Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exogenous gibberellin altered morphology, anatomic and transcriptional regulatory networks of hormones in carrot root and shoot

BMC Plant Biology volume 15, Article number: 290 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Gibberellins stimulate cell elongation and expansion during plant growth and development. Carrot is a root plant with great value and undergoes obvious alteration in organ size over the period of plant growth. However, the roles of gibberellins in carrot remain unclear.

Results

To investigate the effects of gibberelliins on the growth of carrot, we treated carrot plants with gibberellic acid 3 (GA3) or paclobutrazol (a gibberellin inhibitor). The results found that GA3 dramatically reduced the root growth but stimulated the shoot growth of carrot. It also significantly promoted xylem development in the tuberous root of carrot. In addition, transcript levels of genes related to gibberellins, auxin, cytokinins, abscisic acid and brassinolides were altered in response to increased or reduced gibberellins.

Conclusions

The inhibited tuberous root growth but enhanced shoot growth in plants treated with GA3 can be principally attributed to the changes in the xylem development of carrot roots. Negative feedback regulation mechanism of gibberellin biosynthesis also occurred in response to altered gibberellin accumulation. Gibberellins may interact with other hormones to regulate carrot plant growth through crosstalk mechanisms. This study provided novel insights into the functions of gibberellins in the growth and development of carrot.

Background

Plant growth and development are stimulated by environmental or intrinsic cues, such as hormones [1, 2]. Gibberellins (GAs) are indispensable stimulators of plant growth [3]. These hormones are initiated from the diterpenoid pathway. To date, over 100 GAs have been identified, but only a few of them are bioactive [4]. Nowadays, the application of exogenous GAs is commonly used to regulate plant growth and development [5].

GA metabolism and perception have been extensively documented [6]. In vascular plants, geranyl geranyl diphosphate (GGDP) is first converted to ent-kaurene by ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase (CPS) and ent-kaurene synthase (KS). GA12 is then produced with oxidation by ent-kaurene oxidase (KO) and ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase (KAO). Stepwise oxidation is catalyzed by GA20-oxidase (GA20ox) and GA3-oxidase (GA3ox) to produce various GA intermediates and bioactive GAs, whereas GA2-oxidase (GA2ox) is involved in inactivation of bioactive GAs. GA-mediated growth is attributed to the degradation of DELLA proteins, which are the main restraints for plant growth [7]. Binding of GA to the receptor, GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) triggers a close link between GID1 and DELLA; subsequently, DELLAs are degraded via the 26S proteasome [7, 8]. Other components, such as specific ubiquitin E3 ligase complex (SCFSLY1/GID2/SNE), SLEEPY1 (SLY1), PICKLE, SHORT INTERNODE (SHI) and SPINDLY (SPY), are essentially required for GA signal transduction (Fig. 1) [9]. Biochemical, molecular and genetic studies have suggested that genes involved in GA metabolic and signaling pathways are essential for GA accumulation and subsequent functions [10–12].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Receptors and acting components in GA response in higher plants

Full size image

GAs are involved in various processes in plants. GA-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis and tomato cannot germinate without exogenous GAs [13]. By contrast, GA application can make environmental stimuli unnecessary and promote germination, indicating that GAs play essential roles in germination [14]. GAs can promote cell elongation, and GA4 is the active form that regulates shoot elongation in Arabidopsis [15]. GAs also participate in leaf expansion and fruit set and growth [16, 17]. Furthermore, GAs control root elongation and cell proliferation [18, 19].

Carrot (Daucus carota L.), a biennial plant from the Apiaceae family, is a root vegetable with enriched healthy composition [20–22]. Our previous work has focused on conducting carrot breeding and establishing genome and transcriptome database for carrot (http://apiaceae.njau.edu.cn/carrotdb/index.php) [23]. However, the role of GAs in the regulation of root plants is poorly understood because of technical reasons [24]. Hidden underground, root systems are often difficult to observe and quantify without any harm. A previous research indicated that GA is essentially required for carrot somatic embryogenesis [25]. However, another study suggested that applied GA inhibits the growth of carrot roots [26]. Thus, the functions of GAs in carrot remain unclear.

The present study aimed to investigate the effects of GA treatment on the growth and development of carrot. We attempted to gain novel insights into GA functions in carrot growth based on transcript profiles of genes involved in hormone metabolic and signaling pathways. Morphological and anatomical characteristics, along with hormone crosstalk, were also discussed to completely elucidate the roles of applied GA3. This study provided novel insights into GA-mediated plant growth and development in vascular plants.

Results

Plant growth analysis

To determine whether GA is involved in carrot plant growth, 5-week-old carrots were treated with GA or its inhibitor paclobutrazol (PBZ) weekly for five times. The effects of the applied GA and PBZ on carrot plant growth were observed after 5 weeks (Fig. 2). Exogenous GA3 significantly increased the shoot weight but significantly decreased root diameter and the root weight of carrot. By contrast, PBZ increased the root weight and root diameter but decreased the shoot weight of carrot. The exogenous application of GA3 + PBZ resulted in a phenotype similar to that of the control, which was the intermediate between the GA3 and the PBZ treated plants (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on carrot growth. Black lines in the lower left corner of each plant represent 5 cm in that pixel

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on carrot fresh weight (a) and root diameter (b). Values are means ± SD from three replicates, and the bars represent SD. Statistical differences were evaluated by Student t test at the 0.05 probability level. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with control group

Full size image

Anatomical structure changes in the roots, petioles and leaves

In the roots

Carrot roots without any treatment were approximately 1.2 cm in diameter (Fig. 4a). GA3 dramatically reduced the root diameter, which was slightly relieved in the presence of PBZ (Figs. 3 and 4). Interestingly, the ratio of xylem area to total root area was significantly higher under GA3 treatment compared with control conditions (Fig. 5). PBZ alone significantly increased the thickness of root diameter, but decreased the ratio of xylem area to total area, which was relieved by application of GA3 (Figs. 3, 4 and 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the root anatomical structure of carrot. a (b and c), d (e and f), g (h and i) and j (k and l) represent the cross sections of roots under control, GA3, PBZ and GA3 + PBZ treatments, respectively. Epidermis (Ep), parenchymal cell (PC), phellogen (Ph), starch granule (SG) and vessel (Ve) are marked in the figure. Scale bars in b, c, e, f, h, i, k and l are 100 μm in length, whereas bars in a, d, g and j are 1 cm in length

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of GA3 and PBZ treatments on the ratio of xylem area to total root area. Values are means ± SD from three replicates, and the bars represent SD. Statistical differences were evaluated by Student t test at the 0.05 probability level. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with control group

Full size image

In the petioles

GA3 increased the number of vascular bundles in the petioles, which may contribute to influxes of nutrients and water towards the leaves (Fig. 6b). This effect was also observed when GA3 was applied together with PBZ. However, PBZ did not evidently change the number of vascular bundles (Figs. 6 and 7).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the anatomical structure in carrot petioles. a, b, c and d represent the cross sections of petioles under control, GA3, PBZ and GA3 + PBZ treatments, respectively. Collenchyma (C), epidermis (Ep), exodermis (Ex), phloem (P) and xylem (X) are marked in the figure. Scale bars in a, b, c, d and e are 40 μm in length

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Number of vascular bundles in carrot petioles under different treatments. Data were calculated and presented as mean ± SD. Student’s t test was used to determine the difference between two treatments. * P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant compared with control group

Full size image

In the leaves

Palisade tissue (Pt) and spongy tissue (St) are two main components of carrot leaves. Pt, which contains the largest number of chloroplasts, may be the principal site for photosynthesis in the leaves. St is another leaf tissue that facilitates gas exchange. However, no obvious difference was detected in the anatomical structure of the leaves under different treatments (Fig. 8).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the anatomical structure in carrot leaves. a, b, c and d represent the cross sections of leaves under control, GA3, PBZ and GA3 + PBZ treatments, respectively. Epidermis (Ep), palisade tissue (Pt), spongy tissue (St) and vascular (V) are marked in the figure

Full size image

Effects of GA3 treatment on the expression levels of GA biosynthetic pathway genes

To illustrate the effects of gibberellin application on GA biosynthesis, we investigated the changes in the expression levels of GA metabolic genes. DcKS, DcKO, DcKAO1, DcGA20ox1, DcGA20ox2, DcGA3ox1, DcGA2ox1, DcGA2ox2 and DcGA2ox3 were annotated as GA pathway-related genes based on carrotDB, a transcriptomic and genomic database for carrot (Table 1). The expression levels of these selected genes were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The biosynthetic pathway-related genes were strongly regulated by GA or PBZ treatment (Fig. 9).

Table 1 Nucleotide sequences of primers specific to gibberellin biosynthetic and signaling genes used for qRT-PCR
Full size table
Fig. 9
figure 9

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the expression levels of GA pathway-related genes. Error bars represent standard errors among three independent replicates. Data are the means ± SD of three replicates

Full size image

In the roots, exogenous GA3 application upregulated DcKS, DcGA2ox1, DcGA2ox2 and DcGA2ox3 expression but reduced the mRNA levels of DcKO, DcGA20ox1 and DcGA20ox2. Similarly, GA3 + PBZ treatment markedly decreased the expression levels of DcKO, DcGA20ox1 and DcGA20ox2 but obviously increased that of DcGA2ox2. In the petioles, exogenous GA3 application reduced the mRNA levels of DcKS, DcKO, DcKAO1, DcGA2ox1, DcGA2ox2 and DcGA2ox3 but did not significantly alter the expression levels of DcGA20ox1, DcGA20ox2 and DcGA3ox1. PBZ alone upregulated DcKO, DcKAO1, DcGA20ox1, DcGA20ox2, and DcGA3ox1 but downregulated DcGA2ox1 and DcGA2ox3. In the leaves, GA3 application upregulated DcGA2ox1 but downregulated DcKS and DcGA20ox2 expression. PBZ alone upregulated DcGA20ox1 but downregulated DcGA2ox2 and DcGA2ox3 (Fig. 9).

Effects of GA3 application on the expression levels of GA response genes

The proteins encoded by DcGID1b, DcGID1c, DcDELLA, DcSLY1, DcPICKLE1, DcPICKLE2, DcSPY, DcGAMYB and DcSHI were recognized as GA receptors or acting components by carrotDB. Thus, these genes were selected and investigated for qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure 10

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the expression levels of genes involved in GA signaling. Error bars represent the standard errors among three independent replicates. Data are the means ± SD of three replicates

Full size image

In the roots, GA3 treatment downregulated DcGID1b and DcSLY1 but upregulated DcDELLA, DcSPY and DcSHI. In the petioles, GA3 treament alone downregulated DcGID1c and DcPICKLE1. By contrast, DcGID1b, DcGID1c and DcPICKLE1 showed increased expression after PBZ treatment. In the leaves, exogenous GA3 upregulated DELLA and DcSPY. PBZ increased DcGID1c but suppressed DcDELLA (Fig. 10).

Effects of GA3 application on the expression levels of genes implicated in other hormone pathway

To verify whether GA3 altered metabolism of other hormones, a total of 9 genes from auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid, brassinolide biosynthetic pathways were identified and their expression under GA3 and PBZ treatments was determined (Table 2; Fig. 11). In carrot roots, transcript levels of most genes were upregulated by GA3 treatment. By contrast, inhibited transcription was detected when PBZ was applied, which was ameliorated by application of GA3. In the petioles, PBZ resulted in obvious increases in transcript levels of DcIPT3, DcABA2, DcMoCo, DcOPR2, DcDAD1, DcDWF4 and DcDWF5, which was quite different from that in the roots. In the leaves, GA3 application increased transcription of DcIPT3, DcABA2 and DcDWF5 but reduced the mRNA abundance of DcYUCCA, DcCYP83B1, DcOPR2, DcDAD1 and DcDWF4 (Fig. 11).

Table 2 Description of genes implicated in auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid, brassinolide biosynthesis and primers used for qRT-PCR
Full size table
Fig. 11
figure 11

Effects of GA3, PBZ or GA3 + PBZ on the expression levels of genes involved in auxin, cytokinin, abscisic acid and brassinolide metabolism. Error bars represent the standard errors among three independent replicates. Data are the means ± SD of three replicates

Full size image

Discussion

Modifying plant growth, stature and yield has been a farming goal in professional agronomy and horticulture [27]. The use of plant growth regulators, such as synthetic hormones, has achieved great progress in recent years [28, 29]. GAs, a class of plant hormones, have been widely used to regulate seed germination, plant growth and fruit yield [30–32]. The root crop carrot is popular worldwide and has great value [33]. Thus, regulating the root and shoot growth of carrot to increase its yield has been a critical goal. The results of the present study provided new insights into the roles of GA in the growth and development of carrot.

GAs stimulate cell elongation, and this effect has been well studied in GA-deficient mutants [34, 35]. Previous studies on GAs focused on aerial parts because the root is not always economically important. However, the roots of some plants, such as carrot, need intensive attention. The results of the present study showed that GA3 application increased shoot growth but impaired root growth in carrot (Figs. 2 and 3), which is in agreement with the results obtained by Michel-Wolwertz and his collegues [26]. In higher plants, GA could promote cell elongation at the expense of lateral expansion [36]. Here, enlargement of the GA-treated roots was suppressed, again supporting this statement. This treatment also dramatically altered matter distribution. Therefore, excessive GA3 negatively controls root growth in carrot. This interesting observation agrees with a previous research in carrot [26], although some studies indicate that GAs play essential roles in root growth [37, 38].

Xylem is an important tissue for water and solute transport; this tissue also provides structural support [39]. However, the phloem tissue in carrot root provides more nutrients and metabolites than the xylem tissue [40]. As a result, an appropriate phloem/xylem ratio in carrot root is important. A previous study indicated that mobile GA promotes xylem expansion in the hypocotyl of Arabidopsis [41]. Similarly, the present study found that the xylem region in carrot roots treated with GA3 or GA3 + PBZ was evidently multiplied (Fig. 5). This alteration may weaken the root taste, texture and even quality.

GA accumulation within plants may mostly be regulated by biosynthetic genes, and the signals are perceived by receptors and related acting components (Fig. 1) [9, 42]. In the present research, we observed a feedback regulation of GA-related genes. GA3 application decreased the transcript levels of genes encoding GA20-oxidase and GA3-oxidase but increased those of genes encoding GA2-oxidase, whereas PBZ induced opposite effects on these genes. Indeed, feedback regulation of GA biosynthesis is firmly established as a mechanism to maintain GA homeostasis in higher plants [10, 43].

Treatment with GA3 or its inhibitor PBZ can elevate or reduce GA accumulation, thus exerting different effects on plant growth and development [44, 45]. However, we cannot attribute all the alterations to the changing levels of GAs. Indeed, GA-mediated plant growth often involves complex interaction among hormones [46]. Previous studies revealed that altered GA levels can influence accumulation, signaling, transport and even functions of other hormones [47, 48]. In this study, GA3 induced obvious changes in expression of hormone-related genes, suggesting GAs may interact with other hormones to regulate carrot plant growth through crosstalk mechanisms [49–51]. In addition, there seems to be an organ-specific regulation of hormone-related genes in response to GA3 or PBZ. For example, DcGA2ox1 was higher expressed after GA3 treatment in carrot roots and leaves, but was reduced in the petioles. All these results together suggested that hormonal regulation of plant growth is a complicated regulatory network.

Conclusions

In the present study, GA3 or PBZ treatment altered the morphological parameters, anatomical structure and transcriptional regulatory networks of hormones in carrot plants. GA3 treatment restrained root growth but enhanced shoot growth possibly because of thickened xylem region in the roots and increased area of vascular bundles in the petioles. Excessive or reduced gibberellin also altered hormone homeostasis by changing transcription of related genes, thus exerting effects on carrot plant growth.

Methods

Plant material and GA3 application

The seeds of the carrot cultivar ‘Kurodagosun’ were sown in an artificial chamber at the Nanjing Agricultural University (32°02′N, 118°50′E). The artificial weather was controlled at 25 °C for 16 h during daytime with a light intensity of 300 μmol m−2s−1 followed by 18 °C for 8 h at night. Plants were grown in pots (30 × 30 cm) filled with a mixture of vermiculite and organic soil (1:1, v/v). Five weeks after emergence, soils in containers were irrigated with 200 mL of aqueous solution that contains GA3 (150 ppm), PBZ (20 ppm), or the combination of both. The plants treated with aqueous solution were used as the control. All the treatments were performed weekly until the fifth week. The samples were replicated three times and harvested after the treatments. Then, the samples were morphologically characterized before storing at −80 °C until analysis.

Anatomical structure analysis

To examine the effects of GA3 or PBZ treatment on carrot growth, the anatomical structure of the plants was investigated. Fresh samples were cut into small pieces of approximately 1 mm3 and then immediately stored in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.2) containing 2.5 % glutaraldehyde. The slices were dehydrated with gradient ethanol and then infiltrated with epoxy propane. For embedding, the samples were placed and soaked in Spurr resin [52]. A Leica ultramicrotome (Germany) was used to cut the samples into thin sections (~1 μm). The sections were then stained with 0.5 % methyl violet for 10 min. Subsequently, the slices were placed under a Leica DMLB microscope (Germany) for observation and taking photographs.

Total RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis

Total RNA was strictly extracted from carrot roots, petioles and leaves using an RNA extraction kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s directions. RNA was quantified by a One-Drop™ spectrophotometer. Total RNA was treated with gDNA Eraser for 2 min at 42 °C (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) to eliminate genomic DNA contaminants. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from the isolated RNA using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications. The cDNA reaction mixture was diluted 10-fold in deionized water for qRT-PCR analysis.

Gene expression analysis by quantitative real-time PCR

Genes involved in GA, auxin, cytokinin, abcisic acid and brassinolide pathways were selected from carrotDB (http://apiaceae.njau.edu.cn/carrotdb/index.php) [23]. qRT-PCR was performed using TaKaRa SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Dalian, China) in a total of volume of 20 μL. All PCR reaction mixtures contained 10 μL of SYBR Premix Ex Taq, 7.4 μL of deionized water, 0.4 μL of each forward and reverse primer, and 2 μL of diluted cDNA strand. PCR cycling was performed using a program of 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. The experiments were performed with three independent biological replicates and the results were normalized against carrot reference gene DcACTIN [53]. Data from DcGA2ox3 in the leaves of carrot grown under GA + PBZ treatment were selected as calibrator for gene expression analysis. The PCR primer pairs of all genes are shown in Tables 1 and 2.

Statistical analysis

Student t test was applied to detect differences under different treatments at the 0.05 significance level.

Availability of supporting data

The data supporting the results of this article are included within the article.

Abbreviations

C:

collenchyma

CPS:

ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase

Ep:

epidermis

Ex:

exodermis

GA:

gibberellin

GA20ox:

GA20-oxidase

GA2ox:

GA2-oxidase

GA3ox:

GA3-oxidase

GGDP:

geranyl geranyl diphosphate

GID1:

gibberellin Insensitive Dwarf1

KAO:

ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase

KO:

ent-kaurene oxidase

KS:

ent-kaurene synthase

P:

phloem

PBZ:

paclobutrazol

PC:

parenchymal cell

Ph:

phellogen

Pt:

palisade tissue

qRT-PCR:

quantitative real-time PCR

SG:

starch granule

SHI:

short internode

SLY1:

sleepy1

SPY:

spindly

St:

spongy tissue

V:

vascular

Ve:

vessel

X:

xylem

References

  1. 1.

    Malamy JE. Intrinsic and environmental response pathways that regulate root system architecture. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28(1):67–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wolters H, Jurgens G. Survival of the flexible: hormonal growth control and adaptation in plant development. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(5):305–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Pimenta Lange MJ, Lange T. Gibberellin biosynthesis and the regulation of plant development. Plant Biol. 2006;8(3):281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hu J, Mitchum MG, Barnaby N, Ayele BT, Ogawa M, Nam E, et al. Potential sites of bioactive gibberellin production during reproductive growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2008;20(2):320–36.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Claeys H, De Bodt S, Inzé D. Gibberellins and DELLAs: central nodes in growth regulatory networks. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19(4):231–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59(1):225–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sun TP. Gibberellin-GID1-DELLA: a pivotal regulatory module for plant growth and development. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(2):567–70.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Murase K, Hirano Y, Sun TP, Hakoshima T. Gibberellin-induced DELLA recognition by the gibberellin receptor GID1. Nature. 2008;456(7221):459–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Olszewski N, Sun TP, Gubler F. Gibberellin signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways. Plant Cell. 2002;14 suppl 1:S61–80.

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Israelsson M, Mellerowicz E, Chono M, Gullberg J, Moritz T. Cloning and overproduction of gibberellin 3-oxidase in hybrid aspen trees. Effects on gibberellin homeostasis and development. Plant Physiol. 2004;135(1):221–30.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Nakajima M, Itoh H, Katoh E, Kobayashi M, et al. GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE DWARF1 encodes a soluble receptor for gibberellin. Nature. 2005;437(7059):693–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Carrera E, Bou J, García-Martínez JL, Prat S. Changes in GA 20-oxidase gene expression strongly affect stem length, tuber induction and tuber yield of potato plants. Plant J. 2000;22(3):247–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Debeaujon I, Koornneef M. Gibberellin requirement for Arabidopsis seed germination is determined both by testa characteristics and embryonic abscisic Acid. Plant Physiol. 2000;122(2):415–24.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kassen CM, Zagorski S, Kepczynski J, Groot SPC. Key role for endogenous gibberellins in the control of seed germination. Ann Bot. 1989;63(1):71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Eriksson S, Böhlenius H, Moritz T, Nilsson O. GA4 Is the active gibberellin in the regulation of LEAFY transcription and Arabidopsis floral initiation. Plant Cell. 2006;18(9):2172–81.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Serrani JC, Sanjuán R, Ruiz-Rivero O, Fos M, García-Martínez JL. Gibberellin regulation of fruit set and growth in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2007;145(1):246–57.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rebers M, Kaneta T, Kawaide H, Yamaguchi S, Yang YY, Imai R, et al. Regulation of gibberellin biosynthesis genes during flower and early fruit development of tomato. Plant J. 1999;17(3):241–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gou J, Strauss SH, Tsai CJ, Fang K, Chen Y, Jiang X, et al. Gibberellins regulate lateral root formation in Populus through interactions with auxin and other hormones. Plant Cell. 2010;22(3):623–39.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ubeda-Tomás S, Federici F, Casimiro I, Beemster GTS, Bhalerao R, Swarup R, et al. Gibberellin signaling in the endodermis controls Arabidopsis root meristem size. Curr Biol. 2009;19(14):1194–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang GL, Xu ZS, Wang F, Li MY, Tan GF, Xiong AS. Regulation of ascorbic acid biosynthesis and recycling during root development in carrot (Daucus carota L.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;94:10–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Luby CH, Maeda HA, Goldman IL. Genetic and phenological variation of tocochromanol (vitamin E) content in wild (Daucus carota L. var. carota) and domesticated carrot (D. carota L. var. sativa). Hortic Res. 2014;1:14015.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xu ZS, Huang Y, Wang F, Song X, Wang GL, Xiong AS. Transcript profiling of structural genes involved in cyanidin-based anthocyanin biosynthesis between purple and non-purple carrot (Daucus carota L.) cultivars reveals distinct patterns. BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14(1):262.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Xu ZS, Tan HW, Wang F, Hou XL, Xiong AS. CarrotDB: a genomic and transcriptomic database for carrot. Database. 2014;2014:bau096.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Maloof JN. Plant development: slowing root growth naturally. Curr Biol. 2004;14(10):R395–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mitsuhashi W, Toyomasu T, Masui H, Katho T, Nakaminami K, Kashiwagi Y, et al. Gibberellin is essentially required for carrot (Daucus carota L.) somatic embryogenesis: dynamic regulation of gibberellin 3-oxidase gene expressions. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003;67(11):2438–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Michel-Wolwertz MR, Sironval C. Inhibition of growth and accumulation of β-carotene in carrot roots by gibberellic acid. Phytochemistry. 1963;2(2):183–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Biemelt S, Tschiersch H, Sonnewald U. Impact of altered gibberellin metabolism on biomass accumulation, lignin biosynthesis, and photosynthesis in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Physiol. 2004;135(1):254–65.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cai T, Xu H, Peng D, Yin Y, Yang W, Ni Y, et al. Exogenous hormonal application improves grain yield of wheat by optimizing tiller productivity. Field Crop Res. 2014;155:172–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Gray WM. Hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. PLoS Biol. 2004;2(9):e311.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Peng J, Harberd NP. The role of GA-mediated signalling in the control of seed germination. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002;5(5):376–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    de Souza IRP, MacAdam JW. Gibberellic acid and dwarfism effects on the growth dynamics of B73 maize (Zea mays L.) leaf blades: a transient increase in apoplastic peroxidase activity precedes cessation of cell elongation. J Exp Bot. 2001;52(361):1673–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Southwick SM, Glozer K. Reducing flowering with gibberellins to increase fruit size in stone fruit trees: applications and implications in fruit production. HortTechnol. 2000;10(4):744–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Just BJ, Santos CAF, Fonseca MEN, Boiteux LS, Oloizia BB, Simon PW. Carotenoid biosynthesis structural genes in carrot (Daucus carota): isolation, sequence-characterization, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers and genome mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114(4):693–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Weier D, Thiel J, Kohl S, Tarkowská D, Strnad M, Schaarschmidt S, et al. Gibberellin-to-abscisic acid balances govern development and differentiation of the nucellar projection of barley grains. J Exp Bot. 2014;65(18):5291–304.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Willige BC, Ghosh S, Nill C, Zourelidou M, Dohmann EMN, Maier A, et al. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19(4):1209–20.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T. Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18(7):784–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Fu X, Harberd NP. Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature. 2003;421(6924):740–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Achard P, Cheng H, De Grauwe L, Decat J, Schoutteten H, Moritz T, et al. Integration of plant responses to environmentally activated phytohormonal signals. Science. 2006;311(5757):91–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Demura T, Ye ZH. Regulation of plant biomass production. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13(3):298–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Arscott SA, Tanumihardjo SA. Carrots of many colors provide basic nutrition and bioavailable phytochemicals acting as a functional food. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010;9(2):223–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ragni L, Nieminen K, Pacheco-Villalobos D, Sibout R, Schwechheimer C, Hardtke CS. Mobile gibberellin directly stimulates Arabidopsis hypocotyl xylem expansion. Plant Cell. 2011;23(4):1322–36.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hedden P. Recent advances in gibberellin biosynthesis. J Exp Bot. 1999;50(334):553–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gallego-Giraldo L, Ubeda-Tomás S, Gisbert C, García-Martínez JL, Moritz T, López-Díaz I. Gibberellin homeostasis in tobacco is regulated by gibberellin metabolism genes with different gibberellin sensitivity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008;49(5):679–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Saos FLGL, Hourmant A, Esnault F, Chauvin JE. In vitro bulb development in shallot (Allium cepa L. Aggregatum Group): effects of anti-gibberellins, sucrose and light. Ann Bot. 2002;89(4):419–25.

    PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Eshel D, Lichter A, Dinoor A, Prusky D. Characterization of Alternaria alternata glucanase genes expressed during infection of resistant and susceptible persimmon fruits. Mol Plant Pathol. 2002;3(5):347–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gao XH, Xiao SL, Yao QF, Wang YJ, Fu XD. An updated GA signaling ‘relief of repression’ regulatory model. Mol Plant. 2011;4(4):601–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Oh E, Yamaguchi S, Hu J, Yusuke J, Jung B, Paik I, et al. PIL5, a phytochrome-interacting Bhlh protein, regulates gibberellin responsiveness by binding directly to the GAI and RGA promoters in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell. 2007;19(4):1192–208.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Willige BC, Isono E, Richter R, Zourelidou M, Schwechheimer C. Gibberellin regulates PIN-FORMED abundance and is required for auxin transport-dependent growth and development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2011;23(6):2184–95.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yang C, Liu J, Dong X, Cai Z, Tian W, Wang X. Short-term and continuing stresses differentially interplay with multiple hormones to regulate plant survival and growth. Mol Plant. 2014;7(5):841–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Liu J, Rowe J, Lindsey K. Hormonal crosstalk for root development: a combined experimental and modeling perspective. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:116.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Nemhauser JL, Hong F, Chory J. Different plant hormones regulate similar processes through largely nonoverlapping transcriptional responses. Cell. 2006;126(3):467–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Spurr AR. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969;26(1–2):31–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tian C, Jiang Q, Wang F, Wang GL, Xu ZS, Xiong AS. Selection of suitable reference genes for qPCR normalization under abiotic stresses and hormone stimuli in carrot leaves. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117569.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0670); Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (BK20130027); Shanxi Province Coal Based Key Scientific and Technological Project (FT201402-07); Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, China

    Guang-Long Wang, Feng Que, Zhi-Sheng Xu, Feng Wang & Ai-Sheng Xiong

Authors
  1. Guang-Long Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Que
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhi-Sheng Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ai-Sheng Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ai-Sheng Xiong.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: ASX GLW. Performed the experiments: GLW FQ. Analyzed the data: GLW ZSX FW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ASX. Wrote the paper: GLW. Revised the paper: GLW ASX. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, GL., Que, F., Xu, ZS. et al. Exogenous gibberellin altered morphology, anatomic and transcriptional regulatory networks of hormones in carrot root and shoot. BMC Plant Biol 15, 290 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0679-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-015-0679-y

Keywords

  • Gibberellins
  • Morphology
  • Anatomic
  • Transcript profiles
  • Hormonal crosstalk
  • Daucus carota L

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us