Skip to main content
Download PDF

Genetic insights into superior grain number traits: a QTL analysis of wheat-Agropyron cristatum derivative pubing3228

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 271 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Agropyron cristatum (L.) is a valuable genetic resource for expanding the genetic diversity of common wheat. Pubing3228, a novel wheat-A. cristatum hybrid germplasm, exhibits several desirable agricultural traits, including high grain number per spike (GNS). Understanding the genetic architecture of GNS in Pubing3228 is crucial for enhancing wheat yield. This study aims to analyze the specific genetic regions and alleles associated with high GNS in Pubing3228.

Methods

The study employed a recombination inbred line (RIL) population derived from a cross between Pubing3228 and Jing4839 to investigate the genetic regions and alleles linked to high GNS. Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) analysis and candidate gene investigation were utilized to explore these traits.

Results

A total of 40 QTLs associated with GNS were identified across 16 chromosomes, accounting for 4.25–17.17% of the total phenotypic variation. Five QTLs (QGns.wa-1D, QGns.wa-5 A, QGns.wa-7Da.1, QGns.wa-7Da.2 and QGns.wa-7Da.3) accounter for over 10% of the phenotypic variation in at least two environments. Furthermore, 94.67% of the GNS QTL with positive effects originated from Pubing3228. Candidate gene analysis of stable QTLs identified 11 candidate genes for GNS, including a senescence-associated protein gene (TraesCS7D01G148000) linked to the most significant SNP (AX-108,748,734) on chromosome 7D, potentially involved in reallocating nutrients from senescing tissues to developing seeds.

Conclusion

This study provides new insights into the genetic mechanisms underlying high GNS in Pubing3228, offering valuable resources for marker-assisted selection in wheat breeding to enhance yield.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is an essential cereal crop globally [1]. While there have been significant increases in wheat yield and total production in recent decades, the current level of wheat grain production is insufficient to meet the future demands of a growing global population [2]. Moreover, this challenge is exacerbated by the gradual reduction of arable land [3, 4]. Thus, improving wheat grain yield is vital for global food and nutrition security [5]. Consequently, increasing grain yield has become the primary goal in wheat breeding.

The yield of wheat is primarily determined by three components: grain number per spike (GNS), grain weight, and spike number [6, 7]. Previous studies have shown that GNS significantly impacts wheat grain yield more than grain weight [8,9,10]. In wheat breeding programs, high yield is primarily achieved by increasing GNS rather than grain weight [11,12,13,14,15]. Exploring the genetic variation of GNS holds excellent potential for future yield improvement [16]. GNS is a complex quantitative trait controlled by multiple genes [17,18,19]. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping effectively analyzes such traits [17, 20, 21]. With the development of molecular markers, numerous QTL analyses of GNS have been conducted, leading to the identification of several QTLs [22,23,24]. These reports have identified QTLs distributed across the entire wheat genome.

Saturated genetic linkage maps play a crucial role in QTL mapping by providing measurements of marker effects and offering useful DNA markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) in breeding practices [25, 26]. However, due to limited molecular markers, the use of unsaturated genetic linkage maps in the past has led to the presence of linked markers that are further from the target QTL genetic distance [27,28,29]. This condition has restricted the understanding of the genetic architecture of GNS and the application of markers in wheat breeding [30]. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, reference genomes for Chinese Spring wheat and other varieties have been published, providing a way to overcome these limitations [31]. NGS-based SNP genotyping platforms have recently been developed, leading to significant progress in QTL analysis for wheat GNS [32, 33]. High-density SNP genotyping arrays, such as the 9 K, 55 K, 660 K, and 820 K SNP arrays, have been developed for wheat and widely used for QTL analysis [34, 35]. For instance, the 90 K wheat SNP chip was employed to study the genetic control of yield-related traits in 66 elite wheat varieties derived from Xiaoyan 6, resulting in the identification of 803 significant marker-trait associations that explained up to 35.0% of the phenotypic variation.

To address the limited genetic diversity in common wheat, it is crucial to identify new genetic loci controlling yield-related traits to broaden genetic variation and accelerate wheat breeding improvements [36, 37]. Wild relatives, such as the Agropyron genus, are necessary gene resources for improving common wheat [38, 39]. Intergeneric hybrids between common wheat and Agropyron cristatum (A. cristatum) have been generated successfully to transfer beneficial allele genes from the Agropyron genus to wheat [40, 41]. Several novel wheat-A cristatum resources with desirable agronomic traits have been produced [42, 43]. Furthermore, studies have been conducted on the genetic mechanisms of A. cristatum in the background of common wheat, focusing on chromosomal segments or genes [44, 45]. For example, a previous study has studied Pubing2978, a wheat-A. Cristate translocation line with high GNS using techniques like genomic in situ hybridization (GISH), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and molecular markers. The A. cristatum 6P chromosomal segment is critical in increasing GNS [45]. Another study has identified an enhancer grain weight locus on the 7P chromosome of A. cristatum and mapped it to 7PS1-2 using 158 STS markers. Further studies on the mechanism of this locus on wheat grain weight revealed that two translocation lines with 7P chromosomal segments (7PT-A18 and 7PT-B4) could simultaneously increase grain weight, length, and width [41].

Previous studies have mainly focused on common wheat when investigating the genetic factors influencing GNS and have identified several QTLs. However, there is still limited knowledge about the molecular mechanisms controlling GNS in wheat germplasm derived from crossing common wheat with A. cristatum, such as the newly bred wheat germplasm, Pubing3228 [46]. To address this gap, we developed a population of RILs derived from crossing Pubing3228 with Jing4839, which exhibits significant variations in GNS. Based on the recently developed wheat 55 K gene genotyping array, this study aimed to identify novel genetic regions and favorable alleles associated with GNS.

Therefore, the integration of advanced genomic technologies and innovative breeding approaches is essential for fulfilling the increasing demand for wheat. By integrating environmental and climatic considerations into breeding efforts, we can deepen our understanding of their influence on GNS and other critical yield determinants. Analyzing the relationships among GNS, grain weight, and spike number across varied environmental settings offers key insights for harmonizing yield component enhancement. Exploring the genetic diversity of common wheat and its wild relatives, especially untapped genetic resources, opens novel pathways for breeding initiatives. The advent of high-throughput phenotyping and sophisticated bioinformatics tools accelerates identifying and applying novel QTLs and genetic markers. Additionally, elucidating the role of A. cristatum-related genes in the wheat genome may pave new avenues for enhancing the resilience of wheat to stress and adaptability to various agricultural conditions.

Materials and methods

QTL analysis method for novel wheat germplasm Pubing3228 RIL population

For the QTL analysis, this study utilized a RIL population consisting of 210 families derived from the cross between Pubing3228 and Jing4839. Pubing3228, a genetically stable derivative breed, was selected from the offspring of the wheat-A. cristatum chromosome addition line 4844-12 (2n = 44). This hybrid germplasm, developed by Professor Li Lihui at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences over several decades, possesses elite wheat germplasm traits, including long spikes, a large number of spikelets per spike, and a high GNS [46, 47]. Conversely, Jing4839 is characterized by a higher grain weight but a lower GNS. Significant differences in several yield traits, especially in GNS, were observed between the two parents. The F9 RIL population was generated through successive selfing of the F1 generation derived from crossing Pubing3228 and Jing4839, employing the single seed descent method.

Collection of phenotypic data for interregional field trials and novel wheat germplasm Pubing3228 progeny

Field experiments were carried out at three locations, namely Pingdingshan, Yangling, and Xianyang, using 210 RILs derived from the cross between Pubing3228 and Jing4839, along with their respective parents. The experiments were conducted over three crop years (2018, 2019, 2020) in Pingdingshan, two crop years (2019 and 2020) in Yangling, and one crop year (2020) in Xianyang. The field layout was organized in a randomized complete block design, with each design replicated three times. Each replication consisted of three rows of crops, each row being 2 m in length and spaced 30 cm apart. Field management was conducted in accordance with local standards. Ten plants from each replication were selected for harvesting and manual threshing upon reaching physiological maturity. The GNS was counted directly, and the data focused on recording the average values related to the central spike of every ten plants.

Field management practices were governed by local standards. When physiological maturity was reached, ten individuals were randomly selected from each replication for harvesting and subsequent manual threshing. The spikes obtained from this process were directly counted to ascertain the GNS, with the data pertaining to the central spike of each plant being systematically recorded.

DNA extraction and SNP genotyping of hybrid offspring in wheat

Genomic DNA was extracted from the RIL population and its progenitors employing the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) method [48]. Agarose gel electrophoresis was conducted to verify DNA quality using a 0.8% gel. The concentration of DNA was quantified utilizing a microplate reader to ensure compliance with the criteria for further analyses. Subsequently, the DNA samples underwent genotyping at Beijing Capital Bio Company, utilizing the Illumina Infinium iSelect 55 K SNP array. During data processing, specific markers were selectively excluded to enhance the genotyping data’s accuracy and dependability. Notably, markers with a minimum allele frequency (MAF) under 5%, those exhibiting more than 10% missing data, and markers with heterozygosity rates above 20% were removed. Following this filtration process, 3334 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were retained for further QTL analysis. These markers were employed to explore the presence and effect of genetic variants on the targeted traits.

Construction and localization of QTL linkage map in hybrid offspring of wheat

In this investigation, outliers within the phenotypic data were initially removed before calculating the best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs) based on the average values for each environment, which then facilitated subsequent QTL mapping analysis. The QTL mapping analysis employed the QTL IciMapping software V4.2 (http://www.isbreeding.net) to construct a genetic linkage map using polymorphic SNP markers between Pubing3228 and Jing4839. The initial step involved the application of the BIN function to the SNP markers, facilitating the identification of segregating distortions, missing data, and superfluous markers. Following this preliminary screening, the residual SNP markers were employed to establish the framework of the genetic linkage map via the MAP function. The Kosambi function and maximum likelihood estimation were applied to ascertain the order and distance of the markers.

Subsequently, the generated genetic linkage map, in conjunction with the IciMapping software V4.2, was applied to execute QTL mapping. The composite interval mapping (ICIM) model was selected to identify QTLs associated with Grain Number per Spike (GNS). A QTL was deemed significant if it exhibited a Log of Odds (LOD) score exceeding 2.5. The QTL analysis was performed individually for each environment, and QTLs identified in two or more environments were regarded as stable. The nomenclature for the wheat QTL adhered to the following pattern: QGns.wa-1D, where “Q” signifies QTL, succeeded by the trait indicator; “wa” denotes the laboratory, and “1D” indicates the chromosome.

Identification of candidate genes associated with GNS in wheat

The selection of candidate genes for GNS was not limited to sequences associated with grain traits. Instead, genes located within the physical intervals of QTL and expressed explicitly in grain tissues were identified as potential candidates. Information regarding these candidate genes was sourced from the JBrowse website (https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/jbrowseiwgsc). Expression profiles of the candidate genes across various tissues were obtained from the expVIP website (http://wheat-expression.com). By comparing the expression patterns of these preliminary candidate genes, those associated with GNS were determined. This approach facilitated precise genomic localization of genes potentially influencing GNS and further validated their functional relevance through expression profile analysis.

Results

Environmental response of wheat varieties Pubing3228 and Jing4839 to GNS and their contributions to the analysis of QTL

This study focused on comparing the performance of GNS in two wheat varieties, Pubing3228 and Jing4839, under identical environmental conditions. The results revealed significant differences in GNS between Pubing3228 and Jing4839, with Pubing3228 consistently exhibiting higher GNS than Jing4839 across all tested environments (Table 1; Fig. 1A). To further investigate the genetic control of GNS, a RIL population derived from the hybridization of these two parental varieties was analyzed for GNS variability across three environments from 2019 to 2021 (Table 1, Supplementary Material 1). The continuous variation observed in GNS in the RIL population suggests that it is a quantitatively inherited trait with typical characteristics, making it suitable for QTL analysis (Fig. 1B-G).

Table 1 Comparative analysis of GNS in Pubing3228/Jing4839 RIL population across different environments
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Distribution of GNS in the Pubing3228 and Jing4839 RIL population across different years and locations. Note (A) Comparative bar chart of GNS from 2019 to 2021, where E1, E2, and E3 represent the distinct environments of Pingdingshan, Yangling, and Xianyang, respectively. Blue bars indicate the Pubing3228 variety, while red bars represent the Jing4839 variety. (B-G) Histograms and fitted curves showing the distribution of GNS in the RIL population under the environments of Pingdingshan in 2019 (E1, 2019), Pingdingshan in 2020 (E1, 2020), Yangling in 2020 (E2, 2020), Xianyang in 2020 (E3, 2020), Pingdingshan in 2021 (E1, 2021), and Yangling in 2021 (E2, 2021)

Full size image

Notably, the highest GNS, approximately 140 grains, was observed in the Pingdingshan (E1) environment in 2021, while the lowest GNS, about 19.67 grains, was recorded in the Yangling (E2) environment, indicating significant environmental effects on GNS (Table 1). Moreover, the average GNS of the RIL population ranged from 47.81 to 59.69 grains across different environments, implying an interaction between genetic factors and environmental conditions in influencing GNS (Table 1). The near-normal distribution of GNS data, with skewness and kurtosis absolute values mostly less than 1, further supported the suitability of this trait for quantitative genetic analysis (Table 1). Significant differences in GNS were observed between Pubing3228 and Jing4839, as well as variations in the RIL population under different environments.

Analysis of the genetic structure of hexaploid wheat through high-density linkage mapping

In this study, we constructed a high-density genetic linkage map using the genetic diversity analysis of two wheat varieties, Pubing3228 and Jing4839. Our approach involved using a 55 K iSelect SNP array, through which we selected 3,334 polymorphic markers out of a total of 52,478 SNP markers. These markers, which exhibited differences between the two varieties, were used to build the map (Table 2). To ensure the map’s accuracy and reliability, we excluded markers missing more than 10% of individuals or exhibiting co-segregation at the exact location.

Table 2 High-density genetic linkage maps of Pubing3228/Jing4839 RIL population
Full size table

The constructed linkage map accurately represented each chromosome of hexaploid wheat, resulting in 21 linkage groups. Notably, 16 chromosomes were selected for this study (Supplementary Material 2). The total map length was 9,494.36 cM, with an average interval of 2.90 cM between adjacent markers. Notably, the number of markers and marker intervals varied across specific chromosomes. For example, there were 76 markers on chromosome 4D, while chromosome 7D had 262 markers. The most minor average interval, 0.89 cM, was observed on chromosome 1 A, whereas the most significant average interval, 9.03 cM, was found on chromosome 4D.

Regarding the genome breakdown, the linkage map for the A genome comprised 1,166 markers, accounting for 34.97% of the total markers. It had a total length of 2,077.44 cm, with an average interval of 1.76 cm. The B genome consisted of 1,017 markers, representing 30.50% of the total markers, and had a total length of 1,871.35 cm, with an average interval of 1.86 cm. On the other hand, the D genome contained 1,151 markers, accounting for 34.53% of the total markers. It had a total length of 5,545.57 cm, with an average interval of 5.08 cm. Interestingly, while the number of markers in the A genome was similar to that in the B and D genomes, the marker coverage in the B genome was lower, suggesting potential differences in genetic diversity.

Analysis of QTLs for spikelet number revised to grain number per spike in wheat across multiple environments

GNS is a crucial trait that determines wheat yield. Understanding the genetic basis of GNS is vital for breeding. Thus, we conducted QTL mapping of GNS in two populations, Pubing3228 and Jing4839, under different environmental conditions to identify the key genetic factors controlling GNS.

Between 2019 and 2021, across three diverse environments, a total of 40 QTLs related to GNS were identified, distributed across 16 chromosomes, encompassing all chromosomes except for 1B, 2A, 5B, 6A, and 7A (Table 3). Chromosomes 5D and 7D harbored the highest number of QTLs, with six identified on each, whereas chromosomes 2B, 3B, 4D, 6B, and 6D each had only one QTL identified. The log of odds (LOD) scores of these QTLs ranged from 3.01 to 33.21, accounting for 4.25–17.17% of the phenotypic variation. Among all detected QTLs, QGns.wa-1 A.e1.2 exhibited the highest percentage of phenotypic variation explained (PVE), reaching up to 17.17%, located between AX-94,465,571 and AX-109,859,174 on chromosome 1 A. Following this were QGns.wa-7Da.e1 and QGns.wa-1D.e1.1, contributing 15.12% and 14.83% of PVE, respectively. Four QTLs were consistently detected across different environments, indicating stability, including QGns.wa-1A.e1.2, QGns.wa-1D.e1.1, QGns.wa-5A.e1, and QGns.wa-7Da.e1, all showing high PVE. QGns.wa-1A.e1.2 on chromosome 1A was detected in environments 2021E1, 2020E2, and 2020E3, contributing 8.2–17.17% to phenotypic variation. QGns.wa-1D on chromosome 1D was observed in environments 2019E1, 2020E1, and 2020E3, contributing 9.89–14.83% to phenotypic variation. QGns.wa-5A on chromosome 5A was identified in environments 2020E1, 2020E2, and 2020E3, explaining 9.095–11.13% of the phenotypic variation. QGns.wa-7Da.e1 on chromosome 7D accounted for 4.92–15.12% of the phenotypic variation. Notably, positive additive effects indicated an increase in the effect from Pubing3228, while negative additive effects suggested an increase from Jing4839. Except for two QTLs, all others exhibited positive additive effects, indicating that all favorable alleles originated from Pubing3228, which carries genetic traits promoting high GNS.

Table 3 Significant QTLs identified for GNS in the Pubing3228/Jing4839 RIL populations across different environments
Full size table

Exploration of the molecular mechanisms of GNS in wheat

To clarify the molecular mechanism behind GNS in wheat, this study analyzes stable QTLs that impact GNS. The study constructs an expression heatmap of relevant genes using the Wheat Expression Browser public database (http://www.wheatexpression.com). Out of the 1265 genes analyzed, emphasis is placed on genes expressed explicitly in wheat grains, considering them as candidate genes that may influence GNS. This approach identifies 11 potential candidate genes (Table 4) related to GNS. These genes are primarily located on chromosomes 4A, 5D, and 7D.

Table 4 Identified candidate genes for GNS in wheat from the Pubing3228/Jing4839 RIL population
Full size table

Among the candidate genes, TraesCS4A01G601800 is the only one on chromosome 4A. It is potentially involved in the function of 4-hydroxybenzoate acetyltransferase in wheat. On chromosome 5D, three candidate genes are identified: TraesCS5D01G044000, TraesCS5D01G051000, and TraesCS5D01G033700. These genes may encode ribosomal protein L28 [49], aging-related protein, and YABBY transcription factor. On chromosome 7D, seven candidate genes with diverse functions are found. They include TraesCS7D01G056100, potentially encoding S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase precursor, TraesCS7D01G060100 for cysteine proteinase, TraesCS7D01G064300 for starch synthase, TraesCS7D01G109200 for GDSL esterase/lipase, TraesCS7D01G148000 for an aging-related protein, TraesCS7D01G117600 for an ethylene-responsive transcription factor, and TraesCS7D01G117100 for histone H3 [50, 51].

Discussion

GNS, a key determinant of wheat yield, has been extensively studied [52]. Previous research has attributed the enhancement of wheat yield primarily to the increase in GNS [53], making it a crucial selection target in wheat breeding practices. Despite significant progress in GNS over the past decades in China, which has substantially contributed to yield improvements in wheat breeding, recent years have not seen notable advancements in wheat yield enhancement. This stagnation may be attributed to slow progress in identifying and utilizing new genetic resources related to GNS [54, 55]. The germplasm Pubing3228, derived from distant hybridization between common wheat and Agropyron, represents a novel wheat germplasm with numerous desirable agronomic traits, especially those associated with GNS. Therefore, it is imperative to further explore the genetic mechanisms underlying the high grain number in Pubing3228 [56, 57].

QTL comparative study of genetic mechanisms for GNS in Pubing3228 wheat germplasm

We conducted a study using an F2:3 population derived from a cross between Pubing3228 and Jing4839 to investigate the underlying genetic mechanism of GNS in Pubing3228. Our investigation revealed 12 QTLs spread across multiple chromosomes (Supplementary Material 3), marking a notable increase to 40 identified QTLs, with many not previously detected. This variance could stem from using an RIL population and a higher-density genetic linkage map constructed with 3334 SNP markers, unlike the earlier study’s temporary F2:3 population and 179 SSR markers.

We employed the BLAST method to determine the physical positions of the QTL identified in the previous study. It is important to note that the QTLs identified in our study were found within or near the mapping intervals of the previous QTL (Supplementary Material 3). For example, a previously identified QTL on chromosome 5A has been refined in our study from a 20 Mb interval, highlighting potential consistency between the two studies and narrowing the mapping intervals for several QTLs, such as those on chromosomes 7A and 7B. This detailed comparison underscores the consistency of our findings with previous research while offering more precise mapping intervals for identified QTLs.

Comparative analysis and new insights of QTLs for GNS in Pubing3228 wheat germplasm

In this study, we delved into the genetic underpinnings of GNS to enhance wheat yield and facilitate MAS in breeding. Through QTL analysis, an established method for uncovering genetic resources, we reviewed and identified 170 GNS QTLs across all 16 chromosomes (Supplementary Material 4) [58, 59], aligning the physical positions of 153 previously reported QTLs for comparison (Supplementary Material 4). Comparing our results with previous studies revealed some significant differences. However, our study reveals that the genomic locations of several QTLs, which account for approximately 21.33% of the total variation, are consistent with previously identified QTLs (Supplementary Material 5). Our findings showed significant differences and consistencies with prior research, notably confirming the locations of several QTLs that contribute to about 21.33% of the total variation. For instance, we identified QTLs on chromosome 1 A at the same position (498–499 Mb) as previously reported and discovered three GNS QTLs within a broad genetic region on chromosome 7B, previously noted in another study [60, 61]. Our research also matched previously identified GNS QTLs on chromosomes 5 A and 6B [62].

In this study, we identified several GNS QTLs that were consistent with previous research, indicating the reliability of our results. We mapped three major QTLs (QGns.wa-1A, QGns.wa-7D, and QGns.wa-1D) to specific regions on chromosomes 1A, 7D, and 1D, respectively. These regions were between AX-94,465,571 and AX-109,859,174, AX-110,826,147 and AX-108,748,734, AX-109,994,213 and AX-89,491,149. Among the QTLs identified, these QTLs exhibit the highest PVE in all three environments and demonstrate stability. However, the other two major GNS QTLs have yet to be documented in previous studies [63, 64].

An exciting aspect of our study is that we detected more GNS QTLs than in previous studies. This condition may be attributed to the utilization of new germplasm Pubing3228, which is derived from a cross between common wheat and A. cristatum. Moreover, to enhance the detection of GNS QTLs, we constructed a high-density linkage map using many gene-based SNP markers. It is important to note that our study did not find GNS QTLs on chromosomes 5B or 6A. However, previous studies have identified these QTLs controlling GNS [60, 65].

Essential chromosomes and region analysis of QTL for GNS in Pubing3228 wheat germplasm

This study observed an uneven distribution of QTLs for GNS across different chromosomes. Most GNS QTLs were concentrated on a small subset of chromosomes, namely 1A, 1D, 3A, 3D, 5A, 5D, and 7D. For instance, chromosome 1D harbored five GNS QTLs within the range of 126 cM to 129 cM, while chromosome 5A contained five QTLs within the 326 cM to 338 cM. Although only four GNS QTLs were identified on chromosome 3A, they were concentrated in a relatively short range of 203 cM to 258 cM. Other noteworthy regions included the interval of 809 cM to 835 cM on chromosome 5D and 165 cM to 168 cM on chromosome 1A, each containing four GNS QTLs. On the other hand, GNS QTLs on chromosomes 3D and 7D were scattered throughout the chromosomes. These significant chromosomal regions should be prioritized for future research. Similar regions and chromosomes associated with GNS have been identified in previous studies [66,67,68]. Although various studies have explored yield-related traits in wheat, limited research has specifically investigated GNS [69,70,71]. A previous study identified and validated major regions on chromosomes 5A and 2A for high GNS using an RIL population derived from the hybridization between synthetic hexaploid wheat ‘W7984’ and the spring wheat variety ‘Opata M85’. Notably, two GNS QTLs were identified on chromosome 6D. Pubing3228 originated from the crossbreeding of common wheat and A. cristatum [70]. Prior research demonstrated that increased floret and grain numbers in the wheat-A. cristatum chromosome addition line 4844-12 (2n = 44) was controlled by a pair of A. cristatum chromosomes (6P) substituting the wheat chromosome 6D. Pubing3228 was developed through several generations of selection from the progeny of 4844-12 [72]. A prior study has also highlighted the importance of the A. cristatum 6P chromosome segment in increasing GNS in wheat-A. cristatum translocation line Pubing2978. Hence, further analysis is required to determine if these two QTLs on chromosome 6D have origins in A. cristatum [45].

Prediction and analysis of candidate genes associated with GNS in Pubing3228 wheat germplasm

Although numerous QTLs associated with GNS have been identified in wheat, only some candidate genes for GNS have been reported, leaving the genetic mechanism of GNS in wheat largely unknown. This study pinpointed seven stable QTLs for GNS across various environments and proceeded with an analysis to predict 11 potential candidate genes based on functional annotation and expression levels.

Three candidate genes were particularly noteworthy due to their significant association with the most impactful SNP AX-108,748,734, on chromosome 7D, contributing to the highest average PVE (12.62%). The first, TraesCS7D01G148000, is hypothesized to encode a protein linked to aging processes in wheat, crucial for grain yield as they potentially facilitate nutrient reallocation to developing seeds [73]. The second, TraesCS7D01G117600, is believed to encode an ethylene-responsive transcription factor (ERF), part of the AP2/ERF family, instrumental in stress response, reproduction, defense, and hormone secretion regulation [74], with implications for flower development control [75]. The third, TraesCS7D01G117100, might be associated with histone H3, playing a role in the vernalization-induced transition from vegetative to reproductive growth through histone methylation [50, 51], suggesting its potential impact on GNS due to the established relationship between GNS and growth phases [76].

Four other candidate genes were also identified on chromosome 7D. Two genes (TraesCS7D01G056100, TraesCS7D01G060100) correspond to SNP AX-108,759,691, with TraesCS7D01G056100 speculated to encode S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase precursor, potentially playing a role in polyamine biosynthesis. Research has suggested that polyamines, including putrescine, spermidine, and cadaverine, are involved in cell division, embryogenesis, flower development, and fruit development [77, 78]. The candidate gene TraesCS7D01G060100 may encode a cysteine protease, a significant class of proteases in plants involved in various processes such as post-translational modification, development, aging, programmed cell death, and antibiotic response [79, 80]. The candidate genes TraesCS7D01G064300 and TraesCS7D01G109200 may encode starch synthase and GDSL esterase/lipase, respectively. Starch synthase is a critical enzyme in starch synthesis in wheat endosperm, directly affecting final yield [81, 82], while GDSL esterase/lipase plays a regulatory role in plant development and morphogenesis [83, 84].

On chromosome 5D, three candidate genes have been pinpointed: TraesCS5D01G044000, TraesCS5D01G051000, and TraesCS5D01G033700. TraesCS5D01G044000 and TraesCS5D01G051000 are postulated to encode for the 60 S ribosomal protein l28 and a protein linked to aging processes, respectively. The 60 S ribosomal protein l28 plays a crucial role in translation, potentially influencing mitochondrial translation and various plant cellular activities [85]. Research indicates that the 60 S ribosomal proteins are integral to maintaining ribosomal complex stability and enhancing protein biosynthesis, suggesting their possible impact on GNS. Additionally, TraesCS5D01G033700 is implicated in the regulation of pistil and stamen development within wheat flowers. Various studies have documented the significant expression of TaYABBY genes throughout cereal development phases, underscoring their importance in plant growth and reproduction [86, 87]. Furthermore, a significant SNP, AX-108,908,317, on chromosome 4A has been associated with a gene encoding 4-hydroxybenzoic acid acetyltransferase. Previous research has demonstrated that this enzyme is crucial for ubiquinone biosynthesis in rice [88]. Ubiquinone is an essential lipophilic electron carrier required for the mitochondrial respiratory chain in eukaryotic cells [89, 90]. In Arabidopsis, studies have shown that mutants lacking ubiquinone experience developmental arrest during early embryogenesis stages [91,92,93,94].

Scientific and production significance

This study offers significant scientific value in providing new avenues and tools for enhancing the genetic potential of wheat. Firstly, by analyzing the hybridization of Pubing3228 and Jing4839 and conducting subsequent QTL analysis, this study not only elucidates the genetic basis of GNS but also identifies valuable molecular markers that can be employed in wheat breeding programs. Developing high-yielding wheat varieties can be expedited by utilizing these markers in MAS. The identification and analysis of GNS-related genes in this study contribute to our understanding of the underlying mechanisms involved in wheat yield formation, thereby offering crucial insights for future efforts in crop improvement. Moreover, although this study primarily focuses on plant genetics, its methodology and findings extend beyond this area and can inspire a diverse range of biological and agricultural research. For instance, comprehending the genetic control mechanisms behind complex traits like GNS can facilitate similar investigations in other crops or biological traits.

Limitations and future prospects

Despite the advancements achieved in our research, certain limitations require attention. While candidate genes for GNS have been pinpointed, their exact roles and mechanisms in GNS regulation need experimental validation for a comprehensive understanding. Additionally, the impact of environmental variables on GNS was not exhaustively analyzed. Future studies should evaluate the stability and performance of QTLs across various environmental settings. This investigation predominantly centered on the Pubing3228 wheat germplasm, potentially restricting the universality of the identified QTLs and genes. Expanding research to include a broader spectrum of wheat germplasms will broaden the relevance and application of these findings. Employing precise gene-editing methods, such as CRISPR/Cas9, to alter candidate genes can validate their functions and investigate their suitability for molecular breeding strategies. In conclusion, our study contributes valuable perspectives on genetic advancement and yield optimization in wheat, yet further exploration is essential to validate these insights fully.

Conclusion

This study identified 40 QTLs associated with GNS in the wheat germplasm Pubing3228 (Fig. 2), thereby enriching our understanding of wheat’s genetic diversity and illuminating the intricate genetics of the GNS trait. These QTLs, distributed across 16 chromosomes, underscore the multi-gene influence on GNS rather than its being governed by a single gene. Five QTLs demonstrated substantial phenotypic variability across different environments, accounting for over 10% of the variation and highlighting their importance in wheat yield development. The majority (approximately 94.67%) of beneficial GNS QTLs were derived from Pubing3228, underscoring its genetic resource value. Furthermore, the study proposes 11 candidate genes potentially influencing GNS, involving processes like aging and ethylene response, offering crucial insights into the genetic regulatory mechanisms of GNS.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Graphical summary of the genetic basis of high GNS in the wheat-A. cristatum hybrid germplasm Pubing3228

Full size image

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

GNS:

Grain number per spike

RIL:

Recombination inbred line

SNP:

Single nucleotide polymorphism

QTL:

Quantitative trait locus

MAS:

Marker-assisted selection

NGS:

Next-generation sequencing

MTA:

Marker-trait association

GISH:

Genomic in situ hybridization

FISH:

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

PDS:

Pingdingshan

YL:

Yangling

XY:

Xianyang

PVE:

Phenotypic variance explanation

References

  1. Gao Y, An K, Guo W, et al. The endosperm-specific transcription factor TaNAC019 regulates glutenin and starch accumulation and its elite allele improves wheat grain quality. Plant Cell. 2021;33(3):603–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaa040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu P, Yin B, Liu X, et al. Optimizing plant spatial competition can change phytohormone content and promote tillering, thereby improving wheat yield. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1147711. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1147711. Published 2023 Mar 6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou X, Zhao Y, Ni P, Ni Z, Sun Q, Zong Y. CRISPR-mediated acceleration of wheat improvement: advances and perspectives. J Genet Genomics. 2023;50(11):815–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2023.09.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. González-García S, Almeida F, Moreira MT, Brandão M. Evaluating the environmental profiles of winter wheat rotation systems under different management strategies. Sci Total Environ. 2021;770:145270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karnatam KS, Mythri B, Un Nisa W et al. Silage maize as a potent candidate for sustainable animal husbandry development-perspectives and strategies for genetic enhancement. Front Genet. 2023;14:1150132. Published 2023 May 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2023.1150132.

  6. Royo C, Ammar K, Villegas D, Soriano JM. Agronomic, physiological and genetic changes associated with evolution, migration and modern breeding in Durum Wheat. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:674470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.674470. Published 2021 Jul 8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasaya A, Rehman I, Mohi Ud Din A, et al. Foliar application of putrescine alleviates terminal drought stress by modulating water status, membrane stability, and yield- related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [published correction appears in Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1231723]. Front Plant Sci. 2023;13:1000877. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1000877. Published 2023 Apr 21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Reynolds M, Foulkes MJ, Slafer GA, et al. Raising yield potential in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(7):1899–918. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp016.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li T, Deng G, Su Y, et al. Genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci for grain size and weight by high-resolution genetic mapping in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135(1):257–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03964-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen L, Xu Z, Fan X, et al. Genetic dissection of quantitative trait loci for flag leaf size in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1047899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1047899. Published 2022 Dec 14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Dobrovolskaya O, Pont C, Sibout R, et al. FRIZZY PANICLE drives supernumerary spikelets in bread wheat. Plant Physiol. 2015;167(1):189–99. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.250043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dolferus R, Ji X, Richards RA. Abiotic stress and control of grain number in cereals. Plant Sci. 2011;181(4):331–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.05.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li C. Breeding crops by design for future agriculture. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2020;21(6):423–5. https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B2010001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fradgley N, Evans G, Biernaskie JM, et al. Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat. Plant Soil. 2020;452(1):587–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan H, Mamrutha HM, Mishra CN et al. Harnessing high yield potential in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under climate change scenario. Plants (Basel). 2023;12(6):1271. Published 2023 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061271.

  16. Kuzay S, Lin H, Li C et al. WAPO-A1 is the causal gene of the 7AL QTL for spikelet number per spike in wheat. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(1):e1009747. Published 2022 Jan 13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009747.

  17. Cao S, Xu D, Hanif M, Xia X, He Z. Genetic architecture underpinning yield component traits in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2020;133(6):1811–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03562-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Yao X, Yao Y, An L, Feng Z, Wu K. Genome-Wide Association Mapping of Hulless barely phenotypes in Drought Environment. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:924892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.924892. Published 2022 Jun 23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Z, Luo Q, Deng Y, Du K, Li X, Ren T. Identification and validation of a stable major-effect quantitative trait locus for Kernel number per spike on chromosome 2D in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):14289. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241814289. Published 2023 Sep 19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Arriagada O, Marcotuli I, Gadaleta A, Schwember AR. Molecular Mapping and Genomics of Grain Yield in Durum Wheat: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(19):7021. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21197021. Published 2020 Sep 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Xie Q, Sparkes DL. Dissecting the trade-off of grain number and size in wheat. Planta. 2021;254(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-021-03658-5. Published 2021 Jun 12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bhusal N, Sarial AK, Sharma P, Sareen S. Mapping QTLs for grain yield components in wheat under heat stress. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0189594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189594. Published 2017 Dec 19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Guan P, Lu L, Jia L, et al. Global QTL analysis identifies genomic regions on chromosomes 4A and 4B harboring stable loci for yield-related traits across different environments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:529. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00529. Published 2018 Apr 25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Li F, Wen W, He Z, et al. Genome-wide linkage mapping of yield-related traits in three Chinese bread wheat populations using high-density SNP markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2018;131(9):1903–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-018-3122-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu Z, Zhao P, Lai X, Wang X, Ji W, Xu S. The selection and application of peduncle length QTL QPL_6D.1 in modern wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding. Theor Appl Genet. 2023;136(3):32. Published 2023 Mar 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04274-5.

  26. Havill JS, Richardson BJ, Rohwer CL, Gent DH, Henning JA, Muehlbauer GJ. Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with R1-mediated resistance to powdery mildew and sex determination in hop (Humulus lupulus L). Theor Appl Genet. 2023;136(7):154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04399-7. Published 2023 Jun 15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen B, Li Y, Tian M, Su H, Sun W, Li Y. Linkage mapping and QTL analysis of growth traits in Rhopilema esculentum. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-04431-0. Published 2022 Jan 10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu S, Fang T, Dong H, et al. Genetic and QTL mapping in African bermudagrass. Plant Genome. 2021;14(1):e20073. https://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. de Blas FJ, Bruno CI, Arias RS et al. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis for peanut smut resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):312. Published 2021 Jul 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03023-4.

  30. Jiang C, Xu Z, Fan X, et al. Identification and validation of quantitative trait loci for fertile spikelet number per spike and grain number per fertile spikelet in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2023;136(4):69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04297-y. Published 2023 Mar 23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alipour H, Bihamta MR, Mohammadi V, Peyghambari SA, Bai G, Zhang G. Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) revealed Molecular Genetic Diversity of Iranian wheat Landraces and cultivars. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1293. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01293. Published 2017 Aug 29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Morris JA, Caragine C, Daniloski Z, et al. Discovery of target genes and pathways at GWAS loci by pooled single-cell CRISPR screens. Science. 2023;380(6646):eadh7699. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh7699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Harder AVE, Terwindt GM, Nyholt DR, van den Maagdenberg AMJM. Migraine genetics: Status and road forward. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(2):3331024221145962. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024221145962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rajendran NR, Qureshi N, Pourkheirandish M. Genotyping by sequencing advancements in Barley. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:931423. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.931423. Published 2022 Aug 8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sehgal D, Dreisigacker S. GWAS Case studies in Wheat. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2481:341–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2237-7_19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang G, Zhang Y, Wei X, Cui L, Nie X. Genetic Diversity of Transcription Factor Genes in Triticum and Mining for Promising haplotypes for Beneficial Agronomic traits. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:899292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.899292. Published 2022 Jul 8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang R, Lu C, Meng X, et al. Fine mapping of powdery mildew and stripe rust resistance genes Pm5V/Yr5V transferred from Dasypyrum villosum into wheat without yield penalty. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135(10):3629–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04206-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang Z, Lin Z, Xin Z. Research progress in BYDV resistance genes derived from wheat and its wild relatives. J Genet Genomics. 2009;36(9):567–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1673-8527(08)60148-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li H, Lv M, Song L, et al. Production and identification of wheat-Agropyron cristatum 2P translocation lines. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(1):e0145928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145928. Published 2016 Jan 5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Han B, Sun Y, et al. Introgression of chromosome 1P from Agropyron cristatum reduces leaf size and plant height to improve the plant architecture of common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2022;135(6):1951–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-022-04086-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun Y, Lyu M, Han H, et al. Identification and fine mapping of alien fragments associated with enhanced grain weight from Agropyron cristatum chromosome 7P in common wheat backgrounds. Theor Appl Genet. 2021;134(11):3759–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-021-03927-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Song L, Lu Y, Zhang J, et al. Cytological and molecular analysis of wheat - Agropyron cristatum translocation lines with 6P chromosome fragments conferring superior agronomic traits in common wheat. Genome. 2016;59(10):840–50. https://doi.org/10.1139/gen-2016-0065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lu M, Lu Y, Li H, et al. Transferring desirable genes from Agropyron cristatum 7P chromosome into common wheat. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7):e0159577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159577. Published 2016 Jul 26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang J, Liu W, Han H, et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing of Agropyron cristatum to identify available gene resources for the enhancement of wheat. Genomics. 2015;106(2):129–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2015.04.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang Z, Han H, Liu W, et al. Deletion mapping and verification of an enhanced-grain number per spike locus from the 6PL chromosome arm of Agropyron cristatum in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2019;132(10):2815–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-019-03390-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu YF, Ma FF, Zhang JP, Liu H, Li LH, An DG. Unraveling the genetic basis of grain number-related traits in a wheat-Agropyron cristatum introgressed line through high-resolution linkage mapping. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04547-7. Published 2023 Nov 15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu H, Han G, Gu T et al. Identification of the major QTL QPm.cas-7D for adult plant resistance to wheat powdery mildew. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:1042399. Published 2022 Oct 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1042399.

  48. Kuo P, Henderson IR, Lambing C. CTAB DNA extraction and genotyping-by-sequencing to Map Meiotic crossovers in plants. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2484:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2253-7_4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nagaraj S, Senthil-Kumar M, Ramu VS, Wang K, Mysore KS. Plant Ribosomal proteins, RPL12 and RPL19, play a role in Nonhost Disease Resistance against Bacterial pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2016;6:1192. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01192. Published 2016 Jan 6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Diallo AO, Ali-Benali MA, Badawi M, Houde M, Sarhan F. Expression of vernalization responsive genes in wheat is associated with histone H3 trimethylation. Mol Genet Genomics. 2012;287(7):575–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00438-012-0701-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Terada R, Nakayama T, Iwabuchi M, Shimamoto K. A wheat histone H3 promoter confers cell division-dependent and -independent expression of the Gus A gene in transgenic rice plants. Plant J. 1993;3(2):241–52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1993.t01-16-00999.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang X, Jia H, Li T, et al. TaCol-B5 modifies spike architecture and enhances grain yield in wheat. Science. 2022;376(6589):180–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm0717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Guo J, Guo J, Li L, et al. Combined linkage analysis and association mapping identifies genomic regions associated with yield-related and drought-tolerance traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Theor Appl Genet. 2023;136(12):250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-023-04494-9. Published 2023 Nov 20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sun XY, Wang YF, Wang YH, et al. Progress on genic male sterility gene in soybean. Yi Chuan. 2021;43(1):52–65. https://doi.org/10.16288/j.yczz.20-357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Wang X, Han R, Chen Z, et al. Identification and evaluation of wheat-Aegilops bicornis lines with resistance to Powdery Mildew and Stripe Rust. Plant Dis. 2022;106(3):864–71. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-21-0982-RE.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Alsamadany H, Alzahrani Y, Shah ZH. Physiomorphic and molecular-based evaluation of wheat germplasm under drought and heat stress. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1107945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1107945. Published 2023 Apr 12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen Q, Guo Z, Shi X, et al., et al. Increasing the Grain Yield and Grain Protein Content of Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum) by introducing missense mutations in the Q gene. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10772. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231810772. Published 2022 Sep 15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Engel H, Herget GW, Füllgraf H, et al. Chondrogenic bone tumors: the importance of imaging characteristics. Chondrogene Knochentumoren: Bildgebung als Wegweiser? Rofo. 2021;193(3):262–75. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1288-1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Tolios A, De Las Rivas J, Hovig E, Trouillas P, Scorilas A, Mohr T. Computational approaches in cancer multidrug resistance research: identification of potential biomarkers, drug targets and drug-target interactions. Drug Resist Updat. 2020;48:100662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2019.100662.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Li F, Wen W, Liu J, et al. Genetic architecture of grain yield in bread wheat based on genome-wide association studies. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):168. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1781-3. Published 2019 Apr 29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu G, Jia L, Lu L, et al. Mapping QTLs of yield-related traits using RIL population derived from common wheat and tibetan semi-wild wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127(11):2415–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-014-2387-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Muhammad A, Hu W, Li Z, et al. Appraising the Genetic Architecture of Kernel traits in Hexaploid Wheat using GWAS. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(16):5649. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165649. Published 2020 Aug 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Li T, Deng G, Tang Y, et al. Identification and validation of a Novel Locus Controlling Spikelet Number in Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:611106. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.611106. Published 2021 Feb 26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Li T, Li Q, Wang J et al. High-resolution detection of quantitative trait loci for seven important yield-related traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SLAF-seq genetic map. BMC Genom Data. 2022;23(1):37. Published 2022 May 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-022-01050-0.

  65. Guo J, Shi W, Zhang Z et al. Association of yield-related traits in founder genotypes and derivatives of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):38. Published 2018 Feb 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1234-4.

  66. Crocker TF, Brown L, Lam N, Wray F, Knapp P, Forster A. Information provision for stroke survivors and their carers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;11(11):CD001919. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001919.pub4. Published 2021 Nov 23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang P, Cui Q, Zhang Y, et al. A review of Pedal Peptide/Orcokinin-type neuropeptides. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2021;22(1):41–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666201109112758.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ayalon L, Roy S. Combatting ageism in the Western Pacific region. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;35:100593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100593. Published 2022 Sep 7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Cui F, Zhang N, Fan XL et al. Utilization of a Wheat660K SNP array-derived high-density genetic map for high-resolution mapping of a major QTL for kernel number. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3788. Published 2017 Jun 19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04028-6.

  70. Onyemaobi I, Ayalew H, Liu H, Siddique KHM, Yan G. Identification and validation of a major chromosome region for high grain number per spike under meiotic stage water stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0194075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194075. Published 2018 Mar 8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Shi W, Hao C, Zhang Y, et al. A Combined Association Mapping and Linkage Analysis of Kernel Number per Spike in Common Wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01412. Published 2017 Aug 18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Wu J, Yang X, Wang H, et al. The introgression of chromosome 6P specifying for increased numbers of florets and kernels from Agropyron cristatum into wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;114(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0405-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Kipp S, Mistele B, Schmidhalter U. Identification of stay-green and early senescence phenotypes in high-yielding winter wheat, and their relationship to grain yield and grain protein concentration using high-throughput phenotyping techniques. Funct Plant Biol. 2014;41(3):227–35. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP13221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhai Y, Fan Z, Cui Y, Gu X, Chen S, Ma H. APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor in fruit ripening: roles, interactions and expression regulation. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:979348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.979348. Published 2022 Aug 18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Shi JX, Malitsky S, De Oliveira S, et al. SHINE transcription factors act redundantly to pattern the archetypal surface of Arabidopsis flower organs. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(5):e1001388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1001388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Song S, Wang G, Hu Y, et al. OsMFT1 increases spikelets per panicle and delays heading date in rice by suppressing Ehd1, FZP and SEPALLATA-like genes. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(18):4283–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Tian AG, Zhao JY, Zhang JS, Gai JY, Chen SY. Genomic characterization of the S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase genes from soybean. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108(5):842–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1507-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhao X, Zhang L, Wang J et al. Identification of key biomarkers and immune infiltration in systemic lupus erythematosus by integrated bioinformatics analysis [published correction appears in J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):64]. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):35. Published 2021 Jan 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02698-x.

  79. Kiyosaki T, Asakura T, Matsumoto I, et al. Wheat cysteine proteases triticain alpha, beta and gamma exhibit mutually distinct responses to gibberellin in germinating seeds. J Plant Physiol. 2009;166(1):101–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.02.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Simova-Stoilova L, Vaseva I, Grigorova B, Demirevska K, Feller U. Proteolytic activity and cysteine protease expression in wheat leaves under severe soil drought and recovery. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010;48(2–3):200–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.11.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Jiang Q, Hou J, Hao C, et al. The wheat (T. Aestivum) sucrose synthase 2 gene (TaSus2) active in endosperm development is associated with yield traits. Funct Integr Genomics. 2011;11(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10142-010-0188-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Li R, Tan Y, Zhang H. Regulators of starch biosynthesis in cereal crops. Molecules. 2021;26(23):7092. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26237092. Published 2021 Nov 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Su HG, Zhang XH, Wang TT, et al. Genome-wide identification, evolution, and expression of GDSL-Type Esterase/Lipase Gene Family in soybean. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:726. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00726. Published 2020 Jun 25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Requena-Ramírez MD, Atienza SG, Hornero-Méndez D, Rodríguez-Suárez C. Mediation of a GDSL Esterase/Lipase in Carotenoid Esterification in Tritordeum suggests a common mechanism of Carotenoid Esterification in Triticeae Species. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:592515. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.592515. Published 2020 Dec 17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Handa H, Kobayashi-Uehara A, Murayama S. Characterization of a wheat cDNA encoding mitochondrial ribosomal protein L11: qualitative and quantitative tissue-specific differences in its expression. Mol Genet Genomics. 2001;265(4):569–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004380100457.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Chen Z, Liao M, Yang Z, et al. Co-expression network analysis of genes and networks associated with wheat pistillody. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13902. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13902. Published 2022 Aug 24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Hao L, Zhang J, Shi S, et al. Identification and expression profiles of the YABBY transcription factors in wheat. PeerJ. 2022;10:e12855. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12855. Published 2022 Feb 3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Ohara K, Yamamoto K, Hamamoto M, Sasaki K, Yazaki K. Functional characterization of OsPPT1, which encodes p-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase involved in ubiquinone biosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Physiol. 2006;47(5):581–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcj025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Grünler J, Ericsson J, Dallner G. Branch-point reactions in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, dolichol, ubiquinone and prenylated proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994;1212(3):259–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2760(94)90200-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Manoj KM, Gideon DA, Parashar A. What is the role of lipid membrane-embedded quinones in Mitochondria and chloroplasts? Chemiosmotic Q-cycle versus murburn reaction perspective. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2021;79(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-020-00945-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Okada K, Ohara K, Yazaki K, et al. The AtPPT1 gene encoding 4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyl diphosphate transferase in ubiquinone biosynthesis is required for embryo development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol. 2004;55(4):567–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-004-1298-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Zoulias N, Rowe J, Thomson EE, et al. Inhibition of Arabidopsis stomatal development by plastoquinone oxidation. Curr Biol. 2021;31(24):5622–e56327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Morales LO, Shapiguzov A, Safronov O, et al. Ozone responses in Arabidopsis: beyond stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 2021;186(1):180–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiab097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Kumar A, Prasad A, Sedlářová M, Ksas B, Havaux M, Pospíšil P. Interplay between antioxidants in response to photooxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Free Radic Biol Med. 2020;160:894–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2020.08.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere gratitude to Prof. Lihui Li of the Institute of Crop Sciences at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for generously providing the materials essential for this study. We also wish to acknowledge Prof. Li and Jinpeng Zhang for their invaluable guidance and direction throughout this research. This work was supported by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1804102).

Funding

This research was funded by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1804102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Chemistry and Environment Engineering, Pingdingshan University, North to Weilailu road, New district, Pingdingshan, Henan, 467000, China

    Jiansheng Wang & Shiping Cheng

  2. Henan Key Laboratory of Germplasm Innovation and Utilization of Eco-economic Woody Plant, Pingdingshan, Henan, China

    Jiansheng Wang & Shiping Cheng

  3. Pingdingshan Academy of Agricultural Science, Pingdingshan, Henan, 467001, China

    Erwei Wang & Aichu Ma

Authors
  1. Jiansheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erwei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shiping Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aichu Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JSW was the principal investigator, leading the design and execution of the experiments, data analysis, and the preparation of figures and/or tables. EWW, SPC, and ACM significantly contributed to conducting the experiments. All authors were actively involved in drafting and revising the manuscript, and each has given approval for the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiansheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study adhered to all applicable institutional, national, and international guidelines and laws for experimental research and field studies on plants. Permission for the use of all materials, including Pubing3228, was duly obtained from the corresponding author.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Wang, E., Cheng, S. et al. Genetic insights into superior grain number traits: a QTL analysis of wheat-Agropyron cristatum derivative pubing3228. BMC Plant Biol 24, 271 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04913-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04913-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us