Skip to main content
Download PDF

Alleviating salinity stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) through exogenous application of salicylic acid

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 611 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Canola, a vital oilseed crop, is grown globally for food and biodiesel. With the enormous demand for growing various crops, the utilization of agriculturally marginal lands is emerging as an attractive alternative, including brackish-saline transitional lands. Salinity is a major abiotic stress limiting growth and productivity of most crops, and causing food insecurity. Salicylic acid (SA), a small-molecule phenolic compound, is an essential plant defense phytohormone that promotes immunity against pathogens. Recently, several studies have reported that SA was able to improve plant resilience to withstand high salinity. For this purpose, a pot experiment was carried out to ameliorate the negative effects of sodium chloride (NaCl) on canola plants through foliar application of SA. Two canola varieties Faisal (V1) and Super (V2) were assessed for their growth performance during exposure to high salinity i.e. 0 mM NaCl (control) and 200 mM NaCl. Three levels of SA (0, 10, and 20 mM) were applied through foliar spray. The experimental design used for this study was completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. The salt stress reduced the shoot and root fresh weights up to 50.3% and 47% respectively. In addition, foliar chlorophyll a and b contents decreased up to 61–65%. Meanwhile, SA treatment diminished the negative effects of salinity and enhanced the shoot fresh weight (49.5%), root dry weight (70%), chl. a (36%) and chl. b (67%). Plants treated with SA showed an increased levels of both enzymatic i.e. (superoxide dismutase (27%), peroxidase (16%) and catalase (34%)) and non-enzymatic antioxidants i.e. total soluble protein (20%), total soluble sugar (17%), total phenolic (22%) flavonoids (19%), anthocyanin (23%), and endogenous ascorbic acid (23%). Application of SA also increased the levels of osmolytes i.e. glycine betaine (31%) and total free proline (24%). Salinity increased the concentration of Na+ ions and concomitantly decreased the K+ and Ca2+ absorption in canola plants. Overall, the foliar treatments of SA were quite effective in reducing the negative effects of salinity. By comparing both varieties of canola, it was observed that variety V2 (Super) grew better than variety V1 (Faisal). Interestingly, 20 mM foliar application of SA proved to be effective in ameliorating the negative effects of high salinity in canola plants.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

With the enormous demand for growing various crops and the rising controversies regarding the competition between food and energy crops for agricultural land, the utilization of agriculturally marginal lands is emerging as an attractive alternative, including salt-affected wastelands and brackish-saline transitional lands [1, 2]. Salinity stress poses a significant threat to crop yields and especially in arid and semiarid regions globally, with a 10% annual increase. Projections indicate that by the mid-twenty-first century, 50% of arable land could be lost due to increasing salinity, emphasizing the urgent need for effective mitigation strategies [3,4,5]. Currently, high soil salinity is causing significant disruptions to agricultural production on a global scale [6]. Salt stress significantly decreases crop yields on infertile and partially fertile lands, leading to a reduction of over 50% in standard yields. This reduction in crop productivity is primarily attributed to the disruption of the plants' nutritional and water balance [7,8,9,10]. The ability of plants to withstand high salt levels is an intricate process, involving various factors such as morphological, physiological, and biochemical mechanisms [8, 10, 11]. Sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl−) ions create a high osmotic potential, leading to inadequate water and nutrient supply to roots and causing cellular disruptions [8, 12, 13].

High salinity exerts a profound negative growth effects on canola (Brassica napus L.) leading to smaller plants and yield [6, 14]. This, along with osmotic stress, collectively impairs the growth, development and overall survival of the plant uptake and homeostasis in plant body [15, 16]. Mineral imbalances, such as excessive Na+ accumulation at toxic levels, can disrupt the normal metabolic processes within a plant's body. These imbalances lead to an elevated generation of ROS. In reaction to increased ROS production, plants activate a range of defense mechanisms, including the synthesis of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants [9, 14, 17]. Exposure to salt stress results in increased activity of ROS scavenging enzymes such, as peroxidase, in plants. This heightened enzyme activity leads to greater lignification of plant tissues, ultimately restraining the growth of the plant [3, 18, 19].

Canola, a member of the Brassicaceae family, is an important and extensively grown crop globally. It holds the second position, following soybean, in the cultivation of oilseed crops for human consumption of edible oil and animal feed in the world [20]. Although widely recognized as a salt-resistant plant, its productivity and yield are lowered under high salinity conditions [21]. Additionally, it was reported that canola cultivars resistant to salt stress differ genotypically [22]. Canola oil is a versatile ingredient used in salad oils, salad dressings, and margarines, and it also plays a role in creating organogels. Defatted canola, on the other hand, has a wide range of food applications, including emulsifying, gelling, absorbing, stabilizing, thickening, forming oleo gels, and enhancing texture. It is important to note that while there are potential health benefits linked to canola protein, further long-term human studies are required to comprehensively validate these advantages [23]. Considering the detrimental effects of salinity on canola, such as an increase in sodium content and oxidative damage and a decrease in potassium uptake and seed yield [24]. It is imperative to explore strategies aimed at mitigating the negative effects of salt-related damage on the physiological characteristics and crop yield of canola.

In tandem with the availability of resources and environmental cues, plant ontogenic development is coordinated and carefully regulated by various endogenous growth regulators commonly known as phytohormones or biostimulants [25,26,27]. These phytohormones play crucial role in regulating various physiological and biochemical processes that govern plant responses under optimal and stress conditions [13, 28]. The involvement of cytokinins, gibberellins, auxins, abscisic acid, ethylene, strigolactones and brassinosteroids in growth and development has been well documented [13, 25, 29,30,31,32]. Recently, various studies have highlighted the role of phytohormones such as salicylic acid (SA), and jasmonates in the plant responses toward abiotic stresses [27, 29]. Specifically, the phytohormone SA is a phenolic compound that controls plant growth and development in both favorable and challenging environments [29, 33]. More recently, it was discovered that SA offers biological protection to plants against abiotic stresses. This protective function was attributed to its regulation of several essential physiological processes, such as photosynthesis, proline metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, glycine betaine biosynthesis, antioxidant mechanisms, and the overall water status of the plant. Consequently, SA is implicated in enhancing a plant's resistance to a range of abiotic stressors, including ozone, metal exposure, UV-B radiation, extreme temperatures, drought, and high salinity [25, 34]. Salicylic acid functions as a signal sensor in plants, regulating their responses and protecting cells from harmful effects like ion accumulation and cell death. It facilitates important processes such as antioxidant defense, nitrogen metabolism, photosynthesis, and coping with water stress. SA levels vary significantly among plant species and in response to environmental challenges [35]. The impact of naturally occurring SA levels in plants is associated with their developmental stage and exposure to external stimuli [36]. Additionally, applying exogenous SA treatment can enhance a plant's resilience to various stressors, such as salt, drought, heat, cold, and heavy metals [37, 38]. Under abiotic stress conditions, plants can trigger a sequence of gene expressions, some of which are associated with SA-dependent activation. These genes influence a range of biological processes, such as the production of molecular chaperones, antioxidants, and secondary metabolites [8, 11, 39].

Previous literature has indicated that the application of SA significantly enhances stress resistance in various crops under both saline and non-saline conditions. It was hypothesized that SA can alleviate the negative effects of salt stress on canola. This treatment was expected to enhance canola growth, photosynthetic pigment levels, antioxidant defense systems, and nutrient absorption under saline and non-saline conditions. Based on the hypothesis, the objective of present study was to investigate the effects of SA in optimizing the growth, photosynthetic activity, and antioxidant defense system of canola during growth in high salinity conditions.

Materials and methods

Experimental setup

An experiment was conducted at the Botanical Garden, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, to investigate the effects of salinity on canola (Brassica napus L.) through exogenous salicylic acid (SA) application. This study was carried out from November-2022 to February-2023. Two canola varieties, namely Faisal (V1) and Super (V2), were exposed to two levels of salinity i.e. control and 200 mM NaCl. Salicylic acid was applied in three different concentrations (0, 10, and 20 mM) via foliar spray. Plastic pots with 8 kg of soil were utilized for the growth experiment. In each pot, fifteen seeds were sown, and after two weeks of germination, seven plants were maintained after thinning. Salinity was applied with regular intervals in the form of a solution after 45 days of sowing. A foliar spray of SA was applied after two weeks of salinity application. After three weeks of SA application, data related to various growth parameters, i.e., chlorophyll pigments, biochemical characteristics, and antioxidant profiles were recorded. The treatments were applied in the following order; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA. All the experiments were done in compliance with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. High research standards were maintained throughout the experiments and following the various established scientific protocols [13, 28, 40, 41].

Soil analysis

Soil analysis was done at the Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Bahawalpur. Soil sample were obtained at 15 cm depth for analysis. The soil pH was 7.98 and electrical conductivity was 0.29 mS cm−1. In addition to these physical attributes, organic matter (0.63%), available phosphorus (32 mg kg−1), available potassium (28 mg kg−1), saturated percentage (28%) and texture (sandy loamy) were also examined.

Morphological parameters

Shoot and root lengths were measured using a measuring scale. Additionally, the fresh weight of plant samples, comprising both shoots and roots, was promptly determined upon harvesting using a digital weighing balance. Subsequently, the samples underwent oven drying within a temperature range of 65 °C. After two weeks of drying, the dry weights of both shoots and roots were measured using a digital balance.

Photosynthetic pigments

For determination of chlorophyll contents, 0.1 g leaf sample were ground in 5 ml of 80% acetone. Samples were kept overnight and absorbance for each sample was recorded at 663, 645, and 480 nm with spectrophotometer [42].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)

The technique described by Velikova et al. [43], was employed to measure hydrogen peroxide levels. Initially, 0.25 g of leaf sample was ground in 2 ml of 0.1% TCA under chilled conditions. Following centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 20 min, the supernatant was isolated. Subsequently, a test tube was filled with 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer, 0.5 ml of leaf sample, and 1 ml of potassium iodide solution (165.9 g potassium iodide in 1 L of distilled water). After careful vortexing, the absorbance was recorded at 390 nm using a spectrophotometer.

Malondialdehyde (MDA)

Malondialdehyde levels were determined according to Yagi (1982). Initially, 0.25 g of ground leaf sample was added to 2 ml of 0.1% TCA solution (0.1 g TCA in 100 ml of distilled water). The supernatant was separated after centrifuging at 1500 rpm for 20 min. A solution was prepared by dissolving 20 g of TCA and 0.5 g of TBA in 100 ml of distilled water. In a test tube, 4 ml of the solution and 1 ml of the supernatant were added. The solution was then placed in a water bath at 95ºC for 30 min. After removal from the water bath, it was allowed to cool, and readings were taken at 532 and 600 nm.

Enzymatic antioxidants activities

Catalase (CAT)

The Chance and Maehly [44], method was employed to measure CAT activity. Initially, 5 ml of phosphate buffer was added to 0.2 g of ground leaf sample. The solution was then centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 20 min, followed by the perpendicular separation of the supernatant. Subsequently, a cuvette was filled with 0.1 ml of the sample, 1 ml of H2O2, and 1.9 ml of phosphate buffer. At intervals of 0, 30, 60, and 90 s, the absorbance was measured at 240 nm using a spectrophotometer.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD)

Superoxide dismutase activity was measured using the method described by Giannopolitis and Ries [45]. Reaction mixture contains 50 µL of nitroblue tetrozolium (NBT), 50 µL of riboflavin, 100 µL of L-methionine, 250 µL of phosphate buffer, 100 µL of tritox and 150 µL of distilled water. The sample was exposed to light for 20 min, and the absorbance was recorded at 560 nm using a spectrophotometer.

Peroxidase (POD)

The Chance and Maehly [44], method was employed to measure POD activity. A cuvette was prepared with 0.05 ml sample extract, 7.5 ml phosphate buffer, 0.1 ml guaicol solution (335 µl H2O2 + 15 µl phosphate buffer), and 0.1 ml H2O2 solution (100 µl H2O2 + 20 µl phosphate buffer). The absorbance was recorded at 470 nm with spectrophotometer at 0, 30, 60, and 90-s intervals.

Non-Enzymatic antioxidants activities

Total phenolics

The amount of total phenolics was calculated in accordance with Julkenen-Titto [46]. Leaf material (0.5 g) was extracted using 10 mL of 80% acetone. One milliliter of the supernatant was mixed with 5 mL of 20% Na2CO3 and 1 mL of Folin-Ciocalteu phenol reagent. Distilled water was added to bring the total volume of the mixture to 10 mL. The absorbance of reaction mixture was recorded at 750 nm with spectrophotometer.

Flavonoids

According to Marinova et al., [47], flavonoid contents were measured. A brief incubation at 25 °C was followed by the addition of 1 mL of the ethanol extract to 300 L of NaNO3. Then, AIC13 (300 µL) was added, and the mixture was left at room temperature for 5 min. The mixture was further enhanced with 2 mL of NaOH (1 M), which was allowed to cool at room temperature for 10 min. The mixture's volume was increased to 10 mL using distilled water. The absorbance was observed at 510 nm through spectrophotometer.

Ascorbic acid (AsA)

The amount of endogenous AsA was calculated according to Mukherjee and Choudhuri [48], protocol. For extraction, 0.25 g fresh leaf sample was crushed in 5 mL of 6% trichloroacetic acid. 4 mL of the extract, 2 mL of 2% dinitrophenyl hydrazine in acidic medium and a drop of thiourea in 70% ethanol were added. The mixture was heated in a water bath for 15 min and then chilled to room temperature. After cooling, 5 mL of 80% H2SO4 was added to the solution, which was then maintained on ice at 0 °C. Absorbance was recorded at 530 nm with spectrophotometer.

Total soluble sugars (TSS)

To measure the total soluble sugar, 0.5 g of fresh leaf material was extracted using 80% ethanol. 100 mL of ethanol extract were combined with 3 mL of enthrone reagent, which had been previously prepared in 72% sulfuric acid. The mixture was then heated at 95 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the mixture was measured at 620 nm using a spectrophotometer [49].

Total soluble proteins (TSP)

Bradford reagent was prepared to measure the total soluble proteins. This reagent was made by mixing 1 L of distilled water with 100 ml of 85% phosphoric acid, 0.1 g of brilliant blue, and 50 ml of 95% ethanol. The freshly made reagent was filtered using filter paper three to four times. Each test tube contained 5 ml of reagent and 0.1 ml of leaf sample Absorbance was recorded at 595 nm by using a spectrophotometer.

Anthocyanin

For the measurement of anthocyanin, in 0.2 g of crushed leaf sample was mixed with 5 ml of acidified methanol. Acidified methanol was prepared by mixing 120 mL of methanol with 1 mL of HCl. The samples were placed in appropriately labeled test tubes, which were then transferred to a water bath at 50 °C for one hour. Afterward, the test tube were removed, and the absorbance were recorded at 535 nm using a spectrophotometer [50].

Total free proline

Proline content was measured by crushing 0.25 g of fresh leaf material in 5 ml of 3% sulfosalicylic acid, followed by filtering the extract. One milliliter filtrate was retained in a test tube containing 1 ml of acid ninhydrin and 1 ml of glacial acetic acid, and then heated in a water bath for 90 min at 100 °C. The vortexing created two layers, and a spectrophotometer was used to measure the absorbance of the upper pinkish layer at 520 nm.

Glycine betaine (GB)

For glycine betaine determination, 0.25 g of fresh material was extracted in 5 ml of distilled water. The extract was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. 500 µl of the resulting extract were added to a test tube along with 1 ml of 2 N H2SO4 and 1 ml of the sample extract. After adding 0.2 ml of potassium tri-iodide, the test tubes were chilled for 90 min. To the ice-cooled test tubes, distilled water and 6 ml of 1, 2-dichloroethane were added, respectively. Two distinct layers were created, and the lower layer was used for measuring the absorbance at 365 nm with a spectrophotometer.

Ion analysis of root and shoot (Na+, K+, Ca2+)

Oven-dried samples (0.1 g) of the root and shoot were kept in distinct, labelled conical flasks. Following which, 5 ml of pure H2SO4 were added to each flask and covered overnight. The next day, the flasks were placed on a hot griddle, and H2O2 was gradually added while heating the sample until the solution become transparent. After cooling, the solution was filtered using filter paper, and distilled water was added to maintain the volume up to 50 mL. The levels of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ were then measured using the flame photometer.

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis, software (Statistic 8.1) was used. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to analyze the data. Microsoft Excel was used to create the graphs. Radar analysis and correlation matrix were performed by using R-studio version R-4.3.0 (R Development Core Team 2021).

Results

Morphological parameters

The application of 200 mM NaCl (T3) considerably affected the length of root and shoot, their fresh weights and dry weights in both varieties. A considerable reduction recorded in root length, fresh weight and dry weight (52, 47 and 52%) in V1 and (47, 42 and 47%) in V2. It is also observed that under T3 salt stress decreased the shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight in V1 (22, 50 and 40%) and V2 (13, 50 and 40%). However, exogenous application of SA (T5) increased the root length, fresh weights and dry weights in V1 54%, 70% and 62% and 31%, 36% and 63% respectively in V2. Similarly, foliar application of SA also enhanced the shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight in V1 (49, 49 and 100%) and V2 (35, 38 and 100%) respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of salicylic acid (SA) on root length, shoot length, root fresh weight, shoot fresh weight, root dry weight and shoot dry weight of canola under salt stress. The three replicates ± SE is shown by the error bars above the means. For a parameter, means that share same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05. (V1 = Faisal; V2 = Super; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA)

Full size image

Photosynthetic pigments and ROS

The exposure of canola to 200 mM NaCl significantly altered the levels of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, carotenoids) and ROS (hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde) in both varieties. There was a notable decrease in chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids contents by 61, 65, 63 and 58% in V1 respectively; 59.8, 59.6, 59.7 and 55% in V2 under T3. Concomitantly, exposure to NaCl stress (T3) increased the production of ROS (H2O2, MDA) in V1 (48% and 49%) and V2 (43% and 55%). In contrast, SA (20 mM) application had a positive effect and increased the chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll and carotenoids in V1 (30, 61, 40 and 32%) and V2 (21, 42, 28 and 22%) under T2. Foliar application of 20 mM SA markedly reduced the hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde by 18%, and 30% in V1 and 25% and 24% in V2 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Effects of salicylic acid (SA) on chlorophyll a chlorophyll b total chlorophyll, carotenoids, hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde of canola under salt stress. The three replicates ± SE is shown by the error bars above the means. For a parameter, the means that share same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05. (V1 = Faisal; V2 = Super; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA)

Full size image

SOD, POD, CAT, TSP, TSS and flavonoids

High concentrations of NaCl (200 mM) had a significant impact on superoxidase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), total soluble proteins (TSP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and flavonoids in both plant varieties (V1 and V2). SOD, POD, CAT substantially increased (63, 35 and 108%), (76, 30 and 88%) in V1 and V2 respectively under stress conditions. Similarly, TSP, TSS and flavonoids slightly increased (46, 39 and 36%) in V1 and (42, 40 and 38%) V2 under saline conditions. However, the application of SA increased the SOD, POD, CAT in V1 (41, 19 and 75%) and V2 (47, 16 and 56%) under both stress and control conditions. SA (20 mM) also increased TSP, TSS and flavonoids by (32, 22 and 26%) in V1 while (28, 23 and 24%) in V2. Maximum increase recorded in V2 under T5 (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of salicylic acid (SA) on superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), total soluble proteins (TSP), total soluble sugars (TSS) and flavonoids of canola under salt stress. The three replicates ± SE is shown by the error bars above the means. For a parameter, means that share same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05. (V1 = Faisal; V2 = Super; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA)

Full size image

GB, proline, anthocyanin, ascorbic acid and phenolics

The levels of glycine betaine, proline, anthocyanin, ascorbic acid and phenolics increased after the application of 200 mM NaCl by 103, 48, 43, 32 and 49% in V1, whereas (95, 56, 39, 35 and 35%) in V2. Salicylic acid (20 mM) was applied foliarly that considerably enhanced the glycine betaine, proline, anthocyanin in V1 (50, 32 and 25%) and V2 (64, 41 and 28%). Similarly, ascorbic acid and phenolics also enhanced by (23% and 27%) (17% and 21%) in V1 and V2 respectively. The highest value recorded under T5 and lowest value seen under T0. Hence, V2 sowed better concentration as compared to V1 (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effects of salicylic acid (SA) on glycine betaine, total free proline, anthocyanin, ascorbic acid and total phenolics of canola under salt stress. The three replicates ± SE is shown by the error bars above the means. For a parameter, the means that share same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05. (V1 = Faisal; V2 = Super; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA)

Full size image

Root and shoot ions

High concentrations of NaCl (200 mM) gave significantly negative effects on root/shoot K+ and Ca2+ in both anola varieties (V1 and V2) by (55, 58, 54 and 58%) and (53, 56, 50 and 58%). On the other hand, application of NaCl enhanced the Na+ level in both root and shoot by (51% and 54%) in V1 and (44% and 42%) in V2. However, the negative effects of NaCl stress were mitigated by the application of SA (20 mM). Salicylic acid positively influenced on the root/shoot K+ and Ca2+ and increased the ion concentration in V1 (25, 37 36 and 32%) and V2 (23, 23, 27 and 25%), leading to decrease in root/shoot Na+ in both varieties (16, 21 and 14, 20%) respectively (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of salicylic acid (SA) on root sodium, shoot sodium, root potassium, shoot potassium, root calcium and shoot calcium of canola under salt stress. The three replicates ± SE is shown by the error bars above the means. For a parameter, the means that share same letter do not differ significantly at p < 0.05. (V1 = Faisal; V2 = Super; T0 = Control + 0 mM SA, T1 = Control + 10 mM SA, T2 = Control + 20 mM SA, T3 = 200 mM NaCl + 0 mM SA, T4 = 200 mM NaCl + 10 mM SA and T5 = 200 mM NaCl + 20 mM SA)

Full size image

Radar analysis

The radar analysis presented the average observations of all parameters studied under salt stress, including morphological parameters, photosynthetic pigments, ROS, enzymatic antioxidants, non-enzymatic antioxidants, and salt ions (Fig. 6). According to the findings, the photosynthetic pigments of the canola plant increased under treatment T2, followed by T1 and control, which led to an increase in the morphological parameters of the plant, including the root and the shoot. The treatments T4 and T5 had the effect of reducing the photosynthetic pigments, while simultaneously increasing the activity of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. However, the morphological parameters of the root and shoot were reduced. The plant ions (Na+) for root and shoot have been increased under treatment T3, T4 and T5 while (Ca2+ and K+) have been increased under T1, T2 and control conditions.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Radar chart showing the effects of salinity and salicylic acid on various parameters of canola varieties a Faisal b Super

Full size image

The correlation analysis revealed that the two types of canola studied traits had a similar correlation trend. Pearson’s correlation of antioxidants, non-enzymatic and biochemical traits with plant morphological parameters was analyzed for the two varieties of canola (Fig. 7). In canola plants, a highly positive correlation was observed between photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) with morphological parameters (SL, SFW, SDW RL, RFW, and RDW). Increasing these attributes directly correlated with the yield plant biomass and increased significantly (Fig. 7). A strong negative correlation was found between ROS (H2O2, MDA), enzymatic antioxidants (CAT, SOD, POD), non-enzymatic antioxidants (AsA, Anthocyanin, TSS, TSP, Proline, GB, Phenolics, Flavonoids), with morphological parameters of canola. Salt ions shows variation in correlation as Ca and K ions for root and shoot showed a positive correlation while the Na ion for root and shoot showed a negative correlation with morphological parameters of plants. The enzymatic antioxidants showed a significant strong correlation with non-enzymatic antioxidants (Fig. 7). Under salinity an increase in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant will cause a decline in photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids) which will directly cause a decline in morphological parameters and decline in yield. The MDA and H2O2 showed a strong negative correlation with all plant biomass attributes.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Correlation matrix of different parameters of canola varieties a Faisal b Super, and the different levels of salicylic acid (SA) under salt stress conditions

Full size image

Discussion

Globally, the saline soil is predicted to increase because of insufficient rainfall, highly-saline irrigating water, and poor agricultural management strategies, particularly in semi-arid and arid zones where evapotranspiration exceeds than precipitation [51]. In current study, it was observed that parameters related to growth, including the length of shoot and root, as well as the fresh and dry weights of shoot and root, markedly decreased under saline stress. Salinity hinders the development and growth of plant by impressive constraints. One primary mechanism contributing to these effects is osmotic stress is first constraint which reduces the plant ability for uptake of water. There are numerous events occurring in the plant but this is considering as main event in plant tissues that are under stress [52]. Lower water uptake immediately blocked the cell expansion that leads toward the loss in turgor pressure [53]. Exogenous SA led to enhanced growth parameters, including increased length of the root and shoot, greater shoot fresh and dry weight, and higher fresh and dry root weight. Salicylic acid helps to reduce the harmful effects of salinity by controlling photosynthesis through modulation of enzyme activity related to CO2 fixation and enhancement of stomatal conductance. It provides protection to plants cells against oxidative stress by managing both antioxidant systems i.e., enzymatic and non-enzymatic, and maintaining ion homeostasis by regulating the movement of H+ ions in plant roots [54, 55].

Both canola varieties exhibited a substantial reduction in photosynthesis-related pigments including chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids under salt stress. The decrease was attributed to the breakdown of photosynthetic mechanism because chlorophyllase enzyme activity increased that interrupts the photosynthetic activity [56, 57]. All photosynthetic pigments significantly increased in both canola varieties by the application of SA. Exogenously applied SA plausibly restored the production of foliar photosynthetic pigments under salinity as the phytohormone improved homeostasis thereby giving cellular protection against salt-induced damage [58].

The concentration of reactive oxygen species i.e. MDA and H2O2 considerably increased under salt stress. The formation of different types of ROS (H2O2 and MDA) under salinity caused oxidative stress which violate the membrane system (both cellular and organelle) and influence lipid peroxidation. Numerous factors ionic and oxidative stress contribute to the generation and release of ROS that restricts photosynthetic activity and cause chlorophyll degradation [59]. SA considerably reduced H2O2 level by increasing antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, POD and CAT, which plays crucial role in ROS detoxification and maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis under both saline and control environment. Foliar applications of SA effectively reduced the increased levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and preserved cell membranes from oxidative harm. Salicylic acid achieved this by functioning as antioxidants, directly scavenging H2O2, and indirectly by stimulating the activity of antioxidant enzyme [60].

In current study, the concentration of enzymatic antioxidants such as CAT, POD, and SOD considerably enhanced under salt stress. The notable increase in enzymatic antioxidants is a plant’s adaptive response to counteract ROS-induced oxidative damage. The main scavenger of superoxide anion radical (O2•.−) is enzyme SOD and its action produces O2 and H2O2. Additional antioxidant enzymes like CAT and POD, then suppress the generated H2O2. Enzymatic antioxidants comprising POD and CAT detoxify ROS and metamorphose H2O2 into water and molecular oxygen [61, 62]. The enzymatic antioxidants, such as CAT, POD, and SOD considerably increased in both canola varieties by the application of foliar SA under both saline and control conditions. Salicylic acid performs important role in improving plant tolerance against stress by enhancing the antioxidative defense system [63]. It influences the activity of antioxidant enzymes by decreasing the destructive effects of ROS under saline stress [64, 65]. Foliar applications of SA efficiently diminish the high levels of H2O2 and protect cell membranes from oxidative destruction. Because of its distinctive properties, SA prevents membrane oxidation loss by acting directly as an antioxidant to scavenge H2O2 and indirectly by activating antioxidant enzymes [66, 67].

The amount of TSP, as well as TSS, and endogenous AsA significantly increased in both varieties under saline conditions. The accumulation of osmolytes such as TSS, TSP and endogenous AsA are one of the key physiological indicators of salt tolerance in plants, which is considered an essential mechanism employed by many plants to cope with salt stress [68, 69]. These compounds under salt stress protects cells by balancing the osmotic potential of the cytosol with that of the vacuole [70]. Salicylic acid considerably increases TSS, TSP and endogenous AsA under both salinity and control conditions. SA enhanced the salinity tolerance by osmotic adjustment through maintaining membrane stability and preserving enzyme activity involved in osmolyte metabolism that are essential mechanisms which enable plants to safeguard their tissues from damage thereby enabling uninterrupted growth and development in saline environments [22, 71].

Secondary metabolites such as total phenolics, anthocyanin and flavonoids increased under salt stress. These compounds are known for their key function in preventing salt stress, which can lead to oxidative damage in plants [72]. Phenolic compounds demonstrate antioxidant properties by neutralizing free lipid radicals and preventing the conversion of hydro peroxides into free radicals. This enhanced antioxidant activity aids in the detoxification of ROS, likely contributing to increased resistance against salinity [73, 74]. Secondary metabolites such as phenols, anthocyanin, and flavonoids considerably increased by the exogenous use of SA under control and salt stress in current experiment. SA acts as a signaling molecule that triggers various defense mechanism in plants. One of these mechanisms involves maintaining membrane integrity and enzymatic action. These secondary metabolites assist the plant in avoiding tissue damage, scavenge harmful ROS thus improving the plant defense system from various harmful effects of salinity allowing for continuing development and progress under challenging circumstances [75].

Our study demonstrated that under salt stress, proline and glycine betaine increased in both varieties of canola. The elevation of these compatible solutes and osmoprotectant under salt stress reflects the plant’s adaptive response to counteract salinity’s adverse effects. Proline is essential for maintaining the stability of membranes because it binds to membrane phospholipids, which alters the hydrated layer around biological macromolecules and aids in safeguarding cellular structures against the disruptive effects of salt stress. Use of exogenous SA improved the production of glycine betaine and proline in varieties both saline and non-saline environments [76]. Glycine betaine and proline have ability to scavenge ROS production and resist salt stress. Glycine betaine and proline have a potential to assist the plant in preventing tissue damage as these two inhibit the production of destructive ROS which contributes to the plant defense system from various harmful effects of salinity and allowing continued growth and development under stressful conditions [77, 78].

The substantial increase in root and shoot Na+ and a considerable decrease in potassium (K+) and calcium (Ca2+) ion under salinity was observed. The excessive buildup of sodium (Na+) can be detrimental to various aspects of plant health [79]. It disrupts the balance of water and nutrient uptake, impairs metabolic processes, disturbs ionic equilibrium, and hinders crucial plant developmental processes, ultimately leading to plant death [80]. Potassium and calcium play dynamic osmoregulation functions, enzymes activation and cytoplasmic homeostasis maintenance [36]. Application of SA cause significant reduction in root and shoot sodium ions (Na+) and increased the K+ and Ca2+ ions. Maintaining proper ion balance and cellular homeostasis is crucial for plants to effectively cope with salt stress. Plants treated with SA showed a significant decrease in sodium (Na+) concentration and a notable increase in K+ uptake. This could be attributed to the combined influence of both compounds in regulating nutrient uptake and maintaining ionic stability in plants [81].

Conclusion

Under high salinity conditions, both canola varieties experienced a decline in morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes, including a notable reduction in photosynthetic pigments and the accumulation of ROS. Interestingly, the adverse effects of salt stress were mitigated by the application of SA as a foliar spray. Salicylic acid treatment (10 mM and 20 mM) played a crucial role in maintaining osmotic balance, facilitating nutritional absorption and mineral ion uptake, and aiding in ROS detoxification by promoting the production of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants and osmolytes. The efficacy of SA in alleviating the effects of salt stress has been well established. Additionally, it was observed that variety V2 (Super canola) demonstrated greater resilience to salinity stress compared to variety V1 (Faisal canola), as evidenced by its lesser deterioration in morphological features, antioxidant metabolism, and nutritional absorption when subjected to SA application. Further investigations should be conducted to explore the application of SA using different methods in field settings on a larger scale.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. FAO. Soil salinization as a global major challenge, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ITPS Soil Lett. #3, Glob. Soil Partnersh. (n.d.). https://www.fao.org/global-soil-partnership/resources/highlights/detail/en/c/1412475/. Accessed 5 Nov 2023.

  2. Mukhopadhyay R, Sarkar B, Jat HS, Sharma PC, Bolan NS. Soil salinity under climate change: Challenges for sustainable agriculture and food security. J Environ Manag. 2021;280:111736.

  3. Kanwal R, Maqsood MF, Shahbaz M, Naz N, Zulfiqar U, Ali MF, Jamil M, Khalid F, Ali Q, Sabir MA, Chaudhary T. Exogenous ascorbic acid as a potent regulator of antioxidants, osmo-protectants, and lipid peroxidation in pea under salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24(1):247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Farooqi ZUR, Sabir M, Abdul Qadir A, Din MU, W. and Zulfiqar, U. Assessment of the change in soil properties and aggregates formation of freshly restored texturally different marginally salt-affected soils under various soil amelioration strategies. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2024;55(12):1714–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Munns R, Gilliham M. Salinity tolerance of crops - what is the cost? New Phytol. 2015;208:668–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maqsood MF, Shahbaz M, Zulfiqar U, Saman RU, Rehman A, Naz N, Akram M, Haider FU. Enhancing wheat growth and yield through salicylic acid-mediated regulation of gas exchange, antioxidant defense, and osmoprotection under salt stress. Stresses. 2023;3(1):372–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali Q, Shabaan M, Ashraf S, Kamran M, Zulfiqar U, Ahmad M, Zahir Z.A, Sarwar M.J, Iqbal R, Ali B, Ali M.A. Comparative efficacy of different salt tolerant rhizobial inoculants in improving growth and productivity of Vigna radiata L. under salt stress. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):17442.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu D, Chen C, Liu Y, Yang L, Yong JWH. Iso-osmotic calcium nitrate and sodium chloride stresses have differential effects on growth and photosynthetic capacity in tomato. Sci Hortic. 2023;312:111883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2023.111883.

  10. He A, Ma Z, Li Y, Huang C, Yong JWH, Huang J. Spatiotemporal, physiological and transcriptomic dynamics of wild jujube seedlings under saline conditions. Tree Physiol. 2023;43:832–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpad001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki N, Rivero RM, Shulaev V, Blumwald E, Mittler R. Abiotic and biotic stress combinations. New Phytol. 2014;203:32–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aqeel M, Khalid N, Tufail A, Ahmad RZ, Akhter MS, Luqman M, Jawd M, T., Irshad, M, k., Alamri, S., Hashem, M., & Noman, A. Elucidating the distinct interactive impact of cadmium and nickel on growth, photosynthesis, metal-homeostasis, and yield responses of mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:27376–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma Z, He A, Han Q, Zhao X, Yong JWH, Huang J. Mycorrhizal symbiosis in jujube enhances salt tolerance by altering ion fluxes and fatty acid metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2022;189:2481–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Naveed, M, Sajid H, Mustafa A, Niamat B, Ahmad Z, Yaseen M, Kamran M, Rafique M, Ahmar S, Chen J.T. Alleviation of salinity-induced oxidative stress, improvement in growth, physiology and mineral nutrition of canola (Brassica napus L.) through calcium-fortified composted animal manure. Sustainability. 2020;12(3):846.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Rohman MM, Anee TI, Huang Y, Fujita M. Exogenous silicon protects Brassica napus plants from salinity-induced oxidative stress through the modulation of AsA-GSH pathway, thiol-dependent antioxidant enzymes and glyoxalase systems. Gesunde Pflanzen. 2018;70:185–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu H, Guo J, Wang C, Li K, Zhang X, Yang Z, Li M, Wang B. An effective screening method and a reliable screening trait for salt tolerance of Brassica napus at the germination stage. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:530.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Shahid S, Shahbaz M, Maqsood M, Farhat F, Zulfiqar F, Javed T, Fraz Ali M, Alhomrani M, Alamri A.S. Proline-induced modifications in morpho-physiological, biochemical and yield attributes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars under salt stress. Sustainability. 2022;14(20):13579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabagh A, Hossain E, Barutçular A, Islam C, Ratnasekera M.S, Kumar D, Meena N, Gharib R S, Saneoka H.S, da Silva J. A. T. Drought and salinity stress management for higher and sustainable canola (’Brassica napus’ L.) production: A critical review. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2019;13(1):88–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharif P, Seyedsalehi M, Paladino O, Van Damme P, Sillanpää M, Sharifi AA. Effect of drought and salinity stresses on morphological and physiological characteristics of canola. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;15:1859–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gill R.A, Helal M. M. U, Tang M, Hu M, Tong C, Liu S. High-Throughput Association Mapping in Brassica napus L.: Methods and Applications. Methods and Protocols. 2023;2638:67–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bandehagh A, Dehghanian Z, Henry R, Hossain MA. Salinity tolerance in Canola: insights from proteomic studies. IntechOpen: In Brassica Breeding and Biotechnology; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mohamed I.A, Shalby N, Bai C, Qin M, Agami R.A, Jie K, Zhou G. Stomatal and photosynthetic traits are associated with investigating sodium chloride tolerance of Brassica napus L. Cultivars. Plants. 2020;9(1):62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Goyal A, Tanwar B, Sihag MK, Kumar V, Sharma V, Soni S. Rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus) seed. Oilseeds: Health Attributes and Food Applications; 2021. p. 47–71.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naheed R, Aslam H, Kanwal H, Farhat F, Gamar MIA, Al-Mushhin AA, Jabborova D, Ansari M, J., Shaheen, S., Aqeel, M., Noman, A., & Hessini, K. Growth attributes, biochemical modulations, antioxidant enzymatic metabolism and yield in Brassica napus varieties for salinity tolerance. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;28(10):5469–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. EL Sabagh A, Islam MS, Hossain A, Iqbal MA, Mubeen M, Waleed M, Reginato M, Battaglia M, Ahmed S, Rehman A, Arif M, Athar H-U-R, Ratnasekera D, Danish S, Raza MA, Rajendran K, Mushtaq M, Skalicky M, Brestic M, Soufan W, Fahad S, Pandey S, Kamran M, Datta R, Abdelhamid MT. Phytohormones as growth regulators during abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Front Agron. 2022;4:765068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2022.765068.

  26. Jameson PE. Zeatin: The 60th anniversary of its identification. Plant Physiol. 2023;192:34–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiad094.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wong WS, Tan SN, Ge L, Chen X, Yong JWH. The importance of phytohormones and microbes in biofertilizers: a critical review. In: Maheshwari DK, editor. Bacterial Metabolites in sustainable Agroecosystem. Switzerland: Springer International; 2015. p. 105–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Yong JWH, Letham DS, Wong SC, Farquhar GD. Effects of root restriction on growth and associated cytokinin levels in cotton. Funct Plant Biol. 2010;37:974–84. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP10009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Peng Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang Y. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis and signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2021;72(1):761–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wong WS, Zhong HT, Cross AT, Yong JWH. Plant biostimulants in vermicomposts: characteristics and plausible mechanisms. In: Geelen D, Xu L, editors. The Chemical Biology of Plant Biostimulants. John Wiley & Son; 2020. p. 155–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119357254.ch6.

  31. Pan C, Tan SN, Yong JWH, Ge L. Gibberellins: progress and development in analytical methods. J Sep Sci. 2017;40:346–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201600857.

  32. Tarkowski P, Ge L, Yong JWH, Tan SN. Analytical methods for cytokinins. Trends Anal Chem. 2009;28:323–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2008.11.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pirasteh-Anosheh H, Ranjbar G, Hasanuzzaman M, Khanna K, Bhardwaj R, Ahmad P. Salicylic acid-mediated regulation of morpho-physiological and yield attributes of wheat and barley plants in deferring salinity stress. J Plant Growth Regul. 2022;41(3):1291–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Boamah S, Ojangba T, Zhang S, Zhu N, Osei R, John Tiika R, Xu B. Evaluation of salicylic acid (SA) signaling pathways and molecular markers in Trichoderma-treated plants under salinity and Fusarium stresses. A Review. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2023;166(3):259–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan N, Bano A. Effects of exogenously applied salicylic acid and putrescine alone and in combination with rhizobacteria on the phytoremediation of heavy metals and chickpea growth in sandy soil. Int J Phytorem. 2018;20(5):405–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Chavoushi M, Najafi F, Salimi A, Angaji SA. Effect of salicylic acid and sodium nitroprusside on growth parameters, photosynthetic pigments and secondary metabolites of safflower under drought stress. Sci Hortic. 2020;259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Huang W, Wang Y, Li X, Zhang Y. Biosynthesis and regulation of salicylic acid and N-hydroxypipecolic acid in plant immunity. Mol Plant. 2020;13(1):31–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang W, Zhou Z, Chu Z. Emerging roles of salicylic acid in plant saline stress tolerance. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Aazami M.A, Maleki M, Rasouli M, Gohari G. Protective effects of chitosan based salicylic acid nanocomposite (CS-SA NCs) in grape (Vitis vinifera cv. ’Sultana’) under salinity stress. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N, Gurvich DE, Reich PB, ter Steege H, Morgan HD, van der Heijden MGA, Pausas JG. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian J Bot. 2003;51:335–80. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT02124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shi QW, Pang JY, Yong JWH, Bai CM, Pereira CG, Song QB. Phosphorus fertilisation has differential effects on leaf growth and photosynthetic capacity of Arachis hypogaea L. Plant Soil. 2020;447:99–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04041-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Yong JWH, Ng YF, Tan SN, Chew AYL. Effect of fertilizer application on photosynthesis and oil yield of Jatropha curcas L. Photosynthetica. 2010;48:208–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-010-0026-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva AJPS. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000;151(1):59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chance B, Maehly AC. Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Method Enzymol. 1955;2:764–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutases: I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 1977;59(2):309–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Julkenen-Titto R. Phenolic constituent in the leaves of northern willows: methods for the analysis of certain phenolics. Agric Food Chem. 1985;33:213–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Marinova D, Ribarova F, Atanassova M. Total phenolics and flavonoids in Bulgarian fruits and vegetables. JU Chem Metal. 2005;40(3):255–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Mukherjee SP, Choudhuri MA. Implications of water stress-induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiol Plant. 1983;58(2):166–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yemm EW, Willis A. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J. 1954;57(3):508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Murray JR, Hackett WP. Dihydroflavonol reductase activity in relation to differential anthocyanin accumulation in juvenile and mature phase Hedera helix L. Plant Physiol. 1991;97(1):343–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Fareed S, Haider A, Ramzan T, Ahmad M, Younis A, Zulfiqar U, Rehman HU, Waraich EA, Abbas A, Chaudhary T, Soufan W. Investigating the growth promotion potential of biochar on pea (Pisum sativum) plants under saline conditions. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):10870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Mndi O, Sogoni A, Jimoh MO, Wilmot CM, Rautenbach F, Laubscher CP. Interactive effects of salinity stress and irrigation intervals on plant growth, nutritional value, and phytochemical content in Mesembryanthemum crystallinum L. Agriculture. 2023;13(5):1026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao C, Zhang H, Song C, Zhu J.K, Shabala S. Mechanisms of plant responses and adaptation to soil salinity. The innovation. 2020;1(1):100017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sultan I, Khan I, Chattha MU, Hassan MU, Barbanti L, Calone R, Usman S. Improved salinity tolerance in early growth stage of maize through salicylic acid foliar application. Italian Journal of Agronomy. 2021;16(3):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Talaat N.B, Hanafy A.M. Spermine-Salicylic Acid Interplay Restrains Salt Toxicity in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plants. 2023;12(2):352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Ahmed KBM, Khan MMA, Jahan A, Siddiqui H, Uddin M. Gamma rays induced acquisition of structural modification in chitosan boosts photosynthetic machinery, enzymatic activities and essential oil production in citronella grass (Cymbopogon winterianus Jowitt). Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;145:372–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Ijaz M, Sher A, Sattar A, Shahid M, Nawaz A, Ul-Allah S, Tahir M, Ahmad S, Saqib M. Response of canola (Brassica napus L.) to exogenous application of nitrogen, salicylic acid and gibberellic acid under an arid climate. Soil Environ. 2019;38(1):90–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wahid I, Kumari S, Ahmad R, Hussain SJ, Alamri S, Siddiqui MH, Khan MIR. Silver nanoparticle regulates salt tolerance in wheat through changes in ABA concentration, ion homeostasis, and defense systems. Biomolecules. 2020;10(11):1506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Mugwanya M, Kimera F, Madkour K, Dawood MA, Sewilam H. Influence of salinity on the biometric traits of striped catfish (Pangasianodon hypophthalmus) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) cultivated under an integrated aquaculture-agriculture system. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Roșca M, Mihalache G, Stoleru V. Tomato responses to salinity stress: From morphological traits to genetic changes. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1118383.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sarker U, Hossain MM, Oba S. Nutritional and antioxidant components and antioxidant capacity in green morph Amaranthus leafy vegetable. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Rezayian M, Zarinkamar F. Nitric oxide, calmodulin and calcium protein kinase interactions in the response of Brassica napus to salinity stress. Plant Biol. 2023;25(3):411–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Li G, Peng X, Wei L, Kang G. Salicylic acid increases the contents of glutathione and ascorbate and temporally regulates the related gene expression in salt-stressed wheat seedlings. Gene. 2013;529(2):321–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Poór P. Effects of salicylic acid on the metabolism of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in plants. Biomolecules. 2020;10(2):341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. El-Beltagi HS, Al-Otaibi HH, Parmar A, Ramadan KM, Lobato AKDS, El-Mogy MM. Application of potassium humate and salicylic acid to mitigate salinity stress of common bean. Life. 2023;13(2):448.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Junmatong C, Faiyue B, Rotarayanont S, Uthaibutra J, Boonyakiat D, Saengnil K. Cold storage in salicylic acid increases enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants of Nam Dok Mai No. 4 mango fruit. Sci Asia. 2015;41:12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Talaat NB, Mahmoud AWM, Hanafy AM. Co-application of salicylic acid and spermine alleviates salt stress toxicity in wheat: growth, nutrient acquisition, osmolytes accumulation, and antioxidant response. Acta Physiol Plant. 2023;45(1):1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Doganlar Z.B, Demir K, Basak H, Gul I. Effects of salt stress on pigment and total soluble protein contents of three different tomato cultivars. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ma Y, Dias MC, Freitas H. Drought and salinity stress responses and microbe-induced tolerance in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Vazayefi M, Shekari F, Zangani E, Dolatabadian A, Janda T, Mastinu A. Seed treatment with chlormequat chloride improves the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Brassica napus L. Plant Stress. 2023;9:100175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Latif HH, Mohamed HI. Exogenous applications of moringa leaf extract effect on retrotransposon, ultrastructural and biochemical contents of common bean plants under environmental stresses. S Afr J Bot. 2016;106:221–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Castillo JM, Mancilla-Leytón JM, Martins-Noguerol R, Moreira X, Moreno-Pérez AJ, Muñoz-Vallés S, Pedroche J, Figueroa ME, González AG, Francisco M, Cambrollé J. Interactive effects between salinity and nutrient deficiency on biomass production and bio-active compounds accumulation in the halophyte Crithmum maritimum. Sci Hortic. 2022;301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Gengmao Z, Shihui L, Xing S, Yizhou W, Zipan C. The role of silicon in physiology of the medicinal plant (Lonicera japonica L.) under salt stress. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):12696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Ghanem AMF, Mohamed E, Kasem AM, El-Ghamery AA. Differential salt tolerance strategies in three halophytes from the same ecological habitat: Augmentation of antioxidant enzymes and compounds. Plants. 2021;10(6):1100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Mehri Chavadeh M, Zakerin H. R, Mostafavi Rad M, Sayfzadeh S, Valadabadi S. A. Evaluation of physiological responses of peanut to different irrigation regimes and foliar application of Salicylic acid. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production. 2024;33(4):199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Hnilickova H, Kraus K, Vachova P, Hnilicka F. Salinity stress affects photosynthesis, malondialdehyde formation, and proline content in Portulaca oleracea L. Plants. 2021;10(5):845.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Abdelaal KA, EL-Maghraby, L. M., Elansary, H., Hafez, Y. M., Ibrahim, E. I., El-Banna, M., … & Elkelish, A. Treatment of sweet pepper with stress tolerance-inducing compounds alleviates salinity stress oxidative damage by mediating the physio-biochemical activities and antioxidant systems. Agronomy. 2020;10(1):26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Kırgeç Y, Batı-Ay E, Açıkgöz MA. The effects of foliar salicylic acid and zinc treatments on proline, carotenoid, and chlorophyll content and anti-oxidant enzyme activity in Galanthus elwesii Hook. Horticulturae. 2023;9(9):1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Fatima A, Hussain S, Hussain S, Ali B, Ashraf U, Zulfiqar U, Aslam Z, Al-Robai SA, Alzahrani FO, Hano C, El-Esawi MA. Differential morphophysiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of maize hybrids to salinity and alkalinity stresses. Agronomy. 2021;11(6):1150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Ondrasek G, Rathod S, Manohara KK, Gireesh C, Anantha MS, Sakhare AS, Horvatinec J. Salt stress in plants and mitigation approaches. Plants. 2022;11(6):717.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Farooq M, Rehman A, Al-Alawi AK, Al-Busaidi WM, Lee DJ. Integrated use of seed priming and biochar improves salt tolerance in cowpea. Sci Hortic. 2020;272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Maria Ilyas, Muhammad Faisal Maqsood & Nargis Naz

  2. Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

    Muhammad Shahbaz

  3. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Usman Zulfiqar

  4. Department of Botany, College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling , Shaanxi, 712100, China

    Kamran Ahmad

  5. College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang, 712100, China

    Muhammad Fraz Ali

  6. Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040, Pakistan

    Muhammad Ahmad

  7. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Qasim Ali

  8. Department of Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden

    Jean Wan Hong Yong

  9. Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Hayssam M. Ali

Authors
  1. Maria Ilyas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Faisal Maqsood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Muhammad Shahbaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Usman Zulfiqar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kamran Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nargis Naz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Muhammad Fraz Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Muhammad Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qasim Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jean Wan Hong Yong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Hayssam M. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, M.I., M.F.M., and M.S.; methodology, M.I.; software, U.Z., and K.A.; validation and formal analysis, M.F.A., and M.A.; resources, H.M.A.; data curation, N.N., M.A., Q.A., and U.Z.; writing-original draft preparation, M.I., M.F.M., U.Z., and J.W.H.Y,; writing-review and editing, N.N., M.F.A., M.A., M.S., and H.M.A.; supervision, M.F.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Faisal Maqsood, Usman Zulfiqar or Jean Wan Hong Yong.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. We have obtained permission to collect plant material and seedlings.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilyas, M., Maqsood, M.F., Shahbaz, M. et al. Alleviating salinity stress in canola (Brassica napus L.) through exogenous application of salicylic acid. BMC Plant Biol 24, 611 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05314-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05314-y

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us