Skip to main content
Download PDF

In-silico analysis of heat shock transcription factor (OsHSF) gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.)

BMC Plant Biology volume 23, Article number: 395 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

One of the most important cash crops worldwide is rice (Oryza sativa L.). Under varying climatic conditions, however, its yield is negatively affected. In order to create rice varieties that are resilient to abiotic stress, it is essential to explore the factors that control rice growth, development, and are source of resistance. HSFs (heat shock transcription factors) control a variety of plant biological processes and responses to environmental stress. The in-silico analysis offers a platform for thorough genome-wide identification of OsHSF genes in the rice genome.

Results

In this study, 25 randomly dispersed HSF genes with significant DNA binding domains (DBD) were found in the rice genome. According to a gene structural analysis, all members of the OsHSF family share Gly-66, Phe-67, Lys-69, Trp-75, Glu-76, Phe-77, Ala-78, Phe-82, Ile-93, and Arg-96. Rice HSF family genes are widely distributed in the vegetative organs, first in the roots and then in the leaf and stem; in contrast, in reproductive tissues, the embryo and lemma exhibit the highest levels of gene expression. According to chromosomal localization, tandem duplication and repetition may have aided in the development of novel genes in the rice genome. OsHSFs have a significant role in the regulation of gene expression, regulation in primary metabolism and tolerance to environmental stress, according to gene networking analyses.

Conclusion

Six genes viz; Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os03g25080, Os01g54550, Os02g13800 and Os10g28340 were annotated as promising genes. This study provides novel insights for functional studies on the OsHSFs in rice breeding programs. With the ultimate goal of enhancing crops, the data collected in this survey will be valuable for performing genomic research to pinpoint the specific function of the HSF gene during stress responses.

Peer Review reports

Background

The growth of plants is significantly impacted by a variety of detrimental environmental variables, including biotic and abiotic stresses [1] because they can hasten chlorophyll deterioration and reduce photosynthetic efficiency. The abiotic stresses like high temperatures and drought are particularly important because they can severely restrict plant growth, development, and function. Due to sessile structure of plants, which precludes them from actively avoiding stress, plants are dependent on physiological and biochemical processes to withstand external extremes [2, 3]. As a result, they must create a wide range of complex and effective mechanism to maintain normal physiology, metabolism, and development under stress conditions. The transcription factors like ABRE Binding Factor and MYC are involved in calcium signaling, abscisic acid and jasmonate signaling pathways that regulate the reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell signaling pathways [4]. For plants to be resistant to stress, transcription factor (TF) gene expression is essential. For the reception and transmission of signals, eukaryotes usually contain a set of transcription factors called heat shock factors (HSFs). Plant stress response and the tolerance to heat are induced by the discovery of heat shock factors and the regulation of downstream genes [5, 6]. Numerous studies have documented interactions between heat and oxidative stress in the cellular pathways. The production of ROS is regarded to be a link between stressful situations like flooding, exposure to UV radiation, pathogen attack etc. [7]. Previously, it was proposed that redox responsive transcription factors like HSFA4a are probably responsible for detecting ROS levels in Arabidopsis. These "sensors" are thought to function upstream in a cascade that controls some stress-responsive proteins and other TF, including Zat and WRKY gene families [8]. In-depth investigation has shown that a variety of HSFs, including HSFA1b, HSFA4a, and HSFA8, are suspected of taking part in abiotic stress-induced ROS regulated gene networks. It is proposed, the generation of various ROS triggers HSF activation, which in turn causes the regulation of other genes. These mechanisms could act as a molecular bridge between the cellular response to heat stress and other types of stresses [9].

Heat shock transcription factors are the primary regulatory components of the plant towards heat stress response. The sequence of the Arabidopsis thaliana genome revealed 21 open reading frames (ORFs) that encode putative HSFs that were divided into three groups as A, B and C based on phylogenetic analysis and structural features [10]. The DNA binding domain (DBD), which interacts with "heat-shock elements" (5′-nGAAnnTTCn-3′) regulatory sequences found in the target gene via the helix-turn-helix motif and the oligomerization domain, which is responsible for HSF trimerization and has a bipartile heptad repeat pattern in the hydrophobic-associated region (HR-A/B) [11]. The HSF gene family has been characterized in several plant species, including A. thaliana [12], Brachypodium distachyon [13], Glycine max [14], Solanum lycopersicum [15], Populus trichocarpa [16], Triticum aestivum and Zea mays [17,18,19].

However, the function of HSFs in rice plant growth and development, responses to stressors and transcript expression profiling of HSFs gene has not been thoroughly investigated. The computational biology methods offer a practical and stable foundation on which additional wet-lab research could be carried out. Numerous abiotic stresses have been connected to HSF genes. In the study, we examined this important gene family in detail using the whole annotated rice genome sequence (TIGR Rice Annotation release 7).

Material and methods

Identification of HSF genes in Oryza sativa genome

The genome of the Oryza sativa L. japonica cultivar Nipponbare was initially mined for HSF genes using ESTs and cDNA sequences. The National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ [20], the Database of Rice Transcription Factors (DRTF) http://planttfdb.gao-lab.org/index.php?sp=Osj [21], MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project Database http://rice.uga.edu/ [22] and Plant Genome Database (PlantGDB) https://www.plantgdb.org/ [23] were used to mined the HSF genes. HSF genes in the rice genome were predicted using the BLAST online tool available at http://rice.uga.edu/analyses search blast.html on the RAP-DB website [24]. The sequences with more than 80% coverage in the BLAST analysis were found using the online tool GENSCAN (http://hollywood.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html). On both sides of the hit, the open reading frame (ORF) was expanded by around 2000 bp [25]. Additionally, the HSF domains in the query sequences were validated using the SMART (Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool) programme (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/).

Phylogenetic and MEME motif analysis

Through the use of Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/), the protein sequences obtained from several public repositories were aligned to remove the redundant sequences. Bootstrap (5000 replicates) and pairwise deletion were used as the default parameters to create a combined unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) tree. Besides, the conserved motifs in HSF rice protein sequences were combed using online tool Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME Suite version 5.5.0) https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme.

Distribution of intron and exon size in OsHSF family genes

Using the Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, the positions of introns and exons in OsHSF genes were determined by gaps discovered during the alignment of full-length cDNA transcripts with genomic sequences [5]. Concisely, exons are proximal blocks of homologous sequence between full-length cDNA and genomic sequences. The introns are gaps between exons that are wholly made of genomic sequence for a single full-length cDNA that was matched to a conterminous stretch of genomic sequence [26]. To better comprehend the range and magnitude of HSF family genes, the total length of a gene is estimated by adding the lengths of each of its exons.

Chromosomal localization

Chromosomal localization of OsHSF family genes was constructed using Tbtool https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools/releases.

Protein 3D structure

Using the online programme AlphaFold, available at https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/ [27], the 3-D structure of the HSFs rice genes was predicted, as shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Protein structure of rice HSFs. The prediction model confidence level is presented at the bottom

Full size image

Gene expression analysis

The rice expression profile database (RiceXPro) [28], a public repository of gene expression, was utilized to analyze and confirm the expression of the OsHSF gene (s). The data from microarray experiments were used to study the entire life cycle of the rice plant, including field development (leaf day time, root day time, leaf sunset, leaf night time, root night time, reproductive organs, grain at early stage, grain ripening, spatio-temporal profile), and plant hormones (abscisic acid, auxin, brassinosteroid, cytokinin, gibberellin, and jasmonic acid in root and shoot). The most precise quantitative measurement of the transcript levels for particular genes is produced by creating a table of normalised signal intensity values for each gene in each plant tissue.

Results

Identification and chromosomal distribution of OsHSFs

With the development of genomic sequencing technology, it is now possible to recover the protein/nucleotide sequences of all OsHSFs family genes. After eliminating the duplicated sequences, 25 OsHSFs were discovered in the study, as indicated in Table 1. Using HMM and EMBL-EBI, all OsHSF proteins were evaluated for the presence of DBD. The SMART online tool certified the OsHSFs-DBDs. Table 2 lists all of the properties of the OsHSF genes. The 25 HSF genes were localized on rice chromosomes as shown in Fig. 2. Chromosome-1 and chromosome-3 had a maximum of 5 and 6 OsHSF genes respectively, whereas a single copy of OsHSFs gene was localized on chromosomes-4 and chromosome-5. In contrast, chromosomes-6, chromosome-7 and chromosome-8 harbor three paralogus genes, while two paralogus gene were identified on each of chromosomes-2 and chromosome-9 respectively. Except for OsHSF13800, OsHSF06630, OsHSFSS12370, OsHSF25080 and OsHSF08140, all other OsHSF genes were confined on the lower arm of the chromosomes.

Table 1 Basic information of HSF gene family
Full size table
Table 2 Features of HSF gene family for chromosomal localization
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Localization of HSF family genes on rice chromosomes

Full size image

Phylogenetic classification of OsHSFs family genes

These findings led to the construction of a phylogenetic tree for 25 OsHSF genes using bootstrap analysis (5000 replicates) based on multiple alignments of protein sequences (Fig. 3). The phylogram is alienated into a total of four clades namely clade-I to clade-IV. Clade-I is further distinguished into sub-groups: I-a, I-b and with total of nine OsHSF genes. With 14 OsHSF genes, the clade-II is further split into clade-IIa and clade-IIb. Clade IIa also has two sub-clades called clade IIab and clade IIac. Two distinct groups with a single gene each are clade-III and clade-IV. Finally, the genes are characterized into OsHSF proteins, which are applied for abiotic factors like heat shock and drought resistance.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Protein based phylogenetic tree of HSF gene family

Full size image

Using the amino acid sequences of the OsHSF domains, multiple alignment analysis was carried out to dissect the evolutionary relationships amongst Oryza sativa HSF family members. The alignment predicts that Ser-55, Ser-56, Phe-57, Val-58, Arg-59, Gln-60, Leu-61, Asn-62, Thr-63, Tyr-64, Arg-68, Val-70, Val-71, Pro-72, Asp-73, Arg-74, Asn-79, Gly-85 and Leu-89 are highly conserved whereas Gly-66, Phe-67, Lys-69, Trp-75, Glu-76, Phe-77, Ala-78, Phe-82, Ile-93 and Arg-96 are completely conserved in all OsHSFs family members in rice (Fig. 4). More than 10% of OsHSFs members have completely conserve amino acid residues whereas more than 19% OsHSFs amino acids are highly conserved in the OsHSFs domain. Multiple alignments of protein sequence and DBD of OsHSFs gene family are given in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multiple allignment of protein sequence and DNA binding domain (DBD) of HSF gene family

Full size image

Characteristics of each group in the rice HSFs family genes

The responses of these genes to abiotic factors have been documented in Arabidopsis, Brachypodium and Oryza species. These genes must be classified in accordance with various stress regimes in order to be included in unique groups based on their protein similarity, which may aid in related function within their evolutionary placement. The Table 4 provides a summary on the roles of each gene in the OsHSF family. The two sub-groups of Clade-I, Ia and Ib, harbour nine total genes. All genes in this group are involved in root development, vegetative growth and reproductive stages (embryo development). These genes have resistance against water stress in early seed germination and at the time of flowering during high temperature.

The clade-II comprised of 14 genes and involved in anther, ovary, embryo and endosperm and root development. In Clade-III and clade-IV has single gene. The gene in the clade-III is involved in vegetative i.e. leaf blade and root development along with reproductive (pistil and palea development). The gene in clade-IV involved in leaf blade, leaf sheath, stem, vegetative and root development and reproductive (pistil, palea, lemma anthers and inflorescence).

Distribution of motifs

OsHSFs TF contain functionally important motifs linked to mitochondria and chloroplasts. Such functional sequencing motifs are typically conserved among members of a subgroup in vast families of transcription factors in plants, and the proteins of these motifs in their subgroups are likely to have similar activities. Multiple alignment analysis with Clustal Omega was used to investigate the conserved motifs in the nucleotides of each clade in the rice OsHSFs gene family. The MEME Suite version 5.5.0 was used to examine rice OsHSFs protein sequences for the presence of conserved motifs. Overall, 15 conserved motifs were predicted which correspond to the OsHSFs domain as shown in Fig. 5 and these conserved motifs found in the OsHSFs family are listed in Table 3.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Motif location of HSF gene family

Full size image
Table 3 Conserved motif sequence of Oryza sativa L. HSFs
Full size table

Gene structure analysis

The GSDS tool was used to examine the intron–exon organization of the selected OsHSFs in order to determine the structural link between the genes. The quantity and structure of introns and exons have a significant impact on how gene families have evolved. The number of exons and introns was found to remain constant, and 84% (21/25) of OsHSFs contain just one intron for Os08g43334, Os03g12370, Os09g35790 and Os03g06630 (Fig. 6). The remaining OsHSF gene family has two introns. Exon counts for the Os08g43334, Os03g12370, Os09g35790, and Os03g06630 revealed seven, two, three, and three exons, respectively. All OsHSFs contained 5′ and 3′ un-translated region (UTR). In terms of intron number, intron phase, exon length, and overall gene length, similar intron–exon patterns were observed in the OsHSF genes belonging to the same class and subclasses.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Intron/exon size distribution of HSF family gene

Full size image

Expression profiles of OsHSFs at different developmental stages

Investigations into the OsHSF gene expression patterns were conducted on various time scales and at various growth stages. Transcriptome profiles provide insight into the potential role of genes in a variety of biological processes, despite the fact that protein expression is not always associated with gene expression. The rice genome database RiceXpro was used to download the transcriptome data that was used in the current study. The Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os03g25080, Os01g54550, Os10g28340, and Os02g13800 have been demonstrated to be among the tissues with the highest up-regulation of OsHSFs during different growth phases (Fig. 7). The Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os01g54550, Os02g29340, Os03g58160, Os03g63750, Os06g35960, Os07g08140, Os07g44690, Os09g28200, Os09g35790, and Os10g28340 are also up-regulated throughout the development of reproductive organs and grain ripening stages. A total of 4 OsHSFs exhibited less expression at all as shown in Table 4.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Role of Os02g13800 gene in field development (A) and network image (B)

Full size image
Table 4 Role of HSF gene family in field development
Full size table

The Os01g39020, Os01g43590, Os01g53220, Os02g29340, Os03g12370, Os03g53340, and Os09g35790 genes are up-regulated during the leaf and root diurnal stage. This suggests that these genes could potentially regulate these tissues and influence vegetative growth. In leaf tissues, OsHSFs were expressed most highly. In the same way, grain formation at early stage across different tissues, Os01g39020 (Fig. 8), Os01g53220 (Fig. 9), Os01g54550 (Fig. 10), Os03g25080 (Fig. 11) Os02g29340, Os03g58160, Os03g63750, Os06g35960, Os07g08140, Os07g44690, Os08g43334 (Fig. 12), Os09g28200, Os09g35790 and Os10g28340 are up-regulated see Table 4.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Role of Os01g39020 gene in field development (A) and network image (B)

Full size image
Fig. 9
figure 9

Role of Os01g53220 gene in field development (A) and gene networking analysis on the basis locus ID (B)

Full size image
Fig. 10
figure 10

Role of Os01g54550 gene in field development (A) and gene networking analysis on the basis locus ID (B)

Full size image
Fig. 11
figure 11

Role of Os03g25080 gene in field development (A) and network image (B)

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

Role of Os08g43334 gene in field development (A) and gene networking analysis on the basis of locus ID (B)

Full size image

Expression profiles of OsHSFs at different plant hormone stages

A wide variety of plant hormones have an impact on rice growth, development, and yield. RiceXpro was used to analyze the data in order to survey rice OsHSFs expression in response to several plant hormones (Table 5). The genes Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os02g13800, Os03g12370, Os03g25080, Os04g48030, Os06g35960, Os07g08140, Os08g43334 and Os09g28354 had the highest expression in the root and shoot in response to abscisic acid. Os01g54550 and Os03g25080 were moderately overexpressed in the root and shoot at various times when gibberellins were present. Only two OsHSFs (Os01g39020 and Os01g54550) displayed considerably increased expression in the rice plant's root and shoot when auxin hormone was present. A single gene, Os01g43590, showed moderate expression in the root and shoot when brassinosteroid hormone was present. The genes Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os02g29340, and Os08g43334 had the maximum expression under cytokinin hormone; however no discernible effect was seen in the shoot. Most OsHSFs genes in the shoot are up-regulated in response to jasmonate. However, some OsHSFs could only be activated by a specific hormone. While other OsHSFs displayed virtually minimal expression in response to any hormone stimulation.

Table 5 Role of HSF gene family in plant hormones
Full size table

Coexpression of OsHSFs gene family

According to a hierarchy and mutual rank (MR) value on an ascending MR value, as illustrated in Fig. 13, the HyperTree graphical presentation illustrates the relationships between coexpressed genes. The HyperTree nodes were labeled with transcription factors name. It reveals the association of HSF genes with other TF such as G-2 like, GRAS, RWP, RWK, bZIP, trihelix, WRKY as shown in Fig. 14. As a result, the gene network would show how the 25 HSF genes had overlapping activities and provide valuable information that could be used to better understand the molecular mechanism of rice reproductive evolution.

Fig. 13
figure 13

Networking of HSF gene family members [25] triggering multiple genes. Red dots represents the endocytosis process, blue dot for the spliceosome process, pink dot for the ascorbate and aldarate metabolism and yellow dot for glutathione metabolism

Full size image
Fig. 14
figure 14

Hyper tree of single guide gene of heat shock factor gene family

Full size image

Discussion

To provide food security under diverse climate scenario and ever-increasing global populace, it is imperious to comprehend the molecular mechanisms of plants and discover genetic resources related to agricultural productivity. It has been discovered through the sequencing of the crop plants that the number of OsHSFs may not be influenced by the genome's size. As an illustration, Zea mays (2.4 Gb) has 25 genes, Oryza sativa (430 Mb) has 25 HSFs, A. thaliana (135 Mb) has 21 HSFs and Medicago truncatula (375 Mb) has 15 HSFs, Based on the drafted rice genome sequence [29, 30], Baniwal et al. [31] hypothesised that the rice genome contained 23 genes that encode HSF. OsHSFs are essential to plant growth, according to earlier findings. So, using the RiceXPro database, we looked at the specific expression of OsHSFs across 12 different developmental stages (Table 4). Many genes had increased expression, which was indicative of how they functioned at various developmental stages. In particular, Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os03g25080, Os01g54550, Os02g13800 and Os10g28340 expressed extremely across all the growth stages. This gives significant support for the outcome of our analysis and creates a solid foundation for subsequent research to characterize the functions of Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os01g54550, Os02g13800 and Os10g28340 under different plant hormonal level. Similarly, it has been suggested that OsHSFs are crucial for plants to cope with abiotic stresses. According to Kumar et al. (2018), TaHSFs A6e modulates wheat's resistance to drought and heat stress during the reproductive phases [32]. By inducing the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs), Yokotani et al. (2018) shown that HSFsA2e restores Arabidopsis adaptation to salt and heat stress [33]. The expression of OsHSFs was assessed under abiotic stress conditions using microarray analysis. Most of OsHSFs family genes displayed stress-specific expression; however some OsHSFs exhibited up-regulation under particular stress. According to Jiang (2016), OsHSFs improves plant tolerance to heat and salinity stress and escalated sensitivity to the abscisic acid [34]. Similarly in our study, Os01g39020, Os01g53220, Os01g54550, Os02g13800 and Os10g28340 genes exhibited highest expression may be used to improved development of plant reproductive organs, leaf diurnal, root diurnal and grains ripening and these genes is also played better performance under different hormonal levels. The study found that there were various transcription factor transcripts under different stress conditions.

In Arabidopsis, sunflower and Medicago truncatula solely express HSFA9 gene during seed development [35, 36]. The rice gene Os03g12370, which is an Arabidopsis and sunflower homolog, was not expressed during seed development. In our investigation, six OsHSF genes had enhanced expression in specific tissue. The Os09g28354 and Os01g39020 and Os01g53220 genes have a relationship with reproductive organ tissues, respectively, as well as seed and root tissues. The Os02g1380 is in root and reproductive organs, Os05g45410 and Os01g54550 in leaf, vegetative and ripening, Os03g58160 in panicle, Os01g53220 in flower and Os03g25080 in the pistil has significant affect under stress conditions. Theoretical explanations for HSF A1a/A1b in Arabidopsis and HSF A1a in tomato suggest that constitutively produced OsHSFs may be crucial for the regulation of stress-induced HSFs genes [37, 38].

It is well known that osmotic stress, salt, cold, and heat all significantly increase the expression of HSF in Arabidopsis. In this study, expression profile analysis revealed that OsHSF also respond to various abiotic stresses. Os03g53340, Os07g44690, Os01g53220, Os01g54550 and Os02g13800 play major role in the ROS accumulation pathways. Our findings are consistent with those of Wang et al. (2022) [39], who hypothesised that OsHSFs would function as sensors for changes in ROS intensity. Among all OsHSFs, the gene Os03g53340 showed the greatest level of expression at both oxidative stress time points. Furthermore, it implies that Os02g32590 and Os01g39020 could be involved in the delayed reaction to oxidative stress. It is notable that Os07g08140 seems to be the least responsive to the stress circumstances whereas Os03g53340 had the greatest transcript regulation under stress. The co-induction of OsHSF genes may provide important details about the pathways that respond to stress. The DNA-binding domain of plant OsHSFs genes is divided into two portions by an intron. This intron is located in the same location at each OsHSF, however its size varies [40]. The majority of HSF genes only contain one intron in the DBD, and rice is not an exception to this rule (Fig. 6). Besides, it was revealed that the rice HSFs gene is not intron-less, contrary to the general finding that roughly 20% of rice genes are intron-less [19, 41]. Intron-less genes have been found in several rice transcription factors such as MADS box [42], C2H2 zinc finger [43], bZIP [44], SAUR [45] and F-box [46] gene families. Alternative splicing may occur and vary according to environmental stresses and at certain developmental stages. The Oryza 10% and Arabidopsis 11.6% genes exhibited alternatively spliced across numerous tissues [41, 47]. It is hypothesized that the evolution of a gene family is significantly influenced by the increase or decrease in exon number. As a result, the quantity and distribution of introns and exons in OsHSF genes were examined. Our findings showed that, with the exception of Os08g43334, Os03g12370, Os09g35790, and Os03g06630, all OsHSF genes had one intron and two exons (Fig. 6). Furthermore, exon and intron length and positions varied significantly between various subclasses as they were highly conserved within the same subclasses. It is reported that the improvement of translational efficiency through the promotion of gene expression by intron transcription initiation, increased mRNA accumulation [48].

According to Xie et al. 2019, the OsHSF family of genes exhibits a co-expression pattern under various abiotic stimuli in Arabidopsis [49]. Our study indicates that OsHSF TF regulate multiple mechanisms in rice. During co-expression analysis of selected OsHSF gene(s), it was found that the OsHSF genes trigger the C2H2 type zinc finger proteins that enhance plant drought resistance through activating the expression of related targeted genes and increasing the levels of osmotic regulations [50]. The OsHSF genes also co-expressed with Golden 2-like family genes (G2-like) that have been characterized by regulating the formation of chloroplasts during the transition and early maturing phases Fig. 14 [51].

The CCAAT-binding complex (CBC), which regulates primary and secondary metabolism, development, stress reactions, and pathogenicity in fungi and plants, is activated by the OsHSFs. The CBC is normally composed of heterotrimeric core subunits. [52]. Moreover, the sequence-specific DNA-binding TF known as "growth regulating factors" (GRFs) regulate numerous aspects of plant growth and development [53, 54]. The BZR1/BES1 and OsHSFs play a crucial role in BR signaling and also act as a regulator in multi-signal-regulated plant growth and development events by directly networking with other key proteins or genes [42, 55].

In the co-expression analysis, the AP2/EREBP genes were also triggered that play indispensable roles in root initiation and growth of rice plant [56]. The basic leucine zipper (bZIP) family control key processes in all eukaryotes. In plants, bZIPs with OsHSFs regulates many central developmental and physiological processes like photomorphogenesis, energy homeostasis, leaf formation, seed development under biotic and biotic stresses. The rice drought stress is caused by TF that are encoded by the bZIP genes. By modifying amino acid metabolism, OsMYB55 and OsHSFs co-expressed in rice promote vegetative development and increase grain production under high temperature circumstances [57]. Systematic investigation of the rice TF family gene reveals that they are up-regulated under heat stress and contribute in a multiplicative way to the OsHSF genes [58].

When plant is growing, auxin stimulates the cell wall and also influences root formation [59].

The root nodules (RN) symbiosis is dependent on two GRAS domain transcription factors known as the nodulation signaling pathway (NSP1 and NSP2). Their rice homologs, OsNSP1 and OsNSP2, effectively reversed the RN symbiosis-defective phenotypes of the mutants of the corresponding genes in the model legume Lotus japonicas [60, 61]. Through cell differentiation, OsHSFs and the RWP-RK domain regulate the development of female gametophytes. This is good attribute to identify the early maturing rice genotypes which flower under high temperature [62].

Co-expression of HSF and WRKY TF, which respond to biotic and abiotic stresses, controls plant growth and development. It is still unclear how WRKY TFs regulate plant height in rice and react to drought stress at the molecular level. In rice, the majority of the WRKY genes show variable responses towards cold, heat, PEG and salinity stresses [63]. Recently, the HSFA2e gene has been annotated to confer thermo-tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants [64].

In the field, plants are subjected to a variety of stresses; hence it’s crucial to develop crop types that are resilient to a variety of stress conditions. The ability of OsHSFs to respond to stress can be used to create transgenic rice plants that are tolerant to abiotic stress [65].

Conclusion

Comprehensive in-silico investigation, including phylogenetic analysis, gene structure and conserved motif analysis, chromosomal location, evolutionary analysis, and OsHSF expression profile, was carried out to better understand the function of 25 OsHSF genes. According to expression profiling, Os03g53340, Os01g54550, Os02g13800, and Os01g39020 are the key heat shock regulators (HSR) in rice, and Os03g53340 is crucial for the early activation of the heat shock protein gene under heat stress. These findings laid the foundation for developmental processes and responses to various stresses using various functional validation processes, such as overexpression, knockout via CRISPR/Cas9 systems, etc. The role of OsHSFs in the abiotic stress response pathway was initiated not only in heat shock but also in other abiotic stresses. This information can be used to produce stress-tolerant rice cultivars suitable under changing climate conditions.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in public repository, [PERSISTENT WEB LINK OR ACCESSION NUMBER TO DATASETS]”.

1. The datasets generated during the current study are available in the public repositories and analysed using online tools/softwares. The National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, the Database of Rice Transcription Factors (DRTF) http://planttfdb.gao-lab. org/index.php?sp = Osj, MSU Rice Genome Annotation Project Database http://rice.uga.edu/, Plant Genome Database (PlantGDB) https://www.plantgdb.org/, The RAP-DB website's BLAST online tool http://rice.uga.edu/analyses_search_blast.shtml GENSCAN http://hollywood.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html The Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/. Clustal Omega https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/. Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME Suite version 5.5.0) https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme. Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) http://gsds.gao-lab.org/, Tbtool https://github.com/CJ-Chen/TBtools /releases, AlphaFold https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/, RiceXPro https://ricexpro.dna.affrc.go.jp/, Ricefrnd https://ricefrend.dna.affrc.go.jp/single-guide-gene.html.

References

  1. Lippmann R, Babben S, Menger A, Delker C, Quint M. Development of wild and cultivated plants under global warming conditions. Curr Biol. 2019;29(24):R1326–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Qin L, Li C, Li D, Wang J, Yang L, Qu A, Wu Q. Physiological, metabolic and transcriptional responses of Basil (Ocimum basilicum Linn. var. pilosum (Willd.) Benth.) to heat stress. Agronomy. 2022;12(6):1434.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaturvedi P, Wiese AJ, Ghatak A, Zaveska Drabkova L, Weckwerth W, Honys D. Heat stress response mechanisms in pollen development. New Phytol. 2021;231(2):571–85.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu H, Timko MP. Jasmonic acid signaling and molecular crosstalk with other phytohormones. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(6):2914.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guo A-Y, Zhu Q-H, Chen X, Luo J-C. GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi= chuan Hereditas. 2007;29(8):1023–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyriakou E, Taouktsi E, Syntichaki P. The thermal stress coping network of the nematode caenorhabditis elegans. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(23):14907.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bano A, Gupta A, Rai S, Fatima T, Sharma S, Pathak N. Mechanistic role of reactive oxygen species and its regulation via the antioxidant system under environmental stress. Plant Stress Physiol Perspect Agric. 2021;11:1–18.

  8. Yang Y, Guo Y. Unraveling salt stress signaling in plants. J Integr Plant Biol. 2018;60(9):796–804.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoang TV, Vo KTX, Rahman MM, Choi S-H, Jeon J-S. Heat stress transcription factor OsSPL7 plays a critical role in reactive oxygen species balance and stress responses in rice. Plant Sci. 2019;289:110273.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. von Koskull-Döring P, Scharf K-D, Nover L. The diversity of plant heat stress transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2007;12(10):452–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scharf K-D, Berberich T, Ebersberger I, Nover L. The plant heat stress transcription factor (Hsf) family: structure, function and evolution. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. 2012;1819(2):104–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nover L, Bharti K, Döring P, Mishra SK, Ganguli A, Scharf K-D. Arabidopsis and the heat stress transcription factor world: how many heat stress transcription factors do we need? Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001;6(3):177.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen F, Wu X, Li T, Jia M, Liu X, Li P, Zhou X, Ji X, Yue X. Genome-wide survey of heat shock factors and heat shock protein 70s and their regulatory network under abiotic stresses in Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0180352.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazerooni EA, Al-Sadi AM, Kim I-D, Imran M, Lee I-J. Ampelopsin confers endurance and rehabilitation mechanisms in glycine max cv. sowonkong under multiple abiotic stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(20):10943.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang X, Zhu W, Zhang H, Liu N, Tian S. Heat shock factors in tomatoes: genome-wide identification, phylogenetic analysis and expression profiling under development and heat stress. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1961.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang F, Dong Q, Jiang H, Zhu S, Chen B, Xiang Y. Genome-wide analysis of the heat shock transcription factors in Populus trichocarpa and Medicago truncatula. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:1877–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin Y-X, Jiang H-Y, Chu Z-X, Tang X-L, Zhu S-W, Cheng B-J. Genome-wide identification, classification and analysis of heat shock transcription factor family in maize. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Haider S, Rehman S, Ahmad Y, Raza A, Tabassum J, Javed T, Osman HS, Mahmood T. In silico characterization and expression profiles of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs) in maize (Zea mays L.). Agronomy. 2021;11(11):2335.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Duan S, Liu B, Zhang Y, Li G, Guo X. Genome-wide identification and abiotic stress-responsive pattern of heat shock transcription factor family in Triticum aestivum L. BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, Canese K, Chetvernin V, Church DM, DiCuccio M, Federhen S. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39(suppl_1):D38–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang H, Jin J, Tang L, Zhao Y, Gu X, Gao G, Luo J. PlantTFDB 2.0: update and improvement of the comprehensive plant transcription factor database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(suppl_1):D1114–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, Childs K, Thibaud-Nissen F, Malek RL, Lee Y, Zheng L. The TIGR rice genome annotation resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(suppl_1):D883–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong Q, Schlueter SD, Brendel V. PlantGDB, plant genome database and analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(suppl_1):D354–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka T, Antonio BA, Kikuchi S, Matsumoto T, Nagamura Y, Hisataka Numa, Hiroaki Sakai, et al. “The rice annotation project database (RAP-DB): 2008 update.” Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36;D741–4.

  25. Burge C, Karlin S. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 1997;268(1):78–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lynch M, Kewalramani A. Messenger RNA surveillance and the evolutionary proliferation of introns. Mol Biol Evol. 2003;20(4):563–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, Ronneberger O, Tunyasuvunakool K, Bates R, Žídek A, Potapenko A. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature. 2021;596(7873):583–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sato Y, Antonio BA, Namiki N, Takehisa H, Minami H, Kamatsuki K, Sugimoto K, Shimizu Y, Hirochika H, Nagamura Y. RiceXPro: a platform for monitoring gene expression in japonica rice grown under natural field conditions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;39(suppl_1):D1141–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Fragkostefanakis S, Mesihovic A, Simm S, Paupière MJ, Hu Y, Paul P, Mishra SK, Tschiersch B, Theres K, Bovy A. HsfA2 controls the activity of developmentally and stress-regulated heat stress protection mechanisms in tomato male reproductive tissues. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(4):2461–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang N, Lin Y, Qi F, Xiaoyang C, Peng Z, Yu Y, Liu Y, Zhang J, Qi X, Deyholos M. Comprehensive analysis of differentially expressed genes and epigenetic modification-related expression variation induced by saline stress at seedling stage in fiber and oil flax, linum usitatissimum L. Plants. 2022;11(15):2053.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Baniwal SK, Bharti K, Chan KY, Fauth M, Ganguli A, Kotak S, Mishra SK, Nover L, Port M, Scharf K-D. Heat stress response in plants: a complex game with chaperones and more than twenty heat stress transcription factors. J Biosci. 2004;29:471–87.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kumar RR, Goswami S, Singh K, Dubey K, Rai GK, Singh B, Singh S, Grover M, Mishra D, Kumar S. Characterization of novel heat-responsive transcription factor (TaHSFA6e) gene involved in regulation of heat shock proteins (HSPs)—A key member of heat stress-tolerance network of wheat. J Biotechnol. 2018;279:1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Jiang Y, Zheng Q, Chen L, Liang Y, Wu J. Ectopic overexpression of maize heat shock transcription factor gene ZmHsf04 confers increased thermo and salt-stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Acta Physiol Plant. 2018;40:1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Guo M, Liu J-H, Ma X, Luo D-X, Gong Z-H, Lu M-H. The plant heat stress transcription factors (HSFs): structure, regulation, and function in response to abiotic stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:114.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Tejedor-Cano J, Prieto-Dapena P, Almoguera C, Carranco R, Hiratsu K, Ohme-Takagi M, Jordano J. Loss of function of the HSFA9 seed longevity program. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(8):1408–17.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zinsmeister J, Berriri S, Basso DP, Ly-Vu B, Dang TT, Lalanne D, da Silva EAA, Leprince O, Buitink J. The seed-specific heat shock factor A9 regulates the depth of dormancy in Medicago truncatula seeds via ABA signalling. Plant, Cell Environ. 2020;43(10):2508–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rowley ER, Mockler TC. Plant abiotic stress: insights from the genomics era. Abiotic Stress Response in Plants-Physiological, biochemical and genetic perspectives. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. p. 221–68.

  38. Mittal D, Chakrabarti S, Sarkar A, Singh A, Grover A. Heat shock factor gene family in rice: genomic organization and transcript expression profiling in response to high temperature, low temperature and oxidative stresses. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2009;47(9):785–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang L, Hou Y, Wang Y, Hu S, Zheng Y, Jin P. Genome-wide identification of heat shock transcription factors and potential role in regulation of antioxidant response under hot water and glycine betaine treatments in cold-stored peaches. J Sci Food Agric. 2022;102(2):628–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Qiao X, Li M, Li L, Yin H, Wu J, Zhang S. Genome-wide identification and comparative analysis of the heat shock transcription factor family in Chinese white pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) and five other Rosaceae species. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15(1):1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Chauhan H, Khurana N, Agarwal P, Khurana P. Heat shock factors in rice (Oryza sativa L.): genome-wide expression analysis during reproductive development and abiotic stress. Mol Genet Genom. 2011;286:171–87.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang Y, Zhang J, Hu Z, Guo X, Tian S, Chen G. Genome-wide analysis of the MADS-box transcription factor family in Solanum lycopersicum. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(12):2961.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Cai Y, Zhang W, Fu Y, Shan Z, Xu J, Wang P, Kong F, Jin J, Yan H, Ge X. Du13 encodes a C2H2 zinc-finger protein that regulates Wxb pre-mRNA splicing and microRNA biogenesis in rice endosperm. Plant Biotechnol J. 2022;20(7):1387–401.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahad A, Aslam R, Gul A, Amir R, Munir F, Batool TS, Ilyas M, Sarwar M, Nadeem MA, Baloch FS. Genome-wide analysis of bZIP, BBR, and BZR transcription factors in Triticum aestivum. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(11):e0259404.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Fan Y, Yan J, Lai D, Yang H, Xue G, He A, Guo T, Chen L, Cheng X-B, Xiang D-B. Genome-wide identification, expression analysis, and functional study of the GRAS transcription factor family and its response to abiotic stress in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. BMC Genom. 2021;22:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sadat M, Ullah M, Bashar KK, Hossen QM, Tareq M, Islam M. Genome-wide identification of F-box proteins in Macrophomina phaseolina and comparison with other fungus. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2021;19(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ganie SA, Reddy AS. Stress-induced changes in alternative splicing landscape in rice: functional significance of splice isoforms in stress tolerance. Biology. 2021;10(4):309.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Shaul O. How introns enhance gene expression. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2017;91:145–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Xie L, Li X, Hou D, Cheng Z, Liu J, Li J, Mu S, Gao J. Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling of the heat shock factor gene family in Phyllostachys edulis during development and in response to abiotic stresses. Forests. 2019;10(2):100.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Cheuk A, Ouellet F, Houde M. The barley stripe mosaic virus expression system reveals the wheat C2H2 zinc finger protein TaZFP1B as a key regulator of drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nguyen MK, Yang C-M, Tin-Han S, Szu-Hsien L, Pham GT, Nguyen HC. Chlorophyll biosynthesis and transcriptome profiles of chlorophyll b-deficient type 2b rice (Oryza sativa L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2021;49(3):12380–12380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kim J-E, Nam H, Park J, Choi GJ, Lee Y-W, Son H. Characterization of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor complex in the plant pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4898.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Kim JH. Biological roles and an evolutionary sketch of the GRF-GIF transcriptional complex in plants. BMB Rep. 2019;52(4):227.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Kuijt SJ, Greco R, Agalou A, Shao J, t Hoen CC, Övernäs E, Osnato M, Curiale S, Meynard D, van Gulik R. Interaction between the growth-regulating factor and knotted1-like homeobox families of transcription factors. Plant physiology. 2014;164(4):1952–66.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Li Q, Guo L, Wang H, Zhang Y, Fan C, Shen Y. In silico genome-wide identification and comprehensive characterization of the BES1 gene family in soybean. Heliyon. 2019;5(6):e01868.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kim E-J, Kim Y-J, Hong W-J, Lee C, Jeon J-S, Jung K-H. Genome-wide analysis of root hair preferred RBOH genes suggests that three RBOH genes are associated with auxin-mediated root hair development in rice. J Plant Biol. 2019;62:229–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yerlikaya BA, Ates D, Abudureyimu B, Aksoy E. Effect of climate change on abiotic stress response gene networks in arabidopsis thaliana. In: Principles and practices of OMICS and genome editing for crop improvement. Cham: Springer international publishing; 2022. p. 149–172.

  58. Li K, Duan L, Zhang Y, Shi M, Chen S, Yang M, Ding Y, Peng Y, Dong Y, Yang H. Genome-wide identification and expression profile analysis of trihelix transcription factor family genes in response to abiotic stress in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. BMC Genom. 2021;22(1):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Toungos MD. Plant growth substances in crop production: a Review. IJIABR. 2018;6:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yokota K, Soyano T, Kouchi H, Hayashi M. Function of GRAS proteins in root nodule symbiosis is retained in homologs of a non-legume, rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51(9):1436–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Waseem M, Nkurikiyimfura O, Niyitanga S, Jakada BH, Shaheen I, Aslam MM. GRAS transcription factors emerging regulator in plants growth, development, and multiple stresses. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(10):9673–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tedeschi F, Rizzo P, Rutten T, Altschmied L, Bäumlein H. RWP-RK domain-containing transcription factors control cell differentiation during female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2017;213(4):1909–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Sun X, Zhu J, Li X, Li Z, Han L, Luo H. AsHSP26. 8a, a creeping bentgrass small heat shock protein integrates different signaling pathways to modulate plant abiotic stress response. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):1–19.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Bi H, Miao J, He J, Chen Q, Qian J, Li H, Xu Y, Ma D, Zhao Y, Tian X. Characterization of the wheat heat shock factor TaHsfA2e-5D conferring heat and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(5):2784.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. He M, He C-Q, Ding N-Z. Abiotic stresses: general defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1771.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are highly thankful to NIAB-C, PIEAS, for providing the permission and analytical facilities to carry out the PhD study and complete the research.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology College, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (NIAB-C, PIEAS), Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Areeqa Shamshad & Muhammad Rashid

  2. Department of Environmental Sciences, The University of Lahore, Lahore, 54590, Pakistan

    Qamar uz Zaman

Authors
  1. Areeqa Shamshad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qamar uz Zaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Areeqa Shamshad and Muhammad Rashid wrote the main manuscript text and Qamar uz Zaman prepared figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qamar uz Zaman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shamshad, A., Rashid, M. & Zaman, Q.u. In-silico analysis of heat shock transcription factor (OsHSF) gene family in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Plant Biol 23, 395 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04399-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04399-1

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us