Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

Production and molecular characterization of bread wheat lines with reduced amount of α-type gliadins

  • Francesco Camerlengo1,
  • Francesco Sestili1,
  • Marco Silvestri2,
  • Giuseppe Colaprico3,
  • Benedetta Margiotta3,
  • Roberto Ruggeri1,
  • Roberta Lupi1,
  • Stefania Masci1 and
  • Domenico Lafiandra1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
BMC Plant BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:248

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1211-3

Received: 10 July 2017

Accepted: 8 December 2017

Published: 19 December 2017

Abstract

Background

Among wheat gluten proteins, the α-type gliadins are the major responsible for celiac disease, an autoimmune disorder that affects about 1% of the world population. In fact, these proteins contain several toxic and immunogenic epitopes that trigger the onset of the disease. The α-type gliadins are a multigene family, encoded by genes located at the complex Gli-2 loci.

Results

Here, three bread wheat deletion lines (Gli-A2, Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2) at the Gli-2 loci were generated by the introgression in the bread wheat cultivar Pegaso of natural mutations, detected in different bread wheat cultivars. The molecular characterization of these lines allowed the isolation of 49 unique expressed genes coding α-type gliadins, that were assigned to each of the three Gli-2 loci.

The number and the amount of α-type gliadin transcripts were drastically reduced in the deletion lines. In particular, the line Gli-A2/Gli-D2 contained only 12 active α-type gliadin genes (−75.6% respect to the cv. Pegaso) and a minor level of transcripts (−80% compared to cv. Pegaso). Compensatory pleiotropic effects were observed in the two other classes of gliadins (ω- and γ-gliadins) either at gene expression or protein levels.

Although the comparative analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences highlighted the typical structural features of α-type gliadin proteins, substantial differences were displayed among the 49 proteins for the presence of toxic and immunogenic epitopes.

Conclusion

The deletion line Gli-A2/Gli-D2 did not contain the 33-mer peptide, one of the major epitopes triggering the celiac disease, representing an interesting material to develop less “toxic” wheat varieties.

Keywords

Glutenα-gliadinsCeliac diseaseBread wheatDeletion lines

Background

With a surface of 220 M of hectares, wheat represents the most widely cultivated crop and a major component of the human diet. This is the result of its agronomic adaptability, ease of storage, nutritional value and ability of its flour to produce a large variety of palatable and satisfying foods [1]. It is firmly established that functional properties of doughs, necessary to realize different types of end products are mainly related to gluten proteins. The main constituents of the gluten are gliadins and glutenins that represent the storage proteins, accumulated in the endosperm during the graining phase and used by the growing embryo during the first phases of germination. Gliadins and glutenins constitute about 80% of the total proteins and are classified as “prolamins” because of their high content in proline and glutamine [2]. Glutenins are polymeric proteins, whose constituents, high and low molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS and LMW-GS, respectively), are held together by intermolecular disulfide bonds [3, 4]. Genes encoding these subunits are present at the Glu-1 and Glu-3 loci, present on the long and short arm of the homeologous group 1 chromosomes, respectively [4]. Differently, gliadins are monomeric proteins, classified in four groups, known as α-, β-, γ- and ω-gliadins, on the basis of their decreasing mobility in electrophoresis at acid pH [5]. Subsequent comparisons of amino acid and DNA sequences have demonstrated that the separation of gliadins in four groups is not correct as α- and β-gliadins share similar sequences leading Kasarda et al. [6] to suggest that, from a structural point of view, gliadins could be subdivided into three groups: α-, γ- and ω-type.

The genes encoding ω- and γ-type gliadins are located at three complex Gli-1 loci (Gli-A1, Gli-B1 e Gli-D1) present on the short arms of the homeologous chromosomes of group 1, whereas α-type are controlled by genes located at the Gli-2 loci (Gli-A2, Gli-B2 e Gli-D2) on the short arms of the homeologous chromosomes of group 6 [7, 8].

Within the same Gli-1 and Gli-2 loci, genes encoding for mutant form of gliadins are also present [9, 10]. They are highly similar in sequence to individual α-, γ- and ω-type gliadins, and are probably derived from these components by point mutations resulting in the presence of an additional cysteine residue. The extra cysteine residue is capable to form intermolecular disulfide bonds resulting in incorporation of the modified gliadin into the glutenin polymers where it can act as chain terminator and limiting their molecular weight distribution [3, 11].

It is estimated that the average number of copies of α-gliadin genes per haploid genome ranges from 25–35 to 100–150 copies; this large number has been generated by duplication, deletion events and retrotransposon insertion [1214].

At least half of α-type gliadin genes are considered inactive or pseudogenes because they show premature stop codons in the coding sequences [1517]. From a quantitative point of view the proportions of the different classes of gliadins fluctuate considerably among different varieties, although the α-type gliadins are generally present in larger amount, followed by the γ- and ω-type gliadins [18].

Several studies have shown that peptides derived from incomplete digestion of all gluten proteins, but in particular those of the α-type gliadins, are the main responsible for the onset of celiac disease [17, 19, 20]. Celiac disease is a permanent food disorder caused by an abnormal autoimmune response to dietary gluten peptides that occurs in genetically susceptible individuals carrying T-cell with HLA-DQ2 or -DQ8 receptors [2123]. The autoimmune component is demonstrated by serologic autoantibodies such as serum anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) [24]. The partially digested peptides contain epitopes that are involved in the disease processes in different manner and they are accordingly classified into two groups: toxic and immunogenic epitopes. Toxic peptides can induce mucosal damage when added in culture to duodenal endoscopic biopsy or if administered in vivo, whereas the peptides defined immunogenic stimulate HLA-DQ2- or DQ8-restricted T cell clones isolated from jejunal mucosa or peripheral blood of coeliac patients [25]. However, it is not excluded that some peptides can perform both functions, toxic and immunogenic.

Several studies have demonstrated that the large genetic diversity existing at the different loci encoding gliadin components is reflected in a large variation in the number of T-cell–stimulatory peptides present in different durum and bread wheat accessions as well as in diploid progenitors of polyploid wheats [17, 2628]. In the past years, several lines and cultivars have been identified in durum and bread wheat, characterized by the deletion of genes associated to the Gli-1, Gli-2 and Glu-1 loci [29, 30].

In this paper, we report the production of bread wheat lines with reduced amount of α-type gliadins, and the characterization of their corresponding genes, with the aim to produce wheat varieties with a reduced content in immunogenic and toxic peptides.

Methods

Plant material and experimental site

Bread wheat lines lacking gliadin components at the three homeologous Gli-1 loci and two lines without the gliadins associated at the Gli-A2 and Gli-D2 loci, previously identified in different bread wheat cultivars, have been initially used to develop the lines used in this work (Table 1). In order to have the single deletion lines in the same genetic background, they were crossed and backcrossed four times with the Italian bread wheat cultivar Pegaso. The gliadins present in the seeds obtained after each backcross were analyzed by one dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in acidic conditions (A-PAGE) and those lacking the gliadins, associated at one of the five above mentioned loci, were used for the next step of backcrossing. BC4F6 seeds were used for all the analyses. The single deletion lines obtained from the backcross with the bread wheat cv Pegaso were crossed between them, thus, besides single Gli-A2, or Gli-D2 deletion lines, also double Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion lines were isolated.
Table 1

List of deletion mutant lines at the Gli-1 and Gli-2 loci

Locus

Cultivar

Country

Reference

Gli-A1

Saratovskaja 29

USSR

Redaelli et al. [30]

Gli-B1

Spada

Italy

Lafiandra et al. [31]

Gli-D1

Darius

France

Branlard et al. [32]

Gli-A2

Reader

USA

Lafiandra et al. [29]

Gli-D2

Saratovskaja 29

USSR

Redaelli et al. [30]

The three BC4F6 deletion lines and the cultivar Pegaso were grown in open field during 2014/2015 growing season at the Experimental Farm of the University of Tuscia, located in Viterbo, Italy (lat. 42°26’ N, long. 12° 04′ E, altitude 310 m a.s.l.). The experimental site is characterized by a Mediterranean climate with mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures of 19 and 8 °C, respectively, and annual rainfall of 743 mm.

Electrophoretic analysis of gliadins

Monomeric gliadins were extracted from single kernel and fractionated by A-PAGE as described by Pflüger et al. [33]. Two-dimensional (two-pH) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was carried out as described by Lafiandra and Kasarda [34].

Isolation of genes coding α-type gliadin proteins expressed in grain

Genes coding α-type gliadins were amplified by Reverse transcriptase-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from immature kernels (24 Day Post Anthesis, DPA) using the Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) and following manufacturer’s instructions. One μg of RNA constituted the template for the synthesis of cDNA, based on the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each PCR reaction were performed in a volume of 20 μL containing 10 μL of GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega), 0.5 μM of each primer (L1 and R1, Table 2) and 1 μL of cDNA. PCR conditions were: an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles at 95 °C for 1 min, 61 °C for 30 s,72 °C for 1 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. PCR amplicons were checked on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.
Table 2

List of primer pairs used to isolate the α-type gliadins and in RT-PCR analysis

Primer name

Sequence

Reference

L1

5’-ATGAAGACCTTTCTCATCCTTG

Xie et al. [35]

R1

5’-TCAGTTRGTACCRAAGATGCC

RT a-gli F

5’-AGACCTTTCTCATCCTTGCC

Li et al. [36]

RT a-gli R

5’-TGTACCAATGGAACTTGCTCT

G1Gli*1

5’-ACAGGTGAACCCATGCAAGAATTT

Piston et al. [37]

G1Gli*2

5’-TGCATGATGATGGAATGTATGATGG

G2Gli*1

5’-TCATTCCCCCAACAACAACGG

Piston et al. [37]

G2Gli*2

5’-AGGTTTGCATTGTTGCAAGAGGAT

G3 Gli*1

5’-GCAAATCCTGGTGCCACTGTCTCAA

Piston et al. [37]

G3 Gli*2

5’-TGGGACATACACGTTGCACATGGTT

 

G4 Gli*1

5’-GATCCTGCGGCCACTATTTCAGCTC

Piston et al. [37]

G4 Gli*2

5’-CAGGTGGCACATACACGTTGCACAT

 

QF18

5’-AAGGCAAGCAAGCAGTAG

Altenbach et al. [38]

QR18

5’-GATTGTTGAGGTGATTGTAGC

QF21

5’-CAACCACCACAACAATTC

Altenbach et al. [38]

QR21

5’-TTACATCTCTTCATTTCATAGG

PCR amplicons were recovered from gel by NucleoSpin® Gel and PCR Clean-up kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) and the purified products were ligated into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). JM109 Competent Cells (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) were transformed with the ligation reaction. Transformed cells were plated onto LB medium plus Ampicillin containing X-Gal and IPTG (Sigma-Aldrich,) for blue/white screening.

White colonies were inoculated in LB medium plus Ampicillin, and plasmids were extracted with the NucleoSpin® Plasmid kit (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany). The presence of the insert was verified by digesting about one μg of each recombinant plasmid for 2 h with 5 units of EcoRI restriction enzyme (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Digested plasmids were checked on an agarose gel (0.8%).

DNA sequencing was performed with the universal primers T7 and SP6 by Eurofins Genomics (Ebersberg, Germany).

Full length sequences of α-gliadin genes were reconstructed by overlapping the fragments with the bioinformatic program Geneious R8. Clustal Omega (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/) was used to align and compare the deduced amino acid sequences.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree was generated by Neighbor Joining method using MEGA7 software package (http://www.megasoftware.net/) [39].

Quantification of gliadin transcripts

Real-time PCR was performed on total RNA using primer pairs specific for α-, γ and ω-gliadins (Table 2). The analyses were performed in the CFX 96 Real-Time PCR Detection System device (Bio-Rad Hercules, CA, USA). The reactions were carried out in a final volume of 15 μL, consisting in 7.5 μL SsoAdvUniver SYBR GRN SMX (Bio-Rad Hercules, CA, USA), 0.5 μM of each primer and 1 μL of cDNA, following the protocol below: 94 °C for 30 s and 40 cycles at 94 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 30 s and melt curve 65–95 °C with 0.5 °C increment 5 s/step. Three technical replicates per biological sample and three independent plants per genotype were analyzed. The quantification analysis was performed as described in Sestili et al. [40].

Results

Separation of gliadins by one- and two-dimensional electrophoresis

The utilization of the three different deletion lines, without the Gli-1 loci (Gli-A1, Gli-B1, Gli-D1) and the two without the Gli-2 loci (Gli-A2 and Gli-D2), all backcrossed four times with the bread wheat cv Pegaso, have allowed the isolation of five single deletion lines. The five lines obtained differ for the absence of different clusters of gliadin components encoded by genes present at the Gli-1 or Gli-2 locus, whereas the remaining gliadin genes are the same as those present in Pegaso.

One dimensional electrophoretic separations of gliadin components present in the bread wheat cultivar Pegaso and derived single and double deletion lines (Gli-A2, Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2) are reported in Fig. 1. Three independent single seeds were analyzed for each deletion line. Comparison of the electrophoretic separations of gliadins present in Pegaso, with single and double deletion lines, allowed to assign gliadin components to the three different Gli-2 loci. Although the gliadins were extracted from single kernels for each genotype and the same volume was loaded on the gel, an increase of intensity of the other gliadin fractions was observed in the deletion lines and this was more marked in the double deletion genotype (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

A-PAGE separation of gliadin fractions. Proteins were extracted from kernels of Pegaso (1–3), Gli-A2 deletion line (4–6); Gli-D2 deletion line (7–9) and Gli-A2/Gli-D2 double deletion line (10–12)

Two dimensional electrophoretic separations have a higher resolving power of a complex mixture of proteins as is the case for the gliadin fraction present in wheat. Using the two dimensional separation at two different pH [34] a more complete chromosomal assignment of the gliadins associated at the Gli-2 loci was possible (Fig. 2). Though the deletion line involving the Gli-B2 locus was not available, components associated at this locus were also identified, after assignment of gliadin components at the three Gli-1 loci (data not shown), along with those associated at the Gli-A2 and Gli-D2 loci.
Fig. 2

Two-dimensional (2-pH) electrophoretic separation of gliadins. Proteins were extracted from the bread wheat cultivar Pegaso (a) and Gli-A2 (b), Gli-D2 (c), Gli-A2/Gli-D2 (d) deletion lines

A total of seventeen gliadins were found associated to the Gli-2 loci, seven to the Gli-A2, six to the Gli-D2 and three to the Gli-B2 locus. It is very likely that these numbers are an underestimation since it has been reported that single protein spots could derive from different genes because of their close similarity [7].

Isolation and genetic localization of α-type gliadins expressed in the bread wheat cv Pegaso

The transcripts of α-type gliadin genes were isolated by Reverse transcriptase-PCR on immature caryopsis (24 DPA) of the bread wheat cv Pegaso and derived deletion lines at the Gli-A2, Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2 loci. Full-length ORFs were amplified using specific oligonucleotides (L1 and R1) designed on highly conserved regions previously described by Xie et al. [35]. The PCR products were checked on agarose gel (data not shown) and ranged from 800 to 950 base pairs. After purification, the amplicons were cloned into pGEM T-easy vector. In total, 381 sequences of α-type gliadins were identified and sequenced. In particular, 104 sequences were isolated from the bread wheat cv Pegaso; 101, 107 and 69 were isolated from the deletion lines Gli-A2, Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2, respectively. Several chimeric genes, probably produced during PCR amplification, and some pseudogenes were observed and discarded. Blast analysis on NCBI database highlighted that the sequences isolated from the deletion lines Gli-A2 and Gli-D2 had a high similarity with genes coding α-type gliadins from Triticum aestivum, Triticum urartu, Aegilops speltoides and Aegilops tauschii species; while the sequences deriving from the double deletion line and associated to the Gli-B2 locus showed the higher similarity with genes coding α-type gliadins isolated from Aegilops speltoides; this is not unexpected, as it has been suggested that an unknown close relative of Aegilops speltoides donated the B genome to polyploid wheats [41].

After removing either redundant genes and chimeric/pseudogenic sequences, 49 unique genes were isolated from the cv Pegaso and submitted to the EMBL database (from the acc. n° LT627562 to LT627610). Considering together the data obtained by the sequencing of the four genotypes, all the full-length sequences were assigned to one of the homoeologous Gli-2 loci: 18 sequences to the Gli-A2, 12 to the Gli-B2 and 19 to the Gli-D2. Alignment of the isolated α-type-gliadins is reported in Additional file 1: Figure S1. All α-type gliadin genes isolated lack introns and their size range from 846 to 960 bp.

Analysis of amino acidic sequences of the α-type gliadins isolated from the bread wheat cv Pegaso

The 49 deduced amino acidic sequences were aligned through the bioinformatic tool Clustal Omega (EMBL-EBI) (Aditional file 2: Figure S2). All the sequences had the typical features of α-type gliadins, characterized from a signal peptide (P) and five domains: 1) N-terminal domain (R1); 2) Polyglutamine domain 1 (QR1); 3) Unique domain 1 (NR1); 4) Polyglutamine domain 2 (QR2); 5) C-terminal unique domain (NR2). In Additional file 3: Table S1 the number of amino acids present in each domain of the 49 α-type gliadins isolated from the bread wheat cv Pegaso is reported. Size of the deduced proteins ranges from 281 to 319 amino acids, whereas the molecular weight ranges from 30.4 to 34.7 kDa. The signal peptide is strongly conserved in size (20 aa) and composition in all the sequences. Similarly the domains NR1 and NR2 resulted highly conserved among the different genomes and ranged from 68 to 69 and 76 to 78 aa, respectively.

The α-type gliadins assigned to the Gli-B2 locus, with the exception of Gli-B2–1, Gli-B2–8 and Gli-B2–9, are larger in size compared to those assigned to the other two loci. In particular, their size (including the signal peptide) ranged from 312 to 319 aa; differently, α-type gliadins assigned to the Gli-A2 and Gli-D2 loci ranged from 283 to 294 and from 282 to 309 aa, respectively (Aditional file 3: Table S1; Additional file 2: Figure S2). These differences were mainly due to the length of the two polyglutamine domains (QR1 and QR2) and the N-terminal domain (R1); in fact, QR1 was highly polymorphic among the different α-type gliadins and ranged from 18 to 29 aa for the Gli-A2 locus, from 21 to 33 for the Gli-B2 and from 12 to 25 for the Gli-D2. Similarly, the QR2 domain was different in length for the proteins associated to the Gli-B2 (7–33) and Gli-D2 (8–18) loci, while was identical in size (8 aa) for the α-type-gliadins associated to the Gli-A2 locus (Additional file 3: Table S1).

InDels polymorphism was also observed in the R1 domain, except for the sequences associated to the Gli-A2 locus, that were highly conserved (92 aa) (Additional file 3: Table S1). This domain was higher in size in the α-type gliadins associated to the Gli-D2 locus compared to those of the other two loci. In particular, a peptide of seven amino acids (QPQLPYP), present from one to three times in sixteen genes out of the nineteen possible, is responsible for this difference (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

All the 18 sequences associated to the Gli-A2 locus resulted more conserved among them than those of the other two loci; in particular the size of the 4 domains (R1, NR1, QR2 and NR2) was identical in the 18 α-type-gliadins; only the QR1 varied in size (from 18 to 29 aa). Differently for the proteins associated to the other two loci, the NR1 and NR2 domains were conserved, while R1 and QR2, as above reported, changed in length among the different sequences (Additional file 3: Table S1).

The position and number of cysteine residues (in total 6) were highly conserved in the deduced proteins except for the six sequences (Gli-B2–1, Gli-D2–4, Gli-D2–5, Gli-D2–6, Gli-D2–7 and Gli-D2–8) which showed the presence of an additional cysteine residue in the NR2 domain. The extra cysteine is the result of a point mutation in the codon TCC, coding for the amino acid serine, to TGC. The polymorphism was detected in the same position in all sequences above cited (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Phylogenetic analysis of α-type gliadins isolated from the bread wheat cv Pegaso

The phylogenetic relationships among the 49 α-type gliadins were investigated on the basis of the predicted amino acidic sequences. This analysis showed that it is possible to distinguish the α-type gliadins on the basis of their genomic origin (Fig. 3). In fact, the phylogenetic tree revealed that the deduced proteins were grouped in three large clusters (I, II and III): all the sequences associated at the Gli-A2 locus were assigned to the cluster I; whereas, those associated at the Gli-B2 and Gli-D2 loci were assigned to the cluster II and III, respectively. Only the sequence Gli-B2–1 did not cluster with other sequences in the phylogenetic tree, but it was located at an intermediate position between the clusters I and II.
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic relationships among the α-type gliadins isolated from the cultivar Pegaso. The tree was constructed based on neighbor-joining analysis using the entire coding regions

Analysis of gene expression of the ω-, γ- and α-type gliadins

To investigate at molecular level the reduction of α-type gliadin transcripts and to confirm the possible pleiotropic effects on the other classes of gliadins observed at protein level (Fig. 1), a Real Time PCR experiment was carried out on mRNA extracted from 24 DPA immature kernels of Pegaso, the two single deletion lines and the double one. Seven primer pairs were used: one specific for genes encoding α-type gliadins, four for γ-gliadins (G1, G2, G3, G4) [37] and two for ω-gliadins (Q18, Q21) [38]. Data shown in Fig. 4 highlighted that the single deletion lines (Gli-A2 and Gli-D2) had a significant reduction of the expression of α-type gliadins, that ranged from 25% in the Gli-A2 line to 62% in the Gli-D2 one. A more drastic reduction (80%) was observed in the double deletion line Gli-A2/Gli-D2. These results indicated that the genes located on the locus Gli-D2 were more expressed or in a higher number of copies compared to the Gli-A2 and Gli-B2 loci.
Fig. 4

Analysis of relative gene expression of α- (Gli), γ- (G1, G2, G3 and G4) and ω-type (Q18 and Q21) gliadin transcripts in immature grain of bread wheat cv Pegaso and derived Gli-2 deletion lines. Dotted line indicates the relative transcription value of the control (cv. Pegaso). Each bar corresponds to the standard error, along with an asterisk to indicate where the deletion line values differed significantly (P < 0.05) from that of the wild type

The primer pairs, designed by Piston et al. [37], were used to quantify the levels of the four classes of γ-gliadin transcripts in immature grains. No changes were detected in the single deletion line Gli-A2; differently, these genes were up-regulated (up to 6 fold) in the other two deletion lines (Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2) (Fig. 4). A significant increase, but less evident, was also observed for the gene expression of the ω-gliadins in the genotype Gli-A2/Gli-D2, whereas no significant differences were observed in the single deletion lines (Fig. 4). All together, these data confirmed the existence of a compensatory mechanism as a consequence of the α-type gliadins down-regulation, in particular, when the locus Gli-D2 was absent.

Analysis of toxic and immunogenic peptides present in the 49 α-gliadins expressed in bread wheat cv Pegaso

The presence of toxic and immunogenic epitopes was investigated in the isolated α-gliadin genes. The analysis was focused on seven toxic epitopes previously described [25] and on five dominant immunogenic epitopes [36] (Additional file 4: Table S2 and Additional file 5: Table S3). Six toxic peptides, α-Glia (31–43), α-Glia (31–49), α-Glia (31–55), α-Glia (44–55), α-Glia (51–70) and α-Glia (56–75), were found in the N-terminal repetitive domain; whereas, the epitope α-Glia (206–217) was localized in the C-terminal domain. The position of the seven toxic epitopes was highly conserved, but a specificity in epitope occurrence on α-type gliadins assigned to the different genomes was observed. In particular the toxic peptides α-Glia (31–43) was specific of six and sixteen α-type gliadins present at the Gli-B2 and Gli-D2 loci, respectively. Similarly, the epitope α-Glia (31–49) was not detected in the proteins associated to the Gli-A2 and was observed in fourteen α-type gliadins (five associated to the Gli-B2 and nine to the Gli-D2).

The peptides α-Glia (31–55) and α-Glia (206–217) were specific for the D and A genome, respectively. The first one was present in nine sequences; the last one was detected in all the α-type gliadins of the Gli-A2 locus. Two epitopes (α-Glia (44–55) and α-Glia (51–70)) were detected in all the three Gli-2 loci, although they were more abundant in the α-type gliadins of the Gli-A2 and Gli-D2 loci compared to those of Gli-B2. α-Glia (56–75) was characteristic of five α-type gliadins of the Gli-D2  locus: it was not observed in any sequences assigned to the Gli-A2 and Gli-B2 loci (Additional file 4: Table S2).

The presence of the five immunogenic epitopes (Glia-α, Glia-α2, Glia-α9, Glia-α20 and 33-mer), able to specifically stimulate HLA-DQ2- or DQ8-restricted T cell clones, was investigated in deduced protein sequences of the 49 α-gliadins isolated from the cultivar Pegaso (Additional file 5: Table S3).

Glia-α9 and Glia-α20 were the most abundant, being identified in 30 and 25 sequences, respectively. Noteworthy, these epitopes were present only in one sequence produced from the Gli-B2 locus. The Glia-α2 peptide was typical of α-gliadins associated at the D genome, being completely absent in those associated with the Gli-A2 and Gli-B2 loci. In particular, it was detected in 13 sequences out of 19 associated with the Gli-D2 locus.

Gli-α was present in 24 sequences (13 associated with the D genome and 11 with the B genome): this epitope was not detected in α-gliadins deriving from the Gli-A2 locus.

The 33-mer immunogenic peptide, that is considered the principal responsible of the development of the gluten dependent lesion since it is the most immunogenic powerful inducer [42], was completely absent in the α-gliadins assigned to Gli-A2 and Gli-B2  loci; whereas it was detected in four proteins assigned to Gli-D2 locus.

The comparison of deduced amino acid sequences between Pegaso and derived Gli-2 deletion lines highlighted that these latter had a reduced number of toxic and immunogenic epitopes (Table 3). This reduction was either quantitative or qualitative: the deletion lines had less α-type gliadin proteins (31 in the Gli-A2 genotype; 30 in Gli-D2 and 12 in Gli-A2/Gli-D2) compared to Pegaso (49); moreover, as some epitopes were specific of one of the three Gli-2 loci, each deletion lines had lost some of these peptides. More in detail, the immunogenic peptides Glia-α2 and 33-mer and the toxic peptides α-Glia (31–55) and α-Glia (56–75) were completely absent in the Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion lines (Table 3). Similarly, the toxic peptide α-Glia (206–217) associated to the Gli-A2 locus was not detected in the α-type gliadins present in the two genotypes lacking this locus (Gli-A2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion lines) (Table 3). In conclusion, the total number of the immunogenic and toxic epitopes detected in the Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion line was, respectively, 13 and 17, drastically reduced if compared to the cultivar Pegaso, where 96 immunogenic and 111 toxic peptides were present.
Table 3

Number of deduced proteins and immunodominant/toxic epitopes detected in the bread wheat cv Pegaso and Gli-2 deletion lines

  

Immunodominant epitopes

Toxic epitopes

Genotypes

n° proteins

Glia-α

Glia-α2

Glia-α9

Glia-α20

33-mer

α-Glia

(31–43)

α-Glia

(31–49)

α-Glia

(31–55)

α-Glia

(44–55)

α-Glia

(51–70)

α-Glia

(56–75)

α-Glia

(206–217)

Pegaso

49

24

13

30

25

4

22

14

9

27

16

5

18

Gli-A2

31

24

13

18

10

4

22

14

9

13

10

5

0

Gli-D2

30

11

0

13

16

0

6

5

0

15

7

0

18

Gli-A2/GliD2

12

11

0

1

1

0

6

5

0

5

1

0

0

Discussion

Copy number of expressed α-type gliadin genes and genetic localization

Genes coding α-gliadins present in the bread wheat cultivar Pegaso and the deletion lines were isolated and characterized. The analysis of α-gliadin transcripts leads to the isolation of 49 unique sequences. This number is congruent with that previously reported for other bread wheat cultivars [16, 43].

Although estimated copy numbers of α-type gliadins are consistently higher (from 100 up to 150) in genomic DNA [13], it was estimated that half of the α-type-gliadin genes are pseudogenes and thus not expressed [15]. In agreement with this estimation, Noma and colleagues [43] found that 40 out of 90 genes isolated from the bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (ca. 44%) had a premature stop codon.

Here, all the 49 α-type-gliadin genes were associated to one of the three Gli-2 loci. The Gli-B2 locus contains a lower number of genes (12) compared to the Gli-A2 (18) and Gli-D2 (19) loci. This result agrees with that observed by Salentijn et al. [44] that found a low amount of Gli-B2 sequences in two landraces and in the bread wheat cultivar Lavett. However, the same authors analyzed several tetraploid and hexaploid wheat varieties and demonstrated that the copy number of expressed α-type gliadins associated to each Gli-2 locus is extremely variable, either among the wheat species or within the same species among different varieties. For example, differently from the cv Pegaso, Noma and colleagues [43] found a similar number of intact genes coding α-type gliadins in the three Gli-2 loci of the bread wheat cv Chinese Spring; in particular, the copy number was 16, 16 and 18 from the Gli-A2, Gli-B2 and Gli -D2 loci, respectively.

Expression of gliadin fractions in bread wheat cv Pegaso and derived Gli-2 deletion lines

Our data highlighted a differential contribution of the three Gli-2 loci in the production of α-type gliadin transcripts. In particular, the levels of transcript produced from the Gli-D2 locus is larger than those deriving from the Gli-A2 and Gli-B2 loci. Kawaura and colleagues [45] carried out a study of expression patterns of α-type gliadin genes by using a bioinformatic approach and found that genes from the D genome were preferentially expressed compared to those deriving from the A or B genomes. Similarly, Salentijn et al. [44] investigated the expression of α-type-gliadins in some tetraploid and hexaploid wheats, demonstrating that large differences exist in the expression levels of the α-type gliadins associated at the three Gli-2 loci. Noteworthy the Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion line contains a low level of α-type gliadins (20%), but a drastic increase of the other gliadin fractions was observed in A-PAGE. This observation was confirmed at molecular level by Real-Time PCR and lead us to hypothesize the existence of compensatory mechanisms. A similar mechanism of regulation was never observed among the gliadin fraction, but it has previously reported between glutenins and gliadins [46, 47].

Number and position of the cysteine residues

The number and position of cysteine residues was conserved among the different α-type gliadins; In fact, six cysteine residues were present in most of the α-gliadins, except for six sequences which showed the presence of an additional cysteine residue in the NR2 domain (five associated to the Gli-D2 locus and one to the Gli-B2). The presence of an extra cysteine residue in α-gliadins was also reported by different authors [35, 43]. Interestingly, a search on NCBI revealed that this extra cysteine was also present in the same position in different T. aestivum ssp. (vulgare, compactum, spelta and macha) and several accessions of Ae tauschii, thereby supporting the hypothesis that the point mutation responsible for the appearance of the odd cysteine residue occurred in the wild progenitor of the D genome to hexaploid wheats.

Presence of toxic and immunogenic epitopes

It is scientifically proved that celiac disease is triggered from digestion-resistant gluten peptides, among these α-type gliadins are considered the major responsible [19, 26, 4850]. In fact, as all the other gluten proteins, α-type gliadins, being rich in proline and glutamine, have few trypsin cleavage sites and are partially digested. Some of these peptides are recognized from T cell lines and can activate the adaptive and innate immune response [25]. Van den Broeck and colleagues [28] compared the genetic diversity of gluten proteins for the presence of CD epitopes in 36 modern European wheat varieties and in 50 landraces, finding that the presence of the Gli-α9 (one of the major immunodominant epitope present on α-type gliadins) was higher in modern wheats, as compared to old varieties. In the present work the number of α-type gliadins that have the epitope Gli-α9 is reduced in the lines lacking Gli-A2 (18) and Gli-D2 (14) loci compared to the cultivar Pegaso (31); this reduction is drastically evident in the Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion line, where the epitope Gli-α9 was detected only in one α-type gliadin (Table 3).

Some α-type gliadin isoforms contain the peptide 33-mer, that correspond to a cluster of immunogenic epitopes. This peptide is considered the main immunodominant toxic epitope and it is formed by six overlapping copies of three DQ2-restricted T-cell epitopes [16, 42].

Here, the 33-mer epitope was detected in four α-gliadin proteins, all encoded by the genes associated with the Gli-D2 locus; for this reason, the Gli-D2 and Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion lines are completely devoid of this peptide.

The investigation of the presence of immunogenic and toxic epitopes among the 49 α-gliadin isoforms isolated from the bread wheat cv Pegaso highlighted that the proteins associated with the Gli-D2 locus should be considered more highly reactive in respect to T cell toxicity. This result agrees with other works that found a higher amount of immunogenic and toxic epitopes in the α-gliadin proteins specific of the D genome compared to those derived from A and B genomes [17, 27, 51].

Conclusions

Several wheat breeding programs have focused on gluten proteins, in particular on glutenins as these proteins are the main determinants of wheat technological properties. It has been hypothesized that breeding has contributed to the production of more “toxic” varieties, responsible for the increase in celiac disease and gluten sensitivity [28]. Since the gluten exposure is correlated with the incidence of CD, the use of wheat varieties with a reduced amount of toxic and immunogenic peptides seems to be a promising solution. At this regard, the single and double deletion lines here described could, very likely, be less harmful for people with a genetic predisposition for celiac disease, but that have still not developed the pathology, and would represents a good material for the development of safer wheat varieties. In particular, the Gli-A2/Gli-D2 deletion line contains a drastic reduction of immunogenic (−85%) and toxic (−85%) epitopes compared to the bread wheat cv Pegaso. The use of novel technologies (e. g. genome editing technologies), capable to introduce accurately specific changes into the wheat genome combined with the use of some deletion lines, lacking already several toxic epitopes, could be effective in the challenge of obtaining a complete safe wheat for people suffering of CD.

Abbreviations

A-PAGE: 

Acid-Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

CD: 

Celiac disease

DPA: 

Days Post Anthesis

EMA: 

Endomysial antibodies

EMBL-EBI: 

European Bioinformatics Institute

HMW-GS: 

High molecular weight glutenin subunits

IPTG: 

Isopropyl-β-D-1-tiogalattopyranoside

LB: 

Luria-Bertani

LMW-GS: 

Low molecular weight glutenin subunits

NCBI: 

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NR1: 

Unique domain 1

NR2: 

C-terminal unique domain

ORF: 

Open Reading Frame

P: 

Signal peptide

QR1: 

Polyglutamine domain 1

QR2: 

Polyglutamine domain 2

R1: 

N-terminal domain

tTG: 

Tissue transglutaminase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

The research was financially supported by Barilla G. e R. F.lli S.p.A. The funding contributed to the design of the study, interpretation of data and writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Authors’ contributions

FC carried out the isolation of α-gliadins and the molecular analysis; BM and GC produced the deletion lines and 2D gel; FS and DL interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript; RR managed the plant grown in field and made substantial contributions to the acquisition of data; MS, RL and SM participated to the interpretation of data and revised the manuscript critically; DL conceived and coordinated the work. All authors have read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, University of Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy
(2)
Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, Bari, Italy
(3)
Barilla G. e R. F.lli S.p.A, Parma, Italy

References

  1. Shewry PR. Wheat. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:1537–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shewry PR, Tatham AS. The prolamin storage proteins of cereal seeds: structure and evolution. Biochem J. 1990;267:1–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Kasarda DD. Glutenin structure in relation to wheat quality. In: Pomeranz Y, editor. Wheat is unique. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St Paul, Minnesota; 1989. p. 277–302.Google Scholar
  4. Shewry PR, Halford NG, Lafiandra D. Genetics of wheat gluten proteins. Adv Genet. 2003;49:111–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Woychik JH, Boundy JA, Dimler RJ. Starch gel electrophoresis of wheat gluten proteins with concentrated urea. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1961;94:477–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kasarda DD, Adalsteins AE, Laird NF. Gamma-Gliadins with alpha-type structure coded on chromosome 6B of the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar 'Chinese Spring'. In: Lasztity R, Bekes F, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Gluten Proteins, Budapest, Hungary; 1987.Google Scholar
  7. Lafiandra D, Kasarda DD, Morris R. Chromosomal assignment of genes coding for the wheat gliadin protein components of the cultivars ‘Cheyenne’ and ‘Chinese spring’ by two-dimensional (two-pH) electrophoresis. Theor Appl Genet. 1984;68:531–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Metakovsky EV, Branlard GP, Graybosch RA, Wrigley C, Békés F, Bushuk W. Gliadins of common wheat: polymorphism and genetics. In: Wrigley C, Bekes F, Bushuk W, editors. Gliadin and glutenin: the unique balance of wheat quality. AACC International, St Paul, MN; 2006. p. 35–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Masci S, Lafiandra D, Porceddu E, Lew EJL, Tao HP, Kasarda DD. D-Glutenin subunits: N-terminal sequences and evidence for the presence of cysteine. Cereal Chem. 1993;70:581–5.Google Scholar
  10. Masci S, Rovelli L, Kasarda DD, Vensel WH, Lafiandra D. Characterisation and chromosomal localisation of C-type low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits in the bread wheat cultivar Chinese Spring. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;104:422–8.Google Scholar
  11. Vensel WH, Tanaka CK, Altenbach SB. Protein composition of wheat gluten polymer fractions determined by quantitative two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry. Proteome Sci. 2014;12:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Harberd NP, Bartels D, Thompson RD. Analysis of the gliadin multigene loci in bread wheat using nullisomic-tetrasomic lines. Mol Gen Genet. 1985;198:234–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Anderson OD, Litts JC, Greene FC. The α-gliadin gene family. I. Characterization of ten new wheat α-gliadin genomic clones, evidence for limited sequence conservation of flanking DNA, and southern analysis of the gene family. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95:50–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. YQ G, Crossman C, Kong XY, Luo MC, You FM, Coleman-Derr D, Dubcovsky J, Anderson OD. Genomic organization of the complex alpha-gliadin gene loci in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109:648–57.Google Scholar
  15. Anderson OD, Greene FC. The α-gliadin gene family. II. DNA and protein sequence variation, subfamily structure, and origins of pseudogenes. Theor Appl Genet. 1997;95:59–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ozuna CV, Iehisa J, Giménez MJ, Alvarez JB, Sousa C, Barro F. Diversification of the celiac disease α-gliadin complex in wheat: a 33-mer peptide with six overlapping epitopes, evolved following polyploidization. Plant J. 2015;82:794–805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Herpen TW, Goryunova SV, van der Schoot J, et al. Alpha-gliadin genes from the A, B, and D genomes of wheat contain different sets of celiac disease epitopes. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:1.Google Scholar
  18. Ribeiro M, Rodriguez-Quijanod M, Nunesc FM, Carrillod JM, Branlard G, Igrejasa G. New insights into wheat toxicity: Breeding did not seem to contribute to a prevalence of potential celiac disease's immunostimulatory epitopes. Food Chem. 2016;213:8–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mitea C, Salentijn EM, Van Veelen P, et al. A universal approach to eliminate antigenic properties of alpha-gliadin peptides in celiac disease. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15637.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Vaccino P, Becker HA, Brandolini A, Salamini F, Kilian BA. Catalogue of Triticum monococcum genes encoding toxic and immunogenic peptides for celiac disease patients. Mol Genet Genomics. 2009;281:289–300.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Louka AS, Sollid LMHLA. In coeliac disease: unravelling the complex genetics of a complex disorder. Tissue Antigens. 2003;61:105–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mazzarella G, Maglio M, Paparo F, et al. An immunodominant DQ8 restricted gliadin peptide activates small intestinal immune response in in vitro cultured mucosa from HLA-DQ8 positive but not HLA-DQ8 negative coeliac patients. Gut. 2003;52:57–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Margaritte-Jeannin P, Babron MC, Bourgey M, et al. HLA-DQ relative risks for coeliac disease in European populations: a study of the European genetics cluster on coeliac disease. Tissue Antigens. 2004;63:562–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sapone A, Bai JC, Ciacci C, et al. Spectrum of gluten-related disorders: consensus on new nomenclature and classification. BMC Med. 2012;10:13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Ciccocioppo R, Di Sabatino A, Corazza GR. The immune recognition of gluten in coeliac disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005;140:408–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Molberg Ø, Uhlen AK, Jensen T, Flæte NS, Fleckenstein B, Arentz-Hansen H, Raki M, Lundin KE, Sollid LM. Mapping of gluten T-cell epitopes in the bread wheat ancestors: implications for celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:393–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Spaenij–Dekking L, Kooy–Winkelaar Y, van Veelen P, Drijfhout JW, Jonker H, van Soest L, Smulders MJ, Bosch D, Gilissen LJ, Koning F. Natural variation in toxicity of wheat: potential for selection of nontoxic varieties for celiac disease patients. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129:797–806.Google Scholar
  28. Van den Broeck HC, de Jong HC, Salentijn EM, Dekking L, Bosch D, Hamer RJ, Gilissen LJ, van der Meer IM, Smulders MJ. Presence of celiac disease epitopes in modern and old hexaploid wheat varieties: wheat breeding may have contributed to increased prevalence of celiac disease. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:1527–39.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lafiandra D, Colaprico G, Kasarda DD, Porceddu E. Null alleles for gliadin blocks in bread and durum wheat cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 1987;74:610–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Redaelli R, Metakovsky EV, Davidov SD, Pogna NE. Two-dimensional mapping of gliadins using biotypes and null mutants of common wheat cultivar Saratovskaya 29. Hereditas. 1994;121:131–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lafiandra D, D’Ovidio R, Tanzarella OA, Ciaffi M, Margiotta B. Identification, molecular characterization and use of mutants for wheat storage proteins in quality studies. In: Bushuk W, Tkachuk R, editors. AACC International, St Paul, MN; 1990. p. 537–44.Google Scholar
  32. Branlard G, Dardevet M, Nardjis A, Gilberto I. Allelic diversity of HMW and LMW glutenin subunits and omega gliadins in French bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Genet Res Crop Evol. 2003;50:669–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Pflüger LA, D’Ovidio R, Margiotta B, Pena R, Mujeeb-Kazi A, Lafiandra D. Characterisation of high-and low-molecular weight glutenin subunits associated to the D genome of Aegilops tauschii in a collection of synthetic hexaploid wheats. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;103:1293–301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Lafiandra D, Kasarda DD. One-and two-dimensional (two-pH) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in a single gel: separation of wheat proteins. Cereal Chem. 1985;62:314–9.Google Scholar
  35. Xie Z, Wang C, Wang K, et al. Molecular characterization of the celiac disease epitope domains in α-gliadin genes in Aegilops tauschii and hexaploid wheats (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:1239–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, Xin R, Zhang D, Li S. Molecular characterization of α-gliadin genes from common wheat cultivar Zhengmai 004 and their role in quality and celiac disease. Crop J. 2014;2:10–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Piston F, Dorado G, Martin A, Barro F. Cloning of nine γ-gliadin mRNAs (cDNAs) from wheat and the molecular characterization of comparative transcript levels of γ-gliadin subclasses. J Cereal Sci. 2006;43:120–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Altenbach SB, Kothari KM. Omega gliadin genes expressed in Triticum aestivum cv. Butte 86: effects of post-anthesis fertilizer on transcript accumulation during grain development. J Cereal Sci. 2007;46:169–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016; msw054.Google Scholar
  40. Sestili F, Janni M, Doherty A, Botticella E, D'Ovidio R, Masci S, Jones HD, Lafiandra D. Increasing the amylose content of durum wheat through silencing of the SBEIIa genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Marcussen T, Sandve SR, Heier L, et al. Ancient hybridizations among the ancestral genomes of bread wheat. Science. 2014;345:1250092.Google Scholar
  42. Shan L, Molberg Ø, Parrot I, Hausch F, Filiz F, Gray GM, Sollid LM, Khosla C. Structural basis for gluten intolerance in celiac sprue. Science. 2002;297:2275–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Noma S, Kawaura K, Hayakawa K, Abe C, Tsuge N, Ogihara Y. Comprehensive molecular characterization of the α/β-gliadin multigene family in hexaploid wheat. Mol Genet Genomics. 2016;291:65–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Salentijn EM, Goryunova SV, Bas N, van der Meer IM, van den Broeck HC, Bastien T, Gilissen LJ, Smulders MJ. Tetraploid and hexaploid wheat varieties reveal large differences in expression of alpha-gliadins from homoeologous Gli-2 loci. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kawaura K, Mochida K, Ogihara Y. Expression profile of two storage-protein gene families in hexaploid wheat revealed by large-scale analysis of expressed sequence tags. Plant Physiol. 2005;139:1870–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Scossa F, Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Anderson OD, Vensel WH, Lafiandra D, D'Ovidio R, Masci S. Comparative proteomic and transcriptional profiling of a bread wheat cultivar and its derived transgenic line overexpressing a low molecular weight glutenin subunit gene in the endosperm. Proteomics. 2008;8:2948–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rakszegi M, Bekes F, Lang L, Tamas L, Shewry PR, Bedő Z. Technological quality of transgenic wheat expressing an increased amount of a HMW glutenin subunit. J Cereal Sci. 2005;42:15–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Anderson RP, Degano P, Godkin AJ, Jewell DP, Hill AV. Vivo antigen challenge in celiac disease identifies a single transglutaminase-modified peptide as the dominant A-gliadin T-cell epitope. Nat Med. 2000;6:337–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Arentz–Hansen H, Mcadam SN, Molberg Ø, Fleckenstein B, Lundin KE, Jørgensen TJ, Jung G, Roepstorff P, Sollid LM. Celiac lesion T cells recognize epitopes that cluster in regions of gliadins rich in proline residues. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:803–809.Google Scholar
  50. Vader W, Stepniak D, Kooy Y, Mearin L, Thompson A, van Rood JJ, Spaenij L, Koning F. The HLA-DQ2 gene dose effect in celiac disease is directly related to the magnitude and breadth of gluten-specific T cell responses. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2003;100:12390–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang DW, Da Li JW, Zhao Y, et al. Genome-wide analysis of complex wheat gliadins, the dominant carriers of celiac disease epitopes. Sci Rep. 2017;7Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement