Skip to main content

Exogenous gibberellic acid shortening after-ripening process and promoting seed germination in a medicinal plant Panax notoginseng



Panax notoginseng (Burk) F.H. Chen is an essential plant in the family of Araliaceae. Its seeds are classified as a type of morphophysiological dormancy (MPD), and are characterized by recalcitrance during the after-ripening process. However, it is not clear about the molecular mechanism on the after-ripening in recalcitrant seeds.


In this study, exogenous supply of gibberellic acid (GA3) with different concentrations shortened after-ripening process and promoted the germination of P. notoginseng seeds. Among the identified plant hormone metabolites, exogenous GA3 results in an increased level of endogenous hormone GA3 through permeation. A total of 2971 and 9827 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in response to 50 mg L−1 GA3 (LG) and 500 mg L−1 GA3 (HG) treatment, respectively, and the plant hormone signal and related metabolic pathways regulated by GA3 was significantly enriched. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) revealed that GA3 treatment enhances GA biosynthesis and accumulation, while inhibiting the gene expression related to ABA signal transduction. This effect was associated with higher expression of crucial seed embryo development and cell wall loosening genes, Leafy Contyledon1 (LEC1), Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA), expansins (EXP) and Pectinesterase (PME).


Exogenous GA3 application promotes germination and shorts the after-ripening process of P. notoginseng seeds by increasing GA3 contents through permeation. Furthermore, the altered ratio of GA and ABA contributes to the development of the embryo, breaks the mechanical constraints of the seed coat and promotes the protrusion of the radicle in recalcitrant P. notoginseng seeds. These findings improve our knowledge of the contribution of GA to regulating the dormancy of MPD seeds during the after-ripening process, and provide new theoretical guidance for the application of recalcitrant seeds in agricultural production and storage.

Peer Review reports


The seed is the most critical period in the life cycle of a plant [1]. Seed dormancy is traditionally defined as an intrinsic obstacle to germination under a favorable condition [2,3,4]. It is crucial for the conservation of germplasm resources, and the prevention of pre-harvest sprouting [5]. The morphological features of seed-covering tissues and the physiological status of the embryo are an essential determinant of seed dormancy [6], and it is classified as physiological (PD), morphological (MD), physical (PY), combinational (PY + PD) and morpho-physiological (MPD) types [7, 8]. The MPD seeds have to undergo an after-ripening (AR) process characterized by a gradual reduction in dormancy level [9]. The seeds with the after-ripening process would undergo an intricate range of metabolic processes before germination, which is in preparation for the mobilization of food reserve and cell growth [10]. The after-ripening process depends on moisture and oil contents, seed-covering structures and temperature [11]. With a low level of dormancy, temperatures and light could overcome the final limitations on germination [12], and germination happens if water potential is adequate to allow the radicle to protrude [13]. The after-ripening is a process in which the dormancy is lost in a low-hydrated state. However, it remains largely unknown about the mechanism of dormancy release of MPD seeds that show a high water content during the after-ripening process.

The elicitation, retention and reduction of seed dormancy is a highly intricate physiological process that relies on a multitude of endogenous and environmental factors [14]. Signals from hormones, essentially those of abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) are integrators between environmental cues and molecular signals, thus regulating gene expression [9, 15]. The balance of GA and ABA is a critical factor in controlling seed dormancy and germination [4]. Fluctuating temperatures enhance the ratio of GA/ABA by decreasing ABA content in Cynara cardunculus seeds, and simultaneously the expression of Nine-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) and ABA-INSENSITIVE5 (ABI5) is inhibited [16]. In the Arabidopsis and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.), the mutants with defects in the gene encoding GA biosynthetic enzymes are unable to germinate [17]. The dormancy loss in wheat seeds is accompanied by the increased expression of TaGA20ox and the enhanced level of bioactive GA1 during imbibition [18, 19]. Arabidopsis plants constitutively expressing GA catalytic enzyme GA 2-oxidase (GA2ox) reveal that the reduced accumulation of GA in seeds leads to the increased probability of seed abortion [20]. The seed germination depends on gibberellin (GA) and is inhibited by DELLA when GA concentration is relatively low in Arabidopsis. Seeds of GA-deficient mutant ga1 (GA Requiring 1) exhibit a failure to germinate phenotype in the lack of exogenous gibberellic acid (GA3) [21]. In contrast, the mutant GA2ox could deactivate bioactive GA, consequently accompanying a decreased level of seed dormancy [22]. Overall, the signaling and content of ABA and GA play a critical role in regulating seed dormancy.

GA is required in seed development, and exogenous GA3 has been applied to break seed dormancy. Exogenous GA3 facilitates the germination of Fraxinus hupehensis seeds by enhancing the level of soluble sugars and weakening lipolysis [23]. Similarly, exogenous GA3 might increase starch hydrolysis by stimulating the catalytic activity to mitigate oxidative damages in the early germination of Zanthoxylum dissitum seeds [24]. It has been found that exogenous GA3 application prompts GA signal transduction and suppresses ABA synthesis to facilitate rice seed germination under low-temperature conditions [25]. Exogenous GA3 might break seed dormancy and promote seed germination. However, little information is available about the response of dormancy release in recalcitrant seed to exogenous GA3.

Panax notoginseng (Burkill) F. H. Chen (Sanqi in Chinese), a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, is a perennial herb from the family of Araliaceae [26]. Its seeds are classified into the group of morphophysiological dormancy (MPD). Moreover, it has been characterized by the typically recalcitrant trait [27, 28], the water content is about 67.3% in seeds at morphological maturation, and the seeds are highly sensitive to dehydration, the viability of seeds under natural conditions is only 15 days [29, 30]. Most recalcitrant seeds might quickly germinate after shedding, but some recalcitrant seeds with incomplete development of embryo have to undergo the after-ripening process before the germination [31]. Among of them, P. notoginseng seeds need to undergo about 45 ~ 60 days of after-ripening process before germination [32]. A preliminary study has demonstrated that incompletely developed embryos might result in the dormancy of P. notoginseng seed, the embryo in the postharvest seed at a heart-shaped period has to be further differentiated and developed during the after-ripening process [33]. Meanwhile, soluble sugar, starch and protein gradually decrease with the prolonged storage time in the seeds of P. notoginseng during the after-ripening process [34, 35]. The lack or inadequate accumulation of LEA proteins in the embryo tissues and the low activity of GSH metabolism might be the key factors leading to the dehydration sensitivity in recalcitrant seeds of P. notoginseng [36]. PE2, GAI, KS, PP2C, GA2OX and other genes have been identified as the key genes involved in regulating the dormancy release of P. notoginseng seeds [37]. Our recent work has shown that exogenous GA3 treatment could effectively shorten the after-ripening process and stimulate seed germination of P. notoginseng [38]. However, it is still unknown about the mechanisms through that GA3 facilitate the germination of postharvest P. notoginseng seeds at the physiological and molecular levels. In this study, we compared germination rate, hormonal content, and transcriptomic-related indicators of seeds treated with exogenous GA3. We also identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with seed germination and the expression of genes related to seed germination verified by qRT-PCR. Our data revealed the physiological and transcriptomic aspects of the promoted effect of GA3 on recalcitrant seed germination.


Effects of exogenous GA3 treatment on physiological indexes during P. notoginseng seed after-ripening process

In this study, the seeds were obtained by sandy stratification after treatment with 50 mg L−1 GA3 (LG), 250 mg L−1 GA3 (MG), 500 mg L−1 GA3 (HG) and water (CK). Embryo development and seed germination were shown in Fig. 1. At 0 DAR, the embryos were enclosed by endosperms (Fig. 1A). The size of the embryos generally increased as the after-ripening process was prolonged (Fig. 1A-B). The embryo length was more than half of the seeds sections at 30 DAR, and the rates of Em/En of 50 mg L−1, 250 mg L−1and 500 mg L−1 GA3-treated seeds were 61.98%, 60.50% and 63.01%, respectively. At 45 DAR, the 500 mg L−1 GA3-treated seeds had a significantly higher Em/En rate (92%) than 50 mg L−1 GA3-treated seeds and the control (Fig. 1B). Beginning 30 days after treatment, GA3-treatment significantly enhanced the germination rate of P. notoginseng seeds (Fig. 1D). Compared with 30 DAR, the seed germination rate in control was raised by 10.0% and 27.0% at 45 DAR and 60 DAR, respectively, while the increase in the 50 mg L−1 GA3-treated seeds were 30.0% and 53.0%, respectively, during the same period (Fig. 1D). Compared with CK, the external application of GA3 significantly promoted seed germination of P. notoginseng, the rate of seed germination tended to raise as the GA3 application increased (Fig. 1C, Fig. S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Application of exogenous GA3 to promote seed germination of P. notoginseng. A Appearance and stereoscopic micrographs of control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. B Changes in Em/En ratio of control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. C Appearance and morphology of control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds after germination (t = 60d). D Changes in the rate of germination in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. The values presented are the means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments in the same period using Duncan’s test (P < 0.05)

RNA sequencing and gene annotation of P. notoginseng seed transcriptome

To acquire a general overview of the regulation in seed germination as impacted by exogenous GA3 treatment with different concentrations, the samples from the concentrations of 50 mg L−1 (LG), 500 mg L−1 (HG) of GA3 and CK at each sampling point (0, 30, 50 DAR) were selected based on the results from experiments (Fig. 1) for transcriptome assays. 27 cDNA libraries from the whole seed were selected to examine the transcriptome level of gene expression in P. notoginseng seeds. A total of 187.75 gigabytes (Gb) clean sequencing data was acquired (Table S1). For each sample, the average clear data was about 6.95 Gb, and Q30 (the percentage of bases with Phred > 30 to the total bases, Phrede = -10log10(e)) was about 94%. The data were used for comparisons with the reference genome of P. notoginseng [39]. 86.09% ~ 88.82% of the reads in the 27 libraries were uniquely mapped by alignment with the reference genome of P. notoginseng (Table 1). The transcript abundances of genes were assessed by fragments per kilobase of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM). The distribution of the log2 (FPKM + 1) showed relatively high gene expression as shown in Fig. S2. In this experiment, all R2 values between the three biological replicates were closer to 1 by using the Persons Correlation Coefficient (R) (Fig. S3), showing that the biological replicates of each sample had strong correlations.

Table 1 Comparative genome statistics of samples

Comparative analysis of DEGs in P. notoginseng seeds with exogenous GA3 treatment

DEGs were analyzed using the FPKM method to determine the degree of overlap between the three seed groups. Compared with CK, a total of 2971 and 9827 DEGs were identified in P. notoginseng seeds with exogenous LG and HG treatment, respectively (Fig. S4). Through pairwise comparisons, a total of 1064, 397, 1115, 2777, 792 and 6653 DEGs were identified at CK_0 d vs LG_0 d, CK_0 d vs HG_0 d, CK_30 d vs LG_30 d, CK_30 d vs HG_30 d, CK_50 d vs LG_50 d and CK_50 d vs HG_50 d, respectively (Fig. 2). In HG-treated seeds at 0 DAR, 265 were up-regulated and 132 down-regulated. At 30 DAR, 1144 genes were up-regulated and 1633 genes were down-regulated on the CK compared with HG-treated seeds (Fig. 2). At 50 DAR, 474 genes were up-regulated and 318 genes were down-regulated on the CK compared with LG-treated seeds (Fig. 2); 3187 genes were up-regulated and 3466 genes were down-regulated on the CK compared with HG-treated seeds. To obtain the functional annotations of DEGs, GO annotation analysis was performed on DEGs (Fig. 3). The results showed that most DEGs were enriched in biological process and molecular function, while a number of DEGs were enriched in the cellular components in the comparisons at CK_30 d vs LG_30 d, CK_30 d vs HG_30 d, CK_50 d vs LG_50 d and CK_50 d vs HG_50 d (Fig. 3, Fig. S5). In biological process classification, these DEGs were specifically involved the metabolic processes, cells biological processes, and response the stress and abiotic stimulus. The molecular functions mainly included binding, catalysis, and transport activity. Besides, most of the gene products were located in cells and organelles.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Statistical analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process

Fig. 3
figure 3

GO terms of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process. A DEGs between CK_50 VS LG_50. B DEGs between CK_50 VS HG_50. The Y-axis on the left represents GO terms, including biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, the X-axis indicates genes number of each term. Up-regulated genes are shown in the red bar, and down-regulated genes are shown in the blue bar

Moreover, KEGG analysis was used to evaluate the biological functions of the DEGs (Fig. 4). In the comparisons at CK_0 d vs LG_0 d and CK_0 d vs HG_0 d, and the DEGs were mainly identified in pentose and glucuronate interconversions, cyanoamino acid metabolism and protein processing in the endoplasmic reticulum (Fig. S6). In the comparisons at CK_30 d vs LG_30 d and CK_30 d vs HG_30 d, our results found that DEGs were mainly identified in plant hormone signal transduction, galactose metabolism, and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism. Importantly, in the comparisons at CK_50 d vs LG_50 d and CK_50 d vs HG_50 d, the results showed that the plant hormone signal transduction, carbon metabolism and citrate cycle were enriched in top KEGG pathways (Fig. 4C). Thus, DEGs functional enrichment suggested that plant hormone signal transduction and carbon metabolism were closely involved in GA3-promoted seed development, and these pathways were further investigated.

Fig. 4
figure 4

KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. A DEGs between CK_30 vs LG_30. B DEGs between CK_30 vs HG_30. C DEGs between CK_50 vs LG_50. D DEGs between CK_50 vs HG_50. The Y-axis on the left represents GO KEGG pathways, the X-axis indicates the “Gene Ratio” represented by the ratio of DEGs numbers to the total annotated gene numbers of each pathway. Low P values are shown in the red circle, and high P values are shown in the purple circle. The area of a circle represents DEGs number

Changes in profiles of plant hormone signal transduction and related metabolites in response to exogenous GA3 treatment

The KEGG annotations revealed that DEGs were related to the plant hormone signal transduction pathway in P. notoginseng seeds. To identify highly correlated DEGs that responded to exogenous GA3 treatment, the map showed the expression pattern of DEGs related to plant hormone ABA and GA signal transduction (Fig. 5). Compared with the CK, GA3 treatment up-regulated DEGs related to GA biosynthesis and signal transduction during the after-ripening process, including ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS), GA20-oxidase (GA20ox) and GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1), whereas down-regulated DELLA. Further, GA3-treatment down-regulated most of the DEGs involved in ABA transport signal transduction pathway among them are Pyrabactin resistance 1-like (PYL) and ABSCISIC ACIDINSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5), whereas up­regulated Protein Phosphatase 2C (PP2C). To explore the functions of endogenous hormones in seed germination, ABA, GA3 and IAA contents in the CK and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process were detected using LC–MS (Table 2). Compared with the CK, endogenous hormones GA3 content was significantly the highest at 0 DAR, but IAA content was not changed considerably in the GA3-treated group. By contrast, ABA contents were the lowest in the GA3-treated group. Thus, GA3 treatment could stimulate seed germination by altering the accumulation of endogenous hormones. Moreover, exogenous GA3 induced seed germination through increased GA3 concentration and decreased ABA concentration. These results imply that exogenous GA3 enhances GA biosynthesis and accumulation, while inhibiting the gene expression related to ABA signal transduction.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Expression pattern analysis base on RNA-seq of GA (A) and ABA (B) biosynthesis and signal transduction pathway-related genes of P. notoginseng seeds treated with GA3 during the after-ripening process. In the heat map, different color indicates the expression level changes in GA3-treated seeds compared with the control during the after-ripening process

Table 2 Changes of endogenous hormones in the control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process

WGCNA analysis the expression of key genes in response to GA3 treatment

In order to identify highly correlated genes that co-occurred and responded to exogenous GA3 treatment in P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process, the Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was performed to analyze gene expressions at 0, 30 and 50 DAR. After removal of the genes with low fluctuation in expression (standard deviation ≤ 0.4), 21,988 of 45,737 genes were subjected to pairwise correlation analysis regarding gene expression and sorted into different twenty-two modules, the genes in the same modules shared high correlation coefficients (Fig. S7). Based on the finding that seed embryos elongated significantly after gibberellin treatment (Fig. 1), the modules significantly associated with the traits were identified. Two modules showed a higher correlation (r = 0.86 and r = 0.77 for coral2 and black, respectively) with GA3 treated, indicating that genes in these modules regulate embryo development and seed germination (Fig. 6A). A total of 2086 and 3732 genes were found in the “coral2” and “black” (P < 0.01) modules, respectively. Based on the connectedness of genes, the hub genes PME and PP2C were screened in coral2 and black modules, respectively (Fig. 6B-C). Moreover, the genes with the higher connectivity included those GA biosynthesis and catabolism (GID1, GA20ox, DELLA), embryo development (LEA, LEC1) and cell wall loosening (EXP, XET). It is revealed that these genes may be the key genes of the “coral2” and “black” modules and involved in GA3 regulation of P. notoginseng seed germination.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Network analysis of co-expression modules using WGCNA. (A) Heatmap of module-trait weight correlations and corresponding P-values. (B) Potential regulatory network of DEGs in coral2 and black (C) modules. Degree indicates the number of lines owned by a node. A line connects two different genes

Based on the analysis of WGCNA (Fig. 6), we focused on embryo development-related and cell wall-related DEGs (Fig. 7), which were clustered into five gene groups: Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA), Leafy Contyledon1(LEC1), Expansin (EXP), Xyloglucan Endotransglucosylase (XET) and Pectin Methylesterase (PME). Compared with the CK, the expression level of PME and LEA did not change upon GA3 treatment at 0 DAR, while GA3 increased the expression level of LEC1 and EXP. With the prolonged after-ripening process, LEA and PME were dramatically up-regulated in response to GA3 applications. The expression of LEC1, EXP and other genes were found to be increased during after-ripening process after GA3 treatment.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Effects of GA3 on profiles of transcriptome of P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. A The candidate genes involved in embryo development. B The candidate genes involved in cell wall metabolism. In the heat map, different color indicates the expression level changes in GA3-treated seeds compared with the control during the after-ripening process

Verification of expression of DEGs using qRT-PCR

To test the reliability and the repeatability of RNA-seq, the DEGs related to GA biosynthesis and signal (CPS, GA20ox, DELLA), ABA signal and response (PYL, ABI5), embryo development (LEA) and cell wall metabolism (PME) were chosen for the confirmation of gene expression (Fig. 8). It indicated that the results of transcriptomic were reliable and accurate.

Fig. 8
figure 8

The DEGs expression in response to GA3 treatment was analyzed by RT-qPCR. A CPS, ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase. B GA20ox, GA20-oxidase. C, D DELLA. E PYL, Pyrabactin resistance 1-like. F ABI5, ABA-INSENSITIVE5. G PME, Pectinesterase. H LEA, Late Embryogenesis Abundant. The values presented are the means ± SE (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments in the same period using Duncan’s test (P < 0.05)


Exogenous GA3 effectively shortens the after-ripening process and promotes seed germination of P. notoginseng

Seed dormancy and germination are influenced by plant hormonal and the external environment [40,41,42]. Exogenous GA3 treatment could significantly promote germination in wild species of pistachioo [8, 43]. It has been found that seed germination is substantially facilitated by exogenous GA3 treatment in Fraxinus hupehensis [23]. Consistently with the finding of previous studies, the present study revealed that exogenous GA3 obviously promote seed germination of P. notoginseng (Fig. 1C-D). Compared with CK, the seed germination rate tended to be raised as GA3 application increased, and the germination rate was highest in P. notoginseng seeds treated with 500 mg L−1 exogenous GA3 (Fig. 1D, Fig. S1). It has also been recorded that Acer mono Maxim. seeds are treated with 200 mg L−1 GA3 and their germination rate is effectively increased [44]. Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. seeds are treated with 150 mg L−1 GA3 and germination rate, the germination index and vigor index are the highest [45]. These studies indicate that the appropriate concentration of exogenous GA3 is one of the key factors in breaking dormancy and promoting seed germination. In our research, we verified the impacts of different concentrations of GA3 (LG, MG and HG) on seed embryo development, germination rate and after-ripening process of P. notoginseng seeds (Fig. 1B-D), and found that the germination rate of P. notoginseng seed is gradually elevated with the increase of exogenous GA concentration (Fig. 1, Fig. S1), indicating that 500 mg L−1 of exogenous GA3 is most appropriate to promote seed germination of recalcitrant P. notoginseng seeds.

GA essentially stimulates endosperm weakening and embryo expansion [46], and promotes the protrusion of radicles by breaking through the confines of the seed coat [47, 48]. Herein, we found that the endosperm tissue around seed embryos treated with HG is softened at 30 DAR compared with CK (Fig. 1A), implying that GA3 treatment might stimulate the softening of tissues around seed embryo, thus providing sufficient space for embryo development. Our results agreed with the observation that GA accelerates the growth potential of the embryo and weakens the structures surrounding the embryo in tomato [49]. Above all, our results reveal that 500 mg L−1 GA3 treatment might effectively shorten the after-ripening process and promote seed germination by stimulating seed embryo development and softening the tissues around the embryos of P. notoginseng.

Exogenous GA3 application accelerates P. notoginseng seed germination by changing endogenous hormone accumulation

ABA and GA antagonistically regulate seed dormancy and germination [40, 50]. The induction and maintenance of dormancy are positively regulated by ABA, while germination is enhanced by GA [51]. Consistently, our results showed that GA3 content is the highest, and ABA content is the lowest in P. notoginseng seeds treated with GA3 (Table 2). This is agreement with other study showing an increase in energy requirements and endogenous GA3 content but a decrease in ABA content during germination and growth of seeds [23]. Compared with the CK, our study found that the GA3 content in P. notoginseng seeds had a 60-fold increase after treatment with 500 mg L−1 GA3, followed by a ninefold increase in seeds after treatment with 250 mg L−1 GA3 at 0 DAR (Table 2). The levels were much too high to be endogenous GA3 and they were reduced with time after treatment. It could be the result that the penetration of exogenous GA3 into the seed tissues was caused by the concentration difference between the soak solution and the cytolymph during the soaking treatment. Those results indicated that a part of measured endogenous GA3 is likely to be remaining from the GA3 treatment, but both of them contribute to altering the ratio of GA and ABA. Besides, our results found that exogenous GA3 application could not cause auxin (IAA) content to be different in P. notogensing seeds, and this is contrary to the finding that exogenous GA3 increases IAA content in the tiller node of rice (Oryza sativa L.) [52], implying that IAA responds diversely in the regulation network of plant development upon GA3 treatment. Thus, we consider that exogenous GA3 release dormancy to promote seed germination mainly through changing the ratio of GA and ABA.

Cellular ABA and GA levels are controlled by the balance between their biosynthesis and catabolism [53]. Our transcriptomic analysis revealed that a total of 2971 and 9827 DEGs are dramatically affected by exogenous LG and HG treatment, respectively (Fig. 2). Meanwhile, it was significantly enriched for plant hormone signal transduction and related metabolic pathways regulated by GA (Fig. 4C-D), suggesting that GA induces dramatic responses at the transcriptional level. Some candidate genes in GA3 and ABA signaling pathways also determine seed germination [50, 54]. In our study, the expression level of CPS, GID1 and most of GA20ox were downregulated by GA3 treatment at 0 DAR (Fig. 5). This effect gradually weakened and was lost with decreasing levels of GA3 in seeds (Table 2), suggesting that high concentrations of GA3 in treated seeds might be a negative regulator to suppress GA biosynthesis and signaling by reducing expression of some GA-biosynthesis genes in a homeostasis mechanism (Binenbaum et al., 2018). A study on barley, wheat and rice has shown that HvGA20ox is a pivotal gene for regulating seed germination in barley [55]. OsGA20ox2 and OsGA2ox3 were essential genes to control seed germination in rice [56], and the mutation OsGA20ox2 shows a reduced GA level and enhanced seed dormancy [57]. Likewise, our study found that CPS, GA20ox, GID1 and DELLA genes involved in GA hormone biosynthesis and catabolism pathways are affected by exogenous GA3 treatment (Fig. 5). GA3 upregulated the expression of CPS, GA20ox and GID1, and downregulated DELLA at 30 DAR and 50 DAR (Fig. 8C-D). DELLA is a plant growth suppressor, while GID1 is a receptor for GA3. It acts by binding to the GID1 receptor to degrade the DELLA protein in plants [58, 59]. Overall, the expression levels of GA20ox and GID1 were upregulated, and the expression level of DELLA was downregulated by GA3 treatment during the after-ripening process, thereby perturbing GA3 signal transduction in recalcitrant P. notogensing seeds.

A comparative analysis of PP2C mutants suggests that AtPP2CA is a significant player in seeds [60, 61]. The ABA receptors PYR1/PYL proteins might confer a prominent function in seed ABA responsiveness through regulating PP2C activity [62, 63], and the pyr1 prl1 prl2 prl4 quadruple mutant shows ABA insensitive the germination [62]. Genetic analysis reveals that ABA-INSENSITIVE 3(ABI3), ABA-INSENSITIVE 4 (ABI4) and ABA-INSENSITIVE 5 (ABI5) are the key transcription factors that confer seed ABA responsiveness [64]. The seeds of abi5 mutants reduce transcript levels of Early Methionine-labelled 1 and 6 (EM1 and EM6), which are associated with the germination process [65, 66]. The WGCNA analysis showed that the PP2C was hub gene in the black module (Fig. 6), and the expression of PYL, PP2C and ABI5 has a significant change in P. notoginseng seeds treated with exogenous GA3 (Fig. 5C). PYL and ABI5 showed a higher expression level at the 0 DAR. They gradually decreased with the prolonged after-ripening process in P. notoginseng seeds. Surprisingly, compared with CK, the expression of PYL and ABI5 tended to decline as the GA3 application increased, and it was lowest in P. notoginseng seeds treated with 500 mg L−1 exogenous GA3 at 50 DAR (Fig. 8E-F), and the expression trend of PP2C was reversed during the after-ripening process (Fig. 5). Our results suggest that exogenous GA3 regulates the essential genes to perturb endogenous GA and ABA biosynthesis and catabolism in P. notoginseng seeds. This might partly contribute to the antagonistic action of GA and ABA on seed germination and growth.

The elevated endogenous hormone GA effectively promotes the expression of genes related to embryo development and cell wall loosening

The synthesis and catabolism of GA3 vigorously promote cell division during seed development and germination [67, 68]. A previous study has shown that the incomplete development of embryos could result in seed dormancy of P. notoginseng [33]. Recent studies revealed that LEAFY COTYLEDON 1 (LEC1) is a critical regulator of seed development, its loss of function results in a short embryo axis and intolerance to desiccation [69, 70]. Consistently, Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) and LEC1 are required for seed maturation and acquisition of desiccation tolerance [71, 72]. In our study, we found that the expression of LEC1 and LEA is lower in CK at 0 DAR, and they are dramatically up-regulated in response of P. notoginseng seeds to GA3 applications during the after-ripening process (Fig. 7A), demonstrating that the embryo development is relatively vigorous under GA3 treatment (Fig. 1A). These results support the view that GA3 treatment could promote the embryo development to boost seed germination of postharvest P. notogensing.

The architecture of the cell wall is a crucial determinant of plant growth [73]. The dormancy or germination is determined by the balance between the resistance strength of the surrounding tissues and the growth potential of the elongating radicle [74]. There are a series of evidence that GA3 could facilitate radicle protrusion by breaking through the mechanical constraints of the seed coat during seed germination [67, 75]. The cell wall-degrading enzymes, such as cellulases, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase-hydrolase (XTH), pectinesterase (PME), expansins (EXP) and hemicellulases, have been proven to contribute to cell wall loosening [73, 76,76,78]. In our study, DEGs (PME, EXP and XTH) involved in cell wall development were up-regulated by exogenous GA3 treatment (Fig. 6, Fig. 7A-B). Our result is consistent with observations that xyloglucan endotransglucosylase (XET), xyloglucan endohydrolase (XEH) and EXP are upregulated during Arabidopsis seed germination [79, 80]. Our observations confirmed that a series of cell wall-degrading genes is up-regulated significantly in P. notoginseng seeds treated with exogenous GA3 (Fig. 8G), and it suggests that exogenous GA3 might promote cell wall metabolism and endosperm degradation. Compared with CK, the expression of EXP and PME were upregulated in P. notoginseng seeds treated with LG and HG. Differently, the up-regulated expression level in the seeds treated with HG was significantly higher than those treated with LG (Fig. 7B). Thus, although LG, MG and HG treatments all promote seed germination, to a higher degree HG accelerates the degradation of the cell wall to create more spaces for seed germination by up-regulating EXP and PME. This could be regarded as the reason for the highest germination rate of P. notoginseng seeds treated with HG. In general, we believe that the genes (LEA, LEC1, EXP, PME and XEH) involved in embryo development and the cell wall degradation might create more spaces for radicle elongation to accelerate the germination in postharvest P. notoginseng seeds treated with GA3.


Exogenous GA3 increases the content of endogenous hormones GA3 through permeation and alters the ratio of GA and ABA to promote seed germination of P. notogensing. GA-treated P. notogensing seeds maintain higher development and germination than CK treatment. We also find that GA3 upregulates DEGs involved in GA biosynthesis and catabolism, embryo development and cell wall loosening, while downregulates ABA biosynthesis and catabolism. Based on the findings of the present work, a model is proposed to explain the dormancy mechanism in recalcitrant P. notogensing seeds regulated by GA3 (Fig. S8). Exogenous GA3 application increases the content of endogenous hormones GA3 through permeation to alter the ratio of GA/ABA, and this would contribute to the development of the embryo, break the mechanical constraints of the seed coat and promote the protrusion of the radicle in postharvest recalcitrant seeds. These findings would comprehensively improve our understanding of the potential roles of GA in regulating the dormancy of recalcitrant seeds during the after-ripening process.

Materials and methods

Materials and treatments

Seeds were routinely harvested from the plants of 3-year-old P. notoginseng (Fig. S9A) that were cultivated at the experimental farm of Wenshan Miao Xiang P. notoginseng Industrial Co., Ltd., China (Longitude 104°32′, latitude 23°53′). In November, 3-year-old mature and plump seeds of P. notoginseng were selected (Fig. S9B). After artificial peeling (Fig. S9C), the seeds were washed in ddH2O, soaked and disinfected with 5% CuSO4 bactericidal solution and washed twice, then the seeds were obtained by indoor shade drying out surface moisture. The seeds were submitted to one of three different treatments by soaking for 24 h, the concentrations 50 mg L−1 (LG), 250 mg L−1 (MG) and 500 mg L−1 (HG) of exogenous hormones GA3 were selected for soaking treatment, and ddH2O-soaked treatment was defined as the control (CK). The soaked seeds with three replicates were placed in a ventilated net basket for 50 days in a sandy stratification chamber at 15 ± 5℃, and sandy humidity at 25% to accomplish after-ripening process. Dark conditions are maintained during after-ripening process with an ambient humidity at 70%. The start point before the seeds were stored in sandy stratification is defined as the time point of 0 days after-ripening (DAR). At each sampling point (0, 30, 50 DAR), the samples from the concentrations of 50 mg L−1 (LG) and 500 mg L−1 (HG) of GA3 were selected based on the results from experiments (Fig. 1) for further assays.

Microscopic inspection and morphological measurements

A number of seeds were fixed using FAA (70% alcohol: acetic acid: formalin = 18:1:1) for microscopic inspection. The determination of embryo (Em), endosperm (En) and embryo rate (Em/En) was carried out at four time points of 0, 15, 30 and 45 DAR. Seeds were divided in half lengthwise by using a razor blade. Seed sections were examined using a stereoscopic microscope (ZEISS, SteREO Discovery.V20, Germany) equipped with a digital camera. The pictures were processed (brightness and contrast adjusted) and combined using Photoshop CS6 (Adobe, USA).

HPLC–MS analysis of endogenous hormone GA3, ABA and IAA content

Samples used for the determination of endogenous hormone content were frozen in liquid nitrogen at three time points of 0, 30 and 50 DAR. Endogenous hormone ABA, GA3 and IAA content in seed of P. notoginseng was examined as reported by Pan et al. [81] with some modifications.

Total RNA extraction and transcriptome analysis

For LG, HG and CK treatment, the sample at 0, 30 and 50 DAR were separated and applied for RNA extraction. Using the Plant Plus Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) to extract the total RNA with three replications, and RNA quality was monitored on 1% agarose electrophoresis. RNA purity was checked using the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (IMPLEN, CA, USA), and RNA integrity was assessed using the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). Using NEBNext® UltraTM RNA Library Prep Kit, sequencing libraries were generated for Illumina® (NEB, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations and index codes were added to attribute sequences. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina platform by the Novegene Technology Company (Beijing, China). Raw reads were analyzed and low quality reads and reads containing adapters were removed, resulting in clean reads. The clean reads were mapped to the P. notogensing reference genome (Fan et al., 2020) using HISAT2 v2.0.5, and novel genes prediction were made with String Tie (1.3.3b) [82].

Differential expression analysis of paired conditions with three biological replicates per condition was performed using the DESeq2 R package (1.16.1). According to the method of Benjamini and Hochberg [83], the P-values were adapted to control the false discovery rate. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis and KEGG analysis [84] of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were performed by the clusterProfiler R package.

Gene expression assessment

Gene expression was assayed by Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The total RNA was isolated from seeds of P. notogensing samples using the same scheme described for RNA-Seq. The cDNA was synthesized by using Prime Script RT reagent kit (Takara Bio, Kyoto, Japan). As shown in Table S2, primers were accessed using Premier 3.0 [85] for quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) and synthesized by Tsingke Biotech Co., Ltd. (Kunming, China). The qRT-PCR reaction was performed with three technical replicates using the Quant studio12 K Flex System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE(GAPDH) was chosen as the internal reference for P. notoginseng seeds. Candidate genes were analyzed for relative expression levels using the 2−ΔΔCt algorithm [86] by standardizing their transcript levels of related genes in control. Each sample was analyzed in three replicates.

Statistical analysis

The experiment was performed in three biological replicates. Statistical analyses were carried out using the SPSS software package (Chicago, IL, USA) and SigmaPlot 10.0, where the variables were present as the mean ± SD (n = 3). The least significant difference (LSD) was calculated and P < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant. PCA was performed using the prcomp function in R language. Genes with an adjusted P-value < 0.05 found by DESeq2 were designated as differential expressions. The terms in GO and KEGG analysis with corrected P-value < 0.05 were identified as significant enrichment of differently expressed genes. The gene co-expression network was constructed using the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) package in R language [87].

Availability of data and materials

The raw sequencing data from this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive in BIG Data Center (, Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, under the accession number: CRA008378. Other data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. Hoo & Tseng first undertook the formal identification of the plant material Panax notoginseng (Burkill) (Journal of Systematics and Evolution 11: 435, 1973) in Flora of China.


ABI5 :



Ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase


Days after-ripening




Embryo rate

GA20ox :

GA 20-oxidase


Late Embyogenesis Abundant

LEC1 :

Leafy Cntyledon1


Pyrabactin resistance 1-like



PP2C :

Protein Phosphatase 2C


  1. Soppe WJJ, Bentsink L. Seed dormancy back on track; its definition and regulation by DOG1. New Phytol. 2020;228(3):816–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Finkelstein R, Reeves W, Ariizumi T, Steber C. Molecular aspects of seed dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:387–415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandizzi F. To grow or not to grow…. Plant J. 2020;103(2):479–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tuan PA, Nguyen TN, Jordan MC, Ayele BT. A shift in Abscisic acid/gibberellin balance underlies retention of dormancy induced by seed development temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 2021;44(7):2230–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. MacGregor DR, Zhang N, Iwasaki M, Chen M, Dave A, Lopez Molina L, Penfield S. ICE1 and ZOU determine the depth of primary seed dormancy in Arabidopsis independently of their role in endosperm development. Plant J. 2019;98(2):277–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nikolaeva MG. On criteria to use in studies of seed evolution. Seed Sci Res. 2004;14(4):315–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baskin JM, Baskin CC. A classification system for seed dormancy. Seed Sci Res. 2007;14(1):1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Finch Savage WE, Leubner MG. Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol. 2006;171(3):501–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrera-Castaño G, Calleja-Cabrera J, Pernas M, Gómez L, Oñate-Sánchez L. An Updated Overview on the Regulation of Seed Germination. Plants. 2020;9(6):703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Y, Han C, Deng X, Liu D, Liu N, Yan Y. Integrated physiology and proteome analysis of embryo and endosperm highlights complex metabolic networks involved in seed germination in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Plant Physiol. 2018;229:63–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Manz B, Muller K, Kucera B, Volke F, Leubner-Metzger G. Water uptake and distribution in germinating tobacco seeds investigated in vivo by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol. 2005;138(3):1538–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tognacca RS, Botto JF. Post-transcriptional regulation of seed dormancy and germination: Current understanding and future directions. Plant Commun. 2021;2(4):100169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Batlla D, Benech-Arnold RL. A framework for the interpretation of temperature effects on dormancy and germination in seed populations showing dormancy. Seed Sci Res. 2015;25(2):147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang L, Liu S, Lin R. The role of light in regulating seed dormancy and germination. J Integr Plant Biol. 2020;62(9):1310–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shu K, Zhou W, Chen F, Luo X, Yang W. Abscisic acid and gibberellins antagonistically mediate plant development and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Roberto Huarte H, Luna V, Pagano EA, Zavala JA, Benech-Arnold RL. Fluctuating temperatures terminate dormancy in Cynara cardunculus seeds by turning off ABA synthesis and reducing ABA signalling, but not stimulating GA synthesis or signalling. Seed Sci Res. 2014;24(2):79–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchum MG, Yamaguchi S, Hanada A, Kuwahara A, Yoshioka Y, Kato T, Tabata S, Kamiya Y, Sun TP. Distinct and overlapping roles of two gibberellin 3-oxidases in Arabidopsis development. Plant J. 2006;45(5):804–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zuo J, Lin C, Cao H, Chen F, Liu Y, Liu J. Genome-wide association study and quantitative trait loci mapping of seed dormancy in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Planta. 2019;250(1):187–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakamura S. Grain dormancy genes responsible for preventing pre-harvest sprouting in barley and wheat. Breeding Sci. 2018;68(3):295–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh DP, Jermakow AM, Swain SM. Gibberellins are required for seed development and pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2002;14(12):3133–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cao D, Cheng H, Wu W, Soo HM, Peng J. Gibberellin mobilizes distinct DELLA-dependent transcriptomes to regulate seed germination and floral development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(2):509–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Li C, Zheng L, Wang X, Hu Z, Zheng Y, Chen Q, Hao X, Xiao X, Wang X, Wang G, Zhang Y. Comprehensive expression analysis of Arabidopsis GA2-oxidase genes and their functional insights. Plant Sci. 2019;285:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Song Q, Cheng S, Chen Z, Nie G, Xu F, Zhang J, Zhou M, Zhang W, Liao Y, Ye J. Comparative transcriptome analysis revealing the potential mechanism of seed germination stimulated by exogenous gibberellin in Fraxinus hupehensis. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun J, Jia H, Wang P, Zhou T, Wu Y, Liu Z. Exogenous gibberellin weakens lipid breakdown by increasing soluble sugars levels in early germination of zanthoxylum seeds. Plant Sci. 2019;280:155–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang Y, Cui Y, Hu G, Wang X, Chen H, Shi Q, Xiang J, Zhang Y, Zhu D, Zhang Y. Reduced bioactive gibberellin content in rice seeds under low temperature leads to decreased sugar consumption and low seed germination rates. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;133:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen J, Kuang S, Long G, Yang S, Meng Z, Li L, Chen Z, Zhang G. Photosynthesis, light energy partitioning, and photoprotection in the shade-demanding species Panax notoginseng under high and low level of growth irradiance. Funct Plant Biol. 2016;43(6):479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Duan YM, Yang L, Duan CL. Desiccation sensitivity of Panax notoginseng seeds and membrane lipid peroxidation. Seed. 2014;33(04):6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang K, Li L, Long GQ, Meng ZG, Li LG, Chen JW. Changes of antioxidant enzyme and ultrastructure in recalcitrant seeds of Panax notoginseng during after-ripening process. Guihaia. 2016;36(12):1519–25.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li L, Sun XT, Zhang GH, Long GQ, Meng ZG, Yang SC, Chen JW. Effect of drying rates on the desiccation sensitivity and antioxidant enzyme activities of recalcitrant Panax notoginseng seeds. Seed. 2014;33(12):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cui XM, Wang CL, Li W, He CF, Zhang Y. Study on the biological properties of Panax notoginseng seeds. J Chin Med Mater. 1993;12:3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Penfield S, MacGregor DR. Effects of environmental variation during seed production on seed dormancy and germination. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(4):819–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Duan CL, Li ZT, Ding JL, Xiao FH. Physiologic characteristics of Panax notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process. China J Chin Mater Med. 2010;35(20):2652–6.

    Google Scholar 

  33. An N, Cui XM, Xiao FH, Chen ZJ, Duan CL. Dynamic studies on physiological and biochemical changes during fruit development of Panax notoginseng. Chin Trad Herb Drugs. 2006;37(7):1086–8.

    Google Scholar 

  34. An N, Cui XM, Huang LQ, Duan CL, Xiao FH. Studies on variation of physiology and biochemistry during post-maturation of seeds in Panax notoginseng II. Analysis of variation of metabolic products in seeds. Southwest China J Agric Sci. 2010;23(04):1090–3.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cui XM, An N, Huang LQ, Duan CL, Xiao FH. Studies on variation of physiology and biochemistry during post-maturation of seeds in Panax notoginseng I. Effect of different store condition viability during post-maturation of P. notoginseng seeds. Southwest China J Agric Sci. 2010;23(03):704–6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ge N, Yang K, Yang L, Meng Z, Li L, Chen J. iTRAQ and RNA-seq analyses provide an insight into mechanisms of recalcitrance in a medicinal plant Panax notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. Funct Plant Biol. 2022;49(1):68–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yang K, Yang L, Fan W, Long GQ, Xie SQ, Meng ZG, Zhang GH, Yang SC, Chen JW. Illumina-based transcriptomic analysis on recalcitrant seeds of Panax notoginseng for the dormancy release during the after-ripening process. Physiol Plant. 2019;167(4):597–612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ge N, Yang L, Chen JW. Effects of varying gibberellin and abscisic acid levels on embryo development and endogenous hormones in recalcitrant Panax notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2020;26(03):574–81.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fan G, Liu X, Sun S, Shi C, Du X, Han K, Yang B, Fu Y, Liu M, Seim I, et al. The Chromosome Level Genome and Genome-wide Association Study for the Agronomic Traits of Panax notoginseng. iScience. 2020;23(9):101538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Miransari M, Smith DL. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environ Exp Bot. 2014;99:110–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Penfield S. Seed dormancy and germination. Cur Biol. 2017;27(17):874–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Willis CG, Baskin CC, Baskin JM, Auld JR, Venable DL, Cavender-Bares J, Donohue K, Rubio DCR. The evolution of seed dormancy: environmental cues, evolutionary hubs, and diversification of the seed plants. New Phytol. 2014;203(1):300–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rahemi M, Baninasab A. Effect of gibberellic acid on seedling growth in two wild species of pistachio. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2000;75(3):336–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang SY, Cui NH, Feng YC, Zhang J, Liu Y. Effect of gibberellin concentration on seed germination of Acer mono Maxim. Chin J Appl Environ Biol. 2021;3(27):555–9.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guo YH, Ling HM. Regulatory effect of GA and KT on seeds germination of Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. Chin J Eco-Agri. 2009;17(06):1196–9.

  46. Cao X, Li M, Li J, Song Y, Zhang X, Yang D, Li M, Wei J. Co-expression of hydrolase genes improves seed germination of Sinopodophyllum hexandrum. Ind Crop Prod. 2021;164:113414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Tuan PA, Kumar R, Rehal PK, Toora PK, Ayele BT. Molecular mechanisms underlying abscisic acid/gibberellin balance in the control of seed dormancy and germination in cereals. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun T, Gubler F. Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2004;55(1):197–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yamaguchi S, Kamiya Y. Gibberellins and Light-Stimulated Seed Germination. J Plant Growth Regul. 2001;20(4):369–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nambara E, Okamoto M, Tatematsu K, Yano R, Seo M, Kamiya Y. Abscisic acid and the control of seed dormancy and germination. Seed Sci Res. 2010;20(2):55–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Nee G, Xiang Y, Soppe WJ. The release of dormancy, a wake-up call for seeds to germinate. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;35:8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu Y, Ding Y, Wang Q, Li G, Xu J, Liu Z, Wang S. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth of rice tiller bud and changes of endogenous hormones. Acta Agron Sin. 2011;37(4):670–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Yan A, Chen Z. The pivotal role of Abscisic acid signaling during transition from seed maturation to germination. Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36(5):689–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hauvermale AL, Steber CM. GA signaling is essential for the embryo-to-seedling transition during Arabidopsis seed germination, a ghost story. Plant Signal Behav. 2020;15(1):1705028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Li C, Ni P, Yu J, Bellgard M, Lance R, Appels R, Francki M, Hunter A, Zhang Y, Schibeci D, Li H, Tarr A, Wang J, Cakir M. Genes controlling seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in a rice-wheat-barley comparison. Funct Integr Genomic. 2004;4(2):84–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Ye H, Feng J, Zhang L, Zhang J, Mispan MS, Cao Z, Beighley DH, Yang J, Gu X. Map-based cloning of seed dormancy1-2 identified a gibberellin synthesis gene regulating the development of endosperm-imposed dormancy in rice. Plant Physiol. 2015;169(3):2152–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Magwa RA, Zhao H, Xing Y. Genome-wide association mapping revealed a diverse genetic basis of seed dormancy across subpopulations in rice (Oryza sativa L.). BMC Genet. 2016;17:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ito T, Okada K, Fukazawa J, Takahashi Y. DELLA-dependent and -independent gibberellin signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2018;13(3):e1445933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Binenbaum J, Weinstain R, Shani E. Gibberellin localization and transport in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23(5):410–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Yoshida T, Nishimura N, Kitahata N, Kuromori T, Ito T, Asami T, Shinozaki K, Hirayama T. ABA-hypersensitive germination3 encodes a Protein Phosphatase 2C (AtPP2CA) that strongly regulates Abscisic acid signaling during germination among Arabidopsis Protein Phosphatase 2Cs. Plant Physiol. 2006;140(1):115–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Dupeux FF, Antoni RR, Betz KK, Santiago JJ, Gonzalez-Guzman MM, Rodriguez LL, Rubio SS, Park SS, Cutler SRSR, Rodriguez PLPL, et al. Modulation of Abscisic acid signaling in vivo by an engineered receptor-insensitive Protein Phosphatase Type 2C Allele1. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(1):106–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ma Y, Szostkiewicz I, Korte A, Moes D, Yang Y, Christmann A, Grill E. Regulators of PP2C phosphatase activity function as Abscisic acid sensors. Science. 2009;324(5930):1064–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Fuchs S, Tischer SV, Wunschel C, Christmann A, Grill E. Abscisic acid sensor RCAR7/PYL13, specific regulator of protein phosphatase coreceptors. PNAS. 2014;111(15):5741–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Maia De Oliveira J, Dekkers SJW, Dolle M, Ligterink W, Hilhorst HWM. Abscisic acid (ABA) sensitivity regulates desiccation tolerance in germinated Arabidopsis seeds. New Phytol. 2014;203(1):81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lopez-Molina L, Mongrand S, Chua NH. A post germination developmental arrest checkpoint is mediated by Abscisic acid and requires the ABI5 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. PNAS. 2001;98(8):4782–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kanai M, Nishimura M, Hayashi M. A peroxisomal ABC transporter promotes seed germination by inducing pectin degradation under the control of ABI5. Plant J. 2010;62(6):936–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hedden P, Thomas SG. Gibberellin biosynthesis and its regulation. Biochem J. 2012;444(1):11–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Pimenta Lange MJ, Lange T. Gibberellin biosynthesis and the regulation of plant development. Plant Biol. 2006;8(3):281–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Jo L, Pelletier JM, Harada JJ. Central role of the LEAFY COTYLEDON1 transcription factor in seed development. J Integr Plant Biol. 2019;61(5):564–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Song J, Xie X, Chen C, Shu J, Thapa RK, Nguyen V, Bian S, Kohalmi SE, Marsolais F, Zou J, Cui Y. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 expression in the endosperm enables embryo maturation in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3963.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Plancot B, Gugi B, Mollet JC, Loutelier-Bourhis C, Ramasandra GS, Lerouge P, Follet-Gueye ML, Vicre M, Alfonso C, Nguema-Ona E, Bardor M, Driouich A. Desiccation tolerance in plants: Structural characterization of the cell wall hemicellulosic polysaccharides in three Selaginella species. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;208:180–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Battaglia M, Covarrubias AA. Late Embryogenesis Abundant (LEA) proteins in legumes. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Hayashi T, Kaida R. Functions of xyloglucan in plant cells. Mol Plant. 2011;4(1):17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Graeber K, Nakabayashi K, Miatton E, Leubner-Metzger G, Soppe WJJ. Molecular mechanisms of seed dormancy. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35(10):1769–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Davière J, Achard P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development. 2013;140(6):1147–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Liepman AH, Nairn CJ, Willats WG, Sorensen I, Roberts AW, Keegstra K. Functional Genomic Analysis Supports Conservation of Function among Cellulose Synthase-like a Gene Family Members and Suggests Diverse Roles of Mannans in Plants. Plant physiol. 2007;143(4):1881–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Zhu XF, Shi YZ, Lei GJ, Fry SC, Zhang BC, Zhou YH, Braam J, Jiang T, Xu XY, Mao CZ, Pan YJ, Yang JL, Wu P, Zheng SJ. XTH31, encoding an in vitro XEH/XET-active enzyme, regulates aluminum sensitivity by modulating in vivo XET action, cell wall xyloglucan content, and aluminum binding capacity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(11):4731–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Cosgrove DJ. Loosening of plant cell walls by expansins. Nature. 2000;407(6802):321–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Sechet J, Frey A, Effroy-Cuzzi D, Berger A, Perreau F, Cueff G, Charif D, Rajjou L, Mouille G, North HM, Marion-Poll A. Xyloglucan metabolism differentially impacts the cell wall characteristics of the endosperm and embryo during Arabidopsis seed germination. Plant physiol. 2016;170(3):1367–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Sampedro J, Guttman M, Li LC, Cosgrove DJ. Evolutionary divergence of β-expansin structure and function in grasses parallels emergence of distinctive primary cell wall traits. Plant J. 2015;81(1):108–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Pan X, Welti R, Wang X. Quantitative analysis of major plant hormones in crude plant extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(6):986–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Pertea M, Pertea GM, Antonescu CM, Chang T, Mendell JT, Salzberg SL. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(3):290–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Statist Soc B. 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):e115.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: An R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(1):559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr JYZ for technical assistance. We are also grateful to KLL and MJM for their assistance with data analysis.


This work is funded by the Major Special Science and Technology Project of Yunnan Province (202102AA310048); and the National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2021YFD1601003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Chen Jun-Wen directed the experiment and made suggestions for the writing of the manuscript. Ge Na wrote the manuscript, Jia Jin-Shan and Ge Na participated most of the experiments. Yang Ling, Huang Rong-Mei, Wang Qing-Yan, Chen Cui, Meng Zhen-Gui and Li Long-Geng analyzed the relevant experimental data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun-Wen Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. The authors declared that permission to collect Panax notoginseng material had been obtained, and experimental research works on the plants described in this paper comply with institutional, national and international guidelines.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors report no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Appearance and morphology of GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds after germination. (A) t=30d. (B) t=45d. Figure S2. Gene expression distribution. The distribution of gene expression levels for different samples is illustrated by box plots. The X-axis represents sample names, the Y-axis on the left indicates the log2 (FPKM + 1). The Box plots for each region are plotted against five statistics (maximum, upper quartile, median, lower quartile and minimum). Figure S3. Pearson correlation analysis of gene expression levels between samples. The X-axis and Y-axis in the graph are the squares of the correlation coefficients for each sample. Figure S4. Venn diagrams of DEGs. (A) DEGs between the control and Low concentration GA3-treated (LG) P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process. (B) DEGs between the control and the High concentration GA3-treated (HG) P. notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process. Figure S5. GO analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process. (A) Top 30 most enriched GO terms of DEGs between CK_30 VS LG_30. (B) Top 30 most enriched GO terms of DEGs between CK_30 VS HG_30. The Y-axis on the left represents GO terms, including biological process, cellular component, and molecular function, the X-axis indicates genes number of each term. Up-regulated genes are shown in red bar, and down-regulated genes are shown in blue bar. Figure S6. KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in control and GA3-treated P. notoginseng seeds during after-ripening process. (A) Top 20 most enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs between CK_0 vs LG_0. (B) Top 20 most enriched KEGG pathways of DEGs between CK_0 vs HG_0. The Y-axis on the left represents GO KEGG pathways, the X-axis indicates the “Gene Ratio” represented by the ratio of DEGs numbers to total annotated gene numbers of each pathway. Low P values are shown in the red circle, and high P values are shown in the purple circle. The area of a circle represents DEGs number. Figure S7. WGCNA network module mining. (A) Clustering dendrogram of genes. In the dendrogram, each leaf corresponds to a gene. A total of 21,988 genes resulted in 22 co-expression modules labelled by different merged colors. (B) Scatterplots of Gene Significance for Em/En vs Module Membership in the coral2 and black (D) modules. (C) Scatterplots of Gene Significance for germination vs Module Membership in the coral2 and black (E) modules. Figure S8. A model for the possible mechanism of exogenous GA3 regulation of germination in P. notoginseng seeds during the after-ripening process at the transcriptional levels. Exogenous GA3 application increases the content of endogenous hormones GA3 through permeation, and this alter would contribute to the expression of genes in embryo development, cell wall relaxation and ABA signal transduction, consequently shortening after-ripening process and promoting recalcitrant seed germination. Genes marked in red indicate that these genes were GA-induced, and likewise, black ones suggest that the genes were GA-repressed. Arrows and blunted lines designate positive and inhibitory interactions, respectively. Figure S9. Appearance and morphology of 3-year-old P. notoginseng seeds. (A) Seeds are routinely harvested from the 3-year-old P. notoginseng. (B) Mature and plump seeds of P. notoginseng before artificial peeling. (C) The morphology of P. notoginseng seeds after artificial peeling.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Evaluation of sample sequencing data. Table S2. List of primers used in qRT-PCR analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, N., Jia, JS., Yang, L. et al. Exogenous gibberellic acid shortening after-ripening process and promoting seed germination in a medicinal plant Panax notoginseng. BMC Plant Biol 23, 67 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • After-ripening process
  • Gibberellic acid
  • Morphophysiological dormancy
  • Panax notoginseng
  • Recalcitrant seeds
  • Transcriptome