Skip to main content
Download PDF

Development of Efficient Plant Regeneration and Transformation System for Impatiens Using Agrobacterium tumefaciensand Multiple Bud Cultures as Explants

BMC Plant Biology volume 10, Article number: 165 (2010) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) is a top selling floriculture crop. The potential for genetic transformation of Impatiens to introduce novel flower colors or virus resistance has been limited by its general recalcitrance to tissue culture and transformation manipulations. We have established a regeneration and transformation system for Impatiens that provides new alternatives to genetic improvement of this crop.

Results

In a first step towards the development of transgenic INSV-resistant Impatiens, we developed an efficient plant regeneration system using hypocotyl segments containing cotyledonary nodes as explants. With this regeneration system, 80% of explants produced an average of 32.3 elongated shoots per initial explant plated, with up to 167 elongated shoots produced per explant. Rooting efficiency was high, and 100% of shoots produced roots within 12 days under optimal conditions, allowing plant regeneration within approximately 8 weeks. Using this regeneration system, we developed an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated Impatiens transformation method using in vitro multiple bud cultures as explants and a binary plasmid (pHB2892) bearing gfp and nptII genes. Transgenic Impatiens plants, with a frequency up to 58.9%, were obtained within 12 to 16 weeks from inoculation to transfer of transgenic plants to soil. Transgenic plants were confirmed by Southern blot, phenotypic assays and T1 segregation analysis. Transgene expression was observed in leaves, stems, roots, flowers, and fruit. The transgenic plants were fertile and phenotypically normal.

Conclusion

We report the development of a simple and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system for Impatiens. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Impatiens with experimental evidence of stable integration of T-DNA and of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for plants using in vitro maintained multiple bud cultures as explants. This transformation system has the advantages of 1) efficient, simple and rapid regeneration and transformation (with no need for sterilization or a greenhouse to grow stock plants), 2) flexibility (available all the time) for in vitro manipulation, 3) uniform and desirable green tissue explants for both nuclear and plastid transformation using Agrobacterium-mediated and biolistics methods, 4) no somaclonal variation and 5) resolution of necrosis of Agrobacterium-inoculated tissues.

Background

Impatiens is a top selling floriculture crop, with an annual value of approximately $155 million in the US reported in 2006 [1]. It grows throughout tropical Africa, India, southwest Asia, southern China, Japan, as well as parts of Europe, Russia, and North America [2], with Impatiens walleriana the most commonly cultivated species throughout the world [2].

Impatiens Necrotic Spot Virus (INSV) is a serious threat for the floriculture industry both in North America and in Europe [3–5]. Because no naturally INSV-resistant Impatiens cultivars have been available the possibility of transgenic virus resistance is attractive. This possibility depends, however, on the availability of a robust transformation system.

There are few reports in the literature dealing with Impatiens tissue culture and transformation. These include micropropagation [6–9], in vitro germination of immature ovules [10], growth of cotyledon sections [11], callus culture [12, 13] and embryo and ovule culture [14, 15]. The majority of these publications reported callus induction from explants using New Guinea, Java Impatiens and Impatiens platypetala, with no de novo plant regeneration. Plantlet production has only been reported via micropropagation.

In terms of Impatiens transformation reports, hairy root induction in vivo from cotyledons of Impatiens balsamina and Impatiens hawkerii was reported using A. rhizogenes [16, 17]. GUS and PCR positive plants of I. balsamina were obtained from cotyledon explants using microprojectile bombardment [18]. A patent relating to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Impatiens was issued, but no experimental data confirming transformation were reported in the patent [19]. We report the development of a simple and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration system for Impatiens using in vitro maintained multiple bud cultures as transformation explants. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Impatiens with experimental evidence of stable integration of T-DNA and of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for plants using in vitro maintained multiple bud cultures as explants.

Results and discussion

Regeneration protocol development

Cotyledonary node explants (CNE) were evaluated for shoot regeneration after 4 weeks on shoot induction media 1 (SIM1) and 2 (SIM2), supplemented with 5 μM 6-benzyladenine (BA) and 5 μM thidiazuron (TDZ), respectively. On SIM2 medium amended with TDZ, 43% of explants produced multiple shoots (with more than three shoots per single explant) whereas only 18% of explants formed multiple shoots on SIM1 containing BA. Once TDZ had been shown to promote greater shoot regeneration than BA from cotyledonary nodes of Impatiens, the concentration of TDZ in the regeneration medium was optimized. With I. walleriana cv. Accent Red, TDZ at 1, 3 and 7 μM had significantly (P < 0.05) greater frequencies (40.0%, 26.7% and 35.0%, respectively) of explants producing multiple shoots than 5 μM (6.7%), but there was no significant difference for percent of explants producing multiple shoots among the three concentrations (Table 1 ). For I. walleriana cv. Salmon Picote, the frequency (50.0%) of explants producing multiple shoots was significantly (P < 0.05) greater when using 1 μM TDZ than the other (from 10.0% to 26.7%) concentrations tested (Table 1).

Table 1 Mean percent of explants producing shoots of I. walleriana cvs. Accent Red and Salmon Picote after cotyledonary nodes were placed on medium with four different concentrations of TDZ 4 weeks after culture.
Full size table

To further optimize shoot regeneration frequency, we tested combinations of TDZ with BA at different concentrations using hypocotyl segments containing cotyledonary nodes (HSCCN). More than 95% of explants from both genotypes produced multiple shoots when using IM2 and IM3 with both BA and TDZ (data not shown), whereas TDZ at 1 μM without BA (IM1) promoted only 40% response for Accent Red and 50% response for Salmon Picote (Table 1). The combination of 2.3 μM TDZ and 1.8 μM BA (IM2 medium) generated significantly (P < 0.05) greater frequencies of explants (66.5% for Accent Red and 80.1% for Salmon Picote) producing massive shoots, determined as production of 15 to 167 elongated shoots from a single explant (an average of 32.3 elongated shoots per explants) compared to other treatments (Table 2). IM2 not only significantly increased the frequency of explants responding, but also increased number of shoots produced per explant and reduced time to produce the shoots. Multiple buds formed 2 to 3 weeks after culture (Figure 1A) and up to 167 shoots were produced from a single explant on IM2 (Figure 1B). Shoots were separated 3-4 weeks after multiple shoot induction on IM2 and transferred to shoot elongation medium IM4 similar to IM2 except with 0.23 μM TDZ and 0.22 μM BA for several weeks. For rooting, 95.8% to 100% of shoots produced roots within 2 to 3 weeks after the shoots were transferred to the rooting medium IM5. Kinetin at 139 μM produced the greatest number of shoots (8.5 shoots from the most responsive genotype) from shoot tips of an interspecific hybrid, T63-1, of a cross between Impatiens platypetala and a New Guinea Impatiens [6]. Han and Stephens [7] reported that BA at 10 μM was most effective for stimulating shoot multiplication using shoot tips as explants for the same hybrid, for which 9.3 shoots per explant were obtained. Also BA at 4 mg/dm3 and kinetin at 12 or 20 mg/dm3 induced multiple shoots from shoot tip explants of I. walleriana in micropropagation [9].

Table 2 Mean percent of explants of I. walleriana cvs. Accent Red and Salmon Picote producing multiple shoots from HSCCN 4 weeks after placement on media with three growth regulator combinations.
Full size table
Figure 1
figure1

Regeneration and transformation of I. walleriana cv. Accent Red. Multiple bud induction 2 weeks after HSCCN explants were cultured on IM2 (A). Multiple shoot production approx. 6 weeks after HSCCN explants were initially cultured on IM2 (B). Transgenic buds expressing GFP produced approx. 3 weeks after selection on IM2 supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin (C). Transgenic shoots expressing GFP generated approx. 6 weeks after selection on IM2 supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin and nontransgenic shoots exhibiting dark red autofluorescence (pointed by R) of chlrorophll, indicating no GFP expression (D). Transgenic plantlets expressing GFP approx. 3 weeks after selection on IM4 supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin (E). GFP segregation in T1 plants (7 day-old seedlings) (F). A transgenic plant in soil (G). A wild type plant (non-transgenic plant) in soil (H).

Full size image

Cotyledonary nodes have been the explants of choice for transformation of soybean and otherwise recalcitrant legumes [20–23]. They have recently been used to transform a member of the Bignoniaceae family [24]. Micropropagation of recalcitrant species of legumes, including common bean [25], grasspea [26], and Sesbiana [27], among others, has been facilitated by the use of cotyledonary nodes. Recently cothledonary nodes were identified as the only explants capable of regeneration for the ice plant, Mesembranthemum crystallinum [28]. TDZ was reported to induce a high frequency of plant regeneration in Stachys sieboldii [29], lingonberry [30], Linum [31], Salicornia europaea [32], Cichorium intybus [33], Astragalus cicer [34], Carthamus tinctorius [35], Pisum sativum [36] and ginger [37].

Determination an optimal concentration of kanamycin for transformation selection

For shoot selection, the percentage of multiple bud cluster explants (MBCE) producing new growth was significantly (P < 0.05) lower when using kanamycin at 50 mg/l than at 0, 20 or 35 mg/l (18.2% vs. 100%, 91.5% and 86.4% for Accent Red and 15.7% vs. 100%, 80.6% and 83.3% for Salmon Picote. Kanamycin at 50 mg/l was chosen for shoot selection of both cultivars because it significantly (P < 0.05) inhibited shoot growth and this non-lethal concentration may allow recovery of transgenic plants having low expression of a neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPTII).

For root selection of Accent Red, kanamycin at 25, 35 and 50 mg/l significantly inhibited the percentages of shoots producing roots (22.2%, 11.1% and 0%, respectively) compared with no kanamycin. However, there was no significant difference among the percentages of shoots producing roots when using kanamycin at 25, 35 and 50 mg/l. Kanamycin at 35 mg/l was chosen for root selection because it prevented 90% of shoots from producing roots, and this non-lethal concentration may allow the recovery of transgenic plants having low NPTII expression.

Effect of co-culture duration on Agrobacteriuminfection

After 6 and 7 days of co-culture a significantly (P < 0.05) greater percentage of explants (31.2% and 29.4%, respectively) exhibited a green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression compared to those receiving 1 or 2 days of co-culture when there was no GFP expression was observed and there were only a few shoots with GFP expression when MBCE were co-cultured for 3 or 5 days (data not shown). By using MBCE and co-culture of the explants on filter paper dampened with an inoculation medium, we were able to control Agrobacterium growth even 10 days after co-culture (data not shown). Cheng et al. [38, 39] reported that placing explants on filter paper moistened with inoculation medium during co-culture significantly reduced Agrobacterium overgrowth compared to solid co-culture medium.

Regeneration of transgenic plants

Six to seven days after co-culture, MBCE were selected on IM2 supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin. Approximately 3 to 4 weeks after selection, GFP positive buds were observed (Figure 1C), with GFP positive shoots obtained 6 to 7 weeks after selection (Figure 1D). The percentage of explants producing GFP positive buds and/or shoots was 59%. GFP positive shoots were transferred to IM5 with 35 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin to induce roots, and 79% of GFP positive shoots generated roots on IM5 2 to 4 weeks after culture (Figure 1E). Transgenic plants expressing GFP were transplanted into soil. The transformation cycle from inoculation to soil took approx. 2 to 3 months. The percentage of explants producing transgenic plants was 59% and the frequency of initial explants that produced independent transgenic plant events confirmed by Southern blot was 10.4%. Transgenic plants expressed GFP in many tissues, including leaf, stem, root, flower (including sepals, anther walls and ovaries), and immature seed (Figure 1 and 2). Transgenic plants appeared phenotypically normal and fertile (Figure 1G and 1H). Taha et al [18] reported that GUS and PCR positive shoots of I. balsamina were regenerated from bombarded cotyledon explants on MS medium supplemented with 1 mg/l BA and 75 mg/l hygromycin; subsequently, GUS and PCR positive plants were obtained on MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/l indole-3-acetic acid (IAA).

Figure 2
figure2

GFP expression of transgenic plants of I. walleriana cv. Accent Red. Left panel, Flower buds/organs and seeds of control plants viewed under tungsten light (left side) and UV light using GFP filters (right side); Right panel, Flower buds/organs and seeds of transgenic plants viewed under tungsten light (left side) and UV light using GFP filters (right side). A flower bud (A). Sectional slice of the flower bud (A_1). Posterior sepal (S) (B). Anthers (An) and anther wall (AW) (C). Sectional slice of an ovary (O) (D). Sectional slice of a seed pod with immature seeds (IS) (E).

Full size image

PCR, Southern blot and R1 segregation analysis of transgenic I. walleriana

Amplified PCR products corresponded to the expected size for the nptII gene in five GFP positive plants and in the Agrobacterium, but not in the wild type plant (non-transgenic plant) (Figure 3A). In addition, the PCR band for the picA gene was only present in the Agrobacterium strain EHA105 containing pHB2892 (Figure 3B). This indicated that the nptII gene had integrated into the genome of the transgenic plants, and was not due to Agrobacterium contamination of the transgenic plants.

Figure 3
figure3

PCR analysis of genomic DNA from five transgenic I. walleriana plants that expressed GFP using primers for the nptII gene (A) and the picA gene of A. tumefaciens chromosome (B).

Full size image

Up to twenty transgenic plants that expressed GFP were analyzed by Southern blot using probes of nptII and gfp genes. Southern blot hybridization with the nptII probe revealed the transgene copy number varying between one and three for ten T0 and two T1 transgenic plants (Figure 4). An expected band size of 1.9 kb, positioned within the T-DNA for the gfp gene, was present in eleven T0 and six T1 transgenic plants (Figure 5).

Figure 4
figure4

Southern blot of genomic DNA from 12 transgenic plants that were GFP positive. The DNA was digested with EcoR1 and the blots hybridized with an nptII gene probe. Transgenic plants 1, 3, 38, 34, 5, 9, 51, 52, 65 and 66 were T0 plants and transgenic plants 66_F1 and 8_F1 were T1 plants.

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

Southern blot of genomic DNA from 17 transgenic plants that were GFP positive. The DNA was digested with HindIII and the blots hybridized with a gfp probe. Transgenic plants 1, 11, 23, 3, 33, 34, 42, 9, 52, 65, 66 were T0 plants and transgenic plants 1_F1, 10_F1, 11_F1, 14_F1, 8_F1 and 66_F1 were T1 plants.

Full size image

Segregation of GFP expression among the T1 plants for 13 transgenic T0 lines displayed the expected 3:1 ratio (p < 0.05) for a single gene hemizygous in the T0 (Figure 1F and 6). Segregation in the remaining ten transgenic exhibited a disproportionate number of nontransgenics in the T1 (Figure 6). No seedlings from the control Impatiens plant displayed GFP.

Figure 6
figure6

Segregation for GFP expression in T 1 progeny of 23 transgenic I. walleriana plants. Control: non-transgenic plant. *Transgenic plant had a 3:1 ratio (P < 0.05) for segregation of GFP expression.

Full size image

For our transformation system, GFP expression was used to select transformed buds and/or shoots 2 to 4 weeks after selection. The GFP positive buds and/or shoots were transferred to shoot elongation medium with 50 mg/l kanamycin for 3 to 4 weeks and the GFP positive shoots were transferred to rooting medium with 30 mg/l kanamycin for 2 to 4 weeks. Among selected GFP positive shoots tested, 100% of them produced transgenic plants that were confirmed by Southern blot and R1 segregation analysis. Among MBCE that were inoculated and plated on selection medium, 10% of them produced GFP positive buds and/or shoots. Approximately 40% to 94% of kanamycin resistant shoots have been reported to be non-transgenic (shoot escapes) when using kanamycin as a selective agent in many plant species [40]. For transformation of tomato cv. MicroTom, 91.5% of kanamycin resistant shoots after selection on 100 mg/l kanamycin were shoot escapes [41]. However, additional selection of kanamycin resistant shoots on rooting medium with 100 mg/l kanamycin yielded 95.6% transgenic plants [42]. An advantage of visualizing GFP expression in our system was to enable us to select transformation events at an early stage thus avoiding the transfer of non-transgenic shoot that survived the kanamycin selection, saving both time and labor.

Conclusions

We report the development of a simple and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and regeneration system for Impatiens. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Impatiens with experimental evidence of stable integration of T-DNA. Co-cultivation period, type of explants, a gfp gene as reporter marker to allow early stage selection of transformants and selection regime were critical factors for successful transformation of Impatiens.

Many Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methods have used explants derived directly from in vivo plants or from pre-cultured embryogenic calli for inoculation, due to ease of infection by Agrobacterium, but these methods have disadvantages such as expense of stock plant growth, detrimental sterilization procedures, time-consuming explant preparation, lack of flexibility, microbial contamination of explants, variation due to age and position of explants, all of which affect transformation efficiency. Our direct shoot regeneration system without an intervening callus phase is desirable for both nuclear and plastid transformation using Agrobacterium-mediated and biolistics methods for several reasons, including: 1) efficient, simple and rapid regeneration and transformation (with no need for sterilization or a greenhouse to grow stock plants), 2) flexibility (available all the time) for in vitro manipulation, 3) uniform and desirable green tissue explants for both nuclear and plastid transformation using Agrobacterium-mediated and biolistics methods and 4) no somaclonal variation. In addition, Impatiens CNE derived from in vivo seedlings necrosed, rotted and died several days after Agrobacterium inoculation [43]. Using in vitro MBCE derived from the HSCCN of Impatiens overcame this problem and enabled transgenic plant regeneration. Maziah et al. [44] inoculated a single bud isolated from in vitro multiple buds with Agrobacterium to produce transgenic banana. Our use of in vitro MBCE for Agrobacterium inoculation circumvented the problem of necrotic explants and resulted in more efficient transformation than inoculation of single buds. To our knowledge from literatures, there have been no reports of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation method for plants using in vitro maintained multiple bud cultures as explants.

A major challenge associated with plant transformation technology is the death of Agrobacterium-transformed tissues or cells, which severely limits the number of transgenic plants that can be regenerated, and the biotechnological exploitation of economically important crops. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) plays an important role in programmed cell death (PCD) and stress [45]. However, little is known about the molecular mechanisms regulating plant PCD, and the signaling pathway leading from H2O2 to the death of the tissues during transformation. Impatiens CNE derived from in vivo seedlings necrosed, rotted and died several days after Agrobacterium inoculation [43]. Using in vitro MBCE derived from the HSCCN of Impatiens overcame this problem and enabled transgenic plant regeneration. We can further investigate levels of cell death and the correlation between the cell death and H2O2 production of the both explant types and determine whether MBCE reduces the H2O2 production and subsequently it decreases cell death. A mechanistic knowledge of how the tissue death is triggered by the signaling molecule (H2O2) during the transformation is required in order to solve this issue.

Ornamental horticulture, and particularly floriculture, is well-suited to the application of genetic engineering technology because the product is not intended to be consumed, so commercialization may meet fewer obstacles without the need of food safety studies. However, genetic engineering technologies including transformation have had limited impact in ornamental horticulture. As the development of new varieties is an important driving force in the industry, there are, therefore, good prospects for the development of new genetically modified ornamental crops. Using the present protocol, thousands of transgenic Impatiens could be produced within 3 to 4 months. The transformation methodology developed in this study will thus be useful for future Impatiens improvement.

Methods

Materials

Seeds of I. walleriana cvs. Accent Red and Salmon Picote were obtained as a gift from Goldsmith Seed Co. (Gilroy, CA). Seeds were decontaminated by a gas sterilization method. Seeds were placed in a sterile 100 × 15 mm Petri dish. The Petri dish and a 250 ml beaker containing 100 ml Clorox™ bleach were placed in a 150 mm diameter desiccator, which had been surface sterilized with 70% alcohol. The desiccator was placed in a fume hood and 3.3 ml of 37% HCl (Sigma, reagent grade, 435570-2 (or 12 N HCl) were added drop by drop along the side of the beaker. The desiccator was placed under vacuum for 15 min, after which the valve was closed and the seeds left overnight. The next day the seeds were transferred to MAGENTA® culture vessels (PhytoTechnology Laboratories, Shawnee Mission, KS, USA.) containing approx. 100 ml germination medium (GM) medium (Table 3), a modified MS medium [46] and incubated at 24°C, 16 h photoperiod and light intensity of approx. 82.6 μmol for 12 to 20 days. Agrobacterium strains EHA105 and LBA 4404 containing plasmid pHB2892 [47] were used for transformation experiments. The plasmid pHB2892 contains a green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene driven by a double CaMV 35 S promoter, and a neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene driven by a nos promoter (Figure 7) [47].

Table 3 Components of germination medium and basal media for multiple shoot induction, shoot elongation and root induction media in Impatiens walleriana.
Full size table
Figure 7
figure7

The T-DNA region of pHB2892 plasmid with the gfp and npt II genes (47).

Full size image

Regeneration protocol development

Cotyledonary node explants (CNE) were excised from seedlings of I. walleriana cvs. Accent Red and Salmon Picote that had grown on solid MS basal medium for 8-12 days, prior to expansion of the first true leaves. The epicotyl was removed approx. 5 mm below the cotyledonary node, and the cotyledonary node was divided vertically producing two explants from each seedling. The cotyledonary node tissue was then wounded with a scalpel blade (Feather Safety Razor Co. LTD Medical Division, Japan) by making 8 to 10 vertical cuts. The CNE were subsequently cultured upright with the basal end embedded in 100 × 20 mm Petri dishes containing 25 ml of different media based on basal medium 1 (BM1) for shoot induction (Table 3) amended with 5 μM BA or TDZ at 1, 3, 5, or 7 μM for 4 weeks. Each Petri plate contained ten explants, each treatment was replicated four times and plates were arranged using a completely random design. All cultures were placed in a growth chamber (Enconair, Ecological Chambers, Inc., Manitoba, Canada) at 25°C with 16 h photoperiod.

To improve regeneration efficiency and simplify explant preparation, we prepared hypocotyl segments containing cotyledonary nodes (HSCCN) from seedlings by removing epicotyls just above cotyledon nodes, both cotyledons and hypocotyls at a position approximately 0.5 cm below the cotyledonary node. The hypocotyl segments were placed upright, with the basal end embedded in 100 × 25 mm Petri dishes containing approx. 40 ml of any of three different shoot induction media (IM1, IM2, and IM3). IM1, IM2 and IM3 contained basal medium 2 (Table 3), supplemented with 1 μM TDZ (IM1), 2.3 μM TDZ and 1.8 μM BA (IM2) or 1 μM TDZ and 2.2 μM BA (IM3), respectively. After 3-4 weeks on the media, multiple buds or shoots were transferred to 100 × 25 mm Petri dishes containing approx. 40 ml of shoot elongation medium (IM4), which had basal medium 2 plus 0.05 mg/l TDZ and 0.05 mg/l BA. Several weeks after shoot elongation, shoots were transferred to 100 × 25 mm Petri dishes containing approx. 40 ml rooting medium (IM5), which had basal medium 2 plus 0.5 mg/l indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), for 2-3 weeks. All cultures were placed in a growth chamber (Enconair, Ecological Chambers, Inc., Manitoba, Canada) under 24°C, 16 h photoperiod and light intensity of approximately 82.6 μmol. All experiments were conducted two to four times independently.

Determination of optimal concentration of kanamycin for transformation selection

To determine the optimal kanamycin concentration for shoot selection, we used MBCE approx. 0.5 cm diam isolated from 2-7 month old cultures that had been subcultured every month on IM2, and placed them on fresh IM2 with 0, 20, 35 and 50 mg/l kanamycin for 6 to 7 weeks. After this treatment, the cultures were examined for evidence of new growth (alive) or not (dead or necrotic). For root selection, individual shoots were separated from multiple shoot clusters and cultured on IM5 supplemented with 0, 25, 35 and 50 mg/l kanamycin for approximately 4 weeks, after which they were examined for evidence of root growth. Explants were grown under conditions described previously. All experiments were conducted three times independently.

Agrobacteriumpreparation and transformation

Agrobacterium strains were grown according to Dan et al. [42], except with 50 mg/l kanamycin in LB medium. The bacteria were suspended in liquid medium containing 2.22 g/l MS basal medium, 30 g/l sucrose and 0.2 mM acetosyringone (AS) with pH of 5.4. Multiple bud cluster explants (MBCE) approx. 0.5 cm in diameter were isolated from two to seven month old cultures that were sub-cultured every month on IM2. The MBCE were inoculated in 30 ml Agrobacterium solution at OD600 = 0.5 for 30 min at room temperature after which the Agrobacterium solution was removed with a sterile pipette. A modification to the method of Cheng et al. [39] was used, where the explants were co-cultured in a sterile 100 × 15 mm Petri dishes Petri dish containing a filter paper (Whatman 4) soaked with 40 μl inoculation medium at 24°C in the dark for 1 to 7 days. After co-culture, the explants were cultured on IM2 supplemented with 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin for multiple shoot induction. Multiple shoots that formed 5-8 weeks after selection were transferred onto IM4 plus 50 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin for shoot elongation. Two to three weeks after shoot elongation, individual shoots were separated and transferred into IM5 with 35 mg/l kanamycin and 250 mg/l carbenicillin for rooting. All culture vessels and conditions were as described above. All experiments were conducted two or three times independently. An independent transgenic plant event was determined as only one transgenic plant that had regenerated from a single initial explant to ensure that each regenerant represented an independent transformation when multiple transgenic plants were obtained from a single initial explant. The transgenic plants were transplanted to soilless mix (Product No.: 74364300, Microcle-Gro Lawn Product, Inc., Marysville, OH, USA) in 15 cm diam pots and acclimated to in vivo conditions by placing each pot in a plastic bag for 2 weeks and then removing the plastic bag. The pots were placed in a growth chamber (Enconair, Ecological Chambers, Inc., Manitoba, Canada) under 20°C, 11 h photoperiod and light intensity of approximately 40 μmol where they were hand pollinated.

PCR, Southern blot and R1segregation analysis

Plant genomic DNA for PCR was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Cat#69104, Maryland, USA). Primers used for the gfp gene were 5'-AGGGCGATGCCACCTA-3' and 5'-GACTGGGTGCTCAGGTA-3'. Primers for the nptII gene were 5'-TGTGCTCGACGTTGTCACTGAA-3' and 5'-CACCATGATATTCGGCAAGCAG-3'. Primers for the picA gene (plant-inducible chromosomal gene A) of A. tumefaciens chromosome were 5'-ATGCGCATGAGG CTCGTCTTCGAG-3' and 5' GACGCAACGCATCCTCGATCAGCT-3'. PCR was conducted in a total volume of 20 μl, containing 100 ng template DNA, 2 μl 10× buffer, 1 μl 4 mM dNTP, 0.2 μl of 50 μM primers, 0.2 μl of 5000 U/ml Taq DNA polymerase (NEB, Maryland, USA) with a MyCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). The PCR conditions were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 sec, annealing at 49°C for 30 sec for the gfp gene, 62°C for the nptII gene or 70°C for the picA gene, and extension at 72°C for 30 sec, followed by final extension at 72°C for 5 min and holding at 4°C.

Southern blot analysis was performed by Lofstrand Labs Ltd. (Gaithersburg, MD 20879). Approx. 15 μg genomic DNA of Impatiens plants were digested with EcoR1 for the nptII probe or Hind III for the gfp probe. The digested DNA samples were loaded onto a 350 ml 0.7% TBE agarose gel and the gel was electrophoresed at 50 V for 18 h. It was transferred to a nylon membrane Nytran Supercharge (Whatman/Schleicher and Schuell). Each membrane was UV linked and air-dried. The membrane was prehybridized using 6× SSC, 5× Denhardt's solution, and 0.5% SDS at 68°C for 6 h. They were separately hybridized using the random primed probes of nptII and gfp template DNA that were labeled with P32. The hybridizations were carried out at 68°C for 27 h. The membranes was washed in 2× SSC+0.1%SDS at 68°C with three buffer changes over a period of 60 min; and 20 min at 68°C with 0.1× SSC + 0.1% SDS. The membranes were autoradiographed for approximately 41 h and 4 days using an intensifier screen at -80°C for the nptII and gfp genes, respectively.

Approximately 100 seeds of each transgenic plant and a wild type Impatiens as control were geminated on moistened filter paper in 100 × 15 mm Petri plates sealed with parafilm and incubated at 25°C in the dark for 7 days. The seedlings and some non-geminated seeds were screened under an Olympus SZX12 stereomicroscope with a GFP filter for the presence of GFP (Figure 4f). The number of GFP positive and negative seedlings and the number of GFP positive and negative seeds were recorded. Chi-square analysis was conducted to determine goodness of fit to a 3:1 ratio of GFP positive to GFP negative seedlings and seeds.

References

  1. 1.

    USDA: Floriculture Crops, NASS. 2006

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Grey-Wilson C: Impatiens of Africa: morphology, pollination and pollinators, ecology, phytogeography, hybridisation, keys and a systematic treatment of all African species: with a note on collecting and cultivation Balkema, Rotterdam: A. A.1980.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Law MD, Moyer JW: A tomato spotted wilt-like virus with a serologically distinct N-protein. J Genl Virol. 1990, 71: 933-938. 10.1099/0022-1317-71-4-933.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Deangelis JD, Sether DM, Rossignol PA: Transmission of impatiens necrotic spot virus in peppermint by western flower thrips (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). J Econ Entomol. 1994, 87: 197-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Vaira AM, Roggero P, Luisoni E, Masenga V, Milne RG, Lisa V: Characterization of 2 Tospoviruses in Italy - Tomato Spotted Wilt and Impatiens Necrotic Spot. Plant Pathol. 1993, 42: 530-542. 10.1111/j.1365-3059.1993.tb01533.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Stephens LC, Krell SL, Weigle JL: In vitro-propagation of Java, New-Guinea, and Java-x-New-Guinea Impatiens. Hortscience. 1985, 20: 362-363.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Han K, Stephens LC: Growth-regulators affect in vitro-propagation of 2 interspecific Impatiens hybrids. Sci Hort. 1987, 32: 307-313. 10.1016/0304-4238(87)90096-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nikolova RV, Lall N, Bosa AJN: An assessment of the conditions for the rapid propagation of Impatiens flanaganae in-vivo and in-vitro. Acta Hortic. 1996, 440: 633-638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Witomska M, Lukaszewska A: Effect of cytokinin concentration and explant type on micropropagation of Impatiens × walleriana Hook. Annals of Warsaw Agricultural University, Horticulture (Landscape Architecture). 2003, 24: 35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Han KC, Stephens LC: Carbohydrate and nitrogen-sources affect respectively in vitro germination of immature ovules and early seedling growth of Impatiens platypetala Lindl. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 1992, 31: 211-214.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Han KC: In-vitro shoot regeneration from cotyledons of immature ovules of Impatiens platypetala Lindl. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 1994, 30P: 108-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    He YK, Xi T: Relationship between the accumulation of anthocyanin and phenylalanine ammonia lyase in Impatiens balsamina. Plant Physiol Commun. 1989, 2: 35-38.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Josekutty PC, Mpikeleli P, Nikolova RV: Calcium mediated callus induction in Impatiens flanaganiae. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot. 1998, 63: A-199.

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Arisumi T: In vitro culture of embryos and ovules of certain incompatible selfs and crosses among Impatiens species. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 1980, 105: 629-631.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Arisumi T: Rescuing abortive Impatiens hybrids through aseptic culture of ovules. J Am Soc Hort Sci. 1985, 110: 273-276.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Xiang TH, Wang LL, Pang JL, Chen M, Xu C: Hairy root induced by wild-type Agrobacterium rhizogenes K599 in soybean, cucumber and garden balsam in vivo. Hereditas. 2005, 27: 783-786.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Milosevic S, Subotic A, Cingel A, Jevremovic S, Ninkovic S: Efficient genetic transformation of Impatiens hawkerii Bull. (Balsamiaceae) Using Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Arch Biol Sci. 2009, 61: 467-474. 10.2298/ABS0903467M.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Taha AM, Wagiran A, Ghazali H, Huyop F, Parveez GKA: Optimization and transformation of garden balsam, Impatiens balsamina, mediated by microprojectile bombardment. Biotechnology. 2009, 8: 1-12. 10.3923/biotech.2009.44.52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Chou TS: Production of transgenic impatiens. United States Patent No. 6,121,511. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Paz MM, Shou HX, Guo ZB, Zhang ZY, Banerjee AK, Wang K: Assessment of conditions affecting Agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation using the cotyledonary node explant. Euphytica. 2004, 136: 167-179. 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000030670.36730.a4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Anuradha TS, Jami SK, Datla RS, Kirti PB: Genetic transformation of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using cotyledonary node as explant and a promoterless gus::nptII fusion gene based vector. J Biosci. 2006, 31: 235-246. 10.1007/BF02703916.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xue RG, Xie HF, Zhang B: A multi-needle-assisted transformation of soybean cotyledonary node cells. Biotechnol Lett. 2006, 28: 1551-1557. 10.1007/s10529-006-9123-6.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Muruganantham M, Amutha S, Selvaraj N, Vengadesan G, Ganapathi A: Efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Vigna mungo using immature cotyledonary-node explants and phosphinothricin as the selection agent. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2007, 43: 550-557. 10.1007/s11627-007-9060-7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aslam M, Singh R, Anandhan S, Pande V, Ahmed Z: Development of a transformation protocol for Tecomella undulata (Smith) Seem from cotyledonary node explants. Sci Hort. 2009, 121: 119-121. 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.01.007.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dang W, Wei ZM: High frequency plant regeneration from the cotyledonary node of common bean. Biol Plant. 2009, 53: 312-316. 10.1007/s10535-009-0056-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Barik DP, Naik SK, Mohapatra U, Chand PK: High-frequency plant regeneration by in vitro shoot proliferation in cotyledonary node explants of grasspea (Lathyrus sativus L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2004, 40: 467-470. 10.1079/IVP2004549.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Jha AK, Prakash S, Jain N, Nanda K, Gupta SC: Micropropagation of Sesbania rostrata from the cotyledonary node. Biol Plant. 2004, 48: 289-292. 10.1023/B:BIOP.0000033458.88441.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sunagawa H, Agarie S, Umemoto M, Makishi Y, Nose A: Effect of urea-type cytokinins on the adventitious shoots regeneration from cotyledonary node explant in the common ice plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum. Plant Production Science. 2007, 10: 47-56. 10.1626/pps.10.47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li W, Dong W, Zhao Dl, Guo GQ, Zheng GC: TDZ induced high frequency of plantlet regeneration from axillary node of Stachys sieboldii. Xibei Zhiwu Xuebao. 2002, 22: 965-969.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Debnath SC: A two-step procedure for adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro-derived lingonberry leaves: Shoot induction with TDZ and shoot elongation using zeatin. Hortscience. 2005, 40: 189-192.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Mundhara R, Rashid A: TDZ-induced triple-response and shoot formation on intact seedlings of Linum, putative role of ethylene in regeneration. Plant Sci. 2006, 170: 185-190. 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.06.015.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Shi XL, Han HP, Shi WL, Li YX: NaCl and TDZ are two key factors for the improvement of In vitro regeneration rate of Salicornia europaea L. J Integr Plant Biol. 2006, 48: 1185-1189. 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00342.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Yucesan B, Turker AU, Gurel E: TDZ-induced high frequency plant regeneration through multiple shoot formation in witloof chicory (Cichorium intybus L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 2007, 91: 243-250. 10.1007/s11240-007-9290-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Basalma D, Uranbey S, Gurlek D, Ozcan S: TDZ-induced plant regeneration in Astragalus cicer L. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008, 7: 955-959.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Basalma D, Uranbey S, Mirici S, Kolsarici O: TDZ × IBA induced shoot regeneration from cotyledonary leaves and in vitro multiplication in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Afr J Biotechnol. 2008, 7: 960-966.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhihui S, Tzitzikas M, Raemakers K, Zhengqiang M, Visser R: Effect of TDZ on plant regeneration from mature seeds in pea (Pisum sativum). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2009, 45: 776-782. 10.1007/s11627-009-9212-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lincy A, Sasikumar B: Enhanced adventitious shoot regeneration from aerial stem explants of ginger using TDZ and its histological studies. Turk J Bot. 2010, 34: 21-29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cheng M, Hu T, Layton J, Liu CN, Fry JE: Desiccation of plant tissues post-Agrobacterium infection enhances T-DNA delivery and increases stable transformation efficiency in wheat. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2003, 39: 595-604. 10.1079/IVP2003471.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Cheng M, Lowe BA, Spencer TM, Ye X, Armstrong CL: Factors influencing Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of monocotyledonous species. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2004, 40: 31-45. 10.1079/IVP2003501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Dan Y: Biological Functions of Antioxidants in Plant Transformation. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2008, 44: 149-161. 10.1007/s11627-008-9110-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Dan Y, Armstrong CL, Dong J, Feng X, Fry JE, Keithly GE, Martinell BJ, Roberts GA, Smith LA, Tan L, Duncan DR: Lipoic Acid----A Unique Plant Transformation Enhancer. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant. 2009, 45: 630-638. 10.1007/s11627-009-9227-5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Dan Y, Yan H, Munyikwa T, Dong J, Zhang Y, Armstrong CL: MicroTom---A high-throughput model transformation system for functional genomics. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25: 432-44. 10.1007/s00299-005-0084-3.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Baxter A: Regeneration and transformation of impatiens walleriana using cotyledonary node culture. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, MS Thesis 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Maziah M, Sariah M, Sreeramanan S: Transgenic banana Rastali (AAB) with β-1, 3-glucanase gene for tolerance to Fusarium wilt race 1 disease via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation system. Plant Pathol J. 2007, 6: 271-282. 10.3923/ppj.2007.271.282.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gechev ST, Jacques Hille J: Hydrogen peroxide as a signal controlling plant programmed cell death. J Cell Biol. 2005, 168: 17-20. 10.1083/jcb.200409170.

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant. 1962, 15: 473-497. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Molinier J, Himber C, Hahne G: Use of green fluorescent protein for detection of transformed shoots and homozygous offspring. Plant Cell Rep. 2000, 19: 219-223. 10.1007/s002990050002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Barry Flinn for his critical review of this manuscript. This work was supported through funds from the "High Value Horticulture and Forestry-Virginia" Special Grants (Project No. 2003-38891-02112) from the United States Department of Agriculture CSREES, the Department of Horticulture, the Virginia Tobacco Indemnification and Community Revitalization Commission and operating funds from the Commonwealth of Virginia to the Institute for Advanced Learning and Research.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute for Sustainable and Renewable Resources, Institute for Advanced Learning and Research, 150 Slayton Avenue, Danville, VA, 24540, USA

    Yinghui Dan, Song Zhang & Christopher J Pantazis

  2. Department of Horticulture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Yinghui Dan, Aaron Baxter & Richard E Veilleux

  3. Department of Forestry, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA

    Yinghui Dan

  4. Fisher Scientific, 3970 John's Creek Court, Suite 500, Suwanee, GA, 30024, USA

    Aaron Baxter

Authors
  1. Yinghui Dan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aaron Baxter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Song Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher J Pantazis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Richard E Veilleux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yinghui Dan.

Additional information

Authors' contributions

YD performed transformation and regeneration improvement experiments, data analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript and supervised the study as a principal investigator. AB performed experiments for initial regeneration method development as part of his MS thesis. SZ performed PCR and Impatiens DNA isolation. CP performed GFP assay for F1 seedlings, analyzed its GFP expression data and technical assistance. RV directed AB in graduate studies, provided technical and partial financial support and revised the manuscript critically. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dan, Y., Baxter, A., Zhang, S. et al. Development of Efficient Plant Regeneration and Transformation System for Impatiens Using Agrobacterium tumefaciensand Multiple Bud Cultures as Explants. BMC Plant Biol 10, 165 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-165

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transgenic Plant
  • Green Fluorescent Protein
  • Multiple Shoot
  • Green Fluorescent Protein Expression
  • nptII Gene

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us