Skip to main content

A pattern-triggered immunity-related phenolic, acetosyringone, boosts rapid inhibition of a diverse set of plant pathogenic bacteria

Abstract

Background

Acetosyringone (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxyacetophenone, AS) is a syringyl-type phenolic compound rarely found in plants in free form. It has been shown earlier to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas bacteria in the presence of hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase (AS mix).

Results

We detected elevated levels of free AS in Nicotiana tabacum and N. benthamiana plants after inducing pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) by injecting bacterial elicitor flg22, or pathogenicity-mutant Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 hrcC- bacteria; but not after inoculations with compatible or incompatible pathogens at the time of PTI onset. In this study, we demonstrate that the antibacterial effect of the AS mix is general, as growth of several Gram-negative and -positive phytopathogenic bacteria was characteristically inhibited. The inhibition of bacterial metabolism by the AS mix was rapid, shown by the immediate drop of luminescence intensity of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 lx strain after addition of AS mix. The mechanism of the bacteriostatic effect was investigated using fluorescent reporter dye assays. SYTOX Green experiments supported others’ previous findings that the AS mix does not result in membrane permeabilization. Moreover, we observed that the mode of action could be depolarization of the bacterial cell membrane, as shown by assays carried out with the voltage sensitive dye DIBAC4(3).

Conclusions

Level of free acetosyringone is elevated during plant PTI responses in tobacco leaves (N. tabacum and N. benthamiana). When combined with hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase (AS mix), components of the mix act synergistically to inhibit bacterial metabolism and proliferation rapidly in a wide range of plant pathogens. This effect is related to depolarization rather than to permeabilization of the bacterial cell membrane. Similar AS mixture to the in vivo model might form locally at sites of invading bacterial attachment to the plant cells and the presence of acetosyringone might have an important role in the inhibition of bacterial proliferation during PTI.

Peer Review reports

Background

Similarly to the innate immune response of mammals, plants also have an inducible resistance system called pattern-triggered immunity (PTI). This form of plant resistance recruits pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that have a structure like Toll-like receptors (TLRs) of mammals. PTI, similarly to innate immune responses, can be triggered by microbe associated molecular patterns (MAMPs). These include a conserved peptide from bacterial flagellin (flg22), elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), peptidoglycan (PGN), lipopolysaccharides (LPSs), activator of XA21-mediated immunity in rice (Ax21) (reviewed in: [1, 2]). PTI can also be induced in planta by non-pathogens: saprophytes, commensals (e.g. Pseudomonas fluorescens) or pathogenicity mutants (e.g. Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 hrcC-) [3,4,5]. PTI is effective against a broad range of microbes and is able to suppress opportunistic pathogens. Its early signalling events include rapid calcium influx, activation of mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphorylation cascades, which then lead to production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), callose deposition, and defence gene expression, presumably mediating inhibition of microbial growth [6]. Disease-inducing, virulent P. syringae pv. tabaci in tobacco plant is able to block the MAMP-induced expression level alterations of specific genes coding for signal transduction and transcription regulation-related proteins [7].

During our previous work, we identified over 400 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) representing 176 individual genes that are activated during PTI in Nicotiana tabacum. Phenylpropanoid synthesis-related genes were highly represented and covered a major part of the currently known network of the phenylpropanoid pathway [8]. Our hypothesis was that elements of the phenylpropanoid pathway might play an important role in the inhibitory effects of PTI on bacteria, either by leading to cell wall fortification or by some phenolic compounds having direct antimicrobial effect, or else, by acting as a signalling agent, affecting virulence factors of bacteria. Lignification and induction of lignin monomers’ and related compounds’ synthesis has long been associated with plant defences [9, 10], and lately with flg22-induced immunity in Arabidopsis [11]. Recently, lignin deposition has been shown to spatially restrict bacterial pathogens and to limit their motility also in Arabidopsis [12].

Baker and colleagues [13] have detected accumulation of acetosyringone (AS) and some other phenolics in N. tabacum cell cultures, when treated with suspensions of P. syringae pv. syringae strain B7 (non-HR inducing). Later they have also shown that P. fluorescens, a non-pathogenic species causes elevation of AS in the apoplast fluid of N. tabacum [14]. In this study we describe detection and identification of AS in N. benthamiana and N. tabacum leaves using high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-mass spectrometry (HPLC-DAD-MS), moreover, we show the MAMP (i.e. flg22) associated accumulation of this phenolic compound, and suggest that it is a marker of PTI in tobacco plants.

We sought for compound(s) that are accumulated during PTI in both Nicotiana model species, because while N. tabacum is a classical model plant to study bacterial interactions in the Solanaceae family, parallel data from N. benthamiana might later prove to be useful as well, as transient silencing and overexpression studies are easier to carry out in the latter species. We investigated if appearance of AS is specific for PTI in N. benthamiana and whether it correlates temporally with the onset of PTI, using HPLC-DAD-MS. Based on reports of AS as an enhancer of laccase activity [15] and having antibacterial activity when combined with horseradish peroxidase and hydrogen peroxide [16], we tested a wide range of plant pathogenic bacteria to detect antibacterial activity. We also used luminescent P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 bacteria to monitor effects on bacterial metabolic activity. Finally, to gain information about the mode of action of AS we used fluorescent dyes to measure membrane permeabilization and membrane depolarization of affected bacteria.

Results

Identification of acetosyringone, a metabolite correlated with PTI onset

Our first aim was to detect and identify phenolic metabolite that are specifically more (or less) abundant in N. benthamiana leaves in association with the onset of PTI. N. benthamiana leaves were infiltrated with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae hrcC- (P. s. syringae hrcC-) suspension or flg22 peptide to induce PTI, and water as a control. Both PTI inducers were used at concentrations that caused reliable HR-inhibition at 6 h post inoculation (flg22 at 50 μM, P. s. syringae hrcC- at 109 CFU/ml), based on works of Nguyen et al. and Chakravarthy et al. [17, 18]. Inhibition of HR, sometimes referred to as an “HR test” is an indicator of the onset of effective PTI and correlates well with the onset of local resistance that is able to halt bacterial proliferation after a challenge inoculation [3, 8, 17]. Leaf samples were taken 6 h later and extracts were analyzed by HPLC-DAD-MS to find PTI-related phenolic compounds. Extraction from N. benthamiana leaves was performed with 90% aqueous methanol according to recommendations in literature [19].

We detected several putative phenolic compounds (with characteristic UV spectra) in PTI-induced N. benthamiana leaves (data not shown). Works of others [13, 20] carried out on N. tabacum helped identification of some of these compounds. In this manuscript, we focus on one specific compound (m/z 197 [M + H]+) that occurred selectively in PTI-induced (6 h post inoculation, hpi) N. benthamiana leaves (Fig. 1a), and was identified as acetosyringone (3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxyacetophenon), by comparison of its MS (Fig. 1b) and UV (Fig. 1c) spectra and retention time (Fig. 1a) to those of an analytical standard. Spiking the standard compound into the plant extracts resulted in clear elevation of the putative AS peak.

Fig. 1
figure1

Identification of PTI-related phenolic compound acetosyringone by HPLC-DAD-MS using analytical standard in Nicotiana benthamiana. a HPLC-DAD analysis of phenolic compounds from PTI-induced and water-treated control N. benthamiana leaves detected at 298 nm. PTI was induced by P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- bacteria, water was injected as control. Samples were taken at 2, 4, 6 hpi. b MS spectra of AS had the expected m/z values in both positive and negative modes, identical to that of the standard. c) Identity of acetosyringone was supported by the similar UV spectra of the analytical standard and the unknown peak. Abbreviations: AS: acetosyringone, ESI+, ESI-: electrospray ionization positive and negative modes, Std: standard, W: water

We found AS especially interesting, because besides P. s. syringae hrcC- treatment, it was also strongly induced in flg22 peptide-treated N. benthamiana leaves, but was not detectable in water treated controls at 6 hpi (Fig. 2a). The abundance of AS correlated closely with PTI in the leaves of both N. benthamiana (Fig. 2a), and tobacco (N. tabacum, Additional file 1). AS itself was first isolated from N. tabacum leaf exudates and root culture medium, where it was established to be exudate specific, not passively leaking out from damaged plant cells [21]. Baker et al. have reported accumulation of AS in tobacco cell culture media [13] and in the apoplastic fluid [14] after treatment with different bacteria.

Fig. 2
figure2

Relative accumulation of acetosyringone in N. benthamiana leaves. a Response to treatments with P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- bacteria at 2, 6 and 24 hpi. b Relative accumulation of AS in N. benthamiana leaves in response to treatments with different bacteria at 6 hpi. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant difference from corresponding water-treated controls according to student’s T-test (*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05). Red downward arrows indicate zero values. W: water-treated control; P. s.: Pseudomonas syringae pathovars; flg: flg22 peptide elicitor

Changes in phenolic metabolite levels

To see if elevated level of AS occurs in different plant-bacterium interactions, we analyzed 6 hpi samples from N. benthamiana leaves injected with suspensions of a compatible bacterium: Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci, two incompatible bacteria: P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and P. syringae pv. syringae 61, PTI inducing bacterium: P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- (109 CFU/ml each), and a PTI-inducing MAMP: flg22 peptide. Water-treated controls were also analyzed. Interestingly, AS displayed a unique pattern: it was only detected in flg22 and P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- treated samples – the two PTI- induced samples; but it was absent (below detection limit) in the rest of the samples at the used concentrations (Fig. 2b). Time course experiments supported the gradual accumulation of AS during the course of the build-up of effective PTI both in N. benthamiana (Fig. 2a) and N. tabacum (Additional file 1). It should be noted that there appears a co-timing with inhibition of HR and of proliferation of compatible bacteria upon challenge inoculation; which usually becomes effective also at 5–6 h after induction of PTI [22].

Antimicrobial effect of acetosyringone in combination with hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase against plant pathogenic bacteria

Several sources reported that AS or related acetophenones have antifungal or antibacterial effects. Lorimer and Perry [23] reported isolation of two major antifungal active components from Plagiochila fasciculata (New Zealand liverwort). These were identified as 2-hydroxy-4,6-dimethoxyacetophenone and 2-hydroxy-3,4,6-trimethoxyacetophenone. The relatively high activity of the crude extract was due to the high level of these compounds in the plant (6–7 mg/g dried plant for both). In vitro oxidation of AS with hydrogen peroxide by a peroxidase can create a prolonged oxidative environment similar to the oxidative burst in tobacco suspension cells inoculated with incompatible bacteria according to Mock et al. [16].

Based on the latter, we tested if in vitro oxidation of AS results in antimicrobial effects against bacterial strains corresponding to different plant (tobacco)-bacterium interactions (Fig. 3a-b). P. s. pv. tomato DC3000 and P. s. pv. syringae 61, and the PTI-inducing bacterium P. s. pv. syringae hrcC- and other plant pathogenic bacteria were tested, including wild type tumorigenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains (from cherry, sour cherry and dahlia) [24] and a disarmed laboratory strain (A. tumefaciens C58C1) [25]. Virulence genes of Agrobacteria are activated by AS, and they are known to be poor inducers of PTI marker genes (Szatmári et al. 2006). We combined 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2 and 0.72 U/ml peroxidase in phosphate buffer, containing 105 CFU/ml suspensions of different bacteria. Serial dilutions were plated after 3 h of co-incubation. No growth of the Pseudomonas, Xanthomonas, Pectobacterium, Clavibacter or Curtobacterium strains was detected after 3 h of incubation in the complete reaction mixture. On the contrary, Agrobacterium growth was retained in the case of two of the examined strains. When omitting different components of the mixture, some Pseudomonas strains were still inhibited to various extent. For example CFU counts of P. s. pv. syringae hrcC- were lowered by one order of magnitude when treated with H2O2 and peroxidase. However, when the mixture was completed with AS, no growth was detected at all. AS alone was not effective against any of the strains, so the combination of acetosyringone with peroxidase activity is essential. Activation of tobacco peroxidase activity in planta at the time interval of AS production during PTI has been shown earlier [3].

Fig. 3
figure3

Antimicrobial effect of oxidized form of acetosyringone on different plant pathogenic bacteria. Bacteria (105 CFU/ml) were added to reaction mixtures containing 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml horseradish peroxidase, and various control mixtures from which one or two components were omitted. Serial dilutions were plated following 3 h of co-incubation for CFU determination. a Typical representative examples of serial dilutions plated on Kings’s B agar plates. Right half of each plate: no dilution (0×), left side of each plate: 10× dilution (indicated with blue lettering). Numbering of treatment combinations applied to the bacterial suspensions: 1. non-treated control; 2. AS; 3. H2O2; 4. H2O2 + POX; 5. AS + H2O2 + POX; 6. HK. b Diagram showing quantification of the results. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant difference from corresponding water-treated controls according to student’s T-test (*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05). Downward arrows indicate zero values. Abbreviations: Bact: bacterium, AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase

When identical concentrations of AS, H2O2 and peroxidase were combined with higher concentrations of bacteria, the mixture was not effective in CFU reduction. At 5 × 107 CFU/ml Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci and Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 were apparently unaffected, and at 5 × 106 CFU/ml they only showed a 5–6-fold reduction in CFU counts (Additional file 2). There seems to be a strong factor depending on bacterial concentration that seems to counter the effect of oxidized AS.

We were curious about the changes occurring in the AS mix after combining the ingredients. We found that the amount of AS is diminishing over time only in the full AS mix, but not in the partial mixes containing AS+POX or AS+H2O2 (Additional file 3A). New compounds appeared only in the latter throughout the 180 min period (Additional file 3B).

The LC–mass spectrometry analysis of the full AS mix reaction yielded m/z peaks corresponding to AS itself (m/z = 197, [M + H]+; (m/z = 195, [M-H]-); putative compounds syringaldehyde (m/z = 183, [M + H]+; (m/z = 181, [M-H]-) and 2,6-DMQB (2,6-dimethoxy-p-benzoquinone, m/z = 169, [M + H]+) and several other peaks corresponding to unknown compounds (Additional file 3B). Putative identification of the newly formed compounds was based on data from literature [26, 27].

The catalytic cycle of oxidases like peroxidases and laccases in general involves an intermediate phenoxy radical after phenolic substrates release a proton and an electron when they are oxidized in the enzymatic step to produce radicals. The phenoxy radicals can be involved in the radical recombination, cross-coupling and self-coupling resulting in disproportionation, dimerization, polymerization, or oxidation of other substrates [26, 28]. The resulting compounds are expected to be the products of such reactions.

We used a luminescent P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 strain that is tagged chromosomally with the luxCDABE gene cluster [29] to monitor the changes in bacterial cell viability caused by oxidized AS. Viable P. s. pv. tomato DC3000 lux bacteria actively emit a constant level of luminescence. We planned to monitor the time dependent decrease of luminescence, when combined with oxidized AS. We found that the luminescence level dropped virtually immediately to the background level of heat killed bacteria already at the first measurement (5 min) after administration of the AS + H2O2 + POX cocktail (Fig. 4). This response was significantly faster than the effect caused by H2O2 alone or H2O2 combined with peroxidase. AS alone did not reduce bioluminescence. In fact, it seemed to significantly increase bioluminescence compared to untreated bacteria, a phenomenon that needs further investigations to find an explanation. Altogether, these results implied that metabolic activity of the bacteria was halted immediately after addition of the AS + H2O2 + POX cocktail. Therefore, not only is the mixture more effective in inhibiting bacterial proliferation than H2O2 + peroxidase alone, but acts much quicker on the bacteria, at least as far as metabolic activity is concerned.

Fig. 4
figure4

Bioluminescence changes of indicator bacteria after treatment with oxidized AS. 105 CFU/ml of P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 lux, a luminescent P. syringae strain was added to reaction mixtures containing 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml POX, and various control mixtures from which one or two components were omitted. Bioluminescence was measured at indicated time points. Different letters above the bars denote different levels of luminescence assigned by Tukey’s Test (P < 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviations. AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, P.s. tomato DC3000 lux: Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 luminescent strain, POX: horseradish peroxidase

Testing viability and membrane depolarization of acetosyringone mix treated bacterial cells by enhanced fluorescence of selected dyes

We tested several fluorescent dyes to be able to detect viability of bacteria upon treatment with AS mixture (Fig. 5a-c). The SYTOX Green and TO-PRO-3 iodide assays are generally used to assess bacterial cell membrane integrity, while DIBAC4(3) is known to be able to report slower speed membrane depolarization. With DIBAC4(3) and TO-PRO-3 iodide we found that the H2O2 + POX and AS + H2O2 + POX mixtures caused bleaching of the added dye (Fig. 5b, c), testing by addition of heat killed bacteria (HK BACT), therefore no valid detection of staining was possible. Destaining enhancing effect of acetosyringone (and other phenolic compounds) is known to facilitate destaining of even recalcitrant dyes by aggressive oxidation. AS seems to be a superior mediator of bleaching as compared to other tested molecules [15]. Because the redox potential in the AS + H2O2 + POX mixture returns to nearly basal level after 2–3 h [16], we added the fluorescent dyes 3 h after adding the reaction mixtures to the wells. This allowed detection of SYTOX Green and DIBAC4(3) fluorescence in the HK BACT + H2O2 + POX and HK BACT + AS + H2O2 + POX mixtures as well (Fig. 5a, c), while in the case of TO-PRO-3 Iodide the bleaching still occurred and still no fluorescence was detectable. This phenomenon might mean that at 3 h there is still significant remaining oxidizing capacity in the H2O2 + POX and AS + H2O2 + POX mixtures that is able to bleach TO-PRO-3 (Fig. 5b), but not SYTOX Green and DIBAC4(3) (Fig. 5a, c). TO-PRO even seemed to go through significant fading in the control wells during the 3-h incubation. Therefore, we concluded that DIBAC4(3) is a suitable dye to detect bacterial cell membrane depolarization after treatment of cells by AS + H2O2 + POX mixture, given that the dye is added only 3 h after the addition of the original reaction mixture.

Fig. 5
figure5

Evaluation of applicability of different fluorescent dyes for the detection of membrane permeability and membrane depolarisation in the AS mix system. Different fluorescent dyes were tested for usability to measure membrane permeability: SYTOX Green (a), TO-PRO (b); and membrane depolarisation: DIBAC4(3) (c). Fluorescence of indicator dyes in reaction mixtures containing 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml POX, and various control mixtures from which one or two components were omitted was measured. Fluorescent dyes were added either immediately (0 h) or 3 h after preparation of the mixtures to see if bleaching occurs. HK P. syringae pv. tabaci suspension was also added 3 h after mixture preparation to 5 × 106 CFU/ml final density. Fluorescence was measured 4 h after preparation of the mixtures. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant difference from corresponding controls according to student’s T-test (*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05). Abbreviations: CONT: untreated bacteria, AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase, AU: arbitrary unit

DIBAC4(3) is a voltage sensitive fluorescent dye, which can be used to monitor the dissipation of the membrane potential, not just increasing membrane permeability in general as in the case of propidium iodide (PI) or SYTOX Green dyes [30]. The latter dyes can only penetrate bacterial cells and dye the nucleoid when membrane integrity is compromised. However, the death of a cell can also result from dissipation of the transmembrane potential, which can be detected by voltage sensitive fluorescent dyes such as DIBAC4(3). This dye reports longer term depolarization but does not measure instant changes [31].

Depolarization of the bacterial membrane contributes to the inhibitory effect of oxidized acetosyringone on bacteria

We compared elevations of DIBAC4(3) fluorescence values in control and AS mix-treated bacterial suspensions of three species at two cell concentrations. Bacteria were incubated in the mixtures for 3 h, then DIBAC4(3) was added, finally, fluorescence was recorded after 1 h of co-incubation (Fig. 6a-b). The AS mixture affected fluorescence differently at the two bacterial concentrations used. At 5 × 107 CFU/ml there was none or just a small elevation in fluorescence as compared to the untreated control in any of the bacteria (Fig. 6a). In contrast, at 5 × 106 CFU/ml the fluorescence of the AS mix-treated bacteria was closer to the values of the heat killed controls (Fig. 6b). This correlated with the previous finding, that higher concentrations of bacteria were less affected by the same AS mix as far as the drop in colony forming units is concerned (section 2.3). Reading of fluorescence below 5 × 106 CFU/ml bacterial density was not sensitive enough, therefore, we used microscopy to detect fluorescent cells in more diluted suspensions.

Fig. 6
figure6

Dependence of bacterial membrane depolarisation on bacterial density after treatment with oxidized AS. Suspensions of 5 × 107 (a) and (b) 5 × 106 CFU/ml of P. syringae pv. tabaci, P. syringae pv. tomato DC3000 or A. tumefaciens bacteria were added to reaction mixtures containing 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml POX, and various control mixtures from which one or two components were omitted. Bacterial membrane polarity was tested with the voltage sensitive DIBAC4(3) stain added 3 h after treatments of bacteria. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Different letters above the bars denote different levels of DIBAC4(3) fluorescence assigned by Tukey’s Test (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: Cont: non-treated control bacteria, AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase, Blank: buffer only

Corresponding literature suggests that DIBAC4(3) is correlated to bacterial cell death in many, but by far not all cases, as membrane depolarisation does not necessarily mean full permeabilization of the membrane [30]. Therefore, to address this issue in the case of the AS mix, we found it necessary to carry out parallel experiments with a dye that measures cell viability by detecting membrane permeability to larger molecules, such as SYTOX Green (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure7

Membrane depolarization and permeability testing of bacteria after treatment with oxidized AS as a function of bacterial concentration. Dilution series of bacteria from 5 × 107 to 0.625 × 107 CFU/ml of P. syringae pv. tabaci and A. tumefaciens C58C1 bacteria was added to reaction mixtures containing 50 μM AS, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml POX. Untreated bacteria were used as negative, and heat killed bacteria as positive controls. Bacterial membrane polarity was tested with the voltage sensitive DIBAC4(3) stain, and membrane permeability with SYTOX Green stain, both added 3 h after treatment of bacteria. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant difference from corresponding controls according to student’s T-test (*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05). Abbreviations: BACT: bacterium, AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase, AU: arbitrary unit

To test, if the level of cell membrane depolarisation correlates to or diverges from cell membrane permeability when AS mix is added to plant pathogenic bacteria, the same AS mix was applied to bacterial suspensions with increasing densities. A Pseudomonas and an Agrobacterium strain were randomly selected as representative strains. Heat killed bacteria were used as positive controls both for membrane depolarisation (DIBAC4(3)) and membrane permeability (SYTOX Green). At lower bacterial densities (0.625 × 107 and 1.25 × 107 CFU/ml), significant difference was detected between DIBAC4(3) fluorescence of non-treated and AS mix-treated bacteria. This difference diminished towards higher bacterial densities, in the case of both bacterial species, and became insignificant in the case of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci. These data indicated that membrane depolarisation is counteracted by bacteria, using an unknown mechanism. In contrast to DIBAC4(3), SYTOX Green fluorescence did not increase upon treatment with the AS mix. This was the case with both bacteria at all densities. Therefore we concluded that the AS mix might induce depolarization of the bacterial membrane, when bacterial density is relatively low, compared to the concentration of the components of the acetosyringone mix. On the other hand, no permeabilization of the bacterial membrane occurs.

Microscopic evaluation of cell viability

Fluorescent microscopy was used to augment fluorescence measurements to visualize the depolarization of the bacterial cell membrane at low CFU and to compare this to the degree of membrane permeabilization, if detectable. The latter has been investigated by Postnikova et al. [32] on P. syringae pv. syringae using LIVE/DEAD® BacLight fluorescent stain, which utilizes propidium iodide (PI) to detect membrane permeability. The authors there found no permeabilization of the bacterial membrane by oxidized AS.

Here we used the same dyes as in section 2.5., as both dyes have been shown before to be suitable for microscopy of bacteria. The voltage sensitive dye Dibac4(3) is known not to inhibit bacterial growth and proliferation, therefore it has even been used for time lapse microscopy [30]. SYTOX Green has widely been applied for viability staining of bacteria. We used each dye with DAPI as a counterstain to envisage all bacteria in the microscope’s field of view. As shown earlier, the inhibitory effect of the AS mix is inversely proportional to bacterial counts, therefore we worked here with a low (105 CFU/ml) density of P. syringae pv. tabaci bacteria, similarly to the CFU reduction experiments (Additional file 2). Cells were incubated in the AS mix or buffer as control for 3 h, and dyes were added only then to prevent bleaching by oxidation (Fig. 8). DIBAC4(3) fluorescence was absent in untreated control samples, however it was remarkably strong in the AS mix-treated samples and in the heat-killed samples (Fig. 8a). This means that bacterial membranes are depolarized when the cells are incubated in the AS mix. In contrast, SYTOX Green, the dye specific for permeabilized membranes left the AS mix-incubated bacteria unstained, meaning that the membranes did not become permeable to larger molecules (Fig. 8b). The results of microscopy experiments supported those obtained by fluorescence measurements. Taken together, AS in combination with hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase resulted in membrane depolarization, but negligible membrane permeability, based on staining with specific fluorescent dyes.

Fig. 8
figure8

Fluorescent microscopic images of P. syringae pv. tabaci bacteria treated with an AS mix, and stained to evaluate changes in membrane permeability and polarity. P. syringae pv. tabaci (105 CFU/ml) was treated with a mixture of AS + H2O2 + POX. After 3 h of shaking, (a) DIBAC4(3), an indicator dye of membrane depolarization or (b) SYTOX Green, an indicator of membrane permeability, and DAPI as counterstain were added and co-incubated for 1 h. After concentration of the bacteria, microscopic slides were prepared and photographed within 1–2 h. Bar = 100 μm. Abbreviations: Control: untreated bacteria AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase

Investigation of the in planta effect of AS mix on compatible P. syringae pv. tabaci

We carried out in vivo experiments to see if external administration of the AS mix enhances the ability of tobacco plants to withstand the attack of compatible P. syringae pv. tabaci. Bacteria were suspended in 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6) to 106 CFU/ml. AS mix components (AS, hydrogen peroxide, horseradish peroxidase) were added to final concentrations used in vitro (in section 2.4.). Then the prepared bacterial mixtures were injected into interveinal areas of tobacco leaves either immediately or after 3 h of incubation to see if the reaction mixture is able to inhibit bacterial cells in the intracellular space. Bacteria were re-isolated from the leaf tissue by grinding the leaves in a mortar and colony forming units were counted by dilution plating (Fig. 9).

Fig. 9
figure9

Proliferation of compatible P. syringae pv. tabaci (106 CFU/ml inoculum) bacteria in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Bacteria were suspended in 0.01 M potassium phosphate buffer pH 6. Mixture of AS+H2O2 + POX was added to the bacteria. N. tabacum leaves were infiltrated either immediately or after 3 h of incubation. Samples for bacterial counts were taken at 0, 2, 7 dpi. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Significant difference from untreated bacterial control according to student’s T-test is marked by a * (p < 0.1). Abbreviations: AS mix: acetosyringone combined with hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase, HK: heat killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase

Our results indicated that while the applied AS mix effectively lowered colony forming unit numbers of P. syringae pv. tabaci bacteria by cca. 2 orders of magnitude during the 3 h of incubation, no reduction in colony number was observed when the mixture was immediately injected into the leaf. P. syringae pv. tabaci bacteria proliferated at similar pace irrespective of the type of pre-treatment. In each case, bacterial counts increased about 1.5–2 orders of magnitude in the first two days, then declined slightly by the seventh day. The in vitro pre-treated bacteria could not reach a relatively higher apparent rate of proliferation as compared to the non-treated and the immediately injected bacteria. The ratio of colony forming units re-isolated from the plants inoculated with the non-treated control over that of the 3 h-preincubated bacteria increased from 30 to 65-fold by the end of the 7th day. This tells us, that if part of the bacteria were in VBNC state, they were apparently not able to return to normal state within the plant tissue, under the applied circumstances.

Discussion

Our results indicate that AS, a tobacco metabolite specifically appearing in N. tabacum and N. benthamiana after PTI induction either by HR-negative mutant P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- bacteria or the flg22 elicitor peptide at the time point (5–6 hpi) when PTI starts to be effective against bacterial multiplication, causes a rapid inactivation of certain plant pathogenic bacteria in vitro, when in an oxidative environment.

During our present study, AS was only detected in the PTI-induced (flg22 and P. syringae hrcC-) samples at 6 hpi. This was especially interesting, as it was found to rapidly inhibit several phytopathogenic Pseudomonas bacterium species, when combined with hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase in vitro. These results are even more interesting as over-expression of C4H (cinnamate 4-hydroxylase) has been shown to increase the accumulation of AS in elicited tobacco cell-suspension cultures [33]. Moreover, an OMT (O-methyltransferase) capable to synthesise AS was found in methyl jasmonate-treated tobacco cell-suspension cultures [34]. These changes in acetosyringone levels would be worth to be analyzed in the future in C4H and OMT overexpressing plants.

We demonstrated that the antibacterial effect of the AS mix is inversely proportional to bacterial density. Moreover, some Agrobacterium isolates are more resistant to the AS mix than the remaining plant pathogenic bacteria tested. A straightforward explanation to these phenomena could be the antioxidant capacities possessed by bacteria, e.g. the constitutive and inducible catalase enzyme activities. Xu and Pan [35] have shown that an Agrobacterium strain deficient in catalase activity was highly attenuated in the ability to cause tumours on plants compared with the wild type. Thus, catalase was considered a virulence factor of Agrobacterium, and our results might provide a possible confirmation for an antioxidant enzyme being a virulence factor, however further investigations are needed. Agrobacteria are known to have a peroxide and phosphate limitation-inducible catalase gene (KatA), which was also shown to be regulated by a negative feedback loop [36, 37]. Complex regulatory mechanisms may eventually lead to higher resistance of Agrobacteria to oxidative stress. Pseudomonas species and other plant pathogens are also known to have functioning catalase and OxyR (a hydrogen peroxide-sensing transcriptional activator) [38], moreover, Pseudomonas syringae catalases were shown to be necessary for plant pathogenesis [39].

We investigated two possible antibacterial mechanisms of the AS mix using fluorescent dyes as reporters of membrane permeabilization and membrane depolarization. We found that AS in combination with hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase resulted in membrane depolarization, but negligible membrane permeability. Our results were in concordance with those of Baker and colleagues [14] who have shown in flow cytometry experiments that PI was not able to penetrate Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae bacterial cells after treatment with the AS mix. They also have shown that these bacterial cells reached a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, supported by sustained cellular respiration. Our present data imply that this perceived VBNC state is reached following significant depolarization of the bacterial cell membrane. Mariano et al. [40] made similar observations, when investigating a toxin (Ssp6) secreted by Serratia marcescens, that was able to cause depolarization of target cells as detected by DIBAC4(3), without increasing membrane permeability for larger dye molecules such as PI, similarly to SYTOX Green in our present study. In another study, Spindler et al. [41] reported an antimicrobial mechanism where membrane depolarization and permeabilization were not correlated. The peptide antibiotic Bac8c caused almost immediate but reversible membrane depolarization of the Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli at the IC50 concentration while no increase in membrane permeability was detected. At a higher concentration, depolarisation of the bacterial membrane still occurred within 5 min, and in that case, membrane permeabilization also followed, but only within 30 min. Our results underline that membrane depolarization and membrane permeabilization might be present simultaneously in the activity mechanism of antimicrobial agents or these two effects might be decoupled as in the present case of oxidized AS.

Non-impaired proliferation of the AS mix treated, and immediately injected compatible bacteria in planta indicates that there might be one or more factors in the plant intercellular space that either scavenges hydrogen peroxide fast, and/or metabolizes or binds free AS. The provided 50 μM concentration of H2O2 in the AS mix might prove insufficient in vivo. In resistant interactions, plants might produce significantly higher amounts at the location of bacterial invasion. ROS production has especially been widely investigated during defence reactions (Reviewed in [42]). Respiratory burst associated with pathogen attack is thought to have a signalling role, moreover, ROS might also contribute to direct antimicrobial effects in different pathosystems [43, 44]. Oxidative burst in Arabidopsis produced by apoplastic peroxidases has also been shown as an essential part of resistance [45]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) producing cell wall peroxidases and a plasma membrane-localized NADPH oxidase, which are active during fungal infection, were recently identified by Kámán-Tóth and colleagues [46] in Arabidopsis.

Our group reported induction of peroxidase genes and peroxidase activity during PTI in tobacco leaves earlier [3, 8]; as well as localised production of hydrogen peroxide in the cell wall adjacent to the attachment site of PTI-inducing hrpL mutant of Pseudomonas phaseolicola in N. tabacum using electron microscopy [22]. Co-localized accumulation of H2O2 and peroxidases at the site of bacterial attachment to the plant cell wall and around bacteria themselves were also reported in leaves of various plants after infection with different bacteria including hrp mutant pathogens [47, 48]. These microscopic phenomena with the simultaneous accumulation of AS suggest that the conditions might be given locally for an antibacterial mix that, as we have shown, can be effective against wide range of bacterial pathogens. The in planta role of AS is however not clear at the moment, therefore further investigations would be necessary. Based on the above cited literature one possibility is the formation of local points of high antimicrobial activity near the cell wall peroxidases or NADPH oxidases, when AS concentration is also elevated in the intercellular space is most probable.

Conclusion

During this work, we managed to reveal an indicator metabolite of pattern triggered immunity of Nicotiana plants. Modeling the oxidizing milieau of the intercellular space of plants invaded by PTI-inducing bacteria in vitro, we demonstrated the ability of acetosyringone combined with hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase to inhibit the growth of several different plant pathogenic bacteria. We have also shown that metabolic inhibition of the bacteria is almost immediate, moreover, that the antimicrobial effect is not based on membrane permeabilization, but on membrane depolarization of bacteria.

Based on our results we propose that besides some phenolic acids directly inhibiting bacterial growth, it seems that the interplay of a phenolic compound (e.g. acetosyringone) and the oxidative burst (generated by hydrogen peroxide and peroxidase) might enhance antibacterial activity. Investigation of the in vivo role of AS, and its interrelation with other components of the complex ROS production system of plants however will require more complex methods in the future.

Our results add a new aspect to the types of of antimicrobial activities found in plants. Direct antimicrobial activity of metabolites derived from plants have been widely investigated (reviewed in [49]). Antimicrobial activity of ROS in plants has long been studied as well [50, 51]. Enhanced antimicrobial activity resulting from the reaction of secondary metabolites and hydrogen peroxide, leading to strong antimicrobial activity is a relatively novel area that is worth extensive investigation. Plant metabolites that are produced after specific induction, like PTI elicitors in this case, might be a rich source of compounds with indirect antimicrobial activity.

Methods

Plant material

Tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum cv. Samsun and Nicotiana benthamiana) were grown in the greenhouse in soil (General potting mix from peat, clay and cow manure (Florimo® általános virágföld) pH 6.4+/− 0.5, Matécsa Ltd., Kecel, Hungary, completed with 5 V/V% perlite (Florimo® Kertészeti Perlit, 2-6 mm, Matécsa Ltd., Kecel, Hungary). Two days before and during the experiments, the 2–2.5-month-old tobacco plants were kept in a growth chamber with 16/8 h light/dark period at 23 °C. Hypodermic syringes fitted with a 25 gauge needle were used for the infiltration of the 2–3 middle leaves with bacterial suspensions or solution of flg22 peptide. At the appropriate time points, leaf samples were frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 70 °C until processing. Water-infiltrated adjacent leaves next to the treated ones (in the case of N. benthamiana) or fully separated interveinal areas on the same leaves (in the case of N. tabacum) were used as control. Every experiment was carried out on at least two plants in parallel as biological replications. The experiments were also repeated at least twice using different plant generations to confirm the detected trends.

Bacterial and chemical treatments

All bacterial strains (Table 1) were cultured at 28 °C on King’s medium B [55]. Sources and reference publication of each bacterial strain is included in Table 1. Overnight cultures of bacteria were suspended in distilled water and adjusted to OD 1.0 or OD 0.21 at 560 nm (109 or 108 CFU/ml). Bacteria were diluted to the required density from this stock. Bacterial density was routinely verified by the plate dilution method before carrying out the experiments. Briefly, 10 μl from the 10 times dilution of the 105 CFU/ml suspension was plated before starting the experiments, and colonies were counted 48 h later. The flg22 peptide (Genescript, USA) was dissolved in sterile double-distilled water to a stock solution of 1 mM. This was further diluted in sterile double-distilled water to 50 μM to infiltrate N. benthamiana plants.

Table 1 Bacterium strains used in this study

High-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-mass spectrometry (HPLC-DAD-MS)

For sample preparation, 100 mg leaf samples were ground with a mortar and pestle under liquid nitrogen. After addition of 500 μl 90% methanol they were heated to 70 °C for 15 min. The samples were then sonicated two times with an ultrasonic homogenizer (series 4710, Cole Parmer Instrument Co., IL, USA) at 55% for 45 s. Then the samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 13000 rpm. The supernatant was filtered through 0.22 μm pore size hydrophilic PTFE syringe filters (Gen-lab Ltd., Hungary), and an aliquot was used for subsequent analysis.

Standards containing 0.02 mg/ml neocholorogenic acid, cryptochlorogenic acid, chlorogenic acid, acetosyringone, salicylic acid, cinnamic acid, coumaric acid and caffeic acid (each from Sigma St Louis, MO, USA) were run parallelly. Gradient grade acetonitrile (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburg, PA, USA), formic acid (98–100%, Reanal, Budapest, Hungary) and pure water (purification equipment: Merck Millipore Direct-Q 3 UV system) were used in HPLC mobile phase.

HPLC-DAD-MS was used to identify and quantify phenolic compounds. The analysis was performed on an LC-MS-2020 system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a binary gradient solvent pump, a vacuum degasser, a thermostated autosampler, a column oven, a photodiode detector and a single-quadrupole mass analyzer with electrospray ionization (ESI) interface. Chromatographic separations were carried out at 35 °C on a Reprospher 100 C18-DE column (150 mm × 3 mm ID, 5 μm particle size, Dr. Maisch, Ammerbuch, Germany) using 0.8 ml/min mobile phase flow rate and 10 μl injection volume. The gradient of 5% aqueous acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (B) was as follows: 0–10 min, 5–15% B; 10–17 min, 15–65% B; 17.1–19.5 min, 100% B and 19.51–22 min, 5% B. ESI worked under the following conditions: desolvation line (DL) temperature, 250 °C; heat block temperature, 400 °C; drying N2 gas flow, 15 l/min; nebulizer N2 gas flow, 1.5 l/min. Full mass scan spectra were recorded in the positive and negative ionization mode in the range of m/z 130–700 and selected-ion monitoring (SIM) acquisition was also performed detecting the base peak of phenolics found in the samples during pre-investigations. Data were acquired and processed using the program LabSolutions 5.42v (Shimadzu).

In vitro susceptibility testing

Susceptibility of the phytopathogenic bacteria (Table 1) to oxidized AS was tested by serial dilutions and plating based on the method published by Mock et al. (2015). Briefly, acetosyringone (AS; Sigma St Louis, MO, USA) was dissolved in ethanol to gain a 50 mM stock solution, which was then diluted to 50 μM final concentration in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (PPB), pH 6. AS was used either alone, or in combination with 50 μM H2O2 (from 30% H2O2, Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) and horseradish peroxidase (POX). This mixture of acetosyringone combined with hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase is referred to as acetosyringone mix (AS mix). Type VI horseradish peroxidase (P8375-2KU, Sigma) stock (720 U/ml) was prepared in 100 mM PPB, pH 6. Its final concentration was 0.72 U/ml in 10 mM PPB, pH 6.

Bacteria were grown as indicated in section 5.2., then were diluted to 105 CFU/ml in 10 mM PPB, pH 6. The following treatment combinations were applied to the bacterial suspensions: 1. non-treated control; 2. AS; 3. H2O2; 4. H2O2 + POX; 5. AS + H2O2 + POX; 6. Heat-Killed (HK) at 70 °C for 10 min. Bacteria were incubated in the above treatment combinations in a thermoshaker (Stat Fax® 2200, Awareness Technology, Florida, USA) for 180 min at 27 + − 0.1 °C with continuous shaking (200 rpm), then were diluted 10 times. 10 μl of original and diluted mixtures were spread onto King’s B agar plates, and colonies were counted 2 days later. Treatments on each bacterial strain were carried out in duplicates at a time and were repeated at least twice on different days.

Monitoring changes in the acetosyringone reaction mixture by mass-spectrometry

Testing solutions were prepared as described in section 5.4 but in 0.01 M ammonium acetate buffer pH 6. AS in combination with H2O2 or POX and AS mix were analysed by flow injection analysis using an LC-MS 2020 system (without column). Water (purified with Merck Millipore Direct-Q 3 UV system) with 2% methanol (gradient grade, Molar Chemicals, Budapest, Hungary) was used as mobile phase with 0.3 mL/min flow rate and 10 μL was injected immediately and at 5, 30, 60, 120 and 180 min after the preparation of the mixtures. The mixtures were kept at 25 °C during this time. The ESI-MS settings was the same as given in section 5.3, but full mass scan spectra were recorded in the positive and negative ionization mode in the range of m/z 150–800.

Membrane depolarization and permeability assays

For membrane depolarization and permeability assays, bacterial density was adjusted to given values between 5 × 106 and 5 × 107 CFU/ml. Testing solutions and mixtures were prepared as described in section 5.4. Volumes of treatment combinations were 200 μl, experiments were carried out in 96 well microtiter plates in duplicates. Mixtures were incubated in a thermoshaker (Stat Fax® 2200, Awareness Technology, Florida, USA) for 180 min at 27 + − 0.1 °C with continuous shaking at 200 rpm. Fluorescent indicator dyes were then added, and co-incubated for 60 min.

The fluorescent dye DIBAC4(3) (Biotium Inc., CA, USA) stock solution was 1 mg/ml dissolved in DMSO. This was further diluted 1:1000 in the experimental mixture.

SYTOX® Green and TO-PRO®-3 fluorescent dyes were from the SelectFX Nuclear Labeling Kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). SYTOX® Green (60 μg/ml in DMSO) and TO-PRO®-3 (210 μg/ml in DMSO) stock solutions were both diluted 1:300 as recommended by the manufacturer.

Fluorescence was then recorded by an iBright™ FL1000 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. MA, USA) in the GFP channel. Quantification was performed using the NIH ImageJ [56] software ReadPlate2.1 plugin.

Fluorescent microscopy

For fluorescent microscopy, bacterial density was adjusted to 105 CFU/ml. Testing solutions and mixtures were prepared as described in section 5.4. Volumes of treatment combinations were 1 ml. Mixtures were incubated in a thermoshaker (Stat Fax® 2200, Awareness Technology, Florida, USA) for 180 min at 27 + − 0.1 °C with continuous shaking. Fluorescent indicator dyes were then added, and co-incubated for 60 min. Bacterial cells were then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 1 min. Then 990 μl of the supernatant was discarded, the bacterial cells were re-suspended in the remaining 10 μl, and taken for fluorescent microscopy immediately.

The fluorescent dyes DIBAC4(3) and SYTOX Green were used at the same concentrations as described in section 5.6. DAPI originated from the SelectFX Nuclear Labeling Kit (60 μg/ml in DMSO; Invitrogen, CA, USA), and was used at 1:300 dilution, as recommended by the manufacturer.

Fluorescent microscopic images were collected using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 Plus fluorescent microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH). SYTOX Green and DIBAC4(3) (green fluorescence) were detected in epifluorescent mode using a filter set composed of a 450–490 nm excitation filter, a 495 nm dichroic mirror, and a 500–550 nm barrier filter. DAPI (blue) fluorescence was detected using a fluorescent filter set composed of a 365 nm excitation filter, a 395 nm dichroic mirror, and a 420–470 nm barrier filter. Overlay images were generated using NIH ImageJ software [56]. Brightness and contrast adjustments were applied across entire images and controls using NIH ImageJ. Brightness and contrast were maintained so that every captured feature remains clearly visible in each image.

In vivo (in planta) bacterial proliferation testing

Tobacco plants were grown as described in 2.1. Density of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci bacteria was adjusted to 106 CFU/ml. Testing solutions and mixtures were prepared in 0.01 M PPB pH 6 as described in section 5.4. Treatments were the following: 1. bacteria (control); 2. bacteria + 50 μm AS + 50 μm H2O2 + 0.72 U/ml POX; mixture injected immediately; 3. bacteria + 50 μm AS + 50 μm H2O2 + 0.72 U/ml POX; mixture injected following 3 h of shaking at 27 °C. Hypodermic syringes fitted with a 25 gauge needle were used for the infiltration of the 3 middle leaves of tobacco with bacterial suspensions as described by [57]. Eight pieces of 11 mm diameter discs from three leaves per time point were homogenised in 800 μl 10 mM MgCl2 in a mortar. The number of viable cells was calculated by the plate-count technique on King’s B agar plates. The experiment was carried out twice with similar results.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

PTI:

pattern-triggered immunity

AS:

acetosyringone

AS mix:

mixture of acetosyringone, hydrogen peroxide and horseradish peroxidase

POX:

horseradish peroxidase

PRRs:

plant resistance recruits pattern recognition receptors

TLRs:

Toll-like receptors

MAMPs:

microbe associated molecular patterns

EF-Tu:

elongation factor Tu

PGN:

peptidoglycan

LPSs:

lipopolysaccharides

MAPK:

mitogen activated protein kinase

ROS:

reactive oxygen species

ESTs:

expressed sequence tags

HPLC-DAD-MS:

high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-mass spectrometry

PPB:

potassium phosphate buffer

HK:

heat-killed

HK BACT:

heat killed bacteria

P. s. syringae:

Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae

P. s. tabaci:

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci

P. s. tomato:

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato

X. c. campestris:

Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris

P. c. carotovorum:

Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum

C. m. michiganensis:

Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis

HR:

hypersensitive response

hpi:

hours post inoculation

ESI:

electrospray ionization

PI:

propidium iodide

VBNC:

viable but non-culturable

References

  1. 1.

    T. Boller, G. Felix, A renaissance of rlicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors, Annu Rev Plant Biol 60 (2009) 379–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105346, 1.

  2. 2.

    M.A. Newman, T. Sundelin, J.T. Nielsen, G. Erbs, MAMP (microbe-associated molecular pattern) triggered immunity in plants, Front Plant Sci 4 (2013) 139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00139.

  3. 3.

    Z. Bozso, P.G. Ott, A. Szatmari, A. Czelleng, G. Varga, E. Besenyei, E. Sardi, E. Banyai, Z. Klement, Early detection of bacterium-induced basal resistance in tobacco leaves with diaminobenzidine and dichlorofluorescein diacetate, J Phytopathol 153 (2005) 596–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.2005.01026.x, 10.

  4. 4.

    A. Szatmari, P.G. Ott, G.J. Varga, E. Besenyei, A. Czelleng, Z. Klement, Z. Bozsó, Characterisation of basal resistance (BR) by expression patterns of newly isolated representative genes in tobacco, Plant Cell Rep. 25 (2006). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-005-0110-5.

  5. 5.

    A.R. Ramos, J.E. Morello, S. Ravindran, W.L. Deng, H.C. Huang, A. Collmer, Identification of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 type III secretion system Hrp proteins that can travel the type III pathway and contribute to the translocation of effector proteins into plant cells, J. Bacteriol. 189 (2007) 5773–5778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00435-07.

  6. 6.

    J. Withers, X. Dong, Post-translational regulation of plant immunity, Curr Opin Plant Biol 38 (2017) 124–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2017.05.004.

  7. 7.

    Z. Bozsó, P.G. Ott, E. Kámán-Tóth, G.F. Bognár, M. Pogány, Á. Szatmári, Overlapping yet response-specific transcriptome alterations characterize the nature of tobacco–Pseudomonas syringae interactions, Front Plant Sci 7 (2016) 251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00251.

  8. 8.

    Á. Szatmári, Á. Zvara, Á.M. Móricz, E. Besenyei, E. Szabó, P.G. Ott, L.G. Puskás, Z. Bozsó, Pattern triggered immunity (PTI) in tobacco: isolation of activated genes suggests role of the phenylpropanoid pathway in inhibition of bacterial pathogens, PLoS One 9 (2014) e102869. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102869, 8.

  9. 9.

    C.P. Vance, T.K. Kirk, R.T. Sherwood, Lignification as a mechanism of disease resistance, Annu Rev Phytopathol 18 (1980) 259–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.18.090180.001355, 1.

  10. 10.

    R.A. Dixon, C.J. Lamb, S. Masoud, V.J.H. Sewalt, N.L. Paiva, Metabolic engineering: prospects for crop improvement through the genetic manipulation of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and defense responses - a review, Gene. 179 (1996) 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(96)00327-7, 1.

  11. 11.

    W.R. Chezem, A. Memon, F.S. Li, J.K. Weng, N.K. Clay, SG2-type R2R3-MYB transcription factor MYB15 controls defense-induced lignification and basal immunity in arabidopsis, Plant Cell 29 (2017) 1907–1926. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00954, 8.

  12. 12.

    M. Lee, H.S. Jeon, S.H. Kim, J.H. Chung, D. Roppolo, H. Lee, H.J. Cho, Y. Tobimatsu, J. Ralph, O.K. Park, Lignin-based barrier restricts pathogens to the infection site and confers resistance in plants, EMBO J. 38 (2019). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2019101948.

  13. 13.

    C.J. Baker, B.D. Whitaker, D.P. Roberts, N.M. Mock, C.P. Rice, K.L. Deahl, A.A. Aver’Yanov, Induction of redox sensitive extracellular phenolics during plant-bacterial interactions, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 66 (2005) 90–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.05.002, 3.

  14. 14.

    C.J. Baker, N.M. Mock, J.M. Smith, A.A. Aver’yanov, The dynamics of apoplast phenolics in tobacco leaves following inoculation with bacteria, Front Plant Sci 6 (2015) 649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00649.

  15. 15.

    S. Camarero, D. Ibarra, M.J. Martínez, Á.T. Martínez, Lignin-derived compounds as efficient laccase mediators for decolorization of different types of recalcitrant dyes, Appl Environ Microbiol 71 (2005) 1775–1784. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.4.1775-1784.2005, 4.

  16. 16.

    N.M. Mock, C.J. Baker, A.A. Aver’yanov, Induction of a viable but not culturable (VBNC) state in some Pseudomonas syringae pathovars upon exposure to oxidation of an apoplastic phenolic, acetosyringone, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 89 (2015) 16–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2014.11.006.

  17. 17.

    H.P. Nguyen, S. Chakravarthy, A.C. Velásquez, H.L. McLane, L. Zeng, H. Nakayashiki, D.H. Park, A. Collmer, G.B. Martin, Methods to study PAMP-triggered immunity using tomato and nicotiana benthamiana, Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 23 (2010) 991–999. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-8-0991, 8.

  18. 18.

    S. Chakravarthy, A.C. Velásquez, S.K. Ekengren, A. Collmer, G.B. Martin, Identification of Nicotiana benthamiana genes involved in pathogen-associated molecular pattern-triggered immunity, Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 23 (2010) 715–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-23-6-0715, 6.

  19. 19.

    K. Cho, Y. Kim, S.J. Wi, J.B. Seo, J. Kwon, J.H. Chung, K.Y. Park, M.H. Nam, Nontargeted metabolite profiling in compatible pathogen-inoculated tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Wisconsin 38) using UPLC-Q-TOF/MS, J. Agric. Food Chem. 60 (2012) 11015–11028. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303702j.

  20. 20.

    M.I. Mhlongo, P.A. Steenkamp, L.A. Piater, N.E. Madala, I.A. Dubery, Profiling of altered metabolomic states in Nicotiana tabacum cells induced by priming agents, Front Plant Sci 7 (2016) 1527. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01527.

  21. 21.

    S.E. Stachel, E. Messens, M. Van Montagu, P. Zambryski, Identification of the signal molecules produced by wounded plant cells that activate T-DNA transfer in Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Nature. 318 (1985) 624–629. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/318624a0, 6047.

  22. 22.

    Z. Klement, Z. Bozsó, M.L. Kecskés, E. Besenyei, C. Arnold, P.G. Ott, Local early induced resistance of plants as the first line of defence against bacteria, Pest Manag Sci 59 (2003) 465–474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.694, 4.

  23. 23.

    S.D. Lorimer, N.B. Perry, Antifungal hydroxy-acetophenones from the New Zealand liverwort, Plagiochila fasciculata, Planta Med 60 (1994) 386–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-959511, 04.

  24. 24.

    S. SÜLE, Biotypes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in Hungary, J Appl Bacteriol 44 (1978) 207–213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.1978.tb00792.x, 2.

  25. 25.

    C. Koncz, J. Schell, The promoter of TL-DNA gene 5 controls the tissue-specific expression of chimaeric genes carried by a novel type of Agrobacterium binary vector, MGG Mol Gen Genet 204 (1986) 383–396. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00331014, 3.

  26. 26.

    T. Rosado, P. Bernardo, K. Koci, A. V. Coelho, M.P. Robalo, L.O. Martins, Methyl syringate: an efficient phenolic mediator for bacterial and fungal laccases, Bioresour Technol 124 (2012) 371–378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.023.

  27. 27.

    A. Martorana, L. Sorace, H. Boer, R. Vazquez-Duhalt, R. Basosi, M.C. Baratto, A spectroscopic characterization of a phenolic natural mediator in the laccase biocatalytic reaction, J Mol Catal B Enzym 97 (2013) 203–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2013.08.013.

  28. 28.

    C. Jacyn Baker, D.P. Roberts, N.M. Mock, B.D. Whitaker, K.L. Deahl, A.A. Aver’yanov, Apoplastic redox metabolism: synergistic phenolic oxidation and a novel oxidative burst, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 67 (2006) 296–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2006.04.005, 6.

  29. 29.

    J. Fan, C. Crooks, C. Lamb, High-throughput quantitative luminescence assay of the growth in planta of Pseudomonas syringae chromosomally tagged with Photorhabdus luminescens luxCDABE, Plant J 53 (2007) 393–399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03303.x, 2.

  30. 30.

    J.D. te Winkel, D.A. Gray, K.H. Seistrup, L.W. Hamoen, H. Strahl, Analysis of antimicrobial-triggered membrane depolarization using voltage sensitive dyes, Front Cell Dev Biol 4 (2016) 29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00029.

  31. 31.

    Alakomi HL, Mättö J, Virkajärvi I, Saarela M. Application of a microplate scale fluorochrome staining assay for the assessment of viability of probiotic preparations. J Microbiol Methods. 2005;62(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2005.01.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    O.A. Postnikova, J. Shao, N.M. Mock, C.J. Baker, L.G. Nemchinov, Gene Expression Profiling in Viable but Nonculturable (VBNC) Cells of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Front. Microbiol. 6 (2015) 1419. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01419.

  33. 33.

    J.W. Blount, S. Masoud, L.W. Sumner, D. Huhman, R.A. Dixon, Over-expression of cinnamate 4-hydroxylase leads to increased accumulation of acetosyringone in elicited tobacco cell-suspension cultures, Planta. 214 (2002) 902–910. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-001-0701-5, 6.

  34. 34.

    Negrel J, Javelle F, Wipf D. Detection of an O-methyltransferase synthesising acetosyringone in methyl jasmonate-treated tobacco cell-suspensions cultures. Phytochemistry. 2014;99:52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.12.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    X.Q. Xu, S.Q. Pan, An Agrobacterium catalase is a virulence factor involved in tumorigenesis, Mol Microbiol 35 (2000) 407–414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01709.x, 2.

  36. 36.

    K. Nakjarung, S. Mongkolsuk, P. Vattanaviboon, The oxyR from Agrobacterium tumefaciens: evaluation of its role in the regulation of catalase and peroxide responses, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 304 (2003) 41–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(03)00535-7, 1.

  37. 37.

    Z.-C. Yuan, R. Zaheer, T.M. Finan, Phosphate limitation induces catalase expression in Sinorhizobium meliloti, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Mol Microbiol 58 (2005) 877–894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04874.x, 3.

  38. 38.

    Ishiga Y, Ichinose Y. Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato Oxyr is required for virulence in tomato and Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2016;29:119–31 https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-09-15-0204-R.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    M. Guo, A. Block, C.D. Bryan, D.F. Becker, J.R. Alfano, Pseudomonas syringae catalases are collectively required for plant pathogenesis, J Bacteriol 194 (2012) 5054–5064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00999-12, 18.

  40. 40.

    G. Mariano, K. Trunk, D.J. Williams, L. Monlezun, H. Strahl, S.J. Pitt, S.J. Coulthurst, A new family of Type VI secretion system-delivered effector proteins displays ion-selective pore-forming activity, BioRxiv. (2019) 676247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/676247.

  41. 41.

    E.C. Spindler, J.D.F. Hale, T.H. Giddings, R.E.W. Hancock, R.T. Gill, Deciphering the mode of action of the synthetic antimicrobial peptide bac8c, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55 (2011) 1706–1716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01053-10, 4.

  42. 42.

    D. Camejo, Á. Guzmán-Cedeño, A. Moreno, Reactive oxygen species, essential molecules, during plant-pathogen interactions, Plant Physiol Biochem 103 (2016) 10–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.035.

  43. 43.

    C. Lamb, R.A. Dixon, The oxidative burst inplant disease resistance, Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48 (1997) 251–275. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.251, 1.

  44. 44.

    J.A. Hernández, G. Gullner, M.J. Clemente-Moreno, A. Künstler, C. Juhász, P. Díaz-Vivancos, L. Király, Oxidative stress and antioxidative responses in plant–virus interactions, Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 94 (2016) 134–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2015.09.001.

  45. 45.

    L. V. Bindschedler, J. Dewdney, K.A. Blee, J.M. Stone, T. Asai, J. Plotnikov, C. Denoux, T. Hayes, C. Gerrish, D.R. Davies, F.M. Ausubel, G.P. Bolwell, Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance, Plant J 47 (2006) 851–863. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02837.x, 6.

  46. 46.

    E. Kámán-Tóth, T. Dankó, G. Gullner, Z. Bozsó, L. Palkovics, M. Pogány, Contribution of cell wall peroxidase- and NADPH oxidase-derived reactive oxygen species to Alternaria brassicicola -induced oxidative burst in Arabidopsis, Mol Plant Pathol 20 (2019) 485–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12769, 4.

  47. 47.

    Bestwick CS, Brown IR, Mansfield JW. Localized changes in peroxidase activity accompany hydrogen peroxide generation during the development of a nonhost hypersensitive reaction in lettuce. Plant Physiol. 1998;118(3):1067–78. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.118.3.1067.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    K. Mitchell, I. Brown, P. Knox, J. Mansfield, The role of cell wall-based defences in the early restriction of non-pathogenic hrp mutant bacteria in Arabidopsis, Phytochemistry. 112 (2015) 139–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.07.015.

  49. 49.

    P. Bednarek, P. Schulze-Lefert, Role of plant secondary metabolites at the host-pathogen interface, in: Annu. Plant Rev. Online, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2018: pp. 220–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119312994.apr0368.

  50. 50.

    B. Barna, J. Fodor, B.D. Harrach, M. Pogány, Z. Király, The Janus face of reactive oxygen species in resistance and susceptibility of plants to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens, Plant Physiol Biochem 59 (2012) 37–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.01.014.

  51. 51.

    S. Lehmann, M. Serrano, F. L’Haridon, S.E. Tjamos, J.P. Metraux, Reactive oxygen species and plant resistance to fungal pathogens, Phytochemistry. 112 (2015) 54–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2014.08.027.

  52. 52.

    H.C. Huang, R. Schuurink, T.P. Denny, M.M. Atkinson, C.J. Baker, I. Yucel, S.W. Hutcheson, A. Collmer, Molecular cloning of a Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae gene cluster that enables Pseudomonas fluorescens to elicit the hypersensitive response in tobacco plants, J. Bacteriol. 170 (1988) 4748–4756. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.170.10.4748-4756.1988.

  53. 53.

    Cuppels DA. Generation and characterization of Tn5 insertion mutations in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1986;51.

  54. 54.

    C. Vogel, G. Innerebner, J. Zingg, J. Guder, J.A. Vorholt, Forward genetic in planta screen for identification of plant-protective traits of Sphingomonas sp. strain Fr1 against Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78 (2012) 5529–5535. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00639-12.

  55. 55.

    E.O. King, M.K. Ward, D.E. Raney, Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin, J Lab Clin Med 44 (1954) 301–307. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5555/uri:pii:002221435490222X, 2.

  56. 56.

    C.A. Schneider, W.S. Rasband, K.W. Eliceiri, NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis, Nat Methods 9 (2012) 671–675. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089, 7.

  57. 57.

    Klement Z. Generally used pathophysiological methods. In: Klement Z, K. RK, Sands D, editors. Methods in Phytobacteriology. Budapest: Akadémiai Press; 1990. p. 96–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Sándor Süle for the kind gift of A. tumefaciens strains.

Statement of authorization of plant material

The research protocols in this study comply with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation.

The legal permissions were obtained by the research institute to cultivate tobacco plants used in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the NKFI/OTKA Grant PD 109050.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ÁS and ZB designed and conceived the study. ÁS, ÁMM and ZB performed the experiments. ÁMM, IS, ÁA and JKN contributed the materials/analysis tools. ÁS, ÁMM and ZB carried out the data analysis; ÁS and ZB supervised the research work; ÁS, ZB, ÁMM interpreted the data and revised the manuscript; IS, JKN, MP and ÁA revised the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ágnes Szatmári or Zoltán Bozsó.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Relative accumulation of AS in N. tabacum leaves. Response to treatments with Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae hrcC- bacteria at 2, 4 and 6 hpi. Values are averages of three biological replicates. All values were normalized with non-treated control levels. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Asterisks indicate significant difference from corresponding water treated controls according to student’s T-test (*p < 0.1; **p < 0.05). W: water-treated control; P.s. syringae hrcC (HR-): P. syringae pv. syringae hrcC- (HR negative mutant).

Additional file 2.

Antimicrobial effect of oxidized form of AS on different plant pathogenic bacteria. 5 × 106 or 5 × 107 CFU/ml bacteria were added to reaction mixtures containing 50 μM acetosyringone, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml horseradish peroxidase, and control mixtures from which acetosyringone was omitted. Serial dilutions were plated following 3 h of co-incubation, for CFU determination. A-D) Diagrams showing quantification of the results. Error bars indicate standard deviations. Abbreviations: Bact: bacterium, AS: acetosyringone, HK: heat-killed, POX: horseradish peroxidase.

Additional file 3.

LC–mass spectrometry analysis of the AS MIX reaction in a time course experiment. Relative quantity of AS and new compounds in the reaction mixtures containing 50 μM acetosyringone, 50 μM H2O2, and 0.72 U/ml horseradish peroxidase, and control mixtures from which H2O2 or horseradish peroxidase was omitted. Reaction mixtures were tracked through 180 min using HPLC-MS. Compounds are denoted by to their m/z values. Abbreviations: AS: acetosyringone, POX: horseradish peroxidase

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szatmári, Á., Móricz, Á.M., Schwarczinger, I. et al. A pattern-triggered immunity-related phenolic, acetosyringone, boosts rapid inhibition of a diverse set of plant pathogenic bacteria. BMC Plant Biol 21, 153 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-021-02928-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Pattern-triggered immunity
  • Pseudomonas syringae
  • Acetosyringone
  • Elicitor
  • Oxidative burst
  • Antibacterial