Skip to main content
Download PDF

PINIR: a comprehensive information resource for Pin-II type protease inhibitors

BMC Plant Biology volume 21, Article number: 267 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Serine protease inhibitors belonging to the Potato type-II Inhibitor family Protease Inhibitors (Pin-II type PIs) are essential plant defense molecules. They are characterized by multiple inhibitory repeat domains, conserved disulfide bond pattern, and a tripeptide reactive center loop. These features of Pin-II type PIs make them potential molecules for protein engineering and designing inhibitors for agricultural and therapeutic applications. However, the diversity in these PIs remains unexplored due to the lack of annotated protein sequences and their functional attributes in the available databases.

Results

We have developed a database, PINIR (Pin-II type PIs Information Resource), by systematic collection and manual annotation of 415 Pin-II type PI protein sequences. For each PI, the number and position for signature sequences are specified: 695 domains, 75 linkers, 63 reactive center loops, and 10 disulfide bond patterns are identified and mapped. Database analysis revealed novel subcategories of PIs, species-correlated occurrence of inhibitory domains, reactive center loops, and disulfide bond patterns. By analyzing linker regions, we predict that alternative processing at linker regions could generate PI variants in the Solanaceae family.

Conclusion

PINIR (https://pinir.ncl.res.in) provides a web interface for browsing and analyzing the protein sequences of Pin-II type PIs. Information about signature sequences, spatio-temporal expression, biochemical properties, gene sequences, and literature references are provided. Analysis of PINIR depicts conserved species-specific features of Pin-II type PI protein sequences. Diversity in the sequence of inhibitory domains and reactive loops directs potential applications to engineer Pin-II type PIs. The PINIR database will serve as a comprehensive information resource for further research into Pin-II type PIs.

Background

Protease inhibitors (PIs) function as intrinsic defense molecules for plants and are gaining importance as therapeutics [1, 2]. Potato type Inhibitor-II family PIs (Pin-II type PIs) form a major family of plant PIs, which plays a vital role in protecting plants against biotic stress, particularly against lepidopteran insect pests [3]. Pin-II type PIs are serine PIs found mainly in Solanaceous plants and are induced upon wounding or insect infestation. They inhibit the digestive serine proteases present in the insect gut by forming a protease-PI complex that causes a reduction in protein assimilation and ultimately leads to retardation in the growth and development of the insect [4, 5]. Pin-II type PIs have also been utilized as anti-obesity agents to reduce food intake in humans because these PIs increase the level of satiety hormone (cholecystokinin) via trypsin inhibition [6,7,8]. The protease inhibitory potential of Pin-II type PIs has also been used for the development of antimicrobial and antifungal agents [9, 10].

The unique feature of Pin-II type PIs is the presence of multiple inhibitory repeat domains (IRDs). A single Pin-II type PI consists of multiple IRDs joined by 5 to 6 amino acid linker regions. The IRDs are 50 to 55 amino acid long proteins with a unique structure stabilized by disulfide bonds [11, 12]. Proteolytic processing at linker regions releases IRDs from its parent Pin-II type PI molecule. These IRDs can then target multiple serine proteases [5, 13] (Fig. 1a). The number of IRDs in a PI is variable; also, the protein sequences of IRDs show subtle differences, which may profoundly impact the function of IRDs [14]. For example, IRD-7 and IRD-9 (IRD-145 and IRD-143 in the PINIR database) from Capsicum annuum are more than 90% similar in the protein sequence but show a significant difference in the inhibitory activity towards serine proteases [15]. This difference is attributed to the replacement of two cysteine residues in IRD-7 by serine in IRD-9, which causes the loss of two disulfide bonds. These variations result in increased flexibility of IRD-9, allowing a better fit of IRD-9 in the active site of trypsin, and hence higher inhibitory activity [15, 16]. The diversity in protein sequences is useful for combinatorial inhibition since the IRDs could target resistant proteases generated upon adaption to other PI isoforms [4]. Each IRD contains a tripeptide loop called the reactive center loop (RCL), which provides target specificity to the Pin-II type PIs [17]. RCL is the primary interaction site for target serine protease and functions as an inhibitory tripeptide independent of the native IRD scaffold [18].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Development of PINIR Database (a) Schematic depicting processing of Pin-II type PIs into IRDs (left), and structure of bi-domain Pin-II typePI from tomato (PDB id: 1pju) showing characteristics of Pin-II type PIs- IRD, linker and RCL regions (right). b Conceptual Data Model (CDM) of PINIR database, showing the entities and relations between them. All the entities are structured around two Primary entities highlighted within red rectangles (Pin-II type PIs and Inhibitory RepeatDomains). The entities which capture the details about the two primary entities are shown within green rectangles and the grey rectangles represent the entities which provide the support data. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

Pin-II type PIs provide a multi-level strategy to design molecules for agricultural and therapeutic applications. PIs with multiple IRDs joined by short linkers demonstrate a potential approach for simultaneous in-vitro delivery of PIs [19, 20]. The disulfide bonded IRD scaffold by itself is a potential candidate for engineering PIs for human therapeutics, as demonstrated for cyclotides [21, 22] and Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor (BBI) proteins [23]. Moreover, since RCL regions define the reactivity of Pin-II type PIs [17], grafting of these peptides on the existing scaffolds can make proteins with altered functions. The RCL tripeptides can also be used as small molecule PIs since they are amenable for chemical peptide synthesis [24].

These signature sequences (IRD, linker and RCL) vary in number and sequence in different Pin-II type PI proteins. Thus, it is imperative to have a dedicated resource of these PIs to understand the classification and diversification of this family. Although several protein and PI databases are available, none provides detailed annotated information for this Pin-II type PI family. Specifically, the number and position of IRDs, Linker, RCL, disulfide linkages and biochemical features are not mapped in any protein databases.

We have developed PINIR (Pin-II type PIs Information Resource), available at https://pinir.ncl.res.in, a web-based information system that provides a user-friendly web interface with utilities for browsing and analyzing information related to Pin-II type PIs. The current release of PINIR has sequence annotations of 415 Pin-II PI sequences with a collection of 695 IRDs, 75 Linkers, and 63 RCLs. Biochemical features such as expression pattern, target protease and insects are also compiled in the database. Further, we have categorized the Pin-II type PIs based on the annotations such as position, number and sequences of IRDs, linkers and RCLs. Upon analysis of the PINIR database for linker regions in Pin-II type PI sequences, we hypothesize that the Pin-II type PIs might undergo alternative processing to generate diverse IRDs. Further interpretation of this dataset will highlight the hierarchical categorization of the Pin-II type PI sequences and serve as a useful scientific resource.

Construction and content

Database development model

Literature review of Pin-II type PIs and the study of protein databases resulted in the elucidation of various features of Pin-II type PIs, which determined the various elements of our database (Supplementary Table S1). Figure 1b displays the Conceptual Data Model (CDM) of the PINIR database. It identifies the different entities and relations between them. All the information is structured around two primary entities:'Pin-II type PIs' and 'Inhibitory Repeat Domains' (IRDs/Domains). Table 1 lists the entities which capture the detailed information about the primary entities and those which provide support information. The Development Model followed for the assembling of Pin-II PI information resource is depicted in Fig. 2. It comprises of four development stages: (1) Data Sources; (2) Data Preprocessing and Integration; (3) Database Creation; (4) and PINIR Website.

Table 1 Conceptual Data Model (CDM) Entities of PINIR Database
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Development Model followed for the creation of PINIR comprises of four development stages: Data Sources, Data Preprocessing and Integration, Database Creation; PINIR Website. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

Data sources

The data for the entities of the PINIR database scheme was accumulated from several sources such as external databases, published information, and in-house data compilation.

  1. a)

    The protein sequences and associated data about Pin-II type PIs were extracted from Uniprot [25] and Interpro [26]. These online databases were queried for terms belonging to the Pin-II PI family using Interpro ID: IPR003465 and Pfam ID: PF02428. A total of 415 Pin-II PI records were downloaded from Uniprot. Out of 415, 16 were reviewed and 399 were unreviewed Uniprot entries.

  2. b)

    Identification of IRDs in the Pin-II type PIs was performed using HMMSEARCH with Pfam domain ID PF02428, which gave 404 results. PHMMER search was also performed using a few sequences from UniProtKB (P84813, P01078, P01079, P56615, P83241). Removal of redundant and incomplete sequences resulted in a total of 695 IRDs.

  3. c)

    Data for Reactive Center Loops (RCL) and Linkers were manually prepared by sequence alignment of IRD sequences. 75 unique Linker Regions and 63 RCLs were identified in the Pin-II type PI family.

  4. d)

    Publications related to Pin-II type PI were searched using Pubmed IDs from UniProt and Google Scholar. Experimental information such as Spatio-temporal Distribution, Domain Structure Folds, Biochemical Properties, and Biophysical Properties was compiled manually from the articles.

Data preprocessing and integration

The preprocessing of the data was either done manually or, in many cases, was automated by using Python programs or Structured Query Language (SQL) queries and procedures. Following are the scenarios where the data preprocessing was carried out:

  1. a)

    The Pin-II type PI data imported from Uniprot had monolithic records that suffered from redundancy and covered varied features of Pin-II type PIs. For efficient processing and creating simplified views, the Uniprot data was distributed into different tables using SQL queries and procedures, keeping their relationships intact.

  2. b)

    The manually prepared list of RCL sequences and their target protease was made more informative by adding P1, P2, and P1` positions of an RCL sequence. Also, the organism field was enriched with Genus and Species data. Both of these were achieved by using programs written in Python.

  3. c)

    Python programs were written to determine the positions of 63 RCL and 75 Linkers in the 695 IRDs (domains).

  4. d)

    Another significant property, "Domain Type" which is determined based upon the position of RCL and Linker in the domain sequence, was identified for all the available IRDs using a Python program.

  5. e)

    A Python program was written to capture the data about the position and occurrence of IRDs in Pin-II PI sequences.

  6. f)

    Information about the disulfide bonds in the IRDs was compiled using the online utility DISULFIND [27]. To identify the Isoelectric Points of Pin-II type PI sequences, the online utility of the website http://isoelectric.org/ [28] was used.

  7. g)

    We used Python programming to derive the information regarding the amino acid composition of Pin-II type PIs and Domain sequences.

Database creation

PINIR is a web-based information system to make the Pin-II type PI database easily accessible to the users. This information system is developed using the WISA (Windows, IIS, SQL, and ASP.net) stack. Windows Server 2012 R2 is used as an operating system, SQL Server 2016 for backend database, it is hosted on IIS 8.0 web server, and the front-end is created using ASP.net (C#) Framework 4.7.

All the entities identified at the CDM level (Fig. 1b) of PINIR DB were converted into corresponding Tables (listed in Table 2) at the Logical Data Model (LDM) level. LDM captures entities and relationships among them and also specifies attributes, primary Key(s) and foreign Key(s) for each entity, Pin-II type PIs (Fig. 3a) and Inhibitory Repeat Domains (Fig. 3b). At the LDM level, the names of the tables containing data that is not dependent on other tables are prefixed with the acronym 'MST' for Master. The tables containing extra information about Master tables are prefixed with the acronym 'DET' for Detail.

Table 2 Description of entities and corresponding tables in PINIR
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Logical Data Model (LDM) of PINIR. LDM captures entities and relationships and also specifies Attributes, Primary Key and Foreign Keys for each entity. a and b present the LDM for Primary entities Pin-II type PIs and Inhibitory Repeat Domains, respectively. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

In the LDM, the table MST_PI_GENERAL_FEATURES holds information that identifies the entity 'Pin-II type PIs' in CDM. As shown in Table S2, the attribute 'ID' represents the Primary Key, and 'OrganismID' is the Foreign Key to table MST_TAXONOMY. Similarly, the other primary entity, 'Inhibitory Repeat Domains,' is represented by table MST_DOMAINS in the LDM (Table S2), which holds the information that identifies the IRDs of Pin-II type PIs. Here the 'ID' attribute represents the Primary Key, and there are 3 Foreign Keys, 'RCLID', 'LinkerID', and 'DomainType', which refers to MST_REACTIVE_LOOPS, MST_LINKERS and MST_DOMAIN_TYPE tables, respectively.

Finally, the LDM is converted into Physical Data Model (PDM), representing how the Model is built in the database. In the PDM, additional fields, namely column name, column data type, column constraints, Primary Key(s) and Foreign Key(s) are added to the tables identified in LDM for corresponding entities. Table S2 lists the various table structures for the PINIR database, which is implemented using Microsoft SQL Server.

PINIR website

To make the Pin-II type PI database publicly accessible, a web-based information system is developed which can be accessed using: https://pinir.ncl.res.in. PINIR provides an intuitive and user-friendly web interface to Browse, Analyze, Search and Download the information related to Pin-II type PIs (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Main features of PINIR website (a) Browse page of PINIR (b) The Detail page showing the detailed information of a PI (c) Data Analysis page provides a comprehensive analysis of the Pin-II type PIs (d) Search page of PINIR allows users to search Pin-II type PIs by a variety of keywords (e) Download page allows the users to download the PINIR data. The images depicted in the figure are prepared and compiled by the authors using original screenshots of PINIR website

Full size image

Browse

The Browse module of the PINIR website provides a user-friendly interface to view the functional annotations of Pin-II type PIssuch as IRDs, RCL, Linker regions, Target Protease(s) and the Organism. Browse by protein, lists a table with PINIR Entry, UniProt Accession Number, Name, Species, Mass, Length and Domains Count. Clicking any Pin-II type PI entry directs to the PIs detail page, composed of four sections: Overview, Function, Domains and Amino Acid Composition.

The Overview section provides basic information about Pin-II type PIs such as Length, Mass, Species, Gene Name, Isoelectric Points and Domains Count. It gives details about a PI sequence, namely, Amino Acid Sequence, Signal Peptide, Domain Architecture. It also provides Cross References to Uniprot, Pfam, InterPro, EMBL, and MEROPS database and links to any References available.

The Function section gives information about the RCL, Target Protease and the GO terms associated with the Pin-II type PI. Details about Spatio-temporal Distribution, Domain Structure Folds, Biochemical Properties, and Biophysical Properties are also provided in this section.

The Domain section lists the IRDs found in the Pin-II type PIs sequence with the RCL and Linkers present in them. It also gives details about the Domain Architecture of the PI sequence.

The Amino Acid composition section lists each amino acid number and its percentage composition in the Pin-II type PIs sequence.

Data analysis

The Data Analysis module of the PINIR website aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Pin-II type PI database to the users. It is divided into 5 categories: data analysis based on Pin-II type PIs, Domains (IRDs), Reactive Loops (RCL), Linker, and Target Protease. Under each category, the data is analyzed in various ways. For each analysis, a title and a brief description of the results is provided with corresponding charts. These charts are downloadable in PNG (Portable Network Graphics) and SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) formats, and the result data displayed in tabular format can be downloaded in CSV (Comma Separated Values) file for offline analysis.

Search and download

For each of the options in the Browsing module, the results are displayed in a table format. The results data can be sorted by clicking the column header as per the user's requirement. Also, a Quick Search is provided at the top right of the search results table. This Quick Search is case insensitive and accepts any fuzzy term using which users can filter the results based on the content of displayed columns. Apart from this Quick Search, a dedicated Search module is provided on the website. This search allows for text-based search using Uniprot accession, Species, RCL, Linker, Target Protease, and Gene Ontology Terms. Users can also create complex search queries by combining multiple queries using Boolean expressions (e.g., AND, OR and NOT). The search results are displayed in a table, in which each record represents a Pin-II type PI and its information in separate columns. PINIR website also provides a Download module to facilitate its users in downloading the information captured in the PINIR database in CSV files.

Utility and discussion

Currently available protein and PI databases such as Uniprot, Pfam, Interpro, Plant PI and MEROPS have limited annotated information of protein sequences of the Pin-II type PI family. Hence, we have developed a comprehensive information resource of this family to provide functional annotations of each available Pin-II type PI sequence. We have identified the IRDs, RCL, Linker and Disulfide Bonds and their position in the PI sequences. Physiochemical properties such as isoelectric points and amino acid composition are also compiled within the database. The following sections describe an in-depth data analysis of the PINIR database:

Occurrence and domain distribution of Pin-II type PI sequences

As of 2nd October 2020, the PINIR database encapsulates information about 415 Pin-II type PIs distributed in 109 species. Out of 415 sequences, 277 Pin-II type sequences are from Solanaceae plants and 138 are from non-Solanaceae plants. A large number of Pin-II type PI sequences are represented by the Solanaceous plant Capsicum annuum (n = 99), followed by Solanum tuberosum(n = 52) and Nicotiana tabacum (n = 22). We also found Pin-II type PI sequences from non-Solanaceae plants, like Selaginella moellendorffii, Coffea canephora (Rubiaceae), Rosa chinensis (Rosaceae), indicating a widespread occurrence of Pin-II type PIs (Supplementary Fig. S1a, b).

We obtained 695 unique IRD sequences in 415 Pin-II type PIs, suggesting that the PIs consist of multiple combinations of IRDs. Despite a higher number of Pin-II type PIs found in genus Capsicum than Nicotiana, the number of unique IRDs found in the latter was higher, as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1c,d. This shows that the genus Nicotiana has a greater diversity of IRD sequences, while Capsicum generates a higher number of Pin-II type PIs from a limited set of IRDs. The majority of the IRDs appeared as a part of only one sequence (single occurrence in the database) (Supplementary Table S3). This suggests that the IRDs which are recurrent might be more conserved. Interestingly, all the IRDs were specific to their genus of origin; that is, each domain was found (either once or repeatedly) only in a single genus. Thus, Pin-II type PIs are composed of combinations of IRDs, which might have resulted from the restricted evolution of sequences within a particular genus (Supplementary Table S4).

We found 14 domain architectures of Pin-II type PIs in the PINIR database (Supplementary Table S5). We categorized the Pin-II type PIs as single-domain (n-domains = 1) or multi-domain (n-domains > 1). Among the multi-domain PIs, the majority consisted of n-domains between 2 to 5, and a few n-domains greater than 7. There are 17 domain architectures for Pin-II type PIs in InterPro, of which 9 are composed of domain IPR003465 (Pin-II type PIs), whereas 8 architectures consist of Pin-II domains in combination with domains from other families. Therefore, we identified novel domain architectures for Pin-II type PIs from the PINIR database. Also, Solanaceae plants consisted of PIs with n-domains ranging from 1 to 21, whereas non-Solanaceae plants consisted only of single-domain PIs. Out of 170 single-domain PIs, 60 are distributed among 10 Solanaceae species, whereas 110 single-domain PIs are spread across 63 non-Solanaceae species. This indicates that the Solanaceous plants preferably express multi-domain PIs, which could accommodate different/same IRD sequences needed to inhibit multiple proteases. We also observed that Capsicum annuum has a majority of sequences with n-domain = 5, Solanum tuberosum has maximum sequences with n = 2 or 3, and Nicotiana tabacum has maximum sequences with n-domain > 5 suggesting a correlation between n-domains and species (Supplementary Table S6).

Linker diversity and distribution in Pin-II type PIs

Two types of linker regions are present in the Pin-II type PI family, namely type-I (DPRNP) and type-II (EEKKN) [29]. The linker region divides the IRD into heavy (H) and the light fragment (L). The L-fragment consists of the RCL (Fig. 5a). There are three types of IRDs depending on the arrangement of H and L fragments around the linker regions, as shown in Fig. 5a. IRDs with type-I linkers have H–L type arrangement: {H-linker-L}, while those with type-II linkers have L–H type:{L-linker-H}. IRDs without a linker have H + L arrangement (type-III). Upon manual identification of linker regions, we found 75 linker sequences, which belonged to type-I (n = 24) and type-II (n = 51).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Linker regions in Pin-II type PIs. a Classification of IRD sequences based on linker regions; heavy chain (H), light chain (L), RCL and linker regions are color-coded for sequences in (b) and (c). b Example of Pin-II type PI with H + L type IRDs. c Example of Pin-II type PI with overlapping H–L and L–H type IRDs. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

We classified the IRD sequences into three subtypes, types based on whether type-I, type-II, or no linker region is present in the IRDs. We identified 238 type-I linkers containing IRDs (H–L type), 256 type-II linkers containing IRDs (L–H type) and 201 IRDs with no linker regions (H + L type). Kong and Ranganathan [29] suggested that the presence of the IRD subtype is based upon the domain organization in the multi-domain Pin-II type PIs. Two types of domain organizations are reported for the Pin-II type PI family: tandem repeats (beads on string) or circularly permuted (clasped bracelet). The tandem repeat PIs have L–H type IRDs, whereas, in the circularly permuted PIs, the domain formed by N- and C-terminal sequence is present in the H + L topology, and other domains adopt H–L topology. In our analysis, however, we found that both the L–H and H–L topologies are present within the same IRD sequence, depending on the position of the linker in the parent Pin-II type PI sequence. We mapped the IRD sequences and linker regions to the Pin-II type PI sequences and found that the same fragment can be a part of both (L–H and H–L) topologies upon alternate processing at linker regions. For the H + L type, the linker regions were present outside the IRD sequence (Fig. 5b). The presence of overlapping IRD sequences in the Pin-II type PIs indicates that alternate proteolytic processing of PIs at the linker regions might generate enormous diversity of IRDs from the same parent Pin-II type PI. For example, in Fig. 5c, alternative processing at the linker regions can result in five IRD variants instead of 4 IRDs. The presence of overlapping variant sequences in Pin-II type PIs can be viewed as a natural permutation mechanism to generate vast diversity of IRDs without increasing the protein length. This feature of Pin-II type PIs might be beneficial in co-evolution with insect proteases where multiple proteases could be targeted by several IRDs in the insect gut [30]. It might also explain the higher number of IRDs compared to PIs, as seen in our analysis. Whether these alternate processing mechanisms occur in nature and play a role in Pin-II type PI organization needs to be elucidated.

Species distribution of linker regions showed that IRDs from Solanaceous plants had linker regions, whereas PIs from non-solanaceous plants were all type-III that did not contain linkers. Furthermore, type-I linker containing IRDs are present mainly in Capsicum, whereas IRDs with type-II and type-III linkers are found in Nicotiana and Solanum genera, indicating a preferential occurrence of the linkers depending on the species (Supplementary Table S7).

Furthermore, the Type-I linker sequence DPNNP was exclusive to Capsicum species, while DPRNP was found majorly in Nicotiana and DPKNP in Solanum plants. DPRNP and DPKNP showed widespread occurrence across species. Among the type-II linker sequences, EGNAE was exclusive to Capsicum, EEKKN was in Nicotiana, and EGSPE in Solanum species (Supplementary Fig. S2; Supplementary Table S8, S9). This shows the restricted distribution of linkers, which shows possible species-specific proteolytic processing machinery for Pin-II type PIs.

RCL distribution and specificity

In the IRD sequence dataset, 63 RCL sequences were identified. The RCL sequence "CPRNC" is the most predominant in Pin-II type PIs, occurring 576 times in the Pin-II type PI sequences, followed by "CTLNC" (113 times) and "CPRYC" (94 times) (Supplementary Table S10) while in the IRD dataset, "CPRNC" occurred 291 times. “CPRNC” shows a widespread occurrence in Capsicum, Nicotiana and Solanum species and is found in high numbers. However, “CTLNC” and “CPRYC” display limited occurrence, predominantly in Capsicum annuum (Supplementary Table S10). Furthermore, P1', P1 and P2 positions of the RCL interact with the active site of target protease. The distribution of amino acids at these positions shows a preference for a few amino acids at these crucial positions. Specifically, Pro is dominant at P2 residue, followed by Thr (Fig. 6a). It is reported that P2 Pro plays an essential role in determining the potency and specificity of the RCL [18]. Interestingly, Ser is rarely found at this position despite being structurally similar to Thr. At the P1 position, which is the specificity-determining residue, Arg is dominant, indicating that the majority are trypsin inhibitors. This is followed by Leu, indicating chymotrypsin inhibitors. Surprisingly, we found that Gln also occupied P1 position in ~ 100 sequences. The presence of Gln at the P1 site of serine protease inhibitors has not been reported earlier. 23.1% of the targets to the IRDs were unknown due to amino acids like Gln, Ser, Thr, Met, Glu, and Ala at the P1 residue. This might be a unique feature of Pin-II type PIs, leading to diversification of its target specificities. Species distribution of RCLs showed that Solanaceous plants contained diverse RCL sequences, with Arg/Lys/Leu/Gln at the P1 residue. In contrast, non-solanaceous plants majorly contain Gln/Leu at the P1 position (Fig. 6b and 6b'). At P1' residue, Asn was the most common, followed by Tyr and Glu. Elucidation of functional features of these amino acids requires further research.

Fig. 6
figure 6

RCL regions and disulfide variants in Pin-II type PIs. a Preference of amino acids at P1, P2 and P1’ residues in the RCL regions (b) Distribution of RCL sequences across solanaceous and non-solanaceous plants. Frequently occurring RCL are shown separately in (b’) (c) Cysteine content (number of cysteine residues per sequence) in Pin-II type PIs and IRDs (inset) (d) Major types of disulfide bond architectures in IRDs. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

Disulfide bond variations in the Pin-II type PI family

Disulfide bonds are crucial for maintaining the proper structural fold for Pin-II type PIs and important for the potency of IRDs [11, 16]. The variations in disulfide bonds and the number of cysteine residues impart differential potency to the Pin-II type PIs [14]. The presence of 4 disulfide bonds is characteristic of IRDs of the Pin-II type PIs. We performed amino acid composition analysis of Pin-II type PI sequences and show that Cys is the most abundant residue, followed by Gly (Supplementary Fig. S3). Other amino acids show a dispersed distribution across the Pin-II type PI family. Analysis of the number of cysteines across the IRDs indicated that most IRDs contain 8 Cys residues or 4 disulfide bonds. Few sequences (n = 4) had 7 Cys residues, indicating disulfide bond variants (Fig. 6c).

Further, Cys distribution across the Pin-II type PI sequences showed that most sequences had 8 or 9 Cys, corresponding to that observed for IRDs. Also, sequences with 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 Cys were prominent, showing multi-domain PIs. Interestingly, sequences with 9,10, 17, 25 and 33 Cys are also present in high numbers, indicating the presence of disulfide bond variants or free Cys residues in the Pin-II sequences (Fig. 6c). Although IRDs consist of 8 Cys residues, the presence of an odd number of Cys in Pin-II type PIs indicates additional Cys-mediated structural scaffolds.

Further, we analyzed disulfide bonds within the IRD sequences. We found 10 types of disulfide bond architectures in the IRDs (Supplementary Table S11). Types 1 to 4 are the most common (Fig. 6d). The disulfide bond types correlated with the type of linker regions, wherein type 1 and type 2 disulfide bond architectures were found predominantly in IRDs with type-1 and 2 linkers, respectively (Supplementary Table S12). Thus, disulfide bond connections are conserved to the type of IRDs. Furthermore, Capsicum species comprised type-1 bond architecture, while type 2 and 3 were commonly found in Nicotiana species, highlighting a species-specific preference of disulfide bond scaffolds (Supplementary Table S13). In addition to intra-IRD bonds, it will be interesting to determine the inter-IRD disulfide bond connections in Pin-II type PIs.

Conclusion

Pin-II type PIs have promising applications as scaffolds for protein engineering. These proteins are useful as agricultural pest control agents because they effectively reduce the growth of agricultural insect pests like Helicoverpa armigera [4, 15]. Also, the application of RCL peptides as synthesized in linear and cyclic forms has been reported for developing eco-friendly insect pest control strategies [24]. Pin-II PIs have also been used as antimicrobial and antifungal agents [9]. For example, Potamin-I inhibits several proteases like chymotrypsin, trypsin, and papain and is active against pathogenic microbial strains, including Candida albicans, Rhizoctonia solani [10]. These PIs are also used as formulations for reducing obesity [6, 31]. While only Pin-II type PIs from potatoes have been studied, Pin-II type PIs from other species can also be explored by utilizing the PINIR database, which provides a repository of signature sequences, namely, RCL, linker and domain regions. These annotations are not available in any other public databases, making PINIR a unique resource for research into the Pin-II type plant PI family.

PINIR is a family-specific database, and it identifies novel subcategories within the Pin-II type PI family based on sequence characteristics (Fig. 7). We identified 688 IRDs within the 415 Pin-II type PIs, suggesting that many PIs have overlapping IRDs and that these IRDs have small variations in their amino acid sequences. The study of linker regions and their positions highlighted both H–L and L–H type IRDs in a continuous Pin-II type PI sequence. This result suggests an unexplored mechanism in plants for producing several combinations of IRDs from the limited size of Pin-II type PI proteins. We aim to continuously update and expand the PINIR database by routinely adding new features and sequences of Pin-II-type PIs.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Categorization of Pin-II type PIs in PINIR according to sequence characteristics. Purple boxes represent the basis of categorization, blue boxes represent the categories. The number of sequences in a particular category is mentioned in brackets. The images depicted in the figure are original images prepared by the authors

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the PINIR repository, https://pinir.ncl.res.in

Abbreviations

PIs:

Protease Inhibitors

Pin-II type PIs:

Potato type-II Inhibitor family Protease Inhibitors

PINIR:

Pin-II type PIs Information Resource

IRDs:

Inhibitory Repeat Domains

RCL:

Reactive Center Loop

BBI:

Bowman-Birk Protease Inhibitor

CDM:

Conceptual Data Model

SQL:

Structured Query Language

LDM:

Logical Data Model

PDM:

Physical Data Model

PNG:

Portable Network Graphics

SVG:

Scalable Vector Graphics

CSV:

Comma Separated Values

References

  1. Hellinger R, Gruber CW. Peptide-based protease inhibitors from plants. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24:1877–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Srikanth S, Chen Z. Plant protease inhibitors in therapeutics-focus on cancer therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2016.00470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tamhane VA, Mishra M, Mahajan NS, Gupta VS, Giri AP. Plant Pin-II family proteinase inhibitors: structural and functional diversity. Funct Plant Sci Biotechnol. 2012;1:42–58.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunse KM, Stevens JA, Lay FT, Gaspar YM, Heath RL, Anderson MA. Coexpression of potato type I and II proteinase inhibitors gives cotton plants protection against insect damage in the field. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:15011–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009241107.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mishra M, Tamhane VA, Khandelwal N, Kulkarni MJ, Gupta VS, Giri AP. Interaction of recombinant CanPIs with Helicoverpa armigera gut proteases reveals their processing patterns, stability and efficiency. Proteomics. 2010;10:2845–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200900853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Komarnytsky S, Cook A, Raskin I. Potato protease inhibitors inhibit food intake and increase circulating cholecystokinin levels by a trypsin-dependent mechanism. Int J Obes. 2011;35:236–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peters HPF, Foltz M, Kovacs EMR, Mela DJ, Schuring EAH, Wiseman SA. The effect of protease inhibitors derived from potato formulated in a minidrink on appetite, food intake and plasma cholecystokinin levels in humans. Int J Obes. 2011;35:244–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu Y, Lasrado JA, Hu J. Potato protease inhibitor II suppresses postprandial appetite in healthy women: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Food Funct. 2017;8:1988–93. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6fo01803c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bártová V, Bárta J, Jarošová M. Antifungal and antimicrobial proteins and peptides of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers and their applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:5533–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09887-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JY, Park SC, Kim MH, Lim HT, Park Y, Hahm KS. Antimicrobial activity studies on a trypsin-chymotrypsin protease inhibitor obtained from potato. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;330:921–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gartia J, Anangi R, Joshi RS, Giri AP, King GF, Barnwal RP, et al. NMR structure and dynamics of inhibitory repeat domain variant 12, a plant protease inhibitor from Capsicum annuum, and its structural relationship to other plant protease inhibitors. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2020;38:1388–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2019.1607559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barrette-Ng IH, Ng KK-S, Cherney MM, Pearce G, Ghani U, Ryan CA, et al. Unbound form of tomato inhibitor-II reveals interdomain flexibility and conformational variability in the reactive site loops. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:31391–400. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M304562200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barrette-Ng IH, Ng KK-S, Cherney MM, Pearce G, Ryan CA, James MNG. Structural basis of inhibition revealed by a 1:2 complex of the two-headed tomato inhibitor-II and subtilisin Carlsberg. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:24062–71. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M302020200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schirra HJ, Guarino RF, Anderson MA, Craik DJ. Selective Removal of Individual Disulfide Bonds within a Potato Type II Serine Proteinase Inhibitor from Nicotiana alata Reveals Differential Stabilization of the Reactive-Site Loop. J Mol Biol. 2010;395:609–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2009.11.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Joshi RS, Gupta VS, Giri AP. Differential antibiosis against Helicoverpa armigera exerted by distinct inhibitory repeat domains of Capsicum annuum proteinase inhibitors. Phytochemistry. 2014;101:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.01.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi RS, Mishra M, Tamhane VA, Ghosh A, Sonavane U, Suresh CG, et al. The remarkable efficiency of a Pin-II proteinase inhibitor sans two conserved disulfide bonds is due to enhanced flexibility and hydrogen bond density in the reactive site loop. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2014;32:13–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2012.745378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beekwilder J, Schipper B, Bakker P, Bosch D, Jongsma M. Characterization of potato proteinase inhibitor II reactive site mutants. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:1975–84. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01201.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saikhedkar NS, Joshi RS, Bhoite AS, Mohandasan R, Yadav AK, Fernandes M, et al. Tripeptides derived from reactive centre loop of potato type II protease inhibitors preferentially inhibit midgut proteases of Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;95:17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.02.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Khandelwal N, Doke DS, Khandare JJ, Jawale PV, Biradar AV, Giri AP. Bio-physical evaluation and in vivo delivery of plant proteinase inhibitor immobilized on silica nanospheres. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2015;130:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.03.060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tamhane VA, Dhaware DG, Khandelwal N, Giri AP, Panchagnula V. Enhanced permeation, leaf retention, and plant protease inhibitor activity with bicontinuous microemulsions. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;383:177–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2012.06.025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Northfield SE, Wang CK, Schroeder CI, Durek T, Kan MW, Swedberg JE, et al. Disulfide-rich macrocyclic peptides as templates in drug design. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;77:248–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.03.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang CK, Gruber CW, Cemazar M, Siatskas C, Tagore P, Payne N, et al. Molecular grafting onto a stable framework yields novel cyclic peptides for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. ACS Chem Biol. 2014;9:156–63. https://doi.org/10.1021/cb400548s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fittler H, Avrutina O, Empting M, Kolmar H. Potent inhibitors of human matriptase-1 based on the scaffold of sunflower trypsin inhibitor. J Pept Sci. 2014;20:415–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/psc.2629.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saikhedkar NS, Joshi RS, Yadav AK, Seal S, Fernandes M, Giri AP. Phyto-inspired cyclic peptides derived from plant Pin-II type protease inhibitor reactive center loops for crop protection from insect pests. Biochim Biophys Acta - Gen Subj. 2019;1863:1254–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.05.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Consortium TU. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D506–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mitchell AL, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Blum M, Bork P, Bridge A, et al. InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:D351–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceroni A, Passerini A, Vullo A, Frasconi P. DISULFIND: a disulfide bonding state and cysteine connectivity prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W177–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kozlowski LP. IPC – Isoelectric Point Calculator. Biol Direct. 2016;11:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-016-0159-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kong L, Ranganathan S. Tandem duplication, circular permutation, molecular adaptation: how Solanaceae resist pests via inhibitors. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9(Suppl 1):S22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-S1-S22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Jongsma MA, Beekwilder J. Co-evolution of insect proteases and plant protease inhibitors. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2011;12:437–47. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920311796391115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Flechtner-Mors M, Thoma U, Wittmann R, Boehm BO, Mors M, Steinacker JM, et al. The Effect of Potato Protease Inhibitor II on Gastrointestinal Hormones and Satiety in Humans During Weight Reduction. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther. 2020;13:521–34. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S201853.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Sheon Mary, University of Glasgow, UK for suggestions to revise the English language of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, under Niche Creating Project (NCP), Phyto-inspired-peptides for Crop Protection to National Chemical Laboratory (MLP101526), New Delhi, Government of India. The funding body provided financial support and had no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Nikhilesh K. Yadav and Nidhi S. Saikhedkar contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Publication and Science Communication Unit, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune, 411008, India

    Nikhilesh K. Yadav

  2. Information Systems Area, Indian Institute of Management Indore, Indore, 453556, India

    Nikhilesh K. Yadav

  3. Biochemical Sciences Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Dr. Homi Bhabha Road, Pune, 411008, India

    Nidhi S. Saikhedkar & Ashok P. Giri

  4. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India

    Nidhi S. Saikhedkar & Ashok P. Giri

Authors
  1. Nikhilesh K. Yadav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nidhi S. Saikhedkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ashok P. Giri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NKY developed database and website, prepared manuscript; NSS performed analysis, interpreted results and prepared manuscript; APG conceived the idea, plan and supervised overall work, and wrote the paper with comments from all authors. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok P. Giri.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Distribution of Pin-II type PIs. Figure S2. Occurrence of Type-I and Type-II linker regions. Figure S3. Percentage distribution of amino acids in Pin-II PIs. Table S1. Available information about the Pin-II type PI sequences in online databases. Table S2. Detail Table structures implemented in PINIR database. Table S3. Occurrence of IRDs in PINIR database. Table S4. Species-wise distribution of IRDs (occurrence frequency >10). Table S5. Domain architectures in Pin-II type PI family. Table S6. Species distribution of multidomain Pin-II PIs. Table S7. Genus-wise distribution of linker regions. Table S8. Species distribution of type-I linker regions in Pin-II PIs. Table S9. Species distribution of type-II linker regions in Pin-II PIs. Table S10. Occurrence and distribution of RCL. Table S11. Disulphide bonds architecture in IRDs. Table S12. Distribution of IRDs according to dsBond type and correlation with linker types. Table S13. Genus-wise distribution of IRDs in dsBond types.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, N.K., Saikhedkar, N.S. & Giri, A.P. PINIR: a comprehensive information resource for Pin-II type protease inhibitors. BMC Plant Biol 21, 267 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03027-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-03027-0

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us