Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of EST-SSR markers in castor bean (Ricinus communisL.)

BMC Plant Biology volume 10, Article number: 278 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The castor bean (Ricinus communis L.), a monotypic species in the spurge family (Euphorbiaceae, 2n = 20), is an important non-edible oilseed crop widely cultivated in tropical, sub-tropical and temperate countries for its high economic value. Because of the high level of ricinoleic acid (over 85%) in its seed oil, the castor bean seed derivatives are often used in aviation oil, lubricants, nylon, dyes, inks, soaps, adhesive and biodiesel. Due to lack of efficient molecular markers, little is known about the population genetic diversity and the genetic relationships among castor bean germplasm. Efficient and robust molecular markers are increasingly needed for breeding and improving varieties in castor bean. The advent of modern genomics has produced large amounts of publicly available DNA sequence data. In particular, expressed sequence tags (ESTs) provide valuable resources to develop gene-associated SSR markers.

Results

In total, 18,928 publicly available non-redundant castor bean EST sequences, representing approximately 17.03 Mb, were evaluated and 7732 SSR sites in 5,122 ESTs were identified by data mining. Castor bean exhibited considerably high frequency of EST-SSRs. We developed and characterized 118 polymorphic EST-SSR markers from 379 primer pairs flanking repeats by screening 24 castor bean samples collected from different countries. A total of 350 alleles were identified from 118 polymorphic SSR loci, ranging from 2-6 per locus (A) with an average of 2.97. The EST-SSR markers developed displayed moderate gene diversity (He) with an average of 0.41. Genetic relationships among 24 germplasms were investigated using the genotypes of 350 alleles, showing geographic pattern of genotypes across genetic diversity centers of castor bean.

Conclusion

Castor bean EST sequences exhibited considerably high frequency of SSR sites, and were rich resources for developing EST-SSR markers. These EST-SSR markers would be particularly useful for both genetic mapping and population structure analysis, facilitating breeding and crop improvement of castor bean.

Background

Castor bean (Ricinus communis L., Euphorbiaceae, 2n = 20) is an important non-edible oilseed crop and its seed derivatives are often used in aviation oil, lubricants, nylon, dyes, inks, soaps, adhesive and biodiesel. Among all the vegetable oils, castor bean oil is distinctive due to its high level of ricinoleic acid (over 85%), a fatty acid consisting of 18 carbons, a double bond between C9 and C10, and a hydroxyl group attached to C12. Ricinoleic acid is responsible for castor bean oil interest, with the highest and most stable viscosity index among all the vegetable oils combined with high lubricity, especially under low-temperature conditions. Although it was found that castor bean seeds had been used by people dating from about 4000 BC [1], it is still an unanswered question about the origin of castor bean cultivation. Castor bean's contemporary distribution in the warmer regions is worldwide, although its origin is obscured by wide dissemination in ancient times and the ease and rapidity with which it becomes established. Castor bean is indigenous to southeastern Mediterranean Basin, Eastern Africa, and India, and most probably originated in tropical Africa [2, 3]. Because of its high economic value, castor bean is widely cultivated in tropical, sub-tropical and temperate countries, particularly India, China and Brazil [4]. Due to increased demand for castor bean in many countries, breeding and improvement of varieties are drawing great attention from breeders [5].

Although the genus Ricinus is considered monotypic, castor bean varies greatly in its growth habit, color of foliage and stems, seed size and oil content [6, 7]. Most types are large perennials that often develop into small trees in tropical or subtropical areas; however it is usually shorter and smaller and grown annually in areas prone to frost. It is obvious that castor bean exhibits great phenotypic diversity and phenotypic plasticity to environmental factors. However, little is known about castor bean's genetic diversity and the genetic basis of its phenotypic plasticity. Castor bean is usually considered to be both self- and cross-pollinated by wind, but controlled crossing studies suggest that outcrossing is a frequent mode of reproduction [8, 9].

Germplasm collections constitute one of the world's most readily available sources of plant genetic material [10]. The USDA-ARS Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit (at Griffin, GA, USA) collected and maintained diverse germplasm resources of castor bean worldwide, which provided valuable germplasms for castor bean breeding and improvement of varieties. There is an increasing need for distinguishing the varieties reliably, establishing their purity, and fingerprinting released varieties, hybrids and the parental lines of castor bean germplasm held in different countries by efficient molecular markers during breeding and improvement of varieties. Most cultivars have low productivity. The castor bean seed, meanwhile, contains the highly toxic protein ricin which seriously limits its usage. The main goal of breeding and improvement of varieties to breeders is to develop high-productivity and nontoxic varieties of castor bean. Developing robust and reliable molecular markers associated with traits of interest will enhance the breeding program efficiency.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites showing extensive length polymorphisms have been widely used in DNA fingerprinting, genetic diversity studies, construction of genetic linkage map and breeding applications [11]. Previous studies of genetic diversity suggested that SSRs are more informative and robust than other available molecular marker resources, such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in castor bean [12, 13]. In particular, SSR markers are readily transferable between laboratories as each locus is defined by the primer sequence. SSRs can be used not only for identifying cultivars but also for genetic mapping and marker-assisted selection [14, 15]. Development of SSR markers specific to castor bean is critical and should be a priority for assisting in the breeding and improvement of varieties [5]. The SSR markers of castor bean are, however, very limited to date because the de novo development of SSRs is a costly and time consuming endeavor [16, 17]. The advent of modern genomics age has produced large amounts of publicly available DNA sequence data. In particular, the expressed sequence tags (ESTs) provide a valuable resource for identifying and developing gene-associated SSR markers. Linkage of EST-SSR markers with desired characters may lead to the identification of genes controlling these traits [18]. In addition, EST-SSRs are universal and can be applied in comparative mapping and linkage map construction [19, 20]. Therefore, in recent years, EST-SSRs have already been developed for various crops such as wheat and rice [21–25], barley [26–28], grape [29], tomato [30], sugar cane [19], coffee [31–33], oil palm [34] and rubber tree [35].

To our knowledge, there has been no report of development of EST-SSR markers in castor bean to date. Therefore, we report our work on EST-SSRs derived from castor bean ESTs in the National Centre of Bioinformatics Information, USA database, based on (1) the frequency and distribution of SSRs in castor bean ESTs, (2) the establishment and validation of EST-SSR markers for detection of polymorphism in castor bean, and (3) the assessment of genetic relationships among 24 germplasm accessions collected from main diversity centers of castor bean by using EST-SSR markers developed. These rich SSR resources from castor bean EST database are publicly available and the polymorphic EST-SSR markers reported herein would be particularly useful for genetic map-based analyses as well as population genetic studies, facilitating breeding and crop improvement of castor bean.

Results

Frequency and distribution of microsatellites

A total of 18,928 non-redundant castor bean EST sequences trimmed were identified from 62,611 publicly available EST sequences by running the EST-TRIMMER and the CD-HIT programs. The search for microsatellites in 18,928 non-redundant castor bean ESTs representing approximately 13.68 Mb revealed 7,732 microsatellites in 5,376 ESTs; nearly one in 3.5 unique ESTs (28.4%) contained at least one SSR; 2,356 ESTs contained more than one SSR and 573 SSRs were found as compound SSRs. This corresponds to an average distance between SSRs of approximately 1.77 kb (i.e. one SSR per 1.77 kb) or one SSR-containing EST every 2.45 ESTs. The SSRs identified contained 1939 di-, 3698 tri-, 220 tetra-, 61 penta-, 138 hexa-, and 1676 mononucleotides (Table 1). The trinucleotides are the dominant motifs (Figure 1). Among motif repeats, 1624 A/T repeats accounting for 96.9% of total mononucleotide repeats (1676) were the dominant mono- motifs; 1350 AG/CT repeat accounting for 69.6% of total dinucleotide repeats (1939) are the dominant di- motifs. However, the trinucleotide motifs were relatively diverse with 321 AAG/CTT, the richest repeat among tri- motifs, accounting for 8.7% of total trinucleotide motifs (3698). Similarly, there were no obvious dominant motifs among the tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide motifs.

Table 1 Occurrence of 7732 SSRs identified in a set of 18,928 non-redundant castor bean ESTs
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

Number of mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexa- SSRs and their distribution between UTR and exon regions.

Full size image

Inspection of SSR location on EST sequences showed that 1344 mono- repeats (accounting for 80.2%), 1362 di- repeats (accounting for 70.3%), 183 tetra- repeats (accounting for 83.2%), and 47 penta- repeats (accounting for 77.1%) occurred within un-translated regions (UTRs), while 2813 tri- repeats (accounting for 76.1%) and 101 hexa- repeats (accounting for 73.2%) occurred within expression regions (see Figure 1).

Polymorphism and genera transferability of EST-SSRs markers

Out of 6056 SSR embedded within 3871 ESTs, excluding 1676 MNRs, primer pairs could be designed for 4223 SSR loci (69.7%) by using PRIMER3. The remaining sequences contained either too little DNA sequence flanking the SSR loci or the sequences were inappropriate for primer modeling. Three hundred and seventy-nine primer pairs flanking 151 di-nucleotide repeats (DNRs), 185 tri-nucleotide repeats (TNRs), 35 tetra-nucleotide repeats (TeNRs), 4 penta- nucleotide repeats (PNRs) and 4 Hexa-nucleotide repeats (HNRs) were assayed to test the polymorphism and genera transferability of EST-SSRs in 24 accessions worldwide (see additional file 1, Table S1, additional). In 308 (81.2%) cases, PCR products could be amplified with genomic DNA, while for 71 primer pairs PCR completely failed, amplified too weakly, or amplified multiple bands and the 71 primers were excluded from further analysis (see additional file 2 Table S2, additional). In 21 cases, the amplicons obtained were of obviously larger size than expected from the EST sequence, probably due to the presence of introns. The amplification of introns may cause problems, since fragments above 300 bp could not be scored accurately for small differences in fragment size. Additionally, it can be assumed that in several cases the observed polymorphism is caused by a size polymorphism within the intron, which may overshadow a putative polymorphism of the microsatellite. Thus the 21 primer pairs containing obvious introns and producing over 300 bp fragments were also excluded from further analyses. One Hundred and sixty-nine primer pairs were monomorphic, covering 56 di- motif loci, 104 tri- motif loci and 9 tetra- motif loci. In total, 118 polymorphic EST-SSR markers from 287 primer pairs were identified, including 68 di- motif loci, 42 tri- motif loci and 8 tetra- motif loci (see additional file 2, Table S2, additional). The proportion of polymorphic primers was 41.1%. The polymorphic proportion of di-, tri-, and tetra- motif loci were 54.8%, 28.8% and 47%, respectively. From the 118 loci we identified 350 alleles with an average of 2.97 alleles per locus (Table S3, Figure 2). Of the 350 alleles, 223 alleles were from di- loci with an average of 3.28 per locus, 107 alleles were from tri- loci with an average of 2.49 per locus. Across 118 loci, gene diversity (expected heterozygosity, He) ranged from 0.08 to 0.78 (mean = 0.41 ± 0.02). Among 68 dinucleotide loci and 42 trinucleotide loci, the mean of He were 0.44 and 0.37, respectively. Across dinucleotide and trinucleotide loci, dinucleotide SSRs were significantly more polymorphic than trinucleotide SSRs (nA and He both P < 0.01; 2-sample t test). Across 118 loci, PIC values ranged from 0.07 to 0.73 (mean = 0.36 ± 0.02), suggesting the EST-SSR markers developed had moderate level of polymorphism. BLAST analyses showed that 76 EST sequences from the developed 118 polymorphic SSR markers shared significant homology to Arabidopsis loci. The functional annotations of markers developed were listed in Table S3 (see additional file 3, additional).

Figure 2
figure2

PCR products and their length polymorphisms of four EST-SSR markers (Rc05, Rc85, Rc28 and Rc158) on agarose gel among 24 germplasms (see Table 2 for the codes of germplasms).

Full size image

To test the genera transferability of EST-SSRs identified in castor bean to Jatropha curcas and Speranskia cantonensis, the 308 primer pairs, which could successfully amplify PCR products in castor bean were tested for amplification of the genomic DNA of J. curcas and S. cantonensis with the same PCR conditions used in castor bean. 155 of 308 (50.2%) primer pairs amplified in S. cantonensis, and 74 of 308 (24.0%) primer pairs amplified in J. curcas (see additional file 1, Table S1, additional).

Genetic relationships among germplasms

A dendrogram based on UPGMA Nei-Li's criteria was generated with five distinct clusters (Figure 3). Cluster I included two African (SA and MA) and two South American (BR and PE) accessions; Cluster II contained one African (DZ), one Russian (RU), and two west Asian (PK and IR) accessions; Cluster III comprised of one North American (MX) and two Indian (IN-1 and IN-2) accessions; Cluster IV covered all Chinese (CN1-9) and Vietnam (VN1-2) accessions. The dendrogram based on Neighbor-Joining criteria was very similar to the UPGMA tree, and the five distinct clusters (Cluster I, Cluster II, Cluster III, Cluster IV and Cluster V in Figure 3) were again identified, though there were slight differences in branch length within clusters (data not shown).

Figure 3
figure3

Dendrogram constructed from genetic distances estimated from genotypes of 118 EST-SSRs among 24 germplasms using the UPGMA Nei-Li criteria within PAUP*. The numbers beside lines denote the branch length (see Table 2 for the codes of germplasms).

Full size image

Discussion

SSR frequency and distribution

The non-redundant EST sequences provided a more accurate representation of the densities of SSR motifs in the transcribed portions of the genome [20, 32]. Based on the 18,928 non-redundant castor EST sequences, 7732 SSRs were identified. The overall density of SSRs is one SSR per 1.77 kb, nearly one in 3.5 unique ESTs (23.6%). Using the same cut-off criteria, Ellis and Burke inspected the frequency of EST-SSRs from 33 plant genera and found that the frequency varied from one in every 5 unique ESTs (21%) to one in every 40 unique ESTs (2.5%), with a mean frequency of nearly one SSR-ESTs in every 10 unique ESTs (9.0%) [18]. Compared to the 33 plant genera, castor exhibits considerably high frequency of EST-SSRs. To further compare the overall densities of SSRs in castor bean EST sequences with that reported in other plants, we used the same cut-off criteria as Cardle et al. [21] with 7, 5, 4 and 4 repeats for di-, tri-, tetra- and penta-, respectively, excluding the mono-repeats. Correspondingly, we identified 2710 SSRs with one SSR per 5.0 kb (1/5.0kb) EST sequence in castor. This density is higher than that in soybean (1/7.4 kb), maize (1/8.1 kb), tomato (1/11.1 kb), Arabidopsis (1/13.83 kb), poplar (1/14.0 kb), and cotton (1/20.0 kb). However, it is lower than that in rice (1/3.4 kb). Similarly, we separately used the same cut-off criteria as Aggarwal et al. used in coffee [33], Low et al. used in oil palm [34] and Feng et al. used in rubber tree [35], and identified 10,442 (1/1.31 kb), 4,177 (1/3.3 kb) and 3,616 SSRs (1/3.8 kb) respectively, higher than that in coffee (1/2.16 kb) and oil palm (1/7.7 kb), and lower than that in rubber tree (1/3.39 kb). Varshney et al. assumed that the high frequency of SSR in rice EST sequences may be due to its small genome size [36]. The genome size of castor was estimated to be 323 Mb [37]. The high frequency SSR in castor EST sequences may be related to its small genome size.

Like other plants, A/T is the main mononucleotide motif in castor bean EST sequence [23]. Among the dinucleotide repeat motifs identified, AG/CT repeats (1350) were the most common in the dataset, accounting for 69.6% of the total dinucleotide motifs (1939). These results are consistent with the frequency of DNRs identified in Arabidopsis, rice, soybean, maize, oil palm, coffee, barley, wheat and rubber tree [23, 24, 27, 32, 34, 35]. Kantety et al. suggested that the high level of occurrence of GA/CT motifs could be due to the high level of occurrence of the translated amino acid products of the motifs [38]. The GA/CT motifs are translated into GAG (Glu), AGA (Arg), CUC (Leu) and UCU (Ser). We inspected the codon usage from 200 ORFs containing 44,298 codons in castor bean EST sequences and detected 10,892 codons for these four amino acids (24.6% of the total codons analyzed), accounting for that the four amino acids have a relatively higher frequency than the amino acids produced by the other dinucleotide repeats (data unshown). Thus, Kantety et al.'s assumption was supported in our study. The CG/GC is the most rare di- repeat in accordance with that reported in other plants compared [23, 24, 27, 32, 34, 35].

Varshney et al. reported that among cereal species TNRs were the most frequent (54-78%) followed by DNRs (17.1-40.4%) and TTNRs (3-6%), excluding MNRs [36]. Our results (excluding MNRs) are consistent with cereal species with the most frequent TNRs (61.1%), followed by DNRs (32.0%), and TTNRs (3.6%). The abundance of trimetric SSRs in ESTs was attributed to the absence of frameshift mutations in coding regions when there is length variation in these SSRs [39]. Among the tri- motifs AAG/CTT is the most frequently occurring (23.5%) in castor bean ESTs, followed by AGC/GCT (16.6%), ACC/GGT (15.0%), ATC/GAT (12.5%), AAT/ATT (9.5%). Morgante et al.'s observation that AAG/CTT is predominant and CCG/CGG is relatively rare tri- repeats in dicotyledonous plants [23] was confirmed.

The mono-, di-, tetra- and penta- repeat loci mainly occurred within UTR regions, while tri- and hexa- repeat loci occurred mainly within exon regions. This seems to be a common feature of EST-SSRs and has often been found in other organisms. This could be a result of selection and evolution, since tri- and hexa- SSRs do not change the coding frame in coding regions when there is a SSR length variation, while mono-, di-, tetra- and penta- SSR easily change the coding frame within coding regions and give rise to negative mutation when the SSR length variation occurred.

Polymorphism of EST-SSR markers and genera transferability

Hitherto, little work has been done on the development and application of SSR markers in castor bean genetic and breeding studies. We obtained 118 polymorphic EST-SSR markers from 379 primer pairs within 24 germplasm sampled with a polymorphic ratio of 41.1%, excluding the null allele primers and those that harbor obvious introns. Compared to other plants, the polymorphic ratio of EST-SSR primers in castor bean is at the medium level [20]. These polymorphic EST-SSR markers derived herein, to our knowledge, are the first report on development of genic microsatellite markers in castor bean to date. Using these 118 polymorphic EST-SSR markers, 350 alleles were identified from 24 accessions with an average of 2.97 alleles per marker. Allan et al. reported nine genomic SSR markers with an average of 0.403 gene diversity (PIC) and an average of 3.01 alleles per locus [13]. Bajay et al. developed 12 genomic SSR markers with an average of 0.416 gene diversity (He) and an average of 3.3 alleles per locus [40]. Our results displayed that the gene diversity (He) and PIC value of the 118 polymorphic markers were 0.41 and 0.36, respectively. These results were consistent with each another, suggesting that SSR locus of castor bean represents a moderate level of gene diversity. The gene diversity values (He and PIC) reported herein can serve as a guide in selecting the loci that are most likely to be informative in further castor bean research.

As mentioned above, di- and tetra- SSRs mainly occurred within UTR regions, while tri- SSRs mainly occurred within exon regions. Unsurprisingly, di- (54.8%) and tetra- (47%) motif loci presented higher polymorphic proportions than tri- motif loci (28.8%) in castor bean, suggesting that the SSRs which occurred within UTR are more polymorphic than those in exon regions. Across di- and tri- motif loci, di- motif markers presented significantly higher gene diversity than those of the tri- motif markers. These observations showed that the SSR loci harbored within UTR regions were more polymorphic than these harbored within exon regions in castor bean.

Transferability of EST-SSRs among closely related genera has been reported in many crops. Ellis and Burke summarized the transferability of EST-SSRs among plant taxa and exhibited a variation range of EST-SSRs cross-genera transferability from 10% to 80% [18]. Our results indicated that castor bean EST-SSRs had a moderate transfer rate (50.2%) in S. cantonensis and a relatively lower transfer rate (24.0%) in J. curcas. Raji et al. reported the transfer rate of EST-SSR markers developed from Manihot to castor bean was 15% [41]. The different cross-genera transferability of EST-SSRs may be related to the evolutionary distance between the three genera, since castor bean phylogenetically has a more distant relationship with Jatropha than Speranskia and Manihot [42].

Evaluation of genetic relationships among germplasms

As mentioned above, castor bean belongs to a monotypic genus with great phenotypic diversity and phenotypic plasticity. Castor bean is a fast-growing and easily-establishing perennial shrub under various habitats, and is widespread throughout tropical and subtropical regions and is often found on wastelands today. It is difficult to establish castor bean's origin now, though it is thought to be native to the southeastern Mediterranean Basin, Eastern Africa, and India. According to Moshkin, there are four main centers of genetic variability viz., Irano-Afghanistan-USSR region, Palestine-SW Asia, India-China and the Arabian Peninsula, each with its own specific plant characteristics [43]. It is an acceptable view that castor bean landraces collected from South or North America today were most likely introduced from Africa or west Asia in early society due to human activities.

Our current research identified five distinct groups Clusters I-V within 24 samples using the genotypes of 350 alleles. Apparently, the five clusters lacked a geographic structure because the two South American germplasms (BR and PE) clustered with two African members (SA and MA) in Cluster I, and the North American accession (MX) clustered with two Indian (IN-1 and IN-2) members in Cluster III. However, if we assume that the two South American germplasms (BR and PE) and the one North American germplasm (MX) were introduced from Africa or west Asia, our current research seems to support, in a way, Moshkin's view [43], namely, Cluster I represents African members, Clusters II and III represent Irano-Afghanistan-USSR and Palestine-SW Asia members, and Clusters IV and V represent India-China members. It is noteworthy that the germplasms sampled in the current study is limited and incomplete. It remains to be determined whether this geographic pattern of germplasm group is present in a more extensive survey of germplasm samples. Allan et al.'s studies [13] did not identify distinct geographic groups among worldwide germplasms. The possible reasons could be that 1) the polymorphic markers used in their studies were limited, or 2) many castor bean germplasms were introduced or multi-introduced across several continents due to human activities. It may be difficult to figure out the origin and domestication of castor bean without the genotype of the wild castor bean germplasms. Without a doubt, the polymorphic EST-SSR markers developed herein will provide robust genetic markers for further investigation of the origin and evolution of castor bean, though the geographic structuring of castor bean germplasms detected from our current study is uncertain.

Conclusion

In summary, the castor bean EST database harbored highly rich SSR sites and the EST-SSR markers reported herein exhibited moderate levels of gene diversity. These EST-SSR markers should prove useful for both genetic mapping and population structure analysis, facilitating breeding and crop improvement of castor bean.

Methods

Plant material and EST retrieval

Twenty-four worldwide accessions representing the main germplasms of castor bean from 14 countries were used to screen the polymorphism of SSR markers developed, and to investigate the genetic diversity of germplasms based on the polymorphic SSR markers. Seeds of each accession were obtained from the USDA National Plant Germplasm System http://www.ars-grin.gov/npgs/ and our collected landraces in China and Vietnam (Table 2). Phylogenetically, the genus Speranskia has a closer relationship with Ricinus than the genus Jatropha [42]. The genomic DNAs of Jatropha curcas and Speranskia cantonensis were used to test the cross-genera transferability of EST-SSR markers which can amplify PCR products using castor bean genomic DNA. The seeds of accessions were germinated at a greenhouse, and the young leaves were collected for genomic DNA extraction using a CTAB methodology [44].

Table 2 Germplasm accessions used for testing polymorphism of EST-SSR markers and inspecting genetic relationships
Full size table

Castor bean EST sequences were obtained via the ENTREZ search tool of the EST database at the NCBI http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucest. A total of 62,611 castor bean ESTs originated from different tissues were available for this study on January 1, 2009, including the 750 ESTs (GE632454-GE637384) from developing seeds [45], 158 ESTs (AM267320-AM267478) from phloem [46], 4307 ESTs (EV519634-EV523941) from endosperm [47], 4,902 ESTs (AM267321- AM267479) from developing seeds [Kroon et al. released in 2008, unpublished], 329 ESTs (CF981112-CF981441) from seed [Cahoon et al. released in 2003, unpublished], and the 11,633; 24,567; 5,619 and 10,346 ESTs (EG690439-EG702071, EG665872-EG690438, EE254600- EE260857, EG656356-EG665871, EE253769-EE254599) from developing seeds, root, flower and leaf, respectively [Melake et al. released in 2006, unpublished]. The FASTA-formatted files of EST sequences were downloaded for further data mining.

Data mining for SSRs

In a preliminary step, polyA and polyT stretches which correspond to polyA-tails in eukaryotic mRNA were removed with the help of the EST-trimmer software http://www.pgrc.ipk-gathersleben.de/misa/download/est-trimmer.pl until no stretch of (T)5 or (A)5 was present in a range of 50 bp on the 5'- or 3'-end, respectively. EST sequences of less than 100 bp were discarded and sequences larger than 800 bp were clipped at their 3' side to preclude the inclusion of low quality sequences [27]. To remove redundant ESTs, the CD-HIT program [48] was used with a 95% sequence similarity threshold. Then trimmed non-redundant EST sequences were scanned using the MISA (MIcroSAtellite) tool [27] to identify all SSRs within a set of sequences. We set the script to identify all possible mono-, di-, tri-, tetra-, penta- and hexanucleotide repeats (MNRs, DNRs, TNRs, TeNRs, PNRs and HNRs) with a minimum of 10, 5, 4, 4, 4, and 4 subunits, respectively. The results of the MISA run were transferred to a Microsoft Excel worksheet for further analyses.

To localize the distribution of SSRs on EST sequences, the ESTscan2 http://www.ch.embnet.org/software/ESTScan2.html was used to inspect the ratio of SSR distribution on the transcribed regions (TRs) and UTRs.

PCR conditions and separation of microsatellites

Primer pairs were designed from the flanking sequences, using PRIMER3 software [49] in batch mode via the p3_in.pl and p3_out.pl Perl5 scripts within the MISA package [27]. To test the polymorphisms of EST-SSRs identified in castor bean, we randomly selected 379 primer pairs. The target amplicon size was set as 100-300 bp, the optimal annealing temperature as 60°C, and the optimal primer length as 20 bp.

PCR primers were developed and an M13 forward (GGAAACAGCTATGACCAT) was added to the 5' end of one of each primer pair using OliGO 6.67 (Molecular Biology Insights) to determine which tag would produce the least offensive secondary structures. Inclusion of the 5'-tag allows use of a 3rd primer in the PCR (M13F) that is fluorescently labeled for detection on ABI3730 DNA Analyzer. M13F primers were labeled with a FAM fluorescent dye. PCR reactions were carried out in a 10 μl volumes containing 1x PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, and 2 mM MgCl2), 100 μM each dNTP, 0.04 μM tag labeled Forward primer, 0.16 μM universal dye labeled primer, and 0.2 μM Reverse primer, and 2 U of Taq DNA polymerase. Approximately 10 ng of genomic DNA was used in each reaction. The reagents for PCR amplification were from TAKARA Biotechnology (DaLian) CO. LTD.

Primers were tested using TOUCHDOWN thermal cycling programs encompassing a 10° span of annealing temperatures ranging between 65-55°C, or 60-50°C. Cycling parameters were: an initial denaturing step of 3 min at 95°C, followed by ten cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at the highest annealing temperature (annealing temperature was reduced by 1°C per cycle), 45 s at 72°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C (for 65-55°C touchdown range) or 50°C (for 60-50°C touchdown range), 45 s at 72°C, and a final extension time of 10 min at 72°C. PCR products were initially scored for amplification on agarose gels, and successful PCR products were subsequently sized on an ABI 3730 DNA Analyzer, after clean-up with Millipore® 96 well filter plate. Genescan 500 ROX size standards (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California) were run in each lane to allow for the accurate determination of fragment size, and alleles were called using the GeneMapper software V4.0 (Applied Biosystems). Ambiguous samples were run a second time.

The putative functions of identified polymorphic markers were annotated by BLASTX against the NCBI Non-Redundant Protein http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/RefSeq/. In order to test the cross-genera transferability of SSR markers developed from castor bean EST sequence, all primer pairs producing successful PCR bands using castor bean genomic DNA were tested using J. curcas and S. cantonensis genomic DNA as templates.

Statistical analysis

The level of polymorphism per locus (number of alleles, nA, and expected heterozygosity [i.e., gene diversity], He) was calculated using the program GDA [50]. The polymorphic information content (PIC) is a tool to measure the informativeness of a given DNA marker. Thus we calculated the PIC value for each locus using PIC calculator http://www.liv.ac.uk/~kempsj/pic.html. In order to investigate the genetic relationships among germplasms using these polymorphic SSR markers identified, we scored these SSR products as the presence (1) and absence (0) of the band, thus generating a binary matrix. The binary data matrix was transferred to the software PAUP to construct the dendrogram among germplasms. The unrooted dengrograms were generated with Neighbor-Joining and UPGMA Nei-Li's criteria within PAUP*version 4.0 [51].

References

  1. 1.

    Hayes WC: The Scepter of Egypt II. Cambridge, Mass. USA: Harvard University Press: 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Weiss EA: Castor bean, Sesame, and safflower. London, Leonard Hill: 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Govaerts R, Frodin DG, Radcliffe-Smith A: World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (with Pandaceae). Trowbridge, Wiltshire, Redwood Books Limited: 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Atsmon D: Castor. Oilcrops of the World, Their Breeding and Utilization. Edited by: Robbelen G, Downey RK, Ashri A. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1989,438-447.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sujatha M, Reddy TP, Mahasi MJ: Role of biotechnological interventions in the improvement of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) and Jatropha curcas L. Biotechnol Adv. 2008, 26: 424-435. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.05.004.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Weiss EA: Oilseed crops. London, Blackwell: 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li FJ, Wang CL, Wang YF, Chen ZQ, Chen MH, Gao LF: Fatty acid composition of the castor bean seed of nine castor bean hybrids. China Oils and Fats. 2008, 33: 62-64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Meinders HC, Jones MD: Pollen shedding and dispersal in the castor bean plant Ricinus communis L. J Agron. 1950, 4: 206-209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Brigham RD: Natural outcrossing in dwarf-internode castor bean, Ricinus communis L. Crop Sci. 1967, 7: 353-355. 10.2135/cropsci1967.0011183X000700040022x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Allard RW, Alvim PDeT, Ashri A, Barton JH: Managing global genetic resources; the U. S. national plant germplasm system: elements of the national plant germplasm system. Washington DC, The National Academies Press, 1991. 43-86.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gupta PK, Varshney RK: The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica. 2000, 113: 163-185. 10.1023/A:1003910819967.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chakrabarty SK, Banu SS: Genetic diversity in pistillate lines of castor bean (Ricinus communis). Indian J Agric Sci. 1999, 69: 729-730.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Allan G, Williams A, Rabinowicz PD, Chan AP, Ravel J, Keim P: Worldwide genotyping of castor bean germplasm (Ricinus communis L.) using AFLPs and SSRs. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2008, 55: 365-378. 10.1007/s10722-007-9244-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, Rafalski A: The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed. 1996, 2: 225-238. 10.1007/BF00564200.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK: An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: The basic concepts. Euphytica. 2005, 142: 169-196. 10.1007/s10681-005-1681-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T: Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol. 2002, 11: 1-16. 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Squirrell J, Hollingsworth PM, Woodhead M, Russell J, Lowe AJ, Gibby M, Powell W: How much effort is required to isolate nuclear microsatellites from plants?. Mol Ecol. 2003, 12: 1339-1348. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01825.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ellis JR, Burke JM: EST-SSRs as a resource for population genetics analysis. Heredity. 2007, 99: 125-132. 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801001.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Cordeiro GM, Casu R, McIntyre CL, Manners JM, Henry RJ: Microsatellite markers from sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) ESTs cross transferable to erianthus and sorghum. Plant Sci. 2001, 160: 1115-1123. 10.1016/S0168-9452(01)00365-X.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Varshney RK, Sigmund R, Börner A, Korzum V, Stein N, Sorrells ME, Langridge P, Graner A: Interspecific transferability and comparative mapping of barley EST-SSR markers in wheat, rye and rice. Plant Sci. 2005, 168: 195-202. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.08.001.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cardle L, Ramsay L, Milbourne D, Macaulay M, Marshall D, Waugh R: Computational and experimental characterization of physically clustered simple sequence repeats in plants. Genetics. 2000, 156: 847-854.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Tóth G, Gáspári Z, Jurka J: Microsatellites in different eukaryotic genomes: Survey and analysis. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 967-981. 10.1101/gr.10.7.967.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Morgante M, Hanafey M, Powell W: Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetitive DNA in plant genomes. Nat Genet. 2002, 30: 194-200. 10.1038/ng822.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nicot N, Chiquet V, Gandon B, Amilhat L, Legeai F, Leroy P, Bernard M, Sourdille P: Study of simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers from wheat expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Theor Appl Genet. 2004, 109: 800-805. 10.1007/s00122-004-1685-x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kota R, Varshney RK, Thiel T, Dehmer KJ, Graner A: Generation and comparison of EST-derived SSRs and SNPs in barley (Houdeum vulgare L.). Hereditas. 2001, 135: 145-151. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2001.00145.x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Temnykh S, DeClerck G, Lukashova A, Lipovich L, Cartinhour S, McCouch S: Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res. 2001, 11: 1441-1452. 10.1101/gr.184001.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Thiel T, Michalek W, Varshney RK, Graner A: Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2003, 106: 411-422.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Holton TA, Christopher JT, McClure L, Harker N, Henry RJ: Identification and mapping of polymorphic SSR markers from expressed gene sequences of barley and wheat. Mol Breed. 2002, 9: 63-71. 10.1023/A:1026785207878.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Scott KD, Eggler P, Seaton G, Rossetto M, Ablett EM, Lee LS Henry RJ: Analysis of SSRs derived from grape ESTs. Theor Appl Genet. 2000, 100: 723-726. 10.1007/s001220051344.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Areshchenkova T, Ganal MW: Comparative analysis of polymorphism and chromosomal location of tomato microsatellite markers isolated from different sources. Theor Appl Genet. 2002, 104: 229-235. 10.1007/s00122-001-0775-2.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bhat PR, Krishnakumar V, Hendre PS, Rajendrakumar P, Varshney RK, Aggarwal RK: Identification and characterization of gene-derived EST-SSR markers from robusta coffee variety 'CxR' (an interspecific hybrid of Coffea canephora x Coffea congensis). Mol Ecol Notes. 2005, 5: 80-83. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00839.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Poncet V, Rondeau M, Tranchant C, Cayrel A, Hamon S, de Kochko A, Hamon P: SSR mining in coffee tree EST databases: potential use of EST-SSRs as markers for the Coffea genus. Mol Genet Genomics. 2006, 276: 436-449. 10.1007/s00438-006-0153-5.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Aggarwal RK, Hendre PS, Varshney RK, Bhat PR, Krishnakumar V, Singh L: Identification, characterization and utilization of EST-derived genic microsatellite markers for genome analyses of coffee and related species. Theor Appl Genet. 2007, 114: 359-372. 10.1007/s00122-006-0440-x.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Low ETL, Alias H, Boon SH, Shariff EM, Tan CYA, Ooi LCL, Cheah SC, Raha AR, Wan KL, Singh R: Oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) tissue culture ESTs: Identifying genes associated with callogenesis and embryogenesis. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8: 62-10.1186/1471-2229-8-62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Feng SP, Li WG, Huang HS, Wang JY, Wu YT: Development, characterization and cross-species/genera transferability of EST-SSR markers for rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). Mol Breed. 2009, 23: 85-97. 10.1007/s11032-008-9216-0.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Varshney RK, Thiel T, Stein N, Langridge P, Graner A: In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2002, 7: 537-546.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Arumuganathan K, Earle ED: Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Report. 1991, 9: 211-215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kantety RV, La Rota M, Matthews DE, Sorrells ME: Data mining for simple sequence repeats in expressed sequence tags from barley, maize, rice, sorghum and wheat. Plant Mol Biol. 2002, 48: 501-510. 10.1023/A:1014875206165.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Metzgar D, Bytof J, Wills C: Selection against frame shift mutations limits microsatellite expansion in coding DNA. Genome Res. 2000, 10: 72-80.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Bajay MM, Pinheiro JB, Batista CEA, Nobrega MBM, Zucchi MI: Development and characterization markers for castor bean (Ricinus communis L.), an important oleaginous species for biodiesel production. Conservation Genet Resour. 2009, 1: 237-239. 10.1007/s12686-009-9058-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Raji AA, Anderson VJ, Kolade AO, Ugwu DC, Dixon GA, Ingelbrecht LI: Gene-based microsatellites for cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): prevalence, polymorphisms, and cross-taxa utility. BMC Plant Biol. 2009, 9: 118-10.1186/1471-2229-9-118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wurdack KJ, Hoffmann P, Chase MW: Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2005, 92: 1397-1420. 10.3732/ajb.92.8.1397.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Moshkin VA: History and origin of castor bean. Castor bean. Edited by: Moshkin VA. New Delhi, Oxonian, 1986,6-10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Doyle JJ, Doyle JL: A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull. 1987, 19: 11-15.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    van de Loo FJ, Broun P, Turner S, Ville CS: An oleate 12-hydroxylase from Ricinus communis L. is a fatty acyl desaturase homolog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995, 92: 6743-6747. 10.1073/pnas.92.15.6743.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Doering-Saad C, Newbury HJ, Couldridge CE, Bale JS, Pritchard J: A phloem-enriched cDNA library from Ricinus: insights into phloem function. J Exp Bot. 2006, 57: 3183-3193. 10.1093/jxb/erl082.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Lu C, Wallis JG, Browse J: An analysis of expressed sequence tags of developing castor bean endosperm using a full-length cDNA library. BMC Plant Biol. 2007, 7: 42-10.1186/1471-2229-7-42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li WZ, Godzik A: Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 1658-1659. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158. [http://bioinformatics.ljcrf.edu/cd-hi/]

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ: Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, Totowa NJ, 2000,365-386. [http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/primer3_code.html]

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Lewis PO, Zaykin D: Genetic data analysis: computer program for the analysis of allelic data. 2001, --- Either ISSN or Journal title must be supplied.. [http://lewis.eeb.uconn.edu/lewishome/software.html]

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Swofford DL: PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), Version 4b. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates 2001,

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Qihui Zhu from University of Georgia for her assistance in SSR mining. We extend many thanks to anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments during manuscript review. This work was jointly supported by NSFC (Grant No.30871548) and the Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. KSCX2-YW-G-035-1).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 88 Xuefu Road, Kunming, 650223, PR, China

    Lijun Qiu, Chun Yang, Bo Tian & Aizhong Liu

  2. SW China Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650204, PR, China

    Jun-Bo Yang

  3. Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100039, PR, China

    Lijun Qiu

Authors
  1. Lijun Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chun Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bo Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jun-Bo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aizhong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aizhong Liu.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

LQ and CY developed and screened the DNA markers, performed molecular and statistical genetic analyses, BT performed data mining analyses and assisted with developing the DNA markers, JBY assisted with molecular and statistical genetic analyses. AL designed and coordinated the study and assisted with statistical genetic analyses and drafting the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Table S1

Additional file 1: : A summary for the primer sequences of 379 EST-SSR markers tested and their PCR amplification using genomic DNA as templates among castor bean, Jatropha curcas and Speranskia cantonensis.doc (DOC 519 KB)

Additional file 2: Table S2: Validation and characterization of polymorphic SSR markers derived EST sequences.doc (DOC 238 KB)

Table S3

Additional file 3: : Homology with Aradidopsis and functional annotations of the EST-SSR markers.doc (DOC 218 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, L., Yang, C., Tian, B. et al. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of EST-SSR markers in castor bean (Ricinus communisL.). BMC Plant Biol 10, 278 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-278

Download citation

Keywords

  • Polymorphic Information Content
  • Castor Bean
  • Rubber Tree
  • Ricinoleic Acid
  • Motif Locus

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us