Skip to main content

Internal ammonium excess induces ROS-mediated reactions and causes carbon scarcity in rice

Abstract

Background

Overuse of nitrogen fertilizers is often a major practice to ensure sufficient nitrogen demand of high–yielding rice, leading to persistent NH4+ excess in the plant. However, this excessive portion of nitrogen nutrient does not correspond to further increase in grain yields. For finding out the main constraints related to this phenomenon, the performance of NH4+ excess in rice plant needs to be clearly addressed beyond the well-defined root growth adjustment. The present work isolates an acute NH4+ excess condition in rice plant from causing any measurable growth change and analyses the initial performance of such internal NH4+ excess.

Results

We demonstrate that the acute internal NH4+ excess in rice plant accompanies readily with a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and initiates the downstream reactions. At the headstream of carbon production, photon caption genes and the activity of primary CO2 fixation enzymes (Rubisco) are evidently suppressed, indicating a reduction in photosynthetic carbon income. Next, the vigorous induction of glutathione transferase (GST) genes and enzyme activities along with the rise of glutathione (GSH) production suggest the activation of GSH cycling for ROS cleavage. Third, as indicated by strong induction of glycolysis / glycogen breakdown related genes in shoots, carbohydrate metabolisms are redirected to enhance the production of energy and carbon skeletons for the cost of ROS scavenging. As the result of the development of these defensive reactions, a carbon scarcity would accumulatively occur and lead to a growth inhibition. Finally, a sucrose feeding cancels the ROS burst, restores the activity of Rubisco and alleviates the demand for the activation of GSH cycling.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that acute NH4+ excess accompanies with a spontaneous ROS burst and causes carbon scarcity in rice plant. Therefore, under overuse of N fertilizers carbon scarcity is probably a major constraint in rice plant that limits the performance of nitrogen.

Background

Nitrogen (N) limitation is a leading constraint to the grain yield of rice [1, 2]. Leaf N accounts for the largest N sink of rice plant, ca. 80% of which is distributed in the chloroplast and stored as Ribulose–1,5–bisphosphate carboxylase / oxygenases (Rubisco), the primary carbon fixation enzymes of C3 plants [3]. Photosynthesis is tightly correlated to leaf N content [4], and more than 80% of grain N is derived from leaves in rice [5]. Hence, insufficient leaf N storage will lead to reduction of photosynthetic carbon fixation efficiency and is therefore considered as a major limitation to biomass and grain production of cereal ecosystems [6,7,8,9].

To sustain the strong and persistent N demand for higher grain yield of rice (6.4 t ha− 1 or above), the average N input is normally over 180 kg ha− 1 in China [10]. In the high-yielding rice farming areas, the N input can even reach to 300 kg ha− 1 and this is particularly the case for recent super-hybrid rice cultivars that achieve as high as > 10 t ha-1 of grain yields [11]. In soils, applied N fertilizers (e.g. urea form accounted for the majority of current N fertilizers) are rapidly converted to ammonium with the potent reactions of ureases. In rice paddy soils, ca. 70–80% of the growth period is water flooded, causing an anaerobic environment that largely prevents the process of nitrification. Therefore, NH4+ is the major form of nitrogen available to rice plant. Thus efficient dealing with NH4+ is a most important concern in rice. However, recent results show that overuse of N fertilizers strengthens excessive NH4+ accumulation in rice plant that does not correspond to further increase in grain yields [12]. Therefore, low efficiencies of N utilization and its agronomic benefits are major problems of N overuse in rice farming. The performance of such redundant portion of NH4+ is thus a meaningful issue of investigations.

The most straightforward observation caused by high NH4+ over-supply is the strong reduction of root growth. To this respect, significant advances have been achieved centering the insightful molecular mechanisms or pathways that modulate the adjustment of root morphology. In Arabidopsis, root tip contact to high NH4+ is essential for triggering the inhibitory growth of primary roots [13]. Whereas leaf contact and accumulation of toxic NH4+ impair AUX1-mediated primary polar transport of IAA to the roots thereby inhibit the emergence of lateral roots [14]. In rice, continuous exposure for several days to high NH4+ strongly inhibits seminal root elongation then causes a reduction in plant growth [15,16,17,18,19]. Moreover, the mechanisms of NH4+ toxicity to plants are considered to result from the accumulative consequences of divergent frustrations such as ion imbalance, intracellular pH disturbance, carbon limitation, charge/hormone imbalance or oxidative stresses [20,21,22,23,24]. In addition, the analysis of Arabidopsis hsn/vtc mutants indicates that GDP–mannose pyrophosphorylases-mediated protein N-glycosylation can also participate in the modulation of root elongation under NH4+ stresses [25,26,27]. Moreover, phytohormone signals are reported to interact with NH4+ supply and regulate plant metabolism, growth and development [13, 14, 24, 25, 27, 28]. In addition, a number of transcriptome analyses speculate that the redirections of carbohydrate metabolisms, amino acid metabolisms [19, 29] in rice plant are responsible for the toxicity of excessive NH4+. To the opposite direction, efforts have also been put to the retrieval of plant from severe stress of NH4+ toxicity. For instance, the application of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) alleviates NH4+ toxicity through reducing NH4+ accumulation and assimilation capacity for a energy saving [30]. OsPTR6 promotes rice root growth by enhancing OsAMT1 expression and GS activity but at the expense of decreasing nitrogen use efficiency [31]; OsSE5 that encodes the heme-heme oxygenase 1 dedicates to relieving NH4+ toxicity by reinforcing antioxidant defense system [18].

In general, the current knowledge on plant responses to NH4+ toxicity has focused on the impacts of high NH4+ supplied outside to the roots that depends on the occurrence of a measurable phenotype to accumulate for a relatively longer time course. To this respect, ‘mixed’ influences between specific NH4+ stress responses and endogenous changes along the course of plant growth and development seem inevitable. Therefore, to one hand, the initiation of high NH4+ stress responses needs to be specifically isolated; to the other hand, the physiological and or molecular performances of NH4+ excess retained inside rice plant remain to be addressed independently of a root phenotype.

The previous study implies that the adjustment of carbohydrate metabolisms could be a notable feature in responding NH4+ status in rice in a short time period [29]. Environmental stress stimuli such as salinity or drought stresses induce the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and promptly trigger oxidative defense responses [32, 33]. As the result, the reduction of photosynthetic CO2 fixation efficiency and redirection of carbohydrate metabolism could speculatively be major causes leading to compromised carbon gain and growth retardance [32, 34]. Therefore, findings or speculations from classical stress responses provide useful links to uncover the nature of the toxicity of internal NH4+ excess that has not been clearly demonstrated.

Based on the above descriptions, the present work aims at isolating the initial reactions and (molecular-) physiological responses of rice plant to the internal NH4+ excess stress before the formation of a visible phenotype. For this purpose, an acute method is established allowing drastic NH4+ excess within several hours. This is anticipated a problem-solving orientated work that could be practically useful for further understanding the performance of excess NH4+ in rice plant caused by overuse of N fertilizers. By the integration of physiological observation, transcriptomic gene expression analysis and enzyme activity assays, we demonstrate that the activation of the toxic effects of acute NH4+ excess is readily initiated by the bursts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequently leads to damages to the photosynthetic components and causes the headstream reduction of the activity of primary CO2 fixation. Meanwhile, elevated ROS in the plant activates GSH cycles for active radical scavenging that requires the redirection of carbohydrate metabolisms for engergization and for providing of carbon skeletons. These downstream reactions strengthen the carbon scarcity in rice plant. Finally, a sucrose feeding effectively alleviates ROS-induced frustrations, supporting that the carbon scarcity is a major constraint of rice plant in dealing with internal NH4+ excess.

Results

Growth inhibition under high NH4+ correlates to an NH4+ excess induced ROS burst in rice seedlings

Under persistent treatment with high NH4+ (20 mM) for 14d, a significant growth inhibition was observed compared to the control condition (1 mM NH4+) (Fig. 1a). The inhibition was more profound in roots showing a biomass reduction of up to 67% (Fig. 1a) and the root/shoot ratio was significantly lowered from approximately 0.5 down to 0.2 (Fig. 1b). Meanwhile, 7 and 5 folds higher concentrations of free NH4+ were measured in roots and shoots, respectively (Fig. 1c). Nevertheless, the strong inhibition of root growth under high NH4+ supplement was a well-defined issue that had attracted numerous investigations. Efforts have be extensively made on the elucidation of molecular mechanisms involved in root architecture adjustments in response to the accumulation of relatively long-term (several days or longer) stress effects impended by high NH4+ treatments. Here to reveal early responsive reactions that could be the trigger of the accumulative responses (growth modifications), a prompt status of internal NH4+ excess is necessarily to be established without causing visible changes in plant growth (especially roots). Therefore, L–methionine–D,L–sulfoximine (MSX), a potent inhibitor of the primary NH4+ assimilation pathway mediated by the activity of glutamine synthetases [35] was applied (1 mM) for 4 h in the presence of high NH4+ (20 mM). Considering the strong toxicity of MSX, proper conditions for the use of the drug were pre-tested to avoid lethal effects that lead to apoptotic lyses of cell components. In our hydroponics a 4 h incubation with 1 mM MSX could efficiently result in an acute NH4+ excess in both roots and shoots 5–6 fold that of the control conditions without any visible damage to rice seedlings (Fig. 1d). Thus the method allowed to simulate as fast as within 4 h, ‘saturable’ NH4+ excess circumstances inside both the roots and shoots to similar levels of the long term treatments (compare Fig. 1 c & d).

Fig. 1
figure1

Biological and physiological analyses of NH4+ excess responses of rice. Rice seedlings aged 7 d were subjected to NH4+ treatments for 14 d (a-c, e). a Fresh biomasses of roots and shoots. b Root-shoot ratios. c Free NH4+ content and e Total ROS content in response to NH4+ treatments. d Acute NH4+ excess simulation by treating with high NH4+ for 4 h in the presence of 1 mM MSX. Rice seedlings used for this experiment were 10 d old. Values indicated means ± SE of three independent replicates. ** and *** represented statistical significances at p<0.01 and 0.001, respectively

In line with the accumulation of free NH4+, bursts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were observed (Fig. 1e), implying possible occurrence of ROS-induced reactions triggered by internal NH4+ excess.

To further demonstrate the involvement of radical species in the early response to NH4+ excess, we carried out respectively DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine) and NBT (nitroblue tetrazolium) histochemical staining to trace the occurrence of H2O2 and O2 in newly-born roots and the 2nd leaves of the above treated rice plants. Results showed that upon the acute exposure to high NH4+, significant accumulation of H2O2 in both leaves and roots was detected with strong colored staining (Additional file 1, Fig. S1, a & b). The stains were readily faded to close to the control levels following a feeding of 1% sucrose (Additional file 1, Fig. S1, a & b), indicating the fallback of the H2O2 burst to the normal levels. Consistent with the observation of H2O2, the NBT stained O2 showed closely similar changes (Additional file 2, Fig. S2, a & b). This set of data rose questions that the burst of ROS (probably independent of their composition species) was an initiation step of the toxicity mediated by NH4+ excess. Consequently, a set of ROS–triggered reactions or responses would be expected to take place as extensively described for abiotic stress responses. Indeed, according to the measurements of free amino acid contents (Additional file 3, Fig. S3), high NH4+ also caused a significant accumulation of free amino acids in both roots and leaves, resembling a common protective response of that of a drought or salinity stress.

RNA-Seq analysis for preliminary identification of genes modulated by NH4+ excess

According to above description, rice seedlings were treated with high NH4+ in the presence of 1 mM MSX for 4 h to establish an internal environment of NH4+ excess. Then RNA-Seq analyses were carried out to seek for molecular responses related to this circumstance. Respectively 1077 and 1040 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained from roots and shoots, with > 2 fold changes in their transcriptional levels (Additional file 4). Based on the GO classification, these genes mainly belonged to “metabolic process”, “molecular function”, “binding” and “biological process” (Additional file 5). Further KEGG pathway analysis revealed possible involvements of the responsive genes (DEGs) in stress response, photosynthetic adjustment, carbohydrate and amino acid metabolisms, preparation of hormone signaling pathways and re-adjustment of NH4+ transport (Additional file 6). The significantly regulated genes were further summarized below within the framework of major processes they participate.

Activation of GSH cycle for ROS scavenging

Following the acute NH4+ excess and the bursts of ROS (Fig. 1c, d, e), a most remarkable response was the strong induction of glutathione S–transferases (GST) genes (Fig. 2). Eleven GST genes were typically upregulated for > 7 or even some tens to hundreds fold both in roots and shoots (Fig. 2ab, genes#1–11). Among those GSTs, a OsGSTU4 (Os10g0528300, Fig. 2a, gene#11) was the most severely induced by > 300 and > 600 fold in roots and shoots respectively, followed by 2 putative GST genes (Os10g0481300 and Os10g0527800) that were upregulated by 50–100 fold in both parts. Whereas Os10g0525500 (77 fold) and Os03g0785900 (90 fold) showed strong induction in roots and shoots respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Since GSTs catalyze the transfer of superoxide free radicals to reductive glutathione (GSH) that leads to the detoxification of the oxidants, these changes in GST gene expression provide indications for the critical involvement of the GSH cycle in scavenging the NH4+ excess induced ROS.

Fig. 2
figure2

Gene expression analyses of responsive ROS scavenging genes. a Differentially expressed genes obtained by RNA-Seq were illustrated in relation to the major pathways they were involved. Colored columns corresponded to fold changes of the transcripts as indicated by the definition of color gradients (bottom). The symbol ‘+’ and the red gradient columns represented up-regulated genes and the fold of induction; while ‘-‘and the green gradient columns referred to down-regulated genes. b The qRT-PCR validation of randomly selected genes coding for ROS scavenging systems. The relative expression levels were normalized against OsActin. Values indicated were means of three independent replicates. Numbered responsive genes were annotated as followings: 1. Os01g0949700, putative glutathione S-transferase; 2. Os03g0785900, probable glutathione S-transferase GSTU1; 3. Os01g0369700, putative glutathione transferase 4; 4. Os01g0949800, putative glutathione S-transferase; 5. Os01g0949750, putative glutathione S-transferase; 6. Os10g0365200, glutathione S-transferase; 7. Os10g0527800, glutathione S-transferase OsGSTU12; 8. Os10g0481300, glutathione S-transferase; 9. Os10g0525500, glutathione S-transferase parC; 10. Os01g0372400, putative glutathione S-transferase; 11. Os10g0528300, glutathione S-transferase OsGSTU4; 12. Os10g0415300, glutathione reductase; 13. Os08g0557600, monodehydroascorbate reductase; 14. Os07g0638400, 1-Cys peroxiredoxin B; 15. Os05g0499300, peroxidase 1; 16. Os07g0677300, peroxidase 2; 17. Os05g0134800, Class III peroxidase 67; 18. Os02g0236600, Class III peroxidase 27; 19. Os03g0234900, Class III peroxidase 39; 20. Os03g0368000, Class III peroxidase 42; 21. Os06g0695300, Class III peroxidase 92; 22. Os07g0564500, NADH dehydrogenase [EC:1.6.99.3]

In line with strengthened demand of reducing power, a putative glutathione reductase gene (Os10g0415300) responsible for the recruitment of GSH was moderately upregulated (~ 8 fold) in roots and vigorously enhanced by 70 fold in shoots (Fig. 2a). Meanwhile, a NADH dehydrogenase gene (Os07g0564500) was stimulated by 127 folds in shoots, partly reflecting the coupling of energization and reducing power with the operation of the GSH cycle (Fig. 2a).

In addition to profound changes related to the GSH cycle, 7 peroxidase genes were suppressed in roots whereas a putative 1-Cys peroxiredoxin B gene (Os07g0638400) was significantly induced in both roots (19 fold) and shoots (179 fold) (Fig. 2a), corresponding to the contradictory roles of peroxidases in the cleavage / homeostasis maintenance of ROS [36].

Suppression of photosynthesis components and contrasting regulation of energy producing carbohydrate metabolism

The chlorophyll a/b binding proteins of light-harvesting complexes (LHCs), also known as antenna proteins, are involved in gathering light energy (photons) of the primary reaction of photosynthesis [37]. Then trapped photons and electrons are transported to reaction center for further photochemical reactions. Disruption of these processes by photodamage, herbicides, or accumulation of highly active radicals will obviously hinder the progress of photosynthesis. Upon a prompt (4 h) NH4+ excess treatment, 6 genes coding for the LHC antenna proteins (4 LHC II and 2 LHC I, respectively), a PS I and a PS II reaction center genes were almost evenly suppressed by approximately 5 fold (Fig. 3), indicating the onset of the reduction of efficiencies of photon gathering and transfer. It would be easily supposed that apparent suppression of photosynthesis would accumulate along the progress of NH4+ excess stress and growth inhibition would consequently occur. Meanwhile, Os12G0292400 coding for the small chain of Rubisco, the key enzyme catalyzes the fixation / assimilation of CO2, was downregulated by ~ 5 fold (Fig. 3), providing further indication of compromised photosynthetic carbon production. Therefore, plant NH4+ excess initiates and probably also develops the disruption of photosynthesis by interfering in the primary reaction and the Calvin Cycle.

Fig. 3
figure3

Responsive genes involved in photosynthesis. Differentially expressed genes obtained by RNA-Seq were illustrated in relation to the major processes they were involved. Colored columns corresponded to fold changes of the transcripts as indicated by the definition of color gradients (bottom). The symbol ‘+’ and the red gradient columns represented up-regulated genes and the fold of induction; while ‘-‘and the green gradient columns referred to down-regulated genes. Numbered responsive genes were annotated as followings: 23. Os03g0592500, light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 2 (LHCB2); 24. Os07g0558400, light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 4(LHCB4); 25. Os01g0720500, light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1 (LHCB1); 26. Os09g0346500, light-harvesting complex II chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1 (LHCB1); 27. Os03g0333400, photosystem II Psb27 protein (psb27); 28. (Os08g0560900), photosystem I subunit II (psaD); 29. Os06g0320500, light-harvesting complex I chlorophyll a/b binding protein 1 (LHCA1); 30. Os02g0197600, light-harvesting complex I chlorophyll a/b binding protein 3 (LHCA3); 31. Os12g0292400, ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase small chain [EC:4.1.1.39] (rbcS)

Radical scavenging enzymes are activated and energized by the ATP producing processes including glycolysis and the TCA pathways. However, several genes involved in glycolysis and the TCA cycle were contrastingly regulated in roots and shoots (Fig. 4). In roots, genes coding for 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase (Os05g0482700, gene#33) and fructose-bisphosphate aldolases (Os08g0120600, gene#34 and Os01g0905800, gene#35) of glycolysis, isocitrate dehydrogenase (Os05g0573200, gene#36) and malate dehydrogenase (Os05g0574400, gene#37) of the TCA cycle were down-regulated by 6–10 fold following 4 h of NH4+ excess treatments (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile genes involved in glycogen breakdown were suppressed in roots (Fig. 4a): phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Os10g0204400, gene#32, − 19 fold), beta-glucosidase (Os09g0491100, gene# 40, − 11 fold), beta-glucosidase (Os02g0131400, foldgene#41,–15 fold), beta-D-xylosidase 4 (Os04g0640700, gene#42, −7fold), sucrose synthase (Os03g0401300, gene#43, −8fold), beta-fructofuranosidase (Os02g0106100, gene#44, − 11 fold). To the contrary, enhanced glycolysis/glycogen breakdown in shoots could be indicated by the upregulation of related genes (Fig. 4b): glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase (Os02g0600400, gene#39, + 5 fold), inorganic pyrophosphatase (Os05g0438500, gene#49, + 18 fold), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (Os10g0204400, gene#32, + 34 fold), beta-glucosidase (Os05g0366600, gene#47, + 12 fold), beta-glucosidase (Os09g0511600, gene#48, + 20 fold). Notably, a pyruvate decarboxylase gene (Os05g0469600, gene #38) of glycolysis, was specifically induced in shoots (Fig. 4b). In addition, two genes Os06g0222100 and Os08g0445700 coding for trehalose 6-phosphate synthase/phosphatases were induced by respectively 15 and 13 fold in roots (Fig. 4a, genes #45,46), suggesting enhanced biosynthesis of the ‘survival substance’ [32] trehalose induced by NH4+ excess stress.

Fig. 4
figure4

Responsive genes involved in carbohydrate metabolisms in roots (a) and shoots (b). Differentially expressed genes obtained by RNA-Seq were illustrated in relation to the major processes they were involved. Colored columns corresponded to fold changes of the transcripts as indicated by the definition of color gradients (bottom). The symbol ‘+’ and the red gradient columns represented up-regulated genes and the fold of induction; while‘-’ and the green gradient columns referred to down-regulated genes. Numbered responsive genes were annotated as followings: 32. Os10g0204400, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (ATP) [EC:4.1.1.49] (pckA); 33. Os05g0482700, 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate-independent phosphoglycerate mutase [EC:5.4.2.12] (gpmI); 34. Os08g0120600, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, class I [EC:4.1.2.13] (ALDO); 35. Os01g0905800, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, class I [EC:4.1.2.13] (ALDO); 36. Os05g0573200, isocitrate dehydrogenase [EC:1.1.1.42] (IDH); 37. Os05g0574400, malate dehydrogenase [EC:1.1.1.37] (MDH2); 38. Os05g0469600, pyruvate decarboxylase [EC:4.1.1.1]; 39. Os02g0600400, glucose-6-phosphate 1-dehydrogenase [EC:1.1.1.49] (G6PD); 40. Os09g0491100, beta-glucosidase [EC:3.2.1.21]; 41. Os02g0131400, beta-glucosidase [EC:3.2.1.21]; 42. Os04g0640700, beta-D-xylosidase 4 [EC:3.2.1.37] (XYL4); 43. Os03g0401300, sucrose synthase [EC:2.4.1.13]; 44. Os02g0106100, beta-fructofuranosidase [EC:3.2.1.26] (sacA); 45. Os08g0445700, trehalose 6-phosphate synthase / phosphatase [EC:2.4.1.15 3.1.3.12] (TPS); 46. Os06g0222100, trehalose 6-phosphate phosphatase [EC:3.1.3.12] (otsB); 47. Os05g0366600, beta-glucosidase [EC:3.2.1.21]; 48. Os09g0511600, beta-glucosidase [EC:3.2.1.21], 49. Os05g0438500, inorganic pyrophosphatase [EC:3.6.1.1]

Sucrose feeding alleviates NH4+ excess stress responses

The above analyses revealed rather frustrating responses to NH4+ excess stress in rice plant that closely associated with the consumption of carbohydrates for energy demand. Hence a sugar scarcity could accumulatively (to a longer time course) result in growth inhibition. To test this hypothesis, we fed 1% of sucrose as a sugar compensation to the high NH4+ (20 mM) hydroponics for 24 h. This treatment compensated the sucrose consumption at high NH4+ and allowed the sucrose contents in roots and shoots to restore to equivalent levels of the control (1 mM NH4+) conditions (Fig. 5a). The sucrose feeding treatments further increased the free NH4+ contents in roots, but significantly reduced NH4+ accumulation to the shoots (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5
figure5

Effects of sucrose feeding on NH4+ accumulation, uptake and assimilation processes. Seedlings aged 10 d were subjected to control (1 mM NH4+), high NH4+ (20 mM) or high NH4++ suc (20 mM NH4+ + 1% sucrose) treatments for 24 h. a Sucrose content, b free NH4+ content, c the expression profiles of OsAMT1;1, OsAMT1;2 and OsAMT1;3 determined by qRT-PCR, d GS enzyme activity, e GOGAT enzyme activity. Data were means ± SE of three independent replicates. Letters on the bars represented statistical significances

Under high NH4+ conditions, the expression levels of 3 AMT1 genes (OsAMT1;1–Os04g0509600, OsAMT1;2–Os02G0620500 and OsAMT1;3–Os02G0620600) were suppressed respectively by 3, 67 and 6 fold in roots, implying a reduction in NH4+uptake activity. With the supplement of sucrose (1%) to the high NH4+ hydroponics (Fig. 5c), their expression levels restored to close to the ‘normal’ levels (at 1 mM NH4+).. This implied a release of ammonium transporting activity from suppression by NH4+excess, thus contributed to enhanced NH4+ accumulation in roots under high NH4+ plus sucrose condition. Whereas the reduced free NH4+ content under the same condition in shoots indicated probably the efficient utilization of NH4+ upon the addition of sucrose (Fig. 5b). Meanwhile the GS (Fig. 5d) and GOGAT (Fig. 5e) activities were respectively enhanced by 17% (GS) and 29% (GOGAT) in roots following the sucrose feeding treatments, indicating a restoration of NH4+ assimilation activities from initial suppression by NH4+ excess.

Upon the compensation of sucrose source, the total ROS contents in both roots and shoots were lowered down by 20–30%, close to the levels determined at control (1 mM NH4+) conditions (Fig. 6a). Accordingly, the GSH content and GST activity were significantly reduced to the initial levels (at 1 mM NH4+), no longer showing strong induction by NH4+ excess (Fig. 6b, c). Unexpectedly, no significant changes were observed with the activities of classical defense enzymes CAT, POD and SOD under either treatment (Fig. 6d, e, f). Together with the gene expression analyses (Fig. 2), our results demonstrated that the activation of GSH reducing pathway is probably a featured response of rice in dealing with NH4+ excess and ROS accumulation. Finally, in consistent with the decreased level of ROS, Rubisco activity was elevated by 24% (compared with high NH4+) in shoots with the presence of sucrose feeding (Fig. 6g), suggesting enhanced efficiency of primary CO2 fixation activity.

Fig. 6
figure6

Effects of sucrose feeding on ROS accumulation, ROS scavenging enzymes and Rubisco activities. Seedlings aged 14 d were subjected to control (1 mM NH4+), high NH4+ (20 mM) or high NH4++ suc (20 mM NH4+ + 1% sucrose) treatments for 24 h. a Total ROS accumulation represented by fluorescence degrees, b GSH content, c-g Enzymes activity assays for c GST, d CAT, e POD, f SOD and g Rubisco. Experimental conditions were the same as described in Fig. 5. Data were expressed as means ± SE of three independent replicates. Letters on the bars represented statistical significances

Taken together, this set of experiments indicated that sucrose feeding could effectively alleviate rice plant from carbon scarcities exerted by internal NH4+ excess and ROS stresses.

Discussion

The performance of internal NH4+ excess is an issue of physiological and practical significance

Due to particular water-flooding and anaerobic environment, NH4+ retains as the major form of N nutrient available to paddy rice. For the present high-yielding rice production in China, to satisfy the strengthened N demand for high levels of grain yields, nitrogen fertilizers are applied as high as typically 300 kg ha-1 N. The total amount of nitrogen normally composes of ~ 40% of basal N at the seedling stage and respectively 30% of topdressed N at the tillering and grain-filling stages to ensure sufficiently higher N contents in the roots and photosynthetic leaves. This amount of nitrogen is thought to be overused since the grain yield is saturated; but is necessary for farms’ goal of a high grain yield [10,11,12, 38, 39]. As the consequence of N overuse, a persistent internal NH4+ excess circumstance exists for rice plant to cope with. Therefore, a study focuses on such farming-intervened special circumstances would be helpful in discovering ‘bottlenecked’ constraints and adaptation strategies related to the (molecular) physiological and agronomic respects of N performances in rice. Then questions rise for researchers: what the excessive portion of N does in rice plant? What is the main constraint that limits the excess N from conversion to further productivity?

Under the field conditions of N overuse (say 300 kg ha-1 N), suppose the N fertilizer exists totally in the form of NH4+ ions and are mainly distributed within a depth of 30 cm (including water body), the 4:3:3 proportions of total N (NH4+) will roughly result in 2.2, 1.7 and 1.7 mM of NH4+ concentrations, such concentrations will be further compromised due to the buffering capacity of the soil (NH4+ adhered to soil particles), finally the free NH4+ ions around the roots could be in a “safe” range that does not stress the roots. As the result, N overuse in rice field is not exactly an external high NH4+ stress, for N fertilizer topdressing is normally applied almost evenly to the surface of water flooded field, not by localized dressing that brings high NH4+ to the roots. In this circumstance, the problem of N overuse can be simplified as an NH4+ excess inside the plant.

It is to this respect we design the experiments. Although like many others, for better controlling of experimental conditions we use hydroponics to address the question. Particular attentions have been paid to avoid growth divergence during the whole set of experiments. To isolate the specific reactions initiated by internal NH4+ excess, we establish an acute method that creates sufficient levels of NH4+ excess in 4 h by the presence of MSX to block (targeted to GS) the assimilation of NH4+ acquired into the plant. For the use of MSX, we clearly notice its strong toxicity to plants and serious precautions are made to find a “safe” condition by pre-testing its effects on induction of significant NH4+ accumulation in shoots and its toxic influences to the seedlings. When MSX was supplied at 0.1 mM concentration, NH4+ accumulation in shoots within 4 h is much less profound (1–2 fold) than at 1 mM (5–6 fold). Within the first 4 h of incubation with 1 mM of MSX, rice seedlings remain clearly unaffected, indicating no injury occurred at this time period; with extended incubation to 12 h, leaves turn yellowish and somehow curl, and finally up to 24 h, seedlings start dying. In addition, our previous work on optional gene expression observation [29], we finally use 4 h treatments with high NH4+ and the presence of 1 mM MSX.

The toxicity of internal NH4+ excess initiates with bursts of ROS

High NH4+ stress and toxicity have been considered as a major human-intervened environmental distress exerted on plants and attracted extensive research interests. Researches on these topics have focused on the identification of mechanisms or pathways that primarily modulate the biological modifications of root architectures [20,21,22,23,24]. Solid evidences have shown the re-configuration of plant root morphology in response to NH4+ stresses is tightly controlled through the interactions with plant hormone signaling pathways [13, 14, 24, 25, 27]. Whereas NH4+ toxicities could be attributed to ion imbalances [20], intracellular pH disturbance [40], energy consumption due to invalid NH4+ cycles in roots [13, 41]. Assessments of NH4+ stress responses in plant roots and its biological toxicities, to a great extent, relies on the establishment of measurable growth phenotypes that requires effects or reactions to accumulate for a desired time course. These analyses are obviously important in addressing the mode-of-action of physiological effects or processes developed along the progresses of the treatments. To the other hand, since plants keep growing and developing during the experimental periods, these accumulative observations might be not satisfactory for capturing the initial reactions or the nature of NH4+ excess stresses. Therefore, it seems inevitably necessary to isolate the initial reactions triggered by internal NH4+ excess from rather mixed accumulative effects.

Our results with physiological measurements and histochemical observations clearly demonstrate that the burst of ROS radicals is a foremost straightforward consequence readily along the acute internal NH4+ excess (Fig. 1c- e; Additional files 1, 2). Then we obtain a whole set of indications supporting that the essential nature of the toxicity of NH4+ excess in rice plant is probably initiated by the induction of ROS bursts and the downstream reactions: 1) since photosynthetic components are sensitive to radical injuries, we observe reduced abundances of genes involved in photon-caption and compromised primary CO2 fixation activity of the Rubisco enzymes (Figs. 3 and 6g); 2) downstream the ROS burst, we identify that GSH cycling acts as a seemingly specific defense mechanism for scavenging ROS, using both transcription and enzyme activity changes of GST genes as indicators (Figs. 2 and 6); 3) to energize the highly energy-consuming ROS cleavage reactions, we observe gene expression indications for a reduced complex sugar synthesis and strongly enhanced breakdown of active simple sugars in shoots (Fig. 4), such shift in carbon metabolism points to a strengthened production of carbon skeletons. Conversely, the enhancements of energy and carbon skeleton production seem not accordingly take place in roots (Fig. 4), implying a sacrifice of root growth for stress escaping.

To this end, the nature of the toxicity of NH4+ excess in rice plant resembles largely that has been well defined for an abiotic stress, such as drought or salinity stresses described in other plant species [32, 34], and shares same origins—oxidative injuries and ROS induced energy and carbon skeleton consumption. There are sufficient speculations of the induction of ROS under high NH4+ stresses. In tobacco and grapevine suspension cells, a 24-treatment with high NH4+ or NaCl results in the generation of ROS that signals the redirection of amino acid synthesis and metabolisms [42] (Skopelitis et al., 2006 PC). In the hydroponics of Myriophyllum mattogrossense, the induction of oxidative stress responses by an excess of ammonia (NH3 and NH4+) is deduced from the increased activities of antioxidative protection enzymes [43] (Nimptsch et al., 2007, Chemosphere). After a 26 h of N depletion, resupplement of even 1 mM of NH4+ to Arabidosis is suspected to induce oxidative stress responses as deduced from elevated activities of antioxidant scavengers [44] (Patterson 2010 PEC). Under 25 mM NH4+, elevated H2O2 can be detected in Arabidosis and participates the modulation of AMOS1/EGY1-dependent ABA signaling 28]. In rice, continuous exposure for 6 days to extremely high concentration of NH4+ (80 mM) results in significant accumulation of ROS and activates the involvement of heme oxygenase 1 in the alleviation of NH4+ toxicity [18] (Xie et al., 2015 PCE). In general, for most of phenotype-related assessments, plants are subjected to continuous NH4+ stresses so that solid phenotypes develop, and in these cases, elevated of ROS levels are considered as fundamental signals or triggers for the activation of specific molecular pathways. For the identification of “early” responses before the formation of a growth phenotype, transcriptomic studies focus on the gene expression regulation to form speculations on the involvement of ROS and downstream reactions in plants’ responses to high NH4+ stresses [19, 29]. However, the induction of ROS remains to be clearly quantified in relation to the accumulation of free NH4+ inside the plant and the internal effects of NH4+ excess also need to be isolated from stress responses impended exogenously to the roots. Here in this report, we present with physiological and histochemical observations, the acute induction of ROS readily accompanied with the formation of internal NH4+ excess, providing a solid evidence that the frustrating performance of internal NH4+ excess integrates and probably also originated from the burst of ROS.

Carbon scarcity is a major constraint on the effectiveness of the internal NH 4 + excess

Our whole set of data supports a prediction that a carbon scarcity occurs along with the internal NH4+ excess, including the headstream reduction of photosynthetic carbon assimilation (Fig. 3) and the redirection of carbohydrate metabolisms to enhanced energy and C skeleton production (Fig. 4). The prediction is further proofed by the sucrose feeding experiments that eventually cancel the negative effects associated with NH4+ excess (Fig. 5 and 6). Sucrose is chosen for the complementation of carbon scarcity because this sugar is the major form of active carbon source in the phloem and can be transported and allocated in plant tissues and organs [45].

However, the issue of “carbon scarcity” is rather a common view as the consequence of a stress response, since numerous reports have raised such speculation [20,21,22,23,24, 29, 32, 46]. In this report, we present data sets that point to the initiation and development of carbon scarcity (Figs. 2, 3 and 4). Therefore, the occurrence of carbon scarcity and its relationship to NH4+ excess and / or N overuse are no longer a hypothesis but a conclusive notion with solid data supports. To this respect, the nature of NH4+ toxicity can be explained as the development and accumulation of carbon scarcity that eventually lead to growth inhibition or death of the plants.

As demonstrated by sucrose feeding experiment of the present work (Figs. 5 and 6) and reports from Arabidopsis under high NH4+ [46], salinity stresses [47] (Qiu et al., Biologia Plantarum) or chickpea under salinity stresses [48] (Khan et al., 2016 JXB), enhancement of active sugar income would be an efficient approach of overcoming the shortage of carbon source. Whereas in the field, supplement of elevated concentration of CO2 is a straightforward regulation to enhance photosynthetic carbon production and the grain yields of cereals [49,50,51,52] (Ainsworth 2005; Leakey 2009; Becker 2016; Kimball 2016 Current opinion). However, reports have shown that continuous exposure to high CO2 for longer than 3–5 growth seasons leads to a phenomenon of acclimation due to a significant reduction of stomatal conductance and limits of nitrogen nutrient [49, 53] (Seneweera et al., 2002 Funct. Plant biology; Ainsworth 2005). Such acclimation to elevated CO2 can be partly hindered by supplement of sufficient nitrogen [54] (Stitt, 1999), providing an implication that this approach may be more effective under current N overuse in rice. Additionally, reports has shown that the addition of CaCO3 to the roots alleviates the growth inhibition of cucumber from high NH4+ stress [55] (Roosta, 2008). This manner of carbon feeding is expected to be practically useful for China’s rice farming because a great plot of rice production locates to the low pH red soils, and lime is often applied as a soil conditioner for the purpose of pH neutralization.

Efficient NH4+ uptake through AMT transporters is closely related to the removal of the substrate by GS-mediated assimilation processes, ineffective removal or accumulation of NH4+ would hinder the uptake of the ions—a phenomenon of so–called feedback inhibition [[46, 56,57,58]. The strong suppression of root-specific AMT genes, OsAMT1;2 and OsAMT1;3 under rapid NH4+ excess conditions (Fig. 5c) and reduction of GS and GOGAT activities (Fig. 5d, e) provide further evidence of such feedback regulation in rice. Here, upon the carbon compensation by sucrose feeding, the NH4+ assimilation activities restore to normal rates (normal NH4+, 1 mM) and the AMT expression levels are accordingly enhanced (Fig. 5c, d, e), supportedly suggesting that carbon scarcity may be a major cause that leads to feedback inhibition of NH4+ uptake.

Conclusions

To summarize, the present work reveals that the essential nature of internal NH4+ excess stresses in rice plant is closely correlated to its accompanying ROS bursts. Elevated oxidative radicals impair the photosynthetic components and lead to reduced primary carbon production. The activation of ROS scavenging processes redirects the carbohydrate metabolisms for enhanced energy and carbon skeleton production and strengthens carbon scarcity in rice plant. A sucrose feeding effectively alleviates frustrating stress responses. Therefore we conclude that carbon scarcity is probably a major constraint on the effectiveness of internal NH4+ excess under current N fertilizer overuse of high-yielding rice.

Methods

Plant growth and treatments

Rice seeds of Oryza. sativa ssp. Japonica Nipponbare were obtained from Prof. Yingguo Zhu’s group, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University. The seeds were surface sterilized, germinated and seedlings were grown in a growth chamber according to previously described [29]. The growth chamber was set with 16/8 h day/night, 27/25 °C,day/night; The light intensity was 400 μmol m− 2 s− 1, relative humidity was set at 70%. Seedlings were grown in the IRRI solution [29] until desired ages. The pH of hydroponics was buffered to 5.7 with 10 mM MES and renewed every 48 h. For treatments seedlings of uniform sizes were transferred to cylinder polyvinyl chloride culturing tanks (10 cm inner diameter and 15.5 cm height) filled with 1.0 L of nutrient solutions supplied with desired concentrations of NH4+. Eight seedlings separated into 4 holes were placed onto the lids of each culturing tanks. At the time of harvest, seedlings of each tank were pooled and served as one duplicate of every treatment. The treatments were duplicated in 3 individual culturing tanks. For long-term growth tests, uniform seedlings of 7 d were treated with either 1 mM (control) or 20 mM (high NH4+) of NH4Cl supplemented to nitrogen–free IRRI solutions for further 14 days with daily refreshment of the culture solutions. To achieve a rapid NH4+ excess in rice plants without causing a growth discrepancy, so that NH4+ excess-responsive genes could be analyzed at the early stages of responses, 10-d old seedlings were promptly treated with ‘control’ or ‘high NH4+’ (see above) for 4 h in the presence of 1 mM methionine sulfoximine (MSX, a potent inhibitor of glutamine synthetase) to block the major assimilation of NH4+. For sucrose feeding experiments, 14-d old seedlings were treated with control (1 mM NH4+) or high NH4+ (20 mM NH4+) in IRRI solution in the presence of 1% (w/v) sucrose for 24 h. To avoid the burst of microbes associated with sucrose–containing hydroponics, antibiotics penicillin (50 mg L− 1) and chloramphenicol (25 mg L− 1) were included to the culturing solution according to Lejay’s description [59]. Same strength of antibiotics was included in the control seedlings (control NH4+ and high NH4+ treated plants). Also in order to prevent possibly undesired impacts, the treatment was limited to within 24 h.

RNA-Seq and quantitative real-time PCR analyses

Total RNAs from treated root or shoot samples was extracted withTRIzol total RNA extraction kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For RNA–Seq analysis, RNAs from control (1 mM NH4+)or high NH4+plus 1 mM MSX treated (4 h) tissue samples were used for library construction and sequencing. Data extraction, identification of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and functional annotation were analyzed according to our previous work [29]. DEGs were designated with expression fold changes greater than 2 (p < 0.05) between the rapid NH4+ accumulation (high NH4+ + MSX) and the control conditions.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT–PCR) analyses was carried out to reveal possible responses at the gene expression level related to special conditions such as NH4+ excess stress or sucrose feeding treatments. About 1 μg of total RNA was used to synthesize first–strand cDNAs using the PrimeScript™ RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time, TaKaRa, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s description. Primer sequences used for qRT-PCR were listed in Additional file 7. Thermocycling and fluorescence detection were performed with C1000 Thermal Cycler CFX96 Real–Time System (Bio–Rad) using the SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa, Japan) as indicated by the manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction was performed under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 44 cycles of 95 °C for10 s, 60 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 15 s. For fold change analysis, gene expression abundance was quantized with –2ΔΔCt and normalized against the internal OsActin gene. PCR amplifications were repeated three times using cDNA templates synthesized from three independent plant samples.

Tissue free NH4+, free amino acids, GSH and sucrose contents assays

Fresh root or shoot samples (0.2 g) were ground into fine powder in liquid N2 and homogenized in 5 ml of 0.3 mM sulfuric acid. The supernatant was harvested by centrifugation with 20,000 g at 4 °C for 20 min. For free NH4+measurements, aliquots of supernatant (200 μL) were mixed with 4.9 mL each of phenol-sodium nitroprusside solution and alkaline hydrochlorite solution according to the method of Weatherbur [60]. The color reaction was allowed to develop at room temperature for 1hbefore the colorimetric absorbance been measured at 625 nm. The content of free amino acids was determined by a T–free AA assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China) using glycine as the standard [61]. The tissue GSH content was measured according to Cheng’s method [62]. The tissue sucrose extraction was carried out according to Sonnewald’s method [63], and the tissue sucrose contents determination was measured based on Stitt’s description [63, 64].

Determination of total ROS, histochemical staining and ROS scavenging enzyme activity assays

Total reactive oxygen species (ROS) contents induced by internal NH4+excess were assessed by 2′,7′-Dichlorofluoresceindiacetate (H2DCF-DA) method [65]. Fresh root or shoot samples were first made into single cell suspensions with single cell suspension medimachine after removing cell wall with cellulase and macerozyme. Then H2DCF–DA was added to 200 μL single cell suspensions to a final concentration of 10 μM, mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1000 g for 10 min, washed twice with PBS, and diluted with PBS for fluorescence assay. The absorbance was determined on a fluorescence microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT) at an excitation wavelength of 500 nm and an emission wavelength of 530 nm according to the descriptions of Karlsson and Sun [66, 67].

Relatively uniformed and newly-grown roots and the second leaf of rice seedlings were used for histochemical staining [68]. The generation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or superoxide (O2) in situ was detected by using 3,3′ -diaminobenzidine (DAB) or nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) staining, respectively [68, 69]. Samples were analyzed and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon 80i). At least three leaves or roots were stained independently for these experiments.

For antioxidative enzyme activity analyses, 0.2 g of fresh root or shoot samples were ground in liquid N2, homogenized and crude extracts were used for the measurements of CAT, POD and SOD activities as previously described [32]. The specific activity of GST was assayed in the supernatant by following the increase of absorbance at 340 nm using GST Assay Kit according to the manufacturer instructions (CS0410, Sigma, USA). One unit of activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to form 1 μM product per minute at 30 °C. Enzyme activities were expressed as U. mg−1FW.

Measurement of GS, GOGAT and Rubisco activities

To prepare the crude enzyme extracts, roots or shoots of each sample were ground into fine powder with liquid N2 and homogenized with 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 7.6, containing 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM β–mercaptoethanol and 4% (w/v) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone–40) using a chilled pestle and mortar. The homogenate was centrifuged at 15000 g for 30 min at 4 °C and the supernatants were used for the determination of enzyme activities. The glutamine synthetase (GS) activity was measured according to Sakurai’s description [70]. One unit of GS activity was expressed as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the formation of 1 μmol γ-glutamylhydroxamate per min at 37 °C [71]. The glutamate synthase (GOGAT) activity in the supernatants was determined by the conversion of 2-ketoglutarate to glutamate in a reaction mixture containing 200 mM KH2PO4-KOH pH 7.5, 10 mM glutamine (Gln), 10 mM 2–ketoglutarate, 0.14 mM NADH [72], One unit of GOGAT activity was defined as the oxidation rate of 1 nmol NADH per min at 30 °C. And the Rubisco activity was measured according to the method of Li [73]. One unit of Rubisco activity was defined as the oxidation rate of 1 nmol NADH per min at 25 °C.

Statistical analysis

Experiment data were expressed as means ± S.E.M. of 3 independent replicates. Statistical differences were evaluated by Duncan’s or t-test with SPSS 13.0 and the level of statistically significant difference was set at p<0.05.

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are provided within the article (and its additional files).

Abbreviations

AMT:

Ammonium transporter

CAT:

Catalase

CO2 :

Carbon dioxide

DAB:

3,3′ –diaminobenzidine

DEGs:

Differentially Expressed Genes

GABA:

Gamma–Aminobutyric acid

GO:

Gene Ontology

KEGG:

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

GOGAT:

Glutamate synthase

GS:

Glutamine synthetase

GSH:

Glutathione

GST:

Glutathione S-transferase

H2DCF–DA:

2′,7′–Dichlorofluoresceindiacetate

H2O2 :

Hydrogen peroxide

LHCs:

Light–harvesting complexes

MSX:

L–methionine–D,L–sulfoximine

N:

Nitrogen

NBT:

Nitroblue tetrazolium

NH4+ :

Ammonium

qRT-PCR:

Quantitative Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction

O2 :

Superoxide

POD:

Peroxidase

ROS:

Reactive Oxygen Species

RNA–Seq:

RNA sequencing

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

Rubisco:

Ribulose–1,5–bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase

TCA cycle:

Tricarboxylic acid cycle

References

  1. 1.

    Aerts RC, Chapin FS III. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res. 1999;30:1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Schlegel AJ, Grant CA, Havlin JL. Challenging approaches to NitrogenFertilizer recommendations in continuous cropping Systems in the Great Plains. Agron J. 2005;97:391–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kant S, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ. Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency. J Exp Bot. 2011;62:1499–509.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Makino A. Photosynthesis, grain yield, and nitrogen utilization in rice andwheat. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:125–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tabuchi M, Abiko T, Yamaya T. Assimilation of ammonium ions and reutilization of nitrogen in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot. 2007;58:2319–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Chen YZ, Murchie EH, Hubbart S, Horton P, Peng SB. Effect of season-dependent irradiance levels and nitrogen-deficiency on phytosynthesis and photoinhibition in field-grown rice. Physiol Plant. 2003;117:343–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Dobermann A,Fairhurst T. Rice Nutrient Disorders&Nutrient Management. 2000;pp:41–60. Potash &Phosphate Institute (PPI), Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada (PPIC) and International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).

  8. 8.

    Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Lee T, Ellsworth DS, West JB, Tilman D, Knops JMH, Naeem S, Trost J. Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature. 2006;440:922–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Zhang YM, Yan YS, Wang LN, Yang K, Xiao N, Liu YF, Fu YP, Sun ZX, Fang RX, Chen XY. A novel rice gene, NRR responds to macronutrient deficiency and regulates root growth. Mol Plant. 2012;5:63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Peng SB, Buresh RJ, Huang JL, Zhong XH, Zou YB, Yang JC, Wang GH, Liu YY, Hu HR, Tang QY, Cui KH, Zhang FS, Dobermann A. Improving nitrogen fertilization in rice by site-specific N management. Agron Sustain Dev. 2010;2:943–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yuan LP. Progress in super-hybrid rice breeding. Crop J. 2017;5(2):100–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ju CX, Buresh RJ, Wang ZQ, Zhang H, Liu LJ, Yang JC, Zhang JH. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application. Field Crop Res. 2015;175:47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Li Q, Li BH, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. Root growth inhibition by NH4+ in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH4+ efflux and GMPase activity. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:1529–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li BH, Li Q, Su YH, Chen H, Xiong LM, Mi GH, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. Shoot-supplied ammonium targets the root auxin influx carrier AUX1 and inhibits lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:933–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hirano T, Satoh Y, Ohki A, Takada R, Arai T, Michiyama H. Inhibition of ammonium assimilation restores elongation of seminal rice roots repressed by high levels of exogenous ammonium. Physiol Plant. 2008;134:183–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ranathunge K, El-Kereamy A, Gidda S, Bi Y, Rothstein S. AMT1;1 transgenic rice plants with enhanced NH4+ permeability show superior growth and higher yield under optimal and suboptimal NH4+ conditions. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:965–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ranathunge K, Schreiber L, Bi YM,Rothstein SJ. Ammonium-induced architectural and anatomical changes with altered suberin and lignin levels significantly change water and solute permeabilities of rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Planta. 2016;243:231–249.

  18. 18.

    Xie YJ, Mao Y, Xu S, Zhou H, Duan XL, Cui WT, Zhang J, Xu GH. Heme-heme oxygenase 1 system is involved in ammonium tolerance by regulating antioxidant defence in Oryza sativa. Plant Cell Environ. 2015;38:129–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Sun L, Di DW, Li GJ, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM. Spatio-temporal dynamics in global rice gene expression (Oryza sativa L.) in response to high ammonium stress. J Plant Physiol. 2017;212:94–104.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ. NH4+ toxicity in higher plants: a critical review. J Plant Physiol. 2002;159:567–84.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Li BH, Li GJ, Kronzucker HJ, Baluska F, Shi WM. Ammonium stress in Arabidopsis: signaling, genetic loci, and physiological targets. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:107–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bittsánszky A, Pilinszky K, Gyulai G, Komives T. Overcoming ammonium toxicity. Plant Sci. 2015;231:184–90.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Esteban R, Ariz I, Cruz C, Moran JF. Review: mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and the quest for tolerance. Plant Sci. 2016;248:92–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liu Y, Von Wirén N. Ammonium as a signal for physiological and morphological responses in plants. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(10):2581–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Qin C, Qian WQ, Wang WF, Wu Y, Yu CM, Jiang XH, Wang DW, Wu P. GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase is a genetic determinant of ammonium sensitivity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18308–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barth C, Gouzd Z, Steele H, Imperio R. A mutation in GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase causes conditional hypersensitivity to ammonium, resulting in Arabidopsis root growth inhibition, altered ammonium metabolism, and hormone homeostasis. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(2):379–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jadid N, Mialoundama AS, Heintz D, Ayoub D, Erhardt M, Mutterer J, Meyer D, Alioua A, Van Dorsselaer A, Rahier A, Camara B, Bouvier F. Dolichol phosphate mannose synthase1 mediates the biogenesis of isoprenyl-linked glycans and influences development, stress response, and ammonium hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2011;23:1985–2005.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Li BH, Li Q, Xiong LM, Kronzucker HJ, Kramer U, Shi WM. Arabidopsis plastid AMOS1/EGY1 integrates abscisic acid signaling to regulate global gene expression response to ammonium stress. Plant Physiol. 2012;160:2040–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Yang SY, Hao DL, Song ZZ, Yang GZ, Wang L, Su YH. RNA-Seq analysis of differentially expressed genes in rice under varied nitrogen supplies. Gene. 2015;555(2):305–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ma XL, Zhu CH, Yang N, Gan LJ, Xia K. 휸–Aminobutyric acid addition alleviates ammonium toxicity by limiting ammonium accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiol Plant. 2016;158:389–401.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Fan XR, Xie D, Chen JG, Lu HY, Xu YL, Ma C, Xu GH. Over-expression of OsPTR6 in rice increased plant growth at different nitrogen supplies but decreased nitrogen use efficiency at high ammonium supply. Plant Sci. 2014;227:1–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Jin M, Guo MY, Yue GZ, Li JL, Yang SY, Zhao PS, Su YH. An unusual strategy of stomatal control in the desert shrub Ammopiptanthus mongolicus. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2018;125:13–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mittler R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7(9):405–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Thalmann M, Santelia D. Starch as a determinant of plant fitness under abiotic stress. New Phytol. 2017;214:943–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sieciechowicz KA, Joy KW, Ireland RJ. Effect of methionine Sulfoximine on Asparaginase activity and ammonium levels in pea leaves. Plant Physiol. 1989;89:192–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shigeto J, Tsutsumi Y. Diverse functions and reactions of class III peroxidases. New Phytol. 2016;209:1395–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pietrzykowska M, Suorsa M, Semchonok DA, Tikkanen M, Boekema EJ, Aro EM, Jansson S. The light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b binding proteins Lhcb1 and Lhcb2 play complementary roles during state transitions in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2016;26(9):3646–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Sui B, Feng XM, Tian GL, Hu XY, Shen QR, Guo SW. Optimizing nitrogen supply increases rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating yield formation factors. Field Crop Res. 2013;150:99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Zhang FS, Chen XP, Vitousek P. An experiment for the world: China’s scientists are using a variety of approaches to boost crop yields and limit environmental damage. Nature. 2013;497:33–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhu YY, Di TJ, Xu GH, Chen X, Zeng HQ, Yan F, Shen QR. Adaptation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase of rice roots to low pH as related to ammonium nutrition. Plant Cell Environ. 2009;32(10):1428–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Btritto DT, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kronzucker HJ. Futile transmembrane NH4+ cycling: a cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(7):4255–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Skopelitis DS, Paranychianakis NV, Paschalidis KA, Pliakonis ED, Delis ID, Yakoumakis DI, Kouvarakis A, Papadakis AK, Stephanou EG, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA. Abiotic stress generates ROS that signal expression of anionic glutamate dehydrogenases to form glutamate for Proline synthesis in tobacco and grapevine. Plant Cell. 2006;18:2767–81.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nimptsch J, Pflugmacher S. Ammonia triggers the promotion of oxidative stress in the aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum mattogrossense. Chemosphere. 2007;66:708–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Patterson K, Cakmak T, Cooper A, Lager I, Rasmusson AG, Escobar MA. Distinct signalling pathways and transcriptome response signatures differentiate ammonium-and nitrate-supplied plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33:1486–501.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lemoine R, Camera SL, Atanassova R, Dedaldechamp F, Allario T, Pourtau N, Bonnemain JL, Laloi M, Coutos-Thevenot P, Maurousset L, Faucher M, Girousse C, Lemonnier P, Parrilla J, Durand M. Source–to–sink transport of sugar and regulation by environmental factors. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:272.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Li Y, Zhou JY, Hao DL, Yang SY, Su YH. Arabidopsis under ammonium over–supply: characteristics of ammonium toxicity in relation to the activity of ammonium transporters. Pedosphere. 2020;30(2):1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Qiu ZB, Wang YF, Zhu AJ, Peng FL, Wang LS. Exogenous sucrose can enhance tolerance of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings to salt stress. Biol Plantarum. 2014;58(4):611–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hammad A, Khan HA, Siddique KHM, Colmer TD. Vegetative and reproductive growth of salt-stressed chickpea are carbon-limited: sucrose infusion at the reproductive stage improves salt tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2017;68(8):2001–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ainsworth EA, Long SP. What have we learned from 15 years of free–air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 2005;165:351–72.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Becker C, Kläring HP. CO2 enrichment can produce high red leaf lettuce yield while increasing most flavonoid glycoside and some caffeic acid derivative concentrations. Food Chem. 2016;199:736–45.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kimball BA. Crop responses to elevated CO2 and interactions with H2O, N, and temperature. Curr Opin Plant Bio. 2016;31:36–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Leakey ADB, Ainsworth EA, Bernacchi CJ, Rogers A, Long SP, Ort DR. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2859–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Seneweera SP, Conroy JP, Ishimaru K, Ghannoum O, Okada M, Lieffering M, Kim HY, a Kobayashi K. Changes in source–sink relations during development influence photosynthetic acclimation of rice to free air CO2 enrichment (FACE). Funct Plant Biol 2002;29:945–953.

  54. 54.

    Stitt M, Krapp A. The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: the physiological and molecular background. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22:583–621.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Roosta HR, Schjoerring JK. Root carbon enrichment alleviates ammonium toxicity in cucumber plants. J Plant Nutr. 2008;31:941–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wang MY, Siddiqi MY, Ruth TJ, Glass ADM. Ammonium uptake by rice roots. II. Kinetics of 13NH4+ in flux across the plasmalemma. Plant Physiol. 1993;103:1259–67.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sonoda Y, Ikeda A, Saiki S, Yamaya T, Yamaguchi J. Feedback regulation of the ammonium transporter gene family AMT1 by glutamine in rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003;44:1396–402.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Yang SY, Hao DL, Cong Y, Jin M, Su YH. The rice OsAMT1;1 is a proton-independent feedback regulated ammonium transporter. Plant Cell Rep. 2015b;34:321–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Lejay L, Tillard P, Lepetit M, Olive FD, Filleur S, Daniel-Vedele F, Gojon A. Molecular and functional regulation of two NO3- uptake systems by N- and C-status of Arabidopsis plants. Plant J. 1999;18(5):509–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    WeatherburnW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of Ammonia. Anal Chem 1967;39(8):971–974.

  61. 61.

    Yang ZM, Guo RB, Xu XH, Fan XL, Li XP. Enhanced hydrogen production from lipid-extracted microalgal biomass residues through pretreatment. Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2010;35:9618–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cheng MC, Ko K, Chang WL, Kuo WC, Chen GH, Lin TP. Increased glutathione contributes to stress tolerance and global translational changes in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2015;83:926–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sonnewald U, Braue M, von Schaewen A, Stitt M, Willmitzer L. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing yeast–derived invertase in either the cytosol, vacuole or apoplast: a powerful tool for studying sucrose metabolism and sinkkource interactions. Plant J. 1991;1(1):95–106.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Stitt M, Lilley RMC, Gerhardt R, Heldt HW. Determination of metabolite levels in specific cells and subcellular compartments of plant leaves. Methods Enzymol. 1989;174:518–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Jambunathan N. Determination and detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS), lipid peroxidation, and electrolyte leakage in plants. Plant Stress Tolerance, Methods in Molecular Biology, 2010;pp:291–297. Springer Science, Business Media, LLC.

  66. 66.

    Karlsson M, Kurz T, Brunk UT, Nilsson SE, Frennesson CI. What does the commonly used DCF test for oxidative stress really show? Biochem J. 2010;428:183–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sun LJ, Zhang JB, Lu XY, Zhang LY, Zhang YL. Evaluation to the antioxidant activity of total flavonoids extract from persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) leaves. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:2689–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Kuar N, Sharma I, Kirat K, Pati PK. Detection of reactive oxygen species in Oryza sativa L. (Rice). Bio-Protocol. 2016;6(24):1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Yang YN, Qi M, Mei CS. Endogenous salicylic acid protects rice plants from oxidative damage caused by aging as well as biotic and abiotic stress. Plant J. 2004;40:909–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Sakurai N, Hayakawa T, Nakamura T, Yamaya T. Changes in the cellular localization of cytosolic glutamine synthetase protein in vascular bundles of rice leaves at various stages of development. Planta. 1996;200:306–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Lin YL, Chao YY, Kao CH. Exposure of rice seedlings to heat shock protects against subsequent cd-induced decrease in glutamine synthetase activity and increase in specific protease activity in leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2010;167:1061–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shah JM, Bukhari SAH, Zeng J, Quan X, Ali E, Muhammad N, Zhang G. Nitrogen (N) metabolism related enzyme activities, cell ultrastructure and nutrient contents as affected by N level and barley genotype. J Integr Agr. 2017;16(1):190–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Li Y, Ren BB, Ding L, Shen QR, Peng SB, Guo SW. Does chloroplast size influence photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency? PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62036.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Rong Huang and Mr. Zuohao Ma, Analytical and Testing Center, Institute of Soil Science (Nanjing), Chinese Academy of Sciences for kind help and technical assistant.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Key Research & Development Program of China (2017YFD0200100, 2017YFD0200103), the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31501826, 31701991) and the Project of Priority and Key Areas, ISSCAS (ISSASIP1609). The funders did not play any roles in the design of the study, collection, analysis and interpretation of the relevant data, and writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YS and SY conceived and designed the research. SY, DH, MJ prepared samples for RNA-Seq analysis, performed quantitative PCR validation and analyzed data. SY, DH, MJ, YL, ZL, YH and TC carried out physiological/biochemical assays and data analyses. SY and YS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanhua Su.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

H2O2 localization in situ.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

O2 localization in situ.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Free amino acid contents assays.

Additional file 4: Table S1.

Summary of total DEGs identifided in rice roots and shoots following a 4 h rapid NH4+ accumulation treatment.

Additional file 5: Table S2.

GO enrichment analysis of DEGsin rice roots and shoots following a 4 h rapid NH4+ accumulation treatment. (XLS 192 kb)

Additional file 6: Table S3.

KEGG Enrichment Analysis of DEGsin rice roots and shoots following a 4 h rapid NH4+ accumulation treatment. (XLS 56 kb)

Additional file 7: Table S4.

The sequences of primers used for real-time RT-PCR in this research (XLS 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, S., Hao, D., Jin, M. et al. Internal ammonium excess induces ROS-mediated reactions and causes carbon scarcity in rice. BMC Plant Biol 20, 143 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02363-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Rice
  • NH4+ excess
  • ROS
  • GSH cycle
  • Carbon scarcity
  • Sucrose feeding