Skip to main content

An improved method to study Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands zoospores interactions with host

Abstract

Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands is a highly prevalent phytopathogen worldwide, ranking among the top ten in terms of distribution. It inflicts crown rot, canker, and root rot on numerous plant species, significantly impacting the biodiversity of both flora and fauna within affected environments. With a host range spanning over 5,000 species, including important plants like Quercus suber, Quercus ilex, Castanea sativa, and commercially significant crops such as avocado (Persea americana), maize (Zea mays), and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), Phytophthora cinnamomi poses a substantial threat to agriculture and ecosystems. The efficient dissemination of the oomycete relies on its short-lived asexually motile zoospores, which depend on water currents to infect host roots. However, managing these zoospores in the laboratory has long been challenging due to the complexity of the life cycle. Current protocols involve intricate procedures, including alternating cycles of growth, drought, and flooding. Unfortunately, these artificial conditions often result in a rapid decline in virulence, necessitating additional steps to maintain infectivity during cultivation. In our research, we sought to address this challenge by investigating zoospore survival under various conditions. Our goal was to develop a stable stock of zoospores that is both easily deployable and highly infective. Through direct freezing in liquid nitrogen, we have successfully preserved their virulence. This breakthrough eliminates the need for repeated culture transfers, simplifying the process of plant inoculation. Moreover, it enables more comprehensive studies of Phytophthora cinnamomi and its interactions with host plants.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

The oomycete Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands stands out as one of the most destructive phytopathogens known, with a vast host range exceeding 5000 species across herbaceous, forest, and non-forest ecosystems. Its infections lead to severe diseases and extensive ecological and economic losses [1,2,3,4]. Compounded by factors linked to global warming, such as environmental shifts, P. cinnamomi incidence is on the rise [1, 5,6,7,8,9,10]. Extreme drying and warming temperatures are unfavorable conditions for Phytophthora species and other related subspecies [1, 9, 11,12,13,14]. To confront this growing threat, new research methodologies are imperative. These methods must enable comprehensive studies of P. cinnamomi to understand its behavior and combat its spread effectively in the years to come.

Phytophthora cinnamomi was initially identified as the causative agent of stripe canker in cinnamon trees (Cinnamomum burmanii) in Sumatra, leading to its classification as an oomycete [15]. It has since been linked to sporadic mortality among species of the Proteaceae species [16, 17]. Additionally, P. cinnamomi has been associated with infections caused by Phytophthora cambivora in chestnut trees and various other hosts since as early as 1966 [18], and even earlier in American chestnut (Castanea dentata) before 1910 [19, 20]. However, recent research suggests that the species’ origin may not be in Sumatra [21] but possibly in Papua New Guinea [22]. Its spread has extended to other regions in eastern and southern Asia, as well as New Guinea and Australia [22, 23].

Phytophthora cinnamomi exerts a significant negative economic impact, leading to the widespread mortality of native plants globally. Its effects extend beyond mere economic concerns, contributing to alterations in vegetation communities and a decline in botanical diversity. This reduction in plant diversity has ripple effects, affecting food availability for various wildlife species, ultimately impacting populations of birds and small mammals. Thus, the repercussions of P. cinnamomi’s presence are far-reaching, affecting both ecosystems and economies worldwide [24]. . In the USA, P. cinnamomi was first identified in a commercial blueberry plantation in Arkansas in 1978 [25]. Since then, it has been extensively documented on American white oak (Quercus alba) in the Appalachian Mountains and has inflicted substantial damage to avocado trees in California [26]. In southern regions of Europe, including Portugal, Spain, France, and Italy, P. cinnamomi targets native chestnut trees (Castanea sativa), mature cork oaks (Quercus suber), and holm oaks (Quercus ilex), among other species [20, 27,28,29]. Its presence in these areas sometimes leads to significant market impact due to the damage caused [30]. For instance, the production of acorns from holm oaks in meadows serves as the primary feed for Spanish acorn-fed ham, underscoring the potential impact of P. cinnamomi on this market [27, 31,32,33]. . P. cinnamomi is responsible for inducing severe forest dieback, known as Jarrah dieback, in the northern jarrah forest of Western Australia [34]. This destructive phenomenon significantly impacts macrofungal diversity in the region [35, 36]. With the onset of global warming and rising temperatures, P. cinnamomi is expanding its reach into central, colder regions of Europe, such as Germany and Poland. Recent detections of P. cinnamomi in the commercial sector, particularly in Vaccinium corymbosum (blueberry) nursery plants, underscore the growing threat posed by this pathogen [9]. In south-western Australia, a widespread forest die-off in 2011 coincided with exceptionally hot and dry conditions, occurring within an ecosystem historically affected by P. cinnamomi root disease, also known as Phytophthora dieback [34, 37]. Given the current scenario, combatting P. cinnamomi has become an urgent priority, necessitating concerted efforts to mitigate its effects and protect ecosystems [1, 2, 4, 38].

The most virulent form of P. cinnamomi is its asexual biflagellate zoospores, which possess a remarkable capacity for dispersal and survival in water [1, 4, 39,40,41]. During spring and high humidity seasons, following periods of drought, heavy rainfall can lead to soil waterlogging, creating favorable conditions for zoospores. Under these circumstances, zoospores propel themselves using flagella, swimming rapidly (up 250 mm/s) in both forward and backward directions, with a strong attraction to root chemicals. They bind to roots via annexin proteins [39, 42,43,44], and a well-known mechanism involving biofilm formation [39, 41, 45, 46]. Once attached to the roots, colonization proceeds, leading to root necrosis and ultimately impairing water supply to the aerial parts of the plant [4, 46].

Despite the wealth of research articles addressing P. cinnamomi [4, 47], and its increasing incidence [1, 30, 48, 49], laboratory protocols for handling this complex oomycete and its zoospores have seen minimal evolution since 1965 [6, 24, 50,51,52,53,54,55]. There exists significant variability in laboratory conditions for obtaining zoospores from P. cinnamomi mycelium and in plant inoculation methodologies. The primary methods involve inoculating fragmented plant tissues with mycelial fragments or culture filtrates, using cut leaves, roots, shoots, or explants [56,57,58]. Assays on cut plants hold commercial significance due to the high prevalence of P. cinnamomi in flowering ornamental plants [56, 59,60,61]. Alternatively, assays utilizing freshly obtained zoospores involve inoculating plant seedlings or plantlets, sometimes obtained through lengthy embryogenesis processes requiring months of micropropagation of forest species [28, 62,63,64,65,66]. In both cases, researchers face considerable time investment not only in acquiring explants but also in obtaining fresh zoospores.

In this study, we have developed a straightforward methodology for obtaining and conserving stocks of zoospores with a high infectivity capacity, thereby enabling researchers to conduct less time-intensive assays while preserving phytopathogen virulence. Our findings have introduced two additional steps to existing protocols, facilitating the use of zoospore stocks for repetitive assays. We tested the infectivity of these zoospores in Solanum lycopersicum, a host species that has been relatively understudied in relation to P. cinnamomi [67,68,69,70]. Our results confirm that Solanum lycopersicum is a valuable host for future studies involving this phytopathogen.

Results

The protocol for the acquiring of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores stocks

Before proceeding with our experimental work, an extensive literature review was conducted to assess the current state of research. Drawing from previous studies, we synthesized a comprehensive global protocol, outlined in Fig. 1 (steps 1 to 8). In this study, we introduce two additional steps to the protocol (Fig. 1), involving the rapid freezing of zoospores in liquid nitrogen followed by storage at -80 °C (Fig. 1, steps 7 and 8). These additions allowed us to procure zoospores for ongoing investigations into Phytophthora cinnamomi host interactions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Obtaining Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores. A.1.P. cinnamomi growth in Potato Dextrose Agar medium (PDA) in darkness, at 24 °C for 3 weeks. A.2. Inducing mycelium growth by growing P. cinnamomi on V8 agar medium in darkness, at 24 °C for 7 days on a miracloth disc. A.3. Inducing sporangia formation in V8 clarified liquid medium under fluorescence light and shaking, at 24 °C for 48 h. A.4. Second sporangia induction in mineral salt solution, enriched with chelated iron solution, under fluorescent light and shaking at 24 °C for 24 h. A.5. Inducing zoospore formation in sterile water under shaking, at 4 °C for 90 min. A.6. Filtration of zoospores. A.7. Freezing of zoospores in liquid nitrogen. A.8. Storage at -80 °C until use. B. Bright field of mature sporangium. C. P. cinnamomi culture stained with trypan blue, correponding to chlamydospore and hyphal swelling after the step of sporangia induction with mineral salt solution. Scale bar = 50 μm. D. Bright field snapshot image taken of obtained fresh zoospores. Scale bar = 20 μm. Images were taken at 40x magnification. E.P. cinnamomi culture stained with trypan blue, correponding to chlamydospore and hyphal swelling after the step of sporangia induction with mineral salt solution where some zoospores are observed. Scale bar = 90 μm

Fresh zoospores were obtained based on previously published methodologies [6, 50, 52, 53, 55, 65] (detailed in Fig. 1, Sect. 5), and the development of P. cinnamomi cultures was monitored with snapshots captured at various stages. Figure 1B illustrates fresh mature sporangia, while Fig. 1C depicts chlamydospore and hyphal swelling following sporangia induction with a mineral salt solution. Additionally, Fig. 1D provides a snapshot of free-living zoospores obtained during the process. The observed results and morphology align with previous studies describing P. cinnamomi under similar growth conditions and are consistent with the identification criteria outlined by the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization (OEPP/EPPO, Bulletin 34, 155–157, 2004, PM 7/26) for P. cinnamomi.

Assessment of Phytophthora Cinnamomi zoospore viability via absorbance measurement

The MTT method, detailed in Sect. 5, enabled the measurement of zoospores at concentrations as low as 10 [6] Zs/ml, aligning closely with results obtained through manual counting using a Neubauer chamber (Fig. 2A). Particularly effective for assessing zoospores survival at room temperature (approximately 23 °C), the MTT method provided stable measurements over 24 h, exhibiting a slight decline in survival without significant statistical variance across measured time points (Fig. 2B). Leveraging an absorbance plate reader, MTT facilitated the simultaneous measurement of multiple samples and triplicates, streamlining assay procedures while minimizing the residual error inherent in manual counting methods. Throughout our study, both the MTT method and manual counting via the Neubauer chamber were employed to ensure comprehensive data collection and analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Viability of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores measured via MTT and Neubauer chamber. (A) The scatter plot shows the concentration of zoospores (×108/mL), at 50, 100 and 500 dilutions, counted using a Neubauer chamber plotted against the absorbance signal (measured at 600 nm using MTT; see Sect. 5). Significant differences were based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a variance check (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters (a, b, c and d) indicate significant differences (R = 0.907). Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 20). (B) Changes in zoospore survival at 23 °C measured via MTT. Significant differences were based on a non-parametric Krustal-Wallis´s test with a variance check (p < 0.05). Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 14). The data were analyzed using the Stat-graphics Centurion 19 program

Determining viability of fresh Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores using fluorescence analysis

The dispersal of Phytophtora cinnamomi zoospores in water and their subsequent adhesion to host roots are intricately linked to their motility [39, 41, 45, 46, 71]. Hence, we monitored the cell viability of chlamydospores, hyphae, and zoospores in culture, utilizing both bright field microscopy (Fig. 3A) and fluorescence imaging (Fig. 3B, detailed in Sect. 5). To assess live and dead cells, porcine spermatozoa were introduced into the medium (refer to Sect. 5), with zoospores indicated by arrows (Fig. 3C and D). Zoospore viability is depicted in Fig. 3E and F, with a corresponding schematic representation aiding identification (inset F). Analysis of fluorescence data obtained via SQS® (Fig. 3G, detailed in Sect. 5) revealed a slight increase in the percentage of decayed cells after 24 h, aligning with observations from MTT assays (Fig. 2B). This increase was attributed to residual mitochondrial activity detected on red cells by SQS®. Notably, a strong correlation was observed between the green fluorescence signal and zoospore viability and motility. Conversely, zoospores exhibiting red fluorescence lacked motility during the assays, suggesting that this method enables the determination of zoospore mobility and survival, like estimates made using porcine spermatozoa. A comparison between the counting methods is provided in Figure S1A.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Viability of Phytophthora cinnamomi cells determined by fluorescence. (A) Bright image of chlamydospore and hypha. (B) fluorescent image of A. Scale bars = 50 μm. (C) Snapshot of zoospores (white arrowed), and Duroc sperm cells at time 0 by SQS® system. (D) Snapshot of zoospores (white arrowed), and Duroc sperm cells after 1 h by SQS® system. Scale bars = 30 μm. E and F. Bright (left), and fluorescence (right), images of zoospores by SQS® system. F inset. Detail that alive cells are arrowed in green while dead cells are arrowed in red. Scale bars = 20 μm. Images with 40x magnification. G. Percentage of zoospore survival after 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 24 h, determined by taking at least five snapshots per time, measured with SQS® machine and counted with ImageJ® Software (see Sect. 5). Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 35). The data were analyzed with Stat-graphics Centurion 19 program, with a variance check (p < 0.05) indicated by one asterisk

Survival and recovery of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores following freezing conditions

To establish stable stocks of zoospores, we investigated optimal conditions for obtaining non-fresh zoospores with maximal recovery capacity. The survival of non-fresh zoospores exhibited an inverse relationship with glycerol concentrations ranging from 0 to 30%, with the highest survival rate observed in the absence of glycerol (Fig. 4A). Further kinetic studies over 60 min at 4 °C confirmed the decline of zoospores viability in the presence of glycerol, attributed specifically to glycerol and not to freezing or ice treatments, both in non-fresh zoospores (Figure S2A) and fresh zoospores (Figure S2B).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Survival of Phythophthora cinnamomi zoospores to freezing and defrosting. (A) Survival of zoospores after freezing in glycerol (0, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 30%). Lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 115). (B) Survival of zoospores using next freezing methods: −20 °C (− 20), − 80 °C (− 80), Mister Frosty (MF), ramp freezing (for 22–18 − 4 to − 20 °C) (RF), liquid nitrogen (− 196 °C). For A and B significant differences were based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a variance check (p < 0.05). Lowercase letters (a and b) indicate significant differences. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 16). (C) Survival of zoospores after defrosting at 4, 22, 24, and 37 °C. Lowercase letters (a, b, and c) indicate significant differences. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 30). (D) Survival of zoospores stocks at seven days (d) and six, nine and twelve months (m). The zoospore stock analyzed was 2 × 108 /mL. At least four independent biological assays were performed with similar results. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 14). For C and D significant differences were based on Krustal-Wallis´s test with a variance check (p < 0.05). All data were analyzed using the Stat-graphics Centurion 19 program

The recovery of zoospore survival post-freezing was assessed using the MTT assay (Fig. 4B). Freezing methods involving liquid nitrogen and sequential freezing (RF) demonstrated the highest survival rates at 80%, while other methods yielded less than 60% survival. Specifically, freezing fresh zoospores in a water solution without glycerol, in liquid nitrogen, emerged as the optimal and most efficient method for conserving zoospore stocks.

Furthermore, among the various defrosting temperatures tested (4 °C, 22 °C, 24 °C, and 37 °C), zoospores exhibited higher survival rates upon defrosting at 4 °C and 37 °C. However, defrosting at 4 °C (on ice) was deemed the simplest and quickest method for laboratory settings, as it requires less time and energy compared to 37 °C, which necessitates a water bath or thermoblock (Fig. 4C).

Long-term survival of zoospore stocks at -80 °C was evaluated over periods ranging from seven days to one year using the MTT assay, revealing a slight decrease in survival of 2.86% (± 0.5) per month (Fig. 4D).

Retention of viability and infectivity in non-fresh Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospore stocks post-freezing

To assess the infectivity of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospore stocks, we developed a rapid inoculation method using Solanum lycopersicum seedlings. Solanum lycopersicum has been reported as a host for P. cinnamomi [4, 67,68,69, 72], enabling swift evaluation of zoospore infectivity. Fourteen-day-old Solanum lycopersicum seedlings were inoculated with previously frozen zoospore stocks directly onto soil. Within just 4 days of inoculation, the zoospore stocks induced high levels of root necrosis and chlorosis on primordial leaves compared to water-treated controls (Fig. 5A and C depict controls, while Fig. 5B and D show inoculated samples). Necrosis in seedlings was further confirmed through trypan blue staining (Fig. 5E).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Symptoms of Solanum lycopersicum seedlings inoculated with Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospore stocks. Fourteen-day-old seedlings were grown on soil and inoculated with a final concentration of fresh zoospores (F), or non-fresh zoospore stocks (2 × 10 7 Zs/ml, see Sect. 5). A and C. Control plants (water). B and D. Symptoms of inoculated plants after four days of inoculation (4 dpi). Scale bar = 1 cm. E. Necrotic lesions detected by trypan blue staining, control (left image), and inoculated plant (right) at 4dpi. Scale bars = 1 cm. F. Disease ratio at 4 dpi, on seedlings performed with F, and NF. Symptom severity was assessed on a scale where “0” is absence of symptoms, “1” plant growth inhibition, “2” light chlorosis on leaves, “3” significant chlorosis on leaves and root necrosis, “4” high necrosis on leaves and roots and decayed seedlings. (n = 240). G. Oomycete biomass was quantified into vegetal tissue at 4dpi, inoculated with F (fresh) and NF (non-fresh) zoospores, measured by qRT-PCR using specific primers for P. cinnamomi β-Tubulin and normalized to the Solanum lycopersicum β-actin (see Sect. 5). The data were analyzed using the Stat-graphics Centurion 19 program, with a variance check (p < 0.05) indicated by asterisk. Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 3)

Quantification of Phytophthora cinnamomi burden in plants and re-isolation using qRT-PCR

We assessed the infectivity of fresh Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores compared to zoospore stocks by quantifying the Phytophthora cinnamomi burden via qRT-PCR (refer to Sect. 5). Our findings revealed a slight increase in disease severity symptoms in plants inoculated with zoospore stocks (Fig. 5F) compared to those inoculated with fresh zoospores (Figure S3A and C for controls, and Figure S3B and D for inoculated plants). Confirmation of necrosis on seedlings inoculated with both fresh zoospores and zoospore stocks was demonstrated through trypan blue staining (Figure S3E).

The quantification of oomycete biomass was conducted via qRT-PCR on tissues inoculated with fresh P. cinnamomi zoospores (F) and zoospore stocks (NF), as well as on non-inoculated control plants (C), with Ct values of β-tubulin (P. cinnamomi) normalized to β-actin (Solanum lycopersicum) housekeeping genes (see Sect. 5). The β-actin housekeeping gene for Solanum lycopersicum was previously published [73], while a β-tubulin housekeeping gene specific to Phytophthora cinnamomi was designed for this study (refer to Table S1). Prior to analysis, efficiencies and melting curves were determined to confirm primer specificity for both genes (Figure S4A and S4B for β-tubulin gene, and Figure S4C and S4D for β-actin gene).

Although slight differences were observed in plant disease symptoms (Fig. 5F), no statistically significant disparities were found in oomycete burden between the two types of inoculations (Fig. 5G).

Additionally, qRT-PCR was conducted to amplify mycelium re-isolated from inoculated Solanum lycopersicum seedlings (see Sect. 5). Representative photos of P. cinnamomi mycelium growth on plates, obtained from the roots after seven days, are presented in Figure S5A and Figure S5B. A photo of the current stock of P. cinnamomi mycelium is shown in Figure S5C. Staining of mycelium recovered from roots with trypan blue is depicted in Figure S5D. These images were compared to the current mycelium and with previous descriptions of P. cinnamomi hyphae, confirming the identity of P. cinnamomi [74, 75]. The melting curve obtained by qRT-PCR, from amplification performed using P. cinnamomi mycelium obtained from plates, or mycelium recovered from Solanum lycopersicum roots, were identical, confirming a unique amplicon, and showing that P. cinnamomi mycelium recovered from Solanum lycopersicum corresponds to P. cinnamomi (Figure S5E and Figure S5F). Oomycete biomass quantified in nanograms is presented in Figure S5G.

Discussion

As part of our study, we conducted a comprehensive biochemical and physiological investigation to identify optimal laboratory conditions for cultivating viable and virulent Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores. Throughout this process, we discovered that each developmental stage of P. cinnamomi required specific environmental conditions, often mirroring, or resembling its natural habitat. We identified four key factors that significantly influenced the growth of P. cinnamomi: the plant content of the growth medium, light exposure, the physical state of the medium (solid or liquid), and temperature.

In the initial phase of mycelial growth, we found that a high concentration of plant nutrients was crucial for enhancing hyphal development. Interestingly, complete filtration of the growth medium resulted in the inhibition of mycelial growth, indicating that elevated levels of specific plant nutrients are conducive to the survival and proliferation of P. cinnamomi on culture plates. Additionally, our investigations revealed that the composition of the soil substrate exerted a profound influence on the survival of P. cinnamomi, further emphasizing the importance of environmental factors in its growth and development [6, 76].

V8 juice, a widely consumed commercial juice blend, serves as the current medium for cultivating P. cinnamomi and comprises extracts from eight distinct plant tissues. Our observations revealed that P. cinnamomi growth on potato dextrose agar (PDA), which solely contains nutrients derived from potatoes, was significantly lower compared to growth in V8 juice. This disparity underscores the necessity for a rich availability of plant-derived nutrients in the laboratory medium for robust P. cinnamomi growth. This observation likely aligns with the necrotic activity exhibited by P. cinnamomi, facilitated by various enzymes at different developmental stages [12, 13, 39, 43, 45, 46, 71, 77].

A notable illustration is the necrosis instigated by alpha-cinnamomin during the initial phases of vascular colonization [29, 68, 78,79,80]. Comparative trials involving P. cinnamomi inoculations with both zoospores and mycelium in Quercus ilex revealed a correlation between elevated infection levels of P. cinnamomi and reduced lignin content alongside increased nutrient levels derived from necrotic tissue. This correlation suggests that nutrient availability may play a role in the subsequent formation of chlamydospores [13]. Additionally, another study demonstrated that the proliferation of P. cinnamomi was associated with the presence of detritivores in nutrient-rich soil environments [81, 82]. Zoospores exhibited an extended survival period by colonizing deceased plant tissue, although outcomes varied depending on the host [83]. Furthermore, it would be intriguing to explore how plant nutrients contribute to P. cinnamomi virulence in the artificial medium utilized in laboratory settings.

The second crucial factor influencing the growth of Phytophthora cinnamomi was the physical state of the medium, whether solid or liquid. Initial steps for mycelium growth were conducted on solid surfaces, with the mycelium cultured on filter paper discs, akin to the solid surfaces of roots where mycelium naturally proliferates. Conversely, attempts to cultivate mycelium in liquid media hindered its development. Conversely, the production of zoospores necessitated liquid media, inhibiting zoospore production on solid media (data not shown). These conditions mirrored the natural growth environment of zoospores in water.

The third factor of significance was light exposure. Specifically, during the sporangia induction stage, the importance of light for sporangia induction varied among previous studies, with some highlighting its significance while others did not [55, 84, 85]. In this study, the initial stages of P. cinnamomi growth were conducted in darkness, aligning with the natural conditions of P. cinnamomi growth below ground. It was noted that the presence of low light levels in forested areas contributes to the development of P. cinnamomi [86]. Under our experimental conditions, we found that the presence of light was crucial, particularly for the induction of sporangia. These observations were substantiated through trypan blue staining during the process. Specifically, the presence of light during the transfer of the paper disc with mycelium from the V8 solid plate to a liquid medium was necessary for sporangia induction. Additionally, continuous shaking proved to be essential. Conversely, the absence of light or shaking notably reduced sporangia production and subsequent zoospore production. Some studies [87,88,89] have determined that alternating light and dark periods during sporangium production increase the growth of P. cinnamomi. Additionally, several authors have noted that P. cinnamomi can persist as a saprophyte on dead plant tissue [83]. Our observations suggest that the optimal conditions for P. cinnamomi development overlap with those found in artificial greenhouses [88], contributing to the occurrence of P. cinnamomi. Furthermore, the abundance of P. cinnamomi in Mediterranean forest soils has been linked to a predictable spatial structure associated with heavily defoliated oak trees and light exposure in forests [49]. However, direct comparisons with laboratory conditions may not be meaningful. Given the contrasting conclusions regarding the influence of light on P. cinnamomi sporangiogenesis, further investigation into the role of light is warranted. It’s worth noting that sporangia development occurs belowground in the absence of light under optimal conditions in nature [85].

The final critical factor in Phytophthora cinnamomi growth to obtain zoospores was temperature. The induction of zoospores development from sporangia was conducted as a later step, adapting methods previously published [44, 54, 55, 90, 91]. The highest efficiency for obtaining fresh zoospores from sporangia cultures was achieved by maintaining them in darkness within a cold-water bath (refer to methods Sect. 5). In contrast, assays conducted at room temperature or under light conditions yielded significantly lower numbers of fresh zoospores. These cold-water conditions mirror those found in nature, particularly during spring and autumn, facilitating the development of zoospores within sporangia before their release into above- or below-ground water sources.

After establishing the optimal conditions for growing Phytophthora cinnamomi and obtaining fresh zoospores, we investigated the survival of zoospores under various freezing and thawing conditions. While the MTT method has been traditionally utilized for quantifying protozoa [92], it has not been applied to quantify P. cinnamomi zoospores previously 6. In our study, we found this method to be highly useful, particularly when dealing with numerous samples and replicates, as it enables the measurement of zoospores in a 96-well plate reader.

Furthermore, we assessed the motility of zoospores using SQS®, employing two fluorescent dyes in conjunction with sperm cells. This method proved effective in determining the size of zoospores and their survival under different conditions. Notably, we observed that zoospores remained viable for up to 24 h at room temperature (23 °C), a significant extension compared to the 4-hour survival period reported in previous studies [93, 94]. This prolonged survival time may be attributed to the different conditions utilized to obtain zoospores in our study.

Previous research investigating the persistence of Phytophthora cinnamomi DNA and RNA in various soil types revealed that P. cinnamomi RNA, a real-time indicator of the metabolic activity of living P. cinnamomi, remained detectable up to one day after soil inoculation, whereas DNA persisted at later stages of detection [8]. Although direct comparison between these two studies is challenging due to the presence of other P. cinnamomi spores besides zoospores in soil, it is worth considering that the survival of zoospores in laboratory settings and in nature may be longer than initially assumed.

One of the most surprising findings of this study was the remarkable survival of non-fresh P. cinnamomi zoospores under freezing conditions, even in the absence of cryoprotectants, particularly glycerol. In nature, P. cinnamomi is highly sensitive to extreme temperatures, but not warm temperatures [5, 6, 9, 30, 31, 91, 95, 96]. The unexpected survival of zoospores in liquid nitrogen, without the use of antifreeze agents, was attributed to the toxicity of the glycerol medium, especially to fresh zoospores, compared to non-fresh ones (refer to Figure S2). This result was surprising in light of previous studies on P. cinnamomi [55, 97,98,99,100].

Conventionally, cryopreservation of Phytophthora species cultures involves immersion in a cryoprotectant solution such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), 1,2-propanediol, glycerol, or skim milk/glycerol to prevent ice crystal formation during freezing in liquid nitrogen [101, 102]. In fact, the major collections saved for this specie use that method [99, 100]. However, our findings suggest that intracellular ice formation in zoospores may not occur, or its effects on zoospore recovery after freezing may be minimal. Control of the freezing rate is critical to optimize the ice nucleation process and minimize cell damage.

Because rapid freezing leads to intracellular ice nucleation [103, 104], which is lethal to cells, we performed various tests to optimize the freezing method of fresh zoospores. Our experiments to optimize the freezing method of fresh zoospores revealed that slower freezing rates resulted in higher cell death rates, possibly due to prolonged exposure to hypertonic solutions and subsequent “pickling” effects. Similar observations have been reported with green macroalgae solutions of Enteromorpha intestinalis [105].

Further investigations will be necessary to confirm our hypothesis regarding intracellular ice formation in zoospores and to analyze the cell wall composition of zoospores to understand the effects of liquid nitrogen, which allows survival without cryoprotectants, as observed in our study.

Phytophthora cinnamomi has been documented to elicit changes in the mineral content of infected plant tissues, with notable differences between susceptible and tolerant hosts [106,107,108,109,110]. For instance, in Eucalyptus, a decrease in metal content was observed in susceptible hosts compared to tolerant ones, implying that P. cinnamomi absorbs these minerals from the plants [107]. It is conceivable that the same capacity observed in P. cinnamomi for uptake of plant nutrients, salts, and minerals from the host may enable zoospores to absorb salts and minerals from water. This process could potentially protect zoospores from ice crystal formation during freezing, thereby explaining their high survival capacity in the absence of cryoprotectants. However, this hypothesis requires experimental validation to confirm its validity.

The zoospore stocks obtained in this study retained their infectivity towards the plant host even after undergoing freezing and thawing processes. Further investigations are ongoing to comprehensively characterize the response of Solanum lycopersicum to P. cinnamomi at both physiological and molecular levels. Although Solanum lycopersicum is not typically considered a host of P. cinnamomi, this study demonstrates that exploring this plant-oomycete interaction could serve as a valuable tool for understanding this complex phytopathogen and elucidating the plant’s response to it.

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this study represents the first published research on obtaining stocks of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores by freezing in liquid nitrogen and storing them at -80 °C without the use of cryoprotectants. Remarkably, frozen stocks of zoospores maintained their viability to infect plants comparable to fresh stocks. The findings of our research offer valuable insights for researchers aiming to conduct assays with reduced time and cost, while also circumventing challenges associated with the loss of P. cinnamomi virulence during growth on plates. The utilization of MTT and SQS® staining methods enables the monitoring of zoospore survival, revealing a higher survival capacity than initially anticipated. Moreover, we have developed a protocol to investigate the interaction between P. cinnamomi and Solanum lycopersicum, an underexplored plant-pathogen interaction. This protocol holds promise for advancing our understanding of this complex relationship.

Materials and methods

Biological material

The Solanum lycopersicum seeds (var. marmande) were provided by Ramiro Arnedo S.A, La Rioja, Spain. The seeds were stored and maintained at 4 °C until use. Phytophtora cinnamomi Rands, was kindly supplied by TRAGSA (Maceda nursery, Orense, Spain), and isolated by the Center for Research and Technology of Extremadura (CYCYTEX), located in Mérida, Spain.

Detailed protocol for obtaining Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores stock

The protocol was obtained from the specified bibliography [5, 53, 55, 62, 111], with little modifications. The oomycete was obtained from provider and was previously identified as Phytophthora cinnamomi, on potato dextrose agar medium plate cultures (PDA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis MO, USA). PDA plates were obtained using 39 g/L and autoclaved at 120° C for 20 min. P. cinnamomi on PDA plates was incubated at 24 °C in darkness for one week within a Memmert incubator (INB 500, Madrid, Spain).

For obtaining P. cinnamomi subcultures, V8 agar medium plates were prepared as follows. A piece of 1 cm × 1 cm of mycelium was transferred onto a previously 1-mL-watered Miracloth disk (Miracloth EMD Millipore Corp, Darmstadt, Germany) using a plate with a freshly prepared medium with 100 mL/L of fresh V8 juice (Campbell Soup Company, Camden, NJ, USA), supplemented with 15 g/L of Difco agar (Le Pont de Claix, France), plus 2 g/L of calcium carbonate (CaCO3, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), and 0.02 g of β -sitosterol dissolved in 5 mL of ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The pH was adjusted with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) or potassium hydroxide (KOH, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to 6.5, and 0.1 M HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) [62, 63] to ensure pH stability. Plates were closed with BemisTm ParafilmTm (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and protected from light with aluminium foil. Plates were incubated for 12–30 days [62], and growth into an Aralab® digital chamber (Lisbon, Portugal). Controlled conditions included 50% humidity (v/v), a temperature of 24 °C during the day and 18 °C during the night, with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod and light intensity of 150 μE·m− 2 per second; the photoperiods during the day were fixed and mimicked a spring day based on a meteorology statal agency (AEMET) profile, Madrid, Spain. Those conditions fit with natural conditions used for growing plants (see below).

The diameter of mycelium as well as the high of it, was measured been between 0.5 and 0.9 cm of high and 7–9 cm of diameter accordingly with previous works [112]. To induce sporangia, the Miracloth disc was aseptically transferred to a 1-L Erlenmeyer flask, containing 100 mL of a 10% clarified V8 liquid medium. The medium was then filtered with one slide filter paper, and the filtrate was diluted 10 times with distilled water and autoclaved, following previous work [113]. The Erlenmeyer containing the Miracloth disc, was incubated in an orbital shaker (100 rpm) at 24 °C, under fluorescence light, for 48 h to induce sporangial production. These conditions were selected specifically, after the revision of different protocols [45, 55, 62, 113, 114]. The obtention of sporangia was confirmed via trypan blue (TB) staining and visualization under a light microscope (see TB details below). During this step we observed that the use of smaller Erlenmeyer flask (0.5 L) reduced the oxygen availability for the P. cinnamomi, thus decreasing survival. The centrifugation of the clarified medium also diminished the final yield of the process. The same step in the absence of light rendered no or significantly less available alive sporangia.

A second step of sporangia induction was subsequently performed based on previous work [55], the clarified V8 liquid medium was decanted off, and the Miracloth disc with the P. cinnamomi mycelium obtained was transferred with sterilized forceps onto a 9-cm sterilized plastic Petri plate (Fisher Scientific SL, Madrid, Spain). The disc was then washed by carefully adding 20 mL of a previously sterilized and fresh mineral salt solution (MSS). The MSS medium was prepared into an Erlenmeyer with 0.01 M of calcium nitrate (CaN2O6), 0.005 M of potassium nitrate (KNO3) and 0.004 M of magnesium sulphate heptahydrate (MgSO4 7H2O), all chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. The MSS was autoclaved and then supplemented with 1 mL/L of a chelated iron solution (CIS). To prepare CIS, 13.05 g/L of Ethylene-dinitrile-acetic acid (EDTA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was mixed with 7.5 g/L of potassium hydroxide (KOH, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 24.9 g/L of iron sulphate (II), and heptahydrate (FeSO4 7H2O, 99%, both from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. The CIS solution was filtered using a 0.22-μm diameter Millipore filter (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) before adding to MSS. 3MM (Micropore, Neuss, Germany), and BemisTm ParafilmTm (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) were used to avoid losing the liquid medium during orbital shaking at 100 rpm for 24 h at 24 °C with fluorescence light. The obtention of MSS and CIS was performed following [55]. MSS and CIS mediums were found essential for sporangia induction. Again, variations of this step, including conducting the process in the absence of light, or transferring the disc to 1 L Erlenmeyer using 100 mL of the medium, rendered, much lower numbers of final zoospores (data not shown).

For the induction of zoospores, the disc containing the P. cinnamomi sporangia obtained was transferred carefully with forceps to a 50-mL Falcon tube (Corning Inc, Corning, NY, USA) containing 20 mL of sterile water type I (available for molecular biology, water supllier Aristerra 2011 S.L., Pamplona, Spain), at 4 °C. The tube was then placed in an orbital shaker and kept at 100 rpm at 4 °C for 1.5 h and in the absence of light. The resulting solution (step six at Fig. 1A) was filtered through three slides of a sterilized gauze pad (Hartmann S.A., Heidenheim, Germany); this step was based specifically on [111].

The occurrence of zoospore releasing from sporangia was confirmed using the light microscope and via TB staining (see TB details below). The number of zoospores per ml after release occurs, was measured for each assay, at Neubauer chamber (Marienfeld GmbH & Co. KG, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany), the quantification of zoospores rendered always between 1.8 and 5 × 108 zoospores/ml. A more restrictive filtering with Whatman filter paper for a 110-mm size pore, (GE Healthcare life science, Amersham, UK) rendered much lower quantity of zoospores (data not shown). The number of sporangia per unit of area (mm2), on each assay under the microscope, was measured been between 5 and 10 sporangia/mm2.

After previouslly described procedures for zoospore acquisition, the long-term maintenance and conservation of P. cinnamomi Rands mycelium, was made by taking 1 × 1 cm squares of mycelium from plates where zoospores were obtained. These squares are carefully placed into 1.5 ml Safe-lock Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf A.G, Hamburg, Germany), rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at -80 °C. To initiate mycelium reactivation, the tubes are gently thawed on ice and the mycelium is transferred onto fresh Petri dishes containing V8 agar. The cultures are then maintained in darkness at 24 °C for 7 days before start a new process for zoospore obtention.

MTT procedure to measure the viability of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores

Because fresh zoospores move extremely fast, currently, for counting, the zoospores need to be fixed to avoid their mobility. This process currently involves killing the cells, or induction of cysts, by centrifugation or vortex [6, 39, 46, 75]. At this point we observed that zoospores turned to cyst after shaking and remained alive, however, we still observed that not all of them turned to cyst and several remains alive moving at Neubauer chamber during counting.

Because that, and to ensuring a good correlation between the counting of alive cells and the final number of zoospores available for inoculation assays, we used one additional method for counting zoospores. A colorimetric assay, based on the absorbance signal produced by formazan, during the mitochondrial oxidative activity produced in the presence of MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Sigma-Aldrich, Rockford, IL, USA) production [92, 115]. This reaction is produced only in viable cells [116].

This method is commonly used to also measure the cell viability in various species of protozoa, including the human pathogen Leishmania sp. parasite [117] and has been used to measure viability of Phytophthora oospores [6]. Briefly, 100 μL of MTT at 0.5 mg/mL were added to 900 μL solution of zoospores, incubating the mixture at 37 °C for 2 h. Next, 100 μL of 10% Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS, Sigma-Aldrich, Rockford, IL, USA) in distilled water was added and the mixture was kept at 37 °C for 2 h. The absorbance of the solution was measured at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hach DR 2000, Hach Co. Loveland, CO, USA). Controls were performed in the same manner but using water instead of zoospores. The straight pattern showing the survival of spores at different dilutions measured via MTT is shown at Figure S1A.

SQS® fluorescence procedure to detect the viability of Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores

Cell viability of zoospores, chlamydospore and hyphal structures was conducted using the Swine Sperm Viability (SQS®) & Morphology Kit (Arquimea, S.L., Madrid, Spain). This methodology is currently used for determining the survival and detect the motility of different sperm cells [118]. The kit employs a dual staining approach that enables for the differentiation of live and dead sperm cells and flagella, as well as organ abnormalities [119]. To determine correlation between motility and viability of fresh zoospores, they were stained using this fluorescence dye, as controls for the alive and dead cells, pig spermatozoids were added at the medium with zoospores. This method is based on the green or red fluorescence signal emission produced by live or dead cells, respectively, in real-time.

Briefly, a mixture of 1 μL of Duroc sperm cells, used for reference of size and survival, and 2 μL of a zoospore solution (2 × 108 Zs/mL) was prepared and added simultaneously to the SQS® plate. Two distinct methods were utilized for analyzing and detecting the fluorescence signal. The first method involved an SQS2 semen analysis system machine (kindly provided by ARQUIMEA S.L., Madrid, Spain), coupled with a fluorescence microscopy-based sperm counter, integrated with a high-resolution CMOS camera with a high-power blue LED computer vision system. This system was used to evaluate the total number of cells taking snapshots at different times, using at least five photos per time. A SQS2 red led signal corresponded to Em617 nm/Ex536 nm, and a green led signal to Em526 nm/Ex500 nm. A second detection was performed by using a fluorescence stereomicroscope A292/21 Microscopy iScope IS.3153-PLFi/6 with Fluorescence–IS.3153-PLi/6,nEWF 10×/22; Plan Fluarex PLFi, 4×, 10×, 20×, 40×, 60×; 100× oil lenses that included blue, green, UV-DAPI, and red fluorescence filters; and a charge-coupled device (CCD) digital cooled camera A292/21 Euromex 20 MP USB 3.0 with a 1-inch CMOS sensor (Microsercon SLU, Madrid, Spain). The green led signal corresponded to Em570 nm/Ex510–550 nm, and the red led signal to Em690 nm/Ex620 nm. At least 10 photographs were captured per condition. Image processing and quantification of trypan blue were performed using the ImageJ® program and plug-in tools [120, 121] as previously [120] (Figure S1 B to D).

Frosting and thawing of fresh Phytophthora cinnamomi zoospores

The most frequent method for conserving microbial stocks for long periods of time within laboratories is glycerol imbibition prior to a fast freezing into liquid nitrogen afterwards [101, 122,123,124,125]. Cryopreservation methods were tested based on previous studies made with liquid nitrogen [102, 126,127,128,129,130,131,132] and they also included the addition of glycerol as a cryoprotectant [133, 134].

To study the direct effect of the glycerol on the zoospore survival, two kinds of assays were performed with zoospore stocks, non-fresh zoospores (NF) and fresh zoospores (F). Aliquots of 250 μL of zoospore stocks were defrosted in ice (4 °C), and mixed with 250μL of glycerol solutions in water, at final percentages of 0, 5, 25, and 50%. The survival of zoospores was measured at 0, 30, and 60 min using MTT. In a second kind of assay, 250 μL aliquots of F zoospores were treated as previously and were immediately placed into liquid nitrogen, before defrosting in ice. The recovery capacity was measured at times 0, 30 and 60 min, by MTT.

To determine the best method for frosting zoospores, they were immersed in water, in the absence of glycerol, and frozen under different conditions. The conditions used were based on a previous work performed on Phytophthora hibernalis, P. infestans, P. lateralis and P. nicotianae [133]. A direct immersion into liquid nitrogen (− 196 °C). A sequence ramp treatment at − 20 °C and at − 80 °C. A one degree decreasing ramp of freezing using the Nalgene® Mr Frosty™ Cryocontainer (C1562, Sigma-Aldrich, Rockford, IL, USA), used to achieve freezing with a speed of 1 °C/min following the manufacturer’s instructions, briefly, the container was filled with isopropyl alcohol before the samples were placed in a vial holder, with the assembly then being moved to a − 80 °C freezer overnight. In addition, a ramp freezing was used for getting sequential water baths, performed over periods of two hours at 23 °C, 18 °C, 4 °C, with a final freezing for 18 h at − 20 °C with a final step at − 80 °C (RF). For determining the survival of zoospores after different conditions of freezing, zoospores were slowly thawed on ice, as well as thawed in water baths at 22, 24, and 37 °C for 30 min. The recovery and survival rates for the zoospore stocks after freezing were measured for twelve months. In all methods, 1.5 mL Safe-lock Eppendorf tubes (Eppendorf A.G, Hamburg, Germany) were used. The tubes were then stored in a freezer at − 80 °C until evaluation of the viability of them.

Plant growth and plant inoculation conditions

Solanum lycopersicum seedlings were grown following the methods we optimized previously [135] with little modifications. Briefly, the seeds were germinated in soil in twelve-well microplates of twelve pots (Deltalab S.L, Barcelona, Spain), into a sterile mixture of Projar Professional Seed Pro 5050, NPK 14–16 − 18 plus microelements (Commercial Projar S.A., Valencia, Spain) substrate and vermiculite (3:1), with a granulometry measurement of between 0 and 3 mm (Commercial Projar S.A., Valencia, Spain), with 10 seeds per pot and twelve pots per plate, with a total of 120 seedlings per plate. In all assays, at least 120 Solanum lycopersicum seedlings were used for each assay and condition. The plants were irrigated with a regular water supply and grown for 18 days in an Aralab® digital chamber (Lisbon, Portugal). Controlled conditions included 50% humidity (v/v), a temperature of 24 °C during the day and 18 °C during the night, with a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod and light intensity of 150 μE·m− 2 per second for all experiments; the photoperiods during the day were fixed and mimicked a spring day based on a State Meteorological Agency (AEMET) profile, Madrid, Spain.

For plant inoculations, after fourteen days, seedlings were inoculated with a 500-μL of a sterilized distilled water suspension of fresh or non-fresh zoospores (2 × 107 Zs/mL), detailed on each assay. Control samples were treated with 500 μL of sterilized distilled water. The inoculated seedlings were located into a digital growth chamber at same conditions for growth (Aralab S.L, Lisbon, Portugal) following disease symptoms.

Plant disease symptoms

Disease symptoms of Solanum lycopersicum seedlings were followed from 0 to 12 days after inoculation or until plant decayed, currently apparent disease symptoms on roots and secondary symptoms produced on leaves, were observed after three or four days. The analysis of the seed germination rate and disease symptoms on Solanum lycopersicum seeds and seedlings was made according to the Protocol for tests on distinctness, uniformity and stability stablished by Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO-TP/1-Rev-5, 01/06/2021). The plant disease symptoms produced by P. cinnamomi were considered following the standards approved for diagnostic protocols for regulated pests by EPPO council (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization), at PM 7/26, OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 34, 155–157, 2004). Those symptoms included principally root rot brown lesions and necrosis produced directly by the pathogen and secondary symptoms of decline producing leave chlorosis and later necrosis and dead. The disease ratio was determined as the percent of disease severity symptoms present on the seedlings related to the total number of plants under the same treatment, this scale is detailed as follows: “0” no disease symptoms; “1” delayed growth observed for shoots and roots; “2” chlorosis on the aerial part; “3” significant chlorosis and necrosis both on leaves and roots; “4” high necrosis and decayed seedlings. For each scale, the percentages of disease severity symptoms were calculated related to the total number of plants (n), considering “n” the 100%. Delayed growth related to controls, when was observed by view on aerial parts or roots, was confirmed digitally by analysing snapshots from harvested seedlings, using Image J® [120, 121]. The cell death was detected by trypan blue (TB) staining, as previously described [136]. Briefly, a TB solution was prepared with 10 mL of lactic acid (85%), 10 mL of phenol (TE balanced buffer, pH 7.5–8.0), 10 mL glycerol (≥ 99%), 10 mL of distilled water, and 40 mg of TB (final concentration of 10 mg/mL). The plant tissue or P. cinnamomi culture samples stayed for 20 min in the solution before been rinsed with 100% ethanol overnight and preserved in 60% glycerol at 4 °C or mounted on slides until observation under bright-light microscopy using a stereomicroscope (Microsercon SLU, Madrid, Spain), to obtain digital photos and snapshots. Image processing of snapshots was performed, when necessary, using the ImageJ® program using the specific corresponding software and plug-in tools [120, 121] as previously [120].

Phytophthora cinnamomi burden and re-isolation in plants measured by qRT-PCR

In addition, at this work we were focus and interested in the quantification of pathogen biomass, in planta, useful to determine the oomycete burden into the tissue, because this is a crucial step when monitoring disease resistance [137,138,139,140].

With the unique objective of identifying and quantifying the oomycete P. cinnamomi burden on infected plants using qRT-PCR, we selected a specific gene previously utilized for P. cinnamomi identification. This gene, initially identified by Weerakoon et al. in 1998 [141] for studying Tubulin expression and microtubule organization in P. cinnamomi, was cloned, and sequenced from a cDNA library. The gene, found in genomic DNA without introns, encodes a 445-amino acid protein with a single copy in the genome. Comparison of this P. cinnamomi β-Tubulin gene sequence with β-Tubulin genes from various fungi, algae, and protists supported the hypothesis that Oomycetes are more closely related to algae and protists than higher fungi.

Subsequently, Kroon et al. in 2004 [142] used this gene in a phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences to identify P. cinnamomi. They designed two oligonucleotides based on the previously published genomic DNA sequence by Weerakoon et al. in 1998 and amplified a 989 DNA bases pair fragment, demonstrating its utility for P. cinnamomi identification. Bezuidenhout et al. in 2010 [141] also employed this gene for taxonomic identification and phylogenetic marker of P. cinnamomi, studying Phytophthora taxa based on previous gene studies.

Briefly, for relative quantification by qRT-PCR, of oomycete burden on plants, the tissues of Solanum lycopersicum seedlings, growth on soil, inoculated or not, were harvested with eighteen days, corresponding to four days after inoculation with zoospores (4 dpi), or treated with water on controls. The tissues were weighted (g), snap frozen and finely ground to powder with a Sylamat® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Austria). Total RNA extraction, including DNAase treatment, was isolated from 0.350 g of plant tissue, using at least two plants per triplicate, and at least three triplicates per treatment, following manufacture instructions (NZY Total RNA Isolation kit, Nyztech, Lisbon, Portugal). The quantity and quality of RNAs were obtained using a nanodrop (UV-Vis ACTG Gene UVS − 99. 200 an 850 nm), and a Qubit 4.0 (Fisher Scientific, Madrid, Spain) respectively. RNA samples were visualized in 1% agarose gel stained with Gel Red (Nippon, Japan). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using an hexanucleotide random primer, following manufacture instructions of First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Amersham-Pharmacia, Rainham, UK).

The method used for relative quantification of oomycete burden on inoculated and non-inoculated seedlings was determined by qRT-PCR based on previous works [143,144,145]. Briefly, 1μL cDNA obtained (as before), from inoculated and non-inoculated plants, were analysed by qRT-PCR using specific housekeeping oligonucleotides of plant and mycelia. The relation between Ct numbers obtained measuring β-actin (Solanum lycopersicum) and β-tubulin (P. cinnamomi) amplification was calculated. Data were acquired using the One-Step PCR Applied Biosystem Analysis software (Version 2.01), and changes in transcript levels were determined using the 2−∆∆CT method [146].

The nuclear β-Tubulin gene of P. cinnamomi corresponds to Accession No. U22050, GenBank accession number GU1911391 (selected from P. cinnamomi genome database (PHYCI_418545, https://fungidb.org/fungidb/app/), gene-specific primers were designed considering the annealing temperatures of 56 °C (forward) and 58 °C (reverse), that amplified one product of 160 bp with an efficiency of the 97,4%. These specific primers resulted useful for amplification and identification of the P. cinnamomi β-Tubulin gene using qRT-PCR for the first time (Table S1), resulting in a single product profile in the qRT-PCR melting curve. The gene was only amplified in cDNA from mycelia or inoculated Solanum lycopersicum seedlings and was absent in control non-inoculated plants, confirming its specificity to P. cinnamomi and allowing us to quantify the burden on plants using a previously published housekeeping gene used on Solanum lycopersicum. The β-Actin gene-specific primers for Solanum lycopersicum corresponds to (Solyc11g005330.2, https://solgenomics.net/) and were obtained from previous work [73] with annealing temperatures of 60 °C (forward) and 57 °C (reverse), amplifying one product of 150 bp with an efficiency of the 98,01%(Table S1).

The qRT-PCR was performed using a SYBR® Green qPCR master mix (Nzytech, Lisbon, Portugal), using a final volume of 20μL per well. The reaction mixture was 1μL aliquot of the first-strand cDNA, 10μL of SYBR® Green mix, 1μL of each oligonucleotide (10μM) and 7μL of DEPC-Water (Ambion, Austin, USA). The qRT-PCR program was adjusted to melting curve oligonucleotides temperatures and consisted of 10 min at 25 °C, 30 min at 50 °C, and 5 min at 85 °C. Samples were run into a DNA Engine One-Step qRT-PCR machine (Thermofisher Scientific, USA).

The primers were verified for specificity using a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST at NCBI). The program of qRT-PCR consisted of 3 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, and 30 s at 60 °C, with a final extension step consisting of 7 min at 72 °C with a final dissociation melting curve. Data points were compared using t-tests. At least, three independent biological replicates obtained from different assays, were used with three technical replicates in each experiment.

Simultaneously, to confirm Phytophtora cinnamomi re-isolation from Solanum lycopersicum, assays of absolute qRT-PCR were performed. Briefly, roots from inoculated seedlings were harvest after seven days as previously. The roots were surface sterilized with water and transferred onto a Petri dish containing PDA medium. Subsequently, the dishes were placed into a digital chamber Aralab® (Lisbon, Portugal), under the current conditions described before. Plates were kept in darkness for seven days allowing mycelium growth. One 1cmx 1 cm piece of agar containing the mycelium was transferred onto a PDA and used to re-isolate mycelium, sporangia and zoospores (following Fig. 1A). In parallel, a fresh mycelium stock of P. cinnamomi was obtained as before. In both cases, 0.135 g of P. cinnamomi mycelium were snap frozen in liquid Nitrogen and homogenized to powder with a Sylamat® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Austria). The extraction of total RNA and First-strand cDNA were performed as previously. The absolute quantification of mycelia was made by qRT-PCR relating β-tubulin Ct to ng of mycelia cDNA.

Statistical analysis

The Stat Graphics Centurion XVI.II program (Stat Point Technologies, Inc., Warrenton, VA, USA) was used for all data analysis using a Variance check (p value > 0.05). Statistical significance was calculated for all the experiments by unpaired t-test (P < 0.05), indicated with one asterisk (*), bars with non-asterisk are not significantly different, according to one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (P > 0.05). For qRT-PCR analysis, error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different according to one way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (P < 0.05). Linear trend estimation was calculated by t-test (P < 0.05), when the correlation coefficient is significantly different the linear trend is shown with gray dots, correlation degree (“r), is shown at the corresponding figure legend.

Data availability

Availability of data and materials: All materials generated in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Burgess TI, Scott JK, Mcdougall KL, et al. Current and projected global distribution of Phytophthora cinnamomi, one of the world’s worst plant pathogens. Global Change Biol. 2017;23(4):1661–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kamoun S, Furzer O, Jones JDG, et al. The top 10 oomycete pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2015;16(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12190

  3. Shakya SK, Grünwald NJ, Fieland VJ, et al. Phylogeography of the wide-host range panglobal plant pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol Ecol. 2021;30(20). https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16109

  4. Hardham AR, Blackman LM. Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19(2):260–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/MPP.12568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Corcobado T, Cubera E, Pérez-Sierra A, Jung T, Solla A. First report of Phytophthora gonapodyides involved in the decline of Quercus ilex in xeric conditions in Spain. New Dis Rep. 2010;22(1). https://doi.org/10.5197/j.2044-0588.2010.022.033

  6. Gyeltshen J, Dunstan WA, Grigg AH, Burgess TI, Giles GE. The influence of time, soil moisture and exogenous factors on the survival potential of oospores and chlamydospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Pathol. 2021;51(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12637

  7. Jung T, Orlikowski L, Henricot B, et al. Widespread Phytophthora infestations in European nurseries put forest, semi-natural and horticultural ecosystems at high risk of Phytophthora diseases. Pathol. 2016;46(2):134–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/EFP.12239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kunadiya MB, Burgess TI, Dunstan A, White W, Giles D. Persistence and degradation of Phytophthora cinnamomi DNA and RNA in different soil types. Environ DNA. 2021;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.127

  9. Nechwatal J, Jung T. A study of Phytophthora spp. in declining highbush blueberry in Germany reveals that P. Cinnamomi can thrive under central European outdoor conditions. J Plant Dis Prot. 2021;128(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-021-00445-y

  10. Zhu P, Burney J, Chang J et al. Warming reduces global agricultural production by decreasing cropping frequency and yields. Nature Climate Change. 2022;12(11):1016–1023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01492-5

  11. Dorado FJ, Alías JC, Chaves N, Solla A. Warming scenarios and Phytophthora cinnamomi infection in Chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill). Plants. 2023;12(3):556. https://doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS12030556/S1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Redondo MA, Boberg J, Stenlid J, Oliva J. Contrasting distribution patterns between aquatic and terrestrial Phytophthora species along a climatic gradient are linked to functional traits. ISME J. 2018;12(12). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0229-3

  13. Redondo MA, Boberg J, Olsson CHB, Oliva J. Winter conditions correlate with Phytophthora alni subspecies distribution in southern Sweden. Phytopathology. 2015;105(9). https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-15-0020-R

  14. Redondo MÁ, Pérez-Sierra A, Abad-Campos P, et al. Histology of Quercus ilex roots during infection by Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Trees - Struct Function. 2015;29(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-015-1275-3

  15. Rands RD. Stripe canker of Cinnamon caused by Phytophthora Cinnamomi n. Sp. Mededelingen Van Het Instituut Voor Plantenziekten. 1922;54.

  16. Von Broembsen SL. Phytophthora cinnamomi associated with mortality of native vegetation in South Africa. Plant Dis. 1985;69(8):715. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-69-715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zentmyer GA. Origin of Phytophthora cinnamomi: evidence that it is not an indigenous fungus in the Americas. Phytopathology. 1977;77(11). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-67-1373

  18. UK, International CAB, Waterhouse GM, Waterston JM. Phytophthora cambivora. [Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria]. Descriptions of Fungi and Bacteria. Published online 1966. https://doi.org/10.1079/dfb/20056400112

  19. Anagnostakis SL. The effect of multiple importations of pests and pathogens on a native tree. Biol Invasions. 2001;3(3). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015205005751

  20. Crandall BS, Gravatt GF, Ryan MM. Root disease of Castanea species and some coniferous and broadleaf nursery stocks, caused by Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Phytopathology. 1945;35(3).

  21. Old KM, Moran GF, Bell JC. Isozyme variability among isolates of Phytophthora cinnamomi from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Can J Bot. 1984;62(10). https://doi.org/10.1139/b84-274

  22. Arentz F, Simpson JA. Distribution of Phytophthora cinnamomi in Papua New Guinea and notes on its origin. Trans Br Mycological Soc. 1986;87(2):289–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(86)80032-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arentz F. Phytophthora Cinnamomi A1: an ancient resident of New Guinea and Australia of Gondwanan origin? Pathol. 2017;47(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12342

  24. Cahill DM, Rookes JE, Wilson BA, Gibson L, McDougall KL. Turner review 17. Phytophthora cinnamomi and Australia’s biodiversity: impacts, predictions and progress towards control. Aust J Bot. 2008;56(4):279–310. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT07159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sterne RE. Phytophthora root rot of blueberry in Arkansas. Plant Dis. 1982;66(1):604. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-66-604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van den Berg N, Swart V, Backer R, et al. Advances in understanding defense mechanisms in Persea Americana against Phytophthora cinnamomi. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:636339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.636339

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Camilo Alves C, Ivone Clara M, Ivone Esteves da Clara M. Manuel Cabral De Almeida Ribeiro N. Decline of Mediterranean oak trees and its association with Phytophthora cinnamomi: a review. Springer. 2013;132(3):411–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0688-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Martínez MT, Arrillaga I, Sales E, Pérez-Oliver MA, González-Mas M, del Corredoira C. Micropropagation, characterization, and conservation of Phytophthora cinnamomi-tolerant holm oak mature trees. Forests. 2021;12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/f12121634

  29. Medeira C, Maia I, Ribeiro C et al. Alpha cinnamomin elicits a defence response against Phytophthora cinnamomi in castanea sativa.

  30. Jung T, Vettraino AM, Cech T, Vannini A. The impact of invasive Phytophthora species on European forests. Phytophthora: a global perspective. Published Online January 2013:146–58. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640938.0146

  31. Hernández-Lambraño RE, González-Moreno P, Sánchez-Agudo JÁ. Environmental factors associated with the spatial distribution of invasive plant pathogens in the Iberian Peninsula: the case of Phytophthora Cinnamomi Rands. Ecol Manage. 2018;419–420:101–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2018.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mora-Sala B, León M, Pérez-Sierra A, Abad-Campos P. New reports of Phytophthora species in plant nurseries in Spain. Pathogens 2022. 2022;11(8):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/PATHOGENS11080826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sánchez-Cuesta R, Ruiz-Gómez FJ, Duque-Lazo J, González-Moreno P, Navarro-Cerrillo RM. The environmental drivers influencing spatio-temporal dynamics of oak defoliation and mortality in dehesas of Southern Spain. Ecol Manage. 2021;485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118946

  34. Anderson P, Brundrett M, Grierson P, Robinson R. Impact of severe forest dieback caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi on macrofungal diversity in the northern jarrah forest of Western Australia. Ecol Manage. 2010;259(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.015

  35. Dell B, Malajczuk N. Jarrah dieback — A disease caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. In: The Jarrah Forest.; 1989. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3111-4_6

  36. Dell B, Hardy G. History of Phytophthora cinnamomi management in Western Australia. Proceedings 6th National Conference of the Australian Forest History Society Inc. Published online 2005.

  37. Matusick G, Ruthrof KX, Scott P, Hardy GESJ. Climate change or tree disease: challenges for diagnosing causes of forest die-off. Aust J Bot. 2023;71(8). https://doi.org/10.1071/BT23039

  38. Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012;13(4):414. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1364-3703.2011.00783.X

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Bassani I, Larousse M, Tran QD, Attard A, Galiana E. Phytophthora zoospores: from perception of environmental signals to inoculum formation on the host-root surface. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020;18:3766–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSBJ.2020.10.045

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Dunstan WA, Rudman T, Shearer BL, et al. Containment and spot eradication of a highly destructive, invasive plant pathogen (Phytophthora Cinnamomi) in natural ecosystems. Biol Invasions. 2010;12(4):913–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9512-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Narayan RD, Blackman LM, Shan W, Hardham AR. Phytophthora nicotianae transformants lacking dynein light chain 1 produce non-flagellate zoospores. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010;47(8):663–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FGB.2010.04.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Allen RN, Harvey JD. Negative chemotaxis of zoospores of Phytophthora cinnamomi. J Gen Microbiol. 1974;84(1):28–38. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-84-1-28/CITE/REFWORKS

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Galiana E, Cohen C, Thomen P, Etienne C, Noblin X. Guidance of zoospores by potassium gradient sensing mediates aggregation. J R Soc Interface. 2019;16(157). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2019.0367

  44. Morris BM, Reid B, Gow NAR. Tactic response of zoospores of the fungus Phytophthora palmivora to solutions of different pH in relation to plant infection. Microbiol (Reading). 1995;141(5):1231–7. https://doi.org/10.1099/13500872-141-5-1231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gubler F, Hardham AR, Duniec J. Characterising adhesiveness of Phytophthora Cinnamomi zoospores during encystment. Protoplasma. 1989;149(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623979

  46. Kasteel M, Ketelaar T, Govers F. Fatal attraction: how Phytophthora zoospores find their host. Semin Cell Dev Biol. Published online 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SEMCDB.2023.01.014

  47. Ri AD, Ne EN, Har Dh Am R, Lei AD, Lac LMB, An KM. Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19(2):260–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/MPP.12568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Balci Y, Bienapfl JC. Phytophthora in US forests. Phytophthora: a global perspective. Published Online January 2013:135–45. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640938.0135

  49. Gómez-Aparicio L, Ibáñez B, Serrano MS, et al. Spatial patterns of soil pathogens in declining Mediterranean forests: implications for tree species regeneration. New Phytol. 2012;194(4):1014–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1469-8137.2012.04108.X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. de Andrade Lourenço D, Branco I, Choupina A. Phytopathogenic oomycetes: a review focusing on Phytophthora cinnamomi and biotechnological approaches. Molecular Biology Reports. 2020;47(11):9179–9188. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11033-020-05911-8

  51. de Andrade Lourenço D, Branco I, Choupina A. A systematic review about biological control of phytopathogenic Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mol Biol Rep Published Online. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11033-022-07547-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Judelson HS, Blanco FA. The spores of Phytophthora: weapons of the plant destroyer. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1064

  53. Jung T, Blaschke H, Neumann P. Isolation, identification and pathogenicity of Phytophthora species from declining oak stands. Eur J for Pathol. 1996;26(5):253–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-0329.1996.TB00846.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zentmyer GA. Bacterial stimulation of sporangium production in Phytophthora cinnamomi. Sci (1979). 1965;150(3700):1178–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.150.3700.1178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chen D wu, Zentmyer GA. Production of Sporangia by Phytophthora Cinnamomi in Axenic culture. Mycologia. 1970;62(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1970.12018977

  56. Sedgley M. New banksia cultivars for cut flower production. Acta Hortic. 1997;453. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1997.453.8

  57. Yang CH, Crowley DE, Menge JA. 16S rDNA fingerprinting of rhizosphere bacterial communities associated with healthy and Phytophthora infected avocado roots. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006;35(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00796.x

  58. Zilberstein M. Detached root inoculation -- a new method to evaluate resistance to phytophthora root rot in avocado trees. Phytopathology. 1987;77(6). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-77-841

  59. Bezuidenhout CM. Screening proteaceae for Resistance against phytophthora root rot - Preliminary results. In: Acta Horticulturae. Vol 1031.; 2014. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2014.1031.9

  60. Dunne CP, Dell B, Hardy GESJ. Sudden death in proteas in the southwest of Western Australia. In: Acta Horticulturae. Vol 602.; 2003. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.602.4

  61. von Broembsen SL, Brits GJ, Evaluation of the, resistance of pincushion (Leucospermum spp.) breeding lines to root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Acta Hortic. 1990;264. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.1990.264.14

  62. Byrt P, Grant BR. Some conditions governing zoospore production in axenic cultures of Phytophthora Cinnamomi rands. Aust J Bot. 1979;27(2). https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9790103

  63. Byrt PN, Holland AA. Infection of axenic Eucalyptus seedlings with Phytophthora Cinnamomi zoospores. Aust J Bot. 1978;26(2). https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9780169

  64. Meyer FE, Shuey LS, Naidoo S, et al. Dual RNA-sequencing of Eucalyptus nitens during Phytophthora Cinnamomi challenge reveals pathogen and host factors influencing compatibility. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7(MAR2016):191. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2016.00191/BIBTEX

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Rookes JE, Wright ML, Cahill DM. Elucidation of defence responses and signalling pathways induced in Arabidopsis thaliana following challenge with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2008;72(4–6):151–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmpp.2008.08.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Valencia LDC, Pascual CB, Delfin EF. In-vitro selection of pineapple cv. Queen with resistance to culture filtrate of Phytophthora Cinnamomi Rands. Philippine J Crop Sci. 2014;39(1).

  67. Macías-Rodríguez L, Guzmán-Gómez A, García-Juárez P, Contreras-Cornejo HA. Trichoderma atroviride promotes tomato development and alters the root exudation of carbohydrates, which stimulates fungal growth and the biocontrol of the phytopathogen Phytophthora Cinnamomi in a tripartite interaction system. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018;94(9):137. https://doi.org/10.1093/FEMSEC/FIY137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Ivanova DG, Sarkar HK, Singh BR. Cloning, expression, and biological activity of recombinant alpha-cinnamomin: toxicity to cranberry and other plant species. J Nat Toxins. 2002;11(2):95–102. Accessed March 31, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12009117/

  69. Palmucci HE, Wolcan S. The Genus Phytophthora (Peronosporales) in Argentina. Boletín De La Sociedad Argentina De Botánica. 2020;55(2):161–93. https://doi.org/10.31055/1851.2372.V55.N2.25537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. McComb JA. Expression of field resistance in callus tissue inoculated with Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology. 1987;77(2):346. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-77-346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hinch JM, Clarke AE. Adhesion of fungal zoospores to root surfaces is mediated by carbohydrate determinants of the root slime. Physiol Plant Pathol. 1980;16(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-4059(80)80001-4

  72. Sanchez AD, Ousset MJ, Sosa MC. Biological control of Phytophthora collar rot of pear using regional Trichoderma strains with multiple mechanisms. Biol Control. 2019;135:124–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOCONTROL.2019.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Martín-Trillo M, Grandío EG, Serra F, et al. Role of tomato BRANCHED1-like genes in the control of shoot branching. Plant J. 2011;67(4):701–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04629.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ho HH, Zentmyer GA. Morphology of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Mycologia. 1977;69(4). https://doi.org/10.2307/3758860

  75. Downer AJ, Menge JA, Pond E. Effects of cellulytic enzymes on Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology. 2001;91(9). https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.9.839

  76. Greenhalgh FC. Evaluation of techniques for quantitative detection of Phytophthora cinnamomi. Soil Biol Biochem. 1978;10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(78)90104-9

  77. Hinch J, Weste G. Behaviour of Phytophthora Cinnamomi zoospores on roots of Australian forest species. Aust J Bot. 1979;27(6). https://doi.org/10.1071/BT9790679

  78. Ebadzad G, Medeira C, Maia I, Martins J, Cravador A. Induction of defence responses by cinnamomins against Phytophthora cinnamomi in Quercus suber and Quercus ilex subs. Rotundifolia. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2015;143(4):705–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0721-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Horta M, Caetano P, Medeira C, Maia I, Cravador A. Involvement of the β-cinnamomin elicitin in infection and colonisation of cork oak roots by Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2010;127(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-010-9609-x

  80. Rodrigues ML, Archer M, Martel P, et al. Crystal structures of the free and sterol-bound forms of β-cinnamomin. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2006;1764(1):110–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBAPAP.2005.09.008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Shearer BL. Time course studies of temperature and soil depth mediated sporangium production by Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Australas Plant Pathol. 2014;43(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-013-0258-3

  82. Morgan BR, Shearer BL. Soil type and season mediated Phytophthora cinnamomi sporangium formation and zoospore release. Australas Plant Pathol. 2013;42(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-013-0201-7

  83. Hwang IS, An SH, Hwang BK. Pepper asparagine synthetase 1 (CaAS1) is required for plant nitrogen assimilation and defense responses to microbial pathogens. Plant J. 2011;67(5):749–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04622.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Chee K, Newhook FJ. Improved methods for use in studies on Phytophtohora cinnamomi rands and other Phytophthora species. New Z J Agricultural Res. 1965;8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1965.10420024

  85. Hwang SC. Biology of chlamydospores, sporangia, and zoospores of Phytophthora Cinnamomi in Soil. Phytopathology. 1978;68(5). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-68-726

  86. Jiménez-Chacón A, Homet P, Matías L, Gómez-Aparicio L, Godoy O. Fine scale determinants of soil litter fauna on a mediterranean mixed oak forest invaded by the exotic soil-borne pathogen Phytophthora cinnamomi. Forests. 2018;9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/f9040218

  87. Costa JLDS, Menge JA, Casale WL. Biological control of Phytophthora root rot of avocado with microorganisms grown in organic mulches. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2000;31(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-83822000000400002

  88. Douhan GW, Fuller E, McKee B, Pond E. Genetic diversity analysis of avocado (Persea americana Miller) rootstocks selected under greenhouse conditions for tolerance to phytophthora root rot caused by Phytophthora Cinnamomi. Euphytica. 2011;182(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-011-0433-y

  89. Zentmyer GA, Ribeiro OK. The effect of visible and near-visible radiation on sporangium production by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytopathology. 1977;67:91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Ridge GA, Jeffers SN, Bridges WC, White SA. In situ production of zoospores by five species of Phytophthora in aqueous environments for use as inocula. Plant Dis. 2013;98(4). https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-06-13-0591-RE

  91. Zentmyer GA. The effect of temperature on growth and pathogenesis of Phytophthora cinnamomi and on growth of its Avocado host. Phytopathology. 1981;71(9). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-71-925

  92. Berrocal-Lobo M, Molina A, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P, García-Olmedo F, Rivas L. Leishmania donovani: thionins, plant antimicrobial peptides with leishmanicidal activity. Exp Parasitol Published Online. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2009.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Diseases P, Erwin WDC, Ribeiro OK. Phytophthora diseases Worldwide. Plant Pathol. 1998;47(2):224–5. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-3059.1998.0179A.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Erwin DC. (Donald C), Ribeiro OK. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. Published Online 1996:562.

  95. Duque-Lazo J, Navarro-Cerrillo RM, van Gils H, Groen TA. Forecasting oak decline caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi in Andalusia: identification of priority areas for intervention. Ecol Manage. 2018;417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.045

  96. Mcconnell ME, Balci Y. Fine root dynamics of oak saplings in response to phytophthora cinnamomi infection under different temperatures and durations. Pathol. 2015;45(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12150

  97. Dahmen H. Technique for long-term preservation of phytopathogenic fungi in liquid nitrogen. Phytopathology. 1983;73(2). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-73-241

  98. Maddox JV, Solter LF. Long-term storage of infective microsporidian spores in liquid nitrogen. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1996.tb01395.x

  99. Tooley PW. Use of uncontrolled freezing for liquid nitrogen storage of phytophthora species. Plant Dis. 1988;72(8). https://doi.org/10.1094/pd-72-0680

  100. Yang DQ, Rossignol L. Survival of wood-inhabiting fungi in liquid nitrogen storage. Mycologist. 1998;12(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-915X(98)80014-1

  101. Cunningham JL. Preservation of rust fungi in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 1973;10(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(73)90058-8

  102. Smith D. Liquid nitrogen storage of fungi. Trans Br Mycological Soc. 1982;79(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(82)80035-1

  103. Gurian-Sherman D, Lindow SE. Ice nucleation and its application. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1992;3(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/0958-1669(92)90109-V

  104. Lindow PS. History of discovery and environmental role of ice nucleating bacteria. Published online September 19, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-07-22-0256-IA

  105. Taylor R, Fletcher RL. A simple method for the freeze-preservation of zoospores of the green macroalga enteromorpha intestinalis. J Appl Phycol. 1999;11(3). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008002120416

  106. Cahill D, Wookey C, Weste G, Rouse J. Changes in Mineral content of Eucalyptus marginata and E. Calophylla grown under controlled conditions and inoculated with Phytophthora cinnamomi. J Phytopathol. 1986;116(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-0434.1986.TB00890.X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Chaudhri MA, Lee MM, Rouse JL, Weste G. Proton activation studies of changes in mineral composition of eucalyptus obliqua due to phytophtora cinnamomi. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1978;29(9–10):585–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(78)90173-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Jang JC, Tainter FH. Optimum tissue culture conditions for selection of resistance to Phytophtora Cinnamomi in pine callus tissue. Plant Cell Rep. 1991;9(9). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232102

  109. Weste G, Chaudhri MA. Changes in the mineral composition of plants infected with Phytophthora cinnamomi. J Phytopathol. 1982;105(2):131–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-0434.1982.TB00669.X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Weste G, Chaudhri MA, Haukka M, Vithanage K. The influence of root infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi on mineral content of certain native species. J Phytopathol. 1980;99(3):205–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1439-0434.1980.TB03781.X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Fraedrich SW. Zoospore inoculum density of Phytophthora cinnamomi and the infection of lateral root tips of shortleaf and loblolly pine. Phytopathology. 1989;79(10). https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-79-1109

  112. Kaiser C, Van Der Merwe R, Bekker TF, Labuschagne N. In-vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of several phytopathogenic fungi. Including Phytophthora Cinnamomi Soluble Silicon. 2005;28.

  113. Hardham AR, Gubler F, Duniec J, Elliott J. A review of methods for the production and use of monoclonal antibodies to study zoosporic plant pathogens. J Microsc. 1991;162(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1991.tb03142.x

  114. Kathryn McCarren. Saprophytic Ability and the Contribution of Chlamydospores and Oospores to the Survival of Phytophthora Cinnamomi. 2006.

  115. Luque-Ortega JR, Martínez S, Saugar JM et al. Fungus-elicited metabolites from plants as an enriched source for New Leishmanicidal agents: antifungal phenyl-phenalenone phytoalexins from the Banana Plant (Musa acuminata) Target Mitochondria of Leishmania Donovani Promastigotes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. Published online 2004. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.5.1534-1540.2004

  116. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1–2):55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(83)90303-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Kiderlen AF, Kaye PM. A modified colorimetric assay of macrophage activation for intracellular cytotoxicity against Leishmania parasites. J Immunol Methods. 1990;127(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1759(90)90334-R

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Maside C, Recuero S, Salas-Huetos A, Ribas-Maynou J, Yeste M. Animal board invited review: an update on the methods for semen quality evaluation in swine – from farm to the lab. Animal. 2023;17(3):100720. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANIMAL.2023.100720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Pérez-Duran F, Acosta-Torres LS, Serrano-Díaz PN et al. Toxicity and antimicrobial effect of silver nanoparticles in swine sperms. 2020;66(4):281–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396368.2020.1754962

  120. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with imageJ. Biophotonics Int. Published online 2004. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005615.ax4

  121. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089

  122. Costa CP, Ferreira MC. Preservation of microorganisms - a review. Revista De Microbiol. 1991;22(3).

  123. Guo N, Wei Q, Xu Y. Optimization of cryopreservation of pathogenic microbial strains. J Biosaf Biosecur. 2020;2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2020.11.003

  124. Manzanera M. Dealing with water stress and microbial preservation. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.15096

  125. Stevenson A, Hamill PG, Medina Á, et al. Glycerol enhances fungal germination at the water-activity limit for life. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13530

  126. Kanneganti TD, Huitema E, Cakir C, Kamoun S. Synergistic interactions of the plant cell death pathways induced by Phytophthora infestans Nep1-like protein PiNPP1.1 and INF1 elicitin. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19(8):854–63. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Ko WH. Long-term storage and survival structure of three species of Phytophthora in water. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2003;69.

  128. Kolkowski JA, Smith D. Cryopreservation and freeze-drying of fungi. Methods Mol Biol. 1995;38. https://doi.org/10.1385/0-89603-296-5:49

  129. Lloyd DH. The preservation and maintenance of living fungi, 2nd edition, D. Smith and A.H.S. Onions. Vet Dermatol. 1994;5(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3164.1994.tb00033.x

  130. Ryan MJ, Smith D. Cryopreservation and freeze-drying of fungi employing centrifugal and shelf freeze-drying. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;368. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-362-2_9

  131. Ryan MJ, Smith D, Jeffries P. A decision-based key to determine the most appropriate protocol for the preservation of fungi. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2000;16(2). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008910006419

  132. Smith D. Cryoprotectants and the cryopreservation of fungi. Trans Br Mycological Soc. 1983;80(2):360–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1536(83)80025-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Houseknecht JL, Suh SO, Zhou JJ. Viability of fastidious Phytophthora following different cryopreservation treatments. Fungal Biol. 2012;116(10):1081–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FUNBIO.2012.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Hubálek Z. Protectants used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology. 2003;46(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-2240(03)00046-4

  135. Soudani S, Poza-Carrión C, De la Cruz Gómez N, González-Coloma A, Andrés MF, Berrocal-Lobo M. Essential oils prime epigenetic and metabolomic changes in tomato defense against Fusarium oxysporum. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPLS.2022.804104

  136. Fernandez-Bautista N, Dominguez-Nuñez J, Moreno MM, Berrocal-Lobo M. Plant tissue trypan blue staining during phytopathogen infection. Bio Protoc. Published online 2016. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.2078

  137. Brouwer M, Lievens B, Van Hemelrijck W, Van Den Ackerveken G, Cammue BPA, Thomma BPHJ. Quantification of disease progression of several microbial pathogens on Arabidopsis thaliana using real-time fluorescence PCR. FEMS Microbiol Lett Published Online. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00759-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Gomez-Gutierrez SV, Goodwin SB. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of plant pathogens in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.857673

  139. Redkar A, Di Pietro A, Turrà D. Live-cell visualization of early stages of root colonization by the vascular wilt pathogen fusarium oxysporum. Published Online 2023:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3159-1_6

  140. Ammour MS, Fedele G, Morcia C, Terzi V, Rossi V. Quantification of botrytis cinerea in grapevine bunch trash by real-time PCR. Phytopathology. 2019;109(7). https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-11-18-0441-R

  141. Bezuidenhout CM, Denman S, Kirk SA, Botha WJ, Mostert L, McLeod A. Phytophthora taxa associated with cultivated Agathosma, with emphasis on the P. Citricola complex and P. capensis sp. nov. Persoonia: Mol Phylogeny Evol Fungi. 2010;25:32–49. https://doi.org/10.3767/003158510X538371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Kroon LPNM, Bakker FT, Van Den Bosch GBM, Bonants PJM, Flier WG. Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Fungal Genet Biol. 2004;41(8):766–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2004.03.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Redkar A, Sabale M, Schudoma C, et al. Conserved secreted effectors contribute to endophytic growth and multi-host plant compatibility in a vascular wilt fungus. Plant Cell Published Online June. 2022;11. https://doi.org/10.1093/PLCELL/KOAC174

  144. Suarez MB, Walsh K, Boonham N, O’Neill T, Pearson S, Barker I. Development of real-time PCR (TaqMan®) assays for the detection and quantification of Botrytis cinerea in planta. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. Published online 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.07.003

  145. Zhang H, Jiang H. Resistance analysis of grape Botrytis Cinerea based on PCR and sequencing technology. Cell Mol Biol. 2021;67(6). https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2021.67.6.25

  146. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-Tim e quantitative PCR and the 2 C T method. Methods. 2001;2(5):402–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Beatríz Cuenca (TRAGSA), and María del Mar Ruíz Galea (IMIDRA), for assistance and providing Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands culture and initial assistance with protocols; Rafael Núñez Ramírez (CIB, CSIC, Spain), for assistance with the ImageJ® specific plugging tools, Arquimea SLU., for providing the SQS® system; and Steven Lindow (Plant Biology Dpt. at Berkeley University) for made suggestions.

Funding

This research was partially funded by EU FEADER funds through the project “Breeding and conservation program for holm and cork oak for tolerance to oak decline” leaded by the Spanish Ministry for Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge (MITECO, Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación). This research and L. D.C.G. contract were funded partially by Fundación Conde Del Valle Salazar, Spain. SS was funded by an international Ph.D. fellow from the Algerian Government from MHESR, Decree No. 14–196 (Collaboration UPM-Argelia). N.D.C-G; was funded by a PhD fellow DIN2018-009928 from Ministerio de Ciencia Innovacion y Universidades, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Supervision, conceptualization, funding acquisition, writing M.B.-L.; data curation, formal analysis, methodology writing L.D.C.-G., S. S and N. D-G.; writing—review, project administration, funding acquisition J.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Berrocal-Lobo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Del Castillo-González, L., Soudani, S., De La Cruz-Gómez, N. et al. An improved method to study Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands zoospores interactions with host. BMC Plant Biol 24, 508 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05205-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05205-2

Keywords