Open Access

The UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT), a key enzyme in ER quality control, plays a significant role in plant growth as well as biotic and abiotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana

  • Francisca Blanco-Herrera1,
  • Adrián A. Moreno1, 2,
  • Rodrigo Tapia1,
  • Francisca Reyes1, 2,
  • Macarena Araya1,
  • Cecilia D’Alessio3, 4,
  • Armando Parodi3 and
  • Ariel Orellana1, 2Email author
BMC Plant Biology201515:127

Received: 26 November 2014

Accepted: 18 May 2015

Published: 28 May 2015



UDP-glucose: glycoprotein glucosyltransferase (UGGT) is a key player in the quality control mechanism (ER-QC) that newly synthesized glycoproteins undergo in the ER. It has been shown that the UGGT Arabidopsis orthologue is involved in ER-QC; however, its role in plant physiology remains unclear.


Here, we show that two mutant alleles in the At1g71220 locus have none or reduced UGGT activity. In wild type plants, the AtUGGT transcript levels increased upon activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR). Interestingly, mutants in AtUGGT exhibited an endogenous up–regulation of genes that are UPR targets. In addition, mutants in AtUGGT showed a 30 % reduction in the incorporation of UDP-Glucose into the ER suggesting that this enzyme drives the uptake of this substrate for the CNX/CRT cycle. Plants deficient in UGGT exhibited a delayed growth rate of the primary root and rosette as well as an alteration in the number of leaves. These mutants are more sensitive to pathogen attack as well as heat, salt, and UPR-inducing stressors. Additionally, the plants showed impairment in the establishment of systemic acquired resistance (SAR).


These results show that a lack of UGGT activity alters plant vegetative development and impairs the response to several abiotic and biotic stresses. Moreover, our results uncover an unexpected role of UGGT in the incorporation of UDP-Glucose into the ER lumen in Arabidopsis thaliana.


UGGT Endoplasmic reticulum Abiotic stress Biotic stress


The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) hosts the synthesis and folding of proteins that are secreted extracellularly or delivered into different compartments of the endomembrane system. A significant portion of these proteins are N-glycosylated at an asparagine residue that is present in the consensus sequence -N-X-S/T- (where X is any amino acid except proline). This glycosylation occurs as they are translocated to the ER lumen by the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme oligosaccharyltransferase from a dolichol-PP-Glc3Man9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide [1, 2]. Once the oligosaccharide is linked to asparagine, the last two glucoses are quickly removed by glucosidase I and glucosidase II to yield a protein with a bound GlcMan9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharide [35]. In addition, the nascent polypeptide begins to fold towards its proper conformation. This process is controlled by a mechanism known as the ER protein quality control (ER-QC) that includes the Calnexin (CNX)/Calreticulin (CRT) cycle.

The CNX and CRT are lectin/chaperones that bind the monoglucosylated oligosaccharides (GlcMan9GlcNAc2) present on N-glycosylated proteins they retain the proteins at the ER while they go through the folding process. Glucosidase II can cleave the remaining glucose residue to produce Man9GlcNAc2. If the protein is still not completely folded, it is recognized by the enzyme UDP-Glucose: Glycoprotein Glucosyltransferase (UGGT) that recognizes nearly folded proteins that lack glucose in N-oligosaccharide and catalyze the reglucosylation of these sugar moieties using UDP-glucose as substrate [6, 7]. Upon reglucosylation, the protein is again bound by CNX or CRT and retained in the ER to continue with the folding process. Glucosidase II then removes the Glc residue added by UGGT. Cycles of glucosylation-binding to CNX/CRT-deglucosylation continue until the glycoprotein folds or is targeted for degradation [8].

UGGT was described biochemically several years ago in many different species including plants [9]. Further studies helped to characterize the mechanism of action of the enzyme [10, 11]. However, little information is available regarding the physiological role that this enzyme plays. UGGT mutants in S. pombe show normal growth at standard conditions; however, the viability is reduced under extreme ER stress [12]. The absence of UGGT in mice results in embryo lethality suggesting a critical role of this enzyme in animals [13]. In Arabidopsis, Jin et al. [14] showed that a defective form of the brassinosteroid receptor (bri1-9) is retained in the ER but is released when the At1g71220 locus (encoding for the UGGT orthologue in Arabidopsis) was mutated in Arabidopsis.

Two other studies using forward genetic analysis concluded that this locus is also important for the biogenesis of the plant innate immune receptor EFR and suggested that EFR is a target of UGGT [15, 16]. Consequently, these results suggested that the At1g71220 locus is involved in ER-QC. However, in spite of the importance of these findings, no functional evidence on the actual activity of the gene product encoded by At1g71220 was provided. On the other hand, both Jin et al. [14] and Saijo et al. [16] indicated that— in contrast to what is observed in mice and despite the phenotypes observed at the molecular level— no obvious morphological phenotype was observed on mutants in the Arabidopsis UGGT orthologue. This suggested that this enzyme plays a less important role in plants than in animals.

To expand our understanding of the role that UGGT plays in the physiology of plants, we identified two allelic mutants on At1g71220 with abolished or significantly reduced UGGT activity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Both mutants showed a basal induction of the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the absence of any stimuli. Furthermore, they exhibited a delayed growth rate in the aerial part that became evident after 6 weeks of growth, even though after 10–12 weeks the wild type and the mutant plants showed no obvious morphological differences. Root growth was also affected in the mutants. Plants lacking UGGT showed a higher sensitivity to pathogen attack and a compromised basal and systemic resistance. These mutants are also more sensitive to heat, salt and salicylic acid during germination, which indicates that UGGT helps Arabidopsis cope with these stresses. Our results indicate that although mutations in UGGT are not lethal to Arabidopsis thaliana, this enzyme does play a significant role in plant growth and response to environmental cues.


Arabidopsis thaliana ER-enriched fractions exhibit UGGT activity

The UGGT activity has been measured in mung bean [9], and its role in protein quality control in the ER has been determined based on genetic analyses in Arabidopsis thaliana [1416]. These studies proposed that locus At1g71220 encodes for UGGT; however, the activity of its gene product has not been directly assessed. To analyze whether this locus encodes for UGGT, we measured its activity in Arabidopsis wild type and mutant plants in the locus At1g71220. The UGGT senses the conformation of the glycoproteins and transfers a Glc residue from UDP-Glc to Man9GlcNAc2-bearing proteins only if they have not yet acquired their native folding.

Using UDP-[14C]Glc and denatured soybean agglutinin (SBA, a glycoprotein that contains mainly Man9GlcNAc2 oligosaccharides) as substrates, we found that ER-enriched fractions from Arabidopsis thaliana increased the incorporation of the radioactive label into TCA-insoluble material. This indicates that UGGT activity was present in the ER fraction (Fig. 1a). The activity was abolished when the ER-enriched fraction was inactivated by boiling. We used thyroglobulin as an acceptor to confirm that glucose was transferred from UDP-Glc to high mannose glycoproteins; thyroglobulin is a glycoprotein that contains high mannose oligosaccharides (Man9-7GlcNAc2). After the reaction, the sample was treated with endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (endo-H) to release the N-linked oligosaccharides, which were then separated via paper chromatography as described by Trombetta et al. [9]. A peak migrating as the GlcMan9GlcNAc2 standard was observed after the treatment (Fig. 1b). We also observed two peaks with higher mobility that likely corresponded to GlcMan8GlcNAc2 and GlcMan7GlcNAc2. These results confirm that UGGT activity is present in ER-enriched fractions from Arabidopsis thaliana.
Fig. 1

UGGT activity in ER-enriched fractions of Arabidopsis thaliana. a Microsomal membranes were prepared from etiolated Arabidopsis plants as described in the Material and Methods. The membranes were incubated in the presence of denatured SBA and UDP-[14C]glucose. The reaction was finished by adding TCA. The pellet was washed three times and the incorporated radioactivity was determined. Controls in which the SBA acceptor withheld or in which the ER-derived membranes were previously heat-inactivated are also shown. b The reaction was carried out as described above but with bovine thyroglobulin as the acceptor substrate. The proteins were treated with endoglycosidase H (Endo-H) to release the N-linked oligosaccharides that were separated by paper chromatography. The paper was cut and radioactivity determined by liquid scintillation

Mutants in the UGGT-coding gene show a decrease in the glucosyltransferase activity

The Arabidopsis thaliana genome contains one locus (At1g71220) whose gene product shows similarity to UGGTs described in other species (Additional file 1). The protein bears the conserved C-terminal domain that contains the glucosyltransferase activity present in all UGGTs as well as a poorly conserved large N-terminal domain (Additional file 2). Orthologs of this gene are also present in other plant species (Additional file 1). A. thaliana expression databases indicate that AtUGGT is expressed in different organs. This was confirmed by quantitative PCR in which the AtUGGT-coding mRNA was detected at similar levels in roots, stems, leaves and flowers (Additional file 3).

To confirm that At1g71220 is indeed responsible for the UGGT activity detected on ER-enriched fractions, we analyzed whether mutants in this gene have diminished UGGT activity. Two insertional mutants were identified: atuggt1-1 and atuggt1-2 (Additional file 4). Homozygous plants were obtained for both alleles (Additional file 4). Gene expression analyses by quantitative PCR showed that both UGGT-coding mutant alleles have decreased mRNA transcript levels; however, these were not completely abolished (Additional file 4). To determine whether the mutants had less UGGT activity we incubated ER-enriched fractions with denatured SBA and UDP-[14C]glucose. After the reaction, proteins were separated on SDS-PAGE, and the radioactivity associated with SBA was assessed. The results indicated that atuggt1-1 had some residual activity, whereas atuggt1-2 had no detectable re-glucosylation activity (Fig. 2). These results strongly suggest that At1g71220 is responsible for the UGGT activity in Arabidopsis.
Fig. 2

UGGT activity is reduced in plants bearing mutations in the At1g71220 gene. a UGGT activity detection in A. thaliana ER-enriched fractions from wild type and mutant plants. Incorporation of UDP-[14C]-glucose into unfolded SBA by wild type or mutant ER fractions. The upper panel shows the radioactivity associated with SBA while the lower panel shows the total amount of SBA used in the assay. b Quantification of the UGGT activity obtained from the PhosphorImager scans presented in a

AtUGGT expression is induced upon ER stress

ER chaperones such as BiP are up-regulated by a signaling pathway known as UPR when ER stress is induced. Treatment of Arabidopsis plants with the ER stress-inducing agents tunicamycin or dithiothreitol (DTT) triggers UPR [17]. Because UGGT is a component of the CNX/CRT cycle [1], we wondered whether ER stress has any effect on the transcript levels of AtUGGT. Arabidopsis plants treated with tunicamycin and DTT showed an increased amount of AtUGGT at the transcript levels. This suggested that this gene is up-regulated by UPR. Other UPR-responding genes are involved in quality control and include BIP1/2, BIP3 and PDIL2-1 as well as AtUTr1, which is a gene encoding for an ER-localized UDP-glucose transporter likely involved in the supply of UDP-glucose for ER-QC [18]. These were also up-regulated under these conditions (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

UGGT is induced during UPR and UGGT mutants that exhibit ER stress. a Quantitative real-time PCR monitoring of AtUTr1, BiP1/2, BiP3, PDIL2-1 and AtUGGT transcript levels in stressed wild type plants. Fifteen day-old seedlings were treated over 5 hrs with DTT 2.5 mM or TUN 5 μg/ml in MS medium. Clathrin adapter (At5g46630) was used as a housekeeping gene. The average values of three independent experiments (n = 6) are shown; error bars represent ± SD. b Quantitative real-time PCR monitoring AtUTr1, BiP1/2, BiP3, PDIL2-1 and AtUGGT transcript levels in wild type and AtUGGT mutant plants grown under normal conditions. Fifteen day-old seedlings were used for the analysis. Clathrin adapter (At5g46630) was the housekeeping gene. The average values of three independent experiments (n = 6) are shown; error bars represent ± SD

UGGT mutants trigger UPR in the absence of an exogenous ER stress

We reasoned that a decrease in the activity of UGGT may perturb the mechanisms of quality control because the AtUGGT transcript levels are increased by UPR. This caused the expression of other UPR-responding genes to change even in the absence of an exogenous ER stressor. Therefore, we assessed the transcript levels of different ER chaperones both in the wild type and in the two AtUGGT mutant alleles. The results pointed out that AtUGGT mutants exhibit an endogenous up-regulation of genes involved in quality control (BiP1/2, BiP3, PDIL2-1) as well as the UDP-glucose transporter AtUTr1 (Fig. 3b).

UDP-glucose is utilized by UGGT to re-glucosylate unfolded proteins within the ER. Our results showed that the UDP-glucose transporter gene AtUTr1 is up-regulated upon ER-stress induction, but that it is also endogenously up-regulated in cells lacking UGGT. The up-regulation of the transporter suggests that the uptake of UDP-glucose could be enhanced in AtUGGT mutants. However, the lack of glucosyltransferase in the ER should reduce the usage of UDP-glucose in the ER and lead to a lower incorporation of UDP-glucose into this organelle. To address this issue, we assessed the incorporation of UDP-glucose into ER-enriched fractions from both wild type and AtUGGT mutant plants. Fig. 4 shows that although the nucleotide-sugar transporter coding-gene is up regulated in both UGGT mutant alleles, these plants show a decrease in the incorporation of UDP-Glc into ER fractions. This indicates that an active UGGT is important to drive the uptake of its substrate.
Fig. 4

The atuggt1-1 and atuggt1-2 mutants exhibit a reduced uptake of UDP-[14C]Glc into ER-derived vesicles. The UDP-Glc uptake was assayed into 50 μg of ER-enriched fractions from wild-type and AtUGGT mutant plants incubated with 1 μM UDP-[14C]Glc for 15 min. The reaction was stopped with a 10-fold dilution with cold STM buffer and filtration. The filter-associated label was counted using liquid scintillation. Results are presented as mean with SD; significance was determined with ANOVA. Asterisks indicate a Tukey’s test p-value < 0.001

Mutants in the AtUGGT gene exhibit an altered growth

Mutants in UGGT are lethal in mice [13]. On the other hand, UGGT mutants in S. pombe have no obvious phenotype in normal growth conditions although show a lethal phenotype upon ER stress induction [12]. Arabidopsis mutants in AtUGGT showed shorter roots when compared to wild type plants (Fig. 5a and Additional file 5). An analysis of the aerial growth part revealed that mutants had normal rosettes for about 35–40 days. After that time the mutants exhibited a delay in their growth rate and the number of leaves and size of the rosette were smaller (Fig. 5b, c, d). However, the differences were less evident after 60 days.
Fig. 5

UGGT mutant plants show altered growth rates during vegetative development compared to wild type. a Root length in seven day-old seedlings grown in half MS medium; both wild type and AtUGGT mutant plants are shown. b Phenotypes of six-week-old plants grown in hydroponic medium. The rosette diameter (c) and the number of leaves (d) were measured in plants between days 20 and 70. The average values of eight independent plants (n = 8) are shown; error bars represent ± SD

AtUGGT mutant plants are more sensitive to biotic and abiotic stresses

Multiple lines of evidence suggest that UGGT is involved in pathogen response [15, 16]. Therefore, we decided to test the sensitivity to pathogens on mutants that have residual or no detectable UGGT activity. We infected UGGT mutant plants with Pseudomona syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst) and assessed the number of bacteria infecting the leaves after 3 days. A higher number of bacteria were recovered from the leaves of mutants in comparison to those obtained from wild type suggesting that mutants in AtUGGT have an altered basal defense response (Fig. 6). Furthermore, a similar phenotype was observed when plants were first infected with Pst avrRpm1 to induce the systemic acquired resistance followed by infection with the virulent strain (Pst DC3000) (Fig. 6). These results indicate that both basal and systemic resistance responses are compromised in the AtUGGT mutants.
Fig. 6

AtUGGT mutant plants are less tolerant to biotic stress. Whole leaves of four-week-old soil grown WT and mutant plants were infiltrated with Pst AvrRpm1 (OD600 = 0.001) to trigger SAR; a solution of 10 mM MgCl2 served as the mock. Twenty-four hours later the systemic leaves were infiltrated with Pst DC3000 (OD600 = 0.001). Bacterial growth (Pst DC3000) was monitored 3 days post infection. Error bars represent standard deviation from 6 samples. Different letters statically represent differences between the genotypes (lowercase for –AvrRpm1; uppercase for + AvrRpm1) at p < 0.05 (Tukey’s test). The experiments were performed at least three times with similar results

We also investigated whether mutants in AtUGGT are more sensitive to abiotic stresses such as heat and salt because they have been shown to up-regulate ER chaperones associated with ERQC; mutants of the ERQC components also show a salt-sensitive phenotype [1922]. Fig. 7 shows that mutant plants heat-shocked for 2 hrs at 42 °C and then returned to normal temperature developed a higher percentage of dead leaves and more chlorotic and necrotic lesions than wild type plants (Additional file 6). Furthermore, when grown at 150 mM NaCl, mutants were more sensitive than wild type plants (Fig. 8a) and displayed a significant decrease in fresh weight (Fig. 8b).
Fig. 7

AtUGGT mutant plants are less tolerant to heat shock stress. Arabidopsis wild type and UGGT mutant plants were grown on soil for six weeks. The plants were treated at 42 °C for 2 hrs and returned to the growth chamber for 24 hrs. The leaves were then analyzed and classified as “dead” (completely dry and collapsed leaves), “damaged” (chlorotic lesions in leaves) or “healthy” (green and turgid leaves) and counted. The results are expressed as a percentage of total leaves analyzed per genotype (around 60 leaves per genotype)

Fig. 8

AtUGGT mutant plants are less tolerant to salt stress. a Photograph of seven-day-old seedlings of the different genotypes grown in MS media supplemented with 150 mM NaCl. b Arabidopsis wild type or UGGT mutants were grown in MS media supplemented with 150 mM NaCl for 2 weeks. Eighty plants of each genotype were weighed, and the experiments were performed in triplicate. The average values of three independent plates (n = 240) are shown; error bars represent ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA. Asterisks indicate a Tukey's test p-value <0.01

Mutants in AtUGGT are over-sensitive to ER stress

To evaluate the sensitivity of the AtUGGT mutants to ER-stress, we grew the plants in the presence of tunicamycin and salicylic acid, which are two plant UPR-inducers [23]. Both allelic AtUGGT mutants were more sensitive to these compounds than the wild type (Fig. 9a and b). We also observed a significant decrease in fresh weight (Fig. 9c and d) when mutants were grown under these conditions. No differences were observed in the fresh weight of AtUGGT mutants compared to wild type plants in absence of ER stress (Additional file 7).
Fig. 9

Mutant plants are over-sensitive to ER stress. Arabidopsis wild type and AtUGGT mutant plants were grown in MS media supplemented with 250 μM SA (a and c) or 0.1 μg/ml TUN (b) and (d) for 2 weeks. a and b. Photos of representative plants from different genotypes grown in SA or TUN, respectively. c and d. Eighty plants of each genotype were grown in SA or TUN, respectively, and were weighed in triplicates. The average values of three independent replicates (n = 240) are shown; error bars represent ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA. Asterisks indicate a Tukey's test p-value < 0.01

Discussion and conclusion

UGGT is an enzyme that plays a critical role in the CNX/CRT cycle by sensing unfolded proteins and adding glucose to the N-linked oligosaccharide to form Glc1Man9GlcNAc2. CNX or CRT binds glycoproteins containing this oligosaccharide, which facilitate protein folding and enable interactions with ERp57 (a protein disulfide isomerase) [24]. This prevents aggregation of folding intermediates and maintains the glycoproteins at the ER until they are properly folded. This activity has been identified in different species ranging from protozoan to mammals [9]. Phylogenetic analyses show that different species share UGGT orthologs and that these are widely distributed in plants as well.

Our results show that UGGT is present in Arabidopsis thaliana and that there is a single locus (At1g71220) that accounts for this activity. Two allelic mutants in AtUGGT showed reduced or non-detectable transcript levels. Residual expression of genes is a phenomenon that has been observed in insertional mutants in different Arabidopsis loci [25]. Furthermore, while some low residual UGGT activity was observed in one of the alleles, we could not detect any activity in the second allele. All of this evidence strongly suggests that locus At1g71220 is responsible for the UGGT activity in Arabidopsis. In addition, it is likely that this is the only gene encoding for UGGT in Arabidopsis thaliana because no other homologous sequence is present in the genome.

Abolishing the expression of UGGT has different impacts on the viability of different species. S. pombe mutants in this gene are viable under normal conditions. However, their viability is affected under conditions of extreme ER stress [12]. On the other hand, the deletion of the UGGT gene in mice leads to embryo lethality although embryonic fibroblasts can propagate normally [13]. This suggests that in animals UGGT plays a fundamental role in the biogenesis and further localization of proteins that are involved in signaling among cells during the formation of multicellular structures. Data regarding the Arabidopsis UGGT mutants showed that they were viable with a normal reproductive cycle; however, different phenotypes were observed. At the macroscopic level, mutant plants were smaller than the wild type at some growth stages but eventually they reached similar sizes. Differences were more obvious in roots and rosette leaves.

The expression analyses of target genes that respond to the unfolding protein response showed that these genes were constitutively up-regulated in AtUGGT mutants. This indicates that decreasing the UGGT activity leads to ER stress. In particular, we observed that mutants in AtUGGT showed AtUTr1 up-regulation. This gene encodes for an ER-localized UDP-glucose transporter [26] that likely provides the substrate for UGGT. Nevertheless, the incorporation of UDP-glucose into ER-enriched vesicles is reduced in mutants in comparison to the wild type. This result suggests that UGGT is a driving force for the transport of UDP-glucose into the ER and that a deficiency in this enzyme leads to a reduction in the uptake of its substrate (Additional file 8). Interestingly, the incorporation of UDP-glucose into the ER was not completely reduced in mutants in UGGT suggesting that UDP-glucose is not only needed in the ER for protein re-glucosylation but by some other processes as well.

The decrease in UGGT activity has consequences for the response of these mutants to different stress conditions. We observed that AtUGGT mutants were more susceptible to pathogen infection at the basal and systemic level. This observation correlates with other reports that demonstrated an important role for the AtUGGT gene in the establishment of defense responses [15, 16].

In addition, growing these mutants in salicylic acid (SA) decreases their viability. Similar results were seen when plants are grown in tunicamycin—a chemical known to trigger the unfolded protein response (UPR). No differences in the fresh weight were observed when wild type and mutant plants were grown in the absence of tunicamycin or SA. Only the presence of these chemicals causes trait differences. This suggests that the endogenous ER stress level observed on AtUGGT mutants do not significantly alter the plant development at early developmental stages. A similar observation was described for the yeast UGGT mutant where cells are viable until an external cue that triggers the UPR is applied. This leads to cell death [12].

Interestingly, SA treatment also activates the UPR [23, 27] suggesting that an increase in the protein folding and secretion requires UGGT activity during the systemic acquire resistance. Furthermore, AtUGGT mutant plants also showed an increased susceptibility to several abiotic stress conditions. Indeed, leaves of these plants show a diminished percentage of survival under heat stress. Also these develop several chlorotic and necrotic lesions. In addition, the development of these mutants is severely affected by salt stress when compared to wild type plants.

Previous work indicated that Arabidopsis mutants in UGGT exhibit a phenotype at the molecular level regarding expression of genes involved in ERQC and the response to pathogens. However, no obvious growth phenotypes are seen when plants are grown normally without any treatment [14, 16], but no detailed phenotypic analyses of these mutants were done.

We performed an exhaustive analysis throughout the plant growth and under different growth conditions. The results showed no differences in the aerial part of the plant during the first 6 weeks of development. After that time however, we observed a slower growth rate in the mutants that led to smaller plants. The impaired growth was recovered after 10–12 weeks when wild type and mutants showed no differences. Although it could be argued that this phenomenon is a consequence of the growth conditions employed (hydroponic media), no studies have yet demonstrated that this condition triggers the UPR. It is difficult to predict what proteins are responsible for these phenotypes because UGGT is responsible for the proper folding of a number of proteins that are synthesized in the ER. Membrane receptors have been shown to depend on UGGT for their normal biosynthesis [15, 16] but it is also possible that other proteins involved in signaling are also altered in the mutant leading to a delayed growth rate.

The work of Liu et al. [28] supports this hypothesis. They showed that the expression in Arabidopsis of a constitutively active form of bZIP28, a transcription factor involved in the activation of UPR, produces a delayed growth of seedlings but with competent mature plants. This phenotype resembles in part the one observed in the AtUGGT mutant and suggests that continuous activation of UPR may delay the growth rate. Future work will further study this process.

Because heat stress perturbs the protein-folding processes, it is expected that mutants in the protein folding machinery display an altered response to heat stress. The AtUGGT mutants show extensive lesions in the aerial tissues of plant exposed to heat stress. Different reports show that heat stress induces UPR in Arabidopsis thaliana [22, 29]. These chlorotic and necrotic phenotypes can be associated to an overactive UPR. Also it is possible that these plants die because AtUGGT mutant plants display a constitutively activated UPR. In mammalian cells, the chronic activation of the UPR leads to cell death by apoptosis [30].

Regarding salt stress in the AtUGGT mutants, it is not clear how the CNX/CRT cycle and the activity of UGGT are related to this process. However, there is evidence of a relationship between salt stress and ER-QC/UPR. Li et al. [20], showed that mutants in CRT3 are more sensitive to salt during germination—this resembles the phenotype observed in the UGGT mutants. Therefore, it is likely that ER-QC and UPR are important in the plant response to salt stress.

Our results suggest that plants with decreased UGGT activity have an abnormal growth rate and are less tolerant to stress. This is in agreement with an increasing amount of evidence that supports the role of ER-QC and UPR in the plant response to different types of stresses [31, 32]. Because UGGT is a key component in the CNX/CRT cycle and ER-QC, our results provide additional support for the role of ER-QC in the plant response to environmental cues.


Plant material and treatments

The Arabidopsis thaliana wild type and UGGT mutants uggt1-1 (CS854661) and uggt1-2 (SALK_016805) are of Columbia (Col-0) background. For real time PCR analysis, seeds were germinated and grown in vitro in Murashige-Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 15 g/l sucrose under controlled conditions in a growth chamber (16 hrs light, 100 μmoles m−2 s−1, 22 ± 2 °C). For treatments with tunicamycin (TUN) or ditiotreitol (DTT), 15 day-old seedlings were used. They were taken from the MS medium and placed in a Petri dish containing MS medium supplemented with 5 μg/ml TUN or 2.5 mM DTT for 5 hrs. Control samples were similarly incubated.

For hydroponic growing, seeds were germinated in hydroponic medium and grown under controlled conditions to plant senescence (approximately 70 days). For the plant fresh weight analysis under different chemical treatments, approximately 80 seeds were placed in petri dishes in triplicate. The seeds were germinated in MS solid medium supplemented with 0.1 μg/ml TUN, 250 μM SA or 150 mM NaCl for 10 days.

Infection assays

Pseudomonas infection assays were performed as described previously [23]. Briefly, Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) and Pst avrRpm1 were grown at 28 °C on King’s B agar plates supplemented with 50 mg/ml rifampicin and 50 mg/ml kanamycin. Bacteria were suspended in 10 mM MgCl2 at OD600 = 0.001 and infiltrated into 3–4 leaves per plant leaf using a needleless syringe. Leaf discs from four independent plants were combined, ground in 10 mM MgCl2, serial-diluted 1:10 and plated onto King’s B medium containing the appropriate antibiotics. Plates were incubated at 28 °C for 3 days after which the colonies were counted.

To test for SAR, plants were pre-inoculated with Pst avrRpm1 (OD600 = 0.001) or mock (10 mM MgCl2) 24 hrs prior to infection. They were subsequently inoculated with PstDC3000 (OD600 = 0.001) into 3–4 distal leaves per plant with 4 plants/genotype. Sampling was performed 3 days post inoculation.

Phenotypic analysis of A. thaliana transgenic seedlings under stress conditions

Three replicates of 80 T3- mutant or wild-type seeds were placed in petri dishes containing MS medium supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 250 μM SA. The plates were then transferred to the chamber, and seeds were germinated at 22 ± 2 °C under 16 hrs light/8 hrs dark at an illumination intensity of 100 μmol m−2 s−1 for 12 days.

To test for salt stress, seedlings were treated with liquid MS medium containing 150 mM NaCl for the defined times. For heat shock analysis, the mutant or wild-type plants were grown in soil for six weeks and then incubated in a chamber at 42 °C for 2 hrs. Finally, the plants were placed back in the growth chamber to observe recovery. The leaf phenotypes were analyzed after 24 hrs of the heat shock. Leaves were classified as “dead” (completely dry and collapsed leaves), “damaged” (chlorotic lesions in leaves) or “healthy” (green and turgid leaves). The results were graphed as the percentage of total leaves analyzed per genotype (around 60 leaves per genotype).

Preparation of plant ER-enriched vesicles

Etiolated plants (50 g FW) were homogenized in 0.5 M sucrose and then were filtrated in miracloth. The filtrated material was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 2 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was layered over a 8 ml cushion of 1.3 M sucrose and then centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 90 min at 4 °C using a Sorvall AH-629 swinging bucket rotor. The upper phase was discarded leaving the membranous interphase. Layers of 1.1 M sucrose (15 ml) and 0.25 sucrose (5 ml) were added to the surface. This was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 100 min at 4 °C. The membranous interphase between 1.3 and 1.1 M sucrose was withdrawn, and one volume of water was added followed by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 50 min at 4 °C. The resulting pellet was resuspended in 500 μl of STM buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM pH 8 Tris-HCl and 1 mM MgCl2). A 20-μl aliquot was used for total protein quantification.

UGGT activity

A 50-μl mixture containing 1 mg/ml of total proteins obtained from ER-enriched vesicles, 1.2 mg/ml of SBA, 200 μCi UDP-[14C]Glc, 10 mM HEPES, 20 mm CaCl2, 1.5 % Triton X-100 and 0.5 mM DNJ (chaperone 1-deoxynojirimycin) was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min.

The reaction was stopped by adding SDS-PAGE loading buffer and heating the mixture to 100 °C for 5 min. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE. The gel was dried-out overnight and the radioactive signals were quantified using a Phosphorimager (FX Molecular, BioRad).

Uptake of UDP-[14C]glucose into ER vesicles

Sterile seeds of the wild type as well as uggt1-1 and uggt1-2 mutants were grown in a 16 hrs light/8 hrs dark cycle at 22 °C in MS containing 1 % sucrose (w/v) for 14 days. The plants were homogenized and subjected to subcellular fractionation as described by Muñoz et al. [33]. Endoplasmic reticulum-enriched microsomal fractions were taken from the 1.3/1.1 M sucrose interfaces as described above.

For the uptake assays, 50 μg of protein corresponding to the ER vesicles from the wild type, uggt1-1 or uggt1-2 plants were incubated with 1 μM UDP-[14C] glucose (0.1 μCi) in a medium containing 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 and 1 mM MgCl2 (STM buffer) for 15 min at 25 °C. To stop the reaction, the vesicles were diluted in cold STM buffer and filtered through 0.7-μm glass fiber filters. The filters were washed with an additional 10 volumes of cold STM buffer and dried. The radioactivity on the filters was determined by liquid scintillation counting.

Quantitative PCR

Frozen plants were homogenized in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol® (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), and residual DNA was removed with an RNase-free DNase I (Invitrogen, USA). One microgram total RNA was reverse transcribed using 500 ng of Oligo (dT) and 50 units of SuperScript II (Invitrogen, USA) following the supplier’s instructions. Quantitative real time PCR was performed using the Fast Eva Green Master mix (Biotium, USA). The PCR conditions consisted of 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 55 or 60 °C for 15 s and an extension at 72 °C for 15 s. A dissociation curve was generated at the end of each PCR cycle to verify that a single product was amplified using the software provided with the Stratagene System.

To minimize sample variations, mRNA expression of the target gene was normalized relative to the expression of the clathrin adaptor housekeeping gene. The experiments were repeated four times. Quantification of clathrin adaptor (At5G46630) mRNA levels in the threshold cycle (Ct) internal standard was subtracted from values from genes of interest to obtain a ΔCt value. The Ct value of untreated control sample was subtracted from the ΔCt value to obtain a ΔΔCt value. The fold changes in expression level relative to the control were expressed as a 2-ΔΔCt. The following primers were designed for gene-specific transcript amplification:




Endoplasmic reticulum


ER protein quality control






UDP-Glucose: Glycoprotein Glucosyltransferase


Unfolded protein response


Systemic acquired resistance


Soybean agglutinin


endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H






Pseudomona syringae pv tomato DC3000





This work was supported by FONDAP CRG 15090007, Fondecyt 1070379 and Fondecyt 11121387, PNM GFP P10-062 and PFB-16. AAM and MA are recipients of a CONICYT doctoral fellowship. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centro de Biotecnología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Andrés Bello
FONDAP Center for Genome Regulation
Fundación Instituto Leloir and IIBBA, CONICET
School of Sciences, University of Buenos Aires


  1. Helenius A, Aebi M. Roles of N-linked glycans in the endoplasmic reticulum. Annu Rev Biochem. 2004;73:1019–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Pattison RJ, Amtmann A. N-glycan production in the endoplasmic reticulum of plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:92–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Deprez P, Gautschi M, Helenius A. More than one glycan is needed for ER glucosidase II to allow entry of glycoproteins into the calnexin/calreticulin cycle. Mol Cell. 2005;19:183–95.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. D’Alessio C, Caramelo JJ, Parodi AJ. UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase-glucosidase II, the ying-yang of the ER quality control. Semin. Cell Dev Biol. 2010;21:491–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Stigliano I, Alculumbre SG, Labriola CA, Parodi AJ, D’Alessio C. Glucosidase II and N-glycan mannose content regulate the half-lives of monoglucosylated species in vivo. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22:1810–23.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Sousa M, Parodi AJ. The molecular basis for the recognition of misfolded glycoproteins by the UDP-Glc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase. EMBO J. 1995;14:4196–203.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Taylor SC, Thibault P, Tessier DC, Bergeron JJ, Thomas DY. Glycopeptide specificity of the secretory protein folding sensor UDP-glucose glycoprotein:glucosyltransferase. EMBO Rep. 2003;4:405–11.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Parodi AJ. Protein glucosylation and its role in protein folding. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:69–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Trombetta SE, Bosch M, Parodi AJ. Glucosylation of glycoproteins by mammalian, plant, fungal, and trypanosomatid protozoa microsomal membranes. Biochemistry. 1989;28:8108–16.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Caramelo JJ, Castro OA, Alonso LG, De Prat-Gay G, Parodi AJ. UDPGlc:glycoprotein glucosyltransferase recognizes structured and solvent accessible hydrophobic patches in molten globule-like folding intermediates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:86–91.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Caramelo JJ, Castro OA, de Prat-Gay G, Parodi AJ. The endoplasmic reticulum glucosyltransferase recognizes nearly native glycoprotein folding intermediates. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:46280–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Fanchiotti S, Fernández F, D’Alessio C, Parodi AJ. The UDP-Glc:Glycoprotein glucosyltransferase is essential for Schizosaccharomyces pombe viability under conditions of extreme endoplasmic reticulum stress. J Cell Biol. 1998;143:625–35.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Molinari M, Galli C, Vanoni O, Arnold SM, Kaufman RJ. Persistent glycoprotein misfolding activates the glucosidase II/UGT1-driven calnexin cycle to delay aggregation and loss of folding competence. Mol Cell. 2005;20:503–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jin H, Yan Z, Nam KH, Li J. Allele-specific suppression of a defective brassinosteroid receptor reveals a physiological role of UGGT in ER quality control. Mol Cell. 2007;26:821–30.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Li J, Zhao-Hui C, Batoux M, Nekrasov V, Roux M, Chinchilla D, et al. Specific ER quality control components required for biogenesis of the plant innate immune receptor EFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15973–8.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Saijo Y, Tintor N, Lu X, Rauf P, Pajerowska-Mukhtar K, Häweker H, et al. Receptor quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum for plant innate immunity. EMBO J. 2009;28:3439–49.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Martínez IM, Chrispeels MJ. Genomic analysis of the unfolded protein response in Arabidopsis shows its connection to important cellular processes. Plant Cell. 2003;15:561–76.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Reyes F, Marchant L, Norambuena L, Nilo R, Silva H, Orellana A. AtUTr1, a UDPglucose/UDP-galactose transporter from Arabidopsis thaliana, is located in the endoplasmic reticulum and up-regulated by the unfolded protein response. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:9145–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Koiwa H, Li F, McCully MG, Mendoza I, Koizumi N, Manabe Y, et al. The STT3a subunit isoform of the Arabidopsis oligosaccharyltransferase controls adaptive responses to salt/osmotic stress. Plant Cell. 2003;15:2273–84.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Li Z, Cao Y, Zhang J, Chen S. Characterization of Arabidopsis calreticulin mutants in response to calcium and salinity stresses. Prog Nat Sci. 2008;18:1219–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang M, Xu Q, Yu J, Yuan M. The putative Arabidopsis zinc transporter ZTP29 is involved in the response to salt stress. Plant Mol Biol. 2010;73:467–79.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Deng Y, Humbert S, Liu JX, Srivastava R, Rothstein SJ, Howell SH. Heat induces the splicing by IRE1 of a mRNA encoding a transcription factor involved in the unfolded protein response in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:7247–52.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Moreno AA, Mukhtar MS, Blanco F, Boatwright JL, Moreno I, Jordan MR, et al. IRE1/bZIP60-mediated unfolded protein response plays distinct roles in plant immunity and abiotic stress responses. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31944.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Oliver JD, Roderick HL, Llewellyn DH, High S. ERp57 functions as a subunit of specific complexes formed with the ER lectins calreticulin and calnexin. Mol Biol Cell. 1999;10:2573–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zuber H, Davidian JC, Aubert G, Aimé D, Belghazi M, Lugan R, et al. The seed composition of Arabidopsis mutants for the group 3 sulfate transporters indicates a role in sulfate translocation within developing seeds. Plant Physiol. 2010;154:913–26.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Norambuena L, Marchant L, Berninsone P, Hirschberg CB, Silva H, Orellana A. Transport of UDP-galactose in plants, identification and functional characterization of AtUTr1, an Arabidopsis thaliana UDP-galactose/UDP-glucose transporter. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:32923–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang D, Weaver ND, Kesarwani M, Dong X. Induction of protein secretory pathway is required for systemic acquired resistance. Science. 2005;308:1036–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu JX, Srivastava R, Che P, Howell SH. An endoplasmic reticulum stress response in Arabidopsis is mediated by proteolytic processing and nuclear relocation of a membrane-associated transcription factor, bZIP28. Plant Cell. 2007;19:4111–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gao H, Brandizzi F, Benning C, Larkin RM. A membrane-tethered transcription factor defines a branch of the heat stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:16398–403.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kelleher DJ, Gilmore R. DAD1, the defender against apoptotic cell death, is a subunit of the mammalian oligosaccharyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:4994–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu JX, Howell SH. Endoplasmic reticulum protein quality control and its relationship to environmental stress responses in plants. Plant Cell. 2010;22:2930–42.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Moreno A, Orellana A. The physiological role of the unfolded protein response in plants. Biol Res. 2011;44:73–8.Google Scholar
  33. Muñoz P, Norambuena L, Orellana A. Evidence for a UDP-Glucose transporter in Golgi apparatus-derived vesicles from peas and their possible role in polysaccharide biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1996;112:1585–94.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen DG, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:539.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2 - a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1189–91.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Blanco-Herrera et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.