Open Access

Isolation and characterization of the C-class MADS-box gene involved in the formation of double flowers in Japanese gentian

  • Takashi Nakatsuka1,
  • Misa Saito2,
  • Eri Yamada2,
  • Kohei Fujita2,
  • Noriko Yamagishi3,
  • Nobuyuki Yoshikawa3 and
  • Masahiro Nishihara2Email author
BMC Plant Biology201515:182

Received: 23 April 2015

Accepted: 7 July 2015

Published: 17 July 2015



Generally, double-flowered varieties are more attractive than single-flowered varieties in ornamental plants. Japanese gentian is one of the most popular floricultural plants in Japan, and it is desirable to breed elite double-flowered cultivars. In this study, we attempted to characterize a doubled-flower mutant of Japanese gentian. To identify the gene that causes the double-flowered phenotype in Japanese gentian, we isolated and characterized MADS-box genes.


Fourteen MADS-box genes were isolated, and two of them were C-class MADS-box genes (GsAG1 and GsAG2). Both GsAG1 and GsAG2 were categorized into the PLE/SHP subgroup, rather than the AG/FAR subgroup. In expression analyses, GsAG1 transcripts were detected in the second to fourth floral whorls, while GsAG2 transcripts were detected in only the inner two whorls. Transgenic Arabidopsis expressing GsAG1 lacked petals and formed carpeloid organs instead of sepals. Compared with a single-flowered gentian cultivar, a double-flowered gentian mutant showed decreased expression of GsAG1 but unchanged expression of GsAG2. An analysis of the genomic structure of GsAG1 revealed that the gene had nine exons and eight introns, and that a 5,150-bp additional sequence was inserted into the sixth intron of GsAG1 in the double-flowered mutant. This insert had typical features of a Ty3/gypsy-type LTR-retrotransposon, and was designated as Tgs1. Virus-induced gene silencing of GsAG1 by the Apple latent spherical virus vector resulted in the conversion of the stamen to petaloid organs in early flowering transgenic gentian plants expressing an Arabidopsis FT gene.


These results revealed that GsAG1 plays a key role as a C-functional gene in stamen organ identity. The identification of the gene responsible for the double-flowered phenotype will be useful in further research on the floral morphogenesis of Japanese gentian.


AGAMOUS Apple latent spherical virus vector Double-flowers Japanese gentian LTR-type retrotransposon MADS-box genes


Double-flowered plants are often preferred by consumers because they are larger, more floriferous, and more showy than single flowers [1]. Double-flowered varieties are more common than single-floweredvarieties for several important floricultural plants including carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus), rose (Rosa hybrida), and chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum × morifolium). In other floricultural plants, the development of double-flowered varieties is one of the main breeding aims alongside improvements to floral color, size, scent, vase life, and disease resistance.

Generally, the flowers of dicotyledonous plants are composed of four types of organs; sepals, petals, stamens, and pistils, which are arranged in four whorls. In eudicots, floral organ identities are explained by the ABC model, which has been established from studies on two model plants, Arabidopsis thaliana and Antirrhinum majus [2]. The ABC model includes many genes encoding MADS-box transcription factors. According to this model, there are three classes of gene functions. The A-function gene, APETALA1 (AP1, SQUAMOSA (SQUA) in A. majus), is expressed in the first and second whorls. The B-function genes, APETALA3 (AP3, DEFICIENCE (DEF) in A. majus) and PISTILLATA (PI, GLOBOSA (GLO) in A. majus) are expressed in the second and third whorls, and their encoded proteins gain their B-function when they form heterodimers [3]. The C-function genes are expressed in the third and fourth whorls, and play an important role in stamen and pistil formation. Male and female organ identities are specified by a single C-function gene, AGAMOUS (AG), in Arabidopsis, but by two C-function genes, PLENA (PLE) and FARINELLI (FAR), in A. majus [4]. The A. majus ple mutant was shown to form petal and petaloid organs in place of stamens and carpels, respectively [5], similar to the Arabidopsis ag-1 mutant. A. majus PLE is an ortholog of Arabidopsis SHATTERPROOF 1/2 (SHP1/2), which is involved in the dehiscence of mature fruit [6], but it is not an ortholog of AG. AG/FAR and SHP/PLE are paralogs, but not orthologs derived from a duplication event in a common ancestor [7].

To control floral organ identity, the B- and C-function genes also require SEPALLATA (SEP), which is defined as an E-function gene [8]. The proposed “quartet model” directly links floral organ identity to the action of four different tetrameric transcription factor complexes composed of MADS-box proteins [9, 10]. Petunia FBP6 and FBP11 are expressed in the ovule, and are defined as D-class MADS-box genes [11]. Recently, the petunia C- and D-clade genes were shown to have largely overlapping functions specifying ovule identity and floral termination [12]. D-function genes have also been identified in lily (LMADS2, [13]), Eustoma grandiflorum (EgMADS2, [13]), and Arabidopsis (STK, [14]).

The deficiency of C-function genes results in the conversion of third-whorl stamens to petals, and fourth-whorl pistils to sepals [15]. This sepal-petal-petal pattern repeats itself many times, resulting in flowers with many petals. In addition to its role in determining floral organ identity, AG also plays a role in terminating flower development [16, 17]. Double-flowered phenotypes result from C-function deficiency in most floricultural plants, including Ipomoea nil [18], Rosa hybrida [19], Petunia hybrida [20], Cyclamen persicum [21], and Cymbidium ensifolium [22]. Therefore, it is likely that double-flowers of Japanese gentian plants result from lost or impaired C-function gene (s), although this had not been confirmed experimentally.

Japanese gentian (Gentiana scabra, Gentiana triflora, and their interspecific hybrids) is one of the most popular floricultural plants in Japan, and is used as cut flowers and potted plants [23]. The genus Gentiana comprises more than 400 species, and belongs to the family Gentianaceae, which also contains the genera Eustoma, Swertia, and Tripterospermum. The flowers of Japanese gentian have a bell-shaped corolla with five lobes, five stamens partly fused with petals, and one pistil. Organs known as plicae, which are located between the lobes of the corolla, are a typical feature of the Gentiana genus. The petals of Japanese gentians are vivid blue, which is conferred by the polyacylated anthocyanin gentiodelphin [24]. The flavonoids of Japanese gentian, the structures of the anthocyanins and flavones, and the biosynthetic structural and regulatory genes associated with these pigments have been well studied [25]. More recently, we determined the structures of flavones that accumulate in the leaves and flowers of G. triflora and identified a novel glucosyltransferase gene involved in the formation of flavone-glucosides [26].

However, there have been few studies on the floral morphogenesis in Japanese gentian at the molecular level. Floral homeotic MADS-box genes have been isolated and characterized from E. grandiflorum, which belongs to the family Gentianaceae [27]. Although Mishiba et al. [28] isolated four MADS-box genes from G. triflora (GtMADS1GtMADS4; Genbank accession numbers AB189429–AB189432), these genes have not been characterized in detail. To date, there have been no systematic characterizations of floral morphological MADS-box genes in Japanese gentian.

Here, we attempted to characterize a double-flowered mutant of G. scabra, a species closely related to G. triflora. We isolated and characterized MADS-box genes expressed in gentian flower buds, focusing on C-class MADS-box genes. We identified 14 MADS-box genes belonging to A, B, C, D, and E classes; these genes are presumably involved in floral development and organ identification. Analyses of a double-flowered mutant revealed that the phenotype was caused by an insertion of a novel retrotransposable element (Tgs1) into one of the C-function genes, GsAG1. This was confirmed by suppressing GsAG1 using the Apple latent spherical virus (ALSV) vector. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the functional characterization of MADS-box genes involved in the floral morphogenesis of Japanese gentian, and the involvement of a retrotransposable element in its double-flowered phenotype.


Isolation of MADS-box genes from Japanese gentian

The fragments of Japanese gentian MADS-box genes were amplified using degenerate primers designed from the conserved domain of AGAMOUS proteins, as described by Kramer et al. [29, 30]. After subcloning, 96 clones were sequenced, and 14 independent clones were identified. Using 5′-RACE technology, we obtained eight independent clones of complete full-length cDNA sequences, whereas the 5′-upstream fragments corresponding to the other six clones were not obtained. In a phylogenetic analysis based on the deduced amino acid sequences, these Japanese gentian MADS-box genes clustered into four functional clades (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Figures S1 and S2).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree of C/D-class MADS-box proteins. Phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method using ClustalW and visualized using MEGA6. Genbank accession numbers of amino acid sequences used in phylogenetic analysis are as follows: Arabidopsis thaliana AG (NP_567569), SHP1 (NP_001190130), SHP2 (NP_850377) and STK (NP_192734); Antirrhinum majus FAR (CAB42988) and PLE (AAB25101); Aquilegia alpina AG1(AAS45699) and AG2 (AAS45698); Cucumis sativus CUM1 (AAC08528) and CUM10 (AAC08529); Gentiana scabra GsAG1 and GsAG2 (this study); Gerbera hybrida GAGA1 (CAA08800) and GAGA2 (CAA08801); Gossypium hirsutum MADS3 (AAL92522), MADS5 (ABM69043) and MADS7 (ABM69045); Ipomoea nil DP (BAC97837) and PEONY (BAC97838); Lilium longiflorum MADS2 (AAS01766) and MADS10 (AIJ29174); Oncidium hybrida MADS2 (AIJ29175) and MADS4 (AIJ29176); Petunia hybrida FBP6 (CAA48635), FBP11 (CAA57445), PFG (AAF19721) and pMADS3 (Q40885); Rosa rugosa MASAKO C1 (BAA90744) and MADSKO D1 (BAA90743); Thalictrum dioicum ThdAG1 (AAS45683) and ThdAG2 (AAS45682); Zea mays ZAG1 (AAA02933) and ZMM2 (NP_001104926). Numerals beside branches indicate bootstrap values from 1,000 replicates. Scale bar indicates 0.05 amino acid substitutions per site

There were two gentian A-clade MADS-box genes; GsAP1 (Genbank accession number LC022772) and GsFUL (LC022780). Core eudicot species have two types of A-class MADS-box lineage genes, euAP1 and euFUL [31]. GsAP1 and GsFUL were categorized into euAP1 and euFUL, respectively (Additional file 1: Figure S1). The deduced amino acid sequence of GsAP1 showed 63.9 % identity with that of GsFUL.

We also identified another six MADS-box genes, which were categorized as B-class genes (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The B-class MADS-box genes form three subgroups, euAP3/DEF, TM6 (paleoAP3), and PI/GLO [32]. GsAP3a (LC022769) and GsAP3b (LC022774) were categorized into the AP3/DEF subgroup, while GsPI1 (LC022770), GsPI2 (LC022771), and GsPI3 (LC022773) were categorized into the PI/GLO subgroup. GsTM6 (LC022767) belonged to the TM6 subgroup derived from the AP3/DEF subgroup. The deduced amino acid sequence of GsAP3a exhibited 78.0 % and 59.8 % identities with those of GsAP3b and GsTM6, respectively. The deduced amino acid sequence of GsAP3b showed 60.1 % identity with that of GsTM6. GsAP3a exhibited 60.3 %, 77.1 %, and 72.4 % identities, while GsAP3b exhibited 56.7 %, 71.5% and 73.1 % with Arabidopsis AP3, Antirrhinum DEF, and petunia GP, respectively. GsTM6 exhibited 58.8 %, 57.3 %, and 52.4 % identities with tomato TDR6, petunia TM6, and rose MADSKO B3, respectively. GsPI1 exhibited 93.7 % and 86.3 % identity with GsPI2 and GsPI3, respectively, while GsPI2 showed 80.2 % identity with GsPI3. The GsPIs exhibited 55.7 %–58.9 %, 58.1 %–64.2 %, 68.1 %–70.8 %, and 59.9 %–67.3 % identities with Arabidopsis PI, Antirrhinum GLO, petunia pMADS2, and petunia GLO1, respectively.

The C-clade MADS-box genes can be separated into two subgroups, AG/FAR and SHP/PLE [7]. We isolated two Arabidopsis AG/SHP orthologs, GsAG1 (LC022775) and GsAG2 (LC022779), from Japanese gentian floral buds, and both belonged to the SHP/PLE subgroup (Fig. 1). No clones in the AG/FAR subgroup were obtained by degenerate PCR or by searching the gentian flower normalized library described by Nakatsuka et al. [33]. The deduced amino acid sequence of GsAG1 showed 63.9 % identity with that of GsAG2. GsAG1 showed 68.8 %, 66.8 %, and 65.2 % amino acid sequence identity with petunia FBP6 [34], A. majus PLENA [5], and I. nil PEONY [18], respectively, whereas GsAG2 showed 68.4 %, 63.5 %, and 66.4 % identity, respectively.

GsSTK1 (LC022768) showed high sequence similarity to STK (AGL11), which is encoded by a D-class MADS-box gene in Arabidopsis and regulates ovule development [35]. The deduced amino acid sequence of GsSTK1 showed 85.1 %, 80.9 %, and 64.9 % identity with that of Eustoma grandiflorum MADS1 [13], petunia FBP7 [36] and Arabidopsis STK [14], respectively. We also isolated three SEP orthologs, designated as GsSEP1 (LC022776), GsSEP2 (LC022777), and GsSEP3 (LC022778), all of which were E-function MADS-box genes (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

The A-function genes included AP1-like MADS-box genes, and also AP2-like genes harboring two continuous AP2 domains. We isolated a GsAP2 ortholog (LC022781) from the gentian petal normalized library described by Nakatsuka et al. [33]. The GsAP2 cDNA was 1,813-bp long, and encoded a protein of 456 amino acid residues (Additional file 1: Figure S3). The miR172-target nucleotide sequences of AP2 were conserved within the GsAP2 coding regions.

Spatial expression analysis of MADS-box genes in different floral organ, leaves, and stems

The spatial expression patterns of isolated MADS-box genes were analyzed by semi-quantitative RT-PCR in wild-type Japanese gentian (Fig. 2). Among the A-clade MADS-box genes, GsAP1 expression was restricted to the first and second whorls and stem tissues, while GsFUL transcripts were detected in all of the tissues tested. GsFUL was strongly expressed in the first and second floral whorls and also in stem tissues.
Fig. 2

Spatial expression profiles of MADS-box genes in floral organs of Japanese gentian. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analysis was performed using total RNAs isolated from sepals, petals, stamens, and pistils of floral buds, and from leaves and stems. Expression profiles of 14 MADS-box genes were investigated: A-clade (GsAP1 and GsFUL), B-clade (GsAP3a, GsAP3b, GsTM6, GsPI1, GsPI2 and GsPI3), C-clade (GsAG1 and GsAG2), D-clade (GsSTK1), and E-clade (GsSEP1, GsSEP2 and GsSEP3) genes. Actin served as the reference gene. Gene names and cycle numbers are indicated at the left and right of panel, respectively

The expressions of GsAP3a, GsAP3b, and GsTM6, belonging to the AP3/DEF subfamily, were detected in all four whorls of the floral organs. There were high transcript levels of GsAP3a and GsAP3b in the petal and stamen, and high transcript levels of GsTM6 in the pistil organs in addition to whorls 2 and 3. Transcripts of GsAP3a, GsAP3b, and GsTM6 were detected in stem organs, but barely detected in leaves. In contrast to the AP3/DEF subfamily, the PI/GLO subfamily genes GsPI1, GsPI2 and GsPI3 were expressed only in the petal and stamen organs (Fig. 2). The transcript levels of GsPI2 and GsPI3 were approximately equal in the petal and stamen organs, whereas there were higher transcript levels of GsPI1 in the petal than in the stamen. The three GsPI genes were expressed at undetectable levels in vegetative organs. Thus, the expression profiles of the GsPI genes belonging to PI/GLO subgroup differed from those of the genes in the AP3/DEF and TM6 subgroups.

The two C-class MADS-box genes, GsAG1 and GsAG2, were strongly expressed in the third (stamen) and fourth whorls (pistil). Transcripts of GsAG1 were also present in petals. Transcripts of both GsAG1 and GsAG2 were at very low levels or undetected in vegetative tissues (leaves and stems). Transcripts of GsSTK1 were detected only in pistils, and not in other whorls, leaves, or stems. The three E-class MADS-box genes, GsSEP1, GsSEP2, and GsSEP3, showed similar expression profiles in floral organs. Transcripts of GsSEP2 and GsSEP3 were detected all floral whorls but not in leaves or stems, whereas GsSPE1 transcripts were detected in all floral whorls and in stems.

Heterologous expressions of GsAG1 and GsAG2 in Arabidopsis

To investigate the functions of GsAG1 and GsAG2, we produced four and six lines of T2 transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing GsAG1 or GsAG2, respectively. Ectopic expressions of C-class MADS-box genes in Arabidopsis and tobacco have been used to evaluate the function of AG orthologs from several plants [37, 38]. Ectopic expressions of AG genes have been shown to induce the ap2 mutant phenotype; that is, pistil-stamen-stamen-pistil [39] Of the four GsAG1-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines, three formed carpeloid organs instead of sepals, and showed partial disappearance of petals (Fig. 3b–d). No morphological changes were observed in all six GsAG2-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines (Fig. 3e–f). These results revealed that the biological functional ortholog of Arabidopsis AG was GsAG1, not GsAG2.
Fig. 3

Typical floral phenotypes of GsAG1- and GsAG2-expressing transgenic Arabidopsis plants. a Vector-control flower with normal sepal and petal organs. bd Flowers of GsAG1-overexpressing transgenic lines nos. 2, 3, and 6 with sepals and petals converted into pistiloid and stamenoid organs, respectively. ef Flowers of GsAG2-overexpressing transgenic lines nos. 9 and 13 with normal floral phenotypes. Expression of transgene in each T2 transgenic plant is illustrated in Additional file 1: Figure S4. Bar = 10 mm

Expression analysis of MADS-box genes in a double-flowered mutant

Next, we attempted to identify the cause of double-flowers in a gentian mutant. The double-flowered mutant had petaloid organs instead of stamens in the third whorl (Fig. 4a). The petaloid organ consisted of a petal structure fused to a sterile stamen. Some individuals of the double-flowered mutant also formed a slightly abnormal pistil that contained another incomplete pistil.
Fig. 4

Phenotype of double-flowered gentian mutant and spatial expression analysis of MADS-box genes. a Typical floral phenotypes of single flower cv. Alta (upper panels) and double-flowered mutant (lower panels). Bar = 2 cm. b qRT-PCR analysis of floral MADS-box genes in single-flowered cultivar (WT) and double-flowered mutant. Total RNAs were isolated from each whorl organ of floral buds at flower developmental stage 3 as defined by Nakatsuka et al. [58]. Values are the average of four biological replicates ± standard deviation. White bar indicates single-flowered gentian cv. Alta. Black bar indicates double-flowered mutant. ** and ND indicate significant difference (P < 0.01) and no significant difference, respectively (Student’s t-test)

To identify the candidate gene responsible for the formation of double flowers, we compared the spatial expression profiles of C-class MADS-box genes between the double-flowered mutant and the typical single-flowered gentian cv. Alta (Fig. 4b). The transcript levels of GsAG1 in the third and fourth whorls were significantly lower in the double-flowered mutant than in the single-flowered cultivar. In contrast, the abundance of GsAG2 transcripts was not significantly different between the wild-type cultivar and the double-flowered mutant. The transcript levels of GsAP2 in the inner two whorls were higher in the double-flowered mutant than in the wild-type plants (Fig. 4b). There were also differences between the wild-type cultivar and the double-flowered mutant in the transcription profiles of other A-class GsAP1 and GsFUL genes in the second and third whorls. Slight differences in the expression patterns of some genes might be because of the different genetic backgrounds of the single-flowered cultivar and the double-flowered mutant. However, these results suggested that GsAG1, a C-class MADS-box gene, was the most likely candidate gene responsible for the double-flowered phenotype.

Genomic structures of GsAG1 and GsAG2 in Japanese gentian

In spatial expression analyses of Japanese gentian MADS-box genes, reduced GsAG1 transcript levels were detected in male and female organs of the double-flowered mutant (Fig. 4b). Therefore, we determined the genomic sequences of GsAG1 and GsAG2 in the double-flowered mutant and control plants.

The genome sequence corresponding to GsAG1 cDNA was 15.3-kb long, and consisted of nine exons and eight introns (Fig. 5a). The number and position of introns were conserved between Arabidopsis AG and GsAG1. The second and third introns of GsAG1 (4.3 kb and 6.7 kb, respectively) were considerably longer than those of the corresponding introns in AG genes in other plants (2,998 bp and 102 bp, respectively, in Arabidopsis). The genomic sequence of GsAG2 was 9.5-kb long and consisted of nine exons and eight introns, like GsAG1 (Fig. 5b). The second intron of GsAG2 was 6.6-kb long, but the third intron was shorter than that of GsAG1. The second intron of Arabidopsis AG contains transcriptional regulation regions [7, 40]. The second intron region of both GsAG1 and GsAG2 had several cis-elements; a CArG box (CW8G), a LFY binding site (CCANTG) and a 70-bp region (CCAATCA repeat) (data not shown).
Fig. 5

Genomic structures of GsAG1 and GsAG2. a Genomic structure of GsAG1 in Japanese gentian. Open boxes show untranslated regions, filled boxes show translated regions with exons. Numerals above boxes indicate exon number. Scale bar indicates 1 kb. Open arrow indicates insertion position of transposable element Tgs1 in gsag1 in double-flowered mutant. TSD, target site duplication; LTR, long terminal repeat. Tgs1 is 5,150-bp long with an ORF encoding 1,431 amino acid sequences of a gag-pol polyprotein, 334 bp of LTRs, and 5 bp of TSDs. b Genomic structure of GsAG2 in Japanese gentian cv. Alta

Genomic structures of GsAG1 and GsAG2 in the double-flowered mutant

Next, we compared the genomic structures of GsAG1 and GsAG2 between the wild-type cultivar and the double-flowered mutant. Genomic PCR analyses targeting the sixth intron region of GsAG1 amplified a fragment from wild type, but not from the double-flowered mutant (data not shown). Therefore, we sequenced the sixth intron of GsAG1 in the double-flowered mutant using genome walking technology. The sixth intron of GsAG1 in the double-flowered mutant had a 5,150-bp insertion that was not present in wild type. This inserted sequence had typical features of an LTR-retrotransposon, including a 5-bp target site duplication (TSD, CCCCA) and a 334-bp perfectly matching long terminal repeat (LTR) at both ends (Fig. 5a). The insert was designated as Tgs1 (transposable element of Gentiana scabra 1). Tgs1 encoded a 1,431-amino acid sequence of a gag-pol polyprotein belonging to the Ty3/gypsy-type retrotransposon group. There was no difference in the genomic structure of GsAG2 between the double-flowered mutant and the wild-type cultivar (data not shown).

Suppression of GsAG1 by virus-induced gene silencing

To confirm whether the deficiency of the GsAG1 gene contributed to the double-flowered phenotype in Japanese gentian, we attempted to suppress the expression of GsAG1 using VIGS. We used Apple latent spherical virus (ALSV) vectors because they have been used for reliable and effective VIGS in a broad range of plants [41, 42].

Gold particles coated with pEALSR1 and pEALSR2L5R5 were bombarded into in vitro-grown plants of transgenic Japanese gentian overexpressing AtFT [43]. One month after the bombardment, the proliferation of ALSV in inoculated plants was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis. The proliferation of ALSV was detected in almost all plantlets (data not shown), confirming that the direct bombardment of plasmid vectors was suitable to inoculate ALSV into gentian.

Twenty-two and 20 AtFT-overexpressing gentian plants were inoculated with either an empty ALSV vector (pEALSR1/pEALSR2L5R5) or the ALSV-GsAG1 vector (pEALSR1/pEALSR2-GsAG1), respectively. RT-PCR analysis confirmed that the biolistic inoculation of ALSV vectors resulted in a 90 % inoculation frequency (data not shown). The gentian plants inoculated with ALSV vectors were acclimated in a closed greenhouse, and set flowers after 1–3 months of acclimation. There was no significant difference in flower phenotype between wild type and plants inoculated with an empty ALSV vector (Fig. 6a). Six out of 14 surviving plants inoculated with ALSV-GsAG1 formed petals in place of stamens (Fig. 6b). The qRT-PCR analysis showed that plants showing the conversion phenotype by infection with ALSV-GsAG1 had significantly suppressed GsAG1 transcript levels, compared with those in plants inoculated with the empty vector (Fig. 6c). The transcript levels of GsAG2 were not affected by ALSV-GsAG1 infection. There was no significant morphological change in the pistils of ALSV-GsAG1-inoculated plants.
Fig. 6

Effects of GsAG1 suppression by VIGS. Typical flower phenotypes of control ALSV-empty (pEALSR1/pEALSR2L5R5, a) and ALSV-AG1 (pEALSR1/pEALSR2-GsAG1)-infected plants (b). Spatial expression patterns of GsAG1 (c) and GsAG2 (d) in ALSV-empty and ALSV-GsAG1-infected plants. Flowers from three independent plants were examined for each treatment. Values are mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). ** and ND indicate significant difference (P < 0.01) and no significant difference, respectively (Student’s t-test)


In this study, we isolated 14 MADS-box genes expressed in floral buds of G. scabra: two A-class genes (GsAP1 and GsFUL), six B-class genes (GsAP1a, GsAP1b, GsTM6, GsPI1, GsPI2 and GsPI3), two C-class genes (GsAG1 and GsAG2), one D-class genes (GsSTK1), and three E-class genes (GsSEP1, GsSEP2, and GsSEP3) (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Figure S1 and Figure S2). Mishiba et al. [28] cloned four MADS-box genes, GtMADS1GsMADS4, from G. triflora, a closely related species of G. scabra. Our analyses confirmed that GtMADS1–GtMADS4 are orthologs of GsFUL, GsAG2, GsAG1, and GsSEP1, respectively.

In Arabidopsis, AP1 and FUL function independently; the former controls sepal and petal identities, and the latter controls fruit development and determinacy [31]. In other core eudicots, plants with defective AP1 genes formed leaf-like sepals, but their petal identity was unaffected [44]. Therefore, euFUL genes play an early role in promoting the transition to reproductive meristems and a late role in fruit development. In Japanese gentian, GsAP1 expression was restricted to the first and second whorls of the floral bud and stem, and it was expressed strongly in the sepals and stems (Fig. 2). Conversely, GsFUL was expressed in all tested organs, and was strongly expressed in petals and stems (Fig. 2). As well as GsAP1 and FUL, GsAP2 might also act as an A-function gene (Additional file 1: Figure S1). GsAP2 was strongly expressed in the second whorl (Fig. 4b). In Arabidopsis, the expression of AP2 is regulated by miR172 through translational inhibition [45]. The nucleotide sequence of GsAP2 contained a conserved miR172 target sequence (data not shown). Therefore, the whorl-specific expression of GsAP2 might be controlled by miR172 in gentian, like in other plants.

In Arabidopsis and A. majus, B-function, which specifies petal and stamen identities, is determined by a heterodimer consisting of one AP3/DEF protein and one PI/GLO protein [46, 47]. AP3/DEF lineages can be categorized into two subgroups; euAP3 and paleoAP3 [29]. euAP3 is widely distributed in higher eudicots, whereas paleoAP3 is distributed in lower eudicots, magnoliid dicots, monocots, and basal angiosperms [48]. In addition, a number of higher eudicot species contain both euAP3 and paleoAP3 (designated as TM6). AP3/DEF genes belonging to the euAP3 (GsAP3a and GsAP3b) and TM6 (GsTM6) groups were isolated from Japanese gentian (Additional file 1: Figure S2). Three euAP3, one TM6, and two PI/GLO genes were also identified from Eustoma grandiflorum in the family Gentianaceae [27]. Therefore, it seems that a TM6 gene encoding a B-class MADS-box protein is present in the family Gentianaceae, but not in the Solanaceae [35] or Asteraceae [49]. Geuten and Irish [50] reported that the PI/GLO lineage was duplicated and separated into GLO1 and GLO2 lineages in the Solanaceae. Their results also implied that the GLO1 lineage has been lost from the Gentianales and the GLO2 lineage lost from the Lamiales. The results of the present study indicated GsPI1 to GsPI3 in Japanese gentian are in the GLO2 lineage (Additional file 1: Figure S2). GsAP3a, GsAP3b, and GsTM6 were expressed in all floral whorls (Fig. 2). High transcript levels of GsAP3a and GsAP3b were detected in the second (petal) and third whorls (stamen), and GsTM6 was expressed at high levels in whorls 2–4. On the other hand, the expressions of the three GsPIs were clearly restricted to the second and third whorls (Fig. 2). These differences in expression profiles among euAP3, TM6, and PI/GLO were also reported in petunia [48]. In petunia, PhTM6 is mainly expressed in third and fourth whorls and is involved in stamen development but not petal development, while PhDEF is involved in both petal and stamen development [51, 48].

Both GsAG1 and GsAG2 were categorized into the SHP/PLE subgroup but not the AG/FAR subfamily (Fig. 1). In this study, we could not find any paralogous genes belonging to the AG/FAR subgroup by degenerate PCR technology. In E. grandiflorum, which also belongs to the family Gentianaceae, three SHP/PLE subgroup genes (EgPLE1 to EgPLE3) were identified, but no AG/FAR subgroup genes [27]. The AG/FAR subgroup of C-class MADS-box genes is responsible for male and female organ identity in several plant species. This subgroup of genes includes Arabidopsis AG [52], petunia pMADS3 [53], and I. nil DUPLICATED (DP, [18]). Members of the SHP/PLE subgroup also play a major role in floral organ identity in A. majus [5]. Therefore, AG/FAR subgroup genes might have disappeared from some species in the Gentianaceae, leaving SHP/PLE subgroup genes to function as C-class genes, although further analysis such as whole-genome sequencing should be conducted to confirm this hypothesis.

There is only one C-class MADS-box gene, a single copy of AG, in Arabidopsis. However, there are two AG paralogs in some plant species, including A. majus (PLE/FAR, [4]), petunia (pMADS3/FBP6, [34]), cucumber (CUM1/CUM10, [34]), maize (ZAG1/ZMM2, [54]), I. nil (DP/IN, [18]), and cyclamen (CpAG1/CpAG2, [21]). In maize, ZAG1 transcripts accumulate in developing ears rather than in tassels, whereas ZMM2 transcripts are more abundant in tassels [54]. In the ple single mutant of A. majus, the fourth whorl develops as two sepaloid/carpeloid/petaloid organs. The fourth whorl organs of ple/far double mutants develop as four or five well-formed petals [4]. Thus, PLE and FAR appear to contribute unequally to the specification of male and female organs.

GsAG1 transcripts were detected in the inner three whorls, whereas GsAG2 transcripts were restricted to the third and fourth whorls (Fig. 2). GsAG1 transcripts were detected in petal organs (whorl 2) in the RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 2) but not in the qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 4). The RT-PCR and qRT-PCR analyses were performed using floral buds at different floral development stages, S1 (immature bud) and S3 (just before anthesis), respectively. In general, AG is expressed in either the third or fourth whorls [15]. Therefore, GsAG1 expression in the second whorl in Japanese gentian appears to be a unique phenomenon. This may be because the petals and stamens of Japanese gentians are fused at their lower halves. Therefore, at an early floral developmental stage, young petal organs might contain stamen primordia. As shown in the qRT-PCR analysis (Fig. 4), no GsAG1 transcripts were detected in the second whorl because both petal and stamen organs were completely distinguishable at the later stage of floral development.

The heterologous expression of GsAG1 in transgenic Arabidopsis caused the conversion of sepals into carpeloid organs, indicating its AG function (Fig. 3b). In contrast, GsAG2-expressing Arabidopsis showed no significant changes in morphogenesis compared with the empty vector control (Fig. 3c). Ectopic expressions of Arabidopsis AG or Antirrhinum PLE specified homeotic conversion of the first and second whorl organs, causing sepals to develop as carpels and petals to develop as stamens [37, 7]. The ectopic expression of Antirrhinum FAR converted petals to stamens, but did not alter sepal identity [7]. Thus, heterologous expression analyses in Arabidopsis do not always correctly evaluate the function of C-class MADS-box genes from other plant species.

Most double-flowered phenotypes result from a deficiency of C-function genes [2]. The qRT-PCR analysis showed that GsAG1 transcripts were markedly decreased in the third and fourth whorls of double-flowered Japanese gentian, compared with those in single-flowered wild-type Japanese gentian (Fig. 4b). No GsAG1 transcripts were detected in the doubled-flower mutant by RT-PCR using several primer combinations (data not shown), and no truncated GsAG1 transcripts were detected by 3′-RACE. A sequencing analysis revealed that the double-flowered mutant had an insertion of a 5,150-bp putative retrotransposable element in the sixth intron of GsAG1 (Fig. 5a). This transposable element, Tgs1, had the typical features of Ty3/gypsy-type retrotransposable elements (Fig. 5a). In the duplicated (dp) mutant of I. nil, the mutation was due to the rearrangement of genomic structure by the Em/Spm transposable element [18]. The Antirrhinum ple mutant was shown to have an insertion of the Tam3 transposable element in the second intron of PLE, and ple mRNA was hardly detected in the floral organs of the mutant [5]. It was also reported that a double-flowered ranunculid mutant was associated with the insertion of a solo LTR retrotransposon into the fourth exon of ThAG1 [55]. Thus, it is likely that the expression of GsAG1 would be interrupted by the insertion of the long transposable element in the sixth intron.

VIGS is a useful tool for the functional analysis of genes in horticultural plants that are recalcitrant to other means of genetic transformation [56]. Petunia plants in which both pMADS3 and FBP6 were silenced by VIGS formed petaloid organs in place of carpels, depending on the cultivar [57]. Most viral vectors are excluded from meristematic tissue, and therefore, gene silencing in the meristem is not possible in most instances [56]. In this study, we used VIGS to silence GsAG1 and observed that stamens were converted into petaloid organs (Fig. 6b). These results strongly suggested that the deficiency of GsAG1 was responsible for the double-flowered phenotype of this mutant. Enhanced transcript levels of GsAP2 were detected in the third and fourth whorls of the double-flowered mutant (Fig. 4b). In contrast, the spatial expression profiles of GsAP1 and GsFUL were similar between the single-flowered cultivar and double-flowered plants. Mizukami and Ma [39] reported that AG antagonizes the function of AP2. Therefore, we speculated that GsAG1 controls the whorl-specific expression of GsAP2.

In the double-flowered gentian mutant, the fourth-whorl pistil was not converted into petals, possibly because of the function of GsAG2. Compared with single-flowered gentian, the double-flowered mutant showed increased expression of GsAG2 in the third whorl (Fig. 4b). There were also increased transcript levels of GsAG2 in double-flowered transgenic gentians in which GsAG1 was suppressed by VIGS (Fig. 6b). In Antirrhinum, PLE is required for full expression of FAR, whereas FAR negatively regulates the expression of PLE [4]. It is possible that GsAG1 negatively regulates the expression of GsAG2 in the third whorl of Japanese gentian. Unfortunately, there are no GsAG2-deficient mutants in nature; therefore, to show the function of the GsAG2, the suppression of GsAG2 by VIGS should be attempted in future studies. In cyclamen, CpAG1 is involved in stamen formation, and the deficiency of CpAG1 caused the homeotic conversion of stamens into petals, resulting in double-petal phenotypes [21]. Overexpression of CpAG2-SRDX (a chimeric repressor) in the cyclamen cpag1 mutant resulted in a multiple-petal phenotype, and the conversion of pistils into petals [21]. Thus, two C-class MADS orthologs contribute to male and female organ identity. Noor et al. [57] demonstrated that VIGS suppression of both MADS3 and FBP6 resulted in the conversion of the stamen/carpel into petal/petaloid organs, resulting in double flowers.

The current hypothesis is that GsAG1 plays an important role in male organ identify, while GsAG2 plays important roles in female organ identity and in terminating flowering. To confirm this hypothesis, GsAG2- and GsAG1/GsAG2- knockdown or knockout lines of Japanese gentian should be generated and analyzed in further studies.


We investigated the causal factor (s) of a double-flowered mutant in Japanese gentian. We isolated and characterized 14 MADS-box genes and revealed that a novel retrotransposable element (Tgs1) inserted into the sixth intron of GsAG1 gene is responsible for the mutant flower phenotype. This was confirmed by ALSV-based VIGS system in combination with Arabidopsis FT-expressing early flowering transgenic gentian plants. Further investigations will be required to fully understand the developmental regulation of floral morphogenesis in Japanese gentian. As variation in floral shape is currently limited in Japanese gentians, we believe that this information will be helpful for breeding gentian cultivars with variation in floral shape in the future.


Plant materials

Japanese gentian (Gentiana scabra) cv. Alta was grown in a field at the Iwate Agricultural Research Center (Kitakami, Iwate, Japan). The double-flowered mutant was purchased from Iwasaki-Engai Co. (Kitahiroshima, Hokaido, Japan) and grown as potted plants in the greenhouse of Iwate Biotechnology Research Center. Floral bud samples were collected at developmental stage 1, as defined by Nakatsuka et al. [58], and then stored at −80 °C until RNA extraction.

Isolation of MADS-box genes from gentian flower buds

Total RNAs were isolated from the floral buds of Japanese gentian and purified using RNAiso Plus and Fruit-mate kits (Takara-bio, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). The cDNAs were synthesized by an RNA PCR kit (AMV) Ver. 3 (Takara-bio). The candidate gentian MADS-box genes were isolated using degenerate primers as described by Kramer et al. [29, 30]. The amplified fragments were subcloned into the pCR4TOPO TA cloning vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and sequenced using a BigDye terminator ver. 1.1 cycle sequencing kit and an ABI PRISM 3130xl DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). To obtain the full-length cDNA of each gentian MADS-box gene, 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′-RACE) was performed using a GeneRacer kit with SuperScript III RT (Invitrogen). The amplified fragments were subcloned and sequenced as described above. Nucleotide sequences were translated into deduced amino acid sequences using CLC Sequence Viewer 7 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) and compared using the BLAST network service at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using ClustalW with neighbor-joining algorithm and visualized using MEGA ver. 6 software [59].

The GtAP2 ortholog, which is not categorized as a MADS-box protein, was found by BLAST searches of in-house gentian petal cDNA library data [33], and then the full-length cDNA was obtained using RACE technology as described above.

Gene expression analysis

To investigate the spatial expression profiles of gentian MADS-box genes, we performed semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses. Total RNAs (1 μg) were isolated from each organ as described above, and then genomic DNA was eliminated and cDNAs were synthesized using gDNA Eraser and PrimeScript RT, respectively (Takara-bio).

For the RT-PCR analyses, the reaction mixture (50 μL) consisted of 1 × Ex Taq buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.4 μM each primer, 2.5 U Ex Taq polymerase (Takara-bio), and 1 μL template cDNA. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 2 min at 94 °C, 26–34 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 40 s at 55 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C, and final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were electrophoresed on a 1.5 % agarose gel in TAE buffer and then stained with ethidium bromide.

The qRT-PCR analyses were performed with the StepOne Plus system (Applied Biosystems) using SYBR GreenER qPCR Super Mix (Invitrogen) as described previously [33]. Briefly, the reaction mixture (10 μL) consisted of 1 × Master Mix, 0.2 μM each primer, and 1 μL template cDNA. The cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 20 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 1 s and 60 °C for 20 s. The specificity of each amplification reaction was checked by a melting curve analysis. Fluorescence was measured at the end of each annealing step. The data were analyzed using StepOne Plus Software Version 2.2.2. The transcript level each gene was calculated relative to that of the reference gene GtUBQ. qRT-PCR analyses were performed using four biological replicates, and data were statistically analyzed by Student’s t-test. The sequences of all primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Production of transgenic Arabidopsis plants

GsAG1 and GsAG2 ORFs under the control of the CaMV35S promoter were each inserted into a binary vector harboring the kanamycin resistance (NPTII) gene to produce the plasmids pSkan-35S:: GsAG1 and pSkan-35S:: GsAG2, respectively. Each binary vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA101 by electroporation (MicroPulser: Bio-Rad, Tokyo, Japan). A. thaliana ecotype col-1 was transformed by the floral dip method as described by Clough and Bent [60]. Positive transformants were selected on germination medium containing 50 mg L−1 kanamycin. GsAG1- and GsAG2-expressing T2 transgenic plants (homozygous) were obtained by self-pollination. The floral morphogenetic phenotypes were observed in four GsAG1-expressing lines and in six GsAG2-expressing lines.

Determination of genomic structures of GsAG1 and GsAG2

The genomic nucleotide sequences of GsAG1 and GsAG2 were obtained using genome walking technology with a GenomeWalker Kit (Clontech, Takara-bio). Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves of G. scabra ‘Alta’ and the double-flowered mutant using Nucleon PhytoPure (GE Healthcare Ltd., Buckinghamshire, UK). Amplified fragments were subcloned and then sequenced as described above.

Virus-induced gene silencing of GsAG1 in gentian plants

To investigate the function of GsAG1, we conducted virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) using the Apple latent spherical virus (ALSV) vector [41]. The trigger fragment was amplified using primers harboring XhoI or BamHI sites (Additional file 1: Table S2), and then subcloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, MI, USA). The fragment was excised by double-digestion with XhoI and BamHI, and then ligated into pEALSR2L5R5 [61] digested with the same enzymes. Large-scale plasmid purification was conducted using a NuleoBond Xtra Midi plus kit (Macherey-Nagel, Takara-bio).

The ALSV vector was inoculated into G. hybrida ‘Polarno White’ plants overexpressing the Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T (AtFT) gene. The AtFT-expressing gentian plants flower earlier than wild-type gentian [43]; therefore, they are useful for studies on floral morphogenesis. Gentian plants expressing AtFT were grown in vitro and inoculated with ALSV vectors by the PDS-1000/He particle Delivery system (Bio-Rad Laboratory). A 0.5-mg aliquot of gold particles (1.0 μm diameter; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was mixed with 100 μL plasmid solution, which contained 5 μg pEALSR1 and 5 μg pEALSR2L5R5 derivatives, 10 μL 10 M ammonium acetate, and 220 μL isopropanol. The mixture was kept at −20°C for at least 1 h. Gold particles coated with plasmid DNA were washed three times with 1 mL ethanol and re-suspended in 10 μL ethanol. Particles were bombarded with 1,100 psi pressure at a distance of 10 cm from the microcarrier holder. After bombardment, virus-infected plants were acclimated and then grown in a closed greenhouse until flowering.

Availability of supporting data

The GenBank/EMBL accession numbers of genes identified in this study are: GsAP1 (LC022772), GsFUL (LC022780), GsAG1 (LC022775), GsAG2 (LC022779), GsSTK1 (LC022768), GsSEP1 (LC022776), GsSEP2 (LC022777), GsSEP3 (LC022778) and GsAP2 (LC022781).

Phylogenetic data have been deposited in TreeBASE respository and is available under the URL





Apple latent spherical virus










Long terminal repeat




quantitative reverse transcription-PCR


semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR








Target site duplication


Virus-induced gene silencing



We thank Mses. A. Kubota, Y. Abe, and C. Yoshida for technical support. This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI (Grant number 21780028) and by the Iwate Prefectural Government.

Authors’ Affiliations

Graduate School of Agriculture, Shizuoka University
Iwate Biotechnology Research Center
Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University


  1. Reynold J, Tampion J. Double flowers. UK: Pembridge press; 1983.Google Scholar
  2. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM. The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature. 1991;353(6339):31–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. McGonigle B, Bouhidel K, Irish VF. Nuclear localization of the Arabidopsis APETALA3 and PISTILLATA homeotic gene products depends on their simultaneous expression. Genes Dev. 1996;10(14):1812–21.Google Scholar
  4. Davies B, Motte P, Keck E, Saedler H, Sommer H, Schwarz-Sommer Z. PLENA and FARINELLI: redundancy and regulatory interactions between two Antirrhinum MADS-box factors controlling flower development. EMBO J. 1999;18(14):4023–34.Google Scholar
  5. Bradley D, Carpenter R, Sommer H, Hartley N, Coen E. Complementary floral homeotic phenotypes result from opposite orientations of a transposon at the plena locus of Antirrhinum. Cell. 1993;72(1):85–95.Google Scholar
  6. Liljegren SJ, Ditta GS, Eshed Y, Savidge B, Bowman JL, Yanofsky MF. SHATTERPROOF MADS-box genes control seed dispersal in Arabidopsis. Nature. 2000;404(6779):766–70.Google Scholar
  7. Causier B, Castillo R, Zhou J, Ingram R, Xue Y, Schwarz-Sommer Z, et al. Evolution in action: following function in duplicated floral homeotic genes. Curr Biol. 2005;15(16):1508–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pelaz S, Ditta GS, Baumann E, Wisman E, Yanofsky MF. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature. 2000;405(6783):200–3.Google Scholar
  9. Egea-Cortines M, Saedler H, Sommer H. Ternary complex formation between the MADS-box proteins SQUAMOSA, DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA is involved in the control of floral architecture in Antirrhinum majus. EMBO J. 1999;18(19):5370–9.Google Scholar
  10. Honma T, Goto K. Complexes of MADS-box proteins are sufficient to convert leaves into floral organs. Nature. 2001;409(6819):525–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Colombo L, Franken J, Koetje E, van Went J, Dons HJ, Angenent GC, et al. The petunia MADS box gene FBP11 determines ovule identity. Plant Cell. 1995;7(11):1859–68.Google Scholar
  12. Heijmans K, Ament K, Rijpkema AS, Zethof J, Wolters-Arts M, Gerats T, et al. Redefining C and D in the petunia ABC. Plant Cell. 2012;24(6):2305–17.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tzeng TY, Chen HY, Yang CH. Ectopic expression of carpel-specific MADS box genes from lily and lisianthus causes similar homeotic conversion of sepal and petal in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2002;130(4):1827–36.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Pinyopich A, Ditta GS, Savidge B, Liljegren SJ, Baumann E, Wisman E, et al. Assessing the redundancy of MADS-box genes during carpel and ovule development. Nature. 2003;424(6944):85–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM. The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature. 1990;346(6279):35–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lenhard M, Bohnert A, Jürgens G, Laux T. Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell. 2001;105(6):805–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Lohmann JU, Hong RL, Hobe M, Busch MA, Parcy F, Simon R, et al. A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2001;105(6):793–803.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nitasaka E. Insertion of an En/Spm-related transposable element into a floral homeotic gene DUPLICATED causes a double flower phenotype in the Japanese morning glory. Plant J. 2003;36(4):522–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubois A, Raymond O, Maene M, Baudino S, Langlade NB, Boltz V, et al. Tinkering with the C-function: a molecular frame for the selection of double flowers in cultivated roses. PLoS One. 2010;5(2):e9288.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Kapoor M, Baba A, Kubo K, Shibuya K, Matsui K, Tanaka Y, et al. Transgene-triggered, epigenetically regulated ectopic expression of a flower homeotic gene pMADS3 in Petunia. Plant J. 2005;43(5):649–61.Google Scholar
  21. Tanaka Y, Oshima Y, Yamamura T, Sugiyama M, Mitsuda N, Ohtsubo N, et al. Multi-petal cyclamen flowers produced by AGAMOUS chimeric repressor expression. Sci Rep. 2013;3:2641.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Wang SY, Lee PF, Lee YI, Hsiao YY, Chen YY, Pan ZJ, et al. Duplicated C-class MADS-box genes reveal distinct roles in gynostemium development in Cymbidium ensifolium (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Physiol. 2011;52(3):563–77.Google Scholar
  23. Nishihara M, Nakatsuka T, Mizutani-Fukuchi M, Tanaka Y, Yamamura S. Gentian: from gene isolating to molecular breeding. In: da Silva J, editor. Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology. UK: Global Science Books; 2008.Google Scholar
  24. Goto T, Kondo T, Tamura H, Imagawa H. Structure of gentiodelphin, an acylated anthocyanin isolated from, that is stable in dilute aqueous solution. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982;23(36):3695–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Nakatsuka T, Sasaki N, Nishihara M. Transcriptional regulators of flavonoid biosynthesis and their application to flower color modification in Japanese gentians. Plant Biotechnol. 2014;31(5):389–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Sasaki N, Nishizaki Y, Yamada E, Tatsuzawa F, Nakatsuka T, Takahashi H, et al. Identification of the glucosyltransferase that mediates direct flavone C-glucosylation in Gentiana triflora. FEBS Lett. 2015;589(1):182–7.Google Scholar
  27. Ishimori M, Kawabara S. Conservation and diversification of floral homeotic MADS-box genes in Eustoma grandiflorum. J Japanese Society Horticultural Sci. 2014;83(2):172–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishiba K, Nishihara M, Nakatsuka T, Abe Y, Hirano H, Yokoi T, et al. Consistent transcriptional silencing of 35S-driven transgenes in gentian. Plant J. 2005;44(4):541–56.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kramer EM, Dorit RL, Irish VF. Molecular evolution of genes controlling petal and stamen development: duplication and divergence within the APETALA3 and PISTILLATA MADS-box gene lineages. Genetics. 1998;149(2):765–83.Google Scholar
  30. Kramer EM, Jaramillo MA, Di Stilio VS. Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiosperms. Genetics. 2004;166(2):1011–23.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Litt A, Irish VF. Duplication and diversification in the APETALA1/FRUITFULL floral homeotic gene lineage: implications for the evolution of floral development. Genetics. 2003;165(2):821–33.Google Scholar
  32. Kramer EM, Irish VF. Evolution of the petal and stamen developmental programs: Evidence from comparative studies of the lower eudicots and basal angiosperms. Int J Plant Sci. 2000;161(6):S29–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Nakatsuka T, Yamada E, Saito M, Fujita K, Nishihara M. Heterologous expression of gentian MYB1R transcription factors suppresses anthocyanin pigmentation in tobacco flowers. Plant Cell Rep. 2013;32(12):1925–37.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kater MM, Colombo L, Franken J, Busscher M, Masiero S, Van Lookeren Campagne MM, et al. Multiple AGAMOUS homologs from cucumber and petunia differ in their ability to induce reproductive organ fate. Plant Cell. 1998;10(2):171–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Rounsley SD, Ditta GS, Yanofsky MF. Diverse roles for MADS box genes in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell. 1995;7(8):1259–69.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Angenent GC, Franken J, Busscher M, van Dijken A, van Went JL, Dons HJ, et al. A novel class of MADS box genes is involved in ovule development in petunia. Plant Cell. 1995;7(10):1569–82.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Airoldi CA, Bergonzi S, Davies B. Single amino acid change alters the ability to specify male or female organ identity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(44):18898–902.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandel MA, Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature. 1992;360(6401):273–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Mizukami Y, Ma H. Ectopic expression of the floral homeotic gene AGAMOUS in transgenic Arabidopsis plants alters floral organ identity. Cell. 1992;71(1):119–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Deyholos MK, Sieburth LE. Separable whorl-specific expression and negative regulation by enhancer elements within the AGAMOUS second intron. Plant Cell. 2000;12(10):1799–810.Google Scholar
  41. Sasaki S, Yamagishi N, Yoshikawa N. Efficient virus-induced gene silencing in apple, pear and Japanese pear using Apple latent spherical virus vectors. Plant Methods. 2011;7(1):15.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Yamagishi N, Yoshikawa N. Highly efficient virus-induced gene silencing in apple and soybean by apple latent spherical virus vector and biolistic inoculation. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;975:167–81.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Nakatsuka T, Abe Y, Kakizaki Y, Kubota A, Shimada N. M N. Over-expression of Arabidopsis FT gene reduces juvenile phase and induces early fowering in ornamental gentian plants. Euphytica. 2009;168:113–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Pabón-Mora N, Ambrose BA, Litt A. Poppy APETALA1/FRUITFULL orthologs control flowering time, branching, perianth identity, and fruit development. Plant Physiol. 2012;158(4):1685–704.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Chen XM. A microRNA as a translational repressor of APETALA2 in Arabidopsis flower development. Science. 2004;303(5666):2022–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Davies B, Egea-Cortines M, de Andrade SE, Saedler H, Sommer H. Multiple interactions amongst floral homeotic MADS box proteins. EMBO J. 1996;15(16):4330–43.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Krizek BA, Meyerowitz EM. Mapping the protein regions responsible for the functional specificities of the Arabidopsis MADS domain organ-identity proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(9):4063–70.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Vandenbussche M, Zethof J, Royaert S, Weterings K, Gerats T. The duplicated B-class heterodimer model: whorl-specific effects and complex genetic interactions in Petunia hybrida flower development. Plant Cell. 2004;16(3):741–54.Google Scholar
  49. Broholm SK, Pollanen E, Ruokolainen S, Tahtiharju S, Kotilainen M, Albert VA, et al. Functional characterization of B class MADS-box transcription factors in Gerbera hybrida. J Exp Bot. 2010;61(1):75–85.Google Scholar
  50. Geuten K, Irish V. Hidden variability of floral homeotic B genes in Solanaceae provides a molecular basis for the evolution of novel functions. Plant Cell. 2010;22(8):2562–78.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Rijpkema AS, Royaert S, Zethof J, van der Weerden G, Gerats T, Vandenbussche M. Analysis of the Petunia TM6 MADS box gene reveals functional divergence within the DEF/AP3 lineage. Plant Cell. 2006;18(8):1819–32.Google Scholar
  52. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM. Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Dev. 1991;112(1):1–20.Google Scholar
  53. Tsuchimoto S, van der Krol AR, Chua NH. Ectopic expression of pMADS3 in transgenic petunia phenocopies the petunia blind mutant. Plant Cell. 1993;5(8):843–53.Google Scholar
  54. Mena M, Ambrose BA, Meeley RB, Briggs SP, Yanofsky MF, Schmidt RJ. Diversification of C-function activity in maize flower development. Science. 1996;274(5292):1537–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Galimba KD, Tolkin TR, Sullivan AM, Melzer R, Theissen G, Di Stilio VS. Loss of deeply conserved C-class floral homeotic gene function and C- and E-class protein interaction in a double-flowered ranunculid mutant. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109(34):E2267–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Senthil-Kumar M, Mysore KS. New dimensions for VIGS in plant functional genomics. Trends Plant Sci. 2011;16(12):656–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Noor S, Ushijima K, Murata A, Yoshida K, Tanabe M, Tanigawa T, et al. Double flower formation induced by silencing of C-class MADS-box genes and its variation among petunia cultivars. Sci Hortic. 2014;178(23):1–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Nakatsuka T, Nishihara M, Mishiba K, Yamamura S. Temporal expression of flavonoid biosynthesis-related genes regulates flower pigmentation in gentian plants. Plant Sci. 2005;168:1309–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(12):2725–9.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Clough SJ, Bent AF. Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 1998;16(6):735–43.Google Scholar
  61. Li C, Sasaki N, Isogai M, Yoshikawa N. Stable expression of foreign proteins in herbaceous and apple plants using Apple latent spherical virus RNA2 vectors. Arch Virol. 2004;149(8):1541–58.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Karlova R, Rosin FM, Busscher-Lange J, Parapunova V, Do PT, Fernie AR, et al. Transcriptome and metabolite profiling show that APETALA2a is a major regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Plant Cell. 2011;23(3):923–41.PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Nakatsuka et al. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.