Skip to main content
Download PDF

The ARGOS gene family functions in a negative feedback loop to desensitize plants to ethylene

BMC Plant Biology volume 15, Article number: 157 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Ethylene plays critical roles in plant growth and development, including the regulation of cell expansion, senescence, and the response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Elements of the initial signal transduction pathway have been determined, but we are still defining regulatory mechanisms by which the sensitivity of plants to ethylene is modulated.

Results

We report here that members of the ARGOS gene family of Arabidopsis, previously implicated in the regulation of plant growth and biomass, function as negative feedback regulators of ethylene signaling. Expression of all four members of the ARGOS family is induced by ethylene, but this induction is blocked in ethylene-insensitive mutants. The dose dependence for ethylene induction varies among the ARGOS family members, suggesting that they could modulate responses across a range of ethylene concentrations. GFP-fusions of ARGOS and ARL localize to the endoplasmic reticulum, the same subcellular location as the ethylene receptors and other initial components of the ethylene signaling pathway. Seedlings with increased expression of ARGOS family members exhibit reduced ethylene sensitivity based on physiological and molecular responses.

Conclusions

These results support a model in which the ARGOS gene family functions as part of a negative feedback circuit to desensitize the plant to ethylene, thereby expanding the range of ethylene concentrations to which the plant can respond. These results also indicate that the effects of the ARGOS gene family on plant growth and biomass are mediated through effects on ethylene signal transduction.

Background

The gaseous hormone ethylene plays critical roles in plant growth and development, including the regulation of cell expansion, senescence, and the response to biotic and abiotic stresses [1]. Key elements in the ethylene signaling pathway have been identified through the characterization of ethylene insensitive and constitutive ethylene response mutants of Arabidopsis, double mutant analysis then allowing for the ordering of these elements into a signaling pathway [2, 3]. These signaling elements are, in order, an ethylene receptor family related to the histidine kinases of prokaryotes, the Raf-like kinase CTR1, the Nramp-like protein EIN2, and the EIN3 family of transcription factors. This signal transduction pathway transduces the ethylene signal from the membrane-bound receptors to the nucleus, where the EIN3 transcription factors mediate the characteristic transcriptional response to ethylene.

Interestingly, the ethylene receptors as well as the initial signaling elements in the pathway are predominantly localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) [4]. The ER is an unusual location for a hormone receptor but is compatible with the ready diffusion of ethylene in aqueous and lipid environments. The proximity of the receptors, CTR1, and EIN2 at the ER would facilitate transmission of the ethylene signal, which is thought to operate according to the following model. In the absence of ethylene, the receptors activate the Raf-like kinase CTR1 [5]. The direct phosphorylation target of CTR1 is EIN2, which is maintained in an inactive state when phosphorylated by CTR1, thereby resulting in a suppression of the ethylene response [6–8]. Upon ethylene binding, the receptors inactivate CTR1, thereby relieving suppression on the downstream signaling elements. As a result, EIN2 is proteolytically processed such that a C-terminal domain is released to migrate to the nucleus, where it either directly or indirectly activates the transcription factors EIN3 and EIN3 like1 (EIL1) to initiate the transcriptional response to ethylene [6–8].

Arabidopsis seedlings can sense and respond to a tremendous range of ethylene concentrations, spanning over six orders of magnitude [9, 10]. Diverse mechanisms exist by which output from the ethylene signaling pathway can be modulated to regulate the plant’s ethylene sensitivity [11]. These include transcriptional regulation and proteasome-mediated degradation of key signaling elements [12–17], clustering of receptors [18–20], and interactions of pathway elements with auxiliary proteins such as the RTE1/GR family [21, 22]. In addition, various genes have been identified as modulating the ethylene response based on a genetic screen for enhanced ethylene sensitivity [23–27].

We report here that the AUXIN REGULATED GENE INVOLVED IN ORGAN SIZE (ARGOS) gene family functions to regulate output by the ethylene signal transduction pathway. ARGOS is the founding member of a four-member family of proteins, and its expression, as indicated by its name, is induced by auxin [28]. ARGOS is proposed to be a regulator of plant growth and biomass because overexpression increases organ size and antisense decreases organ size [28]. Other members of this family (ARL, OSR1, and OSR2) yield similar mutant phenotypes [29–31], consistent with an overlapping function in the control of plant growth. As reported here, our data indicate that a primary function of the ARGOS family is to control ethylene signaling, with the ARGOS family members functioning as negative feedback mediators to desensitize the plant to ethylene, a role that facilitates the ethylene adaptation response of plants. This function in the regulation of ethylene signaling may itself account for the majority of the phenotypes associated with mutations in the ARGOS family.

Results

Ethylene-dependent expression of the ARGOS gene family

The primary success to date in identifying elements of the ethylene signal transduction pathway (e.g. ETR1, EIN2, CTR1, and EIN3) has come through the employment of genetic approaches [2, 3]. We pursued an alternative approach to identify new ethylene signaling elements, based on the hypothesis that many signaling pathways induce the production of negative regulators for the pathway, a precedent in the ethylene pathway being the negative regulator RTE1 [22]. To this end, we examined microarray data for genes that are (1) induced by ethylene or the ethylene precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) and (2) encode proteins with predicted transmembrane domain(s), because these proteins could potentially be targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum where the initial signaling elements in the ethylene pathway are localized [4]. By this process we identified members of the ARGOS family (ARGOS, ARL, and OSR1), which have been previously reported to regulate organ size, with OSR1 also identified as a gene induced in response to ACC [28–30]. The fourth member of the family (OSR2) is not present on the Affymetrix ATH1 genome array. The phylogenetic relationship between members of the ARGOS family is given in Additional file 1.

All four members of the ARGOS family are induced by exogenous ethylene (Fig. 1a), but the dose dependence for ethylene-induction varies among the family members, induction of the closely related ARGOS and ARL being most sensitive to ethylene. Induction is blocked in the ethylene-insensitive mutants etr1-1 and ein2-1, and reduced in ein3;eil1 (which exhibits partial ethylene insensitivity) (Fig. 1b), demonstrating that expression is regulated through the well-characterized ethylene-signaling pathway [32, 33]. Time-course analysis indicated that both ARGOS and ARL are rapidly induced by ethylene, induction paralleling that of the ethylene receptor genes ETR2, ERS1, and ERS2 (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Ethylene induction of ARGOS family members. a Ethylene dose-dependency for induction varies among family members. Green seedlings were treated for 2 h in the presence or absence of the indicated ethylene concentrations, RNA isolated, and gene expression determined by qRT-PCR based on three biological replicates. Expression is shown relative to the maximal induction observed for each gene. Significant dose-dependent differences in expression for each gene are based on an analysis of variance applying Bonferroni correction post-test comparisons (p < 0.05); designations with the same letter exhibit no significant difference. Error bars indicate SE; error bars not shown if smaller than symbol. b Effect of ethylene-insensitive mutations on gene induction. Induction was examined in wild-type (wt) and the ethylene-insensitive mutants etr1-1, ein2-1, and ein3;eil1 using 2-h treatments of green seedlings in the presence or absence of 10 μL L−1 ethylene. Gene expression was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. c Time course for ethylene induction of ARGOS and ARL, as compared to the receptors ETR2, ERS1, and ERS2. Green seedlings were treated for indicated times with 10 μL L−1 ethylene and gene expression determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. d Auxin induction of ARGOS family members is ethylene-dependent. Wild-type or etr1-1 green seedlings were treated for 3 h in the absence or presence of 50 μM ACC or 5 μM NAA. Gene expression was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR

Full size image

To determine if the ethylene-induced changes in expression are reflected at the protein level we employed GFP-fusions to ARGOS and ARL driven from their native promoters (Fig. 2). In response to exogenous ethylene, both the ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP proteins are strongly induced, the level of induction being even greater than that observed for the transcripts (Fig. 2a). Upon removal of ethylene, transcript and protein levels for ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP rapidly drop, demonstrating tight control of expression by ethylene (Fig. 2b). Dose response analysis demonstrated that their protein induction is very responsive to ethylene, induction being detected in response to 0.001 μL L−1 ethylene (Fig. 2c).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Ethylene-dependent regulation of ARGOS and ARL protein levels. GFP-tagged versions of ARGOS and ARL, driven by their native promoters, were stably expressed in Arabidopsis. Transcript levels for the ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP fusions were determined by RT-PCR, with β-tubulin as a control. Protein levels of the GFP fusions were determined by immunoblot analysis using an anti-GFP antibody, with BiP detected by an anti-BiP antibody as a loading control. a Time course for mRNA and protein induction of ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP by ethylene. Seedlings were treated with 10 μL L−1 for the indicated times. b Reduction in mRNA and protein levels following removal of ethylene. Expression of ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP was induced by ethylene treatment for 4 h, then the ethylene removed, and the kinetics for reduction followed at the RNA and protein levels. c Ethylene dose dependence for induction of ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP protein. Green seedlings were treated with the indicated ethylene concentrations for 4 h. Two immunoblot exposures are shown for the GFP fusions to allow for visualization of induction at low and high ethylene concentrations

Full size image

Public microarray data indicates that only ethylene (as the ethylene precursor ACC) and auxin (indole-3-acetic acid; IAA) consistently induce expression of ARGOS gene family members, ACC demonstrating a stronger effect than IAA (Additional file 2). Members of the ARGOS family were previously reported to be induced by auxin [28, 30]. However auxin stimulates ethylene biosynthesis [1, 34, 35], raising the possibility that the effect of auxin on the induction of ARGOS gene family members might operate indirectly through the ethylene signaling pathway. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 on the ability of auxin to induce expression of ARGOS, ARL, and OSR1 (Fig. 1d). Auxin (1-naphthaleneacetic acid; NAA) induced expression of all three genes, but this effect was eliminated by the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1. These results indicate that auxin induction of the ARGOS gene family is dependent on the ethylene signaling pathway.

ARGOS family proteins are membrane-associated and localize to the endoplasmic reticulum

Members of the ARGOS family contain two predicted transmembrane domains (Additional file 1). Prior analysis has suggested that members of the ARGOS family might be localized to nucleus, cytoplasm, plasma membrane and/or endoplasmic reticulum [28–31]. We found that the green-fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions of ARGOS and ARL are membrane-localized based on fractionation of transgenic plant lines into microsomal and soluble fractions (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, the fusion proteins are resistant to extraction from the membranes by sodium chloride, but can be solubilized from membranes when treated with the detergent lysophosphatidylcholine (Fig. 3b). In this respect, they are similar to the transmembrane ethylene-receptor ETR1 [36], consistent with ARGOS and ARL being transmembrane proteins. Although readily detectable by immunoblot analysis, we could not detect ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP based on their GFP fluorescence in these stable transgenic lines. Therefore, to determine the subcellular localization of ARGOS and ARL, we transiently expressed the GFP fusions in Arabidopsis protoplasts (Fig. 3c). The resulting fluorescence co-localized with the ER-marker BiP-RFP. Furthermore, the fluorescence in the region underlying the plasma membrane exhibited the distinctive reticulate network appearance found with the cortical ER (Fig. 3c). No localization to the plasma membrane itself was detected. Thus, both the co-localization with BiP and morphological features of the membrane network support ER localization for ARGOS and ARL, consistent with results reported by Feng et al. [29].

Fig. 3
figure 3

ARGOS and ARL are membrane-associated proteins localized to the ER. a Membrane association of ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP. Membrane and soluble fractions were isolated from green seedlings following 4-h treatment in the absence or presence of 10 μL L−1 ethylene. Immunoblot analysis was performed with anti-GFP antibody to detect the ARGOS-GFP and ARL-GFP. Immunological detection of the ethylene receptor ETR1 and ACC-oxidase served as markers for the membrane and the soluble fractions, respectively. b Strong association of ARGOS and ARL with membranes. Microsomal membranes were treated with 0.5 M NaCl or 0.5% (w/v) lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC). The different lanes represent the total membranes prior to centrifugation (T), and from the soluble (S) and (P) fractions after centrifugation. The relative amounts of ARGOS-GFP, ARL-GFP, and ETR1 were determined by immunoblot analysis, the membrane protein ETR1 serving as an internal control for solubilization. c ARGOS and ARL localize to the ER. Protoplasts were transfected with either ARGOS-GFP or ARL-GFP (green), along with the ER-marker BiP-RFP (magenta), and visualized by confocal microscopy. Regions of overlap are indicated by white on the merged image. DIC images of protoplasts are also shown. Focused region is on the cortical ER underlying the plasma membrane. Scale bars = 10 μm

Full size image

The ARGOS family regulates ethylene sensitivity of seedlings

We found that the ARGOS:ARGOS-GFP and ARL:ARL-GFP lines affected ethylene sensitivity based on the growth response of dark-grown seedlings to ethylene. Wild-type seedlings exhibit a pronounced reduction in hypocotyl growth when grown in 1 μL L−1 ethylene (Fig. 4B, C). Dose response analysis indicated that both the ARGOS:ARGOS-GFP and ARL:ARL-GFP exhibit reduced ethylene sensitivity (p < 0.05) compared to wild type at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 μL L−1 ethylene (Fig. 4c). Since the ARGOS:ARGOS-GFP and ARL:ARL-GFP transgenes are expressed in the wild-type background, ethylene treatment will result in an overall heightened level of ARGOS family expression compared to wild type due to the presence of the native gene and the transgene. These data indicate that ARGOS and ARL can function as negative regulators of the ethylene response. Furthermore, the finding that such a phenotype can be induced from the native promoter is suggestive that changes in expression levels of ARGOS and ARL normally regulate ethylene sensitivity.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Functional analysis of the ARGOS and ARL in regulating ethylene sensitivity. a Increased expression levels of ARGOS in CaMV 35S:ARGOS lines and of ARL in CaMV 35S:ARL lines compared to wild type. Two independent transgenic lines (#1, #2) were analyzed for each construct, expression levels being examined in green seedlings following 2-h treatment in the absence or presence of 10 μL L−1 ethylene. β-tubulin served as a loading control. Primers were designed to specifically amplify the transgene (trg), the native gene (nat), or the total expression of native and transgene together (tot). b Phenotypic analysis of 4-day-old dark-grown seedlings grown in the absence or presence of 1 μL L−1 ethylene. Growth of transgenic lines were compared to the the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 and the constitutive ethylene response mutant ctr1-2. Seedlings were examined for significant differences in growth based on the Tukey multiple range test among the means on the analysis of variance (p < 0.05; n = 10). Seedling measurements designated with the same letter exhibit no significant difference. Error bars indicate SD. c Ethylene dose response curves for hypocotyl growth in mutant lines compared to wild-type dark-grown seedlings. Error bars indicate SD (n = 10). Statistical significance of wild type to the transgenic lines was performed by an analysis of variance applying Bonferroni correction post-test comparisons (* p < 0.05)

Full size image

We tested the hypothesis that ARGOS and ARL function as negative regulators by generating transgenic lines overexpressing these genes under the constitutive CaMV 35S promoter. Overexpression lines exhibited increased basal expression of ARGOS or ARL in the absence of ethylene, and resulted in higher than wild-type expression in the presence of ethylene (Fig. 4a). The ethylene sensitivity of the ARGOS and ARL overexpression lines was significantly reduced compared to wild-type based on the dark-grown hypocotyl growth response to 1 μL L−1 ethylene (Fig. 4b). For comparison in this analysis, we also included the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 which lacks this hypocotyl growth response to ethylene [33, 37], and the constitutive ethylene-response mutant ctr1-2 which displays reduced hypocotyl growth in the both the absence and presence of ethylene (Fig. 4b). Dose response analysis demonstrating reduced sensitivity (p < 0.05) of the ARGOS and ARL overexpression lines compared to wild type from 0.01 to 100 μL L−1 ethylene (Fig. 4c).

Overexpression of ARGOS and ARL recapitulates the effects on leaf cell expansion and division found in the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1

A defining characteristic for ARGOS family mutants is their effect on plant biomass, their overexpression resulting in increased leaf area, these effects being attributed to changes in cell expansion and/or cell proliferation [28–31]. Ethylene insensitivity results in a similar increase in leaf area [32, 37, 38], suggestive that effects of ARGOS-family overexpression on biomass could be due to altered ethylene signaling. To assess the role of the ethylene signal-transduction pathway in regulating cell expansion and cell proliferation, we characterized fully expanded leaves of the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 [37] and the constitutive ethylene-response mutant ctr1-2 [5]. As shown in Fig. 5, ethylene insensitivity results in increased leaf area due to an increase in both cell size and cell number. Conversely, the reduced leaf area found in ctr1-2 arises from a decrease in both cell size and cell number. Overexpression of ARGOS or ARL results in increased leaf area, consistent with prior studies [28, 30], this change being due to a significant increase in both cell expansion and cell proliferation (Fig. 5). Thus the changes in leaf area arising from altered expression of the ARGOS family are consistent with what is observed in mutants that affect ethylene signaling.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Overexpression of ARGOS and ARL recapitulate the effects on leaf cell expansion and division found in ethylene-insensitive mutants. Leaf area (n = 4), cell area (n = 40), and cells per leaf (n = 4) were determined for the fully expanded 5th leaf of 30-day-old plants. Significant differences are based on the Tukey multiple range test among the means on the analysis of variance (p < 0.05); measurements designated with the same letter exhibit no significant difference. Error bars indicate SD

Full size image

The ARGOS family regulates ethylene-dependent gene expression

To gain information at the molecular level as to how the ethylene response differs between wild type and the ARGOS-family overexpression lines, we examined ethylene-dependent gene expression (Fig. 6a). RNA was prepared from seedlings grown in the dark in the absence or presence of 1 μL L−1 ethylene, because we observed substantial differences in the hypocotyl growth response under these conditions (Fig. 4b, c). Five reporter genes we previously identified as robustly induced by ethylene [10, 39], were all induced in the wild-type seedlings (Fig. 6a). The molecular response to ethylene was altered in the 35S::ARGOS and 35S::ARL lines (Fig. 6a). First, the basal expression of the reporter genes was reduced compared to wild type, indicating a reduced response to endogenous ethylene in the 35S::ARGOS and 35S::ARL lines. Second, the expression level of the reporter genes in response to 1 μL L−1 ethylene was also reduced in the transgenic lines compared to wild type. Thus overall, we observed consistently reduced expression for the reporter genes in the 35S::ARGOS and 35S::ARL lines.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Overexpression of the ARGOS and ARL suppresses ethylene-dependent gene expression. a Gene expression was analyzed in dark-grown seedlings of the overexpression lines (35S::ARGOS #1 and 35S::ARL #2) grown in the absence and presence of 1 μL L−1 ethylene. Expression of the indicated genes was determined by qRT-PCR, with the expression level of wild-type in the absence of ethylene set to 1. The left column shows genes whose expression is induced by ethylene, the right column genes whose expression is suppressed by ethylene. Data based on three biological replicates for each treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by unpaired two-tailed t-test with a Bonferroni correction (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001), between the experimental samples and the corresponding wild-type control. b Overexpression of ARGOS or ARL reduces ethylene-dependent gene expression in a transient protoplast assay. Protoplasts were transfected with either of the ethylene-dependent luciferase reporters GCC-LUC or ERF1-LUC, as well as with a UBQ-GUS transgene for normalization of the transfection. Protoplasts were co-transfected with CsV::ARGOS or CsV::ARL constructs to determine their effect on the expression of the luciferase reporters. Protoplasts were treated in the absence or presence 10 μL L−1 ethylene for 6 h prior to determining the relative LUC/GUS activity. Data from one experiment is shown from two independent experiments with similar results, each experiment including two biological replicates per sample treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by t-test with a Bonferroni correction (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01), between the experimental samples and the corresponding wild-type control

Full size image

We also examined the molecular response for four genes whose expression is repressed in response to 1 μL L−1 ethylene in wild type (Fig. 6a) [39]. Effects of the transgenic lines on the ethylene-repressed genes were less consistent than on the set of ethylene-induced genes. However, notably, the basal expression levels for both KIN2 and CHS were significantly higher in the 35S::ARGOS and 35S::ARL lines (Fig. 6a), consistent with the response to endogenous ethylene in these lines being compromised such that they no longer suppress expression of these genes effectively.

As an alternative approach to examine the ability of ARGOS family members to inhibit ethylene-dependent gene expression, we employed a transient protoplast assay with the ethylene-inducible luciferase reporters ERF1-LUC or GCC-LUC [40–42]. Treatment of protoplasts with ethylene induces expression of the luciferase reporters (Fig. 6B). However, co-transfection with either ARGOS or ARL reduces the responsiveness of the luciferase reporter to the exogenous ethylene treatment. The basal level of expression for the luciferase reporter is also reduced, indicating that expression of ARGOS or ARL reduces the response to endogenous ethylene. Overall, these molecular results reveal that the ARGOS family members function as negative regulators of the ethylene-signaling pathway.

The ARGOS family regulates the desensitization response of seedlings to ethylene

We used time-lapse imaging to examine the growth inhibition kinetics of hypocotyls from two-day-old, dark-grown Arabidopsis seedlings. We have previously shown that application of higher concentrations of ethylene (>1 μL L−1) to wild-type Arabidopsis seedlings results in a rapid reduction in growth rate approximately 10 min after application of ethylene, with seedlings reaching a new steady state growth rate approximately 75 min after ethylene addition [9, 12]. Application of 0.1 μL L−1 ethylene causes growth inhibition with kinetics that are initially indistinguishable from higher dosages [9]. However, approximately 2.5 h after 0.1 μL L−1 ethylene application, desensitization is observed where the growth rate increases to a new steady-state rate approximately 50 % of that observed in air [9]. We obtained similar results with wild-type seedlings in the current study (Fig. 7). Overexpression of either ARGOS or ARL resulted in seedlings that initiated desensitization with a shorter delay and which reached a higher growth rate than wild-type seedlings (Fig. 7, Table 1). These results indicate that changes in expression of ARGOS family members modulate the seedling desensitization response to ethylene.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Overexpression of ARGOS and ARL accelerate the desensitization response to ethylene. Ethylene growth response kinetics were analyzed in dark-grown seedlings. Measurements were made in air for 1 h prior to introducing 0.1 μL L−1 ethylene (arrow), and growth rates normalized to the growth rate during this first hour. Error bars represent SE (n = 6 for wild-type, 8 for 35S::ARGOS, 12 for 35S::ARL)

Full size image
Table 1 Growth rates of seedlings during analysis of ethylene growth response kinetics
Full size table

Discussion

Our results indicate that a key physiological role of the ARGOS family is to desensitize plants to ethylene. Desensitization is a common feature of sensory systems and is, for example, incorporated into such diverse systems as bacterial chemosensing, yeast osmosensing, and mammalian olfactory and light sensing [43]. Desensitization (or adaptation) is typified by the sensitivity to a signal being altered in response to changes in the level of the signal, thereby allowing the organism to sense the signal over as wide a range as possible. Arabidopsis can sense changes in ethylene concentration over six orders of magnitude [9, 10], consistent with a desensitization response. Short-term analysis of ethylene growth kinetics previously demonstrated that seedlings exhibit a desensitization response when treated with 0.01 μL L−1 ethylene, the timing of the response being consistent with the transcriptional induction of a negative regulator such as the ARGOS gene family [9], our data demonstrating that altered expression of ARGOS family members perturbs this desensitization response. Differing induction kinetics suggests that members of the ARGOS family could modulate the desensitization response across a range of ethylene concentrations. Ethylene induction of the ARGOS gene family is likely to be a primary ethylene response based on the presence of binding sites for the transcription factor EIN3 in the promoters of ARGOS, ARL, and OSR2 [44].

Additional mechanisms that may allow for desensitization of the ethylene response have been identified. As with the ARGOS family, these involve transcriptional induction by ethylene of negative regulators. First, the ethylene receptors are negative regulators and several members are induced by ethylene (ERS1, ETR2, and ERS2 in Arabidopsis), such induction being observed in dicots and monocots [12, 45]. Second, members of the RTE1/GR family are also negative regulators of ethylene signaling [21, 22]. RTE1 is an ethylene-inducible transmembrane protein that interacts with the ethylene receptor ETR1 and appears to stabilize the receptor in the conformation normally observed in the absence of ethylene, thereby decreasing the receptor’s sensitivity to ethylene [22, 46, 47]. Third, acting to control the level of transcriptional output, the F-box protein EBF2 is an ethylene-induced negative regulator that targets the EIN3/EIL family of transcription factors for degradation [16, 48]. Fourth, transcriptional repressors of the ERF family are induced by ethylene and feedback to down-regulate the ethylene transcriptional response [49, 50]. Interestingly, co-expression analysis places ARGOS, ARL, and OSR1 in a network involving genes for the ethylene receptors ERS1 and ETR2 as well as for the F-box protein EBF2 [29], consistent with a role in regulating the ethylene response. The range of mechanisms for desensitization would allow for concerted regulation of ethylene responses from receptor to gene expression, and also provide multiple points for cross-talk with other pathways.

The mechanism by which the ARGOS family regulates ethylene signaling remains to be elucidated, but several predictions can be made. First, the mechanism is likely to involve the transmembrane portion of the ARGOS family proteins, the two transmembrane domains and the proline-rich linker joining them exhibiting the greatest sequence conservation, deletion analysis confirming that this region is sufficient to induce organ growth when overexpressed [29]. Second, the effect of the ARGOS family is likely to involve initial components of the ethylene signaling pathway based on their co-localization to the ER [4]. Third, the ARGOS family is likely to regulate signal output from a primary rather than a peripheral element of the pathway, because modulation of ARGOS family expression has broad effects on the physiological and molecular response to ethylene. Based on these characteristics, the ethylene receptors and EIN2 represent potential targets for regulation by the ARGOS family.

Based on our analysis, the previously described effects of ARGOS family mutants on plant biomass, occurring due to alterations in cell expansion and proliferation [28–30], can be ascribed to a role in modulation of the ethylene signaling pathway. Ethylene mutants are known to affect plant growth, ethylene insensitivity resulting in increased plant biomass [37, 51, 52], enhancement of ethylene signaling resulting in decreased biomass [5, 53]. Indeed, approaches to inhibit ethylene signaling have been pursued as a means to increase plant biomass under common environmental-stress conditions [54, 55]. Our results making use of ethylene pathway mutants support a role for ethylene in regulation of both cell expansion and proliferation in Arabidopsis leaves, these effects both contributing to changes in biomass, consistent with the effects we observed in ARGOS family mutants. We note that prior characterization of ARGOS-family overexpression lines indicated effects on cell proliferation for ARGOS [28], cell expansion for ARL and OSR2 [30, 31], and both for OSR1 [29]. Our results indicate that ARGOS and ARL, like OSR1, regulate both cell expansion and proliferation. Differences in ascribing roles in cell proliferation and/or expansion can arise due to such factors as to the leaf chosen for analysis and whether the leaf has reached full expansion, prior interpretation for the effects of ethylene mutants on leaf area having differed due to such variables [37, 56].

The ARGOS family is plant-specific and the role it plays in modulating plant biomass has led to its characterization in other plant species, including the dicot cabbage and the monocots rice and maize. Overexpression of an ARGOS homologue from cabbage (BrARGOS) in Arabidopsis resulted in increased organ growth, with an increase in leaf area arising primarily due to an increase in cell proliferation [57]. Similarly, overexpression of the rice homologue OsARGOS in Arabidopsis also resulted in increased organ growth, although here the increase in leaf area was attributed to effects on both cell proliferation and expansion [58]. Interestingly, no effects on organ size were found when OsARGOS was overexpressed in rice. However the effects of ethylene insensitivity on the adult rice phenotypes examined are subtle [59] and so the lack of a phenotype is consistent with what might be expected based on a role for OsARGOS in ethylene signaling. It will be of interest to determine if the transgenic rice lines have altered ethylene-related phenotypes for root and coleoptile growth, senescence, and grain weight per plant. The maize homologue to ARGOS (ZmZAR1) has also been characterized, its transgenic overexpression in maize resulting in increased plant and organ growth, including that of leaves, stalks, and ears [60]. Increased leaf area of the ZmZAR1 overexpressing lines was primarily due to an increase in cell proliferation rather than cell expansion. Overexpression of ZmZAR1 was also implicated in an enhanced resistance to drought stress, a phenotype that could relate to a role in ethylene signaling because a reduction in ethylene activity enhances drought tolerance in maize [61].

Of interest is our finding that ethylene pathway mutants affect cell proliferation as well as cell expansion. Although the role of ethylene as an inhibitor of cell expansion is well documented in Arabidopsis, a role for ethylene in the control of cell proliferation is more novel. However, earlier data from agronomic plant species as well as recent data from Arabidopsis support an inhibitory role for ethylene in cell division [1, 62]. In particular, treatment of Arabidopsis seedlings with the ethylene precursor ACC inhibited cell proliferation in leaves as well as activity of cyclin-dependent kinase A [62]. Our analysis of ethylene-pathway mutants is consistent with an inhibitory role for ethylene in the regulation of cell proliferation. The five-fold difference in leaf cell number we observe between the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1-1 and the constitutive ethylene response mutant ctr1-2 support a substantive contribution of ethylene to the regulation of cell proliferation.

Conclusions

We demonstrate a new role for the ARGOS gene family in negatively regulating the ethylene response of Arabidopsis. A model integrating the ARGOS family with the ethylene signaling pathway is shown in Fig. 8. Members of the ARGOS family are transcriptionally induced in response to ethylene, induction requiring signaling through the primary ethylene signaling pathway. ARGOS and ARL are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum, the same subcellular location as initial signaling elements in the ethylene pathway. Consistent with their role as negative regulators of the ethylene pathway are the effects of overexpression lines on (1) the triple response of dark-grown seedlings to ethylene, (2) the short-term kinetic response to ethylene, (3) cell expansion and proliferation in leaves, and (4) ethylene-dependent gene expression. Together these data support a model in which the ARGOS gene family functions as part of a negative feedback circuit to desensitize the plant to ethylene, thereby expanding the range of ethylene concentrations to which the plant can respond. These results also indicate that the effects of the ARGOS gene family on plant growth and biomass are mediated through effects on ethylene signal transduction.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Model for negative feedback loop by which the ARGOS family desensitizes ethylene signaling. Key signaling elements of the ethylene pathway are shown, initial elements being localized to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the EIN3 transcription factor family being localized to the nucleus. Ethylene activates the transcriptional response to ethylene, stimulating expression of ARGOS family members. ARGOS family proteins insert into the ER where they serve to desensitize the ethylene signal output

Full size image

Methods

Constructs and plant transformation

To make constructs for expression of ARGOS (At3g59900) and ARL (At2g44080) with C-terminal GFP tags and driven under their native promoters, genomic fragments including 5′ flanking regions (1640 bp and 1479 bp for ARGOS and ARL, respectively) and coding regions (390 bp and 405 bp for ARGOS and ARL, respectively) were amplified from wild-type Col-0 genomic DNA, using the ARGOS primers 5′-TGGTCAACGATTCAAGGAGATCCA-3′ and 5′-GCCGATTGACATGAAATTGCAAGTTACATCTG-3′, and the ARL primers 5′-TAGCCACCACATGAAATGCCGAGA-3′ and 5′-GCCGATTGACATGAAATTGCAAGTTACATCTG-3′. Fragments were cloned into the entry vector pCR8 (Invitrogen, USA) and then recombined into the vector pGWB204 [63] using the Gateway system.

For overexpression of ARGOS and ARL in plants and protoplasts, their coding regions were amplified from cDNA, with ARGOS amplified using the primers 5′-GAATCCATGATTCGAGAAATCTCAAACTTAC-3′ and 5′-GGATCCTGACATGAAATTGCAAGTTACATCTG-3′ and ARL amplified using the primers 5′-GAATCATGATTCGTGAGTTCTCCAGTCTAC-3′ and 5′-GGATCCCATAAAAGTGGAAGAAGAAGAAACATG-3′, and the fragments cloned into pCR8. The fragments were moved into pEarleyGate100 [64] for stable plant transformation and into CsVGFP-999 [65] for protoplast transfection. For plant transformation, constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and transformed into Arabidopsis by the floral-dip method [66].

Transient expression in Arabidopsis protoplasts

Arabidopsis protoplasts were isolated and transfected as described [67]. Visualization for localization studies was with a Leica TCS SP UV confocal microscope, GFP being imaged with a 488 nm laser, RFP with a 561 nm laser, and protoplasts with DIC optics. For analysis of the ethylene response, the reporter constructs GCC-LUC [40] and ERF1-LUC [42] were used. The UBQ10-GUS construct was used as an internal control. Transfected protoplast samples in culture dishes were placed in air-tight containers with or without 10 μL L−1 ethylene for 6 h at 22 °C under dim light (5 μE⋅m−2⋅s−1). The results are shown as the means of relative LUC activities from duplicate samples with error bars.

Membrane fractionation and immunoblot analysis

Microsomal and soluble fractions were isolated from green Arabidopsis seedlings as described [36]. Briefly, plant material was homogenized in 30 mM Tris (pH 8), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, and 20 % (v/v) glycerol, with protease inhibitors cocktail (Sigma) and then centrifuged at 8,000 g for 15 min. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min, and the resulting membrane pellet was resuspended in 10 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 % (v/v) glycerol with protease inhibitors cocktail.

Immunoblot analysis was performed as described [36]. The BCA assay (Pierce) was used to measure protein concentration as described [68]. Before SDS-PAGE, protein samples were mixed with SDS-PAGE loading buffer and incubated at 37 °C for 1 h to denature integral membrane proteins without aggregation. Primary antibodies used were HRP-conjugated monoclonal anti-GFP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-ETR1 [69], anti-BIP (Stressgen Biotech), and anti-ACC oxidase (Santra Cruz Biotechnology).

Analysis of the ethylene response

For short-term ethylene treatment of green seedlings, seedlings were grown at 22 °C for two to three weeks with constant light on Murashige and Skoog basal medium with Gamborg’s vitamins (pH 5.75; Sigma), 1 % (w/v) sucrose and 8 % (w/v) agar [53], then treated for the indicated times and ethylene concentrations in sealed containers. Treatment and analysis of the triple response of dark-grown Arabidopsis seedlings to ethylene was performed as described [39]. Aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG; 5 μM), an inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis, was included in the media to reduce endogenous ethylene production. For short-term kinetic analysis of dark-grown seedlings, time-lapse imaging and growth rate analysis of hypocotyls were carried out as previously described [9, 12]. To determine leaf size, cell area, and cells per leaf of ethylene pathway mutants compared to ARGOS family mutants, the fully expanded fifth leaf was analyzed from 30-day-old plants grown under an 18-h light/6-h dark cycle. Cell area was determined from palisade cells at the central region of the leaf beside the mid-vein as described [29], with 10 palisade cells characterized per leaf. Area determination measurements were made with IMAGE J software (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). ANOVA tables were generated using http://www.physics.csbsju.edu/stats/anova.html and multiple comparison tests done using http://graphpad.com/quickcalcs/posttest1/ quick calc web tool that uses the Bonferroni correction for post-test comparisons.

Quantitative real-time PCR and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from seedlings using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, USA) and cDNA synthesized using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, USA) as described [70]. For quantitative RT-PCR, RNA from three biological replicates was used as template for first-strand cDNA synthesis, and three experimental replicate reactions were performed for each biological replicate using primer pairs specific for the genes of interest. The following primers were used: ARGOS (5′-GTCATGGACGTCGGAAGAAACAAC-3′ and 5′-GGGAACCAATAGCAGCATAAACGG-3′); ARL (5′-CAACAACAACATGGACGTGAGAGG-3′ and 5′- GGAGGCAATGGTGGAAGAATCAAC-3′); OSR1 (At2g41230) (5′-ATGAGGGTTCATGATCAACGGCTG-3′ and 5′-GGCTGGGCTCATTAGAAGGAGAAA-3′); OSR2 (At2g41225) (5′-TGATGGTGCTATTGGCGGTT-3′ and 5′- CAAACGACGACGCATTCACA-3′), ERS1 (At2g40940) (5′-ACCTATGTGTGCAGGTGAAGGACA-3′ and 5′-AGCCCGACAAACCGTTTACAG AGA-3′); ERS2 (At1g04310) (5′-TCAAGAAGCGGTTTGGCTACATTG-3′ and 5′-TAGACCGTCCTCAACAACCCGAAT-3′); ETR2 (At3g23150) (5′-AGAGAAACTCGGGTGCGATGT-3′ and 5′-TCACTGTCGTCGCCACAATC-3′); Peroxidase ATP-N (At5g19890) (5′-AGTGACTTAGCCGTGAACACCACA-3′ and 5′-ACGAGACCGATCAACTCCCAAACA-3′); ACO ACC-oxidase (At1g77330) (5′-GTGATGGATGAGAATTTGGGTTTGCC-3′ and 5′-ATCGATCCACTCGCCGTCTTTCAA-3′); and pEARL1-like (At4g12470) (5′-AGTCCTAAACCAAAGCCAGTCCCA-3′ and 5′-CGATATTGTGCACTGGCATCGCAT-3′), KIN2 (AT5G15960) (5′-TGTATCGGATGCGGCAGCG-3′ and 5′-TTTGAATATAAGTTTGGCTCGTCT-3′), CHS (At5g13930) (5′-TGCTTACATGGCTCCTTCTCTGGA-3′ and 5′-ATCTCAGAGCAGACAACGAGGACA-3′), APG-like (AT1G75900) (5′-TTTGCGTCCGGAGGTTCTGGTTAT-3′ and 5′-CTGAGGCAGAGTCAGACATAAGAG-3′), and a pathogen-related gene (AT4G25780) (5′-TGACCACGACTCCTTGCAGTTCTT-3′ and 5′-ATGAAGATCCCACCATTGTCGCAC-3′). For RT-PCR, the ARGOS transgene (5′-GGTCTAACGGCATCTCTGTTAAT-3′ and 5′-GTACAAGAAAGCTGGGTCGAA-3′) and the native gene (5′-CCAGTTGCCCTAAAGATCAG-3′ and 5′-GTCCATGACTCGGTTGTTC-3′) were specifically amplified with the indicated primers; the ARL transgene (5′-TGTTGGTCTCACAGCATCTC-3′ and 5′-CACCTAGGCACCACTTTGTA-3′) and the native gene (5′-CTCAAGTTTCTTCTTCATACATCG-3′ and 5′-TCCGGTTATGATCTCCTCTC-3′) were specifically amplified with the indicated primers; total expression levels were determined with the primers listed earlier for qRT-PCR. Beta-tubulin (At5g62700) was used as a control for qRT-PCR with primers 5′-CGTAAGCTTGCTGTGAATCTCATC-3′ and 5′-CTGCTCGTCAACTTCCTTTGTG-3′ and for RT-PCR with primers 5′-TGGTGGAGCCTTACAACGCTACTT-3′ and 5′-TTCACAGCAAGCTTACGGAGGTCA-3′. For RT-PCR of the

Abbreviations

ACC:

1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid

AVG:

Aminoethoxyvinylglycine

ER:

Endoplasmic reticulum

GFP:

Green-fluorescent protein

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

NAA:

1-naphthaleneacetic acid

References

  1. Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit Jr ME. Ethylene in Plant Biology. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benavente LM, Alonso JM. Molecular mechanisms of ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol Biosyst. 2006;2(3-4):165–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen YF, Etheridge N, Schaller GE. Ethylene signal transduction. Ann Bot (Lond). 2005;95(6):901–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ju C, Chang C. Advances in ethylene signalling: protein complexes at the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. AoB Plants. 2012;2012:pls031.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kieber JJ, Rothenberg M, Roman G, Feldman KA, Ecker JR. CTR1, a negative regulator of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis, encodes a member of the Raf family of protein kinases. Cell. 1993;72:427–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ju C, Yoon GM, Shemansky JM, Lin DY, Ying ZI, Chang J, et al. CTR1 phosphorylates the central regulator EIN2 to control ethylene hormone signaling from the ER membrane to the nucleus in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(47):19486–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qiao H, Shen Z, Huang SS, Schmitz RJ, Urich MA, Briggs SP, et al. Processing and subcellular trafficking of ER-tethered EIN2 control response to ethylene gas. Science. 2012;338(6105):390–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wen X, Zhang C, Ji Y, Zhao Q, He W, An F, et al. Activation of ethylene signaling is mediated by nuclear translocation of the cleaved EIN2 carboxyl terminus. Cell Res. 2012;22(11):1613–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Binder BM, Mortimore LA, Stepanova AN, Ecker JR, Bleecker AB. Short-term growth responses to ethylene in Arabidopsis seedlings are EIN3/EIL1 independent. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(2):2921–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen QG, Bleecker AB. Analysis of ethylene signal transduction kinetics associated with seedling-growth responses and chitinase induction in wild-type and mutant Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1995;108:597–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Binder BM, Chang C, Schaller GE. Perception of ethylene by plants: Ethylene receptors. In: Annual Plant Reviews: The Plant Hormone Ethylene. Edited by McManus MT, vol. 44: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012: 117-145

  12. Binder BM, O’Malley RC, Wang W, Moore JM, Parks BM, Spalding EP, et al. Arabidopsis seedling growth response and recovery to ethylene. A kinetic analysis. Plant Physiol. 2004;136(2):2913–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen Y-F, Shakeel SN, Bowers J, Zhao X-C, Etheridge N, Schaller GE. Ligand-induced degradation of the ethylene receptor ETR2 through a proteasome-dependent pathway in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:24752–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kevany BM, Tieman DM, Taylor MG, Cin VD, Klee HJ. Ethylene receptor degradation controls the timing of ripening in tomato fruit. Plant J. 2007;51:458–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gagne JM, Smalle J, Gingerich DJ, Walker JM, Yoo SD, Yanagisawa S, et al. Arabidopsis EIN3-binding F-box 1 and 2 form ubiquitin-protein ligases that repress ethylene action and promote growth by directing EIN3 degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;17:6803–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo H, Ecker JR. Plant responses to ethylene gas are mediated by SCF(EBF1/EBF2)-dependent proteolysis of EIN3 transcription factor. Cell. 2003;115(6):667–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Potuschak T, Lechner E, Parmentier Y, Yanagisawa S, Grava S, Koncz C, et al. EIN3-dependent regulation of plant ethylene hormone signaling by two arabidopsis F box proteins: EBF1 and EBF2. Cell. 2003;115(6):679–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gao Z, Schaller GE. The role of receptor interactions in regulating ethylene signal transduction. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4(12):1152–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao Z, Wen C-K, Binder BM, Chen Y-F, Chang J, Chiang Y-H, et al. Heteromeric interactions among ethylene receptors mediate signaling in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:23081–810.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grefen C, Städele K, Růžička K, Obrdlik P, Harter K, Horák J. Subcellular localization and in vivo interaction of the Arabidopsis thaliana ethylene receptor family members. Mol Plant. 2008;1:308–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barry CS, Giovannoni JJ. Ripening in the tomato Green-ripe mutant is inhibited by ectopic expression of a protein that disrupts ethylene signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(20):7923–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Resnick JS, Wen CK, Shockey JA, Chang C. REVERSION-TO-ETHYLENE SENSITIVITY1, a conserved gene that regulates ethylene receptor function in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(20):7917–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Larsen PB, Cancel JD. Enhanced ethylene responsiveness in the Arabidopsis eer1 mutant results from a loss-of-function mutation in the protein phosphatase 2A A regulatory subunit, RCN1. Plant J. 2003;34(5):709–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Larsen PB, Chang C. The Arabidopsis eer1 Mutant Has Enhanced Ethylene Responses in the Hypocotyl and Stem. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(2):1061–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Robles LM, Wampole JS, Christians MJ, Larsen PB. Arabidopsis enhanced ethylene response 4 encodes an EIN3-interacting TFIID transcription factor required for proper ethylene response, including ERF1 induction. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(10):2627–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Christians MJ, Larsen PB. Mutational loss of the prohibitin AtPHB3 results in an extreme constitutive ethylene response phenotype coupled with partial loss of ethylene-inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis seedlings. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(8):2237–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Christians MJ, Robles LM, Zeller SM, Larsen PB. The eer5 mutation, which affects a novel proteasome-related subunit, indicates a prominent role for the COP9 signalosome in resetting the ethylene-signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;55(3):467–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hu Y, Xie Q, Chua NH. The Arabidopsis auxin-inducible gene ARGOS controls lateral organ size. Plant Cell. 2003;15(9):1951–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Feng G, Qin Z, Yan J, Zhang X, Hu Y. Arabidopsis ORGAN SIZE RELATED1 regulates organ growth and final organ size in orchestration with ARGOS and ARL. New Phytol. 2011;191(3):635–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu Y, Poh HM, Chua NH. The Arabidopsis ARGOS-LIKE gene regulates cell expansion during organ growth. Plant J. 2006;47(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Qin Z, Zhang X, Zhang X, Feng G, Hu Y. The Arabidopsis ORGAN SIZE RELATED 2 is involved in regulation of cell expansion during organ growth. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:349.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alonso JM, Hirayama T, Roman G, Nourizadeh S, Ecker JR. EIN2, a bifunctional transducer of ethylene and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;284:2148–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chang C, Kwok SF, Bleecker AB, Meyerowitz EM. Arabidopsis ethylene response gene ETR1: Similarity of product to two-component regulators. Science. 1993;262:539–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Abel S, Nguyen MD, Chow W, Theologis A. ACS4, a primary indoleacetic acid-responsive gene encoding 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Structural characterization, expression in Escherichia coli, and expression characteristics in response to auxin [corrected]. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(32):19093–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Arteca RN, Arteca JM. Effects of brassinosteroid, auxin, and cytokinin on ethylene production in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(11):3019–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gao Z, Chen YF, Randlett MD, Zhao XC, Findell JL, Kieber JJ, et al. Localization of the Raf-like kinase CTR1 to the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis through participation in ethylene receptor signaling complexes. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(36):34725–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bleecker AB, Estelle MA, Somerville C, Kende H. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 1988;241:1086–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen JF, Gallie DR. Analysis of the functional conservation of ethylene receptors between maize and Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;74(4-5):405–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hall BP, Shakeel SN, Amir M, Haq NU, Qu X, Schaller GE. Histidine kinase activity of the ethylene receptor ETR1 facilitates the ethylene response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012;159(2):682–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yanagisawa S, Yoo SD, Sheen J. Differential regulation of EIN3 stability by glucose and ethylene signalling in plants. Nature. 2003;425(6957):521–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hass C, Lohrmann J, Albrecht V, Sweere U, Hummel F, Yoo SD, et al. The response regulator 2 mediates ethylene signalling and hormone signal integration in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2004;23(16):3290–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lan G, Sartori P, Neumann S, Sourjik V, Tu Y. The energy-speed-accuracy tradeoff in sensory adaptation. Nat Phys. 2012;8(5):422–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chang KN, Zhong S, Weirauch MT, Hon G, Pelizzola M, Li H, et al. Temporal transcriptional response to ethylene gas drives growth hormone cross-regulation in Arabidopsis. eLife. 2013;2:e00675.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yau CP, Wang L, Yu M, Zee SY, Yip WK. Differential expression of three genes encoding an ethylene receptor in rice during development, and in response to indole-3-acetic acid and silver ions. J Exp Bot. 2004;55(397):547–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dong CH, Jang M, Scharein B, Malach A, Rivarola M, Liesch J, et al. Molecular association of the Arabidopsis ETR1 ethylene receptor and a regulator of ethylene signaling, RTE1. J Biol Chem. 2011;285(52):40706–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Resnick JS, Rivarola M, Chang C. Involvement of RTE1 in conformational changes promoting ETR1 ethylene receptor signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008;56(3):423–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Binder BM, Walker JM, Gagne JM, Emborg TJ, Hemmann G, Bleecker AB, et al. The Arabidopsis EIN3 binding F-Box proteins EBF1 and EBF2 have distinct but overlapping roles in ethylene signaling. Plant Cell. 2007;19(2):509–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Fujimoto SY, Ohta M, Usui A, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis ethylene-responsive element binding factors act as transcriptional activators or repressors of GCC box-mediated gene expression. Plant Cell. 2000;12:393–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M. Repression domains of class II ERF transcriptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell. 2001;13(8):1959–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Guzmán P, Ecker JR. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. Plant Cell. 1990;2:513–23.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hua J, Chang C, Sun Q, Meyerowitz EM. Ethylene sensitivity conferred by Arabidopsis ERS gene. Science. 1995;269:1712–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Qu X, Hall BP, Gao Z, Schaller GE. A strong constitutive ethylene response phenotype conferred on Arabidopsis plants containing null mutations in the ethylene receptors ETR1 and ERS1. BMC Plant Biol. 2007;7:3.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Zahir ZA, Munir A, Asghar HN, Shaharoona B, Arshad M. Effectiveness of rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase for growth promotion of peas (Pisum sativum) under drought conditions. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18:958–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gamalero E, Berta G, Massa N, Glick BR, Lingua G. Synergistic interactions between the ACC deaminase-producing bacterium Pseudomonas putida UW4 and the AM fungus Gigaspora rosea positively affect cucumber plant growth. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2008;64:459–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Tholen D, Voesenek LACJ, Poorter H. Ethylene insensitivity does not increase leaf area or relative growth rate in Arabidopsis, Nicotiana tabacum, and Petunia x hybrida. Plant Physiol. 2004;134:1803–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Wang B, Zhou X, Xu F, Gao J. Ectopic expression of a Chinese cabbage BrARGOS gene in Arabidopsis increases organ size. Transgenic Res. 2010;19(3):461–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang B, Sang Y, Song J, Gao XQ, Zhang X. Expression of a rice OsARGOS gene in Arabidopsis promotes cell division and expansion and increases organ size. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(1):31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ma B, He SJ, Duan KX, Yin CC, Chen H, Yang C, et al. Identification of rice ethylene-response mutants and characterization of MHZ7/OsEIN2 in distinct ethylene response and yield trait regulation. Mol Plant. 2013;6(6):1830–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Guo M, Rupe MA, Wei J, Winkler C, Goncalves-Butruille M, Weers BP, et al. Maize ARGOS1 (ZAR1) transgenic alleles increase hybrid maize yield. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(1):249–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Habben JE, Bao X, Bate NJ, DeBruin JL, Dolan D, Hasegawa D, et al. Transgenic alteration of ethylene biosynthesis increases grain yield in maize under field drought-stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(6):685–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Skirycz A, Claeys H, De Bodt S, Oikawa A, Shinoda S, Andriankaja M, et al. Pause-and-stop: the effects of osmotic stress on cell proliferation during early leaf development in Arabidopsis and a role for ethylene signaling in cell cycle arrest. Plant Cell. 2011;23(5):1876–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Nakagawa T, Kurose T, Hino T, Tanaka K, Kawamukai M, Niwa Y, et al. Development of series of gateway binary vectors, pGWBs, for realizing efficient construction of fusion genes for plant transformation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2007;104(1):34–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Earley KW, Haag JR, Pontes O, Opper K, Juehne T, Song K, et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 2006;45(4):616–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Verdaguer B, de Kochko A, Beachy RN, Fauquet C. Isolation and expression in transgenic tobacco and rice plants, of the cassava vein mosaic virus (CVMV) promoter. Plant Mol Biol. 1996;31(6):1129–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Hwang I, Sheen J. Two-component circuitry in Arabidopsis cytokinin signal transduction. Nature. 2001;413(6854):383–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen YF, Gao Z, Kerris 3rd RJ, Wang W, Binder BM, Schaller GE. Ethylene receptors function as components of high-molecular-mass protein complexes in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):e8640.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Chen YF, Randlett MD, Findell JL, Schaller GE. Localization of the ethylene receptor ETR1 to the endoplasmic reticulum of Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(22):19861–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Argyros RD, Mathews DE, Chiang Y-H, Palmer CM, Thibault DM, Etheridge N, et al. Type B response regulators of Arabidopsis play key roles in cytokinin signaling and plant development. Plant Cell. 2008;20:2102–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Nick Weir for assistance in the initial characterization of mutants and Ian Street for assistance in statistical analysis. This work was supported by grants from the Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U. S. Department of Energy (DE-FG02- 05ER15704) and the National Science Foundation (IOS-1022053) to GES, from the National Science Foundation (MCB-0918430 and IOS-1254423) to BMB, the Human Frontier Science Program (LT000757/2009-L) to HJK, and the International Research Support Initiative Program of Higher Education Commission of Pakistan to MIR.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA

      Muneeza Iqbal Rai, Xiaomin Wang, Derek M. Thibault, Hyo Jung Kim, Matthew M. Bombyk, Samina N. Shakeel & G. Eric Schaller

    2. Department of Biochemistry, Quaid-i-azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

      Muneeza Iqbal Rai & Samina N. Shakeel

    3. Department of Biochemistry and Cellular & Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

      Brad M. Binder

    Authors
    1. Muneeza Iqbal Rai
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Xiaomin Wang
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Derek M. Thibault
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Hyo Jung Kim
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Matthew M. Bombyk
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Brad M. Binder
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Samina N. Shakeel
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. G. Eric Schaller
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to G. Eric Schaller.

    Additional information

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Authors’ contributions

    MIR performed molecular and physiological analyses on wild type and transgenic lines. XW helped generate transgenic lines and characterized wild type and transgenic plants. DMT helped generate transgenic lines and characterized wild type and transgenic plants. HJK performed the transient protoplast assay. MMB assisted in cloning and analysis of ethylene regulation of ARGOS family genes in wild type. BMB performed the kinetic analysis and helped draft the manuscript. SS participated in the design and coordination of the study. GES conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, and drafted the manuscript in concert with the other co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Muneeza Iqbal Rai, Xiaomin Wang and Derek M. Thibault contributed equally to this work.

    Additional files

    Additional file 1:

    Characteristics of the ARGOS family. Arabidopsis contains a four-member gene family encoding AtARGOS, AtARL, AtOSR1, and AtOSR2. The moss Physcomitrella patens has a gene encoding a related protein (PpARL). At indicates Arabidopsis; Pp indicates Physcomitrella patens. (A) Amino acid sequence alignment. Two predicted transmembrane domains are highlighted in yellow. Residues identical to the consensus (Majority) are highlighted. Note the highly conserved proline-rich region at the turn between the two predicted transmembrane domains. Clustal alignment was performed on the multiple sequences using the Lasergene MegAlign program (DNASTAR, Inc.). (B) Phylogenetic relationship derived from the multiple sequence alignment. Units indicate number of substitution events.

    Additional file 2:

    Hormonal induction of the ARGOS gene family based on microarray analysis. Three-dimensional graphs are shown for expression of ARGOS, ARL, and OSR1, with hormone treatment on the X-axis, relative expression on the Y-axis, and time on the Z-axis. Data was extracted from AtGEnExpress using the Weigelworld interface (http://www.weigelworld.org/resources/microarray/AtGenExpress) for green seedlings treated for 0.5 (blue), 1 (red), and 3 (yellow) hours with a water control (H2O), the ethylene biosynthetic precursor aminocyclopropane-carboxylic acid (ACC), auxin (IAA), gibberellic acid (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and cytokinin (zeatin).

    Rights and permissions

    Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

    The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

    To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Rai, M.I., Wang, X., Thibault, D.M. et al. The ARGOS gene family functions in a negative feedback loop to desensitize plants to ethylene. BMC Plant Biol 15, 157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0554-x

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0554-x

    Keywords

    BMC Plant Biology

    ISSN: 1471-2229

    Contact us