Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

Relationships between starch synthase I and branching enzyme isozymes determined using double mutant rice lines

  • Natsuko Abe1,
  • Hiroki Asai1,
  • Hikari Yago1,
  • Naoko F Oitome1,
  • Rumiko Itoh1,
  • Naoko Crofts1,
  • Yasunori Nakamura1 and
  • Naoko Fujita1Email author
BMC Plant Biology201414:80

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-80

Received: 9 November 2013

Accepted: 19 March 2014

Published: 26 March 2014

Abstract

Background

Starch is the most important carbohydrate in plant storage tissues. Multiple isozymes in at least four enzyme classes are involved in starch biosynthesis. Some of these isozymes are thought to interact and form complexes for efficient starch biosynthesis. Of these enzyme classes, starch synthases (SSs) and branching enzymes (BEs) play particularly central roles.

Results

We generated double mutant lines (ss1/be1 and ss1 L /be2b) between SSI (the largest component of total soluble SS activity) and BEI or BEIIb (major BEs in developing rice endosperm) to explore the relationships among these isozymes. The seed weight of ss1/be1 was comparable to that of wild type, although most ss1/be2b seeds were sterile and no double recessive plants were obtained. The seed weight of the double recessive mutant line ss1 L /be2b, derived from the leaky ss1 mutant (ss1 L ) and be2b, was higher than that of the single be2b mutant. Analyses of the chain-length distribution of amylopectin in ss1/be1 endosperm revealed additive effects of SSI and BEI on amylopectin structure. Chain-length analysis indicated that the BEIIb deficiency significantly reduced the ratio of short chains in amylopectin of ss1 L /be2b. The amylose content of endosperm starch of ss1/be1 and ss1 L /be2b was almost the same as that of wild type, whereas the endosperm starch of be2b contained more amylose than did that of wild type. SSI, BEI, and BEIIb deficiency also affected the extent of binding of other isozymes to starch granules.

Conclusions

Analysis of the chain-length distribution in amylopectin of the double mutant lines showed that SSI and BEI or BEIIb primarily function independently, and branching by BEIIb is followed by SSI chain elongation. The increased amylose content in be2b was because of reduced amylopectin biosynthesis; however, the lower SSI activity in this background may have enhanced amylopectin biosynthesis as a result of a correction of imbalance between the branching and elongation found in the single mutant. The fact that a deficiency of SSI, BEI, or BEIIb affected the affinity of other starch biosynthetic isozymes for the starch granule implies that there is a close interaction among SSI, BEI and BEIIb during amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm.

Keywords

AmylopectinAmyloseBranching enzymeMutantRiceStarch synthase

Background

Starch, one of the most important life-sustaining carbohydrates, consists of two homopolymers of the α-D-glucosyl unit; amylopectin and amylose. Amylopectin is a large branched molecule and has a molecular weight greater than 108–10 Da, while amylose is a linear molecule. The amylopectin and amylose content strongly affect the physical and chemical properties of starch. At least four classes of enzymes are involved in starch biosynthesis: ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), starch synthase (SS), starch branching enzyme (BE), and starch debranching enzyme (DBE) [14]. Among these four enzyme classes, SSs and BEs have central roles in starch biosynthesis.

SS (EC 2.4.1.21) elongates α-glucans by adding a Glc residue from ADP-Glc to the non-reducing ends of α-glucans via α-1,4 glucosidic linkages. Among all of the starch biosynthesis enzymes, SS has the most isoforms [5, 6]. SSI, SSIIa, SSIIIa, and GBSSI genes are strongly expressed in developing rice endosperm [5, 6]. The first three SS isozymes are involved only in amylopectin biosynthesis, whereas GBSSI is involved in biosynthesis of amylose and extra-long chains of amylopectin [7].

SSI is the largest component of total soluble SS activity in developing rice endosperm. SSI-deficient mutants (ss1) were isolated from an SSIIa-inactive Japonica rice cultivar Nipponbare by reverse genetics via insertion of the retrotransposon Tos17[8]. The changes in amylopectin chain-length distribution were examined in four ss1 allelic mutants, in which Tos17 was inserted into the SSI gene in different positions. These mutants exhibited different levels of SSI activity (0%–25% that of wild type) that were positively correlated with the degree of changes in amylopectin chain-length distribution. Chain-length distribution analyses indicated that SSI generates the degree of polymerization (DP) 8–12 chains from very short (DP 6–7) chains emerging from the branch point of the A and B1 chains of amylopectin [8]. This was confirmed by an in vitro experiment using recombinant rice SSI [9]. Surprisingly, the ss1 mutation did not affect the size and shape of seeds or starch granules, or the crystallinity of endosperm starch. Nevertheless, SSI accounts for more than 60% of soluble SS activity in developing rice endosperm. SSIIIa, which is the second largest component of total soluble SS activity in developing rice endosperm, elongates long chains that connect amylopectin clusters [10]. A double recessive homozygous mutant derived from ss1 and ss3a null mutants was sterile; however, double recessive mutant lines containing a leaky ss1 mutant and a ss3a null mutant were fertile, as were mutant lines in which one or both of these genes were heterozygous with the wild-type allele. These results suggested that SSI and/or SSIIIa are required for starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm [11].

BE (EC 2.4.1.18) is the only enzyme that can introduce α-1,6 glucosidic linkages into α-glucans. Therefore, it plays an essential role in amylopectin biosynthesis. Higher plants have two types of BE; BEI and BEII. Rice and maize have two BEII isoforms, BEIIa and BEIIb. BEIIb has only been detected in the endosperm, whereas BEI and BEIIa have been detected in all organs. The seed phenotype and starch accumulation of a BEI-deficient mutant were equivalent to those of wild type, but the chain-length distribution of amylopectin differed. In the BEI-deficient mutant, there were reduced levels of long chains with DP ≥ 37 and short chains with 12 ≤ DP ≤ 21, but increased levels of short chains with DP ≤ 10 and 24 ≤ DP ≤ 34 [12]. In contrast to the relatively mild phenotypic differences between the BEI-deficient mutant and wild type, the characteristics of endosperm starch differed substantially between BEIIb-deficient mutant lines and wild type. BEIIb-deficient mutants accumulated significantly fewer amylopectin short chains with DP ≤ 13, resulting in strong resistance to gelatinization [13].

Biochemical analyses of BEI-deficient [12] and BEIIb-deficient [13] mutant lines and in vitro analyses of recombinant BEI and BEIIb [14, 15] suggested that the two enzymes have different roles. BEI is involved in transferring longer chains that eventually link multiple clusters of amylopectin with the medium size chains in the amylopectin amorphous lamellae. In contrast, BEIIb specifically transfers the short chains that represent the border between the amorphous lamellae and the crystalline lamellae of amylopectin [3, 15].

Recent analyses of protein–protein interactions in maize have strongly suggested that SSI, SSIIa, and BEIIb interact during starch biosynthesis [16, 17]. SS and BE isozymes in developing rice endosperm likely co-operate with each other during starch biosynthesis. Analyses of double mutant lines with mutations in genes encoding SS and BE isozymes is one strategy to further analyze the interactions among these enzymes and their functions.

In this study, we generated double recessive mutants from deficient (ss1) or leaky (L) ss1 mutants (ss1 L ) and BEI- or BEIIb-deficient mutants (ss1/be1 and ss1 L /be2b). The structure and components of starch differed between the double mutant lines and the parental mutant lines. The pleiotropic effects of the deficient isozyme activities and their relationships in starch biosynthesis in rice developing endosperm are discussed.

Results and discussion

Generation of double recessive mutant lines between SSI and BEs

To generate a double mutant line (#4011) between SSI and BEI, the ss1-null mutant (e7) [8] was crossed with the be1-null mutant (EM557) [12]. The resulting double recessive F2 seeds were identified by immunoblotting, and showed a translucent or white-core phenotype (Figure 1). The F3 seeds generated by self-pollination of double recessive F2 plants were segregated into translucent (~28%) and white-core (~72%) phenotypes, although this ratio varied among different growth years. The seeds of both phenotypes of F2 and F3 seeds were deficient in SSI and BEI, and the chain-length distribution patterns of amylopectin from both phenotypes were identical (data not shown). Therefore, segregation of the seed phenotype was independent of the SSI and BEI genotype. The difference in seed phenotypes may be related to environmental conditions (data not shown). Therefore, two phenotypes, translucent and white-core seeds of ss1/be1, were combined and used as the ss1/be1 double mutant for further analyses.
Figure 1

Pedigree and seed morphologies of double mutant lines. Morphology of dehulled rice seeds (upper panels) and seed cross-sections (lower panel). Seeds were obtained from double mutant lines derived from SSI and BEI or BEIIb mutants and their parent lines, and were observed under a stereo-microscope. Symbols in parentheses show genotypes of lines.

To generate a double mutant line between SSI and BEIIb, the ss1-null mutant (e7) [8] was crossed with the be2b-null mutant (EM10) [13]. One quarter of the F2 seeds were opaque, indicative of BEIIb deficiency, and were screened by immunoblotting. Approximately 2% (2 out of the 88 opaque F2 seeds screened) were double recessive for both SSI and BEIIb, indicating that most of the double recessive seeds were sterile. Unfortunately, none of the seedlings from double recessive opaque seeds survived (Figure 1). The fact that the double recessive mutant seeds between SSI and BEIIb were rarely fertile indicated that in rice, SSI and BEIIb are indispensable isozymes for both endosperm starch biosynthesis and plant development.

To produce a non-sterile double recessive mutant line between SSI and BEIIb, we used the leaky ss1 mutant line i2-1[8] as the ss1 mutant parental line in a cross with the be2b-null mutant line (EM10). Double recessive F2 seeds (#4017) were selected from opaque seeds by immunoblotting. The growth and yield of #4017 were less than half those of wild type (data not shown). The seed weight of #4017 was approximately 70% that of wild type (Table 1). These results suggested that even the small amount of SSI activity in #4017 was sufficient to avoid sterility in the absence of BEIIb.
Table 1

Dehulled grain weight, starch content, and apparent amylose in rice mutant lines

Line

Genotype

Background

Grain weighta(mg)

Starch contentb(mg)

Amylose contentc(mg/seed)

Nipponbare (Nip)

Wild type (WT)

Nip

20.7 ± 0.2 (100.0)d

14.7 ± 0.1 (100.0)d

3.13

Taichung 65 (T65)

WT

T65

20.6 ± 0.2 (100.0)e

13.3 ± 1.0 (100.0)e

2.94

e7

ss1

Nip

19.0 ± 0.2*,** (91.7)d

13.7 ± 3.5 (93.1)d

3.19

EM557

be1

T65

23.4 ± 0.1*,** (112.7)e

14.5 ± 0.7 (108.9)e

3.15

#4011

ss1/be1

Nip/T65

21.0 ± 0.2 (101.4)d

12.5 ± 1.5 (85.1)d

2.68

Kinmaze (Kin)

WT

Kin

20.5 ± 0.2 (100.0)f

13.6 ± 0.4 (100.0)f

2.92

i2-1

ss1 L

Nip

21.2 ± 0.2** (102.4)d

11.9 ± 1.5 (80.8)d

2.50

EM10

be2b

Kin

11.7 ± 0.2*,** (56.4)f

6.2 ± 0.5* (45.1)f

1.82

#4017

ss1 L /be2b

Nip/Kin

14.2 ± 0.2*** (68.5)d

8.7 ± 2.0*** (59.3)d

1.88

aMean ± SE of 50 seeds.

bMean ± SE of three seeds.

cAmylose content per seed = Starch contentb × apparent amylose content (%) (Table 3).

dPercentage of wild type (Nipponbare).

ePercentage of wild type (Taichung 65).

fPercentage of wild type (Kinmaze).

*Significant difference between single mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

**Significant difference between parental mutant and double mutant lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

***Significant difference between double mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

F3 and F4 seeds from #4011 (ss1/be1) and #4017 (ss1 L /be2b) double recessive mutant lines were used for further analyses.

Seed weight and starch content

Of the three BE isozymes expressed in rice endosperm, BEIIb is the major isozyme required for branching of amylopectin molecules. Indeed, a deficiency in BEIIb induced a more pronounced phenotype than did a deficiency in either BEI or BEIIa [3, 12, 13]. A deficiency of SSI or BEI activity did not affect seed phenotype or starch accumulation [8, 12]. The dehulled grain weight and starch content of ss1/be1 seeds were not significantly different from those of wild type and parent mutant lines (Table 1). By contrast, the dehulled grain weight and starch content were greatly reduced in be2b seeds, to 56% and 45% of the levels in wild type, respectively (Table 1) [13]. The dehulled grain weight and starch content were higher in the ss1 L /be2b double mutant than in the single be2b mutant, and were 69% and 59% of the levels in wild type, respectively. It is unclear why starch accumulation was higher in the double mutant than in the single mutant.

In be2b, there were significantly fewer non-reduced ends of amylopectin molecules. This led to a decrease in starch accumulation because of an imbalance between branching by BEs and elongation by SSs. Excess chain elongation may lead to steric inhibition within the amylopectin cluster structure. In the double mutant lines between BEIIb and SSI (ss1 L /be2b), this excessive chain elongation and imbalance may have been countered by reduced SSI activity, leading to greater starch accumulation than that in the single be2b mutant.

Pleiotropic effects of SSI and BEs deficiencies on other starch biosynthesis enzymes

To confirm that ss1, be1, and be2b single mutant and double mutant lines were deficient in the relevant proteins and enzyme activities, we conducted zymogram analyses by semi-quantitative native- polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (Figure 2) and immunoblotting assays (Figure 3; Total and SP) of the soluble protein fraction (SP) from developing endosperm at 12 days after flowering (DAF). SSI activity was completely absent from ss1 and ss1/be1 mutants, and the SSI activity in ss1 L mutants was less than one-third that in wild type (Figures 2A and 3). SSI activity and the amount of SSI protein in the SP were approximately 50% lower in be2b than in wild type. Decreases in SSI activity and total SS activity in be2b (EM10) were similarly demonstrated in previous studies on rice [13] and maize [18]. These results support the hypothesis that SSI mainly elongates short chains (DP 6–7) that are branched by BEIIb [15], and that a close interaction among the isozymes is required during starch biosynthesis [16]. SSI activity and the amount of SSI protein in the SP were approximately 30% lower in ss1 L /be2b than in ss1 L (Figures 2A and 3; SP). The intensity of the SSI activity band in ss1 L /be2b was estimated at 5%–10% of that in wild type according to the semi-quantitative zymogram (Figure 2A). This small amount of SSI activity is one possible explanation for the fertility of ss1 L /be2b, although other possibilities cannot be excluded. The BEI activities in SSI-deficient or SSI-reduced lines were slightly higher than that in wild type (Figure 2B). The activities of other starch biosynthesis isozymes, namely SSIIIa (Figure 2A), BEIIa (Figure 2B), ISA, PUL, and PHO1 (Figure 2C), were not significantly different between the mutant lines and wild type.
Figure 2

Enzyme activities on zymograms. Native-PAGE/activity staining of starch synthases (SSs; Panel A), branching enzymes (BEs; Panel B), and debranching enzymes (DBEs; Panel C) in developing endosperm of double mutant, parental mutant, and wild-type lines. Arrowheads indicate SSI, SSIIIa, BEI, BEIIa, BEIIb, ISA (isoamylase), PUL (pullulanase), and PHO (phosphorylase) activity bands. Soluble protein extracts were prepared from developing endosperm. Amount of soluble protein is per mg fresh weight. Volumes of crude extract applied to the native gels in section ‘a’ are 2-fold and 4-fold greater than those applied in sections ‘b’ and ‘c’, respectively. Kin, Kinmaze; Nip, Nipponbare; T65, Taichung 65; WT, wild type.

Figure 3

Distributions of enzymes in total protein extract and three protein fractions. Immunoblotting of total protein extract (Total), soluble protein fraction (SP), loosely-bound protein fraction (LBP), and tightly-bound protein fraction (TBP) from three developing rice endosperms at 12–15 days after flowering (DAF). Samples are from double mutant, parental mutant, and wild-type lines. Immunoblotting analyses were conducted using antisera raised against rice SSI, GBSSI, BEI, and BEIIb. GBSSI from mature endosperms (mature GBSSI) were also analyzed. Amounts of protein loaded onto the gels were as follows: 1/25 of extracts in SP, 1/15 of extracts in LBP and 1/4 of extracts in TBP. Amount of protein bands in ‘Total’ was standardized against density of total protein bands stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (data not shown). Kin, Kinmaze; Nip, Nipponbare; T65, Taichung 65; WT, wild type.

To clarify whether the increased starch content in the ss1 L /be2b double mutant was because of enhanced substrate levels, AGPase activity in developing seeds at 10-15 DAF were quantified (Table 2). The synthesis of ADP-glucose by AGPase is the first committed step, and the rate-limiting step, for starch biosynthesis. Previous studies showed that mutant lines with high amylose contents often show elevated AGPase activities [10, 11]. The results are shown in two different units, per microliter of extract and per endosperm, so the data is comparable to previous studies. The results of AGPase activity per microliter extract showed that the AGPase activity was significantly higher in the be2b single mutant than in its parental line. The AGPase activity of ss1 L /be2b was also significantly higher than in ss1 L . This suggests that loss of BEIIb enhances the AGPase activity. There were no significant difference in AGPase activity between the double mutant lines (ss1/be1 and ss1 L /be2b) and wild types (Table 2). The value of AGPase activity per endosperm was also calculated by multiplying the total volume of extract obtained from the endosperm. This result reflects the weight of endosperm. ss1/be1 showed highest total AGPase activity as the endosperms used for this experiment were heavier.
Table 2

AGPase activity in developing seeds (DAF 10–15) of double mutants, their parental lines, and wild type

Lines

nmol min-1 μl-1a

μmol min-1endosperm-1a

Wild type

17.7 ± 0.4 (100)b

0.550 ± 0.016 (100)b

(Nipponbare)

Wild type

16.9 ± 0.2 (100)c

0.550 ± 0.016 (100)c

(Taichung 65)

ss1

18.2 ± 0.4 (103)b

0.628 ± 0.017 (114)b, *

(e7)

be1

16.8 ± 0.3 (99)c

0.533 ± 0.019 (97)c, **

(EM557)

ss1/be1

17.9 ± 0.2 (101)b

0.726 ± 0.071 (132)b, ***

(#4011)

Wild type

17.0 ± 0.3 (100)d

0.566 ± 0.027 (100)d

(Kinmaze)

ss1 L

16.7 ± 0.8 (94)b, **

0.551 ± 0.022 (100)b, **

(i2-1)

be2b

19.3 ± 0.5 (113)d, *

0.689 ± 0.026 (122)d, *

(EM10)

ss1 L /be2b

19.4 ± 0.9 (109)b

0.660 ± 0.040 (120)b

(#4017)

aMean ± SE. n = 4 for all the lines except for #4017 (n = 2).

bPercentage of the wild type Nipponbare.

cPercentage of the wild type Taichung 65.

dPercentage of the wild type kinmaze.

*Significant differences between single mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

**Significant differences between parental mutant and double mutant lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

***Significant differences between double mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

To measure the expression levels of proteins encoded by genes for the main isozymes (SSI, GBSSI, BEI and BEIIb) in starch biosynthesis, the amounts of these proteins were compared by immunoblotting using total proteins extracted with urea buffer (Figure 3; Total). The amount of GBSSI protein was higher in ss1/be1 than in other lines. The amount of BEI protein was also slightly higher in ss1 and ss1 L than in wild type. These results indicated that the deficiency in some starch biosynthetic enzymes led to elevated levels of other starch biosynthetic enzymes.

Next, we determined the localization of these extra starch biosynthetic enzymes. We prepared a SP fraction representing amyloplast stroma, a loosely-bound protein (LBP) fraction, and a tightly-bound protein (TBP) fraction in which proteins are bound to starch granules. Then, the amount of proteins related to starch biosynthesis in each fraction were compared by immunoblotting.

We examined the pleiotropic effects of deficiencies in SSI, BEI, and BEIIb on various protein fractions from developing endosperm. SSI, GBSSI, BEI, and BEIIb were detected by immunoblotting (Figure 3; LBP and TBP). The amount of SSI in the SP fraction was higher in ss1 L than in ss1 L /be2b, and vice versa in the LBP and TBP fractions. In wild type, BEI was detected in the SP and LBP fractions, but not in the TBP fraction. Although there were low levels of BEI in the TBP fraction in ss1 and ss1 L , there were much higher levels of BEI in the TBP fraction in be2b and ss1 L /be2b. There was slightly more BEI in the LBP fraction from ss1 than in the same fraction from other lines (Figure 3; LBP). In the LBP fraction, there was slightly more BEIIb in BEI-deficient mutant lines (be1 and ss1/be1) than in the other lines (Figure 3; LBP).

In the TBP fraction, the amount of BEIIb was higher in SSI-deficient (ss1 and ss1/be1) and SSI-reduced lines (ss1 L ) than in the other lines (Figure 3; TBP). Dense SSI bands were detected in the TBP of be2b. Previous studies reported similar results from maize ae (BEIIb-deficient) mutant lines [16]. These results suggested that deficiencies in BEIIb in rice and maize affect the binding of SSI and BEI to starch granules. Both stromal and granule-bound BEI and BEIIb in maize are phosphorylated, and these phosphorylation events play an important role in the formation of the protein–protein complex during amylopectin synthesis [17]. The absence of BEIIb in maize resulted in the recruitment of other starch biosynthetic enzymes to the starch biosynthetic protein complex and to starch granules. Therefore, a deficiency of SSI, BEI and BEIIb rice isozymes may have altered the binding of other starch biosynthetic isozymes to the starch granules in rice, as is the case in maize. It is possible that the deficiency of a specific isozyme is compensated for by other isozymes to allow the formation of starch biosynthetic protein complexes.

SSI was distributed in every fraction (SP, LBP, and TBP) in maize [19] and rice [8]. SSI in developing rice endosperm tends to bind to starch granules at later stages [8], indicating that this binding occurs as dehydration progresses. One explanation for the increased amount of SSI in the TBP fraction in BEIIb-deficient lines is that the abundance of long-chain amylopectin molecules in the be2b background lines could lead to the early maturation and dehydration of endosperm (Asai et al., in preparation). It could be that more SSI binds to starch granules in developing endosperm (12 DAF) in be2b background lines than in other lines.

Binding of GBSSI to starch granules was also affected by BEIIb deficiency. We detected dense bands corresponding to GBSSI in the LBP fraction of be2b and ss1 L /be2b, but only faint bands in wild type, ss1, be1, ss1/be1, and ss1 L . By contrast, the amount of GBSSI (per mg starch) in the TBP of developing and mature endosperm was comparable between ss1 L /be2b and wild type (Figure 3; TBP). This might be related to the similar amylose contents in ss1 L /be2b and wild type (Table 3).

Characterization of starch structure in mature endosperm of double mutant lines

Next, we compared the structure of amylopectin among the double mutant lines, their parental mutant lines, and wild-types. We analyzed the endosperm amylopectin isoamylolysate chain-length distribution by capillary electrophoresis (Figure 4). The results showed that the chain-length distribution patterns of ss1/be1 were similar, but not identical, to those of ss1 (Figure 4A and B). The profile obtained for ss1/be1 was almost identical to that of the calculated profile made by adding the profiles of the ss1 and be1 single mutants (Figure 4C). However, in ss1/be1, the amount of chains with DP 7 and DP 18 was higher, and the amount of chains with DP 9 was lower, compared with those in the calculated profile. This indicated that there was an additive effect of the reduction of SSI activity on the chain-length of amylopectin in the be1 background, with a slight synergistic enhancement.
Figure 4

Molecular structure analysis of amylopectin by capillary electrophoresis. Chain-length distribution patterns of endosperm amylopectin in mature endosperm (A, D). Differential plots between single mutant and wild-type lines (B, E). Differential plots between double mutant and wild type and the calculated profiles made by adding the profiles of single mutant lines (C, F). Numbers on plots represent DP values. Each figure shows one representative data set (one of at least three replicates prepared from different rice seeds from homogenous plants). Relative standard error of molar% of each chain length from DP5–60 was less than 2.5%. Kin, Kinmaze; Nip, Nipponbare; T65, Taichung 65; WT, wild type.

The chain-length distribution patterns of ss1 L /be2b were similar, but not identical, to those of the be2b mutant line (Figure 4D and E). Compared with be2b, ss1 L /be2b had significantly fewer short chains with DP ≤ 13 and more long chains with DP ≥ 14. The chain-length profile of ss1 L /be2b was almost identical to that calculated by adding the profiles of the ss1 L and be2b single mutants (Figure 4F), except that the molar (%) of very short chains with DP 6–7 did not increase in the pattern generated from ss1 L /be2b-WT profile. The molar% of DP 6–7 chains was lower in ss1 L /be2b (Figure 4D) than in wild type as a result of BEIIb deficiency. These results indicated that there was an additive effect of the reduction of SSI activity on the chain-length of synthesized amylopectin in the be2b background. This finding strongly suggests that the reaction proceeds from branch formation by BEIIb to chain elongation by SSI. If there are no or only a few branches generated by BEIIb in the crystalline lamellae, then SSI could lose its main function, since branched chains are the preferred target chains for elongation by SSI.

To further investigate the components of starch and its structure in the double mutant lines, the isoamylolysates of endosperm starch and purified amylopectin were subjected to size-exclusion chromatography using Toyopearl HW55S and HW50S columns (Figure 5). The λmax values greater than 600 nm, which represent the α-glucan-iodine complex, indicated that fraction I (Fr. I) contained most, if not all, of the amylose (Figure 5A). A small amount of carbohydrate was also detected in Fr. I from a purified amylopectin sample (Figure 5). This was “extra-long chain” (ELC, DP ≥ 500) amylopectin [7, 20]. Therefore, Fr. I from endosperm starch contained both true amylose and ELC. The value obtained by subtracting the ELC content from the apparent amylose content (AAC) of starch is equivalent to the true amylose content (TAC) of starch [20]. Fr. II included B2-3 long chains of amylopectin connecting 2–3 clusters of amylopectin, while Fr. III included short chains within a single cluster of amylopectin. The proportion of each starch component was calculated based on the data shown in Figure 5. The results are shown in Table 3.
Figure 5

Size separation of debranched endosperm starch and purified amylopectin by gel-filtration. Size separation of debranched endosperm starch and purified amylopectin from double mutant (E and I), parental mutant (C, D, G and H), and wild-type lines (A, B and F) by gel filtration chromatography through three Toyopearl HW55S-HW50S columns. Graphs show elution profiles of isoamylase-debranched starch (blue lines) and purified amylopectin (red lines). Different X-axis scales reflect different flow rates among experiments. Fractions (Fr. I, II, and III) were divided at troughs of carbohydrate content curve, as detected by refractive index detectors (left Y-axis). Grey line in wild type (Nipponbare) indicates λmax values of starch-iodine complexes (right Y-axis). Figures show one typical dataset (one of at least three replicates prepared from starch and purified amylopectin).

Table 3

Composition of carbohydrate (weight%) in endosperm starch fractions separated by gel filtration chromatography

Lines

 

Fr. I (%)a

Fr. II (%)

Fr. III (%)

TAC (%)e

III/II

Wild type

Starchb

21.3 ± 0.3d

20.4 ± 0.0

58.5 ± 0.3

18.2

2.9 ± 0.0

(Nipponbare)

Amylopectinc

3.0 ± 0.4

17.7 ± 0.9

54.4 ± 1.8

-

3.1 ± 0.1

Wild type

Starch

22.1 ± 0.8

20.6 ± 0.0

57.4 ± 0.9

19.0

2.8 ± 0.0

(Taichung 65)

Amylopectin

2.8 ± 0.1

19.4 ± 0.0

57.7 ± 0.1

-

3.0 ± 0.0

ss1

Starch

23.3 ± 0.4*,**

18.7 ± 0.4*

58.0 ± 0.1

20.8*

3.1 ± 0.1

(e7)

Amylopectin

2.5 ± 0.2**

18.6 ± 0.5

58.2 ± 4.5

-

3.1 ± 0.2

be1

Starch

21.7 ± 1.2

19.5 ± 0.4

58.8 ± 1.5

18.1

3.0 ± 0.1

(EM557)

Amylopectin

3.6 ± 0.1*,**

19.0 ± 0.3

58.4 ± 1.2

-

3.1 ± 0.1

ss1/be1

Starch

21.4 ± 0.3

20.5 ± 0.8

58.1 ± 0.6

20.0

2.9 ± 0.1

(#4011)

Amylopectin

1.4 ± 0.1***

20.2 ± 0.9

57.6 ± 1.1

-

2.9 ± 0.2

Wild type

Starch

21.5 ± 1.9

21.2 ± 0.7

57.3 ± 1.9

19.2

2.7 ± 0.2

(Kinmaze)

Amylopectin

2.3 ± 0.1

21.4 ± 0.5

59.6 ± 2.2

-

2.8 ± 0.2

ss1 L

Starch

21.0 ± 0.3

21.8 ± 0.5*,**

57.2 ± 0.3*,**

19.7

2.6 ± 0.1*,**

(i2-1)

Amylopectin

1.3 ± 0.0*

21.2 ± 0.5*,**

59.1 ± 2.6**

-

2.8 ± 0.0*,**

be2b

Starch

29.4 ± 0.8**

34.3 ± 0.6*

36.3 ± 0.4*

28.1*,**

1.1 ± 0.0*

(EM10)

Amylopectin

1.3 ± 0.1*

35.8 ± 1.4*

38.9 ± 1.5*

-

1.1 ± 0.0*,**

ss1 L /be2b

Starch

21.6 ± 0.6

37.5 ± 1.2***

40.9 ± 1.9***

19.7

1.1 ± 0.0***

(#4017)

Amylopectin

1.2 ± 0.1***

37.8 ± 0.5***

38.6 ± 1.0***

-

1.0 ± 0.0***

aThree fractions (Fr. I, II and III) were divided at troughs of carbohydrate content curve, as detected by refractive index detectors (Figure 5).

bTotal carbohydrate content = 100%.

cAreas of Fr. II and Fr. III of amylopectin were superimposed onto those of the starch, and amount of amylopectin (extra-long chain) in Fr. I was calculated.

dMean ± SE of three replicates.

eTrue amylose content (TAC) = apparent amylose content (Fr. I of starch) – extra-long chains (Fr. I of amylopectin).

*Significant differences between single mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

**Significant differences between parental mutant and double mutant lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

***Significant differences between double mutant and wild-type lines (t-test, P < 0.05).

The proportions of AAC in ss1 (23.3%), be1 (21.7%) and ss1/be1 (21.4%) were slightly higher than, or similar to, those in the Nipponbare wild type (21.3%) and Taichung 65 wild type (22.1%). This result indicated that deficiencies in SSI and/or BEI did not greatly affect amylose content (Figure 5 and Table 3), although the TAC of ss1 was significantly higher than that of wild type.

There was a greater proportion of ELC in be1 (3.6%) than in wild type, but a smaller proportion of ELC in ss1/be1 (1.4%) than in wild type. The ratio of Fr. III to Fr. II (III/II) in endosperm starch was similar in ss1/be1 (2.9) and the parental mutant and wild types (2.8–3.1) (Table 3).

The proportion of AAC was similar in ss1 L (21.0%) and wild-type Nipponbare (21.3%), whereas that in be2b (29.4%) was significantly higher than that in wild-type Kinmaze (21.5%). Interestingly, the proportion of AAC in ss1 L /be2b (21.6%) was similar to that in wild type. This suggested that the trend of BEIIb deficiency to increase amylose content was counteracted by a reduction in SSI activity.

The proportion of AAC was approximately 1.5-fold higher in the SSIIIa-deficient mutant (ss3a, ca. 30%) than in wild type (ca. 20%) [10]. Amylose content per seed was higher in ss3a (2.8 mg) than in wild type (2.1 mg) [11]. The GBSSI content, especially starch granule-bound GBSSI (GBSSI in TBP), is related to amylose content [11, 21]. The presence of a single nucleotide polymorphism in exon four of OsGBSSI reduced binding of GBSSI to starch granules and resulted in a low amylose content [22]. The results from those reports implied that functional GBSSI is distributed in the TBP, where it can synthesize amylose. A deficiency in SSIIIa enhances GBSSI expression [10], resulting in an increase in GBSSI and thus, more AAC than in wild type. In the present study, the proportion of AAC was 1.4-fold higher in be2b (29.4%) than in wild type (21.5%). The amount of GBSSI in TBP (per mg starch) was higher in be2b than in wild-type Kinmaze (Figure 3; TBP). On the other hand, amylose content per seed was much lower in be2b (1.82 mg) than in wild type (2.92 mg) because of the reduced starch accumulation in be2b (Table 1). These data suggested that the mechanism underlying the increase in AAC in be2b differs from that of ss3a. While the amylose content per seed was similar in ss1 L /be2b and be2b (Table 1), the proportion of AAC was much lower in ss1 L /be2b than in be2b (Table 3 and Figure 5). Thus, there was greater starch accumulation in ss1 L /be2b than in be2b (Table 1) because of the increase in amylopectin biosynthesis caused by the reduction in SSI activity in the be2b background.

The ratio of Fr. III to Fr. II (III/II) in endosperm starch was similar in ss1 L (2.6) and wild type (2.9) (Table 3). By contrast, the Fr. III to Fr. II ratios in be2b and ss1 L /be2b (1.1) were significantly lower than that in wild type. These results are consistent with the chain-length distribution patterns determined by capillary electrophoresis (Figure 4D and E), indicating that BEIIb deficiency was responsible for the significant reduction in the amount of short chains with DP ≤ 13.

Conclusions

We generated double recessive mutant lines of SSI and BE isozymes (BEI and BEIIb) and analyzed their starch phenotypes. The complete deficiency of both SSI and BEIIb led to a significant reduction in fertility, and the seeds could not grow into plantlets. However, starch accumulation was recovered in double mutants in which BEIIb was absent but SSI was reduced (ss1 L /be2b). These results suggest that in rice, SSI and BEIIb are indispensable isozymes for both starch biosynthesis in the endosperm and plant development, and only a small amount of SSI activity is sufficient for fertility. By contrast, starch accumulation and AAC were not affected in lines deficient in both SSI and BEI. Structural analyses of starch in the double mutant lines reveal additive effects of SSI and BEI on amylopectin structure. The effects of SSI and BEIIb on amylopectin structure were also primarily additive, except that the levels of very short chains with DP 6-7 were reduced in ss1 L /be2b and be2b and increased in ss1 L , compared with wild type. These results strongly suggest that branch formation by BEIIb is followed by chain elongation by SSI. The increased AAC in be2b was because of a reduction in amylopectin biosynthesis, whereas an additional reduction of SSI activity against a background of BEIIb deficiency might enhance amylopectin biosynthesis via resolving the imbalance between branching by BEs and chain elongation by SSs.

The results also showed that deficiencies in SSI, BEI and BEIIb affected the starch granule-binding of the other isozymes. Although the precise mechanisms remain unclear, these data strongly support a close interaction among SSI, BEI, and BEIIb during amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm.

Liu et al.[17] showed that in maize, at least SSI, SSIIa, and BEIIb form a protein complex in the stroma with a phosphorylation dependent manner [17] and that these protein–protein complexes are trapped in starch granules during starch biosynthesis. They also described that granule-bound BEI and BEIIb in maize endosperm were completely phosphorylated [17]. They hypothesized that these complexes are the functional components involved in amylopectin clusters [16]. Therefore, a deficiency of rice SSI, BEI and BEIIb isozymes may have altered the binding of other starch biosynthetic isozymes to the starch granules in rice, as is the case in maize. According to our preliminary immuno-precipitation experiments using developing endosperm of Japonica rice, it is likely that at least SSI, BEI, and BEIIb form complexes in the SP fraction. Although we have no evidence that these complexes are functional in the LBP or TBP fractions, it is possible that other isozymes replace deficient ones, as shown in this study. For example, the significant increase in amylopectin long chains with DP ≥ 14 in be2b and ss1 L /be2b (Figure 4D, E) might result not only from the deficiency of BEIIb, but also from its replacement by BEI, which functions in the branching of long chains [15], in the TBP fraction (Figure 3).

One of the most widely accepted amylopectin structure models to date is the “cluster model” proposed by Hizukuri [23]. This model proposes that clusters interconnect through long amylopectin chains that participate in forming the crystalline and amorphous lamellae. Bertoft [24] proposed an alternative “two-directional backbone model”. This model proposes that long chains of amylopectin are not integrated as parts of the clusters, and the clustered chains are orientated perpendicular to the direction of the amorphous backbone. However, currently it is unknown which model represents true amylopectin structure.

Understanding the interactions and relationships among starch biosynthetic enzymes during starch biosynthesis will help to clarify the architecture of amylopectin structure. Further analyses of isozyme complexes in mutant lines, including double mutant rice lines, are required to answer these and other questions.

Methods

Plant materials

The mutant ss1, be1, and be2b lines were used in crosses. We used two ss1 lines; e7, an SSI-deficient mutant (ss1), and i2-1, an SSI-leaky mutant (ss1 L ) [8], as well as the be1 and be2b mutant lines (BEI- and BEIIb-deficient mutants EM557[12] and EM10[13], respectively). As wild-type controls, we used the cultivars Nipponbare, which is the parent of e7 and i2-1, Kinmaze, which is the parent of EM10, and Taichung 65, which is the parent of EM557. Three combinations of double mutant lines (ss1 × be1, ss1 × be2b, and ss1 L  × be2b) were isolated and the resulting double heterozygotes (F1) were self-pollinated (Figure 1). In the cross between ss1 and be1, double recessive F2 seeds (ss1/be1) were selected after immunoblotting analyses of the mature endosperm. In the crosses between ss1 or ss1 L and be2b, double recessive F2 seeds (ss1/be2b and ss1 L /be2b) were selected by the opaque seed phenotype and by immunoblotting of the mature endosperm. Rice plants were grown during summer in an experimental paddy field at Akita Prefectural University, Japan, under natural environmental conditions.

Protein extraction from developing and mature endosperm

Total proteins were extracted from developing endosperm from three individuals (12 DAF) per line using 200 μL urea buffer [125 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 8 M Urea, 4% (w/v) SDS and 5% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol] and a plastic pestle. The homogenate was incubated with a rotator (Iuchi MTR-103, Japan) at 37°C for 2 h. The homogenate was centrifuged at 20,000 g at room temperature for 20 min and the supernatant was set aside. The pellet was homogenized in 200 μL urea buffer, and then centrifuged under the same conditions. The pooled supernatants were loaded on SDS-PAGE and the proteins were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB).

The amounts of total proteins were normalized to the same intensity of general protein bands on SDS-PAGE gel stained with CBB, and used for immunoblotting. SP and LBP fractions were prepared from developing and mature endosperm as follows: seeds were ground in extraction buffer [50 mM imidazole-HCl (pH 7.4), 8 mM MgCl2, 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 12.5% (v/v) glycerol] to obtain the SP fraction. The resulting pellet after centrifugation at 20,000 g for 10 min at 4°C was extracted with SDS solution [55 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 10% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, and 12.5% (v/v) glycerol] to obtain the LBP fraction. The TBP fraction was extracted from the pellet after boiling with SDS solution for 7 min as described in a previous report [8].

Native-PAGE/activity staining and immunoblotting

Native-PAGE/activity staining of DBE and BE was performed as previously described [25, 26]. The activity bands corresponding to ISA [27], PUL [28], PHO1 [29], BEI [12], BEIIb [13], and BEIIa (unpublished data) were previously identified using mutant lines .

Native-PAGE/SS activity staining was performed on 7.5% (w/v) acrylamide slab gels containing 0.8% (w/v) oyster glycogen (G8751, Sigma), according to Nishi et al.[13], with the addition of 0.5 M citrate.

We conducted immunoblotting analyses for four extracts (Total, SP, LBP and TBP) as previously described [30]. We used antiserum raised against SSI (5,000 times dilution for total protein extract, 1,000 times dilution for SP, 1,500 times dilution for LBP, and 1,000 times dilution for TBP) [8]; antiserum raised against BEI (4,000 times dilution for total protein extract, 1,000 times dilution for SP, 1,000 times dilution for LBP, and 1,000 times dilution for TBP) [12]; antiserum raised against BEIIb (5,000 times dilution for total protein extract, 2,000 times dilution for SP, 2,000 times dilution for LBP, and 750 times dilution for TBP) [13], and antiserum raised against GBSSI (4,000 times dilution for total protein extract, 500 times dilution for LBP, and 1,000 times dilution for TBP) [10].

AGPase activity assay

AGPase activity was quantified as described in a previous report [31]. Soluble protein was extracted from developing rice endosperms at DAF 10–15 using three volumes grinding solution. Extract was diluted one hundred fold. Then, 30 μL supernatant was mixed with 220 μL assay mixture (100 mM Hepes-NaOH, pH 7.4, 3 mM ADP-glucose, 3 mM Sodium pyrophosphate, 3.7 mM 3-phosphoglycerate, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT). The reaction was carried out at 30°C for 20 min and terminated by boiling. The samples were diluted with 350 μL water and then centrifuged. Then, 10 μL 10 mM NADP+ was added to a 500 μL aliquot of the supernatant. After addition of 0.2 U phosphoglucomutase and 1 U glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the absorbance at 340 nm was measured using a spectrophotometer. The amount of NADPH was calculated using the extinction coefficient 6.22 mmol-1 cm2.

Analysis of starch and amylopectin structure

Starch was extracted from mature rice endosperms to assess the amylopectin chain-length distribution as described by Fujita et al.[32]. The chain-length distributions of endosperm α-glucans were analyzed using capillary electrophoresis methods [32, 33] using a P/ACE MDQ Carbohydrate System (Beckman Coulters, CA, USA).

Gel filtration chromatography of starches and amylopectin was performed as previously described [10, 28] using a Toyopearl HW55S gel filtration column (300 × 20 mm) connected in series to three Toyopearl HW50S columns (300 × 20 mm) equipped with an RI (refractive index) detector (Tosoh RI-8020).

Abbreviations

AAC: 

Apparent amylose content

ADP: 

Adenosine diphosphate

BE: 

Branching enzyme

DAF: 

Days after flowering

DBE: 

Debranching enzyme

DP: 

Degree of polymerization

DTT: 

Dithiothreitol

ELC: 

Extra-long chain

Fr: 

Fraction

GBSSI: 

Granule-bound starch synthase I

Glc: 

Glucose

LBP: 

Loosely-bound protein

PAGE: 

Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

SDS: 

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

SP: 

Soluble protein

SS: 

Starch synthase

TBP: 

Tightly-bound protein.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Prof. Hikaru Satoh (Kyushu University) for providing BE mutant lines (EM10 and EM557) and Ms. Yuko Nakaizumi and Ms. Satomi Aihara (Akita Prefectural University) for growing the rice plants. This work was partly supported by the ‘Program for the Promotion of Basic and Applied Research for Innovations in Bio-oriented Industry’ and ‘Science and technology research promotion program for agriculture, forestry, fisheries and food industry’.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biological Production, Akita Prefectural University

References

  1. Smith AM, Denyer K, Martin C: The synthesis of the starch granule. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1997, 48: 67-87. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Myers AM, Morell MK, James MG, Ball SG: Recent progress toward understanding biosynthesis of the amylopectin crystal. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122: 989-997. 10.1104/pp.122.4.989.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nakamura Y: Towards a better understanding of the metabolic system for amylopectin biosynthesis in plants: rice endosperm as a model tissue. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43: 718-725. 10.1093/pcp/pcf091.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball SG, Morell MK: From bacterial glycogen to starch: understanding the biogenesis of the plant starch granule. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2003, 54: 207-233. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134927.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hirose T, Terao T: A comprehensive expression analysis of the starch synthase gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta. 2004, 220: 9-16. 10.1007/s00425-004-1314-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ohdan T, Francisco PB, Sawada T, Hirose T, Terao T, Satoh H, Nakamura Y: Expression profiling of genes involved in starch synthesis in sink and source organs of rice. J Exp Bot. 2005, 56: 3229-3244. 10.1093/jxb/eri292.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Takeda Y, Hizukuri S, Juliano BO: Structures of rice amylopectins with low and high affinities for iodine. Carbohydr Res. 1987, 168: 79-88. 10.1016/0008-6215(87)80008-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujita N, Yoshida M, Asakura N, Ohdan T, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nakamura Y: Function and characterization of starch synthase I using mutants in rice. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140: 1070-1084. 10.1104/pp.105.071845.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujita N, Goto S, Yoshida M, Suzuki E, Nakamura Y: The function of rice starch synthase I expressed in E. coli. J Appl Glycosci. 2008, 55: 167-172. 10.5458/jag.55.167.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Fujita N, Yoshida M, Kondo T, Saito K, Utsumi Y, Tokunaga T, Nishi A, Satoh H, Park J-H, Jane J-L, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Nakamura Y: Characterization of SSIIIa-deficient mutants of rice: the function of SSIIIa and pleiotropic effects by SSIIIa deficiency in the rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144: 2009-2023. 10.1104/pp.107.102533.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Fujita N, Satoh R, Hayashi A, Kodama M, Itoh R, Aihara S, Nakamura Y: Starch biosynthesis in rice endosperm requires the presence of either starch synthase I or IIIa. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62: 4819-4831. 10.1093/jxb/err125.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Satoh H, Nishi A, Yamashita K, Takemoto Y, Tanaka Y, Hosaka Y, Sakurai A, Fujita N, Nakamura Y: Starch-branching enzyme I-deficient mutation specifically affects the structure and properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133: 1111-1121. 10.1104/pp.103.021527.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Nishi A, Nakamura Y, Tanaka N, Satoh H: Biochemical and genetic analysis of the effects of amylose-extender mutation in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127: 59-472.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Sawada T, Francisco PB, Aihara S, Utsumi Y, Yoshida M, Oyama Y, Tsuzuki M, Satoh H, Nakamura Y: Chlorella starch branching enzyme II (BEII) can complement the function of BEIIb in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50: 1062-1074. 10.1093/pcp/pcp058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nakamura Y, Utsumi Y, Sawada T, Aihara S, Utsumi C, Yoshida M, Kitamura S: Characterization of the reactions of starch branching enzymes from rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51: 776-794. 10.1093/pcp/pcq035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu F, Makhmoudova A, Lee EA, Wait R, Emes MJ, Tetlow IJ: The amylose extender mutant of maize conditions novel protein-protein interactions between starch biosynthetic enzymes in amyloplasts. J Exp Bot. 2009, 60: 4423-4440. 10.1093/jxb/erp297.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu F, Romanova N, Lee EA, Ahmed R, Evans M, Gilbert EP, Morell MK, Emes MJ, Tetlow IJ: Glucan affinity of starch synthase IIa determines binding of starch synthase I and starch-branching enzyme IIb to starch granules. Biochem J. 2012, 448: 373-387. 10.1042/BJ20120573.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyer CD, Preiss J: Multiple forms of starch branching enzyme of maize: evidence for independent genetic control. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978, 80: 169-175. 10.1016/0006-291X(78)91119-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mu-Forster C, Huang R, Powers JR, Harriman RW, Knight M, Singletary GW, Keeling PL, Wasserman BP: Physical association of starch biosynthetic enzymes with starch granules of maize endosperm. Plant Physiol. 1996, 111: 821-829. 10.1104/pp.111.3.821.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Horibata T, Nakamoto M, Fuwa H, Inouchi N: Structural and physicochemical characteristics of endosperm starches of rice cultivars recently bred in Japan. J Appl Glycosci. 2004, 51: 303-313. 10.5458/jag.51.303.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Sano Y: Differential regulation of waxy gene expression in rice endosperm. Theor Appl Genet. 1984, 68: 467-473.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu L, Ma X, Liu S, Zhu C, Jiang L, Wang Y, Shen Y, Ren Y, Dong H, Chen L, Liu X, Zhao Z, Zhai H, Wan J: Identification and characterization of a novel waxy allele from a Yunnan rice landrace. Plant Mol Biol. 2009, 71: 609-626. 10.1007/s11103-009-9544-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hizukuri S: Polymodal distribution of the chain lengths of amylopectins, and its significance. Carbohydr Res. 1986, 147: 342-347. 10.1016/S0008-6215(00)90643-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Bertoft E: On the nature of categories of chains in amylopectin and their connection to the super helix model. Carbohydr Polm. 2004, 57: 211-224. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.04.015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fujita N, Kubo A, Francisco PB, Nakakita M, Harada K, Minaka N, Nakamura Y: Purification, characterization, and cDNA structure of isoamylase from developing endosperm of rice. Planta. 1999, 208: 283-293. 10.1007/s004250050560.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Yamanouchi H, Nakamura Y: Organ specificity of isoforms of starch branching enzyme (Q-enzyme) in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 1992, 33: 985-991.Google Scholar
  27. Kubo A, Fujita N, Harada K, Matsuda T, Satoh H, Nakamura Y: The starch-debranching enzymes isoamylase and pullulanase are both involved in amylopectin biosynthesis in rice endosperm. Plant Physiol. 1999, 121: 399-409. 10.1104/pp.121.2.399.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Fujita N, Toyosawa Y, Utsumi Y, Higuchi T, Hanashiro I, Ikegami A, Akuzawa S, Yoshida M, Mori A, Inomata K, Itoh R, Miyao A, Hirochika H, Satoh H, Nakamura Y: Characterization of PUL-deficient mutants of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and the function of PUL on the starch biosynthesis in the rice endosperm. J Exp Bot. 2009, 60: 1009-1023. 10.1093/jxb/ern349.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Satoh H, Shibahara K, Tokunaga T, Nishi A, Tasaki M, Hwang S-K, Okita TW, Kaneko N, Fujita N, Yoshida M, Hosaka Y, Sato A, Utsumi Y, Ohdan T, Nakamura Y: Plastidic α-glucan phosphorylase mutation dramatically affects the synthesis and structure of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell. 2008, 20: 1833-1849. 10.1105/tpc.107.054007.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Crofts N, Abe K, Sihara S, Itoh R, Nakamura Y, Itoh K, Fujita N: Lacking of starch synthase IIIa and high expression of granule-bound starch synthase I synergistically increase the apparent amylose content in rice endosperm. Plant Sci. 2012, 193–194: 62-69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakamura Y, Yuki K, Park SY, Ohya T: Carbohydrate metabolism in the developing endosperm of rice grains. Plant Cell Physiol. 1989, 30: 833-839.Google Scholar
  32. Fujita N, Hasegawa H, Taira T: The isolation and characterization of a waxy mutant of diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum L.). Plant Sci. 2001, 160: 595-602. 10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00408-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Shea MG, Morell MK: High resolution slab gel electrophoresis of 8-amino-1,3, 6-pyrenetrisulfonic acid (APTS) tagged oligosaccharides using a DNA sequencer. Electrophoresis. 1996, 17: 681-688. 10.1002/elps.1150170410.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Abe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement