Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comprehensive molecular evaluation of the histone methyltransferase gene family and their important roles in two-line hybrid wheat

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 290 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Histone methylation usually plays important roles in plant development through post-translational regulation and may provide a new visual field for heterosis. The histone methyltransferase gene family has been identified in various plants, but its members and functions in hybrid wheat related in heterosis is poorly studied.

Results

In this study, 175 histone methyltransferase (HMT) genes were identified in wheat, including 152 histone lysine methyltransferase (HKMT) genes and 23 protein arginine methyltransferase (PRMT) genes. Gene structure analysis, physicochemical properties and subcellular localization predictions of the proteins, exhibited the adequate complexity of this gene family. As an allohexaploid species, the number of the genes (seven HKMTs orthologous groups and four PRMTs orthologous groups) in wheat were about three times than those in diploids and showed certain degrees of conservation, while only a small number of subfamilies such as ASH-like and Su-(var) subfamilies have expanded their members. Transcriptome analysis showed that HMT genes were mainly expressed in the reproductive organs. Expression analysis showed that some TaHMT genes with different trends in various hybrid combinations may be regulated by lncRNAs with similar expression trends. Pearson correlation analysis of the expression of TaHMT genes and two yield traits indicated that four DEGs may participate in the yield heterosis of two-line hybrid wheat. ChIP-qPCR results showed that the histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K36me3 and H3K9ac) enriched in promoter regions of three TaCCA1 genes which are homologous to Arabidopsis heterosis-related CCA1/LHY genes. The higher expression levels of TaCCA1 in F1 than its parents are positive with these histone modifications. These results showed that histone modifications may play important roles in wheat heterosis.

Conclusions

Our study identified characteristics of the histone methyltransferase gene family and enhances the understanding of the evolution and function of these members in allohexaploid wheat. The causes of heterosis of two-line hybrid wheat were partially explained from the perspective of histone modifications.

Peer Review reports

Background

Common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), which is among the most widely consumed foods globally, is grown all over the world, second only to rice (Oryza sativa L.). It is generally believed that wheat was domesticated in Western Asia about 8000 years ago and consists of allohexaploid (AABBDD) in three sets of genomes: Triticum urartu (A-genome donor), an Aegilops speltoides-related grass (B-genome donor), and Aegilops tauschii (D-genome donor) [1, 2]. The huge genome and complex structure of wheat kept its genetic information a mystery for a long time. After years of unremitting scientific effort, some high-quality genome annotation data have been released, and multiple genome assemblies are available, which provide a powerful basis for the study of functional genomics [3,4,5,6,7]. A large amount of genetic diversity of cultivated crop species reside in its wild relatives. To harness that diversity and to expand the genetic base of the cultivated species, it is important to understand the evolutionary relationships among them and to know which genomic and phenomic tools would be appropriate.

Epigenetics, including DNA methylation, chromatin modification, and RNA editing, is a branch of genetics that studies the heritable changes of gene expression without changing the nucleotide sequence of genes [8]. In eukaryotes, nucleosomes that contain four groups of proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) are the main structural components of chromatin. The four groups of proteins are two H3:H4 dimers and two H2A:H2B dimers, as well as a mixture of 146 bp DNA and a double helix. The N-end trailing of each histone conserved in vitro is the point of many targeted signal transduction pathways, resulting in post-translational modifications [9, 10]. Histone methylation is one of most important epigenetic modifications, and it plays a fundamental role in a range of biological processes, from transcriptional regulation to heterochromatin formation [11]. Methylation sites are usually located on the lysine (K) and arginine (R) residues of H3 and H4 and thus determine the two methylation patterns of histone lysine (Lys, K) methylation (HKMT) and histone arginine (Arg, R) methylation (PRMT). Methylation occurred in the arginine and lysine residues of histones, including seven sites in arginine and 17 sites in lysine [11]. These complex modification processes, one earlier and one more advanced, are deeply associated with gene expression. Studies have shown that histone methylation, catalyzed by HKMT and PRMT proteins, plays an important role in plant developmental processes, such as floral organogenesis, seed development, and plant senescence and defense [12,13,14,15,16].

The two-line method is a preferred way of realizing the heterosis of wheat, but the results of research on the molecular mechanism of the heterosis remain relatively weak. Generally, there is a strong correlation between heterosis and the genetic distance of the parents [17], but the study has shown that genetic distance does not fully explain heterosis [18]. The allelic variation caused by epigenetic modification provides a novel way of explaining heterosis. Previous study has shown that histone modification is closely related to the differential expression of genes in hybrid maize [19]. The methylation of H3K4me2 can reduce the expression of two genes: CCA1 and LHY, which are the cores of heterosis in Arabidopsis, resulting in the improvement of photosynthetic efficiency of F1 and the emergence of obvious hybrids [20]. Generally, H3K9ac and H3K4me3 occur in regions of normal chromatin and activate the expression of genes, whereas H3K9me2 and H3K27me3 tend to occur in the heterochromatin regions and usually inhibit gene expression [21, 22]. The levels of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 vary greatly among ecotypes and subspecies, but they showed additive patterns in Arabidopsis hybrids, whereas in rice they showed non-additive ones [19, 23]. Proteins in hybrid F1, such as H3K9ac, H3K4me2, and H3K4me3, may be related to heterosis through the modification of different types of histone proteins to regulate circadian genes CCA1 and LHY [20]. However, due to the various methods of modification, the regulation mechanisms of histone modification and heterosis require further exploration. lncRNA-mediated deposition of H3K27me3 is critical for chromatin modification and transcriptional regulation [24, 25]. lncRNAs participate in histone modification to regulate a series of important biological processes, such as vernalization and flowering, which can affect plant yield and quality [26, 27]. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small noncoding RNAs which are involved in the regulation of gene expression at the posttranscriptional level by degrading their target mRNAs and/or inhibiting their translation. MicroRNA-mediated regulation is a key component in a wide range of biological processes such as plant developmental plasticity, abiotic/biotic responses, and symbiotic/parasitic interactions [28, 29]. HMT genes have been identified and studied in many plant systems and are widely involved in the regulation of plant growth and development [13, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36]. Although it is a fundamental process in an important cereal crop, histone methylation remains mysterious, and the role of regulatory factors such as miRNAs and lncRNAs in regulating histone methylation is largely unknown.

In this study, we provided a detailed overview of the phylogeny and expression of HMT genes in different hybrid bread wheats. We aim to explore the distribution and evolution of HMT members that catalyze histone methylation in wheat, and search for some specific HMTs which may participate in the construction of heterosis in hybrid wheat. All our efforts enhance the understanding of the evolution and function of the histone methylation family and sheds light on the histone methylation involved in regulating wheat yield.

Results

Identification of TaHMT genes from the whole wheat genome

Hmmsearch and the BLASTP program obtained 152 HKMT (histone lysine methyltransferase) genes and 23 PRMT (histone arginine methyltransferase) genes, which were named TaHMT1–TaHMT152, coinciding with TaHKMT1–TaHKMT152, TaHMT153–TaHMT175, and TaPRMT1-23, following the nomenclature 1A to 1D, 2A to 2D, up to 7A to 7D, based on their position on the chromosome. In total, we identified 175 genes that catalyze two kinds of histone methyltransferases (Fig. 1, Table 1, Table S1 and Table S2). Chromosome distribution showed that the HKMT gene family of wheat was distributed across all chromosomes and showed a trend of cluster distribution on chr2 and chr3. The small number of PRMT genes entails that they are orphans that exist on some chromosomes, such as chr4A (Figure S1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Collinearity analyses of all TaHMT genes. All 175 genes were mapped to their respective locus in the wheat genome in a circular diagram. Sub-genomes are indicated by different shades of blue (outer track). Homoeologous genes were inferred by phylogeny (shown in the Materials and Methods section)

Full size image
Table 1 Numbers of HMT genes in wheat and related species
Full size table

HMT gene family of wheat has expanded with more in-paralogs genes

Sorghum bicolor, Hordeum vulgare, and Brachypodium distachyon are usually considered to be relatives of wheat due to the whole-genome duplication events that occurred at about 45–60 million years ago [37]. In this study, the HMT gene families in Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor, and Brachypodium distachyon were also comprehensively identified in Table 1 using the same method as that employed for wheat. According to previous results, the number of HMT genes family in diploid species is between 40 and 60. We found that there were 47 and 57 HMT genes in rice (Os) and Arabidopsis (At), respectively, which is close to the results previously obtained. In addition, 54, 56, and 49 HMT genes were obtained from the Sorghum bicolor (Sb), Brachypodium distachyon (Bd), and Hordeum vulgare (Hv) genome data, respectively. The proportion of gene quantity between wheat and other species was 3.07 (At), 3.72 (Os), 3.24 (Sb), 3.13 (Bd), and 3.57 (Hv), close to a ratio of 3:1, as expected (χ2 test, P > 0.05).

To further explore the evolutionary relationship between wheat and the other five species, the orthologs and in-paralogs between each pair of these species were calculated. The number of orthologs in each species with one other genome is shown in Table 2. The result shows that wheat had a high average ortholog group size of 2.32, which also meant that every HMT gene had an average of 1.32 paralogs. The group sizes of other five species were significantly smaller than those of wheat, indicating that the genome ploidy of wheat enriches the number of paralogous genes for the HMT gene family. Significantly, the fact that wheat and Brachypodium distachyon clearly have more orthologous genes proves a later divergence between the two species, which is also a reflection of the previous conclusion that Brachypodium distachyon has a common ancestor with wheat.

Table 2 Total number of orthologs identified by In-paranoid 4. 1
Full size table

According to the published wheat genome data, there are about in homologous groups of three, termed triads (1:1:1; 35.8% of genes) (IWGSC, 2018) [38]. Our results revealed a higher proportion 92.76% of HKMTs were in triads. In PRMTs, the ratio is 91.3% (Table 3). The high homology retention rate indicates that the HMT gene of three sets of wheat chromosome donors exhibited a certain conservation; in other words, there was almost no lack of homologous genes. This kind of conservative combination of triplets and high homology retention rate can also explain the richness of some gene families in wheat, such as the HMT genes. In addition to this 1:1:1 correspondence, some genes have expanded in breadth along the chromosomes. These members do not strictly follow the three homologies, like HKMT1 and PRMT1. In addition to a correspondence to genes on chromosomes with A/B/D homology, they also show homology with members of other chromosomes to a certain extent. The homology of these genes may have been established before the formation of wheat polyploidy.

Table 3 Groups of homoeologous HMT genes in wheat
Full size table

Structure, phylogeny, and domain analysis of HMT genes in wheat

The analysis of the physical and chemical properties of the protein sequences encoded by 152 TaHKMT genes revealed that the amino acid content of different HKMT proteins varied significantly, and the molecular weight of the encoded protein was significantly different from 24.76 kD (TaHMT145) to 221.14 kD (TaHMT118). Compared to the HKMT gene family, the protein encoded by the PRMT gene family seems not to show a significant difference in physicochemical properties. In the HKMT protein, the differences in the physicochemical properties of the protein were significantly higher than those of the histone arginine methyltransferase. With the exception of TaHMT154, the isoelectric point (pI) of the proteins encoded by the histone arginine methyltransferase gene was less than 7.0. This shows a more consistent acidity that tends to play a role in the acidic subcellular environment, which may be due to the coding of weakly acidic protein by the PRMT genes. Only 5.26% (8 /152) of HKMT proteins showed high stability, while 34.78% (8/23) of PRMT members were proteins with high stability. These findings suggest that HKMT may have wider catalytic functions and may be involved in more biological processes.

Interestingly, the subcellular localization prediction analysis told us that most HKMT proteins are located in the nucleus, while most PRMT proteins are located in the cytoplasm (Table S1). This difference in localization also implies that they may have different physiological functions. The structural analysis of all TaHMT genes indicated that all of the members contained exons, but the number of them was quite different. The TaHMT gene family has a large number of introns and exons, most of which have more than four exons, and their genetic structure is complex and diverse. Interestingly, the number of exons in the HKMT gene family presents a huge difference from 25 (TaHMT113) to 1 (TaHMT13.etc.) (Fig. 2, Table S1).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Analysis of phylogeny, structures, and protein motifs of all 175 TaHMTs in wheat. A and B Gene phylogeny, structures, and protein motifs of 152 HKMT genes. C Gene phylogeny, structures, and protein motifs of 23 PRMT genes. The full-length coding sequence (CDS) were aligned with Clustal X, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Maximum Likelihood method by MEGA-X. In the gene structures, the purple boxes represent exons, and the green lines represent introns. The untranslated regions (UTRs) are indicated by red boxes. The sizes of the exons and introns can be estimated using the scale at the bottom. The protein motifs were drawn by different colored boxes as shown in the figure using Dog 2.0

Full size image

All 152 TaHKMT proteins were divided into seven classes according to the classification of the SET gene family in Arabidopsis [39]. The seven classes have fully different domain architectures and motif compositions (Figs. 2 and 3). Class I, namely, Enhancer of zeste [E(Z)] homologs (H3K27), has unique domains, such as SWI3, ADA2, N-CoR, and TFIIIB (SANT) DNA-binding domains and DNA binding protein CXC domain. These domains may facilitate the ability of the SET domain to modify histones. Class II consists of 16 SET proteins, which are homologous with Drosophila ortholog ASH1 and may lead to H3K4 and H3K36 modifications. Class III is believed to be the SET protein most responsible for the active mark H3K4me1/2/3, similar to the Drosophila ortholog TRX.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The phylogeny of HKMT (A) and PRMT (B) proteins from wheat, rice, and Arabidopsis. Wheat proteins are colored red and are subclade-specific, whereas rice and Arabidopsis genes are in blue and green, respectively. The HKMT proteins were divided into seven subfamilies and PRMT were divided into four subfamilies

Full size image

Class IV is the least of all of the classifications, which is highly conservative, and it is mainly characterized by a PHD finger and a C-terminally located SET domain. It is suggested that the members of this group may be involved in the methylation of H3K4. Class V is the largest population, consisting of 63 SET genes homologous to Drosophila SU(VAR)3–9, which is divided into two different subgroups. Subgroup I contains the WIYLD domain, pre-SET domains, SET domains, and post-SET domains, while subgroup II contains a typical SRA domain at the N-terminus, playing an essential role in the establishment of heterochromatic mark H3K9me1/2/3, as well as H4K20mes and H3K27me2. Classes VI and VII contain 44 members with interrupted SET domains and Rubis-subs-bind whose functions are to be determined.

The 23 TaPRMT proteins were divided into four classes, following previous opinion [40]. Classes I-1 to I-3 contain 20 members. Most of them include AdoMet-MTases with arginine methyl-transfer activity, which catalyzes the formation of mono-methylarginine and asymmetric dimethylarginine. TaPRMT18 to 20 belong to class II, which owns the core domain PRMT5, which catalyzes mono-methylarginine and symmetric dimethylarginine (Figs. 2C and 3B). The main reason that the HMT gene family has a large number of members is that the class I/II/V HKMT subfamily is expanding its members during evolution. The ratio of their number in wheat to that in rice and Arabidopsis is higher than the average of 3 (χ2 test, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4, Table S3).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The number of HMT genes identified per subfamily in A Arabidopsis, B rice, and C wheat. D The ratio of total HMT gene numbers to those in all subfamilies is shown for wheat: rice (red) and wheat: Arabidopsis (purple). In D the expected ratio (3:1) is indicated by a black line, and asterisks mark a significant deviation from the expected value using χ2 test, P < 0.05

Full size image

Expression characterization and transcription regulation analysis of TaHMTs

At present, the expression level of HMTs in various wheat tissues without any stress pressure is still unknown. In our study, the expression of TaHMT genes in the root, young leaf/shoot, and the young spikes during the vegetative growth stage were significantly higher than those of other tissues at other stages, and they may be widely involved in the physiological activities of wheat growth and development. Spike, as the reproductive organ, exhibits all-round expression for the genes during vegetative and reproductive stages. This result also indicates that the gene expression levels were significantly different in different organs and tissues, which may be biased. For example, TaHKMT6 and TaHKMT18 showed obvious tissue specificity, which are characterized by high expression only in the leaves/shoots during the seedling stage, and a relatively low relative expression in young spikes (Fig. 5). There are many inert genes whose expression level is always very low, such as TaHKMT15 and TaHKMT41.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Tissue and organ expression of all identified HMT genes. The tpm values of all gene expression data are retrieved from downloaded from wheat-expression.com.. Blue modules indicate low expression level and red modules indicate high expression level. The concentrate of expression was in spike both at vegetative growth and reproductive growth

Full size image

Cis-regulatory elements analysis showed that light responsiveness related elements were the most extensive-elements in the promoter regions of TaHMT genes. Except for TaHMT151, all genes contained light responsiveness related elements SP1 (GGGCGG) or GT1 motif (GGTTAA), of which 29 TaHMTs also contained circadian elements. Most TaHMT genes (173/175) contained stress resistance related elements, such as MBS motif related to drought-inducibility, ABRE motif to abscisic acid responsive, LTR motif to low-temperature responsiveness (Figure S2). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of endogenous small noncoding RNAs which are involved in the regulation of gene expression at the posttranscriptional level by degrading their target mRNAs and/or inhibiting their translation. We found that 11 different miRNAs had 15 targeting sites in body parts of 11 TaHMT genes (Table S4, Figure S6). Some miRNAs can act on multiple TaHMT genes, and one TaHMT gene can also interact with multiple miRNAs. Two miRNAs were found to inhibit expression of the target genes at the translational level: tae-miR5049-3p inhibiting gene TaHMT40 and tae-miR1134 inhibiting gene TaHMT172.

Expression analysis of HMT genes between parents and hybrids

Based on our transcriptome sequencing results of JM8 (BS366 × TY806), we obtained four genes whose relative expression level was significantly different (|fold change|> 2, p < 0.05) from that of their parents in spikes (Fig. 6B). These parts are TaHMT39, TaHMT49, TaHMT149, and TaHMT152, which may be involved in heterosis during the period of wheat reproductive growth in spikes. However, there are no significant DEGs screened in the tillering tissue. We conducted a profound analysis of the transcriptome sequencing data and the expression data downloaded from wheat-expression.com. We defined the transcriptome sequencing data as shoot-TR and spike-TR, respectively, and the data obtained from the website database was defined as shoot-WE and spike-WE, representing two organizations in two periods. The two parts showed the matching degrees of 56.67% in shoot tissue, with 43.33% in spikes (Fig. 6A, Table S5). Our expectation of seven active genes at high levels of expression in the four groups was met. Finally, among them, 12 genes were screened in shoots, and 15 were screened in spikes for further analysis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Screening and expression analysis of differentially expressed genes. A Pooled analysis of high expression level genes from two databases using Venn diagrams. B The mRNA abundance of four genes in JM8 combinations from transcriptome data, presented a significant difference between any one parent and F1. The relative expression levels were significantly different, which met the |fold change|> 2 and p < 0.05 in spikes. Values are given as means ± SD (n = 3). C WGCNA analysis of 19 genes in spikes, wherein only three genes show correlations with TSW

Full size image

TaHMT genes showed multiple gene expression patterns in hybrid combinations

Together with the 1000 seed weight (TSW) and effective tillers per plant in wheat, four TaHMT DEGs and 27 genes obtained by the previous methods were analyzed by qRT-PCR. WGCNA was performed on the expression results. The relative expression level of each maternal plant was standardized as relative 1, and all of the expression results were shown in Figure S3.

Based on the trait data of TSW, the expression of 19 genes in spikes showed low correlations on the whole. The results were divided into six modules, in which three DEGs (green modules), TaHMT49, TaHMT149, and TaHMT152 showed a certain correlation (R = 0.32, p = 0.04) (Fig. 6C). In general, their expression levels showed a positive correlation with the TSW in the samples. These three genes, on the whole, showed under-dominant expression patterns. In addition, their expression in transgressive materials was somehow higher than that of the low-parent materials corresponding to transcriptome sequencing data (Fig. 7). In the HP combination, the gene expression in F1 were up-regulated by about 20 times at most (TaHMT49 in Combi201), while in some LP combinations, it was down regulated by more than 30 times (TaHMT49 in Combi199), compared with one parent. It is worth noting that this expression trend is not consistent in all materials. For example, TaHMT149 and TaHMT152 in Combi7 has low parental expression. This seems to be a manifestation of the complexity of heterosis. Interestingly, another DEG, TaHMT39, showed a low-parent dominant expression pattern in the transgressive materials (HP) and high-parent dominant expression patterns in the low-parent materials (LP) (Fig. 8A).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Analysis of three differentially expressed genes in five different two-line hybrid combinations. A Combi175, a representative of HP material. Combi99, a representative of LP material. The length of the red ruler represents 1 cm. S B Expression levels of three differentially expressed genes in five two-line hybrid combinations. Values are given as means ± SD (n = 3)

Full size image
Fig. 8
figure 8

Multiple expression patterns in all combinations. A The expression results TaHMT39 in HP and LP materials. B Negative correlation expression patterns of TaHMT71, TaHMT118, and TaHMT162. C Positive correlation expression patterns of TaHMT83, TaHMT84, and TaHMT148. D TaHMT86, TaHMT89, and TaHMT93 showed under-dominance patterns in M1 and M3 combinations. The relative expression of the maternal parent of each combination was relative 1, which is not shown in Fig. 8A but appears in the blue-colored box in Fig. 8B–D, marked as a dotted line. Red represents the relative expression of F1, and the yellow adjacent to the right represents the relative expression of its male paternity. +  + marks applicability of all HP combinations, and – marks LP combinations. Values are given as means ± SD (n = 3)

Full size image

The high-expression genes in spikes showed multiple expression patterns in all combinations. However, no consistent rule indicated that we could not obtain a more consistent conclusion. TaHMT71 in the M5 combination, TaHMT118 in the M6 combination, and TaHMT162 in the M1 combination had negative correlation expression patterns. In HP, the expression in F1 was up-regulated by about 6 times, while in LP, the expression was down regulated by over 25 times at most (Fig. 8B). This means that in the HP materials, the genes presented a trend of low expression and a trend of high expression in the LP material. The expression patterns of TaHMT83, TaHMT84, and TaHMT148 were positively correlated in the M4 combination, and their expression trends were consistent with the TSW, showing an over-dominant expression pattern (Fig. 8C). Conversely, TaHMT86, TaHMT89, and TaHMT93 showed under-dominant patterns in some combinations (Fig. 8D).

For the analysis of the expression of the 12 genes in the tillers: as a whole, the expression of the 12 genes had a negative correlation with the number of tillers, but the trend was nevertheless not very significant. No significant correlation was seen between the first two modules and the number of tillers. Therefore, the gene may have no relation to the number of tillers. The expression of the six genes in the third modules (green part) was negatively correlated with the number of tillers (R = -0.34, p = 0.03). From the analysis of the expression of each combination, the TaHMT genes mainly showed a negative correlation (Fig. 9A). That is, the expression of F1 was significantly down-regulated in HP and significantly up-regulated in LP. For example, TaHMT50 was down-regulated by 3–5 times in HP in M6 and M4, and up-regulated by 3 times in LP in M4. In particular, the expression of TaHMT122 in maternal M4 and TaHMT50 in M6 had a strong negative correlation (R > -0.6, p < 0.05) with the tiller number (Fig. 9B).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Expression analysis 12 TaHMT genes in tillers. A WGCNA analysis of 12 genes in tillers. B The expression of TaHMT50 and TaHMT122 in specific combinations showed a strong negative correlation with effective tiller number. The relative expression of the female parent of each combination was relative 1, which is shown in the blue-colored and marked as a dotted line. Red represented the relative expression of F1, and the yellow adjacent to the right represents the relative expression of its male paternity. +  + marks applicability for all HP combinations, and – indicates LP combinations. R represents the Pearson correlation coefficient. Values are means ± SD (n = 3)

Full size image

The abundance of lncRNAs were associated with histone methylation

Studies have shown that the lncRNAs are important regulation factors involved in the methylation of histone [41, 42]. So far, a large number of lncRNAs have been found and studied in Arabidopsis, rice, and maize, which are obviously related to the development and reproduction of panicles [43, 44]. We obtained four lncRNAs using the JM6 and JM8 lncRNA sequencing databases. Among the four DEGs, TaHMT39 and TaHMT49 showed a strong correlation with these lncRNAs (Fig. 10, Table 4). The expression of these four lncRNAs in the two-line hybrid wheat combinations of JM6(BS366 × GLDS) and JM8(BS366 × TY806) were higher than those in female parents, but lower than that of male parents, showing very similar expression patterns with their possible target genes.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Abundance of four lncRNAs in JM8 combination (A) and JM6 combinations (B). The relative expression levels were significantly those that which met the |fold change|> 2 and p < 0.01 in spikes. **indicates a significant difference from the one parent at p < 0.01 according to Student’s t-test

Full size image
Table 4 Correlation analysis of TaHMT genes and lncRNAs
Full size table

Three TaCCA1 genes were regulated by histone methylation

The growth heterosis of Arabidopsis is related to the change of histone modification state in the promoter region of CCA1 and LHY. The apparent regulation of H3K9ac and H3K4me2 reduces the expression of CCA1 and LHY, while the expression of downstream genes controlling photosynthesis and starch metabolism increases accordingly, which improves the photosynthetic utilization efficiency, starch accumulation and growth heterosis of hybrid F1 [20]. We predicted the methylation level of TaCCA1 promoter regions and gene body regions at seedling stage (Fig. 11). It was found that the three homologous TaCCA1s were rich in a large number of histone modifications such as H3K4me3 and H3K9ac in the promoter regions. The expression of TaCCA1 in JM8 was significantly higher than that in its parents, and the results of ChIP-qPCR showed that histone modification level in the 5 kb promoter regions were also significantly higher than that in its parents (Fig. 12).

Fig. 11
figure 11

Prediction of histone modification in gene body region and promoter region of three TaCCA1 genes of TaCCA1-7A (A), TaCCA1-7B (B) and TaCCA1-7D (C). From top to bottom of the figure, they are length of the regions, different transcripts of the genes and the abundance of different histone modifications. The results showed that the histone modified region was mainly enriched in the promoter region

Full size image
Fig. 12
figure 12

ChIP-qPCR analysis of three TaCCA1 genes on JM8 combinations. Expression level of TaCCA1-7A (A-B), TaCCA1-7B (C-D) and TaCCA1-7D (E–F) in F1 and its parents as well as H3K4me3/H3K9ac/H3K36me3 histone modification analysis of 5kb promoter region of the genes

Full size image

Discussion

Characteristics comparison of HMT genes in wheat and other diploid species

Allopolyploidization is the key event in the formation of common wheat as one of the main reasons for environmental adaptability [45]. Histone methylation modifying genes are widely seen in animals and plants. The increased multi-function of the SET gene evolution may ensure plants to be more adaptive to the complex natural environment [46]. In this study, the number of TaHMT genes identified was about three times than other five diploids and shows that the gene family has expanded. We found that 92.76% of the HKMT genes were triplet genes which is a typical characteristic of hexaploid wheat. Comparing the number of genes in each subfamily in wheat, Arabidopsis, and rice, the main reason is the expansion of gene number in class I E(z)-like and class V Su(var) 3–9-like, while PRMTs is relatively conservative. our study is consistent with previous studies which have shown that the SUV subfamily shows the rapid evolution [36]. We also found that ASH-like also has a high evolution speed. The ratio of this subfamily in wheat to its amount in rice and Arabidopsis was significantly higher than the average.

Wheat has more orthologous genes and paralogous genes than other diploid species, which is a typical characteristics of a wheat heteropolyploid. According to the homology analysis, the ortholog group of wheat achieved a higher average size of 2.32, and therefore, every TaHMT gene had an average of 1.32 paralogs. This number is higher than other species, which supports the previous results in wheat [47]. In wheat, 67.11% of SET gene members belong to Suv, Ash, Trx and E(z) families, and most of them have colinearity support, showing that the diversity of SET gene is mainly caused by genome duplication. We also observed that, in addition to the SET protein domain, HKMT has evolved more new protein structures such as pre-SET, SRA, AWS, WIYLD, and SANT, among which SRA and WIYLD are structures plant-specific [48]. In fact, the presence of more auxiliary proteins such as pre-SET and post-SET may make the function of the SET protein more stable. Histone methylation can activate or repress gene expression according to different modified types. The modification types of each subfamily of HMT protein have been widely studied. For example, the activated sites (H3K36 and H3K4) include subfamilies of class II, class III, class IV and class VI, while the exercise inhibited sites (H3K9 and H3K27) contains the subfamilies of class I and class V. Unlike HKMTs, PRMTs are relatively conservative. The role of PRMTs in plants is far less clear than that of HKMTs [49]. Our results show that PRMTs are mainly located in the cytoplasm, unlike the nucleus location of HKMTs, and their physical and chemical properties tend to be consistent. According to the previous studies, PRMTs is mainly divided into three types of arginine methylation: ω-NG monthyllargine (MMA), ω-NG, NG-asymmetric dimethylargine (aDMA), and ω-NG, N’G-symmetric dimethylargine (sDMA) [50]. One type of PRMT can often catalyze two methylation modes. The same arginine measurement plays a major role in general regulation because of the capability of the PRMTs to deposit key activation functions (H4R3me2a, H3R2me2s, H3R17me2a and H3R26me2a) or repressive functions (H3R2me2a, H3R8me2a, H3R8me2a and H3R8me2s) [51]. The phylogenetic tree shows that wheat contains four types of PRMTs, while their catalytic sites and functions need further study.

Histone methylation may be involved in regulating heterosis in two-line hybrid wheat

The utilization of heterosis is the main mean of improving crop yield. Heterosis utilization can be accelerated by using male sterile lines. In wheat, TGMS lines (such as BS366) are the main means of heterosis utilization. Many excellent two-line hybrid wheat varieties with good yield performance were developed by TGMS as maternal materials [52]. The male sterility of TGMS can be inherited and has some epigenetic characteristics. Through the analysis of tissue-specific expression of TaHMTs using Chinses Spring (CS) wheat expression data in this study we found that spike was the concentrated expression tissue, and its expression was concentrated in the vegetative and reproductive period. This is consistent with the previous work, which showed that HMTs were closely related to the development of flower organs and flowering [53]. The transcriptome data of two-line hybrid wheat is to a certain degree consistent with CS expression data. They share a number of genes that are highly expressed in both spike and shoot. The expression analysis of hybrid combinations with different yield performance showed that the correlation between the relative expression of 31 genes and their yield traits is relatively low, which may be due to the lower gene expression levels in the experimental context, the complexity of quantitative traits controlled by multiple genes, and the uncertainty of apparent modification [54, 55]. Among the known modes of microRNAs regulating target genes, the two main ways are miRNAs direct target mRNAs cleavage and translational repression [56]. Of the fifteen target sites we obtained, thirteen of them were predicted to act in a cleavage mode indicating a main way for miRNA to regulate HMT genes in wheat. In rice, some miRNAs have been identified to be involved in controlling rice grain size and panicle branching by targeting severe SPL genes, including OsSPL14 and OsSPL16 [57,58,59]. In our study, the expression of TaHMT162 in M1 combination, TaHMT71 in M5 combination showed a significant negative correlation with TSW, while the gene expression of TaHMT50 in M1 and M6 combination also showed a significant negative correlation with the number of effective tillers. In the regulation of miRNAs, there are cleavage-regulation modes of tae-miR1122b-3p-TaHMT162 and tae-miR9677a-TaHMT50/71. We speculated that the histone methylation catalyzed by these three HMT genes might negatively regulate the expression of yield-related genes, and the control of miRNA reduces their mRNAs, resulting in low expression in HP but high expression in LP. Whether their regulatory roles are similar to those in rice need further more experimental evidences. It was also found that four DEGs had significant expression differences in JM8 hybrid combinations, which were also reflected in other two-line hybrid wheat combinations. Among the four DEGs, TaHMT39 and TaHMT49 exhibited a strong correlation with the expression of four lncRNAs in the two-line hybrid wheat combinations of JM6 and JM8 with both cis-regulation mode and trans-regulation mode. This result also further indicated that these DEGs may function positively in the process of heterosis regulated by these lncRNAs. Heterosis is a complex biological phenomenon. The interaction networks provide a theoretical foundation for further study on the methylation of candidate genes and the influence of non-coding RNA on plant growth and development. The cooperative relationship between miRNA-lncRNA-HMT gene will be a promising study for the analysis of heterosis in wheat.

In Arabidopsis hybrids and allopolyploids, increased photosynthetic and metabolic activities are linked to altered expression of circadian clock regulators, including CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) [20]. The higher levels of carbon fixation and starch accumulation in the maize hybrids are also associated with altered temporal gene expression and overexpressing ZmCCA1b disrupts circadian rhythms and biomass heterosis [60]. However, this may have a different mechanism from that of dicotyledonous plants. In Arabidopsis, CCA1 modified by H3K9ac and H3K4me2 reduce the expression level, which improves the expression of downstream genes regulating photosynthesis and starch metabolism. Our findings indicated that the expression of three TaCCA1 genes in hybrid with heterosis were higher than that in parents, and the methylation modifications of H3K4me3/H3K9ac and H4K36me3 activated gene expression in promoter regions were also significantly enrichment. This mechanism is similar to that of monocotyledonous maize, which may be an important way for histone methylation to participate in the heterosis of hybrid wheat. Although the relationship between gene expression and histone modification is consistent with previous knowledge [21, 22], the differences of expression patterns of CCA1 among species and how to accurately control the expression of CCA1 by the histone modifications to achieve heterosis are worthy of in-depth research. At the same time, some important genes associated with heterosis for the location of histone methylation modifications are also noteworthy in the future.

Conclusion

In this study, two types of histone methylation genes, histone lysine methylation gene and histone arginine methylation gene, a total of 175 members were comprehensively identified in wheat as well as its relative species, and the functions of the genes in terms of structure, evolution and expression regulation were deeply explored. Through transcriptome sequencing and analysis of expression in different yield performance hybrid combinations, we found some potential DEGs that may be involved in the construction of yield-heterosis. Furthermore, the identification and expression analysis of lncRNAs with strong correlation to the DEGs were conducted to elucidate their roles for yield-heterosis. Furthermore, the high expression and high histone modification levels of CCA1 in hybrid F1 indicated that histone methylation played important potential roles in regulating yield traits heterosis. Our results accumulated the original data for the cloning of functional genes in the future, and laid a certain data foundation for in-depth research on the growth and development of wheat and the improvement of yield.

Materials and methods

Identification of HMT genes in wheat and its relatives

To identify the putative HMT genes, the wheat genome sequence, gene annotation files, and protein sequences were downloaded from the ENSEMBL database (http://plants.ensembl.org/Triticum_aestivum/Info/Index: version: release-46, as well as http://oct2017-plants.ensembl.org/index.html: TGACv1). The genome and protein data for Sorghum bicolor, Hordeum vulgare, and Brachypodium distachyon were downloaded simultaneously. The Hidden Markov Model (HMM version 33.0) was conducted using the profiles of the SET domain (Pfam accession No: PF00856) as queries with the hmmsearch program of all annotated proteins of these species (E < 1e−10). BLAT was used to compare the protein sequences of each species with the Pfam sequence of the gene family (the following analysis software used the default parameters unless otherwise specified). The modified DOT1L (Pfam accession No: PF08123), which participates in H3K79 methylation, was the only lysine methyltransferase that has so far been found without the SET-conserved domain [61]. We did not find genes containing the DOT1L conserved domain in wheat.

PRMT5 is the most important type II protein arginine methyltransferase. It catalyzes the formation of symmetrical arginine demethylation [62]. Consequently, the Hidden Markov Model was also conducted using the HMM profiles of PRMT5 domain (Pfam accession No: PF05185). The nine reported Arabidopsis PRMTs and the eight reported rice PRMTs were used to conduct a BLASTP program (Version: blast-2.10) with a wheat protein database. The standard of the BLASTP is as follows: (1) e-value < 1e−10; (2) bit-score > 100 and global alignment of identity > 50% overlap, that is, the length of the matching length must exceed 50% of the longer sequence. All of the gene loci were numbered and mapped onto corresponding chromosomes, and the non-chromosome sequences scattered across the genome were merged into unfound-chromosomes (U). The name of each gene begins with Ta, an abbreviation for Triticum aestivum L., and the gene loci were re-numbered based on the order of A/B/D subgroups.

Analysis of the characteristics of TaHMT genes

The CD searches (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) and ORF finder (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder) functions of NCBI were used to find the location of each gene and the location of ORF reading frame, and ProtParam (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to predict the molecular weight, isoelectric point, and the instability index of all HMT protein [63, 64]. It is considered to be an unstable protein when the instability index is greater than 40. Subcellular localization was analyzed using cell-ploc2.0 (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/). All genes’ exon–intron structures were depicted by the online tool GSDS (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn) [65]. Protein organization sketch maps were drawn using Dog2.0 (http://dog.biocuckoo.org/) [66]. The 2 kb sequence before the CDS of each HMT gene was extracted as the promoter region and submitted to PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) for cis-regulatory response elements prediction [67], and the results were visualized by TBtools [68]. The miRNAs annotated in wheat and their targets to HMTs as well as 2 kb promoter sequences were predicted using the psRNATarget server (https://plantgrn.noble.org/psRNATarget/) with default parameters; the mismatch expectation was 0–3 [69]. The Cytoscape tool was used to visualize the interaction networks of miRNAs and HMT targets [70]. The histone modification predicted data of TaCCA1-7A, TaCCA1-7B and TaCCA1-7D are from Chinese Spring Wheat at 10-day seedling stage on WheatOmics database [71].

Evolutionary analysis of wheat TaHMT gene family

Multiple sequence alignment and the phylogenetic analysis of the HMT gene family were performed using MUSCLE. InParanoid 4.1 was adopted to analyze the homologous protein (OG, orthologous groups) for every two species, and Multi-Paranoid was used for analyzing multiple species OG [72]. All HMT genes were mapped to their respective locus in the wheat genome in a circular diagram using shinyCircos [73]. The HMT proteins for wheat, rice, and Arabidopsis were introduced into MEGA-X software to construct phylogenetic trees using Maximum likelihood method [74]. In order to obtain more reliable evolutionary analysis, we constructed the phylogenetic trees of HKMT and PRMT of six species at the same time in Figure S5.

Expression analysis of TaHMT gene family

From the expVIP-Wheat Browser (http://wheat-expression.com/ version: TGACv1), the expression data of root, shoot, leaf, spike, and grain of all TaHMTs in seedling, vegetative, and reproductive growth stages were downloaded. The heatmap for gene expression patterns was generated with the online toolshttps://www.chiplot.online/#Heatmap refer to the instructions on the website. The 28 TaHMT genes with the highest expression of shoots at the seedling stage and spikes at the reproductive growth stage were screened. In screening for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the parents, the two-line hybrid wheat JM8 (Jing Mai 8), cultivated by Beijing Hybrid Wheat Engineering Technology Research Center, was used for RNA sequencing. The transcriptome data can be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number PRJNA398700 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA398700) from JM8 and parental ones (BS366 × TY806) [75]. The DEGs in each comparison from among all TaHMT genes were identified by EdgeR, using a significance threshold of P < 0.05 and a fold change ≥ 2. The first 30 TaHMT genes with the highest expression were also screened. To clarify the relationship between the two groups’ data, we used a Venn Diagram (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/) to analyze all of the highest-expression genes.

Plant materials and treatments

All plant materials used in this article were provided by Beijing Engineering Research Center for Hybrid Wheat. Two-line hybrid wheat JM6, JM8 and other materials have been approved and widely planted in China. A total of 201 two-line hybrid wheat hybridized combinations were prepared with six female parents (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5, and M6) and 34 male parents. These materials, grown at the experimental farm in Beijing Haidian District (China, N39°54′, E116°18′), were regularly watered and fertilized. Each material was planted in three rows as three biological replicates. The corresponding next generations were numbered Combi1 to Combi201 (also 1 to 201 in figures), and the male parents were identified with a prefixed P to the label, such as in P5 or P13. Tillers from root base to stem about 0.5 cm in length were obtained, which contained the apical meristem. As the wheat grew into the anther separation stage, we sampled the spikes with the awn removed. All plant materials used for the above studies were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C for RNA extraction.

Collection of yield phenotypes of multiple two-line hybrids

When the wheat was fully matured, all of the samples were collected according to the names of the materials. The number of tillers and spikes with well-grown individuals was investigated. We selected five wheat plants randomly and counted tillers with mature grains. The mature grains were dried and threshed, and 1000 seeds were weighed three times. The yield character data obtained above were recorded, and finally, the dominant differences in F1 and parents were evaluated by Student’s t-test, p < 0.05. The phenotypes and data statistics were listed in Supplementary Figure S4 and Table S6.

Correlation analysis

The expression of the genes was identified as over-dominance or under-dominance if the expression level of a gene in F1 was significantly higher or lower than, respectively, the expression level in both parents. The high-parent dominant genes and low-parent dominant genes were defined such that the expression level in F1 genotype was significantly different from that in only one parent. Phenotypic data were processed in a similar way to the genotype expression. The materials were divided into high-parent material (HP), middle-parent material (MP), and low-parent material (LP). The yield data of five maternal parents in the hybrid combinations were homogenized. Pearson analysis was conducted to calculate the correlation between yield-character data and gene-expression data after homogenization using SPSS27.0 software. The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was calculated, and the p-value was considered statistically significant when it was below 0.05. To identify discrete groups of co-expressed genes showing their relationship to multiple traits, we applied TKW/Tillers-HMT weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to integrate expression differences into a higher order. The network was built using 42 wheat samples. Eigengenes (the normalized linear combination of genes with the largest variance in a population) carry the representative gene expression pattern for each module. The association between co-expressed gene modules and phenotypic traits was further assessed using Pearson correlations. Based on our sequencing data of lncRNA of Two-line Hybrid Wheat JM6 and JM8 combinations, we compared the lncRNA with known mRNA and used the results of Cufflinks to screen candidate lncRNA. According to the structural characteristics and noncoding functional characteristics of lncRNA, the assembling results based on StringTie software are screened. LncRNA functions mainly through “cis” or “trans” acting on protein coding target genes. For the prediction of cis target genes, we screened the (upstream and downstream 100 k) protein coding genes near the lncRNA as their target genes. Subsequently, the main functions of lncRNA were predicted by target gene function enrichment analysis. For the prediction of “trans” target genes, we used Pearson correlation coefficient to analyze the correlation between lncRNA and target genes expression among samples, and took the protein coding genes with high correlation for function enrichment analysis to predict the main functions of lncRNA. The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) was calculated using SPSS 27.0 and a multiple linear regression analysis was applied in the bivariate analysis. A t-test was used for comparison among groups.

qRT-PCR and ChIP-qPCR

For the expression analysis of HMT genes, total RNA was extracted from plant tissues using TRIzol reagent (Ambion, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using a TaKaRa PrimeScript™ RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). qRT-PCR analysis was conducted using an CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) with Takara SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Tli RNaseH Plus). The primers for all genes were designed using the Primer3plus online tools (http://www.primer3plus.com/cgi-bin/dev/primer3plus.cgi). Each reaction was performed in triplicate in a reaction volume of 10 µL. Expression levels of genes in samples were normalized using endogenous wheat 18 s gene; the relative expression levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [76]. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Assay Followed by qPCR (ChIP-qPCR). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed according to a previously described method [77]. Briefly, 2 g of samples were washed twice in cold PBS buffer, and proteins were cross-linked to DNA by incubating the samples with formaldehyde at a final concentration of 1% on a shaking device for 10 min at 4 °C. Samples were then lysed, and chromatin was precipitated on ice. Chromatin was then sonicated to yield soluble sheared chromatin (200–500 bp). One part of the soluble chromatin was saved at -20 °C for input DNA, and the remainder was used for immunoprecipitation with antibodies for H3K9Ac (CST, 9649), H3K4Me3 (CST, 9751), H3K36Me3 (CST, 4909), and normal rabbit IgG (CST, 2729). Immunoprecipitated DNA was amplified by PCR using their specific primers. PCR reactions were set up and run using the ChamQ SYBR Color qPCR Master Mix. The enrichment values were normalized to the input sample. The primers used are shown in Supplementary Table S7.

Availability of data and materials

The genome databases of wheat and other plants used are derived from http://plants.ensembl.org/index.html.

The expression data of wheat comes from http://wheat-expression.com/.

The transcriptome data of Two-line Hybrid Wheat (JM8) were derived from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA398700.

We declare that the datasets required to reproduce the results of this article are included in the article and additional files available.

Abbreviations

TaHMT:

Wheat Histone Methyltransferase

H3K4me3:

Histone H3 lysine 4 tri-methylation

HKMT:

Histone lysine methyltransferase

PRMT:

Protein arginine methyltransferase

CS wheat:

Chinese Spring wheat

TSW:

Thousand seeds weight

RNA-seq:

RNA sequencing

References

  1. Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GL, D’Amore R, Allen AM, McKenzie N, Kramer M, Kerhornou A, Bolser D, et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature. 2012;491(7426):705–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shewry PR. Wheat. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(6):1537–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avni R, Nave M, Barad O, Baruch K, Twardziok SO, Gundlach H, Hale I, Mascher M, Spannagl M, Wiebe K, et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science. 2017;357(6346):93–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He F, Pasam R, Shi F, Kant S, Keeble-Gagnere G, Kay P, Forrest K, Fritz A, Hucl P, Wiebe K, et al. Exome sequencing highlights the role of wild-relative introgression in shaping the adaptive landscape of the wheat genome. Nat Genet. 2019;51(5):896–904.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. International Wheat Genome Sequencing C, investigators IRp. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(6403):eaar7191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Borrill P, Lang D, Harrington SA, Brinton J, Venturini L, Davey M, Jacobs J, van Ex F, Pasha A, et al. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheat. Science. 2018;361(6403):eaar6089.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Walkowiak S, Gao L, Monat C, Haberer G, Kassa MT, Brinton J, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, Kolodziej MC, Delorean E, Thambugala D, et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature. 2020;588(7837):277–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447(7143):396–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature. 2004;429(6990):457–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holliday R. DNA methylation and epigenetic defects in carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 1987;181(2):215–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu C, Lu F, Cui X, Cao X. Histone methylation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:395–420.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ay N, Janack B, Humbeck K. Epigenetic control of plant senescence and linked processes. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(14):3875–87.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang Y, Mo Y, Chen P, Yuan X, Meng F, Zhu S, Liu Z. Identification of SET domain-containing proteins in gossypium raimondii and their response to high temperature stress. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32729.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niu L, Lu F, Zhao T, Liu C, Cao X. The enzymatic activity of Arabidopsis protein arginine methyltransferase 10 is essential for flowering time regulation. Protein Cell. 2012;3(6):450–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thorstensen T, Grini PE, Aalen RB. SET domain proteins in plant development. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1809(8):407–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yi X, Jiang XJ, Li XY, Jiang DS. Histone methyltransferases: novel targets for tumor and developmental defects. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7(11):2159–75.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang X, Zhang Y, Ma Q, Zhang Z, Xue Y, Bao S, Chong K. SKB1-mediated symmetric dimethylation of histone H4R3 controls flowering time in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2007;26(7):1934–41.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Comings DE, MacMurray JP. Molecular heterosis: a review. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;71(1–2):19–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. He G, Chen B, Wang X, Li X, Li J, He H, Yang M, Lu L, Qi Y, Wang X, et al. Conservation and divergence of transcriptomic and epigenomic variation in maize hybrids. Genome Biol. 2013;14(6):R57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ni Z, Kim ED, Ha M, Lackey E, Liu J, Zhang Y, Sun Q, Chen ZJ. Altered circadian rhythms regulate growth vigour in hybrids and allopolyploids. Nature. 2009;457(7227):327–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jenuwein T, Allis CD. Translating the histone code. Science. 2001;293(5532):1074–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li B, Carey M, Workman JL. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell. 2007;128(4):707–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Moghaddam AM, Roudier F, Seifert M, Berard C, Magniette ML, Ashtiyani RK, Houben A, Colot V, Mette MF. Additive inheritance of histone modifications in Arabidopsis thaliana intra-specific hybrids. Plant J. 2011;67(4):691–700.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim DH, Sung S. Environmentally coordinated epigenetic silencing of FLC by protein and long noncoding RNA components. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15(1):51–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian Y, Zheng H, Zhang F, Wang S, Ji X, Xu C, He Y, Ding Y. PRC2 recruitment and H3K27me3 deposition at FLC require FCA binding of COOLAIR. Sci Adv. 2019;5(4):eaau7246.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Heo JB, Sung S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science. 2011;331(6013):76–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Swiezewski S, Liu F, Magusin A, Dean C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis Polycomb target. Nature. 2009;462(7274):799–802.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubio-Somoza I, Weigel D. MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16(5):258–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang J, Chu C. MicroRNAs in crop improvement: fine-tuners for complex traits. Nat Plants. 2017;3:17077.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmad A, Dong Y, Cao X. Characterization of the PRMT gene family in rice reveals conservation of arginine methylation. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e22664.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aiese Cigliano R, Sanseverino W, Cremona G, Ercolano MR, Conicella C, Consiglio FM. Genome-wide analysis of histone modifiers in tomato: gaining an insight into their developmental roles. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:57.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Batra R, Gautam T, Pal S, Chaturvedi D, Jan RI, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. Identification and characterization of SET domain family genes in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14624.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fan S, Wang J, Lei C, Gao C, Yang Y, Li Y, An N, Zhang D, Han M. Identification and characterization of histone modification gene family reveal their critical responses to flower induction in apple. Bmc Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):173.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Qian Y, Xi Y, Cheng B, Zhu S, Kan X. Identification and characterization of the SET domain gene family in maize. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(3):1341–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Xu J, Xu H, Liu Y, Wang X, Xu Q, Deng X. Genome-wide identification of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) histone modification gene families and their expression analysis during the fruit development and fruit-blue mold infection process. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:607.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang LS, Ma CR, Ji Q, Wang YF. Genome-wide identification, classification and expression analyses of SET domain gene family in Arabidopsis and rice. Yi Chuan. 2009;31(2):186–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. International Brachypodium I. Genome sequencing and analysis of the model grass Brachypodium distachyon. Nature. 2010;463(7282):763–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Schilling S, Kennedy A, Pan S, Jermiin LS, Melzer R. Genome-wide analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box genes in wheat: pervasive duplications, functional conservation and putative neofunctionalization. New Phytol. 2020;225(1):511–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ng DW, Wang T, Chandrasekharan MB, Aramayo R, Kertbundit S, Hall TC. Plant SET domain-containing proteins: structure, function and regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1769(5–6):316–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bedford MT. Arginine methylation at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2007;120(Pt 24):4243–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Magistri M, Faghihi MA, St Laurent G, Wahlestedt C 3rd. Regulation of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNAs: focus on natural antisense transcripts. Trends Genet. 2012;28(8):389–96.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tsai MC, Manor O, Wan Y, Mosammaparast N, Wang JK, Lan F, Shi Y, Segal E, Chang HY. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science. 2010;329(5992):689–93.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li L, Eichten SR, Shimizu R, Petsch K, Yeh CT, Wu W, Chettoor AM, Givan SA, Cole RA, Fowler JE, et al. Correction to: Genome-wide discovery and characterization of maize long non-coding RNAs. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):122.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang YC, Liao JY, Li ZY, Yu Y, Zhang JP, Li QF, Qu LH, Shu WS, Chen YQ. Genome-wide screening and functional analysis identify a large number of long noncoding RNAs involved in the sexual reproduction of rice. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):512.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Feldman M, Levy AA. Genome evolution due to allopolyploidization in wheat. Genetics. 2012;192(3):763–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Fawcett JA, Maere S, Van de Peer Y. Plants with double genomes might have had a better chance to survive the cretaceous-tertiary extinction event. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(14):5737–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Li X, Gao S, Tang Y, Li L, Zhang F, Feng B, Fang Z, Ma L, Zhao C. Genome-wide identification and evolutionary analyses of bZIP transcription factors in wheat and its relatives and expression profiles of anther development related TabZIP genes. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:976.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Freiman RN, Tjian R. Regulating the regulators: lysine modifications make their mark. Cell. 2003;112(1):11–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Paik WK, Paik DC, Kim S. Historical review: the field of protein methylation. Trends Biochem Sci. 2007;32(3):146–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Blanc RS, Richard S. Arginine methylation: the coming of age. Mol Cell. 2017;65(1):8–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Auclair Y, Richard S. The role of arginine methylation in the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2013;12(7):459–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tang Z, Zhang L, Xu C, Yuan S, Zhang F, Zheng Y, Zhao C. Uncovering small RNA-mediated responses to cold stress in a wheat thermosensitive genic male-sterile line by deep sequencing. Plant Physiol. 2012;159(2):721–38.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Schubert D, Primavesi L, Bishopp A, Roberts G, Doonan J, Jenuwein T, Goodrich J. Silencing by plant Polycomb-group genes requires dispersed trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27. EMBO J. 2006;25(19):4638–49.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Swanson-Wagner RA, Jia Y, DeCook R, Borsuk LA, Nettleton D, Schnable PS. All possible modes of gene action are observed in a global comparison of gene expression in a maize F1 hybrid and its inbred parents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(18):6805–10.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang HY, He H, Chen LB, Li L, Liang MZ, Wang XF, Liu XG, He GM, Chen RS, Ma LG, et al. A genome-wide transcription analysis reveals a close correlation of promoter INDEL polymorphism and heterotic gene expression in rice hybrids. Mol Plant. 2008;1(5):720–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Song X, Li Y, Cao X, Qi Y. MicroRNAs and their regulatory roles in plant-environment interactions. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:489–525.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Jiao Y, Wang Y, Xue D, Wang J, Yan M, Liu G, Dong G, Zeng D, Lu Z, Zhu X, et al. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice. Nat Genet. 2010;42(6):541–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nat Genet. 2010;42(6):545–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z, Lin X, Zeng R, Zhu H, Dong G, Qian Q, et al. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):950–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Ko DK, Rohozinski D, Song Q, Taylor SH, Juenger TE, Harmon FG, Chen ZJ. Temporal shift of circadian-mediated gene expression and carbon fixation contributes to biomass heterosis in maize hybrids. PLoS Genet. 2016;12(7):e1006197.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Gao WL, Liu HL. DOT1: a distinct class of histone lysine methyltransferase. Yi Chuan. 2007;29(12):1449–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Peterson CL, Laniel MA. Histones and histone modifications. Curr Biol. 2004;14(14):R546-551.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, Geer LY, Geer RC, He J, Gwadz M, Hurwitz DI, et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D222-226.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wilkins MR, Gasteiger E, Bairoch A, Sanchez JC, Williams KL, Appel RD, Hochstrasser DF. Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server. Methods Mol Biol. 1999;112:531–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Hu B, Jin J, Guo AY, Zhang H, Luo J, Gao G. GSDS 2.0: an upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(8):1296–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Ren J, Wen L, Gao X, Jin C, Xue Y, Yao X. DOG 1.0: illustrator of protein domain structures. Cell Res. 2009;19(2):271–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lescot M, Dehais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouze P, Rombauts S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Dai X, Zhuang Z, Zhao PX. psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server (2017 release). Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W49–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ma S, Wang M, Wu J, Guo W, Chen Y, Li G, Wang Y, Shi W, Xia G, Fu D, et al. WheatOmics: a platform combining multiple omics data to accelerate functional genomics studies in wheat. Mol Plant. 2021;14(12):1965–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. O’Brien KP, Remm M, Sonnhammer EL. Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(Database issue):D476-480.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Yu Y, Ouyang Y, Yao W. shinyCircos: an R/Shiny application for interactive creation of Circos plot. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(7):1229–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Liu YJ, Gao SQ, Tang YM, Gong J, Zhang X, Wang YB, Zhang LP, Sun RW, Zhang Q, Chen ZB, et al. Transcriptome analysis of wheat seedling and spike tissues in the hybrid Jingmai 8 uncovered genes involved in heterosis. Planta. 2018;247(6):1307–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Saleh A, Alvarez-Venegas R, Avramova Z. An efficient chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) protocol for studying histone modifications in Arabidopsis plants. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1018–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Zhang Ning from Beijing Normal University, Dr. Sun Wei-fen and Jiang Teng-fei for the guidance to some graphs. We also thank the English language editors and Dr. Pan Zhuo-xi from Waseda University in Japan for the language editing guidance.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Important Crops Genetically Modified New Germplasm Creation (KJCX20200205)、Beijing Science and Technology Plan (Z191100004019014)、Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences Program (QNJJ202008) and Basic scientific research funding projects of public welfare scientific research institutes in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (KY2019009).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Renwei Sun and Jie Gong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Hybrid Wheat, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (BAAFS), Beijing, 100097, China

    Renwei Sun, Jie Gong, Yongjie Liu, Zhaobo Chen, Fengting Zhang, Jiangang Gao, Xianchao Chen, Shengquan Zhang, Changping Zhao & Shiqing Gao

  2. The Municipal Key Laboratory of the Molecular Genetics of Hybrid Wheat, Beijing, 100097, China

    Renwei Sun, Jie Gong, Yongjie Liu, Changping Zhao & Shiqing Gao

  3. Institute of Grain Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi, 830091, China

    Junmei Cao

Authors
  1. Renwei Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yongjie Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhaobo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Fengting Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jiangang Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Junmei Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xianchao Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Shengquan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Changping Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Shiqing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SRW, GJ analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. SRW, GJ and LYJ conducted most of the experiments; GSQ, ZSQ and ZCP conceived and designed researches. GSQ and ZCP revised the manuscript. ZCP, CZB, ZFT, GJG, CJM and CXC prepared different wheat hybrid combinations and contributed all the seeds. SRW, GJ and LYJ gathered the phenotype data. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shengquan Zhang, Changping Zhao or Shiqing Gao.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All plant materials used in this article were provided by Beijing Engineering Research Center for Hybrid Wheat. All experimental procedures including use of plant or collection of the plant material comply with relevant guidelines and regulation. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals and did not involve any endangered or protected species.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. (A) and (B): Distribution of two sub-gene families on wheat chromosome. Distribution of two gene families on wheat chromosome. All wheat chromosomes have HKMT gene distribution, which are relatively uniform. However, chromosome 2 and chromosome 3 also tend to cluster. Compared with the HKMT genes, the number of PRMT genes is relatively small, and the distribution of PRMT genes in the whole wheat genome is uneven. In addition, compared with previous research results, most HMT genes have been located in a clear range, and there is only one HKMT gene on the U chromosome, may also indicate that the genome quality of wheat has been greatly improved. Figure S2. Analysis of cis-elements of promoters of TaHMT genes. The 2kb sequence before the CDS of each HMT gene was extracted as the promoter region and submitted to PlantCARE database for cis-regulatory response elements prediction, and the results were visualized by TBtools. Figure S3. Expression analysis all selected TaHMT genes. (A) Expression analysis of 19 genes in spike. (B) Expression analysis of 12 genes in tiller. The relative expression of the female parent of each combination was relative 1, and the expression values for each parent are placed in front of each combination. The horizontal column is the gene name and the vertical column is the name of the samples. Figure S4. The phenotype as well as sampling times at different periods of wheat development. (A) Different periods of wheat spike development and sampling were conducted on this basis at anther separation stage. The length of the red ruler represents 1mm. (B) Tillers from root base to stem about 0.5 cm in length were sampled which contains the apical meristem at about four-leaf stage; P: male parent, M: maternal parent. (C) Phenotypic trait combinations for different tillers at harvest time, from left to right, they were: high parent (HP), middle parent (MP) and low parent (LP). In the picture, the three plants were photographed as a whole. Figure S5. The phylogenetic trees of HKMT (A) and PRMT (B) proteins from wheat, rice, Arabidopsis, Sorghum bicolor, Hordeum vulgare, and Brachypodium distachyon were constructed by MEGA-X using Maximum likelihood method. The HKMT proteins were divided into seven subfamilies and PRMT were divided into four subfamilies based on the previous methods. The members of wheat were marked with red circles in Fig. S5B. Figure S6. Interaction networks of miRNAs and HMT targets. miRNAs were marked as a blue node and HMT targets were marked as a yellow node. The size of the node represents the number of action sites. The black solid line represents that the mismatch expectation is 3.0, the red thick solid line represents that the mismatch expectation is 1.5, and the green thick solid line represents that the mismatch expectation is 2.5. 

Additional file 2:

Table S1. Basic characteristic features of 175 HMT genes identified in wheat.

Additional file 3:

Table S2. Location and Homoeologous of HMT genes in wheat.

Additional file 4:

Table S3. Distribution of HMT family members in subgroups in wheat, Arabidopsis and rice.

Additional file 5:

Table S4. Targeting analysis of miRNAs and HMT genes in wheat.

Additional file 6:

Table S5. mRNA abundance of top 30 highly expressed genes.

Additional file 7:

Table S6. Phenotypic statistics. Table S6-1.The number of the tiller. Table S6-2. Thousand seed weight (TSW) (g).

Additional file 8:

Table S7. Primers used for qRT-PCR and ChIP-qPCR.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, R., Gong, J., Liu, Y. et al. Comprehensive molecular evaluation of the histone methyltransferase gene family and their important roles in two-line hybrid wheat. BMC Plant Biol 22, 290 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03639-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03639-0

Keywords

  • Hybrid wheat
  • Histone methyltransferase
  • Phylogenetic analysis
  • Gene expression
  • TaCCA1
  • Heterosis

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us