Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access

Genome-wide identification of MADS-box family genes in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) and a functional analysis of PeMADS5 in flowering

BMC Plant Biology201818:176

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1394-2

©  The Author(s). 2018

  • Received: 19 April 2018
  • Accepted: 27 August 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

MADS-box genes encode a large family of transcription factors that play significant roles in plant growth and development. Bamboo is an important non-timber forest product worldwide, but previous studies on the moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) MADS-box gene family were not accurate nor sufficiently detailed.

Results

Here, a complete genome-wide identification and characterization of the MADS-box genes in moso bamboo was conducted. There was an unusual lack of type-I MADS-box genes in the bamboo genome database (http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/index.php), and some of the PeMADS sequences are fragmented and/or inaccurate. We performed several bioinformatics techniques to obtain more precise sequences using transcriptome assembly. In total, 42 MADS-box genes, including six new type-I MADS-box genes, were identified in bamboo, and their structures, phylogenetic relationships, predicted conserved motifs and promoter cis-elements were systematically investigated. An expression analysis of the bamboo MADS-box genes in floral organs and leaves revealed that several key members are involved in bamboo inflorescence development, like their orthologous genes in Oryza. The ectopic overexpression of one MADS-box gene, PeMADS5, in Arabidopsis triggered an earlier flowering time and the development of an aberrant flower phenotype, suggesting that PeMADS5 acts as a floral activator and is involved in bamboo flowering.

Conclusion

We produced the most comprehensive information on MADS-box genes in moso bamboo. Additionally, a critical PeMADS gene (PeMADS5) responsible for the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth was identified and shown to be related to bamboo floral development.

Keywords

  • MADS-box
  • Bamboo
  • Gene expression pattern
  • Flower time
  • Floral organ

Background

MADS-box genes encode a large family of transcription factors that have essential roles in animals, plants, and fungi [1]. The first plant MADS-box genes were found to regulate floral meristem identity. Since then, several MADS-box genes have been reported to control the vegetative to reproductive phase transition in plants and developmental processes in plant organs, such as fruit, root, stem, and leaf [2–4]. This large gene family contains two groups, type I (SRF-like) and type II (MEF2-like), based on their conserved domains [5]. In plants, the type-I genes encode plant-specific transcription factors of the Mα, Mβ, and Mγ subfamilies, while the most well-known MADS genes are from the type-II group, such as the MIKCC-type and MIKC*-type [6, 7]. The term MIKC originated from the four major domains of proteins encoded by type-II genes: the MADS (M) domain followed by an Intervening (I) domain, a second most conserved Keratin (K) domain and a C-terminal domain [8].

Flowering is a complicated process that requires cooperation and interaction among numerous genes. Loss-of-function plant mutations have been used to identify many MADS-box genes that play crucial roles in flowering processes, including flowering time (SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS1 (SOC), FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC), and SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP)) [9–11], formation of floral meristems and organs (APETALA1 (AP), FRUITFULL (FUL), PISTILLATA (PI), APETALA3 (AP3), SHATTERPROOF (SHP) 1/2, SEPALLATA (SEP) 1/2/3 and AGAMOUS (AG)) [12–16], fruit ripening (SHP1 and SHP2) [17], seed pigmentation, and embryo development (TRANSPARENT TESTA16) [8, 18]. The ABCDE model explains the ontogeny of dicot flowers [16, 19]. In general, A-class genes participate in sepal development, whereas C-class genes are involved in carpel development. Petal development requires both A- and C-class genes, whereas stamen development needs both B- and C-class genes. D-lineage genes are necessary for ovule development [15, 20, 21]. E-class genes redundantly specify all floral organ identities and floral meristem determination [16]. Almost every gene from this model, except Arabidopsis AP2, belongs to the type-II MADS-box subfamily, indicating that MADS-box genes play pivotal roles during flowering. Compared with type-II MADS-box genes, type-I genes in plants have attracted less attention [22]. However, functional studies of type-I MADS-box genes have revealed their crucial roles during plant reproduction and development, especially in determining female gametophyte, embryo, and endosperm development in Arabidopsis [22].

Bamboo is an important non-timber forest product worldwide. The plant is beneficial to the human food supply and several industries, as well as to the conservation of the environment and animal habitats. Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis), native to China, is a large woody bamboo species with a complex rhizome system, hollow and highly lignified culms, and bisexual spikelets [23]. For the many years of the long vegetative phase, moso bamboo culms (building materials) and young shoots (edible vegetable) can be continually harvested. However, moso bamboo only flowers once and dies after seed production (monocarpy) [24]. Woody bamboos typically exhibit synchronous flowering in a community in which all culms flower and die within the same year [25]. The switch from vegetative to reproductive growth is difficult to predict. These unique characteristics have led to centuries of study by scientists and enthusiasts. Several hypotheses have been proposed for the mechanism of bamboo flowering, and physiological and biochemical studies have been conducted [23]. External controls, such as photoperiod and drought cycles, may initiate flowering [26, 27], and endogenous factors may control flowering induction, including the circadian clock, which has been supported by observations of synchronous flowering in parental stocks and transplanted seedlings [28, 29]. However, the mechanism underlying the molecular regulation of flowering remains unclear.

In eudicots, the expression of some MADS-box genes can affect flowering time and the development of floral structures, which make MADS-box genes good candidates to understand the unique flowering patterns in bamboos. Lin identified two AP/SQUA-like MADS-box genes from Phyllostachys praecox, PpMADS1 (FUL3 subfamily) and PpMADS2 (FUL1 subfamily) [30]. Both genes play vital roles in the floral transition of bamboo. Next-generation sequencing allows the investigation of functional genes and flowering pathways on a genome scale. In the caespitose bamboo Bambusa edulis, two sequencing platforms have been used and 16 MADS-box genes (BeMADS) identified [31]. Most BeMADS genes are highly expressed in floral organs and share similar expression patterns with their homologs in Oryza sativa. A transcriptome analysis in P. edulis identified 38 putative MADS-box transcription factors in panicle tissues [32]. Although the first version of the bamboo genome sequence is available, the annotations of several genes are still tentative owing to the limitations of the previously used sequencing and assembling technologies. Here, we report a novel and systematic study of the MADS-box gene family involving not only database sequence identification but also sequence complementation and correction. We identified 42 MADS-box genes and then investigated the structures, phylogenetic relationships, conserved protein motifs, duplications, and expression patterns of these genes during floral development in bamboo. The overexpression of an AGL24 homologous gene, PeMADS5, in Arabidopsis resulted in early flowering and floral abnormalities. Yeast two-hybrid analyses revealed that PeMADS5 can interact with PeAP1 (PeMADS2) and PeSOC1 (PeMADS34), which suggests that PeAGL24 and PeSOC1 act as dimers to promote flowering. This study will serve as a useful reference for further functional analyses of candidate genes involved in bamboo floral development.

Methods

Identification and classification of MADS-box genes

We downloaded P. edulis genome sequences from the Bamboo Genome Database (http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/index.php). MADS-box protein sequences from Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Brachypodium were obtained from published studies [8, 18, 33]. To acquire the maximum number of MADS-box domain containing sequences in moso bamboo, we built three different Hidden Markov Models (HMM) profiles to search the P. edulis protein dataset based on Arabidopsis, Oryza, and Brachypodium, respectively. Gene name query was also employed on NCBI and BambooGDS. All of these candidate MADS-box genes were checked manually to remove the incomplete and redundant sequences. The nomenclature of putative type II bamboo MADS-box genes was assigned based on their scaffolds rankings.

Determination of presence and absence of type I MADS-box gene clades

In the first round of identification, type I MADS-box subfamily genes escaped detection in the HMM search. Therefore, the coding sequences (CDS) of Type I MADS-box from Oryza and Brachypodium were used as the probe sequences to blast against the bamboo genome as local databases. We obtained the best three BLAST results to check whether they represent MADS-box genes that were already in our dataset. If not, the CDS and protein sequences were predicted by Fgenesh ++ software [34] based on the corresponding genomic scaffold.

Correcting the incomplete PeMADSs sequences

The P. edulis transcriptome reads were downloaded from the NCBI SRA database (Accession: SRR4450542, SRR4450543, SRR4450544, SRR4450545, SRR4450546, SRR4450547, SRR4450548, SRR4450549, SRR4450550, SRR4450551). One of the methods to correct PeMADSs sequences was using Trinity software. After trimming low-quality sequences, transcriptome data was de novo assembled with the Trinity software using default parameters [35]. Because we are only interested in the PeMADSs, all of the CDS sequences of the MADS-box family genes were used as the references. Then the software of the Tablet was employed to exhibit the alignment results [36]. To identify the incomplete 5′ and 3′ end sequence of the genes, another method to complete the sequences was using in-house scripts to conduct e-Genome-walking process. To validate these complementary sequences, full-length CDS sequences of 16 PeMADSs were amplified (Primers in Additional file 1: Table S1) and cloned into pMD18-T vectors. After sequencing, multiple sequence alignments among the cloned, assembled and original sequences were conducted to explore the accuracy of the methods we used here.

Subcellular localization analysis

The coding sequences of PeMADS23 and PH01002755G0230 without the stop codon were amplified and then subcloned into the p2GWY7 vector and fused in-frame with the Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) sequence under the control of the CaMV35S promoter. The fusion constructs were introduced into Arabidopsis protoplasts prepared from 4-day suspension cells by using 40% polyethylene glycol (PEG) as described previously [37]. YFP fluorescence was observed with a laser scan confocal microscope. The transient expression assay was repeated three times.

Phylogenetic analysis

P. edulis MADS-box proteins were aligned with Oryza, Arabidopsis by MAFFT [38]. The alignment was cropped to remove low conserved regions and finally contained the M- and part of the K domain. An unrooted neighbor-joining (NJ) tree was constructed using the MEGA7 package [33, 39]. The tree nodes were evaluated by bootstrap analysis for 1000 replicates. Branches with less than 50% bootstrap values were collapsed.

Conserved motif analysis

The conserved motifs were investigated by MEME version 2.2 online tool (Multiple Expectation Maximization for Motif Elicitation) (http://meme-suite.org/) [40]. The parameters are set as follows: number of repetitions: any, the maximum number of motifs: 10, optimum motif width set to≥6 and ≤ 200. The motifs obtained were annotated using the Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) and NCBI CD search program [41, 42].

Cis-element enrichment analysis

PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) was used to predict cis-regulatory elements in the PeMADS promoter (1.5 kb upstream from the translational start codon) and intron region [43]. In this study, we selected cis-element associated with core promoter elements, protein binding sites, hormones responses, tissue-specific elements, light responsive elements, abiotic and biotic stress responses, circadian responses and cell cycle regulation elements.

Collection of plant material

The inflorescence samples of flowering moso bamboo and the leaf samples from non-flowering plants were collected in Guilin, Guangxi province from June to July 2016. The identification of four stages of bamboo inflorescence development is based on the numbers of florets and anatomical structures (stages F1–4): the first floral bud formation, initial stage of inflorescence development (3–5 florets), maturation of inflorescence (~ 10 florets) and anthesis. The leaf tissues were collected from the non-flowering moso bamboo, under the same growth environment with the flowering plants. The panicle and leaf samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately and stored at − 70 °C. Total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep pure Plant Kit (TianGen, China). Contaminating DNA was removed using DNase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Japan). After checking the quality of purified RNA on an agarose gel, the RNA samples were quantified by NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies Inc., USA). RNA was reverse transcribed from 5 μg of total RNA in 100 μL of reaction volume using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNA was used for further experiments.

Expression analysis of MADS-box genes

The primers used for MADS-box expression analysis were designed by Primer Premier 5 (Additional file 1: Table S2). The expression levels of target genes were detected with SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Japan). All qPCR assays were carried out in a CFX- 96-well Real-Time System (BioRad, USA). The reaction mixture consisted of 10 μL SYBR Green mix, 200 nM of each primer, and 2 μL of diluted cDNA in a final volume of 20 μL. The qPCR protocol consisted of an initial thermal cycling step of 95 °C for 3 mins, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s and annealing with a temperature gradient from 50 to 60 °C for 30 s. All experimental samples were repeated in triplicate. To normalize the variance among different samples, NTB was used as a housekeeping gene for data normalization [44, 45]. The raw Cycle threshold (Ct) values were calculated automatically by the Bio-Rad CFX Manager (version 2.3) using the 2-△△ct method [46].

Construction of PeMADS5 ectopic expression transgenic Arabidopsis lines

The full open reading frame of the PeMADS5 was amplified from cDNA using the primer pairs PeMADS5 (Additional file 1: Table S1) and cloned into pMD18-T Vector. The pCXSN (FJ905214) vector containing the CaMV35S promoter and the Nos terminator was digested with XcmI (New England Biolabs) [47]. The PCR product was amplified from pMD18-T followed by an A-addition procedure. The digested pCXSN plasmid and the PCR-amplified product were ligated using T4 DNA ligases (NEB). All recombinant plasmids identified from each individual E coli colone were verified by sequencing. This ectopic expression construct was named 35S::PeMADS5. Healthy wild-type Arabidopsis (Columbia-0) plants were grown on soil under long-day photoperiod conditions (16 h of light/8 h of darkness). The construct was transformed to Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 and used to transform Arabidopsis by the floral dip method [48]. Arabidopsis seeds obtained after transformation were plated on one-half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium containing 30 mg hygromycin for selection. Rosette leaves of Col-0, 35S::PeMADS5 #2 and #10 were obtained when plants bore a 1-cm-long inflorescence. The inflorescences from col-0 and transgenic plants were also collected on full flowering stage. Plant materials were sampled for qRT-PCR. Statistical analysis for the results from qPCR expression data and bolting days of Arabidopsis were carried out using a Student’s t-test. All data are presented as mean ± SD. p ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01 were considered statistically significant compared with the Columbia-0 (Col-0) wild-type.

Yeast two-hybrid assay

The experimental procedures of yeast two-hybrid assay were performed using the Matchmaker Two-Hybrid System (Clontech). The full coding sequence of PeMADS2, 5, 16, 20 and 34 were cloned into both pGBKT7 and pGADT7 vectors. The resulting recombinant plasmids were introduced into yeast strains Y2HGold and Y187, respectively. Two-hybrid interactions were assayed on selective SD/−Trp/−Leu double-dropout (DDO). Potential interactions were tested on selectiveSD/−Trp/−Leu/-His/−Ade/X-α-gal (40 mg/ml) media supplemented with 5 mM 3-amino-triazole (3-AT).

Results

Identification and replenishment of P. edulis MADS-box genes

The MADS-box protein sequences of three species, Oryza, Arabidopsis, and Brachypodium, were used to build a hidden Markov model, which was used to search the moso bamboo protein dataset. In total, 36 unique MADS-box proteins were identified (Table 1). PeMADSs (PeMADS18, − 27, − 30, − 36, − 37, − 38, − 42, and − 44) do not contain the most conserved MADS domain, and they were verified to be pseudogenes. Furthermore, five type-I genes, a PI-like clade gene (PeAP3) and an AGL6-like clade gene (PeAGL6) were obtained by running BLAST algorithm-based searches of the Bamboo genome databases with Oryza and Arabidopsis homologous genes. In total, 42 MADS genes have been identified in P. edulis. However, owing to the limited accuracy of Phyllostachys scaffolding, some PeMADSs may lack full-length gene sequence information. Thus, we developed a bioinformatics pipeline to recover the full-gene regions using the transcriptome sequencing data. First, the transcriptome reads were indexed as the references, and then, the incomplete PeMADS sequences were used as query in BLAST algorithm-based searches of the reads database. The optimally aligned reads were chosen to extend the open reading frame of each gene. The newly modified sequences were then included in a new search cycle until no new reads could be identified for any extension. All of the replenished coding DNA sequences (CDSs) were translated by Fgenesh++ software (Fig. 1) [34]. A total of 17 PeMADS genes were further corrected or completed (Table 2). Among them, 13 PeMADS genes lacked the M- or K-domain, while four other genes have incorrect sequences in their open reading frame regions. After correction, the PeMADS sequences’ quality and integrity were greatly improved. For instance, a K-domain, which is one of the most conserved domains in MADS-box genes, was added to PeMADS23 (Additional file 2: Figure S1). These 17 full-length PeMADS genes were also experimentally cloned from P. edulis cDNA with gene-specific primers to further confirm the sequence accuracy (Additional file 1: Table S1). To determine the accuracy levels of the modified sequences, we chose one gene, PeMADS23, to undergo a functional analysis. Using a subcellular localization prediction tool, PeMADS23 (corrected sequence) was found to have a nuclear subcellular location signal that is not found in the original sequence PH01002755G0230. In the experimental validation, the PeMADS23-YFP fusion protein was observed to be localized in the nucleus of the Arabidopsis protoplast, while the PH01002755G0230-YFP fusion protein was observed in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2). Thus, the experimental results corroborated the predictions. Additionally, the K-domain appears to be essential for a MADS-box gene to gain entry into the nucleus. Compared with those of the BambooGDS, the sequences obtained using our protocols are more accurate, which will assist further MADS-box gene functional analyses.
Table 1

List of 42 MADS-box genes identified in P. edulis and their homologs in Oryza (aa, amino acids)

Name

Gene ID

Homologous

Length (aa)

Intron

Gene location

Subfamily

Predicted gene type

PeMADS1

PH01002127G0260

OsMADS3

266

7

PH01002127:173109–184,410(− stand)

Type II

AG-like

PeMADS2

PH01000306G0610

OsMADS18

257

7

PH01000306:378556–403,756(− stand)

Type II

FUL3 AP1 SQUA-like

PeMADS3

PH01000606G0250

OsMADS14

201

6

PH01000606:177440–184,284(+ stand)

Type II

FUL1 AP1 SQUA-like

PeMADS4

PH01000466G0340

OsMADS68

370

10

PH01000466:212382–216,357(− stand)

Type II

MIKC*

PeMADS5

PH01000437G0930

OsMADS22

228

7

PH01000437:618016–625,547(− stand)

Type II

SVP-like

PeMADS6

PH01000059G1270

OsMADS56

222

6

PH01000059:749594–811,731(+ stand)

Type II

TM3-like

PeMADS7

PH01000759G0450

OsMADS56

226

6

PH01000759:309532–372,975(+ stand)

Type II

TM3-like

PeMADS8

PH01000038G1550

OsMADS47

230

7

PH01000038:1113162–1,119,265(− stand)

Type II

SVP-like

PeMADS9

PH01000317G0080

OsMADS2

209

6

PH01000317:51918–54,493(+ stand)

Type II

PI GLO-like

PeMADS10

PH01001878G0200

OsMADS4

209

6

PH01001878:118831–120,592(+ stand)

Type II

PI GLO-like

PeMADS11

PH01000338G0120

OsMADS31

226

4

PH01000338:109773–112,174(+ stand)

Type II

GGM13-like

PeMADS12

PH01000616G0020

OsMADS33

190

5

PH01000616:15256–18,269(− stand)

Type II

AGL12-like

PeMADS13

PH01002743G0050

OsMADS18

257

7

PH01002743:23635–31,559(− stand)

Type II

FUL3 AP1 SQUA-like

PeMADS14

PH01000006G0210

OsMADS20

281

6

PH01000006:135925–141,334(− stand)

Type II

SQUA-like

PeMADS15

PH01005177G0100

OsMADS26

211

5

PH01005177:60648–64,034(+ stand)

Type II

AGL12-like

PeMADS16

PH01000794G0210

OsMADS4

273

5

PH01000794:136094–138,076(− stand)

Type II

PI GLO-like

PeMADS17

PH01001113G0580

OsMADS32

301

6

PH01001113:351365–358,010(− stand)

Type II

PI GLO-like

PeMADS19

PH01001303G0110

OsMADS37

183

5

PH01001303:60303–74,009(− stand)

Type II

OsMADS37-like

PeMADS20

PH01001952G0230

OsMADS1

244

7

PH01001952:162071–190,513(− stand)

Type II

AGL2-like SEP

PeMADS21

PH01000117G1210

OsMADS37

158

2

PH01000117:863423–865,146(− stand)

Type II

OsMADS37-like

PeMADS23

PH01002755G0230

OsMADS50

215

6

PH01002755:82368–142,165(− stand)

Type II

TM3-like

PeMADS24

PH01000080G0200

OsMADS55

259

7

PH01000080:117443–126,410(− stand)

Type II

SVP-like

PeMADS25

PH01003178G0150

OsMADS65

205

4

PH01003178:58826–64,955(− stand)

Type II

OsMADS37-like

PeMADS26

PH01000222G1060

OsMADS34

216

6

PH01000222:703088–717,231(+ stand)

Type II

AGL2-like SEP

PeMADS28

PH01000222G1190

OsMADS15

192

6

PH01000222:177607–183,539(+ stand)

Type II

FUL2 AP1 SQUA-like

PeMADS29

PH01001278G0330

OsMADS3

229

6

PH01001278:214488–227,311(+ stand)

Type II

AG-like

PeMADS31

PH01021006G0010

OsMADS3

229

5

PH01021006:308–2511(+ stand)

Type II

AG-like

PeMADS32

PH01003236G0170

OsMADS29

251

4

PH01003236:150540–151,005(− stand)

Type II

GGM13-like

PeMADS33

PH01001174G0480

OsMADS5

228

5

PH01001174:303844–317,831(+ stand)

Type II

AGL2-like SEP

PeMADS34

PH01002152G0120

OsMADS56

221

6

PH01002152:73202–96,884(+ stand)

Type II

TM3-like

PeMADS35

PH01000107G0570

OsMADS56

152

4

PH01000107:455631–474,775(− stand)

Type II

TM3-like

PeMADS40

PH01001750G0200

OsMADS58

230

5

PH01001750:217480–232,134(+ stand)

Type II

AG-like

PeMADS41

PH01001188G0490

OsMADS15

259

7

PH01001188:311503–334,928(+ stand)

Type II

FUL2 AP1 SQUA-like

PeMADS43

PH01000077G1380

OsMADS55

224

6

PH01000077:896999–903,795(+ stand)

Type II

SVP-like

PeAP 3

N/A

OsMADS16

200

7

PH01001272:176122–180,192(+ stand)

Type II

AP3 GLO-like

PeAGL6

N/A

OsMADS6

240

4

PH01002217: 12110–41,791(+ stand)

Type II

AGL6-like

PeMα1

N/A

OsMADS73

97

0

PH01010177:5039–5332(+ stand)

Type I

Mα

PeMα2

N/A

OsMADS73

98

0

PH01000557:531750–532,199(− stand)

Type I

Mα

PeMα3

N/A

OsMADS78

212

0

PH01000604:455236–455,874(− stand)

Type I

Mα

PeMα4

PH01000954G0350

OsMADS72

377

1

PH01000954:196706–198,735(− stand)

Type I

Mα

PeMα5

N/A

OsMADS75

184

0

PH01002999: 94340–94,894(+ stand)

Type I

Mα

PeMα6

N/A

OsMADS73

87

0

PH01224566:45–309 (− stand)

Type I

Mα

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the bioinformatics strategy of the replenishment of PeMADS sequences

Table 2

The detail information about these 17 genes before and after bioinformatics corrections

Gene ID

Imcomplete Reason

Original Length (aa)

Corrected Length (aa)

PeMADS13

Lack of K-domain

124

257

PeMADS19

Lack of K-domain

132

183

PeMADS20

Lack of K-domain

79

244

PeMADS21

Lack of K-domain

152

258

PeMADS23

Lack of K-domain

105

215

PeMADS25

Lack of K-domain

86

205

PeMADS26

Prior 319 bp is APO-domain

160

216

PeMADS28

Lack of M-domain

235

192

PeMADS29

Lack of M-domain

200

229

PeMADS31

Lack of M-domain

152

229

PeMADS32

M-domain is truncated

179

251

PeMADS33

Prior 184 bp is incorrect

181

228

PeMADS34

Prior 100 bp is incorrect

202

221

PeMADS35

Lack of M-domain

309

152

PeMADS40

Lack of M-domain

273

230

PeMADS41

Lack of M-domain

173

259

PeMADS43

Lack of M-domain

165

224

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Subcellular localization analysis of PeMADS23 and PH01002755G0230. Constructs of PeMADS23-YFP and PH01002755G0230-YFP were transfected into Arabidopsis protoplasts. The fluorescence signal was detected with a laser scanning confocal microscope. YFP indicates fluorescence of YFP, and the red color shows the auto-fluorescence of chlorophyll. The length of the bar is 10 μm

Phylogenetic and conserved motif analyses of PeMADSs

A phylogenetic tree of both type-I and type-II MADS-box genes was constructed to determine the evolutionary relationships between P. edulis MADS-box genes and the known MADS-box genes of Arabidopsis and Oryza. The exhibited groupings of MADS genes in moso bamboo were similar to those of the established model plants and can be further divided into 16 clades (Fig. 3). PeMADSs, except for the AGL17, FLC-like, and Mβ- and Mγ subgroups, formed 11 subgroups. Most PeMADSs belong to the MIKCC type: two P. edulis orthologs each were present for the Arabidopsis GGM13and AGL12 clades; three were present for the AGL2(SEP) and OsMADS37 clades; four were present for the AG and Solanum tuberosum MADS11(SVP) clades; five were present for GLO (PI)-like, and six were present for Mα, TM3, and SQUA-like clades. Only one MIKC*-type gene, PeMADS4, has been identified in P. edulis. It has a longer I-domain, which appears to be the most prominent characteristic of the MIKC*-type proteins [49].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Phylogenetic analysis of MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis, Oryza and P. edulis. A total of 188 type II MADS-box amino acid sequences were used to construct the NJ tree. Bamboo MADS-box proteins are marked by green circles. The names of MADS-box genes from other species are based on previous studies: AGL: Arabidopsis; Os: Oryza; Pe: P. edulis

The motif distribution in PeMADS proteins was analyzed using the MEME program. The MEME software identified 20 conserved motifs in PeMADS, as well as their distribution (Fig. 4). The detected motifs were annotated using SMART protein analyzing software. Motifs 1 and 5 contain the typical MADS-box domain. Motifs 2 and 4 contain the second most conserved signature motif, the K-domain. Motifs 3, 6 and 18 contain the I-domain. C-terminals were the least conserved region of the MIKC proteins and had the most unknown motifs.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Distribution of conserved motifs in P. edulis MADS-box proteins identified by the MEME. Twenty putative conserved motifs were identified in bamboo MADS-box proteins by the MEME motif search tool. Different motifs are represented by different colors. The phylogenetic tree of all PeMADS members and the combined p-value from different groups are shown on the left side of the figure. Detailed information on each motif is presented in S4 Table

Long-terminal repeat–retrotransposon (LTR–RT) analysis in long introns of PeMADSs

The CDSs and corresponding genomic DNA sequences of the PeMADSs were used to identify the gene structures of the PeMADS genes, with four (PeMADS1, − 2, − 6, and − 7) having extraordinary long introns. In fact, those of PeMADS6 and − 7 are ~ 60 kb. We analyzed potential repeats in the PeMADS gene family using Repeat Masker online software [50] (Additional file 1: Table S3). The four above-mentioned MADS-box genes have a number of repeats in their intron areas. After analyzing these repetitive sequences, 140 transposable elements (TEs) were identified (Additional file 1: Table S4). LTR-RTs were the most abundant class, with 44 LTR/Gypsy and 26 LTR/Copia (26) superfamily members. In addition to LTR-RTs, DNA transposons, including DNA/hAT-Tag1, DNA/Merlin, and DNA/Harbinger, were found in these MADS-box genes.

cis-element analysis of MADS-box family gene promoters and intron sequences

Most of the well-characterized MADS-box genes contribute to the processes of plant growth and responses to hormones or environmental stimuli, such as photoperiod and temperature. Determining the promoter region features of PeMADSs will help us to understand the expression patterns of bamboo MADS-box genes. To identify cis-regulatory elements in PeMADS genes, we extracted the promoter and intron regions for each PeMADS gene from the P. edulis genome and analyzed them using the PlantCare server. We categorized all of the cis-elements into nine broad categories based on their responsiveness to environmental stimuli. Details of the cis-elements are found in Additional file 1: Table S6. In the pie chart (Fig. 5), the proportion of light-responsive elements is the greatest, followed by tissue-specific, plant hormone-responsive, abiotic stress-responsive, and core promoter elements. G-box, Sp1, and TCT-motifs were the most frequently identified light-responsive elements. We identified several hormone-responsive cis-elements, such as ABRE, CGTCA-motif, TGACG, and TCA-elements, and abiotic stress-responsive elements, such as ARE, AAGAA-motif, LTR, HSE, GC-motif and TC-rich repeats. Most genes contain the endosperm expression elements Skn-1 and GCN4-motif. Some contain the meristem tissue-specific elements CAT and CCGTCC-box. Furthermore, we found some protein-binding sites in PeMADS promoter regions. The most numerous binding sites are MBS, CArG, and CCAAT-box. Previous studies showed that MADS-box proteins regulate the expression of target genes by binding to CArG motifs in their promoter regions [51]. CArG-motifs are not specific to promoter regions, but can also occur in the intron area. For instance, the Arabidopsis AG gene has a CArG-motif in its 1st intron [52, 53]. In our study, CArG motifs existed many times throughout PeMADS promoters and introns (Additional file 1: Table S7). The presence of these core binding sites indicated that PeMADS proteins form either homodimers or heterodimers to bind to the CArG-box sequence and affect the floral transition. The presence of the plant AP2-like-binding element implies that the three genes PeMADS13, 24, and 43 can respond to endogenous floral developmental signals. This prediction is consistent with PeMADS13, 24, and 43 showing relatively greater expression levels in floral tissues than in leaf tissues.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Frequency of cis-regulatory elements in the 1.5 kb upstream regions of PeMADS. The pie chart depicts the categorized nine types of cis-regulatory elements, and the corresponding colored bar chart represents the occurrence of different cis-elements

Expression analysis of MADS-box genes during moso bamboo floral development

We investigated the spatial expression patterns of the MADS-box genes in bamboo leaf tissues and in the different stages of floral development. PeMADSs were widely expressed in almost all of the tested tissues. For instance, PeMADS2, − 3, − 6, − 13, and − 17 were expressed in both vegetative and reproductive samples (Additional file 3: Figure S2; Additional file 1: Table S8). The relative expression levels of PeMADS1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 24, 31, 34, 35, and 41 were from 1.5- to 10-fold greater than that of the bamboo housekeeping gene NTB [44]. However, the transcripts of five genes, PeMADS4, − 8, − 26, − 27, − 40, and PeMα2, could not be detected in any sample. The expression patterns of the PeMADSs are shown as a schematic in Fig. 6. Most of the MADS-box genes were more highly expressed in the floret than in leaf. The transcript levels of PeMADS3, 5, 16, 19, and 10 were from 2- to 5-fold greater in panicle than leaf, which indicated that these MADS-box genes play crucial roles both in floral transition and floral organ formation. The PeMADS2, − 7, − 8, − 23, − 34, and − 35 genes showed relatively lower expression levels in floral tissues than in leaf tissues, which suggested that these genes are involved in other processes of plant development.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Hierarchical clustering of MADS-box gene expression in bamboo floral and leaf tissues. Results of real-time qPCR were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method using the Bio-Rad CFX Manager software (version 2.3). To normalize the variance among different floral samples, NTB was used as the housekeeping control. The expression levels were further normalized to those of the leaf sample. Mean values and SDs were obtained from three biological and three technical replicates. Red represents the low expression, black shows moderate expression, and green signifies high expression

Bamboo inflorescence development can be divided into four stages, F1–F4, from first floral bud to anthesis. PeMADS14, − 15, − 19, − 21, − 24, − 28, and − 40 were mainly expressed at the F1 stage. PeMADS2, − 5, − 9, − 10, − 16, − 20, and − 29 were prominently expressed at the F2 and F3 stages. Then, the expression levels of PeMADS1, − 3, − 9, − 25, − 32, and − 33 were greater higher in the F4 stage. In general, bamboo MADS-box genes within subfamilies share relatively similar expression patterns. Based on the expression patterns (Fig. 6), MADS-box genes, such as SQUA-like (PeMADS13, − 14, and − 28) and OsMADS37-like genes (PeMADS19 and − 21) were found to be involved in floral meristem activity and were highly expressed at the F1 stage. The “ABCDE” model genes AGL2-like (PeMADS20 and − 33), GLO-like (PeMADS9, − 10, and − 16), and AG-like (PeMADS1, − 29, and − 31) were up-regulated during floral-organ development. Homologs of the SVP/StMADS11-like subfamily are hallmark meristematic genes, and PeMADS5, − 8, − 24, and − 43 displayed their greatest expression levels in F2, leaf, F1, and F4, respectively. The type-I genes PeMα1, − 3, − 4, and − 5 were highly expressed during the late developmental stages of the bamboo inflorescence. PeMADS5 was greatly expressed in the F2 stage, and its expression decreased with the development of the bamboo inflorescence, suggesting a role for this gene in spikelet initiation.

Overexpression of PeMADS5 in wild-type Arabidopsis plants causes an early flowering time and abnormal floral morphology

Genes from SVP/StMADS11-like subgroup are involved in panicle branching, flowering time determination, and floral meristem specification in Arabidopsis and Oryza. In this study, we found four SVP/StMADS11-like genes, PeMADS5, − 8, − 24, and − 43, in bamboo. Among them, PeMADS5 was expressed highly during inflorescence initiation. We selected this gene for the functional studies. We obtained 12 single-copy independent transgenic lines for PeMADS5. Flowering time was determined in the T3 generation under the long-day conditions, and 35S::PeMADS5 plants flowered significantly earlier than wild-type plants (Fig. 7a and b). Four of the transformed Arabidopsis T3 lines (35S::PeMADS5 #2, #4, #5, and #10) showed various degrees of phenotypic alterations in their reproductive organs compared with wild-type plants (Fig. 8 and Additional file 4: Figure S3). To confirm the overexpression of transgenes, PeMADS5 transcript levels were analyzed by RT-PCR in these four transgenic lines (Fig. 7c). Relative PeMADS5 expression levels in 35S::PeMADS5 #2 and #10 were greater than in other lines, and they also had ‘strong’ phenotypes as shown in Fig. 8e, f. Flowers of 35S::PeMADS5 #2 and #10 exhibited sepals that formed leaf-like structures and did not completely enclose the inner developing organs (Fig. 8f and j). Additionally, 35S: PeMADS5 #2 had five petals instead of four (Fig. 8g). Furthermore, sepals remained attached in fruit of both transgenic lines #2 and #10 (Fig. 8h and l), which was in contrast to wild-type Arabidopsis plants (Fig. 8d). In addition to the phenotypic analysis, the expression levels of some flowering-related genes, including those involved in flowering time and flower organ development, were also analyzed (Fig. 8m and n). In both rosette leaves and inflorescences, AGL24 and SOC1 transcripts were significantly upregulated in 35S::PeMADS5 #2 and #10 compared with wild-type, while AP1 was downregulated. The expression levels of FT and SEP3 in 35S::PeMADS5 were nearly 0.3- and 0.5-fold, respectively, those of the wild-type inflorescences, while they were expressed at slightly different levels in leaves. Thus, PeMADS5 may act as a floral activator in bamboo flowering.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Ectopic expression of PeMADS5 causes early flowering in Arabidopsis. a The flowering phenotype of PeMADS5 transgenic Arabidopsis plants under LD conditions. b Flowering time was measured under LD conditions. Error bars on each column indicate SD from three replicates. c PeMADS5 expression levels in col-0 and four 35S:: PeMADS5 transgenic lines by qRT-PCR, with the Actin2 gene as an internal control. The *means Significant difference at P ≤ 0.05 compared with the wild-type by Student’s test, and ** means the difference at P ≤ 0.01 with wild-type

Fig. 8
Fig. 8

Morphological analysis of 35S::PeMADS5 transgenic Arabidopsis. Light micrographs of Wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 (a–d) and 35S::PeMADS5 transgenic plants (#2: E to H; #10: I to L). a Wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 inflorescence. b Side view and (c) top view of a wild-type Arabidopsis Col-0 flower at anthesis. d A wild-type Arabidopsis matured fruit. e 35S::PeMADS5 #2 (i) 35S::PeMADS5 #10 inflorescences. f Side view and (g) top view of a 35S::PeMADS5 #2 flower at anthesis. Note the extra petal indicated with an arrow. j Side view and (k) top view of a 35S::PeMADS5 #10 flower at anthesis. Note the sepals with leaf-like characteristics and did not completely enclose the inner developing organs. Both 35S::PeMADS5 #2 (h) and #10 (l) matured fruits have attached petals denoted with arrows. Relative expression levels of different flowering time genes (SVP, AGL24, SOC1, FT, CO, AP1 and SEP3) in both leaves (m) and flowers (n) as determined by qRT-PCR, with the Actin 2 gene as an internal control. Error bars on each column indicated from three replicates. The * indicates Significant difference at P ≤ 0.05 compared with the wild-type by Student’s test, and ** means the difference at P ≤ 0.01 with wild-type

Interaction of PeMADS5 with other floral-related MADS-box proteins

In Arabidopsis, AGL24 interacts with SOC1 and FUL in the shoot apical meristem to promote flowering [54]. During floral organ formation, AGL24–AP1 dimers can also interact with the class B gene PISTILLATA (PI) and the class E gene SEPALLATA (SEP) [55, 56]. Therefore, we performed a yeast two-hybrid assay using the protein-coding regions of PeSOC1 (PeMADS34), PeAP1 (PeMADS2), PeSEP3 (PeMADS20), and PePI (PeMADS16) to obtain insights into the interaction patterns of the PeAGL24 (PeMADS5) protein in bamboo. The coding sequences of PeMADS2, − 5, − 16, − 20, and − 34 were fused to the binding and activating domains and their abilities to interact were determined (Fig. 9). PeMADS5 (AGL24) could interact independently with PeMADS34 (SOC1) and PeMADS2 (AP1), but not with PeMADS16 (PI) or PeMADS20 (SEP3).
Fig. 9
Fig. 9

Yeast two-hybrid assays of PeMADS5 and its interacting proteins. The PeMADS5, PeMADS2, PeMADS16, PeMADS20 and PeMADS34 genes were fused both in-frame to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (BD)-coding sequences and activation domain (AD)-coding sequences. Cell growth on -Leu-Trp dropout selective medium (-DDO) represents normal cells (upper panel) and -Leu-Trp-His-Ade dropout selective medium (-QDO) represents positive interactions (bottom panel). Pe refers to PeMADS

Discussion

A practical alternative way to obtain a complete gene sequence

Owing to the current assembly of the bamboo genome, some PeMADS sequences were incorrectly annotated and lack full-length CDSs. For instance, some MADS-box genes identified in the BambooGDS lack the characteristic M- or K-domain. In this study, we employed a transcriptome assembling and polishing method to achieve more accurate MADS-box sequences in bamboo. Briefly, we first used the truncated PeMADS sequences as query seeds to seek optimally aligned short reads. These reads extended both the 5′- and 3′-end regions until full-length CDSs with 5′ UTRs and 3′ UTRs were achieved. By cloning full-length genes and validating protein subcellular localizations, we demonstrated that this bioinformatics procedure reliably produced full-length MADS-box gene sequences.

MADS-box type-I subfamily members may be lost during Phyllostachys’ evolution

A total of 36 MIKC-type MADS-box genes in moso bamboo were identified in this study. This number is similar to that in Arabidopsis (39), Oryza (38), and other well-studied species (Table 3). Non-candidate genes belonging to the type-I MADS-box were found. Using Oryza and Brachypodium type-I genes sequences as query, only six Mα genes have been found. In gymnosperms, type-I MADS-box genes are underrepresented [57]. Only two type-I MADS-box genes are present in the most recent common ancestor of seed plants [58]. Although the number of type-I MADS-box genes appeared to have dwindled in some angiosperms, including wheat, poplar, and barley, we observed an extreme decrease in bamboo [46, 59, 60]. Brachypodium has the same number of type-II genes as bamboo but also has fewer members of the type-I subfamily (Table 3). Therefore, the common ancestor of bamboo and Brachypodium may have undergone a gene loss event after it initially diverged from Oryza 45–50 million years ago. Subsequently, we hypothesize that bamboo experienced a second gene loss event after speciation. The expansion and construction of orthologous clusters showed the greatest number, among the grass family members, in bamboo after species divergence [61]. Thus, gene families in bamboo are more divergent and polarized than in other grass species. Another hypothesis for the lack of type-I genes is based on numerous scaffolds not being obtained by the Phyllostachys whole-genome shotgun sequencing, resulting in the lack of assembled pseudochromosomes. Given the presence of small fragments in the assembly, the lack of type-I subfamily members may be a statistical riddle because of the imperfect genome sequence [61]. Conversely, orthologous type-I genes may exist in bamboo but were not identified because of the limited number of phylogenetically informative sites. In summary, bamboo may have a unique type-I subfamily evolutionary pattern but share a common type-II subfamily evolutionary pathway with other angiosperms.
Table 3

Total number of MADS-box genes within each group among nine species

 

Mα

Mβ

Mγ

I type

MIKCC

MIKC*

II type

Pseudogenes

Total

P. edulis

6

  

6

36

1

36

8

42

Arabidopsis

25

20

16

61

39

8

45

 

107

Oryza

13

9

10

32

40

3

43

 

75

Maize

27

3

2

32

39

4

43

 

75

Sorghum

26

2

2

30

33

2

35

 

65

Physcomitrella patens

2

2

3 (unclassified)

7

6

11

17

2 (1 Mβ; 1 MIKC*)

26

Brachypodium

9

7

2

18

32

7

39

 

57

Poplar

23

12

6

41

55

2

 

7 (Mδ)

105

Soybean

37

14

24

75

81

7

88

 

163

Presence of long introns and the insertion of LTR-RT elements in the Phyllostachys MADS-box family

A notable characteristic of the structure of bamboo MADS-box genes is the presence of long introns. This is similar to findings in the repeat-rich genomes of Vitis vinifera, Zea mays, and Norway spruce [62–64]. An analysis of sequences containing long introns revealed that they all contain numerous repeats, suggesting that intron expansion in bamboo was promoted by repeat insertion. By contrast, exon size and the number of MADS-box genes were consistent with those of other well-studied species. Long introns did not influence expression levels (Fig. 6). TEs are the most abundant DNA components in higher eukaryotes [65], and is approximately 59% of the bamboo genome consists of TEs [61]. In the full-length genome sequences of PeMADS1, − 2, − 6, and − 7, 140 TEs were found. Most of the repeats could be assigned to known TE repeat families (Additional file 1: Table S5). LTR-RTs were the most abundant fraction of TEs, with the Gypsy-type LTR superfamily members being more abundant than Copia-type LTR superfamily members. This was consistent with the genome-wide analysis of LTR-retroelements in P. edulis [66]. These TEs are prone to insertion and/or maintenance in the intronic regions of MADS-box genes. Thus, PeMADSs, with their abundant repetitive sequences, may be hotspots for TE insertion. Large-genome species, such as maize, barley, and wheat, contain a large number of LTR-RT element that, which have been amplified within the last few million years [67, 68]. Therefore, we hypothesized that the accumulation of LTR-RTs in bamboo gene families may be a main factor that led to the increased genome size without polyploidization, like that identified in Oryza australiensis.

Expression analysis of Phyllostachys MADS-box genes and their orthologs during inflorescence development

To gain insight into bamboo MADS-box gene expression patterns, we carried out a qPCR expression study using different floral tissues. The study revealed that critical regulatory genes for spikelet meristem development might be conserved between Phyllostachys and Oryza. For example, genes from the AG-like subfamily are essential for reproductive structure morphogenesis [69–71]. As shown in Fig. 6, bamboo AG-like genes PeMADS1, − 29, and − 31 are primarily expressed in the later stages of floral development, whereas their Oryza orthologs OsMADS3 and − 58 have relatively greater expression levels in reproductive tissues [18]. Several SQUA-like genes are proposed to be vital regulators in inflorescences or floral meristems and are involved in organ identity [72]. In the present study, Phyllostachys SQUA-like genes PeMADS2, − 3, − 13, and − 41 were significantly expressed at all stages of inflorescence development, with expression patterns parallel to those of their putative Oryza orthologs OsMADS14, − 15, and − 18, respectively [18]. Nevertheless, modifications in orthologous gene expression patterns may be necessary owing to neofunctionalization and subfunctionalization. OsMADS34, a member of the SEP subgroup, was a key regulator of rice inflorescence and spikelet architecture. In rice, OsMADS34 expression was detected in the floral meristem, and the osmads34 mutants develop altered inflorescence morphology [73]. Additionally, PeMADS26, the OsMADS34 homolog in bamboo, was highly expressed in leaves but not florets. Similarly, PeMADS6 and − 34 from the TM3-like subgroup were predominantly expressed in the bamboo leaf but not in the spikelet meristems. In Oryza, MADS56 showed a high transcript accumulation level at all stages, especially in panicle materials [18]. We surmised that the differences in inflorescence structures might be the result of expression pattern changes in the conserved genes of the grass family.

PeMADS5 may interact with PeMADS34 and PeMADS2 to control flowering time and floral organ development

PeMADS5 belongs to the StMADS11/SVP clade of the MADS-box gene family, which has two diversified functional members in Arabidopsis: SVP and AGL24 [74]. In Arabidopsis, AGL24 acts as an integrator of multiple flowering signals and function together with SOC1 to regulate the floral transition and inflorescence meristem identity [75, 76] SVP controls flowering time by negatively regulating the expression of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) by directly binding to the CArG motifs in the FT sequence [77]. The overexpression of AGL24 in Arabidopsis results in early flowering and floral abnormalities, such as leaf-like sepals, or the transformation of floral meristems into inflorescence meristems [75, 76, 78]. In contrast, the overexpression of SVP results in late flowering and the loss of carpels, as well as the conversion of flowers into shoot-like structures [78]. The ectopic overexpression of PeMADS5 in Arabidopsis triggered an earlier flowering time in all of the transgenic lines, and 4 out of the 15 lines developed aberrant flower phenotypes (Fig. 8). The expression level of PeMADS5 was greater in transgenic lines with an obvious mutant phenotype, and proportionately lower in lines with less obvious mutant phenotypes (Fig. 7c). The phylogenetic analysis of PeMADS5 revealed that it had a closer relationship to OsMADS22 and OsMADS55 (Fig. 3). The constitutive expression of OsMADS22 and OsMADS55 leads to floral reversion phenotypes, including leaf-like sepals, which is similar to the PeMADS5-overexpression phenotype, but OsMADS55 acts as a floral repressor by suppressing the expression levels of Hd3a and SOC1 [79]. In Arabidopsis, the identity of each floral organ has been determined by a specific combination of floral homeotic genes constituting the ABCDE model, in which the class E SEP3 and class A AP1 genes have critical roles [80–82]. Thus, the relatively low expression levels of SEP3 and AP1 (Fig. 8m and n) may affect normal floral development, leading to the abnormal floral phenotypes of the 35S::PeMADS5 plants. The ectopic expression of class C (AG subfamily) in Arabidopsis results in the conversion of petals to stamens and of sepals to carpels, as observed in 35S:AG lines, and this is similar to the 35S:PeMADS5 phenotypes [83]. AP1–SVP and AP1–AGL24 dimers can bind CArG boxes in the second AG intron and affect the formation of floral organs [53]. It is likely that multiple mechanisms act on PeMADS5 through class C, D and E genes. Furthermore, the yeast two-hybrid assay showed that the PeMADS5 protein interacts with PeMADS2 (PeAP1) and PeMADS34 (PeSOC1) proteins. This suggests that the interaction domains of the AGL24, SOC1, and AP1 proteins are conserved between Arabidopsis and bamboo. In conclusion, we found that PeMADS5 is functionally similar to AGL24, that it may interact with PeSOC1 as an integrator of flowering inducers, and that it associates with PeAP1 to regulate flower development.

Conclusion

The recent release of the P. edulis genome sequence enabled us to identify and comprehensively analyze its MADS-box family. We identified 42 full-length bamboo MADS-box genes, 6 that were type I and 36 that were type II. Consequently, we hypothesized a low formation rate and high destruction rate for type-I genes in Phyllostachys. The MADS-box genes and proteins of moso bamboo were classified and their evolutionary relationships with those of other eudicots were evaluated using phylogenetic and structural analyses. A survey of the expression levels of bamboo MADS-box genes in floral and leaf tissues revealed that some MADS-box genes are involved in inflorescence development. Most Phyllostachys MADS-box genes appeared to have similar expression patterns to those of their orthologous genes. MADS-box genes with specific expression patterns may play particular functions in bamboo floral development and can be considered candidate genes for cloning and further functional analyses. In addition, the overexpression of PeMADS5, a candidate gene from the StMADS11 clade, in Arabidopsis caused early flowering and abnormal floral organ development. Therefore, further studies are required to understand how PeMADS5 is regulated and whether and how it regulates other genes to control flower development in Phyllostachys.

Abbreviations

AG: 

AGAMOUS

AGL: 

AGAMOUS LIKE

AP: 

APETALA

cDNA: 

Complementary DNA

CFO1: 

Chimeric Floral Organs

DEF: 

DEFICIENS

FLC: 

Flowering Locus C

FUL: 

FRUITFULL

GLO: 

GLOBOSA

HMM: 

Hidden Markov Model

LTR-RTs: 

Long Terminal Repeat-Retrotransposons

MEF2: 

Myocyte Enhancer Factor 2

NCBI: 

National Center for Biotechnology Information

NJ: 

Neighbor-joining

NTB: 

Nucleotide Tract-Binding Protein

PCR: 

Polymerase chain reaction

qPCR: 

Quantitative Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction

SEP: 

SEPALLATA

SHP: 

SHATTERPROOF

SOC: 

Suppressor of Overexpression of CONSTANS

SQUA: 

SQUAMOSA

SRF: 

Serum Response Factor

SVP: 

Short Vegetative Phase

TEs: 

Transposable Elements

TF: 

Transcription factor

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Lesley Benyon, PhD, from Liwen Bianji, Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac), for the modification of article language.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31270715, 31000295), the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (No. 2012CB723008), Zhejiang Provincial Specialized Research Fund for Bamboo Breeding (No. 2012C12908–2), Top Key Discipline of Forestry of Zhejiang Province [KF201304] and Innovation Program for Graduate Student of Top key Discipline of Forestry.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant supplementary data is provided within this manuscript as Supplementary files. Genomic sequences and gene annotation information of moso bamboo presented in this report are available in the bamboo genome database (BambooGDB, http://202.127.18.221/bamboo/index.php). The P. edulis transcriptome reads were downloaded from the NCBI SRA database (Accession: SRR4450542, SRR4450543, SRR4450544, SRR4450545, SRR4450546, SRR4450547, SRR4450548, SRR4450549, SRR4450550, SRR4450551) The full-length sequences of the MADS-box gene family of A. thaliana and O. sativa are available in the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp) and Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/home_contacts.shtml), respectively [8, 18, 33].

Authors’ contributions

ZT, MD, and YZ designed the experiments. MD and YZ performed most of the experiments. DT and XL made substantial contributions to the materials collection and data analysis. YZ wrote the manuscript. MD revised and edited the manuscript. ZT and MD gave the final approval of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the paper.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an, Zhejiang, China
(2)
The Key Laboratory for Quality Improvement of Agricultural Products of Zhejiang Province, College of Agriculture and Food Science, Zhejiang A & F University, Lin’an, Zhejiang, China

References

  1. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Liljegren SJ, Pelaz S, Gold SE, Burgeff C, Ditta GS, Vergara-Silva F, Yanofsky MF. MADS-box gene evolution beyond flowers: expression in pollen, endosperm, guard cells, roots and trichomes. Plant J. 2000;24(4):457–66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhang H, Forde BG. An Arabidopsis MADS box gene that controls nutrient-induced changes in root architecture. Science. 1998;279(5349):407–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Pelaz S, Liljegren SJ, Gold SE, Burgeff C, Ditta GS, De Pouplana LR, Martínez-Castilla L, Yanofsky MF. An ancestral MADS-box gene duplication occurred before the divergence of plants and animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2000;97(10):5328–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ng M, Yanofsky MF. Function and evolution of the plant MADS-box gene family. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2(3):186–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaufmann K, Melzer R, Theissen G. MIKC-type MADS-domain proteins: structural modularity, protein interactions and network evolution in land plants. Gene. 2005;347(2):183–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yang Y, Jack T. Defining subdomains of the K domain important for protein-protein interactions of plant MADS proteins. Plant Molecular Biology. 2004;55(1):45–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Nam J, Kim J, Lee S, An G, Ma H, Nei M. Type I MADS-box genes have experienced faster birth-and-death evolution than type II MADS-box genes in angiosperms. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(7):1910–1915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Parenicová L, de Folter S, Kieffer M, Horner DS, Favalli C, Busscher J, Cook HE, Ingram RM, Kater MM, Davies B. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis new openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell. 2003;15(7):1538–51.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanda SL, Amasino RM. Interaction ofFLC and late-flowering mutations inArabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet MGG. 1996;251(1):69–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartmann U, Höhmann S, Nettesheim K, Wisman E, Saedler H, Huijser P. Molecular cloning of SVP: a negative regulator of the floral transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2000;21(4):351–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Moon J, Suh SS, Lee H, Choi KR, Hong CB, Paek NC, Kim SG, Lee I. The SOC1 MADS-box gene integrates vernalization and gibberellin signals for flowering in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003;35(5):613–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992;360(6401):273–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gu Q, Ferrándiz C, Yanofsky MF, Martienssen R. The FRUITFULL MADS-box gene mediates cell differentiation during Arabidopsis fruit development. Development. 1998;125(8):1509–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Liljegren SJ, Ditta GS, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman JL, Yanofsky MF. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2000;404(6779):766–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma H. The ABCs of floral evolution. Cell. 2000;101(1):5–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Riechmann JL, Meyerowitz EM. MADS domain proteins in plant development. Biological Chemistry. 1997;378(10):1079–1101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nesi N, Debeaujon I, Jond C, Stewart AJ, Jenkins GI, Caboche M, Lepiniec L. The TRANSPARENT TESTA16 locus encodes the ARABIDOPSIS BSISTER MADS domain protein and is required for proper development and pigmentation of the seed coat. Plant Cell. 2002;14(10):2463–79.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Arora R, Agarwal P, Ray S, Singh AK, Singh VP, Tyagi AK, Kapoor S. MADS-box gene family in rice: genome-wide identification, organization and expression profiling during reproductive development and stress. BMC Genomics. 2007;8(1):242.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Theissen G, Becker A, Di RA, Kanno A, Kim JT, Münster T, Winter KU, Saedler H. A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Molecular Biology. 2000;42(1):115–149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature. 1990;346(6279):35–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Weigel D, Meyerowitz EM. The ABCs of floral homeotic genes. Cell. 1994;78(2):203–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Masiero S, Colombo L, Grini PE, Schnittger A, Kater MM. The emerging importance of type I MADS box transcription factors for plant reproduction. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):865–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Clark LG, Londoño X, Ruiz-Sanchez E. Bamboo Taxonomy and Habitat. Springer International Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
  24. Yuan JL, Yue JJ, Gu XP, Lin CS. Flowering of Woody bamboo in tissue culture systems. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1589.Google Scholar
  25. Isagi Y, Shimada K, Kushima H, Tanaka N, Nagao A, Ishikawa T, Onodera H, Watanabe S. Clonal structure and flowering traits of a bamboo [Phyllostachys pubescens (mazel) Ohwi] stand grown from a simultaneous flowering as revealed by AFLP analysis. Mol Ecol. 2004;13(7):2017–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wong KM. Flowering, fruiting and germination of the bamboo Schizostachyum zollingeri in Perlis. Malays Forester. 1981;44(4):453–63.Google Scholar
  27. Campbell J. Bamboo flowering patterns:a global view with special reference to East Asia. J Am Bamboo Soc. 1985;6:17–35.Google Scholar
  28. Troup RS, Troup RS. The silviculture of Indian trees. Published under the authority of his Majesty’s secretary of state for India in council. Cesk Pediatr. 1921;12(1):1–12.Google Scholar
  29. Keeley JE, Bond WJ. Mast flowering and Semelparity in bamboos: the bamboo fire cycle hypothesis. Am Nat. 1999;154(3):383.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin EP, Peng HZ, Jin QY, Deng MJ, Li T, Xiao XC, Hua XQ, Wang KH, Bian HW, Han N. Identification and characterization of two bamboo ( Phyllostachys praecox ) AP1 / SQUA- like MADS-box genes during floral transition. Planta. 2009;231(1):109–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shih MC, Chou ML, Yue JJ, Hsu CT, Chang WJ, Ko SS, Liao DC, Huang YT, Chen JJ, Yuan JL. BeMADS1 is a key to delivery MADSs into nucleus in reproductive tissues- De novo characterization of Bambusa edulis transcriptome and study of MADS genes in bamboo floral development. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14(1):179.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gao J, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Qi F, Li X, Mu S, Peng Z. Characterization of the floral transcriptome of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) at different flowering developmental stages by transcriptome sequencing and RNA-Seq analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98910.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Wei B, Zhang R-Z, Guo J-J, Liu D-M, Li A-L, Fan R-C, Mao L, Zhang X-Q. Genome-wide analysis of the MADS-box gene family in Brachypodium distachyon. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e84781.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Solovyev V, Kosarev P, Seledsov I, Vorobyev D. Automatic annotation of eukaryotic genes, pseudogenes and promoters. Genome Biol. 2006;7(Suppl 1):1–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA, Amit I, Adiconis X, Fan L, Raychowdhury R, Zeng Q. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29(7):644–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Milne I, Stephen G, Bayer M, Cock PJ, Pritchard L, Cardle L, Shaw PD, Marshall D. Using tablet for visual exploration of second-generation sequencing data. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14(2):193–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheen J. Signal transduction in maize and Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 2001;127(4):1466.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(2):511–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(D1):D257–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, Ren J, Li WW, Noble WS. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(suppl_2):W202–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schultz J, Milpetz F, Bork P, Ponting CP. SMART, a simple modular architecture research tool: identification of signaling domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95(11):5857–64.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Letunic I, Doerks T, Bork P. SMART 7: recent updates to the protein domain annotation resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(Database issue):302–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, Rouzé P, Rombauts S. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Fan C, Ma J, Guo Q, Li X, Wang H, Lu M. Selection of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis). PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhao H, Lou Y, Sun H, Li L, Wang L, Dong L, Gao Z. Transcriptome and comparative gene expression analysis of Phyllostachys edulisin response to high light. BMC Plant Biology. 2016;16(1):34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhao T, Ni Z, Dai Y, Yao Y, Nie X, Sun Q. Characterization and expression of 42 MADS-box genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Gen Genomics. 2006;276(4):334–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Chen S, Songkumarn P, Liu J, Wang GL. A versatile zero background T-vector system for gene cloning and functional genomics. Plant Physiol. 2009;150(3):1111–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 1998;16(6):735–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Henschel K, Kofuji R, Hasebe M, Saedler H, Münster T, Theißen G. Two ancient classes of MIKC-type MADS-box genes are present in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19(6):801–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(2):573.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Folter SD, Angenent GC. Trans meets cis in MADS science. Trends Plant Sci. 2006;11(5):224–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Khan MR, Hu J, Ali GM. Reciprocal loss of CArG-boxes and auxin response elements drives expression divergence of MPF2-like MADS-box genes controlling Calyx inflation. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42781.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Gregis V, Sessa A, Dorca-Fornell C, Kater MM. The Arabidopsis floral meristem identity genes AP1, AGL24 and SVP directly repress class B and C floral homeotic genes. Plant J. 2010;60(4):626–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Torti S, Fornara F. AGL24 acts in concert with SOC1 and FUL during Arabidopsis floral transition. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(10):1251–4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Gregis V, Sessa A, Colombo L, Kater MM. AGL24, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, and APETALA1 Rebundantly control AGAMOUS during early stages of flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18(6):1373.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. V G AS, D-F C, MM K. The Arabidopsis floral meristem identity genes AP1, AGL24 and SVP directly repress class B and C floral homeotic genes. Plant J. 2009;60(4):626–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Gramzow L, Weilandt L, Theißen G. MADS goes genomic in conifers: towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants. Ann Bot. 2014;114(7):1407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Gramzow L, Ritz MS, Theißen G. On the origin of MADS-domain transcription factors. Trends Genet. 2010;26(4):149–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Leseberg CH, Li A, Kang H, Duvall M, Mao L. Genome-wide analysis of the MADS-box gene family in Populus trichocarpa. Gene. 2006;378:84–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Kapazoglou A, Engineer C, Drosou V, Kalloniati C, Tani E, Tsaballa A, Kouri ED, Ganopoulos I, Flemetakis E, Tsaftaris AS. The study of two barley type I-like MADS-box genes as potential targets of epigenetic regulation during seed development. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12(1):166.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Peng Z, Lu Y, Li L, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Gao Z, Lu H, Hu T, Yao N, Liu K. The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Nat Genet. 2013;45(4):456–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Messing J, Bharti AK, Karlowski WM, Gundlach H, Kim HR, Yu Y, Wei F, Fuks G, Soderlund CA, Mayer KF. Sequence composition and genome organization of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(40):14349–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Jaillon O, Aury J-M, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007;449(7161):463–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin Y-C, Scofield DG, Vezzi F, Delhomme N, Giacomello S, Alexeyenko A. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature. 2013;497(7451):579–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Finnegan DJ. Eukaryotic transposable elements and genome evolution. Trends Genet. 1989;5:103–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhou M, Hu B, Zhu Y. Genome-wide characterization and evolution analysis of long terminal repeat retroelements in moso bamboo ( Phyllostachys edulis ). Tree Genet Genomes. 2017;13(2):43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Ma J, SanMiguel P, Lai J, Messing J, Bennetzen JL. DNA rearrangement in orthologous orp regions of the maize, rice and sorghum genomes. Genetics. 2005;170(3):1209–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. SanMiguel P, Tikhonov A, Jin Y-K, Motchoulskaia N, Zakharov D, Melake-Berhan A, Springer PS, Edwards KJ, Lee M, Avramova Z. Nested retrotransposons in the intergenic regions of the maize genome. Science. 1996;274(5288):765–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Bowman JL, Drews GN, Meyerowitz EM. Expression of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS is restricted to specific cell types late in flower development. Plant Cell. 1991;3(8):749–58.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Mizukami Y, Ma H. Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell. 1992;71(1):119–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Theißen G, Saedler H. Plant biology: floral quartets. Nature. 2001;409(6819):469–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Theißen G, Kim JT, Saedler H. Classification and phylogeny of the MADS-box multigene family suggest defined roles of MADS-box gene subfamilies in the morphological evolution of eukaryotes. J Mol Evol. 1996;43(5):484–516.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Gao XC, Liang WQ, Yin CS, Ji SM, Wang HM, Xiao S, Guo CC, Kong HZ, Xue HW, Zhang DB. The SEPALLATA-like gene OsMADS34 is required for rice inflorescence and spikelet development. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):728–40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Liu C, Xi W, Shen L, Tan C, Yu H. Regulation of floral patterning by flowering time genes. Dev Cell. 2009;16(5):711–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Yu H, Xu Y, Tan EL, Kumar PP. AGAMOUS-LIKE 24, a dosage-dependent mediator of the flowering signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(25):16336–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Liu C, Chen H, Er HL, Soo HM, Kumar PP, Han JH, Liou YC, Yu H. Direct interaction of AGL24 and SOC1 integrates flowering signals in Arabidopsis. Development. 2008;135(8):1481.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Lee JH, Yoo SJ, Park SH, Hwang I, Lee JS, Ahn JH. Role of SVP in the control of flowering time by ambient temperature in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2007;21(4):397.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Liu C, Zhou J, Brachadrori K, Yalovsky S, Ito T, Yu H. Specification of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity byrepression of flowering time genes. Development. 2007;134(10):1901.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Lee JH, Park SH, Ji HA. Functional conservation and diversification between rice OsMADS22/OsMADS55 and Arabidopsis SVP proteins. Plant Sci. 2012;185-186:97–104.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Pelaz S, Ditta GS, Baumann E, Wisman E, Yanofsky MF. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature. 2000;405(6783):200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Peña L, Martíntrillo M, Juárez J, Pina JA, Navarro L, Martínezzapater JM. Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY or APETALA1 genes in citrus reduces their generation time. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(3):263–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Goto K. Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature. 2001;409(6819):525.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Kramer EM, Jaramillo MA, Di SV. Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004;166(2):1011–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us