Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

Research article
Open Access

SuperSAGE analysis of the Nicotiana attenuata transcriptome after fatty acid-amino acid elicitation (FAC): identification of early mediators of insect responses

  • Paola A Gilardoni1,
  • Stefan Schuck1,
  • Ruth Jüngling2,
  • Björn Rotter2,
  • Ian T Baldwin1 and
  • Gustavo Bonaventure1Email author
BMC Plant Biology201010:66

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-66

©  Gilardoni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

Received: 23 December 2009

Accepted: 14 April 2010

Published: 14 April 2010

Abstract

Background

Plants trigger and tailor defense responses after perception of the oral secretions (OS) of attacking specialist lepidopteran larvae. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates (FACs) in the OS of the Manduca sexta larvae are necessary and sufficient to elicit the herbivory-specific responses in Nicotiana attenuata, an annual wild tobacco species. How FACs are perceived and activate signal transduction mechanisms is unknown.

Results

We used SuperSAGE combined with 454 sequencing to quantify the early transcriptional changes elicited by the FAC N-linolenoyl-glutamic acid (18:3-Glu) and virus induced gene silencing (VIGS) to examine the function of candidate genes in the M. sexta-N. attenuata interaction. The analysis targeted mRNAs encoding regulatory components: rare transcripts with very rapid FAC-elicited kinetics (increases within 60 and declines within 120 min). From 12,744 unique Tag sequences identified (UniTags), 430 and 117 were significantly up- and down-regulated ≥ 2.5-fold, respectively, after 18:3-Glu elicitation compared to wounding. Based on gene ontology classification, more than 25% of the annotated UniTags corresponded to putative regulatory components, including 30 transcriptional regulators and 22 protein kinases. Quantitative PCR analysis was used to analyze the FAC-dependent regulation of a subset of 27 of these UniTags and for most of them a rapid and transient induction was confirmed. Six FAC-regulated genes were functionally characterized by VIGS and two, a putative lipid phosphate phosphatase (LPP) and a protein of unknown function, were identified as important mediators of the M. sexta-N. attenuata interaction.

Conclusions

The analysis of the early changes in the transcriptome of N. attenuata after FAC elicitation using SuperSAGE/454 has identified regulatory genes involved in insect-specific mediated responses in plants. Moreover, it has provided a foundation for the identification of additional novel regulators associated with this process.

Keywords

Gene OntologyJasmonic AcidTobacco Rattle VirusWRKY DomainOral Secretion

Background

Nicotiana attenuata is an annual native to Southwestern USA that germinates from seed banks in response to factors in wood smoke after fires [1]. Because of this germination behavior and a strong intra-specific competition, N. attenuata allocates resources primarily to sustain rapid growth and seed setting and as a consequence, it has developed a large number of induced defense responses to ward off the unpredictable attacks from herbivores [2]. Hence, when N. attenuata is attacked by insect folivores, an extensive reprogramming of its transcriptome, proteome and metabolome takes place [3–5]. Previous studies estimated that more than 500 N. attenuata genes respond to Manduca sexta larval feeding [6] and demonstrated that the plant readjusts its metabolism for de novo synthesis of direct and indirect defense responses and to induce tolerance mechanisms [7–9]. Activation of these defensive mechanisms requires energy and resources from primary metabolism and involves therefore a complex rearrangement of resource allocation in the plant, including altered photosynthesis and sink/source relations [5]. How plants decode insect feeding and trigger defense and tolerance responses is starting to be understood. For example, a SnRK1 kinase complex has been found to regulate tolerance mechanisms associated to the leaf/root partition of photoassimilates [9] and two MAPKs, WIPK and SIPK (Wound-induced and Salicylate-Induced Protein Kinases, respectively), were shown to be critical for the induction of direct defense responses in N. attenuata [10].

Herbivore attack induces in plants the coordinated activation of several signal cascades including those of jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), and ethylene (ET) [11]. Among them, JA plays a major and essential role in the induction of a large number of the plant's protective responses against insect herbivory and wounding [12, 13]. Thus, having JA as a common signal, a large number of the plant responses to these two stimuli overlap, however, plants can differentiate between mechanical damage and insect herbivory to tailor their responses. The perception of components in the oral secretions (OS) of feeding larvae is one mechanism by which plants can decode insect feeding. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates (FAC) are major components in the OS of M. sexta larvae and they are necessary and sufficient to induce most of the defense responses triggered by feeding M. sexta caterpillar in N. attenuata [14]. Hence, previous studies suggest the existence of central herbivore-activated regulators in N. attenuata leaves, which, in turn, are regulated by minute amounts of FACs in the insect's OS. Disentangling the effect of mechanical tissue damage and FAC elicitation will provide critical information on how plants control changes in its metabolism to more efficiently reduce the negative fitness consequences of herbivore attack.

One of the earliest known molecular events differentially induced by OS and FACs in tobacco is the activation of WIPK and SIPK. Activation of these protein kinases occur within the first minutes after wounding [15] and the activation is enhanced several-fold by applying M. sexta OS to wounds [10]. Importantly, not only their activities but also SIPK and WIPK transcript levels are rapidly (within 60 min) and transiently induced after elicitation [10, 15], indicating that these regulators are under positive feedback control at the transcriptional level. One of the early targets of the FAC signal transduction pathway in N. attenuata is the WRKY6 gene. Its transcript levels are also rapidly and transiently induced after wounds have been supplemented with M. sexta OS or synthetic FACs but only marginally by mechanical damage alone [16]. This rapid and transient kinetic of mRNA accumulation is characteristic of regulatory components and differs from that showed by, for example, transcripts encoding for defense components (e.g., protease inhibitors) which is characterized by a slower and more persistent rate of mRNA accumulation, reaching maximum levels after hours to days [8]. However, not all regulatory components are under positive feedback control at the transcriptional level: the Coronatine Insensitive 1 (COI1) gene is an example in the JA transduction pathway [17]. However, some of the recently identified JAZ proteins that interact with COI1 and participate in JA-Ile perception are rapidly and transiently induced at the mRNA level by wounding in Arabidopsis [18].

The rapid advances in high throughput sequencing capacity in combination with new "open-architecture" techniques for quantification of gene expression has opened the possibility of performing genome-wide transcriptome studies in organisms from which massive nucleotide sequence information is not yet available. Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) is a technique that allows for the absolute quantification of mRNA abundance by quantifying the relative frequencies of individual short (13 nt) transcripts signatures tags [19]. Further development of the technique allowed for the generation of 26 nt tags (SuperSAGE) [20] which substantially improved the annotation of tags when aligned to sequences in public nucleotide databases [21]. With these techniques, the detection of transcripts is proportionally correlated to the scale of DNA sequencing and their combination with next generation sequencing (NGS) allows for the detection and analysis of very low abundant transcripts (frequently encoding for regulatory components) which have been estimated to account for more than 90% of mRNAs in eukaryotic cells [20, 22].

Here we used SuperSAGE in combination with NGS for the quantification of the early changes (within 30 min) occurring in the transcriptome of N. attenuata plants after a single event of 18:3-Glu elicitation. The major objective of the study was to identify genes encoding for potential regulatory components of the FAC-mediated responses by looking for low abundant transcripts that were rapidly and transiently induced after 18:3-Glu elicitation.

Results

Generation of SuperSAGE libraries from wounded and FAC elicited N. attenuataleaves

Two SuperSAGE libraries were generated from the second fully expanded leaf of N. attenuata plants either mechanically wounded or wounded and supplemented with 18:3-Glu as a single FAC elicitor. Leaf samples were harvested after 30 min of the treatments (Figure 1). Wounding is a prerequisite for FAC-elicitation; hence, analysis of wounded leaves was used to differentiate between genes regulated by mechanical damage from those regulated more specifically or deferentially by FACs. Additionally, elicitation by a single elicitor (18:3-Glu) and a single wound event were used to eliminate the effects of other OS components and repeated wounding on gene expression.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the approach used for identification of regulatory genes by SuperSAGE. Two SuperSAGE libraries were generated from the second fully expanded leaf of N. attenuata. Plants were mechanically wounded or wounded plus the immediate addition of 18:3-Glu as a single FAC elicitor and leaves were harvested 30 min after the treatments. From these libraries, 547 unique mRNA sequences (UniTags) were defined as differentially expressed after 18:3-Glu elicitation versus wounding (FC: fold-change). After gene ontology categorization, the kinetics of transcript accumulation corresponding to 27 UniTags were analyzed by quantitative PCR. Six selected genes were functionally characterized by Virus Induce Gene Silencing (VIGS).

The total number of SuperSAGE tags obtained after sequencing the libraries in a single 454 plate and eliminating i) incomplete reads, ii) twin-ditags, and iii) ditags without complete library-identification DNA linkers was 354,930; comprising 227,536 tags from the wounding (W) library and 127,394 from the FAC-elicited (F) library (Table 1). These tags represented 31,878 unique sequences with 19,104 (11,951 in the W library and 7,153 in the F library) detected only once (singletons) in the combined libraries, and 12,774 detected at least twice in the combined libraries (Table 1). These latter tags are referred as UniTags throughout the manuscript [22] and will be considered for further analysis. Singletons represented thus ~60% of unique sequences, in agreement with previous studies [21, 22]. The complete SuperSAGE dataset is available in Additional file 1 (see also Accession numbers).
Table 1

Features of the SuperSAGE libraries from wounded and 18:3-Glu elicited leaves

Library

W**

F**

Total

(%)

Sequenced tags

227,536

127,394

354,930

(100)

Number of unique transcripts (UniTags)

11,942

10,117

12,774

 

Number of singletons

11,951

7,153

19,104

 

Abundance classes of UniTags*

    

Very high-abundant: > 5,000 copies.million-1

24

22

46

(0.2)

High-abundant: > 1,000 - 5,000 copies.million-1

127

133

260

(1.2)

Mid-abundant: 100 - 1,000 copies.million-1

1,178

1,084

2,262

(10.2)

Low-abundant: < 100 copies.million-1

10,613

8,878

19,491

(88.4)

Total

11,942

10,117

  

Copy number of Tags in Abundance classes*

    

Very high-abundant: > 5,000 copies.million-1

2.34 × 105

2.34 × 105

4.68 × 105

(23.4)

High-abundant: > 1,000 - 5,000 copies.million-1

2.36 × 105

2.43 × 105

4.80 × 105

(24.0)

Mid-abundant: 100 - 1,000 copies.million-1

3.32 × 105

3.16 × 105

6.48 × 105

(32.4)

Low-abundant: < 100 copies.million-1

1.98 × 105

2.07 × 105

4.05 × 105

(20.2)

Total

1.00 × 106

1.00 × 106

  

* Values normalized to 1 million tags

** W: wounded; F: 18:3-Glu elicited

Abundance of UniTags and annotation to public databases

The UniTags were first classified in abundance groups according to their number of copies [22]. UniTags present at ≤ 100, > 100 - ≤ 1,000, > 1,000 - ≤ 5,000 and >5,000 copies per million (copies.million-1) were considered as low-, mid-, high- and very high-abundant tags, respectively (Table 1). The frequency distribution of the 12,774 UniTags showed that the number of copies in low and mid abundance groups (≤ 1,000 copies.million-1) represented > 98% of the UniTags while high- and very high-abundant tags (>1,000 copies.million-1) represented only 1.4% (Table 1). However, although the latter group represented only a small fraction of the 12,774 UniTags, together they accounted for ~47% of the total number of tag copies in both the W and F libraries (Table 1). These values were in agreement with previously reported data [23, 24].

Annotation of the 12,774 UniTags using basic local alignments (BLASTN) gave 5,565 tags (43.6%) that matched with a maximum of 3 mismatches (score ≥ 46.1 or e-value ≤ 6.10-4) to sequences deposited in GenBank plant nucleotide databases (Additional file 1 and Table 2). 78.8% of these 5,565 UniTags matched perfectly (26/26) with sequences in the databases while 8.4% did it with one mismatch (25/26), 6.5% with two mismatches (24/26) and 6.4% with three mismatches (23/26; Table 2). Moreover, 88% of the annotated UniTags matched sequences corresponding to Nicotiana spp, 5% to Solanum spp and 8% to other plant species (Table 2).
Table 2

Annotation of UniTags using GenBank DNA sequence databases

 

No. of matches (total 26)

  
 

26

25

24

23

Total

(%)

Nicotiana spp

3,867

403

305

300

4,875

(88)

Solanum ssp

188

31

19

22

260

(5)

Other species

330

32

35

33

430

(8)

Total

4,385

466

359

355

5,565

(100)

(%)

(78.8)

(8.4)

(6.5)

(6.4)

  

FAC elicitation induces differential expression of 547 UniTags

Statistically significant changes in tag copy number between the F and W libraries were analyzed by calculating a probability (P)-value according to [25] (see Materials and Methods for a brief description). Although small changes in expression levels may have biological significance [25], in this study we focused primarily on genes which showed strong changes in expression levels with arbitrary fold-change (FC) values ≥ 2.5 or ≤ 0.4 (FAC elicitation vs wounding). Based on the calculated (P)-values and using a 95% confidence level, 547 UniTags were identified as differentially expressed after FAC elicitation (Additional file 2). Among these UniTags, 430 had FC ≥ 2.5 and 117 FC ≤ 0.4 (F vs W; Figure 2a and Additional file 2). Most of the differentially expressed UniTags presented FC values between 0.2 and 10, with 29 and 24 UniTags presenting FC values ≥ 10 and ≤ 0.2, respectively (Figure 2b). The majority (98.6%) of the differentially up-regulated UniTags and all of the down-regulated UniTags corresponded to low- and mid-abundance groups (< 1,000 copies.million-1; Figure 2c and Additional file 2), indicating that the strongest changes in expression levels occurred primarily in genes expressed at low to intermediate levels.
Figure 2

Analysis of differentially expressed UniTags. A, Volcano plot showing the Log2(fold-change; F vs. W) versus Log10(P-value) of 547 expressed UniTags. B, Fold change (F vs. W) distribution of the 547 differentially expressed UniTags. C, Distribution of the expressed UniTags based on the Log2(Fold-change; F vs. W) versus Log10(tag copy number). The dashed line corresponds to a threshold of 1,000 copies.million-1. D, Distribution of 242 annotated UniTags in Gene Ontologiy (GO) categories based on Molecular Function and Biological Process.

Assignment of differentially expressed UniTags to Gene Ontology (GO): biological and functional categories

To obtain gene function categories of the differentially expressed UniTags, gene ontology (GO) annotation was performed by BLASTX (using the corresponding annotated nucleotide sequences as queries) against the non-redundant GenBank and UniProtKB/TrEMBL protein databases (Additional file 2). For this analysis, we used UniTags that showed a maximum of 2 mismatches (24/26) with entries in the GenBank nucleotide database (Additional file 1). Of the 547 differentially expressed UniTags, 349 had an associated nucleotide sequence and 323 matched to an amino acid sequence entry (e-value < 9.10-4) in the GenBank and UniProtKB/TrEMBL databases (Additional file 2). GO annotations (biological processes and/or molecular function) could be assigned to 242 of these 323 UniTags with the remaining entries corresponding to uncharacterized proteins (Additional file 2).

Among the most prevalent GO biological processes, ~25% of the UniTags classified into metabolism, ~12% into regulation of gene expression (including transcription, nucleosome assembly and mRNA processing), ~10% into amino acid phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, ~8% into translation (including ribosome assembling), ~8% into defense and stress responses, ~7% into transport, ~6% into protein degradation and folding and ~6% into signal transduction components (Figure 2d). The preponderance of changes in transcripts corresponding to metabolism, signaling, transcription, translation and transport associated processes after 30 min of 18:3-Glu elicitation emphasized the fact that at this early time point a substantial reprogramming of the leaf metabolism is already in progress. Based on changes in metabolic genes, hallmarks of this reprogramming included an increased capacity for protein synthesis and the generation of C skeletons and reducing power (see Discussion). These changes in the expression of metabolic genes are consistent with a substantial shift in primary metabolism to support secondary metabolism and tolerance mechanisms [5] and are consistent with previous gene expression studies [3, 6, 26] (see Discussion). The identification of regulatory factors controlling these changes in metabolism and defense and tolerance processes against insects is one of the major challenges for the future and some potential candidates are described below.

Changes in the expression of UniTags/mRNAs encoding for regulatory components

The most prevalent GO molecular function with regulatory activity corresponded to transcriptional regulators and protein kinases, represented by 30 and 22 UniTags, respectively. The protein phosphatase category contained 3 UniTags, the signal transduction category 14 UniTags and the nucleic acid binding category 6 UniTags (Additional file 2). Thus, a total of 75 annotated UniTags corresponded to factors with potential regulatory function.

Among transcriptional regulators, UniTags corresponding to WRKY transcription factors (TFs) were the most predominant (seven UniTags) and Tag-995 was the most up-regulated (23 fold) after 18:3-Glu elicitation within this group. Other UniTags for WRKYs were up-regulated between 9 and 2.5 fold (Additional file 2). Within the WRKY domain containing family, a WIZZ TF (wound-induced leucine zipper zinc finger) [27] was up-regulated 7 fold. Other prevalent up-regulated TFs included AP2-like factors (three UniTags; up-regulated between 9 and 3 fold), RAV factors (two UniTags; up-regulated ~3 fold), ethylene-responsive element binding proteins (EREBP; two UniTags; up-regulated between 9 and 3 fold) and CCR4-NOT transcription complex proteins (two UniTags; up-regulated between 7 and 3 fold) (Additional file 2). Single up-regulated UniTags in this category corresponded to a bZIP TF (2.5 fold), HIS4 (2.5 fold), S1FA (7 fold), RNA polymerase II (RNAPII; 5.5 fold) and a sigma subunit for a plastidial RNA polymerase (7 fold). Among down-regulated transcriptional regulators were a GATA-1 zinc finger protein and RNA polymerase III (RNAPIII; Additional file 2).

Within the protein kinase and phosphatase classes, three UniTags corresponded to MAPK (two up-regulated between 4 and 2.5 fold and one down-regulated 10 fold), three to cell-wall associated kinases (WAK; up-regulated between 3.5 and 6 fold), two to BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1; up-regulated between 9 and 3 fold) and three to protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and C (PP2C; two up-regulated ~3 fold and one down-regulated ~5-fold). In addition, this category contained a chloroplast precursor for Arabidopsis protein kinase 1 (APK1) [28] up-regulated ~7 fold, a shaggy-like kinase (up-regulated ~5 fold), and a cytokinin-regulated kinase 1 (CRK1; the most up-regulated, ~14 fold) and a calmodulin protein kinase 1 (up-regulated ~11 fold) among others (Additional file 2).

Within the signal transduction class, the most predominant UniTags corresponded to "Avr9/Cf-9 rapidly elicited proteins" (seven UniTags) up-regulated between 13 and 2.5 fold. Single up-regulated UniTags corresponded to a Hs1pro-1-like protein (putative nematode resistance protein (NRP); 17.9 fold), SGT1 (3.6 fold), a lipid phosphate phosphatase (LPP; 5.4 fold) and an extra-large G protein (2.5 fold) were also contained in this category (Additional file 2).

Validation of the SuperSAGE data by qPCR

A subset of 27 differentially expressed UniTags (Table 3) was selected for further analysis based on the fulfillment of at least two of the following criteria: 1) strong and significant changes in their FC values (either up- or down-regulated, F vs W); 2) abundance of <1,000 copies.million-1 (as regulatory components are encoded by low abundant transcripts); 3) matched known regulatory components in the databases.
Table 3

List of the 27 UniTags selected for qPCR and VIGS analysis1

Tag-Id

Tag sequence

FC

Protein Description

Tag-11166

CATGTGTCAAGCTGGAAAACTTGCCA

69.92

NM

Tag-4898

CATGCTGCTGGGACTCTCGTATACAG

25.78

NM

Tag-995

CATGAATTCAAGAAACAAGCCAACAA

23.31

ACJ04728.1| WRKY transcription factor

Tag-6642

CATGGCCAAGAGTACGTTCTCAAAGG

19.72

AAL08561.1| auxin-regulated protein

Tag-895

CATGAATGACACTAATGAATTCGTCG

19.72

NM

Tag-6205

CATGGATCTACGCGTCAAAAATGCTT

17.93

AAG44839.1| Hs1pro-1-like receptor

Tag-2452

CATGATGAATACGAGCAGCTTCGGGT

17.93

NM

Tag-1439

CATGACTGCTGTCAGACGAACTGCAC

16.14

BAD33355.1| ABC transporter

Tag-837

CATGAATCATCCAATATGGTATGGGC

14.70

XP_002298932.1| predicted protein (UnkA)

Tag-9719

CATGTATTCTGCTGTAAATTCAGGAA

12.77

AAG43557.1| Avr9/Cf-9 rapidly elicited protein

Tag-2978

CATGATTTTTTTTCCTTCTGCTGTAT

12.55

NM

Tag-12314

CATGTTTAGAGCAATGAGTACACGAA

10.81

EEF40825.1| hypothetical protein (UnkB)

Tag-6199

CATGGATCGGCAAACAAAGAGATTAT

10.51

NM

Tag-7795

CATGGGTTATTCAGTGCTGTTCAGTG

5.98

AAY17949.1| ring zinc finger protein

Tag-1844

CATGAGGAAGGCTATGAAGGAGAAGA

5.82

NM

Tag-7036

CATGGCTGCTGACAACTTACCTGGAT

5.79

ACG41445.1| plastid-lipid associated protein

Tag-11559

CATGTTATCAGTTAACTAATAAAAGC

5.70

EEF35389.1| wall-associated kinase (WAK)

Tag-10039

CATGTCCACCATACTAACGGAGGATT

5.38

NP_001078095.1| LPP (Lipid Phosphate Phosphatase)

Tag-6032

CATGGAGGTCTTTCTCGTTATCTGAT

5.22

XP_002278077.1| hypothetical protein

Tag-5869

CATGGAGACTTTGCAAGTTAAGTTTT

4.26

BAC07504.2| receptor-like protein kinase

Tag-2067

CATGAGTTGGTGGATTCAAATCTTGG

4.13

EEF37528.1| wall-associated kinase (WAK)

Tag-129

CATGAAACACAGTTAGCAATTTATGA

4.03

ABD28351.1| Lissencephaly type-1-like homology

Tag-6938

CATGGCTCGGATTTGCATCTCTAAAG

3.84

NP_563839.1| transcription factor

Tag-5283

CATGCTTTGTAAAACTTAGCAACAAA

3.47

NM

Tag-2815

CATGATTGAGTTGCAAAGCAGTGGAG

3.36

BAB16427.1| Nicotiana Elicited Induce Gene (NEIG)

Tag-9434

CATGTATAGCAGATTGGTGAAATGAT

3.19

BAE44121.1| protein phosphatase 2C

Tag-2990

CATGCAAAACGTACACCGAGAAAGAA

0.09

NM

FC: fold change (FAC-elicitation vs. Wounding). NM: no match in GenBank

1UniTags selected for VIGS analysis are depicted in bold.

The selected UniTags were first elongated by amplification of their corresponding cDNAs and BLASTed against the GenBank plant nucleotide databases to confirm their identities. All of the elongated sequences (see "Accession numbers") matched to the same entries as the original 26 bp tags (data not shown). Secondly, the elongated sequences were used to design gene-specific primers to i) validate the SuperSAGE data and ii) to study the kinetic of mRNA induction by real time quantitative PCR (qPCR). Total RNA was extracted from both wounded and 18:3-Glu elicited leaves of WT plants after different times of the stimuli.

The accumulation of 20 mRNAs corresponding to the selected UniTags was consistent with a rapid increase (within 60 min) after FAC elicitation and a rapid decrease (within 120 min) to basal or lower levels after the stimuli (Figure 3 and Additional file 3 [Figure S1]). Interestingly, several transcripts showed either no or minimal induction by wounding, representing therefore genes activated almost specifically by FACs (e.g., 837, 995, 1844, 2815; Figure 3). For some transcripts mechanical damage induced an increase in their corresponding mRNA levels which was potentiated several fold by 18:3-Glu elicitation (e.g., 5869, 10039; Figure 3). For transcripts corresponding to four UniTags (6032, 7036, 129, 6642), the differential regulation by 18:3-Glu elicitation could not be confirmed (Additional file 3 [Figure S1]) and they may represent false positives in the SuperSAGE analysis [25]. Finally, mRNAs for three UniTags (1439, 2452, 2990) were differentially repressed by 18:3-Glu elicitation (Additional file 3 [Figure S1]).
Figure 3

Analysis of mRNA accumulation corresponding to selected UniTags by qPCR. Examples of the kinetics of induction of mRNAs for 15 UniTags analyzed by qPCR after wounding and 18:3-Glu elicitation. Relative mRNA quantification was performed using the eEF1A as a reference gene for normalization and the data is expressed as fold-change relative to time 0 (unelicited leaves). Values at this time point were set arbitrary to 1. Transcripts levels were analyzed in three biological replicates (n = 3).

Functional characterization of candidate regulatory components of insect mediated responses by VIGS

To validate the use of the SuperSAGE approach for the identification of candidate regulatory components of the interaction between N. attenuata and M. sexta larvae, six genes were selected for preliminary gene function characterization by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS). The selection of these genes was based on: 1) their kinetic of mRNA induction and 2) their fold-change compared to wounding (minimal induction by wounding -except for Tag-10039). Some of the genes encoded for putative regulatory components and two presented no similarity to any other protein of known or predicted function (Figure 3 and Table 3). The selected UniTags corresponded to a Hs1pro-1-like protein (putative nematode resistance protein (NRP); Tag-6205), lipid phosphate phosphatase (LPP; Tag-10039), Nicotiana elicitor induced gene (NEIG; Tag-2815), cell wall-associated protein kinase (WAK; Tag-11559), UnkA (Tag-837) and UnkB (Tag-12314) (these last two presenting no protein annotation) (Table 4). To evaluate whether these genes participate in FAC- and insect defense-mediated responses, gene-specific silenced plants and plants transformed with the empty vector (EV; control plants) were assessed for M. sexta larval performance and the accumulation of JA and JA-Ile after 18:3-Glu elicitation and wounding. Gene silencing efficiency in these plants was analyzed by qPCR in 18:3-Glu-elicited leaves after 1 h of the treatment (Table 4). The morphological phenotype of the silenced-plants was indistinguishable from EV control plants (data not shown).
Table 4

Selected genes for functional characterization by VIGS

Tag ID

Gene Name

VIGS construct

Silencing efficiency (%)1

Tag-6205

Nematode Resistance Protein (NRP)

pTVNRP

67 ± 1.8

Tag-10039

Lipid Phosphate Phosphatase (LPP)

pTVLPP

69 ± 2.1

Tag-11559

Wall Assocaited Kinase (WAK)

pTVWAK

83 ± 2.5

Tag-2815

Nicotiana Elicited Induced Gene (NEIG)

pTVNEIG

91 ± 5.2

Tag-837

UnkA

pTVUNKA

73 ± 4.7

Tag-12314

UnkB

pTVUNKB

98 ± 2.8

1 The silencing efficiency is expressed as the reduction (%) of the mRNA levels in the VIGS-silenced plants relative to the levels of the corresponding mRNA in EV (empty vector) plants. In all cases the reductions were statistically significant (P < 0.05, t-test, EV vs VIGS).

M. sexta larva feeding on plants silenced in the expression of LPP or UnkA showed significant increases in mass gained after 11 and/or 15 days compared to EV plants (Figure 4; see caption for statistical analysis). In contrast, larval performance was similar between EV and plants silenced in NRP, NEIG, WAK and UnkB (Additional file 3 [Figure S2]). The rate of JA and JA-Ile accumulation after wounding was similar between EV and LPP-silenced plants (Figure 5a). After 18:3-Glu elicitation, the accumulation of JA and JA-Ile was significantly slower in LPP-silenced plants however after 90 min the levels were similar to EV plants (Figure 5a, see caption for statistical analysis). Plants silenced in UnkA expression had similar rates of JA and JA-Ile accumulation to EV plants after both 18:3-Glu elicitation and wounding (Figure 5b). Likewise, induced levels of JA and JA-Ile in NRP-, WAK-, NEIG- and UnkB-silenced plants were similar to EV plants (data not shown).
Figure 4

M. sexta larval performance on LPP- and UnkA-silenced plants. N. attenuata plants were silenced in the expression of LPP and UnkA by VIGS. Plants transformed with the empty vector (EV) were used as control. A, Mean (± SE) of M. sexta larval mass after 4, 7, 11 and 15 days of feeding on EV and LPP-silenced plants (n = 32 for each genotype). Statistical analysis was performed by repeated-measurement ANOVA (F1,54 = 12.79, P < 0.01). B, Mean (± SE) of M. sexta larval mass after 4, 7, 11 and 15 days of feeding on EV and UnkA-silenced plants (n = 32 for each genotype). Statistical analysis was performed by repeated-measurement ANOVA (F1,48 = 6.62, P < 0.05). In both cases asterisks represent significant differences between EV and the corresponding silenced line. Both experiments were conducted two times independently with identical results.

Figure 5

Quantification of JA and JA-ILE levels in LPP- and UnkA-silenced plants. Leaves from N. attenuata plants silenced in the expression of LPP and UnkA by VIGS were either wounded or 18:3-Glu elicited and tissue was harvested at different times. A, Mean (± SE) JA and JA-ILE levels in EV and LPP-silenced plants (n = 5). Statistical differences in JA and JA-ILE levels were analyzed by univariate ANOVA (JA, F3,12 = 18.6, P < 0.001; JA-ILE, F3,12 = 5.6, P < 0.05). Different letters denote significant differences in a Scheffé post-hoc test at P < 0.05. B, Mean (± SE) JA and JA-ILE levels for EV and UnkA-silenced plants (n = 5).

Discussion

In this study we exploited the combined capacities of SuperSAGE and NGS to quantify the expression of thousands of genes in N. attenuata leaves elicited by one of the major elicitors (18:3-Glu) present in the OS of M. sexta larvae. We analyzed the expression of >335,000 SuperSAGE tags, representing 12,774 unique transcript sequences with the main objective of identifying factors with potential regulatory functions during the M. sexta-N. attenuata interaction. The analysis disclosed 75 annotated putative regulatory factors and from a subset of 27 selected we could confirm that the kinetic of mRNA induction for 20 of them followed the expected profile, a rapid and transient up-regulation.

Because the SuperSAGE generates 26 nt tags, DNA sequence databases are a prerequisite to warrant efficient gene annotation of the tags. Consistent with the presence of >17,000 Nicotiana spp nucleotide sequences publicly available in GenBank, ~88% of the N. attenuata UniTags matched to Nicotiana species (Table 2). However, only 43.5% of the 12,774 UniTags matched -with a maximum of 3 mismatches- to sequences in GenBank (Table 2). With a tolerance of 6 mismatches (20/26), 8,151 UniTags (64%) found a hit in this database (Additional file 1). Most SuperSAGE tags are derived from the 3' UTR of each mRNA molecule [20] which has been shown to be allele-specific in plants [29]. Since most of the Nicotiana spp nucleotide entries in GenBank correspond to N. tabacum, a percentage of the mismatches may be attributed to polymorphisms in the 3' UTR of mRNAs from N. attenuata and this tobacco species. Regarding the 547 differentially expressed UniTags, 60% could be assigned to a protein entry (Additional file 2) in GenBank and UniProtKB/TrEMBL protein databases and 25% of this fraction represented fully uncharacterized protein entries (Additional file 2), a fact that partially handicapped the functional characterization of the N. attenuata transcription profiles. Nevertheless, a total of 242 UniTags were reliably assigned to a GO category. However, since these 242 UniTags represented < 50% of the differentially regulated mRNAs (Additional file 2), we expect that improved gene annotation will increase (probably by factor of two) the number of putative regulators that change expression after 18:3-Glu elicitation.

Changes in the expression of mRNAs encoding for regulatory components

WRKY transcription factors (TFs) occur in large gene families in plants and orchestrate different responses including those for pathogen resistance and wound healing [30, 31]. For example, WRKYs bind to W-box elements in PR1 genes and regulate their expression after salicylic acid (SA) induction and pathogen elicitation [32]. WRKY3 and 6 in N. attenuata have been involved in responses against insect herbivores [16]. WIZZ (wound-induced leucine zipper zinc finger) was identified as an early and transiently activated wound-responsive gene in tobacco [27] and contains a leucine-zipper motif and a WRKY domain in its structure. After wounding, WIZZ transcripts accumulate within 10 min reaching maximal levels by 30 min and decreasing thereafter to basal levels [27]. Our results suggested that several WRKY members including WIZZ may play critical roles in the coordination of M. sexta-N. attenuata interactions. AP2/ERF is a large family of TFs in plants, encoding transcriptional regulators with a variety of functions in the control of developmental and physiological processes including the integration of JA and ET signals [33]. The AP2/ERF family is classified into subfamilies containing AP2, DREB, EREBP and RAV TFs. Three AP2-like, two EREBP and two RAV TFs were rapidly up-regulated after 18:3-Glu elicitation (Additional file 2), suggesting that this family of TF may also play important roles in the orchestration of some of the plant's responses to insect feeding.

Two UniTags corresponding to the CCR4-associated factor 1 (CAF1) were up-regulated by 18:3-Glu elicitation. CAF1 is a subunit of the CCR4-NOT complex involved in mRNA degradation and Arabidopsis plants mutated in CAF1a and b genes are more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae infection [34]. These authors hypothesized that the CAF1-containing complex controls the expression of a repressor of defense genes during pathogenesis. Our results suggested that the CCR4-NOT complex may also plays a role in defense responses against insects.

Several UniTags corresponding to putative cell wall-associated protein kinases (WAKs) were rapidly up-regulated after 18:3-Glu elicitation (Additional file 2). WAKs are transmembrane proteins containing a cytoplasmic Ser/Thr kinase domain and an extracellular domain in contact with components of the plant cell walls [35]. WAKs play important roles in cell expansion, pathogen resistance, and heavy-metal stress tolerance [36, 37]. These protein kinases may associate changes in the cell wall structure after insect attack with downstream responses. Indirect evidence for rapid changes in cell wall structure and metabolism comes from the substantial number of genes associated with these processes that were up-regulated after 18:3-Glu elicitation (including an arabinogalactan protein (9-fold), beta-glucan-binding protein (9-fold), cellulose synthase (6-fold), α-expansin (2.5-fold), cell wall peroxidase (7-fold), raffinose synthase (7-fold), xyloglucan endotransglycosylases (3-fold), UDP-GlcUA 4-epimerase (3-fold) and xylose isomerase (4-fold; Additional file 2). Changes in the cell wall structure trigger JA- and ET-mediated defense responses in Arabidopsis as evidenced by the cev1 mutant, carrying a genetic lesion in a cellulose synthase gene [38]. Thus, changes in cell wall structure or homeostasis after mechanical damage and FAC elicitation might influence defensive signaling in a manner analogous to the cev1 mutant of Arabidopsis.

GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase is a highly conserved Ser/Thr kinase involved in several signaling pathways. The Arabidopsis BRASSINOSTEROID-INSENSITIVE 2 (BIN2) gene encodes a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase and was identified as a negative regulator of brassinosteroid (BR) signaling [39]. Changes in the expression of transcripts for this kinase together with BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1-associated receptor kinase 1 (BAK1) suggested that BR play a role in the regulation of M. sexta-N. attenuata interaction. BR induces resistance against TMV, P. syringae and Oidium spp in tobacco plants [40]. Evidence for cytokinins also playing a role in this interaction came from the strong up-regulation of the CYTOKONIN-REGULATED KINASE 1 gene (CRK1) [41].

UniTags corresponding to PP2A and C were up-regulated while one UniTag corresponding to a PP2C isoform was down-regulated (Additional file 2). These regulators are known to play a central role in the control of defense-associated mechanisms. For example, the Arabidopsis AP2C1 (a PP2C) inactivates MPK4 and MPK6 and the mutant ap2c1 produces higher amounts of JA after wounding and is more resistant to phytophagous mites than WT. In contrast, plants with increased AP2C1 activity produced less ET and had compromised immunity against necrotrophic pathogens [42].

Among components associated to signal transduction processes, genes encoding for "Avr9-Cf9 rapidly elicited proteins" were the most predominant. The GO molecular function associated with these proteins was either protein kinase or receptor activity (Additional file 2) and some may correspond to R (resistance) genes in N. attenuata. The Avr9-Cf9 elicitor-receptor system is involved in the race-specific resistance of tomato (S. lycopersicum) against Cladosporium fulvum [43]. Interestingly, similar to wounding and OS elicitation, the Cf9 receptor induces the activation of WIPK and SIPK upon Avr9 binding and it has been proposed that these protein kinases are hubs in the integration of signals for diverse elicitors [44]. Thus, "Avr9/Cf9 rapidly elicited proteins" may be either important components in defense responses against insects or they may reflect redundancy (via activation of WIPK and SIPK and downstream gene expression) in the signal transduction pathway activated by wounding and FACs. An additional regulator that shows high homology to protein kinase receptors and R genes is the putative Hs1pro-1-like receptor (Additional file 2). The Hs1pro-1 gene confers resistance to the beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) [45]. The transcript of Hs1pro-1 is present at low levels in uninfected roots and it is induced specifically after nematode infection independently of SA, JA, ABA or wounding [46]. Its induction by 18:3-Glu in leaves on N. attenuata suggested that this gene may play a role in some plant responses against lepidopteran larvae in aboveground tissue. Up-regulation of UniTags corresponding to SGT1, a component of the Skp1-Cullin-F-box protein (SCF) ubiquitin ligases previously linked to early plant defenses responses conferred by R genes [47], also suggested that signaling pathways connected to R genes may be induced by insect elicitors in N. attenuata.

Early changes in gene expression after 18:3-Glu elicitation reflect a rapid reprogramming of leaf metabolism

As a validation of the SuperSAGE approach, several UniTags identified as differentially regulated by 18:3-Glu elicitation corresponded to transcripts previously identified as differentially regulated by M. sexta larval feeding or OS/FAC elicitation [3, 6, 26]. Most of these genes corresponded to proteins involved in primary metabolism (Additional file 4). Changes in the expression of these genes supported the idea of a shift in primary metabolism to supply energy, C skeletons and reducing power for the synthesis of defensive compounds and to induce tolerance mechanisms [5]. Most of the putative regulatory factors identified in the present study were not identified in previous studies except for a WRKY transcription factor [26].

Changes occurring at the level of metabolism were among the most prevalent comprising more than 60 annotated UniTags. The up-regulation of twelve UniTags corresponding to transcripts for ribosomal structural proteins, four to translation initiation factors, two to tRNA synthases and several corresponding to amino acid biosynthesis (including tryptophan synthase, threonine deaminase, prephenate dehydrataseand 2-isopropylmalate synthase (Additional files 2 and 5) suggested that, within 30 min, 18:3-Glu elicitation stimulated an increased capacity for protein biosynthesis. Additionally, several annotated UniTags corresponding to genes involved in the generation of energy and C skeletons (e.g., subunits of ATP synthases, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate-dehydrogenase, aldose-1-epimerase, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, phosphofructokinase, sucrose synthase) and in the generation and metabolism of reducing power (e.g., NADP-dependent malic enzyme, Fed-NAD(P)+ reductase, NAD kinase, nicotinamidase) showed strong up-regulations (Additional file 2). NAD-dependent malic enzymes (MEs) catalyze the oxidative decarboxylation of malate to produce pyruvate, CO2, and NADH in mitochondria [48] while NADP-dependent plastidic and cytosolic isoforms provide C skeletons and reducing power for defense responses, lignin biosynthesis and reactive oxygen species formation [49, 50]. Changes in the expression of these genes are probably necessary to meet large requirements for NADPH to supply anabolic processes.

Interestingly, several UniTags corresponding to low abundant mRNAs for isoforms of photosynthetic proteins were found up-regulated between ~3 and 7-fold, including an oxygen-evolving protein, ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase activase, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO) large subunit, chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, ferredoxin (Fed)-NADP(+) reductase and a PSI-H precursor (Additional files 2 and 5). In contrast to the up-regulation of these low abundant UniTags, high abundant UniTags corresponding to similar genes did not change significantly within 30 min after 18:3-Glu elicitation (e.g., Tags-4671, -3383, -1319 and -1133: photosystem II subunits; Tag-10791: light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding protein; Tags-11115, -11779, and -10899: RuBisCO subunits; Additional file 1). Why these low abundant isoforms of photosynthetic genes are up-regulated after elicitation is unknown. One possibility is that they play some specific roles during defense responses. In previous studies, it has been observed that after lepidopteran larvae feeding or OS/FAC elicitation transcripts encoding for photosynthetic enzymes (e.g., PSII, RuBisCO, RuBisCO activase) in attacked N. attenuata leaves tend to be down-regulated, with the lowest expression after several hours [6]. Long-term reductions in the synthesis of these proteins have been proposed as a mechanism that attacked plants use to reinvest resources into other processes such as the synthesis of secondary defense pathways or tolerance [5]. Within 30 min of FAC elicitation there were no significant reductions in the copy number of high abundance UniTags corresponding to mRNAs for photosynthetic proteins, suggesting that repressive mechanisms of major leaf isoforms act later during the FAC-induced response.

Identification of two mediators of M. sexta-N. attenuatainteraction

The analysis of six candidate genes by VIGS identified two putative regulatory components of resistance mechanisms against lepidopteran larval feeding. Caterpillars that fed for two weeks on plants silenced in the expression of a putative lipid phosphate phosphatase (LLP) and a protein of unknown function (UnkA) gained ~2-fold and ~1.3-fold more mass, respectively, than larvae grown on EV control plants (Figure 4). Gain of mass by the larvae can be achieved by increased foliar consumption by stimulatory mechanisms, increased efficiency of food intake by increased food quality, or a combination both [51]. By which mechanism M. sexta larvae grew larger on these plants is at present unknown and the subject of future investigations using stable transformed plants silenced in the expression of LPP and UnkA by RNA interference (RNAi). LPPs are signal transduction components that utilize a variety of lipid phosphate substrates including phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol pyrophosphate (DGPP), lyso-PA, ceramide 1-phosphate, and sphingosine 1-phosphate and it has been proposed that their function is to attenuate the signaling functions of these molecules [52, 53].

Both LPP- and UnkA-silenced plants accumulated similar levels of JA and JA-Ile after wounding and FAC elicitation (Figure 5b), indicating that the effects of LLP and UnkA on M. sexta caterpillar performance was not the result of impaired JA biosynthesis. Together, these results suggested that mechanisms acting independently of JA biosynthesis must be affected in these plants to confer reduced resistance to M. sexta larval performance.

Conclusions

The analysis of FAC-elicited N. attenuata plants by combined SuperSAGE and NGS enabled the identification of multiple factors with potential regulatory activity during the M. sexta-N. attenuata interaction. Together with the use of VIGS to analyze candidate gene function we provided experimental evidence for the participation of two of these potential regulators in this interaction. The further characterization of genetically stable LLP- and UnkA-silenced plants in addition to the identification and characterization of novel regulators based on the SuperSAGE data will shed light on mechanisms used by plants to control a large reorganization of their metabolism and physiology to adjust defense and tolerance mechanisms with growth and reproduction.

Methods

Plant growth and treatments

Seeds of the 30th generation of an inbred line of N. attenuata plants were used as the wild-type genotype (WT) in all experiments. Plants were grown in the glasshouse at 26-30°C under 16 h of light. The second fully expanded leaf of rosette stage plants [54] were wounded by rolling a fabric pattern wheel three times on each side of the midvein and the wounds were immediately supplied with either 20 μL of 0.01% (v/v) Tween-20/water (solvent control) or 10 μL of synthetic N-linolenoyl-glutamic acid (18:3-Glu; 0.03 nmol/μL in 0.01% (v/v) Tween-20/water). Tissue was collected after 30 min of the treatments and frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent SuperSAGE analysis. For RT-qPCR experiments, leaf samples were harvested at different time points and frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA extraction. For VIGS experiments, plants were grown in climate chambers under 20°C, 16 h light (1000 μmol m-2s-1) and 65% humidity. Wounding and FAC elicitation was performed as described above. Larvae of M. sexta were hatched overnight at 28°C and one neonate was placed on each VIGS-silenced plant (n = 32). The larval mass was measured using a microbalance after 4, 7, 11 and 15 days of the start of the experiment.

RNA isolation and construction of SuperSAGE libraries

Total RNA was extracted by the phenol/chloroform-LiCl method as previously described [55] and the samples were cleaned using the Plant RNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following commercial instructions. poly(A)-RNA was purified from total RNA with the Oligotex mRNA mini Kit (Qiagen) according to commercial instructions. Subsequent steps for the construction of the SuperSAGE libraries and 454 sequencing were performed as previously described [21, 22]. To avoid methodological artifacts and to assure the detection of true transcript variants in the libraries, double NlaIII digestions were performed during library generation [22].

For each library, 26 bp long tags were extracted from the sequences using the GXP-Tag sorter software provided by GenXPro GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany). Library comparisons were carried out using the DiscoverySpace 4.01 software [Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, available at http://www.bcgsc.ca/discoveryspace]. Statistical analysis of differentially expressed tags was calculated according to [25]. Briefly, the probability distribution represented by equation (2) in [25] was used considering N1 and N2 as the total number of Tags in libraries 1 and 2, respectively, and x as the number of copies of a given Tag in library 1 and y as the number of copies of the same Tag in library 2. For fold-change (FC) calculations the libraries were normalized to 100,000 tags (Additional file 1) and the FC for each tag was calculated by dividing the number of tags in the normalized FAC library (F) by the number of tags in the normalized wounded (W) library (F vs. W). Tags absent in one of the libraries (tag count = 0) were set to 1 for calculation.

Sequence homology alignments

BLAST searches were carried out using the BLASTN algorithm with the 12,774 UniTag sequences against plant nucleotide databases in GenBank (Additional file 1), filtering by selecting the Nicotiana (taxid: 4085) and Viridiplantae (taxid:33090) taxa. Low complexity regions were rejected and gap costs were set to 5-2. The sequence annotation presented in Additional file 1 was restricted to hits that matched a minimum of 20 nt. UniTags that matched to < 20 nt were annotated as "no hit" in this Table. Multiple entries separated by "or" were included when the UniTag matched more than one hit with identical scores. UniTags that matched to the negative strand of the nucleotide sequence in the database carry the prefix "minus" in their respective gene identification (GI) column (Additional file 1). For protein and gene ontology (GO) annotations of differentially expressed UniTags (Additional file 2), their respective nucleotide sequences (Additional file 1) were used to perform BLASTX against the NCBI non-redundant protein database and hits with scores < 9.10-4 were used for GO determination based on the UniProtKB/TrEMBL protein databases.

Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (3'-RACE)

For cDNA synthesis, the 3'RACE System for Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) was used following the manufacturer's instructions and using UniTag- and gene-specific primers (Additional file 5). The PCR products were cloned into the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI) and sequenced using universal primers.

Real time quantitative PCR

To analyze the mRNA levels corresponding to the 27 selected UniTags (Table 3), rosette stage N.attenuata WT plants were either wounded or FAC elicited as described above. Leaves were harvested at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the treatments, total RNA extracted using the TRIzol® reagent (Invitrogen) and DNase-I treated (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). Five μg of total RNA were reverse transcribed using oligo(dT)18 and SuperScript reverse transcriptase II (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed with a Mx3005P Multiplex qPCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and the qPCR Core kit for SYBR® Green I (Eurogentec, Liege, Belgium). Relative quantification of mRNA levels was performed by the comparative ΔCt method using the eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (NaeEF1A) mRNA as an internal standard. The sequences of the primers used for qPCR are listed in Additional file 5. All the reactions were performed with three biological replicates.

Virus induced gene silencing

Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) based on the tobacco rattle virus (TRV) was used to transiently silence the genes listed in Table 4 in N. attenuata as previously described [56]. The accession numbers corresponding to the sequences are listed under "Accession numbers" below. Fragments of ~300 bp were amplified by PCR with the specific primers listed in Additional file 5. PCR products were digested with BamH1 and Sal1 and inserted into plasmid pTV00 in antisense orientation. Plants transformed with the empty vector (EV) were used as control. Plants were analyzed after 15 days of leaf infiltration. Efficiency of gene silencing was evaluated by qPCR after 1 h of 18:3-Glu elicitation using the primers listed in Additional file 5.

Phytohormone extraction and quantification

For analysis of JA and JA-Ile, 0.1 g of frozen leaf material was homogenized in FastPrep® tubes containing 1 g of FastPrep® matrix (Bio101, La Jolla, CA) and 1 mL ethylacetate spiked with 0.1 μg of [9,10-2H2]-dihydro-JA and [13C6]-JA-Ile. Homogenates were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C, the organic phase collected and plant material re-extracted with 0.5 mL ethylacetate. Organic phases were combined and the samples evaporated to dryness. The dry residue was reconstituted in 0.2 mL of 70% (v/v) methanol/water for analysis on a LC-(ESI)-MS/MS system as previously described [57].

Statistical analysis

Repeated-measurement and univariate ANOVA were calculated using SPSS v. 17.0.

Accession numbers

The SuperSAGE data was deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) public domain under the accession [GenBank: GSE18595]. The accession numbers for ESTs corresponding to the extended Unitag sequences are Tag-129: [GenBank: GT184388]; Tag-837: [GenBank: GT184389]; Tag-895: [GenBank: GT184390]; Tag-995: [GenBank: GT184391]; Tag-1439: [GenBank: GT184392]; Tag-1844: [GenBank: GT184393]; Tag-2067: [GenBank: GT184394]; Tag-2452: [GenBank: GT184395]; Tag-2815: [GenBank: GT184396]; Tag-2978: [GenBank: GT184397]; Tag-2990: [GenBank: GT184398]; Tag-4898: [GenBank: GT184399]; Tag-5283: [GenBank: GT184400]; Tag-5869: [GenBank: GT184401]; Tag-6032: [GenBank: GT184402]; Tag-6199: [GenBank: GT184403]; Tag-6205: [GenBank: GT184404]; Tag-6642: [GenBank: GT184405]; Tag-6938: [GenBank: GT184406]; Tag-7036: [GenBank: GT184407]; Tag-7795: [GenBank: GT184408]; Tag-9719: [GenBank: GT184409]; Tag-10039: [GenBank: GT184410]; Tag-11166: [GenBank: GT184411]; Tag-11559: [GenBank: GT184412]; Tag-12314: [GenBank: GT184413].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

PG is a fellow of the Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst (DAAD). We thank Dr. E. Grosse-Wilde for his help with batch-BLAST and M. Hartl for his help with statistical analysis. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; Project BO3260/3-1) and the Max Planck Society.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Molecular Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
(2)
GenXPro GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

References

  1. Baldwin IT, Morse L: Up in Smoke 2. Germination of Nicotiana attenuata in response to smoke-derived cues and nutrients in burned and unburned soils. J Chem Ecol. 1994, 20: 2373-2391. 10.1007/BF02033208.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldwin IT: Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 8113-8118. 10.1073/pnas.95.14.8113.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Halitschke R, Gase K, Hui DQ, Schmidt DD, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. Microarray analysis reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by fatty acid-amino acid conjugates. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131: 1894-1902. 10.1104/pp.102.018184.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Giri AP, Wunsche H, Mitra S, Zavala JA, Muck A, Svatos A, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VII. Changes in the plant's proteome. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142: 1621-1641. 10.1104/pp.106.088781.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Schwachtje J, Baldwin IT: Why does herbivore attack reconfigure primary metabolism?. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 845-851. 10.1104/pp.107.112490.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hermsmeier D, Schittko U, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 683-700. 10.1104/pp.125.2.683.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kessler A, Baldwin IT: Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J. 2004, 38: 639-649. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02076.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Hui DQ, Baldwin IT: Manipulation of endogenous trypsin proteinase inhibitor production in Nicotiana attenuata demonstrates their function as antiherbivore defenses. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134: 1181-1190. 10.1104/pp.103.035634.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT: SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006, 103: 12935-12940. 10.1073/pnas.0602316103.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Wu JQ, Hettenhausen C, Meldau S, Baldwin IT: Herbivory rapidly activates MAPK signaling in attacked and unattacked leaf regions but not between leaves of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Cell. 2007, 19: 1096-1122. 10.1105/tpc.106.049353.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Howe GA, Jander G: Plant Immunity to Insect Herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008, 59: 41-66. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092825.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Reymond P, Bodenhausen N, Van Poecke RMP, Krishnamurthy V, Dicke M, Farmer EE: A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell. 2004, 16: 3132-3147. 10.1105/tpc.104.026120.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Voelckel C, Baldwin IT: Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part II. Array-studies reveal the transience of herbivore-specific transcriptional imprints and a distinct imprint from stress combinations. Plant J. 2004, 38: 650-663. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02077.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Halitschke R, Schittko U, Pohnert G, Boland W, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid-amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore-specific plant responses. Plant Physiol. 2001, 125: 711-717. 10.1104/pp.125.2.711.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Seo S, Sano H, Ohashi Y: Jasmonate-based wound signal transduction requires activation of WIPK, a tobacco mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 289-298. 10.1105/tpc.11.2.289.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Skibbe M, Qu N, Galis I, Baldwin IT: Induced Plant Defenses in the Natural Environment: Nicotiana attenuata WRKY3 and WRKY6 Coordinate Responses to Herbivory. Plant Cell. 2008, 20: 1984-2000. 10.1105/tpc.108.058594.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Xie DX, Feys BF, James S, Nieto-Rostro M, Turner JG: An Arabidopsis gene required for jasmonate-regulated defense and fertility. Science. 1998, 280: 1091-1094. 10.1126/science.280.5366.1091.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chung HS, Koo AJK, Gao X, Jayanty S, Thines B, Jones AD, Howe GA: Regulation and function of Arabidopsis JASMONATE ZIM-domain genes in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 952-964. 10.1104/pp.107.115691.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Velculescu V, Zhang L, Vogelstein B, Kinzler K: Serial analysis of gene expression. Science. 1995, 270: 484-487. 10.1126/science.270.5235.484.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Matsumura H, Ito A, Saitoh H, Winter P, Kahl G, Reuter M, Kruger D, Terauchi R: SuperSAGE. Cell Microbiol. 2005, 7: 11-18. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00478.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Matsumura H, Reich S, Ito A, Saitoh H, Kamoun S, Winter P, Kahl G, Reuter M, Kruger DH, Terauchi R: Gene expression analysis of plant host-pathogen interactions by SuperSAGE. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100: 15718-15723. 10.1073/pnas.2536670100.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Molina C, Rotter B, Horres R, Udupa SM, Besser B, Bellarmino L, Baum M, Matsumura H, Terauchi R, Kahl G: SuperSAGE: the drought stress-responsive transcriptome of chickpea roots. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 553-581. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-553.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Matsumura H, Nirasawa S, Terauchi R: Transcript profiling in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Plant J. 1999, 20: 719-726. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00640.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Song SH, Qu HZ, Chen C, Hu SN, Yu J: Differential gene expression in an elite hybrid rice cultivar (Oryza sativa, L) and its parental lines based on SAGE data. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7: 49-64. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-49.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Audic S, Claverie J: The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Research. 1997, 7: 986-995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hui D, Iqbal J, Lehmann K, Gase K, Saluz HP, Baldwin IT: Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (lepidoptera, sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata: V. microarray analysis and further characterization of large-scale changes in herbivore-induced mRNAs. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131: 1877-1893. 10.1104/pp.102.018176.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Hara K, Yagi M, Kusano T, Sano H: Rapid systemic accumulation of transcripts encoding a tobacco WRKY transcription factor upon wounding. Mol Gen Genet. 2000, 263: 30-37. 10.1007/PL00008673.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Hirayama T, Oka A: Novel protein kinase of Arabidopsis thaliana (APK1) that phosphorylates tyrosine, serine and threonine. Plant Mol Biol. 1992, 20: 653-662. 10.1007/BF00046450.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Eveland AL, McCarty DR, Koch KE: Transcript profiling by 3'-untranslated region sequencing resolves expression of gene families. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146: 32-44. 10.1104/pp.107.108597.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Eulgem T, Rushton PJ, Robatzek S, Somssich IE: The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5: 199-205. 10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01600-9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim CY, Zhang SQ: Activation of a mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade induces WRKY family of transcription factors and defense genes in tobacco. Plant J. 2004, 38: 142-151. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02033.x.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rushton PJ, Torres JT, Parniske M, Wernert P, Hahlbrock K, Somssich IE: Interaction of elicitor-induced DNA-binding proteins with elicitor response elements in the promoters of parsley PR1 genes. EMBO J. 1996, 15: 5690-5700.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Pré M, Atallah M, Champion A, De Vos M, Pieterse CMJ, Memelink J: The AP2/ERF domain transcription factor ORA59 integrates jasmonic acid and ethylene signals in plant defense. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147: 1347-1357. 10.1104/pp.108.117523.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Liang W, Li C, Liu F, Jiang H, Li S, Sun J, Wu X, Li C: The Arabidopsis homologs of CCR4-associated factor 1 show mRNA deadenylation activity and play a role in plant defence responses. Cell Res. 2009, 19: 307-316. 10.1038/cr.2008.317.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Anderson CM, Wagner TA, Perret M, He ZH, He D, Kohorn BD: WAKs: cell wall-associated kinases linking the cytoplasm to the extracellular matrix. Plant Mol Biol. 2001, 47: 197-206. 10.1023/A:1010691701578.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Wagner TA, Kohorn BD: Wall-associated kinases are expressed throughout plant development and are required for cell expansion. Plant Cell. 2001, 13: 303-318. 10.1105/tpc.13.2.303.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Li H, Zhou SY, Zhao WS, Su SC, Peng YL: A novel wall-associated receptor-like protein kinase gene, OsWAK1, plays important roles in rice blast disease resistance. Plant Mol Biol. 2009, 69: 337-346. 10.1007/s11103-008-9430-5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Ellis C, Karafyllidis I, Wasternack C, Turner JG: The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 1557-1566. 10.1105/tpc.002022.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Li J, Nam KH: Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling by a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. Science. 2002, 295: 1299-1301.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Krishna P: Brassinosteroid-Mediated Stress Responses. J Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 22: 289-297. 10.1007/s00344-003-0058-z.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Schäfer S, Schmülling T: The CRK1 receptor-like kinase gene of tobacco is negatively regulated by cytokinin. Plant Mol Biol. 2002, 50: 155-166. 10.1023/A:1016087908746.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Schweighofer A, Kazanaviciute V, Scheikl E, Teige M, Doczi R, Hirt H, Schwanninger M, Kant M, Schuurink R, Mauch F: The PP2C-type phosphatase AP2C1, which negatively regulates MPK4 and MPK6, modulates innate immunity, jasmonic acid, and ethylene levels in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007, 19: 2213-2224. 10.1105/tpc.106.049585.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. De Wit P: Molecular characterization of gene-for-gene systems in plant-fungus interactions and the application of avirulence genes in control of plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1992, 30: 391-418. 10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.002135.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Romeis T, Piedras P, Zhang S, Klessig DF, Hirt H, Jones JDG: Rapid Avr 9-and Cf-9-Dependent Activation of MAP Kinases in Tobacco Cell Cultures and Leaves Convergence of Resistance Gene, Elicitor, Wound, and Salicylate Responses. Plant Cell. 1999, 11: 273-288. 10.1105/tpc.11.2.273.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Cai D, Kleine M, Kifle S, Harloff HJ, Sandal NN, Marcker KA, Klein-Lankhorst RM, Salentijn EMJ, Lange W, Stiekema WJ: Positional cloning of a gene for nematode resistance in sugar beet. Science. 1997, 275: 832-834. 10.1126/science.275.5301.832.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Thurau T, Kifle S, Jung C, Cai D: The promoter of the nematode resistance gene Hs1 pro 1 activates a nematode-responsive and feeding site-specific gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2003, 52: 643-660. 10.1023/A:1024887516581.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Tör M, Gordon P, Cuzick A, Eulgem T, Sinapidou E, Mert-Türk F, Can C, Dangl JL, Holub EB: Arabidopsis SGT1b is required for defense signaling conferred by several downy mildew resistance genes. Plant Cell. 2002, 14: 993-1003. 10.1105/tpc.001123.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Artus NN, Edwards GE: Properties of leaf NAD-malic enzyme from the inducible crassulacean acid metabolism species Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Cell Physiol. 1985, 26: 341-350.Google Scholar
  49. Schaaf J, Walter MH, Hess D: Primary metabolism in plant defense (regulation of a bean malic enzyme gene promoter in transgenic tobacco by developmental and environmental cues). Plant Physiol. 1995, 108: 949-960.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Casati P, Drincovich MF, Edwards GE, Andreo CS: Malate metabolism by NADP-malic enzyme in plant defense. Photosynth Res. 1999, 61: 99-105. 10.1023/A:1006209003096.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Waldbauer GP: The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology. Edited by: Beament JWL. London, Academic Press Inc; 1965:229-282.Google Scholar
  52. Pierrugues O, Brutesco C, Oshiro J, Gouy M, Deveaux Y, Carman GM, Thuriaux P, Kazmaier M: Lipid Phosphate Phosphatases in Arabidopsis: Regulation of the AtLPP1 gene in response to stress. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276: 20300-20308. 10.1074/jbc.M009726200.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee S, Suh S, Kim S, Crain R, Kwak JM, Nam HG, Lee Y: Systemic elevation of phosphatidic acid and lysophospholipid levels in wounded plants. Plant J. 1997, 12: 547-556. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.00547.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Dam NM, Horn M, Mares M, Baldwin IT: Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuata. J Chem Ecol. 2001, 27: 547-568. 10.1023/A:1010341022761.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Bonaventure G, Ohlrogge JB: Differential regulation of mRNA levels of acyl carrier protein isoforms in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002, 128: 223-235. 10.1104/pp.010397.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Saedler R, Baldwin IT: Virus-induced gene silencing of jasmonate-induced direct defences, nicotine and trypsin proteinase-inhibitors in Nicotiana attenuata. J Exp Bot. 2004, 55: 151-157. 10.1093/jxb/erh004.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Kallenbach M, Alagna F, Baldwin IT, Bonaventure G: Nicotiana attenuata SIPK, WIPK, NPR1 and fatty acid-amino acid conjugates participate in the induction of JA biosynthesis by affecting early enzymatic steps in the pathway. Plant Physiol. 2010, PubMed PMID: 19897603Google Scholar

Copyright

© Gilardoni et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us