Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comparative transcriptomic analysis of maize ear heterosis during the inflorescence meristem differentiation stage

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 348 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Heterosis is widely used in many crops and is important for global food safety, and maize is one of the most successful crops to take advantage of heterosis. Gene expression patterns control the development of the maize ear, but the mechanisms by which heterosis affects transcriptional-level control are not fully understood.

Results

In this study, we sampled ear inflorescence meristems (IMs) from the single-segment substitution maize (Zea mays) line lx9801hlEW2b, which contains the heterotic locus hlEW2b associated with ear width, as well as the receptor parent lx9801, the test parent Zheng58, and their corresponding hybrids Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b (HY) and Zheng58 × lx9801 (CK). After RNA sequencing and transcriptomic analysis, 2531 unique differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between the two hybrids (HY vs. CK). Our results showed that approximately 64% and 48% of DEGs exhibited additive expression in HY and CK, whereas the other genes displayed a non-additive expression pattern. The DEGs were significantly enriched in GO functional categories of multiple metabolic processes, plant organ morphogenesis, and hormone regulation. These essential processes are potentially associated with heterosis performance during the maize ear developmental stage. In particular, 125 and 100 DEGs from hybrids with allele-specific expression (ASE) were specifically identified in HY and CK, respectively. Comparison between the two hybrids suggested that ASE genes were involved in different development-related processes that may lead to the hybrid vigor phenotype during maize ear development. In addition, several critical genes involved in auxin metabolism and IM development were differentially expressed between the hybrids and showed various expression patterns (additive, non-additive, and ASE). Changes in the expression levels of these genes may lead to differences in auxin homeostasis in the IM, affecting the transcription of core genes such as WUS that control IM development.

Conclusions

Our research suggests that additive, non-additive, and allele-specific expression patterns may fine-tune the expression of crucial DEGs that modulate carbohydrate and protein metabolic processes, nitrogen assimilation, and auxin metabolism to optimal levels, and these transcriptional changes may play important roles in maize ear heterosis. The results provide new information that increases our understanding of the relationship between transcriptional variation and heterosis during maize ear development, which may be helpful for clarifying the genetic and molecular mechanisms of heterosis.

Peer Review reports

Background

Heterosis is the phenomenon in which hybrid offspring are more vigorous than either parent, resulting in superior growth potential, yield capacity, adaptability, and stress resistance [1]. Heterosis is an important method for improving crop yield and quality, and it plays a critical role in the breeding of several crops, including maize, rice, sorghum, and rape [2,3,4,5]. However, the molecular mechanisms of heterosis remain unclear. At present, three classical hypotheses, dominance, overdominance, and epistasis, have been proposed to explain heterosis, and they have been debated for over 100 years [6]. With advances in science and technology, studies on heterosis using genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and epigenetics approaches have provided new insights into the molecular mechanisms of heterosis.

At the transcriptional level, changes in gene expression cause changes in biological regulatory networks, which are important sources of phenotypic novelty and affect heterosis [7]. When comparing differences in gene expression between parents and hybrids, multiple modes of gene action, including additivity, non-additivity, high- and low-parent dominance, and over- and underdominance, have been proposed to contribute to the phenomenon of heterosis [8]. Several studies in maize (Zea mays) revealed that additive effects are universal and are positively correlated with yield heterosis. Dominant and over-dominant expression patterns, which belong to the non-additive category, are also considered to be important factors in hybrid heterosis [9,10,11]. These changes in gene expression may alter biological regulatory networks, thereby affecting heterosis. By comparing the gene expression levels of hybrids and their parents at the maize ear developmental stage, Huang et al. [12] found that most negatively dominant genes are involved in carbohydrate metabolism, lipid metabolism, energy metabolism, and protein degradation, whereas positively dominant genes are mainly involved in DNA replication and repair. In allotetraploid Arabidopsis thaliana, non-additively expressed genes are significantly enriched in processes related to energy, metabolism, stress response, and plant hormone signal transduction [13].

In diploid hybrids, each gene is present in two copies, one each from the male and female parent. In theory, the alleles from both parents should be expressed equally in the hybrid. However, the transcriptional activities of different alleles in hybrids vary greatly [14, 15]. Allele-specific expression (ASE) refers to the preferential expression of a specific parental allele in the hybrid, driven by regulatory factors from the parental genomes [16]. Hybridization produces an extremely large pool of allelic variants, which affect gene expression levels. The expression differences caused by ASE may lead to phenotypic diversity, depending on the gene functions [17]. The ASE phenomenon has been documented in Arabidopsis, rice, maize, and barley [18,19,20]. ASE patterns may have distinct implications for the genetic basis of heterosis, especially for the dominance and overdominance hypotheses, because genetic variations frequently cause differential gene expression, which may lead to phenotypic differences in the hybrids [17, 21,22,23]. Although many genes in numerous species have been shown to exhibit ASE at the whole-genome level, the potential relationship between ASE and heterosis remains unclear.

Important traits related to maize yield, such as kernel row number, kernel number per ear, ear width, and ear length, are all determined during inflorescence meristem (IM) development. The development of immature maize ears displays strong heterosis in ear architectural traits, which greatly affect grain yield [24]. The size of the IM is significantly positively correlated with ear width and length, and its development directly affects the final morphological characteristics of the mature maize ear [25]. The classic pathway for maintenance of the IM amplification process is the CLAVATA–WUSCHEL (CLV–WUS) negative feedback loop. This pathway affects IM development by regulating the relationship between stem cell proliferation and tissue and organ differentiation [26]. WUS is a crucial regulator that determines stem cell formation and maintenance [27], and CLV3 is a peptide ligand for the CLV1/CLV2 receptor complex. Its expression may be induced by WUS, and it can move back to the organizing center to inhibit WUS expression. The CLV3/WUS negative feedback loop may affect the IM differentiation process [28]. The WUS–CLV feedback loop has also been tightly connected to auxin signaling, and auxin accumulates at specific positions to induce organ emergence in the peripheral zone [29]. Thus, hormones may play critical roles in the regulation of immature maize ear development.

To eliminate the influence of genetic background and reduce environmental effects, single-segment substitution line populations have been developed and used to map heterotic loci. Yu et al. [30] used single-segment substitution line test populations to research the heterosis performance of yield-related traits, and they discussed the advantages of single-segment substitution lines for heterosis research. Wang et al. [31] identified 21 yield-related heterotic loci by comparing differences between a test cross population and the background parents of 66 rice single-segment substitution lines. Wei et al. [32] used the same experimental design to identify 21 heterotic loci related to maize plant architectural traits.

During the development of the maize ear inflorescence, the IM stage is critical for ear development and heterosis. In the present study, we collected immature maize ears from the single-segment substitution line lx9801hlEW2b (which contains the heterotic locus hlEW2b associated with ear width), the receptor parent lx9801, the test parent Zheng58, and their corresponding hybrids Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b and Zheng58 × lx9801 during the IM stage. We then constructed global gene expression profiles using RNA sequencing technology (RNA-seq) to investigate the mechanisms of heterosis associated with transcriptome changes. Our research provides new insights into the relationship between transcriptomic changes and heterosis during maize ear development.

Results

Phenotypic analysis of near-isogenic lines and their corresponding hybrids

We previously identified the chromosome segment substitution line sub-CSSL16 that carries the ear-width heterotic locus hlEW2b and contains a 1.98-Mb donor segment from Chang7-2. Ear width and weight are significantly higher in Zheng58 × sub-CSSL16 than in the control hybrid Zheng58 × lx9801 (P < 0.01) [33]. A heterotic effects analysis revealed that the heterotic locus hlEW2b exhibits strong over-dominance for heterosis (d/a ≥ 1, d = 4.19, a = 0.07) [33]. In the present study, the chromosome segment substitution line sub-CSSL16 containing the ear-width heterotic locus is redefined as lx9801hlEW2b. The phenotypic values of ear-related traits in the near-isogenic lines lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b and their corresponding hybrids Zheng58 × lx9801 (CK) and Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b (HY) were investigated in multiple environments to evaluate the effect of the introgressed locus. In six environments, ear width and ear weight were significantly higher in HY than in CK, with average increases of 2.1 mm and 15.96 g, respectively, and their average over-standard heterotic values were 5.55% and 8.03% (Fig. 1; Table 1). There were no significant differences in five ear traits between the inbred lines lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b in two environments (Supplementary Table S1). These results imply that there may be a heterotic locus associated with the Zheng58 allele in lx9801hlEW2b that controls the heterotic performance of ear width and weight in the hybrid.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Heterosis performance of mature ear width trait between Zheng58×lx9801hlEW2b (HY) and Zheng58×lx9801 (CK). Scale bar is 5 cm

Full size image
Table 1 Comparison of ear traits between Zheng58 × lx9801 and Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b in six environments
Full size table

To understand the developmental basis of ear width, the IM sizes of 2–4 mm immature ears were observed. The average diameter of the ear IM in the developing female inflorescence of HY was 501.21 ± 19.98 μm, significantly larger (P-value = 3.36E − 09) than that of CK (465.29 ± 17.04 μm) (Fig. 2A and C). However, there were no significant differences in IM length, which was determined using the final lengths of mature ears in the CK and HY hybrids. In addition, the comparison results at the inbred line level showed that there were no significant differences between lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b in the length and width of the IM (Fig. 2B–D), which may be caused by the similar genetic background of the near-isogenic lines (NILs, lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b). The IM length of Zheng58 was significantly lower than that of lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b, and the width was significantly greater than that of lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b. We also compared IM sizes between the hybrids and their parents and found that both IM length and width were significantly higher in the hybrids (Fig. 2C–D, Supplementary Table S2). This result may be due to hybrid heterosis. Thus, the presence of the heterotic locus hlEW2b may significantly increase the IM widths of hybrids but not NILs. The wider IM may provide more space for ear development, leading to the significantly greater ear width and weight in HY than in the control hybrid CK.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inflorescence meristem size in hybrids and inbred lines. A Scanning electron micrograph of 2–4-mm immature ears from Zheng58×lx9801hlEW2b (HY) and Zheng58×lx9801 (CK), Bar = 200 μm. B Scanning electron micrograph of 2–4-mm immature ears from lx9801, lx9801hlEW2b and Zheng58, Bar = 150 μm. C–D Comparison of inflorescence meristem size between lx9801, lx9801hlEW2b, Zheng58, Zheng58×lx9801hlEW2b and Zheng58×lx9801. * and ** indicate significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability levels. More than 10 individuals were measured for each inbred line, and 30 individuals were measured for the two hybrids

Full size image

RNA-seq and data filtering

For comparative transcriptome analysis, 15 IM samples (three replicates each of lx9801, lx9801hlEW2b, Zheng58, CK, and HY) were used to construct cDNA libraries for RNA-seq. After reads with low-quality bases were removed, 2.05–3.41 million and 4.05–5.58 million clean reads were obtained from inbred lines and hybrids, respectively. Approximately 66.96–74.95% of the clean reads from the inbred lines and 71.56–77.96% from the hybrids were unique and could be aligned with the maize B73 reference genome (Zea_mays.B73_RefGen_v4.41; Table 2). To avoid false positive estimates for gene expression, a transcript was considered to be positively expressed only if fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads (FPKM) ≥ 1. Based on this criteria, a total of 20 086, 20 816, and 20 448 genes were transcribed in Zheng58, lx9801hlEW2b, and lx9801, respectively. In addition, there were 21 703 and 21 622 genes transcribed in HY and CK hybrids, respectively. On average, 2143 and 4009 genes displayed high (FPKM ≥ 50) and medium (20 ≤ RPKM < 50) expression, respectively, and 14 783 genes exhibited low expression levels that accounted for 70.61% of the expressed genes (FPKM < 20). More genes were expressed in hybrids than in their corresponding parents in both HY and CK hybrids (Supplementary Table S3).

Table 2 Quality control results of RNA-seq sequencing
Full size table

Identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by RNA-seq

To study the effect of differences in gene expression on heterosis between HY and CK, we compared their transcriptomes and identified a total of 2931 DEGs between them. Four hundred of the DEGs in the HY vs. CK comparison may result from the substitution of the hlEW2b fragment into the recipient parent lx9801 at the level of the inbred line, rather than from crosses of lx9801hlEW2b and lx9801 with the test parent Zheng58. The reason for identifying DEGs between lx9801hlEW2b and lx9801 (1703 DEGs) and excluding the 400 DEGs shared by the two pairwise comparisons of HY vs. CK and lx9801hlEW2b vs. lx9801 from the DEG set of the HY vs. CK comparison was to eliminate interference caused by differences between the inbred lines at the hybrid level. Therefore, the following analysis focuses on the 2531 genes that were unique to the HY vs. CK comparison (Fig. 3A). Of the unique DEGs from the HY vs. CK comparison, 1261 were upregulated (HY > CK), and 1270 were downregulated (HY < CK) (Supplementary Table S4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Expression patterns of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). A Statistical analyses of DEGs between hybrids [Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b (HY), Zheng58 × lx9801 (CK)] and their corresponding inbred lines lx9801hlEW2b and lx9801. B Expression pattern analysis of specific DEGs between hybrids. C Venn diagram showing the number of additively (HY_additive and CK_additive) and non-additively (HY_Non-additive and CK_Non-additive) expressed genes in each hybrid

Full size image

Differential gene expression patterns associated with heterosis

To fully examine differences in gene expression patterns and their effects on heterosis, various pairwise comparisons were performed between hybrids and their corresponding mid-parent values (MPVs). Based on the criteria of FPKM ≥ 1 in at least one genotype and false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, a total of 11 808 and 9895 genes were additively and non-additively expressed in the HY hybrid. In the CK hybrid, 8909 and 12 713 genes displayed additive and non-additive expression, respectively. Because of the highly similar genetic backgrounds of the two hybrids (HY and CK share the same female paternal line Zheng58, and the male paternal lines lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b were near-isogenic lines), DEGs from the pairwise comparison of HY vs. CK may be responsible for the different heterotic performance between the hybrids during the female inflorescence developmental stage.

To gain overall insights into the expression patterns of unique DEGs in HY vs. CK, genes were classified as additively or non-additively expressed based on pairwise comparisons between their values in the hybrids and the corresponding MPVs. A total of 1614 DEGs (64% of 2531 unique DEGs from HY vs. CK) were expressed additively in HY, and 1224 DEGs (48% of 2531 unique DEGs from HY vs. CK) were expressed additively in CK (F1 vs. MPV, FDR > 0.05) (Fig. 3B). In addition, 769 upregulated (HY > CK, 47.65% of 1614 additively expressed genes in HY) and 845 downregulated (HY < CK, 52.35% of 1614 genes) additively expressed genes were identified in the HY hybrid. There were 794 upregulated (CK > HY, 64.87% of 1224 additively expressed genes in CK) and 430 downregulated (CK < HY, 35.13% of 1224 genes) additively expressed genes in the CK hybrid (Supplementary Figure S1). The prevalence of additively expressed genes implied complementary effects on gene expression in the hybrid [34]. In this study, the majority of DEGs from HY vs. CK displayed an additive expression pattern; more than two-thirds of the DEGs from HY and nearly half of the DEGs from CK were additively expressed. This result suggests that complementary effects have a fundamental role in the early formation of maize ear heterosis.

In addition, previous heterosis research at the transcriptional level has shown that genes with over-dominance and dominance exhibit a non-additive expression pattern [35, 36], implying that non-additively expressed genes could more reasonably explain classical hypotheses for heterosis, such as the over-dominance and dominance hypotheses. Here, 917 genes in HY (36% of 2531 unique DEGs from HY vs. CK) and 1307 genes in CK (52% of 2531 unique DEGs from HY vs. CK) displayed non-additive expression patterns (F1 vs. MPV, FDR < 0.05) (Fig. 3B). There were 484 upregulated (HY > CK, 52.78% of 917 non-additively expressed genes in HY) and 433 downregulated (HY < CK, 47.22% of 917 genes) non-additive DEGs in the HY hybrid. Likewise, there were 480 upregulated (CK > HY, 36.73% of 1307 non-additively expressed genes in CK) and 827 downregulated (CK < HY, 63.27% of 1307 genes) non-additive DEGs in the CK hybrid (Supplementary Figure S1). The non-additively expressed DEGs in the HY and CK hybrids could be further classified into over-dominant (ODO), under-dominant (UDO), lx9801hlEW2b-dominant, lx9801-dominant, Zheng58-dominant, and conserved expression classes. The detailed proportions of genes in each class in the two hybrids are listed in Table 3. In HY, 120 and 273 genes were ODO and UDO; 212 and 122 genes exhibited lx9801hlEW2b-dominance and Zheng58-dominance; and 142 genes had a conserved expression pattern (Table 3). In CK, 255 and 507 genes were ODO and UDO; 199 and 145 genes displayed lx9801-dominance and Zheng58-dominance; and 201 genes had a conserved expression pattern. Nearly half of the non-additively expressed genes were ODO and UDO in the two hybrids (HY, 42.86% ODO and UDO; CK, 58.30% ODO and UDO) (Table 3). In both the HY and CK hybrids, a greater proportion of genes showed lx9801hlEW2b-dominance and lx9801-dominance than Zheng58-dominance, implying that lx9801hlEW2b and lx9801 alleles may strongly affect gene expression levels in the hybrids.

Table 3 Classification of additive and non-additive expression patterns for DEGs from HY vs. CK
Full size table

Functional characterization of additively and non-additively expressed genes

We performed a gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis at the AgriGO website to determine the molecular and biological functions of additive and non-additive DEGs in heterotic performance and to assess their biological roles in heterosis during ear development in the hybrids. In total, 711 of 1614 and 321 of 1224 additively expressed DEGs in HY and CK, respectively (Fig. 3C), were found to be enriched (FDR < 0.05, Yekutieli FDR dependency) in terms from the three hierarchically structured GO categories: biological process (BP), molecular function (MF) and cellular component (CC). The additive DEGs specifically expressed in HY were mainly enriched in 44 BP GO terms (Supplementary Table S5), and the three most significant terms were Cellular process (GO:0009987), Carboxylic acid metabolic process (GO:0019752), and Metabolic process (GO:0008152). In the MF category, the three most significantly enriched terms were Catalytic activity (GO:0003824), ATP binding (GO:0005524), and Carbohydrate derivative binding (GO:0097367), whereas Cytoplasm (GO:0005737) and Intracellular (GO:0005622) were enriched in the CC category (Fig. 4A). In the CK hybrid, specific additive DEGs were enriched in 10 main GO terms (Fig. 4B, Supplementary Table S6). The top three most significantly enriched BP terms were Macromolecule metabolic process (GO:0043170), Primary metabolic process (GO:0044238), and Nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807). The top enriched MF terms were Binding (GO:0005488), Structural constituent of ribosome (GO:0003735), and Structural molecule activity (GO:0005198), and the top CC terms were Cytosolic ribosome (GO:0022626) and Intracellular (GO:0005622). More GO terms were enriched in the additively expressed DEGs of HY than of CK, suggesting that additively expressed genes played an important role during early development of the HY maize ear.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison and functional enrichment of additive genes in hybrids. A Top 20 enriched biological process GO terms in additive genes of the HY hybrid. B All 10 enriched biological process GO terms in the CK hybrid. The Y-axis lists the enriched GO terms, and the X-axis represents the rich factor. The smaller the Q value, the higher the significance level and the closer to the red point. The more genes, the larger the circle

Full size image

The 331 (331/917) and 721 (721/1307) non-additively expressed DEGs in HY and CK (Fig. 3C) were specifically enriched in different GO functional categories. In HY, the non-additively expressed genes were most enriched in the BP terms Macromolecule metabolic process (GO:0043170), Cellular process (GO:0009987), Plant organ development (GO:0099402), Response to hormone (GO:0009725), and Primary metabolic process (GO:0044238). They were enriched in the MF terms Binding (GO:0005488) and Structural molecule activity (GO:0005198). In the CC category, the most enriched terms were Cytosol (GO:0005829), Organelle (GO:0043226), and Cellular anatomical entity (GO:0110165) (Fig. 5A, Supplementary Table S7). Genes that were non-additively expressed in CK were enriched in BP terms such as Cellular process (GO:0009987), Metabolic process (GO:0008152), Nitrogen compound metabolic process (GO:0006807), and Shoot system morphogenesis (GO:0010016). In the MF and CC categories, the most enriched terms were Binding (GO:0005488), Catalytic activity (GO:0003824), and Small molecule binding (GO:0036094) and Cytoplasm (GO:0005737), Intracellular (GO:0005622), and Membrane-bounded organelle (GO:0043227) (Fig. 5B, Supplementary Table S8). These results may imply that multiple metabolic processes, plant organ morphogenesis, and hormone response processes, among others, play important roles in maize ear development and early heterosis formation.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison and functional enrichment of non-additive genes in hybrids. A Top 20 enriched biological process GO terms in non-additive genes of the HY hybrid. B All 14 enriched biological process GO terms in the CK hybrid. The Y-axis lists the enriched GO terms, and the X-axis represents the rich factor. The smaller the Q value, the higher the significance level and the closer to the red point. The more genes, the larger the circle

Full size image

Allele-specific expression analysis

ASE is an important source of gene expression divergence in hybrids [37]. Several studies have suggested that ASE plays a role in heterosis because genetic variation often leads to differences in gene expression, which then lead to phenotypic changes [17, 18]. Based on single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data and specific allele sequencing data for the parents, genes that showed ASE were identified in the hybrids. First, SAMtools was used to obtain SNP information for lx9801 and Zheng58 in the CK hybrid and for lx9801hlEW2b and Zheng58 in the HY hybrid. A total of 362 410 and 360 791 polymorphic SNPs were identified between lx9801 and Zheng58 and between lx9801hlEW2b and Zheng58, respectively (Fig. 6A, Table 4). Based on ASE gene identification criteria (see Materials and methods), 2263 genes (12.89% of 17 563 analyzed genes) and 2352 genes (14.65% of 16 059 analyzed genes) were identified as having significant allelic bias in CK and HY, respectively (Table 4).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Global allele-specific expression analysis. A: The distribution of ASE genes in hybrids. Green and red represent genes with ASE and no ASE at the genome-wide level in Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b (HY) and Zheng58 × lx9801 (CK). B Comparison of DEGs between hybrids that show an ASE pattern

Full size image
Table 4 Allele-specific gene expression genes in two hybrids
Full size table

To more fully elucidate the relationship between ASE and heterosis, we identified DEGs between the hybrids that also showed ASE in HY and CK. When we compared HY ASE genes with CK ASE genes, we found that 286 genes in HY and 261 genes in CK showed both ASE and differential expression between the two hybrids. Among these DEGs, 161 showed ASE in both hybrids, 125 showed ASE only in HY, and 100 showed ASE only in CK (Fig. 6B). We performed GO analysis to determine the molecular and biological functions of these genes, but no BP or MF GO terms were significantly enriched among all three gene sets. However, some auxin synthesis and transport genes (such as tryptophan synthase, PIN-formed protein, and brachytic2) (Fig. 7 A–B, Supplementary Figure S2), plant growth and development genes (such as bHLH-transcription factor and AP2-EREBP-transcription factor), and inflorescence meristem development genes (such as CLAVATA3/ESR and WUSCHEL-homeobox-transcription factor) were identified among the DEGs with ASE in the HY hybrid (Fig. 7 C–D, Supplementary Table S9). Among them, PIN-formed protein4, CLAVATA3/ESR, and WUSCHEL-homeobox-transcription factor genes were simultaneously identified in both hybrids (Supplementary Table S10). In the set of DEGs with ASE in the CK hybrid, genes related to amino acid synthesis (such as glutamine synthetase) (Supplementary Figure S2), growth and developmental regulation (such as MYB-transcription factor and AP2-EREBP-transcription factor), and maintenance of phytohormone homeostasis (such as OVATE-transcription factor) differed in expression from the HY hybrid (Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Table S11). These results implied that ASE genes may participate in various biological processes, potentially leading to differences in heterotic performance.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Critical DEGs with an ASE expression pattern in HY and CK hybrids that participate in regulation of ear development. Each point on the figure represents an SNP between the two parental genomes of the hybrid, and the size of the point indicates the read number at each SNP. The more reads, the larger the point. The X-axis represents the position of the SNP in the parental genomes, and the Y-axis represents the level of allele-specific expression (P). The lx9801hlEW2b allele is set to 0 in Zheng58×lx9801hlEW2b, and the lx9801 allele is set to 0 in Zheng58×lx9801. The test parent Zheng58 is set to 1 in both hybrids

Full size image

Discussion

Overdominance effects may be the greatest contributors to heterosis

In recent years, many studies have shown that overdominance effects contribute to heterosis, and some genes that exhibit overdominance effects have been identified. The most typical example is the SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS (SFT) gene in tomato, which confirmed the overdominance effects of heterosis. Krieger et al. (2010) found that the SFT gene was heterozygous for a functional allele and that a loss-of-function allele resulted in overdominant performance for tomato yield [38]. The FT gene (an SFT homolog) controls florigen synthesis in Arabidopsis. When heterozygous, FT causes A. thaliana to differentiate to form more inflorescences than the parents, showing an overdominance effect for heterosis [39]. In addition, heterotic loci with overdominant effects at the single-site level have been identified using genetic mapping populations [40]. However, these putative overdominant genes or heterotic loci have only been analyzed at the single gene or locus level, without controlling for the complex genetic backgrounds of the materials themselves. Therefore, pseudo-overdominance and epistatic heterotic effects may exist at the genomic level. In this study, single-fragment substitution lines were used to eliminate the interference of the genetic background. To analyze the heterotic effects of hlEW2b, the ear width phenotypes of the test hybrid (Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b) and its parental inbred lines (Zheng58 and lx9801hlEW2b) were assessed under multiple environmental conditions, and the heterotic locus hlEW2b had an overdominance effect on heterosis of ear width.

Different expression patterns play critical roles in heterosis of maize ear width

Changes in gene expression pattern may cause heterosis in hybrids [41, 42]. By analyzing transcriptome data of hybrids and parents, gene expression patterns can be divided into additive and non-additive patterns [43]. Among species with different heterotic rates (such as Arctic char, Medicago, and Larix gmelinii), hybrids with heterosis are more likely to show non-additive expression than hybrids without heterosis [44,45,46]. The increased activities of non-additively expressed genes in Arabidopsis promote photosynthetic capacity, cell size, and cell number, demonstrating that non-additively expressed genes may play important roles in biomass heterosis [46]. Meyer et al. [47] proposed that non-additively expressed genes can effectively improve the resource use of Arabidopsis seedlings and promote the enhancement of metabolic activities, which show strong heterosis in hybrids. However, in some cases, additively expressed genes are the greatest contributors to heterosis, or additive and non-additive genes may have similar effects [8]. A transcriptome study of maize ear growth and development during the spikelet and floret differentiation stages found that additive genes accounted for a greater proportion in the F1 hybrid and played fundamental roles in maize ear heterosis [34].

Here, a specific experimental design was used to explore the relationships between changes in gene expression pattern and heterosis. We found that 64% and 48% of the genes differentially expressed between hybrids were additively expressed in HY and CK, respectively, indicating that additively expressed genes may have had a greater effect on HY hybrid ear development. Previous studies have proposed that additive gene expression implies that the hybrid parental alleles have a strong complementary effect. This effect may neutralize the role of inferior alleles and adjust gene expression to an optimal level that promotes the hybrid advantage [23, 34]. This hypothesis is consistent with the results of the present study. In the dominant hybrid HY, more genes exhibited additive expression patterns, implying that more genes were in an advantageous expression state in HY than in the CK hybrid.

In addition, 36% and 52% of genes exhibited a non-additive expression pattern in HY and CK. Of these genes, nearly half displayed ODO and UDO in the two hybrids (Table 3). This result suggests that, among the different categories of non-additively expressed genes, ODO and UDO genes may have a particularly strong influence on heterosis. Furthermore, there were significantly more genes with lx9801hlEW2b- and lx9810-dominant patterns than with Zheng58-dominant patterns in HY and CK, respectively (Table 3), perhaps reflecting the influence of donor chromosome fragments. This result suggests that lx9801hlEW2b and lx9801 alleles have a greater effect than Zheng58 alleles on gene expression levels in their corresponding hybrids, HY and CK. Together, these findings indicate that different hybrid gene expression patterns may make contributions to hybrid vigor.

The role of carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism in heterosis

Carbohydrate metabolism is an essential process that produces energy sources in the plant [48]. Some enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, such as triose phosphate isomerase (TPI) and Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase (PEPK), belong to a complex network that regulates carbon assimilation and conversion processes. TPI (Zm00001d039865, Zm00001d008619) and PEPK (Zm00001d051156) are involved in glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and the Calvin cycle, thus playing a crucial role in storage reserve mobilization and carbohydrate conversions [49, 50]. TPI genes can promote starch synthesis, and PEPK can increase the efficiency of carbon fixation in crops [49, 50]. These genes were upregulated in HY (Supplementary Table S12–13, Supplementary Table S15) and may have helped to provide energy and carbon to support maize ear development in the HY hybrid.

In addition, nitrogen metabolism is closely related to protein synthesis and nitrogen assimilation process, which can provide abundant nitrogen sources for organs development [51]. In the aspect of protein synthesis, downregulation expression of ribosome export associated 1 (Zm00001d038475) could inhibits cell proliferation and cell growth by affecting the biogenesis of 60 S ribosomal subunits, which can significantly reduce cell size, with cell width and cell length both decreased, and was not conducive to the growth and development of organs in maize [52]. In this study, the expression level of Zm00001d038475 was higher in HY than CK, which may play a major positive role for HY female ear development. The ribosome proteins were mainly involved in the ribosomal protein synthesis and the assembly of ribosomes, which positive regulated the processes of the biosynthesis and processing of proteins [53]. The ribosome proteins (Zm00001d049666) up-regulation in HY could promote the proteins biosynthesis, thus providing the sufficient nitrogen source for female inflorescence development during early stage. In the aspect of nitrogen assimilation, Glutathione transferase (Zm00001d036951) involved in the TCA cycle, glycolysis and nitrogen assimilation, and the low expression of glutathione transferase in rice reduced primary root elongation and lateral root formation [54]. Glutamine provides the nitrogen that is required for purine and pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis, and these nucleic acid synthesis processes may be closely related to stem cell development in inflorescence meristems. Glutamine synthetase (Zm00001d033747) is a rate-limiting enzyme for the synthesis of glutamine [55]. These two genes were downregulated in CK, which perhaps lead to the nitrogen assimilation levels were lower in CK hybrid than HY hybrid (Supplementary Table S15). Above genes differed in expression between the hybrids and that they govern aspects of carbohydrate- and nitrogen-related processes might be promoted in the HY hybrid.

Transcription factors involved in heterosis formation in maize ear development

Transcription factors play critical roles in responding to the onset of many biological processes involved in heterosis. To date, several transcription factor families were predicted to regulate downstream genes linked to hybrid vigor, including the Dof, MADS and MYB families [56, 57]. In maize a Dof-transcription factor 36 (Zm00001d029512) with highly conserved domain, have been demonstrated to positively control nutrient accumulation [58]. This gene showed higher expression in HY than in CK, implying that more nutrient may have accumulated to facilitate early maize ear development in HY. Many genes code for MADS-box family transcription factors are involved in meristem, floral organ, and vegetative development [59, 60]. Transcriptional expression level of ZmMADS1 (Zm00001d023955), which plays a positive regulatory role in the development of the inflorescence for ear size [61], was up-regulated in HY for facilitating early maize ear development (Supplementary Table S12, Supplementary Table S15). In addition, available evidence suggests that in plants, MYB transcription factors can control the morphology and patterning of cells and play a key role in plant development [62]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, overexpression of AtMYB24 produces short plants with poorly developed floral organs [63], suggesting that AtMYB24 may be negatively regulate IM development. The MYB transcription factors 53 (Zm00001d044107) in maize is homologous to Arabidopsis thaliana AtMYB24, and downregulation of MYB transcription factors 53 in HY relative to CK may thus promote IM development (Supplementary Tables S14–15). The above analysis implies that IM heterosis performance is better in the HY than the CK hybrid, and this result may be influenced by regulation of gene expression by transcription factors.

ASE DEGs involved in maize ear development

The specific expression of alleles and the unbalanced expression of the two parental alleles in hybrids are important causes of heterosis [37]. Allelic variation is widespread in genomes and is a prerequisite for studying ASE. The specific combinations of parental allelic variations in hybrids may cause changes in hybrid gene expression patterns that contribute to heterosis formation [23]. A competitive transcriptional relationship between the two alleles may be the cause of differential gene expression in hybrids. By comparing genes that were differentially expressed between hybrids, we identified 125 DEGs that showed ASE only in HY, 100 genes that showed ASE only in CK, and 161 DEGs that showed ASE in both hybrids. Gene functional annotation revealed that DEGs that displayed ASE functioned in aspects of plant hormone metabolism and signal transduction and in the regulation of IM development.

The ASE genes AP2-EREBP-transcription factor 109 and PIN-formed protein4, which function in plant hormone synthesis, transport, and signal transduction processes, were identified in both hybrids (Supplementary Table S10). AP2-EREBP-transcription factor 109 acts downstream of auxin signaling induced by low concentrations of auxin [64]. The downregulated expression of this gene in HY implies that there may be higher auxin levels in the IM of the HY hybrid than of the CK hybrid (Supplementary Table S10). Transcript expression levels of PIN-formed protein4 (Zm00001d052442), a transmembrane protein that accelerates auxin transport and promotes cell elongation [65], were upregulated in HY (Fig. 7, Supplementary Table S10). A gene encoding tryptophan synthase (Zm00001d018969), which participates in auxin synthesis, differed in expression between the two hybrids and showed ASE only in HY (Fig. 7, Supplementary Figure S3). Tryptophan synthase participates directly in the tryptophan-dependent auxin biosynthetic pathway; by regulating the synthesis of the auxin precursor tryptophan, it is an important determinant of auxin biosynthesis [66]. Its low expression level in CK may have hindered auxin biosynthesis and restricted the development of female IMs in maize.

WUSCHEL-homeobox-transcription factor (Zm00001d012330) and CLAVATA3/ESR-related26 (Zm00001d008722), which function in the regulation of IM development, showed ASE in both hybrids (Fig. 7). The former gene encodes a key transcription factor that can move via plasmodesmata into the apical domain (called the central zone) to promote the proliferation of stem cells, thereby regulating development of the shoot meristem [26]. The latter gene is negatively regulated by WUSCHEL-homeobox-transcription factor; it plays an important role in regulating the architecture of the female maize IM and interacts with auxin signaling [67]. The upregulation of WUSCHEL-homeobox-transcription factor (Zm00001d012330) in HY may have led to downregulation of CLAVATA3/ESR-related26 (Zm00001d008722) (Supplementary Figure S3); this combined gene expression pattern may have promoted heterosis in HY during the female spike developmental stage. In addition, OVATE family protein (Zm00001d022446) is a plant-specific transcription factor that positively regulates the longitudinal diameter of wild tomato fruit [68]. Transcript expression levels of Zm00001d022446 were upregulated and showed ASE in HY (Supplementary Figure S2, Supplementary Table S9), suggesting that this gene may encode a transcription factor that increases the diameter of the female IM in maize. ASE is an important source of gene expression differences in hybrids [69]; it may be responsible for the differential expression of the above genes between the hybrids, and these genes participate in diverse biological processes (such as plant hormone metabolism and meristem development) that influence heterosis formation during IM development.

Auxin may participate in heterosis formation during maize ear development

Morphological analyses have shown that the most obvious feature of the transformation from vegetative to reproductive growth is a rapid increase in the size of the IM. The cells located in the central zone of the IM have typical stem cell characteristics, and they can initiate and determine the developmental processes of maize ears [70]. The CLV–WUS negative feedback loop may affect the development of the IM by regulating the relationship between stem cell proliferation and tissue and organ differentiation. In this pathway, the WUS gene, located in the organizing center of the meristem, activates the expression of the signal molecule CLV3, which is sensed by CLV1-CLV2, and they form a complex. This complex positively regulates the expression of the WUS gene and promotes stem cell proliferation. However, CLV1, CLV2, and CLV3 in the noncomplexed state inhibit WUS gene expression and form a dynamically balanced negative feedback loop that affects IM differentiation processes [26]. The genes involved in the CLV–WUS negative feedback loop have also been cloned in maize; they include thick tassel dwarf1 and fasciated ear2, which are homologs of CLV1 and CLV2, respectively. The homolog of CLV3 in maize is CLAVATA3/ESR. The expression of WUS may be induced by auxin, and WUS gene expression is positively correlated with the auxin gradient, implying that auxin regulation is critical for IM development [71]. In the present study, several critical genes involved in inflorescence development and auxin metabolism were identified. The thick tassel dwarf1 and fasciated ear2 genes exhibited non-additive expression in both CK and HY (Supplementary Figure S3, Supplementary Tables S14–15) and were separately enriched in different GO terms in the two hybrids. The CLAVATA3/ESR gene not only showed significant differential expression between the hybrids but also showed ASE in both hybrids (Fig. 7, Supplementary Figure S3). The specific expression patterns of these genes may be responsible for the different gene expression levels between the hybrids. Our results suggest that in the IM, upregulated CLV1 [tassel dwarf1 (Zm00001d014793), HY vs. CK, FDR = 1.66E − 02, log2(HY/CK) = 0.57] and CLV2 [fasciated ear2 (Zm00001d051012), HY vs. CK, FDR = 2.20E − 02, log2(HY/CK) = 0.54] combine with CLV3 [CLAVATA3/ESR (Zm00001d008722), HY vs. CK, FDR = 1.27E − 02, log2(HY/CK) = − 1.16] to form a complex, which enhances WUS gene expression [WUS (Zm00001d012330), HY vs. CK, FDR = 3.34E − 02, log2(HY/CK) = 1.16] to maintain the size of the stem cell population and positively regulate IM development (Fig. 8, Supplementary Figure S3). Rodriguez et al. (2016) and Perales et al. (2016) proposed a model in which WUS dimers negatively regulate CLV3 expression in the organizing center and WUS monomers positively regulate CLV3 expression in the central zone [72, 73]. This may explain why CLV3 shows significant downregulation in the dominant hybrid HY (Supplementary Figure S3).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Predicting the regulatory process of heterosis formation during the inflorescence meristem period. Auxin may contribute to hybrid heterosis during maize ear development. Additive, non-additive, and allele-specific expression patterns may fine-tune the expression of crucial genes that control auxin metabolism and IM development to an optimal level, and this may be responsible for maize ear heterosis formation in hybrids

Full size image

Local auxin gradients may play roles in the establishment of organs in the IM [74]. Several auxin synthesis and transport genes, such as auxin response factor (ARF) and Aux/IAA transcription factor genes, as well as functional genes encoding brachytic2 and tryptophan synthase with non-additive expression patterns were all specifically enriched in the GO term Response to hormone in the HY hybrid (GO: 0009725, Response to hormone) (Supplementary Figure S3, Supplementary Table S14), and their expression differed significantly between HY and CK. The expression of brachytic2, which is involved in polar auxin transport [75], was significantly higher in HY than in CK. The tryptophan pathway is critical for auxin synthesis, and tryptophan synthase is the rate-limiting enzyme in this pathway [66]; its gene was significantly upregulated in HY compared with CK. In terms of transcription factors, ARF proteins form heterodimers with Aux/IAA proteins at high auxin concentrations, repressing the transcriptional activities of ARFs and Aux/IAA (Supplementary Figure S3) [76]. Therefore, we inferred that lower transcriptional activity of ARFs and Aux/IAA in HY may have promoted the accumulation of auxin in the IM. These results imply that auxin accumulation in the IM may be higher in HY than in CK, thus promoting greater heterosis in HY (Fig. 8).

Conclusions

We used RNA-seq to systematically investigate the global transcriptomes of near-isogenic hybrids and their corresponding parents during the maize ear IM developmental stage. Our results identified DEGs that are involved in various carbohydrate metabolic processes, protein synthesis, and nitrogen assimilation, which may lead to phenotypic differences in the two near-isogenic hybrids. Differential expression of these genes may be the reason for different heterosis performances of HY and CK hybrids during female inflorescence development. In addition, we found evidence that auxin affects the development of the IM in maize. Our results implied that different gene expression patterns of the DEGs may fine-tune the expression of genes involved in crucial biological processes that control female inflorescence development to an optimal level, and this may be responsible for heterosis in maize ear formation in hybrids.

Materials and methods

Plant materials

The single-segment substitution line lx9801hlEW2b, which contains the heterotic locus hlEW2b associated with ear width, was developed in a previous study [33]; lx9810 and Zheng58 are leading self-lines used for maize breeding in the Yellow and Huai Valley of China. The lx9801hlEW2b line, the receptor parent lx9801, the test parent Zheng58, and their corresponding hybrids were grown in experimental fields in Zhengzhou (Henan, China; E113°65ʹ, N34°76ʹ) in the summer of 2016. Based on the leaf-age index, 2–4-mm immature maize ear samples were collected from each plant (only the first ear was collected per plant). A microscope was used to observe and determine the developmental period. Immature maize ears were manually collected at the IM differentiation stage. There were three biological replicates for each genotype, and each biological replicate contained at least 30 immature maize ears. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C.

RNA extraction and transcriptome sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from each sample with the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and DNaseI was used to degrade the remaining DNA after extraction. The quality of the total RNA was determined using a Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA). An Illumina TruSeq RNA sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to construct a library from each RNA sample. The prepared libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Internal Perl scripts were used to remove linker sequences and low-quality sequences (with lengths < 120 bp) [77]. After the raw data were subjected to quality control measures, the paired-end clean reads were aligned to the maize B73 reference genome (Zea_mays.AGPv4.37) using Bowtie2 software (http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/manual.shtml) with the parameter ‘-bowtie2-N 1’, which allows for only one base mismatch during the alignment process. Cufflinks (http://cole-trapnell-lab.github.io/cufflinks/) was used to assemble transcripts, and FPKM values were used to estimate gene expression levels.

DEG identification and gene expression pattern analysis

DEGs between samples were identified using the default parameters of Cuffdiff (a Cufflinks software component). This software controlled the FDR of the P-value using the Benjamini and Hochberg method and set the differential expression threshold to FDR < 0.05. To gain overall insights into gene expression patterns in the F1 hybrids, they were compared with MPVs. The threshold value was set to 0.05. Thus, FDR < 0.05 indicated a non-additive expression pattern, and FDR > 0.05 indicated an additive expression pattern. The GO (http://www.geneontology.org/) database was used for functional analysis of the genes. Statistically enriched GO terms in gene sets were identified using the single enrichment analysis tool at the AgriGO2 website (http://systemsbiology.cau.edu.cn/agriGOv2/); the confidence criterion was FDR < 0.05.

ASE gene identification

Transcriptome data were used to identify SNPs at the mRNA level between the parents. SAMtools (http://www.htslib.org/doc/1.2/samtools.html) was used to identify hybrid parental SNP information. The ‘-sort’ parameter in SAMtools was used to sort the output results of Bowtie2 and convert them into a ‘bam’ file. Parental ‘bam’ files were imported into SAMtools, and the ‘mpileup’ and ‘bcftools’ parameters were used to identify SNP information between the parents [78]. The “-t DP” parameter was used to output the count results for the reference and nonreference genotypes of the SNP loci. Each parent was independently compared with the reference genotype to obtain the SNP count results between the parents.

RNAmodel is an R program (http://cran.r-project.org/) that is used to identify ASE genes at the genome-wide level and to infer the results of allelic genotype counts for specific loci [79]. For the hybrids, the allele counts of each parent gene were imported into RNAmodel, and the alleles of both parents were quantitatively estimated to determine the expression levels of different alleles. The allele-specific expression level (P) from a paternal or maternal allele was calculated based on the number of reads for the given allele divided by the total number of reads for the SNP. When P = 0, only the allele of lx9801 (Zheng58 × lx9801, CK) or lx9801hlEW2b (Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b, HY) was expressed in the hybrid. When P = 1, only the allele of Zheng58 was expressed. When P = 0.5, no allele-specific expression occurred. Reliable ASE genes in the hybrids were identified according to the following criteria: (1) all reads uniquely match on the lx9801hlEW2b, lx9801, and Zheng58 genomes; (2) all reads from one parent produce a consensus base at the SNP position, different from the other parent; (3) comparisons for two alleles at each SNP position were calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg FDR criterion, and FDR < 0.05 was used as the significance threshold; (4) there are at least two SNPs in a single gene; (5) the allele-specific expression level (P) is greater than 0.6 or less than 0.4 [37, 79, 80]. Genes that met the above criteria were identified as ASE genes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets necessary for supporting the results of this article are included in this manuscript and its additional files. The RNA-seq datasets were deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession PRJNA772971 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA772971/).

Abbreviations

ASE:

Allele-specific expression

BP:

Biological process

CC:

Cellular component

CK:

Zheng58 × lx9801

DEGs:

Differentially expressed genes

FDR:

False discovery rate

FPKM:

Fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped reads

GO:

Gene ontology

HY:

Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b

IM:

Inflorescence meristem

MF:

Molecular function

MPV:

mid-parent value

P:

Allele-specific expression level

PEPK:

Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase

RNA-seq:

RNA sequencing technology

SAM:

Shoot apical meristem

SCF:

Skp1/Cullin/F-box components

SNP:

Single-nucleotide polymorphism

TPI:

triose phosphate isomerase

UPS:

Ubiquitin-proteasome system

References

  1. Birchler JA, Auger DL, Riddle NC. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell. 2003;15(10):2236–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sokolov BP. Heterosis and maize breeding. Byul Vses n i in-ta kukuruzy. 1970:5–12.

  3. Cheng SH, Zhuang JY, Fan YY, Du JH, Cao LY. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: a super-domesticate in China. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):959–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kul'Pinova EP. Breeding sorghum for heterosis. Breeding sorghum for heterosis. 1966.

  5. Sernyk JL, Stefansson BR. Heterosis in summer rape (Brassica napus L.). Canadian Journal of Plant Science. 1983;63(2):407–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lippman ZB, Zamir D. Heterosis: revisiting the magic. Trends in Genetics. 2007;23(2):60–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schadt EE, Monks SA, Drake TA, Lusis AJ, Che N, Colinayo V, et al. Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man. Nature. 2003;422(6929):297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, Decook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(18):6805–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rentao S, Joachim M. Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(15):9055–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Song S, Qu H, Chen C, Hu S, Yu J. Differential gene expression in an elite hybrid rice cultivar (Oryza sativa, L) and its parental lines based on SAGE data. Bmc Plant Biol. 2007;7(1):49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Użarowska A, Keller B, Piepho HP, Schwarz G, Ingvardsen C, Wenzel G, et al. Comparative expression profiling in meristems of inbred-hybrid triplets of maize based on morphological investigations of heterosis for plant height. Plant Molecular Biology. 2007;63(1):21–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Y, Zhang L, Zhang J, Yuan D, Xu C, Li X, et al. Heterosis and polymorphisms of gene expression in an elite rice hybrid as revealed by a microarray analysis of 9198 unique ESTs. Plant Molecular Biology. 2006;62(4-5):579–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jianlin W, Lu T, Hyeon-Se L, Ning E. Wei, Hongmei J, Brian W, Andreas M, Osborn TC, Doerge RW, Luca C: Genome wide nonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics. 2006;172(1):507–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi X, Ng WK, Zhang C, Comai L, Ye W, Chen ZJ. Cis- and trans-regulatory divergence between progenitor species determines gene-expression novelty in Arabidopsis allopolyploids. Nature Communications. 2012;3:950.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Todesco M, Balasubramanian S, Hu TT, Traw MB, Horton M, Epple P, et al. Natural allelic variation underlying a major fitness trade-off in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2010;465(7298):632–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaur U, Li K, Mei S, Liu G. Research progress in allele-specific expression and its regulatory mechanisms. J Appl Genet. 2013;54(3):271–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Guo M, Rupe MA, Christopher Z, Jeffrey H, Bowen BA, Smith OS. Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell. 2004;16(7):1707–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo M, Rupe MA, Danilevskaya ON, Yang X, Hu Z. Genome-wide mRNA profiling reveals heterochronic allelic variation and a new imprinted gene in hybrid maize endosperm. Plant J. 2003;36(1):30–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang X, Borevitz JO. Global analysis of allele-specific expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2009;182(4):943–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. von Korff M, Radovic S, Choumane W, Stamati K, Udupa SM, Grando S, et al. Asymmetric allele-specific expression in relation to developmental variation and drought stress in barley hybrids. Plant J. 2009;59(1):14–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo M, Rupe M, Yang X, Crasta O, Zinselmeier C, Smith O, et al. Genome-wide transcript analysis of maize hybrids: allelic additive gene expression and yield heterosis. Theoretical & Applied Genetics. 2006;113(5):831–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Anja P, Yi J, Caroline M, Steve L, Larson NB, Cheng-Ting Y, et al. Complementation contributes to transcriptome complexity in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids relative to their inbred parents. Genome Research. 2012;22(12):2445–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Springer NM, Stupar RM. Allelic variation and heterosis in maize: How do two halves make more than a whole? Genome Research. 2007;17(3):264–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jia H, Li M, Li W, Liu L, Jian Y, Yang Z, et al. A serine/threonine protein kinase encoding gene KERNEL NUMBER PER ROW6 regulates maize grain yield. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):988.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu L, Du Y, Shen X, Li M, Sun W, Huang J, et al. KRN4 Controls Quantitative Variation in Maize Kernel Row Number. Plos Genetics. 2015;11(11):e1005670.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Somssich M, Je BI, Simon R, Jackson D. CLAVATA-WUSCHEL signaling in the shoot meristem. Development. 2016;143(18):3238–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yadav RK, Perales M, Gruel J, Girke T, Jonsson H, Reddy GV. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev. 2011;25(19):2025–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brand U, Fletcher JC, Hobe M, Meyerowitz EM, Simon R. Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science. 2000;289(5479):617–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lopes FL, Galvan-Ampudia C, Landrein B. WUSCHEL in the shoot apical meristem: old player, new tricks. J Exp Bot. 2021;72(5):1527–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chuanyuan Yu, Wan J, Zhai H, Wang C, Jiang L, Xiao Y, et al. Study on heterosis of inter-subspecies between indica and japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.)using chromosome segment substitution lines. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2005;50(2):131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Z, Yu C, Liu X, Liu S, Yin C, Liu L, et al. Identification of Indica rice chromosome segments for the improvement of Japonica inbreds and hybrids. Theoretical & Applied Genetics. 2012;124(7):1351–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wei X, Wang B, Qian P, Feng W, Mao K, Zhang X, et al. Heterotic loci for various morphological traits of maize detected using a single segment substitution lines test-cross population. Molecular Breeding. 2015;35(3):94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi X, Zhang X, Shi D, Zhang X, Li W, Tang J. Dissecting heterosis during the ear inflorescence development stage in maize via a metabolomics-based analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):212.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu X, Wang H, Diao X, Liu Z, Li K, Wu Y, et al. Transcriptome profiling and comparison of maize ear heterosis during the spikelet and floret differentiation stages. BMC Genomics. 2016;17(1):959.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang JF, Li GG, Li HJ, Pu XB, Jiang J, Chai L, Zheng BC, Cui C, Yang ZJ, Zhu YQ. Transcriptome analysis of interspecific hybrid between Brassica napus and B. rapa reveals heterosis for oil rape improvement. Int J Genomics. 2015;2015:230985.

  36. Zhao Y, Hu F, Zhang X, Wei Q, Dong J, Bo C, et al. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals important roles of nonadditive genes in maize hybrid An'nong 591 under heat stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019;19(1):273.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shao L, Feng X, Xu CH, Zhang QH, Che J, Wang XM, et al. Patterns of genome-wide allele-specific expression in hybrid rice and the implications on the genetic basis of heterosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(12):5653–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Uri K, Lippman ZB, Dani Z. The flowering gene SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS drives heterosis for yield in tomato. Nature Genetics. 2010;42(5):459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lifschitz E, Ayre BG, Eshed Y. Florigen and anti-florigen - a systemic mechanism for coordinating growth and termination in flowering plants. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:465.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hua JP, Xing YZ, Wu WR, Xu CG, Sun XL, Yu SB, et al. Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(5):2574–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sun Q, Limin WU, Zhongfu NI, Meng F, Wang Z, Lin Z. Differential gene expression patterns in leaves between hybrids and their parental inbreds are correlated with heterosis in a wheat diallel cross. Plant Science. 2004;166(3):651–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Schnable PS, Springer NM. Progress toward understanding heterosis in crop plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2013;64(1):71–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nadine H, Barbara K, Nils M, Didier C, Patrick D, Hans-Peter P, et al. Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organ-specific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics. 2008;179(179):1275–83.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Li X, Wei Y, Dan N, Brummer EC. Comparative gene expression profiles between heterotic and non-heterotic hybrids of tetraploid Medicago sativa. Bmc Plant Biology. 2009;9(1):1–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Bougas B, Granier S, Audet C, Bernatchez L. The transcriptional landscape of cross-specific hybrids and its possible link with growth in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill). Genetics. 2010;186(1):97–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ryo F, Taylor JM, Sachiko S. W James P, Dennis ES: Heterosis of Arabidopsis hybrids between C24 and Col is associated with increased photosynthesis capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(18):7109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meyer RC, Wituckawall H, Becher M, Blacha A, Boudichevskaia A, Dörmann P, et al. Heterosis manifestation during early Arabidopsis seedling development is characterized by intermediate gene expression and enhanced metabolic activity in the hybrids. Plant Journal. 2012;71(4):669–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Jackson MB. New root formation in plants and cuttings. M Nijhoff. 1986.

  49. Thelen CJJ. The plastid isoform of triose phosphate isomerase is required for the postgerminative transition from heterotrophic to autotrophic growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2010;22(1):77–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hartwell J, Gill A, Nimmo GA, Wilkins MB, Nimmo HG. Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase kinase is a novel protein kinase regulated at the level of expression. Plant Journal. 2010;20(3):333–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hirel B, Bertin P, Quillere I, Bourdoncle W, Attagnant C, Dellay C, et al. Towards a better understanding of the genetic and physiological basis for nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Physiol. 2001;125(3):1258–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Qi W, Zhu J, Wu Q, Wang Q, Song R. Maize reas1 mutant stimulates ribosome use efficiency and triggers distinct transcriptional and translational responses. Plant physiology. 2015;170(2):971.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Korobeinikova A, Garber G. Gongadze: Ribosomal proteins: Structure, function, and evolution. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2012;77(6):562–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Lian L, Lin Y, Wei Y, He W, Zhang J. PEPC of sugarcane regulated glutathione S-transferase and altered carbon-nitrogen metabolism under different N source concentrations in Oryza sativa. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Satterlee JW, Strable J, Scanlon MJ. Plant stem cell organization and differentiation at single-cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(52):202018788.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Kong X, Chen L, Wei T, Zhou H, Bai C, Yan X, et al. Transcriptome analysis of biological pathways associated with heterosis in Chinese cabbage. Genomics. 2020;112(6):4732–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Venu RC, Ma J, Jia Y, Liu G, Jia MH, Nobuta K, et al. Identification of candidate genes associated with positive and negative heterosis in rice. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95178.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu J, Chen L, Chen M, Zhou W, Dong Q, Jiang H, et al. The DOF-domain transcription factor ZmDOF36 positively regulates starch synthesis in transgenic maize. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:465.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM. MADS domain proteins in plant development. Biol Chem. 1997;378(10):1079–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Theissen G, Becker A, Di Rosa A, Kanno A, Kim JT, Munster T, et al. A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Mol Biol. 2000;42(1):115–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Sigrid H, Susanne H. Jörg B, Reinhold B, Erhard K, Horst L, Thomas D: The maize MADS box gene ZmMADS3 affects node number and spikelet development and is co-expressed with ZmMADS1 during flower development, in egg cells, and early embryogenesis. Plant Physiology. 2001;127(1):33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Li J, Han G, Sun C, Sui N. Research advances of MYB transcription factors in plant stress resistance and breeding. Plant Signal Behav. 2019;14(8):1613131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang XY, Li JG, Pei M, Gu H, Chen ZL, Qu LJ. Over-expression of a flower-specific transcription factor gene AtMYB24 causes aberrant anther development. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26(2):219–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Hirota A, Kato T, Fukaki H, Tasaka AM. The auxin-regulated AP2/EREBP gene PUCHI is required for morphogenesis in the early lateral root primordium of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19(7):2156–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Krecek P, Skupa P, Libus J, Naramoto S, Tejos R, Friml J, et al. The PIN-FORMED (PIN) protein family of auxin transporters. Genome Biol. 2009;10(12):249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang B, Chu J, Yu T, Xu Q, Sun X, Yuan J, et al. Tryptophan-independent auxin biosynthesis contributes to early embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(15):4821–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Miwa H, Kinoshita A, Fukuda H, Sawa S. Plant meristems: CLAVATA3/ESR-related signaling in the shoot apical meristem and the root apical meristem. J Plant Res. 2009;122(1):31–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu J, Eck JV, Cong B, Tanksley SD. A new class of regulatory genes underlying the cause of pear-shaped tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(20):13302–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Bell GD, Kane NC, Rieseberg LH, Adams KL. RNA-seq analysis of allele-specific expression, hybrid effects, and regulatory divergence in hybrids compared with their parents from natural populations. Genome Biol Evol. 2013;5(7):1309–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kynast RG. Handbook of maize: its biology; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Su YH, Zhao XY, Liu YB, Zhang CL. ONeill SD, Zhang XS: Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;59(3):448–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Rodriguez K, Perales M, Snipes S, Yadav RK, Diaz-Mendoza M, Reddy GV. DNA-dependent homodimerization, sub-cellular partitioning, and protein destabilization control WUSCHEL levels and spatial patterning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(41):E6307–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Perales M, Rodriguez K, Snipes S, Yadav RK, Diaz-Mendoza M, Reddy GV. Threshold-dependent transcriptional discrimination underlies stem cell homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(41):E6298–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Benková E, Michniewicz M, Sauer M, Teichmann T, Seifertová D, Jürgens G, et al. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation - ScienceDirect. Cell. 2003;115(5):591–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Knoller AS, Blakeslee JJ, Richards EL, Peer WA, Murphy AS. Brachytic2/ZmABCB1 functions in IAA export from intercalary meristems. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(13):3689–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wang R, Estelle M. Diversity and specificity: auxin perception and signaling through the TIR1/AFB pathway. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2014;21:51–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Cole T, Adam R, Loyal G, Geo P, Daehwan K, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. NATURE PROTOCOLS. 2012;7(3):562–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. Genome Project Data Processing S: The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Skelly DA, Johansson M, Madeoy J, Wakefield J, Akey JM. A powerful and flexible statistical framework for testing hypotheses of allele-specific gene expression from RNA-seq data. Genome Research. 2011;21(10):1728–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Song G, Guo Z, Liu Z, Cheng Q, Qu X, Chen R, et al. Global RNA sequencing reveals that genotype-dependent allele-specific expression contributes to differential expression in rice F1 hybrids. Bmc Plant Biology. 2013;13(1):221–1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was funded by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31971961, 31871641), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1000302), the National Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (202300410215), the Key Technologies R & D Program of Henan Province (212102110061, 212102110043), and the Basic and Frontier Technology Research Program of Henan Province (162300410165).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450002, China

    Xia Shi, Weihua Li, Zhanyong Guo, Mingbo Wu, Liang Yuan, Xiaoqian Qiu, Ye Xing, Xiaojing Sun, Huiling Xie & Jihua Tang

  2. Henan Institute of Crop Molecular Breeding, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou, 450002, China

    Xia Shi & Xiangge Zhang

  3. The Shennong Laboratory, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450002, China

    Jihua Tang

Authors
  1. Xia Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weihua Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhanyong Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mingbo Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiangge Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Liang Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaoqian Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ye Xing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xiaojing Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Huiling Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jihua Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.T. and W.L. designed the experiments and, together with X.S, X.S. and Z.G., carried out data analysis. M.W., X.Z., L.Y., X.Q. and H.X. carried out maize morphological investigation and collected samples. Y.X. performed chart visualization. X.S. and J.T. were mainly involved in preparation of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Weihua Li or Jihua Tang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were in compliance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table S1.

Maize ear traits analysis of lx9801 and lx9801hlEW2b in two environments. Supplementary Table S2. Comparison of inflorescence meristems size between lx9801, lx9801hlEW2b, Zheng58, HY and CK with immature ears. Supplementary Table S3. Distribution of gene expression levels in each sample. Supplementary Table S4. Differentially expressed genes between HY and CK hybrids. Supplementary Table S5. GO enriched terms of additive expressed genes in the Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2bhybrid. Supplementary Table S6. GO enriched terms of additive expressed genes in the Zheng58 × lx9801 hybrid. Supplementary Table S7. GO enriched terms of non-additive expressed genes in the Zheng58 × lx9801hlEW2b hybrid. Supplementary Table S8. GO enriched terms of non-additive expressed genes in the Zheng58 × lx9801 hybrid. Supplementary Table S9. Maker DEGs with ASE expression pattern in HY hybrid involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S10. Maker DEGs with ASE expression pattern in both HY and CK hybrids involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S11. Maker DEGs with ASE expression pattern in CK hybrid involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S12. Maker DEGs with additive expression pattern in HY hybrid involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S13. Maker DEGs with additive expression pattern in CK hybrid involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S14. Maker DEGs with non-additive expression pattern in HY hybrid involved in regulation of ear development. Supplementary Table S15. Maker DEGs with non-additive expression pattern in CK hybrid involved in regulation of ear development.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Figure S1.

Different expression patterns DEGs up- and down-regulation relationship between two near-isogenic hybrids.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Figure S2.

Critical DEGs with an ASE expression pattern in HY and CK hybrids that participate in regulation of ear development.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Figure S3.

Expression analysis of marker genes in the hybrids.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Li, W., Guo, Z. et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of maize ear heterosis during the inflorescence meristem differentiation stage. BMC Plant Biol 22, 348 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03695-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03695-6

Keywords

  • Maize (Zea mays L.)
  • Heterosis
  • Inflorescence meristem
  • Transcriptomics
  • Additive and non-additive gene expression
  • Allele-specific expression

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us