust at all stages. Therefore, all six substitution lines may serve as novel resistant germplasms for wheat breeding.

One of the most commonly used techniques, FISH analysis, is generally used with GISH to discriminate alien chromosomes [33, 46] and to detect genomic changes in specific regions [47,48,49]. In this study, after characterization by sequential FISH–GISH and mc-GISH analysis, specific karyotype patterns of chromosomes 2St and 3St derived from Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum were elucidated, which is useful for rapidly identifying the alien chromosomes in germplasm materials. Furthermore, chromosomal structure variation was observed in ES-25 when distant hybridization was detected by FISH. Compared with the parental lines, Abbondanza and Zhong4, the telomere with the subtelomeric region of chromosome 5BS carrying a blight pSc119.2 hybridization signal was eliminated in ES-25, resulting in a similar FISH pattern to chromosome 2B of common wheat. Chromosome 2B is almost metacentric whereas chromosome 5B is fully submetacentric, so it was clear that chromosome 2B was replaced by chromosome 2St of Th. intermedium (Fig. 4h). Due to the dynamic and high frequency variation of subtelomeres in Triticeae species [50, 51], it is difficult to identify the possible function(s) of the deleted regions of chromosome 5BS. Because there were no severe effects on viability of ES-25, elimination of the subtelomeric region presumably contributed to genome diversity [52].

The genomic composition of Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium has been an interesting subject for many years [53, 54]. During the past several decades, it was determined that the set of St chromosomes contained in Th. intermedium were probably derived from P. spicata [55], whereas it was unclear whether the St genome is one of the sets of chromosomes of Th. ponticum [11, 56]. According to molecular cytogenetic identification results, ES-23 and ES-9 (group 1) contained the same genome composition of 12A + 14B + 14D + 2(2St), while ES-24 and ES-10 (group 2) had the same genome composition of 14A + 14B + 12D + 2(3St). Although the alien chromosomes were derived from two different donors, Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum, identical alien chromosome FISH patterns and similar specific agricultural performances were identified in each group of plant materials. This implies that St chromosomes were included in Th. ponticum, and could be stably inherited with desirable genes. Furthermore, combined with the close homoeologous relationships between the alien chromosomes analyzed by meiotic chromosome pairing and genomic polymorphism, P. spicata was identified to represent the complete set of St chromosomes that function directly during the speciation of Th. ponticum. However, further analyses are needed to determine the effects of the recombination events that occurred between diverse genomes through the allopolyploidization. In summary, based on the specific SLAFs obtained in this study, it was feasible for us to develop transferable St-chromosome-specific molecular markers from Th. intermedium to Th. ponticum.

Although FISH–GISH analysis has been widely utilized to precisely characterize wheat–Th. intermedium lines for several decades, it is very time-consuming. Specific molecular markers can rapidly trace alien chromosomes or even small segment introgression with advantageous traits for wheat improvement breeding programs. However, the complete Th. intermedium genome has not been sequenced, so only a few chromosome-specific markers are available [57,58,59]. With the development of sequencing technology, the first consensus genetic map of Th. intermedium was developed by genotyping-by-sequencing [60]. Subsequently, 635 [9] and 745 [61] unique Th. intermedium SNP markers have been successfully developed, including 225 St-chromosome-specific markers, with 27 2St-chromosome-specific markers and 25 3St-chromosome-specific markers. Due to the much more complex genomic composition of Th. ponticum, molecular marker development work is mainly focused on genome E [56, 62, 63], especially following publication of the complete genome of Th. elongatum [64].

In the present study, the wheat–Th. intermedium DSLs, ES-23(DS2St (2A)) and ES-24(DS3St (3D)) were sequenced by SLAF-seq for further St-chromosome-specific marker development. Two 2St-chromosome-specific molecular markers, PTH-005 and PTH-013, as well as two 3St-chromosome-specific molecular markers, PTH-113 and PTH-135, were obtained. FISH analysis of the BC1F2 population of ES-24 and HXH combined with a stripe rust resistance test (Fig. 7) confirmed that the stripe rust resistance gene(s) was (were) derived from chromosome 3St of Th. intermedium. The utility of PTH-113 and PTH-135 amplification in the BC1F2 individuals indicated that the St-chromosome-specific molecular markers can serve as useful tools for tracing chromosome 3St of Th. intermedium in a common wheat background. In addition, according to the close genetic relationship between the alien chromosomes of Th. ponticum and Th. intermedium analyzed in this study, the four St-chromosome-specific markers could be simultaneously amplified in Th. ponticum, tetraploid P. spicata, Th. intermedium, and diploid P. spicata, as well as the corresponding substitution lines, ES-9, ES-23, ES-10, and ES-24. These results suggested that the four St-chromosome-specific markers could also be utilized to rapidly detect the St genome chromosomes of Th. ponticum. The remarkable stripe rust resistance of ES-24 and ES-10 thus probably originated from the same gene(s), but this needs to be validated in future genetic analyses.

Conclusions

Four wheat–Th. intermedium and two wheat–Th. ponticum DSLs conferring stripe rust resistance were characterized and compared by molecular cytogenetic analysis, and can be used as bridging parents for transmission of valuable resistance genes. Furthermore, according to the related homoeologous relationships, two 2St-chromosome-specific and two 3St-chromsome-specific molecular markers were developed by SLAF-seq for rapidly detecting the alien chromosomes of Th. intermedium and Th. ponticum in a common wheat background.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The plant materials included Th. intermedium (2n = 6x = 42, JJJsJsStSt), Th. ponticum (2n = 10x = 70), diploid P. spicata (2n = 2x = 14, StSt), tetraploid P. spicata (2n = 4x = 28, StStStSt), Th. bessarabicum (2n = 2x = 14, JJ), Th. elongatum (2n = 2x = 14, EE), wheat cv. Chinese Spring (CS), the Abbondanza lines, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, Zhong4, and Xiaoyan784, as well as two wheat–Th. intermedium disomic addition lines (DALs), L4 (DA4St) and L7 (DA6St). Twenty-six F1 hybrids were obtained from two cross combinations, ES-9 × ES-23 (15 plants), and ES-10 × ES-24 (11 plants). The BC1F2 population comprising 60 individuals was derived from ES-24 and the wheat landrace Huixianhong (HXH). Five wheat–Th. intermedium DALs were developed via hybridization between Abbondanza nullisomic lines and Zhong4, including DA1St, DA2St, DA3St, DA5St, and DA7St (unpublished data). All the above-mentioned plant materials were preserved at the College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, China. HXH served as a susceptible control in the stripe rust resistance evaluation. The Pst race CYR32 was used for seedling stage of stripe rust resistance evaluation, and the CYR31 and CYR32 mixture was used for adult stage evaluation. All the Pst races were provided by the College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, China.

In situ hybridization

Chromosome spreads by the drop method [14] were used for in situ hybridization analyses. The protocols of genomic DNA extraction, sequential FISH–GISH, and mc-GISH were based on Wang et al. [33]. According to the nick translation method, total genomic DNA of Th. bessarabicum, Th. intermedium, and Th. ponticum was labeled with fluorescein-12-dUTP, while St genomic DNA from diploid and tetraploid P. spicata was labeled with Texas Red-5-Dutp, and used as GISH and mc-GISH probes. The sheared DNA of CS was used as a blocking DNA. The oligonucleotide probes combination of Oligo-pTa535 (red) and Oligo-pSc119.2 (green) were used for FISH analyses. Hybridization signals were observed and acquired with an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope.

Wheat 15 K SNP array analysis

Wheat 15 K SNP genotyping arrays were used to genotype nine samples, including Abbondanza, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, Th. ponticum, and Th. intermedium, using Illumina SNP genotyping technology (China Golden Marker Biotechnology Company). There were 13,199 SNP loci contained in the wheat 15 K array and distributed on all 21 wheat chromosomes. Percentages of the same genotypes in each chromosome between two materials were obtained by calculating the rate of the same genotype loci number in total number of markers. The software Origin (OriginLab, USA) was used for data analysis and graphing.

PLUG markers analysis

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR)–based landmark unique gene (PLUG) markers (http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/SNP/new/pcr_primers.shtml) were selected for 21 wheat chromosomes among homoeologous groups 1 to 7 and then synthesized by AuGCT DNA-SYN Biotechnology Co. (Beijing, China). PCR assays and electrophoresis procedures were conducted as described before [65].

Agronomic traits and stripe rust resistance evaluation

The stripe rust resistance evaluation was conducted annually in the field at the adult stage, while the seedling stage test was conducted in the greenhouse in 2020 and 2021. In 2020, a mixture of Pst races CYR31 and CYR32 was used to evaluate the adult plant resistance of Abbondanza, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, Xiaoyan784, and Zhong4, with HXH as susceptible control. Ten plants of each material were evaluated and scored. For further genetic analyses of the resistance, Pst race CYR32 was used to inoculate the above-mentioned materials at the seedling stage in 2020 and 2021 with two replicates (five plants of each material were planted and evaluated as one replicate), while the BC1F2 population individuals of ES-24 and HXH were tested in 2021 with no replication. The infection type (IT) was scored with a scale of 0–4 [66].

To assess the morphological traits, ten plants of each material (Abbondanza, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, ES-25, ES-26, Xiaoyan784, and Zhong4) at the physiological maturity stage were randomly selected during the 2019–2020 growing season. Seven agronomic traits recorded in the field, including plant height, spike length (main spike), number of spikelets per main spike, number of tillers, number of seeds per main spikelets, awnedness, and thousand-kernel weight. The significant differences of each agronomic trait were analyzed by Duncan’s multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Meiotic chromosome pairing analysis of the F1 hybrids

Young spikes of F1 hybrids derived from the two crosses (ES-9 × ES-23 and ES-10 × ES-24) at appropriate stages were extracted at the suitable temperature under field conditions, and immediately treated with Carnoy’s fixative fluid II (6:3:1 ethanol-chloroform-glacial acetic acid solution). Before cytological observation of pollen mother cells, anthers were extracted and stained with 1% acetocarmine. The chromosome configurations in the meiosis period were observed, recorded and photographed.

Genomic polymorphism analysis by pairwise comparisons

On the basis of SLAF-seq [67], genomic DNA of Abbondanza, ES-9, ES-10, ES-23, ES-24, Th. intermedium, and Th. ponticum was sequencedby Biomarker Technologies Co. (Beijing, China). The restriction endonuclease HaeIII was selected to digest the genomic DNA. According to the sequence similarity, the filtered SLAF pair-end reads (150 bp per read) were clustered. Using BLAST software, sequences with over 90% identity were divided into one SLAF locus. Genomic polymorphism analyses were conducted in two groups, ES-9 and ES-23 (group 1), as well as ES-10 and ES-24 (group 2). First, all the SLAFs from the two groups were blasted with the wheat genome, and the sequences with high wheat homology (over 80%) were removed. Second, the remaining SLAFs were further blasted with the sequences of Th. ponticum or Th. intermedium. The SLAFs with high identity (over 90%) remained, and served as specific sequences of Th. ponticum attributed to ES-9 and ES-10, as well as the specific sequences of Th. intermedium attributed to ES-23 and ES-24. Finally, intercomparisons within groups were conducted and the specific SLAFs with high identity (over 90%) were acquired.

Development and validation of the St-chromosome-specific markers

Based on the obtained specific SLAFs, PCR primers were designed to amplify the two groups of materials. All the primers were designed using the online tool Primer3 Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi) and synthesized by AuGCT DNA-SYN Biotechnology Co. (Beijing, China). The amplified products were examined using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis. The markers amplified specific sequences in tetraploid P. spicata, diploid P. spicata, Th. ponticum, Th. intermedium, DA2St, ES-9, and ES-23, but not in CS, Abbondanza, Th. bessarabicum, Th. elongatum, the 1St and 3-7St addition lines, and served as 2St-chromosome-specific molecular markers. The markers present in ES-10 and ES-24, but absent in the 1-2St and 4-7St addition lines, served as 3St-chromosome-specific molecular markers. Subsequently, the 3St-chromosomes-specific markers were utilized in BC1F2 individuals of ES-24 and HXH for further genetic analysis.

PCR amplifications were performed in a reaction of 20 μl, containing 1.6 μl of template DNA (100 ng/µl), 1.6 μl dNTP mixture (2.5 mM each), 2 μl of 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+ plus), 1.4 μl of each primer (10 µM), 0.1 μl rTaq DNA polymerase (2.5 U/μl, Takara), and 13.3 μl double-distilled water. The PCR protocol was as follows: 94 °C for 4 min; 32 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 54–60 °C for 35 s, 72 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 10 min.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or materials and/or codes during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. The data sets were deposited in the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) database under accession number PRJCA006783.

References

  1. Chen Q, Conner RL, Li HJ, Sun SC, Ahmad F, Laroche A, Graf RJ. Molecular cytogenetic discrimination and reaction to wheat streak mosaic virus and the wheat curl mite in Zhong series of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. Genome. 2003;46(1):135–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Z, Li B, Tong Y. The contribution of distant hybridization with decaploid Agropyron elongatum to wheat improvement in China. J Genet Genomics. 2008;35(8):451–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Thomas JB. Genome analysis of Thinopyrum intermedium and Thinopyrum ponticum using genomic in situ hybridization. Genome. 1998;41(4):580–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang RR, Larson SR, Jensen KB, Bushman BS, DeHaan LR, Wang S, Yan X. Genome evolution of intermediate wheatgrass as revealed by EST-SSR markers developed from its three progenitor diploid species. Genome. 2015;58(2):63–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu ZW, Wang RR: Genome analysis of Elytrigia caespitosa, Lophopyrum nodosum, Pseudoroegneria geniculata ssp. scythica, and Thinopyrum intermedium (Triticeae: Gramineae). Genome. 1993;36(1):102–111.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang RRC, Lu BR. Biosystematics and evolutionary relationships of perennial Triticeae species revealed by genomic analyses. J Syst Evol. 2014;52(6):697–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng CL, Bai LL, Fu SL, Yin WB, Zhang YX, Chen YH, Wang RRC, Zhang XQ, Han FP, Hu ZM. Microdissection and Chromosome Painting of the Alien Chromosome in an Addition Line of Wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium. Plos One. 2013;8(8):e72564.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahelka V, Kopecky D, Pastova L. On the genome constitution and evolution of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium: Poaceae, Triticeae). BMC Evol Biol. 2011;11:127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cseh A, Yang CY, Hubbart-Edwards S, Scholefield D, Ashling SS, Burridge AJ, Wilkinson PA, King IP, King J, Grewal S. Development and validation of an exome-based SNP marker set for identification of the St, J(r) and J(vs) genomes of Thinopyrym intermedium in a wheat background. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(5):1555–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li J, Yu Z, Zhang A, Yin Y, Tang L, Li G, Zhang P, Khan I, Dundas I, Yang Z. Physical mapping of chromosome 7 J and a purple coleoptile gene from Thinopyrum intermedium in the common wheat background. Planta. 2021;253(1):22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kruppa K, Molnár-Láng M. Simultaneous visualization of different genomes (J, JSt and St) in a Thinopyrum intermedium x Thinopyrum ponticum synthetic hybrid (Poaceae) and in its parental species by multicolour genomic in situ hybridization (mcGISH). Comp Cytogenet. 2016;10(2):283–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. He F, Xing PY, Bao YG, Ren MJ, Liu SB, Wang YH, Li XF, Wang HG. Chromosome Pairing in Hybrid Progeny between Triticum aestivum and Elytrigia elongata. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:2161.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Fedak G, Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Petroski R, Armstrong KW. Characterization of wheat-Thinopyrum partial amphiploids by meiotic analysis and genomic in situ hybridization. Genome. 2000;43(4):712–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han FP, Liu B, Fedak G, Liu ZH. Genomic constitution and variation in five partial amphiploids of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium as revealed by GISH, multicolor GISH and seed storage protein analysis. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(5):1070–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng Q, Lv ZL, Niu ZX, Li B, Li HW, Xu SS, Han FP, Li ZS. Molecular Cytogenetic Characterization and Stem Rust Resistance of Five Wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum Partial Amphiploids. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41(11):591–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kruppa K, Turkosi E, Mayer M, Toth V, Vida G, Szakacs E, Molnár-Láng M. McGISH identification and phenotypic description of leaf rust and yellow rust resistant partial amphiploids originating from a wheat x Thinopyrum synthetic hybrid cross. J Appl Genet. 2016;57(4):427–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cui Y, Xing P, Qi X, Bao Y, Wang H, Wang RR, Li X. Characterization of chromosome constitution in three wheat - Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploids revealed frequent rearrangement of alien and wheat chromosomes. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):129.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Cheng S, Shi Y, Zhang S, Yan W, Song W, Yang X, Song Q, Jang B, Qi X, et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization and fusarium head blight resistance of five wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium partial amphiploids. Mol Cytogenet. 2021;14(1):15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li HW, Zheng Q, Pretorius ZA, Li B, Tang DZ, Li ZS. Establishment and characterization of new wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum addition and translocation lines with resistance to Ug99 races. J Genet Genomics. 2016;43(9):573–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li HW, Boshoff WHP, Pretorius ZA, Zheng Q, Li B, Li ZS: Establishment of wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocation lines with resistance to Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici Ug99. J Genet Genomics. 2019;46(8):405–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Li JB, Chen QH, Zhang P, Lang T, Hoxha S, Li GR, Yang ZJ: Comparative FISH and molecular identification of new stripe rust resistant wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium ssp. trichophorum introgression lines. Crop J. 2019;7(6):819–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng XW, Tang CG, Han R, Zhao JJ, Qiao L, Zhang SW, Qiao LY, Ge C, Zheng J, Liu C. Identification, Characterization, and Evaluation of Novel Stripe Rust-Resistant Wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium Chromosome Translocation Lines. Plant Dis. 2020;104(3):875–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cui L, Ren Y, Bao Y, Nan H, Tang Z, Guo Q, Niu Y, Yan W, Sun Y, Li H. Assessment of resistance to cereal cyst nematode, stripe rust and powdery mildew in the wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium derivatives and their chromosome composition. Plant Dis. 2021;105(10):2898–906.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Figueiras A, González-Jaén M, Benito C. Biochemical evidence of homoeology between Triticum aestivum and Agropyron intermedium chromosomes. Theor Appl Genet. 1986;72(6):826–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Friebe B, Mukai Y, Gill B, Cauderon Y: C-banding and in-situ hybridization analyses of Agropyron intermedium, a partial wheat x Ag. intermedium amphiploid, and six derived chromosome addition lines. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;84:899–905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen Q, Conner RL, Laroche A, Ji WQ, Armstrong KC, Fedak G: Genomic in situ hybridization analysis of Thinopyrum chromatin in a wheat-Th. intermedium partial amphiploid and six derived chromosome addition lines. Genome. 1999;42(6):1217–1223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Forster BP, Reader SM, Forsyth SA, Koebner RMD, Miller TE, Gale MD, Cauderon Y. An assessment of the homoeology of six Agropyron intermedium chromosomes added to wheat. Genet Res. 2009;50(2):91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen XM. Epidemiology and control of stripe rust [Puccinia striiformis f. sp tritici] on wheat. Can J Plant Pathol. 2005;27(3):314–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanwal M, Qureshi N, Gessese M, Forrest K, Babu P, Bariana H, Bansal U. An adult plant stripe rust resistance gene maps on chromosome 7A of Australian wheat cultivar Axe. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(7):2213–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu L-J, Li G-R, Zeng Z-X, Chang Z-J, Liu C, Zhou J-P, Yang Z-J. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a new wheat-Thinopyrum substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Euphytica. 2010;177(2):169–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nie L, Yang Y, Zhang J, Fu T. Disomic chromosome addition from Thinopyrum intermedium to bread wheat appears to confer stripe rust resistance. Euphytica. 2019;215(3):56.

  32. Song X, Li G, Zhan H, Liu C, Yang ZJ. Molecular identification of a new wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium ssp. Trichophorum addition line for resistance to stripe rust. Cereal Res Commun. 2013;41(2):211–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang SW, Wang CY, Wang YZ, Wang YJ, Chen CH, Ji WQ. Molecular cytogenetic identification of two wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum substitution lines conferring stripe rust resistance. Mol Breed. 2019;39(11):143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li ZS, Rong S, Chen S, Zhong GC, Mu SM. Wheat wide hybridization. Bejing: Chinese Scientific Publishing Co.; 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sun SC. The approach and methods of breeding new varities and new species from Agrotriticum hybrids. Acta Agron Sin. 1981;7(1):51–58.

  36. Xue XZ, Ji WQ, Wang QY, Xu XT. Development of the wheat Abbondanza nullisomic lines. Acta Agron Sin. 1991;17(6):417–23 + 481-4.

  37. Zhan HX, Li GR, Zhang XJ, Li X, Guo HJ, Gong WP, Jia JQ, Qiao LY, Ren YK. Yang ZJ et al. Chromosomal Location and Comparative Genomics Analysis of Powdery Mildew Resistance Gene Pm51 in a Putative Wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum Introgression Line. Plos One. 2014;9(11):e113455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Ma PT, Xu HX, Han GH, Luo QL, Xu YF, Zhang XT, An DG, Li LH, Sun Y. Characterization of a Segregation Distortion Locus with Powdery Mildew Resistance in a Wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium Introgression Line WE99. Plant Dis. 2016;100(8):1541–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ceoloni C, Forte P, Kuzmanovic L, Tundo S, Moscetti I, De Vita P, Virili ME, D’Ovidio R: Cytogenetic mapping of a major locus for resistance to Fusarium head blight and crown rot of wheat on Thinopyrum elongatum 7EL and its pyramiding with valuable genes from a Th. ponticum homoeologous arm onto bread wheat 7DL. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130(10):2005–2024.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang G, Boshoff WHP, Li H, Pretorius ZA, Luo Q, Li B, Li Z, Zheng Q. Chromosomal composition analysis and molecular marker development for the novel Ug99-resistant wheat-Thinopyrum ponticum translocation line WTT34. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(5):1587–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li H, Dong Z, Ma C, Xia Q, Tian X, Sehgal S, Koo D, Friebe B, Ma P, Liu W. A spontaneous wheat-Aegilops longissima translocation carrying Pm66 confers resistance to powdery mildew. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133(4):1149–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Li J, Dundas I, Dong C, Li G, Trethowan R, Yang Z, Hoxha S, Zhang P. Identification and characterization of a new stripe rust resistance gene Yr83 on rye chromosome 6R in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133(4):1095–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo J, Zhang XL, Hou YL, Cai JJ, Shen XR, Zhou TT, Xu HH, Ohm HW, Wang HW, Li AF, et al. High-density mapping of the major FHB resistance gene Fhb7 derived from Thinopyrum ponticum and its pyramiding with Fhb1 by marker-assisted selection. Theor Appl Genet. 2015;128(11):2301–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mago R, Zhang P, Xia XD, Zhang JP, Hoxha S, Lagudah E, Graner A, Dundas I. Transfer of stem rust resistance gene SrB from Thinopyrum ponticum into wheat and development of a closely linked PCR-based marker. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(2):371–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fedak G, Chi D, Wolfe D, Ouellet T, Cao W, Han F, Xue A. Transfer of Fusarium Head Blight Resistance from Thinopyrum elongatum to bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring. Genome. 2021;64(11):997–1008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang YJ, Long DY, Wang YZ, Wang CY, Liu XL, Zhang H, Tian ZR, Chen CH, Ji WQ. Characterization and Evaluation of Resistance to Powdery Mildew of Wheat-Aegilops geniculata Roth 7 M(g) (7A) Alien Disomic Substitution Line W16998. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(5):1861.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu B, Xu C, Zhao N, Qi B, Kimatu JN, Pang J, Han F. Rapid genomic changes in polyploid wheat and related species: implications for genome evolution and genetic improvement. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(9):519–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Li A-l, Geng S-f, Zhang L-q, Liu D-c. Mao L: Making the Bread: Insights from Newly Synthesized Allohexaploid Wheat. Mol Plant. 2015;8(6):847–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Li G, Zhang T, Yu Z, Wang H, Yang E, Yang Z. An efficient Oligo-FISH painting system for revealing chromosome rearrangements and polyploidization in Triticeae. Plant J. 2021;105(4):978–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhang P, Li W, Fellers J, Friebe B, Gill BS. BAC-FISH in wheat identifies chromosome landmarks consisting of different types of transposable elements. Chromosoma. 2004;112(6):288–99.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Svacina R, Sourdille P, Kopecky D, Bartos J. Chromosome Pairing in Polyploid Grasses. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Oizumi Y, Kaji T, Tashiro S, Takeshita Y, Date Y, Kanoh J. Complete sequences of Schizosaccharomyces pombe subtelomeres reveal multiple patterns of genome variation. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):611.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang RRC. Genome Relationships in the Perennial Triticeae Based on Diploid Hybrids and Beyond. Hereditas. 1992;116(1–2):133–6.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Tiryaki I, Karaoglu GB, Yucel G, Tuna M. Assessment of Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Barkworth & D. R. Dewey accessions using universal rice primers and molecular cytogenetics. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2021;68:1875–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang R, Li X, Robbins M, Larson S, Bushman S, Jones T, Thomas A: Pseudoroegneria spicataDNA sequence-based mapping and comparative genomics of the genome of (Pursh) Á. Löve versus wheat (L.) and barley ( L.). Genome. 2020;63(9):445–457.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Baker L, Grewal S, Yang CY, Hubbart-Edwards S, Scholefield D, Ashling S, Burridge AJ, Przewieslik-Allen AM, Wilkinson PA, King IP, et al. Exploiting the genome of Thinopyrum elongatum to expand the gene pool of hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133(7):2213–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang Z, Xin Z, Larkin P. Molecular characterization of a Thinopyrum intermedium group 2 chromosome (2Ai-2) conferring resistance to barley yellow dwarf virus. Genome. 2001;44(6):1129–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hu L, Li G, Zhan H, Liu C, Yang Z. New St-chromosome-specific molecular markers for identifying wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium derivative lines. J Genet. 2012;91(2):e69-74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Li G, Wang H, Lang T, Li J, La S, Yang E, Yang Z. New molecular markers and cytogenetic probes enable chromosome identification of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgression lines for improving protein and gluten contents. Planta. 2016;244(4):865–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Kantarski T, Larson S, Zhang X, DeHaan L, Borevitz J, Anderson J, Poland J. Development of the first consensus genetic map of intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) using genotyping-by-sequencing. Theor Appl Genet. 2017;130(1):137–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Qiao L, Liu S, Li J, Li S, Yu Z, Liu C, Li X, Liu J, Ren Y, Zhang P, et al. Thinopyrum intermediumDevelopment of Sequence-Tagged Site Marker Set for Identification of J, J, and St Sub-genomes of in Wheat Background. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:685216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Hu LJ, Liu C, Zeng ZX, Li GR, Song XJ, Yang ZJ. Genomic rearrangement between wheat and Thinopyrum elongatum revealed by mapped functional molecular markers. Genes  Genomics. 2012;34(1):67–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Li D, Zhang J, Liu H, Tan B, Zhu W, Xu L, Wang Y, Zeng J, Fan X, Sha L, et al. Characterization of a wheat-tetraploid Thinopyrum elongatum 1E(1D) substitution line K17–841-1 by cytological and phenotypic analysis and developed molecular markers. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):963.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang H, Sun S, Ge W, Zhao L, Hou B, Wang K, Lyu Z, Chen L, Xu S, Guo J et al. Fhb7Horizontal gene transfer of from fungus underlies head blight resistance in wheat. Science (New York, NY). 2020;368(6493).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhu C, Wang YZ, Chen CH, Wang CY, Zhang AC, Peng NN, Wang YJ, Zhang H, Liu XL, Ji WQ. Molecular cytogenetic identification of a wheat - Thinopyrum ponticum substitution line with stripe rust resistance. Genome. 2017;60(10):860–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ma H, Singh RP, Mujeebkazi A. Suppression Expression of Resistance to Stripe Rust in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat (Triticum-Turgidum X T-Tauschii). Euphytica. 1995;83(2):87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Sun XW, Liu DY, Zhang XF, Li WB, Liu H, Hong WG, Jiang CB, Guan N, Ma CX. Zeng HP et al. SLAF-seq: An Efficient Method of Large-Scale De Novo SNP Discovery and Genotyping Using High-Throughput Sequencing. Plos One. 2013;8(3):e58700.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Prof. Baotong Wang, college of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China, for providing the Pst races.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant No. 2016YFD0102001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Siwen Wang, Changyou Wang, Xianbo Feng, Jixin Zhao, Pingchuan Deng, Yajuan Wang, Hong Zhang, Xinlun Liu, Tingdong Li, Chunhuan Chen & Wanquan Ji

  2. Shaanxi Research Station of Crop Gene Resources and Germplasm Enhancement, Ministry of Agriculture, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Changyou Wang, Jixin Zhao, Pingchuan Deng, Yajuan Wang, Hong Zhang, Xinlun Liu, Tingdong Li, Chunhuan Chen & Wanquan Ji

  3. State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Changyou Wang, Jixin Zhao, Pingchuan Deng, Yajuan Wang, Hong Zhang, Xinlun Liu, Tingdong Li, Chunhuan Chen, Baotong Wang & Wanquan Ji

  4. College of Plant Protection, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Baotong Wang

Authors
  1. Siwen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Changyou Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xianbo Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jixin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pingchuan Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yajuan Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xinlun Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tingdong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chunhuan Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Baotong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Wanquan Ji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

WJ and CW designed the project, SW performed the experiments and drafted the manuscript, JZ and PD provided help in analysis of wheat 15 K SNP array, XF, HZ and XL provided help in analyzing the morphological characters, YW, TL and CC provided help in preparing materials, BW provided the Pst races. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanquan Ji.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

There is no research requiring ethical approval and consent to participate in this manuscript. All related plant materials are available and comply Wild Plants Protection Regulation of China.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Uncropped images of Fig. 1.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

SNP array raw data of the six substitution lines for Fig. 2.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

  PLUG polymorphic markers mapped on homoeologous group 2 and 3 used to linkage analysis of Thinopyrum ponticum and Thinopyrum intermedium chromosome.

Additional file 4: Fig. S2.

Uncropped gel images of markers of Fig. 3.

Additional file 5: Fig. S3.

Raw images of  Fig. 4 and ES-12.

Additional file 6: Fig. S4.

The crossing program of wheat-Thinopyrum substitution lines.

Additional file 7: Table S3.

Quality of SLAF data.

Additional file 8: Fig. S5.

Uncropped gel images of markers of Fig. 6.

Additional file 9: Fig. S6.

Uncropped gel images of markers of Fig. 8.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, S., Wang, C., Feng, X. et al. Molecular cytogenetics and development of St-chromosome-specific molecular markers of novel stripe rust resistant wheat–Thinopyrum intermedium and wheat–Thinopyrum ponticum substitution lines. BMC Plant Biol 22, 111 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03496-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03496-x

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us