Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exploring the mechanism of transformation in Acacia nilotica (Linn.) triggered by colchicine seed treatment

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 428 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acacia nilotica Linn. is a widely distributed tree known for its applications in post-harvest and medicinal horticulture. However, its seed-based growth is relatively slow. Seed is a vital component for the propagation of A. nilotica due to its cost-effectiveness, genetic diversity, and ease of handling. Colchicine, commonly used for polyploidy induction in plants, may act as a pollutant at elevated levels. Its optimal concentration for Acacia nilotica's improved growth and development has not yet been determined, and the precise mechanism underlying this phenomenon has not been established. Therefore, this study investigated the impact of optimized colchicine (0.07%) seed treatment on A. nilotica's morphological, anatomical, physiological, fluorescent, and biochemical attributes under controlled conditions, comparing it with a control.

Results

Colchicine seed treatment significantly improved various plant attributes compared to control. This included increased shoot length (84.6%), root length (53.5%), shoot fresh weight (59.1%), root fresh weight (42.8%), shoot dry weight (51.5%), root dry weight (40%), fresh biomass (23.6%), stomatal size (35.9%), stomatal density (41.7%), stomatal index (51.2%), leaf thickness (11 times), leaf angle (2.4 times), photosynthetic rate (40%), water use efficiency (2.2 times), substomatal CO2 (36.6%), quantum yield of photosystem II (13.1%), proton flux (3.1 times), proton conductivity (2.3 times), linear electron flow (46.7%), enzymatic activities of catalase (25%), superoxide dismutase (33%), peroxidase (13.5%), and ascorbate peroxidase (28%), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl-radical scavenging activities(23%), total antioxidant capacity (59%), total phenolic (23%), and flavonoid content (37%) with less number of days to 80% germination (57.1%), transpiration rate (53.9%), stomatal conductance (67.1%), non-photochemical quenching (82.8%), non-regulatory energy dissipation (24.3%), and H2O2 (25%) and O−2 levels (30%).

Conclusion

These findings elucidate the intricate mechanism behind the morphological, anatomical, physiological, fluorescent, and biochemical transformative effects of colchicine seed treatment on Acacia nilotica Linn. and offer valuable insights for quick production of A. nilotica’s plants with modification and enhancement from seeds through an eco-friendly approach.

Peer Review reports

Background

The Acacia genus, belongs to the Leguminosae family (Mimosideae subfamily and Acacieae tribe) and encompasses approximately 1200 to 1300 species which are predominantly found in the subtropical regions [1]. Acacia nilotica Linn. exhibits a prolific distribution across the continents of Africa, Americas, Asia, and Australia [2]. The ploidy levels in this group of species vary from 2n = 2x = 26 to 2n = 8x = 104. A. nilotica, with a ploidy level of 2n = 2x = 26, exhibits slow growth when raised from the seed but this species occupies a significant place for its biomass applications in horticulture [3]. For instance, Arabic gum, which is extracted from the stems of Acacia spp. trees, has been widely documented to reduce the respiration rate and ethylene production in fruits and vegetables which enhances the products' resistance to phytopathogens and delays the fruit senescence [4,5,6,7]. Furthermore, numerous bioactive compounds have also been extracted from various parts of A. nilotica, encompassing apigenin, catechin, gallic acid, kaempferol, niloticane, rutin, umbelliferone, as well as two steroids, namely β-sitosterol and rostene; which indicate the significance of its utilization in the medicine. Nonetheless, different species of Acacia have been tested for their increased production potential [8]. But this process requires a significant time and resources to conduct comprehensively.

In recent studies, colchicine has been found to have a substantial influence on morphological, biochemical and anatomical traits of different plants species which ultimately determine the effectiveness of their fluorescence and physiological activities [9]. However, it is highly toxic to human health and unsafe to the environment at elevated levels [10]. In plants, the elevated levels of colchicine also lead to deformities and diminish their growth and productivity [11]. So, the determination of optimum colchicine concentration is of dire need for seed treatment of plants to alter the morphological traits i.e., plant size, leaf thickness, and leaf colour [12, 13]. The use of colchicine below toxic level for extended periods may be a reliable strategy to mitigate its harmful effects and boost the crop growth and production rate. Numerous previous studies report the application of 0.1% colchicine in orchid for 96 h [14], 1% colchicine in lily for 24 h [15], 0.05% colchicine in salvia for 24 h [16], 0.2% colchicine in Japanese barberry for 24 h [17], 0.5% colchicine in phlox for 36 h [18], 0.08% colchicine in calendula for 4 h [19], 0.2% colchicine in marigold for 3 h [20], 0.2% colchicine in rose for 12 h [21], and 0.1–0.3% colchicine in gladiolus for 24 h [22] for their successful growth and development.

Morphological and physiological changes in plants may occur by application of colchicine due to an increase in cell size, gene silencing and epigenetic or genetic interactions [23,24,25]. Additionally, an improvement in the resistibility of plants to the environmental stresses and diseases have also been observed [26]. Another significant advantage associated with the application of colchicine is that it facilitates the acquisition of novel functions by the mutant without compromising its essential functions [27]. The impact of colchicine on polyploidy induction and its mechanism has been widely studied but there is no literature found that signifies its influence on growth and development of tree species particularly A. nilotica. Therefore, this study was carried out to investigate the changes in plant morphological, anatomical, physiological, fluorescent, and biochemical attributes of A. nilotica Linn.

Results

Morphometric and anatomical attributes of Acacia nilotica Linn

The experiment evidently illustrated significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) for shoot length, root length, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, fresh biomass, stomatal size, stomatal density, and stomatal index under the main and interactive effects of seed treatment and time interval (Table 1). The shoot length of A. nilotica seedlings was about 1.8 times greater from colchicine-treated seeds than the control (Fig. 1A). In general, all the studied morphological and anatomical attributes showed a significant increase with the passage of the time interval, irrespective of treatments. For instance, the shoot length of A. nilotica, on the 6th week, was two-fold higher than on the 3rd week interval (Fig. 1A). The root length was approximately 53.5% higher in the seedlings raised from colchicine treated seeds compared to the control (Fig. 1B). The shoot and root fresh weights of seedlings under colchicine seed treatment were approximately 59.1% and 42.8% higher than control seedlings (Fig. 1C, D). Similarly, the shoot and root dry weights were around 51.5% and 40% higher in the seedlings grown under colchicine seed treatment compared to control ones (Fig. 1E, F). The fresh biomass of Acacia nilotica seedlings was also nearly 23.6% greater under colchicine seed treatment than control (Fig. 1G). Similarly, colchicine treated seeds produce seedlings with 35.9% higher stomatal size (Fig. 1H), 41.7% higher stomatal density (Fig. 1I), and 51.2% increased stomatal index compared to the control seeds (Fig. 1J). Overall, a noticeable improvement was observed in the visual appearance of seedlings under colchicine (0.07%) seed treatment with the passage of time compared to the control group (Fig. 2).

Table 1 Analysis of variance for factors (Treatment, interval and their interaction) for shoot length (SL), root length (RL), shoot fresh weight (SFW), root fresh weight (RFW), shoot dry weight (SDW), root dry weight (RDW), fresh biomass, stomatal size, stomatal density, and stomatal index in Acacia nilotica recorded at three- and six- week interval in control and colchicine seed-treated seedlings
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The morphological and anatomical attributes including shoot length (A), root length (B), shoot fresh weight (C), shoot dry weight (D), root fresh weight (E), root dry weight (F), fresh biomass (G), stomatal size (H), stomatal density (I), and stomatal index (J) recorded in Acacia nilotica’ s seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment and control. The bars indicate the standard error ( ±) of the mean (n = 3). Lettering denotes statistical variations between the treatment means carried out using Least Significant Difference Test at the P ≤ 0.05 after analysis of variance

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Visual difference between the colchicine seed treated (0.07% w/v for 21 h) and control seedlings of Acacia nilotica Linn. after 30 and 90 days of sowing

Full size image

Physiological attributes of Acacia nilotica Linn

A significant effect on physiological attributes was recorded under colchicine seed treatment and control. Under colchicine seed treatment, the photosynthetic rate of Acacia nilotica seedlings was about 40% higher than those under control group (Fig. 3A). With colchicine seed treatment, the transpiration rate was also lower (8.25 mmol H2O m–2 s–1), almost a 54% decrease from control seedlings (12.7 mmol H2O m–2 s–1) was noted (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the soaking of Acacia nilotica’ s seeds in colchicine resulted in a decreased stomatal conductance (0.067 mmol m–2 s–1) of seedlings comparably 67.1% than control (0.112 mmol m–2 s–1) (Fig. 3C). Following the colchicine seed treatment, the water use efficiency (WUE) of Acacia nilotica’ s seedlings increased from 1.43 to 3.14, reflecting a significant two-folds increase compared to control (Fig. 3D). Finally, the substomatal CO2 concentration was also found higher (465.2 μmol CO2 mol–1) in the seedlings grown under colchicine seed treatment rather than control (635.7 μmol CO2 mol–1) showcasing nearly a 36.7% comparable increase (Fig. 3E).

Fig. 3
figure 3

The physiological attributes including photosynthetic rate (P N) (A), transpiration rate (E) (B), stomatal conductance (gs) (C), water use efficiency (WUE) (D), and substomatal CO2 level (C i) (E) recorded in Acacia nilotica’ s seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment and control. The bars indicate the standard error ( ±) of the mean (n = 3). Lettering denotes statistical variations between the treatment means carried out using Tukey’s HSD Test at the P ≤ 0.05 after analysis of variance

Full size image

Fluorescence-related attributes of Acacia nilotica Linn

The colchicine and control showed significant differences for all the studied fluorescence-related attributes. The quantum yield of photosystem II (ΦII) was 13.1% higher in the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment than those raised through the control seeds (Fig. 4A). Non-photochemical quenching (ΦNPQ) was noted around 83% lower in the seedlings grown under colchicine seed treatment than those grown under control conditions (Fig. 4B). The non-regulatory energy dissipation (ΦNO) was also found about 24% lower in the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment than the control’s seedlings (Fig. 4C). The seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment had a 4.5 time rise in relative chlorophyll contents compared to control seedlings (Fig. 4D). The values of photosynthetically active radiations (PARs) were detected comparably 18.8% greater in the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment compared to the control (Fig. 4E). In terms of linear electron flow (LEF), the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment displayed about 47% increase in the electron’s movement within thylakoid membrane of chloroplasts than the control (Fig. 4F). The seedlings raised from colchicine treated seeds also induced three-fold stronger proton flux (vH+) than the control (Fig. 4G). In the case of proton conductivity (gH+), the seedlings under colchicine seed treatment exhibited approximately 2.3 times higher values than those under control conditions (Fig. 4H). Regarding leaf thickness, the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment also showed a three-fold increase compared to the control (Fig. 4I). After all, the leaf angle was also found greater (63°) in the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment than the control (26°) (Fig. 4J).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The chlorophyll fluorescence attributes including quantum yield of photosystem II (фII) (A), non-photochemical quenching (фNPQ) (B), non-regulatory energy dissipation (фNO) (C), relative chlorophyll contents (D), photosynthetically active radiations (PARs) (E), linear electron flow (LEF) (F), proton flux (vH+) (G), proton conductivity (gH+) (H), leaf thickness (I), and leaf angle (J) recorded in Acacia nilotica’ s seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment and control. The bars indicate the standard error ( ±) of the mean (n = 3). Lettering denotes statistical variations between the treatment means carried out using Tukey’s HSD Test at the P ≤ 0.05 after analysis of variance

Full size image

Biochemical attributes of Acacia nilotica Linn

Colchicine seed treatment had a notable impact on the biochemical attributes of A. nilotica compared to the control group. Under colchicine seed treatment, the production of H2O2 content in the leaves of A. nilotica was approximately 25% lower than that under the control group (Fig. 5A). With colchicine seed treatment, the development of O–2 content was also lower (3.61 mmol kg–1); almost a 30% decline from control seedlings (4.69 mmol kg–1) was observed (Fig. 5B). On the other hand, the control group had lower catalase (CAT) enzyme activity (200 µmol s–1 kg–1) than the seedlings of Acacia nilotica grown from colchicine-soaked seeds (250 µmol s–1 kg–1) (Fig. 5C). Following the colchicine seed treatment, the superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity of Acacia nilotica's seedlings increased from 60 µmol s–1 kg–1 to 80 µmol s–1 kg–1, reflecting a significant 33% increase compared to control (Fig. 5D). The peroxidase (POD) enzyme activity was also found to be higher (352 µmol s–1 kg–1) in the seedlings grown under colchicine seed treatment rather than control (310 µmol s–1 kg–1), showcasing nearly a 13.5% comparable increase (Fig. 5E). The activity of ascorbate peroxidase (APX) was found to be comparably 28% greater in the seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment compared to the control (Fig. 5F). The radical-scavenging activities of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) were found to be almost 23% higher in the seedlings raised from colchicine-treated seeds than the control ones (Fig. 5G). The seedlings raised after colchicine seed treatment also showed 59% greater total antioxidant capacity than control seedlings (Fig. 5H). The total phenolic content (TPC) of Acacia nilotica seedlings went up by almost 23% after being treated with colchicine (Fig. 5I). Finally, total flavonoid content was found to be approximately 37% higher in the seedlings from colchicine-treated seeds than the control (Fig. 5J).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The biochemical attributes including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content (A) superoxide anion (O−2) (B), catalase (CAT) enzyme activity (C), superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme activity (D), peroxidase (POD) enzyme activity (E), Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) enzyme activity (F), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl-radical scavenging activity (DPPH-RSA) (G), total antioxidative capacity (TAC) (H), total phenolic content (I), and total flavonoid content (J) recorded in Acacia nilotica’ s seedlings raised under colchicine seed treatment and control. The bars indicate the standard error ( ±) of the mean (n = 3). Lettering denotes statistical variations between the treatment means carried out using Tukey’s HSD Test at the P ≤ 0.05 after analysis of variance

Full size image

Discussion

This is the first ever report to the best of our knowledge, elucidating the mechanism of colchicine in expediting the growth and development of Acacia nilotica Linn. by improving its physiology and chlorophyll fluorescence (Fig. 6). According to Lam et al. (2014), healthy and vigorous plants can be produced from colchicine over 24 h. In this study, all the morphological and anatomical attributes were considerably enhanced by 0.07% colchicine seed treatment for a period of 21 h. The findings validate the results of Wang et al. [28] who observed a notable improvement in the germination percentage and shoot length of Impatiens walleriana after seed treatment with 0.05% colchicine for 48 h. Similarly, Li and Ruter [29] soaked seedlings of Hibiscus moscheutos at cotyledon stage and found a substantial increase in plant height and shoot fresh weight. In another study, Mori et al. [30] soaked seeds of Limonium bellidifolium in 0.05% colchicine solution for 72 h and found an enormous increase in germination percentage, shoot and root lengths as well as shoot and root fresh and dry weights. Likewise, He et al. [20] treated seeds of Tagetes erecta with a colchicine solution of 0.2% for 3 h and noted a boost in the morphological attributes compared to control. The positive strong relationship of shoot length, shoot fresh weight and fresh biomass with stomatal size, stomatal density, stomatal index, ΦII, vH+, gH+ and P N suggests that the physiological robustness of seedlings contributed to their capacity for efficient photosynthesis by effectively using absorbed light energy and CO2 due to a greater rate of proton transport across cellular membranes and efficient ion transport processes which are crucial for various cellular functions and metabolic activities in vigorous seedlings (Fig. 7). The results are in agreement with those of Wei et al. [31] who found considerable differences for growth potential between untreated and colchicine (0.05–0.20%) applied seedlings of Lespedeza formosa. The significant influence of colchicine on morphological and anatomical attributes might be due to its direct effect on cell division which led to changes in cell size, hence resulted in the altered plant morphology and anatomy, including increased shoot and root length, shoot fresh weight, overall increased fresh biomass, increased stomatal size, stomatal density, and stomatal index.

Fig. 6
figure 6

The proposed mechanism of phenotypic impact of colchicine seed treatment on Acacia nilotica Linn

Full size image
Fig. 7
figure 7

Pearson correlation (P ≤ 0.05) among the studied attributes of Acacia nilotica Linn.; SL = shoot length, RL = root length, SFW = shoot fresh weight, RFW = root fresh weight, SDW = shoot dry weight, RDW = root dry weight, P N = photosynthetic rate, E = transpiration rate, g s = stomatal conductance, WUE = water use efficiency, C i = substomatal CO2 level, фII = quantum yield of photosystem II, фNPQ = non-photochemical quenching, фNO = non-regulatory energy dissipation, Chl = relative chlorophyll content, PARs = photosynthetically active radiations, LEF = linear electron flow, vH+ = proton flux, gH+ = proton conductivity, CAT = catalase enzyme activity, SOD = superoxide dismutase enzyme activity, POD = peroxidase enzyme activity, APX = ascorbate peroxidase enzyme activity, DPPH-RSA = 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl-radical scavenging activity, TAC = total antioxidant capacity, TPC = total phenolic content, TFC = total flavonoid content

Full size image

The thick leaves containing a comparatively larger number of chloroplasts allow the plants to absorb much light as well as enhance subcellular CO2 diffusion within the leaves (Fig. 4I), which should encourage photosynthetic efficiency [32, 33]. In the current study, leaf thickness had a strong positive correlation with subcellular CO2 and the photosynthetic rate of A. nilotica's seedlings (Fig. 7). The thickness of leaves is advantageous for photosynthesis, as chloroplasts, even those located deeper within the leaves, can absorb an ample supply of light [34]. Alternatively, leaf thickness had a strong negative correlation with E and g s (Fig. 7) that are related to water transport [35]. The chlorophyll fluorescence is a measure of the light energy absorbed by chlorophyll molecules in plants, which is re-emitted as fluorescence light [36, 37]. It provides valuable insights into the photosynthetic performance of plants, including forest trees [38]. As chlorophyll fluorescence occurs in chloroplast, the process by which plants convert light energy into chemical energy [39]. So, chlorophyll fluorescence measurements are a valuable tool for assessing the effects of colchicine and understanding their physiological consequences on chloroplasts. In this study, leaf angle was recorded due to its significant role in the chlorophyll fluorescence of forest trees by influencing light absorption, distribution, and physiological responses of leaves to varying light conditions [40]. The leaves, which are oriented perpendicularly to incoming sunlight, receive the maximum amount of light, allowing chloroplasts to absorb more photons and initiate photosynthesis efficiently. In contrast, leaves at oblique angles receive less direct light, leading to reduced chlorophyll excitation and lower rates of photosynthesis [41]. Photosynthetically active radiation (PARs) is also an important photosynthetic attribute, indicating a fraction of the incoming light (400–700 nm) that can be utilized for photosynthesis. In the present study, leaf angle showed a strong positive correlation with PARs, indicating that the leaves angled wider towards the incident light received more PARs, hence enhancing the photosynthesis process. The findings are in agreement with those of Yirdaw and Luukkanen [42], who evaluated the transmittance rate of PARs in five different forest tree species and found a decisive role of leaf angle in the light absorption for photosynthesis. The positive relationship of leaf thickness with ΦII shows that seedlings with thick leaves may have many chloroplasts per unit leaf area (Fig. 7). An increase in ΦII with an increase in leaf thickness has been reported in many previous studies [43,44,45]. A tremendous increase in the leaf thickness was also noticed in the plants of Gladiolus grandiflorus subjected to a 0.3% colchicine treatment compared to the control [22].

According to Hosseini and Javanbakht [46], the induction of tetraploidy in the plants involves notable modifications in biochemical attributes, including a substantial decrease in reactive oxygen species (ROS) and an increase in TAC, TPC, and the activities of antioxidative enzymes including CAT, SOD, POD, and APX. In the current study, a significant decrease in H2O2 and O–2 while an increase in CAT, SOD, POD, APX, DPPH-RSA, TAC, TPC, and TFC was observed in the leaves of A. nilotica. The results of our study support the hypothesis of Hosseini and Javanbakht [46]. Our findings are also in good agreement with those of Akbari et al. [47], who found a substantial improvement in the activities of APX and CAT enzymes as well as phenolics and carotenoids in the leaves of Carum copticum after seed treatment with 0.5 g L–1 colchicine for 6 h. Our findings are also validated by previous findings of Keshmiri et al. [48], who found a significant increase in the production of TFC in Linum album’s callus during chromosome doubling. Thus, our research may be useful in elaborating the mechanism of colchicine’s morpho-physiological impact on A. nilotica.

In the present study, our measurements were limited to phenotypic and physiological attributes. Further molecular studies are required to explore the changes occurred in the ploidy level underlying the observed improvements in growth and development to gain insights into molecular mechanism and potential genetic modifications for enhancing A. nilotica.

Conclusion

The optimized concentration of colchicine treatment (0.07%) significantly enhanced Acacia nilotica's growth, physiology, and biochemical properties, presenting a promising approach for efficient seed-based propagation. Future research should focus on scaling this method for field applications, considering environmental implications and long-term effects to establish sustainable cultivation practices for A. nilotica.

Methodology

Seed source

The seeds of Acacia nilotica Linn., were collected from the Forestry Research Area (29°37′17.4′′ N 71°76′53.6′′ E), The Islamia University of Bahawalpur (IUB), Pakistan and transported to Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory, Department of Horticultural Sciences (DoHS), IUB to carry out the research trial.

Colchicine seed treatment

In the present experiment, a total of 30 seeds were dipped in each of the three replicates of colchicine treatment (0.07%) and distilled water (control) on August 1, 2022, for 21 h. The selection of a 0.07% colchicine concentration was based on a preliminary assessment involving solutions with concentrations of 0%, 0.035%, 0.07%, 0.14%, and 0.28%. The immersion duration was also chosen based on preliminary investigations, during which 7 h, 14 h, 21 h, and 28 h of durations were tested.

Experimental protocol

The seeds for each colchicine and control group were sterilized in 70% ethanol solution for 30 s and washed five times in double distilled water. Then seeds were soaked in the optimized solution colchicine solution (0.07%). After drying them out for 24 h, each seed was sown in an individual disposable cup containing silt as a growing media, and the seeds were allowed to germinate and develop in growth room of Plant Tissue Culture Laboratory, DoHS, IUB. The temperature and humidity conditions in the growth room were maintained to 21 °C and 62%, respectively. The photoperiod was maintained through the provision of 16 h of daylight and an 8 h of darkness with the photosynthetic photon flux density of 300 μmol m−2 s−1 light. The seedlings were shifted in plastic bags 35 days after sowing.

Measurement of attributes

The data related to morphometric, anatomical, physiological, fluorescence, and biochemical analysis of Acacia nilotica Linn. in response to seed treatment with colchicine solution and distilled water (control) were recorded on 21st and 42nd day of sowing for 20 randomly selected seedlings from each experimental unit.

Morphometric and anatomical attributes

The number of germinated seeds were recorded on a daily basis and their percentage was calculated and number of days to 80% germination were also computed. The values of shoot and root length were taken at 3rd and 6th week of sowing from every 20 seedlings and their average was calculated. Vigor index was calculated using the below formula as adopted by Zhu and Hong [49].

$$Seedling\ vigor\ index \left(SVI\right)={\text{S}}\times \sum \frac{Gt}{Dt}$$

where S is seedling height of the 14th day, Gt is number of germinated seeds in the “tth” day, Dt is number of days from the first day to the “tth” day. The fresh weight of biomass including shoots and roots as well as their dry weights were taken using an analytical balance (PR Series, Ohaus, Newark, USA). For heat drying of both shoots and roots, they were initially air-dried in the sun until most of the moisture had escaped. Subsequently, they were placed in a hot dry oven (SLN 15 SMART, Pol-Eko, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland) at 65°C until their dry mass became constant.

Three- and six-week-old seedlings of treated and untread A. nilotica were taken for counting stomata under an optical microscope (B-192, Optika, Ponteranica, Italy) and a 0.5 mm2 acetate template was used. Stomatal density i.e., number of stomata mm−2 and stomatal index were also recorded at three- and six-week interval. The stomatal index was determined by using the below formula [50]:

$$Stomatal\ index=\frac{Stomatal\ density}{Stomatal\ density+Epidermal\ cells\ density}\times 100$$

Physiological attributes

The physiological parameters, including photosynthetic rate (μmol CO2 m–2 s–1), transpiration rate (mmol H2O m–2 s–1), stomatal conductance (mol H2O m–2 s–1), and intercellular CO2 concentration (μmol CO2 mol–1), were measured on the 21st and 42nd days after sowing using an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) (model LCi-SD, manufactured by ADC Bio-scientific in England). Then, the mean values were calculated from the readings of both intervals. The measurement was conducted by selecting three fully developed and healthy leaves of 20 randomly selected plants from each experimental unit. The IRGA measurements were taken under specific conditions including a light intensity of 300 µmol m–2 s–1, a leaf surface temperature ranging from 31.7°C to 36.5°C, a leaf surface area of 6.25 cm2, a CO2 concentration of 390.12 µmol–1, an airflow rate per unit area of leaf (U) at 200.9 µmol s–1, an atmospheric pressure (P) of 991 mBar, and a H2O partial pressure of 13.4 mBar. Water use efficiency (WUE) was calculated using the below formula:

$$Water\ use\ efficiency (WUE)=\frac{Photosynthetic\ rate\ ({P}_{{\text{N}}})}{Transpiration\ rate\ (E)}$$

Fluorescence-related attributes

The fluorescence measurements in Acacia nilotica plants were taken on the 21st and 42nd day of sowing, using a MultispeQ-Beta instrument and the PhotosynQ platform software [51] and average was taken from the readings of both intervals. These attributes encompassed quantum yield of photosystem II (ΦII), relative chlorophyll contents, photosynthetically active radiations (PARs), non-photochemical quenching (ΦNPQ), non-regulatory energy dissipation (ΦNO), proton flux (vH+), proton conductivity (gH+), linear electron flow (LEF), leaf thickness, and leaf angle.

Biochemical attributes

The biochemical attributes in Acacia nilotica seedlings were taken on the 21st and 42nd day of sowing, and average was computed from the readings taken at both intervals. To determine the content of H2O2, the method described by Haider et al. [52] was followed. In this approach, 1 g of A. nilotica's leaf disc was homogenized in 1 ml of 0.1% TCA and then centrifuged for 15 min at a speed of 12,000 × g. Subsequently, 0.5 ml of the extracted supernatant was combined with 10 mmol L−1 of phosphate buffer (pH = 7) and 1M KI. Afterwards, the measurement was obtained by calculating the absorbance of each sample at a wavelength of 390 nm and expressed as μmol kg−1 FW.

The quantity of O−2 in leaf tissues of A. nilotica was examined utilizing a technique documented by Hasan et al. [53]. One gram of A. nilotica's leaf disc was thoroughly blended with 3 ml of phosphate buffer containing 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone at 4°C. Subsequently, the samples underwent centrifugation with a force of (10,000 × g) for a duration of 15 min. They were combined thereafter with a solution containing 10 mmol L–1 hydroxylamine hydrochloride and allowed to react at a temperature of 25°C for a duration of 30 min. The absorption of each sample was observed at a wavelength of 530 nm. The quantity of O−2 was calculated by utilizing the NO2 curve as a reference, and the measurements were expressed in nmol kg−1 FW.

For the determination of antioxidative enzymes, a leaf sample of A. nilotica weighing 1 g was ground using a cold mortar and pestle in 2 ml of phosphate buffer with a pH of 7.2. The mixture was subsequently subjected to centrifugation using a Rotofix 46 centrifuge (Hettich, Kirchlengern, Germany) at a speed of 10,000 × g for a duration of five minutes at a temperature of 4°C. The activities of antioxidative enzymes were measured after collecting the supernatant. The activities of catalase (CAT) (EC 1.11.1.6), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (EC 1.15.1.1), peroxidase (POD) (EC 1.11.1.7), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (EC 1.11.1.11) were measured using the method outlined previously by Haider et al. [52]. The samples were analyzed at different wavelengths: 240 nm for CAT, 560 nm for SOD, 470 nm for POD, and 290 nm for APX. The enzyme activities were quantified in µmol kg−1 FW.

The 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity was determined using the method as previously described by Ali et al. [4], and results were represented as a percentage of inhibition. For the determination of the total antioxidant capacity of A. nilotica's seedlings, the methodology reported by Osman et al. [54] was followed. The molybdate reagent consisted of 1 ml of 0.6 M H2SO4, 28 mM Na3PO4, and 4 mM (NH4)2MoO4. The volume was then increased to 50 ml by adding distilled H2O. The leaves of A. nilotica were extracted following the homogenization process. The resulting supernatant layer of the extract, measuring 100 ml, was then transferred into a test tube. This test tube already included 3 ml of distilled water and 1 ml of molybdate reagent. The test tube was subjected to incubation at a temperature of 95°C for a duration of 90 min. Subsequently, the test tube was allowed to cool until it reached the ambient temperature, which took around 20–30 min. The absorbance of the resulting reaction mixture was then measured at a wavelength of 695 nm. The mean values were recorded, and the results were reported in micromoles equivalents of Trolox per gram of fresh leaf weight of the sample.

The estimation of the total phenolic content (TPC) in the leaves of A. nilotica was carried out by measuring the absorbance at a wavelength of 765 nm using the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent [55]. A standard curve was established for gallic acid, and the content of total phenolics (TPC) was expressed in mg kg−1. The measurement of flavonoid content was accomplished using the methodology adopted by Kaushik et al. [56]. To summarise, a 1 ml sample of A. nilotica's leaf extract was mixed well with 4 ml of deionized water and 300 μl of NaNO2. The samples were subsequently stored for a duration of 5 min. After that, 300 µl of AlCl3 was introduced into a solution containing 2 ml of 1M NaOH. The absorbance was then measured at a wavelength of 510 nm. It was denoted as mg kg−1.

Statistics

Microsoft Excel 2016 was used for data processing. Data analysis involved the application of analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statistix 9® for Windows (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, USA), with subsequent comparisons of mean values carried out using the least significant difference and Tukey’s HSD Tests. The correlation among the measured attributes was examined using “corrplot” function of R program 4.0.2 through the general linear model procedure [57]. A significance level of 5% was chosen for all the above statistics.

Availability of data and materials

All the data related to this work can be sourced from the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

APX:

Ascorbate peroxidase

CAT:

Catalase

C i :

Sub-stomatal CO2 level

DoHS:

Department of Horticultural Sciences

DPPH-RSA:

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl-radical scavenging activity

DTG80 :

Days to 80% germination

E :

Transpiration rate

gH+ :

Proton conductivity

g s :

Stomatal conductance

IUB:

The Islamia University of Bahawalpur

LEF:

Linear electron flow

PARs:

Photosynthetically active radiations

P N :

Photosynthetic rate

POD:

Peroxidase

SOD:

Superoxide dismutase

SPAD:

Soil and plant analysis development

SVI:

Seedling vigor index

TAC:

Total antioxidant capacity

TFC:

Total flavonoid content

TPC:

Total phenolic content

Tukey’s HSD test:

Tukey's honestly significant difference test

vH+ :

Proton flux

WUE:

Water use efficiency

ΦII :

Quantum yield of photosystem II

ΦNO :

Non-regulatory energy dissipation

ΦNPQ :

Non-photochemical quenching

References

  1. Blakesley D, Allen A, Pellny TK, et al. Natural and induced polyploidy in Acacia dealbata Link and Acacia mangium Willd. Ann Bot. 2002;90:391–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcf202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh BN, Singh BR, Sarma BK, et al. Potential chemoprevention of N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced hepatocarcinogenesis by polyphenolics from Acacia nilotica bark. Chem Biol Interact. 2009;181:20–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2009.05.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanafy ZEM, El-Gendy AM, Zaky AA, et al. Protective role of Acacia nilotica extracts and silymarin against mutagenic and hepatic injuries induced by 2-butoxyethanol in male mice. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2017;69:2876–89. https://doi.org/10.12816/0042582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ali S, Khan AS, Nawaz A, et al. The combined application of Arabic gum coating and γ-aminobutyric acid mitigates chilling injury and maintains eating quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin fruits. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahfoudhi N, Hamdi S. Use of almond gum and gum arabic as novel edible coating to delay postharvest ripening and to maintain sweet cherry (Prunus avium) quality during storage. J Food Process Preserv. 2015;39:1499–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bill M, Sivakumar D, Korsten L, et al. The efficacy of combined application of edible coatings and thyme oil in inducing resistance components in avocado (Persea americana mill.) against anthracnose during post-harvest storage. Crop Prot. 2014;64:159–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maqbool M, Ali A, Alderson PG, et al. Postharvest application of gum arabic and essential oils for controlling anthracnose and quality of banana and papaya during cold storage. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2011;62:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.04.002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beck SL, Dunlop RW, Fossey A. Evaluation of induced polyploidy in Acacia mearnsii through stomatal counts and guard cell measurements. S Afr J Bot. 2003;69:563–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30295-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suliman HH, Asander HS. Influence of colchicine treatment on morphological, physiological and anatomical Cercis siliquastrum L. seedlings growth. J Plant Prod. 2019;10:721–30. https://doi.org/10.21608/JPP.2019.58165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Erdem Gürsoy D, Gezer HH, Öz N, Özer A, Acer Kasman S, Duruöz MT. Colchicine resistance: Associated factors and its effect on health-related quality of life in patients with familial Mediterranean fever. Int J Rheum Dis. 2022;25:1239–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pirkoohi MH, Keyvanloo M, Hassanpur M. Colchicine induced polyploidy in mint by seed treatment. Int J Agric Crop Sci. 2011;3:102–4 [Google Scholar].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manzoor A, Ahmad T, Bashir MA, et al. Studies on colchicine induced chromosome doubling for enhancement of quality traits in ornamental plants. Plants. 2019;8:194. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8070194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sajjad Y, Jaskani MJ, Mehmood A, et al. Effect of colchicine on in vitro polyploidy induction in African marigold (Tagetes erecta). Pak J Bot. 2013;45:1255–8 [Google Scholar].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vichiato MRM, Vichiato M, Pasqual M, et al. Tetraploidy induction and identification in Dendrobium nobile Lindl (Orchidaceae). Rev Cienc Agron. 2007;38:385–90 [Google Scholar].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Balode A. Applying colchicine and oryzaline in Lilium L polyploidization. L. J Agron. 2008;11:22–8 [Google Scholar].

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kobayashi N, Yamashita S, Ohta K, et al. Morphological characteristics and their inheritance in colchicine-induced salvia polyploids. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci. 2008;77:186–91. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.77.186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehrer JM, Brand MH, Lubell JD. Induction of tetraploidy in meristematically active seeds of Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii var. atropurpurea) through exposure to colchicine and oryzalin. Sci Hortic. 2008;119:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiwari AK, Mishra SK. Effect of colchicine on mitotic polyploidization and morphological characteristics of Phlox drummondi. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:9336–42. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.3820.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. El-Nashar YI, Ammar MH. Mutagenic influences of colchicine on phenological and molecular diversity of Calendula officinalis L. Genet Mol Biol. 2015;15:1–15. https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr.15027745.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. He Y, Sun Y, Zheng R, et al. Induction of tetraploid male sterile Tagetes erecta by colchicine treatment and its application for interspecific hybridization. Hortic Plant J. 2016;2:284–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpj.2017.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng H, Wang ML, Cong RC, et al. Colchicine-and trifluralin-mediated polyploidization of Rosa multiflora Thunb. var. inermis and Rosa roxburghii F. normalis. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2017;92:279–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2016.1249964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Manzoor A, Ahmad T, Bashir MA, et al. Induction and identification of colchicine induced polyploidy in Gladiolus grandiflorus ‘White Prosperity.’ Folia Hortic. 2018;30:307–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2018-0026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sattler MC, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR. The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta. 2016;243:281–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Griffin RA, Chi NQ, Harbard JL, et al. Breeding polyploid varieties of tropical acacias: Progress and prospects. South For A J For Sci. 2015;77:41–50. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.999303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harbard JL, Griffin AR, Foster S, et al. Production of colchicine-induced autotetraploids as a basis for sterility breeding in Acacia mangium Willd. Forestry. 2012;85:427–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cps041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang LJ, Sheng MY, Wen PC, et al. Morphological, physiological, cytological and phytochemical studies in diploid and colchicine-induced tetraploid plants of Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn. Bot Stud. 2017;58:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-016-0157-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Comai L. The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;2005(6):836–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang W, He Y, Cao Z, et al. Induction of tetraploids in impatiens (Impatiens walleriana) and characterization of their changes in morphology and resistance to downy mildew. HortSci. 2018;53:925–31. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13093-18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Li Z, Ruter JM. Development and Evaluation of diploid and polyploid Hibiscus moscheutos. HortSci. 2017;52:676–81. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI11630-16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mori S, Yamane T, Yahata M, et al. Chromosome doubling in Limonium bellidifolium (Gouan) Dumort. by colchicine treatment of seeds. Hortic J Prev. 2016;85:366–71. https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.MI-117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wei L, Hu D, Li H, Chen X. Polyploid induction of Lespedeza formosa by colchicine treatment. For Stud China. 2007;9:283–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-007-0045-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mizokami Y, Oguchi R, Sugiura D, et al. Cost–benefit analysis of mesophyll conductance: diversities of anatomical, biochemical and environmental determinants. Ann Bot. 2022;130:265–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcac100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Terashima I, Hanba YT, Tholen D, et al. Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:108–16. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.165472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oguchi R, Hikosaka K, Hirose T. Leaf anatomy as a constraint for photosynthetic acclimation: Differential responses in leaf anatomy to increasing growth irradiance among three deciduous trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2005;28:916–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01344.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang SB, Sun M, Cao KF, et al. Leaf photosynthetic rate of tropical ferns is evolutionarily linked to water transport capacity. PLoS One. 2014;9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Hernández-Clemente R, North PRJ, Hornero A, et al. Assessing the effects of forest health on sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence using the FluorFLIGHT 3-D radiative transfer model to account for forest structure. Remote Sens Environ. 2017;193:165–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.02.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pollastrini M, Holland V, Bruggemann W, et al. Interactions and competition processes among tree species in young experimental mixed forests, assessed with chlorophyll fluorescence and leaf morphology. Plant Biol. 2014;16:323–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12068.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Drössler L, Övergaard R, Ekö PM, et al. Early development of pure and mixed tree species plantations in Snogeholm, southern Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 2015;30:304–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1005127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wimalasekera R. Effect of Light Intensity on Photosynthesis. In: Photosynthesis, Productivity and Environmental Stress; Ahmad P, Abass Ahanger M, Nasser Alyemeni M, Alam P, Eds; Hoboken: Wiley: 2019. pp. 65–73, [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

  40. Liu G, Li Z, Bao M. Colchicine-induced chromosome doubling in Platanus acerifolia and its effect on plant morphology. Euphytica. 2007;157:145–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9406-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Pereira RF, Rocha J, Nunes P. Vicariance between Cercis siliquastrum L. and Ceratonia siliqua L. unveiled by the physical-chemical properties of the leaves’ epicuticular waxes. Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:890647. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.890647.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yirdaw E, Luukkanen O. Photosynthetically active radiation transmittance of forest plantation canopies in the Ethiopian highlands. For Ecol Manag. 2004;188:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fujii S, Nishida K, Akitsu TK, Kume A, Hanba YT. Variation in leaf mesophyll anatomy of fern species imposes significant effects on leaf gas exchange, light capture, and leaf hydraulic conductance. Photosynthetica. 2023;61:225–35. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2023.017.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fini A, Loreto F, Tattini M, et al. Mesophyll conductance plays a central role in leaf functioning of Oleaceae species exposed to contrasting sunlight irradiance. Physiol Plant. 2016;157:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tosens T, Niinemets Ü, Vislap V, et al. Developmental changes in mesophyll diffusion conductance and photosynthetic capacity under different light and water availabilities in Populus tremula: how structure constrains function. Plant Cell Environ. 2012;35:839–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02457.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hussan MU, Saleem MF, Hafeez MB, Khan S, Hussain S, Ahmad N, Ramzan Y, Nadeem M. Impact of soil applied humic acid, zinc and boron supplementation on the growth, yield and zinc translocation in wheat. Asian J Agric Biol. 2022(1):202102080. https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2021.02.080.

  47. Akbari R, Fahmideh L, Fazeli-Nasab B. Effects of polyploidy induction on morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of Carum carvi L. Cell Mol Res (Iran J Biol). 2019;32:147–60. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23832738.1398.32.2.1.6.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Keshmiri ZAR, Javadian N, Sharifi M, Karimzadeh G. Ploidy level-induced changes in production of lignans, flavonoids, and phenolic acids in Linum album callus culture. Iran J Rangeland Forest Plant Breed Genet Res. 2022;30:97–107. https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrfpbgr.2022.358704.1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Victoria O, Idorenyin U, Asana M, Jia L, Shuoshuo L, Yang S, Okoi IM, Ping A, Egrinya EA. Seed treatment with 24-epibrassinolide improves wheat germination under salinity stress. Asian J Agric Biol. 2023(3). https://doi.org/10.35495/ajab.2022.076.

  50. Martin WJ, Stimart DP. Stomatal density in Antirrhinum majus L.: inheritance and trends with development. HortSci. 2005;40:1252–8. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Kuhlgert S, Austic G, Zegarac R, et al. MultispeQ Beta: a tool for large-scale plant phenotyping connected to the open PhotosynQ Network. R Soc Open Sci. 2016;3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Haider MW, Nafees M, Iqbal R, et al. Combined application of hot water treatment and eucalyptus leaf extract postpones seneṣcence in harvested green chilies by conserving their antioxidants: a sustainable approach. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23:576. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-023-04588-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hasan MU, Malik AU, Anwar R, Khan AS, Haider MW, Riaz R, Ali S, Rehman RNU, Ziaf K. Postharvest Aloe vera gel coating application maintains the quality of harvested green chillies during cold storage. J Food Biochem. 2021;45:e13682. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13682.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Osman EE, Mohamed AS, Elkhateeb A, et al. Phytochemical investigations, antioxidant, cytotoxic, antidiabetic and antibiofilm activities of Kalanchoe laxiflora flowers. Eur J Integr Med. 2022;49:102085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2021.102085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Ainsworth EA, Gillespie KM. Estimation of total phenolic contents and other oxidation substrates in plant tissue using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:875–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Kaushik N, Rao PS, Mishra HN. Process optimalization for thermal-assisted high-pressure processing of mango (Mangifera indica L.) pulp using response surface methodology. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2016;69:372–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2016.01.062.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2022. Available at: https://www.R-project.org/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Prof. Dr. Tanveer Hussain, Dean, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, IUB for providing seed of Acacia nilotica as research material and Mr. Abdul Rehman, Lecturer, Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, IUB for providing colchicine. The authors also extend their appreciation to the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSPD2024R1091), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. No grant allocated to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Muhammad Wasim Haider, Muhammad Nafees & Muhammad Samsam Raza

  2. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Pakistan, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan

    Rashid Iqbal

  3. Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International, Rawalpindi, 46300, Pakistan

    Habat Ullah Asad

  4. Agri Development, Fauji Fresh N Freeze Ltd, Gulberg II, Lahore, 48000, Pakistan

    Farrukh Azeem

  5. Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar & Mohamed S. Elshikh

  6. Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), Crop Science, University of Bonn, 53115, Bonn, Germany

    Muhammad Habib Ur Rahman

  7. Department of Agroecology and Organic Farming, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES), University of Bonn, Bonn, 53115, Germany

    Muhammad Arslan

  8. Water Studies and Research Complex, National Water Research Center, Cairo, Egypt

    Ayman M. S. Elshamly

Authors
  1. Muhammad Wasim Haider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Muhammad Nafees
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rashid Iqbal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Habat Ullah Asad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Farrukh Azeem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Muhammad Samsam Raza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Abdel-Rhman Z. Gaafar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mohamed S. Elshikh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Muhammad Arslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Muhammad Habib Ur Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ayman M. S. Elshamly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.W.H., M.N., and R.A. proposed the sampling method. M.W.H. and M.N. laid out the experiments. M.W.H. conducted the trial. M.N. supplied resources and supervised the trial. M.W.H. wrote the manuscript. H.U.A., F.A., M.S.R., A.Z.G., M.S.E., M.A., M.H.R., and A.M.S.E. edited the manuscript. All authors have thoroughly reviewed and showed their consent to the final published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Muhammad Wasim Haider or Muhammad Arslan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The laboratory studies were carried out in accordance with all applicable institutional, national, and international laws.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haider, M.W., Nafees, M., Iqbal, R. et al. Exploring the mechanism of transformation in Acacia nilotica (Linn.) triggered by colchicine seed treatment. BMC Plant Biol 24, 428 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05139-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05139-9

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us