Skip to main content
Download PDF

Fatty acid and nutrient profiles, diosgenin and trigonelline contents, mineral composition, and antioxidant activity of the seed of some Iranian Trigonella L. species

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 669 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Fenugreeks (Trigonella L. spp.), belonging to the legume family (Fabaceae), are well-known multipurpose crops that their materials are currently received much attention in the pharmaceutical and food industries for the production of healthy and functional foods all over the world. Iran is one of the main diversity origins of this valuable plant. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to explore vitamins, minerals, and fatty acids profile, proximate composition, content of diosgenin, trigonelline, phenolic acids, total carotenoids, saponins, phenols, flavonoids, and tannins, mucilage and bitterness value, and antioxidant activity of the seed of thirty populations belonging to the ten different Iranian Trigonella species.

Results

We accordingly identified notable differences in the nutrient and bioactive compounds of each population. The highest content (mg/100 g DW) of ascorbic acid (18.67 ± 0.85‒22.48 ± 0.60) and α–tocopherol (31.61 ± 0.15‒38.78 ± 0.67) were found in the populations of T. filipes and T. coerulescens, respectively. Maximum content of catechin was found in the populations of T. teheranica (52.67 ± 0.05‒63.50 ± 0.72 mg/l). Linoleic acid (> 39.11% ± 0.61%) and linolenic acid (> 48.78 ± 0.39%) were the main polyunsaturated fatty acids, with the majority in the populations of T. stellata (54.81 ± 1.39‒63.46 ± 1.21%). The populations of T. stellata were also rich in trigonelline (4.95 ± 0.03‒7.66 ± 0.16 mg/g DW) and diosgenin (9.06 ± 0.06‒11.03 ± 0.17 mg/g DW).

Conclusions

The obtained data provides baseline information to expand the inventory of wild and cultivated Iranian Trigonella species for further exploitation of rich chemotypes in the new foods and specific applications.

Peer Review reports

Background

Throughout history, human societies have developed a wide variety of dietary patterns from available plants and animals. Today, the industrialized countries of the world also recommend diets that are mainly based on plant sources. Plant-based foods are important sources of energy, protein, vitamins, minerals, and fiber in the human diet [1, 2].

In addition to increase the production of plant-based foods, quality is also a focus in improving food products. So, not only the volume of food but also its ingredients affect human health [3]. Therefore, increasing the production of crops and introducing new plant sources with high nutritional value is the most important issue in agriculture that pays attention by all countries [4].

The recent development of functional foods and pharmaceutical products based on medicinal and food plants rich in natural antioxidants such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and tannins [5], has reduced the use of synthetic drugs. Many efforts have been made to find natural antioxidants from plant sources so far. This process has been done for many agricultural crops including fruits, edible seeds, vegetables, and cereals since, a long time ago by selection and breeding of species, cultivars, wild populations, accessions, and other vegetation based on the nutritional, phytochemical, and mineral characteristics [6].

The nutritional value of many agricultural crops including wheat, corn, potato, beet, and canola [3], has been increased by breeding programs. Improving nutritional and phytochemical value and obtaining quality products have also been of great interest [7,8,9,10]. Protein, carbohydrates, vitamins, unsaturated fats, antioxidant compounds, and crude fiber are among the most important nutritional factors considered when selecting and introducing plant foods.

More than 820 million people suffer from insufficient food and protein deficiency. Compared to other crops, including cereals, legumes offer a high protein level in their biomass and underground organs [11]. The detrimental environmental impact of meat production, ethical concerns regarding animal rights, and health considerations have led to a growing interest in the production of legume-based plant foods as a protein source for human consumption [12]. Additionally, the ability of legumes to fix atmospheric nitrogen makes their cultivation a sustainable option, reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers, production costs, and greenhouse gas emissions [13].

According to the Legume Phylogeny Working Group [14], 400,000 plant species are approximately growing on the earth, of which 5% are members of the Fabaceae family. These plants are known as legumes by producing protein-rich seeds. This family includes 770 genera and approximately 20,000 species distributed worldwide [14]. Beans (Vicia faba L.), peas (Pisum sativum L.), mung bean (Vigna radiata L.), soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), green bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), lupine (Lupinus spp.), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), clover (Trifolium spp.) and fenugreeks (Trigonella L. spp.) are the major legume crops that are widely cultivated across the world [15].

Among 70 Trigonella species that are distributed throughout the world, T. arabica Delile, T. caerulea (L.) Ser., T. corniculata Sibth. & Sm., T. stellata Forssk., and T. foenum-graecum L. are the most important species [16]. Twenty Trigonella species are reported in the flora of Iran [17]. Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fenugreek) is a well-known species that is a native plant found in the parts of Iran to the North of India and grows in most parts of the world including Ethiopia, Canada, Oman, and Turkey [18, 19]. The plant is one of the most important medicinal plants and vegetables that are widely cultivated in the world for food purposes.

Fenugreek seeds with a golden yellow color, hard and tetrahedral structure are common and valuable parts of the plant that are traditionally used in the treatment of cough and cold and antipyretic [11]. Cornbread mixed with a small amount of fenugreek (3%) is known as the main food in Egypt [20]. In Italian recipes, fenugreek seeds are also used to flavor pizza and special pasta [21]. The biological and medicinal effects of fenugreek, including the impacts of reducing fat, sugar and blood pressure, protecting the liver and stomach, as well as antioxidant activity, are mostly attributed to the variety of its bioactive chemical compounds. The plant is also a raw material for making various hormonal and therapeutic drugs [22, 23].

Various natural compounds including flavonoids, alkaloids (i.e. trigonelline), steroidal saponins (i.e. diosgenin), tannins, and phenolics in the plant seeds have also been reported [19, 23,24,25,26]. Fenugreek seeds contain high amounts of important nutrients, vitamins, mucilage, protein and fat [27,28,29].

Research on the conservation of genetic resources, plant production, and utilization, including commercial cultivation, as well as the analysis of food and natural compounds for various industrial applications, is crucial. In this context, the active ingredients and nutritional components of T. foenum-graecum from Iran, India, Tunisia, Germany, Algeria, and Malaysia have been extensively investigated [26, 28, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Based on previous reports, wild species of Trigonella from Turkey have been found to possess high nutritional value and contain essential minerals and natural compounds [37, 38]. However, information on other Trigonella species is currently limited. In addition, quantitative and qualitative assessment of nutritional and phytochemical traits of Iranian Trigonella species has not been investigated so far.

Given the nutritional and medicinal significance of fenugreek, the purpose of the present study was to evaluate the fatty acid and nutrient profiles, diosgenin and trigonelline contents, mineral composition, and antioxidant activity of ten Iranian Trigonella species under uniform cultivation conditions. We hypothesized that wild Trigonella species would exhibit higher levels of these compounds. The findings serve as a foundational step in identifying superior species for potential utilization in the food and pharmaceutical industries.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

All chemicals used in this research were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (Buchs, Switzerland), Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), and Thermo Fisher, USA.

Plant materials and cultivation site

Seeds of thirty populations of the ten Trigonella species were obtained from the Iranian Biological Resource Center (IBRC), collected from different parts of Iran (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1), with an altitude ranging from –28 to 2500 m. The seeds were planted in the field at the Horticultural Research Station at University of Tehran, Mohammadshahr, Karaj, Iran (N35° 46′, E50° 55′ at an altitude of 1320 m) from May to September 2021. The experiment was completely randomized block design (CRBD) as one of the standard designs with three replicates. This design was used due to one-way changes in the experimental material and providing more accurate results. The seeds of thirty wild populations of ten Iranian Trigonella species (each species includes three populations) were planted using 0.5 × 1 m plots with three replicates.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution map of the thirty wild populations of ten Trigonella species collected across Iran. T. astroides1 (TAS1, Soltanabad), T. astroides2 (TAS2, Bavi), T. astroides3 (TAS3, Mehran), T. calliceras1 (TCL1, Astara), T. calliceras2 (TCL2, Bandar Anzali), T. calliceras3 (TCL3, Behshahr), T. coerulescens1 (TCO1, Meshginshahr), T. coerulescens2 (TCO2, Tabriz), T. coerulescens3 (TCO3, Khoy), T. elliptica1 (TEP1, Mianeh), T. elliptica2 (TEP2, Kermanshah), T. elliptica3 (TEP3, Mariwan), T. filipes1 (TFP1, Salehabad), T. filipes2 (TFP2, Qasr e Shirin), T. filipes3 (TFP3, Saravand), T. foenum-graecum1 (TFG1, Minab), T. foenum-graecum2 (TFG2, Ardestan), T. foenum-graecum3 (TFG3, Mashhad), T. spruneriana1 (TSP1, Pataveh), T. spruneriana2 (TSP2, Shiraz), T. spruneriana3 (TSP3, Tarom), T. stellata1 (TST1, Qasregand), T. stellata2 (TST2, Borazjan), T. stellata3 (TST3, Kahnuj), T. strangulata1 (TSG1, Khorramabad), T. strangulata2 (TSG2, Ghorveh), T. strangulata3 (TSG3, Urmia), T. teheranica1 (TTH1, Karaj), T. teheranica2 (TTH2, Chalus), and T. teheranica3 (TTH3, Oushan)

Full size image

Due to the correct decision regarding soil amendment, fertilization management, leaching control, and energy saving, the soil physicochemical characteristics of the field were analyzed in the water and soil research laboratory at University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, according to the standard methods. For instance, the organic carbon was determined according to the Walkley–Black method [39]. The pH of the soil extract was assessed by a potentiometric titrator (Orion Star T940, Thermo Scientific, USA). The soil texture and salinity were determined using the soil triangle and the electrical conductivity (MW301 PRO, Milwaukee, USA), respectively. Lime, phosphorus, and potassium were measured by calcium bicarbonate, colorimetrically, and sodium tetraphenyl boron methods, respectively. The soil of the field had a salinity of 0.7 ds/m, pH of 7.6, organic matter of 0.8%, lime of 5.6%, phosphorus of 21 mg/kg, and potassium of 340 mg/kg. The texture of the soil was loamy.

The weeds were controlled by hand twice, and no herbicide and fertilization were used. During the growth period, supplementary irrigation (once a week) was applied to the experimental areas to provide a water supply equivalent to an average crop growing season for the region.

The seeds were collected in the near-dry, mature state in September 2021, completely dried in the shade, and were used for the analysis. The voucher specimens have been deposited for all studied samples in Herbarium of College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (Herbarium Instituti Agronomici Keredjensis) (HIAK), University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran (Supplementary Table 1).

Determination of vitamins

In the present study, the content of different vitamins including β-carotene, B group (B1, B2, B3, and B6), C, and E (α–tocopherol) was measured according to the following methods. β-Carotene was determined as described previously by Negi and Roy [40]. Initially, dried powdered seed sample was (2 g) mixed with acetone (10 ml), and petroleum ether (2 ml). The petroleum ether phase was passed through sodium sulfate (20 ml). Then, the extract was filtered through a column containing magnesium oxide and diatomaceous 1: 1 (w/w). Absorbance was taken at 440 nm using a spectrophotometer (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc., USA).

All B vitamins group were calculated by Akintimehin et al. [41] and Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) [42], methods with a couple modifications. For the measurement of thiamin (vitamin B1), dried powdered seed sample (1 g) was initially added to 100 ml hydrochloric acid (0.1 N) solution and then centrifuged (Centrifuge Rotanta 460r, Hettich, Germany) at 4400 rpm for 5 min. Respectively, 5 ml ethanol (96%), potassium ferricyanide (III) solution (1% v/v), and 10 ml toluene (99.5%) were added to the solution. To determine vitamin riboflavin (vitamin B2) content, dried powdered seed sample (1 g) was mixed with 100 ml acetic acid (glacial)–water solution (50:50 v/v). The solution was then shaken and left for 30 min in a water bath at 100 °C. The solution was filtered with Whatman filter paper No. 1. Niacin (vitamin B3) was calculated with adding dried powdered seed sample (1 g) of each sample to 5 ml hydrochloric acid (5 N), 5 ml dichloromethane, and 90 ml deionized water. The mixture was boiled for 30 min at 100 ͦ C. For evaluation of pyridoxine (vitamin B3), dried powdered seed sample (1 g) was mixed with 10 ml hydrochloric acid (0.1 N) and 600 μl 4-deoxypyridoxine (100 μg/ml). The pH was adjusted to 4.5, and 1 ml takadiastase (10% w/v) was added. Then, 400 μl trichloroacetic acid (50% w/v) was added and heated for 5 min at 100 °C. The volume was made up to 20 ml with water.

The analysis for each sample was conducted in triplicate. The absorbance of thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and pyridoxine were measured at wavelengths of 530, 461, 410, and 290 nm, respectively, by the spectrophotometer. The content of B vitamins group was determined as follows: Vitamin (μg/100g DW) = [(Absorbance of sample)/(Absorbance of standard) × (Dry weight of sample (μg) /(Dry weight of sample (g)] × 100.

The extraction and analysis of vitamin C was made as previously described by Law et al. [43]. Briefly, dried powdered seed sample (500 mg) was mixed with trichloroacetic acid (10% w/v) and then, 10 ml sodium hydroxide was added. To 200 μl of supernatant, 900 μ1 sodium phosphate monobasic buffer (200 mM, pH 7.4), and 200 μl DL-dithiothreitol (1.5 mM) were added. DL-Dithiothreitol was removed by adding 200 μl n-ethylmaleimide (0.5% w/v). To the reaction mixture, 1 ml trichloroacetic acid (10% w/v), 1 ml phosphoric acid (45% v/v), 1 ml 2,2'-bipyridyl (65 mM) in 70% (v/v) ethanol, and 500 μl iron (III) chloride (3% w/v) were added. The absorbance was read at 265 nm using a spectrophotometer (Bio-Tek Instruments, Inc., USA). Ascorbic acid (10–100 μg) was used as the standard.

α-Tocopherol content was determined according to the procedure detailed by Pant et al. [28]. In summary, 100 mg of seed powder was mixed with 2 ml petroleum ether and ethanol (1.6:2 v/v) and homogenized. The extract was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min for 20 min. The supernatant was separated, and 40 μl of 2,2'-bipyridyl (2%, dissolved in ethanol) was added to 200 μl of the extract. The mixture was diluted with 800 µl of distilled water. Absorbance was read at 290 nm using a spectrophotometer. α-Tocopherol (10–50 μg/ml) was used as a standard.

Proximate composition analysis

The samples were analyzed for ash, fat, protein, and fiber by the AOAC method [44]. Ash content was measured by heating the samples in a muffle oven (KSL-500X-71, MTI corporation, USA). The Soxhlet (SOX406, HANON Systems, South Korea) method was used for fat determination. Protein was estimated by the micro-Kjeldahl (K1100, HANON Systems, South Korea) method. Protein content was calculated by multiplying nitrogen content by a factor of 6.25. Crude fiber was obtained after sample digestion with boiling diluted acid and alkali. Carbohydrate content was determined by subtracting the sum of the weights of ash, fat, protein, and fiber from the total dry matter. Energy value was computed as follows: energy value (kcal/100 g) = 9 × (g of fat) + 4 × (g of protein + g of carbohydrates) [45].

Determination of mineral composition

The concentrations of elements were determined after digestion [46], with pure nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide at 140 °C for 3 h and pressure dissolution by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry ICP-MS Agilent 7500A series (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The operating parameters of the ICP-MS instrument are as follows: Rf power: 1100 w, Sampling depth: 2.5 mm, Nebulizes flow rate: 1.06 l/min., Plasma gas flow rate: 15 l/min., Auxiliary gas flow: 1.2 l/min., Helium flow rate: 5.0 ml/min., Fog chamber temperature: 2 °C, Sampling rate: 0.5 l/min., Signal measurement: Peak Hopping. Standard reference materials from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST; Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were used to validate the analytical procedure.

Extraction and determination of mucilage

Evaluation of mucilage was carried out as described by Verma et al. [32] and Singer et al. [47]. The mixture of seed and distilled water (1:40 w/v) was homogenized. Ethanol 96% (1:1 v/v) was used for mucilage deposition due to its effectiveness in dissolving alcohol-soluble components. The extracts were frozen and dried under vacuum for 48 h in a lyophilizer (CHRiST, alpha 1–2 Id plus, Germany). One gram of mucilage was added to 25 ml of distilled water in a cylinder. The swelling index was determined by measuring the volume occupied by mucilage. The isolated mucilage was characterized for organoleptic properties such as color and texture.

Phytochemical analysis

Fatty acid analysis

According to the AOAC procedures (AOAC 920.39), oil content was determined by Soxhlet extraction using n-hexane for 6 h. The seed oil compositions were measured using fatty acid methyl esters according to Milinsk et al. [48] with boron trifluoride due to an increase in volatility, thermal stability, and improvement of peak shape and separation behavior. The n-hexane extract was measured by GC–FID (Agilent Technologies, 7890A, USA). The GC–MS was installed with a universal column (HP5; 30 m 9 0.325 mm 9 0.25 lm; Agilent J&W GC column) with an autosampler. Helium was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min with a split ratio of 1:100. The initial column temperature was maintained at 150 °C for 3 min and then increased to 240 °C at 3 °C/min with a 20 min hold time. Each sample was analyzed in three technical replicates. Determination and identification of fatty acids were used in the reference samples received from the NU-CHEK-PREP company (Code: GLC-462) (USA).

Extraction and HPLC‒PDA determination of diosgenin, trigonelline, and phenolic compounds

Sample preparation for extraction of diosgenin was performed followed by Herrera et al. method [49]. Briefly, samples were extracted by sonication with methanol 1:10 (w/v) because of its polarity (Elma, S120H, Germany) for 30 min at 25 °C. Extracts centrifuged at 4,400 rpm for 10 min. Supernatants were defatted by the addition of the same volume of n-hexane. The methanolic phase was concentrated in a rotary (Heidolph Instruments GmbH, Schwabach Germany) at 35 °C. An equal volume of water-saturated n-butanol was added to the dry extract (50 mg/ml) and centrifuged at 4,400 for 10 min. The supernatant evaporated in a rotary at 35 °C. The dried extract was solved in 3 ml acetonitrile, and then filtered (0.22 μm).

Extraction of trigonelline was based on Campa et al. [50] with minor modifications. About 50 mg of the seed mixed with 25 ml distilled water and 50 mg of magnesium oxide. The mixture was placed in an autoclave at 105 °C for 20 min. The extract was filtered through a filter before analysis.

Phenolic compound extraction was carried out as described previously with modifications [33]. Initially, dried powdered seed sample (100 mg) was ultrasonically extracted with 10 ml methanol-DMSO (50:50 v/v,) for 30 min and centrifuged at 4,400 rpm for 5 min. The supernatants were dried in a rotary and dissolved in methanol with a final concentration of 1 ml.

The compounds analysis was carried out using a high-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array (HPLC–PDA), with a Waters 2695 separations module equipped with a C8 column (50 × 2 mm, 3 μm) and a UV detector (Waters 2487). Water and acetonitrile (10:90 v/v) were used as mobile phases for diosgenin and trigonelline. The mobile phase for phenolic compounds was methanol with 1% formic acid. The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min. The detection was achieved using UV detector calibration curves drawn with regular diosgenin and trigonelline solutions at 210 and 263 nm, respectively.

Quantification of total carotenoids, saponins, and tannins

Total carotenoid content was measured according to Pant et al. [28]. To determine carotenoid level, dried powdered seed sample (100 mg) was mixed with 5 ml acetone (80%) due to its fat solubility. The extract was partitioned with diethyl ether (5 ml). The dry extract was dissolved in ethanol (5 ml) and treated with potassium hydroxide (KOH) (60%). The extract was boiled for 10 min and then partitioned with diethyl ether. The dry extract was dissolved in 5 ml ethanol. The absorbance was calculated at wavelengths of 470 nm, using a spectrophotometer (Shimadzu double beam UV–Visible spectrophotometer-1800, Japan).

Total saponin content in fenugreek seed was determined following the methods of Akbari et al. [26], but slightly modified. Concisely, each dried powdered seed sample (500 mg) was extracted with 5 ml ethanol (64%), using a microwave-assisted extraction method (Milestone ETHOS UP, Italy) under 3 min irradiation time, 572 W microwave power. Then, 50 μl of the extract was mixed with 200 ml methanol, 100 μl vanillin/ethanol (10:90 w/v), and 300 μl sulfuric acid (70%). Absorbance was recorded at 544 using a spectrophotometer. Diosgenin (100‒500 mg/ml) was used as standard. Total saponin content was determined as follows: [the volume of extraction solvent (ml) × the concentration measured from diosgenin standard curve (mg/ml)]/the dry weight of the sample (g).

Total tannin content was determined according to Abdouli et al. [30, 31] with minor modifications. The seed (100 mg) was mixed with 5 ml diethyl ether containing 1% acetic acid. The mixture was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the supernatant was removed. Re-extraction was carried out with 5 ml of acetone (70%) and shocking for 60 min.

Total tannin was determined as the difference in total phenol content (TPC) based on the Folin-Ciocalteu method before and after the treatment with polyethylene glycol.

Measurement of bitterness value

The bitterness value was performed as described previously [31, 51]. The stock solution of quinine hydrochloride contains 0.01 mg/ml. One g of plant material was extracted with 1000 ml of drinking water. The bitterness value was measured as follows formula [51]: Bitterness Value (unit/g) = [2000 × Quantity of quinine hydrochloride with the lowest bitter concentration (mg)]/[Concentration of the stock solution (mg/ml) × volume of stock solution with the lowest bitter concentration (ml)].

Determination of total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC)

Total phenolic content (TPC) was measured according to the procedure detailed by Singleton et al. [52], with Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. The TFC was determined according to the method of Chang et al. [53] with aluminium chloride. Absorbance was taken at 765 nm and 510 nm for TPC and TFC, respectively.

Antioxidant activity analysis

DPPH scavenging activity

Antioxidant activity by the DPPH method was evaluated according to the methods described by Akhlaghi and Najafpour-Darzi [54]. The reduction of the DPPH radical was measured in a spectrophotometer at 515 nm. Butylated hydroxytol (BHT) was used as the control. The IC50 values were calculated as the following equation: DPPH scavenging effect (%) = (Abs control ‒ Abs sample/Abs control) × 100. The IC50 value is defined as the concentration of substrate required to bring 50% scavenging activity of the DPPH radicals.

Ferric reducing power

The methodology described by Benzie and Strain [55]. Absorbance was read at 593 nm by using a spectrophotometer. Different concentrations of iron sulfate (FeSO4 solution) were used for the calibration curve. The standard curve was constructed using FeSO4 solution (0.5–10 mg/ml).

Data analysis

All the assays in the study were performed in triplicate. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). One-way analysis of variance was used to test for significant differences. A post-hoc test was run using Duncan’s test at p < 0.05. All the experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the means and standard deviations were calculated in all tests. The cluster analysis was performed using Euclidean distance coefficient by Ward’s method. The Origin Lab software version 2021 was applied to draw the heat map and bi-plot.

Results and discussion

Vitamin content

The results showed that there is a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the species and populations in terms of vitamin content. The level of vitamins (β-carotene, B group, C, and α–tocopherol) in the studied species and populations are shown in Fig. 2. The content of β-carotene was ranged from 8.19 ± 0.09 to 39.81 ± 1.90 μg/g DW. Among the studied seed samples, TTH3 and TCl3 had the highest and lowest β-carotene content, respectively. Thiamine content was found in the range of 32.64 ± 0.43 to 245.21 ± 3.15 μg/g DW. TFP1, TFP2, TFP3, TST1, TST2, TST3, and TAS2 had the highest content, while the lowest content was observed in TCO1, TCO2, TCO3, TSP1, TSP2, and TSP3. Riboflavin content varied from 231.11 ± 1.33 to 372.81 ± 1.98 μg/g DW. Among B group vitamins, niacin had the highest level that ranged from 972.42 ± 2.93 to 1987.54 ± 11.68 μg/g DW in the studied samples. TST1 contained the highest niacin level in the seeds. The lowest niacin content was observed in TSP2. Pyridoxine was ranged from 237.85 ± 3.25 to 645.64 ± 2.18 μg/g DW. Among the measured vitamins of the seed, α-tocopherol (vitamin E) and ascorbic acid (vitamin C) had the highest levels. α-Tocopherol content was ranged from 12.16 ± 0.10 to 38.78 ± 0.67 mg/100 g DW. The highest and lowest level of α-tocopherol belonged to the seeds of TCO3 and TCL2, respectively. The highest content of vitamin C was measured in TFP1, TFP2, and TFP3 (18.67 ± 0.85‒22.48 ± 0.60 mg/100 g DW), while the lowest level was observed in TCO1 (5.53 ± 0.05 mg/100 g DW).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Histogram of vitamin content for thirty populations of ten Trigonella species

Full size image

Pant et al. [28] reported the content of α-tocopherol in the seeds of 25 genotypes of T. foenum-graecum from India in the range of 1 to 43 mg/100 g. In another study, α-tocopherol content of seed oil of T. strangulata Boiss. from Turkey was reported as 188.77 mg/100 g oil [37]. In the present study, α-tocopherol content for three populations of T. strangulata was found to be 12.50 ± 0.23 and 13.08 ± 0.64 mg/100 g DW. It has been reported that the seeds of T. foenum-graecum contain 96 μg/100 g β-carotene, 43 mg/100 g ascorbic acid, 340 μg/100 g thiamine, 290 μg/100 g riboflavin, and 1.1 mg/100 g niacin [29, 56] which is in agreement with our obtained results.

Out of thirteen vitamins that are necessary for the body, eight of them are in B group vitamins, which shows their significant role in human health and nutrition. In addition, fenugreek seeds contain a substantial amount of vitamins thiamine, riboflavin, and niacin [57]. Due to the lack of vitamins in all age groups, the need for new food sources has recently increased. Therefore, increasing the vitamin content in new foods, bread fortification with vitamin supplements, and enrichment of animal diets have attracted the attention of many countries such as the United States and Canada [58, 59]. In the present study, populations of T. stellata, T. filipes Boiss., T. elliptica Boiss., and T. foenum-graecum are introduced as adequate species of fenugreeks rich in group B vitamins, ascorbic acid, and α-tocopherol that can be interestingly considered for this purpose.

Proximate composition

A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the Iranian Trigonella species and their populations regarding proximate composition. Proximate composition and energy content are shown in Fig. 3. Seed moisture content varied from 4.10 ± 0.07% in TSP2 to 8.43 ± 0.56% in TCO3. The highest amount of ash was measured in TST1 (3.79 ± 0.17%). A wide difference in the amount of crude fiber was also observed in the studied samples (1.97 ± 0.10‒10.86 ± 0.44%). The fat content ranged from 4.12 ± 0.32% to 10.35 ± 0.77%. The highest fat content belonged to the TEP3 and TCO3.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Histogram of proximate composition for thirty populations of ten Trigonella species

Full size image

Carbohydrate content was obtained in the range of 44.25 ± 0.75% to 53.24 ± 1.18%. The highest amount of protein was found in TCL2 (42.17 ± 0.74%), followed by TFG2 (35.20 ± 0.28%), and TTH1 (34.73 ± 0.31%). The highest and lowest amount of energy (kcal/100 g) was obtained in TFP2 (395.57% ± 3.06%) and TAS1 (349.85% ± 1.34%), respectively.

Although it has been reported the seeds of the cultivated fenugreek contain a significant amount of fat and protein, interestingly in the present study, some studied wild populations contained more which increases its nutritional value.

In previous studies, the carbohydrate content of the plant seeds had the highest percentage among proximate composition. Similar values of moisture, ash, crude fiber, and carbohydrates have also been reported in the seeds of T. foenum-graecum from Egypt and Iran [60, 61]. The fat content in seeds of T. foenum-graecum originating from four different countries was previously reported as 5.06 ± 0.61% to 6.33 ± 0.48% [62]. A wide range of protein content (4.4 to 28%) has been reported in fenugreek seeds so far [56, 63]. The results showed that the studied fenugreeks are a potential source of protein, fat, and carbohydrates that can be interestingly used in the food industries. In addition, it has been claimed that the proteins in fenugreeks have better quality compared to other vegetable proteins [23]. In a study, by changing the processing methods of fenugreek seeds, including sprouting and roasting, higher amounts of protein content were obtained, which can be useful for producing coffee-like drinks as well as microgreens with high protein content [64].

The increase in protein content in the germinated plant seeds can be due to the reduction of nitrate to protein or ammonium and enzymatic synthesis of protein [65, 66]. Optimization of protein extraction from fenugreek seeds resulted higher amounts than commercial soybean protein [61]. Data on the proximate composition of Trigonella wild species are not available in the literature. Values of protein and carbohydrate, fat, and crude fiber content in the present study widely varied among T. foenum-graecum in agreement with the variability of data reported. However, values of the protein, fat, and carbohydrate content in some of the studied wild species were higher than those reported for cultivated species of fenugreek. Considering that the amount of fenugreek seed protein in some populations of the studied wild species, including TCL2 (42.17 ± 0.74%), had significant values compared to the populations of its cultivated species (T. foenum-graecum) (26.71 ± 0.19–35.20 ± 0.28%), the fenugreek seed of some wild species can be proposed as an excellent source for improving the value of food formulations.

Mineral composition

A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the species and populations regarding the studied elements. The results of the element content are shown in Fig. 4. The content of five macro-elements including potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus, and sodium was measured as 4554.96 ± 7.08‒7942.89 ± 8.32, 1350.15 ± 2.26‒4325.63 ± 1.97, 744.58 ± 1.15‒2909.45 ± 4.89, 1156.63 ± 5.01‒4981.64 ± 4.40, and 502.64 ± 1.19‒780.52 ± 2.05 μg/g DW, respectively. The population of TFG1, followed by TST2, TCO1, TCL2, and TSG1, contained the highest value of macro-elements mentioned above. Among the micro-elements, iron had the highest content (112.96 ± 1.27‒398.75 ± 2.55 µg/g DW). The value of other elements were zinc, copper, manganese, molybdenum, aluminum, nickel, chromium, selenium, cobalt, cadmium, and lead in descending order.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparisons of the levels of elements among the studied Trigonella species and their populations

Full size image

In a study, potassium, manganese, phosphorus, copper, calcium, sodium, iron, and zinc content in the seeds of T. foenum-graecum from Sudan were reported as 1306, 1550, 415, 331, 158, 49, 22, and 10 mg/100 g, respectively [67]. In another study, it was shown that the seeds of thirteen cultivars of T. foenum-graecum from Turkey were rich in calcium (2341 µg/g) and magnesium (1372 µg/g) [68]. They have also been reported that there is a variation among the cultivars studied in terms of nickel, copper, cobalt, chromium, cadmium, aluminum and lead levels. Pandey and Awasthi [64], have reported that the seeds of T. foenum-graecum from India contained 544.5, 70.5, 11.6, and 5.7 mg/100 g of phosphorus, calcium, iron, and zinc, respectively. Variations in the content of different elements including calcium, chromium, manganese, zinc, copper, magnesium, selenium, aluminum, and lead in the seeds of ten fenugreek species from Turkey have also been reported [38]. Among the twenty-five T. foenum-graecum genotypes studied from India, the highest content of iron, calcium, manganese, copper, and zinc was 781.2, 25.65, 5.82, and 26.28 μg/g DW, respectively [28].

Mucilage data

The content and characteristics of mucilage including pH, swelling index, and mucilage color, are given in Table 1. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed among the studied species and populations in the mentioned parameters.

Table 1 Physicochemical characterization of seed mucilage among the populations of Trigonella species
Full size table

The highest mucilage content (21.31 ± 1.18%) was obtained in TEP3 followed, by TEP2 (20.17 ± 1.06%). The mucilage content in other populations was in the range of 11.25 ± 1.15% to 19.79 ± 1.13%. The pH of mucilage was in the range of 6.20 ± 0.22 to 7.20 ± 0.14. The lowest and highest swelling indices were observed in TTH1 (76.15 ± 1.09%) and TFP1 (92.05 ± 1.53%), respectively. Organoleptic properties including mucilage color and texture, were also measured among the studied fenugreeks. The mucilage color was varied in light yellow, yellow, light brown, and light green. The mucilage texture of all studied samples was rough and irregular.

The differences in mucilage content and characteristics among the studied species and populations can be attributed to their distinct origins and genetic structures. In a study, the mucilage content of T. foenum-graecum seeds from Iran was reported to be 23.86% (w/w), while mucilage acidity (pH) was 6.23 [27]. In another study, the extraction and determination of mucilage characteristics of T. foenum-graecum seeds from India were done. The amount of seed mucilage, pH, and swelling index were 15% (w/w), 7.9, and 90%, respectively. Also, the color of isolated mucilage was light brown with a rough and irregular texture [32].

Mucilage, a group of natural compounds, is widely utilized in food processing due to its beneficial physical properties. In addition, it is used in pharmaceutical industries for its binding, thickening, stabilizing, and humidifying effects [69]. Mucilage possesses valuable properties such as stabilization, emulsification, and suspension, making it a popular ingredient in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries [70]. Furthermore, mucilage is preferred over semi-synthetic and synthetic types due to its non-toxicity, lower cost, easy accessibility, emollient properties, and non-irritating nature [71]. Notably, fenugreek seeds are reported to contain a significant amount of mucilage [27]. Fenugreek seed mucilage is acknowledged as a pharmaceutical excipient, serving as a binder in tablet formulation, gelling agent in diazepam nasal gels, and disintegrant in fast-dissolving tablets of amlodipine besylate [72].

In terms of mucilage content, the populations of T. elliptica, T. spruneriana Boiss., and T. strangulata species had the highest values, so these species can be recommended for further exploitation in the cultivation and breeding programs to cover food and pharmaceutical demands.

Oil content and fatty acids composition

The obtained results revealed significant differences among the species and populations in terms of all the studied phytochemical traits. The seed oil content was in the range of 4.12% ± 0.32% to 10.35% ± 0.77%. The highest value was observed in TEP2. Seven fatty acids were identified in the studied samples, which made up 97.14‒99.78% of the seed oil. Saturated and unsaturated fatty acids (USFA) ranged from 19.77 ± 0.11% to 75.17 ± 1.52% and from 23.72 ± 0.37% to 80.01 ± 1.13%, respectively. Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) ranged from 4.32 ± 0.26% to 24.49 ± 0.07%, while polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) varied from 19.34 ± 1.42% to 63.46 ± 1.21% (Table 2). The seed oil was in bright yellow, dark red, and dark green colors and had a strong smell of celery, which can be of interest to the perfume industry [21].

Table 2 Fatty acid profiles of the studied Trigonella species
Full size table

TST1, TTH3, and TFP1 had the lowest rate of USFA, while TEP1, TEP2, and TEP3 had the highest values. The highest percentage of USFA was determined in TST1, TST2, and TST3. TEP1, TEP2, and TEP3 were the main saturated fatty acids in the studied samples. Palmitic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒70.46 ± 0.87%) is the main saturated fatty acid. Linoleic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒39.11% ± 0.61%) and linolenic acid (6.30 ± 0.10‒48.78 ± 0.39%) were also the main polyunsaturated fatty acids. γ-Linoleic acid was the lowest (0.00 ± 0.00‒1.56 ± 0.07%). The only MUFA was oleic acid, which had the highest values ​​in TTH1, TTH2, TTH3, and TFG1. Typical chromatograms of fatty acids are shown in Supplementary Fig. 1.

Studies have shown that linolenic acid is the predominant fatty acid in oily seeds of flowering plants [73]. Unsaturated fatty acids are considered beneficial fats because they can improve blood cholesterol levels, ease inflammation, and stabilize heart rhythms [74]. Today, researchers have discovered that fenugreek seeds contain 6–8% oil with a high percentage of USFA, making it suitable as a food supplement for edible oils [75]. Moreover, the seed oil extracted from fenugreek is highly beneficial in the pharmaceutical industry due to its antioxidant, anti-cancer, and anti-diabetic properties [76, 77].

The main fatty acids in fenugreek seeds from Turkey and India are polyunsaturated fatty acids, including linoleic acid, linolenic acid, and palmitic acid has been reported as the main saturated fatty acid so far [38, 78,79,80]. The saturation and unsaturation of fatty acids and their levels in plants are affected by environmental conditions such as temperature, rainfall and genotype [81].

In the present study, most of the studied species and populations contained USFA including linoleic acid and linolenic acid, which according to the same cultivation conditions, it can be concluded that the profile of fatty acids is attributed to the plant genotype and origins. Considering the importance of USFA including linoleic acid and linolenic acid for human heart health, cultivation of Trigonella species rich in these compounds for the consumption of their seeds is revealed. Results of this study suggest that farmers should grow the populations of T. stellata and T. filipes to produce the highest economic amount of oil and USFA for therapeutic and food purposes.

Phenolic compounds

Fig. 5 shows the range of ten phenolic compounds found in the studied fenugreeks. As can be seen, catechin was the most abundant phenolic compound in the studied samples with the highest content found in TTH3 (1.67 ± 0.05‒63.50 ± 0.72 mg/l). The other measured phenolic compounds were gallic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒46.96 ± 0.26), quercetin (0.44 ± 0.00‒45.54 ± 0.15), p-coumaric acid (0.57 ± 0.05‒40.65 ± 0.10), ferulic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒26.00 ± 0.11), caffeic acid (0.40 ± 0.01‒13.55 ± 0.09), kaempferol (0.00 ± 0.00‒12.47 ± 0.01), and chlorogenic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒7.33 ± 0.09). The content of apigenin (0.00 ± 0.00‒2.78 ± 0.05 mg/l) and rosmarinic acid (0.00 ± 0.00‒0.98 ± 0.02 mg/l) was negligible. The highest content of these phenolic compounds was determined in T. teheranica and T. stellata. Rosmarinic acid was not found in more than half of the studied samples.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Content of major phenolic compounds identified among the thirty populations of ten Trigonella species

Full size image

Heatmap is a valuable tool for gaining insights from data visually and intuitively, allowing the researchers to make data-driven decisions and identify patterns or areas of interest within the data. Heatmap analysis classified the studied populations into two main groups based on the content of phenolic compounds (Fig. 5). The group I included the populations of T. teheranica (Bornm.) Grossh., T. stellata, T. coerulescens (M.Bieb.) Halacsy, T. foenum-graecum, TCL3, and TSP1 are characterized by a high content of catechin. Group II comprises the populations of T. astroides Fisch. & C.A.Mey., T. filipes, T. strangulata, T. elliptica, TSP2, TSP3, TCL1, and TCL2, were associated with the high amount of p-coumaric acid, quercetin, and gallic acid.

Belguith-Hadriche et al. [82] have reported the presence of the three flavonoid glycosides including kaempferol (3.20 ± 0.12 μg/mg), apigenin (5.11 ± 0.15 μg/mg), and naringenin (7.23 ± 0.09 μg/mg) from the ethyl acetate extract of fenugreek seeds from Tunisia. In another study, apigenin (19,555 ng/mg) and luteolin (725 ng/mg) were the most abundant phenolic compounds in T. foenum-graecum seeds from the UK [83]. Vitexin and isovitexin were also reported as the major phenolic compounds in fenugreek germinated seeds from India [84].

Diosgenin and trigonelline content

The diosgenin and trigonelline contents of the studied samples are presented in Table 3. TST1, TST2, TST3, TFG1, TFG2, TFG3, TCO1, and TCO2 had the highest diosgenin content (9.06 ± 0.06‒11.03 ± 0.17 mg/g DW), while the lowest diosgenin content (2.52 ± 0.01 mg/g DW) was obtained in TFP2. Trigonelline content ranged from 0.68 ± 0.01 mg/g DW to 7.66 ± 0.16 mg/g DW. The highest and lowest trigonelline content was obtained in TST1 and TSP2, respectively.

Table 3 Variation in the phytochemical traits among the populations of ten Trigonella species
Full size table

In a previous study, the content of diosgenin in the seeds of ten T. foenum-graecum populations from Canada has been ranged from 3.29 to 6.43 mg/g [85]. In another study, diosgenin content in seed of T. foenum-graecum from India was also found in the range of 0.53 to 0.65% (w/w) [86].

Among fifteen Trigonella species from Australia [87], T. foenum-graecum seed had a higher diosgenin content (5.09 ± 0.35 mg/g). Trigonella anguina Delile, T. spicata Sm., and T. caerulea (L.) Ser. also contained 3.72 ± 0.17, 1.39 ± 0.10, and 2.46 ± 0.24 mg/g, respectively. The seeds of T. calliceras Fisch., T. filipes, and T. coerulescens lacked diosgenin, while our obtained results showed that the content of diosgenin ranged from 2.52 ± 0.01 to 9.87 ± 0.10 mg/g DW in the studied species mentioned above. In a comparative study from Turkey [38], the highest diosgenin content (0.52 ± 0.01 mg/g) was reported in T. cilicica Hub.-Mor. Diosgenin content in T. spruneriana and T. filipes Boiss. seed were less than our samples. In another study on thirteen genotypes of T. foenum-graecum from India, seed diosgenin content in the studied genotypes ranged from 0.35% to 0.78% [88]. Paramesha et al. [36] were studied diosgenin content in the seeds of eleven varieties of T. foenum-graecum from India. They revealed that the plant seed is a better source of diosgenin than the plant leaf. Variations in the phytochemical traits, such as diosgenin and trigonelline content, may be attributed to the plant genotypes and environmental factors [89, 90]. In this study, we identified several species, including T. stellata, T. foenum-graecum, T. coerulescens, and T. calliceras, with high diosgenin and trigonelline content. Consequently, future research programs can be considered to explore the potential of the other wild fenugreek species to identify high-productive species and their potent populations. The populations of the studied species could serve as alternative sources for synthesizing steroid drugs in pharmaceutical industries.

Total carotenoid, saponin, and tannin content and bitterness value

The total saponin, tannin, and carotenoid content and bitterness value are given in Table 3. The highest and lowest total carotenoid content (μg β-CARE/g DW) was obtained in TTH3 (77.29 ± 0.99) and TST2 (15.11 ± 0.11), respectively. The total carotenoid content in TSG1, TSG2, and TSG3 (73.16 ± 0.49‒76.45 ± 0.76 μg β-CARE/g DW) was also significant compared to other studied species. Total carotenoid content of the seeds of twenty-five T. foenum-graecum genotypes from India has been reported in the range of 1.45 to 8.54 mg/100 g [28].

Total saponin content varied broadly between species and populations (21.32 ± 0.28‒211.58 ± 1.54 mg DE/g DW). The highest total saponin content was found in TST3, TST2, TCO1, and TFG3. The total tannin content was determined in the range of 71.89 ± 0.95 to 394.63 ± 1.86 mg/100 g DW. Among the studied samples, three populations of T. astroides (TAS1, TAS2, and TAS3) had the highest total tannin content. The total saponin content of T. foenum-graecum seed from Iraq has been previously reported to be 26.65% [22]. In another study on optimizing the extraction conditions of total saponin content in T. foenum-graecum seed from Malaysia, the highest value was reported to be 195.89 ± 1.07 mg DE/g DW [26].

According to Abdouli et al. [31] total tannin content of T. foenum-graecum seed from Tunisia was determined as 2.03 and 2.59 mg/g, which is similar to our obtained results. In another study, lower content (63.69 mg/100 g) was also reported [22]. Condensed tannin and total saponin content of the seeds of twenty Omani T. foenum-graecum genotypes were ranged from 30.21 to 74.54 mg catechin/100 g and from 7.27 to 17.03 g/100 g, respectively [91].

TCO2 had the highest bitterness value (4.58 ± 0.12 units × 103/g), while the lowest value (0.95 ± 0.01 units × 103/g) was belonged to TFP1. In a study, the bitterness value (units × 103/g) of two genotypes of T. foenum-graecum seeds from Tunisia was reported as 5.03 and 0.70 [31]. They have also been claimed that the bitterness value in vegetable foods was attributed to environmental and genetic factors. The bitterness value of Trigonella species and populations has not been reported so far, and this is the first report.

Total phenol and total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity

The total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidant activities of the studied samples are given in Table 4. The highest TPC was obtained in TCL2 (156.23 ± 0.57 mg GAE/g DW), while the highest TFC was found in TAS2 (104.76 ± 1.67 mg/RE g DW) which was similar to the obtained results in T. cilicica, T. kotschyi Benth., and T. cylindracea Desv. from Turkey [38]. The highest antioxidant activity by both DPPH (15.78 ± 0.16 μg/ml) and FRAP (399.73 ± 1.32 μmol Fe+2/g DW) methods were obtained in TTH3 and TCL2. TPC, TFC, and antioxidant activity of fenugreeks have been widely reported [26, 35, 91,92,93]. Lohvina et al. [35] reported the DPPH antioxidant activity of T. foenum-graecum seeds from Germany as 100 μg/ml. In another study, the lowest and highest TPC in the seeds of eleven Indian T. foenum-graecum varieties was obtained at 91.47 to 215.55 mg/100 g FW, respectively, while, their TFC was ranged from 101.43 to 1120.83 mg/100 g FW [36]. In the current study, it was found that the seeds of the studied fenugreeks have a high TPC and TFC, which increases their antioxidant activity. According to previous studies, antioxidant activity has a direct relationship with TPC and TFC [94].

Table 4 Total phenol and flavonoids content, and antioxidant activity among the populations of Trigonella species
Full size table

Correlation analysis showed a significant relationship between TPC and antioxidant properties by DPPH (R2 = ‒0.8229) and FRAP (R2 = 0.7214) in the studied fenugreeks seeds (Fig. 6a–f). In addition, TFC was positively associated with FRAP (R2 = 0.8078) and negatively related with DPPH (R2 = ‒0.7438), which is in agreement with earlier reports [26, 95]. The correlation of phenolic compounds is due to their reaction with all kinds of free radicals, which ultimately act as an antioxidant. The mechanism of antioxidant actions involves either hydrogen atom transfer, sequential proton loss electron transfer, and chelation of transition metals [96]. In addition, the antioxidant capacity of different extracts may not only be related to TPC and TFC, but also may be attributed to the other biochemical and phytochemical components [97]. It is also reported that genetic factors, environmental conditions, harvest time, and post-harvest processes can affect the TPC and TFC by changing the metabolic pathways and finally the biological properties including the antioxidant activity of the plant [89].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Linear correlation between total phenol and flavonoid content, and antioxidant properties (a‒f). Significant difference in 1% level

Full size image

Principal component analysis

Bi-plot analysis was performed using PC1 and PC2, which accounted for a total of 52.65% of the variance for major nutritional and phytochemical compounds (Fig. 7). The principal component analysis (PCA) is an efficient and dimensionality reduction method to identify similarities and dissimilarities between experimental plant genotypes based on their desired characteristics [98]. The studied Trigonella species and populations were divided into three groups using the measured data. The populations of T. teheranica, T. filipes, T. astroides, and TCL2 were characterized by high values in thiamine, riboflavin, p-coumaric acid, quercetin, gallic acid, stearic acid, oleic acid, linolenic acid, linoleic acid, ascorbic acid, trigonelline, ash, protein, total tannins, TPC, TFC, and antioxidant properties were placed in the first group, while the populations of T. elliptica, T. spruneriana, and T. strangulata formed the second group on the negative region and strongly contributed to kaempferol, ferulic acid, total carotenoids, palmitic acid, caffeic acid, carbohydrate, and mucilage content. The highest content of fat, crude fiber, β-carotene, α–tocopherol, catechin, pyridoxine, niacin, diosgenin, total saponins, and bitterness value was found in the populations of T. stellata, T. coerulescens, T. foenum-graecum, TCL1, and TCL3, which were placed them in the third group. The PCA analysis showed a significant separation with the genetics of the species and the populations with the same species are most similar to each other.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Bi-plot graph for the first and second principal components based on the major nutritional and phytochemical compounds for thirty populations of ten Trigonella species

Full size image

Phytochemical evaluation of plants is a suitable basis for investigating the diversity between and within plant species [99]. One of the most important reasons for the phytochemical diversity of each medicinal plant is the genetic factors, weather, and climate diversity in different regions; the existence of different climates in the world causes a significant difference in the composition of species and their different populations [100]. Many factors, including geographical conditions, differences in extraction methods, and solvents, involve in special metabolite content [101]. Reports have shown a high correlation between geographical origin and effective specialized metabolites [102].

Conclusions

In the present study, nutritional and phytochemical traits of ten Iranian Trigonella species cultivated at the same environmental conditions were studied for the first time. The studied species and their populations showed a great diversity in the characteristics of macro- and micro-nutrients and plant-based bioactive compounds. Trigonella stellata and T. filipes were rich in vitamins B, E, and C, which makes them valuable for enriching diets or supplements with these essential nutrients. Some studied wild species exhibited higher protein content compared to cultivated species (T. foenum-graecum), suggesting their potential use in cultivation systems for consumption. Among the micro-elements, the studied seeds had a high level of iron, which can be recommended in the diet of people with iron deficiency. Some species were also rich in mucilage and can be cultivated for use in pharmaceutical industries as excipient, binder and gelling agent. The seeds of T. stellata, T. filipes, and T. coerulescens were suitable candidates for production oils rich in USFA. Trigonella stellata, T. foenum-graecum, and T. coerulescens were a good choice for providing raw materials in the production of steroid drugs.

Finally, from a practical point of view, T. stellata, T. filipes, T. coerulescens, and T. foenum-graecum can be selected and introduced as an adequate species for further exploitation in agricultural, food and pharmaceutical systems. Although the intrinsic factor is involved in the content of nutritional and phytochemical compounds of the studied fenugreek species, the significant variation in the compounds is also dependent on environmental factors. Therefore, the cultivation of the proposed species in other areas with different climatic conditions may cause a positive change in the content of its nutritional traits and phytochemical compounds.

Availability of data and materials

All data are within the manuscript.

References

  1. Nestle M. Animal v. plant foods in human diets and health: is the historical record unequivocal? Proc Nutr Soc. 1999;58(2):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665199000300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ewy MW, Patel A, Abdelmagid MG, Mohamed Elfadil O, Bonnes SL, Salonen BR, Hurt RT, Mundi MS. Plant-Based Diet: Is it as good as an animal-based diet when it comes to protein? Curr Nutr Rep. 2022;11(2):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-022-00401-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ludewig F, Sonnewald U. Demand for food as driver for plant sink development. J Plant Physiol. 2016;203:110–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Timsina J. Can organic sources of nutrients increase crop yields to meet global food demand? Agronomy. 2018;8(10):214. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8100214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu M, Gouvinhas I, Rocha J, Barros AI. Phytochemical and antioxidant analysis of medicinal and food plants towards bioactive food and pharmaceutical resources. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89437-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bassolino L, Petroni K, Polito A, Marinelli A, Azzini E, Ferrari M, Ficco DB, Mazzucotelli E, Tondelli A, Fricano A, Paris R. Does plant breeding for antioxidant-rich foods have an impact on human health? Antioxidants. 2022;11(4):794. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11040794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Miho H, Díez CM, Mena-Bravo A, de Medina VS, Moral J, Melliou E, Magiatis P, Rallo L, Barranco D, Priego-Capote F. Cultivar influence on variability in olive oil phenolic profiles determined through an extensive germplasm survey. Food Chem. 2018;266:192–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.06.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gouveia BT, Barrios SCL, do Valle CB, Gomes RDC, Machado WKR, Bueno Filho JSDS, Nunes JAR. Selection strategies for increasing the yield of high nutritional value leaf mass in Urochloa hybrids. Euphytica. 2020;16(3):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-2574-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Devarajan R, Jayaraman JK, Somasundaram SM, Ragupathy S, Raman P, Sathiamoorthy K, Subbaraya U. Genetic diversity in fresh fruit pulp mineral profile of 100 Indian Musa accessions. Food Chem. 2021;361:130080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130080

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poonia A, Phogat DS, Nagar S, Sharma P, Kumar V. Biochemical assessment of oat genotypes revealed variability in grain quality with nutrition and crop improvement implications. Food Chem. 2022;377:131982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131982

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hasanuzzaman M, Araújo S, Gill SS. The Plant Family Fabaceae. Springer Singapore. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4752-2.

  12. Chai BC, van der Voort JR, Grofelnik K, Eliasdottir HG, Klöss I, Perez-Cueto FJ. Which diet has the least environmental impact on our planet? A systematic review of vegan, vegetarian and omnivorous diets. Sustainability. 2019;11(15):4110. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Irisarri P, Imperial J, Lattanzi FA, Monza J, Palacios J, Sanjuan J, Grossman J (Eds.). Maximizing nitrogen fixation in legumes as a tool for sustainable agriculture intensification. Frontiers Media SA. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.796717.

  14. LPWG. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon. 2017;66: 44–77. https://doi.org/10.12705/661.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh RJ, Chung GH, Nelson RL. Landmark research in legumes. Genome. 2007;50(6):525–37. https://doi.org/10.1139/G07-037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Akan H, Ekici M, Aytac Z. The synopsis of the genus Trigonella L. (Fabaceae) in Turkey. Turk J Bot. 2020;44(6):670–93. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-2004-63.

  17. Rechinger KH. Trigonella. In: Rechinger KH, editor. Flora Iranica. Graz: Akademische Drucku.Verlagsanstalt; 1984. p. 207‒253.

  18. Sun W, Shahrajabian MH, Cheng Q. Fenugreek cultivation with emphasis on historical aspects and its uses in traditional medicine and modern pharmaceutical science. Mini-Rev Med Chem. 2021;21(6):724–30. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557520666201127104907.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Basu SK, Zandi P, Cetzal-Ix W. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.): Distribution, genetic diversity, and potential to serve as an industrial crop for the global pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and functional food industries. In the role of functional food security in global health. Academic Press; 2019. p. 471–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813148-0.00028-1.

  20. Galal OM. The nutrition transition in Egypt: obesity, undernutrition and the food consumption context. Public Health Nutr. 2002;5(1):141–8. https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2001286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petropoulos GA. Fenugreek: the genus Trigonella. CRC Press; 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203217474.

  22. Mahmood NM, Yahya KI. Nutrient and phytochemical of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) seeds. Int J Basic Appl Sci. 2017;36(3):203–13.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Syed QA, Rashid Z, Ahmad MH, Shukat R, Ishaq A, Muhammad N, Rahman HUU. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review. Int J Food Prop. 2020;23(1):1777–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2020.1825482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ahmed Kaid NA, Norbaiyah MB, Imad MA, Norazian MH. Quantification of anti-fertility compound-diosgenin concentration in the fenugreek seeds aqueous extract (FSA). Int Med J Malays. 2016;15(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/imjm.v15i1.410.

  25. Garg RC. Fenugreek: multiple health benefits. In Nutraceuticals. Academic Press; 2016. pp. 599–617 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802147-7.00044-9.

  26. Akbari S, Abdurahman NH, Yunus RM. Optimization of saponins, phenolics, and antioxidants extracted from fenugreek seeds using microwave-assisted extraction and response surface methodology as an optimizing tool. C R Chim. 2019;22(11–12):714–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crci.2019.07.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tavakoli N, Varshosaz J, Ghannadi A, Bavarsad N. Evaluation of Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds gum as a novel tablet binder. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012;4(1):97–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pant NC, Tewari M, Dhoundiyal R, Pandey CS, Singh JP, Agrawal S. Evaluation of micronutrients in fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.): A viable alternative for micronutrient supplementation. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2018;7:2446–64. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2018.705.281.

  29. Singh A, Singh S, Sharma R. Nutritional potentials and nutrient profile of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2020;9(10):3606‒3615.

  30. Abdouli H, Hadj-Ayed M, Elham M, Nabila B, Remedios Alvir Morencos M. Proximate composition, and total phenols, tannins, flavonoids and saponins, and in vitro ruminal fermentation activity of fenugreek cut at three maturity stages. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2012;24(1).

  31. Abdouli H, Missaoui H, Jellali S, Tibaoui G, Tayachi L. Comparison of two fenugreek seed genotypes: bitterness value, secondary metabolites contents and biological activities. J New Sci. 2014.

  32. Verma S, Bansal J, Kumar N, Malviya RM, Sharma PK. Isolation and characterization studies of mucilage obtained from Trigonella foenum greacum L. seed and Tamarindus Indica polysaccharide as a pharmaceutical excipient. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2014;4(3):106–9. https://doi.org/10.22270/jddt.v4i3.852.

  33. Riasat M, Pakniyat H, Heidari B, Jafari AA. Variations in phytophenol compounds in association with morphological traits in Trigonella spp. Accessions Annu Res Rev Biol. 2018;1–16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ARRB/2018/39533.

  34. Bouhenni H, Doukani K, Hanganu D, Olah NK, Şekeroğlu N, Gezici S, Spinu M, Niculae M. Comparative analysis on bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of Algerian fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and Syrian cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seeds. Herba Pol. 2021;67(1):18–34. https://doi.org/10.2478/hepo-2021-0005.

  35. Lohvina H, Sándor M, Wink M. Effect of ethanol solvents on total phenolic content and antioxidant properties of seed extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) varieties and determination of phenolic composition by HPLC-ESI-MS. Diversity. 2021;14(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14010007.

  36. Paramesha M, Priyanka N, Crassina K, Shetty NP. Evaluation of diosgenin content from eleven different Indian varieties of fenugreek and fenugreek leaf powder fortified bread. J Food Sci Technol; 2021;1‒9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-04967-z

  37. Uras Güngör ŞS, Kökdil G. Tocopherol, sterol and amino acid compositions of Trigonella strangulata Boiss. seeds. Int Res J Pharm Med Sci. 2018;2(1):36–9.

  38. Uras Güngör ŞS, İlçim A, Kökdil G. A comparison of diosgenin, phenolics, fatty acid profiles and mineral contents with free radical scavenging activity of Trigonella L. species from section cylindricae. Rec Nat Prod. 2017;11(1):17‒30.

  39. Mylavarapu R, Sikora FJ, Moore KP. Walkley-Black Method. Soil test methods from the Southeastern United States. 2014. p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Negi PS, Roy SK. Changes in β-carotene and ascorbic acid content of fresh amaranth and fenugreek leaves during storage by low cost technique. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2003;58(3):225–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QUAL.0000040361.85578.b5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Akintimehin ES, Karigidi KO, Anthony EO, Adetuyi FO. Proximate composition, minerals, vitamins, phytochemical constituents and anti-nutrient profile of Beilschmiedia mannii seeds and Combretum racemosum leaves for soup preparation. J Food Sci Technol. 2021;1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-021-05198-y.

  42. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 18th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA, USA. 2005.

  43. Law MY, Charles SA, Halliwell B. Glutathione and ascorbic acid in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) chloroplasts. The effect of hydrogen peroxide and of paraquat. Biochem. 1983;210(3):899–903. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj2100899.

  44. AOAC. Official methods of analysis,17th edn. Association of official analytical chemists Inc.,. Virginia, USA; 2003.

  45. FAO. Food energy–methods of analysis and conversion factors. Report of a Technical Workshop. Food Nutrition. 2003. p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Başgel S, Erdemoğlu SB. Determination of mineral and trace elements in some medicinal herbs and their infusions consumed in Turkey. Sci Total Environ. 2006;359(1–3):82–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.04.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Singer FAW, Taha FS, Mohamed SS, Gibriel A, El-Nawawy M. Preparation of mucilage/protein products from flaxseed. Am J Food Technol. 2011;6(4):260–78. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2011.260.278.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Milinsk MC, Matsushita M, Visentainer JV, Oliveira CCD, Souza NED. Comparative analysis of eight esterification methods in the quantitative determination of vegetable oil fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). J Braz Chem. 2008;19(8):1475–83. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532008000800006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Herrera T, Navarro del Hierro J, Fornari T, Reglero G, Martin D. Acid hydrolysis of saponin-rich extracts of quinoa, lentil, fenugreek and soybean to yield sapogenin-rich extracts and other bioactive compounds. J Sci Food Agric. 2019;99(6):3157–3167. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Campa C, Ballester JF, Doulbeau S, Dussert S, Hamon S, Noirot M. Trigonelline and sucrose diversity in wild Coffea species. Food Chem. 2004;88(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. WHO G. Quality control methods for medicinal plant material. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. Meth Enzymol. 1999;299:152–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Chang CC, Yang MH, Wen HM, Chern JC. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10(3). https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2748.

  54. Akhlaghi N, Najafpour-Darzi G. Phytochemical analysis, antioxidant activity, and pancreatic lipase inhibitory effect of ethanolic extract of Trigonella foenum graceum L. leaves. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2021;32:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2021.101961.

  55. Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70–6. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Srinivasan K. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum): a review of health beneficial physiological effects. Food Rev Int. 2006;22(2):203–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559120600586315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Ahmad A, Alghamdi SS, Mahmood K, Afzal M. Fenugreek a multipurpose crop: Potentialities and improvements. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2016;23(2):300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2015.09.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Calvo MS, Whiting SJ. Survey of current vitamin D food fortification practices in the United States and Canada. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;136:211–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.09.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cirlincione F, Venturella G, Gargano ML, Ferraro V, Gaglio R, Francesca N, Rizzo BA, Russo G, Moschetti G, Settanni L, Mirabile G. Functional bread supplemented with Pleurotus eryngii powder: a potential new food for human health. Int J Gastron Food Sci. 2022;27:100449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100449.

  60. El Nasri NA, El Tinay AH. Functional properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) protein concentrate. Food Chem. 2007;103(2):582–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.09.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Feyzi S, Varidi M, Zare F, Varidi MJ. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) seed protein isolate: extraction optimization, amino acid composition, thermo and functional properties. J Sci Food Agric. 2015;95(15):3165–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7056.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Aljuhaimi F, Şimşek Ş, Özcan MM, Ghafoor K, Babiker EE. Effect of location on chemical properties, amino acid and fatty acid compositions of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed and oils. J Food Process Preserv. 2018;42(4):e13569. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13569.

  63. Abbas Ali M, Abu Sayeed M, Shahinur Alam M, Sarmina Yeasmin MS, Khan AM, Muhamad II. Characteristics of oils and nutrient contents of Nigella sativa Linn. and Trigonella foenum-graecum seeds. Bull Chem Soc Ethiop. 2012;26(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v26i1.6.

  64. Pandey H, Awasthi P. Effect of processing techniques on nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seed flour. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(2):1054–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-013-1057-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hooda S, Jood S. Effect of soaking and germination on nutrient and antinutrient contents of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum L.). J Food Biochem. 2003;27(2):165–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4514.2003.tb00274.x.

  66. Mathur P, Choudhry M. Effect of domestic processing on proximate composition of fenugreek seeds. J Food Sci Technol. 2009;46(3):255–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Nour AAM, Magboul BI. Chemical and amino acid composition of fenugreek seeds grown in Sudan. Food Chem. 1986;22(1):1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(86)90002-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kan Y, Kan A, Ceyhan T, Sayar E, Kartal M, Altun L, Aslan S, Cevheroğlu Ş. Atomic absorption spectrometric analysis of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. seeds cultivated in Turkey. Turk J Pharm Sci. 2005;2(3):187‒91.

  69. Waghmare R, Moses JA, Anandharamakrishnan C. Mucilages: Sources, extraction methods, and characteristics for their use as encapsulation agents. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022;62(15):4186–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1873730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Dybka-Stępień K, Otlewska A, Góźdź P, Piotrowska M. The renaissance of plant mucilage in health promotion and industrial applications: a review. Nutrients. 2021;13(10):3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Chandravanshi K, Sahu M, Sahu R, Sahu N, Lanjhiyana S, Chandy A. Isolation of mucilage from herbal plants and its evaluation as a pharmaceutical excipients. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 2022;14(3):171–8. https://doi.org/10.52711/0975-4385.2022.00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Nayak AK, Hasnain MS, Nayak AK, Hasnain MS. Fenugreek seed mucilage based multiple units for oral drug delivery. Plant polysaccharides-based multiple-unit systems for oral drug delivery. 2019;93–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6784-6_8.

  73. Ghebretinsae AG, Graham SA, Camilo GR, Barber JC. Natural infraspecific variation in fatty acid composition of Cuphea (Lythraceae) seed oils. Ind Crops Prod. 2008;27(3):279–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.11.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Calder PC. Functional roles of fatty acids and their effects on human health. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015;39:18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148607115595980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Gu LB, Liu XN, Liu HM, Pang HL, Qin GY. Extraction of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seed oil using subcritical butane: Characterization and process optimization. Molecules. 2017;22(2):228. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22020228.

  76. Mandal S, DebMandal M. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) oils. In: Essential oils in food preservation, flavor and safety. Academic Press; 2016. p. 421–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-416641-7.00047-X.

  77. Akbari S, Abdurahman NH, Yunus RM, Alara OR, Abayomi OO. Extraction, characterization and antioxidant activity of fenugreek (Trigonella-Foenum Graecum) seed oil. Mater Sci Energy Technol. 2019;2(2):349–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2018.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Beyzi E. Chemometric methods for fatty acid compositions of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) and black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds at different maturity stages. Ind Crops Herba Pol. Prod. 2020;151:112488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112488.

  79. Munshi M, Arya P, Kumar P. Physico-chemical analysis and fatty acid profiling of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum) seed oil using different solvents. J Oleo Sci. 2020;20137. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess20137.

  80. Chatterjee S, Variyar PS, Sharma A. Bioactive lipid constituents of fenugreek. Food Chem. 2010;119(1):349–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.05.076.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Esmaeili A, Shaykhmoradi F, Naseri R. Comparison of oil content and fatty acid composition of native olive genotypes in different region of Liam. Iran Int J Agric Sci. 2012;4(8):434–8.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Belguith-Hadriche O, Bouaziz M, Jamoussi K, El Feki A, Sayadi S, Makni-Ayedi F. Lipid-lowering and antioxidant effects of an ethyl acetate extract of fenugreek seeds in high-cholesterol-fed rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(4):2116–22. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf903186w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Kenny O, Smyth TJ, Hewage CM, Brunton NP. Antioxidant properties and quantitative UPLC-MS analysis of phenolic compounds from extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) seeds and bitter melon (Momordica charantia) fruit. Food Chem. 2013;141(4):4295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Khole S, Chatterjee S, Variyar P, Sharma A, Devasagayam TPA, Ghaskadbi S. Bioactive constituents of germinated fenugreek seeds with strong antioxidant potential. J Funct Foods. 2014;6:270–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2013.10.016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Taylor WG, Zulyniak HJ, Richards KW, Acharya SN, Bittman S, Elder JL. Variation in diosgenin levels among 10 accessions of fenugreek seeds produced in Western Canada. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(21):5994–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf020486y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Trivedi PD, Pundarikakshudu K, Rathnam S, Shah KS. A validated quantitative thin-layer chromatographic method for estimation of diosgenin in various plant samples, extract, and market formulation. J AOAC Int. 2007;90(2):358–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoac/90.2.358.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Dangi R, Misar A, Tamhankar S, Rao S. Diosgenin content in some Trigonella species. Int j Ayurveda pharma res. 2014;1(2):47–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Saxena SN, Kakani RK, Sharma LK, Agarwal D, John S, Sharma Y. Genetic variation in seed quality and fatty acid composition of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) genotypes grown under limited moisture conditions. Acta Physiol Plant. 2017;39(10):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2522-6.

  89. Esmaeili H, Karami A, Hadian J, Saharkhiz MJ, Ebrahimi SN. Variation in the phytochemical contents and antioxidant activity of Glycyrrhiza glabra populations collected in Iran. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;137:248–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.05.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Heydari A, Hadian J, Esmaeili H, Kanani MR, Mirjalili MH, Sarkhosh A. Introduction of Thymus daenensis into cultivation: Analysis of agro-morphological, phytochemical and genetic diversity of cultivated clones. Ind Crops Prod. 2019;131:14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.01.033.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Al-Maamari IT, Khan MM, Ali A, Al-Sadi AM, Waly MI, Al-Saady NA. Diversity in phytochemical composition of Omani fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) accessions. Pak J Agric Sci. 2016;53(4):851–62. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/16.5559.

  92. Osman MG, Daffalla HM, Ahmad MM, Saleh SA, Hamza AA. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of seeds and callus of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. GSC Biol Pharm Sci. 2020;10(3):1‒9. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2020.10.3.0033.

  93. Aylanc V, Eskin B, Zengin G, Dursun M, Cakmak YS. In vitro studies on different extracts of fenugreek (Trigonella spruneriana Boiss.): Phytochemical profile, antioxidant activity, and enzyme inhibition potential. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(11):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13463.

  94. Hameed S, Imran A, Nisa MU, Arshad MS, Saeed F, Arshad MU, Asif Khan M. Characterization of extracted phenolics from black cumin (Nigella sativa linn), coriander seed (Coriandrum sativum L.), and fenugreek seed (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Int J Food Prop. 2019;22(1):714–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2019.1599390.

  95. Saxena SN, Karwa S, Saxena R, Sharma T, Sharma YK, Kakani RK, Anwer MM. Analysis of antioxidant activity, phenolic and flavanoids content of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seed extracts. Int J seed spices. 2011;1(1):38‒43.

  96. Zeb A. Concept, mechanism, and applications of phenolic antioxidants in foods. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(9):e13394. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Haliem EA, Al-Huqail AA. Correlation of genetic variation among wild Trigonella foenum-graecum L. accessions with their antioxidant potential status. Genet Mol Res. 2014;13(4):10464–81. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.December.12.8.

  98. Suryanarayana L, Sekhar MR, Babu DR, Ramana AV, Rao VS. Cluster and principal component analysis in maize. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(7):354–359. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.501.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Tohidi B, Rahimmalek M, Arzani A. Essential oil composition, total phenolic, flavonoid contents, and antioxidant activity of Thymus species collected from different regions of Iran. Food Chem. 2017;220:153–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Khadivi-Khub A, Salehi-Arjmand H, Hadian J. Morphological and phytochemical variation of Satureja bachtiarica populations from Iran. Ind Crops Prod. 2014;54:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.01.039.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Mirzaei A, Mohammadi J, Mirzaei N, Mirzaei M. The antioxidant capacities and total phenolic contents of some medicinal plants in Iran. J Fasa Univ Med Sci. 2011;1(3):160–7.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Brown B. Mint soil fertility research in the PNW. Western Nutrient Management Conf. 2003;5(3):54–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of the University of Tehran and Shahid Beheshti University for their financial support. We also wish to thank Hamid Ahadi, Maryam Mohammadian, and Zeynab Jalali for their kind help in HPLC and GC analysis.

Funding

No grant was available for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

    Ziba Bakhtiar & Mohammadreza Hassandokht

  2. Division of Biotechnology, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

    Mohammad Reza Naghavi

  3. Department of Phytochemistry, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute of Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 1983969411, Iran

    Hassan Rezadoost

  4. Department of Agriculture, Medicinal Plants and Drugs Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, 1983969411, Iran

    Mohammad Hossein Mirjalili

Authors
  1. Ziba Bakhtiar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammadreza Hassandokht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Reza Naghavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hassan Rezadoost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohammad Hossein Mirjalili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ZB Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing—original draft. MH Supervision, Methodology, Visualization, Validation, Data curation, Review & editing. MRN Validation, Data curation, Review and editing. HR Methodology, Validation, Data curation. MHM Conceptualization, Supervision, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Project administration, Writing—review & editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Hossein Mirjalili.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods performed in this study were in compliance with the relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bakhtiar, Z., Hassandokht, M., Naghavi, M.R. et al. Fatty acid and nutrient profiles, diosgenin and trigonelline contents, mineral composition, and antioxidant activity of the seed of some Iranian Trigonella L. species. BMC Plant Biol 24, 669 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05341-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05341-9

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us