Accumulation and cellular toxicity of aluminum in seedling of Pinus massoniana
© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 14 May 2014
Accepted: 25 September 2014
Published: 30 September 2014
Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) is one of the most important timber species with adaptable, fast growing, versatile advantages in southern China. Despite considerable research efforts, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of A1 toxicity and resistance in P. massoniana are still poorly understood. The effects of Al on uptake and translocation of Al and other minerals, cell division and nucleolus in P. massoniana were investigated.
The results indicated that Al accumulated mainly in the roots, and small amounts were transported to aboveground organs. In the presence of Al, the contents of Mg and Fe in stems increased and decreased in roots. Accumulation of Mn in the organs was inhibited significantly. Evidence from cellular experiments showed that Al had an inhibitory effect on the root growth at all concentrations (10-5 - 10-2 M) used. Chromosome fragments, chromosome bridges, C-mitosis and chromosome stickiness were induced during mitosis in the root tip cells. Al induced the formation of abnormal microtubule (MT) arrays, consisting of discontinuous wavy MTs or short MT fragments at the cell periphery. MT organization and function of the mitotic spindle and phragmoplast were severely disturbed. The nucleolus did not disaggregate normally and still remained its characteristic structure during metaphase. Nucleolar particles containing argyrophilic proteins were accumulated and leached out from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Evidence confirmed that these proteins contained nucleophosmin (B23), nucleolin (C23) and fibrillarin. Western immunoblot analysis revealed that the contents of three nucleolar proteins increased significantly.
Based on the information provided in this article, it is concluded that root tips of plants are the most sensitive organ to environmental stresses and the accumulation of Al ions primarily is in roots of P. massoniana, and small amounts of Al are transported to aboveground. Root apical meristems play a key role in the immediate reaction to stress factors by activating signal cascades to the other plant organs. Al induces a series of the cellular toxic changes concerning with cell division and nucleolus. The data presented above can be also used as valuable and early markers in cellular changes induced by metals for the evaluation of metal contamination.
Aluminium (Al) ranks third in abundance among the Earth’s crust elements, after oxygen and silicon, and is the most abundant metallic element ,. Al is a ubiquitous element without a known, specific and biological function in plant metabolism . However, the metal is considered to be a major growth-limiting factor particularly in acid soils (pH < 5.0), which are estimated to be approximately 30-40% of arable lands in the world . Once the pH decreases below 5.0, Al is solubilized into a phytotoxic form, mainly as Al3+ from nonphytotoxic silicate or oxide forms which restricts plant growth .
It is well known that Al, for most crops, is a serious constraint, although some crops (e.g., pineapple and tea) are considered to be tolerant to high levels of exchangeable Al. Species and genotypes within species greatly differ in their tolerance to Al . Investigations on the toxicity and resistance mechanisms have often been performed taking physiological and genetic basis of resistance into consideration ,. Some investigations indicate that Al uptake is limited mainly to the root system, where it accumulates predominantly in the epidermis and the outer cortex ,. And the others demonstrate that some plant species, such as some species native to the region of central Brazil, can accumulate considerable amounts of Al in their shoots ,. Due to its importance in limiting agricultural and forest productivity, there have been numerous studies that describe the toxic effects of Al on plant root growth and physiology ,. Probing root meristem as a plant bioassay system for Al toxicity testing has been suggested since many plants are known to be injured by Al under natural and experimental exposure conditions. It has been well known that Al toxicity is performed primarily by inhibition of root growth , and the root meristem is one of the most sensitive sites to Al toxicity .
Masson pine (Pinus massoniana) is one of the most important timber species with adaptable, fast growing, versatile advantages in southern China . P. massoniana occupies a very important position in China’s forestry development and forest resources cultivation, and has expanded rapidly to reach an estimated area of 5.7 million hectares . It was reported that due to heavy chemical fertilization the soil pH in the major Chinese crop-production areas declined significantly from the 1980s to the 2000s . Al toxicity due to soil acidification has become the main reason for the decline of the forest . Despite considerable research efforts, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of A1 toxicity and resistance in P. massoniana are still poorly understood.
The effect of Al on uptake and translocation of Al and other minerals (Fe, Mn and Mg), cell division and nucleolus in P. massoniana were carried out in order to understanding the mechanisms of Al-induced toxicity.
Al accumulation and its effect on other minerals
Al content in different organs of Pinus massoniana L. exposed to different concentrations after 40 d treatment
Treatment (Al, M)
Organs (μg/g DW ± SE)
23.02 ± 0.22e
18.33 ± .021e
9.38 ± 0.26d
373.75 ± 4.82d
87.83 ± 9.99d
24.25 ± 1.84d
3384.66 ± 19.82c
171.25 ± 10.85c
120.55 ± 1.58c
10024.62 ± 83.66b
278.47 ± 1.91b
226.56 ± 3.34b
14712.89 ± 36.94a
1383.98 ± 4.41a
3340.84 ± 12.07a
Effects of Al on levels of Mg, Fe and Mn
Effects of Al on accumulation of Mg, Fe and Mn in roots, stems and leaves of Pinus massoniana
Treatment (Al, M)
Organs ( μg/g DW ± SE)
1550.67 ± 11.07a
1169.62 ± 3.15e
2777.18 ± 4.15a
1533.11 ± 5.06a
1331.27 ± 0.55d
2734.00 ± 14.40ab
1378.91 ± 11.64b
1421.89 ± 3.54c
2661.81 ± 20.09c
1196.43 ± 9.65c
2088.24 ± 4.17b
2719.36 ± 9.03b
1158.62 ± 8.18d
2710.64 ± 16.92a
2716.34 ± 27.94b
990.08 ± 9.42a
49.59 ± 7.39c
207.84 ± 6.50a
895.83 ± 2.94b
53.58 ± 0.55c
194.45 ± 0.83b
725.19 ± 3.11c
87.92 ± 2.39b
178.04 ± 0.63c
519.29 ± 5.25d
92.22 ± 2.30b
116.23 ± 0.93e
302.56 ± 2.79e
138.34 ± 1.30a
141.58 ± .69d
302.00 ± 2.14a
10.05 ± 0.12a
125.07 ± 0.08a
165.67 ± 0.64b
9.24 ± 0.21b
59.53 ± 0.41c
151.99 ± 0.55c
8.28 ± 0.24c
61.56 ± 0.14b
12.81 ± 0.29d
6.75 ± 0.10d
20.56 ± 0.15d
9.13 ± 0.08e
5.18 ± 0.19e
11.81 ± 0.14e
Effects of Al on cell division and nucleoli
Effects of Al on root growth
Effects of Al on chromosome morphology
Effects of Al on the organization of MT cytoskeleton
Effects of Al on nucleolar cycle during mitosis
Effects of Al on nucleoli
Translocation of the three major nucleolar proteins in relation to Al treatment
Immunofluorescence localizations of B23, C23 and fibrillarin were performed in the present investigation. The antibodies used could produce positive reactions with three nucleolar proteins above. There were obvious toxic effects on the three nucleolar proteins in the root tip cells of P. massoniana exposed 10-2 M Al treatment when compared with control cells.
Expression of the three major nucleolar proteins in relation to Al treatment
Al uptake and its effects on mineral elements
Data from the present investigation showed Al was poorly translocated from roots to leaves and stems in P. massoniana and accumulated in its leaves and stems much less in 10-5 M to 10-3 M Al treatment groups, but it accumulated significantly in them exposed to 10-2 M Al (Table 1). P. massoniana survived as far as it was able to avoid Al accumulation in the shoots. Species and genotypes within species greatly differ in their tolerance to Al . Osaki et al.  indicated that some species, especially those native to acidic soils, had shown enhanced growth in the presence of Al, often coinciding with increased leaf phosphorus (P) concentrations. It was reported that Al was essential for the growth of Melastoma malabathricum. Jansen et al.  proposed that plants with more than 1000 mg Al per kg dry weight in their leaf tissues be termed hyperaccumulators. According to the results here, P. massoniana cannot be considered as a hyperaccumulator, althrough the Al content of leaf tissues exposed to 10-2 M Al reached the hyperaccumulator standard. The seedling growth of P. massoniana was severely inhibited under 10-2 M Al stress. P. massoniana treated with 10-5 to 10-3 M Al did accumulate Al in stems and leaves, but could not absorb and accumulate large amounts of Al (Table 1).
Magnesium (Mg) is pivotal for activating a large number of enzymes; hence, Mg plays an important role in numerous physiological and biochemical processes affecting plant growth and development . The results indicated that the contents of Mg and iron (Fe) in stems of P. massoniana seedlings increased and decreased in roots with increasing Al (Table 2). Al-induced Mg deficiency in roots may be explained by the fact that the Al and Mg ions compete for membrane transporters and metal-binding sites on enzymes , as Al and Mg ions have similar hydrated radius . As a result, Mg ion bind relatively weakly to the negatively charged groups in the root cell wall, so the excess cations such as H+ and Al3+ present in acid soils can inhibit Mg2+ loading into the apoplasm and uptake across the plasma membrane . After uptake, Mg must be released to the xylem for translocation from the roots to the shoots. In the present investigation, Mg content in stems of P. massoniana seedlings increases. However, transporters for this process have not been identified. Chen and Ma  indicated that based on the RiceXPro database, two CorA-like homologues in rice show high expression in the vascular tissue of root elongation and maturation zones, suggesting their possible role in Mg xylem loading. The transporters for xylem unloading have also not been identified.
Reports on the effects of Al on uptake of manganese (Mn) are conflict (Table 2). Alam  indicated that Al could decrease the concentration of Mn in all parts of barley plants except stem, where more Mn concentration was recorded. However, in rice, Mn concentration decreased in plant tops but increased in roots with increasing Al, suggesting that Mn may compete effectively with A1 for root absorption sites . Mariano and Keltjens  found that all 10 maize genotypes absorbed Mn in amounts significantly lower than their control plants grown in the absence of Al. These conflicting results arise, in part, from the genetic material used. Data from the present investigation showed that uptake and accumulation of Mn in the organs were inhibited significantly (P < 0.05) under Al stress. The results here indicated that the content of Fe in stems of P. massoniana seedlings increased with increasing Al, which is consistent with the findings of Alam  and Guo et al. .
Toxic effects of Al on cell division
The inhibition of root elongation is the first visible symptom of Al toxicity, although the response of the roots to Al toxicity differs among plant species and even cultivars. In the present study, Al had an inhibitory effect on the root growth at all concentrations (10-5-10-2 M) used during the entire treatment (72 h) (Figures 1 and 2), suggesting that root cells is a primary target of Al toxicity. The dissociation of the metallic salt AlCl3 altered the ionic environment of the cell, which might have led to a physiological change in the nucleoprotein or denaturation of proteins reflected as chromosomal aberrations . Some reports indicated that in sensitive plants, cell division in the root tip meristem was quickly inhibited by Al, resulting in affecting root elongation immediately -.
Chromosome aberrations have been used as a measure of reproductive success and as a method for the detection of possible genetic damage by environmental agents (such as herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and heavy metals) in plants for many years, and can provide both qualitative and quantitative data on the effects . Cytogenetic analysis has also revealed the presence of abnormally dividing cells. Our cytological observations clearly showed that Al had toxic effects on the cell division and induced the four types of chromosomal aberrations, chromosome fragments, chromosome bridges, C-mitosis and chromosome stickiness (Figure 3), which is similar to previous reports described by Liu et al. . The chromosome bridges exhibiting stickiness was found in the present study, which was in agreement with other reports where Al, Cd and Cr (VI) on root tip cell division of Oryza sativa, Allium cepa and Amaranthus viridis were investigated. Some studies concerning with the reasons for the formation of stickiness of chromosomes have been reported, such as the increased chromosome contraction and condensation , the depolymerization of DNA  and partial dissolution of nucleoproteins . This kind of chromosomal aberration, usually being irreversible, reflects highly toxic effects and probably leads to cell death. C-mitosis, first described by Levan  in the root tip mitosis of Allium cepa as an inactivation of the spindle followed by random scattering of the condensed chromosomes. The c-metaphase we observed in the treated meristems suggests that Al acts on the mitotic spindle apparatus, probably interfering with the polymerization and depolymerization of microtubules . Chromosome bridges or interchromatid connections are formed by chromatin fibers that join sister chromatids at metaphase and hold the chromatids together until late anaphase or telophase. If these connections become too strong, chromatids might break at or near the points of connection at anaphase. These breaks occurred here at the same point in the sister chromatids, giving rise to fragments of chromosome-like structure ,.
It seems reasonable to suggest that Al is either affecting indirectly some metabolic process associated with cell division, or that it has its effect during DNA replication in interphase . Al has been found to inhibit cell division and to be associated with DNA in several plants ,. Matsumoto indicated that one toxic function of Al in rapidly growing pea roots was the binding of Al to DNA regions unmasked with chromosomal proteins in nuclei causing the condensation and stabilization of chromatin structure and thereby reducing the template activity. Thus, cell division at root tips is inhibited by Al toxicity . Recent studies have demonstrated that Al toxicity is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant cells ,. The attack of ROS to purine-, pyriminide-bases, and deoxyribose in DNA can cause DNA single and double strand breaks, which may increase the probability of chromosomal aberrations formation.
MTs, one key components of the eukaryotic cytoskeleton, play a central role in diverse activities such as cell division, cell expansion, cell differentiation and intracellular organization and motility ,. Cytoskeletal network of plant cell is formed by the integrated arrays of MTs, actin filaments, intermediate filaments, microtubule- and actin-related proteins and others ,. Al, in micromolar concentrations, delays microtubule (MT) re-organization and MT-mediated chromosome movement during mitosis in the root tip cells of Triticum turgidum,. Frantzios et al. reported that Al affected the mechanisms controlling the organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton as well as tubule polymerization, which delayed microtubule disassembly during mitosis, resulting in the disorder of chromosome movements carried out by the mitotic spindle . The findings of this study showed that the Al ions directly or indirectly affected the dynamic condition of MTs and disturbed the organization and function of the mitotic apparatus, resulting in disordering or inhibition of chromosome movement. Al induced the formation of abnormal microtubule (MT) arrays, consisting of discontinuous wavy MTs or short MT fragments at the cell periphery (Figure 4). With increased Al concentration and prolonged duration of treatment, MT organization and function of the mitotic spindle and phragmoplast were severely disturbed (Figure 5). This study revealed that the MT cytoskeleton was a target site of Al toxicity in mitotic root-tip cells of P. massoniana. The structural changes have been attributed to depolymerization of the cortical MTs or to extensive cell-specific depolymerization or to reorganization and stabilization of MTs and actin filaments .
In this investigation, the contents of Mg decreased in roots with increasing Al. Al transport through the Mg channel is also likely because Mg transport is strongly inhibited by Al due to the similar diameter of Al and Mg . Al can bind to nucleoside triphosphates approximately 107 times better than Mg, and the rate of hydrolysis for Al-ATP or Al-GTP complexes is considerably lower than that for the physiological Mg complex (105 times slower), supporting the hypothesis that toxicity is a result of Al ions displacement of Mg ions from nucleoside di- or triphosphate complexes . As the replacement of Mg ions by Al ions during tubulin polymerization in vivo, MTs with atypical properties may be formed .
Toxic effects of Al on nucleoli
The silver staining technique has been widely applied in cytological studies aimed at understanding the nucleolar cycle and nucleolar organization in both animals and plants. NORs are defined as nucleolar components containing a set of argyrophilic proteins, which are selectively stained by silver methods ,. Changes of argyrophilic proteins in nucleoli can be showed specifically using silver staining method. Evidence from the present investigation revealed that the nucleolar material in some root tip cells did not completely disappear during metaphase under Al stress (Figure 6), which was similar to the phenomenon observed by Qin et al. . Generally, persistent nucleoli do not occur during normal mitosis. Vostrikova and Butorina  indicated an increased number of persistent nucleoli cells increased nucleolar activity. Sheldon et al.  studied a series of embryonal carcinoma lines and found them to exhibit nucleolar persistence during mitotic metaphase and anaphase, supposing that rRNA synthesis continues in persistent nucleoli, which means increased biosynthetic activity and more protein production. It was reported that the birch seedling in response to anthropogenic stress (heavy metals, smoke, dust et al.) revealed persistent nucleolus in some cells during mitotic metaphase . It was demonstrated that Cd and Cr (VI) could induce persistent nucleoli in root tips of Vicia faba and Allium cepa. Thus, it may be hypothesized that the phenomenon persistent nucleolus is an adaptive response to stress induced by Al.
The Al-induced phenomena observed in this work were that some tiny particles containing argyrophilic proteins were scattered in the nucleus of root tip cells and leached out from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Figure 7). These effects of Al on nucleoli are more or less the same as those reported by Fiskesjö ,, Liu and Jiang , Zhang et al.  and Qin et al. . However, they did not indicate what kinds of proteins involved in those reports. The recent studies reported that the argyrophilic proteins were B23 and C23 in Allium cepa and in Hordeum vulgare (unpublished) by indirect immunofluorescence and western blotting. Evidence in this investigation indicated that Al could induce the three proteins extruded from nucleoli to cytoplasm (Figures 8, 9 and 10), which confirmed the findings reported by Qin et al. . The nucleolus is the most prominent substructure in the cell nucleus, which is a very dynamic structure and form around the rDNA loci . It plays important roles in the regulation of many fundamental cellular processes, including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, telomerase production, RNA processing, monitoring and response to cellular stress ,. B23 and C23 belong to the two major Ag-NOR proteins ,. However, fibrillarin is distinguished from them by its lack of affinity for silver staining . It has a molecular mass of 41-kDa and is present both in animal and plant cells and is required for multiple events leading to rRNA maturation and ribosome subunit assembly . So we suggest that Al may also have toxic effects on other kinds of nucleolar proteins besides argyrophilic and acidic nucleolar proteins. More studies, however, are required in this direction.
Western blot analysis of the expression of the three proteins showed that Al could induce significant bulking of expression (Figure 11). The changes of localization and expression of the three proteins can be used as valuable and early markers in cellular changes induced by Al for the evaluation of metal contamination. Nevertheless, more studies including the interaction of nucleolus proteins and the molecular mechanism of Al stress will be required to be clarified.
Based on the information provided in this article, it is concluded that (1) The accumulation of Al ions primarily was in roots of P. massoniana, and small amounts of Al were transported to aboveground. (2) Al could disturb cell division inducing chromosome aberration. (3) In the presence of Al, the abnormal MT arrays were formed, and MT organization and function of the mitotic spindle and the phragmoplast were severely disturbed. (4) Persistent nucleoli existed during metaphase. (5) Al could affect nucleoli, inducing nucleolar particles containing argyrophilic proteins leached out from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. (6) Evidence confirmed that these proteins were B23, C23 and fibrillarin. (7) Al could induce over-expression of the three major nucleolar proteins.
Culture condition and Al treatment
Healthy and equal-sized seeds were chosen from P. massoniana. The seeds were soaked in tap water for 48 h. Then, they were transferred to a tray lined with wet gauze and germinated in light incubator at 26°C. The seedlings with about 4.5 cm were grown in containers with 2 L Hoagland’s nutrient solution (pH 4.0) adding different concentrations of Al solutions (10-5, 10-4, 10-3 and 10-2 M) for 40 d respectively in a greenhouse where relative humidity (60%) and supplementary lighting (14 h photoperiod) were controlled. The Al was provided as aluminum chloride (AlCl3). The Al solutions were prepared in deionized water, and were added to the modified half Hoagland’s nutrient solution  containing 5 mM Ca (NO3)2, 5 mM KNO3, 1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 50 μM H3BO3, 10 μM FeEDTA, 4.5 μM MnCl2, 3.8 μM ZnSO4, 0.3 μM CuSO4, and 0.1 μM (NH4)6Mo7O24 (pH = 4.0). The half Hoagland’s nutrient solution without Al was used for control plants. The solutions were aerated by pumps, which connected the containers with pump lines. The nutrient solutions were changed regularly every 10 days. The seedlings from each treatment were harvested after 40 d of incubation for Al determination.
Sampling procedure and Al determination
Ten seedlings from each treatment and control were harvested based on uniformity of size and colour (removing the greatest and the smallest seedlings and then selected randomly) at the end of each time interval (10 d). The seedlings were removed from solution and washed thoroughly with running tap water for 30 min and then with deionized water to remove traces of nutrients and Al ions from root surfaces. Seedlings were divided into roots, leaves and stems. The samples were dried to a constant weight (for 3 d at 45°C, for 1 d at 80°C, and for 12 h at 105°C). All dried plant samples were prepared using a wet-digestion method . The contents of Al, Mg, Mn and Fe were determined with inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) (Leeman Labs Inc., New Hampshire, USA) after dry-ashing .
Culture condition and Al treatment
Healthy and equal-sized seeds were chosen from P. massoniana. The seeds were soaked in tap water for 48 h before starting the experiment. Then they were transferred to plastic containers, which in the bottom has wet gauze to germinate at 26°C for several days. Then the roots reaching about 0.6 cm length were treated in Petri dishes with different concentrations of Al solutions (10-5 to 10-2 M) for 24, 48 and 72 h. The test liquids were changed regularly every 24 h. Control roots were maintained in distilled water. The Al was provided as aluminum chloride (AlCl3). The length of roots were observed, measured and recorded at the end of each time interval (324 h).
Ten root tips from control and seedlings of P. massoniana treated with Al were cut and fixed in 3 parts 95% ethanol: 2 parts acetic acid for 2 h and hydrolyzed in 5 parts 1 M hydrochloric acid: 3 parts 95% ethanol: 2 parts 99.8% acetic acid for 10 min at 60°C. For the observation of changes in cell division, ten root tips were squashed in Carbol Fuchsin solution . For the observation of changes in nucleolus, ten root tips were cut and squashed in 45% acetic acid, dried, and after 2 days stained with silver nitrate .
Indirect immunofluorescent microscopy
Meristematic zones of root tips from control and seedlings of P. massoniana treated with Al were cut and fixed with 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.0) for 1.5 h in darkness at room temperature and then they were washed with the same buffer. Meristematic cells were digested with a mixture of 2.5% cellulose and 2.5% pectolase at 37°C and then washed in PBS for three times. They were squashed on slides and extracted in freshly prepared 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in PBS when slides dried. After three washings in PBS, the cells were subsequently incubated with mouse primary antibodies respectively against B23, fibrillarin, C23 or tubulin for 1 h at 37°C or at 4°C overnight in a moist, sealed chamber. After washing (3 ± 10 min) in PBS, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies for detection of the primary antibodies for 45 min in darkness at 37°C. After repeated washing in PBS, nuclei were stained with 4′, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, Sigma) at a final concentration of 1ug per 1 ml for 15 min at room temperature. After washing (3 ± 10 min) in PBS, the cells were mounted in antifade mounting medium. The slides were stored at 4°C in the dark until observed. The immunofluorescent specimens were examined with a Nikon ECLIPSE 90i confocal laser scanning microscope. An exciter at 488 nm and a barrier at 590/50 nm, an exciter at 543 nm and a barrier at 650 nm, and an exciter at 408 nm and a barrier at 515/30 nm were used for FITC, TRITC and DAPI staining, respectively. Image recording was done with proper software (EZ-C1 3.80) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Images were processed with Image-Pro Plus 6.0 and Photoshop CS3.
Antibodies used in this study were as follows:
B23: primary antibody: a mouse monoclonal antibody to B23 (Sigma, B0556) at dilution 1:100; secondary antibody: FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGs (Sigma, F9137) at dilution 1:50. FITC was used for the detection of signal.
Fibrillarin: primary antibody: a mouse monoclonal antibody to fibrillarin (Santa, SC-81273) at dilution 1:100; secondary antibody: FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGs (Sigma, F9137) at dilution 1:50. FITC was used for the detection of signal.
C23: primary antibody: a mouse monoclonal antibody to C23 (Santa, SC-8031) at dilution 1:100; secondary antibody: TRITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGs (Sigma, T5393) at dilution 1:50. TRITC was used for the detection of signal.
Microtubulin: primary antibody: mouse monoclonal anti-a-tubulin antibody (Sigma T-9026) at diluted at 1:100: secondary antibody: FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgGs (Sigma, F9137) at dilution 1:50. FITC was used for the detection of signal.
Root tips from control and seedlings treated with 10-2 M Al for 72 h were homogenized respectively in a pestle and mortar with liquid nitrogen and then the samples were solubilized with chilled extraction buffer (50 mM Tris hCl (pH 7.8), 10 mM MgCl2, 20 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 1.0 mM EDTA, 8% glycerol) adding protease inhibitor cocktail set VI (Merck, 539133). After vortexing for 1 min at room temperature, the homogenates were kept on ice for 30 min, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min. The mixture of supernatant and 1 ± laemmli buffer (62.5 mM Tris hCl (pH 6.8), 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.001% bromophenol blue) was boiled at 100°C for 5 min  and then was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and the separated proteins were wet blotted onto 0.45 μm PVDF transfer membrane (Millipore, IPVH00010) at 4°C. Blots were blocked for 2 h with 5% (w/v) non-fat milk in TBST buffer at room temperature with shaking. Primary antibody mentioned above against the indicated protein was diluted in TBST buffer (B23, 1:4000; Fibrillarin, 1:4000; C23, 1:3500). Anti-β actin monoclonal antibody (Abmart, P30002) was used for the internal control. The soaked PVDF membrane was subsequently incubated with primary antibody for 2.5 h at room temperature on the rocker platform and then washed with TBST buffer two times for 10 min each and TBS buffer one time for 10 min. The HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Promega, W4021) diluted 1:7000 in TBST buffer was added for 2 h. After another three washes, the blots were detected using the ECL technique (Millipore, WBKL S0100) and exposed to the X-ray film. The intensities of the bands in the film were measured by software “Quantity One” (Bio-Rad). During the experiment, care was taken to prevent membrane from drying.
Each treatment was replicated 3 times for statistical validity. SPSS computer software was used for statistical analyses (SPSS Japan Inc., Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan) and SigmaPlot 8.0 software was used for mapping. Any differences between treatments were determined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and scored as significant if (P < 0.05). The means and standard errors of the means mean ± SE are reported. For Western blotting statistical analysis, independent-samples t-test was used to determine the significance at P < 0.05 using SPSS 15.0 version for Windows software.
HHZ carried out the entire experiments, participated in drafted the manuscript. ZJ and RQ participated in indirect immunofluorescent studies and Western blotting analysis. HNZ and JHZ participated in element determination and the data analysis. WSJ drafted and revised the manuscript with DHL. DHL conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China. The authors wish to express their appreciation to the reviewers for this paper.
- Matsumoto H, Motoda H: Aluminum toxicity recovery processes in root apices; possible association with oxidative stress. Plant Sci. 2012, 186: 1-8. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.07.019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Silva S: Aluminium toxicity targets in plants. J Bot. 2012, 219462: 8-doi:10.1155/2012/219462Google Scholar
- Wang JW, Kao CH: Reduction of aluminum-inhibited root growth of rice seedlings with supplemental calcium, magnesium and organic acids. Crop Environ Bioinfor. 2004, 1: 191-198.Google Scholar
- Lilienfein J, Qualls RG, Uselman SM, Bridgham SD: Soil formation and organic matter accretion in a young andesitic chronosequence at Mt. Shasta, California. Geoderma. 2003, 116: 249-264. 10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00086-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tahara K, Yamanoshita T, Norisada M, Hasegawa I, Kashima H, Sasaki S, Kojima K: Aluminum distribution and reactive oxygen species accumulation in root tips of two Melaleuca trees differing in aluminum resistance. Plant Soil. 2008, 307: 167-178. 10.1007/s11104-008-9593-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kochian LV, Piñeros MA, Hoekenga OA: The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant Soil. 2005, 274: 175-195. 10.1007/s11104-004-1158-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Poot-Poot W, Hernandez-Sotomayor SM: Aluminum stress and its role in the phospholipid signaling pathway in plants and possible biotechnological applications. IUBMB Life. 2011, 63: 864-872. 10.1002/iub.550.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto H, Senoo Y, Kasai M, Maeshima M: Response of the plant root to aluminum stress: analysis of the inhibition of the root elongation and changes in membrane function. J Plant Res. 1996, 9: 99-105. 10.1007/BF02344294.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vitorello VA, Capaldi FR, Stefanuto VA: Recent advances in aluminum toxicity and resistance in higher plants. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005, 17: 129-143. 10.1590/S1677-04202005000100011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jansen S, Broadley MR, Robbrecht E: Aluminum hyperaccumulation in angiosperms: a review of its phylogenetic significance. Bot Rev. 2002, 68: 235-269. 10.1663/0006-8101(2002)068[0235:AHIAAR]2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verstraeten SV, Aimo L, Oteiza PI: Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of brain toxicity. Arch Toxicol. 2008, 82: 789-802. 10.1007/s00204-008-0345-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Arunakumara KKIU, Walpola BC, Yoon MH: Aluminum toxicity and tolerance mechanism in cereals and legumes - a review. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem. 2013, 56: 1-9. 10.1007/s13765-012-2314-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huang CF, Yamaji N, Nishimura M, Tajima S, Ma JF: A rice mutant sensitive to Al toxicity is defective in the specification of root outer cell layers. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50: 976-985. 10.1093/pcp/pcp050.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barceló J, Poschenrieder C: Fast root growth responses, root exudates, and internal detoxification as clues to the mechanisms of aluminium toxicity and resistance: a review. Environ Exp Bot. 2002, 48: 75-92. 10.1016/S0098-8472(02)00013-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yang J, Wei HB, Li F, Yi SL: The effect of high-pressure and high-temperature drying treatments on the deresination ratio of Pinus massoniana. For Sci Pract. 2013, 15: 76-80.Google Scholar
- Zhang Y, Zhou ZC, Ma XH: Foraging ability and growth performance of four subtropical tree species in response to heterogeneous nutrient environments. J For Resh. 2010, 15: 91-98. 10.1007/s10310-009-0153-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo JH, Liu XJ, Zhang Y, Shen JL, Han WX, Zhang WF, Christie P, Goulding KWT, Vitousek PM, Zhang FS: Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science. 2010, 327: 1008-1010. 10.1126/science.1182570.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Godbold DL, Fritz E, Huttermann A: Aluminum toxicity and forest decline. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988, 85: 3888-3892. 10.1073/pnas.85.11.3888.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiskesjö G: The Allium test as a standard in environmental monitoring. Hereditas. 1985, 102: 99-112. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1985.tb00471.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Osaki MT, Watanabe T, Tadano T: Beneficial effect of aluminum on growth of plants adapted to low pH soils. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 1997, 43: 551-563. 10.1080/00380768.1997.10414782.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe T, Jansen S, Osaki M: Al-Fe interactions and growth enhancement in Melastoma malabathricum and Miscanthus sinensis dominating acid sulphate soils. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29: 2124-2132. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.001586.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Waraich E, Ahmad A, Ashraf R, Saifullah MY, Ahmad M: Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agr Scand B-S P. 2011, 61: 291-304.Google Scholar
- Pécsváradi A, Nagy Z, Varga A, Vashegyi Á, Labádi I, Galb°Cs G, Zsoldos F: Chloroplastic glutamine synthetase is activated by direct binding of aluminium. Physiol Plant. 2009, 135: 43-50. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01167.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bose J, Babourina O, Rengel Z: Role of magnesium in alleviation of aluminum toxicity in plants. J Exp Bot. 2011, 62: 2251-2264. 10.1093/jxb/erq456.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marschner H: Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, San Diego; 1995.Google Scholar
- Chen ZC, Ma JF: Magnesium transporters and their role in Al tolerance in plants. Plant Soil. 2013, 368: 51-56. 10.1007/s11104-012-1433-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alam SM: Influence of aluminum on plant growth and mineral nutrition of barley. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 1981, 12: 121-138. 10.1080/00103628109367134.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Alam SM: Effect of aluminum on the dry matter and mineral content of rice. J Sci Technol. 1983, 7: 1-3.Google Scholar
- Mariano ED, Keltjens WG: Long-Term Effects of aluminum exposure on nutrient uptake by maize genotypes differing in aluminum resistance. J Plant Nutr. 2005, 28: 323-333. 10.1081/PLN-200047625.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guo TR, Zhang GP, Wu FB, Chen JX, Zhou MX: Genotypic difference in plant growth and mineral composition in Barley under aluminum stress. Agric Sci. 2003, 2: 494-501.Google Scholar
- Mohanty S, Das AB, Das P, Mohanty P: Effect of a low dose of aluminum on mitotic and meiotic activity, 4C DNA content, and pollen sterility in rice, Oryza sativa L. cv. Lalat. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2004, 59: 70-75. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.07.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clarkson DT: The effect of Al and some other trivalent metal cations on cell division in the root apices of Allium cepa. Ann Bot. 1965, 29: 309-315.Google Scholar
- Doncheva S, Amen’s M, Poschenrieder C, Barceló J: Root cell patterning: a primary target for aluminum toxicity in maize. J Exp Bot. 2005, 56: 1213-1220. 10.1093/jxb/eri115.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meda AR, Furlani PR: Tolerance to aluminum toxicity by tropical leguminous plants used as cover crops. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2005, 48: 309-317. 10.1590/S1516-89132005000200019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grant WF: Chromosome aberrations in plants as a monitoring system. Environ Health Perspect. 1978, 27: 37-43. 10.1289/ehp.782737.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu DH, Jiang WS, Li DS: Effects of aluminium ion on root growth, cell division, and nucleoli of garlic (Allium sativum L.). Environ Pollut. 1993, 82: 295-299. 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90132-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zou JH, Yue JY, Jiang WS, Liu DH: Effects of cadmium stress on root tip cells and some physiological indexes in Allium cepa var. agrogarum L. Acta Biologica Cracov Bot. 2012, 54: 129-141.Google Scholar
- Zou JH, Wang M, Jiang WS, Liu DH: Effects of hexavalent chromium (VI) on root growth and cell division in root tip cells of Amaranthus viridis L. Pak J Bot. 2006, 38: 673-681.Google Scholar
- Ahmed M, Grant WF: Cytological effects of the mercurial fungicide, Panogen 15 on Tradescantia and Vicia faba root tips. Mutat Res. 1972, 14: 391-396. 10.1016/0027-5107(72)90136-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Darlington CD: Chromosome chemistry and gene action. Nature. 1942, 149: 66-69. 10.1038/149066a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kaufman BP: Cytochemical studies of changes induced in cellular materials by ionizing radiations. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1955, 59: 553-566. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1955.tb45969.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Levan A: The effect of colchicine on root mitoses in Allium. Hereditas. 1938, 24: 471-486. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1938.tb03221.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seth CS, Misra V, Chauhan LKS, Singh RR: Genotoxicity of cadmium on root meristem cells of Allium cepa: cytogenetic and Cometassay approach. Ecotoxicol EnvironSaf. 2008, 71: 711-716. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2008.02.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Morimura S, Matsumoto H: Effect of aluminium on some properties and template activity of purified pea DNA. Plant Cell Physiol. 1978, 19: 429-436.Google Scholar
- Morimura S, Takahashi E, Matsumoto H: Association of aluminium with nuclei and inhibition of cell division in onion (Allium cepa) roots. Z Pflanzenphysiol. 1978, 88: 395-401. 10.1016/S0044-328X(78)80255-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matsumoto H: Changes of the structure of pea chromatin by aluminum. Plant Cell Physiol. 1988, 29: 281-287.Google Scholar
- Rigoulet M, Yoboue ED, Devin A: Mitochondrial ROS generation and its regulation: mechanisms involved in H2O2 signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011, 14: 459-468. 10.1089/ars.2010.3363.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu FJ, Li G, Jin CW, Liu WJ, Zhang SS, Zhang YS, Lin XY: Aluminum-induced changes in reactive oxygen species accumulation, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant capacity in wheat root tips. Biol Plant. 2012, 56: 89-96. 10.1007/s10535-012-0021-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Staiger CJ: Signaling to the actin cytoskeleton in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 51: 257-288. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.257.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wasteneys GO, Galway ME: Remodelling the cytoskeleton for growth and form: an overview with some new views. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003, 54: 691-722. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134818.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardiner J, Overall R, Marc J: Putative Arabidopsis homologues of metazoan coiledcoil cytoskeletal proteins. Cell Biol Int. 2011, 35: 767-774. 10.1042/CBI20100719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gardiner J, Overall R, Marc J: Plant microtubule cytoskeleton complexity: microtubule arrays as fractals. J Exp Bot. 2012, 63: 635-642. 10.1093/jxb/err312.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frantzios G, Galatis B, Apostolakos P: Aluminium effects on microtubule organization in dividing root-tip cells of Triticum turgidum. I Mitotic cells. New Phytol. 2000, 145: 211-224. 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00580.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Přibyl P, Cepák V, Zachleder V: Cytoskeletal alterations in interphase cells of the green alga Spirogyra decimina in response to heavy metals exposure: II. The effect of aluminium, nickel and copper. Toxicol Vitro. 2008, 22: 1160-1168. 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.03.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sivaguru M, Yamamoto Y, Matsumoto H: Differential impacts of aluminium on microtubule organisation depends on growth phase in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Physiol Plant. 1999, 107: 110-119. 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.100115.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- MacDiarmid CW, Gardner RC: Al toxicity in yeast. A role for Mg?. Plant Physiol. 1996, 112: 1101-1109. 10.1104/pp.112.3.1101.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grabski S, Schindler M: Aluminum induces rigor within the actin network of soybean cells. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108: 897-901.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- MacDonald TL, Humphreys WG, Martin RB: Promotion of tubulin assembly by aluminum ion in vitro. Science. 1987, 236: 183-186. 10.1126/science.3105058.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu Y: Structure and function of calmodulin (I). Biochem Biophys. 1985, 1: 22-27.Google Scholar
- Trerè D: AgNOR staining and quantification. Micron. 2000, 2: 127-131. 10.1016/S0968-4328(99)00069-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qin R, Jiao YQ, Zhang SS, Jiang WS, Liu DH: Effects of aluminum on nucleoli in root tip cells and selected physiological and biochemical characters in Allium cepa var agrogarum L. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10: 225-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vostrikova TV, Butorina AK: Cytogenetic responses of birch to stress factors. Biol Bull. 2006, 33: 185-190. 10.1134/S1062359006020142.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sheldon S, Speers WC, Lenhman JM: Nucleolar persistence in embryonal carcinoma cells. Exp Cell Res. 1981, 132: 185-192. 10.1016/0014-4827(81)90094-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang HM, Zhang SS, Meng QM, Zou J, Jiang WS, Liu DH: Effects of aluminum on nucleoli in root tip cells, root growth and the antioxidant defense system in Vicia faba L. Acta Biol Cracov Bot. 2009, 51: 99-106.Google Scholar
- Fiskesjö G: Nucleolar dissolution induced by aluminium in root cells of Allium. Physiol Plant. 1983, 59: 508-511. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb04238.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fiskesjö G: Occurrence and degeneration of `Al-structures’ in root cap cells of Allium cepa L. after Al-treatment. Hereditas. 1990, 112: 193-202. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1990.tb00057.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu DH, Jiang WS: Effects of Al3+ on the nucleolus in root tip cells of Allium cepa. Hereditas. 1991, 115: 213-219. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00564.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Qin R, Jiang WS, Liu DH: Aluminum can induce alterations in the cellular localization and expression of three major nucleolar proteins in root tip cells of Allium cepa var agrogarum L. Chemosphere. 2013, 90: 827-834. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.09.093.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Andersen JS, Lam YW, Leung AK, Ong SE, Lyon CE, Lamond AI, Mann M: Nucleolar proteome dynamics. Nature. 2005, 433: 77-83. 10.1038/nature03207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olson MOJ, Dundr M: The moving parts of the nucleolus. Histochem Cell Biol. 2005, 123: 203-216. 10.1007/s00418-005-0754-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boisvert FM, van Koningsbruggen S, Navascu’s J, Lamond AI: The multifunctional nucleolus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007, 8: 574-585. 10.1038/nrm2184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lischwe MA, Smetana K, Olson MOJ, Busch H: Proteins C23 and B23 are the major nucleolar silver staining proteins. Life Sci. 1979, 25: 701-708. 10.1016/0024-3205(79)90512-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ginisty H, Sicard H, Roger B, Bouvet P: Structure and functions of nucleolin. J Cell Sci. 1999, 112: 761-772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Strauss PR, Wilson SH: The Eukaryotic Nucleus: Molecular Biochemistry and Macromolecular Assemblies. The Telford Press, Caldwell; 1990.Google Scholar
- Chen D, Huang S: Nucleolar components involved in ribosome biogenesis cycle between the nucleolus and nucleoplasm in interphase cells. J Cell Biol. 2001, 153: 169-176. 10.1083/jcb.153.1.169.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.