Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex genome editing of the hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase gene family alters arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation and function in Arabidopsis



Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) are a class of hydroxyproline-rich proteins (HRGPs) that are heavily glycosylated (> 90%) with type II arabinogalactans (AGs). AGPs are implicated in various plant growth and development processes including cell expansion, somatic embryogenesis, root and stem growth, salt tolerance, hormone signaling, male and female gametophyte development, and defense. To date, eight Hyp-O-galactosyltransferases (GALT2–6, HPGT1–3) have been identified; these enzymes are responsible for adding the first sugar, galactose, onto AGPs. Due to gene redundancy among the GALTs, single or double galt genetic knockout mutants are often not sufficient to fully reveal their biological functions.


Here, we report the successful application of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing technology to generate higher-order knockout mutants of five members of the GALT gene family (GALT2–6). AGPs analysis of higher-order galt mutants (galt2 galt5, galt3 galt4 galt6, and galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6) demonstrated significantly less glycosylated AGPs in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques compared to the corresponding wild-type organs. Monosaccharide composition analysis of AGPs isolated from rosette leaves revealed significant decreases in arabinose and galactose in all the higher-order galt mutants. Phenotypic analyses revealed that mutation of two or more GALT genes was able to overcome the growth inhibitory effect of β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent, which specifically binds to β-1,3-galactan backbones on AGPs. In addition, the galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutant exhibited reduced overall growth, impaired root growth, abnormal pollen, shorter siliques, and reduced seed set. Reciprocal crossing experiments demonstrated that galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6 mutants had defects in the female gametophyte which were responsible for reduced seed set.


Our CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing approach provides a simpler and faster way to generate higher-order mutants for functional characterization compared to conventional genetic crossing of T-DNA mutant lines. Higher-order galt mutants produced and characterized in this study provide insight into the relationship between sugar decorations and the various biological functions attributed to AGPs in plants.


Arabinogalactan-proteins (AGPs) belong to the hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein (HRGP) superfamily and are distinguished by their type II arabinogalactan (AG) polysaccharide chains which extensively decorate hydroxyproline (Hyp) residues in the protein backbones of AGPs. AGPs play critical roles at plant cell surfaces and function in plant growth, development, cellular signaling, wounding/defense, and programmed cell death [1]. AGPs typically contain dipeptide motifs such as Ala-Hyp, Ser-Hyp, Thr-Hyp, Val-Pro, Gly-Pro, Thr-Pro, and are glycosylated on noncontiguous Hyp residues. Addition of the various sugars to AGPs occurs in a stepwise fashion and requires the action of a large number of distinct enzymes, called glycosyltransferases (GTs) [2]. According to current models, AGPs consist of a backbone of galactosyl residues connected by β-1,3 linkages with branches of galactosyl and arabinosyl residues (type II AGs) that are β-1,6-linked; these side branches also contain other less abundant sugars such as β-(methyl) glucuronic acid (GlcA/MeGlcA), α-rhamnose (Rha), and α-fucose (Fuc) as terminal residues [3].

To date, eight Hyp-O-galactosyltransferases (GALT 2–6 and HPGT1–3) from the Carbohydrate Active Enzyme (CAZy) GT31 family were identified to function in catalyzing the addition of the first sugar, galactose, onto Hyp residues in AGPs of Arabidopsis. HPGT1–3 contain a GALT domain in their protein sequences, whereas GALT2–6 contain both a GALT domain and a GALECTIN domain [4]. Previously, our lab has characterized single and double mutants (galt2, galt3, galt4, galt5, galt6, and galt2 galt5) for the five GALT genes. All five GALTs demonstrated Hyp-O-galactosyltransferase (GALTs) activity in vitro [5, 6]. Single galt mutants exhibited less glycosylated (i.e., β-Gal-Yariv reagent precipitated) AGPs [6]. While the hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3 triple mutant exhibited pleiotropic effects including a dwarf phenotype, longer root hairs, smaller rosettes, and shorter siliques, the corresponding hpgt single mutants displayed no distinct abnormal phenotypes [7]. Furthermore, both the galt2 galt5 double mutant and hpgt triple mutant had ~ 40% and ~ 70% reductions in glycosylated AGPs in young seedlings, respectively [8].

Another β-1,3-galactosyltransferase named KNS4/UPEX1 from the GT31 family was recently characterized in Arabidopsis; this enzyme is thought to be involved with the synthesis of the β-1,3-galactan backbone [9]. Unlike other GALT and HPGT genes already mentioned, which are broadly expressed, the KNS4/UPEX1 gene was only expressed in the inflorescence meristem. Mutant analyses found that KNS4 is critical for exine formation. The kns4 mutants exhibited collapsed pollen, shorter siliques, and reduced fertility [9]. Two other GALTs, AtGALT29A and AtGALT31A were also discovered that function in attaching galactose onto β-1,6 galactan side chains. AtGALT29A and AtGALT31A when co-expressed, worked cooperatively by forming a protein complex. Also, single galt31a mutants exhibited abnormal cell division and an embryo lethal phenotype [10]. Two α-1,2-fucosyltransferases (FUTs), FUT4 and FUT6, from the GT37 family were shown to be responsible for transferring fucose to AGPs in Arabidopsis [11]. Loss of function of FUT4 or FUT6 resulted in a reduction of fucose and xylose on the AGPs, and a fut4 fut6 double mutant contained no detectable fucose and were hypersensitive to salt stress [12, 13]. Additionally, another GT named RAY1, was identified as a putative β- arabinofuranosyltransferase for AGPs in Arabidopsis, despite the fact that only α-Araf modified AGPs are reported to exist in nature [14]. Nonetheless, the ray1 mutant showed a reduction of arabinofuranose (Araf) residues in AGPs. This mutant also exhibited shorter root length along with a dwarf phenotype. It is noteworthy to mention that glucuronic acid is a relatively minor component and the only negatively charged sugar in AGPs. Recently, three glucuronosyltransferase (GLCAT) genes, GLCAT14A, GLCAT14B, and GLCAT14C, from the GT43 family were identified through co-expression analyses with AGPs in Arabidopsis [15]. Allelic T-DNA insertional mutants for GLCAT14A, named glcat14a-1 and glcat14a-2, displayed a reduction in β-GLCAT activity, as well as ~ 12% increase in Gal and ~ 12% decrease in Ara content in AGPs compared to wild-type (WT) Arabidopsis. Both mutants also showed an ~ 30% increase in both root and hypocotyl lengths [15, 16]. Most recently, GLCAT14A and GLCAT14B were found redundantly regulating seed germination, root hair and trichome formation, seed mucilage formation, pollen shape, and silique development [17]. Both glcat14a glcat14b and glcat14a glcat14b glcat14c showed more glycosylated AGPs in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques [17]. Moreover, single, double, and triple glcat mutants demonstrated much less calcium binding on their AGPs compared to WT [17].

Given that AGPs generally consist of approximately 90% carbohydrate and 10% protein by weight, AG polysaccharides are believed to play a key role in AGP biological functions. However, as mentioned earlier, at least eight Hyp-O-GALTs from the GT31 family are known to be involved in initiating AGP glycosylation. Moreover, single galt mutants showed only subtle or no obvious phenotypes, and two higher-order galt mutants (galt2 galt5 and hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3) only had partial reductions in the amount of glycosylated AGPs. This provides evidence that other GALTs are likely compensating when one or few GALT genes are non-functional and indicates gene redundancy exists within this family in Arabidopsis [58]. Clearly, these two higher-order mutants characterized previously were not sufficient to fully elucidate the roles of glycosylation on AGP biological function. To address such gene redundancy issues within the GALTs, we extended this work and characterized two additional higher-order galt mutants (galt3 galt4 galt6 and galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 gal6) generated by two CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing/multiplexing approaches along with the galt2 galt5 T-DNA mutant. Our work has not only demonstrated the feasibility of applying CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing technology to create higher-order mutants for redundant gene families, but also offers insights into understanding the biological importance of sugar decorations on AGPs in plant growth and reproduction.


Expression profiles of the five GALTs (GALT2 –GALT6)

Publicly available RNA-seq data generated from the Klepikova Arabidopsis Atlas eFP Browser ( was used to compare the expression profiles of the five GALT and three HPGT genes in different developmental stages in Arabidopsis [18]. Based on the RNA-seq data, GALT2, GALT3, GALT5, HPGT1, and HPGT2 were expressed in roots, rosette leaves, inflorescences, and during seed germination and flower development. By contrast, GALT4 and GALT6 showed tissue-specific expression patterns. GALT4 was expressed during flower development, whereas GALT6 was only expressed in dry seeds, senescent leaf petioles, first internodes, and the first two siliques. Unlike HPGT1 and HPGT2 that are broadly expressed across tissues, HPGT3 only had moderate expression in flowers and seeds. It is noteworthy that all the GALT and HPGT genes except for GALT6 had relatively high expression values in sepals and carpels when compared to other tissues. As most GALT genes were expressed during flower development, they were expected to play a role in plant reproduction.

Design of two CRISPR/Cas9 multiplexing constructs targeting GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 in Arabidopsis

Previously, our lab characterized galt2 galt5 T-DNA double mutants in Arabidopsis. To further reveal functional relevance between the GALT gene family and the glycosylation process of AGPs, we took advantage of the CRISPR/Cas9 multiplexing approach to further target additional GALTs. The GALTs are gene homologs from Clade 7 in the CAZy GT31 family and were previously demonstrated to have Hyp-O-GALT activity in N. tabacum [5, 6]. To target multiple GALTs, three guide RNA (gRNA) target sites per gene were chosen in GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 (Fig. 1a). These gRNAs were then assembled into two CRISPR constructs using two multiplexing methods. The method used for the first construct was based on a polycistronic tRNA-gRNA (PTG) system, which was originally developed for CRIPSR multiplexing in rice [20] (Fig. 1b-1). Once the PTG units are transcribed in plants, endogenous RNase Z and RNase P cleave at the tRNA site, releasing gRNAs for binding to their respective targets. Because the rice tRNA sequence used in the PTG construct is conserved in Arabidopsis, the PTG system has also been applied to Arabidopsis for multiplex gene editing [19]. The method used for the second construct involved four gRNA cassettes, each with its own promoter and terminator (Fig. 1b-2). The gRNAs in this second construct generally targeted more upstream regions of the three GALT genes. Both the first and second constructs were cloned in the pHEE401E vector, which contains a maize codon-optimized Cas9 gene (zCas9) driven by an Arabidopsis egg-cell specific promoter (E.C.1.1) fused with an egg-cell specific enhancer (E.C.1.2) [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic illustration of gRNA target sites and the two CRISPR multiplexing constructs. a. Three gRNAs were chosen for each of the GALTs, which belong to the five-membered galactosyltransferase (GALT) gene family. gRNAs were labeled as 3–1, 3–2, and 3–3 for GALT3; 4–1, 4–2, and 4–3 for GALT4; 6–1, 6–2, and 6–3 for GALT6; these gRNAs were used in gene constructs shown in 1b. (Green and orange represent 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR regions, respectively; blue represents exons; black lines represent introns. Online software named CRISPR-P 2.0 ( was used to design all gRNAs. Pfam domain predictions: Pf01762 corresponds to the Galactosyltransferase (GALT) domain; Pf00337 corresponds to the Galactose-binding lectin (GALECTIN) domain. b-1. Five gRNAs (3–1, 3–2, 4–1, 6–1, and 6–2 shown in 1a) with each gRNA fused with a tRNA were cloned in a single polycistronic transcription unit to target GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 simultaneously. b-2. Four gRNAs (3–3, 4–2, 4–3, and 6–3 in 1a) were assembled as four individual transcription units to target GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6. Both B-1 and B-2 were cloned in the pHEE401E vector, which contains a maize codon-optimized Cas9 gene (zCas9) driven by an Arabidopsis egg-cell specific promoter (E.C.1.1) fused with an egg-cell specific enhancer (E.C.1.2) [19]

By transforming the tRNA-gRNA construct (Fig. 1b-1) into the galt2 galt5 T-DNA double mutant background, 68 T1 transgenic lines were obtained. Of these 68 T1 lines, three of them (#12, #25, and #40) contained partial deletions created by 3–1 and 3–2 in GALT3 (Fig. 2a and b). Surprisingly, none of the 68 T1 CRISPR lines screened showed a deletion between the 6–1 and 6–2 target sites in GALT6. In order to obtain mutants that contained a full deletion in GALT3, the two T1 CRISPR lines (#25 and #40) that contained partial mutations were selfed and used to produce T2 lines. In the T2, 80% of the progeny from #25 inherited the mutation from T1, including 36.7% of the progeny containing a 581 bp deletion in GALT3 (Fig. 2c). Furthermore, 74% of the progeny from #40 inherited the mutation, including 8.7% of the progeny containing a 581 bp deletion in GALT3 (Fig. 2c). Several lines that contained a 581 bp deletion in the T2 were selfed to produce the T3. In the T3, all of the 12 randomly chosen progenies from #40–10 inherited a 581 bp deletion in GALT3 (Fig. 2d). It should be noted that #40–10 also contained homozygous gene-editing events in the GALT4 and GALT6 genes as well. GALT4 contained a 1 bp insertion in its last exon created by 4–1 (Fig. 3). Unlike 3–1 and 3–2, the gene-editing events for 6–1 and 6–2 in #40–10 did not create a gene deletion between the two sites, but did result in 1 bp deletions at both sites in the GALT6 gene (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inheritance patterns of CRISPR/Cas9 induced gene deletion of GALT3 in the T1, T2, and T3 generations in selected transgenic lines. a. Locations of the two primers (F/R) used to amplify the gene fragment covering the two target sites (3–1 and 3–2) of GALT3. b. Three T1 CRISPR lines (#12, #25, and #40) containing partial deletions in GALT3. c. Segregation patterns of gene editing in two T2 transgenic lines (#25 and #40) showing partial and complete (red numbers) gene deletions of GALT3. d. Stable transmission of gene editing of the #40–10 transgenic line in the T3 generation showing complete deletions in all progeny. M corresponds to the DNA ladder, red numbers indicate transgenic lines that contained a full deletion in the GALT3 gene

Fig. 3
figure 3

Efficient gene editing of all given target sites of galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6 mutant line #40–10. (From top to bottom) Two gRNAs (3–1 and 3–2) created a 581 bp deletion in GALT3; GALT4 contained a 1 bp insertion in the last exon; GALT6 contained 1 bp insertions at both 6–1 and 6–2 target sites. All mutations resulted in frame-shifts and pre-mature stop codons. Mutation sites are indicated by red arrows on the sequencing chromatograms on the right

Because gRNAs for GALT4 (4–1) and GALT6 (6–1 and 6–2) in the tRNA-gRNA construct were located after the GALECTIN domain (Fig. 1a), we were not sure whether these target sites would fully eliminate GT activity from the corresponding GALTs. To ensure that mutants have both GALECTIN and GALT domains inactivated, another CRISPR construct was created that contained gRNAs (3–3, 4–2, 4–3, and 6–3 in Fig. 1a); these gRNAs all generally reside upstream of the two catalytic domains (GALECTIN and GALT) (Fig. 1b-2). By transforming this gene construct into the galt2 galt5 T-DNA homozygous mutant background, one quintuple mutant line #29–36 was obtained which contained homozygous mutations at all the gRNA target sites, included all three genes (GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6), and resulted in pre-mature stop codons (Fig. 4). Therefore, we used this #29–36 mutant line instead of the previous quintuple mutant line (#40–10) for biochemical and functional characterization.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Multiplex gene-editing events occurred in three gRNAs of galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6 mutant line #29–36. (From top to bottom) The 3–3 gRNA generated a 97 bp deletion in GALT3; the 4–2 and 4–3 gRNAs created a 1 bp deletion and a 1 bp insertion in the GALT4 gene, respectively; the 6–3 gRNA produced a 4 bp indel mutation in the GALT6 gene. All mutations resulted in frame-shifts (red amino acids) and pre-mature stop codons (asterisks) in their respective protein sequences. Mutation sites are indicated by red arrows on the sequencing chromatograms on the right

Quantification of β-D-Gal-Yariv precipitated AGPs in various galt mutants

To examine whether the higher-order galt mutants contained less (glycosylated) AGPs, AGPs were extracted from rosette leaves, stems, and siliques from the galt mutants using β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent, which can specifically bind to the β-1,3-galactosyl sugar backbone of AGPs [22] and allow for their quantification [23]. For WT and the various galt mutants, AGPs were most abundant in siliques followed by stems and rosette leaves (Fig. 5). As expected, all the galt mutants exhibited significant reductions in AGPs. Both 23456 (quintuple mutant) and hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3 T-DNA mutant (hereafter referred to as the 789 triple mutant) had similar reductions of AGPs in rosette leaves (80%) and siliques (55%) compared to that of WT, whereas 25 (i.e., the T-DNA double mutant) and the 346 triple mutant exhibited a lesser degree of AGP reduction in rosette leaves (40–45%), stems (30–40%), and siliques (15–16%) (Fig. 5). The fact that 23456 showed considerably more AGP reductions than 25 and 346 reflects redundancy within the GALT gene family and emphasizes the value of the CRISPR-based approach to produce higher-order mutants to elucidate their biological functions.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Quantification of AGPs in 40-day-old higher-order galt mutants in different organs by β-D-Gal-Yariv precipitation. a All higher-order mutants showed significant reductions in AGP content in rosette leaves, stems, and siliques. The 23456 and 789 mutants showed similar reductions in AGP content in rosette leaves and siliques. Both the 25 and 346 mutants exhibited similar AGP content across tissues. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (***, P < 0.001). b Key to mutant genotypes shown in 5a

Monosaccharide composition analysis

To examine the sugar composition of the AGPs in various galt mutants, we purified AGPs from five-week-old rosette leaves of the mutants using β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent followed by monosaccharide composition analysis by high performance anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD). The 25 double mutant, 346 triple mutant, and 23,456 quintuple mutant respectively showed ~ 8%, ~ 8%, and ~ 25% reductions in Ara compared to that of WT (Fig. 6). Similarly, the Gal content was also respectively reduced by ~ 6%, ~ 8%, and ~ 10% in 25, 346, and 23,456 mutants compared to WT. The decrease in Ara and Gal consequently resulted in a relative increase of other monosaccharaides such as rhamose (Rha), xylose (Xyl), and glucuronic acid (GlcA) (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Monosaccharide composition analyses of AGPs extracted from five-week-old rosette leaves. Relative abundance of monosaccharide composition of AGPs extracted from 25 (galt2 galt5), 346 (galt3 galt4 galt6), 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6), and WT calculated by mol%. Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001)

Root growth phenotypes of the galt mutants under normal conditions

To investigate whether knocking out multiple GALT genes affects Arabidopsis root development, primary root and root hair lengths were measured in the galt mutant and WT seedlings grown on ½ MS plates. Both the 23456 quintuple mutant and the 789 triple mutant exhibited shorter primary root length compared to WT, whereas both 25 and 346 showed similar root lengths as WT (Fig. 7a and c). Interestingly, root hairs of 25, 23456, and 789 were significantly longer compared to WT (Fig. 7b and d). In addition, both 23456 and 789 showed approximately a 12 h delay in seed germination compared to other galt mutants and WT, suggesting a key role for AGP glycosylation in seed germination (Fig. 7e).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Root development and seed germination of various galt mutants. a. Photograph of nine-day-old galt mutants on 1/2 MS plates. Scale bar = 1 cm. b. Photograph of root hairs from nine-day-old galt mutants. Scale bar = 0.25 mm. c. Both 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) and 789 (hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3) exhibited longer primary root lengths compared to WT. d. 25 (galt2 galt5), 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) and 789 (hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3) exhibited longer root hairs compared to WT. e. Both 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) and 789 (hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3) showed a delayed germination phenotype. Statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001)

Root growth phenotypes of galt mutants in the presence of 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv

Previous studies have shown that β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent can specially bind to β-1,3-galactose backbones on AGPs and inhibit cell division, root elongation, and pollen tube growth [23, 24]. To further verify the effect of β-D-Gal-Yariv on root growth of the galt mutants, four-day-old seedlings were transferred onto 1/2 MS plates containing 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv and grown for 2 weeks. Root elongation was measured 7 and 14 days after transfer. Both the 25 double mutant and the 23456 quintuple mutant showed much greater root elongation compared to WT and the 346 triple mutant after 7 and 14 days. The root length of the 346 mutant was significantly longer than WT after 14 days, but not after 7 days (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Root elongation of galt mutants in the presence of 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv. a. Root elongation of higher-order galt mutant and wild-type (Col-0) seedlings grown in the presence of 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent for 7 and 14 days after transfer. All genotypes were germinated and grown on normal ½ MS for 4 days before being transferred onto ½ MS medium containing 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent. Root lengths were measured 7 and 14 days after transfer (*, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001). b. Photograph of 14-day-old galt mutant and WT seedlings grown on ½ MS containing 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent

GALTs contribute to normal vegetative and reproductive growth in Arabidopsis

Phenotypically, the 25 double and 346 triple mutants were similar to WT except that these two mutants had 26% and 34% fewer siliques per plant (Fig. 9b and Supplemental Table 5). The 23456 quintuple mutant, however, displayed a number of abnormal growth phenotypes such as smaller and fewer rosette leaves, approximately a 2 day delay in flowering, a 16% reduction in plant height, 20% shorter siliques, 65% fewer siliques per plant, and a 30% reduction in seed set (Fig. 9 and Supplemental Table 5). In order to understand whether the male or female gametophyte of the 23456 mutant is responsible for reduced fertility, reciprocal crossing was done between 23456 and WT plants. When pollen from either WT or 23456 was used to pollinate WT plants, both silique length and seed set were normal. However, when pollen from either WT or 23456 was used to pollinate the 23456 mutant, shorter siliques and a reduced number of seeds were observed (Fig. 9d-e). These reciprocal crossing data indicated that shorter siliques and reduced seed set of 23456 are a result of defects in the female gametophyte. In vitro pollen germination was done to examine the pollen phenotypes of the various galt mutants. All the galt mutants contained normal shape pollen except for the 23456 mutant which had ~ 25% of its pollen being small, defective pollen that failed to germinate in vitro (Fig. 10 and 11c). Pollen germination rates for the normally shaped pollen in all the galt mutants were similar to that of WT (Fig. 11a). However, all the galt mutants exhibited an approximately 25% reduction in pollen tube length compared to WT (Fig. 11b).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Overall plant growth and silique phenotypes displayed by the galt mutants. a. Shoots of five-week-old WT, 25 (galt2 galt5), 346 (galt3 galt4 galt6), and 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) plants. Scale bar = 2 cm. b. Inflorescences of six-week-old WT, 25 (galt2 galt5), 346 (galt3 galt4 galt6), and 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) plants. Scale bar = 2 cm. c. Quantification of seed set for WT, 25 (galt2 galt5), 346 (galt3 galt4 galt6), and 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) plants (n = 15). d. Photograph of cleared siliques obtained by reciprocal crossing between WT and the 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) mutant. e. Quantification of seed set for reciprocal crossing between WT and the 23456 (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) mutant (n = 15) (***, P < 0.001)

Fig. 10
figure 10

In vitro pollen germination of the galt mutants and WT. The 23456 mutant showed defective pollen as indicated by black arrowheads. All photographs were taken 3 h after incubation of pollen grains on pollen germination media. Scale bar = 100 μm

Fig. 11
figure 11

Pollen germination rate of normal pollen, pollen tube length, and defective pollen rate of higher-order galt mutants and WT 3 h after incubation of pollen grains on pollen germination media. a. All galt mutants showed similar pollen germination rates compared to WT. b. All the galt mutants showed shorter pollen tube lengths compared to WT. c. The 23456 quintuple mutant contained more defective pollen compared to the other galt mutants and WT (**, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001)


CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing facilitates study of GTs involved in AGP glycosylation

Arabinogalactan-proteins are the most highly glycosylated proteins in the plant kingdom [3]. Given that AGPs are composed of approximately 90–98% sugar, it is likely that the AG polysaccharide chains form the interactive molecular surface of these glycoproteins and control their biological functions [25]. Consequently, the GTs responsible for adding the sugars to AGPs are of particular interest. Studying these GTs can be particularly challenging for several reasons, including the finding that these GTs exist in gene families and have overlapping and redundant activities, which makes it difficult to examine their effects on AGP structure and function [26, 27].

Here, two multiplexing CRISPR constructs were generated to target multiple GALT genes (i.e., GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6) that are involved in Hyp-O-galactosylation of AGPs in Arabidopsis. Specifically, two homozygous mutant lines [i.e, a 346 triple mutant and a 23456 quintuple mutant] were selected for further characterization (Fig. 1b-1 and b-2). CRISPR-Cas9-induced mutations occurred in both mutants and resulted in premature stop codons for all the target sites (Figs. 12 and 4). Off-target gene mutations were identified by CRISPR-P 2.0 software. The five top off-target genes were identified and sequenced from the GALT CRISPR mutants. No off-target mutations were identified in the GALT CRISPR mutants (Supplemental Table 6).

Fig. 12
figure 12

Gene editing in the galt3 galt4 galt6 mutant line #31–37. Sequencing results of the GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 genes in the #31–37 line produced in the Col-0 background. Mutations in GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 all resulted in pre-mature stop codons (see red amino acids and asterisks). Mutation sites are indicated by red arrows on the sequencing chromatograms on the right

The fewer phenotypic changes seen in the 25 double mutant and the 346 triple mutant compared to the 23456 quintuple mutant indicates that there is a compensation effect among the GALTs. Thus, it is only possible to reveal true biological functions of AGP sugar decorations by eliminating as many redundant genes as possible, preferably by using the CRISPR/Cas9 multiplexing approach. Given the five GALTs (GALT2–6) and three HPGTs (HPGT1–3) each belong to separate clades in GT31 and the 23456 CRISPR mutant displayed a pleiotropic phenotypes resembling the previously reported 789 T-DNA mutant, this indicates that each GT31 clade contributes significantly to the AGP sugar initiation step in Arabidopsis [7].

CRISPR-induced mutations in the GALT genes result in less glycosylated AGPs and reductions in Ara and Gal

Significant reductions of glycosylated AGPs, as detected by β-D-Gal-Yariv precipitation, were found in the rosette leaves, stems, and siliques of all the galt mutants compared to WT (Fig. 5). Furthermore, monosaccharide analysis of the rosette leaf AGPs showed that the 23456 mutant showed the greatest reductions in arabinose (Ara) and galactose (Gal) compared to the 25 and 346 mutants, again illustrating the five GALT genes (GALT2, GALT3, GALT4, GALT5, and GALT6) are functionally redundant (Fig. 6). These data are consistent with the idea that the initiation of galactosylation of Hyp residues in AGP protein cores is increasingly reduced as more and more GALT genes are knocked out, resulting in AGP molecules that are less glycosylated overall because they have fewer Hyp-AG chains on their polypeptide backbones. The AG chains that are added in these mutants are likely similar to wild type AG chains, but do show some reduced amounts of Gal and Ara, which may reflect reduced activities of other potentially interacting GALTs (i.e., β-1,3-galactosyltransferases involved in chain elongation and β-1,6-galactosyltransferases involved in side chain formation/elongation) and arabinosyltransferases when the Hyp-GALT genes are knocked-out. Future research can focus on such potential protein-protein interactions among the GTs responsible for AGP biosynthesis.

AGP glycosylation contributes to normal root growth in Arabidopsis

Both the 23456 CRISPR quintuple mutant and the 789 T-DNA triple mutant exhibited shorter root lengths as well as longer root hairs when grown under normal conditions, indicating some degree of gene redundancy between the GALTs and HPGTs (Figs. 7 and 8). When treated with 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent, the 23456 mutant exhibited the greatest root elongation followed by 25, 346, and WT (Fig. 9). The significantly longer roots shown by 25 compared to 346 after Yariv treatment indicates that GALT2 and GALT5 may play more substantial roles in the glycosylation of AGPs in the root compared to GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 (Fig. 9). This also indicates a partial gene redundancy exists among the GALTs depending on the organ type. This is in agreement with previous findings that single galt mutants such as galt2, galt3, galt4, galt5, and galt6 were shown to be less sensitive to Yariv inhibition of root growth [6]. In addition, the 789 mutant was previously reported to have longer lateral roots and increased root hair lengths compared to WT [7]. As suggested by Basu et al. [4], plants need to maintain a threshold level of glycosylated AGPs for normal growth, especially for roots which are particularly sensitive to AGP changes. Thus, reduced AGP glycosylation can impair root growth as shown in the 23456 and 789 mutants.

AGPs are well known to be localized and involved in root growth from a variety of studies. Yariv treated Arabidopsis roots exhibit a short, swollen root phenotype, which is caused by an inhibition of cell proliferation and cell elongation [23]. Several other AGP-related GTs or AGP mutants such as reb1–1, ray1, fut4/fut6, glcat14a-1, fla1, fla4/sos5 and agp30, also display abnormal root phenotypes under normal or salt-stress conditions in Arabidopsis [12,13,14, 26,27,28,29]. In addition, AGPs antibodies such as JIM8, JIM13, and LM2 localize AGPs in primary roots, root caps, and root hairs [30,31,32]. The CRISPR mutants examined here clearly elucidate the important role of AGP glycosylation in root growth.

AGP glycosylation is critical for normal growth and development

The 23456 CRISPR mutant displayed more abnormal above ground growth phenotypes when compared to the 25 mutant, the 346 mutant, and wild type plants (Fig. 9a-b; Supplemental Table 5). This abnormal growth phenotype included smaller and fewer rosette leaves as well as shorter inflorescences and was reminiscent of the dwarf phenotypes reported previously for the 789 triple mutant and the ray1 mutant [7, 14]. The mechanism by which AGP glycosylation affects and controls such plant growth is largely unknown. One possibility, however, is that AG chains on AGPs initiated by the GALTs allow AGPs to be associated with other plasma membrane and cell wall components to maintain cell wall integrity. Many AGPs are located on the outer surface of the plasma membrane via GPI anchors, these AGPs are in close proximity with other plasma membrane proteins such as wall-associated kinases (WAKs), RLKs (e.g., FEI1/FEI2), and cellulose synthases [10, 28]. Such plasma membrane AGPs are also associated with the cytoskeleton, but the exact molecular interactions are unknown. By expressing a tomato AGP fusion protein (i.e., LeAGP1-GFP) in tobacco BY2 cells, LeAGP1 was found localized at the Hechtian strands during plasmolysis [31].

AGPs are also present in the cell wall and can interact with other wall components. Evidence of the binding between AGPs and pectin was suggested when AGPs were detected from a crude pectin fraction using AGP antibodies [32]. Addition of calcium can promote such binding between carrot AGPs and pectin, whereas EGTA (a calcium chelator) weakened the binding, indicating that calcium may serve as an important cross-linking agent [32]. It was proposed that AGPs and pectin serve as cell wall plasticizers that facilitate the binding among cell wall polysaccharides [33]. Perhaps the most dramatic example of AGPs interacting with other wall molecules is exhibited by the finding that a particular AGP known as APAP1 covalently interacts not only with pectin, but also with arabinoxylan [34]. Linkage analysis of APAP1 purified from Arabidopsis cell suspension cultures found covalent linkages between the AGP sugars and the sugars found in arabinoxylan and pectin (RG-I) [34]. Therefore, knocking out the GALT genes could affect these various associations between the carbohydrate residues on AGPs and their interacting molecules so as to alter cell wall network connections, leading to abnormal growth.

AGP glycosylation functions in both male and female gametophyte development

Reciprocal crossing experiments showed that defects in the female gametophyte are responsible for the reduced seed set (~ 30% less) exhibited by the 23456 quintuple mutant (Fig. 9c-e). The more severe reduction in seed set in the 23456 mutant compared to galt4 and galt6 single mutants suggested GALT4 and GALT6 play redundant roles in seed development. Unlike these galt mutants, the 789 triple mutant was reported to have only shorter siliques, but normal seed set [7]. Thus, despite being Hyp-O-GALTs, the GALTs (GALT2–6) and the HPGTs (HPGT1–3) each may have partially overlapping roles in AGP glycosylation and function. The functional roles of GALTs in silique development demonstrate that the extent to which AGP glycosylation in the ovary contributes to normal female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. As AGPs and their carbohydrate moieties are abundant in reproductive tissues such as pollen, pollen tubes, and ovaries, our results illustrate that the sugar moieties on AGPs initiated by the GALTs are essential for AGP functions relating to reproductive processes.

Several AGPs are known to be involved in female gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. AGP4 (JAGGER), was recently shown to act in synergid cells to block and prevent polytubey in Arabidopsis [35]. In the jagger mutant, the second synergid cell was not degenerated after fertilization and can continue to attract pollen tubes towards the embryo sac [35]. It was suggested that either the AGP4/JAGGER protein itself or the carbohydrate on AGP4/JAGGER serves as a signaling molecule that leads to the degeneration of the second synergid cell after fertilization and blocks more pollen from entering [35]. AGP19 is another AGP which is expressed in the ovary, transmission tract, and siliques of Arabidopsis. An agp19 knockout mutant showed fewer and shorter siliques, indicating AGP19 functions in reproduction [36].

The carbohydrate portion of AGPs have been viewed as signaling molecules and nutrition sources during reproductive development including pollination, male and female gametophyte development, ovary guidance, fertilization, and embryogenesis [35,36,37]. One study found that the glycosylation of AGP18 established the transition from sporophytic to gametophytic tissue. Although the transcript of AGP18 is found in the egg cell, glycosylated AGP18 was only found in the functional megaspore mother cell [28]. A classic example of AGP glycosylation being involved in pollen-ovary communication is the Transmitting Tissue-Specific (TTS) protein, which is an AGP expressed in the transmitting tract of tobacco styles [38]. It was observed that pollen tubes were attracted and grew towards the higher concentrations of glycosylated TTS protein. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments found that pollen tubes can de-glycosylate TTS as it grows towards the ovary, suggesting that the carbohydrate on TTS signaled the way for pollen tubes to grow towards the ovary [38]. The finding that the polysaccharides on AGPs served as a pollen tube attractant in Arabidopsis is also consistent with another study done in Torenia fournieri. It was found that β-methyl-glucuronosyl galactose (4-Me-GlcA-β-1,6-Gal) from AGP glycan chains secreted from the ovaries of Torenia fournieri was essential for making pollen tubes competent for ovule targeting/guidance [39].

With respect to pollen development, most galt mutants except for 23456 contained normally shaped pollen (Fig. 11). All the galt mutants exhibited shorter pollen tubes compared to WT. In addition, approximately 30% of the pollen in the 23456 quintuple mutant was defective such that they were much smaller and non-viable (Fig. 11a-c). This defective pollen phenotype shown by the 23456 mutant phenocopied Arabidopsis RNAi mutants of FLA3, which encodes a fasciclin-like AGP, where half of the pollen grains were shrunken and non-viable [40]. The defective pollen in fla3 showed abnormal pollen intine formation that led to defects in male fertility and reduced seed set [40]. Arabidopsis mutants such as agp6, agp11, and agp6 agp11 also exhibited collapsed pollen, less pollen germination, reduced pollen tube elongation, and pollen release [40,41,42]. Another member of the GT31 family known as KNS4, was recently identified to have AGP β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferase activity and be  involved in the formation of the exine layer of Arabidopsis pollen [43]. The kns4 T-DNA insertion mutant exhibited collapsed pollen grains which contained a thin exine wall and failed to separate from the pollen mother cells at the tetrad stage of pollen development [9]. It is likely that the defective pollen phenotype of the 23456 is likewise caused by abnormal microspore wall formation. Similar phenotypes exhibited by individual AGP mutants and the galt mutants could be attributed to improperly glycosylated or under glycosylated AGPs. A previous study with the galt single mutants showed no difference in pollen shape and pollen tube elongation in galt2, galt3, galt4, galt5, and galt6 mutants [6]. These contrasting findings are again indicative of gene redundancy within the GALT gene family.

Other possible roles for AGPs and/or the glycan chains on AGPs were investigated by immunolocalization in numerous plant species [44] and could be an area of future research. The development of AGP monoclonal antibodies (e.g. JIM8, JIM13, MAC207, and LM2) is a milestone in AGP research as it provides information on the localization and putative roles of AGPs and/or the complicated glycan structures on AGPs in specific cell types or developmental stages. Antibodies such as JIM8 and JIM13 have detected AGPs in the cell walls of microspores in Arabidopsis [45]. LM2 and MAC207 antibodies localized AGPs at the tips of pollen tubes in Arabidopsis [46]. By using JIM8 and JIM13 antibodies along with β-Glc-Yariv reagent, AGPs were found to be on the stigma only before pollination but were depleted after pollination in apple and Magnolia [46,47,48]. Similarly, JIM13-labeled AGPs showed AGPs signaled the way for growing pollen tubes in the micropylar canal; however, the AGP signal was depleted after pollen tube passage in apple. JIM8-labeled AGPs accumulated before and during pollination of apple ovaries, but soon vanished after fertilization [49].


This research has successfully utilized the CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex gene editing technology for the generation of higher-order mutants [i.e. one triple (galt3 galt4 galt6) mutant and one quintuple (galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6) mutant] in the GALT gene family. Both biochemical and physiological analyses indicated gene redundancy exists within the GALT gene family. Biochemical analyses demonstrated the number of GALTs have an additive effect on the extent of glycosylation on AGPs. Phenotypic analyses revealed that AGP glycosylation is crucial for normal vegetative and reproductive growth, especially in root and shoot growth, pollen and pollen tube formation, female gametophyte development, seed set, and silique development in Arabidopsis. Future work can focus on dissecting the molecular mechanism(s) by which AGP glycosylation controls these various physiological processes. Although both the GALTs (GALT2–5) and the HPGTs (HPGT1–3) are involved in initiating glycosylation of AGPs, the GALTs contain both a GALECTIN domain and a GALT domain, while the HPGTs only contain a GALT domain. Future research should also focus on understanding the role of these two protein domains (i.e., GALECTIN and GALT) and addressing the evolutionary relationship between the GALTs and HPGTs. To gain further insight into elucidating the functional importance of glycosylation on AGPs, future work can also focus on the generation of additional higher-order mutants, where different or more genes in the eight membered Hyp-O-GALT gene family are knocked-out using our CRISPR-Cas9 multiplexing approach.


Plant material

A. thaliana (Columbia-0 ecotype) was obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Research Center (ABRC), Columbus, Ohio, USA and used as WT. The galt2 galt5 homozygous T-DNA mutant was previously generated in our lab [6]. The hpgt1 hpgt2 hpgt3 homozygous T-DNA mutant was obtained from Dr. Ogawa-Ohnishi’s lab [7]. We generated all the CRISPR mutants in this study using this Col-0 background.

Vector constructions

An online gRNA designing tool CRISPR-P 2.0 ( was used for gRNA design [49]. Five gRNAs were designed to target GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6 simultaneously using the polycistronic tRNA-gRNA (PTG) method (Table S1) [20]. Each gRNA was amplified as a polycistronic tRNA-gRNA (PTG) unit from a template plasmid pGTR using primers listed in Tables S2 and S3. The pGTR plasmid was a gift from Dr. Yinong Yang’s lab (Addgene plasmid # 63143). After amplification, PCR products were purified by DNA gel extraction using the Wizard® SV gel and PCR clean-up kit from Promega. Six PTG units were ligated together during BsaI digestion, and a PCR reaction was performed to amplify the ligated PTG units using a universal primer pair (pHEE_S5AD-F and pHEE_S5AD-R). The ligated PTG PCR product was purified by DNA gel extraction using the Wizard® SV gel and PCR clean-up kit from Promega, and subsequently ligated to the binary vector pHEE401E, which was a gift from Dr. Qi-Jun Chen’s lab (Addgene plasmid #71287). The pHEE401E binary vector had a maize codon optimized Cas9 gene driven by egg cell-specific promoters (E.C 1.1 and E. C 1.2) [50].

In the second construct designed to target GALT3, GALT4, and GALT6, four gRNAs were designed (Table S1). Primers used to amplify these gRNAs were listed in Table S4. After PCR amplifications, these gRNAs fragments were subsequently cloned into the BsaI site of the pHEE401E binary vector by the Golden Gate cloning method [51]. Three template plasmids (pCBC-DT1, pCBC-DT2T3, and pCBC-DT3T4) were gifts from Dr. Qi-Jun Chen’s lab (Addgene plasmid #50590; #50591; #50592) [21].

After both constructs were cloned into the pHEE401E vector and confirmed by Sanger sequencing, they were transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101, which was then used to transform the Arabidopsis Col-0 ecotype via the floral dip method [52]. A simple PCR-based method was first used for detecting indel mutations and then confirmed by Sanger sequencing [53].

AGPs quantification by β-D-Gal-Yariv

AGPs were extracted from four-week-old galt mutants and WT using β-D-Gal-Yariv [54]. Briefly, approximately 0.3 g of rosette leaves, stems, and siliques of the mutant and WT plants were pulverized using liquid nitrogen before addition of 1 mL 2% CaCl2 by gentle shaking for 2 h. Next, the supernatant was separated from the plant debris by centrifugation at 13,000 g for 10 min. Then, 200 μL β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent was added to the supernatant in a new 1.5 mL centrifuge tube; AGPs were allowed to precipitate for 2 h. To quantify AGP content, the precipitated AGP pellet was dissolved in 20 mM NaOH and measured using a UV-spectrometer at OD420. An AGP standard curve was made using gum arabic under the same Yariv precipitation conditions.

Monosaccharide composition analysis by high pH anion exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection (HPAEC-PAD)

Five-week-old rosette leaves from the galt mutants and WT were used for AGPs extraction. Plant tissues were first pulverized by liquid nitrogen and then mixed with 2% NaCl by gentle shaking for 2–3 h. Next, the supernatant was obtained by centrifugation at 13,000 g for 30 min. After that, β-D-Gal-Yariv reagent was added to the supernatant to allow for AGP precipitation overnight. The precipitated AGP pellet was obtained by low-speed centrifugation (2000 g − 5000 g) for 10 min and resuspended with distilled H2O. To break the linkage between Yariv and the AGPs, approximately 25 mg sodium dithionite was added to the AGP suspension and incubated at 50 °C for 10–15 min. Each AGP sample was passed through a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare). The desalted AGPs were then freeze-dried. Monosaccharide composition analysis was performed using the same method described previously [17, 55].

Measurements of root elongation and root hair length

For root growth measurement, seeds of the galt mutants and WT were first germinated on ½ MS agar plates. Young seedlings were then transferred onto new ½ MS agar plates on the fourth day after sowing and were allowed to grow vertically in a growth chamber at 22 °C, 16 h light/20 °C, 8 h dark photoperiod. Both root length and root hair length were measured 4 days after transfer. Root hairs were measured 5 mm from the root tip. Approximately 300 root hairs were measured using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope at 20x magnification. For β-D-Gal-Yariv treatment, five-day-old seedlings were transferred onto ½ MS agar plates supplemented with 30 μM β-D-Gal-Yariv. Root elongation was measured 7 days and 14 days after transfer. Approximately 20 plants for each genotype were used for each measurement with three replicates.

Germination experiment

Freshly harvested seeds of galt mutants and wild-type plants were first stratified at 4 °C for 3 d before being sown onto ½ MS and 1% sucrose agar plates. Germination percentages were counted at 24 h, 36 h, 48 h, and 60 h after sowing. Approximately 60 seeds were sown for each genotype with four replicates.

Seed set measurements and reciprocal cross analysis

Mature siliques were harvested from five-week-old galt mutants and WT plants. Ten plants for each genotype were used for seed set measurements. The reciprocal crosses were done using stage 12 flowers for WT and the galt2 galt3 galt4 galt5 galt6 mutants. For each reciprocal pair, approximately 15–20 successfully hand-pollinated siliques were chosen for seed set measurements. To measure seed numbers, the siliques were cleared with 70% ethanol for 2–3 days before being transferred into 50% glycerol. After clearing, seed numbers were counted using a Nikon SMZ1500 stereomicroscope at 10x magnification.

In vitro pollen germination assay

In vitro pollen germination was performed using flowers from five-week-old galt mutants and WT. The method for in vitro pollen germination was described previously [17]. After incubating pollen on pollen germination medium for 3 h, pollen shape, the pollen germination rate, and pollen tube length were measured using a Nikon phot-lab2 microscope at 50x magnification. Approximately 300 samples were measured for each genotype with three replicates.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



Hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein








Carbohydrate Active Enzyme (database)



Guide RNA:





  1. Ellis M, Egelund J, Schultz CJ, Bacic A. Arabinogalactan-proteins: key regulators at the cell surface? Plant Physiol. 2010;153:403–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Showalter AM, Basu D. Extensin and arabinogalactan-protein biosynthesis: glycosyltransferases, research challenges, and biosensors. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.

  3. Showalter AM. Arabinogalactan-proteins: structure, expression and function. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS. 2001;58:1399–417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu D, Tian L, Debrosse T, Poirier E, Emch K, Herock H, et al. Glycosylation of a Fasciclin-like arabinogalactan-protein (SOS5) mediates root growth and seed mucilage adherence via a cell wall receptor-like kinase (FEI1/FEI2) pathway in Arabidopsis. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0145092.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Basu D, Liang Y, Liu X, Himmeldirk K, Faik A, Kieliszewski M, et al. Functional identification of a hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase specific for arabinogalactan protein biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:10132–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Basu D, Tian L, Wang W, Bobbs S, Herock H, Travers A, et al. A small multigene hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase family functions in arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation, growth and development in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ogawa-Ohnishi M, Matsubayashi Y. Identification of three potent hydroxyproline O-galactosyltransferases in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015;81:736–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Showalter AM, Basu D. Glycosylation of arabinogalactan-proteins essential for development in Arabidopsis. Commun Integr Biol. 2016;9:e1177687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Suzuki T, Narciso JO, Zeng W, van de Meene A, Yasutomi M, Takemura S, et al. KNS4/UPEX1: a type II arabinogalactan β-(1,3)-galactosyltransferase required for pollen exine development. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:183–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dilokpimol A, Poulsen CP, Vereb G, Kaneko S, Schulz A, Geshi N. Galactosyltransferases from Arabidopsis thaliana in the biosynthesis of type II arabinogalactan: molecular interaction enhances enzyme activity. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu Y, Williams M, Bernard S, Driouich A, Showalter AM, Faik A. Functional identification of two nonredundant Arabidopsis α-(1,2)-fucosyltransferases specific to arabinogalactan proteins. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:13638–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liang Y, Basu D, Pattathil S, Xu W-L, Venetos A, Martin SL, et al. Biochemical and physiological characterization of fut4 and fut6 mutants defective in arabinogalactan-protein fucosylation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2013;64:5537–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tryfona T, Theys TE, Wagner T, Stott K, Keegstra K, Dupree P. Characterisation of FUT4 and FUT6 α-(1-2)-fucosyltransferases reveals that absence of root arabinogalactan fucosylation increases Arabidopsis root growth salt sensitivity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e93291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gille S, Sharma V, Baidoo EEK, Keasling JD, Scheller HV, Pauly M. Arabinosylation of a Yariv-precipitable cell wall polymer impacts plant growth as exemplified by the Arabidopsis glycosyltransferase mutant ray1. Mol Plant. 2013;6:1369–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Knoch E, Dilokpimol A, Tryfona T, Poulsen CP, Xiong G, Harholt J, et al. A β–glucuronosyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana involved in biosynthesis of type II arabinogalactan has a role in cell elongation during seedling growth. Plant J. 2013;76:1016–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dilokpimol A, Geshi N. Arabidopsis thaliana glucuronosyltransferase in family GT14. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9:e28891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Held MA, Showalter AM. Elucidating the roles of three β-glucuronosyltransferases (GLCATs) acting on arabinogalactan-proteins using a CRISPR-Cas9 multiplexing approach in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20:221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Klepikova AV, Kasianov AS, Gerasimov ES, Logacheva MD, Penin AA. A high resolution map of the Arabidopsis thaliana developmental transcriptome based on RNA-seq profiling. Plant J. 2016;88:1058–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang Q, Xing H-L, Wang Z-P, Zhang H-Y, Yang F, Wang X-C, et al. Potential high-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and its prevention. Plant Mol Biol. 2018;96:445–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Xie K, Minkenberg B, Yang Y. Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:3570–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Z-P, Xing H-L, Dong L, Zhang H-Y, Han C-Y, Wang X-C, et al. Egg cell-specific promoter-controlled CRISPR/Cas9 efficiently generates homozygous mutants for multiple target genes in Arabidopsis in a single generation. Genome Biol. 2015;16:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitazawa K, Tryfona T, Yoshimi Y, Hayashi Y, Kawauchi S, Antonov L, et al. β-Galactosyl Yariv reagent binds to the β-1,3-galactan of arabinogalactan proteins. Plant Physiol. 2013;161:1117–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Willats WG, Knox JP. A role for arabinogalactan-proteins in plant cell expansion: evidence from studies on the interaction of beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent with seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 1996;9:919–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nguema-Ona E, Coimbra S, Vicré-Gibouin M, Mollet J-C, Driouich A. Arabinogalactan proteins in root and pollen-tube cells: distribution and functional aspects. Ann Bot. 2012;110:383–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Seifert GJ, Roberts K. The biology of arabinogalactan proteins. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:137–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan L, Showalter AM, Egelund J, Hernandez-Sanchez A, Doblin MS, Bacic A. Arabinogalactan-proteins and the research challenges for these enigmatic plant cell surface proteoglycans. Front Plant Sci. 2012;3.

  27. Zhang Y, Showalter AM. CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology: a valuable tool for understanding plant cell wall biosynthesis and function. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11.

  28. Demesa-Arévalo E, Vielle-Calzada J-P. The classical arabinogalactan protein AGP18 mediates megaspore selection in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2013;25:1274–87.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Šamaj J, Baluška F, Volkmann D. Cell-specific expression of two arabinogalactan protein epitopes recognized by monoclonal antobodies JIM8 and JIM13 in maize roots. Protoplasma. 1998;204:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu S-L, Rahman A, Baskin TI, Kieber JJ. Two leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases mediate signaling, linking cell wall biosynthesis and ACC synthase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20:3065–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sardar HS, Yang J, Showalter AM. Molecular interactions of arabinogalactan proteins with cortical microtubules and F-actin in bright Yellow-2 tobacco cultured cells. Plant Physiol. 2006;142:1469–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Immerzeel P, Eppink MM, de Vries SC, Schols HA, Voragen AGJ. Carrot arabinogalactan proteins are interlinked with pectins. Physiol Plant. 2006;128:18–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lamport DTA, Kieliszewski MJ, Showalter AM. Salt stress upregulates periplasmic arabinogalactan proteins: using salt stress to analyse AGP function. New Phytol. 2006;169:479–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan L, Eberhard S, Pattathil S, Warder C, Glushka J, Yuan C, et al. An Arabidopsis cell wall proteoglycan consists of pectin and arabinoxylan covalently linked to an arabinogalactan protein. Plant Cell. 2013;25:270–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Pereira AM, Nobre MS, Pinto SC, Lopes AL, Costa ML, Masiero S, et al. “Love is strong, and You’re so sweet”: JAGGER is essential for persistent synergid degeneration and polytubey block in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant. 2016;9:601–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang J, Sardar HS, McGovern KR, Zhang Y, Showalter AM. A lysine-rich arabinogalactan protein in Arabidopsis is essential for plant growth and development, including cell division and expansion. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 2007;49:629–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pereira AM, Lopes AL, Coimbra S. Arabinogalactan proteins as interactors along the crosstalk between the pollen tube and the female tissues. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.

  38. Wu H, Wang H, Cheung AY. A pollen tube growth stimulatory glycoprotein is deglycosylated by pollen tubes and displays a glycosylation gradient in the flower. Cell. 1995;82:395–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mizukami AG, Inatsugi R, Jiao J, Kotake T, Kuwata K, Ootani K, et al. The AMOR arabinogalactan sugar chain induces pollen-tube competency to respond to ovular guidance. Curr Biol CB. 2016;26:1091–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li J, Yu M, Geng L-L, Zhao J. The fasciclin-like arabinogalactan protein gene, FLA3, is involved in microspore development of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2010;64:482–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Coimbra S, Costa M, Jones B, Mendes MA, Pereira LG. Pollen grain development is compromised in Arabidopsis agp6 agp11 null mutants. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:3133–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Costa M, Nobre MS, Becker JD, Masiero S, Amorim MI, Pereira LG, et al. Expression-based and co-localization detection of arabinogalactan protein 6 and arabinogalactan protein 11 interactors in Arabidopsis pollen and pollen tubes. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li WL, Liu Y, Douglas CJ. Role of glycosyltransferases in pollen wall primexine formation and exine patterning. Plant Physiol. 2017;173:167–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Leszczuk A, Szczuka E, Zdunek A. Arabinogalactan proteins: distribution during the development of male and female gametophytes. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2019;135:9–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Coimbra S, Almeida J, Junqueira V, Costa ML, Pereira LG. Arabinogalactan proteins as molecular markers in Arabidopsis thaliana sexual reproduction. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:4027–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Dardelle F, Lehner A, Ramdani Y, Bardor M, Lerouge P, Driouich A, et al. Biochemical and immunocytological characterizations of Arabidopsis pollen tube cell wall. Plant Physiol. 2010;153:1563–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Losada JM, Herrero M. Arabinogalactan-protein secretion is associated with the acquisition of stigmatic receptivity in the apple flower. Ann Bot. 2012;110:573–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Losada JM, Herrero M, Hormaza JI, Friedman WE. Arabinogalactan proteins mark stigmatic receptivity in the protogynous flowers of Magnolia virginiana (Magnoliaceae). Am J Bot. 2014;101:1963–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Losada JM, Herrero M. Arabinogalactan proteins mediate intercellular crosstalk in the ovule of apple flowers. Plant Reprod. 2019;32:291–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sprunck S, Rademacher S, Vogler F, Gheyselinck J, Grossniklaus U, Dresselhaus T. Egg cell–secreted EC1 triggers sperm cell activation during double fertilization. Science. 2012;338:1093–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Engler C, Marillonnet S. Golden Gate cloning. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2014;1116:119–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 1998;16:735–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Hua Y, Wang C, Huang J, Wang K. A simple and efficient method for CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutant screening. J Genet Genomics. 2017;44:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lamport D. Preparation of arabinogalactan glycoproteins from plant tissue. BIO-Protoc. 2013;3.

  55. ØBro J, Harholt J, Scheller HV, Orfila C. Rhamnogalacturonan I in Solanum tuberosum tubers contains complex arabinogalactan structures. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:1429–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Savannah Bisson, Rebecca Kula, Sean McGovern, and Weiheng Yu for helping with the mutant screenings and phenotypic analyses. We also thank Oyeyemi Ajayi and Carol Showalter for their critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Graduate Student Research Fund of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University, an Original Work Grant provided by Ohio University, and a Nanoscale & Quantum Phenomena Institute (NQPI) fellowship provided by Ohio University to Y.Z.


This work was supported by a grant from the Ohio University Baker Fund to A.M.S. The funder had no role in the experimental design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y.Z. conducted the experiments. H.A.M. helped with the monosaccharide composition analysis and proofread the manuscript. D.K. helped with the mutant generation and proofread the manuscript. A.M.S. and Y.Z. conceived the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allan M. Showalter.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Allan M. Showalter is a member of the editorial board (i.e., an Associate Editor) of this journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1.

List of guide RNA sequences and their target genes.

Additional file 2: Supplemental Table 2.

Names of the primer pairs for amplifying each polycistronic tRNA-guide RNA (PTG) unit.

Additional file 3: Supplemental Table 3.

List of primer sequences for PTG cloning.

Additional file 4: Supplemental Table 4.

List of primer sequences used to clone the second CRISPR multiplexing construct.

Additional file 5: Supplemental Table 5.

Quantitative data of phenotypes of WT, 25, 346, and 23456 mutants.

Additional file 6: Supplemental Table 6.

List of primers for sequencing off-targets of the GALT genes.

Additional file 7: Supplemental Figure 1.

Gene editing events of GALT3 generated by gRNA 3-1 and gRNA 3-2 were inherited to the next generation. (A-B) Segregation patterns of gene editing events of GALT3 in two transgenic lines (#25 and #40 ) in the T2 generation; (C) (Left panel) Gene deletion of GALT3 was inherited to the T3 generation in the #40-10 CRISPR line; (Right panel) Gene editing events of GALT3 were detected in three independent transgenic lines (#12, #25 and #40) in the T1 generation. Red indicated a full deletion in the GALT3 gene. Supplemental Figure 2. Growth phenotypes of the galt mutants in soil. Photographs of the galt mutants and WT were taken from the third week to the fifth week after sowing. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Held, M.A., Kaur, D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex genome editing of the hydroxyproline-O-galactosyltransferase gene family alters arabinogalactan-protein glycosylation and function in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biol 21, 16 (2021).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: