Skip to main content
Download PDF

Green nanopriming: responses of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings to alfalfa extracts capped and light-induced silver nanoparticles

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 323 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

The application of nanotechnology in agriculture can remarkably improve the cultivation and growth of crop plants. Many studies showed that nanoparticles (NPs) made plants grow more vigorously. Light can make NPs aggregated, leading to the reduction of the NPs toxicity. In addition, treatment with NPs had a “hormesis effect” on plants. In this study, light-induced silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were synthesized by using the alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) extracts, and then the optimal synthetic condition was determined. Light-induced AgNPs were aggregated, spherical and pink, and they were coated with esters, phenols, acids, terpenes, amino acids and sugars, which were the compositions of alfalfa extracts. The concentration of free Ag+ was less than 2 % of the AgNPs concentration. Through nanopriming, Ag+ got into the seedlings and caused the impact of AgNPs on alfalfa. Compared with the control group, low concentration of light-induced AgNPs had a positive effect on the photosynthesis. It was also harmless to the leaf cells, and there was no elongation effect on shoots. Although high concentration of AgNPs was especially beneficial to root elongation, it had a slight toxic effect on seedlings due to the accumulation of silver. With the increase of AgNPs concentration, the content of silver in the seedlings increased and the silver enriched in plants was at the mg/kg level. Just as available research reported the toxicity of NPs can be reduced by using suitable synthesis and application methods, the present light induction, active material encapsulation and nanopriming minimized the toxicity of AgNPs to plants, enhancing the antioxidant enzyme system.

Graphical Abstract

Peer Review reports

Background

Nanoparticles (NPs) are solid particles of atoms or molecules with size between 1-100 nm. Owing to their size and shape, NPs have some excellent physical properties compared with macromolecules [1]. Among all types of NPs, metal NPs are widely used in various scientific and technological researches due to their excellent properties, such as a large surface area to volume ratio and high dispersibility in solution [2, 3]. In addition, nanotechnology is one of the advanced techniques in agricultural applications, including nano-fertilizers, intelligent drug delivery and nano-pesticides [4]. In general, conventional NPs can be made by physical, chemical and green-synthesized methods [5]. Physical and chemical methods require energy-intensive, multi-step processes or toxic chemicals, so they have many limitations [6,7,8]. The green-synthesized method has attracted more and more attention because of its low cost and environmental friendliness [9]. As for green synthesis, a general method widely adopted is to use plant extracts to synthesize NPs, that its characteristics is low-cost, environmentally friendly and biocompatible [10, 11]. In this method, several parts of plants (such as leaves, stems, roots, etc.) are washed with distilled water, and then boiled in general solvent (distilled water) to obtain the plant extracts. The extracts are simply mixed with the metallic salt solution at a specific temperature, and then metal ions are converted into NPs, all within a few minutes in an eco-friendly way [12].

Recently, various plants have been successfully used to synthesize many kinds of AgNPs, such as the leaves of Erythrina suberosa L. [13], the roots of Phoenix dactylifera L. [14], the flowers of Malva sylvestris L. [15] and Phyllanthus emblica L. [16]. These studies demonstrated that the extracts of plants can be used to synthesize AgNPs [17]. It was because that plant phytochemicals had great reduction and stabilization [18], such as polyphenols, flavonoids, organic acids, alkaloids and other antioxidant components [19]. Therefore, using alfalfa extracts to obtain AgNPs is feasible in principle. As for biological effects, its different forms determined special physical and chemical properties [20]. In addition, silver is not an essential nutrient element for plants, and its toxicity to plants is known to all under high concentration. Therefore, we tried to explore the reduction of toxicity by this synthesis, which could also illustrate how metal NPs affected plants.

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is a major perennial legume forage crop that is widely grown worldwide due to its economic importance and outstanding agricultural traits [21]. However, there are few studies on the application of metal NPs to forages. We can make a comprehensive assessment with the effect of other plants on AgNPs. Applying AgNPs to plants has both positive and negative effects, depending on different concentrations of AgNPs. From a biological point of view, particularly high concentrations of AgNPs would not be used to treat plants [22, 23]. As for positive effects, previous reports had demonstrated that proper concentration of AgNPs can be used to enhance corn (Zea mays L.) [24] and rice (Oryza sativa L.) [25] seed germination rate, as well as onion (Allium cepa L.) seedlings growth and biomass [26], and low concentration of AgNPs promoted root elongation, shoot length, root length and chlorophyll content of Hordeum vulgare L. [22]. As for negative effects, some studies had showed that high concentration of AgNPs can affect the photosynthesis [27] and reduce the total chlorophyll content and increase the oxidative stress parameters significantly [28]. The application of AgNPs on plants seems to be a double-edged sword. Besides concentration, phytotoxicity of AgNPs also depends on the application method, exposure time, size, chemical composition of the NPs, capping agent and presence or absence of aggregation [29]. Not only that, it is necessary to ensure that NPs have low toxicity before they are placed in the environment. Fratoddi [30] thought the NPs synthesized using chemicals had significant toxicity in vivo and in vitro, and appropriate coating could reduce its toxicity. Moreover, another study also discovered that NPs synthesized by plants were less toxic than those in chemical methods because of a layer of phytochemicals [9]. In addition, the metal core of NPs had a certain degree of toxicity, but if the ion content was low enough, which could arouse the stress resistance of plants [24, 26].

Currently, nanopriming is a new type of seed priming technology that has many great advantages: having low exposure time, breaking seed dormancy, improving seed vigor and maximizing germination potential [31, 32]. Although silver is not an essential nutrient for plants, the green synthetic AgNPs periphery covered with active substances provides exactly a small amount of nutrients to plants. Moreover, different from continuous fertilization of AgNPs, a short time soaking can reduce the accumulation of NPs in plants [33]. In view of the positive effects of green-synthesized AgNPs on plants, we used green-synthesized technology to obtain nanoparticles and applied them to alfalfa seeds. We call this technology—green nanopriming. The objectives of our study were: (1) Obtain a green and low-energy consumption method to synthesize AgNPs with alfalfa extracts; (2) Discuss the feasibility of this synthesis method to reduce the toxicity of NPs; (3) Apply the synthesized AgNPs to seeds by nanopriming, observing the effects on alfalfa and providing a theoretical basis for the application of NPs of other metallic elements.

Materials and methods

Green synthesis of AgNPs from alfalfa extracts

The aerial parts of “SARDI 10” alfalfa at latter stage of blooming were harvested in the experimental field (34°17′38.95″N, 108°04′31.49″E), Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi province, China. The collected parts were first dried at 378.15 K for 30 minutes, followed by 338.15 K for 2 days. Then, they were pulverized to get grass powder whose size was less than 60 mesh. The obtained grass powder was sealed at room temperature. For the extract process, first, 1 g of grass powder was soaked with 60% ethanol at a ratio of 1: 30 kg/L for 1 hour. Then, the reaction was proceeded by sonication with a power of 4×104 Hz for 30 minutes at 323.15 K. Finally, the mixture was filtered at room temperature and diluted to a volume of 50 mL with 60% ethanol. The alfalfa extracts were stored at 277.15 K.

To perform the green synthesis of AgNPs, first, 2×10-3 mol/L AgNO3 and alfalfa extracts were mixed and stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes, protected from light. The volume ratio (AgNO3: alfalfa extracts) was chosen to be 1:4, 1:2, 1:1, 2:1 and 4:1, and the rotation speed was set to 150, 250, 350 and 450 rpm. Next, the reaction solutions were divided into two equal portions, and they were placed in the dark and in the sunlight for several days, respectively. Then, the solutions were centrifuged to obtain green-synthesized AgNPs. After that, they were washed three times with deionized water. Finally, AgNPs were dried in drying dish under vacuum for 24 hours and stored at room temperature in the dark.

Characterization of green-synthesized AgNPs

The reduction of Ag+ to the nanoparticle was monitored by measuring the UV-visible spectrum of the solutions. The UV-visible spectrum was recorded on spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-3900 UV-VIS Spectrophotometer, Tokyo, Japan). All the measurements were performed within the range of 300-800 nm at a resolution of 1 nm. The absorption peak around 400 nm was used to identify the generated AgNPs. To determining the shape and size of AgNPs, the AgNPs were dissolved in ethanol, and sonicated for about 15 minutes. A drop of the filtered sample was placed on a Cu grid and dried under vacuum for analysis. The prepared samples were performed on Transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEM-1230, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Crystalline nature of green-synthesized AgNPs was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. First, the powder of AgNPs was passed through 200 mesh. Then it was subjected to X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Model D8 ADVANCE A25, Germany) at 40 kV and 40 mA with Cu Kα1 radiation. The scan 2θ range was 10-80°. After the AgNPs were dissolved in absolute ethanol, alfalfa extracts and AgNPs were tested by ATR for Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Thermo Scientific, Model Nicolet iS10, USA) to detect the functional groups involved in synthesis of AgNPs. The spectrum was recorded with a resolution of 0.4 cm-1 and a scanning range of 450 to 4000 cm-1.

Quadrupole-Orbitrap high-resolution LC-MS pair

In order to analyze chemical compounds in green-synthesized AgNPs, a non-targeted metabolomics approach was developed by using liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer (LC-MS). The sample was filtered with 0.22 μm filter membrane and analysed on the LC (Thermo Scientific, Model UltiMate 3000 RS, USA) and MS (Thermo Scientific, Model Q Exactive, USA). In brief, the separation of chemical components was achieved on the XB-C18 (50×2.1 mm, 1.8 μm, Welch) column with a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The used gradient mobile phases were (A) water phase: 0.1 % formic acid aqueous solution, and (B) organic phase: methanol. The following gradient system was applied for the elution compounds: 0 min, 2% B; 5 min, 20% B; 10 min, 50% B; 15 min, 80% B; 20 min, 95% B; and 26 min, 2% B. The data was collected by the high-resolution liquid quality, and then the database was searched and compared. MS detection was achieved at ESI, and model was full mass/dd-MS2. The spray voltage was 3.8 kV (positive), and the temperature was set to 300 °C. The pressure of the nitrogen nebulizing gas was set to 310 kPa. Data was recorded in centroid mode in the range from m/z 150-2000.

Ag+ releases from AgNPs by ICP-OES

The concentration of Ag+ was measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES; Agilent, 725-ES, Australia). Stock suspensions of different AgNPs were put into each filter tube. Tubes were then centrifuged for 30 minutes, 2500 rpm, and the filtrate was digested in 5% HNO3 for at around 24 hours and analyzed by ICAP7000.

Plant culture and treatment

The mature “Ju Neng 7” seeds of alfalfa were purchased from Beijing Clover Group in February, 2021. Randomly selected seeds were disinfected with 75 % alcohol for 30 s and washed 5 times with sterile water. There were 6 treatments with light-induced AgNPs (12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 mg/L) and H2O. Moreover, there were three samples in each treatment, and there were 50 seeds in each sample. The treated seeds were soaked in the corresponding solution for 3 hours, and then dried at room temperature for 48 hours. For each treatment, the seeds were germinated in Petri dishes on 2-layer filter paper imbibed with 5 mL sterile water. Then the seeds were put in a germination chamber at 298.15 ± 275.15 K, 85 % RH and a 16/8-hour photoperiod (light/dark) with 10000 Lx irradiance for 14 days. A certain amount of water was replenished every day in order to make seeds grow.

The effect of green-synthesized AgNPs on seeds

On the 4th and 14th days, germination percentages were calculated. Water uptake by the seeds after imbibition were calculated for 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24 and 36 hours according to the method of Mahakham [25]. The α-amylase enzyme activity of the germinating seeds was determined according to the approach of Hashemi [34]. A unit of α-amylase enzyme activity was defined as catalyzing the production of 1 mg reducing sugar per gram of tissue per minute. The whole seed and longitudinally cut cross-section were sprayed with gold to observe the seed epidermis treated with AgNPs under scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI, Model Nano SEM-450, USA). Energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) analysis was performed on the longitudinally cut seeds.

Seedling growth assay

After 14 days of seed germination, the shoot length, root length, fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) of all seedlings were measured. Fresh leaves were soaked in 100 % ethanol for 24 hours to extract chlorophyll, and then they were ground for 60 s. The chlorophyll content was determined at the wavelengths of 665 nm and 649 nm. The values of chlorophyll content were expressed as mg/g of fresh weight [35, 36]. Following the method of Kannaujia [37], we calculated the seedling vigor index (SVI), germination index (GI) and relative root elongation (RRE):

$$\mathrm{Relative}\kern0.17em \mathrm{root}\kern0.17em \mathrm{elonggation}\;\left(\mathrm{RRE}\right)=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Mean}\kern0.17em \mathrm{root}\kern0.17em \mathrm{length}\kern0.17em \mathrm{with}\kern0.17em \mathrm{AgNPs}\right)}{\mathrm{Mean}\kern0.17em \mathrm{root}\kern0.17em \mathrm{length}\kern0.17em \mathrm{of}\kern0.17em \mathrm{control}}\times 100\%$$
$$\mathrm{RGermination}\ \mathrm{index}\ \left(\mathrm{GI}\right)=\frac{\left(\mathrm{Relative}\ \mathrm{seed}\ \mathrm{germination}\right)\times \left(\mathrm{Relative}\ \mathrm{root}\ \mathrm{elongation}\right)}{100}$$
$$\mathrm{Seedling}\ \mathrm{vigor}\ \mathrm{index}\ \left(\mathrm{SVI}\ \mathrm{I}\right)=\mathrm{Germination}\ \mathrm{percantage}\times \left(\mathrm{Root}+\mathrm{Shoot}\ \mathrm{length}\right)$$
$$\mathrm{Seedling}\ \mathrm{vigor}\ \mathrm{index}\ \left(\mathrm{SVI}\ \mathrm{II}\right)=\mathrm{Germination}\ \mathrm{percantage}\times \left(\mathrm{Root}+\mathrm{Shoot}\ \mathrm{DW}\right)$$

Root activity and leaf cell viability determination

Root activity was determined by triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) method [38]. Membrane integrity of 14 d alfalfa leaves was assessed by Evans Blue assay, according to the method of Baker and Mock [39]. Finally, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 600 nm to detect whether the cells in leaves were dead.

Determination of antioxidant enzyme system in shoots and roots

The influence of AgNPs on antioxidative enzyme activity was studied from the alfalfa seedlings after 14 days growth. Superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1) activity was calculated as unit enzyme required for 50 % inhibition of NBT per gram fresh tissue per minute according to the approach of Beauchamp and Fridovich [40]. Catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6) activity was measured according to the approach of Aebi [41]. The reduction in absorbance due to H2O2 degradation was measured at 240 nm. The amount of 0.1 decrease in A240 within 1 minute was a unit of enzyme activity. Peroxidase (POD, EC 1.11.1.7) activity was analyzed following the method of Hemeda and Klein [42]. An increase of 0.01 in A470 per minute was a unit of enzyme activity.

Determination of proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) in shoots and roots

Proline content was determined after 14 days growth of alfalfa seedlings according to the method of Bates [43]. The absorbance of chromophore containing toluene was recorded by spectrophotometer at 520 nm. Proline content was measured with respect to a standard curve and expressed as μg·g-1 (proline content/FW). Malonaldehyde (MDA) content was determined following the approach of Heath and Packer [44]. The amount of MDA was expressed as nmol·g (FW).

Elemental analysis of shoots and roots

Separated roots and shoots were oven-dried (348.15 K, 48 hours) and digested (50 mg/sample) with 4 mL of plasma pure HNO3 at 388.15 K. Then the cooled digests were diluted to 25 mL with distilled water. Elemental analysis of Ag was conducted by ICP-MS (Thermo Fisher, ICAP-Qc, USA).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed between treatment samples in three replications. Data were analysed by using Spss 26.0. The significant levels of difference for all measured traits were calculated and means were compared by the multiple ranges Duncan test at 5% level. The P value smaller or equal to 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Synthetic process and characterization of AgNPs

In order to optimize the reaction conditions, the centrifugal rotational speed, the reactants ratio, storage time, shading and no shading were considered as variables. We used the intensity of the absorption peak at about 400 nm to measure the concentration of AgNPs (Fig. 1). As for the analysis of synthetic process, not only the absorption peak of generated AgNPs in the sediment, but also the UV-visible absorption spectrum of remaining active substances in the supernatant were measured. In Fig. 1(A) as the centrifugal rotational speed increased from 150 to 450 rpm, the absorption peak became stronger and stronger, which revealed that high speed rotation was beneficial for the synthesis of AgNPs. As seen in Fig. 1(B), the absorption peaks of supernatant decreased with the increase of rotation speed. The ratio of reactants (AgNO3: extracts) also had an impact on the formation of AgNPs. The absorption peak of AgNPs at different ratios of reactants was displayed in Fig. 1(C). It was clear that the characteristic absorption peak of AgNPs was the most remarkable at the ratio of 1:2. Moreover, it was also found that the remaining active substances in supernatant were reduced with the increase of standing time, as seen in Fig. 1(D). Overall, a rotation speed of 450 rpm and reactants ratio of 1:2 were the optimal conditions for the synthesis of AgNPs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The UV-visible spectra of different reaction conditions. A the sediment at different centrifugal rotational speeds; B the alfalfa extracts (water: extracts =1:1) and the supernatant at different centrifugal rotational speeds; C the sediment at different reactants ratios (2mM AgNO3: extracts); D the alfalfa extracts (water: extracts=1:2) and the supernatant placed in the dark for different time; E the sediment placed in the dark for different time; F the sediment placed under the light for different time

Full size image

If the reactions were carried out in the dark, the colour of synthesized AgNPs was light yellow, as shown in Fig. 1(E). Moreover, the characteristic absorption peak of AgNPs around 400 nm was raised with the increase of standing time, and its intensity was unchanged on the third day. However, if the reactions were conducted in the light, the characteristic absorption peak was red-shifted to about 500 nm and the colour of synthesized AgNPs became pink, as shown in Fig. 1(E). Moreover, under the same rotation speed and the ratio of reactants, the intensity of absorption peak in the light was much higher than that in the dark. So, the preparation conditions of AgNPs were as follows: room temperature, 450 rpm, the reactants ratio (2mM AgNO3: extracts) of 1:2, sunlight irradiation for 3 days or dark for 2 days.

As shown in Fig. 2(A)-1, we synthesized the two colours of AgNPs suspensions. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) can provide information about shape, particle size and dispersion of NPs. The TEM images and particle size distribution map of the light yellow (Fig. 2(A)-2) and pink AgNPs (Fig. 2(A)-3) indicated that both of them were nearly spherical in shape and their particle sizes were mainly distributed around 50 nm. The size of pink AgNPs was significantly larger than that of light yellow AgNPs owing to aggregation, with some of their particle sizes distributed not only around 50 nm but also around 55 nm (Fig. 2(A)-4). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was adopted to confirm the crystalline nature of the green-synthesized pink AgNPs. In Fig. 2(B), the Bragg Reflection peaks of pink AgNPs were at 38.13°, 44.25°, 64.46° and 77.65° in the 2θ range of 20° to 80°, which can be indexed to the (111), (200), (220) and (311) planes of face-centered cubic (FCC) silver crystal respectively. The sharp diffraction peaks of the pink AgNPs indicated that the pink AgNPs had a good crystallinity. The crystal size of the pink AgNPs was determined to be 39.17 nm by using Debye-Scherrer formula (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Characterization of green-synthesized AgNPs. (A)-1 light yellow and pink AgNPs solution (10 mg/L); (A)-2 TEM image and particle size distribution map of light yellow AgNPs solution; (A)-3 TEM image and particle size distribution map of pink AgNPs solution; (A)-4 TEM image and particle size distribution map of aggregated particles in pink AgNPs; (B) X-ray diffraction pattern of green-synthesized AgNPs; (C) FTIR spectra of alfalfa extracts and two kinds of AgNPs

Full size image

In order to identify the functional groups and possible synthesis mechanism, light yellow and pink AgNPs were measured by using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). In Fig. 2(C), it was observed that all the FTIR spectra had the same shape and six major absorption peaks, which demonstrated that AgNPs were wrapped with the substances of alfalfa extracts. The major absorption peaks at around 3330 cm-1, 2977.07 cm-1, 1646.91 cm-1, 1085.73 cm-1, 1043.30 cm-1, and 877.45 cm-1 were respectively assigned to -OH stretching of phenolic compounds, aromatic -C-H stretching, carboxyl -C=O stretching, ether or ester -C-O-C symmetric stretching, and carboxylic acid -COOH outer curvature. In order to further study the composition of the phytochemicals encapsulated on NPs, high resolution mass spectrometry full scan of primary mass spectrometry plus data-dependent secondary mass spectrometry scan mode (Full MS/dd MS2) was adopted, and the total ion current in the negative and positive ion mode was in Additional file 1: Figure S1. Primary and secondary mass spectra of 20 compounds can be found in Additional file 1: Figure S2. Subsequently, 20 possible compound information can be matched in the database Table 1. Depending on the class of these substances, esters, phenols, carboxylic acids, olefins, sugars and amino acids are all stably present in the AgNPs suspension, and according to the characterisation technique described above, these substances should cover the periphery of the metal core. In addition, these active substances can not only stabilize AgNPs, but also change the toxicity of NPs, especially releasing Ag+. It was found that the light-induced AgNPs released much smaller Ag+ than light yellow AgNPs in solution. In addition, the concentration of released Ag+ was positively correlated with the concentration of AgNPs Table 2. In light-induced AgNPs, the concentration of released Ag+ was less than 2 % of the AgNPs concentration. It suggests that the 20 active substances mentioned above form an electrostatic interaction outside the metal nucleus of the nano-silver, stabilising the entire system of the nano-silver suspension and making it less likely that Ag+ will be released into the suspension by the AgNPs, thus reducing the amount of free silver ions in the AgNPs suspension.

Table 1 Mass parameters for chemical compounds of green-synthesized AgNPs
Full size table
Table 2 Ag+ releases from different AgNPs by ICP-OES
Full size table

Effects of light-induced AgNPs on alfalfa seeds

In Additional file 1: Figure S3, it was observed the presence of Ag in the treated seeds, which indicated that soaking time of 3 hours could cause the silver enrichment. In Additional file 1: Figure S4, it was seen that the seeds of the control group had more cracks on the surface than the treated seeds, while the treated seeds possessed more holes. Moreover, compared to the control group, AgNPs increased intercellular space on the seed surface, and caused cell invagination. Furthermore, it was observed that the seeds formed shrunken epidermis after they were redried, showing a sunken appearance. And there were fewer cracks on the seed coat. These phenomena showed that the treated seeds had a higher water absorption rate than the seeds of control, as shown in Fig. 3(A). In the initial stage (within 10 hours), the water absorption was positively correlated with the concentration of AgNPs. When the germ broke through the seed coats, the water absorption of the more severely shrunken seeds increased more significantly (after 10 hours), especially under the treatment of 25 mg/L AgNPs. Therefore, AgNPs affected the surface of the seed coat and increased the water absorption rate, thereby affecting seed germination. Fig. 3 (B) showed that low concentrations of AgNPs promoted the germination of alfalfa seeds on the 4 d (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in the germination rate on the 14 d. Moreover, green-synthesized AgNPs had no significant effect on α-amylase activity (P >0.05) (Fig. 3 (C)).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of light-induced AgNPs on seed germination in alfalfa under different concentrations. A Water absorption of seeds at different time; B Germination rate on the 4 d and 14 d; C α-amylase activity

Full size image

Effects of light-induced AgNPs on alfalfa seedlings

In order to further study its effect on alfalfa, important seedling parameters were measured. First, the intuitive and physiological appearance of the seedling was measured. As for shoot length, its value was first decreased and then increased with the increase of AgNPs concentration (P<0.05) (Fig. 4(A)). In terms of root length, its value increased with the increase of AgNPs concentration and the roots were more elongated under 50, 100 and 200 mg/L treatments (P<0.05) (Fig. 4(A)). On the 7th and 14th days, the roots grew significantly better than shoots (Additional file 1: Figure S5). The treatments not only increased the root length but also strengthened the root activity. Compared with the control, all treatments enhanced the root activity significantly at different amplitudes (Fig. 4(B)).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effects of light-induced AgNPs on seedling growth in alfalfa under different concentrations. A Shoot length and root length; B Leaves in Evans blue assay and root activity; C Chlorophyll a and b content. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Furthermore, the leaves were stained with Evans Blue so as to detect the leaf cell death rate. As shown in Fig. 4(B), the cell death in leaves was mainly caused by the high concentrations of AgNPs (P<0.05). Under the high concentration of AgNPs, the growth of leaves was obviously worse than the control group (Additional file 1: Figure S5). In Fig. 4(C) the results showed that AgNPs at the low concentrations of 12.5, 25 and 50 mg/L significantly increased chlorophyll a (P<0.05), whereas AgNPs at the high concentration of 200 mg/L reduced both chlorophyll a and b (P<0.05).

It was found that germination index (GI) and seedling vigor index (SVI I and SVI II) were significantly increased in the nanoprimed alfalfa compared to the control (Additional file 1: Table S2). The FW and DW of the seedlings treated with low concentrations of AgNPs (12.5 mg/L, 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L) were significantly increased (P<0.05), while the seedlings treated with high concentration of AgNPs (200 mg/L) were significantly decreased (P<0.05). In addition, the antioxidant enzyme system of seedlings was also tested. As shown in Fig. 5, both SOD and POD of antioxidant enzyme systems in shoots and roots were greatly affected by AgNPs (Fig. 5((A) and (B)), and their absorbance presented a trend of first increasing and then decreasing as the AgNPs concentration increased. However, the CAT of antioxidant enzyme system fluctuated slightly under AgNPs treatments (Fig. 5(C)). The antioxidant enzyme activities of roots in all treated seedlings were higher than those of the leaves. In general, the treatment of AgNPs still affected the activity of the antioxidant enzyme system, with SOD enzyme activity having the greatest effect, followed by POD enzyme activity and finally CAT.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The effects of light-induced AgNPs on antioxidant enzyme system of shoots and roots in alfalfa under different concentrations. A SOD activity; B POD activity; C CAT activity. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05)

Full size image

In addition, proline and MDA contents also reflect the important parameters of plants growth. As shown in Fig. 6 (A), proline contents in shoots and roots first increased and then decreased as the AgNPs concentration increased. The proline contents in shoots and roots were only significantly lower than the control group under 200 mg/L AgNPs. As for MDA content, it was found in Fig. 6 (B) that the shoots and roots treated with 12.5 mg/L AgNPs had less MDA accumulation, whereas the groups treated with high concentrations of 100 and 200 mg/L had more MDA than the control. It was showed that the seeds treated with low concentration of AgNPs didn’t damage the membrane and had a greater antioxidant enzyme system to reduce extra reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, although the high concentration treatment also had a greater antioxidant enzyme system than the control group, the membrane was irreversibly damaged. The raw data of all the above physiological experiments were included in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The effects of light-induced AgNPs on proline and MDA contents of shoots and roots in alfalfa under different concentrations. A Proline content; B MDA content. Different letters show significant differences (P < 0.05)

Full size image

Since Ag+ was present in seeds under AgNPs treatments, it was necessary to measure the content of Ag+ in the shoots and roots of seedlings. With the increase of AgNPs concentration, the content of silver in the seedlings increased and the silver enriched in alfalfa was at the 3-14 mg/kg level (Fig. 7). Moreover, the migration of different concentrations of AgNPs in seedlings was different. Under low concentration AgNPs treatment, the content of silver in shoots was 2-3 times higher than that in roots. Under high concentration AgNPs treatment, the content of silver in roots gradually increased, and finally exceeded the content in shoots. Light-induced AgNPs had a greater impact on shoots at low concentrations, while it had a more important impact on roots at high concentrations.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Redistribution of element Ag in shoots and roots under different concentration of AgNPs. Silver content ratio in shoot and root is in purple, and the total content of silver is in pink

Full size image

Discussion

We used mainly the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) peak around 400 nm in the UV-visible spectrum to determine the reduction of Ag+ to AgNPs in the synthesis of AgNPs [45]. In the reaction conditions for the synthesis of AgNPs using alfalfa extracts, we mainly considered the rotational speed and the volume ratio of the reaction material (AgNO3: alfalfa extracts) because the temperature affects the composition of the alfalfa extracts, and the placement conditions and time were also found to affect the properties of the AgNPs. Under light placement conditions, aggregation of the AgNPs occurs, resulting in larger particle sizes. As the particles size of the AgNPs becomes larger, the energy required to excite the electrons in the surface plasma is reduced. As a result, in the UV-Vis spectra examined, it can be seen that in the suspension of pink AgNPs, the characteristic peak of AgNPs at 400 nm moves towards the longer wavelength region, i.e. red-shifted, moving between 400-500 nm [46]. Typically, the synthesised AgNPs are yellow in colour and due to the SPR, strong absorption occurs when the frequency of the electromagnetic field resonates with the coherent electron motion, hence the shift in characteristic wavelength and the change in colour in AgNPs suspension [47]. By other characterizations, the shape and size of our synthesized AgNPs are consistent with those synthesized by others at room temperature [1], due to the fact that it is usually at high temperatures that the shape of AgNPs changes, such as cubic, hexagonal, etc. [48], and that more of their own properties require more control over reaction conditions, such as pH and ionic strength etc. The presence of alfalfa extracts within the green synthetic AgNPs can be identified by FTIR, and qualitative analysis yielded 20 phytochemicals in the AgNPs suspension, which theoretically make the AgNPs less toxic than those obtained by chemical synthesis [9].

As shown in Fig. 8, the process of AgNPs synthesis under light placement conditions (Fig. 8 A) may be as follows: of all the reactive substances detected qualitatively, some with the following functional groups have the ability to provide electrons, called electron-giving groups, such as -OH, -NH2, -Ph, -NR2 and -NHCOR [24], which means that as reactant, Ag+ in AgNO3 can get enough electrons and undergo a reduction reaction to produce AgNPs (Fig. 8 B). Whereas the remaining detected substances may not have the ability to provide electrons, they can bind to the AgNPs surface through electrostatic interactions and are stabilised by the following functional groups, which allow more active substances to be enriched in the AgNPs periphery, such as functional groups like -COOH, -C=O and maltose (Fig. 8 C) [26]. And these substances seem to act as a protective layer, allowing the AgNPs to release a small amount of free Ag+, and it is the small amount of free Ag+ that leads to its low biotoxicity (Fig. 8 D) [49]. Since the toxicity of AgNPs is caused by the inherent properties of AgNPs, which can be reduced by the light reaction [50], in the ICP-OES measurement of the Ag+ content, we obtained that both placements of AgNPs suspensions had less free Ag+, except that the pink AgNPs suspension for the light placement condition had less free Ag+. It would suggest that the AgNPs suspension for the light placement condition not only contains phytochemicals from alfalfa, but also has a very small amount of free Ag+ and would therefore be less toxic in vivo and in vitro to the organism than the chemically synthesized NPs [30]. Normally, metal NPs suspensions are known to have some free metal ions, but if the appropriate synthesis is applied, it may stimulate resistance in plants [26], in which case it is of interest to study the interaction between AgNPs and plants [22].

Fig. 8
figure 8

The process of light-induced synthesis of AgNPs and the reduction of its toxicity. A Natural light irradiation makes AgNPs aggregated; B In the solution, Ag+ from AgNO3 undergoes a reduction reaction; C The remaining substances wrapped the AgNPs through electrostatic interaction; D The light-induced AgNPs releases less than 2 % Ag+

Full size image

Unlike other elements, silver is not an essential nutrient element for plants, so it cannot be considered as a fertilizer. Short-term exposure to NPs, the accumulation of NPs with priming was much lower than direct spraying or hydroponics [33]. And this exposure can form pores on the seeds, thereby increasing the water absorption rate of seeds [24]. Because of this physical change, the seed germination rate had changed, but it had not been observed that the α-amylase activity described by others was the dominant cause [25]. These small holes allowed a large amount of AgNPs and water to enter, making it easier for the seeds to germinate [24]. Through physiological indicators and silver element analysis, the distribution of silver was responsible for the physiological indicators of plants. The ROS in plants was in a dynamic balance under normal conditions, but the equilibrium state will be destroyed under adversity. Subsequently, it would lead to the accumulation of ROS. Therefore, in order to survive, plants would enhance the activity of antioxidant enzyme system to remove excess ROS [51]. As AgNPs entered the seeds, it promoted the accumulation of silver in the shoots and roots, which led to varying degrees of response of the antioxidant enzyme system. Under low concentration, compared with roots, silver was mainly concentrated in the shoots, and had a slightly positive effect on the photosynthesis. It would be nontoxic to the leaf cells and there was no elongation effect on shoots. However, our founding was in conflict with the result that low concentration AgNPs was also toxic to plants [52]. It was because Ag+ forms complexes with several essential intracellular biomolecules that can disrupt the normal physiology and growth of seedlings [53, 54]. In contrast, the dissolution of AgNPs into Ag+ depends on a number of important physicochemical parameters such as size, concentration, pH, temperature, ionic strength and the presence or absence of ligands [55]. Whereas green synthetic AgNPs is stabilised by reactive substances [56], these reactive substances influence the dissolution of AgNPs into Ag+ and reduce the release of Ag+ [57]. Under high concentration, compared with shoots, silver was mainly concentrated in the roots, and had a certain positive effect on root cell division [58], increasing root activity and elongation [59]. In addition, when the silver distribution was in a balanced state, the DW and FW of the seedlings can reach the maximum. It was because the concentration of NPs had an impact on plants, and plants consumed nutrients too fast under low-dose treatments, resulting in some positive effects that were not fully amplified on the 14th day; and under high-dose treatments, although plants had some positive effects, it showed a slight toxic effect because of the accumulation of silver. The NPs with lower surface areas can worse interfere with cell membrane function by directly reacting with the membrane [60]. Moreover, under low-concentration treatment, proline accumulated in the roots due to the increase of enzyme activity, thereby absorbing a lot of water and decomposing the stored nutrients. However, since only water was provided in the Petri dishes, which led to premature consumption of nutrients and enhanced photosynthesis to produce nutrients. As the concentration of AgNPs increased, seedlings showed a certain damage. Thus, the distribution of Ag+ explained the effects of AgNPs on the physiological of seedlings and roots under above-mentioned different concentrations [61]. Furthermore, the intake of silver by the seedlings is limited and excess silver can cause irreversible damage to the leaves of the seedlings [62].

Of course, with AgNPs and Ag+, it cannot say who is the main factor affecting the alfalfa. It is because the roots of plants can take up AgNPs directly [63], or they can reduce Ag+ to AgNPs in vivo via reducing sugars and other antioxidants in the roots [64]. Therefore, the reaction of the AgNPs suspensions with the free Ag+ is complex in plants. It was shown that the proportion of Ag+ in shoots was higher than in roots because of the oxidation that occurred in the shoots [65]. Overall, there is an interconversion between AgNPs and Ag+ in plants, with AgNPs acting as a carrier and source of Ag+. In addition, due to the extensive bactericidal effect of AgNPs, and the fact that seed endophytic bacteria may control germination and seedling establishment. So, it is necessary to do more subsequent studies of nanosilver against seed endophytic bacteria [66].

Conclusion

In general, we used ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extraction to obtain the alfalfa extracts that were rich in many active substances. After that, we successfully synthesized light-induced AgNPs by using the alfalfa extracts. Before characterizing, we optimized the reaction conditions by considering, the centrifugal rotational speed, the reactants ratio, storage time, shading and no shading as variables. It was found that light-induced AgNPs released less Ag+ in solution because of being wrapped with esters, phenols, acids, terpenes, amino acid, sugars and so on. Applying light-induced AgNPs to alfalfa, we can find that the toxicity of AgNPs was related to its concentration and the distribution of silver in shoots and roots. In addition, nanopriming promoted early germination of seeds by increasing the water absorption rate of seeds. There was a certain toxicity in AgNPs because of accumulation, but their toxicity can be reduced by using reasonable synthesis and application methods.

In a word, if the engineered particles are properly coated and synthesized by light induction, NPs with lower toxicity would be obtained. Using nanopriming can reduce the minimum exposure of plants to metals, and can have unlimited positive effects on plants, providing more possibilities for nano-agriculture.

Availability of data and materials

All the datasets generated and analysed during the current study were uploaded as with the manuscript as additional files. Primary and processed data are available in additional file.

References

  1. Vanlalveni C, Lallianrawna S, Biswas A, Selvaraj M, Changmai B, Rokhum SL. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using plant extracts and their antimicrobial activities: a review of recent literature. RSC Adv. 2021;11:2804–37. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra09941d.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatterjee S, Dhanurdhar L, Rokhum L. Extraction of a cardanol based liquid bio-fuel from waste natural resource and decarboxylation using a silver-based catalyst. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2017;72:560–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stadler L, Homafar M, Hartl A, Najafishirtari S, Colormbo M, Zboril R, et al. Recyclable magnetic microporous organic polymer (MOP) encapsulated with palladium nanoparticles and Co/C nanobeads for hydrogenation reactions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:2388–99. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarmast MK, Salehi H. Silver nanoparticles: An influential element in plant nanobiotechnology. Mol. Biotechnol. 2016;58:441–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12033-016-9943-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. EPA, Nanomaterial case study: Nanoscale silver in disinfectant spray (final report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2012; Washington, DC EPA/600/R-10/081F.

  6. El-Rafie HM, El-Rafie MH, Zahran MK. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using polysaccharides extracted from marine macro algae. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013;96:403–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Devatha CP, Thalla AK, Katte SY. Green synthesis of iron nanoparticles using different leaf extracts for treatment of domestic waste water. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;139:1425–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Velusamy P, Su CH, Venkat Kumar G, Adhikary S, Pandian K, Gopinath SCB, et al. Biopolymers regulate silver nanoparticle under microwave irradiation for effective antibacterial and antibiofilm activities. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Amooaghaie R, Saeri MR, Azizi M. Synthesis, characterization and biocompatibility of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Nigella sativa leaf extract in comparison with chemical silver nanoparticles. Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 2015;120:400–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2015.06.025.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jha AK, Prasad K, Kumar V. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Eclipta leaf. Biotechnol. Progr. 2009;25:1476–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Crosby KM, Jifon JL, Patil BS. Green-synthesized nanoparticles enhanced seedling growth, yield, and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.). ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:14580–90. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Song KX, He XQ. How to improve seed germination with green nanopriming. Seed sci. Technol. 2021;49:81–92. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2021.49.2.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohanta YK, Panda SK, Jayabalan R, Sharma N, Bastia AK, Mohanta TK. Antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized by leaf Extract of Erythrina suberosa (Roxb.). Front. Mol. Biosci. 2017;4(1–14). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2017.00014.

  14. Oves M, Aslam M, Rauf MA, Qayyum S, Qari HA, Khan MS. Antimicrobial and anticancer activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from the root hair extract of Phoenix dactylifera. Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. 2018;89:429–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2018.03.035.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Esfanddarani HM, Kajani AA, Bordbar AK. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using flower extract of Malva sylvestris and investigation of their antibacterial activity. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2017;12:412–6. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-nbt.2017.0166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masum MMI, Siddiqa MM, Ali KA, Zhang Y, Abdallah Y, Ibrahim E. Biogenic synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract and its inhibitory action against the pathogen Acidovorax oryzae strain RS-2 of rice bacterial Brown Stripe. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00820.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ahmad S, Munir S, Zeb N, Ullah A, Khan B, Ali J, et al. Green nanotechnology: a review on green synthesis of silver nanoparticles - an ecofriendly approach. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021;14:5087–107. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S200254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohamad N, Arham NA, Jai J, Hadi A. Plant extract as reducing agent in synthesis of metallic nanoparticles: A review. Adv. Mat. Res. 2014;832:350–5. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.832.350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Park Y. A new paradigm shift for the green synthesis of antibacterial silver nanoparticles utilizing plant extracts. Toxicol. Res-UK. 2014;30:169–78. https://doi.org/10.5487/TR.2014.30.3.169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A. Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review. Arch. Toxicol. 2013;87:1181–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-013-1079-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouton JH. Breeding lucerne for persistence. Crop Pasture Sci. 2012;63:95–106. https://doi.org/10.1071/CP12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nair RR. Effects of nanoparticles on plant growth and development. In: Kole C, Kumar DS, Khodakovskaya MV, editors. Plant Nanotechnology. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_5.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Tripathi A, Liu S, Singh PK, Kumar N, Pandey AC, Tripathi DK, et al. Differential phytotoxic responses of silver nitrate (AgNO3) and silver nanoparticle (AgNPs) in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Gene. 2017;11:255–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plgene.2017.07.005.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahakham W, Theerakulpisut P, Maensiri S, Phumying S., Sarmah A.K. Environmentally benign synthesis of phytochemicals-capped gold nanoparticles as nanopriming agent for promoting maize seed germination. Sci. Total Environ., 2016; 573:1089-1102. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.120.

  25. Mahakham W, Sarmah AK, Maensir S, Theerakulpisut P. Nanopriming technology for enhancing germination and starch metabolism of aged rice seeds using phytosynthesized silver nanoparticles. Sci. Rep-UK. 2017;7:8263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08669-5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Acharya P, Jayaprakasha GK, Semper J, Patil BS. 1H NMR and LC-MS-based metabolomics reveals enhancement of growth-promoting metabolites in onion seedlings treated with green-synthesized nanomaterials. J Agr Food Chem. 2020;68:13206–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00817.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiechen M, Zaharieva I, Dau H, Kurz P. Layered manganese oxides for water-oxidation: alkaline earth cations influence catalytic activity in a photosystem II-like fashion. Chem. Sci. 2012;3:2330–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2sc20226c.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tripathi DK, Singh S, Srivastava PK, Singh VP, Singh S. Nitric oxide alleviates silver nanoparticles (AgNPs)-induced phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum seedlings. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2017;110:167–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.06.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. Toxic Potential of Materials at the Nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1114397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fratoddi I, Venditti I, Cametti C, Russo MV. How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art. Nano Res. 2015;8:1771–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0697-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Paparella S, Araújo SS, Rossi G, Wijayasinghe M, Carbonera D, Balestrazzi A. Seed priming: state of the art and new perspectives. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34:1281–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-015-1784-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarkar N, Sharma RS, Kaushik M. Innovative application of facile single pot green synthesized CuO and CuO@APTES nanoparticles in nanopriming of Vigna radiata seeds. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2021;28:13221–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11493-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sehnal K, Hosnedlova B, Docekalova M, Stankova M, Uhlirova D, Tothova Z, et al. An assessment of the effect of green synthesized silver nanoparticles using sage leaves (Salvia officinalis L.) on germinated plants of maize (Zea mays L.). Nanomaterials. 2019;9(1550). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111550.

  34. Hashemi M, Mousavi SM, Razavi SH, Shojaosadati SI. Comparison of submerged and solid state fermentation systems effects on the catalytic activity of Bacillus sp. KR-8104 α-amylase at different pH and temperatures. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013;43:661–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rowan KS. Photosynthetic pigments of algae, 1989, first ed. English. Britain: Cambridge University Press. .

  36. Ritchie RJ. Consistent sets of spectrophotometric chlorophyll equations for acetone, methanol and ethanol solvents. Photosynth. Res. 2006;89:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/sl11120-006-9065-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kannaujia R, Srivastave CM, Prasad V, Singh BN, Pandey V. Phyllanthus emblica fruit extract stabilized biogenic silver nanoparticles as a growth promoter of wheat varieties by reducing ROS toxicity. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2019;142:460–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.08.008.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ejazul I, Liu D, Li TQ, Yang X, Jin XF, Qaisar M, et al. Effect of Pb toxicity on root morphology, physiology and ultrastructure in the two ecotypes of Elsholtzia argyi. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007;147:806–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Baker CJ, Mock NM. An improved method for monitoring cell death in cell suspension and leaf disc assays using evans blue. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 1994;39:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 1971;44:276–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(71)90370-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro. Method Enzymol. 1984;105:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hemeda HM, Klein BP. Effects of naturally occurring antioxidants on peroxidase activity of vegetable extracts. J. Food Sci. 1990;55:184–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1365-2621.1990.tb06048.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1968;125:189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vanlalveni C, Rajkumari K, Biswas A, Adhikari PR, Lalfakzuala R, Rokuhum L. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Nostoc linckia and its antimicrobial activity: a novel biological approach. Bionanoscience. 2018;8:624–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-018-0520-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Verma A, Mehata MS. Controllable synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Neem leaves and their antimicrobial activity. J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sc. 2016;9:109–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.11.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. De Silva R, Warnasuriya P, De Silva N, Wijenayaka L, Jayawardana K, Yan M. Nanosilver rainbow: a rapid and facile method to tune different colours of nanosilver through the controlled synthesis of stable spherical silver nanoparticles. RSC ADV. 2016;6:48792–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA08336F.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sun Y, Xia Y. Shape-controlled synthesis of gold and silver nanoparticles. Science. 2002;298:2176–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1077229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cheng YW, Yin LY, Lin SH, Wiesner M, Bernhardt E, Liu J. Toxicity reduction of polymer-stabilized silver nanoparticles by sunlight. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:4425–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp109789j.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Yin LY, Cheng YW, Espinasse B, Colman BP, Auffan M, Wiesner M, et al. More than the ions: The effects of silver nanoparticles on Lolium multiflorum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011;45:2360–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/es103995x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hidangmayum A, Dwivedi P, Katiyar D, Hemantaranjan A. Application of chitosan on plant responses with special reference to abiotic stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Pla. 2019;25:313–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-018-0633-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang HL, Du WC, Peralta-Videa JR, Gardea-Torresdey JL, White JC, Keller A, et al. Metabolomics reveals how Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) reprograms metabolites to cope with silver ions and silver nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018;52:8016–26. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02440.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stampoulis D, Sinha SK, White JC. Assay-dependent phytotoxicity of nanoparticles to plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:9473–9. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901695c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vannini C, Domingo G, Onelli E, Mattia FD, Bruni I, Marsoni M, et al. Phytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles exposure on germinating wheat seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2014;171:1142–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2014.05.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. McGillicuddy E, Murray I, Kavanagh S, Morrison L, Fogarty A, Cormican M. Silver nanoparticles in the environment: sources, detection and ecotoxicology. Sci. Total Environ. 2017;575:231–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Moulton MC, Braydich-Stolle LK, Nadagouda MN, Kunzelman S, Hussain SM, Varma RS. Synthesis, characterization and biocompatibility of “green” synthesized silver nanoparticles using tea polyphenols. Nanoscale. 2010;2:763–70. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0nr00046a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Shi JP, Xu B, Sun X, Ma C, Y, CP, Zhang HW. Light induced toxicity reduction of silver nanoparticles to Tetrahymena Pyriformis: Effect of particle size. Aquat. Toxicol. 2013;132:53–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2013.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Scherer MD, Sposito JC, Falco WF, Grisolia AB, Andrade LH, Lima SM, et al. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of silver nanoparticles on meristematic cells of Allium cepa roots: A close analysis of particle size dependence. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;660:459–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kumar VK, Muthukrishnan S, Rajalakshmi R. Phytostimulatory effect of phytochemical fabricated nanosilver (AgNPs) on Psophocarpus tetragonolobus (L.) DC. seed germination: An insight from antioxidative enzyme activities and genetic similarity studies. Curr. Plant Biol. 2020;23(100158). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100158.

  60. Morones JR, Elechiguerra JL, Camacho A, Holt K, Kouri JB, Ramirez JT, Yacaman M.J. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology. 2005; 16:2346– 2353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/16/10/059.

  61. Sadak MS. Impact of silver nanoparticles on plant growth, some biochemical aspects, and yield of fenugreek plant (Trigonella foenum-graecum). Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019;43:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-019-0077-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Castro-González CG, Sánchez-Segura L, Gómez-Merino FC, Bello-Bello JJ. Exposure of stevia (Stevia rebaudiana B.) to silver nanoparticles in vitro: transport and accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:10372. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46828-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Gardea-Torresdey JL, Gomez E, Peralta-Videa JR, Parsons JG, Troiani H, Jose-Yacaman M. Alfalfa sprouts: a natural source for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Langmuir. 2003;19:1357–61. https://doi.org/10.1021/la020835i.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Marchiol L, Mattiello A, Poscic F, Giordano C, Musetti R. In vivo synthesis of nanomaterials in plants: location of silver nanoparticles and plant metabolism. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014;9:101. https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-9-101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Qingqing Y, Shan Wanyu H, Ligang ZY, Yinzhu H, Yongguang Y, Yong L, et al. Uptake and transformation of silver nanoparticles and ions by Rice plants revealed by Dual Stable Isotope Tracing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:625–33. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J. Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Env. Microbiol. Rep. 2014;7:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University Large Scale Instrument Platform towards the analysis of characterisation.

Funding

The work was supported by the Tibet Finance Department Project (grant no. XZ202001ZY0016N), the Key Industry Innovation Chain in Shaanxi Province of China (grant no. 2019ZDLNY05-02) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31502005). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi Province, China

    Kexiao Song, Donghao Zhao, Haoyang Sun, Jinzhu Gao, Shuo Li, Tianming Hu & Xueqing He

Authors
  1. Kexiao Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donghao Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haoyang Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinzhu Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tianming Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xueqing He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Kexiao Song: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing-original draft, Writing-review&editing. Donghao Zhao: Data curation. Haoyang Sun: Data curation. Jinzhu Gao: Formal Analysis. Shuo Li: Data curation. Tianming Hu: Resources. Xueqing He: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing-review&editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Tianming Hu or Xueqing He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

The total ion current in the negative and positive ion mode in light-induced AgNPs (Figure S1); Primary and secondary mass spectra of 20 chemical substances detected in green-synthesized AgNPs (Figure S2); SEM and EDS patterns of seeds cross-sections treated with different concentrations (Figure S3); SEM images of seeds (Figure S4); Influence of different nanopriming treatment on alfalfa seed in petri dishes (Figure S5); Calculation of pink AgNPs’ crystal size by using Debye-Scherrer formula (Table S1); Effect of AgNPs nanopriming on growth parameters of 14 d seedlings (Table S2); Raw data for all growth parameters of 14 d seedlings under AgNPs treatments (Table S3).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, K., Zhao, D., Sun, H. et al. Green nanopriming: responses of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings to alfalfa extracts capped and light-induced silver nanoparticles. BMC Plant Biol 22, 323 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03692-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03692-9

Keywords

  • Green nanopriming
  • Light-induced AgNPs
  • Alfalfa growth
  • Antioxidant enzyme system

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us