Open Access

Variation in tissue Na+ content and the activity of SOS1 genes among two species and two related genera of Chrysanthemum

  • Jiaojiao Gao1,
  • Jing Sun1,
  • Peipei Cao1,
  • Liping Ren1,
  • Chen Liu1,
  • Sumei Chen1,
  • Fadi Chen1 and
  • Jiafu Jiang1Email author
BMC Plant BiologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:98

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0781-9

Received: 1 September 2015

Accepted: 13 April 2016

Published: 21 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Chrysanthemum, a leading ornamental species, does not tolerate salinity stress, although some of its related species do. The current level of understanding regarding the mechanisms underlying salinity tolerance in this botanical group is still limited.

Results

A comparison of the physiological responses to salinity stress was made between Chrysanthemum morifolium ‘Jinba’ and its more tolerant relatives Crossostephium chinense, Artemisia japonica and Chrysanthemum crassum. The stress induced a higher accumulation of Na+ and more reduction of K+ in C. morifolium than in C. chinense, C. crassum and A. japonica, which also showed higher K+/Na+ ratio. Homologs of an Na+/H+ antiporter (SOS1) were isolated from each species. The gene carried by the tolerant plants were more strongly induced by salt stress than those carried by the non-tolerant ones. When expressed heterologously, they also conferred a greater degree of tolerance to a yeast mutant lacking Na+-pumping ATPase and plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter activity. The data suggested that the products of AjSOS1, CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 functioned more effectively as Na + excluders than those of CmSOS1. Over expression of four SOS1s improves the salinity tolerance of transgenic plants and the overexpressing plants of SOS1s from salt tolerant plants were more tolerant than that from salt sensitive plants. In addition, the importance of certain AjSOS1 residues for effective ion transport activity and salinity tolerance was established by site-directed mutagenesis and heterologous expression in yeast.

Conclusions

AjSOS1, CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 have potential as transgenes for enhancing salinity tolerance. Some of the mutations identified here may offer opportunities to better understand the mechanistic basis of salinity tolerance in the chrysanthemum complex.

Keywords

Chrysanthemum morifolium Compositae SOS1 Functional characterization Complementation assay

Background

Soil salinity is becoming a severe environmental stress all over the world. Currently, over 800 million hectares of the world’s arable land are adversely affected by salinity [1]. The major toxic cation present in saline soils is Na+, so under saline conditions, plants must minimize their cytosolic Na+ concentration to withstand the stress [2]. Three strategies have evolved to avoid the build-up of Na+ in the plant shoot: the first restricts the movement of the ion from the soil into the root, the second sequesters Na+ in the vacuole, and the third actively pumps Na+ out of the cytoplasm into the soil [1, 35]. Various ion transporters are involved in these processes, but a particularly prominent class is represented by the Na+/H+ antiporters. So far, two types of Na+/H+ antiporter NHE/NHX1 and NHA/SOS1 have been well characterized [2, 6].

AtSOS1 is the first plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene cloned from higher plant, primarily expression of AtSOS1 in epidermal cells at the root tip and in parenchyma at the xylem-symplast boundary of roots, stems and leaves, implying a role of this transporter in extruding Na+ to the growth medium and controlling long-distance Na+ transport in plants. Furthmore, under moderate salinity, sos1 mutant accumulated less Na+ in its shoots than WT (wild-type) plants, also indicating that SOS1 participates in loading of Na+ into the xylem [7, 8]. Recently, several similar studies indicated this critical function in tomato [9] and in Thellungiella salsuginea [10]. SOS1 might also be involved in K+ nutrition in plants and under salt stress it is more vital for the plant to keep a high K+/Na+ ratio [6]. The sos1 mutant showed significantly reduced high affinity K+ uptake and K+ content [11, 12], while higher K+ efflux from sos1 root than that in WT plants [13]. Qi and Spalding (2004) demonstrated that SOS1 was required for protecting K+ uptake through AKT1 and compromised K+ nutrition during salt stress [14]. In addition, ZxSOS1 controls long distance transport and spatial distribution of Na+ and K+ and maintains Na+, K+ homeostasis in the xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum [15]. Together, SOS1 is essential for plant to cope with salt stress by maintaining ions homeostasis and controlling long-distance Na+ transport via the xylem [16, 17].

The recognition of AtSOS1 has facilitated the isolation of homologs from a growing number of plant species. Some of these have been tested by their heterologous expression in either yeast or bacterial hosts which lack their own Na+ transport system [9, 1826]. Loss-of-function mutants of AtSOS1 is salinity hypersensitive [12], while constitutive expression of SOS1 in both A. thaliana itself as well as in other plant species, including chrysanthemum, improves the level of salinity tolerance [18, 20, 2731].

The leading ornamental species chrysanthemum does not readily tolerate salinity stress, although some of its many related species do. The current level of understanding the mechanisms of salinity tolerance in this botanical group is still limited [32]. Here, the morphological effects of salinity stress, along with the extent of Na+ and K+ accumulation in chrysanthemum and its three more tolerant related species (C. chinense, A. japonica and C. crassum) have been explored. The SOS1 homologs present in each of the four species has been isolated and their contribution to salinity tolerance assessed by heterologously expressing them in a yeast mutant ANT3, and in transgenic chrysanthemum and A. thaliana. Furthermore, some important amino acid polymorphism for effective ion transport activity and salinity tolerance was also identified by mutagenesis.

Results

Variation for salinity tolerance in the chrysanthemum complex

Most of the leaves of C. morifolium plants became wilted and chlorotic following a ten day exposure to the salinity stress, and their lower leaves were largely necrotic C. crassum plants were less severely affected by the treatment, while there was no evidence of any damage to either C. chinense or A. japonica plants, the leaves of which stayed green, with the plants maintaining a near-normal level of growth for up to 14 days (Fig. 1). Under the non-stressed growing conditions, there was no variation in tissue Na+ concent between the four test species. However, when the plants were exposed to salinity, the tissue Na+ content throughout the plant was increased in all four species. The mean increase was notably lower for C. chinense and A. japonica: in these two species, the Na+ content in the roots (compared to the levels in non-stressed plants) rose by only 142.0 % and 156.0 % respectively, while for C. crassum and C. morifolium plants, the increase was 300.0 % and 324.0 % (Fig. 2a). The leaves behaved similarly, with the Na+ content rising more markedly in C. morifolium than in others. The Na+ content in the leaves of C. morifolium was 125.0 %, 169.0 % and 189.0 % that present in C. crassum, C. chinense and A. japonica plants exposed to the NaCl stress respectively (Fig. 2c). Moreover, the Na+ content in the stems behaved in a consistent way, it was highest in C. morifolium, moderate in C. crassum and low in both A. japonica and C. chinense (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 1

The phenotypic response of chrysanthemum and its three close relatives to a ten day exposure to 200 mM NaCl. a-h Side view; i-p Vertical view from above; a-d and i-l Plants grown in the absence of stress; e-h and m-p plants exposed to NaCl. a, e, i, m C. chinense, b, f, j, n A. japonica, c, g, k, o C. crassum, d, h, l, p C. morifolium. Bar = 1.0 cm

Fig. 2

Variation in tissue Na+、K+ content and K+/Na+ ratio in the four test species in response to salinity stress. a Na+ content in the root, b Na+ content in the stem, c Na+ content in the leaf, d K+ content in the root, e K+ content in the stem, f K+ content in the leaf, g K+/Na+ ratio in the root, h K+/Na+ ratio in the stem, i K+/Na+ ratio in the leaf. *,**: means differ significant from levels in the control treatment (P < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively)

K+ concent in the roots of C. chinense, A. japonica and C. crassum plants show nearly unchanged between control and salt stress except that of C. morifolium plants, whose K+ contents were significantly decreased (Fig. 2d). K+ level in both A. japonica and C. chinense stems was also unchanged, on the contrary, K+ content in the stems of C. crassum and C. morifolium was distinctly reduced by 23.2 % and 43.6 %, respectively (Fig. 2e). While K+ content in the leaves of all the plants tended to decrease, the reduction was far more significant in C. morifolium, i.e., 54.71 % (Fig. 2f). Relative to normal condition, salinity appreciably decreased the K+/Na+ ratio throughout the plants. C. chinense and A. japonica exhibited the highest K+/Na+ ratio of 5.7 and 5.6, respectively. In comparison, C. morifolium showed a minimum value in this ratio (1.8), while C. crassum showed an intermediate ratio of 3.1 (Fig. 2g-i). Overall, K+/Na+ ratio of the salt-sensitive plants was much lower than that of the salt-tolerant plants, indicating that salt-tolerant plants excluded Na+ and imported K+ more effectively than salt-sensitive plants did.

Sequence analysis of the SOS1 homologs

A summary description of the AjSOS1, CrcSOS1, CcSOS1 and CmSOS1 sequences is given in Additional file 1: Table S2. The ORF (open reading frames) sequence of the derived CcSOS1 fully matched that given in [23], but the UTR sequence differed slightly. All four SOS1 sequences were predicted to encode a Na+/H+ antiporter. Both AjSOS1 and CrcSOS1 harbored a 1147aa ORF, whereas the CcSOS1 and CmSOS1 products were two residues shorter. The secondary structure of the four SOS1 proteins featured 12 transmembrane domains in their N terminal region according to TMPRED and included a long hydrophilic cytoplasmic tail in their C terminal segment (Fig. 3). The levels of peptide identity between AjSOS1 and the other three proteins were 98.5 % (CrcSOS1), 97.0 % (CcSOS1) and 97.4 % (CmSOS1); those between CrcSOS1 and the other two proteins were 97.1 % (CcSOS1) and 97.3 % (CmSOS1); and that between CcSOS1 and CmSOS1 was 99.5 %. Comparisons with other plant SOS1s revealed a high degree of sequence conservation: for example the level of amino acid sequence identity between four cloned SOS1s and A. thaliana AtSOS1 was 90.3 %, with the tomato SlSOS1 91.8 %, with rice OsSOS1 90.1 % and with Helianthus tuberosus HtSOS1 94.7 %. A phylogenetic analysis between four SOS1s and other palnt SOS1 transports [7, 9, 15, 18, 19, 21, 2427, 29, 3346] showed that AjSOS1 and CrcSOS1 were closely relatives, as were CcSOS1 and CmSOS1, while the nearest relatives of the four SOS1s as a group were HtSOS1 and SlSOS1 (Fig. 4). The presence of three conserved domains is required for the activity and regulation of the SOS1 protein: these are Nhap (an Na+/H+ exchanger domain spanning the transmembrane region), InhiBD (an auto-inhibitory domain) and S2P (a phosphorylation motif recognized by SOS2) [19, 47], and all three were present in the four SOS1s analysed here (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Multiple amino acid sequence alignment between four SOS1s. The 12 putative transmembrane domains are underlined and numbered 1 through 12. Residues conserved in at least two proteins are highlighted in white and blue. The black asterisks indicate conserved residues which were replaced in the site-directed mutagenesis experiment (see Additional file 2: Figure S4). Nhap, an Na+/H+ exchanger domain spanning the transmembrane region; InhiBD, an auto-inhibitory domain; S2P, SOS2 phosphorylation motif

Fig. 4

Phylogeny of the SOS1 proteins. Artemisia japonic AjSOS (KP896475), Crossostephium chinense CrcSOS1 (KP896476), Chrysanthemum crissum CcSOS1 (AB439132), Chrysanthemum morifolium CmSOS1 (KP896477), Helianthus tuberosus HtSOS1 (AGI04331), Solanum lycopersicum SlSOS1 (BAL04564), Arabidopsis thaliana AtSOS1 (AF256224), Cochlearia hollandica ChSOS1 (AFF57539), Schrenkiella parvula SpSOS1 (ADQ43186), Eutrema halophilum EhSOS1/ThSOS1 (ABN04857), Brassica napus BnSOS1 (ACA50526),Glycine max GmsSOS1 (AFD64746), Vigna radiata VrSOS1 (AGR34307), Zygophyllum xanthoxylum ZxSOS1 (ACZ57357), Cucumis sativus CsSOS1 (AFD64618), Vitis vinifera VvSOS1 (ACY03274), Populus euphratica PeSOS1 (ABF60872), Bruguiera gymnorhiza BgSOS1 (ADK91080), Limonium gmelinii LgSOS1 (ACF05808), Mesembryanthemum crystallinum McSOS1 (ABN04858), Sesuvium portulacastrum SpSOS1 (AFX68848), Suaeda japonica sjSOS1 (BAE95196), Salicornia brachiata SbSOS1 (ACJ63441), Chenopodium quinoa cqSOS1A (ABS72166); cqSOS1B (ACN66494), Cymodocea nodosa CnSOS1A (CAD20320); CnSOS1B (AM399078), Aeluropus littoralis AlSOS1 (AEV89922), Phragmites australis PhaNHA1-n (AB244217); PhaNHA1-e (AB244218); PhaNHA1-u (AB244216), Oryza sativa OsSOS1 (AAW33875), Indosasa sinica IsSOS1 (AGB06353), Puccinellia tenuiflora PtSOS1 (ACV60499), Puccinellia tenuiflora PtNHA1 (EF440291), Lolium perenne LpSOS1 (AAY42598), Triticum durum TdSOS1 (ACB47885), Aegilops speltoides AsSOS1 (CAX83736), Triticum aestivum TaSOS1 (CAX83738), Aegilops tauschii AtaSOS1 (CAX83737), Triticum monococcum TmSOS1 (CAX83735), Physcomitrella patens PpSOS1 (CAM96566); PpSOS1B (CBG92827), Ricinus communis RcSOS1 (XP_002521897), Populus trichocarpa PtSOS1 (EEF02008), Nitraria tangutorum NtSOS1 (AGW30210), Reaumuria trigyna RtSOS1 (AGW30208). The sequences were aligned using Clustal X and the phylogeny was constructed using the neighbor-joining method implemented in MEGA v5.0. The blue and red dots indicate the four SOS1s isolated here

SOS1 transcription profiling

In the roots, the abundance of AjSOS1 transcript increased gradually of salinity stressed plants, reaching a level of 3.87 fold above the base level after a 24 h exposure to 200 mM NaCl. CmSOS1 expression level increased only slowly over the first four hours of the treatment, peaking by 12 h, then decreased slightly, while the transcripts of CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 maintained relatively constant (Fig. 5a). In the stems, all four SOS1s were up-regulated by the stress, their transcripts were greatest after 12 h (Fig. 5b). In the leaves, the level of transcription of both CrcSOS1 and CmSOS1 was highest at 24 h; that of AjSOS1 rosed most sharply between 4 h and 12 h, thereafter declined; and that of CcSOS1 remained relatively constant, with a two fold up-regulation occurring at 4 h (Fig. 5c). In essence, all four SOS1s were up-regulated by exposure to salinity, and the abundance of SOS1 transcript was greater in the more salinity tolerant plants.
Fig. 5

qPCR based transcription profiling of the four SOS1 genes in response to salinity stress. Relative transcript abundances in the root (a), stem (b) and leaf (c). The relative expression in all tissues and time points was first compared to the reference genein each species and then calculated using the expression value at the initial time (0 h) in the root of CmSOS1. Data are presented as mean ± SE (n = 3). Actin was used as reference gene

Complementation of the yeast mutant with four SOS1s

All the yeast cells grew freely on YPDA in the absence of NaCl and one of the four related SOS1s transformed ANT3 cells grew much better on AP NaCl-containing medium than the control strain (Fig. 6a-d). A comparison of the ability of four SOS1s transformants to grow in the presence of salt especially at 70 mM NaCl showed that the inclusion of AjSOS1 was the most beneficial, followed by that of CrcSOS1; the strain carrying CcSOS1 was better than CmSOS1, but was worse than CrcSOS1, while the inclusion of CmSOS1 was the least salinity tolerant of the transformed cells (Fig. 6d). Furthermore, qPCR (quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction) analysis of the SOS1 expression levels were almost the same between yeast transformants for four SOS1s (Fig. 6e). The data demonstrated that Na+/H+ antiporter activity of four SOS1s was essential and AjSOS1, CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 were fully able to exclude Na+ when expressed in yeast.
Fig. 6

Functional characterization of four SOS1s in the salinity sensitive yeast mutant ANT3 (ena1 nha1) and expression analysis of SOS1 gene in four SOS1s yeast transformants. ANT3 were transformed with plasmid containing four SOS1s (+AjSOS1, +CrcSOS1, +CcSOS1, +CmSOS1), G19 (ena1) and ANT3 (ena1 nha1) were transformed with the empty vector. G19 (ena1) cells were used as a positive control. Transformants were brought to a density 2 x 106 per mL, of which 5 μL (serially diluted) were spotted onto YPDA medium containing 0 mM NaCl (a) and AP medium containing 30 (b), 50 (c) and 70 (d) mM NaCl. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2–4 days. e qPCR analysis of SOS1 expression in four SOS1s yeast transformants. The actin gene was employed as an internal control

Overexpression of four SOS1s enhances salinity tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum and Arabidopsis plants

Transgenic chrysanthemum lines overexpressing four SOS1s were successfully generated. qPCR analysis showed that compare with wide type (SM), SOS1 transcript abundance was not very high in the eight transgenic lines under control conditions but increased greatly upon 200 mM NaCl treatment (Fig. 7a). When exposure to saline hydroponics, most of the apex and edge of the lower leaves of all plants showing signs of yellowing and necrotic after 1 day treatment, while after 3 days, the leaves of SM became severely necrotic and most plants died, the survival ratio of which was only 18 %. In the transgenic plants, symptoms of damage in leaves were much less evident in S1 and S2 than SM plants, but were worse than that of other transgenic plants, most of their upper leaves still remained green, and with less affected by salinity stress, which showed the transgenic plants maintained higher chlorophyll contents. The chlorophyll content is often used as index of salt tolerance in plants under salt stress, such as in Arabidopsis [48] and tobacco [49]. The percentage survival of S1 and S2 plants was 33 % and 36 %, respectively, whereas that of other transgenic plants was 49 %-68 % (Fig. 7b-c). Furthermore, each of two transgenic A. thaliana lines overexpressing four SOS1s were selected for further study. For example no expression of exogenous SOS1 was detected in A. thaliana wide type gl1 but in these transgenic lines M-1, M-2, F-1, F-2, D-1, D-2,S-1 and S-2, which showed a high expression level of SOS1 (Additional file 3: Figure S2a). On 1/2 MS medium containing 150 or 75 mM NaCl, the seed germination rates, root length and fresh weight of transgenic A. thaliana wild type or sos1-1 lines were higher than those of the corresponding, and in the transgenic lines, the above index value in gS-1, gS-2, sS-1 and sS-2 were also notably lower than that of other lines (Additional file 3: Figure S2 and Additional file 4: Figure S3). These results indicated that the differences between the SOS1 transcription level in the transgenic lines did not very important effect in their tolerance to salinity, and over expression of four SOS1s enhanced the salinity tolerance of transgenic plants and the overexpressing plants of SOS1s from salt tolerant plants were more tolerant than SOS1s from salt sensitive plants.
Fig. 7

Salinity tolerance of wide type ‘Jinba’ and transgenic chrysanthemum plants overexpressing four SOS1s. a Expression levels of SOS1 in wide type ‘Jinba’ and transgenic chrysanthemum lines overpressing four SOS1s. SM, wide type ‘Jinba’ plant; M1 and M2, transgenic chrysanthemum lines of AjSOS1; F1 and F2, transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CrcSOS1; D1 and D2, transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CcSOS1; S1 and S2, transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CmSOS1. b Phenotypic response of saline hydroponics with 200 mM NaCl for 3 days. c Plant survival measured at 4 day in the presence of saline hydroponics with 200 mM NaCl

Site-Directed Mutagenesis functional analysis in yeast

The site-directed mutagenesis applied to AjSOS1 produced a set of 18 residue polymorphisms and additional one site-directed mutagenesis applied to CcSOS1 (Additional file 2: Figure S4). The hypothesis was that mutations a critical residue in AjSOS1 or CcSOS1 would generate a loss of salinity tolerance, as assayed by the yeast complementation test. The mutated forms were introduced into ANT3, and the drop test was conducted on AP medium containing 70 mM NaCl and 1 mM KCl. As depicted in Fig. 8, mutants G13E, T26S, F143I, V238L, Y463H, E512G, Y549H, S639L, A919T, YG927HS, G982V, A1027V, N1109K and G1127A failed to complement the growth defect of yeast cells, which suggested that these mutations couldn’t mediate Na+ efflux in yeast and may be important for transport activity and salt tolerance of AjSOS1. The other AjSOS1-mutants supported more cell growth than either empty vector transformed ANT3 cells or those transformed with CmSOS1, indicating that these mutants were null mutations.
Fig. 8

The salinity tolerance of ANT3 cells expressing altered forms of AjSOS1. The yeast cells were cultured overnight and a 5 μL aliquot (serially diluted) was spotted onto either a YPDA medium containing no NaCl (a-c) or an AP medium containing 70 mM NaCl (d-e). Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2–4 days

Discussion

At the phenotypic level, C. chinense and A. japonica both appeared to tolerate salinity stress rather better than either C. crassum or C. morifolium (Fig. 1), this finding consistent with the division of 32 chrysanthemum-related taxa into four clusters based on their morphological response to the stress [32]. The primary effect of salinity stress is a disturbance of cellular ion homeostasis, followed by the ingress of toxic levels of Na+ into the cytoplasm. Patterns of ion accumulation have been exploited with some success as a means of discriminating between tolerant and sensitive species/cultivars [50]. The present data showed that exposure to 200 mM NaCl induced a smaller increase in tissue Na+ content and a less reduction in tissue K+ content and K+/Na+ ratio in C. chinense and A. japonica than in C. crassum and C. morifolium (Fig. 2), consistent with the ranking based on the species’ morphological response. The main conclusion was that the variation in salt tolerance displayed by the four species most likely reflected genetic variation for their ability to exclude the ingress of Na+, most probably thanks to have a more selective ion transport system. Similar conclusions have been drawn from the study of a range of other plant species [5154]. Na+ transporters are an important class of protein employed by A. thaliana to maintain ion homeostasis during an episode of salinity stress. The activity of AtSOS1 is central to the exclusion of Na+, as well as to its loading and retrieval into and out of the xylem [8]. The existence of an efficient SOS pathway would therefore make a major contribution to the superior salinity stress tolerance of C. chinense and A. japonica.

The SOS1 genes isolated from the four chrysanthemum and its related species all belong to the A. thaliana CPA1 (cation proton antiporter 1) family [6]. They all harbored three conserved functional domains Nhap, InhiBD and S2P (Fig. 3), a characteristic of SOS1 encoded proteins, and thought to be critical for their functionality [47]. In the absence of salinity stress, the abundance of SOS1 transcript in both the root and stem was higher in the more salinity tolerant A. japonica and C. chinense than in either C. crassum or C. morifolium, whereas in the leaf, the SOS1 transcript abundance in the four species differed little. The SOS1 genes were all up-regulated throughout the plant when salinity stress was imposed, inducing much higher transcript levels in the root than in either the stem or the leaf (Fig. 5). Moreover, the transcripts of reference gene Actin in four tested plants after salt treatment were relatively constant (Additional file 5: Figure S1). The behavior of SOS1 genes in a range of glycophytes is quite similar [7, 10, 15, 18, 22, 29, 43, 55], although in other species, salinity stress has been found to significantly up-regulate SOS1 in the leaf but not in root [26, 40, 42, 56]. In the former case, the assumption is that the SOS1 protein acts to remove Na+ from the root cell, while in the latter, they have been suggested to function as maintainers of a low cytosolic Na+ concentration in the leaf to protect photosynthesis. Notably, the abundance of AjSOS1 and CrcSOS1 transcript in salinity-stressed plants was greater than that of CcSOS1 and CmSOS1, which concords with the differences in ion accumulation and salinity tolerance displayed by the four species. Similarly, in a contrast between the salinity tolerant Populus euphratica and the more sensitive Populus popularis, the former was seen to accumulate a higher transcript abundance of genes related to Na+/H+ antiporter activity [57]. Likewise, in a comparison of four Brassica spp. accessions, the more salinity tolerant entries displayed the highest level of SOS1 transcription [53], while in bread wheat ‘Kharchia 65’, a cultivar known to be an efficient Na+ exporter also showed high levels of SOS1 transcription [58]. Finally, in A. thaliana, the level of SOS1 transcription in the root has been shown to be inversely proportional to the accumulation of Na+ in the plant [59]. Thus the evidence is very strong to support the notion that SOS1 proteins make an important contribution to salinity tolerance in the chrysanthemum species complex.

Heterologous expression in yeast has been exploited by a number of researchers aiming to functionally characterize plant SOS1 genes [10, 18, 2022, 25, 60]. The ANT3-based system effectively discriminated between the efficacy of the chrysanthemum and its related species SOS1s in terms of their ability to counteract salinity stress. In particular, the assay showed that the AjSOS1 and CrcSOS1 products were able to compensate for the yeast host’s lack of Na+-pumping ATPase ENA1-4 and plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter NHA1 activity and the SOS1 expression levels of yeast transformants for four SOS1s were almost the same (Fig. 6). The implication is that these proteins mediate Na+ efflux at the plasma membrane of yeast. Since AjSOS1, CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 were much more effective than CmSOS1, it seems probable that these proteins are key determinants of the contrasting ionic homeostasis and levels of salinity tolerance of the four species. Similar conclusions have been drawn by contrasting the effectiveness of an SOS1 gene isolated from the salinity tolerant species Thellungiella salsuginea with that of AtSOS1 [10], and that of the SOS1 genes from the two halophytes Eutrema salsugineum and Schrenkiella parvula [35]. Takahashi et al. (2009) have shown that yeast cells heterologously expressing a PhaNHA1 allele (PhaNHA1-n) isolated from a salinity tolerant reed plants grew better than those harboring an allele (PhaNHA1-u) isolated from a salinity sensitive accession [21].

Several researchs have been shown that transgenic plants over-expression SOS1 improved salt tolerance [18, 20, 2731, 61]. In this study, we demonstrated that over expression of four SOS1s also enhanced the salinity tolerance of transgenic chrysanthemum and A. thaliana wild type or sos1-1, and the overexpressing plants of SOS1s from salt tolerant plants were more tolerant than that from salt sensitive plants (Fig. 7, Additional file 3: Figure S2 and Additional file 4: Figure S3). These results were consist with the above functional analysis in the yeast mutant. To understand the reason for the different activities at SOS1s, a multiple alignment of four SOS1s proteins was analyzed and found that the AjSOS1 and CrcSOS1 sequences differed from CcSOS1 and CmSOS1 with respect to eighteen residues, and additional one residues in which CmSOS1 encode amino acid relative to the same ones of the other three SOS1s, and of which six were located in the membrane-spanning region and the other thirteen in the hydrophilic tail (Fig. 3).

When site-directed mutagenesis was carried out, it was found that a number of the altered polypeptides had no deleterious effect on the ability to complement the lesion in the ANT3 cell line, showing that these residues were not determinants of the protein’s functionality. However, some of the altered polypeptides (G13E, T26S, F143I, V238L, Y463H, E512G, Y549H, S639L, A919T, YG927HS, G982V, A1027V, N1109K and G1127A) did reduce the level of the yeast’s salinity tolerance, implying that these were essential for endowing AjSOS1 with the capacity to compensate for the host’s defective Na+-pumping ATPase and plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter activity (Fig. 8). G13E and T26S lie at the 5′ end of TMD1, F143I and V238L in the TMD4 and TMD6 respectively, while the remaining sites map to the C terminal hydropholic tail. Transmembrane regions in plant NHAs are thought to be important for Na+ and H+ exchange. The presence of a cytoplasmic tail indicates that the transporter is probably regulated by an external signal: under either salinity or oxidative stress, the AtSOS1 cytoplasmic tail interacts with RCD1, a regulator of the oxidative stress response [62]. Therefore, it is possible that the differential activity of the four SOS1s reflects a dissimilar interaction between their cytoplasmic tail and a signaling protein such as RCD1. Some of the mutations to AjSOS1 are likely to have induced alterations to the protein’s secondary structure (Additional file 6: Figure S5), thereby potentially affecting its regulation and functionality. In A. thaliana, the salinity sensitive mutations sos1-3, sos1-8, sos1-9 and sos1-12 each comprise a single residue substitution in AtSOS1 [7], while the substitution E1044V in the putative auto inhibitory domain of E. salsugineum EsSOS1 is necessary, but not sufficient to facilitate the growth of AXT3K (Δena1::HIS3::ena4, Δnha1::LEU2, Δnhx1::KanMX4) yeast cells cultured on a saline medium [35]. In Triticum durum, the mutation of TdSOS1 alleles S1126A and S1128A (DSPS mutated to DAPA) have been associated with a reduced phosphorylation ability by the A. thaliana SOS2 kinase T/DSOS2Δ308, thereby preventing its activation of TdSOS1 [19]. Furthermore the alleles AtSOS1 S1136A and S1138A both interfere with phosphorylation by SOS2, while the G777D variant (sos1-8) is not activated by SOS2 [47]. Further investigations will be needed to provide much more evidences for contribution of the four SOS1s homologs in salt tolerance and to understand the basis of the observed variation in the activity of the AjSOS1 alleles.

Conclusions

In summary, in the four chrysanthemum and its related species, C. chinense, A. japonica and C. crassum were better tolerate than C. morifolium. They also had a superior capacity to prevent the accumulation of Na+ and the reduction of K+ in planta and their level of SOS1 transcription was higher. Moreover SOS1 sequence polymorphisms may be responsible for the higher efficacy of the AjSOS1 encoded protein. Taken together, AjSOS1, CrcSOS1 and CcSOS1 might be potential genes for enhancing salinity tolerance through transgenic strategies.

Methods

Plant materials, growing conditions and the assessment of salinity tolerance

Samples of C. chinense, A. japonica, C. crassum and C. morifolium were obtained from the Chrysanthemum Germplasm Resource Preserving Centre (Nanjing Agricultural University, China). Uniform cuttings were vegetatively propagated in sand. For experiments designed to estimate Na+ and K+ content under salinity stress, a set of rooted seedlings at the 6–10 leaf stage \was transplanted into a 1:1 mixture of garden soil and vermiculite, and the plants cultured under a 16 h photoperiod, a day/night temperature of 22 °C/18 °C and a relative humidity of 68–75 %. The plants were irrigated with 200 mM NaCl every four days and photographed on day 10. Leaves, stems and roots were harvested separately on day 14, baked at 80 °C for three days and weighed. A 0.1 g aliquot of each dry sample was digested in 2 mL 10 M HNO3, after which the solution were added to 10 mL with distilled water. Na+ and K+ contents were measured in this extract using an Optima 2100DV inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, USA) [63]. Each sample was replicated three times. Means were compared using the Student’s t test implemented in SPSS v17.0 J software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Isolation of SOS1 sequences

RNA (ribonucleic acid) was extracted from roots of plants exposed to a hydroponic solution (half strength Hoagland’s solution) containing 200 mM NaCl using the RNAiso reagent (TaKaRa Bio, Tokyo, Japan), following the manufacturer’s protocol. A 1 μg aliquot of this RNA was reverse transcribed via M-MLV reverse transcriptase (TaKaRa Bio), primed by Oligo d(T)18. The SOS1 coding regions were amplified from the first strand cDNA (complementary deoxyribonucleic acid) using fusion PCR/overlap PCR [64] and the primer pairs F1/R1 and F2/R2 (sequences given in Table 1). The full length cDNA sequences were deduced from 5′ and 3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) amplicons [65], and then amplified from cDNA template using the primer pair Full-F/R (sequences given in Table 1). These amplicons were inserted into the pEASY-Blunt Zero Cloning vector (TransGen Biotech, Beijing, China) for sequence-based validation. Open reading frames (ORFs) was identified using the ORF finder program (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). Hydrophobicity and putative transmembrane domain were predicted using the TMPRED program (www.ch.embnet.org/software/TMPRED_form.html). Multiple peptide alignment and phylogenetic analysis were carried out by DNAman v5.2.2.0 software (Lynnon Biosoft, St Louis, Canada), Clustal X and MEGA v5.0, which utilized the Neighbor-Joining method.
Table 1

Adaptor and PCR primer sequences

Primer name

5′–3′ sequence

Usage

F1

ATGGGATCGGTGGCAAACAAC

overlap ORF fragment1

R1

GCTTGTTTGCAGAAACTTGT

overlap ORF fragment1

F2

ATTTCTAAATGGTGTGCAAGC

overlap ORF fragment2

R2

TTAGGGAGCTCGGGGGAAAG

overlap ORF fragment2

Oligo d (T)18

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

Reverse transcription

AAP

GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTACGGGIIGGGIIGGGIIG

5′ -RACE

AUAP

GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC

5′ -RACE

GSP5′-1

CTCTAAGCAAATGTCTTG

5′ -RACE

GSP5′-2

TCCTCCTCCGCCCTTAG

5′ -RACE

GSP5′-3

GTTTGCCACCGATCCCAT

5′ -RACE

Adaptor J-T

CTGATCTAGAGGTACCGGATCCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

3′ -RACE

Adaptor J-R

CTGATCTAGAGGTACCGGATCC

3′ -RACE

GSP3'-1

TCAGAAGGTTCTACGACAGTGAG

3′ -RACE

GSP3′-2

CCAGACCCAAATGATACTCGTGA

3′ -RACE

GSP3′-3

TACACTATCTTTCCCCCGAGCTC

3′ -RACE

Full-F

TGGTGGAGATGGGATCGGTGGCA

ORF amplifications

Full-R

CTAGTAAATATATTATACAAGTC

ORF amplifications

SOS1s-Sal-F

GCGTCGACATGGGATCGGTGGCAAACAACGTG

Functional complementation

SOS1s-Not-R

TTGCGGCCGCGATTAGGGAGCTCGGGGGAAAG

Functional complementation

Actin-F

AGCTTGCATATGTTGCTCTTGA

qPCR

Actin-R

TTACCGTAAAGGTCCTTCCTGA

qPCR

DL-F

TGGAGCTGAGGATGAACA

qPCR

DL-R

CTACCGTACTTTCTATGAACAC

qPCR

actin-F

GTGATGTCGATGTCCGTAA

qPCR

actin-R

AGAAGCCAAGATAGAACCA

qPCR

CmEF1α-F

TTTTGGTATCTGGTCCTGGAG

qPCR

CmEF1α-R

CCATTCAAGCGACAGACTCA

qPCR

AtAct2-F

TTCGTTTTGCGTTTTAGTCCC

RT-PCR

AtAct2-R

GGGAACAAAAGGAATAAAGAGGC

RT-PCR

SOS1 transcription profiling

Leaf, stem and root samples from four plants per species were collected at 0, 4, 12 and 24 h following the addition of 200 mM NaCl to the hydroponic solution, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and used as a source of cDNA to provide the template for a qPCR assay. The necessary RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as described above. The primer pair DL-F/R (sequences given in Table 1) were designed to amplify SOS1 fragment. The Actin gene (GenBank accession number AB205087) was used as the reference sequence. Each 20 μL reaction contained 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (TaKaRa Bio), 10 ng cDNA and 0.2 μM of each primer. The amplification program comprised an initial denaturation (95 °C/2 min), followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C/15 s, 55 °C/15 s and 72 °C/20 s. Relative transcript abundances were estimated using the 2−ΔΔCt method in compliance with MIQE guidelines [66, 67], and normalized against the transcript abundance at 0 h in the root of CmSOS1 at the respective time-point.

Complementation by the four SOS1 genes in the yeast mutants ANT3

The two bakers’ yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mutant strains G19 (Δena1::HIS3::ena4) and ANT3 (Δena1::HIS3::ena4, Δnha1::LEU2) were employed for performing a complementation assay. The former mutant lacks the Na+-pumping ATPase ENA1 to ENA4 while the latter,both the Na+-pumping ATPase and the plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter NHA1 are defective [8, 68]. First, the ORF of four SOS1s were amplified using Phusion High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, USA) with the primer pair SOS1s-Sal-F/Not-R (sequences given in Table 1). Both the resulting amplicons and pENTRTM1A plasmid were digested with Sal I and Not I restriction sites and the corresponding bands were ligated to yield the entry vector pENTRTM1A-SOS1s. Then the pENTRTM1A vector containing SOS1s were inserted into the yeast expression vector pAD426GPD [69] using LR Clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen, USA). The pAD426GPD-SOS1s constructs were validated by sequencing, then transformed into ANT3 cells, utilizing the Yeastmaker transformation system 2 (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA). The empty vector pAD426GPD was transformed into strain ANT3 and G19, which used as positive control. Transformants were selected by culturing on SD standard medium lacking uracil. The yeast cells’ salinity tolerance phenotype was explored using a drop test in which a 5 μL aliquot of a saturated yeast culture, along with a similar volume of a serial dilution, was spotted onto alkali cation-free AP plates containing 1 mM KCl and with NaCl as designated [68, 70]. The plates were held at 30 °C for 2–4 days before being photographed. Moreover, four SOS1s transformants were cultured overnight and extracted RNA by using a fungi RNA extraction kit (Huayueyang biotech, Beijing, China). The reverse transcription and qPCR were performed as described above. The gene specific primer pair were DL-F/R and the reference gene was actin (GenBank accession number AAA34391), primer sequences were given in Table 1.

Generation of four SOS1s over-expressors and their response to salinity treatment

To further analyze the function of the four SOS1s and confirm their importance in plant salt tolerance, the plasmid pENTRTM1A-SOS1s were subjected to the LR reaction to obtain expression vector pMDC32-SOS1s and introduced the constructs p2 × 35S:: SOS1s into salt sensitive C. morifolium ‘Jinba’, A. thaliana (Columbia ecotype) wide type gl1 and mutant sos1-1 via Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 mediated leaf disc and floral pollen dip method as described above [71]. RNA was isolated from control and 200 mM NaCl treated putative transgenic chrysanthemum and wide type (SM) plants, and processed for qPCR directed to SOS1 (using the primer pair DL-F/R) as described above. The primer pair CmEF1α-F/R was used to amplify the reference gene CmEF1α. Relative gene expression levels were also estimated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [66], and normalized against the expression level of SOS1 in wide type plants under control conditions. Twenty plants of each transgenic lines (M1, M2, F1, F2, D1, D2, S1 and S2) and SM plants with three replicates were exposed to either control and a liquid nutrient solution (half strength Hoagland’s solution) supplemented with 200 mM NaCl conditions, photographed on day 3 and calculated the survival rate on day 4. In addition, putative Arabidopsis transformants were firstly screened on hygromycin medium and then identified by RT-PCR analysis, based on the primer pair DL-F/R. Transgenic lines were used to assess salinity tolerance on 1/2 MS (Murashige and Skoog) agar medium supplemented with NaCl, as indicted for each case. Each experiment was performed three times and significant differences among treatments were identified by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple range test (p = 0.05). All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v17.0 J software (SPSS Inc).

Site-directed mutagenesis and the efficacy of mutated forms of AjSOS1

PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis was applied to the pENTRTM1A-AjSOS1 construct using Pfusion High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific), based on the primers TB1F/R-TB18F/R according to manual of Quickchange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). In addition, we also produced another one mutations which was carried out on pENTRTM1A-CcSOS1 plasmid DNA and based on the primer TB19F/R. All the mutated primer sequences were given in Additional file 7: Table S1. Each 50 μL reaction contained 5 μL 10 × reaction buffer, 1 μL 10 mM dNTP, 2 μL of each primer (10 μM/L), 1 μL Pfu DNA Polymerase (2.5 U/μL) (Thermo Scientific), 2 μL plasmid DNA (5 ng/μl) and 37 μL ddH2O. The reactions were initially denatured (95 °C/30 s), then subjected to 16 cycles of 95 °C/30 s, 55 °C/60 s and 72 °C/7 min. The resulting amplicons were digested with Dpn I and then inserted into E. coli DH5α competent cells. All plasmid constructs were sequenced to ensure that no unexpected mutations or cloning errors had occurred. The mutated constructs were then recombined into pAD426GPD and transformed in mutant ANT3 to assay the cells’ salinity tolerance phenotype, as described above.

Plant line abbreviations

M1 and M2 (Transgenic chrysanthemum lines of AjSOS1), F1 and F2 (Transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CrcSOS1), D1 and D2 (Transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CcSOS1), S1 and S2 (Transgenic chrysanthemum lines of CmSOS1), SM (Wide type ‘Jinba’ plant).

gM-1 and gM-2 (Transgenic lines of AjSOS1 in A. thaliana wide type gl1), gF-1 and gF-2 (Transgenic lines of CrcSOS1 in A. thaliana wide type gl1), gD-1 and gD-2 (Transgenic lines of CcSOS1 in A. thaliana wide type gl1), gS1 and gS2 (Transgenic lines of CmSOS1 in A. thaliana wide type gl1).

sM-1 and sM-2 (Transgenic lines of AjSOS1 in A. thaliana mutant sos1-1), sF-1 and sF-2 (Transgenic lines of CrcSOS1 in A. thaliana mutant sos1-1), sD-1 and sD-2 (Transgenic lines of CcSOS1 in A. thaliana mutant sos1-1), sS1 and sS2 (Transgenic lines of CmSOS1 in A. thaliana mutant sos1-1).

Ethics (and consent to participate)

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional files.

Abbreviations

cDNA: 

complementary deoxyribonucleic acid

MS: 

Murashige and Skoog

ORF: 

open reading frames

qPCR: 

quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction

RACE: 

rapid amplification of cDNA ends

RNA: 

ribonucleic acid

WT: 

wide type

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr Huazhong Shi (Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Texas Tech University, USA) for the gift of yeast strains G19 and ANT3.

Funding

This research was supported by the Chinese Government “National Natural Science Foundation” (grant number 31171987), the Chinese Ministry of Education “Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University” (NCET-12-0890), “Programs of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talents” of Jiangsu Province, and the Priority Academic “Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions”.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University

References

  1. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2008;59:651–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Tester M, Davenport R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany. 2003;91(5):503–27.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Apse MP, Blumwald E. Na+ transport in plants. FEBS Letters. 2007;581(12):2247–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Niu X, Bressan RA, Hasegawa PM, et al. lon homeostasis in NaCl stress environments. Plant Physiology. 1995;109(3):735–42.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Rajendran K, Tester M, Roy SJ. Quantifying the three main components of salinity tolerance in cereals. Plant Cell and Environment. 2009;32(3):237–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Pardo JM, Cubero B, Leidi EO, Quintero FJ. Alkali cation exchangers: roles in cellular homeostasis and stress tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57(5):1181–99.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Shi H, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu JK. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(12):6896.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Shi H, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK. The putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na+ transport in plants. The Plant Cell. 2002;14(2):465–77.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Olias R, Eljakaoui Z, Li J, et al. The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 is essential for salt tolerance in tomato and affects the partitioning of Na+ between plant organs. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2009;32(7):904–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Oh DH, Leidi E, Zhang Q, et al. Loss of halophytism by interference with SOS1 expression. Plant Physiology. 2009;151(1):210–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Wu SJ, Ding L, Zhu JK. SOS1, a genetic locus essential for salt tolerance and potassium acquisition. The Plant Cell Online. 1996;8(4):617–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhu JK, Liu J, Xiong L. Genetic analysis of salt tolerance in Arabidopsis: evidence for a critical role of potassium nutrition. The Plant Cell Online. 1998;10(7):1181–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Shabala L, Cuin TA, Newman IA, Shabala S. Salinity-induced ion flux patterns from the excised roots of Arabidopsis sos mutants. Planta. 2005;222(6):1041–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Qi Z, Spalding EP. Protection of plasma membrane K+ transport by the salt overly sensitive1 Na+-H+ antiporter during salinity stress. Plant Physiology. 2004;136(1):2548–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma Q, Li YX, Yuan HJ, Hu J, et al. ZxSOS1 is essential for long-distance transport and spatial distribution of Na+ and K+ in the xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum. Plant and Soil. 2014;374(1–2):661–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhu JK. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2003;6(5):441–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhang JL, Shi H. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of plant salt tolerance. Photosynthesis Research. 2013;155(1):1–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Martínez-Atienza J, Jiang X, Garciadeblas B, Mendoza I, Zhu JK, Pardo JM, Quintero FJ. Conservation of the salt overly sensitive pathway in rice. Plant Physiology. 2007;143(2):1001–12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Feki K, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Masmoudi K. Regulation of durum wheat Na+/H+ exchanger TdSOS1 by phosphorylation. Plant Molecular Biology. 2011;76(6):545–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tang RJ, Liu H, Bao Y, Lv QD, Yang L, Zhang HX. The woody plant poplar has a functionally conserved salt overly sensitive pathway in response to salinity stress. Plant Molecular Biology. 2010;74(4–5):367–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Takahashi R, Liu S, Takano T. Isolation and characterization of plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter genes from salt-sensitive and salt-tolerant reed plants. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009;166(3):301–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Xu H, Jiang X, Zhan K, et al. Functional characterization of a wheat plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter in yeast. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 2008;473(1):8–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Song A, Lu J, Jiang J, Chen S, Guan Z, Fang W, Chen F. Isolation and characterisation of Chrysanthemum crassum SOS1, encoding a putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter. Plant Biology. 2012;14(5):706–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fraile-Escanciano A, Kamisugi Y, Cuming AC, Rodriguez-Navarro A, Benito B. The SOS1 transporter of Physcomitrella patens mediates sodium efflux in planta. The New Phytologist. 2010;188(3):750–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Garciadeblás B, Haro R, Benito B. Cloning of two SOS1 transporters from the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa. SOS1 transporters from Cymodocea and Arabidopsis mediate potassium uptake in bacteria. Plant Molecular Biology. 2007;63(4):479–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu Y, Ding N, Zhao X, Zhao M, Chang Z, Liu J, Zhang L. Molecular characterization of PeSOS1: the putative Na+/H+ antiporter of Populus euphratica. Plant Molecular Biology. 2007;65(1):1–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang X, Yang R, Wang B, Liu G, Yang C, Cheng Y. Functional characterization of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter from alkali grass (Puccinellia tenuiflora). Molecular Biology Reports. 2011;38(7):4813–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang Q, Chen ZZ, Zhou XF, et al. Overexpression of SOS (Salt Overly Sensitive) genes increases salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant. 2009;2(1):22–31.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Yadav NS, Shukla PS, Jha A, et al. The SbSOS1 gene from the extreme halophyte Salicornia brachiata enhances Na+ loading in xylem and confers salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. BMC Plant Biology. 2012;12(1):188.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Yue Y, Zhang M, Zhang J, Duan L, Li Z. SOS1 gene overexpression increased salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by maintaining a higher K+/Na+ ratio. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2012;169(3):255–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. An J, Song A, Guan Z, et al. The over-expression of Chrysanthemum crassum CcSOS1 improves the salinity tolerance of chrysanthemum. Molecular Biology Reports. 2014;41(6):4155–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Guan Z, Chen S, Chen F, et al. Salt tolerance screening of 32 taxa from Chrysanthemum and its relative genera. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 2010;43(19):4063–71.Google Scholar
  33. Li Q, Tang Z, Hu Y, Yu L, Liu Z, Xu G. Functional analyses of a putative plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene isolated from salt tolerant Helianthus tuberosus. Molecular Biology Reports. 2014;41(8):5097–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Nawaz I, Iqbal M, Hakvoort HWJ, et al. Expression levels and promoter activities of candidate salt tolerance genes in halophytic and glycophytic Brassicaceae. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2014;99:59–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarvis DE, Ryu CH, Beilstein MA, Schumaker KS. Distinct roles for SOS1 in the convergent evolution of salt tolerance in Eutrema salsugineum and Schrenkiella parvula. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2014;31(8):2094–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Oh DH, Gong Q, Ulanov A, et al. Sodium stress in the halophyte Thellungiella halophila and transcriptional changes in a thsos1-RNA interference line. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 2007;49(10):1484–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Nie W, Xu L, Yu B. A putative soybean GmsSOS1 confers enhanced salt tolerance to transgenic Arabidopsis sos1-1 mutant. Protoplasma. 2015;252(1):127–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang S, Li Z, Rui R, Fan GS, Lin KW. Cloning and characterization of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene from Cucumis sativus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;60(3):330–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007;449(7161):463–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Cosentino C, Fischer SE, Bertl A, Thiel G, Homann U. Na+/H+ antiporters are differentially regulated in response to NaCl stress in leaves and roots of Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. New Phytologist. 2010;186(3):669–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhou Y, Yin X, Duan R, Hao G, Guo J, Jiang X. SpAHA1 and SpSOS1 coordinate in transgenic yeast to improve salt tolerance. PLoS One. 2015;10(9):e0137447.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Maughan PJ, Turner TB, Coleman CE, et al. Characterization of Salt Overly Sensitive 1 (SOS1) gene homoeologs in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Genome. 2009;52(7):647–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Guo Q, Wang P, Ma Q, Zhang JL, Bao AK, Wang SM. Selective transport capacity for K+ over Na+ is linked to the expression levels of PtSOS1 in halophyte Puccinellia tenuiflora. Functional Plant Biology. 2012;39(12):1047–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang H, Zhang P, Liu D, et al. Isolation and characterization of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene TaSOS1 from wheat. 2008.Google Scholar
  45. Tuskan GA, DiFazio S, Jansson S, et al. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science. 2006;313(5793):1596–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Dang Z, Zheng L, Feng Z, et al. Cloning and sequence analysis of the plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter cDNA in Recretohalophyte Reaumuria trigyna Maxim. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica. 2013;28(3):1–6.Google Scholar
  47. Quintero FJ, Martínez-Atienza J, Villalta I, et al. Activation of the plasma membrane Na/H antiporter Salt-Overly-Sensitive 1 (SOS1) by phosphorylation of an auto-inhibitory C-terminal domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(6):2611–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Kong X, Pan J, Zhang M, et al. ZmMKK4, a novel group C mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in maize (Zea mays), confers salt and cold tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2011;34(8):1291–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang S, Uddin MI, Tanaka K, et al. Maintenance of chloroplast structure and function by overexpression of the rice MONOGALACTOSYLDIACYLGLYCEROL SYNTHASE gene leads to enhanced salt tolerance in tobacco. Plant Physiology. 2014;165(3):1144–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Shannon MC, Grieve CM. Tolerance of vegetable crops to salinity. Scientia Horticulturae. 1999;78(1):5–38.Google Scholar
  51. Chen S, Li J, Wang S, Fritz E, Hüttermann A, Altman A. Effects of NaCl on shoot growth, transpiration, ion compartmentation, and transport in regenerated plants of Populus euphratica and Populus tomentosa. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 2003;33(6):967–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Chen S, Li J, Wang S, Hüttermann A, Altman A. Salt, nutrient uptake and transport, and ABA of Populus euphratica; a hybrid in response to increasing soil NaCl. Trees. 2001;15(3):186–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Chakraborty K, Sairam RK, Bhattacharya RC. Differential expression of salt overly sensitive pathway genes determines salinity stress tolerance in Brassica genotypes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2012;51:90–101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kumar G, Purty RS, Sharma MP, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A. Physiological responses among Brassica species under salinity stress show strong correlation with transcript abundance for SOS pathway-related genes. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009;166(5):507–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Kant S, Kant P, Raveh E, Barak S. Evidence that differential gene expression between the halophyte, Thellungiella halophila, and Arabidopsis thaliana is responsible for higher levels of the compatible osmolyte proline and tight control of Na+ uptake in T. halophila. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2006;29(7):1220–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Ruiz-Carrasco K, Antognoni F, Coulibaly AK, et al. Variation in salinity tolerance of four lowland genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as assessed by growth, physiological traits, and sodium transporter gene expression. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2011;49(11):1333–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Ding M, Hou P, Shen X, et al. Salt-induced expression of genes related to Na+/K+ and ROS homeostasis in leaves of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive poplar species. Plant Molecular Biology. 2010;73(3):251–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Cuin TA, Bose J, Stefano G, Jha D, Tester M, Mancuso S, Shabala S. Assessing the role of root plasma membrane and tonoplast Na+/H+ exchangers in salinity tolerance in wheat: in planta quantification methods. Plant Cell and Environment. 2011;34(6):947–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Jha D, Shirley N, Tester M, et al. Variation in salinity tolerance and shoot sodium accumulation in Arabidopsis ecotypes linked to differences in the natural expression levels of transporters involved in sodium transport. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2010;33(5):793–804.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Quintero FJ, Ohta M, Shi H, Zhu JK, Pardo JM. Reconstitution in yeast of the Arabidopsis SOS signaling pathway for Na+ homeostasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99(13):9061–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Shi H, Lee B, Wu SJ, Zhu JK. Overexpression of a plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter gene improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Biotechnology. 2002;21(1):81–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Kim K, Agarwal M, Fu X, Huang A, Zhu JK. The plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 interacts with RCD1 and functions in oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(49):18816–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Gao X, Ren Z, Zhao Y, Zhang H. Overexpression of SOD2 increases salt tolerance of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology. 2003;133(4):1873–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Razzaque S, Elias SM, Biswas S, Haque T, Seraj ZI. Cloning of the plasma membrane sodium/hydrogen antiporter SOS1 for its over expression in rice. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology. 2014;23(2):263–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Liu P, Chen S, Song A, et al. A putative high affinity phosphate transporter, CmPT1, enhances tolerance to Pi deficiency of chrysanthemum. BMC Plant Biology. 2014;14(1):18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔC T Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, et al. The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clinical Chemistry. 2009;55(4):611–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Quintero FJ, Blatt MR, Pardo JM. Functional conservation between yeast and plant endosomal Na+/H+ antiporters. FEBS Letters. 2000;471(2):224–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Alberti S, Gitler AD, Lindquist S. A suite of Gateway® cloning vectors for high throughput genetic analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2007;24(10):913–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodríguez-Navarro A, Ramos J. Dual system for potassium transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bacteriology. 1984;159(3):940–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Li P, Song A, Gao C, et al. Chrysanthemum WRKY gene CmWRKY17 negatively regulates salt stress tolerance in transgenic chrysanthemum and Arabidopsis plants. Plant Cell Reports. 2015;34(8):1365–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Gao et al. 2016

Advertisement