Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

ROS1-mediated decrease in DNA methylation and increase in expression of defense genes and stress response genes in Arabidopsis thaliana due to abiotic stresses

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 104 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) target homologous genomic DNA sequences for cytosine methylation, known as RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), plays an important role in transposon control and regulation of gene expression in plants. Repressor of silencing 1 (ROS1) can negatively regulate the RdDM pathway.

Results

In this paper, we investigated the molecular mechanisms by which an upstream regulator ACD6 in the salicylic acid (SA) defense pathway, an ABA pathway-related gene ACO3, and GSTF14, an endogenous gene of the glutathione S-transferase superfamily, were induced by various abiotic stresses. The results demonstrated that abiotic stresses, including water deficit, cold, and salt stresses, induced demethylation of the repeats in the promoters of ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14 and transcriptionally activated their expression. Furthermore, our results revealed that ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation plays an important role in the process of transcriptional activation of ACD6 and GSTF14 when Arabidopsis plants are subjected to cold stress.

Conclusions

This study revealed that ROS1 plays an important role in the molecular mechanisms associated with genes involved in defense pathways in response to abiotic stresses.

Background

DNA methylation is one of the most common forms of covalent DNA modification in the genomes of eukaryotes and plays an important role in the growth and development of plants and in responses to various abiotic stresses. RNA silencing is a conserved pathway that results in the blockage of gene expression in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of eukaryotic organisms [1]. In plants, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) target homologous sequences for DNA methylation, a process known as RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM); this process plays an important role in regulating gene expression, controlling the activity of transposable elements, and defending against foreign DNAs, such as DNA viruses [2,3,4]. These siRNAs are synthesized by RNA polymerase IV (Pol IV), RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RDR2), and Dicer-like 3 (DCL3) [5]. Argonaute protein 4 (AGO4) and the DNA methyltransferases DRM1/2, MET1, and CMT3 perform de novo methylation and maintain methylation of the target DNA [6]. DNA methylation can be reversed by DNA glycosylases/lyases in Arabidopsis plants, and this process is known as active demethylation [7]. Repressor of silencing 1 (ROS1) can negatively regulate the RdDM pathway [8, 9]. ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation helps determine genomic DNA methylation patterns and protects active genes from being silenced [10].

Abiotic stresses mainly include drought, cold, and salt stresses, which severely threaten plant growth and crop yields [11, 12]. Abiotic stresses can induce the accumulation of endogenous abscisic acid (ABA), triggering ABA signal transduction to cope with adverse environmental factors [13,14,15]. When plants are under cold stress, ABA can regulate the expression of cold resistance genes in plants in response to stress [16,17,18]. Abiotic stress also affects dynamic changes in DNA methylation in plants. Changes in methylation levels and patterns regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes, thereby improving the resistance of plants to stress [19]. In Arabidopsis, the ros1 mutant is hypersensitive to ABA, and ROS1 participates in the ABA response by regulating the expression of NICOTINAMIDASE 3 (NIC3) [20]. Soybean has been found to show abnormal expression of approximately 49 transcription factors under salt stress, and the expression profiles of the MYB, b-ZIP, and AP2/DREB transcription factor families are reportedly significantly correlated with the DNA methylation of their gene sequences [21]. Abiotic stress can regulate the expression of stress-responsive genes by inducing dynamic changes in DNA methylation, thereby improving the adaptability of plants to the environment.

Salicylic acid (SA) is an important signaling molecule in plant defense responses and can induce the expression of defense genes and the development of systemic resistance [22]. At least three types of SA regulators have been described [23]: type I regulators, including enzymes involved in SA biosynthesis, e.g., SA INDUCTION-DEFICIENT 2 (SID2) [24], type II regulators such as accelerated cell death 6 (ACD6), which are upstream from SA [25,26,27], and type III regulators, which transduce signals downstream from SA, e.g., NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES 1 (NPR1) [28]. A gain-of-function mutant of ACD6 (acd6–1) has been reported to increase the expression of defense genes in the SA pathway [29]. Plants respond to pathogens via the SA, jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) pathways [2]. The role of SA in plant tolerance to various biotic stresses has been intensively studied [30]. SA also plays an important role in modulating plant responses to many abiotic stresses, including salt, drought, and chilling [31]. For example, salinity induces increases in endogenous SA levels and the activity of the SA biosynthesis enzyme in rice seedlings [32]. Our previous study revealed the molecular mechanisms underlying the induction of defense genes in the SA pathway by biotic stresses in Arabidopsis plants [4, 33]. However, the regulatory mechanisms of genes involved in defense pathways in response to abiotic stresses remain unclear.

In this study, we determined the molecular mechanisms underlying the functioning of the upstream regulator ACD6 of the SA pathway, the endogenous gene GSTF14 in the glutathione S-transferase (GST) superfamily, and aconitate hydratase 3 (ACO3) in response to abiotic stresses. The results showed that the expression levels of defense genes (ACD6, NPR1, and PR5) in the SA pathway, ACO3, and GSTF14 significantly increased after exposure to water deficit, cold, and salt stresses. Sequencing results confirmed that abiotic stresses induced demethylation of the repeats in the promoters of ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14 and transcriptionally activated their expression. Further experiments revealed that ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation plays an important role in the mechanisms of these defense genes in response to abiotic stresses.

Results

Induction of SA pathway-related defense genes by abiotic stresses

Our previous studies verified an upstream regulator (ACD6) in the SA pathway, and GSTF14, an endogenous gene of the glutathione S-transferase superfamily that is implicated in numerous stress responses, which revealed the molecular mechanism underlying the induction of defense gene expression in the SA pathway by biotic stresses [4, 33]. To investigate whether abiotic stress can induce the expression of ACD6, GSTF14, and an ABA pathway-related gene (ACO3), the wild-type Columbia (Col-0) line of Arabidopsis thaliana was selected for water deficit treatment, cold stress treatment, and salt stress treatment. On days 5–7, the leaves of Col-0 plants treated with water deficit stress turned slightly yellow and shrunk (Fig. 1B, C) compared to those of untreated Col-0 plants (Fig. 1A). On day 14, anthocyanin accumulation in the leaves of Col-0 plants treated with water deficit stress clearly increased, and the leaves turned severely yellow and withered (Fig. 1D). No significant phenotypic changes were observed in plants treated with cold stress (4 °C) for 24 h or salt stress (150 mM) for 3 days. Abiotic stresses make a large amount of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) accumulate in plant cells. ROS content can be served as a kind of stress makers, including hydrogen peroxide content and superoxide anino. To confirm that Col-0 plants treated under different conditions were indeed stressed, we performed the measurements of hydrogen peroxide content by spectrophotometry. The results showed that hydrogen peroxide content significantly increased in Col-0 plants after cold stress (4 °C) for 24 h, water deficit for 7 days or salt stress (150 mM) for 3 days (Fig. 1E) and confirmed the treated plants were under the specific stress conditions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Detection and analyses of the expression of defense genes and stress response genes in Arabidopsis plants treated with abiotic stresses. A The untreated Arabidopsis Col-0 plants. B, C The leaves of Arabidopsis plants treated with water deficit stress turned slightly yellow and shrunk during days 5–7. D Anthocyanin accumulation in the leaves of Arabidopsis plants treated with water deficit stress clearly increased, and the leaves turned severely yellow and withered on day 14. E The measurements of hydrogen peroxide content were performed by spectrophotometry, the results showed that hydrogen peroxide content increased in Col-0 plants after cold stress (4 °C) for 24 h, water deficit for 7 days or salt stress (150 mM) for 3 days. F The transcript levels of related and defense genes in Arabidopsis plants treated with water deficit stress were analyzed by qPCR. G The transcript levels of defense genes, GSTF14, and ACO3 in Arabidopsis plants treated with cold stress were analyzed by qPCR; untreated Col-0 plants served as controls. H The transcript levels of defense genes, GSTF14, and ACO3 in Arabidopsis plants treated with salt stress were analyzed by qPCR; untreated Col-0 plants served as controls. Means identified by different letters are significantly different from each other. Error bars represent SEs from three biological replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple comparison Test was used for statistical analysis. (P < 0.05)

Full size image

We extracted total RNA from wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 plants on the 7th day of water deficit treatment for comparative analysis of gene expression. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis confirmed that ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 were significantly upregulated after water deficit treatment, and the upregulation of GSTF14 expression was more pronounced (Fig. 1F). Since ACD6 is an upstream regulator of the SA pathway, the increase in ACD6 expression may upregulate the expression of the defense genes NPR1 and PR5 (Fig. 1F). To further investigate whether cold or salt stress can also induce the expression of defense genes in the SA pathway, we analyzed the expression of related genes in untreated Col-0 plants and Col-0 plants treated under different conditions. The results showed that compared with controls, Col-0 plants treated with cold or salt stress had significantly higher expression levels of defense genes ACD6, NPR1, PR5, and stress response genes GSTF14 and ACO3 and confirmed that cold stress and salt stress activated ACD6 expression, which was significantly increased after 24 h of cold stress treatment (Fig. 1G, H).

Direct correlation between the increased expression of defense and stress resistance genes and the reduction in promoter DNA methylation

To determine whether upregulation of these genes is correlated with a decrease in methylation at these genes’ promoters, the DNA methylation data of these genes were first searched at http://epigenomics.mcdb.ucla.edu/BS-Seq/ [33, 34]. Extensive methylation was found in the promoter sequences corresponding to the promoter regions of ACD6 and ACO3, and strong methylation corresponding to the promoter region of GSTF14 was found through a methylation pattern search. Col-0 plants were treated with abiotic stresses, and cytosine methylation in the gene promoter regions were analyzed with a bisulfite sequencing method. The data revealed that the DNA methylation levels in the region of the ACD6 promoter was reduced by 16.27% (a change from 78.30 to 62.03%) in CG sites, by 13.56% (a change from 21.67 to 8.11%) in CNG sites, and by 7.71% (a change from 13.51 to 5.80%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with water deficit stress. The DNA methylation levels in the region of the ACD6 promoter was reduced by 20.55% (a change from 78.32 to 57.77%) in CG sites, by 14.11% (a change from 21.67 to 7.56%) in CNG sites, and by 8.15% (a change from 13.51 to 5.36%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with cold stress. The DNA methylation levels in the region of the ACD6 promoter was reduced by 14.86% (a change from 78.32 to 63.46%) in CG sites, by 13.41% (a change from 21.67 to 8.26%) in CNG sites, and by 8.26% (a change from 13.51 to 5.25%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with salt stress (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analyses of DNA methylation in promoters in plants treated with different stresses. A Percentage of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the ACD6 promoter in plants treated with different stresses and untreated Col-0 plants. B Percentage of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the ACO3 promoter in plants treated with different stresses and untreated Col-0 plants. C Percentage of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the GSTF14 promoter in Col-0 plants treated with different stresses and untreated Col-0 plants. Fifteen individual clones of each genotype were used for sequencing. Means identified by different letters are significantly different from each other. Error bars represent SEs from three biological replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple comparison Test was used for statistical analysis (P < 0.05)

Full size image

The data revealed that CG methylation of the repeats in the ACO3 promoter was not significantly altered, while DNA methylation in the ACO3 promoter was reduced by 32.56% (a change from 65.89 to 33.33%) in CNG sites and by 33.33% (change from 42.22 to 8.89%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with water deficit stress. The DNA methylation levels in the ACO3 promoter was significantly reduced by 32.56% (a change from 65.89 to 20%) in CNG sites and by 33.33% (a change from 42.22 to 8.16%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with cold stress. DNA methylation in the ACO3 promoter was significantly reduced by 44.46% (a change from 65.89 to 21.43%) in CNG sites and by 33.03% (a change from 42.22 to 9.19%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with salt stress (Fig. 2B). DNA methylation in the GSTF14 promoter was also analyzed using bisulfite sequencing. DNA methylation of the repeats in the GSTF14 promoter was reduced by 14.81% (a change from 90.30 to 75.49%) in CG sites, by 15.43% (a change from 64.04 to 48.61%) in CNG sites, and by 12.06% (a change from 20.78 to 8.72%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with water deficit stress. DNA methylation of the repeats in the GSTF14 promoter was reduced by 17.27% (a change from 90.30 to 73.03%) in CG sites, by 12.58% (a change from 64.04 to 51.46%) in CNG sites, and by 12.58% (a change from 20.78 to 9.63%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with cold stress. DNA methylation in the GSTF14 promoter was reduced by 14.80% (a change from 90.30 to 75.50%) in CG sites, by 11.29% (a change from 64.04 to 52.75%) in CNG sites, and by 12.43% (a change from 20.78 to 8.35%) in CHH sites in Col-0 plants treated with salt stress (Fig. 2C).

Role of ROS1 in regulation of the SA pathway in response to abiotic stresses

To further study the molecular mechanisms underlying the functioning of defense genes of the SA pathway in response to abiotic stresses, we used RNA gel blotting to analyze the expression of related genes in plants mutated at key functional elements of the RdDM pathway. The results showed that ACD6 and GSTF14 expression clearly increased in the mutant ago4 and DNA methyltransferase mutants met1, drm1/2, and cmt3 with Col-0 ecotypes as controls (Fig. 3A). RT-qPCR results further confirmed that ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 were upregulated in the ago4 mutant (Fig. 3B), indicating that RdDM has an important role in maintaining the low transcription levels of ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 in wild-type plants; however, these mutants showed increased transcript levels for those genes.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analyses of the expression levels of related genes. A Analyses of the expression levels of ACD6 and GSTF14 in the mutants ago4, met1, drm1/2, and cmt3 by northern blotting; wild-type Col-0 ecotypes served as background controls for the mutant genotypes. B Analyses of the expression levels of ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14 by RT-qPCR in DNA methylation mutant plants ago4, met1, and cmt3 with wild-type plants as a background control for the mutant genotypes. C The cold stress-treated ros1 mutants exhibited deformed leaves and increased anthocyanin accumulation on the 7th day compared with the cold stress-treated Col-0 plants. D The related genes were analyzed in untreated Col-0 plants, Col-0 plants treated with cold stress, and ros1 and ros1 dml2 dml3 (rdd) mutant plants treated with cold stress by RT-qPCR. Means identified by different letters are significantly different from each other. Error bars represent SEs from three biological replicates. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple comparison Test was used for statistical analysis (P < 0.05)

Full size image

ROS1 can negatively regulate the RdDM pathway [8, 9]. To determine whether ROS1 plays a role in the responses of these genes to abiotic stress, we applied cold stress treatment to loss-of-function Arabidopsis ros1 mutants and Arabidopsis Col-0 plants. Under normal growth conditions, the ros1 mutants showed no obvious developmental defects compared to Col-0 plants. Compared with the cold stress-treated Col-0 plants, the cold stress-treated ros1 mutants appeared to exhibit more severely deformed leaves and increased anthocyanin accumulation on the 7th day (Fig. 3C), indicating that the ros1 mutants exhibited increased susceptibility to cold stress. We further compared the expression of the ACD6 gene between cold stress-treated ros1 mutants (ros1 + cold) and cold stress-treated Col-0 (Col-0 + cold) plants. The results showed that ACD6 expression in the cold stress-treated Col-0 plants significantly increased, compared with that in untreated Col-0 plants. However, the increase in ACD6 expression in the cold stress-treated ros1 mutants and loss-of-function ros1dml2dml3 (rdd) mutants was partially inhibited compared with that in the cold stress-treated Col-0 plants (Fig. 3D). ROS1 plays an important role in the activation of defense genes in response to abiotic stress, which was confirmed by the expression levels of GSTF14 and ACO3. When cold stress-treated Col-0 plants were used as the control, the increase in GSTF14 and ACO3 expression was partially inhibited in the cold stress-treated ros1 mutants (Fig. 3D).

ROS1-mediated decrease in DNA methylation of genes under abiotic stresses

Sequencing analysis demonstrated that the DNA methylation levels of the repeats in the ACD6 promoter in cold stress-treated Col-0 plants were significantly reduced compared with untreated Col-0 plants, including the CG, CNG, and CHH sites, while the decrease in DNA methylation levels of the repeats in the ACD6 promoter in cold stress-treated ros1 mutants was partially inhibited (Fig. 4A). When Col-0 plants were used as the control, the DNA methylation levels of the repeats in the ACD6 promoter in ros1 mutants were not significantly altered (Fig. 4A).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Analyses of DNA methylation of related genes. A Analyses of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the ACD6 promoter in Col-0 plants, ros1 mutants, and Col-0 plants and ros1 mutants treated with cold stress. B Analyses of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the ACO3 promoter in Col-0 plants, ros1 mutants, and Col-0 plants and ros1 mutants treated with cold stress. C Analyses of DNA methylation in the repeat regions of the GSTF14 promoter in Col-0 plants, ros1 mutants, and Col-0 plants and ros1 mutants treated with cold stress. Fifteen individual clones of each genotype were used for sequencing. Error bars represent SEs from three biological replicates. Means identified by different letters are significantly different from each other. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Multiple comparison Test was used for statistical analysis (P < 0.05)

Full size image

The results demonstrated that DNA methylation at CNG and CHH sites in the ACO3 promoter in cold stress-treated Col-0 plants was significantly decreased compared with untreated Col-0 plants, while the decrease in DNA methylation at CNG and CHH sites in the ACO3 promoter in cold stress-treated ros1 mutants was partially inhibited (Fig. 4B). When Col-0 plants were used as the control, the DNA methylation levels of the repeats in the ACO3 promotor in ros1 mutants were not significantly altered (Fig. 4B).

The results further confirmed that the DNA methylation levels in the GSTF14 promoter in cold stress-treated Col-0 plants were significantly decreased compared with untreated Col-0 plants, including the CG, CNG, and CHH sites, while the decrease in DNA methylation in the GSTF14 promoter in cold stress-treated ros1 mutants was partially inhibited (Fig. 4C). When Col-0 plants were used as the control, the DNA methylation levels of the repeats in the GSTF14 promotor in ros1 mutants were not significantly altered (Fig. 4C). These results revealed that activation of the expression of the defense gene ACD6 in the SA pathway, the stress response genes GSTF14 and ACO3 was related to ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation.

Discussion

Scientists began to focus on the important role of hormones in the regulation of plant growth and development and resistance to abiotic stresses in 1930. In this field, the ABA pathway has been well studied. ABA is a key hormone regulating the response of plants to abiotic stresses, such as drought. A total of 40 stress-inducible transcription factor genes have been found in Arabidopsis [35]. For example, MYB transcription factors are indispensable to the adaptation of plants to cold stress and can affect plant resistance to drought by controlling stress-induced ABA synthesis [36]. We know less about the role of the SA defense pathway in the response of plants to abiotic stresses and the related molecular mechanisms.

In this study, we demonstrated that abiotic stresses, including water deficit, cold, and salt stresses, induced DNA demethylation of repeats in the promoters of ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14 and transcriptionally activated their expression. Furthermore, our results confirmed that ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation plays a role in the process of transcriptional activation of the target genes (ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14) regulated by RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) when Arabidopsis Col-0 plants are subjected to cold stress.

Sequencing results confirmed that the increase in the expression of ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 was related to the reduction in the DNA methylation levels of the promoters of these genes. Under the same stress conditions, different genes differ in the levels and patterns of DNA methylation (Fig. 2), suggesting that complex molecular mechanisms regulate the expression of these genes. Our results revealed that abiotic stresses (water deficit, cold, and salt stresses) induced DNA demethylation of the ACD6, ACO3 and GSTF14 promoters and transcriptionally activated the expression of the defense genes ACD6, NPR1 and PR5 in the SA pathway and stress response genes ACO3 and GSTF14, thereby enhancing the adaptability of plants to abiotic stresses.

ROS1 can negatively regulate the RdDM pathway [8, 9]. Recent research has shown that ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation can act on three DNA methylation sites: CG, CNG, and CHH [37]. DNA methylation sequencing of ros1 mutants has revealed that ROS1 generally targets genes containing CG, CNG, and CHH methylation sites in transposable elements and repeats but does not target genes containing only CG methylation sites [38]. Furthermore, our results confirmed that the RdDM pathway has an important role in maintaining the low transcription levels of ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 in wild-type Col-0 plants (Fig. 3A, B). When cold stress-treated Col-0 plants were used as the control, the increase in the expression of ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 in ros1 mutants treated with cold stress for 24 h was partially inhibited (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, after 24 h of cold stress treatment in Col-0 plants, DNA methylation levels in the repeats of the ACD6, ACO3 and GSTF14 promoters were significantly reduced, while the decrease in DNA methylation levels in the repeats of the ACD6 and ACO3 promoters in cold stress-treated ros1 mutants was partially inhibited (Fig. 4). These data analyses indicate that ROS1 is only partially responsible for changes in expression of and levels of methylation of the target genes under cold stress.

This study has revealed the role of ROS1 in the regulation of defense genes ACD6, NPR1 and PR5 in the SA pathway and ACO3 and GSTF14 in response to abiotic stresses. Due to the complexity of the dynamic regulation of DNA methylation, the molecular mechanisms by which plants adapt to various adverse environmental factors and how different signaling pathways interact still require in-depth study.

Conclusions

Our study reveals the molecular mechanism by which plant defense genes in the SA pathway and stress resistance genes are involved in responses to various abiotic stresses. The results show that the RdDM pathway has an important role in maintaining the low transcription levels of ACD6, GSTF14, and ACO3 in wild-type Col-0 plants. Further studies revealed that abiotic stresses induced DNA demethylation of the ACD6, ACO3, and GSTF14 promoters and transcriptionally activated the expression of defense genes and stress resistance genes. Moreover, ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation plays an important role in this process.

Methods

Aabiotic stress treatments and hydrogen peroxide content measurements

thaliana ecotype Columbia (Col-0) and mutant plants were used for this work. The ago4 mutant seeds (original source) [39] and ros1 and rdd mutant seeds (original source) [40] were provided by Chengguo Duan in Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). Col-0, met1, drm1/2, and cmt3 mutant seeds were provided by the Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CAS. Seeds were surface-sterilized with 30% bleach, washed three times with sterile water, and sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) plates. The seedlings were grown for approximately 2 weeks and then transferred to a 22 °C environment with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle for 2 weeks. Arabidopsis plants were transferred to soil in a greenhouse (22 °C, with a 16-h light/8-h dark cycle) and treated with abiotic stresses, including cold stress (4 °C, 24 h), salt stress (150 mM NaCl, 3 days), and water deficit stress (not watered, 7 days). The measurements of hydrogen peroxide content were performed by spectrophotometry [41] after Col-0 plants were treated with cold stress, water deficit or salt stress, respectively [34]. Each experiment consisted of three biological replicates and was repeated twice. The significant experimental details are as follows.

Cold stress

Salt stress

Water deficit stress

4 °C

150 mM NaCl

not watered

24 h

3 days

7 days

RT-qPCR analysis and RNA gel blot analysis

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Total RNA was subsequently used for RT-qPCR analysis. For RT-qPCR, total RNA was extracted from the treated plants and subsequently used for reverse transcription. Complementary DNA synthesis was performed using a reverse transcription kit (Takara). Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using SYBR green mix (Qiagen). Each experiment consisted of three biological replicates and was repeated twice. For the high-molecular-weight RNA gel blot analyses, 10 mg of total RNA was extracted from the treated plants and separated on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels, transferred to Hybond-Nþ membranes, and hybridized as described previously [4]. ACD6 (AT4G14400) and GSTF14 (AT1G49860) probe primer pairs were as follows: F (ACD6), 5′-TCTCCCTGGTGAAGATGTCG-3′ and R (ACD6), 5′-TTACCGATGCAACAAGAGCC-3′; F (GSTF14), 5′-AGGCGAGTCTCCTTACT TGG-3′ and R (GSTF14), 5′-TTATAGGCAAACGACGCTGC-3′; F (ACO3), 5′-ACGAGTCAA TCACCAAGGGT-3′ and R (ACO3), 5′-GAAGTCCTTACGGT CAACGC-3′.

Bisulfite sequencing

Total DNA was extracted using cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer as previously described [23] and purified using a DNA purification kit (Promega). The purified DNA was used for bisulfite treatment using the EpiTect bisulfite kit (Qiagen, http://www.qiagen.com/default.aspx) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified by ACD6 (AT4G14400) and GSTF14 (AT1G49860) promoter-specific primer pairs as follows:

F (ACD6), 5′-AAGTTTATTGATGAAAGGAG-3′ and R (ACD6), 5′-CTTACTT (G/A) TCTT CATCAA-3′; F (GSTF14), 5′-TTTGAAAGTTGGTGTATTAAA-3′ and R (GSTF14), 5′-CCCATA CCTATCATATTTCAT-3′; F (ACO3), 5′-GTAATATTAGTAAAGATGTGT-3′ and R (ACO3), 5′-CACTACTTTC ATTATACTCTTT-3′. PCR included 40 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, 50 °C for 30 s, and 62 °C for 2 min. Cytosine methylation analysis was provided by https://www.cymate.org/cymate.html, as described previously [42]. Each experiment consisted of three biological replicates and was repeated twice.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. About genes database could download from NCBI by their accession number. The accession numbers of these genes are as follows: ACD6 (AT4G14400) and GSTF14 (AT1G49860).

Abbreviations

SA:

Salicylic acid

ABA:

Abscisic acid

JA:

Jasmonic acid

ET:

Ethylene

ACD6:

Accelerated cell death 6

ACO3:

Aconitate hydratase 3

GST:

Glutathione S-transferase

DCL3:

Dicer-like 3

RdDM:

RNA-directed DNA methylation

siRNAs:

Small interfering RNAs

AGO4:

Argonaute protein 4

ROS1:

Repressor of silencing 1

Pol IV:

RNA polymerase IV

RDR2:

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

RT-qPCR:

Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR

Col-0:

Columbia

RT-sqPCR:

Reverse transcription-semiquantitative PCR

rdd :

Ros1 dml2 dml3

References

  1. Baulcombe D. RNA silencing in plants. Nature. 2004;431:356–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ascencio-Ibáñez JT, Sozzani R, Lee TJ, Chu TM, Wolfinger RD, Cella R, et al. Global analysis of Arabidopsis gene expression uncovers a complex array of changes impacting pathogen response and cell cycle during geminivirus infection. Plant Physiol. 2008;148(1):436–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Raja P, Sanville BC, Buchmann RC, Bisaro DM. Viral genome methylation as an epigenetic defense against geminiviruses. J Virol. 2008;82(18):8997–9007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang LP, Xu YN, Liu YQ, Meng DW, Jin TC, Zhou XF. HC-pro viral suppressor from tobacco vein banding mosaic virus interferes with DNA methylation and activates the salicylic acid pathway. Virology. 2016;497:244–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Meister G, Tuschl T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature. 2004;431(18):343–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Buchmann RC, Asad S, Wolf JN, Mohannath G, Bisaro DM. Geminivirus AL2 and L2 proteins suppress transcriptional gene silencing and cause genome-wide reductions in cytosine methylation. J Virol. 2009;83:5005–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong ZZ, Morales-ruiz T, Ariza RR, Roldán-arjona T. ROS1, a repressor of transcriptional gene silencing in Arabidopsis, encodes a DNA glycosylase/lyase. Cell. 2002;111(6):803–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu A, Lepère G, Jay F, Wang J, Bapaume L, Wang Y, et al. Dynamics and biological relevance of DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis antibacterial defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(6):2389–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu R, Lang ZB. The mechanism and function of active DNA demethylation in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2019;62(1):148–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Duan CG, Wang XG, Tang K, Zhang HM, Mangrauthia SK, Lei MG, et al. MET18 connects the cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster assembly pathway to active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2015;11(10):e1005559.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fedoroff NV, Battisti DS, Beachy RN, Cooper PJ, Fischhoff DA, Hodges CN, et al. Radically rethinking agriculture for the 21st century. Science. 2010;327(5967):833–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirouze M, Paszkowski J. Epigenetic contribution to stress adaptation in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2011;14(3):267–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kinoshita T, Seki M. Epigenetic memory for stress response and adaptation in plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014;55(11):1859–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Seki M. Regulatory network of gene expression in the drought and cold stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6(5):410–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu JK. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell. 2016;167(2):313–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2000;3(3):217–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Seki M, Narusaka M, Abe H, Kasuga M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Carninci P, et al. Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell. 2001;13(1):61–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maruyama K, Sakuma Y, Kasuga M, Ito Y, Seki M, Goda H, et al. Identification of cold-inducible downstream genes of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 transcriptional factor using two microarray systems. Plant J. 2004;38(6):982–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chinnusamy V, Zhu JK. Epigenetic regulation of stress responses in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12:133–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JS, Lim JY, Shin H, et al. ROS1-dependent DNA demethylation is required for ABA-inducible NIC3 expression [J]. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(4):1810–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Song Y, Ji D, Li S, Wang P, Li Q, Xiang F. The dynamic changes of DNA methylation and histone modifications of salt responsive transcription factor genes in soybean. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41274.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen H, Zhang ZH, Teng KL, Lai JB, Zhang YY, Huang YL, et al. Up-regulation of LSB1/GDU3 affects geminivirus infection by activating the salicylic acid pathway. Plant J. 2010;62:12–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu H, Rate DN, Song JT, Greenberg JT. ACD6, a novel ankyrin protein, is a regulator and an effector of salicylic acid signaling in the Arabidopsis defense response. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2408–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wildermuth MC, Dewdney J, Wu G, Ausubel FM. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature. 2001;414:562–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Falk A, Feys BJ, Frost LN, Jones JD, Daniels MJ, Parker JE. EDS1, an essential component of R gene-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis has homology to eukaryotic lipases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:3292–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Jirage D, Tootle TL, Reuber TL, Frost LN, Feys BJ, Parker JE, et al. Arabidopsis thaliana PAD4 encodes alipase-like gene that is important for salicylic acid signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:13583–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nawrath C, Heck S, Parinthawong N, Metraux JP. EDS5, an essential component of salicylic acid-dependent signaling for disease resistance in Arabidopsis, is a member of the MATE transporter family. Plant Cell. 2002;14:275–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Cao H, Glazebrook J, Clarke JD, Volko S, Dong X. The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene that controls systemic acquired resistance encodes a novel protein containing ankyrin repeats. Cell. 1997;88:57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rate DN, Cuenca JV, Bowman GR, Guttman DS, Greenberg JT. The gain-of-function Arabidopsis acd6 mutant reveals novel regulation and function of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in controlling cell death, defenses, and cell growth. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1695–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. An C, Mou Z. Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2011;53:412–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hayat Q, Hayat S, Irfan M, Ahmad A. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: a review. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;68:14–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sawada H, Shim IS, Usui K. Induction of benzoic acid 2-hydroxylase and salicylic acid biosynthesisModulation by salt stress in rice seedlings. Plant Sci. 2006;171:263–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang LP, Fang YY, An CP, Dong L, Zhang ZH, Chen H, et al. C2-mediated decrease in DNA methylation, accumulation of siRNAs, and increase in expression for genes involved in defense pathways in plants infected with beet severe curly top virus. Plant J. 2013;73:910–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cokus SJ, Feng SH, Zhang XY, Chen ZG, Merriman B, Haudenschild CD, et al. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature. 2008;452:215–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 2002;31(3):279–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhu JK, Verslues PE, Zheng X, et al. HOS10 encodes an R2R3-type MYB transcription factor essential for cold acclimation in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102:9966–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Marsch-Martinez N, Greco R, Van Arkel G, Herrera-Estrella L, Pereira A. Activation tagging using the en-I maize transposon system in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(4):1544–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tang K, Zhang H, Zhu JK. The DNA demethylase ROS1 targets genomic regions with distinct chromatin modifications. Nat Plants. 2016;2:16169.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Duan CG, Zhang HM, Tang K, et al. Specific but interdependent functions for Arabidopsis AGO4 and AGO6 in RNA-directed DNA methylation. EMBO J. 2015;34(5):581–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Duan CG, Wang XG, Xie SJ, Li P, et al. A pair of transposon-derived proteins function in a histone acetyltransferase complex for active DNA demethylation. Cell Res. 2017;27:226–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li ZQ, Li JX, Li HJ, Shi ZH, Zhang GF. Overexpression of TsApx1 from Thellungiella salsuginea improves abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Plantarum. 2015;59:497–506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang ZH, Chen H, Huang XH, et al. BSCTV C2 attenuates the degradation of SAMDC1 to suppress DNA methylation-mediated gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:273–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Chengguo Duan, Shanghai Center for Plant Stress Biology, Shanghai Institute of Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), for providing the ros1 and ros1dml2dml3 mutant seeds and Prof. Xiaofeng Cao, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, CAS, for providing the ago4–1, met1, and cmt3 mutant seeds. This work was supported by the Key Laboratory of Jilin Province for Plant Resources Science and Green Production, China.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 31301043) and the Department of Finance of Jilin Province (Grant Number JJKH20191013KJ). These founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The School of Life Sciences, Jilin Normal University, Siping, China

    Liping Yang, Chenjing Lang, Yanju Wu, Dawei Meng, Taicheng Jin & Xiaofu Zhou

  2. The School of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, Shanxi, China

    Tianbo Yang

  3. The School of Life Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China

    Danqi Li

Authors
  1. Liping Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chenjing Lang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yanju Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dawei Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tianbo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danqi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Taicheng Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiaofu Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YLP performed the important experiments and prepared the manuscript. HH, LCJ, WYJ, MDW, YTB, LDQ participated in the research work. JTC and ZXF edited the manuscript and gave advices regarding the work. The authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Taicheng Jin or Xiaofu Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, L., Lang, C., Wu, Y. et al. ROS1-mediated decrease in DNA methylation and increase in expression of defense genes and stress response genes in Arabidopsis thaliana due to abiotic stresses. BMC Plant Biol 22, 104 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03473-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03473-4

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us