Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Plant Biology

Open Access

Western white pine SNP discovery and high-throughput genotyping for breeding and conservation applications

  • Jun-Jun Liu1Email author,
  • Richard A Sniezko2,
  • Rona N Sturrock1 and
  • Hao Chen1
BMC Plant Biology201414:380

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-014-0380-6

Received: 31 March 2014

Accepted: 11 December 2014

Published: 30 December 2014

Abstract

Background

Western white pine (WWP, Pinus monticola Douglas ex D. Don) is of high interest in forest breeding and conservation because of its high susceptibility to the invasive disease white pine blister rust (WPBR, caused by the fungus Cronartium ribicola J. C. Fisch). However, WWP lacks genomic resource development and is evolutionarily far away from plants with available draft genome sequences. Here we report a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) study by bulked segregation-based RNA-Seq analysis.

Results

A collection of resistance germplasm was used for construction of cDNA libraries and SNP genotyping. Approximately 36–89 million 2 × 100-bp reads were obtained per library and de-novo assembly generated the first shoot-tip reference transcriptome containing a total of 54,661 unique transcripts. Bioinformatic SNP detection identified >100,000 high quality SNPs in three expressed candidate gene groups: Pinus highly conserved genes (HCGs), differential expressed genes (DEGs) in plant defense response, and resistance gene analogs (RGAs). To estimate efficiency of in-silico SNP discovery, genotyping assay was developed by using Sequenom iPlex and it unveiled SNP success rates from 40.1% to 61.1%. SNP clustering analyses consistently revealed distinct populations, each composed of multiple full-sib seed families by parentage assignment in the WWP germplasm collection. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis identified six genes in significant association with major gene (Cr2) resistance, including three RGAs (two NBS-LRR genes and one receptor-like protein kinase -RLK gene), two HCGs, and one DEG. At least one SNP locus provided an excellent marker for Cr2 selection across P. monticola populations.

Conclusions

The WWP shoot tip transcriptome and those validated SNP markers provide novel genomic resources for genetic, evolutionary and ecological studies. SNP loci of those candidate genes associated with resistant phenotypes can be used as positional and functional variation sites for further characterization of WWP major gene resistance against C. ribicola. Our results demonstrate that integration of RNA-seq-based transcriptome analysis and high-throughput genotyping is an effective approach for discovery of a large number of nucleotide variations and for identification of functional gene variants associated with adaptive traits in a non-model species.

Keywords

Five-needle pineGenotyping arrayLinkage disequilibriumMarker-based selectionPedigree reconstruction

Background

Western white pine (WWP, Pinus monticola Douglas ex D. Don) is an economically and ecologically important forest tree species with wide distribution across western North America. WWP faces serious conservation challenges due to its susceptibility to white pine blister rust (WPBR), caused by the exotic fungus Cronartium ribicola J.C. Fisch., and its high vulnerability to other disturbance agents including the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and fire, both of which are exacerbated by climate change [1]. Today, due largely to WPBR, P. monticola exists in fragmented populations that occupy less than 10 percent of this species’ historical landscape [2],[3]. Other five-needle pines, such as whitebark pine (P. albicaulis Engelm) and limber pine (P. flexilis E.James), are subjected to similar conservation challenges [4]. While development of genetic resistance of WWP and other related species to WPBR is underway in several operational programs [5], better understanding of the genetic diversity, population structure, gene flow, and disease and insect resistance of five-needle pines is critical to their proper management, conservation, and restoration.

In the past decade or so, molecular markers have been developed and used to facilitate conservation and WPBR resistance breeding programs [6]. Analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers has revealed that WPBR disease pressure and selection directed by diverging climates have influenced genetic diversity among WWP populations in different geographical regions [7]-[9]. Several AFLP markers have been shown to be tightly linked with WWP major gene (Cr2) resistance against WPBR [10]. More recently, nucleotide diversity has been investigated through PCR-sequencing of candidate genes under adaptation of host defense response [11]. Progress in association genetics has led to the identification of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers of a few candidate genes associated with quantitative disease resistance traits [12],[13]. Despite these advances, the application of genomic resources, such as high-throughput markers (SNPs and SSRs) and genotyping arrays, remains scarce for WWP and other five-needle pines as these species are quite evolutionarily distant from the few conifers with available draft genome sequences and related genomic information [14],[15].

To develop effective, long term management strategies for WWP and WPBR, ongoing research is needed to improve understanding of the influence that climate and environmental factors have in changing and shaping P. monticola populations. To achieve this objective and realistically score individual genotypes using inexpensive high-throughput techniques, a large number of molecular markers that are easy to score on a large number of WWP populations are needed. While SNP markers are abundant in the genome and have the potential to be excellent tools for these research objectives, to date there is no SNP database or SNP arrays available for WWP.

Next generation sequencing (NGS) strategies for high-throughput SNP discovery and genotyping include restriction-site-associated DNA tags - RAD [16], genotyping by-sequencing - GBS [17], and multiplexed-shotgun genotyping - MSG [18]. RNA-seq is also an important genomic technology for discovery of a large number of DNA markers, including SNP and SSR at transcriptome level. Because RNA-seq produces short cDNA sequence reads targeting at exoms and mainly at protein coding regions, DNA variations associated with phenotypic traits are more easily linked to biological roles for functional characterization of candidate genes than would occur using genomic DNA-based approaches. RNA-seq has wide application to ecological and evolutionary research and it is well suited to understanding speciation and eco-type-specific adaptation by revealing differences in gene expression patterns between populations [19]

The objective of this study was 1) to characterize the transcriptome of tree shoot tissues from resistance germplasm, 2) to develop SNP markers based on a candidate gene approach, and 3) to apply high-throughput SNP genotyping to the reconstruction of pedigrees and resistance screening in WWP conservation and breeding programs. We used RNA-seq for SNP discovery in the transcriptome de-novo assembled from shoot-tip tissues based on bulked segregation of major gene resistance (Cr2/-) and susceptibility (cr2/cr2) to C. ribicola. The SNP assay was designed based on candidate genes related to disease resistance and Pinus highly conserved genes (HCGs). Those SNPs validated here by high-throughput genotyping in a collection of resistance germplasm improve the genomic tools available for WWP and other five-needle pines.

Results

De-novoassembly of shoot-tip transcriptome

Construction of six cDNA libraries from pooled RNA samples representing WPBR resistant and susceptible genotypes enabled us to generate and gain a global view of the transcriptome in the shoot tip tissues of P. monticola. A total of 348.6 million 100-bp paired-end reads were collected from the six cDNA libraries, which represents sequencing data of approximately 33.2 to 89.8 million paired-end (PE) reads per library. A total of 95,727 unique contigs with N50 of 920-bp and average length of 630-bp were produced by de-novo assembly with 123 million RNA-seq 100-bp PE reads from three cDNA libraries constructed from resistant tissues (Additional file 1: Table S1).

54,661 transcripts were extracted from the assembly with read count ≥ 50 per contig, or read count < 50 per contig but with BLASTn E < 10 e-10 when searched against the Pinus Gene Index (PGI) database (Additional file 1: Table S1). All these contigs were used as the shoot-tip reference transcriptome for further analysis, which had a total length of 46 Mb, N50 of 1,376-bp, and average length of 843-bp (Additional file 1: Table S1). BLASTn analysis of the shoot-tip reference transcriptome revealed that it contained 21,930 contigs (40.10% of the total) as Pinus HCGs, since they showed identical hits (E values < 10 e-100) to the PGI database. From this reference transcriptome, a total of 41,460 proteins were predicted by TransDecoder with minimum protein length of 50. Of all putative proteins, 14,287 (30.7% of the total) were putatively complete protein sequences (Additional file 1: Table S2). The WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome with 54,661 contigs has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession GBQX01000000.

Of 41,460 putative proteins derived from WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome, 79.4% and 61.5% of them showed significant similarity to the PGI database and loblolly pine (P. taeda) genome database respectively (tBLASTn or BLASTp with E < 10e-6). tBLASTn search of P. taeda protein database (including 64,809 putative protein sequences) against WWP sequences revealed that 92.9% of them had significant homology hits (E < 10e-6) in WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome (Additional file 1: Table S3). In contrast, only 830 WWP shoot-tip transcripts (1.5% of total) showed identical hits in the poplar leaf rust fungus (Melampsora laricis-populina) genome (BLASTx with E value < 10 e-100), suggesting rare fungal infections in the resistant tissues (Additional file 1: Table S3).

Gene annotation

Gene Ontology analysis was performed for 54,661 transcripts in the WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome using BLAST2GO, 56.7% of them showed significant BLASTx hits in the NCBI nr database. All BLAST top-hit species were plants except one fungal species Botrytis cinerea, and Picea sitchensis accounted for 24.9% of the total contigs while B. cinerea accounted for only 0.2% of the total contigs (Additional file 2: Figure S1), suggesting that contamination was not a serious problem in the data set of WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome. 26,831 contigs (49.1% of the total) were assigned to at least one GO term, and 6,327 of them encoded for putative enzymes. As compared with WWP primary needle reference transcriptome [15], significant enrichment of a series of GO term categories was found and in general, sequences under these categories were significantly over-represented in the shoot-tip tissues (Additional file 3: Figure S2). For example, under category of “response to biotic stimulus”, 1170 genes were expressed in shoot-tip tissues and only 465 genes were expressed in primary needle tissues, suggesting difference of basal defense between these two types of WWP tissues.

Seven hundred and forty-five contigs in the shoot-tip reference transcriptome were identified as resistance gene analogs (RGAs) encoding proteins with domains of nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeats (NBS-LRR) by BLASTx search against 128 WWP RGAs cloned previously [10]. A set of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was identified in P. monticola needle tissues in host defence in response to C. ribicola infection at early stage [15], 740 of them were detected to be expressed in shoot-tips. We selected genes of these three groups HCGs, RGAs, and DEGs as reference sequences in mapping of RNA-seq reads for further SNP discovery.

SNP discovery and characterization

Using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.1 to map PE reads of the six cDNA libraries to the reference sequences, 2,043 indels, 2,857 multi-nucleotide variants (MNV), and 104,452 bi-allelic SNPs were mapped to 41,460 putative protein-coding regions, 57,139 SNPs (54.7%) resulted in an amino acid change (nonsynonymous SNP). We also detected 97,063 SNPs in the HCG group, 7,248 in DEG group, and 6,078 in the RGA group (Additional file 1: Table S4). These SNPs, which totalled 106,399, were distributed across 14,730 contigs with one SNP per 263-bp on average in three candidate groups. HCGs showed the lowest SNP density at one SNP per 285-bp (0.35%). DEGs and RGAs had intermediate and high SNP densities at one SNP per 126-bp and 81-bp (0.79% and 1.23%) respectively. Polymorphic genes accounted for 61%, 83%, and 84% of the total genes in the candidate groups of HCGs, DEGs, and RGAs respectively (Figure 1, and Additional file 1: Table S4).
Figure 1

Distribution of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in contigs of three groups of candidate genes expressed in the shoot-tip tissues. HCGs: Pinus highly conserved genes, DEGs: differential expressed genes in plant defense response, RGAs: resistance gene analogs.

A total of 13,490 HCGs were polymorphic. A detailed examination of SNP distribution revealed that 80.3% (10,826) of these HCGs were polymorphic in both resistant and susceptible samples while 10.9% (1,470) of HCGs were found to be polymorphic only in susceptible seedlings and 5.3% (716) of HCGs were found to be polymorphic only in resistant seedlings. The remaining 3.5% (478) of polymorphic HCGs were homozygous but their alleles were different between resistant and susceptible samples (Figure 2). SNP sites present only in resistant or only in susceptible seedlings were considered the highest priority SNP sites for genotyping verification to identify resistant trait-associated DNA markers.
Figure 2

Unique and shared single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of Pinus highly conserved genes (HCGs) within resistant and susceptible seedlings.

SNP genotyping

Two different genotyping assays tested a total of 432 in-silico SNP loci in 376 seedlings by the Sequenom iPlex technology. Within the first (1st) SNP array, nine genomic DNA samples were removed from genotyping analysis due to too many missing data, resulting in a sample size of n = 179. Analysis of each SNP locus for the three genotypes (A/B/H) found that 301 SNPs (69.7%) were successfully genotyped while the remaining 131 SNPs (30.3%) were scored as ‘failed’ due to missing genotype data in more than 20% of all samples; poor PCR amplification and low signal intensities resulted in missing data.

As summarized in Table 1, out of the 301 SNP loci that were genotyped with a signal, 74 (24.6%) were monomorphic and the other 227 (75.4% of the 301 genotyped SNPs) were verified as polymorphic among the genotyped samples (sequences of their primers and probes are listed in Additional file 4: Table S5). For each SNP locus, observed (Ho) and expected levels of heterozygosity (He) under Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), and significance level for the test for departures from HWE, are shown in Additional file 4: Table S6. A large proportion of SNP markers, 45 in the 1st array and 33 in the second (2nd) array, were identified to be deviated significantly from HWE at P < 0.05 with Bonferroni-correction, probably due to breeding selection of the resistant germplasm from natural populations.
Table 1

Characteristics of in-silico SNPs subjected to verification by high-throughput genotyping

Gene groups

Total

Good SNP loci

Polymorphic SNP loci

no. (%)

MAF = 0 (n)

0 < MAF < 0.05 (n)

MAF ≥ 0.05 (n)*

SNP marker in total (%)

HCGs

162

118 (72.8%)

19

3

96

61.1%

DEGs

118

87 (73.7%)

20

3

64 (6)

56.8%

RGAs

152

96 (63.2%)

35

6

55 (6)

40.1%

Total

432

301 (69.7%)

74

12

215 (12)

52.50%

Note (*): 12 SNP loci (six in RGAs and six in DEGs) showed 100% heterozygocity with MAF values at 0.5.

The distributions of minor allele frequency (MAF) and Ho for the polymorphic loci were similar in two genotyping arrays (Additional file 5: Figure S3 and Additional file 6: Figure S3). The mean Hos for all 227 polymorphic SNP markers were estimated to be 0.529 ± 0.2414, and 0.446 ± 0.178 for the 1st and 2nd SNP arrays, respectively. The candidate group of HCGs had the highest successful rate for conversion of in-silico SNP loci into SNP markers (61.1%) while this rate was only 40.1% for the candidate group of RGAs. In total, 215 SNPs showed a MAF > 0.05 in the sets of tested seedlings. The twelve SNPs that had the highest Ho level of 100% were excluded for population genetics analysis. Thus, a final genotypic data set consisting of 203 SNP loci was used for pedigree reconstruction and LD analysis.

Population structure and full sibship reconstruction

Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the first three principal components explained approximately 60% of the total variation and clear ancestry clusters displayed within the collected samples (Additional file 7: Figure S4). Investigation of population structure with the model-based Bayesian clustering method in STRUCTURE showed that the most likely number of clusters (K) was 4 using the ΔK calculation (Additional file 8: Figure S5). Four genetic clusters were consistently uncovered by two different sampling in the resistant germplasm in the 1st and 2nd SNP arrays (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Genetic diversity among Pinus monticola germplasm by bar plot representation of the percentage of the gene pool in each genotyped seedling. (A) 179 seedlings genotyped by 108 SNP markers in the 1st SNP array; and (B) 188 seedlings genotyped by 95 SNP markers in the 2nd SNP array.

Using COLONY to reconstruct sibship and parentage by the most accurate method of full-likelihood, we found that 179 seedlings in the 1st SNP array and 188 seedlings in the 2nd SNP array were assigned into 35 and 36 full-sib seed families respectively. Both SNP assays revealed the three most abundant seed families, each of which accounted for >10% of the total genotyped samples (Additional file 2: Table S7). These results were largely supported by the known pedigrees and origins of these seedlings in the resistance germplasm collected from breeding programs. The seed family with least members was assigned with only one seedling.

Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis

A total of 11,139 SNP pairs were compared for LD estimates. Chi-squared tests (at P < 0.05) showed significant LD estimates for 962 SNP pairs (8.6% of total), but this pair number was reduced to 183 (1.6% of the total) with an average LD estimate at r 2  = 0.2 after a highly conservative Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (Figure 4). When major gene resistance genotypes (Cr2/- vs. cr2/cr2) were considered in the LD analysis, we detected 21 SNPs (each from one unique gene) in significant LDs with Cr2. After Bonferroni correction, six genes still showed significant LDs with Cr2, including three RGAs (two NBS-LRR genes and one RLK gene), two HCGs, and one DEG (Table 2). Despite not knowing their genetic distances, SNP loci with significant LD may share locations on the same chromosomes. The SNP of the DEG A05_contig_4105 was shown to be tightly associated with major gene (Cr2) resistance (r 2  = 0.81, P = 2.6 E-39). For this SNP marker, CC, GC, and GG genotypes accounted for 26.1%, 68.5%, and 5.4% of the total resistant seedlings; and 0%, 4.6%, and 95.4% of the total susceptible seedlings. This SNP locus thus is an excellent marker for Cr2-resistance selection across four populations in WWP germplasm.
Figure 4

Distribution of the level of significant linkage disequilibrium ( r 2 ) calculated by pairwise comparison of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Only 1.6% of the total SNP comparison pairs are shown here with statistical significance using a Bonferroni correction for multiple tests.

Table 2

Identification of SNP loci in significant linkage disequilibrium (LD) with major gene ( Cr2 ) resistance

Contig-SNP IDs

R^2

pDiseq

N

Candidate group

SNP array

A05_contig_4105

0.808898

2.62E-39***

179

DEG

1st

F0_contig_48562

0.080057

2.29E-04*

179

RGA

1st

F0_contig_3186

0.140014

3.71E-07***

188

RGA

2nd

F0_contig_9161

0.072281

2.87E-04*

188

RGA

2nd

F0_contig_29965

0.067681

4.10E-04*

188

HCG

2nd

F0_contig_3704

0.067235

4.21E-04*

188

HCG

2nd

p values *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction.

Discussion

SNP discovery by a modified RNA-seq approach

Without requirement of pre-existing genomic sequence data, RNA-seq has been shown to have an increasing range of applications in the discovery of novel genes, transcripts, RNAs, alternative splice junctions, fused sequences, and nucleotide variations (such as SNP and SSR) in non-model species [20]-[23]. By integrating regular RNA-seq with bulked segregation analysis, we demonstrate that this approach is an effective strategy for selecting SNPs with high potential to identify DNA variations associated with adaptive traits at transcriptome level in WWP. A recent study found that 15 individuals were needed for accurate allele frequency prediction by RNA-seq approach [24]. Coincidentally, our work used six bulked samples (each pooled from 15 individuals) and recovered a total of ~100,000 high quality SNPs by mapping of 348.6 million RNA-seq reads against three sets of candidate genes under a series of stringent detection criteria. Availability of these novel in-silico SNPs would help provide a large amount of DNA markers for breeding and conservation programs of this important conifer species.

The Sequenom iPlex has been reported as one of highly reliable high-throughput SNP genotyping platforms with wide applications [25],[26]. We adapted it for WWP SNP genotyping due to a more cost-effective and flexible nature of this technology. SNP marker conversion rates from in-silico SNPs to validated loci have been reported for maritime pine (P. pinaster) (42.5%), lodgepole pine (P. contorta var. latifolia) (30.0%), Aleppo pine (P. halepensis Mill.) (76.6%), and Douglas fir (72.5%) [27]-[30]. The present study revealed an average conversion rate of 52.5% in P. monticola. The HCG group showed a much higher conversion rate of 61.1%; this rate is comparable to those SNPs mined by genomic re-sequencing in other tree species [31],[32]. Variation in SNP marker conversion rates suggests criteria for in-silico SNP selection and genotyping design, as well as types of genotyping platforms are important. For example, the in-silico SNP-mining process with stringent quality criteria can distinguish sequence variations from sequencing artefacts. It is possible that the rate of conversion of in-silico SNPs can be improved even more in WWP by optimizing primer design and PCR amplification conditions because we found that some iPlex failed SNPs could be genotyped properly by qPCR genotyping methods such TaqMan and HRM (Liu, unpublished data). Identification of exon-intron boundaries by exome sequencing will improve design of SNP genotyping arrays. Furthermore, as compared to sample-pooling strategy, SNP detection by NGS on individual samples, especially on haploid megagametophyte samples in conifer, has potential to increase overall confidence for in-silico SNP detection.

Our work demonstrates how combining bulked segregation-based RNA-seq with high-throughput SNP arrays enables fast, cost-effective, and yet reliable identification of the most informative (population-specific) markers among hundreds of thousands of in-silico SNPs. We believe that this cost-effective approach for detecting the most informative SNPs can be readily adapted and applied to other non-model conifers, including five-needle pine species (e.g., P. albicaulis Engelm and P. flexilis E.James),

Candidate gene-based SNP array

In the present study we demonstrated the utility of candidate-based approach for selection of a subset of available in-silico SNPs: first, RNA-seq-based transcriptome profiling identified WWP candidate genes (e.g., RGAs and DEGs) having potential biological functions in genetic resistance and host defense against attack by pests, pathogens, and environmental stresses; second, transcriptome profiling also revealed highly conserved genes, even orthologous genes, in conifer species [15]. Because RGAs and DEGs are excellent targets for investigating plant-microbe-environment interactions and HCGs are the most favourable choices for comparative genomics study across related taxa, then we selected SNPs of these candidate groups to develop high-throughput genotyping assays. While SNPs represent a genetic variability of individual at the finest level, if a significant number of SNPs are available, it is not necessary to genotype all the available SNPs throughout the whole genome. Selection of a subset of SNPs that is sufficiently informative but still small enough for the best balance of affordable cost and research objectives is an important step toward effective association studies and genomic selection [33].

A few candidate gene-based case studies have found SNPs and haplotypes associated with quantitative traits in conifers [11],[34] and in other plant species [35]-[40]. Using LD analysis, in this study we identified a defense-responsive gene A05_contig_4105 as being one associated with the Cr2 gene (Table 2). A05_contig_4105 encodes an F-box protein that has high homology with the P. taeda protein AEW08082 and its expressed transcript was specifically up-regulated in the primary needles of resistant seedlings after C. ribicola infection [15]. F-box proteins contain at least one F-box domain that is commonly linked with other motifs such as LRRs and tryptophan-aspartic acid (WD) repeats for protein–protein interactions associated with signal transduction networks and other cellular functions [41].

Despite the disadvantages of relatively low read-mapping coverage and high polymorphism levels, we included in-silico SNPs of 152 RGAs in the Sequenom iPlex assay. Genotyping of RGA SNPs is more likely to identify genetic associations with disease resistance traits due to their putative functions in plant innate immune systems. Plant NBS-LRR and RLK proteins mainly function in host resistance by specific interactions with pathogen effectors, which trigger plant defense responses that inhibit pathogen growth and spread inside infected tissues [42]. We previously identified over one hundred RGAs of the NBS-LRR and RLKs in P. monticola by genomic PCR cloning and several RGA-related AFLP markers linked to Cr2 in genetic mapping populations [10]. Here we revealed that 175 unique RGA transcripts were expressed in the shoot-tip tissues and ~ 2,000 in-silico SNPs were identified in their sequences. Of 96 RGAs genotyped successfully, 61 of them showed polymorphism (Table 1). Three polymorphic RGAs were identified in significant association with major gene (Cr2) resistance by LD analysis in the genotyped populations (Table 2). The RGA F0_contig_3186 encoded a putative RLK protein with highest homology to the Picea glauca protein ABF73316.1 (expect E = 0.0), and another two RGAs, F0_contig_48562 and F0_contig_9161, encoded NBS-LRR proteins. Additional SNPs, especially those non-synonymous SNPs in the above mentioned three RGAs, would provide both positional and functional variation sites for further characterization of major gene resistance against C. ribicola. The large amount of SNP markers, especially those SNPs in the candidate genes, may prove useful to study the evolution and adaptation of resistance mechanisms under selection pressure of climate change and WPBR in the native white pine populations across North America. In the future we will conduct sequence comparison and subsequent functional characterization of resistant and susceptible haplotypes of the related NBS-LRR and RLK genes to determine if any of these RGAs is responsible for the C. ribicola-resistance phenotype.

Identification of SNP markers by LD analysis for resistance screening

Discovery of a large number of SNPs along genome using NGS followed by genotyping of a set of samples with available phenotypes has become standard practice for fine genetic mapping of complex traits. In this study, we used a collection of WWP resistant germplasm to investigate genotype-phenotype relationships. LD, which is the non-random co-segregation of alleles at two loci, can result from many factors, including effective population size and structure, recombination rate, genetic drift, mating system, and selection [43]. Recombination between homologous chromosomes causes LD to decay as the distance between two loci increases during meiosis. In general, LD decay is faster in open-pollinated plants and in more diverse populations of the same species, but rates of LD decay may vary greatly in different genes and genomic regions in the same species [44]. Thus, information on LD content is a crucial prerequisite for any genome-wide association study to fine-tune both targeted genomic regions and candidate genes.

As monoecious gymnosperms, Pinus species show LD decay rates of ~500 to 2,000 bp [45]. Due to this pattern of rapid LD decay in conifers, genetic associations revealed by SNPs are likely to be located in close proximity to causative polymorphisms [34]. Our previous studies showed an intragenic LD decay to r 2 estimate of 0.3 within 600 ~ 700-bp in P. monticola DEGs [11]-[13], suggesting that related candidate genes may have a high resolution for association studies. In the present study, at least one SNP marker was found to be tightly associated to Cr2 with high LD in the tested germplasm across four populations with as many as 35 full-sib families (Table 2, Figure 3, and Additional file 2: Table S7). We suggest that these nucleotide variations may be used as selectable markers for breeding WWP with major gene resistance to C. ribicola. Other SNP markers of the RGAs and DEGs with significant LDs (Table 2) may also be very close to, or within, the gene affecting the resistance trait. To confirm this hypothesis we will conduct a continuous study to determine the extent of inter- and intra-chromosomal LD using WWP genetic mapping populations. Association mapping using a genome-wide approach still requires accumulation of sufficient genomic resources in five needle pines.

Population structure of WWP resistant germplasm

Lack of genetic diversity and ecological challenges (e.g., habitat destruction and environmental change) are two causes of population reduction and species extinction. Conifer seed orchards are commonly used to produce consistent, abundant, and genetically improved seeds with well-adapted environmental performance. These orchard seed lots are used for reforestation and restoration activities with species like WWP. Unfortunately, orchard seed lots are usually composed of undetermined proportions of seeds contributed by many parents through out-crossing and open pollination. Furthermore, it is critical that appropriate levels of genetic diversity are maintained to avoid inbreeding and loss of rare alleles by genetic drift in forest seed orchards or seed collections. While elite seed orchards can be developed by pyramiding favorable alleles, favourable alleles may be dispersed in different stands/ancestors. Complete pedigree information is thus an essential prerequisite for the selection and deployment of elite genotypes in modern conservation and breeding [46]. Molecular-based parentage analysis has been used to quantify genetic diversity and to help prevent inbreeding in reforestation stocks [47],[48]. Maintenance of genetic diversity in reforestation stock of long-lived tree species such as WWP is key to helping ensure the continued presence of this species in forests and forested ecosystems.

Sibship reconstruction in our study provided the clearest evidence for seed family structure in a collection of WWP germplasm. Accuracy of parentage analysis increases with the number and diversity of genetic loci. Popular parentage inference methods (e.g., Colony) can be applied with confidence in natural populations with highly polymorphic loci [49]. SNPs are powerful for parentage inference and a previous study suggested that 60–100 SNPs may allow accurate pedigree reconstruction in large managed and/or natural populations [50]. We took careful consideration of the number and quality of SNP markers to increase the accuracy of our parentage assignments. WWP parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction revealed the occurrence of 35–36 full-sib families in the composite seed lot we tested. Also, consistent results were obtained by separate sampling in a 1st SNP assay using 108 SNPs and in a 2nd assay using 95 SNPs (Figure 3, Additional file 2: Table S7). The WWP breeding germplasm, comprising seed families selected from wild ecosystems, were confirmed to be strongly structured with complex populations. This current comprehensive genetic characterization contributes to the knowledge about levels and distribution of genetic diversity and gains novel insight into genetic subdivision within the available WWP resistance resources. Our results clarify knowledge of the genetic constitution of the collected P. monticola germplasm and could allow us to prioritize individuals on the basis of conservation value for minimizing loss of genetic variation in conservation program as well as to develop breeding recommendation with balance between maximizing gene diversity and minimizing inbreeding for tree improvement by identifying the main genitors. Genotypic data from our study may efficiently guide further application of this diversity in the long-term management and reforestation of this tree species across western North America.

Conclusion

The present study represents the first research of candidate gene-based SNP discovery using pooled RNA-seq approach integrated with bulked segregation analysis in a five-needle pine. We generated novel transcriptome and SNP data from shoot-tip tissues of the C. ribicola-resistant and -susceptible WWP germplasm that originated from a composite seed lot. A subset of 432 SNP loci were verified by high-throughput genotyping and 52.5% of them were polymorphic. Using genotypic data of these SNP markers, parentage relationship and genetic diversity were determined in WWP germplasm collection and SNP markers were identified for breeding screening of resistance to WPBR across WWP populations. These validated SNP resources may open up new avenues for ecological genomics and comparative genetic mapping in five-needle pine species.

Methods

Plant material

A composite P. monticola seed lot with ‘major gene (Cr2) for HR-like resistance’ to WPBR was used in the present study. The lot was sourced mostly from parent trees that originated from the Champion Mine area on the Cottage Grove Ranger District of the Umpqua National Forest in Oregon. These parent trees comprised the breeding crosses were in the early fields established at the Dorena Genetic Resource Center (DGRC, Cottage Grove, Oregon); and the parents in those 1960’s grafts were heavily weighted toward Champion Mine parents (Cr2/-) and Bear Pass parents (many with Cr2/-) from the Bear Pass planting on the Willamette National Forest. There are also a few other clones in the breeding arboretum from other areas of Oregon and Washington.

Growing of seedlings, their artificial inoculation with C. ribicola, and phenotypic assessments were all performed at the DGRC, as described in Danchok et al. [51]. In brief, seeds were sown in June 2010 after four months stratification. Seedlings were grown in a green-house and inoculated with C. ribicola in September 2010 using infected leaves of Ribes spp. (the alternate host of C. ribicola) collected from locations outside of the geographical areas where the virulent isolate (vcr2) is known to occur. Inoculations were done using an average inoculum density of ~6,000 basidiospores/cm2 and a spore germination rate of 89%. Phenotypic traits were assessed at periodic intervals in 2011 when infection symptoms were evident on needles and stems. Each seedling was determined to be either a resistant (Cr2/-) or susceptible (cr2/cr2) genotype based both on their needle spot types (i.e., all HR-like; all susceptible; mixed; un-identified disease spots) and their stem symptoms (i.e., cankers present or absent). Needle samples were collected in July 2011 and stored at −20°C for genomic DNA extraction. In Oct. 2011 (~13 months post C. ribicola-infection), branch and stem tissues were collected from a sub-set of seedlings for each genotype using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until RNA extraction.

RNA-Seq analysis based on bulked segregation

Shoot tips from each of 45 resistant and 45 susceptible seedlings were collected individually and used for total RNA extraction following a protocol described previously [52]. RNA-seq analysis was performed by integration of bulked-segregation analysis. Total RNA samples were pooled into a total of six samples (each RNA sample was equally pooled from 15 seedlings): three with resistant (Cr2/-) phenotype and three with susceptible (cr2/cr2) phenotype. After DNase (RNase-free) treatment for 30 min at 37°C, mRNA was separated using an RNA-Seq sample preparation kit (Illumina) and used for construction of cDNA libraries as previously described [15] except each library contained sample-specific 6-bp nucleotide bar-coding tags. The six tagged cDNA libraries were pooled in equal ratios and used for 2 × 100 bp sequencing on one lane of the Illumina HiSeq2000 at the National Research Council of Canada (Saskaton, Canada). The raw Illumina RNA-seq 100-bp PE sequences were deposited in the NCBI SRA under accession number SRR1574690-1574692.

RNA-seq data analyses were performed using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.1 (CLC Bio, Cambridge, Mass, USA). Raw reads were trimmed before de-novo transcript assembly with default settings at quality limit = 0.05, ambiguous limit = 2, and minimum number of nucleotides in reads = 15. Shoot-tips of resistant (Cr2/-) seedlings were considered free of C. ribicola mycelia, so trimmed reads from the three cDNA libraries of resistant (Cr2/-) seedlings were de-novo assembled for generation of WWP shoot tip transcriptome with graph parameters of automatic word size and automatic bubble size and the parameters for mapping reads back to the contigs at mismatch cost = 2, length fraction = 0.5, similarity fraction = 0.8, deletion or insertion cost = 3, and minimum contig length = 200.

To verify de novo assembly quality, putative open reading frames (ORFs) within transcript sequences was identified by TransDecoder (http://transdecoder.sourceforge.net/) at minimum protein length of 50. Putative WWP protein sequences were compared with the PGI database (77,326 contigs, Release 9.0, March 26, 2011, http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/), and loblolly pine genome database (assembly v1.01, Nov. 20, 2013, http://pinegenome.org/). To estimate transcripts from infected C. ribicola, the WWP shoot-tip transcriptome was also search against the M. laricis-populina protein database (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Mellp1/Mellp1.download.ftp.html).

Contig annotation

As described in previous study [15], GO annotation assignment was performed against databases of the NCBI nr, PIR (http://pir.georgetown.edu/pirwww/), GO (http://www.geneontology.org/), UniProts (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/UniProt/), and KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) using the BLAST2GO program (Biobam Bioinformatics S.L., Valencia, Spain, http://www.blast2go.com/). Annotation difference between WWP primary needle [15] and shoot-tip reference transcritptomes was assessed by the Fisher’s exact test with correction for multiple testing using BLAST2GO. Pinus HCGs in the WWP shoot-tip transcriptome were predicted using BLASTn against the PGI database with homology E values ≤ 10e-100. A set of WWP RGAs [10] and DEGs in host defense response to C. ribicola infection [15] were used to predict candidate genes expressed in shoot-tip tissues involved in genetic resistance against C. ribicola infection by BLAST search and sequence alignment analysis.

SNP discovery and validation by high-throughput genotyping

In-silico SNP detection was performed by mapping RNA-seq PE reads of the six cDNA libraries back to the targeted sets of functional gene groups using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.1 with quality-based variation detection at the following parameters: window length = 11, maximum gap and mismatch count = 1, minimum average quality = 20, minimum central quality = 20, minimum coverage = 20, minimum variant frequency (MVF) = 30%, maximum expected variation (ploidy) = 2, and presence in both forward and reverse reads. Only reads that mapped to a single unique position on the reference sequences were used. To predict the effect of the mutation underlying each SNP at the amino acid level, the best ORFs predicted by TransDecoder were used for as reference sequences for SNP detection using CLC Genomics Workbench, and then each SNP was determined as a synonymous or non-synonymous mutation. SNPs in those WWP ORF sequences that showed best match to P. taeda and PGI databases at protein level by BLAST search were considered for SNP genotyping verification.

Due to unknown intron–exon boundaries and high proportion of paralogs in the pine gene families [53], additional, stringent criteria were considered when SNPs were selected for design of genotyping arrays. Criteria included contig SNP frequency, SNP locations and flanking sequence on the 3′- and 5′- ends. For SNP discovery in a candidate gene approach, in-silico SNP data were generated using HCGs, DEGs, and RGAs as separate mapping references.

For SNP genotyping, genomic DNA was extracted from needle tissues of individual seedlings belonging to the same composite seed lot used in RNA-seq analysis. About 100 mg of needle tissues were cut into small fragments and homogenized in liquid nitrogen using a FastPrep®-24 Instrument (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA). Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada).

High-throughput genotyping was conducted using the Sequenom iPlex MassARRAY platform (Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA) [54] at the Génome Québec Innovation Centre, McGill University. Two SNP assays were designed separately, each composed of 216 SNP loci and genotyped in a collection of 188 seedlings (~50% resistant and ~50% susceptible samples). Almost every SNP was selected from a unique functional gene except that the 2nd SNP array contained 20 SNPs from six genes with two to four SNPs in the same contig. Multiplex assays were designed using the MASSARRAY® Assay Design software for 36 SNPs in each of six multiplex panels set with the following parameters: amplicon length (bp): min:80, optimum:120, max:320; PCR primer length (bp): min:16, optimum:20, max:25; extension primer length (bp): min: 16, max: 31; hybridization Tm (°C): min: 45, max:100. PCR reactions were performed using Sequenom iPlex Gold reagent kits following standard procedures. About 20 ng of genomic DNA was amplified using a pool of 36 pairs of PCR primers under cycling conditions at 95°C for 15 min, 45 × (95°C for 20 sec, 56°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 60 sec), and final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The shrimp alcaline phosphatase was used to remove all unincorporated dNTPs. After single base extension for probes, the products were spotted on a Sequenom 384-well chip using a Nanodispenser and the chip was read by a Mass Spectrometer. Genotypes for each SNP marker in each sample were analyzed by the MassARRAY Analyzer 4 System. Sequence and nucleotide variation of verified SNP markers have been submitted to GenBank dbSNP databases (GenBank: ss#947846159 – ss#947846384).

SNP genotypic data analysis

The quality of SNP genotyping was manually assessed for each SNP locus in the sample collection. Population characteristics of the SNPs such as MAF, Ho, He, and the deviation from HWE were calculated using GenAlex 6.41 [55]. SNPs with a call rate below 80% of the total samples, a MAF below 0.05, and a rate of heterozygosity below 5% were excluded for further analysis.

PCA and Bayesian phylogenetic methods were used to identify if there was any population structure/grouping in the composite seed lot. SNP data were converted into allele frequencies based on SNP genotype of each individual seedlings and PCA was performed using the variance-covariance matrix of SNP allele frequencies in TASSEL [56]. Seedlings were assigned to ancestry clusters using the Bayesian model-based clustering algorithm by assuming Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage equilibrium within populations in the software package STRUCTURE [57]. The no-admixture model, which assumes that each individual comes from only one of the clusters, was used for the SNP haplotype analysis with 50,000 burn-in length and 500,000 replicates. Twenty simulation runs were performed with K values set from 1 to 10 to estimate the cluster number (K). The most likely number of clusters was then determined using the DeltaK method [58].

Individual assignment by STRUCTURE analysis may group different seed families into one population. Sibship analysis and parentage reconstruction of the WWP gemplasm were conducted using the most accurate full-pedigree likelihood method of the COLONY program [59].

Chi-squared test was used to evaluate LD between all pair-wise combinations of SNPs. Association of SNP loci with phenotypic traits of major gene (Cr2) resistance in WWP was evaluated by looking at LD values (r 2 ) among SNP sites and resistance phenotypes (Cr2/- vs. cr2/cr2) using TASSEL as described previously [11]. For multiple SNPs, a weighted average value of r 2 was calculated between each SNP pair [60]. P-values for r 2 were adjusted using a Bonferroni correction [61].

Availability of supporting data

The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article and its additional supporting information files. Illumina raw sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank SRA under accession number SRR1574690-1574692. The WWP shoot-tip reference transcriptome with 54,661 contigs was deposited at GenBank under accession GBQX01000000. SNP markers were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers ss#947846159 – ss#947846384.

Additional files

Abbreviations

AFLP: 

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

DEG: 

Differential expressed genes in plant defense response

He: 

Expected levels of heterozygosity

HEW: 

Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium

Ho: 

Observed levels of heterozygosity

LD: 

Linkage disequilibrium

MAF: 

Minor allele frequency

NBS-LRR: 

Nucleotide-binding site and leucine-rich repeat

PCA: 

Principal component analysis

HCG: 

Pinus highly conserved gene

RGA: 

Resistance gene analog

RLK: 

Receptor-like protein kinase

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

SSR: 

Simple sequence repeat

WPBR: 

White pine blaster rust

WWP: 

Western white pine

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Aimin Guan and Gary Zhang for bioinformatic programming, Kristian Arndt for database management, Arezoo Zamany for sample collection, Angelia Kegley and colleagues at DGRC for resistant trait assessment, and Grace Sumampong and Danelle Chan for genomic DNA extraction. This research was supported partly by CFS and the CFS-GRDI fund award to J-JL.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada
(2)
USDA Forest Service, Dorena Genetic Resource Center

References

  1. Loehman RA, Clark JA, Keane RE: Modeling effects of climate change and fire management on western white pine (Pinus monticola) in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA. Forests. 2011, 2: 832-860. 10.3390/f2040832.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Jain T, Graham R, Morgan P: Western white pine growth relative to forest openings. Can J For Res. 2004, 34: 2187-2198. 10.1139/x04-094.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvey AE, Byler JW, McDonald GI, Neuenschwander LF, Tonn JR: Death ofan Ecosystem: Perspectives on Western White Pine Ecosystems of NorthAmerica at the end of the Twentieth Century. Fort Collins, CO, USA: Gen TechRep RMRS-GTR-208. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, RockyMountain Research Station; 2008:10.Google Scholar
  4. Tomback DF, Achuff P: Blister rust and western forest biodiversity: ecology, values and outlook for white pines. For Path. 2010, 40: 186-225. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00655.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Fins L, Byler JW, Ferguson D, Harvey A, Mahalovich MF, McDonald G, Miller D, Schwandt J, Zack A: Return of the giants: restoring western white pine to the inland northwest. J Forestry. 2002, 100: 20-26.Google Scholar
  6. Richardson BA, Ekramoddoulah AK, Liu J-J, Kim M-S, Klopfenstein NB: Current and future molecular approaches to investigate the white pine blister rust pathosystem. For Pathol. 2010, 40: 314-331. 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00660.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Kim M-S, Brunsfeld SJ, McDonald GI, Klopfenstein NB: Effect of white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) and rust-resistance breeding on genetic variation in western white pine (Pinus monticola). Theor Appl Genet. 2003, 106: 1004-1010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim M-S, Richardson BA, McDonald GI, Klopfenstein NB: Genetic diversity and structure of western white pine (Pinus monticola) in North America: a baseline study for conservation, restoration, and addressing impacts of climate change. Tree Genet Genomes. 2011, 7: 11-21. 10.1007/s11295-010-0311-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Richardson BA, Rehfeldt GE, Kim M-S: Congruent climate-related genecological responses from molecular markers and quantitative traits for western white pine (Pinus monticola). Internat J Plant Sci. 2009, 170: 1120-1131. 10.1086/605870.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu J-J, Ekramoddoullah AK: Development of leucine-rich repeat polymorphism, amplified fragment length polymorphism, and sequence characterized amplified region markers to the Cronartium ribicola resistance gene Cr2 in western white pine (Pinus monticola). Tree Genet Genomes. 2008, 4: 601-610. 10.1007/s11295-008-0135-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J-J, Sniezko RA, Ekramoddoullah AK: Association of a novel Pinus monticola chitinase gene (PmCh4B) with quantitative resistance to Cronartium ribicola . Phytopathology. 2011, 101: 904-911. 10.1094/PHYTO-10-10-0282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Liu J-J, Hammett C, Sniezko RA: Pinus monticola pathogenesis-related gene PmPR10-2 alleles as defense candidates for stem quantitative disease resistance against white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola). Tree Genet Genomes. 2013, 9: 397-408. 10.1007/s11295-012-0561-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu J-J, Zamany A, Sniezko RA: Anti-microbial peptide (AMP): nucleotide variation, expression, and association with resistance in the white pine-blister rust pathosystem. Planta. 2013, 237: 43-54. 10.1007/s00425-012-1747-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Neale DB, Langley CH, Salzberg SL, Wegrzyn JL: Open access to tree genomes: the path to a better forest. Genome Biol. 2013, 14: 1-8. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-1-r1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu J-J, Sturrock RN, Benton R: Transcriptome analysis of Pinus monticola primary needles by RNA-seq provides novel insight into host resistance to Cronartium ribicola . BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 884-10.1186/1471-2164-14-884.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baird NA, Etter PD, Atwood TS, Currey MC, Shiver AL, Lewis ZA, Selker EU, Cresko WA, Johnson EA: Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e3376-10.1371/journal.pone.0003376.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, Mitchell SE: A robust, simple genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011, 6: e19379-10.1371/journal.pone.0019379.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Andolfatto P, Davison D, Erezyilmaz D, Hu TT, Mast J, Sunayama-Morita T, Stern DL: Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping. Genome Res. 2011, 21: 610-617. 10.1101/gr.115402.110.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wolf JBW: Principles of transcriptome analysis and gene expression quantification: an RNA-seq tutorial. Mol Ecol Resour. 2013, 13: 559-572. 10.1111/1755-0998.12109.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M: RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009, 10: 57-63. 10.1038/nrg2484.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yang SS, Tu ZJ, Cheung F, Xu WW, Lamb JF, Jung HJ, Vance CP, Gronwald JW: Using RNA-Seq for gene identification, polymorphism detection and transcript profiling in two alfalfa genotypes with divergent cell wall composition in stems. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12: 199-10.1186/1471-2164-12-199.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Salem M, Vallejo RL, Leeds TD, Palti Y, Liu S, Sabbagh A, Rexroad CE, Yao J: RNA-Seq identifies SNP markers for growth traits in rainbow trout. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e36264-10.1371/journal.pone.0036264.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Quinn EM, Cormican P, Kenny EM, Hill M, Anney R, Gill M, Corvin AP, Morris DW: Development of strategies for SNP detection in RNA-Seq data: application to lymphoblastoid cell lines and evaluation using 1000 genomes data. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e58815-10.1371/journal.pone.0058815.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schunter C, Garza JC, Macpherson E, Pascual M: SNP development from RNA-seq data in a nonmodel fish: how many individuals are needed for accurate allele frequency prediction?. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014, 14: 157-165. 10.1111/1755-0998.12155.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Apinjoh TO, Anchang-Kimbi JK, Njua-Yafi C, Mugri RN, Ngwai AN, Rockett KA, Mbunwe E, Besingi RN, Clark TG, Kwiatkowski DP, Achidi EA, MalariaGEN Consortium: Association of cytokine and Toll-like receptor gene polymorphisms with severe malaria in three regions of Cameroon. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (11): e81071-10.1371/journal.pone.0081071.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell AL, Macarthur KD, Gan EH, Baggott LE, Wolff AS, Skinningsrud B, Platt H, Short A, Lobell A, Kämpe O, Bensing S, Betterle C, Kasperlik-Zaluska A, Zurawek M, Fichna M, Kockum I, Nordling Eriksson G, Ekwall O, Wahlberg J, Dahlqvist P, Hulting AL, Penna-Martinez M, Meyer G, Kahles H, Badenhoop K, Hahner S, Quinkler M, Falorni A, Phipps-Green A, Merriman TR, et al: Association of autoimmune addison’s disease with alleles of STAT4 and GATA3 in European Cohorts. PLoS One. 2014, 9 (3): e88991-10.1371/journal.pone.0088991.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lepoittevin C, Frigerio JM, Garnier-Géré P, Salin F, Cervera MT, Vornam B, Harvengt L, Plomion C: In vitro vs in silico detected SNPs for the development of a genotyping array: what can we learn from a non-model species?. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e11034-10.1371/journal.pone.0011034.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Cullingham CI, Cooke JEK, Coltman DW: Effects of introgression on the genetic population structure of two ecologically and economically important conifer species: lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia ) and jack pine ( Pinus banksiana ). Genome. 2013, 56: 577-585. 10.1139/gen-2013-0071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Howe GT, Yu J, Knaus B, Cronn R, Kolpak S, Dolan P, Lorenz WW, Dean JF: A SNP resource for Douglas-fir: de novo transcriptome assembly and SNP detection and validation. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 137-10.1186/1471-2164-14-137.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinosio S, González-Martínez SC, Bagnoli F, Cattonaro F, Grivet D, Marroni F, Lorenzo Z, Pausas JG, Verdú M, Vendramin GG: First insights into the transcriptome and development of new genomic tools of a widespread circum-Mediterranean tree species, Pinus halepensis Mill. Mol Ecol Resour. 2014, 14 (4): 846-856. 10.1111/1755-0998.12232.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pavy N, Pelgas B, Beauseigle S, Blais S, Gagnon F, Gosselin I, Lamothe M, Isabel N, Bousquet J: Enhancing genetic mapping of complex genomes through the design of highly-multiplexed SNP arrays: application to the large and unsequenced genomes of white spruce and black spruce. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 21-10.1186/1471-2164-9-21.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Eckert AJ, Pande B, Ersoz ES, Mark H, Wright MH, Rashbrook VK, Nicolet CM, Neale DB: High-throughput genotyping and mapping of single nucleotide polymorphisms in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Tree Genet Genomes. 2009, 5: 225-234. 10.1007/s11295-008-0183-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Halperin E, Kimmel G, Shamir R: Tag SNP selection in genotype data for maximizing SNP prediction accuracy. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21: 195-203. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. González–Martínez SC, Wheeler NC, Ersoz E, Nelson CD, Neale DB: Association genetics in Pinus taeda L. I. Wood property traits. Genetics. 2007, 175: 399-409. 10.1534/genetics.106.061127.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bundock PC, Eliott FG, Ablett G, Benson AD, Casu RE, Aitken KS, Henry RJ: Targeted single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) discovery in a highly polyploid plant species using 454 sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2009, 7: 347-354. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00401.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hendre PS, Kamalakannan R, Varghese M: High-throughput and parallel SNP discovery in selected candidate genes in Eucalyptus camaldulensis using Illumina NGS platform. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012, 10: 646-656. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00699.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kharabian-Masouleh A, Waters DLE, Reinke RF, Henry RJ: Discovery of polymorphisms in starch-related genes in rice germplasm by amplification of pooled DNA and deeply parallel sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2011, 9: 1074-1085. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00629.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kulheim C, Yeoh SH, Maintz J, Foley WJ, Moran GF: Comparative SNP diversity among four Eucalyptus species for genes from secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. BMC Genomics. 2009, 10: 452-10.1186/1471-2164-10-452.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Schneeberger K, Weigel D: Fast-forward genetics enabled by new sequencing technologies. Trends Plant Sci. 2011, 16: 282-288. 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.02.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tollenaere R, Hayward A, Dalton-Morgan J, Campbell E, Lee JRM, Lorenc MT, Manoli S, Stiller J, Raman R, Raman H, Edwards D, Batley J: Identification and characterization of candidate Rlm4 blackleg resistance genes in Brassica napus using next-generation sequencing. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012, 10: 709-715. 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00716.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kipreos ET, Pagano M: The F-box protein family. Genome Biol. 2000, 1: reviews 3002-10.1186/gb-2000-1-5-reviews3002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones JD, Dangl JL: The plant immune system. Nature. 2006, 444: 323-329. 10.1038/nature05286.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rafalski A, Morgante M: Corn and humans: recombination and linkage disequilibrium in two genomes of similar size. Trends Genet. 2004, 20: 103-111. 10.1016/j.tig.2003.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Khan MA, Korban SS: Association mapping in forest trees and fruit crops. J Exp Bot. 2012, 63: 4045-4060. 10.1093/jxb/ers105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Neale DB, Ingvarsson PK: Population, quantitative and comparative genomics of adaptation in forest trees. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008, 11: 149-155. 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.12.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. El-Kassaby YA, Lstiburek M: Breeding without breeding. Genet Res. 2009, 91: 111-120. 10.1017/S001667230900007X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Massah N, Wang J, Russell JH, van Niejenhuis A, El-Kassaby YA: Genealogical relationship among members of selection and production populations of yellow-cedar (Callitropsis nootkatensis) in the absence of parental information. J Hered. 2010, 101: 154-163. 10.1093/jhered/esp102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Klápště J, Lstibůrek M, El-Kassaby YA: Estimates of genetic parameters and breeding values from western larch open-pollinated families using marker-based relationship. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013, 9: 1-9. 10.1007/s11295-012-0521-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Harrison HB, Saenz-Agudelo P, Planes S, Jones GP, Berumen ML: Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 2013, 22: 1158-1170. 10.1111/mec.12138.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Anderson EC, Garza JC: The power of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for large-scale parentage inference. Genetics. 2006, 172: 2567-2582. 10.1534/genetics.105.048074.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Danchok RS, Sniezko RA, Long S, Kegley A, Savin D, Mayo JB, Liu J-J, Hill J: Frequency of hypersensitive-like reaction and stem infections in a large full-sib family of Pinus monticola . Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Genetics of Host-Parasite Interactions in Forestry, July 31 to August 5, 2011, Eugene, Oregon. Edited by: Sniezko RA, Yanchuk AD, Kliejunas JT. 2012, USDA Forest Service Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-240, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 281-285.Google Scholar
  52. Liu J-J: Ectopic expression of a truncated Pinus radiata AGAMOUS homolog (PrAG1) causes alteration of inflorescence architecture and male sterility in Nicotiana tabacum . Mol Breeding. 2012, 30: 453-467. 10.1007/s11032-011-9635-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Cui L, Wall PK, Leebens-Mack JH, Lindsay BG, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, Soltis PS, Carlson JE, Arumuganathan K, Barakat A, Albert VA, Ma H, de Pamphilis CW: Widespread genome duplications throughout the history of flowering plants. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 738-749. 10.1101/gr.4825606.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D: SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009, Chapter 2: Unit 2.12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peakall R, Smouse PE: GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28: 2537-2539. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES: TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: 2633-2635. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P: Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000, 155: 945-959.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J: Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005, 14: 2611-2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Jones OR, Wang J: COLONY: a program for parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010, 10: 551-555. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02787.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Farnir F, Coppieters W, Arranz JJ, Berzi P, Cambisano N, Grisart B, Karim L, Marcq F, Moreau L, Mni M, Nezer C, Simon P, Vanmanshoven P, Wagenaar D, Georges M: Extensive genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in cattle. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 220-227. 10.1101/gr.10.2.220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Weir BS: Genetic Data Analysis II. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates; 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement