Skip to main content

Ethylene enhances root water transport and aquaporin expression in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) exposed to root hypoxia



Root hypoxia has detrimental effects on physiological processes and growth in most plants. The effects of hypoxia can be partly alleviated by ethylene. However, the tolerance mechanisms contributing to the ethylene-mediated hypoxia tolerance in plants remain poorly understood.


In this study, we examined the effects of root hypoxia and exogenous ethylene treatments on leaf gas exchange, root hydraulic conductance, and the expression levels of several aquaporins of the plasma membrane intrinsic protein group (PIP) in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings. Ethylene enhanced net photosynthetic rates, transpiration rates, and root hydraulic conductance in hypoxic plants. Of the two subgroups of PIPs (PIP1 and PIP2), the protein abundance of PIP2s and the transcript abundance of PIP2;4 and PIP2;5 were higher in ethylene-treated trembling aspen roots compared with non-treated roots under hypoxia. The increases in the expression levels of these aquaporins could potentially facilitate root water transport. The enhanced root water transport by ethylene was likely responsible for the increase in leaf gas exchange of the hypoxic plants.


Exogenous ethylene enhanced root water transport and the expression levels of PIP2;4 and PIP2;5 in hypoxic roots of trembling aspen. The results suggest that ethylene facilitates the aquaporin-mediated water transport in plants exposed to root hypoxia.

Peer Review reports


Plant roots require sufficient amount of O2 for respiration and growth [1]. Contrary to anoxia, that is characterized by a total absence of O2, plant roots commonly experience periods of hypoxia, especially when O2 availability is reduced due to waterlogging [2] or soil compaction [3, 4]. Even in a normoxic environment, O2 gradients exist across tissues due to the differences in metabolic rates [5]. Although most of the terrestrial plant species cannot survive long-term O2 deficiency, some plants have developed effective strategies to either increase O2 delivery to roots or to tolerate short-term disruptions of the metabolism and the resulting toxicity [6].

Root hypoxia commonly alters plant water relations and may cause wilting [7, 8]. This effect was attributed to changes in the root system architecture [9] and an inhibition of aquaporin-mediated root water transport resulting in a decrease of root hydraulic conductivity [10, 11]. Aquaporins play a central role in plant water relations by regulating water flow resistance, which is especially important for the radial pathway in roots [9]. Aquaporin-mediated and apoplastic water transport interact with each other and regulate plant water balance [7, 12]. In addition to water, aquaporins can transport other small molecules including CO2 [13], NH3 [14] and O2 [15]. Plant aquaporins show high diversity with more than 30 different homologs in all of the examined species [9]. In higher plants, five subfamilies of aquaporins have been described including the PIPs (plasma membrane intrinsic proteins), TIPs (tonoplast membrane intrinsic proteins), NIPs (nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins), SIPs (small intrinsic proteins) and XIPs (uncategorized intrinsic proteins).

Aquaporins mediate root hydraulic adjustments in response to environmental factors [16]. Aquaporin expression [15], membrane trafficking [17], and posttranslational regulation [18] have been implicated in regulating cell-to-cell water transport in response to environmental stress. The closure of aquaporins through intracellular acidosis [11] and energy deprivation [19] was also proposed to be among the reasons for the decreased water uptake by hypoxic roots. Recently, a potassium-dependent O2 sensing pathway was proposed in Arabidopsis, which may regulate the aquaporin activity [20]. Although the inhibition of root hydraulic conductivity by hypoxia is a commonly observed phenomenon, it cannot be clearly correlated with the expression levels of water-transporting aquaporins and both decreases and increases of gene expression levels encoding for different PIP2 aquaporins have been reported in hypoxic roots [7, 21]. On the other hand, increased gene expression by root hypoxia of the NIP and PIP1 aquaporins was reported to be involved in the transport of lactate [22, 23], CO2 [24], and O2 [15] in plants, suggesting a possible role of these aquaporins in hypoxia tolerance.

The inhibitory effects of hypoxia on root water transport in some plants could be partly reversed by the exposure of roots to exogenous ethylene [19]. Ethylene synthesis and accumulation in plants can be induced by various biotic and abiotic stress, including drought [25], wounding [26], and flooding stresses [27], and is produced through the Yang cycle [28]. The effects of ethylene are mediatedby the downstream transcriptional activities of a group of Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs), which are rapidly upregulated following an exposure of plants to hypoxia [29]. Ethylene can improve plant hypoxia tolerance through the stimulation of adventitious roots and aerenchyma formation [29,30,31], however, only a few studies have focused on the relationship between ethylene and aquaporin-mediated water transport [31]. Aquaporins were reported to be involved in the ripening of grape berry and latex yield of rubber tree that were regulated by ethylene [32, 33] and it was recently reported that the cell water transport in Arabidopsis was increased by ethylene through the enhanced C-Terminal phosphorylation of AtPIP2;1 [29]. While these findings provide possible links between ethylene and aquaporin abundance as well as posttranslational regulation of aquaporins, more information is still needed for comprehensive understanding of the processes involved in regulation of root water transport by ethylene.

In the present study, we examined the effects of root hypoxia and exogenous ethylene application on gas exchange, water transport and the expression of ERF and aquaporin genes in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) seedlings to shed more light on the regulation of aquaporin-mediated water transport by O2 deficiency and ethylene. It was hypothesized that the effects of ethylene on root hydraulics under hypoxic conditions involve changes inthe aquaporin gene expression.


Leaf gas exchange and light responses

Hypoxia treatments significantly reduced leaf net photosynthesis rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr) and stomatal conductance (gs) (Table S1; Fig. 1). Ethylene-treated plants showed significantly higher Pn, gs and Tr compared with plants without ethylene treatment under hypoxic conditions, but not under aerated conditions (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Net photosynthesis (Pn, a), stomatal conductance (gs, b) and transpiration rates (Tr, c) in well-aerated trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) plants (A), well-aerated plants treated with ethylene (AE), plants exposed to hypoxia (H) and subjected to hypoxia and ethylene treatment (HE) for one week. Means ± SE (n = 6) are shown. Different letters indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05)

To evaluate the effects of treatments on leaf gas exchange under varying light conditions, we determined the light responses of Pn and gs. Hypoxia treatments significantly decreased the light saturation point (Im) and the level of Pn at light saturation (Pm) (Table S1; Fig. S1a). Ethylene treatments significantly increased Im but not Pm in hypoxic plants (Table 1). When exposed to hypoxia, ethylene-treated plants showed significantly higher Im compared with the plants that were not exposed to ethylene (Table S1). Light response of gs showed that gs gradually increased with increasing light intensity under aerated conditions, but light intensity had no effect on gs under hypoxic conditions (Fig. S1b).

Table 1 Comparison of estimated light-saturated photosynthesis (Pm) and light saturation point (Im) in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) plants after one week of treatments. Means ± SE (n = 3) are shown. Different letters indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05)

Root hydraulic conductance

Hypoxia resulted in a drastic decrease of root hydraulic conductance (Kr) (Table S1; Fig. 2). Exogenous ethylene did not affect Kr in well-aerated plants, but in the plants subjected to hypoxia, ethylene treatment significantly increased Kr by about 20 % compared with the hypoxic plants that were not treated with ethylene (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Root hydraulic conductance (Kr) in well-aerated trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) plants (A), well-aerated plants treated with ethylene (AE), plants exposed to hypoxia (H) and subjected to hypoxia and ethylene treatment (HE) for one week. Means ± SE (n = 6) are shown. Different letters indicate significant difference (P ≤ 0.05)

mRNA expression profiling

After one week of treatments, mRNA expression profiling was carried out by qRT-PCR. Hypoxia treatments significantly affected the relative transcript abundance of the five ethylene responsive factors (ERFs) (Table S1). Significant effects of ethylene were detected in ERF35 and ERF71, and interactions between hypoxia and ethylene treatments were also detected in these two genes (Table S1). Ethylene treatments significantly increased the relative transcript abundance of ERF18, ERF35 and ERF71 under hypoxic conditions, but not under aerated conditions (Fig. 3a). In contrast, the relative transcript abundance of the ERF17 and ERF76 in hypoxic plants were significantly higher compared with well-aerated plants, but showed no change compared with the plants exposed to both hypoxia and ethylene treatments (Fig. 3a).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Transcript abundance of ethylene responsive factors (ERFs, a) and plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs, b) in well-aerated trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) plants (A), well-aerated plants treated with ethylene (AE), plants exposed to hypoxia (H) and subjected to hypoxia and ethylene treatment (HE) for one week. Means ± SE (n = 4–6) are shown. Different letters indicate significant difference compared between each gene (P ≤ 0.05)

Considering PIPs expression level, hypoxia significantly decreased the relative transcript abundance of PIP1;2 and PIP2;2, but significantly increased the relative transcript abundance of PIP2;1 and PIP2;5 (Table S1; Fig. 3b). Ethylene-treated plants exhibited significantly higher PIP1;1, PIP2;4 and PIP2;5 transcripts compared with non-treated plants exposed to root hypoxia, but not under aerated conditions (Table S1; Fig. 3a,b).

Immunodetection of PIPs

Antibodies against PIP1 and PIP2 were used for the immunodetection of PIPs following SDS PAGE. Immunoreactive bands at ~ 50 kDa were detected (Fig. 4; Fig. S4). The staining intensity of the immunoreactive bands with both antibodies was weaker in the roots of hypoxic plants compared with the well-aerated treatment. Under hypoxia, the immunoreactive bands that were detected with the anti-PIP2 antibody showed an increase in intensity in the roots treated with ethylene, but no effect of ethylene on PIP1 was detected (Fig. 4; Fig. S4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Western-blot analyses of plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs) in well-aerated trembling aspen (P. tremuloides) plants (A), well-aerated plants treated with ethylene (AE), plants exposed to hypoxia (H) and in plants subjected to hypoxia and ethylene treatment (HE) for one week. Results from two independent biological replicates of each treatment are shown in the figure. Antibodies against Zea mays PIP1 and PIP2 were used for the immunodetection. Full-length blots were presented in Supplementary Fig. S4


The results demonstrate that the application of exogenous ethylene to roots partly alleviated the effects of hypoxia on root hydraulic conductance and leaf gas exchange. The effects of ethylene on PIP transcript profiles and protein abundance under hypoxic conditions were in parallel with changes of root hydraulic conductance and leaf transpiration rate, suggesting that the aquaporin-mediated water transport was the likely target of ethylene action.

Root hypoxia resulted in a drastic decrease of Kr in trembling aspen plants. A decrease of root water transport under O2 deficiency has been reported for different plant species [11]. Reduced water uptake under hypoxic conditions can be attributed to the impaired aquaporin-mediated water transport [8]. The O2 deficiency results in a transition from aerobic respiration to fermentation triggering energy crisis and causing cell acidosis which, in addition to reduced protein synthesis and phosphorylation, inhibits aquaporin gating [10, 11] and transmembrane water transport [34].

Similar to the earlier study [19], trembling aspen plants treated with exogenous ethylene under root hypoxia showed significantly higher Kr compared with plants that did not receive the ethylene treatment. In the present study, the effects of root hypoxia and ethylene on Kr were associated with the changes in aquaporin abundance. The relative transcript abundance of several PIPs responded differently to hypoxia and ethylene treatments. As limited information about aquaporins in Populus tremuloides, only several PIP1s and PIP2s were studied in our study. Both PIP1;2 and PIP2;2 transcripts were down-regulated while PIP2;1 and PIP2;5 transcripts were slightly up-regulated by hypoxia. The gene expression of PIP1;1, PIP2;4, PIP2;5 were not markedly altered by the hypoxia treatment, but were significantly upregulated by the ethylene treatment under hypoxia. Western blot analyses confirmed that hypoxia decreased the overall protein abundance of both PIP1s and PIP2s, but ethylene-treated plants showed higher PIP2s expression than the plants receiving no exogenous ethylene. In a previous study, PIP2;4 displayed striking up-regulation following defoliation accompanied by a recovery of Lpr in P. tremuloides demonstrating that this aquaporin plays an important role in regulation of water transport [35]. It should also be noted that PIP2;5 has been demonstrated to be the major root aquaporin in poplars P. tremula×tremuloides [36] and P. trichocarpa×deltoides [37], with a high permeability coefficient when expressed in Xenopus oocytes, pointing to the functional significance of its enhanced expression by ethylene in our study.

Although ethylene treatments increased the expression abundance of PIP1;1, PIP2;4 and PIP2;5, the protein immunodetection results only showed an overall higher intensity of PIP2s under hypoxia, suggesting that PIP2s are likely the main targets of ethylene. Earlier studies demonstrated that ethylene induced the expression of PIP2;1 in Hevea brasiliensis [28] and inhibited the PIP2;1 expression in Rosa hybrida [32, 38]. Ethylene can also affect the post-transcriptional regulation of plant aquaporins. It was reported that ethylene increased the C-terminal phosphorylation of Arabidopsis PIP2;1 protein and promoted cell water transport rate [29]. Given that aquaporins regulate root water transport [39] and that PIP2s are the main aquaporins involved in water transport [40], the increase in the abundance of PIP2s might play an important role in the amelioration of root hydraulics by ethylene. However, the possibility that the increase in the abundance of PIP2s may also affect the transport of other molecules that alter responses to hypoxia should not be excluded since some of the aquaporins are also involved in the transport of lactic acid [23], O2 [15] and CO2 [24].

In our study, root hypoxia led to the upregulation of ERFs transcript abundance in hypoxic roots, indicating a likely enhancement of ethylene levels in roots under hypoxic conditions [41]. However, we observed no change in the transcript abundance of genes related to endogenous ethylene synthesis, including ACS1, ACS2 and ACO1, by both hypoxia and exogenous ethylene (Fig. S5). It was reported that the entrapment of ethylene in the tissues of plants by stagnant water is the main factor responsible for its accumulation in roots [30], which may partly explain upregulation of ERFs by hypoxia even in the absence of increased ethylene synthesis. Under hypoxia, exogenous ethylene treatments increased ERF18, ERF35 and ERF71 transcript abundance compared to non-ethylene treatments, suggesting that exogenous ethylene treatment caused accelerated ethylene accumulation in trembling aspen roots. Thus, compared to non-ethylene treated plants, the increased ethylene accumulation in roots with exogenous ethylene treatments may contribute to the acclimation of plants to hypoxia by increasing the transcript abundance of PIP2 aquaporins and enhancing root hydraulics. In contrast, ethylene treatment did not change the expression levels of ERFs under aerated conditions, possibly due to the expulsion of dissolved ethylene by the air pumps in the hydroponic culture. On the other hand, the biosynthesis of ethylene in plants requires free O2 as a substrate [28] which may explain the observed interactions between hypoxia and ethylene treatments in ERF35 and ERF71 levels.

In the present study, ethylene treatment enhanced the gas exchange parameters in trembling aspen seedlings under hypoxic conditions. Photosynthetic responses to root hypoxia differ between plant species and are often used as indicators of hypoxia tolerance. In hypoxia-sensitive maize, net photosynthesis gradually decreased in response to flooding [29], but was maintained nearly unchanged in hypoxia-tolerant species Melaleuca cajuputi [42]. Other than the formation of adventitious roots and aerenchyma tissues to increase O2 supply to roots, the tolerance mechanisms that are responsible for this genetic diversity are still little understood [43]. In the present study, Pn, gs and Tr of trembling aspen showed sharp decreases in response to root hypoxia. However, ethylene treatments significantly increased Pn, gs and Tr under hypoxia and root porosity remained unchanged. It is well acknowledged that root hydraulics play a major role in restricting water delivery to leaves and are tightly linked to gas exchange [35, 44]. Aquaporins are essential in the adjustment and synchronization of root and leaf hydraulics. As demonstrated in partly defoliated trembling aspen, changes of root hydraulic conductivity and leaf transpiration rates were accompanied by major dynamic changes of the PIP expression in roots and leaves at different times and different degrees of defoliation [35]. In our study, since root hydraulic conductance was enhanced by the ethylene treatment in hypoxic plants, it is reasonable to assume that the amelioration of aquaporin-mediated root hydraulics through changes in the expression of PIPs was a likely contributor to the increase of gas exchange. Additionally, hypoxic treatment reduced Pm in trembling aspen which were similar with previous study with flooded Genipa americana seedlings [45]. However, ethylene treatment markedly increased Im in hypoxic plants, without affecting Pm. The change of light-saturated point in plants has been often reported to be due to the electron transport saturation and is reflected by the changes in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters [45]. In our study, no effects of ethylene on chlorophyll fluorescence were detected (data no shown). Furthermore, hypoxiatreatment also greatly hampered the gs responses to light. Taken together, the results point to stomatal constrains due to reduced water delivery to leaves as the major factor contributing to the photosynthetic responses of hypoxic plants to ethylene.


In conclusion, our study demonstrated that the treatment with exogenous ethylene altered aquaporin abundance, root hydraulics, and leaf gas exchange under root hypoxia conditions. The results point to the aquaporin gene expression, including PIP2;4 and PIP2;5, is among the targets of ethylene action in trembling aspen under hypoxia conditions, which enhances the aquaporin-mediated root water transport and, consequently, leaf gas exchange.


Growth conditions and hypoxia treatment

Trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seeds were collected and identified by Dr. Wenqing Zhang (Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta) from the North Saskatchewan River valley (Edmonton, AB, Canada). Authorization is not required for seed collection in this area. Seeds were sterilized twice with 1 % (v/v) sodium hypochlorite and germinated in horticultural soil in a controlled growth room with 18 h photoperiod, 22/18oC (day/night) temperature, 400 µmol m− 2 s− 1 photosynthetic photon flux density and 50 % relative humidity. When five-weeks old, the plants were removed from pots and after rinsing the roots free of soil, they were transferred to 40 L polyethylene containers (60 × 40 × 20 cm) filled with a quarter-strength aerated modified Hoagland’s solution [46]. The plants were kept there for one week to recover from transplanting shock and then 24 plants were transferred into individual 1 L amber plastic flasks. Of these plants, 12 were randomly selected and subjected to aeration treatment by flushing the solution in the flasks with air pumps to maintain a dissolved O2 concentration of about 7.5 mg L− 1 throughout the experiment. The remaining 12 plants were subjected to hypoxia treatment by flushing N2 gas (Praxair, Danbury, CT, USA) for 30 min through the solution until reaching an O2 level of 2 mg L− 1. When the desired O2 concentration was reached, the plants where left in the stagnant solution for one week. The dissolved O2 concentration, which was monitored during the experiment with the YSI-5000 O2 electrode (YSI Incorporated, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) and declined in the stagnant solution to less than 1 mg L− 1 over the one-week treatment period (Fig. S6). All plant measurements and sample collection were carried out on the seventh day of treatments.

Ethylene treatment

Half of the plants in the aerated control and hypoxia treatments (n = 6, respectively) were treated with exogenous ethylene at the beginning of the treatments. Ethylene was supplied to the hydroponic solution from the compressed gas cylinder through a tube stretched to the bottom of plastic bottles [19]. Dissolved ethylene concentration was determined at the onset of ethylene treatment with the headspace analysis method [47]. Briefly, 5 ml sample of hydroponic solution was collected into a gas-tight vacutainer. The headspace (10 %) was prepared by replacing water with N2, and the vacutainers were shaken at 1,400 RPM for 5 min. From the headspace, 100 µl gas samples were collected and injected into the Varian 430-GC gas chromatograph (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with a HP Plot-Q column (30 m×0.53 mm×40 μm, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The concentration of dissolved ethylene was calculated based on the Henry’s Law and a constant of 4.9 × 10− 3 M atm− 1 was used [47, 48]. The ethylene treatment resulted in an average dissolved ethylene concentration of 3.85 mmol L− 1.

Leaf gas exchange

One fully extended leaf was randomly selected from each of the six plants per treatment during 9:00 to 12:00 h to measure net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) using a LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System with a 2 × 3 cm2 red-blue light chamber (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). The reference CO2 concentration was set to 400 µmol mol− 1; the flow rate was 200 µmol s− 1. The leaf chamber temperature was maintained at 20 °C, and PPFD was 400 µmol m− 2 s− 1 of the red-blue light spectrum. To evaluate the effects of treatments on leaf gas exchange under varying light conditions, light responses of Pn and gs were established by setting an automated program with a starting photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 1500 µmol m− 2 s− 1, followed by 1200, 1000, 800, 500, 300, 200, 100, 50, 20 and 0 µmol m− 2 s− 1. Parameters were auto-logged when Pn reached steady state. Light saturated Pn (Pm) and light saturation point (Im) were estimated by fitting the data to a modified rectangular hyperbole model [49].

Root hydraulic conductance

Root hydraulic conductance (Kr) was measured with a high-pressure flow meter (HPFM, Dynamax Incorporated, Houston, TX, USA). During the measurements of six plants in each treatment, roots were kept in the respective treatment solutions. Linear regression between the supplied pressure and flow rate was obtained by applying increasing pressure to the roots, and the slope was calculated as Kr [50].

mRNA expression profiling

After one week of treatment, primary roots (3–5 cm-long distal root segments) of four to six plants from each treatment were collected and kept in liquid nitrogen before being transferred to -80oC freezer. Samples were ground with a mortar and pestle in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted with a Plant RNeasy extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). First strand of cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg total RNA using a Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). Quantitative RT-PCR was employed to analyze RNA expression using JIP1 (AJ407583.1) and ACTIN1 (Potri.001G309500) as reference genes, which did not change significantly across all tested samples (P = 0.36). The transcript abundance of PIP1;1 (AJ849323.1), PIP1;2 (AJ849322.1), PIP2;1 (AJ849324.1), PIP2;2 (AJ849325.1), PIP2;3 (AJ849326.1), PIP2;4 (AJ849327.1) and PIP2;5 (AJ849328.1) were determined. These PIPs have been proven to be functional and stress responsive in poplar plants [35]. The transcript abundance of five ethylene responsive factors (ERFs), ERF17, ERF18, ERF35, ERF71 and ERF76, was determined since these genes were reported to be induced by ethylene in P. tremula × tremuloides [41]. The relative transcript abundance was calculated using the 2−∆Ct method. The primers for trembling aspen PIPs [35] and ERFs [41] were designed as reported in the corresponding references (Table S2).

SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting

SDS gel electrophoresis was performed to separate proteins (10 µg) extracted from roots after one week of treatment. Gel was transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) by electroblotting at 100 V for 1 h. The membrane was blocked in 1 % BSA in TBST buffer (20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and 0.1 % Tween 20) for 3 h and then incubated with the anti-PIP1 (1:500) or -PIP2 (1:1000) primary antibody overnight at 4oC. The anti-PIP1 antibody (R-4445) was raised against an amino peptide from ZmPIP1;5 and the anti-PIP2 antibody (R-2493) was raised against an amino peptide from ZmPIP2;4 and was shown to recognize PIP1s and PIP2s in maize and Larix laricina (Provided by Dr. F. Chaumont) [51, 52]. The PIP antibodies were raised in rabbit against maize (Zea mays) PIPs. The membrane was rinsed 5 times for 5 min with TBST and then incubated in GAR IgG antibody (1:2000) (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON, Canada) for 1 h at room temperature. After rinsing the membrane with TBST 5 times for 5 min, alkaline phosphatase (Bio-Rad) was conjugated to detect signals.

Statistical analysis

The means and standard errors of aerated plants (A), aerated plants treated with ethylene (AE), hypoxic plants (H), and hypoxic plants treated with ethylene (HE) were calculated for each of the measured parameters. Two-way ANOVA was used to examine the effects of aeration (aerated vs. hypoxia treatments) and ethylene treatments (with or without ethylene). The data that did not meet the ANOVA assumptions of normality of distribution and homogeneity of variance were transformed with a square-root function. Comparisons between different treatment means were conducted using LSD test (α = 0.05).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Aerated plants.


Aerated plants treated with ethylene.


Ethylene response factor.

g s :

Stomatal conductance.


Hypoxic plants.


Hypoxic plants treated with ethylene.

I m :

Light saturation point.

K r :

Root hydraulic conductance.


Plasma membrane protein.

P m :

Light saturated net photosynthesis rate.

P n :

Net photosynthetic rate.

T r :

Transpiration rate.


  1. 1.

    Van Dongen JT, Licausi F. Oxygen sensing and signaling. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2015;66:345–67.

  2. 2.

    Herzog M, Striker GG, Colmer TD, Pedersen O. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat–a review of root and shoot physiology. Plant Cell Environ. 2016; 39:1068–1086.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Calvo-Polanco M, Zwiazek JJ, Voicu MC. Responses of ectomycorrhizal American elm (Ulmusamericana) seedlings to salinity and soil compaction. Plant Soil. 2008; 308:189–200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pandey BK, Huang G, Bhosale R, Hartman S, Sturrock CJ, Jose L, Martin OC, Karady M, Voesenek LACJ, Ljung K. Plant roots sense soil compaction through restricted ethylene diffusion. Science. 2021; 371:276–280.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Whipple C. Defining the plant germ line—nature or nurture? Science. 2012; 337:301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Voesenek LACJ, Bailey-Serres J. Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. New Phytol. 2015; 206:57–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Liu M, Tan X, Sun X, Zwiazek JJ. Properties of root water transport in canola (Brassica napus) subjected to waterlogging at the seedling, flowering and podding growth stages. Plant Soil. 2020; 454:431–445.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tan X, Xu H, Khan S, Equiza MA, Lee SH, Vaziriyeganeh M, Zwiazek JJ. Plant water transport and aquaporins in oxygen-deprived environments. J plant physiol. 2018; 227:20–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maurel C, Nacry P. Root architecture and hydraulics converge for acclimation to changing water availability. Nature plants. 2020; 6:744–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tornroth-Horsefield S, Wang Y, Hedfalk K, Johanson U, Karlsson M, Tajkhorshid E, Neutze R, Kjellbom P: Structural mechanism of plant aquaporin gating. Nature. 2006; 439:688–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tournaire-Roux C, Sutka M, Javot H, Gout E, Gerbeau P, Luu D-T, Bligny R, Maurel C. Cytosolic pH regulates root water transport during anoxic stress through gating of aquaporins. Nature. 2003; 425:393.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang P, Calvo-Polanco M, Reyt G, Barberon M, Champeyroux C, Santoni V, et al. Surveillance of cell wall diffusion barrier integrity modulates water and solute transport in plants. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:4227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Navarro-RoDenas A, Xu H, Kemppainen M, Pardo AG, Zwiazek JJ. Laccaria bicolor aquaporin LbAQP1 is required for hartig net development in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides). Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38:2475–2486.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jahn TP, Møller ALB, Zeuthen T, Holm LM, Klærke DA, Mohsin B, Kühlbrandt W, Schjoerring JK. Aquaporin homologues in plants and mammals transport ammonia. FEBS Lett. 2004; 574:31–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zwiazek JJ, Xu H, Tan X, Navarro-Rodenas A, Morte A. Significance of oxygen transport through aquaporins. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:40411.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Maurel C, Boursiac Y, Luu D-T, Santoni V, Shahzad Z, Verdoucq L. Aquaporins in plants. Physiol Rev. 2015; 95:1321–1358.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V. Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008; 59:595–624.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hachez C, Veljanovski V, Reinhardt H, Guillaumot D, Vanhee C, Chaumont F, Batoko H. The Arabidopsis abiotic stress-induced TSPO-related protein reduces cell-surface expression of the aquaporin PIP2;7 through protein-protein interactions and autophagic degradation. Plant Cell. 2014; 26:4974–4990.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kamaluddin M, Zwiazek JJ. Ethylene enhances water transport in hypoxic aspen. Plant Physiol. 2002; 128:962–969.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shahzad Z, Canut M, Tournaire-Roux C, Martiniere A, Boursiac Y, Loudet O, Maurel C. A potassium-dependent oxygen sensing pathway regulates plant root hydraulics. Cell. 2016; 167:87–98 e14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kadam S, Abril A, Dhanapal AP, Koester RP, Vermerris W, Jose S, Fritschi FB. Characterization and regulation of aquaporin genes of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] in response to waterlogging stress. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu F, VanToai T, Moy LP, Bock G, Linford LD, Quackenbush J. Global transcription profiling reveals comprehensive insights into hypoxic response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005; 137:1115–1129

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Choi W-G, Roberts DM. Arabidopsis NIP2; 1, a major intrinsic protein transporter of lactic acid induced by anoxic stress. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282:24209–24218.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Uehlein N, Sperling H, Heckwolf M, Kaldenhoff R. The Arabidopsis aquaporin PIP1;2 rules cellular CO2 uptake. Plant Cell Environ. 2012; 35:1077–1083.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sobeih WY, Dodd IC, Bacon MA, Grierson D, Davies WJ. Long-distance signals regulating stomatal conductance and leaf growth in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) plants subjected to partial root-zone drying. J Exp Bot. 2004; 55:2353–2363.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Reymond P, Weber H, Damond M, Farmer EE. Differential gene expression in response to mechanical wounding and insect feeding in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2000; 12:707–719

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Sasidharan R, Hartman S, Liu Z, Martopawiro S, Sajeev N, van Veen H, Yeung E, Voesenek LACJ. Signal dynamics and interactions during flooding stress. Plant Physiol. 2018;176:1106–17.

  28. 28.

    Yang SF, Hoffman NE. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1984; 35:155–189.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Qing D, Yang Z, Li M, Wong WS, Guo G, Liu S, Guo H, Li N. Quantitative and functional phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that ethylene regulates water transport via the C-terminal phosphorylation of aquaporin PIP2; 1 in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2016; 9:158–174.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sasidharan R, Voesenek LA. Ethylene-mediated acclimations to flooding stress. Plant Physiol. 2015;169:3-12.

  31. 31.

    Calvo-Polanco M, Ibort P, Molina S, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Zamarreño AM, García-Mina JM, Aroca R. Ethylene sensitivity and relative air humidity regulate root hydraulic properties in tomato plants. Planta. 2017;246:987-97.

  32. 32.

    Tungngoen K, Kongsawadworakul P, Viboonjun U, Katsuhara M, Brunel N, Sakr S, Narangajavana J, Chrestin H. Involvement of HbPIP2;1 and HbTIP1;1 aquaporins in ethylene stimulation of latex yield through regulation of water exchanges between inner liber and latex cells in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Physiol. 2009;151:843-56.

  33. 33.

    Chervin C, Tira‐umphon A, Terrier N, Zouine M, Severac D, Roustan JP. Stimulation of the grape berry expansion by ethylene and effects on related gene transcripts, over the ripening phase. Physiol Plantrum. 2008;134:534-46.

  34. 34.

    Alleva K, Niemietz CM, Sutka M, Maurel C, Parisi M, Tyerman SD, Amodeo G. Plasma membrane of Beta vulgaris storage root shows high water channel activity regulated by cytoplasmic pH and a dual range of calcium concentrations. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:609-21.

  35. 35.

    Liu J, Equiza MA, Navarro-Rodenas A, Lee SH, Zwiazek JJ. Hydraulic adjustments in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings following defoliation involve root and leaf aquaporins. Planta. 2014;240:553-64.

  36. 36.

    Marjanović Ž, Uehlein N, Kaldenhoff R, Zwiazek JJ, Weiß M, Hampp R, Nehls U. Aquaporins in poplar: what a difference a symbiont makes! Planta. 2005;222:258-68.

  37. 37.

    Almeida Rodriguez AM, Cooke JEK, Yeh F, Zwiazek JJ. Functional characterization of drought‐responsive aquaporins in Populus balsamifera and Populus simonii×balsamifera clones with different drought resistance strategies. Physiol Plantrum. 2010;140:321-33.

  38. 38.

    Ma N, Xue J, Li Y, Liu X, Dai F, Jia W, Luo Y, Gao J. Rh-PIP2;1, a rose aquaporin gene, is involved in ethylene-regulated petal expansion. Plant Physiol. 2008;148:894-907.

  39. 39.

    Javot H, Lauvergeat V, Santoni V, Martin-Laurent F, Guclu J, Vinh J, Heyes J, Franck KI, Schaffner AR, Bouchez D et al. Role of a single aquaporin isoform in root water uptake. Plant Cell. 2003;15:509-22.

  40. 40.

    Li D, Ruan, X, Zhang J, Wu Y, Wang X, and Li X. Cotton plasma membrane intrinsic protein 2s (PIP2s) selectively interact to regulate their water channel activities and are required for fibre development. New Phytol. 2013;199.3:695-707.

  41. 41.

    Vahala J, Felten J, Love J, Gorzsás A, Gerber L, Lamminmäki A, Kangasjärvi J, Sundberg B. A genome‐wide screen for ethylene‐induced Ethylene Response Factors (ERFs) in hybrid aspen stem identifies ERF genes that modify stem growth and wood properties. New Phytol. 2013;200:511-22.

  42. 42.

    Kogawara S, Yamanoshita T, Norisada M, Masumori M, Kojima K. Photosynthesis and photoassimilate transport during root hypoxia in Melaleuca cajuputi, a flood-tolerant species, and in Eucalyptus camaldulensis, a moderately flood-tolerant species. Tree Physiol. 2006;26:1413-23.

  43. 43.

    Bailey-Serres J, Voesenek L. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:313-39.

  44. 44.

    Rodriguez-Gamir J, Ancillo G, Gonzalez-Mas MC, Primo-Millo E, Iglesias DJ, Forner-Giner MA. Root signalling and modulation of stomatal closure in flooded citrus seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49:636-645.

  45. 45.

    Mielke MS, de Almeida A-AF, Gomes FP, Aguilar MAG, Mangabeira PAO. Leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and growth responses of Genipa americana seedlings to soil flooding. Environ Exp Bot. 2003;50:221-31.

  46. 46.

    Epstein EX. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives; New York: Wiley; 1972.

  47. 47.

    Kampbell DH, Vandegrift SA. Analysis of dissolved methane, ethane, and ethylene in ground water by a standard gas chromatographic technique. J Chromatographic Sci. 1998;36:253-256.

  48. 48.

    Sander R. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15:4399-981.

  49. 49.

    Ye ZP. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynthesis in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica. 2007;45:637-40.

  50. 50.

    Xu H, Kemppainen M, El Kayal W, Lee SH, Pardo AG, Cooke JE, Zwiazek JJ. Overexpression of Laccaria bicolor aquaporin JQ585595 alters root water transport properties in ectomycorrhizal white spruce (Picea glauca) seedlings. New Phytol. 2015;205:757-70.

  51. 51.

    Calvo-Polanco M, Señorans J, Zwiazek JJ. Role of adventitious roots in water relations of tamarack (Larix laricina) seedlings exposed to flooding. BMC Plant Biol. 2012; 12:99.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Lopez D, Venisse J-S, Fumanal B, Chaumont F, Guillot E, Daniels MJ, Cochard H, Julien J-L, Gousset-Dupont A. Aquaporins and leaf hydraulics: poplar sheds new light. Plant Cell Physiol. 2013;54:1963–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


This project was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Research Grant to JJZ.

Author information




All authors designed the experiments. XT performed experiments. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. XT and ML contributed equally to this work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janusz J. Zwiazek.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Table. S1

. Effects of hypoxia and ethylene on the parameters determined in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Table S2. List of qRT-PCR primers used in this study. Figure S1. Light response of net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Figure S2. Root length and shoot length in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Figure S3. Root porosity in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Figure S4. Full length original Western-blot pictures of PIP1s (a) and PIP2s (b) in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Figure S5. Transcript abundance of endo-ethylene synthesis related genes (ACO1, ACS1 and ACS2) in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides). Figure S6. Dissolved oxygen concentration during one-week treatments in trembling aspen (P. tremuloides).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tan, X., Liu, M., Du, N. et al. Ethylene enhances root water transport and aquaporin expression in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) exposed to root hypoxia. BMC Plant Biol 21, 227 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • aquaporin
  • ethylene
  • flooding
  • oxygen
  • hydraulic conductance