Skip to main content
Download PDF

Regulatory effects of silicon nanoparticles on the growth and photosynthesis of cotton seedlings under salt and low-temperature dual stress

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 504 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Silicon nanoparticles (SiO2-NPs) play a crucial role in plants mitigating abiotic stress. However, the regulatory mechanism of SiO2-NPs in response to multiple stress remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to reveal the regulatory mechanism of SiO2-NPs on the growth and photosynthesis in cotton seedlings under salt and low-temperature dual stress. It will provide a theoretical basis for perfecting the mechanism of crop resistance and developing the technology of cotton seedling preservation and stable yield in arid and high salt areas.

Results

The results showed that the salt and low-temperature dual stress markedly decreased the plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass of cotton seedlings by 9.58%, 15.76%, and 39.80%, respectively. While SiO2-NPs alleviated the damage of the dual stress to cotton seedling growth. In addition to reduced intercellular CO2 concentration, SiO2-NPs significantly improved the photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate of cotton seedling leaves. Additionally, stomatal length, stomatal width, and stomatal density increased with the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration. Notably, SiO2-NPs not only enhanced chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content, but also slowed the decrease of maximum photochemical efficiency, actual photochemical efficiency, photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll, and the increase in non-photochemical quenching. Moreover, SiO2-NPs enhanced the activities of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, improved leaf water potential, and decreased abscisic acid and malondialdehyde content. All the parameters obtained the optimal effects at a SiO2-NPs concentration of 100 mg L− 1, and significantly increased the plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass by 7.68%, 5.37%, and 43.00%, respectively. Furthermore, significant correlation relationships were observed between photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance, stomatal length, stomatal width, stomatal density, chlorophyll content, maximum photochemical efficiency, actual photochemical efficiency, photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll, and Rubisco activity.

Conclusion

The results suggested that the SiO2-NPs improved the growth and photosynthesis of cotton seedlings might mainly result from regulating the stomatal state, improving the light energy utilization efficiency and electron transport activity of PSII reaction center, and inducing the increase of Rubisco activity to enhance carbon assimilation under the salt and low-temperature dual stress.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Soil salinization has become an important global issue regarding resources and ecological environments [1]. Additionally, it is one of the main factors limiting crop growth, development, and the increase in stable yield, which poses a severe threat to global food security [2, 3]. Soil salinization is getting worse worldwide, and about 50% of the total agricultural land is expected to be covered by saline soils by 2050 due to climate change and irrational water use for agriculture [4]. Meanwhile, with the gradual increase of the global greenhouse effect, extreme temperature events such as cold waves occur frequently [5], and the probability of crops suffering from low-temperature stress becomes more and more severe in the 21st century [6]. Salt and low-temperature stress lead to shared or specific damage to plants, including osmotic stress, oxidative stress, nutritional disorders, reduced activities of various functional enzymes, alteration of photosynthetic and metabolic processes, and genotoxicity [7, 8]. Differently, salt stress results in a toxic concentration of Na+ and Cl− [9]. Moreover, over accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) negatively affects cell membrane integrity and permeability, ion transport, hormone balance, respiration, oxidation/reduction, DNA and protein synthesis [10, 11]. Together, these subsequently affect the crops growth, development, and yield.

Plants have developed a range of resistant mechanisms to counter salt and low temperature stress. For example, many kinds of osmolytes such as betaines, sorbitol, trehalose, and proline are produced to sustain cellular structures and diminish ROS-induced oxidative injuries [12]. Antioxidant systems such as superoxide dismutase enzymes (SOD), peroxidase enzyme (POD), and catalase (CAT) are activated to scavenge ROS [13]. Abscisic acid (ABA) content is upregulated, affecting the stomatal closure and reducing water loss [14]. Moreover, a transient increase in cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) level induces a change in aquaporin abundance/activity allowing the maintenance of the water balance and photosynthesis adjustment [15, 16].

Cotton is an important strategic reserve material in China, and Xinjiang is the main producing area [17, 18], but the growth and yield formation of cotton in this region is seriously threatened by soil salinization [19]. Meanwhile, the area frequently suffers from unpredictable climates such as cold and low-temperature stress during the cotton seedling stage, especially in the southern region of Xinjiang. The metabolic and physiological processes of cotton seedlings are strongly affected by the combination of salt stress and low temperature, which leads to serious damage to cotton growth, yield, and quality.

Photosynthesis provides materials and energy for plant growth, development, and yield formation [20, 21], and it is one of the physiological processes that are significantly affected by salt and low-temperature stress [22, 23]. Osmotic stress and excessive accumulation of ROS caused by salt and low temperature stress inhibited photosynthesis via stomatal factors and non-stomatal factors [24]. The former is mainly the result of reducing stomatal aperture or stomatal density or irregular distribution of stomatal spaces, which leads to a decrease in CO2 concentration entering the leaves [25]. Among non-stomatal factors, salt and low temperature stresses accelerate the degradation of photosynthetic pigment and the destruction of the chloroplast structure and interfere with CO2 fixation enzymes such as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and ribulose diphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco) [26], which result in an excessive production of ROS in photosynthetic tissues. Moreover, an increase in the non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) to reduce damage to the photosynthetic apparatus, and a decrease in the actual photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII), maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem (Fv/Fm), and photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll (qP) indicate the light energy utilization is restricted and electron transport chain of photosynthesis is damaged [27]. Eventually, it leads to the inhibition of plant growth and development. Therefore, it is imperative to develop technical measures to alleviate stress damage and enhance the photosynthesis of cotton seedlings under salt and low temperature dual stress, and it is of great significance for ensuring healthy and robust growth of cotton seedlings and achieving stable cotton yield.

Silicon is a beneficial element for plant growth and development and has a significant role in mitigating abiotic stresses such as salt, drought, and low-temperature stress [28, 29]. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, the scope of its application in plants and agriculture is expanding. Nanoscale silicon particles (SiO2-NPs) not only possess superior magnetoelectric, mechanical, and thermodynamic properties compared to ordinary silicon, but also have a smaller particle size, larger surface area, energy, and binding capacity [30, 31], which results in their ease of absorption and participation in the physiological metabolism of plants to alleviate the harm of abiotic stress on plant growth [32,33,34]. Previous studies have demonstrated that exogenous application of SiO2-NPs could alleviate the damage of abiotic stress by increasing osmotic regulatory substances, reducing electrolyte leakage and malondialdehyde content, scavenging the toxic effects of ROS, decreasing excessive uptake of Na+ and other approaches, which caused an increase in leaf water content, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, PSII activity and photosynthetic enzyme activity. Ultimately, it resulted in the improvement of the photosynthesis and growth of crops [35,36,37]. However, the regulatory effects of SiO2-NPs on photosynthesis processes is focused on a single salt or low-temperature stress in previous research [33, 36], the regulatory effects on photosynthesis processes under salt and low-temperature dual stress have not been sufficiently elucidated and need further evaluation.

Therefore, this study focused on cotton seedlings and investigated the responses of the growth, leaf water potential, gas exchange parameters, stomatal characteristics, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, photosynthetic enzyme activities, abscisic acid and malonaldehyde content to SiO2-NPs under salt and low-temperature dual stress. We hypothesized that: (I) Salt and low-temperature dual stress limited the growth and photosynthesis of cotton seedlings. (II) SiO2-NPs improved the photosynthesis and growth through the changing of stomatal state, light energy utilization efficiency and electron transport activity of PSII, and photosynthetic enzymes activity under salt and low-temperature dual stress. The objectives of this study were to reveal the regulatory mechanism of SiO2-NPs on the growth and photosynthesis in cotton seedlings under salt and low-temperature dual stress. It will provide a theoretical basis for perfecting the mechanism of crop resistance and exploring new technology for cotton seedling preservation and stable yield in arid and high salt areas.

Materials and methods

Experimental design

The experiment was conducted in a phytotron in the Xinxiang Experimental Station of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (35.09°N, 113.48°E). The phytotron was controlled with a relative humidity of 50–60% and a light period of 12 h (08:00–20:00). The light intensity was maintained at 600 µmol m− 2 s− 1. Salt and low-temperature dual stress was applied with a salt concentration of 150 mM and temperature of 15 ℃/10 ℃ (day/night). Four concentrations of SiO2-NPs (Beike Nano Technology Co., LTD, Suzhou, China) were set at 0 mg L− 1 (distilled water), 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1 and 200 mg L− 1, signed as T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. No salt, normal temperature and sprayed distilled water were used as control (CK).

Full and uniformly sized seeds of Gossypium hirsutum L., cultivar Xinluzhong-37 (Talimu River Seed Industry Co., LTD, Xinjiang, China), were disinfected and sown in PVC pots (6 cm diameter, 24 cm height) with drainage holes at the bottom. Each pot was filled with 290 g substrate (Pindstrup Mosebrug A/S, Denmark), three seeds were sown in each pot for germination and growth in the phytotron under 25 °C/20°C (day/night) temperature, and each treatment replicated 12 times. Once the cotton seedlings had fully expanded to two cotyledons, they were thinned to one plant per pot. When the seedlings grew to the first leaf stage, they were irrigated with 80 mL of Hoagland solution every 7 days. Further, when the seedlings grew to the second leaf with one bud stage, they were transferred to the low-temperature phytotron and irrigated with the salt solution on the 1st, 4th, and 9th day. Simultaneously, different concentrations of SiO2-NPs were sprayed on the same day as irrigating with the salt solution on the cotton leaves at a rate of 10 mL per plant. On the 10th day, the latest fully expanded leaves were sampled for measurements.

Measurements

Plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass

Plant height was defined by the distance from the soil surface to the highest point of the cotton plant. Leaf area was measured using a portable LI-3000 C leaf area meter (Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Three cotton plants were sampled and the roots’ integrity was ensured as much as possible. The plants were thoroughly rinsed and then placed in an oven initially set to 105 ℃ for 30 min to terminate the metabolic activity. Subsequently, the oven was adjusted to 75 ℃, and the plants were dried for 24 h. Finally, the dry weight of the plants was determined using a precision balance accurate to one part in ten thousand.

Leaf water potential

The leaf samples were taken between 08:00–09:00 a.m. and stored in self-sealing bags and placed in foam-insulated boxes with ice packs for measurement. Leaf water potential (LWP) was determined using a WP4C (Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA), dewpoint water potential meter [23].

Gas exchange parameters

Gas exchange parameters were measured using the Li-COR 6400XT photosynthesis measurement system (Li-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA) with a red and blue light source in the leaf chamber. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was adjusted at 1000 µmol m− 2 s− 1, and the reference CO2 concentration was set at 400 µmol mol− 1. Photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) of cotton seedlings with fully expanded leaves were measured between 09:00–11:00 a.m.

Chlorophyll content

The contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll were measured using the spectrophotometrically method [38]. For the sample preparation a leaf disc was cut, and the chlorophyll was extracted with 80% acetone, the filtrate was measured by spectrophotometer at 663 nm and 645 nm. Chlorophyll content was calculated using the following formula:

$$Chlorophyll{\text{ }}a\,\left( {Chl{\text{ }}a} \right) = \left( {12.7 \times D663{\text{ }}-{\text{ }}2.69 \times D645} \right)$$
(1)
$$Chlorophyll{\text{ }}b{\text{ }}\left( {Chl{\text{ }}b} \right){\text{ }} = {\text{ }}\left( {22.9{\text{ }} \times {\text{ }}D645{\text{ }}-{\text{ }}4.64{\text{ }} \times {\text{ }}D663} \right)$$
(2)
$$Total\,Chlorophyll{\text{ }}\left( {Chl{\text{ }}t} \right){\text{ }} = {\text{ }}20.2{\text{ }} \times {\text{ }}D645{\text{ }} + {\text{ }}8.02{\text{ }} \times {\text{ }}D663$$
(3)

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were simultaneously measured on the same day as measuring leaf gas exchange parameters using the ultra-portable modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (MINI-PAM-II, WALZ, Germany). The leaves were adapted to darkness overnight to measure the initial (Fo), maximum (Fm), variable (Fv), and steady-state fluorescence (Fs). Additionally, the parameters of maximum (F’m) and minimum fluorescence (F’o) under light adaptation were determined. The fluorescence parameters were calculated as follows [39]:

$$ Fv/Fm = \left( {Fm - Fo} \right)/Fm $$
(4)
$${\Phi _{PSII}} = \left( {F'm - Fs} \right)/F'm$$
(5)
$$qP = \left( {F'm - Fs} \right)/\left( {F'm - F'o} \right)$$
(6)
$$NPQ = \left( {Fm - F'm} \right)/F'm$$
(7)

where Fv/Fm is the maximum photochemical efficiency, ΦPSII is the actual photochemical efficiency, qP is the photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll, and NPQ is the non-photochemical quenching.

Stomatal characteristics

Stomatal samples were collected using the imprint method and prepared as temporary slides. The stomatal structure was observed and photographed under the Teelen xsp 360a (Teelen Inc., Shanghai, China) microscope with a 40 × objective. The stomatal density (SD) was the number of stomata distributed per unit leaf area, which was recorded under the 10x objective [40]. The stomatal length (SL) and width (SW) were measured separately using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

Photosynthesis enzymes and abscisic acid

Cotton leaf samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen for 30 s after collection. The frozen samples were stored in a refrigerator at -80 ℃ for the determination of abscisic acid (ABA) content and the activities of photosynthetic enzymes including phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and ribulose diphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco).

ABA was extracted using an isopropanol/water/hydrochloric acid solution [41]. Acid was added to the extract to improve the solubility of the hormone in an organic solvent and to inactivate some enzymes in the tissue. The samples were concentrated using a dichloromethane extraction followed by nitrogen gas blowing. A high-performance liquid chromatography system (ACHROM S3000, Acchrom Tech, Beijing, China) was used to measure the ABA content. Compass-C18 (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) chromatographic column was used. The mobile phase was prepared by mixing 600 mL of ultrapure water with 6 mL of acetic acid and then adding 400 mL of methanol. The injection volume was 10 µL, the flow rate was 0.8 mL min− 1, the column temperature was 35 ℃ and the total run time was 40 min. The UV detection wavelength was set at 254 nm.

PEPC and Rubisco were extracted by 0.1 g leave tissue and coarsely ground in a mortar under liquid nitrogen with adding 1mL extraction buffer. Soluble and insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation at 8000 r at 4 ℃ for 10 min, and the supernatant was used to determine enzyme activities. PEPC and Rubisco activities were determined using the colorimetric method with UV detection set at 340 nm [42]. Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., Ltd provided the kits used for measurement.

Malondialdehyde

Approximately 0.5 g of fresh leaf was ground into a homogenate with 5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid solution. The mixture was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 10 min. 2 mL of the supernatant mixed with 2.0 mL of 0.5% thiobarbituric acid solution were reacted in boiling water for 15 min. After the mixture cooled to room temperature. The absorption of the mixture at 450 nm, 532 nm, and 600 nm was measured by a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was then calculated using the following formula [43]:

$$MDA{\text{ }}content{\text{ }} = {\text{ }}6.45{\text{ }} \times {\text{ }}\left( {D532 - D600} \right) - 0.56 \times D450$$
(8)

Statistical analysis

Microsoft Excel 2019 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and Origin 8.5 software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA) were used for data processing and graph plotting, respectively. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted with all data performed as mean (n = 3) followed by standard deviation. Further the least significant difference (LSD) test was adopted for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01) using SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM SPSS Statistics, Chicago, IL, USA) software. Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was used to test the correlation between variables and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assess the relationships among all parameters in CANOCO 5 (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA).

Results

Effect of SiO2-NPs on plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

The salt and low-temperature dual stress caused an obvious decrease in the plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass of cotton seedlings as presented in Fig. 1. The plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass in T1 significantly reduced (p < 0.05) by 9.58%, 15.76%, and 39.80% compared to CK, respectively. Conversely, SiO2-NPs markedly enhanced the plant height, leaf area, and aboveground biomass, and obtained the optimal effects at T3. However, there was no significant difference between T2 and T1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effects of SiO2-NPs on plant height (A), leaf area (B), and aboveground biomass (C) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on gas exchange parameters of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

The salt and low-temperature dual stress significantly decreased the Pn, gs, Ci, and Tr of cotton seedlings compared to CK (Fig. 2). However, SiO2-NPs significantly improved (p < 0.05) the Pn, gs, and Tr (Fig. 2A, B, and D) and displayed a similar trend that was first increasing and then decreasing. The Pn, gs, and Tr in T2, T3, and T4 significantly increased (p < 0.05) compared to T1, except for the gs, whereby no significant differences were observed between T2 and T1. In addition, SiO2-NPs significantly reduced (p < 0.05) Ci and exhibited a trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration (Fig. 2C). The Ci in T3 was decreased (p < 0.05) by 7.11% compared to T1, but there was a statistically insignificant difference between T2, T4, and T1.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of SiO2-NPs on photosynthetic rate (Pn, A), stomatal conductance (gs, B), intracellular CO2 concentration (Ci, C), and transpiration rate (Tr, D) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effect of SiO2-NPs on ABA content and LWP of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

ABA content was significantly reduced by SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress as shown in Fig. 3A. With the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration, ABA content showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing, and T3 obtained the highest reduction of 47.40% compared to T1. Notably, the dual stress caused a substantial decrease in LWP compared to CK as illustrated in Fig. 3B. Conversely, SiO2-NPs significantly decreased (p < 0.05) the reduction of LWP caused by the dual stress and LWP displayed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration. The LWP in T2, T3, and T4 increased significantly (p < 0.05) compared to T1, and the highest increment that appeared in T3 was 19.66%.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of SiO2-NPs on ABA content (A) and LWP (B) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on stomatal characteristics of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

Figure 4 presents the effects of different SiO2-NPs concentrations on the stomatal characteristics of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress. Under the condition of the dual stress without SiO2-NPs treatment (T1), the SL, SW, and SD were reduced by 6.27%, 9.77%, and 20.90%, respectively. With the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration, the trends of SL, SW, and SD were presented as an increase followed by a decrease. The SL, SW, and SD in T3 and T4 significantly increased (p < 0.05) by 1.73%, 2.79%, 2.64%, and 5.13%, 10.90%, 13.62% compared to T1, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between T1 and T2.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of SiO2-NPs on stomatal length (A), stomatal width (B), and stomatal density (C) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on chlorophyll content of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

The effects of the various treatments on chlorophyll content are shown in Fig. 5. In this experiment, the salt and low-temperature dual stress showed a decrease of 7.37%, 6.48%, and 7.15% in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content, respectively. However, treating plants with SiO2-NPs application induced an increase in the content of all pigments. The highest increase was observed in T3 which showed more efficiency than T2 and T4, and chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll content significantly increased (p < 0.05) by 5.32%, 6.06%, 5.50% compared to CK, respectively.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of SiO2-NPs on chlorophyll a content (A), chlorophyll b content (B), and total chlorophyll content (C) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

The responses of ΦPSII, Fv/Fm, NPQ, and qP to SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress are illustrated in Fig. 6. The dual stress generally decreased the ΦPSII, qP, Fv/Fm, and NPQ of cotton seedlings compared to CK. Contrarily, the ΦPSII, qP, and Fv/Fm were remarkably increased (p < 0.05) by SiO2-NPs except for the NPQ under the dual stress. Compared to T1, the ΦPSII, qP, and Fv/Fm in T3 obtained the highest increment by 16.55%, 7.88%, and 9.29%, respectively. The NPQ showed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing with the increase in SiO2-NPs concentration (Fig. 6C). Compared to T1, the NPQ in T3 and T4 significantly decreased (p < 0.05) by 9.67% and 6.92%, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between T1 and T2.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of SiO2-NPs on actual photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (ΦPSII, A), photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll (qP, B), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ, C), and maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm, D) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on photosynthetic enzymes activities of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

PEPC and Rubisco activities showed significant differences among the different treatments due to the different concentrations of SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress (Fig. 7). The PEPC activity in T1 was significantly reduced (p < 0.05) by 14.69% compared to CK, while the SiO2-NPs slightly increased the PEPC activity caused by the dual stress (Fig. 7A). Compared to T1, the PEPC activity in T2, T3, and T4 were enhanced by 1.33%, 4.35%, and 2.37%, respectively, but there was no significant difference among T1, T2, T3, and T4. The effect of salt and low-temperature dual stress on Rubisco activity is illustrated in Fig. 7B. The dual stress remarkably reduced (p < 0.05) the Rubisco activity by 18.66% compared to CK. Notably, the Rubisco activity in T3 and T4 were significantly improved (p < 0.05) by 15.40% and 8.95% compared to T1, respectively. However, there was no significant difference between T2 and T1.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of SiO2-NPs on PEPC activity (A) and Rubisco activity (B) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Effects of SiO2-NPs on malondialdehyde content of cotton seedlings under the salt and low-temperature dual stress

Applying SiO2-NPs significantly affected the MDA content in cotton seedlings exposed to the salt and low-temperature dual stress (Fig. 8). The dual stress significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) the MDA content by 24.43% compared to CK. The application of SiO2-NPs significantly reduced (p < 0.05) the MDA content, and decreased monotonously with increasing SiO2-NPs concentration. The highest reduction (10.51%) was obtained in T3 compared to T1.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effect of SiO2-NPs on malondialdehyde (MDA) of cotton seedlings under the salt and low temperature dual stress. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different alphabets on top of error bars represent significant differences (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Correlation analysis and principal component analysis

The salt and low-temperature dual stress negatively affected the stomatal exchange parameters, while SiO2-NPs alleviated the reduction of Pn caused by the dual stress. To better understand the relationships among stomatal exchange parameters, stomatal characteristic parameters, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, photosynthetic enzyme activities, ABA content and LWP, the PCA and Pearson correlation analysis were performed (Fig. 9; Table 1). According to PCA, a relatively higher positive correlation was observed between Pn and gs, Tr, SL, SW, SD, Chl a, Chl b, Chl t, ΦPSII, qP, Fv/Fm, Rubisco activity and LWP, and the negative correlation between Pn and ABA content at the first component axis, which accounting for 87.04% of the total variation (Fig. 9). It might indicate that SiO2-NPs regulated the Pn of cotton seedlings by affecting the changes of these parameters under the dual stress. Furthermore, significant correlation coefficients (p < 0.05) were obtained between Pn and gs, Tr, SL, SW, SD, Chl a, Chl b, Chl t, ΦPSII, qP, Fv/Fm, Rubisco activity, LWP, and ABA content, but no significant correlation coefficients were obtained between Pn and Ci, NPQ, and PEPC activity (Table 1).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Principal component analyses (PCA) on gas exchange parameters (green lines), stomatal characteristics parameters (red lines), chlorophyll content (blue lines), chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (purple lines), photosynthetic enzyme activities (gray lines), abscisic acid content (ABA, black line), and leaf water potential (LWP, orange line). Pn = Photosynthetic rate, gs = Stomatal conductance, Ci = Intracellular CO2 concentration, Tr = Transpiration rate, SL = Stomatal length, SW = Stomatal width, SD = Stomatal density, Chl a = Chlorophyll a content, Chl b = Chlorophyll a content, Chl t = Total chlorophyll content, ΦPSII = Actual photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, qP = Photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll, NPQ = Non-photochemical quenching, Fv/Fm = Maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystem II. CK represents the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs with no stress. T1, T2, T3, and T4 represent the foliar application of 0 mg L− 1, 50 mg L− 1, 100 mg L− 1, and 200 mg L− 1 SiO2-NPs under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, respectively. Values in bracket are percentages explained by the first two components. Data are the means (n = 3)

Full size image
Table 1 The Pearson’s correlation coefficients for gas exchange parameters, stomatal characteristics parameters, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC), ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), abscisic acid content (ABA), and leaf water potential (LWP).
Full size table

Discussion

Photosynthesis is the basis of plant growth and strongly links to leaf water content because the normal water content in the leaves assists the stomata open [44]. In our study, the salt and low-temperature dual stress caused significant and severe reductions in plant height, leaf area, aboveground biomass, and a decrease in Pn, gs, and LWP. This might be because osmotic stress caused by salt and low-temperature dual stress greatly decreased the absorption of water by the root system [45], which reduced inter- and intracellular water levels and stomatal aperture [46]. Another similar research reported that salt and low-temperature stress generated some chemical signals which induced stomatal closure and further reduced water loss [47], therefore inhabited the photosynthetic efficiency and plants growth. In the current study, SiO2-NPs application significantly increased the plant height, leaf area, aboveground biomass, Pn, gs, and LWP of cotton seedlings, which indicated that SiO2-NPs decreased the damage of osmotic stress. On the one hand, SiO2-NPs might induce the increase in osmotic regulatory substances to increase osmotic potential introduced by the salt and low-temperature stress [48]. In addition, SiO2-NPs could regulate aquaporin (AQP) abundance to facilitate water uptake and transport across cell membranes [49]. Our results showed that the growth of cotton seedlings increased with increasing SiO2-NPs concentration up to 100 mg L− 1 (T3) and then decreased with further increases in SiO2-NPs concentration, which might indicate that high SiO2-NPs concentrations had cytotoxicity and inhibitory effects on plant growth [50].

Stomata serve as an important channel for water and gas exchange between plants and the external environment [51]. Existing literature has documented that stomatal conductance was associated with stomata size, pore area and stomatal density [52], which was consistent with the results of our study (Table 1). A previous study suggested that the stomata aperture was a direct response to the leaf water status [53]. Liu et al. also found Si could increase Pn due to the enhancement in gs resulting from an improvement of the leaf water content [49]. Additionally, researchers had reported that Si-mediated the decrease in ABA content was one of the key approaches affecting photosynthesis efficiency. It might be because Si restricted the gene expression mediated in the ABA synthesis pathway, which maintained the stomatal aperture to increased osmotic stress tolerance [54]. Furthermore, some studies have reported that gs was co-regulated by ABA content and LWP under adversity stresses [55, 56]. Similar results were observed in the current study that there was a high correlation between ABA content, LWP, and gs (Table 1).

Salt and low-temperature stress cause the overproduction of ROS inside the plant cell, which alter the metabolic and oxidative homeostasis of plant cells, hence promoting membrane lipid peroxidationlead (LPO). As MDA is a major product of LPO in plants, it is a key indicator of the oxidative stress [57, 58]. In this experiment, the MDA content increased under the dual stress (Fig. 8), which was consistent with the findings of Liu et al. on the MDA contents of Bermuda grass [59]. While, SiO2-NPs alleviated the deleterious consequences, this mitigation was not only attributed to the increase in antioxidant enzyme activities, but also resulted from non-enzymatic mechanisms such as increased proline and glutathione contents [60, 61].

Due to the defect of biochemical properties in plants grown under stressful conditions, the photosynthesis process and its efficiency will be affected and inhibited [33, 38]. Our results support this statement as chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll content significantly diminished in response to the salt and low-temperature dual stress (Fig. 5). The reduction in chlorophyll content could be a result of the damage to chloroplast structure and a restriction in their biosynthesis [62]. However, SiO2-NPs ameliorate the reduction in chlorophyll content, similar results were found by Haghighi and Pessarakli who also reported enhanced chlorophyll synthesis and photosynthesis in SiO2-NPs treated Solanum lycopersicum seedlings [63]. In addition, one mechanism about Si protecting photosynthetic pigments under stressful conditions was reported that Si could form a binary film at the cell wall to maintain the structural stability of cells [64].

Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters reflect the characteristics of plant absorption, transfer, dissipation and light energy distribution, which are marked as effective probes for investigating photosynthesis in plants under adversity stresses [65, 66]. Changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters accurately characterize the photosynthetic potential of plants and the degree of photosystem damage [67]. Fv/Fm and ΦPSII represent the efficiency of PSII in converting absorbed light energy into chemical energy [21], qP reflects the photosynthetic activity of PSII reaction center [68]. Our results demonstrated that Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, and qP were significantly lower in T1 compared to CK, which might be implied that a marked photo-inhibition was occurred here [39]. While, SiO2-NPs increased ΦPSII, Fv/Fm, and qP (Fig. 6) under the dual stress. One reason might be that SiO2-NPs enhanced light absorbance, which could inhabit the chloroplast ageing and improve the photosynthetic period of chloroplast [69]. Moreover, SiO2-NPs might enhance oxygen transport and the enzyme activity of carbohydrate metabolism to improve photosynthesis efficiency [70]. NPQ reflects the ability of plants to dissipate excess light energy in the form of heat which cannot be used for the transfer of photosynthetic electrons and the damage degree of photosynthetic apparatus [71]. Our results proved that SiO2-NPs reduced NPQ under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, which could be explained by the fact that SiO2-NPs decreased the dissipation of excess light energy and alleviated the damage of photosynthetic apparatus [72].

Rubisco and PEPC are key enzymes affecting photosynthesis in plants [73]. Rubisco catalyzes the carboxylation and oxygenation reactions of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) and controls photosynthetic carbon metabolism and photorespiration in plants [74]. We found Rubisco activity significantly decreased when suffering from the salt and low-temperature dual stress, it might be because of the increase in chloroplast protrusion to release vesicles containing Rubisco (Rubisco-containing body) which one of the pathways of Rubisco exclusion from chloroplasts [75]. However, the reduction of Rubisco activity declined after spraying SiO2-NPs (Fig. 7), which was consistent with the findings of Pereira et al. who found Si application increased the activity of Rubisco that was involved in the Si-induced regulation of photosynthesis [76]. PEPC is closely related to the ability of leaves to fix CO2 and remobilize CO2 released by respiration in C3 plants [77]. In this study, PEPC significantly decreased under the salt and low-temperature dual stress, but there was no significant difference between different treatments after spraying SiO2-NPs (Fig. 7). Meanwhile, our findings proved that Pn was significantly correlated with Rubisco activity but not with PEPC activity (Table 1), which also indicated that SiO2-NPs might mainly by regulated a higher Rubisco activity under the salt and low-temperature dual stress to promote photosynthesis.

Stomatal and non-stomatal factors influencing photosynthesis are generally decided by the relationship between gs and Ci [78]. Our results showed that gs and Ci in T1 were significantly lower than CK, which suggested that the salt and low-temperature dual stress affected the diffusion process of CO2 by inducing stomatal closure, which resulted in a significant decrease in the concentration of CO2 diffusing from the external environment to the leaf through the stomata [24]. However, there was a significant increase in gs but not in Ci after spraying SiO2-NPs, which implied that the reduction of Pn was limited by stomatal and non-stomatal factors. In the current study, the positive correlations were observed between Pn and gs, SL, SW, SD, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, qP), and Rubisco activity (Table 1), and T3 had the most positive influences on these parameters. This result might reveal that SiO2-NPs at the concentration of 100 mg L− 1 could optimally regulate stomatal opening and closing, enhance the photochemical efficiency and photosynthetic activity of PSII reaction centers and increase Rubisco activity to obtain the highest Pn.

Conclusion

The salt and low-temperature dual stress significantly reduced LWP, gs, chlorophyll content, PSII activity, photosynthetic enzyme activity, and enhanced MDA content, which caused the decrease in cotton seedling photosynthesis and growth. While SiO2-NPs application alleviated the deleterious consequences of the dual stress. The positive correlations were observed between Pn and gs, SL, SW, SD, chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, qP, and Rubisco activity. It indicated that SiO2-NPs enhanced the photosynthesis of cotton seedlings by regulating the stomatal state, improving the light energy utilization efficiency and electron transport activity of PSII, and inducing the increase of Rubisco activity to enhance the carbon assimilation capacity under the salt and low-temperature dual stress. According to our results, SiO2-NPs at the concentration of 100 mg L− 1 could be recommended to mitigate the damage in cotton seedling growth under the salt and low-temperature dual stress. However, there was only one combined treatment, and the effects of SiO2-NPs on the ion transport, osmotic regulation, antioxidant defense, signal conduction, and gene expression are still unclear. Further studies are required under a wide range of salt and low-temperature combined treatments to examine the biochemical and molecular mechanism of SiO2-NPs, to provide deeper insights into the effects of SiO2-NPs on plant growth under multiple stress.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

Fv/Fm :

Maximum photochemical efficiency

Φ PSII :

Actual photochemical efficiency

qP :

Photochemical quenching of variable chlorophyll

NPQ :

Non-photochemical quenching

Rubisco:

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

PEPC:

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase

SiO2-NPs:

Silicon nanoparticles

ABA:

Abscisic acid

LWP:

Leaf water potential

Pn :

Photosynthetic rate

Ci :

Intracellular CO2 concentration

gs :

Stomatal conductance

Tr :

Transpiration rate

SD:

Stomatal dendity

SW:

Stomatal width

SL:

Stomatal length

MDA:

Malondialdehyde

Chl a:

Chlorophyll a content

Chl b:

Chlorophyll b content

Chl t:

Total chlorophyll content

References

  1. Mokrani S, Nabti EH, Cruz C. Current advances in plant growth promoting bacteria alleviating salt stress for sustainable agriculture. Appl Sci. 2020;10(20):7025. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stavridou E, Hasting A, Webster RJ, Robson PR. The impact of soil salinity on the yield, composition and physiology of the bioenergy grass Miscanthus×giganteus. GCB Bioener. 2017;9:92–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pan T, Liu M, Kreslavski VD, Zharmukhamedov SK, Nie C, Yu M, Kuznetsov VV, Allakhverdiev SI, Shabala S. Non-stomatal limitation of photosynthesis by soil salinity. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2021;51:791–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2020.1735231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar A, Singh S, Gaurav AK, Srivastava S, Verma JP. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Devireddy AR, Zandalinas SI, Fichman Y, Mittler R. Integration of reactive oxygen species and hormone signaling during abiotic stress. Plant J. 2021;105:459–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kodra E, Steinhaeuser K, Ganguly AR. Persisting cold extremes under 21st-century warming scenarios. Geophys Res Lett. 2011;38(8):8705. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li X, Topbjerg HB, Jiang D, Liu F. Drought priming at vegetative stage improves the antioxidant capacity and photosynthesis performance of wheat exposed to a short-term low temperature stress at jointing stage. Plant Soil. 2015;393:307–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2499-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng J, Liu T, Zheng Q, Li J, Qian Y, Li J, Zhan Q. Identification of cold tolerance and analysis of genetic diversity for major wheat varieties in Jianghuai region of China. Pak J Bot. 2019;52:839–49. https://doi.org/10.30848/PJB2020-3(23).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Y, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses. New Phytol. 2018;217(2):523–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14920.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shao A, Sun ZC, Fan SG, Xu X, Wang W, Amombo E, Yin YL, Li XN, Wang GY, Wang HL, Fu JM. Moderately low nitrogen application mitigate the negative effects of salt stress on annual ryegrass seedlings. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10427. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10427.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao S, Zhang Q, Liu M, Zhou H, Ma C, Wang P. Regulation of plant responses to salt stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4609. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22094609.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Munns R. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25:239–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH, Faisal M, Al Sahli AA. Nano-silicon dioxide mitigates the adverse effects of salt stress on Cucurbita pepo L. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014;33(11):2429–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2697.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang QY, Li Y, Cao K, Xu HW, Zhou XF. Transcriptome and proteome depth analysis indicate ABA, MAPK cascade and Ca2+ signaling co-regulate cold tolerance in Rhododendron chrysanthum Pall. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1146663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1146663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghosh S, Bheri M, Bisht D, Pandey GK. Calcium signaling and transport machinery: potential for development of stress tolerance in plants. Curr Plant Biology. 2022;29:100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2022.100235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pawłowicz I, Masajada K. Aquaporins as a link between water relations and photosynthetic pathway in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Gene. 2019;687:166–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2018.11.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hou XH, Fan JL, Hu WH, Zhang FC, Yan F, Xiao C, Li YP, Cheng HL. Optimal irrigation amount and nitrogen rate improved seed cotton yield while maintaining fiber quality of drip-fertigated cotton in northwest China. Ind Crop Prod. 2021;170:113710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ning SR, Zhou BB, Shi JC, Wang QJ. Soil water/salt balance and water productivity of typical irrigation schedules for cotton under film mulched drip irrigation in northern Xinjiang. Agric Water Manag. 2021;245:106651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He PR, Li JG, Yu SE, Ma T, Ding JH, Zhang FC, Chen KW, Guo SS, Peng SH. Soil moisture regulation under mulched drip irrigation influences the soil salt distribution and growth of cotton in southern Xinjiang, China. Plants. 2023;12(4):791. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12040791.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Pecherina A, Grinberg M, Ageyeva M, Zanegina D, Akinchits E, Brilkina A, Vodeneev V. Salt-Induced changes in cytosolic pH and photosynthesis in tobacco and potato leaves. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(1):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang Q, Li P, Zhang DS, Lin W, Hao XY, Zong YZ. Effects of elevated CO2 on the photosynthesis,chlorophyll fluorescence and yield of two wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) under persistent drought stress. Sustainability. 2023;15:1593. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu XP, Li H, Gao S, He LW, Wang GC. NADPH from the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway drives the operation of cyclic electron flow around photosystem I in high-intertidal macroalgae under severe salt stress. Physiol Plant. 2016;156:397–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zahra N, Hinai MSA, Hafeez MB, Rehman A, Wahid A, Siddique KHM, Farooq M. Regulation of photosynthesis under salt stress and associated tolerance mechanisms. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;178:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li S, Hamani AKM, ZhangYY, Liang YP, GaoY, Duan AW. Coordination of leaf hydraulic, anatomical, and economical traits in tomato seedlings acclimation to long-term drought. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:536. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03304-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Caine RS, Harrison EL, Sloan J, Flis PM, Fischer S, Khan MS, Nguyen PT, Nguyen LT, Gray JE, Croft H. The influences of stomatal size and density on rice abiotic stress resilience. New Phytol. 2023;237:2180–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang MM, Fan DY, Murakami K, Badger MR, Sun GY, Chow WS. Partially dissecting electron fluxes in both photosystems in spinach leaf disks during photosynthetic induction. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019;60:2206–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcz114.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jia XM, Zhu YF, Hu Y, Zhang R, Cheng L, Zhu ZL, Zhao T, Zhang XY, Wang YX. Integrated physiologic, proteomic, and metabolomic analyses of Malus halliana adaptation to saline-alkali stress. Hortic Res. 2019;6:91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-019-0172-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Bilal S, Khan T, Asaf S, Khan NA, Jan SS, Imran M, Al-Rawahi A, Khan AL, Lee IJ, Al-Harras A. Silicon-induced morphological, biochemical and molecular regulation in phoenix dactylifera L. under low-temperature stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24076036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Peña-Calzada K, Olivera-Viciedo D, Calero-Hurtado A, Prado RD, Habermann E, Tenesaca LFL, Ajila G, de Oliveira R, Rodriguez JC, Gratao PL. Silicon mitigates the negative impacts of salt stress in soybean plants. J Sci Food Agric. 2023;103:4360–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.12503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castillo RR, Baeza A, Vallet-Reg M. Recent applications of the combination of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with nucleic acids: development of bioresponsive devices, carriers and sensors. Biomaterials Sci. 2017;5(3):353–77. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6BM00872K.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK. Silicon nanoparticles (SiNp) alleviate chromium (VI) phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum (L.) seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;96:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.07.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Elsheery NI, Helaly MN, El-Hoseiny HM, Alam-Eldein SM. Zinc oxide and silicone nanoparticles to improve the resistance mechanism and annual productivity of salt-stressed mango trees. Agronomy. 2020;10(4):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040558.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh P, Arif Y, Siddiqui H, Sami F, Zaidi R, Azam A, Prave A, Hayat S. Nanoparticles enhances the salinity toxicity tolerance in Linum usitatissimum L. by modulating the antioxidative enzymes, photosynthetic efficiency, redox status and cellular damage. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;213:112020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rizwan M, Ali S, Ibrahim M, Farid M, Adrees M, Bharwana SA, Zia-ur-Rehman M, Qayyum MF, Abbas F. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:15416–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5305-x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hajizadeh HS, Asadi M, Zahedi SM, Hamzehpour N, Rasouli F, Helvacı M, Alas T. Silicon dioxide-nanoparticle nutrition mitigates salinity in gerbera by modulating ion accumulation and antioxidants. Folia Horticulturae. 2021;33(1):91–105. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2021-0007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shweta, Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh S, Dubey NK, Chauhan DK. Impact of nanoparticles on photosynthesis: challenges and opportunities. Mater Focus. 2016;5(5):405–11. https://doi.org/10.1166/mat.2016.1327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akhtar N, Ilyas N. Role of nanosilicab to boost the activities of metabolites in Triticum aestivum facing drought stress. Plant Soil. 2022;477:9–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-021-05285-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ning DF, Qin AZ, Liu ZD, Duan AW, Xiao JF, Zhang JY, Liu ZG, Zhao B, Liu ZJ. Silicon-mediated physiological and agronomic responses of maize to drought stress imposed at the vegetative and reproductive stages. Agronomy. 2020;10:1136. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10081136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamani AKM, Li S, Chen JS, Amin AS, Wang GS, Shen XJ, Zain M, Gao Y. Linking exogenous foliar application of glycine betaine and stomatal characteristics with salinity stress tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21:146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02892-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Pathare VS, Koteyeva N, Cousins AB. Increased adaxial stomatal density is associated with greater mesophyll surface area exposed to intercellular air spaces and mesophyll conductance in diverse C4 grasses. New Phytol. 2020;225(1):169–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Li S, Hamani AKM, Si ZY, Liang YP, Gao Y, Duan AW. Leaf gas exchange of tomato depends on abscisic acid and jasmonic acid in response to neighboring plants under different soil nitrogen regimes. Plants. 2020;9:1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9121674.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Leitao L, Dizengremel P, Biolley JP. Foliar CO2 fixation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) submitted to elevated ozone: distinct changes in Rubisco and PEPc activities in relation to pigment content. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008;69:531–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.10.010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Anjum SA, Wang L, Farooq M, Xue L, Ali S. Fulvic acid application improves the maize performance under well-watered and drought conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 2011;197(6):409–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00483.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Herve D, Fabre F, Berrios EF, Leroux N, Al Chaarani G, Planchon C, Sarrafi A, Gentzbittel L. QTL analysis of photosynthesis and water status traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under greenhouse conditions. J Exp Bot. 2001;362(52):1857–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/52.362.1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang L, Ning CC, Pan TW, Cai KZ. Role of silica nanoparticles in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:1947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23041947.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Liu B, Soundararajan P, Manivannan A. Mechanisms of silicon-mediated amelioration of salt stress in plants. Plants. 2019;8:307. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8090307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wani AS, Hayat S, Ahmad A, Tahir I. Efficacy of brassinosteroid analogues in the mitigation of toxic effects of salt stress in Brassica juncea plants. JEB. 2017;38(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/38/1/MS-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Mahmoud LM, Shalan AM, El-Boray MS, Vincent CI, El-Kady ME, Grosser JW, Dutt M. Application of silicon nanoparticles enhances oxidative stress tolerance in salt stressed ‘Valencia’ sweet orange plants. Sci Hort. 2022;295:110856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110856.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Liu P, Yin LN, Wang SW, Zhang MJ, Deng XP, Zhang SQ, Tanaka K. Enhanced root hydraulic conductance by aquaporin regulation accounts for silicon alleviated salt-induced osmotic stress in Sorghum bicolor L. Environ Exp Bot. 2015;111:42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.10.006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Alzahrani Y, Kuşvuran A, Alharby HF, Kuşvuran S, Rady MM. The defensive role of silicon in wheat against stress conditions induced by drought, salinity or cadmium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018;154:187–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang N, Berman SR, Joubert D, Vialet-Chabrand S, Marcelis L, Kaiser E. Variation of photosynthetic induction in major horticultural crops is mostly driven by differences in stomatal traits. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:860229. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.860229.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen RX, Zheng LJ, Zhao JJ, Ma JJ, Li XF. Biochar application maintains photosynthesis of cabbage by regulating stomatal parameters in salt-stressed soil. Sustainability. 2023;15:4206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Comstock JP. Hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and transpiration. J Exp Bot. 2002;53:195–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.367.195.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Maillard A, Ali N, Schwarzenberg A, Jamois F, Yvin JC, Hosseini SA. Silicon transcriptionally regulates sulfur and ABA metabolism and delays leaf senescence in barley under combined sulfur deficiency and osmotic stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;155:394–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Xue FL, Liu WL, Cao HL, Song LJ, Ji SS, Tong L, Ding RS. Stomatal conductance of tomato leaves is regulated by both abscisic acid and leaf water potential under combined water and salt stress. Physiol Plant. 2021;172:2070–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13441.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Song LJ, Ding RS, Du TS, Kang SZ, Tong L, Xue FL, Wei ZH. Stomatal conductance parameters of tomatoes are regulated by reducing osmotic potential and pre-dawn leaf water potential via increasing ABA under salt stress. Environ Exp Bot. 2023;206:105176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105176.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mahmoud LM, Vincent CI, Grosser JW, Dutt M. The response of salt-stressed Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) to salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate treatments. Plant Physiol Rep. 2021;26:137–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-020-00563-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Morton MJ, Awlia M, Al-Tamimi N, Saade S, Pailles Y, Negr˜ao S, Tester M. Salt stress under the scalpel–dissecting the genetics of salt tolerance. Plant J. 2019;97:148–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Liu A, Hu ZR, Bi AY, Fan JB, Gitau MM, Amombo E, Chen L, Fu JM. Photosynthesis, antioxidant system and gene expression of bermudagrass in response to low temperature and salt stress. Ecotoxicology. 2016;25:1445–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-016-1696-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Dubey NK. Silicon nanoparticles more efficiently alleviate arsenate toxicity than silicon in maize cultiver and hybrid differing in arsenate tolerance. Front Environ Sci. 2016;4:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Mukarram M, Khan MMA, Corpas FJ. Silicon nanoparticles elicit an increase in lemongrass (Cymbopogon fexuosus (Steud.) Wats) agronomic parameters with a higher essential oil yield. J Hazard Mater. 2021;412:125254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125254.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Li RH, Guo PG, Michael B, Stefania G, Salvatore C. Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in Barley. Agric Sci China. 2006;5:751–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60120-X.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Haghighi M, Pessarakli M. Influence of silicon and nano-silicon on salinity tolerance of cherry tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) at early growth stage. Sci Hortic. 2013;161:111e117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.06.034.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Rastogi A, Yada S, Hussain S, Kataria S, Hajihashemi S, Kumari P, Yang X, Brestic M. Does silicon really matter for the photosynthetic machinery in plant? Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021;169:40–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.11.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Ptushenko VV, Ptushenko OS, Tikhonov AN. Chlorophyll fluorescence induction, chlorophyll content, and chromaticity characteristics of leaves as indicators of photosynthetic apparatus senescence in arboreous plants. Biochemistry. 2014;79:260–72. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006297914030122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang HH, Shi GL, Shao JY, Li X, Sun GY. Photochemistry and proteomics of mulberry (mortis alba L.) seedlings under NaCl and NaHCO3 stress. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2019;184:109624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang ZH, Liu XN, Li N, Cao BL, Huang TT, Li P, Liu SQ, Zhang YZ, Xu K. Effect of ofloxacin levels on growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023;194:374–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.11.029.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Li DX, Liu H, Gao SK, Leghari SJ, Hou HS, Li YB. Effect of post-drought rehydration on winter wheat fluorescence and photosynthetic indices under different levels of nitrogen application. Water. 2023;15(2):305. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Yang F, Hong F, You W, Liu C, Gao F, Wu C, Yang P. Influence of nano-anatase TiO2 on the nitrogen metabolism of growing spinach. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2006;110(2):179–90. https://doi.org/10.1385/bter:110:2:179.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Das S, Biswas AK. Comparative study of silicon and selenium to modulate chloroplast pigments levels, Hill activity, photosynthetic parameters and carbohydrate metabolism under arsenic stress in rice seedlings. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29:19508–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16836-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Pshybytko NL. Non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence as an indicator of the state of a plant photosynthetic apparatus under abiotic stress. J Appl Spectrosc. 2023;90:60–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-023-01503-z.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Santos CC, Basso IJ, Navarro VL, Silva WC, Silverio JM, Scalon SDQ. Silicon alleviates damages on photosynthetic apparatus and increases resilience in young inga vera plants exposed to water deficit. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2023;23:3219–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-023-01339-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Masmoudi R, Rival A, Nato A, Lavergne D, Drira N, Ducreux G. Carbon metabolism in in vitro cultures of date palm: the role of carboxylases (PEPC and RubisCO). Planr Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 1999;57:139–43. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006308529895.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Redondo-Gómez S, Mateos-Naranjo E, Davy AJ, Fernández-Muñoz F, Castellanos EM, Luque T, Figueroa ME. Growth and photosynthetic responses to salinity of the salt-marsh shrub Atriplex portulacoides. Ann Bot. 2007;100:555e563. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcm119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. He Y, Yu CL, Zhou L, Chen Y, Liu A, Jin JH, Hong J, Qi YH, Jiang DA. Rubisco decrease is involved in chloroplast protrusion and rubisco-containing body formation in soybean (Glycine max.) Under salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;74:118e124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.11.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Pereira LF, Martins SCV, Aucique-Perez CE, Silva ET, Avila RT, DaMatta FM, Rodrigues FA. Silicon alleviates mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis on rice leaves infected by Monographella albescens. Theor Exp Plant Physiol. 2020;32:163–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-020-00178-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. von Caemmerer S, Furbank RT. Strategies for improving C4 photosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016;31:125–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2016.04.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Pilon C, Snider JL, Sobolev V, Chastain DR, Sorensen RB, Meeks CD, Massa AN, Walk T, Singh B, Earl HJ. Assessing stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation under progressive drought in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). J Plant Physiol. 2018;23:1124–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2018.09.007

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Financial Project of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (2022BC009), the China Agricultural Research System (CARS-15-13), the Basic Scientific Research Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (FIRI2022-07), and Fund of the Key Lab of Moder Agriculture Engineering of Xinjiang Produciton and Consturction Corps (TDNG2022103).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Farmland Irrigation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang, 453002, China

    Yueping Liang, Hao Liu, Penghui Li & Yang Gao

  2. College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alaer, 843300, China

    Yuanyuan Fu

  3. Shandong Academy of Agricultural Machinery Science, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, 250100, China

    Shuang Li

Authors
  1. Yueping Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuanyuan Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Penghui Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Yang Gao conceived and designed the study. Yueping Liang, Yuanyuan Fu, Penghui Li, and Shuang Li performed sample preparations and data analysis. Yueping Liang and Yuanyuan Fu wrote the manuscript. Yueping Liang, Hao Liu, and Yang Gao revised the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors confirm that all the experimental research done on cultivated plants and carried out in accordance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines, standards, and legislation. The plants used were cultivated under controlled conditions and thus posed no threat to other plant species, and no specific permission was required to collect the required sample material used in this study. The plants were cultivated with seeds obtained from the Xinjiang Talimu River Seed Industry Co., LTD, China and sample material was collected and stored at the Xinxiang Experimental Station of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences until utilisation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liang, Y., Liu, H., Fu, Y. et al. Regulatory effects of silicon nanoparticles on the growth and photosynthesis of cotton seedlings under salt and low-temperature dual stress. BMC Plant Biol 23, 504 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04509-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04509-z

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us