Skip to main content
Download PDF

In vitro octaploid induction of Populus hopeiensis with colchicine

BMC Plant Biology volume 22, Article number: 176 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Autopolyploids, especially artificial lines, provide model systems for understanding the mechanisms of gene dosage effects on trait variation owing to their relatively uniform genetic background. Here, a protocol for in vitro octaploid induction of Populus hopeiensis from leaf blades with colchicine treatment was established through investigation of the effects of different pre-culture durations, colchicine concentrations, and exposure times.

Results

We found that pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time had significant effects on the survival rate, shoot regeneration rate, and octaploid induction rate of P. hopeiensis leaf blades. The highest octaploid induction rate (8.61%) was observed when leaf blades pre-cultured for 9 days were treated for 4 days with 100 μM colchicine. The ploidy level of all regenerated plantlets was analyzed by flow cytometry and further confirmed by chromosome counting. A total of 14 octaploids were obtained. The stomatal length, width, and density of leaf blades significantly differed between tetraploid and octaploid plants. Compared with diploid and tetraploid plants, octaploids had a slower growth rate, smaller leaf blade size, and shorter internodes.

Conclusions

We established an effective protocol for inducing octaploids in vitro from autotetraploid P. hopeiensis leaf blades by colchicine treatment.

Peer Review reports

Background

Polyploid plants have three or more sets of homologous chromosomes and have long been considered one of the main forces driving the evolution and diversification of angiosperms [1,2,3,4]. The increase in chromosome number in polyploid plants is mainly caused by whole-genome duplication [5,6,7]. Polyploid plants can be classified as allopolyploids or autopolyploids depending on the mode of origin and the degree of divergence between the parental genomes [8,9,10]. Allopolyploids are derived from hybridization followed by multiplication of two haploid genomes, whereas autopolyploids are generated by the doubling of a diploid genome.

Whole-genome duplication is thought to increase genomic plasticity, which can result in the functional differentiation of replicated genes, transcriptomic changes, genomic and/or chromosomal recombination, and gene dosage effects [1, 6, 11,12,13]. Allopolyploids have provided numerous insights into the effects of genome duplication on phenotype variation [9, 14, 15]. However, most allopolyploids are generated through hybridization of distinct parental genomes [8], which may result in additive heterosis effects due to the differential contribution of parental genomes. In contrast, autopolyploids are generated through the multiplication of the same genome and only exhibit gene dosage effects [8, 16]. Synthetic autopolyploids induced by the chemical agent colchicine can aid the identification of the complex changes that take place during whole-genome duplication as well as characterization of the scope and scale of changes in phenotypic variation among different ploidy levels. Many autopolyploids have been generated for this purpose, such as Arabidopsis thaliana [17,18,19], Oryza sativa [20], Paspalum [21], Elymus elongatus [22], Cymbopogon [23], and Solanum phureja [24].

An autopolyploid is quantitatively different from its isogenic diploid progenitor, as the DNA content and dosage effect of each gene are doubled [25]. Both effects increase the size of cells and organelles by altering gene expression, leading to phenotypic variation [17, 26]. Thus, superior characteristics, such as faster growth [27], larger leaf blades [28,29,30], thicker leaf blades [31, 32], larger flowers [33, 34], greater numbers of seeds [35], and thicker stems [36, 37] are often observed in artificial autopolyploid plants. In addition, autopolyploidy is known to increase physiological tolerance to stress in several plant species [38,39,40]. Although these studies have provided interesting insights into the effects of gene dosage on phenotype variation, most of these studies have not examined the effects of autopolyploids beyond the tetraploid level; there is thus a need to investigate the effects of ploidy level on plant phenotype.

Populus hopeiensis Hu et Chow (section Populus, family Salicaceae, genus Populus) is an indigenous tree species of northern and northwestern China that is primarily distributed in arid and semi-arid areas; it exhibits faster growth, as well as higher adaptability, drought tolerance, and cold tolerance compared with other aspen species [41,42,43]. Autotetraploid plants have been induced from the leaf blades of diploid P. hopeiensis by colchicine treatment, and 54 autotetraploid plants have been obtained [29]. Autooctaploids of P. hopeiensis need to be generated to better understand the direct effects of increasing somatic ploidy levels on plant growth and development. Here, we constructed a series of P. hopeiensis plants with different somatic ploidy levels (2x, 4x and 8x) and studied the phenotypic consequences of gene dosage effects. Autooctaploid plants can be used as bridge parents to provide variation in chromosome number for the polyploid breeding of Populus [44,45,46].

In this study, an effective protocol for inducing octaploids in vitro from autotetraploid P. hopeiensis leaf blades by colchicine treatment was established through investigation of the effects of different pre-culture durations, colchicine concentrations, and exposure times. Additionally, the response of leaf stomatal characteristics in P. hopeiensis among different ploidy levels was evaluated.

Results

Survival and shoot regeneration of leaf blades by colchicine treatment

The survival and shoot regeneration of leaf blades by colchicine treatment in tetraploid P. hopeiensis were assessed (Table 1). Adventitious shoots were regenerated from the injuries of the leaf blades after culture for 30 days on solid shoot regeneration medium (Fig. 1A). Some leaf blades died after colchicine treatment (Fig. 1B), no adventitious shoots regenerated. The survival rates of colchicine-treated leaf blades are shown in Table 1. The survival rate of the control group was 100.00% (data not shown). The survival rates in the treatments varied from 30.00 to 86.67% and were much lower compared with the survival rate of the control (Fig. 1A). Univariate GLM analysis revealed that the colchicine concentration (F = 8.287, P = 0.002) and exposure time (F = 7.263, P = 0.004) had highly significant effects on the survival rate, and pre-culture duration (F = 3.925, P = 0.036) had moderate effects on the survival rate. LSD multiple comparison tests showed that the survival rate was significantly higher after pre-culture for 11 days than after pre-culture for 7 days (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The survival rate was higher after application of 50 and 100 μM colchicine than after 150 μM colchicine. The survival rate was significantly lower after colchicine treatment for 4 days than for 2 and 3 days.

Table 1 Effect of pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time on leaf blades survival, shoot regeneration and octaploid induction of P. hopeiensis
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The regeneration of plants from leaf blades of P. hopeiensis. A Adventitious shoots regenerated from leaf blades after culture for 30 days (control). B Adventitious shoots regenerated from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 30 days. C Vitrification of regenerated shoots from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 30 days. D Healthy shoots successfully regenerated from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 85 days. E Vitrification of regenerated shoots from colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 85 days. F Healthy regenerated plants successfully rooted

Full size image
Table 2 Multiple comparisons of the survival rate, shoot regeneration rate, and octaploid induction rate of different treatments
Full size table

The shoot regeneration rates of leaf blades by colchicine treatment are presented in Table 1. The shoot regeneration rates of leaf blades treated with colchicine ranged from 26.67 to 76.67%, which were much lower compared with the control (Fig. 1A, 100.00%). The shoot regeneration rate significantly varied among different pre-culture durations (F = 6.001, P = 0.009), colchicine concentrations (F = 7.329, P = 0.004), and exposure times (F = 12.039, P = 0.000) according to univariate GLM analysis. LSD multiple comparison tests indicated that the shoot regeneration rate significantly decreased as the colchicine concentration increased, the exposure time lengthened, and the pre-culture duration shortened (Table 2). Vitrification of the regenerated shoots in some of the colchicine-treated leaf blades after culture for 30 days was observed (Fig. 1C), and the extent of vitrification increased as the colchicine concentration and exposure time increased.

After 85 days of culture, healthy shoots successfully regenerated from leaf blades by colchicine treatment (Fig. 1D). However, the vitrified shoots were still vitrified after being transferred to a new adventitious shoot regeneration medium (Fig. 1E). The healthy regenerated shoots were transferred to the rooting medium. The roots of regenerated plants successfully formed after culture for 6 weeks (Fig. 1F).

Octaploid induction of leaf blades treated with colchicine

A total of 1,096 regenerated shoots were obtained from nine treatments after leaf blades were treated with colchicine (Table 1). The ploidy level of all regenerated plantlets was determined by flow cytometry analysis, and the putative octaploids were ultimately confirmed by somatic chromosome counting (Fig. 2). The peak of tetraploid plants (4x) was observed on channel 50 (Fig. 2A), and the peak of putative octaploid plants (8x) was observed on channel 100 (Fig. 2B). Somatic chromosome number of tetraploids was 2n = 4x = 76 (Fig. 2C), and the somatic chromosome number of octaploids was 2n = 8x = 152 (Fig. 2D). Consequently, the 14 putative octaploids were confirmed to be octaploids.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Determination of the ploidy levels in the regenerated P. hopeiensis plants. A Flow cytometry histogram of tetraploids. B Flow cytometry histogram of octaploids. C Somatic chromosome number in tetraploids (2n = 4x = 76). D Somatic chromosome number in octaploids (2n = 8x = 152)

Full size image

Nine treatments were used to evaluate the effects of different pre-culture durations, colchicine concentrations, and exposure times of colchicine treatment on the octaploid induction rates of P. hopeiensis leaf blades. The octaploid induction rates are presented in Table 1. The octaploid induction rates ranged from 0 to 8.61%. The univariate GLM analysis revealed that the pre-culture duration (F = 19.492, P = 0.000), colchicine concentration (F = 6.472, P = 0.007), and exposure time (F = 9.933, P = 0.001) had highly significant effects on octaploid induction rates. LSD multiple comparison tests revealed that the octaploid induction rate was significantly higher following pre-culture for 9 days than after pre-culture for 7 or 11 days (Table 2). The octaploid induction rate was also significantly higher following application of 100 μM colchicine than after application of 50 μM colchicine. The octaploid induction rate was significantly higher following colchicine treatment for 4 days than after colchicine treatment for 2 and 3 days. Thus, the optimal protocol for inducing octaploid P. hopeiensis is pre-culture for 9 days, followed by treatment of 100 μM colchicine for 4 days.

Stomatal and morphological features analysis

To analyze how variation in ploidy level affected changes in the leaf stomata, we measured the stomatal length, width, and density of tetraploid and octaploid plants (Table 3). The mean stomatal length and width (35.01 ± 0.89 and 14.14 ± 0.54 μm, respectively) were significantly higher in octaploid plants than in tetraploid plants (19.21 ± 0.12 and 8.54 ± 0.24 μm, respectively) (t-test). However, a dramatic reduction in the stomatal density of octaploid plants was observed compared with tetraploid plants (Fig. 3). The stomatal density of tetraploid plants was approximately twice that of octaploid plants (Table 3).

Table 3 Effect of ploidy level on stomatal characteristics of P. hopeiensis
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Stomatal characteristics: Stomata of the leaf blade in tetraploid (A) and octaploid (B) plants of P. hopeiensis

Full size image

The phenotypic traits of octaploids differed from those of tetraploid and diploid plants (Fig. 4). After culture for 30 days on rooting medium, the size of the leaf blades was much smaller in octaploid plants than in tetraploid and diploid plants (Fig. 4A, B, C). The growth rate of octaploids was obviously lower than that of tetraploids and diploids (Fig. 4D, E, F). The internodes of octaploids were also shorter compared with tetraploids and diploids. However, the thickness of the leaf blades was larger in octaploids than in tetraploids and diploids.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Morphological traits: Leaf blades of diploid (A), tetraploid (B), and octaploid (C) plants; Sterile-rooted plantlets of diploid (D), tetraploid (E), and octaploid (F) plants of P. hopeiensis

Full size image

Discussion

Effects of colchicine on survival and shoot regeneration

Colchicine is very toxic and may lead to the onset of necrosis in some leaf explants of woody plants [27, 47]. Higher colchicine concentrations and longer exposure times may result in reduced the survival rate and shoot regeneration rate of leaf blades. In this study, the survival rates and shoot regeneration rates were significantly lower for colchicine-treated leaf blades than control leaf blades. The survival rates and shoot regeneration rates also gradually decreased as the colchicine concentration increased, the exposure time lengthened, and the pre-culture duration shortened, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies [27, 28, 33]. These lower survival rates and regeneration rates may be related to the toxicity of colchicine. Colchicine binds to tubulin and inhibits the polymerization of microtubules, which are fundamental components of the cytoskeleton and are involved in many basic cellular processes [48], thereby reducing plant cell viability.

Vitrification is a commonly observed phenomenon in plant tissue culture. Several previous studies have reported that higher concentrations of cytokinins (such as 6-BA, TDZ), high humidity, and low light intensity may lead to the vitrification of regenerated shoots [49,50,51]. In this study, vitrification of the regenerated shoots was only observed in colchicine-treated leaf blades, and the extent of vitrification increased as the colchicine concentration and exposure time increased, suggesting that the toxic effect of colchicine might contribute to the vitrification of regenerated shoots.

Effects of pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time on octaploid induction

Colchicine is considered an antimitotic chemical mutagen that can increase plant ploidy levels in higher plants [52]. It can inhibit the formation of the mitotic spindle by binding to tubulin as well as chromosome separation during cell division, leading to the formation of a polyploid cell. Colchicine has been widely used to generate new germplasm with higher ploidy levels by hybridization with induced 2n pollen or 2n female gametes as well as somatic chromosome doubling [53,54,55,56]. Octaploids have been successfully induced by colchicine treatment in some tree species, such as Ziziphus jujuba Mill. [57], Neolamarckia cadamba Bosser [58], Jatropha curcas L. [59], and Panicum virgatum L. [60, 61]. In this study, colchicine was applied to the leaf blades of P. hopeiensis to induce octaploids, and 14 octaploids were successfully obtained. Hence, colchicine treatment of leaf blades is an effective approach for creating new polyploids in Populus.

Applying colchicine to leaf blades at a suitable pre-culture duration is critically important for inducing polyploidy [28, 30]. The optimal pre-culture duration depends on the species. Cai and Kang [28] showed that the most effective pre-culture duration for inducing the tetraploids of leaf blades in diploid Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag by colchicine treatment was 6 days. The most suitable pre-culture duration for colchicine-induced hexaploids of leaf blades in Populus alba × P. berolinensis ‘Yinzhong’ was 3 days [62]. In our study, the most suitable pre-culture duration for the octaploid induction of P. hopeiensis leaf blades via colchicine treatment was 9 days. This is inconsistent with the findings of previous studies [28, 62]. However, the optimal pre-culture duration for inducing the tetraploids of leaf blades by colchicine treatment was 7 days [29], which is lower than that for the octaploid induction of P. hopeiensis. This may stem from the fact that the cell cycle becomes more costly at higher ploidy levels [63]. Slower cell division results in a delay in the callus development of tetraploid leaf blades. In this study, no octaploid plants were produced when leaf blades were pre-cultured for 11 days. This may be due to the difference in response of different stage of cells be treated. Hence, it is crucial to find a suitable pre-culture duration of leaf blades before colchicine treatment is conducted.

In Populus, polyploid formation is also highly correlated with the colchicine concentration and exposure time [28]. High colchicine concentrations and long exposure times are futile for inducing polyploidy because colchicine toxicity can result in the death of cells [30, 33]. Although low colchicine concentrations or short exposure times can increase the survival rate, the production rate of polyploids is reduced [28, 33]. Therefore, the optimal colchicine concentration and exposure time should be determined experimentally. The highest octaploid induction rate (8.61%) was observed when the leaf blades of tetraploid P. hopeiensis were treated with 100 μM colchicine for 4 days. Our findings were in contrast to the results of previous studies [27, 28, 62]. However, the optimal colchicine concentrations and exposure times for inducing octaploids and tetraploids of P. hopeiensis were similar [29], suggesting that the leaf blades of diploids and tetraploids had the same sensitivity to colchicine.

Previous studies indicate that the presence of mixoploids is related to the process of in vitro polyploid induction [64]. Mixoploids are generally thought to be unstable because of the asynchronism among different cell types in the mixoploid cell cycles [65]. However, several stable mixoploids in Populus have been reported in previous studies [54, 62]. A total of 15 mixoploids were obtained in this study (data not shown). The mixoploids remained stable during 8 months of subculture, but the stability of these mixoploids needs to be tested over a longer period. An effective method for isolating diploid and tetraploid cytotypes from 2 ×—4 × mixoploids using adventitious bud regeneration has been described in Populus [66]. The same method could be used to isolate octaploid cytotypes from 4 ×—8 × mixoploids.

Changes in ploidy-related morphological features

Stomata characteristics, such as stomatal length, stomatal width and stomatal density, have been previously used to distinguish plant ploidy levels [27, 33]. The stomatal length, width, and density of leaf blades significantly differed between diploid and tetraploid plants in P. hopeiensis [29]. In this study, significant differences in the stomatal length, width, and density of leaf blades between tetraploid and octaploid plants in P. hopeiensis were seen. The stomatal length and width were significantly larger in octaploid plants than in tetraploid plants. The stomatal density of tetraploid plants was approximately twice that of octaploids. Our results were consistent with the findings of previous studies [28, 29].

The relationship between gene dosage effects and morphological traits is complex. Tsukaya [63] documented that the organs/bodies of tetraploid Arabidopsis plants are larger than diploid organs/bodies, and organs/bodies of octaploid plants are smaller than tetraploids, or even diploids. Tetraploids of P. hopeiensis produced larger leaf blades, with a slower growth rate, as well as modified leaf blade morphology compared with diploids [29]. The growth rate of octaploids in P. hopeiensis was also slower than that of diploids and tetraploids. However, octaploid plants had smaller leaf blades and shorter internodes compared with diploid and tetraploid plants. Several previous studies have indicated that leaf blade size depends on the cell size and cell number. Larger cell size is associated with a lower cell number [67,68,69]. For example, the leaf blade cells in Arabidopsis are larger in octaploid plants than in diploid and tetraploid plants. However, the leaf blades in Arabidopsis are much smaller in octaploid plants than in diploid and tetraploid plants [19, 63]. Therefore, gene dosage effects might enhance cell expansion but inhibit cell division. However, more morphological characteristics of diploids, autotetraploids, and autooctaploids of P. hopeiensis need to be tested over a longer time range in future studies.

Conclusions

The pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time had significant effects on the survival rate and shoot regeneration rate. They also had highly significant effects on the octaploid induction rate. The most suitable protocol for inducing octaploid P. hopeiensis was 100 μM colchicine treatment for 4 days after the leaf blades had been pre-cultured for 9 days. The highest octaploid induction rate was 8.61%, and 14 octaploids were produced. The stomatal length, width, and density of leaf blades significantly differed between tetraploid and octaploid plants. After culture for 30 days on rooting medium, the size of leaf blades, the growth rate, and the internodes were much smaller in octaploid plants than in tetraploid and diploid plants. However, the thickness of leaf blades was larger in octaploids than in tetraploids and diploids. This suggests that the morphological characteristics of octaploid plants differed from those of diploid and tetraploid plants.

Methods

Plant materials

Tissue culture plantlets of the autotetraploid Populus hopeiensis clone BT-1 [29] were obtained from the National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Beijing Forestry University, China. The sterile-rooted plantlets were cultured on solid root induction medium containing half-strength MS medium [70], 3% (w/v) sucrose, 0.65% (w/v) agar, and 0.98 μM IBA [29]. All media were adjusted to pH 5.8—6.2 and autoclaved at 121 ℃ for 15 min. The cultures were maintained in a growth room under an illumination of 2000 lx with a 14 h photoperiod at 25 ℃.

Octaploid induction by colchicine treatment

Fully expanded leaf blades located third or fourth from the top of 30-day-old sterile rooted plantlets were transected twice through the midrib without fully separating the leaf blades; they were then cultured on solid shoot regeneration medium supplemented with MS medium, 3% (w/v) sucrose, 0.65% (w/v) agar, 1.78 μM 6-BA, 0.07 μM TDZ, and 0.53 μM IAA [29] for 7, 9, and 11 days. The leaf blades were then immersed in the same liquid shoot regeneration medium containing different concentrations (50, 100, and 150 μM) of filter-sterilized colchicine for 2, 3, and 4 days of treatment in the dark, respectively. After colchicine treatment, the treated explants were washed in sterile distilled water three times and dried with sterile filter paper. Explants were then placed on solid shoot regeneration medium without colchicine for shoot formation. As a control, the leaf blades were cultured on colchicine-free solid shoot regeneration medium. The effects of pre-culture duration, colchicine concentration, and exposure time on octaploid induction were studied utilizing an orthogonal experimental design (Table 1). This experiment was repeated three times with 10 explants each treatment.

After 30 days of culture, the adventitious shoots were regenerated from the injuries of the leaf blades. After 85 days of culture, single regenerated shoots were excised and transferred to the rooting medium. The survival and regeneration rates were assessed by counting the number of surviving leaf blades and regenerated leaf blades per treatment. The number of shoots regenerated and octaploids per explant were recorded to determine the octaploid induction rates.

Ploidy analysis via flow cytometry analysis and somatic chromosome counting

The ploidy level of all regenerated plantlets derived from leaf blades by colchicine treatment was preliminarily determined by flow cytometry analysis [71,72,73]. Two or three fresh non-fully expanded leaf blades of each regenerated plantlet were randomly selected and chopped on a 55 mm Petri dish with a sharp razor blade in 1 ml Galbraith’s buffer [73] (45 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 30 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM MOPS, 0.1% (v/v) Triton X—100, pH 7.0), and then the nuclear suspension was filtered by a nylon mesh with a pore size of 40 µm into a 5 ml centrifuge tube. Subsequently, the filtered suspension was stained with 50 μl of 4’, 6’-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, 5 mg / L) for 5 s and the ploidy level was analyzed with a Cyflow® Ploidy Analyzer (Partec—PAS, Germany).

The putative octaploid plants were further confirmed by somatic chromosome counting [29, 74, 75]. Stem tips (5—10 mm) were collected from the plantlets cultured on root induction medium for 20—25 days and immersed in a saturated solution of paradichlorobenzene for 2—4 h at 25 ℃ as pretreatment. Then, they were rinsed in sterile distilled water three times and fixed in fresh Carnoy’s solution (acetic acid: ethanol, 1:3) for at least 24 h at 4 ℃ to kill the cells and maintain their structure. These samples were hydrolyzed in 38% HCl at room temperature for 25 min and washed three times with distilled water for 15 min. Subsequently, the dissociated materials were crushed on a glass slide with tweezers, stained with Carbol Fuchsin solution, and covered with a coverslip. The preparation was observed using Olympus BX 51 microscope under the 100 × oil lens.

Analysis of morphological and stomatal characteristics

The sterile-rooted plantlets after culture for 30 days on rooting medium and at least five times of subculture were used for the analysis of morphological and stomatal characteristics. The morphological traits of three selected individual plantlets for each ploid (2x, 4x and 8x) were observed. Six octaploid and tetraploid plantlets (three each) were sampled for observation of stomata. The lower epidermis of leaf blades was evenly coated with a layer of transparent nail polish to avoid the main veins and dried for 3—5 min, then peeled off and placed on a glass slide with water droplets. Subsequently, the excess water on the glass slide was absorbed with a filter paper. The prepared slide was covered with a coverslip and observed using an Olympus BX 51 microscope. The stomatal density on the lower epidermis of leaf blades was calculated from 10 randomly sampled microscopic field areas of each leaf. The length and width of 30 stomatal cells from tetraploid and octoploid leaf blades were measured randomly with reference to scales.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 20.0 (IBM Inc., New York, NY, USA). Before analysis of variance, percentages were arcsine square-root (p/100) transformed to account for heterogeneity of variances. Univariate GLMs were used to analyze variation in the octaploid induction rates, survival rates, and shoot regeneration rates among different pre-culture durations, colchicine concentrations, and exposure times. LSD multiple comparison tests (significance threshold of 0.05) were performed, and pairwise comparisons were performed for significantly different treatments. Images of stomatal characteristics were analyzed using Image J (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Two-sample t-tests were performed to determine whether tetraploid and octaploid plants significantly differed in stomatal length, width, and density.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

MS:

Murashige and Skoog basal medium [70]

IBA:

Indole-3-butyric acid

6-BA:

6-Benzylaminopurine

TDZ:

Thidiazuron

IAA:

Indole-3-acetic acid

MOPS:

3-Morpholinopropanesulfonic acid

GLM:

General linear model

LSD:

Least significant difference

References

  1. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science. 2008;320(5875):481–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(10):725–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scarpino SV, Levin DA, Meyers LA. Polyploid formation shapes flowering plant diversity. Am Nat. 2014;184(4):456–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Van de Peer Y, Mizrachi E, Marchal K. The evolutionary significance of polyploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18(7):411–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Doyle JJ, Flagel LE, Paterson AH, Rapp RA, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, et al. Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:443–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Albertin W, Marullo P. Polyploidy in fungi: evolution after whole-genome duplication. Proc R Soc B. 2012;279(1738):2497–509.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Moghe GD, Shiu SH. The causes and molecular consequences of polyploidy in flowering plants. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014;1320:16–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Comai L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(11):836–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen ZJ. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:377–406.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Tamayo-Ordóñez MC, Espinosa-Barrera LA, Tamayo-Ordóñez YJ, Ayil-Gutiérrez B, Sánchez-Teyer LF. Advances and perspectives in the generation of polyploid plant species. Euphytica. 2016;209(1):1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Otto SP. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell. 2007;131(3):452–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of polyploid plants. Curr Biol. 2008;18(10):R435–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arrigo N, Barker MS. Rarely successful polyploids and their legacy in plant genomes. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012;15(2):140–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aragoncillo C, Rodriguez-Loperena MA, Salcedo G, Carbonero P, Garcia-Olmedo F. Influence of homoeologous chromosomes on gene-dosage effects in allohexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1977;75(3):1446–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rapp RA, Udall JA, Wendel JF. Genomic expression dominance in allopolyploids. BMC Biol. 2009;7:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Parisod C, Holderegger R, Brochmann C. Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytol. 2010;186(1):5–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shi XL, Zhang CQ, Ko DK, Chen ZJ. Genome-wide dosage-dependent and -independent regulation contributes to gene expression and evolutionary novelty in plant polyploids. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(9):2351–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Vergara F, Rymen B, Kuwahara A, Sawada Y, Sato M, Hirai MY. Autopolyploidization, geographic origin, and metabolome evolution in Arabidopsis thaliana. Am J Bot. 2017;104(6):905–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Corneillie S, De Storme N, Van Acker R, Fangel JU, De Bruyne M, De Rycke R, et al. Polyploidy affects plant growth and alters cell wall composition. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(1):74–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Liu Y, Xia EH, Yao QY, Liu XD, Gao LZ. Autotetraploid rice methylome analysis reveals methylation variation of transposable elements and their effects on gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(50):7022–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martelotto LG, Ortiz JPA, Stein J, Espinoza F, Quarin CL, Pessino SC. Genome rearrangements derived from autopolyploidization in Paspalum sp. Plant Sci. 2007;172(5):970–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eilam T, Anikster Y, Millet E, Manisterski J, Feldman M. Genome size in natural and synthetic autopolyploids and in a natural segmental allopolyploid of several Triticeae species. Genome. 2009;52(3):275–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavania UC, Srivastava S, Lavania S, Basu S, Misra NK, Mukai Y. Autopolyploidy differentially influences body size in plants, but facilitates enhanced accumulation of secondary metabolites, causing increased cytosine methylation. Plant J. 2012;71(4):539–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stupar RM, Bhaskar PB, Yandell BS, Rensink WA, Hart AL, Ouyang S, et al. Phenotypic and transcriptomic changes associated with potato autopolyploidization. Genetics. 2007;176(4):2055–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Doyle JJ, Coate JE. Autopolyploidy: an epigenetic macromutation. Am J Bot. 2020;107(8):1097–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barceló-Anguiano M, Holbrook NM, Hormaza JI, Losada JM. Changes in ploidy affect vascular allometry and hydraulic function in Mangifera indica trees. Plant J. 2021;108(2):541–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cui YH, Hou L, Li X, Huang FY, Pang XM, Li YY. In vitro induction of tetraploid Ziziphus jujuba Mill. var. spinosa plants from leaf explants. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2017;131(1):175–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Cai X, Kang XY. In vitro tetraploid induction from leaf explants of Populus pseudo-simonii Kitag. Plant Cell Rep. 2011;30(9):1771–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu J, Sang YR, Zhou Q, Zhang PD. Colchicine in vitro tetraploid induction of Populus hopeiensis from leaf blades. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2020;141(2):339–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Widoretno W. In vitro induction and characterization of tetraploid Patchouli (Pogostemon cablin Benth.) plant. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2016;125(2):261–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu GF, Li ZN, Bao MZ. Colchicine-induced chromosome doubling in Platanus acerifolia and its effect on plant morphology. Euphytica. 2007;157(1–2):145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu YX, Li WY, Dong J, Yang N, Zhao XM, Yang WD. Tetraploid induction and cytogenetic characterization for Clematis heracleifolia. Caryologia. 2013;66(3):215–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gu XF, Yang AF, Meng H, Zhang JR. In vitro induction of tetraploid plants from diploid Zizyphus jujuba Mill. cv. Zhanhua. Plant Cell Rep. 2005;24(11):671–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Allum JF, Bringloe DH, Roberts AV. Chromosome doubling in a Rosa rugosa Thunb. hybrid by exposure of in vitro nodes to oryzalin: the effects of node length, oryzalin concentration and exposure time. Plant Cell Rep. 2007;26(11):1977–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Xue H, Zhang B, Tian JR, Chen MM, Zhang YY, Zhang ZH, et al. Comparison of the morphology, growth and development of diploid and autotetraploid ‘Hanfu’ apple trees. Sci Hortic. 2017;225:277–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Głowacka K, Jeżowski S, Kaczmarek Z. In vitro induction of polyploidy by colchicine treatment of shoots and preliminary characterisation of induced polyploids in two Miscanthus species. Ind Crop Prod. 2010;32(2):88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tavan M, Mirjalili MH, Karimzadeh G. In vitro polyploidy induction: changes in morphological, anatomical and phytochemical characteristics of Thymus persicus (Lamiaceae). Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2015;122(3):573–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu JW, Shahid MQ, Guo HB, Yin W, Chen ZX, Wang L, et al. Comparative cytological and transcriptomic analysis of pollen development in autotetraploid and diploid rice. Plant Reprod. 2014;27:181–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Z, Zhao ZL, Fan GQ, Dong YP, Deng MJ, Xu EK, et al. A comparison of the transcriptomes between diploid and autotetraploid Paulownia fortunei under salt stress. Physiol Mol Biol Pla. 2019;25(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xiang ZX, Tang XL, Liu WH, Song CN. A comparative morphological and transcriptomic study on autotetraploid Stevia rebaudiana (bertoni) and its diploid. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2019;143:154–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Song YP, Wang ZL, Bo WH, Ren YY, Zhang ZY, Zhang DQ. Transcriptional profiling by cDNA-AFLP analysis showed differential transcript abundance in response to water stress in Populus hopeiensis. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang ZL, Liu J, Guo HY, He X, Wu WB, Du JC, et al. Characterization of two highly similar CBF/DREB1-like genes, PhCBF4a and PhCBF4b, in Populus hopeiensis. Plant Physiol Bioch. 2014;83:107–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen Z, Ji LX, Wang J, Jin JP, Yang XY, Rao P, et al. Dynamic changes in the transcriptome of Populus hopeiensis in response to abscisic acid. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Johnsson H. The triploid progeny of the cross diploid × tetraploid Populus tremula. Hereditas. 1945;31:411–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lu N, Dai L, Wu B, Zhang Y, Luo ZJ, Xun SH, et al. A preliminary study on the crossability in Robinia pseudoacacia L. Euphytica. 2015;206(3):555–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yan FF, Wang LH, Zheng XJ, Luo Z, Wang JR, Liu MJ. Acquisition of triploid germplasms by controlled hybridisation between diploid and tetraploid in Chinese jujube. J Hortic Sci Biotech. 2018;94(1):123–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zeng QQ, Liu Z, Du K, Kang XY. Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in triploid Populus and its effect on plant morphology and anatomy. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2019;138(3):571–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Nogales E. Structural insights into microtubule function. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:277–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang QY, Luo FX, Liu L, Guo FC. In vitro induction of tetraploids in crape myrtle (Lagerstroemia indica L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2010;101(1):41–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Rathore MS, Mastan SG, Yadav P, Bhatt VD, Shekhawat NS, Chikara J. Shoot regeneration from leaf explants of Withania coagulans (Stocks) Dunal and genetic stability evaluation of regenerates with RAPD and ISSR markers. S Afr J Bot. 2016;102:12–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Zeng QQ, Han ZQ, Kang XY. Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf, petiole and root explants in triploid (Populus alba × P. glandulosa)× P. tomentosa. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2019;138(1):121–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Blakeslee AF, Avery AG. Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants. J Hered. 1937;28:393–411.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Li YH, Kang XY, Wang SD, Zhang ZH, Chen HW. Triploid Induction in Populus alba x P. glandulosa by chromosome doubling of female gametes. Silvae Genet. 2008;57(1–6):37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu CP, Huang Z, Liao T, Li Y, Kang XY. In vitro tetraploid plants regeneration from leaf explants of multiple genotypes in Populus. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2016;125(1):1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Wu J, Zhang PD. Colchicine did not affect the viability of induced 2n pollen in Populus tomentosa. Silva Fenn. 2019;53(2):1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhou Q, Wu J, Sang YR, Zhao ZY, Zhang PD, Liu MQ. Effects of colchicine on Populus canescens ectexine structure and 2n pollen production. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Shi QH, Liu P, Liu MJ, Wang JR, Xu J. A novel method for rapid in vivo induction of homogeneous polyploids via calluses in a woody fruit tree (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.). Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2015;121(2):423–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Eng WH, Ho WS, Ling KH. In vitro induction and identification of polyploid Neolamarckia cadamba plants by colchicine treatment. PeerJ. 2021;9:e12399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Niu LJ, Tao YB, Chen MS, Fu QT, Dong YL, He HY, et al. Identification and characterization of tetraploid and octoploid Jatropha curcas induced by colchicine. Caryologia. 2016;69(1):58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang ZY, Shen ZX, Tetreault H, Johnson L, Friebe B, Frazier T, et al. Production of autopolyploid lowland switchgrass lines through in vitro chromosome doubling. Bioenerg Res. 2013;7(1):232–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Yue YS, Zhu Y, Fan XF, Hou XC, Zhao CQ, Zhang S, et al. Generation of octoploid switchgrass in three cultivars by colchicine treatment. Ind Crop Prod. 2017;107:20–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Liu WT, Zheng YF, Song SY, Huo BB, Li DL, Wang J. In vitro induction of allohexaploid and resulting phenotypic variation in Populus. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2018;134(2):183–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Tsukaya H. Controlling size in multicellular organs: focus on the leaf. Plos Biol. 2008;6(7):e174.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Ewald D, Ulrich K, Naujoks G, Schröder MB. Induction of tetraploid poplar and black locust plants using colchicine: chloroplast number as an early marker for selecting polyploids in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2009;99(3):353–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Nilanthi D, Chen XL, Zhao FC, Yang YS, Wu H. Induction of tetraploids from petiole explants through colchicine treatments in Echinacea purpurea L. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009;2009:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu WT, Song SY, Li DL, Lu XC, Liu JR, Zhang JW, et al. Isolation of diploid and tetraploid cytotypes from mixoploids based on adventitious bud regeneration in Populus. Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2020;140(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Krizek BA. Making bigger plants: key regulators of final organ size. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2009;12(1):17–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Gonzalez N, Vanhaeren H, Inzé D. Leaf size control: complex coordination of cell division and expansion. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17(6):332–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang Y, Wang BB, Qi SZ, Dong ML, Wang ZW, Li YX, et al. Ploidy and hybridity effects on leaf size, cell size and related genes expression in triploids, diploids and their parents in Populus. Planta. 2019;249(3):635–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962;15(3):473–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sadat-Hosseini M, Vahdati K, Leslie CA. Germination of Persian walnut somatic embryos and evaluation of their genetic stability by ISSR fingerprinting and flow cytometry. HortScience. 2019;54(9):1576–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ebrahimzadeh H, Lotfi M, Sadat-Hosseini M. Parthenogenetic haploid plant production in Styrian pumpkin by gamma lrradiated pollen. Int J Hortic Sci Technol. 2021;8(3):305–14.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DP, Firoozabady E. Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science. 1983;220:1049–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Grouh MSH, Vahdati K, Lotfi M, Hassani D, Pirvali BN. Production of haploids in Persian walnut through parthenogenesis induced by gamma-irradiated pollen. J Amer Soc Hort Sci. 2011;136(3):198–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Vahdati K, Lotfi M, Sadat Hosseini Grouh M. Karyotype analysis of haploid plants of walnut (Juglans regia L.). Acta Hort. 2014;1048:225–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank EditorBar (https://www.editorbar.com/) for its language editing.

Funding

This study was mainly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFD2201200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Engineering Laboratory for Tree Breeding, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jian Wu, Xuetong Cheng, Bo Kong, Qing Zhou, Yaru Sang & Pingdong Zhang

  2. Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants, Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jian Wu, Xuetong Cheng, Bo Kong, Qing Zhou, Yaru Sang & Pingdong Zhang

  3. College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jian Wu, Xuetong Cheng, Bo Kong, Qing Zhou, Yaru Sang & Pingdong Zhang

Authors
  1. Jian Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xuetong Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaru Sang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pingdong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PZ designed the experiments and edited the language of the manuscript. JW, XC, BK, QZ and YS performed the experiments. JW performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pingdong Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, J., Cheng, X., Kong, B. et al. In vitro octaploid induction of Populus hopeiensis with colchicine. BMC Plant Biol 22, 176 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03571-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03571-3

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us