Skip to main content

Advertisement

Identification and functional characterization of three new terpene synthase genes involved in chemical defense and abiotic stresses in Santalum album

BMC Plant Biologyvolume 19, Article number: 115 (2019) | Download Citation

Abstract

Background

It is well known that aromatic essential oils extracted from the heartwood of Santalum album L. have wide economic value. However, little is known about the role of terpenoids in response to various adverse environmental stresses as other plants do in the form of signals during plant-environment interactions.

Results

In this study, trace amounts of volatiles consisting of α-santalene, epi-β-santalene, β-santalene, α-santalol, β-santalol, (E)-α-bergamotene, (E)-β-farnesene and β-bisabolene were found in the leaves of mature S. album trees. We identified more than 40 candidate terpene synthase (TPS) unigenes by mining publicly-available RNA-seq data and characterized the enzymes encoded by three cDNAs: one mono-TPS catalyzes the formation of mostly α-terpineol, and two multifunctional sesqui-TPSs, one of which produces (E)-α-bergamotene and sesquisabinene as major products and another which catalyzes the formation of (E)-β-farnesene, (E)-nerolidol and (E,E)-farnesol as main products. Metabolite signatures and gene expression studies confirmed that santalol content is closely related with santalene synthase (SaSSY) transcripts in heartwood, which is key enzyme responsible for santalol biosynthesis. However, the expression of three new SaTPS genes differed significantly from SaSSY in the essential oil-producing heartwood. Increased activities of antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase, were detected in different tissues of S. album plants after applying 1 mM methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and 1 mM salicylic acid (SA), or exposure to 4°C, 38°C and high light intensity. MeJA and SA dramatically induced the expression of SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 in leaves. SaTPS1 to 3 transcripts were differentially activated among different tissues under adverse temperature and light stresses. In contrast, almost all SaSSY transcripts decreased in response to these environmental stresses, unlike SaTPS1 to 3.

Conclusions

Multifunctional enzymes were biochemically characterized, including one chloroplastic mono-TPS and two cytosolic sesqui-TPSs in sandalwood. Our results suggest the ecological importance of these three new SaTPS genes in defensive response to biotic attack and abiotic stresses in S. album.

Background

Terpenoids constitute the largest and most diverse class of chemical compounds present in all living organisms. In particular, flowering plants exhibit an unusually high number of terpenoids for a variety of basic functions in growth and development, including hormones, components of electron transfer systems, reagents for protein modification, determinants of membrane fluidity, antioxidants, and others [1]. Different plant lineages also synthesize hundreds of distinct and specialized plant terpenoids. Traditionally, specialized terpenoids are used as natural flavor and aroma compounds and have a beneficial impact on humans as health-promoting compounds. Moreover, the ecological functions of terpenoids have gained increased attention [2].

All plant terpenes are made from the two simple five-carbon building blocks, isopentenyl diphosphate and its isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate, both of which are derived from the mevalonate pathway in the cytosol or the methylerythritol phosphate pathway in plastids [3]. Condensation of the C5 precursors leads to the formation of prenyl diphosphates, geranyl diphosphate (GPP), farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), which are subsequently converted into monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes by terpene synthases (TPSs), respectively. Terpenoid biosynthesis occurs within specific tissues or at specific developmental stages in plants, such as in resin ducts and glandular trichomes [4].

During recent decades, there has been major progress in the identification and functional characterization of genes and enzymes involved in terpenoid biosynthesis [5]. Many mono-TPS and sesqui-TPS genes have been reported from several plants, including Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) [6], grapevine (Vitis vinifera) [7], tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [8], poplar (Populus trichocarpa) [9], spruce (Picea spp.) [10], Artemisia spp. [11] and citrus (Citrus sinensis) [12]. An unusual feature of many TPSs is that they are able to produce terpenoids of structurally and stereochemically diverse compounds from a single substrate [13]. Based on sequence relatedness, functional assessment and gene architecture, the TPS gene family has been divided into eight subfamilies, designated as TPS-a through TPS-h [14, 15]. Class I contains TPS-c (copalyl diphospate synthases), TPS-e (ent-kaurene synthases), TPS-f (other di-TPSs), and TPS-h (lycopod-specific); Class II consists of TPS-d, which is gymnosperm-specific; Class III consists of angiosperm-specific TPS-a, TPS-b (cyclic mono-TPSs and hemi-TPSs), and TPS-g (acyclic mono-TPSs).

Plants produce a number of terpenoid metabolites for adaptation to adverse environments, including biotic and abiotic stresses [1]. Volatile terpenoids are inducibly emitted in response to herbivore or pathogen attacks in plants, and not only function directly as defensive phytoalexins for deterring detrimental attackers but also indirectly attract natural enemies of pathogens and herbivores [16]. Studies have shown that the plant hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) play important roles during biotic attack as defensive signaling [17, 18]. Therefore, exogenously applied JA and SA can be used as biotic stress mimics for studying the mechanism underlying the interaction between plants and biotic stresses [19, 20], and for increasing the production of plant terpenoids in specific organs to produce specialized terpenoids [21]. For example, in sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua), JA can induce the AaMYC2 gene coding for a basic helix-loop-helix-type transcription factor that binds directly to G-box-like motifs within the promoters of two genes encoding multifunction cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (CYP71AV1) and artemisinic aldehyde delta-11 (13) reductase during artemisinin biosynthesis [22]. In A. annua, SA enhanced the expression level of amorpha-4,11-diene synthase and increased artemisinin production [23]. In agarwood (Aquilaria sinensis), exogenously applied methyl jasmonate (MeJA) in cell suspension cultures, callus and plant stems induced the biosynthesis and accumulation of sesquiterpene compounds, especially δ-guaiene [24,25,26].

Moreover, the emission of some biogenic terpenes can be induced by environmental factors such as temperature and light. High temperature was first recognized as one abiotic stress capable of inducing volatile terpenoids in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) [27]. In addition, the elevated emission of a variety of terpene volatiles, including monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, from leaves, flowers and other organs in a range of woody and herbaceous species was observed under temperature, light, drought and salt stresses [28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. The production of terpenes was also induced by ozone, ultraviolet-B rays and γ-rays, which are oxidative stresses [35,36,37]. A common biochemical mechanism explaining the emission of volatile terpenoids induced by exogenous stresses claims that plants have the ability to synthesize terpenoids against oxidative damage resulting in elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [1, 38].

More than 150 terpenoid compounds were identified from the essential oil of sandalwood (Santalum album) heartwood (HW) [39]. The major components were α- and β-santalol, but some minor compounds also exist, including α-santalene, β-santalene, α-bergamotene, and others. In recent years, key genes responsible for santalol biosynthesis have been functionally characterized, including santalene synthase (SaSSY) [40,41,42], SaCYP736A167 and SaCYP76AF39V1 [43, 44]. Another five TPSs, namely SamonoTPS1, SasesquiTPS1, Sasesquisabinene synthases (SaSQS1 and SaSQS2), and Sabisabolene synthase (SaBS), have also been identified [42, 45]. Kulheim et al. (2014) attempted to enhance the essential oil productivity of sandalwood by applying 0.01% MeJA to the leaves of seedling younger than one year [46]. Their findings indicate that the expression levels of only two genes coding for hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase (HMCR) and farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPPS) were slightly induced in leaves and stems of seedlings in response to MeJA treatment. Our previous study in S. album indicated that six TPS unigenes coding for (E)-β-ocimene/α-farnesene synthase, santalene/bergamotene synthase 1 (SS/BS), nerolidol synthase 1-like, myrcene synthase, geranyl linalool synthase, and SamonoTPS1 were differentially expressed in response to cold stress (4°C) [47]. However, little is known about the contribution of TPSs in response to various adverse environmental stresses in S. album.

In this study, transcriptomic data from leaves, stems and roots which were deposited at the Sequence Read Archive (SRC) [42, 44, 47, 48] were integrated to identify expressed members of the sandalwood TPS gene family. Of these, three SaTPS genes, designated as SaTPS1 to 3, were isolated and functionally characterized. The expression pattern and roles of SaTPS1 to 3 besides SaSSY in response to MeJA, SA, and adverse temperature and light, were comparatively investigated. This study paves the way for revealing the regulatory mechanisms underlying the biosynthesis of terpenoids in biotic and abiotic stresses in S. album.

Results

Differences in content and composition of volatiles among four tissues

To understand the distribution pattern and differences in components of S. album volatiles, we examined the metabolic compounds from pentane extracts of young leaves (YL), sapwood (SW) and HW from mature trees and immature wood (IW) from immature trees by GC-MS. There were significant differences in the volatile content among the four tissues. As shown in Fig. 1, the most abundant volatile was detected in HW (Fig. 1a-d). Major sesquiterpenols, α- and β-santalol, were detected in these four tissues, and sesquiterpenes, α- and β-santalene, and epi-β-santalene were identified in YL and HW, but not in IW and SW (Fig. 1e-i, Additional file 1: Table S1). It was curious that trace amounts of α- and β-santalene, epi-β-santalene and α-santalol (peaks 1, 3, 5 and 8, respectively) were found in almost the same proportion in YL (Fig. 1e). Of these, the distribution of the first three compounds matched that in HW (Fig. 1h, peaks 1, 3 and 5). Moreover, (E)-α-bergamotene, (E)-β-farnesene, and β-bisabolene were also detected from leaf extracts of S. album. Almost the same distribution of sesquiterpenols as those in SW and HW was observed in IH (Fig. 1 f, g and i, peaks 8–15), indicating that the accumulation of sandalwood oil occurs at an early developmental stage of the stems and that more essential oil is biosynthesized in HW as the sandalwood tree grows older.

Fig. 1
figure1

Sesquiterpenoid profile from different extracts. Sesquiterpenoids were identified against those in mass spectra reference libraries, NIST2005, NIST2005s, NIST2014, NIST2014s and FFNSC1.3 and a comparison of their retention indices. a, e: YL, young leaves, b, f: IW, immature wood, c, g: SW, sapwood, d, h, i: HW, heartwood. Segments (e, f, g, h and i) of the GC profile (a, b, c, d) are magnified in the right panel, respectively. Peaks: 1, α-santalene, 2, (E)-α-bergamotene, 3, epi-β-santalene, 4, (E)-β-farnesene, 5, β-santalene, 6, β-bisabolene, 7, unknown, 8, α-santalol, 9, α-trans-bergamotol, 10, α-santalol isomer, 11, epi-β-santalol, 12, unknown, 13, β-santalol, 14, β-santalol isomer, 15, lanceol. Peak numbers are indicated in order of elution from a HP-5MS column. IS, internal standard (n-dodecane)

Full size image

Identification of new terpene synthases in S. album

We combined transcriptome sets downloaded from NCBI, including transcripts from leaves, stems and roots as described in the Methods. De novo assembly yielded 164,548 unigenes from the three tissues (Additional file 1: Figure S1, Additional file 1: Table S2). Many unigenes were identified as SaTPS genes, including 38 core terpene synthase genes and nine triterpene-specific synthase genes (Additional file 1: Table S3). Of these, six unigene sequences were completely aligned with those of S. album submitted to NCBI [40, 42, 45]. Three unigenes contained full-length ORFs encoding TPSs, designated as SaTPS1 to 3. In order to confirm that the assembled unigenes generated using the Trinity assembler were accurate, we designed primers to anneal around the predicted start and stop codons of unigenes to amplify ORFs of the three predicted SaTPS genes (Fig. S2). Subsequent sequencing of these nucleotides demonstrated that they were exactly as predicted by the unigene assembly.

Sequence and phylogenetic analysis of three SaTPSs

Three predicted proteins encoded by SaTPS1 to 3 with a range of 564 to 604 amino acids had predicted pIs of 6.01, 5.02 and 5.03, respectively (Additional file 1: Table S4). As shown in Fig. 2, SaTPS1 to 3 contain the arginine-tryptophan motif, R(R) X8W, which is conserved in most mono-TPSs and in some sesqui-TPSs near the N-terminus. The highly conserved aspartate-rich motif (DDXXD) and NSE/DTE motif, which are crucial for chelating divalent cations, typically Mg2+, in the C-terminal domain [49], were present in these three SaTPSs. One of the distinguishing structural features between mono- and sesqui-TPSs is the presence of an N-terminal plastid transit peptide sequence. Using the signal sequence analysis program ChloroP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP), a putative N-terminal plastid transit peptide (Tp) sequence of 44 amino acids for SaTPS1 was predicted, indicating that it is likely a mono-TPS. However, SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 did not contain a plastid Tp sequence, suggesting that they are sesqui-TPSs (Additional file 1: Table S4).

Fig. 2
figure2

Comparison of deduced amino acid sequences of SaTPSs. The deduced amino acid sequences of SaTPS genes were aligned using DNAMAN 6.0 (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA). The Asp-rich domain DDXXD, the RRX8W motif, and the NSE/DTE motif, which are highly conserved in plant TPSs and required for TPS activity, are indicated. The arrowhead denotes the predicted cleavage site of plastidial transit peptide of SaTPS1. Completely conserved residues are shaded in black, identical residues in dark grey, and similar residues in light grey. Dashes indicate gaps introduced to maximize sequence alignment

Full size image

A phylogenetic tree based on the deduced amino acid of sandalwood TPSs and other plant species showed that all Santalum TPSs clustered in the TPS-b clade, with the exception of SasesquiTPS and sesquiTPSs in S. spicatum (SspicsesquiTPS) and S. austrocaledonicum (SaustsesquiTPS) (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Table S5), among which the majority of angiospermous monoterpene synthases reside [15]. The most similar TPS sequence to SaTPS1 is that of (−)-α-terpineol synthase from V. vinifera with 63% identity (Additional file 1: Figure S3; Additional file 1: Table S6) (Martin and Bohlmann, 2004). SaTPS2 clustered most closely to SaSSY, SspicSSY and SaustSSY, with a 100% bootstrap (Jones et al., 2011), and its amino acid sequence had highest identity with SaspiSSY (72%). SaTPS3 formed a clade with several previously characterized TPSs from Santalum species, including SaMonoTPS, SaSQS1, SaSQS2, SaBS, SspicBS and Sspicsesquisabinene [42, 45, 50]. Bioinformatics and phylogenetic analyses suggests that SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 might be involved in the production of essential oil in S. album.

Fig. 3
figure3

Phylogenetic positioning of SaTPS protein products within representative samples of known plant TPS. The neighbour-joining tree was drawn using the MEGA 6 program from an alignment of full-length SaTPSs with other plant TPSs [75]. The seven TPS subfamilies a-g on the right-hand side are delimited based on the taxonomic distribution of the TPS families [15]. Bootstrap values from 1000 replicates were used to assess the robustness of the trees. Names of organism TPSs (NCBI Protein no.) can be retrieved from Additional file 1: Table S4

Full size image

Expression patterns of three SaTPS genes differ from SaSSY

The tissue-specific expression of SaTPS1 to 3 genes was determined by qRT-PCR in four key tissues, i.e., YL, IW, SW and HW. The transcript abundance of SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 genes showed a similar expression pattern, with highest expression in YL (Fig. 4). SaTPS3 showed three-fold higher expression in IW than in YL, SW and HW. In contrast, SaSSY was 100- and 250-fold higher in SW and HW, respectively. Additionally, comparisons of the expression levels among these SaTPSs in specific tissues showed that SaTPS3 showed higher expression than SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 in the four corresponding tissues (Additional file 1 :Figure S4). Of note, the level of SaSSY transcript showed a 200- and 1200-fold increase relative to SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 in SW and HW, respectively. These results suggest that SaTPS3 might play a role in the accumulation of HW essential oil whereas SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 play a minor role in the formation of terpenoids in S. album HW.

Fig. 4
figure4

Expression levels of SaTPS1 to 3 genes in different tissues. YL, young leaves; IW, immature wood; SW, sapwood; HW, heartwood. Significant differences were assessed by a student’s t-test: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Subcellular localization of SaTPSs

To elucidate the function of SaTPS1 to 3, subcellular localization of each SaTPS-YFP (yellow fluorescent protein) fusion protein provided preliminary evidence. Phylogenetic and bioinformatics-based analyses in an attempt to classify TPSs indicated that SaTPS1-YFP, which has the N-terminal plastid transit peptide sequence, was localized in chloroplasts, whereas SaTPS2-YFP and SaTPS3-YFP were distributed throughout the cytosol (Fig. 5). Based on the results of subcellular localization, it was concluded that SaTPS1 is likely involved in monoterpene biosynthesis in plastids, whereas SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 might produce sesquiterpenes in the cytosol.

Fig. 5
figure5

Subcellular localization of SaTPS1 to 3 in Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Protoplasts were transiently transformed with SaTPS-YFP constructs or YFP vector using a modified polyethylene glycol method. YFP fluorescence was observed with a laser scanning confocal microscope. Yellow fluorescence indicates SaTPS-YFP fusion protein signal. Blue signal indicates chlorophyll (Chl) autofluorescence and red signal indicates m-Cherry fluorescence. The merged images represent a digital combination of Chl autofluorescence, YFP fluorescent and m-Cherry protein fluorescence images. Fluorescence was excited for YFP at 514 nm, for Chl at 543 nm and for m-Cherry at 587 nm. Scale bar = 10 μm

Full size image

Functional characterization of the enzymes encoded by SaTPS1 to 3

All cDNAs subcloned into pET28a vector with 6His-tagged were successfully expressed in E. coli Rosetta 2 (DE3) competent cells and recombinant proteins were then purified with a Ni-NTA agarose affinity column (Additional file 1 :Figure S5). We found that this cDNA without the transit peptide sequence could improve the expression of SaTPS1 in E. coli. Following an in vitro enzyme activity assay, SaTPS1 was confirmed to encode a mono-TPS enzyme that catalyzed the formation of mostly α-terpineol (45.7%), while sabinene (14.9%), linalool (11.7%) and myrcene (10.8%), as well as a few minor monoterpenes, were also produced with GPP as the substrate and Mg2+, as detected by GC-MS analysis (Fig. 6a, Additional file 1: Table S7). Although the same compounds were produced when Mg2+ was replaced by Mn2+, levels of product formation were 5-fold lower and the three major compounds, linalool (35.8%), α-terpineol (25.7%), and geraniol (12.9%) were formed (Additional file 1: Figure S6, Additional file 1: Table S7). No terpene product was observed in the reaction of SaTPS1 with FPP as a substrate and Mg2+ or Mn2+ (Fig. 6b). This enzyme was designated as α-terpineol synthase because it is a major monoterpene product and due to its preference for the metal ion, Mg2+.

Fig. 6
figure6

In vitro enzymatic assays of recombinant SaTPS1. In vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS1 using GPP (a) and FPP (b) as the substrate in the presence of Mg2+. The reaction products were analyzed by GC-MS. The peaks marked with numbers were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those in the library data and comparison of their retention index. Peaks: 1, α-thujene, 2, α-pinene, 3, sabinene, 4, β-pinene, 5, myrcene, 6, limonene, 7, cineole, 8, β-ocimene, 9, linalool, 10, α-terpineol, 11, geraniol. Mass spectra for the major product and corresponding authentic standard are shown on the right side of the figure. m/z, mass-to-charge ratio

Full size image

GC-MS analysis of the reaction products catalyzed by SaTPS2 with FPP as a substrate in the presence of Mg2+ identified at least 15 sesquiterpenoids, with (E)-α-bergamotene (24.8%) and sesquisabinene (33.0%) as the two major products, β-bisabolene (9.0%), γ-bisabolene isomer (7.9%), and minor compounds, 7-epi-sesquithujene, (E)-β-farnesene, α-zingiberene, and others at relative proportions less than 5% (Fig. 7a; Additional file 1: Table S7). A similar product profile comprising the major compounds, (E)-α-bergamotene (22.4%) and sesquisabinene (35.6%), were detected when Mg2+ was replaced with Mn2+, but overall yield was relatively lower (Additional file 1: Figure S7, Additional file 1: Table S7). Incubation of SaTPS2 with GPP as a substrate and Mg2+ ion led to the production of nine monoterpenes (Fig. 7b; Additional file 1: Table S7). The most abundant compound was linalool (64.9%). Likewise, assays with Mn2+ instead of Mg2+ showed that almost the same compounds were observed, but overall yield was 5-fold lower (Additional file 1: Figure S8, Additional file 1: Table S7). Taken together, these results indicate that SaTPS2 is a multifunctional sesqui-TPS producing major (E)-α-bergamotene and sesquisabinene in the cytosol.

Fig. 7
figure7

In vitro enzymatic assays of recombinant SaTPS2. In vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS2 using FPP (a) or GPP (b) as the substrate in the presence of Mg2+. The reaction products were analysed by GC-MS. Peaks marked with numbers were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those in the library data and a comparison of their retention index. Peaks in a: 1, 7-epi-sesquithujene, 2, unknown, 3, α-bergamotene isomer, 4, (E)-α-bergamotene, 5, (E)-β-farnesene, 6, sesquisabinene, 7, unknown, 8, α-zingiberene, 9, α-bisabolene, 10, β-bisabolene, 11, γ-bisabolene, 12, unknown, 13, γ-bisabolene isomer, 14, β-bisabolol, 15, α-bisabolol. Peaks in b: 1, α-thujene, 2, α-pinene, 3, sabinene, 4, β-pinene, 5, myrcene, 6, limonene, 7, linalool, 8, α-terpineol, 9, geraniol. Mass spectra for the major products and corresponding authentic standards are shown on the right side of the figure, respectively. m/z, mass-to-charge ratio

Full size image

SaTPS3 converts FPP and GPP substrates to sesqui- and monoterpene products, respectively. When assayed with FPP and Mg2+, recombinant SaTPS3 catalyzed the synthesis of seven compounds, including (E)-β-farnesene (20.7%), (E)-nerolidol (29.8%) and (E,E)-farnesol (21.3%) as the three major products, while a high proportion of γ-bisabolene (13.8%) was also produced (Fig. 8a, Additional file 1: Table S7). In the presence of Mn2+, SaTPS3 recombination enzyme showed no activity, suggesting that SaTPS3 prefers Mg2+ in the reaction with FPP. Analysis of the reaction products formed after incubation of SaTPS3 with GPP showed that the main product linalool (44.8–53.3%) was formed with Mg2+ or Mn2+ in considerable yield (Fig. 8b, Additional file 1: Figure S9, Additional file 1: Table S7). For the three SaTPSs tested in this study, extracts prepared from E. coli transformed with PET28a lacking a cDNA insert and heat-denatured enzyme preparations served as controls, and no terpene products were observed. In all cases, expressed proteins incubated with GGPP did not produce detectable products.

Fig. 8
figure8

In vitro enzymatic assays of recombinant SaTPS3. In vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS3 using FPP (a) or GPP (b) as the substrate in the presence of Mg2+. The reaction products were analysed by GC-MS. The peaks marked with numbers were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those in library data and a comparison of their retention index. Peaks in a: 1, cedrene, 2, unknown, 3, (E)-β-farnesene, 4, unknown, 5, γ-bisabolene, 6, (E)-nerolidol, 7, (E,E)-farnesol. Peaks in b: 1, myrcene, 2, limonene, 3, unknown, 4, β-ocimene, 5, linalool, 6, α-terpineol, 7, geraniol. Mass spectra for the major products and corresponding authentic standards are shown, respectively. m/z, mass-to-charge ratio

Full size image

The Km value of purified SaTPS1 with GPP was 9.08 ± 1.26 μM and the Kcat/Km value was 0.0171 (Table 1; Additional file 1 :Figure S10). The SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 enzymes not only accept substrate FPP but also accept the precursor of monoterpenes, GPP, as analyzed above. Enzyme kinetic properties of SaTPS2 showed that catalysis with FPP and GPP resulted in a similar Km and Kcat/Km. The Km value of the recombination SaTPS3 with FPP was 16.29 ± 1.48 μM, which was slightly higher than with GPP. The Kcat/Km with FPP was relatively lower than with GPP, indicating that the efficiency of this sesqui-TPS catalysis is higher when incubated with GPP.

Table 1 Enzyme kinetic properties of three SaTPSs
Full size table

Elevated antioxidant enzyme activity under multiple stress treatments

The phytohormones JA and SA play crucial roles in regulating the defensive signaling network by elevating the levels of ROS [51, 52]. Moreover, the mechanism by which terpenes alleviate abiotic stress suggests a general antioxidant mechanism by which harmful ROS can be quenched by reacting with unsaturated isoprene, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes [38]. In our study, the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD), a key contributor in the conversion of O− to H2O2 in the presence of elevated levels of ROS, increased significantly under all treatments, except for a decrease in leaves exposed to 4°C, 38°C and high light intensity (approx. 250 μmol m− 2 s− 1) (Fig. 9a). Catalase (CAT) plays an important role in the antioxidant system because it enables plants to eliminate H2O2 by converting H2O2 into O2 and H2O (Miller et al., 2008). CAT activity was strongly elevated by these two elicitors. When the three tissues were exposed to temperature and light stresses, CAT activity was upregulated, the only exception being a slight decreased in leaves in response to high light intensity (Fig. 9b).

Fig. 9
figure9

Effects of external stresses on activities of antioxidant enzymes in S. album. Six-month-old seedlings were sprayed with 1 mM MeJA or SA for 24 h or exposed to 4°C, 38°C or high light intensity (approx. 250 μmol m− 2 s− 1) for 12 h. Three measurements were averaged from the results of three replicated experiments. a: SOD, superoxide dismutase; b: CAT, catalase; c: POD, peroxidase; d: APX, ascorbate peroxidase. L, leaves; S, stems; R, roots. Significant differences were analyzed by a student’s t-test and indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Similarly, peroxidase (POD), which detoxifies H2O2 in the chloroplasts and cytosol of plant cells, also constitutes the main H2O2-scavenging system in cells [53]. POD activity increased in all treatments and roots had two-fold higher POD activity than leaves (Fig. 9c). Conversely, SOD and CAT activities were relatively higher in leaves than in stems and roots, independent of whether they were treated or untreated, suggesting differential endogenous activities of SOD, CAT or POD among different tissues. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) plays a key role in protecting plants against oxidative stress by scavenging H2O2 in different cell compartments [54]. As shown in Fig. 9d, APX activity increased significantly in most tissues under MeJA, SA, cold, heat and high light intensity treatments. Thus, the increase in SOD, CAT, POD and APX activities indicate that S. album seedlings respond to external stresses to protect cellular membranes against oxidative stress, suggesting that these enzymes play roles in tolerance to elicitors and environmental stresses in S. album. In addition, the effect of different adverse stresses on antioxidant enzyme activities will vary among tissues.

Activation of SaTPS1 to 3 gene expression in response to MeJA and SA

To explore the responses of the three SaTPS genes under elicitors as well as temperature and high light intensity treatments, transcript levels for SaTPS1 to 3 and SaSSY were determined by qRT-PCR. SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 exhibited similar expression patterns in response to the two elicitors. As shown in Fig. 10a and b, exogenous MeJA and SA dramatically induced the expression of SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 genes in leaves at 24 h, with more than a 170- and 130-fold increase, respectively, when compared with the controls. SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 transcripts also increased significantly in stems and roots after the application of MeJA. SaTPS3 expression was activated in leaves, stems and roots with an approximately 5-, 3-, and 4-fold increase, respectively compared to the corresponding controls (Fig. 10c). In contrast, SaTPS3 was significantly up-regulated in leaves by SA, but decreased in stems and roots. Moreover, the accumulation of SaSSY transcript were similar to that of SaTPS3 in leaves under MeJA and SA treatments. However, the two exogenous hormones led to a decrease in SaSSY expression in roots compared with the control (Fig. 10d).

Fig. 10
figure10

Transcript accumulation of SaTPS1 to 3 under multiple stresses in S. album. (a-d) Six-month-old seedlings were sprayed with 1 mM MeJA or SA for 24 h. (e-h) Six-month-old seedlings were exposed to 4°C, 38°C or high light intensity (approx. 250 μmol m− 2 s− 1) for 12 h. Three measurements were averaged from the results of three replicated experiments. L, leaves; S, stems; R, roots. Significant differences were analyzed by a student’s t-test and indicated as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001

Full size image

Adverse temperature and high light induced differential accumulation of SaTPS1, SaTPS2 and SaTPS3

SaTPS1 to 3 expression levels were inhibited in leaves at 4°C and 38°C, but were significantly activated in roots when compared to the controls (Fig. 10e-g), suggesting that oxidative damage in leaves was more severe than in stems and roots. When exposed to high light intensity, SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 transcripts showed higher expression in stems and roots than in leaves, particularly SaTPS1, with a 25-fold increase in stems. The level of SaTPS3 transcripts was highest in roots under 4°C, 38°C and high light intensity stresses, with approximately 2-, 6-, and 8-fold increases, respectively, compared to the control. Conversely, SaSSY transcript only increased by about 2-fold in roots at 4°C compared to the control. In all other cases, the expression level of SaSSY was down-regulated to some extent in all tissues examined (Fig. 10h).

Discussion

Candidate TPS genes from S. album by RNA-seq

Next generation sequencing has emerged as a promising platform to discover novel genes, enzymes, and molecular markers from non-model plant species. In recent years, transcriptomic approaches have been widely used to mine genes of terpenoid metabolism in Santalum. Research has mainly focused on cloning and characterization of SaTPSs, including SamonoTPS, SasesquiTPS, SaSSy, SauSSY, SspiSSY, SaSQS1, SaSQS2, SaBS, SauBS, SspiBS, and SspiTPS4 [40, 42, 45, 50]. Celedon et al. (2016) [44] found more than 30 SaTPS transcripts from a HW-specific transcriptome. In the present study, a set of SaTPSs was identified based on a combination of transcriptome data from leaves, stems and roots, implying that S. album likely has a mid-sized TPS gene family according to the classification of other angiosperm TPSs [15]. Currently, the genome assembly data of S. album is available [55], and we are eager to obtain the annotated genome so as to assess the exact size of TPSs in the S. album TPS family. Additionally, some TPSs specific to different tissues were detected (Additional file 1: Table S3), inferring that SaTPSs might play different roles in different tissues.

Santalol content is closely related with SaSSY transcripts in heartwood

The major components of the total essential oil in the heartwood of S. album are α- and β-santalol, contributing over 80% of relative content [39]. SaSSY is a key enzyme responsible for the biosynthesis of α- and β-santalol [40,41,42]. Our study’s findings are in agreement with previous studies that showed that sandalwood essential oil accumulates in stem HW, followed by SW [44, 45]. However, α- and β-santalene and epi-β-santalene were not detected in SW, most likely due to undetectable or low amounts. To our knowledge, trace levels of volatiles consisting of α- and β-santalene, epi-β-santalene, α- and β-santalol, and other compounds in the leaves of S. album were first reported in this study. The distribution pattern of sesquiterpenols similar to those in SW and HW was found in IH (Fig. 1f, g and i). Collectively, these results established a foundation to reveal the mechanism of spatial and temporal distribution of volatiles in S. album. Moreover, high expression levels of SaSSY in the HW of S. album confirm that santalol content is closely related with SaSSY transcript level (Figs. 1 and 4).

In contrast, SaTPS1 to 3 genes had relatively high expression levels in leaves (Fig. 4 and S4a) and trace amounts of (E)-α-bergamotene, (E)-β-farnesene and β-bisabolene in the leaves of mature S. album trees were also detected, suggesting that SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 might convert FPP to these sesquiterpenes, which belonged to major products when incubated with FPP in in vitro enzyme assays (Fig. 7a, 8a and Additional file 1: Table S7). In addition, major α-terpineol catalyzed by SaTPS1 was not identified in leaf extracts, inferring that it might be easily volatilized or that external stimuli might be required for its emission, aspects that still need to be explored.

SaTPS1 is likely a paralogous gene of SamonoTPS1

A study by Jones et al. (2008) [45] documented that SamonoTPS1 is a monoterpene synthase which produced a mixture of eight compounds, with α-terpineol (38.7%) and limonene (35.3%) as the two main products when incubated with GPP. In angiosperms, α-terpineol synthase from V. vinifera was reported as a monoterpene synthase, producing 14 compounds, including major monoterpene, α-terpineol (50.1%), 1,8-cineol (11.8%), β-pinene (8.5%), etc. [56]. Gao et al. (2018) [57] reported that FhTPS2 in flowers of Freesia × hybrida mainly converted GPP into α-terpineol (78.7%) and a few other monoterpenes, such as 1,8-cineole (6.9%), D-limonene (3.9%), α-pinene (3.2%), etc. In our study, SaTPS1 showed higher similarity at the nucleotide level with α-terpineol synthase sequences in V. vinifera than SamonoTPS1, and both of them have an N-terminal plastid transit peptide sequence and are closely related (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Figure S3, Additional file 1: Table S6). Our biochemical characterization and subcellular localization studies confirm that SaTPS1 is a mono-TPS, α-terpineol synthase. Collectively, these results imply that SaTPS1 may be a paralogous gene of SamonoTPS1.

Functional divergence of TPSs has occurred in Santalum

SaSQS1 and SaSQS2 catalyze the cyclization of (E,E)-FPP to a single product, sesquisabinene [42]. SspiTPS4 catalyzed the formation of the most abundant sesquisabinene B (58%) in S. spicatum [50]. In this study, although a phylogenetic tree showed that SaTPS2 is much closer to SaSSY, SspicSSY and SaustSSY than to SaSQS1, SaSQS2 and SspiTPS4, in vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS2 and subcellular localization revealed that the mRNA of SaTPS2 encodes a functional sesqui-TPS producing (E)-α-bergamotene (24.8%) and sesquisabinene (33.0%) as two major products. Moreover, both recombinant SaBS and SauBS can react with FPP to produce β-bisabolene as a major product [40, 42]. SspiBS produced a mixture of β-bisabolene and α-bisabolol, along with traces of α-bisabolene and farnesene isomers [40]. SaTPS2 could synthesize a relatively large amount of β-bisabolene (9.0%) and γ-bisabolene (1.6%) (Additional file 1: Table S7). Taken together, these results suggest that functional divergence of TPS has occurred in Santalum species. The diversification of terpenoid biosynthesis has also been reported in Oryza TPS genes [58].

In angiosperms, only the maize gene TPS1 produces (E)-β-farnesene (26%), (E)-nerolidol (29%), and (E,E)-farnesol (45%) as the only three products in vitro [59]. Phylogenetically, SaTPS3 is paraphyletic group with other TPSs of Santalum spp. in the TPS-b group (Fig. 3). The function of SaTPS3 is similar to TPS1 in maize where it catalyzes the formation of three major compounds, i.e. (E)-β-farnesene (20.7%), (E)-nerolidol (29.8%) and (E,E)-farnesol (21.3%). However, SaTPS3 additionally synthesized γ-bisabolene, cedrene and two unknown sesquiterpene compounds in relative amounts that exceeded 28%, suggesting that SaTPS3 is not a highly conserved TPS in angiosperms. Diversity of function may be an evolution of adaptive selection in monocotyledons and dicotyledons.

SaTPS1 to 3 play important roles in chemical defense

The inductive roles played by JA- and SA-induced biosynthesis of terpenoids have also been widely demonstrated in recent years, playing similar roles as those during attack induced by fungal elicitation and mechanical wounding [60,61,62]. For example, the transcript level of TPS1 producing (E)-β-farnesene, (E)-nerolidol and (E,E)-farnesol in vitro in maize cv. B73 was elevated after herbivory, or after mechanical damage with and without treatment with 5 μl of Egyptian cotton leafworm regurgitant or 5 μl of volicitin [59]. The volatile (E)-α-bergamotene is a well-characterized defensive compound in wounded leaves induced by herbivores [63] and in flowers [64, 65] of Nicotiana attenuata induced by JA-mediated signaling. To date, little is known about the roles of α-terpineol produced by TPSs in plant defense. In S. album, the expression levels of genes coding for HMCR and FPPS were slightly induced in the leaves and stems of seedlings after the foliar application of 0.1% MeJA [46]. In our study, increased enzyme activities in the ROS antioxidant defense system and the sharp accumulation of SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 transcripts by exogenously applied MeJA and SA in leaves suggest that SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 play defensive roles against biotic stresses. Similarly, elevated levels of SaTPS3 transcripts induced by MeJA in the three tissues (Fig. 10c) inferred that SaTPS3 had similarly defensive roles to SaTPS1 and SaTPS2. Moreover, MeJA led to increases of SaTPS1 and SaTPS2 transcripts in stems and roots (Fig. 10a and b). Collectively, this demonstrates that both local and systemic defense responses were triggered by exogenously applied MeJA in S. album seedlings. This result is the same as findings reported by Koo et al. (2009) [66] in Arabidopsis and Delaunois et al. (2014) [67] in grapevine, in which local activation of JA and its biologically active derivatives (i.e., MeJA) as JA signaling molecules spread systemically throughout the plant and induce JA responses in distant organs. In general, SA is mainly associated with resistance to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens, and triggers systemic acquired resistance [68, 69]. The reason why exogenous SA resulted in the downregulation of SaTPS1 to 3 genes in treated roots needs to be further explored. Simultaneously, activated expression of SaSSY in leaves and stems by MeJA and SA offers a cue for further exploring the mechanism of santalol biosynthesis in S. album.

SaTPS1 to 3 play roles in response to abiotic stresses in different tissues

Environmental factors play important roles governing the emission of biogenic terpenes. The emission of some terpene volatiles is highly dependent on temperature, light and oxidative stresses [32, 38]. In loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), high light intensity and temperature induced the emission of (E)-β-farnesene and (E)-α-bergamotene [70]. Our previous work showed that SaSS/BS and SaMonoTPS1 accumulated to high levels in the roots of S. album in response to 4°C [47]. In that study, the full-length of SaSS/BS was rediscovered as SaTPS2 in this study. In the present study, the expression levels of SaTPS2 in leaves and roots after exposure for 12 h to 4°C were similar to our previous results, in which a decrease of SaTPS2 transcripts in leaves and significant up-regulation in roots were observed. Although adverse temperature and light inhibited the expression of SaTPS1 to 3 genes in leaves, high or low temperature significantly induced an increase in SaTPS1 to 3 transcripts in roots. High light intensity induced a remarkable elevation of SaTPS1 and SaTPS3 transcripts in stems and roots. There are two possible reasons for these trends. The first is that leaves are directly exposed to adverse stresses and responded more quickly to these stresses than stems and roots. The second is that there are differences in resource allocation between above- and underground tissues during the stress response. Nevertheless, these results imply that SaTPS1 to 3 play a role in protecting sandalwood from abiotic stresses. In contrast, the decrease of almost all SaSSY transcripts in treated tissues suggests that environmental stresses affect the expression of SaSSY, unlike SaTPS1 to 3.

Conclusions

After mining publicly-available RNA-seq data, three new terpene synthase genes were biochemically characterized. They were shown to be multifunctional mono- and sesqui-TPSs. The occurrence of functional divergence of TPS led to the formation of a diversity of terpenoids in Santalum spp. Our work demonstrated that SaTPS1 to 3 genes play important roles in chemical defense and in protection against temperature and light stress. This study provides a basis for assessing the roles of SaTPSs in direct or indirect defense against pathogen attacks and in regulating environmental stresses. We are currently in the process of overexpressing SaTPS1 to 3 as part of a program to genetically improve sandalwood for enhanced resistance to pathogens, such as powdery mildew, which severely infect S. album leaves [71]. Furthermore, greater attention should be paid to the environmental significance of the volatile terpenoids in S. album essential oil, which is present in the highly valued aromatic HW.

Methods

Plant material and stress treatment

Young leaves (YL) were harvested from 10-year-old mature S. album trees growing in a sandalwood plantation at the South China Botanical Garden. Wood shavings from SW and HW tissues were separately collected by drilling the stems of the same S. album trees at 30 cm from the ground using a Hagloff wood borer. To assess transcript accumulation of young trees, wood shavings from the stems of immature three-year-old trees (IW, immature wood) about 3 cm in diameter were also obtained. Tissue samples from three individuals were pooled as one biological replicate for gene expression and GC-MS analysis of volatiles, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80°C until further use.

Culture of S. album seedlings followed our previous methods [47]. The foliage of six-month-old seedlings was sprayed at a rate of 10 ml per plant with 1 mM MeJA or SA solution which included 0.1% Tween 80 as a surfactant. The induction period was 24 h. Control plants were treated with a 0.1% Tween 80 solution at the same application dose. Treated plants were placed separately in different greenhouses in order to avoid cross-contamination under the same growth conditions. Seedlings with uniform growth were acclimated in a phytotron at 28°C/23°C (day/night), 14-h photoperiod, and 100 μmol m− 2 s− 1 photosynthetic photon flux density for one week. They were then exposed to 4°C and 38°C for 12 h, serving as low temperature or mild heat stress treatments, respectively. Plants grown under normal conditions were transferred to high light intensity (approx. 250 μmol m− 2 s− 1) for 12 h or to normal light as the control. Leaves, stems and roots were separately harvested after the completion of each treatment, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at − 80°C until use. Samples from three individuals were pooled as a biological replicate and repeated three times as three independent biological duplicates.

Extraction of volatiles

Volatile compounds were extracted following the Celedon et al. (2016) [44] method with minor changes. Briefly, YL, SW, HW and IW samples were air dried for one week, extracted using 200 mg of ground tissue with 5 ml of pentane, spiked with n-dodecane as an internal standard (0.05 μl/ml), then mixed end-over-end for 48 h at room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 2000 g at 4°C for 20 min and the pentane phase was transferred to a new GC vial. Then 1 μl was injected for GC/MS analysis after being reduced to 50 μl with a stream of dry nitrogen. Analyses were performed using three biological replicates, each of which comprised two technical replicates.

Identification of terpene synthases in S. album

Raw reads were downloaded at BioProject IDs, PRJNA327296 for leaves [47], PRJNA297453 and SRR1725543 for stems [42, 44], and PRJNA243306 for roots [48] from the SRA database at NCBI. De novo transcriptome assembly was conducted using Trinity [72]. Finally, a single set of non-redundant unigenes were generated from all the unigenes using TGICL [73]. The TPS N-terminal domain (PF01397), TPS family metal binding domain (PF03936), prenyltransferase and squalene oxidase repeat (PF00432), and prenyltransferase like (PF13243) were downloaded from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/), and used as bait to search against the S. album transcriptome with an E-value threshold of 10− 5.

RNA extraction, gene isolation, and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted according to Kolosova et al. (2004) [74] and Jones et al. (2011) [40]. Two micrograms of total RNA were reverse-transcribed using M-MLV reverse transcriptase according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Specific primers used to amplify full-length cDNAs are listed in Additional file 1: Table S8. The DNA molecules were amplified by PCR using high fidelity Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), cloned into the pMD18-T vector (Takara Bio Inc., Dalian, China) and sequenced at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI). The gene-specific oligonucleotide primers used for qRT-PCR analysis are described in Additional file 1: Table S8. qRT-PCR was performed as described previously [47].

Phylogenetic analysis

Multiple alignments were used by DNAMAN8.0 (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, CA, USA) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbour-joining (NJ) method using MEGA 6.0 [75].

Subcellular localization of SaTPSs

For YFP fusion constructs, the coding regions of SaTPS1 to 3 were subcloned into the pSAT6-EYFP vector using T4 ligase (Invitrogen) (Additional file 1: Table S8 and S9). All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing at BGI. The fusion constructs and m-Cherry fluorescence protein were transformed into Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts as described previously [76]. The transformed protoplasts were incubated at 22°C for 16–24 h. YFP fluorescence was observed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP8 STED 3X, Wetzlar, Germany).

Heterologous expression and purification of recombinant protein

Deletion of plastidial targeting peptide can improve the expression of functional mono-TPSs [77, 78]. For SaTPS1, two constructs were made, one with and one without the transit peptide. The SaTPS cDNA fragments obtained with primers designed with restriction enzyme sites at the ends were cloned into the pET-28a vector (Novagen) to generate 6His-SaTPSs (Additional file 1: Table S8 and S9). The constructs were verified by DNA sequencing at BGI. His-SaTPS recombinant proteins were induced into the E. coli Rossetta 2 (DE3) strain (Novagen) according to the method of Srivastava et al. [42]. Purification of the recombinant proteins was performed with Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) and the eluted proteins were desalted on a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare) following the Jones et al. method [40]. The concentration of proteins was determined using the Bradford method [79]. The purified recombinant proteins were analyzed using 10% SDS-PAGE.

In vitro enzyme assay

Enzymatic reactions were performed in a 2-ml screw-capped GC glass vial in a final volume of 500 μl containing 10 μg recombinant TPS, reaction buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2 or MnCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol, and 5% (v/v) glycerol), and 50 μM substrate (E,E)-FPP, GPP, or GGPP (Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction mixtures were carefully overlaid with 500 μl of n-hexane (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 2 h at 30°C. The vial was then vigorously vortexed for 1 min to trap volatile products. After centrifuging at 2000 g and 4°C for 30 min, the upper hexane layer was transferred to a new 2-ml glass vial for GC-MS analysis. As negative controls, heat-inactivated recombinant protein and an empty vector were separately assayed.

GC-MS analysis

GC-MS analysis was performed on a GCMS-QP2010 SE (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a HP-5MS column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm). The injector temperature was 230°C, splitless mode was used with a splitless time of 1 min, and helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The GC temperatures were 60°C for 3 min, ramp of 4°C/min to 230°C, and maintained at 230°C for 20 min. Scan ranges: 40–220 m/z for products of the in vitro enzyme assay and 20–500 m/z for compounds of volatiles. The volatile components and enzyme products were identified by comparison of their mass spectra with those in the NIST2005 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), NIST2005s, NIST2014, NIST2014s and FFNSC1.3 (Flavors and fragrances of natural and synthetic compounds version 1.3) library data for GC-MS and comparison of their retention indices (RIs). RIs were determined on the basis of an n-alkanes (C8-C40) mix standard (Sigma-Aldrich) under the same operation conditions. The identifications of authentic standards of six main products in the enzyme assays, including α-terpineol, linalool, geraniol, (E)-β-farnesene, (E,E)-nerolidol and (E,E)-farnesol were further verified by NMR (Fig. S11–28). Since no (E)-α-bergamotene and sesquisabinene standards were commercially available [80], their verifications were referred to those reported by Srivastava et al. (2015) [42].

Steady-state kinetics

Estimates of the Vmax and Km of SaTPS1, SaTPS2 and SaTPS3 were determined by using the malachite green phosphate assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, No. MAK307) following the method of Vardakou et al. (2014) [81]. One microgram of proteins with varying concentrations (0.5 μM to 50 μM) of substrates FPP or GPP and Mg2+ in 500 μl of 25 mM HEPES buffer was reacted at 30°C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by adding 10 μl of 5 M HCl. Released free phosphate was determined as described in the assay kit manual. The data was fit to a nonlinear regression of the Michaelis-Menten equation by using GraphPad Prism 7 to obtain Vmax and Km.

Antioxidant enzyme assays

The activities of antioxidant enzymes, including SOD (EC1.15.1.1), CAT (EC1.11.1.6), POD (EC1.11.1.7) and APX (EC1.11.1.11) of leaves, stems and roots of untreated and treated samples were separately tested using activity assay kits (product codes BC0175 for SOD, BC0200 for CAT, BC0095 for POD, and BC0220 for APX; Solarbio, Beijing, China). A total of 100 mg of plant tissue was crushed using a mortar and pestle in corresponding extraction buffer and the supernatant was collected after centrifuging at 8000 or 13,000 g for 20 min at 4°C. SOD activity was determined on the basis of the inhibition of the photochemical reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium at 560 nm [82]. CAT activity was expressed as 1 nM of H2O2 degradation/min at 240 nm. One unit of POD activity was defined as the increase by one unit/min at 470 nm. APX activity was expressed as 1 μM of ascorbate oxidized/min at 290 nm.

Abbreviations

APX:

Ascorbate peroxidase

BS:

Bisabolene synthase

CAT:

Catalase

CYP:

Cytochrome P450

FPP:

Farnesyl diphosphate

FPPS:

Farnesyl diphosphate synthase

GGPP:

Geranylgeranyl diphosphate

GPP:

Geranyl diphosphate

HMCR:

Hydroxymethylglutaryl CoA reductase

HW:

Heartwood

IW:

Immature wood

JA:

Jasmonic acid

MeJA:

Methyl jasmonate

POD:

Peroxidase

RI:

Retention index

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SA:

Salicylic acid

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

SQS1:

sesquisabinene synthase 1

SQS2:

sesquisabinene synthase 2

SRC:

Sequence Read Archive

SS/BS:

Santalene/bergamotene synthase 1

SSY:

Santalene synthase

SW:

Sapwood

Tp:

Transit peptide

TPS:

Terpene synthase

YFP:

Yellow fluorescent protein

YL:

Young leaf

References

  1. 1.

    Pichersky E, Raguso RA. Why do plants produce so many terpenoid compounds? New Phytol; 2016.

  2. 2.

    Tholl D. Biosynthesis and biological functions of terpenoids in plants. Adv Biochem Eng Biot. 2015;148:63–106.

  3. 3.

    Tholl D. Terpene synthases and the regulation, diversity and biological roles of terpene metabolism. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(3):297–304.

  4. 4.

    Lange BM, Turner GW. Terpenoid biosynthesis in trichomes-current status and future opportunities. Plant Biotechnol J. 2013;11(1):2–22.

  5. 5.

    Abbas F, Ke Y, Yu R, Yue Y, Amanullah S, Jahangir MM, Fan Y. Volatile terpenoids: multiple functions, biosynthesis, modulation and manipulation by genetic engineering. Planta. 2017;246(5):803–16.

  6. 6.

    Aubourg S, Lecharny A, Bohlmann J. Genomic analysis of the terpenoid synthase (AtTPS) gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genomics. 2002;267(6):730–45.

  7. 7.

    Martin D, Aubourg S, Schouwey M, Daviet L, Schalk M, Toub O, Lund ST, Bohlmann J. Functional annotation, genome organization and phylogeny of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) terpene synthase gene family based on genome assembly. BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:226.

  8. 8.

    Falara V, Akhtar TA, Nguyen TT, Spyropoulou EA, Bleeker PM, Schauvinhold I, Matsuba Y, Bonini ME, Schilmiller AL, Last RL, et al. The tomato terpene synthase gene family. Plant Physiol. 2011;157(2):770–89.

  9. 9.

    Irmisch S, Jiang Y, Chen F, Gershenzon J, Köllner TG. Terpene synthases and their contribution to herbivore-induced volatile emission in western balsam poplar (Populus trichocarpa). BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:270.

  10. 10.

    Warren RL, Keeling CI, Yuen MM, Raymond A, Taylor GA, Vandervalk BP, Mohamadi H, Paulino D, Chiu R, Jackman SD, et al. Improved white spruce (Picea glauca) genome assemblies and annotation of large gene families of conifer terpenoid and phenolic defense metabolism. Plant J. 2015;83(2):189–212.

  11. 11.

    Muangphrom P, Seki H, Suzuki M, Komori A, Nishiwaki M, Mikawa R, Fukushima EO, Muranaka T. Functional analysis of amorpha-4,11-diene synthase (ADS) homologs from non-artemisinin-producing Artemisia species: the discovery of novel koidzumiol and (+)-α-bisabolol synthases. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016;57(8):1678–88.

  12. 12.

    Alquezar B, Rodriguez A, de la Pena M, Pena L. Genomic analysis of terpene synthase family and functional characterization of seven sesquiterpene synthases from Citrus sinensis. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1481.

  13. 13.

    Degenhardt J, Kollner TG, Gershenzon J. Monoterpene and sesquiterpene synthases and the origin of terpene skeletal diversity in plants. Phytochemistry. 2009;70:1621–37.

  14. 14.

    Bohlmann J, Meyer-G G, Croteau R. Plant terpenoid synthases: molecular biology and phylogenetic analysis. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:4126–33.

  15. 15.

    Chen F, Tholl D, Bohlmann J, Pichersky E. The family of terpene synthases in plants: a mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom. Plant J. 2011;66(1):212–29.

  16. 16.

    Taniguchi S, Miyoshi S, Tamaoki D, Yamada S, Tanaka K, Uji Y, Tanaka S, Akimitsu K, Gomi K. Isolation of jasmonate-induced sesquiterpene synthase of rice: product of which has an antifungal activity against Magnaporthe oryzae. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171(8):625–32.

  17. 17.

    Zhang W, Zhao F, Jiang L, Chen C, Wu L, Liu Z. Different pathogen defense strategies in Arabidopsis: more than pathogen recognition. Cells 2018, 7(12).

  18. 18.

    Ku YS, Sintaha M, Cheung MY, Lam HM. Plant hormone signaling crosstalks between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Int J Mol Sci. 2018, 19(10).

  19. 19.

    Barah P, Winge P, Kusnierczyk A, Tran DH, Bones AM. Molecular signatures in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to insect attack and bacterial infection. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58987.

  20. 20.

    Martinez-Medina A, Appels FVW, van Wees SCM. Impact of salicylic acid- and jasmonic acid-regulated defences on root colonization by Trichoderma harzianum T-78. Plant Signal Behav. 2017;12(8):e1345404.

  21. 21.

    Lv Z, Zhang L, Tang K. New insights into artemisinin regulation. Plant Signal Behav. 2017;12(10):e1366398.

  22. 22.

    Shen Q, Lu X, Yan T, Fu X, Lv Z, Zhang F, Pan Q, Wang G, Sun X, Tang K. The jasmonate-responsive AaMYC2 transcription factor positively regulates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytol. 2016;210(4):1269–81.

  23. 23.

    Pu GB, Ma DM, Chen JL, Ma LQ, Wang H, Li GF, Ye HC, Liu BY. Salicylic acid activates artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28(7):1127–35.

  24. 24.

    Okudera Y, Ito M. Production of agarwood fragrant constituents in Aquilaria calli and cell suspension cultures. Plant Physiol. 2009;154:1998–2007.

  25. 25.

    Kumeta Y, Ito M. Characterization of δ-guaiene synthases from cultured cells of Aquilaria, responsible for the formation of the sesquiterpenes in agarwood. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(4):1998–2007.

  26. 26.

    Xu YH, Liao YC, Lv FF, Zhang Z, Sun PW, Gao ZH, Hu KP, Sui C, Jin Y, Wei JH. Transcription factor AsMYC2 controls the jasmonate-responsive expression of ASS1 regulating sesquiterpene biosynthesis in Aquilaria sinensis (Lour.) Gilg. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017;58(11):1924–33.

  27. 27.

    Tingey DT, Manning M, Grothaus LC, Burns WF. Influence of light and temperature on monoterpene emission rates from slash pine. Plant Physiol. 1980;65(5):797–801.

  28. 28.

    Loreto F, Ciccioli P, Cecinato A, Brancaleoni E, Frattoni M, Tricoli D. Influence of environmental factors and air composition on the emission of α-pinene from Quercus ilex leaves. Plant Physiol. 1996;110(1):267–75.

  29. 29.

    Schuh G, Heiden A, Hoffmann TH, Kahl J, RockelJ P, Rudolph J, Wildt J. Emissions of volatile organic compounds from sunflower and beech: dependence on temperature and light intensity. J Atmos Chem. 1997;27(3):291–318.

  30. 30.

    Loreto F, Delfine S. Emission of isoprene from salts tressed Eucalyptus globulus leaves. Plant Physiol. 2000;123:1605–167.

  31. 31.

    Vallat A, Gu H, Dorn S. How rainfall, relative humidity and temperature influence volatile emissions from apple trees in situ. Phytochemistry. 2005;66(13):1540–50.

  32. 32.

    Duhl TR, Helmig D, Guenther A. Sesquiterpene emissions from vegetation: a review. Biogeosciences. 2008;5:761–77.

  33. 33.

    Copolovici L, Kannaste A, Pazouki L, Niinemets U. Emissions of green leaf volatiles and terpenoids from Solanum lycopersicum are quantitatively related to the severity of cold and heat shock treatments. J Plant Physiol. 2012;169(7):664–72.

  34. 34.

    Pazouki L, Kanagendran A, Li S, Kannaste A, Memari HR, Bichele R, Niinemets U. Mono- and sesquiterpene release from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves upon mild and severe heat stress and through recovery: from gene expression to emission responses. Environ Exp Bot. 2016;132:1–15.

  35. 35.

    Vuorinen T, Nerg AM, Holopainen JK. Ozone exposure triggers the emission of herbivore-induced plant volatiles, but does not disturb tritrophic signalling. Environ Pollut. 2004;131(2):305–11.

  36. 36.

    Blande JD, Turunen K, Holopainen JK. Pine weevil feeding on Norway spruce bark has a stronger impact on needle VOC emissions than enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. Environ Pollut. 2009;157(1):174–80.

  37. 37.

    Lee GW, Lee S, Chung MS, Jeong YS, Chung BY. Rice terpene synthase 20 (OsTPS20) plays an important role in producing terpene volatiles in response to abiotic stresses. Protoplasma. 2015;252(4):997–1007.

  38. 38.

    Holopainen JK, Gershenzon J. Multiple stress factors and the emission of plant VOCs. Trends Plant Sci. 2010;15(3):176–84.

  39. 39.

    Baldovini N, Delasalle C, Joulain D. Phytochemistry of the heartwood from fragrant Santalum species: a review. Flavour Frag J. 2011;26(1):7–26.

  40. 40.

    Jones CG, Moniodis J, Zulak KG, Scaffidi A, Plummer JA, Ghisalberti EL, Barbour EL, Bohlmann J. Sandalwood fragrance biosynthesis involves sesquiterpene synthases of both the terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies, including santalene synthases. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(20):17445–54.

  41. 41.

    Rani A, Ravikumar P, Reddy MD, Kush A. Molecular regulation of santalol biosynthesis in Santalum album L. Gene. 2013;527(2):642–8.

  42. 42.

    Srivastava PL, Daramwar PP, Krithika R, Pandreka A, Shankar SS, Thulasiram HV. Functional characterization of novel sesquiterpene synthases from Indian sandalwood, Santalum album. Sci Rep. 2015;5:10095.

  43. 43.

    Diaz-Chavez ML, Moniodis J, Madilao LL, Jancsik S, Keeling CI, Barbour EL, Ghisalberti EL, Plummer JA, Jones CG, Bohlmann J. Biosynthesis of sandalwood oil: Santalum album CYP76F cytochromes P450 produce santalols and bergamotol. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e75053.

  44. 44.

    Celedon JM, Chiang A, Yuen MM, Diaz-Chavez ML, Madilao LL, Finnegan PM, Barbour EL, Bohlmann J. Heartwood-specific transcriptome and metabolite signatures of tropical sandalwood (Santalum album) reveal the final step of (Z)-santalol fragrance biosynthesis. Plant J. 2016;86(4):289–99.

  45. 45.

    Jones CG, Keeling CI, Ghisalberti EL, Barbour EL, Plummer JA, Bohlmann J. Isolation of cDNAs and functional characterisation of two multi-product terpene synthase enzymes from sandalwood, Santalum album L. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008;477(1):121–30.

  46. 46.

    Kulheim C, Jones CG, Plummer JA, Ghisalberti EL, Barbour L, Bohlmann J. Foliar application of methyl jasmonate does not increase terpenoid accumulation, but weakly elicits terpenoid pathway genes in sandalwood (Santalum album L.) seedlings. Plant Biotechnol. 2014;31(5):585–91.

  47. 47.

    Zhang XH, Teixeira da Silva JA, Niu MY, Li MZ, He CM, Zhao JH, Zeng SJ, Duan J, Ma GH. Physiological and transcriptomic analyses reveal a response mechanism to cold stress in Santalum album L. leaves. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42165.

  48. 48.

    Zhang XH, Berkowitz O, Teixeira da Silva JA, Zhang MH, Ma GH, Whelan J, Duan J. RNA-Seq analysis identifies key genes associated with haustorial development in the root hemiparasite Santalum album. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:661.

  49. 49.

    Marrero PF, Poulter C, Edwards PA. Effects of site-directed mutagenesis of the highly conserved aspartate residues in domain II of farnesyl diphosphate synthase activity. J Biol Chem. 1992;267:21873–8.

  50. 50.

    Moniodis J, Jones CG, Barbour EL, Plummer JA, Ghisalberti EL, Bohlmann J. The transcriptome of sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis in heartwood xylem of Western Australian sandalwood (Santalum spicatum). Phytochemistry. 2015;113:79–86.

  51. 51.

    Pieterse CM, Van der Does D, Zamioudis C, Leon-Reyes A, Van Wees SC. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:489–521.

  52. 52.

    Innes R. The positives and negatives of NPR: a unifying model for salicylic acid signaling in plants. Cell. 2018;173(6):1314–5.

  53. 53.

    Miller G, Suzuki N, Rizhsky L, Hegie A, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R. Double mutants deficient in cytosolic and thylakoid ascorbate peroxidase reveal a complex mode of interaction between reactive oxygen species, plant development, and response to abiotic stresses. Plant Physiol. 2007;144(4):1777–85.

  54. 54.

    Davletova S, Rizhsky L, Liang H, Shengqiang Z, Oliver DJ, Coutu J, Shulaev V, Schlauch K, Mittler R. Cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 1 is a central component of the reactive oxygen gene network of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2005;17(1):268–81.

  55. 55.

    Mahesh HB, Subba P, Advani J, Shirke MD, Loganathan RM, Chandana SL, Shilpa S, Chatterjee O, Pinto SM, Prasad TSK, et al. Multi-omics driven assembly and annotation of the sandalwood (Santalum album) genome. Plant Physiol. 2018;176(4):2772–88.

  56. 56.

    Martin DM, Bohlmann J. Identification of Vitis vinifera (−)-alpha-terpineol synthase by in silico screening of full-length cDNA ESTs and functional characterization of recombinant terpene synthase. Phytochemistry. 2004;65(9):1223–9.

  57. 57.

    Gao F, Liu B, Li M, Gao X, Fang Q, Liu C, Ding H, Wang L, Gao X. Identification and characterization of terpene synthase genes accounting for volatile terpene emissions in flowers of Freesia x hybrida. J Exp Bot. 2018;69(18):4249–65.

  58. 58.

    Chen H, Li G, Köllner TG, Jia Q, Gershenzon J, Chen F. Positive darwinian selection is a driving force for the diversification of terpenoid biosynthesis in the genus Oryza. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:239.

  59. 59.

    Schnee C, Kollner TG, Gershenzon J, Degenhardt J. The maize gene terpene synthase 1 encodes a sesquiterpene synthase catalyzing the formation of (E)-beta-farnesene, (E)-nerolidol, and (E,E)-farnesol after herbivore damage. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(4):2049–2060.

  60. 60.

    Qian ZG, Zhao ZJ, Xu YF, Qian XH, Zhong JJ. Novel chemically synthesized salicylate derivative as an effective elicitor for inducing the biosynthesis of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Prog. 2006;22:331–3.

  61. 61.

    Krokene P, Nagy NE, Solheim H. Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defence responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiol. 2008;28:29–35.

  62. 62.

    Menzel TR, Weldegergis BT, David A, Boland W, Gols R, van Loon JJ, Dicke M. Synergism in the effect of prior jasmonic acid application on herbivore-induced volatile emission by Lima bean plants: transcription of a monoterpene synthase gene and volatile emission. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(17):4821–31.

  63. 63.

    Paschold A, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT. Co(i)-ordinating defenses: NaCOI1 mediates herbivore- induced resistance in Nicotiana attenuata and reveals the role of herbivore movement in avoiding defenses. Plant J. 2007;51(1):79–91.

  64. 64.

    Li R, Wang M, Wang Y, Schuman MC, Weinhold A, Schafer M, Jimenez-Aleman GH, Barthel A, Baldwin IT. Flower-specific jasmonate signaling regulates constitutive floral defenses in wild tobacco. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(34):E7205–14.

  65. 65.

    Zhou W, Kugler A, McGale E, Haverkamp A, Knaden M, Guo H, Beran F, Yon F, Li R, Lackus N, et al. Tissue-specific emission of (E)-α-bergamotene helps resolve the dilemma when pollinators are also herbivores. Curr Biol. 2017;27(9):1336–41.

  66. 66.

    Koo AJ, Gao X, Jones AD, Howe GA. A rapid wound signal activates the systemic synthesis of bioactive jasmonates in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009;59(6):974–86.

  67. 67.

    Delaunois B, Farace G, Jeandet P, Clement C, Baillieul F, Dorey S, Cordelier S. Elicitors as alternative strategy to pesticides in grapevine? Current knowledge on their mode of action from controlled conditions to vineyard. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2014;21(7):4837–46.

  68. 68.

    Anand A, Uppalapati SR, Ryu CM, Allen SN, Kang L, Tang Y, Mysore KS. Salicylic acid and systemic acquired resistance play a role in attenuating crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Physiol. 2008;146(2):703–15.

  69. 69.

    Grant M, Lamb C. Systemic immunity. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(4):414–20.

  70. 70.

    Helmig D, Ortega J, Guenther A, Herrick JD, Geron C. Sesquiterpene emissions from loblolly pine and their potential contribution to biogenic aerosol formation in the southeastern US. Atmos Environ. 2006;40(22):4150–7.

  71. 71.

    Wu C, Wang X. Preliminary research on the identification system for anthracnose and powdery mildew of sandalwood leaf based on image processing. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0181537.

  72. 72.

    Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q, et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–52.

  73. 73.

    Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, Lee Y, White J, Cheung F, Parvizi B, et al. TIGR gene indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(5):651–2.

  74. 74.

    Kolosova N, Miller B, Ralph S, Ellis BE, Douglas C, Ritland K, Bohlmann J. Isolation of high-quality RNA from gymnosperm and angiosperm trees. BioTechniques. 2004;36:821–4.

  75. 75.

    Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.

  76. 76.

    Yoo SD, Cho YH, Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(7):1565–72.

  77. 77.

    Bohlmann J, Phillips M, Ramachandiran V, Katoh S, Croteau R. cDNA cloning, characterization, and functional expression of four new monoterpene synthase members of the Tpsd gene family from grand fir (Abies grandis). Arch Biochem Biophys. 1999;368:232–43.

  78. 78.

    Huang XZ, Xiao YT, Kollner TG, Jing WX, Kou JF, Chen JY, Liu DF, Gu SH, Wu JX, Zhang YJ, et al. The terpene synthase gene family in Gossypium hirsutum harbors a linalool synthase GhTPS12 implicated in direct defence responses against herbivores. Plant Cell Environ. 2018;41(1):261–74.

  79. 79.

    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.

  80. 80.

    Schuman MC, Palmer-Young EC, Schmidt A, Gershenzon J, Baldwin IT. Ectopic terpene synthase expression enhances sesquiterpene emission in Nicotiana attenuata without altering defense or development of transgenic plants or neighbors. Plant Physiol. 2014;166(2):779–97.

  81. 81.

    Vardakou M, Salmon M, Faraldos JA, O'Maille PE. Comparative analysis and validation of the malachite green assay for the high throughput biochemical characterization of terpene synthases. MethodsX. 2014;1:187–96.

  82. 82.

    Beauchamp C, Fridovich I. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal Biochem. 1971;44:276–87.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Rufang Deng and Ms. Xinlan Xu for their help in using a confocal laser-scanning microscope.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870666 and 31470685), Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (201804010414), Guangdong Special Support Program (2017TQ04N303) and the Guangdong Science and Technology project (2015B020231008). The funders had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

SaTPS1 to 3 gene sequences were deposited in Genbank with accession numbers MG280891, MG280895 and MG280896. All data analyzed in this study can be found in this published article and its additional files.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xinhua Zhang and Meiyun Niu contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China

    • Xinhua Zhang
    • , Meiyun Niu
    • , Yueya Zhang
    • , Yunfei Yuan
    • , Yongxia Jia
    • , Yangyang Xiao
    • , Yuan Li
    • , Lin Fang
    • , Songjun Zeng
    •  & Guohua Ma

  2. University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    • Meiyun Niu
    •  & Yueya Zhang

  3. P. O. Box 7, cho post office, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-Ken, Miki, 761-0799, Japan

    • Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Authors

  1. Search for Xinhua Zhang in:

  2. Search for Meiyun Niu in:

  3. Search for Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva in:

  4. Search for Yueya Zhang in:

  5. Search for Yunfei Yuan in:

  6. Search for Yongxia Jia in:

  7. Search for Yangyang Xiao in:

  8. Search for Yuan Li in:

  9. Search for Lin Fang in:

  10. Search for Songjun Zeng in:

  11. Search for Guohua Ma in:

Contributions

XZ, MN, JATS and GM designed the experiments. XZ and MN performed most of the experiments. YZ, YY, YJ, YX, YL, JATS and LF made substantial contributions to the materials collection and data analysis. XZ and JATS wrote the manuscript. SZ, JATS and GM revised and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinhua Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All samples from mature S. album trees growing in a sandalwood plantation at the South China Botanical Garden (SCBG), which are available for non-commercial purposes, were collected. S. album seedlings were cultivated in the SCBG greenhouse. No specific permits were required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Composition of volatiles from four sandalwood tissues. Table S2. Length distribution of assembled transcripts and unigenes. Table S3. Terpene synthase identified based on transcriptome data. Table S4. Information of three SaTPSs isolated from S. album. Table S5. TPS proteins from other plant species used in phylogenetic analysis. Table S6. Predicted chloroplast transit peptides. Table S7. In vitro assay products that each recombination SaTPS and FPP or GPP. Table S8. List of primers used in this study. Table S9 Restriction enzymes used for YPF plasmid construction and expression vectors. Figure S1. Length distribution of S. album unigenes. Figure S2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of three SaTPS ORFs. Figure S3. Comparison of deduced amino acid sequences of SaTPS1 and two other TPSs. Figure S4. Comparison of transcript levels of SaTPSs. Figure S5. SDS-PAGE analysis of recombinant proteins. Figure S6. In vitro enzymatic assays of recombinant SaTPS1 using GPP and Mn2+. Figure S7. In vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS2 using FPP and Mn2+. Figure S8. In vitro enzyme assays of recombinant SaTPS2 using GPP and Mn2+. Figure S9. In vitro enzymatic assays of recombinant SaTPS3 using GPP and Mn2+. Figure S10. Michaelis-Menten plots for three SaTPSs. Figure S11–28. Characterization of six authentic standards by NMR. (PDF 2014 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Abiotic stress
  • Methyl jasmonate
  • Salicylic acid
  • Santalum album
  • Sesquiterpene
  • Terpene synthase

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us