Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

Integrated genomics-based mapping reveals the genetics underlying maize flavonoid biosynthesis

  • Min Jin1,
  • Xuehai Zhang1,
  • Mingchao Zhao1,
  • Min Deng1,
  • Yuanhao Du1,
  • Yang Zhou1,
  • Shouchuang Wang1,
  • Takayuki Tohge2,
  • Alisdair R. Fernie2,
  • Lothar Willmitzer2,
  • Yariv Brotman3,
  • Jianbing Yan1 and
  • Weiwei Wen1, 2, 4Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Plant BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:17

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0972-z

Received: 20 October 2016

Accepted: 5 January 2017

Published: 18 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Flavonoids constitute a diverse class of secondary metabolites which exhibit potent bioactivities for human health and have been indicated to play an important role in plant development and defense. However, accumulation and variation of flavonoid content in diverse maize lines and the genes responsible for their biosynthesis in this important crop remain largely unknown. In this study, we combine genetic mapping, metabolite profiling and gene regulatory network analysis to further enhance understanding of the maize flavonoid pathway.

Results

We repeatedly detected 25 QTL corresponding to 23 distinct flavonoids across different environments or populations. In addition, a total of 39 genes were revealed both by an expression based network analysis and genetic mapping. Finally, the function of three candidate genes, including two UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGT) and an oxygenase which belongs to the flavone synthase super family, was revealed via preliminary molecular functional characterization.

Conclusion

We explored the genetic influences on the flavonoid biosynthesis based on integrating the genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic information which provided a rich source of potential candidate genes. The integrated genomics based genetic mapping strategy is highly efficient for defining the complexity of functional genetic variants and their respective regulatory networks as well as in helping to select candidate genes and allelic variance before embarking on laborious transgenic validations.

Keywords

MaizeFlavonoidNatural variationLinkage mappingAssociation analysisCo-expression network

Background

Maize (Zea mays L.) is the world’s most widely grown crop for food, animal feed, biofuel and other industrial materials, and displays the highest global grain production [1]. By 2050, it is estimated that the human population will reach 9 billion [2]. Increasing yield while providing added nutritional value in maize is thus imperative to meet the growing nutritional demand of the huge global population [3, 4].

Flavonoids are a class of phytochemicals containing a C6-C3-C6 carbon framework. Based on the oxidation and saturation in the heterocyclic ring, flavonoids can be classified into six subclasses namely flavone, flavonol, flavanone, flavanol, anthocyanin and isoflavone [5]. Flavonoids have potent anti-inflammatory and anti-carcinogenic activities and they may thus offer protection against major diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart diseases and tumor [6, 7]. In plants, the major states of flavonoids are modified with sugar or hydroxyl moities to facilitate stable storage and confer various biological functions. Moreover, the different colors exhibited by flavonoids can attract pollinators and thus are highly important in plant reproduction [8, 9]. They can additionally function as an UV absorbing compounds protecting plants from the UV-B radiation [10, 11], and can also serve as anti-pathogen such as maysin and GCA (chlorogenic acid) in maize [12, 13]. Flavonoids are necessary for conditional male fertility in maize [14] and are also involved in seed coat development [15], regulating the transport of phytohormones [16, 17], and providing signals to symbionts in plants [18]. Therefore, understanding flavonoid biosynthesis in maize and the genetic basis underlying natural variation of the contents of members of this compound class is essential for maize enhancement in terms both of improving its nutritional value and in maintaining yields by ensuring stress tolerance.

Flavonoid biosynthesis is one of the most intensively studied areas in plant secondary metabolism, and synthesis of most flavonoids have the same steps which are highly evolutionarily conserved [5, 19]. The synthesis starts with the formation of naringenin chalcone by chalcone synthase (CHS) encoded in maize by locus C2 (colorless 2) [20]. The product naringenin chalcone is then converted by chalcone isomerase (CHI) to generate the flavanone naringenin, which serves as a key precursor for various flavonoids [21]. Through the action of flavanone-3′-hydroxylase enzyme (at the Pr1 locus), naringenin can then be converted into another flavanone, eriodictyol [22, 23]. The biosynthesis of flavones begins with flavanones. Flavones are often O- or C- glycosylated by glycosyl transferases. There are two major different classes of flavone synthase (FNS), FNSI and FNSII. FNSI type enzymes are soluble Fe2+ oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases (2-ODDs) and the maize FNSI-1 shows similar enzymatic activity with PcFNSI [24] and produces flavone; while FNSII type enzymes are oxygen- and NADPH-dependent cytochrome P450 membrane-bound monooxygenases [25]. Generally, the FNS protein can prepare aglycone backbones prior to final O-linked modifications [26]. On the other hand, the well characterized F2H (flavanone 2-hydroxlase) can initiate the hydroxylation of flavanones to the 2-hydroxyflavanones. 2-hydroxyflavanones then serves as the substrate [27] for C-glucosylation to form various flavones 6-C- or 8-C-glucosides [28] with the accompany of C-glycosyltransferase (CGT) [2932]. The maize F2H (CYP93G5) was identified through a genome wide expression and ChIP analysis, and co-expression of ZmF2H1 and UGT708A6 results in the formation of flavone C-glycosides [29, 31].

Besides the synthetic enzymes involved in the pathway, considerable regulation by transcription factors (TFs) has been elucidated. The much studied Pericarp1 (P1) is an R2R3-MYB transcription factor which can control the accumulation of various phenylpropanoids by activating a subset of flavonoid biosynthetic genes [33, 34]. The C1 like R2R3-MYB and R1 like bHLH interacting factors also activate the pathway [35]. Flavonoid synthesis is completed in the cytoplasm; however, the final location of different flavonoids is diverse and as such transport processes are necessary for flavonoid movement within and between cells. Three kinds of transporters namely proton-dependent transporters [36], ATP binding cassette-type transporters [37] and MATE-type transporters [38] may be involved in these transport processes. Natural variations in these TFs and enzymes contribute to the divergence of flavonoid accumulation. Many genes in the flavonoid pathway have been cloned using a combination of classical genetics and biochemistry, however recently transposon based mutagenesis and T-DNA tagging approaches have also been employed. In maize, dozens of genes involving in flavonoid biosynthesis were identified based on linkage analysis, transposon tagging approaches and homology-based cloning [22, 39], however, our understanding of the genetic control of the biosynthetic pathways underlying maize flavonoids biosynthesis remains fragmentary [19].

In recent years, the rapid development of metabolomics and adoption of diverse populations for genetic mapping has provided us with unprecedented knowledge concerning the regulation of the abundance of the diverse chemical components in plants [40]. With the aid of high-throughput genotyping and metabolomics data, metabolic QTL were identified in a rice Zhenshan 97 and Minghui 63 recombinant inbred line (RIL) population, and some of the candidate genes for flavonoid content were further validated by examining over-expression transgenic rice lines [41]. A novel gene (BETA GLUCOSIDASE 6, BGLU6) was recently identified to be responsible for the production of flavonol 3-O-gentiobioside 7-O-rhamnoside (F3GG7R) in an Arabidopsis RIL population [42, 43]. In maize, hundreds of loci associated with metabolites from multiple pathways including flavonoid metabolism were identified, following genome wide association studies (GWAS) on a diverse maize population that revealing the genetic influences underlying metabolic variation [44]. In addition, near isogenic lines (NILs) containing P1-rr and P1-ww were used to study the co-expression and direct target genes of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor P1 [31]. Since P1 was proven to regulate some well-known genes involved in flavonoid biosynthesis, such as FLS1 and A1 through targeted molecular experiments [45], this study represented a great advance to systematically comprehend its gene regulatory circuitry. Maysin (C-glycosyl flavone) present in maize silks confers natural resistance to the corn earworm (Helicoverpa zea), which can cause severe damages on maize in the Americas [12]. Two loci that are capable of conferring salmon silks phenotypes, salmon silks 1 (sm1) and salmon silks 2 (sm2) were identified through QTL mapping [30] in 2004. And previous genetic analyses predicted P1 to be epistatic to the salmon silk mutation [13]. Based on the available sm1 and sm2 mapping information and knowledge of the genes regulated by P1 [13, 31], the molecular identification of the sm1 and sm2 gene products are revealed as a UDP-rhamnose synthase and a rhamnosyl transferase, respectively [12]. The molecular characterization of sm1 and sm2 therefore completes the maysin biosynthetic pathway. It can thus be anticipated that deep probing of further profiling studies will facilitate the elucidation of the genetic complexity of maize flavonoid biosynthesis. Indeed, integrative approaches are increasingly applied to enhance our understanding of metabolic pathway structure and regulation and how these affect the end-phenotypes of plants [46].

Previously, comprehensive metabolic profiling using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was carried out in mature maize kernels coming from several populations. Combined linkage analysis and GWAS was carried out on the resultant datasets which led to the identification of a variety of loci involved in multiple biosynthetic pathways [44, 47]. Taking advantage of the informative dataset generated from these previous studies, we here combine genetic mapping, metabolite profiling and gene regulatory network analysis to further enhance understanding of the maize flavonoid pathway. To this end the function of three candidate genes, including two maize UDP-glycosyltransferases (UGT) and an oxygenase which belongs to the flavone synthase super family, was revealed through preliminary molecular functional characterizations including re-sequencing to access allelic variance and candidate gene association as well as reverse genetic experiments employing transgenic approaches. We discuss the obtained results not only in the context of our understanding of maize flavonoid biosynthesis but also in the context of maize genetic improvement both from the perspective of its nutritional content and in terms of its ability to withstand biotic and abiotic stress.

Results

Variation of flavonoids in different maize populations

An association mapping panel (AMP) and two RIL populations were planted in multiple environments (simply called AMPE1, AMPE2 for AMP, BBE1, BBE2 for BB RIL population, and ZYE1 and ZYE2 for ZY RIL population, which were described in detail in “Materials and Methods”) and the mature kernels harvested from these six field experiments were used for LC-MS/MS based metabolite profiling. In our previous metabolome-based GWAS study, 983 metabolite features were identified in the AMP [44]. 184 of these 983 metabolite features with chemical or putative annotations were analyzed in BB and ZY RIL populations subsequently [47]. In this study, we extract the profile of flavonoids from these previous datasets, which includes 29 flavonoids and five of them were chemically annotated. Briefly, these 29 flavonoids can be classified into flavones, flavanones, anthocyanins and methoxylated flavonoid. Among them, 28, 27, 23, 22, 25, 24 flavonoids were found in AMPE1, AMPE2, BBE1, BBE2, ZYE1, ZYE2, respectively, 15 flavonoids were detected in all the six environments (Table 1). The AMP and both RIL populations manifested great diversity in their flavonoid levels (Additional files 1 and 2: Tables S1 and S2), as indicated by the distribution of the log2 value of fold changes (Fig. 1a). In AMP, all flavonoids have broad-sense heritability (H2) greater than 0.3 and over 65% of flavonoids have H2 greater than 0.7. Over 45% and 60% of flavonoids have H2 greater than 0.5 in BB and ZY populations, respectively (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Correlation coefficient networks were also constructed based on flavonoid levels detected in each experiment, respectively, which demonstrated a clear separation between methoxylated flavonoids and other flavonoids, and most flavones were consistently linked to each other with R > 0.3 (Fig. 1b).
Table 1

Detailed information of 29 flavonoids detected in this study

No.

Peak no.

Levela

Ret. Time (min)

Putative flavonoid name

Flavonoid Class

Mol formula

AMPE1

AMPE2

BBE1

BBE2

ZYE1

ZYE2

1

n1129

A

4.7

Cyanidin 3-O-glucoside

Anthocyanin

C21H21O11

×

2

n1518*

C

6.11

Methoxylated flavonoid 3-O-hexoside

Methoxylated flavonoid

C23H24O12

3

n1585*

B

4.94

Methoxylated flavonoid di-O-hexoside

Methoxylated flavonoid

C29H34O17

4

n1109

A

8.68

Apigenin 7-O-glucoside

Flavones

C21H20O10

×

5

n0511*

C

6.96

Apigenin C-hexosyl-C-pentoside

Flavones

C26H28O14

6

n1201*

C

7.53

Apigenin C-pentosyl-C-pentoside

Flavones

C25H26O13

7

n1268*

C

8.49

Apigenin C-pentosyl-O-coumaroylhexoside

Flavones

C35H34O16

8

n1555

C

7.16

Apigenin di-C-hexoside

Flavones

C27H30O15

×

9

n1090

C

8.92

Apigenin-C-pentoside

Flavones

C20H18O9

×

10

n1270*

B

7.81

C-pentosyl-apigenin O-caffeoylhexoside

Flavones

C35H34O17

11

n1370*

A

11.8

Chrysoeriol

Flavones

C16H12O6

12

n1229

C

8.11

Chrysoeriol C-hexosyl-O-pentoside

Flavones

C27H30O15

×

×

×

13

n1562*

B

7.74

Chrysoeriol C-hexosyl-O-rhamnoside

Flavones

C28H32O15

14

n1569*

C

6.63

Chrysoeriol di-C-hexoside

Flavones

C28H32O16

15

n1245*

C

8.18

Chrysoeriol di-O-hexoside

Flavones

C28H32O16

16

n1144

C

8.83

Chrysoeriol O-hexoside

Flavones

C22H22O11

×

×

×

×

17

n1240*

C

9.4

Chrysoeriol O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside

Flavones

C28H32O15

18

n0401

C

9.15

Methylchrysoeriol C-hexoside

Flavones

C23H24O11

×

×

×

19

n1027*

B

11.7

Tricin

Flavones

C17H14O7

20

n1173*

C

11.5

Tricin 4′-O-(erythro-β-guaiacylglyceryl) ether

Flavones

C26H24O10

21

n0477*

C

11.9

Tricin 4′-O-(threo-β-guaiacylglyceryl) ether

Flavones

C27H26O11

22

n1263

C

8.8

Tricin 4′-O-(threo-β-guaiacylglyceryl) ether O-hexoside

Flavones

C33H36O16

×

×

×

23

n1216

B

13.2

Tricin derivative

Flavones

 

×

×

24

n1570

B

8.22

Tricin O-pentosyl-O-hexoside

Flavones

C28H32O16

×

×

25

n1575

C

9.35

Tricin O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside

Flavones

C29H34O16

×

26

n1581

C

11.2

3′,4′,5′-Tricetin O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside

Flavones

C30H36O16

×

27

n1533

C

9.07

3′,4′,5′-Tricetin-O-hexoside

Flavones

C24H26O12

×

28

n1111

A

7.75

Vitexin

Flavones

C21H20O10

×

29

n0145*

A

11.6

Naringenin

Flavanones

C15H12O5

aIdentification level (A; B; C; D)- (A) standard or NMR; (B) MS/MS; (C) MSE; (D) MS only

*represents the flavonoid that was detected in all six environments

“√” and “ × ” indicated that the flavonoid was detected or not in each environment

Fig. 1

Distribution of log2-fold changes and correlation coefficient based network of all flavonoids measured in AMP and two RIL populations. a Box plots showing the log2 value of fold changes of 29 flavonoids among the AMP and both BB and ZY RILs. Data from different environments (experiments) for AMP and each RIL population are shown. b Correlation coefficient based network of all flavonoids in each experiment for AMP and both BB and ZY populations. R ≥ 0.3 for correlation coefficient between two flavonoids was used to construct the network

GWAS for flavonoid levels

A total of 79 loci were identified by GWAS at significance level of P ≤ 1.8 × 10−6 in two experiments (AMPE1, AMPE2) (Table 2). Briefly, 51 loci were identified for 23 flavonoids in AMPE1, with an R2 (explained phenotypic variation) ranging from 6.84 to 19.77% and a mean of 8.93%; while 28 loci were detected for 18 flavonoids in AMPE2. Each locus could explain phenotypic variation ranging from 6.88 to 19.48%, with a mean of 10.19% (Additional file 4: Table S3). Of the 17 common flavonoids for which significant loci were detected in both experiments, a total of 42 and 27 loci were detected in AMPE1 and AMPE2, respectively, and 12 of which were conserved for the same flavonoids in both experiments (Additional file 5: Figure S2A). The detailed information for GWAS results including P value and R2 of each locus, physical position and minor allele frequency (MAF) of lead SNP and the most likely candidate gene and its annotation are provided in Additional file 4: Table S3. All potential candidate genes and their functional annotations within 100 kb (50 kb upstream and downstream of the lead SNP) of the loci identified from GWAS are listed in Additional file 6: Table S4.
Table 2

Summary of significant loci-trait associations identified by GWAS and QTL identified by linkage mapping

 

AMPE1*

AMPE2

BBE1

BBE2

ZYE1

ZYE2

Number of traitsa

23/28

18/27

22/23

22/22

23/25

23/24

Number of locib

51

28

51

55

64

59

Average loci per traitc

2.2 ± 1.7

1.6 ± 0.8

2.3 ± 1.1

2.5 ± 1.2

2.8 ± 1.0

2.6 ± 1.3

*AMPE1 and AMPE2 represent the two experiments conducted on the association panel; BBE1, BBE2 and ZYE1, ZYE2 represent the two experiments conducted on both BB and ZY populations; BB, linkage population B73/By804 RIL; ZY, linkage populationZong3/Yu87-1 RIL

aNumber of traits having significantly associated loci or QTL (before slash), number of total detected traits (after slash)

bNumber of significant loci detected in each experiment on the association panel (P ≤ 1.8 × 10−6, MLM) and QTL detected in each RIL population (LOD ≥ 2.5)

cAverage number of significant loci (or QTL) detected per trait ± s.d

Linkage mapping for flavonoid levels in the two RIL populations

For the BB population, 51 and 55 QTL were mapped for 22 flavonoids in BBE1 and BBE2, respectively (Table 2). A total of 99 QTL were detected for the 19 common flavonoids in both experiments (Additional file 7: Table S5), 12 QTL of which were conserved for the same flavonoid in both experiments (Additional file 5: Figure S2B). The percentage of phenotypic variation (R2) that each QTL could explain ranged from 2.94 to 76.79%, with a mean of 10.33% (Additional file 7: Table S5). Twenty-nine QTL that explained greater than 10% of the phenotypic variation (R 2 = 10.03-76.79%) were identified.

In the ZY population, a total of 123 QTL were detected in the two experiments (Table 2). Each QTL could explain between 2.85 and 23.17% of phenotypic variation, with an average variation of 9.35%. 47 QTL were identified that explained greater than 10% of the variation (R 2 = 10.02–23.17%). Specifically, 64 QTL were detected for 23 flavonoids in ZYE1 (Table 2), with an R2 range of 4.81 to 23.17% and a mean of 9.38%, while in ZYE2, 59 QTL were identified for 23 flavonoids (Table 2) and an R2 range of 2.85–18.34% with a mean of 9.31% (Additional file 7: Table S5). Of the 21 common flavonoids for which could detected QTL in both experiments, a total of 57 and 51 QTL were detected in ZYE1 and ZYE2, respectively, 27 of which were conserved for the same flavonoids in both experiments (Additional file 5: Figure S2C).

Linkage mapping results from both BB and ZY populations indicated that most flavonoid QTL were identified with moderate effects (R 2 < 10%), while a relatively small portion showed major effects (27.4% QTL for BB and 38.2% QTL for ZY with an R 2 ≥ 10%). The identified QTL in both RIL populations are evenly distributed across the maize genome, and detailed information for the QTL results, including logarithm of odds (LOD) value, 2-LOD confidence interval, explained phenotypic variation (R2) of each QTL, as well as candidate genes and their annotations are provided in Additional files 7 and 8: Tables S5 and S6. Two and four flavonoids QTL hot spots were observed across the maize genome in the BB and ZY population, respectively, determined by using 500 permutations at the level of 0.05 (Additional file 5: Figure S2B-S2C; Additional file 7: Table S5). These QTLs were shared by flavonoids that are biochemically related and three known flavonoid pathway genes (p1, c2 and mrpa3) located in hot spots on chromosome 1, 4 and 9, respectively (Additional file 5: Figure S2A, S2C).

In Additional file 9: Table S7, the co-localization of QTL and/or significant loci identified across different environments or different populations is summarized. Overall, 49 trait-loci combinations that are 25 QTLs corresponding to 23 traits were detected in more than one environments or populations (AMP, BBRIL, ZYRIL) in this study (Additional file 9: Table S7). Among them, 11 combinations (six loci for 11 traits) were detected in more than two environments which including seven combinations (five loci for seven traits) identified in four environments. Detailed analyses of the candidate genes underlying these loci will almost certainly provide useful further information concerning the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway.

Candidate genes revealed by multiple evidences

In our previous study, a primary regulatory network consisted of 58 candidate genes for the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway was constructed using an eQTL and qGWAS method based on the expression level of 15 known maize flavonoid pathway genes [47]. Twelve of these 15 genes (namely, a1, bz1, bz2, c2, chi1, chi3, f3h, pr1, pac1, mrpa3, r1, and whp1) were finally involved in the primary network. Moreover, using the same eQTL and qGWAS criteria, a secondary network containing 190 genes was constructed based on the genes present in the primary network. Here, we compared the newly found genes in the primary (46 genes) and secondary network (132 genes) with the candidate genes suggested from GWAS and linkage mapping to identify overlapped genes. Briefly, 11 and 28 genes from the primary and secondary network were found in our genetic mapping results (GWAS or linkage mapping or both), respectively (Table 3).
Table 3

Candidate genes of flavonoid biosynthetic pathway revealed by multiple evidences

Environment (Trait)

Candidate Gene

Gene interval (bp)

Annotation

ZYE1(n1555, n1569), ZYE2(n1569)

AC206266.3_FG001*

chr9:17905187-17908271

ATPase activity

ZYE1(n1027), ZYE2(n1581)

AC233883.1_FG006#

chr4:193154792-193156631

Unknown

BBE2(n1201), ZYE2(n1240)

GRMZM2G016930*

chr9:16491882-16497920

Hydrolase activity||Serine/threonine-protein phosphatase (EC 3.1.3.16)

BBE1(n1370), AMPE1(n1370), AMPE2(n1569, n1570)

GRMZM2G017536#

chr1:47989435-47993634

Unknown

AMPE1(n1263)

GRMZM2G029547*

chr3: 215,757,514-215,764,384

3-beta-hydroxy-delta5-steroid dehydrogenase activity

ZYE2(n1570)

GRMZM2G031938#

chr1:245482582-245492124

Antiporter activity

BBE1(n1240)

GRMZM2G032047#

chr1:46124872-46126322

Cp protein

BBE1(n1370)

GRMZM2G036086#

chr1:47810317-47811419

Peroxisomal biogenesis factor 11 family protein

BBE2(n1173)

GRMZM2G043843#

chr3:230536114-230538220

Unknown

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G054013*

chr4:158142358-158147479

Catalytic activity

ZYE2(n1555)

GRMZM2G063550*

chr9:17397398-17399594

Anthocyanidin 3,5-O-glucosyltransferase

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G066615#

chr4:158338110-158345289

ATP binding

BBE2(n1201), ZYE2(n1240)

GRMZM2G075582#

chr9:16654134-16675731

Unknown

BBE1(n1370), AMPE2(n1555, n1562)

GRMZM2G076537#

chr1:47509293-47517202

Exonuclease activity binding

ZYE1(n1240), ZYE2(n1027, n1263)

GRMZM2G079471#

chr4:195326118-195331420

Unknown

AMPE1(n1581)

GRMZM2G097812*

chr9: 144,508,637-144,511,665

Unknown

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G110192#

chr4:159724032-159726475

Unknown

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G110287#

chr4:159754943-159757904

Catalytic activity

BBE2(n1270), AMPE1(n1201), AMPE2(n1201)

GRMZM2G114801#

chr6:120054604-120057326

Unknown

ZYE1(n1240), ZYE2(n1027, n1263)

GRMZM2G116675#

chr4:195200777-195206090

Unknown

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G121075#

chr4:158558932-158560342

60S ribosomal protein L12

BBE1(n1370)

GRMZM2G122965#

chr1:47699083-47705236

Microtubule motor activity

ZYE1(n1240), ZYE2(n1027, n1263)

GRMZM2G125596#

chr4:195381313-195385012

regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent

BBE1(n1240)

GRMZM2G129302#

chr1:46863231-46865595

Glycosyltransferase 5

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G147780#

chr4:159564598-159569968

Rho guanyl-nucleotide exchange factor activity

ZYE1(n1240), ZYE2(n1027, n1263)

GRMZM2G149843#

chr4:195619489-195622261

Vesicle-mediated transport

BBE2(n1201), ZYE2(n1240)

GRMZM2G160463#

chr9:16727715-16731614

Unknown

BBE1(n1370), AMPE1(n0511, n1370), AMPE2(n1569, n1570)

GRMZM2G162356#

chr1:47900337-47901226

Anaphase-promoting complex subunit 11||zinc ion binding

BBE2(n1270)

GRMZM2G162755*

chr6:119876153-119878032

Anthocyanidin 3-O-glucosyltransferase

BBE2(n1270)

GRMZM2G162783*

chr6:119862763-119864524

Transferase activity, transferring hexosyl groups

ZYE2(n1229)

GRMZM2G163671#

chr4:195797470-195801122

Maternal Effect Lethal family member||protein binding

ZYE1(n1109, n1370, n1575), ZYE2(n1370, n1581)

GRMZM2G177203#

chr10:99379756-99383298

DSBA-like thioredoxin domain containing protein||protein disulfide oxidoreductase activity

BBE1(n1370), AMPE2(n1555, n1562)

GRMZM2G377215#

chr1:47504495-47507003

hydrolase activity, hydrolyzing O-glycosyl compounds

BBE2(n1575)

GRMZM2G421513#

chr4:158560925-158564975

Transcribed locus, weakly similar to NP_001144758.1

BBE1(n1370)

GRMZM2G427418#

chr1:47597259-47600865

Transcribed locus, moderately similar to NP_001168327.1

BBE1(n1370)

GRMZM5G807260*

chr1:47827840-47828946

Unknown

BBE1(n1370), AMPE1(n0511, n1109, n1144, n1240, n1562, n1569, n1570), AMPE2(n0511, n1109, n1111, n1144, n1240, n1370)

GRMZM5G819965*

chr1:47906016-47907112

long cell-linked locus protein

ZYE2(n1570)

GRMZM5G842695*

chr1:245310086-245313090

Antiporter activity

ZYE1(n1240), ZYE2(n1027, n1263)

GRMZM5G873295#

chr4:195545909-195548933

Unknown

ZYE1(n1111), GWAS(n1111)

GRMZM2G043295

chr9:130524722-130526606

Flavanol-3-O-glucosyltransferase

BBE1(n1201), GWAS(n1211)

GRMZM2G059590

chr8:153858072-153864534

Unknown

BBE1(n1216), BBE2(n1216), GWAS(n1216)

GRMZM2G097841

chr10:143746242-143748475

Anthocyanidin reductase

BBE1(n1216), BBE2(n1216), GWAS(n1216)

GRMZM2G097854

chr10:143738314-143740641

Leucoanthocyanidin reductase

BBE1(n1216), BBE2(n1216), GWAS(n1216)

GRMZM2G431504

chr10:143752078-143754011

Leucoanthocyanidin reductase

BBE1(n1518), BBE2(n1518), GWAS(n1518)

GRMZM2G104710

chr10:1919386-1920869

O-Methyltransferase

BBE1(n1585), BBE2(n1585), GWAS(n1585)

GRMZM2G104710

chr10:1919386-1920869

O-Methyltransferase

* and #represent the genes from primary regulatory network and secondary regulatory network associated with the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway, respectively

In Table 3, we summarized genes for which multiple lines of evidence were provided, i.e., these are genes repeatedly identified in multiple populations or across multiple environments or overlapped genes between the result of network analysis and genetic mapping (Table 3). Three of the 11 genes from the primary network and 14 of the 28 genes from the secondary network mentioned above were detected in more than two environments or for more than two flavonoids in one environment, respectively (Table 3). These genes were subsequently prioritized for further functional characterization. 40% of these 45 candidate genes revealed by multiple evidences mentioned above were annotated as enzymes, while functions of 29% of these genes remain unknown. Genes that were annotated as transcription factor and participating in cellular organization only accounted for a small proportion (Additional file 10: Figure S3).

Functional verification of candidate genes underlying the natural variation of flavonoids in the mature maize kernel

According to the mapping results and multiple information regarding prior knowledge of flavonoid biosynthesis and functional annotation of candidate genes, we chose several genes that were supported by multiple evidences for further verification. A QTL on chromosome 6 was identified for the level of C-pentosyl-apigenin O-caffeoylhexoside (n1270) in the B73/BY804 RIL population (Fig. 2a). Three genes, GRMZM2G162755 (UGT1, chr6:119876153-119878032), GRMZM2G162783 (UGT3, Chr6:119,862,763-119,864,524) and GRMZM2G383404 (UGT4, chr6:120018887-120020772) which are all annotated as flavonoids 3-O-glucosyltransferase are located within this QTL. UGT1 is about 12Kb upstream of UGT3, and both genes were identified as targets of the R2R3-MYB transcript factor P1 [31]. UGT1 co-expressed with several genes involved in the flavonoid pathway, such as C2 (GRMZM2G422750, chalcone synthase), Chi1 (GRMZM2G155329, chalcone flavanone isomerase 1) and Pr1 (GRMZM2G025832, cytochrome P450) [47]. Moreover, UGT1, UGT3 and UGT4 all show sequence similarity with the rice C-glycosyltransferase (OsCGT, Fig. 2b). However, only UGT3 has been putatively identified, on the basis of homology, to be a bifunctional C- and O-glycosyltransferase, and UGT1 and UGT2 (another UGT on chromosome 9) is unable to produce apigenin 6-C-glucoside following supply of 2-hydroxynaringenin as a flavonoid receptor [29]. The function of UGT4 in the flavonoid biosynthesis has, however, been investigated using a re-sequencing and candidate gene association method, whereby some proposed functional variations were revealed [44].
Fig. 2

A QTL containing three UGTs and re-sequencing and candidate association analysis of UGT1. a QTL mapping result for the level of C-pentosyl-apigenin O-caffeoylhexoside (n1270) in the mature maize kernel. LOD values are shown as a function of their genetic positions. And the candidate genes are shown as red arrows. b Phylogenetic tree of selected flavonoid glycosyltransferases. Candidate genes in the QTL region on chromosome 6 are in red. The Genbank accession numbers for the sequences are shown in the parentheses: At3RhaT (NM_102790, At1g30530); At3GlcT (NM_121711, At5g17050); At3AraT (NM_121709, At5g17030); Vv3GlcT (AF000371); AcF3GalT (GU079683); Ph3GalT (AF316552); Pf3GlcT (AB002818); Ph3GlcT (AB027454); Hv3GlcT (X15694); Zm3GlcT (X13501); At5GlcT (NM_117485, At4g14090); Ph5GlcT (AB027455); Pf5GlcT (AB013596); Vh5GlcT (AB013598); CsF3G2″GlcT (HE793682); MtUGT72L1 (EU434684); OsCGT (FM179712); At7RhaT (NM_100480, At1g06000); At7GlcT (NM_129234, At2g36790); DbB5GlcT (Y18871); Gt3′GlcT (AB076697); NtIS5s (AF346431); Sb7GlcT (AB031274); BpA3G2″GlcAT (AB190262); CaUGT3, F3G6″GlcT (AB443870); CmF7G2″RhaT (AY048882); Cs1,6RhaT, CsiF7G6″RhaT (DQ119035); PhA3G6″RhaT, UGT79G16 (Z25802); AtA3G2″XylT, UGT79B1 (NM_124785, At5g54060); AtF3G2″GlcT, UGT79B6 (NM_124780, At5g54010); F3GGT1, AcA3Ga2″XylT (FG404013); IpA3G2″GlcT (AB192315). c Boxplot showing the distribution of relative metabolite level (n1270) of lines from the association population with two parental alleles at SNP811 and SNP1331. d Sequence polymorphisms between B73 and By804 in UGT1 (GRMZM2G162755). The SNP identity is indicated by the position starting from the codon ATG. The B73 allele (amino acid) is before the slash, the latter is By804. “XXX” indicates the deletion of three bases. Abbreviations: A3G, anthocyanin 3-O-glucoside; A3Ga, anthocyanin 3-O-galactoide; F3G, flavonol 3-O-glucoside; F7G, flavonoid 7-O-glucoside; 3AraT, 3-O-arabinosyltransferase; 3GlcT, 3-O-glucosyltransferase; 3′GlcT, 3′-O-glucosyltransferase; 3GalT, 3-O-galactosyltransferase; 3RhaT,3-O-rhamnosyltransferase; 5GlcT, 5-O-glucosyltransferase; 7GlcT, 7-O-glucosyltransferase; 7RhaT, 7-O-rhamnosyltransferase; 2″GlcT, 2″-O-glucosyltransferase; 2″RhaT, 2″-O-rhamnosyltransferase; 2″XylT, 2″-O-xylosyltransferase; 6″RhaT, 6″-O-rhamnosyltransferase; CGT, C-glucosyltransferase; NtIS5a, salicylate-induced glucosyltransferase. Abbreviations for species: Ac, Actinidia chinensis; At, Arabidopsis thaliana; Bp, Bellis perennis; Cm, Citrus maxima; Csa, Crocus sativus; Csi, Citrus sinensis; Db, Dorotheanthus bellidiformis; Gt, Gentiana triflora; Hv, Hordeum vulgare; Ip, Ipomoea purpurea; Nt, Nicotiana tabacum; Os, Oryza sativa; Pf, Perilla frutescens; Ph, Petunia hybrida; Sb, Scutellaria baicalensis; Vh, Verbena hybrida; Vv, Vitis vinifera; Zm, Zea mays [80]

Herein we looked into the genetic variations between the two parental lines of the BB RIL population (B73 and By804) and found seven SNPs between the parents in the coding sequence of UGT1, which could cause nonsynonymous mutations (Fig. 2d). Three pairs of KASP (LGC) primers which can successfully genotype three (i.e., SNP811, SNP1331, and SNP1415) of the seven SNPs were used to test the association panel aiming to validate the function of these three SNPs in UGT1. They all exhibited a minor allele frequency (MAF) of more than 0.05. At the sites SNP811 (a Pro to Ala variant) and SNP1331 (a Gly to Glu variant), phenotypic values of lines with the alleles from the two parents were significantly different (t test, P < 0.05; Fig. 2c). Significant phenotypic differences between the lines harboring B73 alleles and By804 alleles were also observed for several other flavonoids detected in this study. For instance, the levels of three apigenin derivatives, chrysoeriol and six chrysoeriol derivatives, four tricin derivatives and cyanidin 3-O-glucoside detected in lines with two parental alleles at SNP811 were significantly different. Similarly, the levels of cyanidin 3-O-glucoside, chrysoeriol di-C-hexoside, 3′,4′,5′-tricetin-O-hexoside and apigenin C-pentosyl-O-coumaroylhexoside in lines with two parental alleles at SNP1331 were significantly different (Additional file 11: Figure S4). In addition, we conducted candidate association analysis using these three SNPs - SNP1331 displayed the lowest P value and can therefore be considered as the most promising functional site among these three SNPs (Additional file 12: Table S8). Compared to SNP811, SNP1331 was associated with more flavonoids, which may suggest that it exhibits broader substrate specificity.

GRMZM2G383404 (UGT4) is around 142 kb away from UGT1, which is associated with the level of apigenin C-pentosyl-C-pentoside (n1201) as revealed by our previous genome wide association analysis, and an amino acid substitution (Asp to Ala) was suggested as one of the functional genetic variants [44]. In the present study, we generated over-expression lines by ectopically expressing GRMZM2G383404 under the control of the maize ubiquitin promoter in the rice cultivar Zhonghua11 (Fig. 3a). We detected the level of flavonoids in the rice leaves of the wild type and T1 individuals of two over-expression lines (L4 and L5) (Fig. 3b). The level of more than half (14/26) of the detected flavonoids were significantly decreased in the over-expression lines. The fold change of these 14 flavonoids between the over-expression lines and wild type ranged from 0.25 to 0.68 (Fig. 3c and Additional file 13: Figure S5). Among them, fold change between the over-expression lines and wild type of the level of apigenin C-pentosyl-C-pentoside was around 0.65. Along with apigenin C-pentosyl-C-pentoside, two other apigenin derivatives (i.e., apigenin 7-O-glucoside and apigenin di-C-hexoside) were also affected (Additional file 13: Figure S5). Notably, the level of all the tricin derivatives detected here (and tricin itself) was significantly decreased (Additional file 13: Figure S5). Moreover, the content of chrysoeriol, chrysoeriol O-hexoside and vitexin were also significantly decreased (Additional file 13: Figure S5). However, no significant changes were found for the content of C-pentosyl-apigenin O-caffeoylhexoside, for which UGT4 was identified in the QTL region as mentioned above. Hence, UGT1 and UGT3 but not UGT4 could be the causative genes for the variance of C-pentosyl-apigenin O-caffeoylhexoside. However, the transgenic result of UGT4 can suggest its influence in the flavonoid biosynthesis. However, further biochemical assay is needed to strongly confirm the function and activity.
Fig. 3

Transgenic result of UGT4. a Diagram of over-expression construct. b The bar plot showing the average mRNA level of UGT4 (GRMZM2G383404) in the wild type (WT) and over-expression lines (T1) (the individual number is 9, 5, 9 for WT, L4 and L5, respectively, 3 technical replicates for each line). c The bar plot showing the relative contents of apigenin C-pentosyl-C-pentoside (n1201) in the WT and UGT4 over-expression lines (n = 9, 5, 9 for WT, L4 and L5, respectively), * and ** represent the significant level of P < 0.05 and P 0.01, respectively

On chromosome 2, gene GRMZM5G843555 was suggested to be important in determining the level of apigenin C-pentosyl-O-coumaroyl hexoside (n1268) by both linkage mapping in Zong3/Yu87-1 population (Fig. 4a) and GWAS in AMPE1 (Fig. 4c). GRMZM5G843555 is annotated as an oxoglutarate/iron-dependent oxygenase (OXY), which belongs to the oxygenase superfamily. However, GRMZM5G843555 (OXY) shows low sequence similarity with the well-known 2-ODD genes, such as FNS. OXY is one of the maize prolyl 4-hydroxylase family (P4Hs) members, which may play a role in tolerance to abiotic stresses, such as water-logging [48]. Correlations between the content of various flavonoids and the expression level of OXY revealed that the content of chrysoeriol, chrysoeriol O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside, tricin O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside and 3′,4′,5′-tricetin O-rhamnosyl-O-hexoside, chrysoeriol O-hexoside, chrysoeriol di-C-hexoside and chrysoeriol C-hexosyl-O-rhamnoside were negatively correlated with expression level of OXY (r = -0.19 ~ -0.1; p < 0.05) (Fig. 4d). We further profiled the rice over-expression lines and quantified the level of 26 flavonoids (Fig. 4b). The levels of 20 flavonoids were significantly decreased compared with that of the wild type (Fig. 4e-h, Additional file 14: Figure S6). Within these 20 flavonoids, the content of six flavonoids was negatively correlated with the OXY expression level. Based on the result, we speculate that the OXY may act as a competitor or inhibitor of the flux through the apigenin, chrysoeriol and tricin branches of flavonoid metabolism.
Fig. 4

Linkage and association mapping of OXY and validation by transformation. a and c Diagram of linkage mapping and GWAS results for the level of Apigenin C-pentosyl-O-coumaroylhexoside in maize kernel. LOD values are shown as a function of their genetic positions. And the peak SNP is located within OXY (GRMZM5G843555). b The bar plot showing the mRNA level of OXY in wild type (WT) and over-expression lines (T1) (the individual number is 6, 10, 7, 8 for WT, L31, L35, L36 and L37, respectively, 3 technical replicates for each line individual). d Plot of correlation between the content of different flavonoids and the normalized expression level of gene OXY in association panel. e-h The bar plot for the relative contents (fold change relative to the mean level of each flavonoid) of naringenin, chrysoeriol, vitexin and tricin between the WT and OXY over-expression lines (n = 6, 10, 10, 10 respectively). * and ** represent the significant level of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively

In addition, abundant genetic variants between Zong3 and Yu87-1 in the promoter region of OXY were observed (Additional file 15: Figure S7). Cis-element prediction using PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) found a variant between the sequences of the two parental lines at the MBS II (MYB binding site II, [49]). The variant at this binding site may affect the function of OXY through transcriptional regulation, as suggested by the finding in Petunia Hybrida [49]. Indeed, a strong cis-eQTL for OXY was identified in our previous study, which may suggest the potential function of this genetic variant at the upstream of this gene (Additional file 16: Figure S8).

To investigate the co-expression mode of the above mentioned genes, a qGWAS-based network was constructed (Fig. 5). GRMZM5G843555 (OXY) is not in this network for no related genes found by using the threshold of P < 3.5 × 10−7 (0.01/28369). UGT4 clustered independently from the rest. Four well-known genes involving in the flavonoids biosynthesis are present in the co-expression network, such as a1 (GRMZM2G026930), c2 (GRMZM2G422750), chi1 (GRMZM2G155329) and whp1 (GRMZM2G151227). 22 uncharacterized genes are also revealed in the network, including a gene homologous to chalcone isomerase (GRMZM2G175076) and other 21 genes with unknown function or without direct functional annotations related to flavonoid biosynthesis.
Fig. 5

Co-expression network for UGT1, UGT2, UGT3 and UGT4 based on a qGWAS method. The red indicates these four genes. The green diamond indicates the known enzyme involved in the flavonoid pathway. The blue circle indicates the uncharacterized co-expressing genes

Discussion

Metabolomics, which promotes the study of plant metabolism, offers the capacity to speed up the breeding process toward high yielding and nutritional crops [50, 51]. With the advent of high-efficiency metabolic profiling and high-throughput sequencing technologies, studies of genetic dissection of metabolomics diversity based on GWAS and linkage analysis have been reported recently in several plant organisms such as maize [44, 47, 52], rice [41, 53], tomato [5457] and Arabidopsis thaliana [58, 59]. In addition to the dataset generated from our previous untargeted metabolomics-based genetic mapping, here we focus on the flavonoids that were found in the mature kernel harvested from an association panel and two RIL populations grown across multiple environments [44, 47]. Based on a combined analysis (genetic mapping, metabolite profiling and gene regulatory network analysis), we firstly dissected the genetic control of the variation of 29 flavonoids. This indicated that few loci with large effect (with R 2  > 20%) along with more loci with minor to modest genetic contribution underlie the variation of flavonoids level in the mature maize kernel, and the average effect that each locus contributes is modest (R 2 is ~10%). Since maize kernel is a storage tissue, we would assume that more loci responsible for flavonoid variation can be identified in the mature kernel as compared with vegetative tissues such as leaves. It will however be worthwhile to investigate the accumulation and distribution of flavonoids in diverse tissue types in further research. Secondly, we are able to propose dozens of promising candidate genes involved in maize flavonoid biosynthesis. Specifically, three UGTs which are all evolutionary close to rice CGT (Fig. 2b), are located in one glycosylated flavone QTL region (Fig. 2a). The function of UGT3 was elucidated as having both C- and O- glucosyltransferase ability [29], while the biochemical activity of UGT1 and UGT4 remains unknown. Re-sequencing the two parental lines as well as the whole association panel and subsequent candidate association analysis have provided us with the potential functional genetic variants of UGT1. However, whether and if so how the two amino acid replacements in the coding region of UGT1 influence the protein structure and enzymatic activity remains to be answered. In addition given the genomic location of these three UGT genes, it will also be interesting to look into the genomic divergence of the region covering the UGT1 locus between diverse maize germplasm (including inbred lines, landraces and wild progenitors) from an evolutionary perspective. On the other hand, we found significant decreases of several flavonoids in UGT4 overexpressing rice leaves. And in our co-expression network, UGT1, UGT2 and UGT3 are clustered with four well-characterized flavonoids biosynthesis pathway genes, while UGT4 clustered independently from the rest. Further molecular and biochemical evidence will be needed to provide the exact mechanism underlying this observation. In addition, the maize OXY gene exerted a negative influence on the levels of a broad range of flavones in the over-expressing rice leaves.

It has been documented that flavonoids have potent bioactivities which are beneficial for human health. Epidemiologic studies have suggested that a diet rich in flavones exhibits some anti-carcinogenic as well as anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory bioactivities [6062]. Flavonoids also have antioxidant and anti-diabetic potential when added to food [63]. Furthermore, flavonoids also play an important role in protecting the plant itself against biotic and abiotic stresses [64]. In particularly, the C- glycosyl flavone has been revealed to participate in protection against UV-B radiation and defense against pathogens [30, 65]. It is thus essential to find functional genes and understand their regulatory networks as an approach for biofortification of these valuable compounds in maize [12, 47, 64]. The genes OXY and UGTs investigated in this study are promising targets for further crop flavonoid content improvement through favorable allele pyramiding or metabolic engineering techniques on the basis of intensive allele mining and a full understanding of gene regulatory network. The non-targeted metabolomics approach, as adopted here, has the potential to enable the findings of novel genes and pathways. To realize this in the future, an elaborate design which takes into account biological or physiological context would also be helpful.

Conclusions

In our current study, we explored the genetic influences on the flavonoid biosythensis in maize kernel based on integrating the genomic, transcriptomic and metabolomic information which provided a rich source of potential candidate genes. As indicated here and in our previous study [44], the integrated genomics based genetic mapping strategy is highly efficient for defining the complexity of functional genetic variants and their respective regulatory networks as well as in helping to select candidate genes and allelic variance before embarking on laborious transgenic validations. In a similar vein, a maize protoplast complementation system developed by Casas et al (2016) was very recently proposed [12] as a means to probe the activity of metabolic enzymes in an approach that circumvents the need for transgenic plants. This method as well as the approach we took in the current study offers new opportunities to advance beyond the QTL/association mapping approach and towards a complete understanding of maize flavonoid biosynthesis.

Methods

Plant materials, genotypic and metabolic data

The metabolic data used in this study is measured from genetic materials including an association mapping panel (referred to as AMP hereafter) for GWAS and two Recombinant Inbred Lines populations (RILs; BB and ZY) for linkage analysis as described previously [44, 47, 66, 67]. The AMP consisted of 368 diverse inbred lines and were planted in Yunnan (Kunming, E 102°30′, N 24°25′, referred to as AMPE1 hereafter) and Chongqing (E 106°50′, N 29°25′, referred to as AMPE2 hereafter) in March of 2011, respectively. The 197 BB RIL population derived from a cross between B73 and a high-oil line By804 were planted in Hainan (Sanya; E 109°519, N 18°259) in October of 2010 (referred to as BBE1 hereafter) and Henan (Zhengzhou; E 113°429, N 34°44′) in June of 2011 (referred to as BBE2 hereafter). The 197 lines that were derived from the cross between Zong3 and Yu87-1 were planted in Yunnan (Kunming; E 102°309, N 24°259; referred to as ZYE1 hereafter) and Henan (Zhengzhou; E 113°429, N 34°449; referred to as ZYE2 hereafter) in March and June of 2011, respectively. All the inbred lines were planted in one-row plots in an incompletely randomized block design. All lines were self-pollinated and ears of each plot were hand-harvested, followed by air drying and shelling. For each line, ears from five plants were harvested at the same maturity and bulked. Twelve well grown kernels were randomly selected from the harvested ears and bulked for grinding. Samples were extracted before analysis using an LC-ESI-MS/MS system [44, 47].

All 368 diverse maize inbred lines of the AMP had been genotyped by the Illumina MaizeSNP50 BeadChip with 56,110 genome-wide SNPs and RNA sequencing on the immature kernels of 15 days after pollination, which resulted in the genotypic data of 556,809 high-quality SNPs with MAF > 0.05 across the maize genome [68, 69]. Both RIL populations were genotyped using the Illumina MaizeSNP50 BeadChip containing 56,110 SNPs [70] and linkage map was constructed using recombinant bins for both RIL populations. Briefly, a map containing 2,496 and 3,071 unique bins was constructed for BB and ZY RILs, respectively [71].

Genetic mapping

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed using a compressed mixed linear model (cMLM) implemented in the software TASSEL 3.0, accounting for the population structure (Q) and familial relationship (K) [72]. SNPs with minor allele frequency (MAF ≥ 5%) in the 368 lines were employed in the association analysis. To facilitate the interpretation of GWAS results, P value of each SNP was calculated and significance was defined at a uniform threshold of 1.8 × 10−6 (i.e., P ≤ 1/N, N = 556809 which is roughly a Bonferroni correction). SNP with the lowest P value (i.e., the lead SNP) and its corresponding gene were reported for each significant flavonoid locus (see Additional file 4: Table S3). Linkage mapping was conducted using composite interval mapping method [73] implemented in Windows QTL Cartographer V2.5 for each flavonoid trait identified in both RIL populations [74]. Zmap (model 6) with a 10-cM window and a walking speed of 0.5 cM was used. To determine a threshold for significant QTLs, 500 permutations (P = 0.05) were used for each flavonoid identified in both RIL populations. The bins were clearly defined, and a uniform LOD value was assigned for each bin. The confidence interval for each QTL was assigned as a 2 LOD drop from the peak. The setting of parameters was the same as described previously [47]. Detailed information including physical location, confidence interval, and R 2 (explained phenotypic variance) of each QTL for each flavonoid trait is shown in Additional file 7: Table S5. To test the cross-validation between GWAS and linkage analysis, 200 kb region of loci identified by GWAS (the 100 kb upstream and downstream region of the lead SNP) was compared with the physical region of QTL.

Candidate gene identification

The filtered working gene list of maize genome was downloaded from MaizeGDB (http://www.maizegdb.org) to identify possible candidate genes in each QTL. Candidate genes were annotated according to InterProScan (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/scan.html). All potential candidate genes and their annotations within 100 kb (50 kb upstream and downstream of the lead SNP) of the loci identified from GWAS are listed in Additional file 6: Table S4. Candidate genes associated with the corresponding flavonoid trait that were searched within the confidence interval for each QTL from linkage mapping are listed in Additional file 8: Table S6. The most likely candidate gene was selected by testing for either gene flavonoid association or association between the gene and pathway. For the loci without appropriate candidates, the gene nearest to the lead SNP is assigned.

Constructs and transformation

To generate OXY over-expressing constructs, the vector pCAMBIA1301s which contains the selectable marker gene hpt and 35S promoter was used. There are six transcripts for OXY on the B73 reference genome. To decide which one to be transferred, five genotypes with highest n1268 content and five with lowest n1268 content were chosen to compare the abundance between different transcripts. We observed that transcript T04 with six exons was the most highly expressed. So the B73 genomic DNA fragment of OXY T04 (from the ATG to TGA) was amplified and the PCR product was cloned into vector pCAMBIA1301s with restriction enzyme KpnI and XbaI. On the other hand, gene UGT4 has only one transcript on B73 genome. Therefore UGT4 T01 DNA fragment of B73 (from ATG to TGA) was amplified to generate the UGT4 over-expressing construct into vector pCAMBIA 1300nu (with the selectable marker gene hpt) using restriction enzyme BamHI and KpnI. The final plant expression vector was introduced into Agrobacterium EHA105 by electroporation and calli induced from mature seeds of an elite japonica rice cultivar Zhonghua11 were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation [75].

Expression analyses

We isolated total RNA from rice leaves with TRIzol (Invitrogen) as the manufacturer’s instructions. The first-strand cDNA was synthesis using a TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TansGen Bioteke) according to the manufactures’ protocol. Quantitative PCR was performed on an optical 96-well plate in a BioRAD PCR system (CFX96) with SYBR Mix (Vazyme). The relative expression level of gene OXY and UGT4 was determined with the rice Actin as an internal control. The expression measurements were obtained using the relative quantification method [76]. The leaves of transgenic rice are sampled and stored immediately in liquid nitrogen. The following extraction and flavonoid profiling were as described previously [44]. A student’s t-test was applied to examine the difference between over-expression line and the wild line.

Phylogenetic analysis

UGT protein sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W implemented in MEGA7 (version 7, http://www.megasoftware.net/) [77]. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from aligned UGT protein sequences by MEGA7 using the neighbor-joining method [78] with the following parameters: bootstrap method (1000 replicates), Poisson model, uniform rates, and complete deletion.

Re-sequencing and allele identification

For UGT1 (GRMZM2G162755) and OXY (GRMZM5G843555), the PCR fragments from gDNA of B73 and By804 were sequenced via the Sanger re-sequence method. The SNPs were identified using CLUSTAL OMEGA online (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). We designed one of the two direction primers with 3′end at the SNPs of UGT1 according to the direction provided by LGC (Laboratory of the Government Chemist) and performed PCR with the KASP Assay Mix referring to its procedure. All primers for vector construction and re-sequencing used in this study are shown in Additional file 17: Table S9.

Construction of co-expression network

A qGWAS-based method was adopted to construct the co-expression network as described previously [47]. The expression data was obtained from our previous RNA sequencing analysis on maize kernels (at the stage of 15 day after pollination) of the association panel containing 368 maize inbred lines [68]. We focused on the four candidate genes (UGT1, UGT2, UGT3, and UGT4) and their co-expressing genes with the threshold of P < 3.5 × 10−7(0.01/28369). The program Cytoscape [79] was used to display the network.

Abbreviations

2″GlcT: 

2″-O-glucosyltransferase

2″RhaT: 

2″-O-rhamnosyltransferase

2″XylT: 

2″-O-xylosyltransferase

2-ODDs: 

Oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases

3′GlcT: 

3′-O-glucosyltransferase

3AraT: 

3-O-arabinosyltransferase

3GalT: 

3-O-galactosyltransferase

3GlcT: 

3-O-glucosyltransferase

3RhaT: 

3-O-rhamnosyltransferase

5GlcT: 

5-O-glucosyltransferase

6″RhaT: 

6″-O-rhamnosyltransferase

7GlcT: 

7-O-glucosyltransferase

7RhaT: 

7-O-rhamnosyltransferase

a1

Anthocyaninless 1

A3G: 

Anthocyanin 3-O-glucoside

A3Ga: 

Anthocyanin 3-O-galactoide

Ac: 

Actinidia chinensis

Ala: 

Alanine

AMP: 

Association mapping panel

At: 

Arabidopsis thaliana

ATP: 

Adenosine triphosphate

BGLU6: 

Beta glucosidase 6

bHLH: 

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix

Bp: 

Bellis perennis

bz1

Bronz 1

bz2

Bronz 2

C2

Colorless 2

CGT: 

C-glucosyltransferase

CHI: 

Chalcone isomerase

chi1

Chalcone isomerase 1

chi3

Chalcone isomerase 3

CHS: 

Chalcone synthase

Cm: 

Citrus maxima

cMLM: 

Compressed mixed linear model

Csa: 

Crocus sativus

Csi: 

Citrus sinensis

Db: 

Dorotheanthus bellidiformis

eQTL: 

Expression quantitative trait loci

F2H: 

Flavanone 2-hydroxlase

F3G: 

Flavonol 3-O-glucoside

F3GG7R: 

Flavonol 3-O-gentiobioside 7-O-rhamnoside

f3h

Flavanone 3-hydroxylase

F7G: 

Flavonoid 7-O-glucoside

FLS1: 

Flavonol synthase

FNS I: 

Flavone synthase I

FNSII: 

Flavone synthase II

GCA: 

Chlorogenic acid

Glu: 

Glutamic acid

Gly: 

Glycine

Gt: 

Gentiana triflora

GWAS: 

Genome wide association

H2

Broad-sense heritability

Hv: 

Hordeum vulgare

Ip: 

Ipomoea purpurea

LC-MS/MS: 

Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

LOD: 

Logarithm of odds

MAF: 

Minor allele frequency

MBS II: 

MYB binding site II

NADPH: 

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NILs: 

Near isogenic lines

Nt: 

Nicotiana tabacum

NtIS5a: 

Salicylate-induced glucosyltransferase

Os: 

Oryza sativa

OXY: 

Oxoglutarate/iron-dependent oxygenase

P1

Pericarp1

P4H: 

Prolyl 4-hydroxylase

pac1

Pale aleurone color 1

Pf: 

Perilla frutescens

Ph: 

Petunia hybrida

pr1

Red aleurone 1

Pro: 

Proline

qGWAS: 

Quantitative genome-wide association study

QTL: 

Quantitative trait locus

r1: 

Red 1

R2

The percentage of phenotypic variation

RIL: 

Recombinant inbred line

Sb: 

Scutellaria baicalensis

sm1

Salmon silks 1

sm2

Salmon silks 2

TF: 

Transcription factor

UDP: 

Uridine diphosphate

UGT: 

UDP-glycosyltransferases

Vh: 

Verbena hybrida

Vv: 

Vitis vinifera

whp1

White pollen 1

Zm: 

Zea mays

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Yongjun Lin and Hao Chen for providing materials and technical support for rice transformation; and thank Prof. Jie Luo for the help of metabolite profiling on the rice transgenic lines.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Projects of China (No. 2013CB127003 and 2014CB138202).

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Authors’ contributions

WW designed and supervised this study. MJ and XZ performed the data analysis. MJ, MZ, MD, YD and YZ performed experiments. SW helped in metabolite profiling on the rice transgenic lines. TT, AF, LW, YB and JY contributed in discussing and critically reading the article. WW, MJ and XZ prepared the manuscript, and all the authors critically read and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The experiments comply with the ethical standards in the country in which they were performed. Maize seeds used in this study were provided by Prof. Jianbing Yan from Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. Since the plant material was not collected from a wild source, no any permissions/permits were necessary.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University
(2)
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Plant Physiology
(3)
Department of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev
(4)
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), Huazhong Agricultural University

References

  1. Haley C. A cornucopia of maize genes. Nat Genet. 2011;43(2):87–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Yan J, Warburton M, Crouch J. Association mapping for enhancing maize (Zea mays L.) genetic improvement. Crop Sci. 2011;51(2):433–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Casas MI, Duarte S, Doseff AI, Grotewold E. Flavone-rich maize: an opportunity to improve the nutritional value of an important commodity crop. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:440.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wen W, Li K, Alseekh S, Omranian N, Zhao L, Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Jin M, Yang N, Liu H, et al. Genetic determinants of the network of primary metabolism and their relationships to plant performance in a maize recombinant inbred line population. Plant Cell. 2015;27(7):1839–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Tohge T, Watanabe M, Hoefgen R, Fernie AR. The evolution of phenylpropanoid metabolism in the green lineage. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;48(2):123–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hertog MG, Hollman PC. Potential health effects of the dietary flavonol quercetin. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50(2):63–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer prevention: a review. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996;96(10):1027–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Grotewold E. Flavonols drive plant microevolution. Nat Genet. 2016;48(2):112–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Sheehan H, Moser M, Klahre U, Esfeld K, Dell’Olivo A, Mandel T, Metzger S, Vandenbussche M, Freitas L, Kuhlemeier C. MYB-FL controls gain and loss of floral UV absorbance, a key trait affecting pollinator preference and reproductive isolation. Nat Genet. 2016;48(2):159–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rius SP, Grotewold E, Casati P. Analysis of the P1 promoter in response to UV-B radiation in allelic variants of high-altitude maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Tohge T, Wendenburg R, Ishihara H, Nakabayashi R, Watanabe M, Sulpice R, Hoefgen R, Takayama H, Saito K, Stitt M, et al. Characterization of a recently evolved flavonol-phenylacyltransferase gene provides signatures of natural light selection in Brassicaceae. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12399.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Casas MI, Falcone-Ferryra ML, Jiang N, Mejia Guerra MK, Rodriguez EJ, Wilson T, Engelmeier J, Casati P, Grotewold E. Identification and characterization of maize salmon silks genes involved in insecticidal maysin biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2016;28(6):1297–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00003.
  13. Szalma SJ, Buckler ES, Snook ME, McMullen MD. Association analysis of candidate genes for maysin and chlorogenic acid accumulation in maize silks. Theor Appl Genet. 2005;110(7):1324–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Mo Y, Nagel C, Taylor LP. Biochemical complementation of chalcone synthase mutants defines a role for flavonols in functional pollen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89(15):7213–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Brouillard R, Dangels O. In: Harborne JB, editor. Flavonoids-advances in research since 1986. London: Chapman and Hall; 1994. p. 565–88.Google Scholar
  16. Brown DE, Rashotte AM, Murphy AS, Normanly J, Tague BW, Peer WA, Taiz L, Muday GK. Flavonoids act as negative regulators of auxin transport in vivo in arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(2):524–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Silva-Navas J, Moreno-Risueno MA, Manzano C, Tellez-Robledo B, Navarro-Neila S, Carrasco V, Pollmann S, Gallego FJ, Del Pozo JC. Flavonols mediate root phototropism and growth through regulation of proliferation-to-differentiation transition. Plant Cell. 2016;28(6):1372–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hungria M, Joseph CM, Phillips DA. Anthocyanidins and flavonols, major nod gene inducers from seeds of a black-seeded common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Physiol. 1991;97(2):751–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Winkel-Shirley B. It takes a garden. How work on diverse plant species has contributed to an understanding of flavonoid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(4):1399–404.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Shih CH, Chu H, Tang LK, Sakamoto W, Maekawa M, Chu IK, Wang M, Lo C. Functional characterization of key structural genes in rice flavonoid biosynthesis. Planta. 2008;228(6):1043–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grotewold E. The genetics and biochemistry of floral pigments. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:761–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma M, Cortes-Cruz M, Ahern KR, McMullen M, Brutnell TP, Chopra S. Identification of the pr1 gene product completes the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway of maize. Genetics. 2011;188(1):69–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma M, Chai C, Morohashi K, Grotewold E, Snook ME, Chopra S. Expression of flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase is controlled by P1, the regulator of 3-deoxyflavonoid biosynthesis in maize. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Emiliani J, Rodriguez EJ, Campos-Bermudez VA, Grotewold E, Casati P. The identification of maize and arabidopsis Type I FLAVONE SYNTHASEs Links Flavones with Hormones and Biotic Interactions. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(2):1090–107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Martens S, Mithofer A. Flavones and flavone synthases. Phytochemistry. 2005;66(20):2399–407.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lam PY, Zhu FY, Chan WL, Liu H, Lo C. Cytochrome P450 93G1 Is a flavone synthase II that channels flavanones to the biosynthesis of Tricin O-Linked conjugates in rice. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(3):1315–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerscher F, Franz G. Biosynthesis of vitexin and isovitexin: Enzymatic synthesis of the C-glucosyl flavones vitexin and isovitexin with an enzymatic preparation from Fagopyrum esculentum M. seedlings. Z Naturforsch. 1987;42c:519–24.Google Scholar
  28. Brazier-Hicks M, Evans KM, Gershater MC, Puschmann H, Steel PG, Edwards R. The C-glycosylation of flavonoids in cereals. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(27):17926–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Rodriguez E, Casas MI, Labadie G, Grotewold E, Casati P. Identification of a bifunctional maize C- and O-glucosyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(44):31678–88.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. McMullen MD, Kross H, Snook ME, Cortes-Cruz M, Houchins KE, Musket TA, Coe Jr EH. Salmon silk genes contribute to the elucidation of the flavone pathway in maize (Zea mays L.). J Hered. 2004;95(3):225–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Morohashi K, Casas MI, Falcone Ferreyra ML, Mejia-Guerra MK, Pourcel L, Yilmaz A, Feller A, Carvalho B, Emiliani J, Rodriguez E, et al. A genome-wide regulatory framework identifies maize pericarp color1 controlled genes. Plant Cell. 2012;24(7):2745–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Winkel-Shirley B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol. 2001;126(2):485–93.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Grotewold E, Chamberlin M, Snook M, Siame B, Butler L, Swenson J, Maddock S, St Clair G, Bowen B. Engineering secondary metabolism in maize cells by ectopic expression of transcription factors. Plant Cell. 1998;10(5):721–40.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Grotewold E, Drummond BJ, Bowen B, Peterson T. The myb-homologous P gene controls phlobaphene pigmentation in maize floral organs by directly activating a flavonoid biosynthetic gene subset. Cell. 1994;76(3):543–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mol J, Grotewold E, Koes R. How gens paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3(6):212–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitamura S. Transport of Flavonoids: From Cytosolic Synthesis to Vacuolar Accumulation. In: The Science of Flavonoids. Edited by Grotewold E. New York: Springer; 2006. p. 123–146.Google Scholar
  37. Lu YP, Li ZS, Drozdowicz YM, Hortensteiner S, Martinoia E, Rea PA. AtMRP2, an Arabidopsis ATP binding cassette transporter able to transport glutathione S-conjugates and chlorophyll catabolites: functional comparisons with Atmrp1. Plant Cell. 1998;10(2):267–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Debeaujon I, Peeters AJ, Leon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. The TRANSPARENT TESTA12 gene of Arabidopsis encodes a multidrug secondary transporter-like protein required for flavonoid sequestration in vacuoles of the seed coat endothelium. Plant Cell. 2001;13(4):853–71.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Goodman CD, Casati P, Walbot V. A multidrug resistance-associated protein involved in anthocyanin transport in Zea mays. Plant Cell. 2004;16(7):1812–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Wen W, Brotman Y, Willmitzer L, Yan J, Fernie AR. Broadening Our Portfolio in the Genetic Improvement of Maize Chemical Composition. Trends Genet. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2016.05.003.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gong L, Chen W, Gao Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Xu C, Yu S, Zhang Q, Luo J. Genetic analysis of the metabolome exemplified using a rice population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(50):20320–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Ishihara H, Tohge T, Viehöver P, Fernie AR, Weisshaar B, Stracke R. Natural variation in flavonol accumulation in Arabidopsis is determined by the flavonol glucosyltransferase BGLU6. J Exp Bot. 2015;67(5):1505–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Schaffner AR. Flavonoid biosynthesis and Arabidopsis genetics: more good music. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(5):1203–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Wen W, Li D, Li X, Gao Y, Li W, Li H, Liu J, Liu H, Chen W, Luo J, et al. Metabolome-based genome-wide association study of maize kernel leads to novel biochemical insights. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3438.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Rius S, Emiliani J, Pourcel L, Feller A, Morohashi K, Casati P, Grotewold E. Cloning and characterization of a UV-B-inducible maize flavonol synthase. Plant J. 2010;62(1):77–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tohge T, Scossa F, Fernie AR. Integrative approaches to enhance understanding of plant metabolic pathway structure and regulation. Plant J. 2015;169(3):1499–511.Google Scholar
  47. Wen W, Liu H, Zhou Y, Jin M, Yang N, Li D, Luo J, Xiao Y, Pan Q, Tohge T, et al. Combining quantitative genetics approaches with regulatory network analysis to dissect the complex metabolism of the maize kernel. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(1):136–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Zou X, Jiang Y, Zheng Y, Zhang M, Zhang Z. Prolyl 4-hydroxylase genes are subjected to alternative splicing in roots of maize seedlings under waterlogging. Ann Bot. 2011;108(7):1323–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Solano R, Nieto C, Avila J, Canas L, Diaz I, Paz-Ares J. Dual DNA binding specificity of a petal epidermis-specific MYB transcription factor (MYB.Ph3) from Petunia hybrida. EMBO J. 1995;14(8):1773–84.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Martin C, Butelli E, Petroni K, Tonelli C. How can research on plants contribute to promoting human health? Plant Cell. 2011;23(5):1685–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F, Sulpice R, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger AE. Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet. 2012;44(2):217–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Riedelsheimer C, Lisec J, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Sulpice R, Flis A, Grieder C, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger AE. Genome-wide association mapping of leaf metabolic profiles for dissecting complex traits in maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(23):8872–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Chen W, Gao Y, Xie W, Liang G, Lu K, Wang W, Li Y, Liu X, Zhang H, Dong H, et al. Genome-wide association analyses provide genetic and biochemical insights into natural variation in rice metabolism. Nat Genet. 2014;46(7):495–506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Alseekh S, Tohge T, Wendenberg R, Scossa F, Omranian N, Li J, Kleessen S, Giavalisco P, Pleban T, Mueller-Roeber B, et al. Identification and mode of inheritance of quantitative trait loci for secondary metabolite abundance in tomato. Plant Cell. 2015;27(3):485–512.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Bolger A, Scossa F, Bolger ME, Lanz C, Maumus F, Tohge T, Quesneville H, Alseekh S, Sorensen I, Lichtenstein G, et al. The genome of the stress-tolerant wild tomato species Solanum pennellii. Nat Genet. 2014;46(9):1034–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sauvage C, Segura V, Bauchet G, Stevens R, Do PT, Nikoloski Z, Fernie AR, Causse M. Genome-wide Association in tomato reveals 44 candidate loci for fruit metabolic traits. Plant Physiol. 2014;165(3):1120–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Schauer N, Semel Y, Roessner U, Gur A, Balbo I, Carrari F, Pleban T, Perez-Melis A, Bruedigam C, Kopka J, et al. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(4):447–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Joseph B, Atwell S, Corwin JA, Li B, Kliebenstein DJ. Meta-analysis of metabolome QTLs in Arabidopsis: trying to estimate the network size controlling genetic variation of the metabolome. Front Plant Sci. 2013;5(1):461.Google Scholar
  59. Keurentjes JJ, Fu J, de Vos CH, Lommen A, Hall RD, Bino RJ, Lh VDP, Jansen RC, Vreugdenhil D, Koornneef M. The genetics of plant metabolism. Nat Genet. 2006;38(7):842–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Gonzalez-Mejia ME, Voss OH, Murnan EJ, Doseff AI. Apigenin-induced apoptosis of leukemia cells is mediated by a bimodal and differentially regulated residue-specific phosphorylation of heat-shock protein-27. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1:e64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Shukla S, Gupta S. Apigenin: a promising molecule for cancer prevention. Pharm Res. 2010;27(6):962–78.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Vargo MA, Voss OH, Poustka F, Cardounel AJ, Grotewold E, Doseff AI. Apigenin-induced-apoptosis is mediated by the activation of PKCdelta and caspases in leukemia cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006;72(6):681–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Xiao J, Muzashvili TS, Georgiev MI. Advances in the biotechnological glycosylation of valuable flavonoids. Biotechnol Adv. 2014;32(6):1145–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Falcone Ferreyra ML, Casas MI, Questa JI, Herrera AL, Deblasio S, Wang J, Jackson D, Grotewold E, Casati P. Evolution and expression of tandem duplicated maize flavonol synthase genes. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3:101.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Markham KR, Tanner GJ, Caasi-Lit M, Whitecross MI, Nayudu M, Mitchell KA. Possible protective role for 3′,4′-dihydroxyflavones induced by enhanced UV-B in a UV-tolerant rice cultivar. Phytochemistry. 1998;49(7):1913–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Ma XQ, Tang JH, Teng WT, Yan JB, Meng YJ, Li JS. Epistatic interaction is an important genetic basis of grain yield and its components in maize. Mol Breed. 2007;20(1):41–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Chander S, Guo YQ, Yang XH, Zhang J, Lu XQ, Yan JB, Song TM, Rocheford TR, Li JS. Using molecular markers to identify two major loci controlling carotenoid contents in maize grain. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;116(2):223–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Fu J, Cheng Y, Linghu J, Yang X, Kang L, Zhang Z, Zhang J, He C, Du X, Peng Z, et al. RNA sequencing reveals the complex regulatory network in the maize kernel. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Li H, Peng Z, Yang X, Wang W, Fu J, Wang J, Han Y, Chai Y, Guo T, Yang N, et al. Genome-wide association study dissects the genetic architecture of oil biosynthesis in maize kernels. Nat Genet. 2013;45(1):43–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A, Berard A, Buckler ES, Charcosset A, Clarke JD, Graner EM, Hansen M, Joets J, et al. A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28334.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Pan Q, Li L, Yang X, Tong H, Xu S, Li Z, Li W, Muehlbauer GJ, Li J, Yan J. Genome-wide recombination dynamics are associated with phenotypic variation in maize. New Phytol. 2016;210(3):1083–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhang Z, Ersoz E, Lai CQ, Todhunter RJ, Tiwari HK, Gore MA, Bradbury PJ, Yu J, Arnett DK, Ordovas JM, et al. Mixed linear model approach adapted for genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42(4):355–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeng ZB, Kao CH, Basten CJ. Estimating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Genet Res. 1999;74(3):279–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang S. CJB, and Z.-B. Zeng. Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC. 2012. (http://statgen.ncsu.edu/qtlcart/WQTLCart.htm). Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
  75. Lin YJ, Zhang Q. Optimising the tissue culture conditions for high efficiency transformation of indica rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2005;23(8):540–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33(7):1870–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Yonekura-Sakakibara K, Nakabayashi R, Sugawara S, Tohge T, Ito T, Koyanagi M, Kitajima M, Takayama H, Saito K. A flavonoid 3-O-glucoside:2″-O-glucosyltransferase responsible for terminal modification of pollen-specific flavonols in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2014;79(5):769–82.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement