Skip to main content
Download PDF

Exploring glycine root uptake dynamics in phosphorus and iron deficient tomato plants during the initial stages of plant development

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 495 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe) deficiencies are relevant plants nutritional disorders, prompting responses such as increased root exudation to aid nutrient uptake, albeit at an energy cost. Reacquiring and reusing exudates could represent an efficient energy and nitrogen saving strategy. Hence, we investigated the impact of plant development, Fe and P deficiencies on this process.

Tomato seedlings were grown hydroponically for 3 weeks in Control, -Fe, and -P conditions and sampled twice a week. We used Isotope Ratio Mass-Spectrometry to measure δ13C in roots and shoots after a 2-h exposure to 13C-labeled glycine (0, 50, or 500 μmol L−1). Plant physiology was assessed with an InfraRed Gas Analyzer and ionome with an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass-Spectrometry.

Results

Glycine uptake varied with concentration, suggesting an involvement of root transporters with different substrate affinities. The uptake decreased over time, with -Fe and -P showing significantly higher values as compared to the Control. This highlights its importance during germination and in nutrient-deficient plants. Translocation to shoots declined over time in -P and Control but increased in -Fe plants, suggesting a role of Gly in the Fe xylem transport.

Conclusions

Root exudates, i.e. glycine, acquisition and their subsequent shoot translocation depend on Fe and P deficiency. The present findings highlight the importance of this adaptation to nutrient deficiencies, that can potentially enhance plants fitness. A thorough comprehension of this trait holds potential significance for selecting cultivars that can better withstand abiotic stresses.

Peer Review reports

Background

Nutritional deficiencies, such as phosphorus (P) and iron (Fe), are among the most limiting factors for agricultural production [1]. To meet the still growing food demand, there is urgency to achieve a sustainable intensification of global food production. It is therefore essential to comprehend how crops interact with their environment, with particular emphasis on the rhizosphere from which they retrieve most of their resources. Plants shape and interact with the rhizosphere through the secretion of multiple root exudates. Root exudates play pivotal roles in influencing soil microbial community [2,3,4], soil structure [5, 6], nutrient availability and mobilization processes [7], toxicity of metals [8, 9] and plant defence mechanisms against pathogens [10, 11]. The multiple functions of root exudates in the rhizosphere are complemented by an equally large chemical variability. Indeed, plants may release amino acids, organic acids, carbohydrates (primary metabolites), as well as phenolic compounds, plant hormones, and glucosinolates (secondary metabolites) through the roots [12].

Despite the large diversity of exudates, glycine (Gly), together with serine and alanine, is one of the 3 major amino acids released by roots [13, 14]. Glycine can chelate Fe ions (logK [Fe(III)Gly] = 8.57–9.25; logK [Fe(II)Gly] = 4.13–4.36 [15, 16]. Complexing Fe can directly enhance the availability of Fe and indirectly phosphorus (P) in the rhizosphere, thereby rendering them more readily accessible for plant uptake. For instance, Gly chelates Fe from FePO4 or Fe3(PO4)2, forming Fe-Gly and Fe-bisGly complexes, and therefore solubilizing PO4 3− in form of H2PO4 − or HPO4 2− which will otherwise be insoluble [17]. Glycine can further affect the redox state of Fe in the soil, leading to reduction of Fe(III) in Fe(II), the most soluble and bioavailable form [17,18,19]. Moreover, microbial activities stimulated by Gly can in turn impact nutrient cycling and availability in the rhizosphere [20, 21]. Lastly, the importance of Gly as organic N supply, i.e. as fertilizer, in agricultural and forest ecosystems was repeatedly proven [22, 23]. Glycine concentration in soil solution was found to be around 10 μmol L−1, but most likely much higher in the rhizosphere [23, 24].

Exudates constitutes a significant energy investment for crops [25, 26], which is even greater considering the energy used for their biosynthesis and exudation [27]. Consequently, the possibility of plants to reacquire exudates from the rhizosphere represents an intriguing energy (C) and nitrogen (N) saving strategy. This concept has been hypothesized [26] and demonstrated only recently [28,29,30]. For example, both wheat and tomato plants can exude and reuptake various organic compounds from the rhizosphere. The uptake appears to be particularly enhanced under P deficiency, supporting the idea that plants may reclaim exudates to save carbon, N and therefore energy [30]. Despite this topic holds potential significance for selecting cultivars that can better withstand biotic and abiotic stresses, the literature contains relatively few studies on the uptake of root exudates. Hence, we aimed at deciphering whether the uptake and the consequent shoot translocation of the acquired root exudates in tomato plants, are altered by the plants nutritional and physio-phenological developmental state. To answer this research question 1-week-old tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.) were grown hydroponically under P or Fe deficiencies for further 17 days. Every 3rd day, after feeding the plants with 13C-labeled Gly for 2 h, roots were separated from shoots and their 13C content was analysed while monitoring plants physiological and nutritional state.

Methods

Growing conditions

Seeds of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Marmande) were germinated on moistened tissue paper (0.5 mmol L−1 CaSO4) in darkness at 25 °C for 7 days [31]. The germinated seedlings were transferred into plastic pots, with each pot accommodating 10 seedlings. Each pot contained 1.5 L of aerated nutrient solution (NS) according to [32], with the following composition mmol L−1: 2 Ca(NO3)2, 0.7 K2SO4, 0.1 KH2PO4, 0.1 KCl, 0.5 MgSO4; and μmol L−1: 10 H3BO3, 0.5 MnSO4, 0.2 CuSO4, 0.5 ZnSO4, 0.01 (NH4)6Mo7O24, and 80 Fe(III)-EDTA. Every 3 days the NS was renewed. After 7 days of growth in the complete NS, two-thirds of the plants were relocated to treatment-specific NS solutions for an additional 17 days. The remaining one-third was maintained in the complete NS as a Control group. Specifically, the treatments involved subjecting one-third of the plants to phosphorus deficiency (-P) and one-third to iron deficiency (-Fe). Each treatment group consisted of five biological replicates for each time point. Throughout the entire growth period (24 days), the environmental conditions within the growth chamber were maintained constant: 14:10 light:darkness, a temperature regimen of 24 °C:19 °C, and a relative humidity of 70%.

Analysis of physiological parameters

On the final sampling day, i.e. 17 days after treatment (DAT), just before the plants were harvested, the leaf CO2 and water vapour fluxes were assessed with an InfraRed Gas Analyzer (IRGA) equipped with a small leaf chamber (2.16 cm2) (ACD BioScientific Ltd. – Lcpro T). Photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate were calculated starting from the directly measured parameters, namely, CO2 concentration and relative humidity from beneath the leaf and from the reference probe far from any CO2 or H2O source, leaf temperature, Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR) at leaf level, atmospheric pressure, and effective molar air flow. Multiple measurements were taken from fully expanded 17 days old leaves on various biological replicates for each treatment (n ≥ 9).

Glycine uptake

Glycine uptake and subsequent sampling occurred twice a week over three consecutive weeks, totalling six samplings on 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 17 DAT. To maintain root integrity, the plants were delicately removed from their pots and immersed in a 0.5 mmol L−1 CaSO4 solution for 15 minutes [33]. After this recovery step, two-thirds of the plants were transferred to either a 50 μmol L−1, or 500 μmol L−1 aerated 13C-labeled Gly solution for 2 h. The 13C-labeled Gly was labeled in the carboxylic carbon with 99 atom % 13C. Glycine concentration was selected according to literature, indeed in soil solution Gly was found to be around 10 μmol L−1, but most likely much higher in the rhizosphere [23, 24]. The remaining one-third of the plants were moved into Milli-Q water representing the Control treatment. All solutions were supplemented with 1 mg L−1 of Micropur (Katadyn) to prevent microbial growth and Gly degradation during the experiment. Following the 2-h exposure, the roots underwent five thorough sequential washes with Milli-Q water. The plants were dried with tissue paper, the shoots were separated from the roots and individually weighed (fresh weight (FW)). The plant samples were then dried in an oven at 70 °C until constant weight was reached (dry weight (DW)). The dried samples were ball-milled (Mixer Mill MM 400, Retsch, Italy) for 1 min at 30 Hz.

Carbon isotope ratio determination

Approx. 0.25 mg of the dried and homogenized samples were carefully weighted into tin capsules. The samples underwent complete combustion prior to the determination of δ13C by an Elemental Analyzer (EA Flash 1112 Thermo Scientific, Germany) coupled with a Continuous Flow Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer (IRMS, Delta V Thermo Scientific, Germany). Under the operating conditions, the oxidation furnace was set to 1020°C, and the reduction furnace was maintained at 900°C. H2O was eliminated using a Mg(ClO4)2 trap. The stable carbon isotope ratios are expressed in δ‰ relative to an international reference, namely V-PDB (Vienna–Pee Dee Belemnite), calculated using the following formula:

$$\delta^{13}C{\permil}=\frac{(R_{sample}-R_{standard})}{R_{standard}}\times10^3$$
(1)

where R represents the ratio between the heavier and lighter isotopes. Rsample denotes the carbon isotope ratio determined for the specific sample, whether it be root or shoot, while Rstandard represents the carbon isotope ratio of a reference material, namely Vienna – Pee Dee Belemnite [34, 35].

To ensure the analytical accuracy and reliability of the results, four sets of three working standards, specifically IAEA 600 (caffeine), IAEA CH3 (cellulose), and acetanilide, were subjected to analysis at the beginning, midway through, and conclusion of the analysis. The margin of uncertainty associated with the determination of carbon isotopes was ± 0.2‰.

Starting from the determined δ13C, the isotopic mass balance, representing the “mg” of Gly taken up per “g” of tissue DW, was computed through the following formula [30, 36]:

$${f}_{r}\left[\frac{mg [Gly]}{g [DW]}\right]= \frac{{\delta }^{13}{C}_{TP}-{\delta }^{13}{C}_{C}}{{\delta }^{13}{C}_{CS}-{\delta }^{13}{C}_{C}}\times \% C\times {10}^{3}$$
(2)

where δCTP represents the δ13C value for plants exposed to either 50 µmol L−1 or 500 µmol L−1 of 13C-labeled Gly. δ13CC denotes the δ13C value for plants treated with 0 µmol L−1 of Gly (MilliQ water). δ13CCS stands for the δ13C value of the 13C-labeled Gly itself. %C refers to the carbon content as percentage of the DW.

Elemental analysis

Approx. 0.25 g of each sample were acid digested with concentrated ultrapure HNO3 (69% w/w) using a single reaction chamber microwave digestion system (UltraWAVE, Milestone, Shelton, CT, United States). Macro- and micronutrient concentrations were then determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7800 ICP-MS, United States), using La as an internal standard and tomato leaves (SRM 1573a) as external certified reference material.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of the raw data was conducted using R × 64 version 4.2.3 software. To aid in this analysis, specific R packages were employed: agricolae, which facilitated statistical analysis [37], and ggplot2, which aided in visualizing the data [38]. All results are presented as means accompanied by their standard errors. The assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were tested with the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene test respectively. To assess the differences among various treatments, multiple comparisons were executed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, with a p-value < 0.05. Further, multiple linear models were calculated with their 95% Confidence Intervals (CI). The analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, with a p-value < 0.05, was performed to compare the slopes of the different linear models.

Results

Elemental analysis

Tomato elemental profile was assessed in both shoots and roots at harvest (i.e. 17 DAT). The One-Way-ANOVA showed a significantly different accumulation of mineral elements in response to the treatments (Fig. 2 & Table 1, S1). The nutrient deficiencies set as treatments were confirmed: -P plants had lower P concentration as compared to Control (-88% in roots; -24% in shoots) and -Fe (-69% in roots; -21% in shoots). Similarly, the Fe concentration in -Fe roots was lower as compared to Control (-75%) and -P (-90%) but in -Fe shoots the Fe content was only lower than -P (-85%) and equal to the Control (-38% n.s.) (Fig. 1). Besides this proof of the experimental setup, nutrient deficient plants, -Fe and especially -P, showed a significant accumulation of the mineral nutrients as compared to the Control in both under- and above-ground tissues. More precisely, -P plants acquired and stored higher amounts of Mo, Zn, Cu, Fe, Mg and Na in both roots and shoots, Mn and S concentrations were significantly higher in shoots, while Ca was significantly higher in roots. Similarly, -Fe plants acquired and stored higher amounts of Zn, Cu and Na in both roots and shoots, Mo and Mn concentrations were significantly higher in shoots, while Ca and Mg were significantly higher in roots (Fig. 2 & Table 1).

Table 1 Table showing the elemental composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants grown under control conditions (Control), phosphorus starvation (-P) and iron starvation (-Fe). The data are expressed as mean ± standard error. N = number of biological replicates. The letters indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments assessed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Picture of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants at harvest (i.e. 17 DAT). Control conditions (Control), phosphorus deficiency (-P) and iron deficiency (-Fe). DAT = Days After Treatment

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Bubble plot of the elemental composition of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants grown under control conditions (Control), phosphorus starvation (-P) and iron starvation (-Fe) plotted over time with n = 5 for shoots and n = 4 roots. Letters next to the boxes indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments assessed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test

Full size image

Physiological parameters

Tomato physiological state was assessed right before harvest (i.e. 17 DAT). The One-Way-ANOVA showed statistically significant treatment derived differences in transpiration rate, stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate (Fig. 3 & Table S2). The photosynthetic rate was significantly higher in Control plants as compared to both Fe and P deficient plants (+ 52% and + 100%, respectively), while there was no difference between Fe and P deficient plants (Fig. 3). On the contrary, both transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were significantly higher in Control (+ 133% and + 137%, respectively) and -Fe (+ 145% and + 145%, respectively) plants as compared to the -P which had a much lower transpiration rate and stomatal conductance (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Photosynthetic rate (µmol CO2 m-2 s-1), transpiration rate and leaf stomatal conductance (mmol H2O m-2 s-1) of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants according to three different treatments: Control (Control), phosphorus deficiency (-P) and iron deficiency (-Fe) with n ≥ 9. Letters next to the boxes indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments assessed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test

Full size image

Mass balance of glycine uptake

The mass balance was calculated starting from the δ13C values of tomato roots and shoots determined by the IRMS every third day, i.e. on 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, and 17 DAT. Figure 4, which summarize the mass balance results, shows how 95–99% of the Gly derived 13C remains in roots after uptake. Moreover, the two-way-ANOVA performed on the mass balance data showed a significant effect of time, namely of the plant physio-phenological developmental state, on the uptake of Gly by roots and on its translocation to shoots in plants treated with either the 50 or 500 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution (Fig. 4 & Table S3). On the contrary, the effect of treatments, namely of the plant nutritional state, was significant only in roots exposed to the 50 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution and in shoots of plants which roots were exposed to either the 50 or 500 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution (Fig. 4). Moreover, the two-way-ANOVA highlighted a significant interaction between treatments and time in the same three conditions: roots exposed to the 50 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution and in shoots of plants which roots were exposed to either the 50 or 500 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution (Fig. 4). This result indicates that in these conditions the effect of the treatments, i.e. nutrient deficiencies, varied over time. More specifically the differences between treatments and Control increased during plant development.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mass balance (mg g-1 Gly derived 13C DW-1) of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants grown under control conditions (Control), phosphorus starvation (-P) and iron starvation (-Fe) plotted over time with n = 5. Day 0 on the x-axis indicates the day on which some of the plants were transferred to the treatment-specific nutrient solutions (NSs), that is, after 7 days of growth in full NS. The graphs on the left show the mass balance values of roots, while the ones on the right the mass balance of the shoots. The top two graphs refer to the tomato plants exposed to 13C Gly at 50 μmol L-1 while the bottom two to 13C Gly at 500 μmol L-1 as reported in the bottom left of each graph. The semi-transparent halo around each trendline represents the 95% confidence interval of the trendline. Letters next to the boxes indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between treatments assessed by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. DW = Dry Weight; DAT = Days After Treatment

Full size image

The fitted regression models show an overall decreasing Gly uptake over time especially when roots are exposed to the highest concentration of 13C-labeled Gly (Fig. 4 & Table S4). Despite this general trend, in -P and -Fe plants exposed to the 50 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution the uptake remained constant over time, and significantly higher as compared to the Control (on average + 115% and + 104%, in -P and -Fe respectively) (Fig. 4 & Table S3, S4). Similarly, the translocation of Gly derived 13C decreased in Control plants exposed to both high and low concentrations of 13C-labeled Gly solution and in -P plants exposed to the 50 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution. On the contrary, the translocation of Gly derived 13C in Fe deficient plants remained constant over time (significantly higher than the Control but the same as -P) when the plants were exposed to the low concentration of 13C-labeled Gly solution. The translocation of Gly derived 13C in Fe deficient plants even increased over time when the plants were exposed to the high concentration of 13C-labeled Gly solution (significantly higher than both -P and Control). In -P plants, instead, the translocation remained constant over time at the same Gly concentration (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Nutrient deficiencies can induce changes in the morphology and physiology of plants (Figs. 1 and 3) [31, 39]. Within these alterations, root exudation represents one of the most important processes to improve nutrient acquisition and to enhance plants´ chances of survival [7, 40]. However, despite the importance of these root exudates in the rhizosphere, only little is known about their uptake and possible reutilization, especially under nutrient deficiencies where a reacquisition might represent a crucial energy and N saving strategy. Our study investigated therefore the acquisition of Gly, identified as a major root exudate, both in terms of concentration and allocation in tomato plants subjected to Fe and P deficiency [18, 21, 41].

The assessment of the morphological and physiological state (Figs. 1 and 3) of tomato plants shows that both -Fe and -P plants have a stunted growth (Fig. S1 & Table S5) and reduced photosynthetic activity similarly to what is already reported in literature [31, 42]. The ICP-MS analysis highlighted how the ionomic profile of both roots and shoots collected from plants subjected to the two nutritional deficiencies here studied, was impaired as compared to the Control. The elemental composition (Fig. 2 & Table 1) of the tomato tissues confirmed the reliability of the nutrient deficiencies set as treatments, showing significantly lower accumulation of P and Fe in -P and -Fe conditions, respectively. Moreover, -P and -Fe compared to Control plants, tend to have significantly higher levels of other micro- and macro nutrients similarly to what described by Tiziani et al. [31] in tomato and highlighted in cucumber by Tomasi et al. [43]. This is claimed to be related to a biomass dilution effect as well as to a functional compensation and an imbalanced ion-uptake [44,45,46]. Indeed, the increase in biomass observed in developing seedlings could determine a decrease in concentration (dilution) of multiple nutrients [44], which content is considerably higher in seeds as compared to adult plants [47]. Consequently, the stunted growth of a -P plant as compared to a Control plant, might decrease this nutrient dilution effect, actually increasing the concentration of certain elements in the biomass of young seedlings. This theory and the mechanisms behind it were thoroughly investigated in the 70s-80s of the past century but it seems to have been partially forgotten since recent literature does not mention them. Alternatively, plants may substitute one limiting element for another to achieve functional compensation. For instance, -P plants, might acquire higher amounts of sulphur to substitute phospholipids with sulfolipids [46, 48]. Furthermore, plants perceiving Fe deficiency take up higher amounts of Zn, Cu, Mn (Fig. 2 & Table 1), as a side effect of the upregulation of IRT1 transporter and of the increased release of organic acids that facilitate the uptake not only of Fe but also of other metals [45, 49, 50].

The IRMS analysis confirmed previous results on the altered 13C discrimination by tomato plants exposed to different nutrient limitations (Fig. S2 & Table S6) [30, 42]. The mass balance data (Fig. 4), show that Gly was taken up by tomato plants and that the great majority (95–99%) of the Gly derived 13C is stored and/or metabolized in the root while only a minor proportion (1–5%) is translocated to shoots as seen also by Warren [51]. This finding was consistent across all treatments, i.e. Control, -P and -Fe. This highlights the importance of Gly at root level for nutrient complexation and acquisition [52, 53]. We further hypothesised that this Gly root accumulation might be important for the biosynthesis of metabolites like glutathione, which is essential for preventing oxidative stress, especially in plants facing abiotic stresses [54]. Moreover, the taken up Gly might be utilized at root level, for the biosynthesis of Gly-rich proteins (GRP) which are involved in cellular stress responses and signalling [55]. These results are in accordance with literature pointing at roots as main sink tissue [56]. Indeed, the flow of carbon, in developing seedlings is mainly from shoots to roots and not vice versa, which agrees with the present results showing that the Gly derived 13C remains for a large proportion in roots. Caution should however be paid in hypothesizing possible roles of Gly in roots and shoots since the present study performed a bulk stable isotope analysis. Indeed, the 13C derived from Gly might be incorporated in several different metabolites [51, 57].

In all treatments, the time-course experiment shows how Gly uptake tends to decrease over time (between 0 and 17 DAT) (Fig. 4). This suggests that the acquisition of exudates as an energy and N saving strategy might be particularly important in roots of developing seedlings, i.e. during the initial phases of plants development. These results relate well with previous knowledge showing that exudation decreases with plant age [58, 59].

The plants nutritional state significantly altered Gly root uptake. Indeed, P and Fe deficient plants took up significantly more Gly as compared to the Control (on average + 115% and + 104%, respectively) (Table S3). These are the first pieces of evidence ever that plants facing Fe deficiency not only take up Gly, but take up more Gly than Control plants. A possible explanation of the increased Gly uptake in -Fe plants might be ascribed to a N uptake compensation for the well-known depression of root nitrate uptake in Fe-deficient dicotyledonous species [43]. The effect of nutrient deficiencies on the uptake was significant only in plants exposed to the 50 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution (Fig. 4). This indicates that the impact of nutrient deficiency on the uptake depends on Gly concentration. This might suggest that root Gly transporters, e.g. from the amino acid permease (AAP) family, with different substrate affinities are regulated differently according to the plants nutritional state [60, 61]. More precisely it is hypothesized that low-capacity high-affinity Gly transporters, which are responsible for the uptake of Gly at low concentrations (50 μmol L−1), are upregulated when the plant is facing Fe and P deficiencies. On the contrary, the regulation of high-capacity low-affinity Gly transports, responsible for the uptake of Gly at higher concentration (500 μmol L−1), remained unchanged under nutrient deficiencies as it was seen for nitrate [62]. However, the opportunity that the higher Gly concentration (500 µmol L−1) saturates Gly transporters, masking the impact of nutrient deficiencies on the uptake of Gly cannot be excluded. The translocation of Gly derived 13C from roots to shoots remained instead constant over time in Control and -P plants, while it increased in -Fe plants (Fig. 4). The increased transport of Gly derived 13C to shoots in -Fe plants was significant in plants exposed to both to 50 μmol L−1 and 500 μmol L−1 13C-labeled Gly solution. Considering both the Gly mobility in the xylem [63] and the possibility of Gly to form Gly Fe-complexes [15,16,17], an involvement of this amino acid in the xylem Fe translocation to shoots cannot be excluded. This hypothesis might explain in fact why Gly derived 13C was higher in -Fe shoots as compared to -P and Control shoots. Moreover, this observed increase in Gly derived 13C translocation to shoots in -Fe plants indicates that -Fe shoots might be a main sink tissue. This is in contrast with literature showing that in later developmental stages shoots lose importance as sink tissues [56].

Conclusions

The results of the present work show that Gly can be taken up by tomato roots and that this uptake is enhanced when plants are suffering Fe and P deficiency. Gly uptake by roots decreases over time, highlighting the importance of this energy and N saving strategy in the first phenological plant stages, namely at germination, when the needs of nutrients and C are more pronounced, particularly in roots. Once acquired, the majority of Gly remained in roots, while only a limited proportion was translocated to shoots, underlining the sink role of the root tissue after germination. Similarly to the uptake, also the translocation of Gly derived 13C to shoots decreased over time for Control and -P plants. On the contrary, the translocation of Gly derived 13C to shoots increased with plant age when plants are exposed to Fe shortage, suggesting a possible involvement of Gly in the Fe xylem transport, N compensation or more in general in the Fe plant homeostasis. In addition, the differences seen between the high (500 µmol L−1) and low (50 µmol L−1) Gly concentrations might be ascribed to different root Gly transporters as well as due to a saturation of the latter. In conclusion, our results provide evidence that the acquisition of root exudates like Gly, can represent an important adaptation to nutrient deficiencies potentially enhancing plants fitness. A better understanding of this plant trait holds potential significance for selecting cultivars that can better withstand abiotic stresses.

Availability of data and materials

The following information was supplied regarding data and code availability: the raw data, the version of the individual packages and scripts used to analyse the data and generate the figures of this study are available at GitHub: https://github.com/Fabio-Trevisan/Gly_Ruptake.

Abbreviations

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

C:

Carbon

DAT:

Days after treatment

DW:

Dry weight

Fe:

Iron

FW:

Fresh weight

Gly:

Glycine

ICP-MS:

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer

IRGA:

Infra-red gas analyser

IRMS:

Isotope Ratio Mass Spectrometer

N:

Nitrogen

n.s.:

Not significant

NS:

Nutrient solution

P:

Phosphorus

δ13C:

Stable carbon isotope ratio

References

  1. van de Wiel CCM, van der Linden CG, Scholten OE. Improving phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture: opportunities for breeding. Euphytica. 2016;207:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shi S, et al. Effects of selected root exudate components on soil bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;77:600–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Steinauer K, Chatzinotas A, Eisenhauer N. Root exudate cocktails: the link between plant diversity and soil microorganisms? Ecol Evol. 2016;6:7387–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cesco S, et al. The hidden effects of agrochemicals on plant metabolism and root-associated microorganisms. Plant Sci. 2021;311:111012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Naveed M, et al. Plant exudates may stabilize or weaken soil depending on species, origin and time. Eur J Soil Sci. 2017;68:806–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumert VL, et al. Root exudates induce soil macroaggregation facilitated by fungi in subsoil. Front Environ Sci. 2018;6:140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mimmo T, et al. Nutrient availability in the rhizosphere: A review. Acta Hortic. 2018;1217:13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Terzano R, et al. Combined effect of organic acids and flavonoids on the mobilization of major and trace elements from soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2015;51:685–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brunetto G, et al. Copper accumulation in vineyard soils: Rhizosphere processes and agronomic practices to limit its toxicity. Chemosphere. 2016;162:293–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baetz U, Martinoia E. Root exudates: the hidden part of plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 2014;19:90–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. el Z Haichar F, Santaella C, Heulin T, Achouak W. Root exudates mediated interactions belowground. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;77:69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vives-Peris V, de Ollas C, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente RM. Root exudates: from plant to rhizosphere and beyond. Plant Cell Rep. 2019;391(39):3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jämtgård S, Näsholm T, Huss-Danell K. Nitrogen compounds in soil solutions of agricultural land. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:2325–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McLaughlin S, Zhalnina K, Kosina S, Northen TR, Sasse J. The core metabolome and root exudation dynamics of three phylogenetically distinct plant species. Nat Commun. 2023;14:1649.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Burgess DR. Critically Selected Stability Constants of Metal Complexes. National Institute of Standards and Technology. 2004. https://doi.org/10.18434/M32154. (https://data.nist.gov/od/id/mds2-2154).

  16. Hatada N. Stability Constant Explorer - Database of Stability Constants of Metal Complexes. 2023. https://n-hatada.github.io/stability-constant-explorer/english.html.

  17. Ghasemi S, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH, Hadadzadeh H, Jafari M. Synthesis of Iron-Amino Acid Chelates and Evaluation of Their Efficacy as Iron Source and Growth Stimulator for Tomato in Nutrient Solution Culture. J Plant Growth Regul. 2012;31:498–508.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Souri MK, Naiji M, Aslani M. Effect of Fe-Glycine Aminochelate on Pod Quality and Iron Concentrations of Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Under Lime Soil Conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 2018;49:215–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Souri MK, Hatamian M. Aminochelates in plant nutrition: a review. J Plant Nutr. 2019;42:67–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jones DL, Murphy DV. Microbial response time to sugar and amino acid additions to soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39:2178–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Haney RL, Haney EB, White MJ, Smith DR. Soil CO2 response to organic and amino acids. Appl Soil Ecol. 2018;125:297–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Näsholm T, Huss-Danell K, Högberg P. Uptake of glycine by field grown wheat. New Phytol. 2001;150:59–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones DL, Shannon D, Junvee-Fortune T, Farrar JF. Plant capture of free amino acids is maximized under high soil amino acid concentrations. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005;37:179–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones DL, Owen AG, Farrar JF. Simple method to enable the high resolution determination of total free amino acids in soil solutions and soil extracts. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34:1893–902.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bais HP, Weir TL, Perry LG, Gilroy S, Vivanco JM. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:233–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: Carbon trading at the soil-root interface. Plant Soil. 2009;321:5–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nakayama M, Tateno R. Solar radiation strongly influences the quantity of forest tree root exudates. Trees - Struct Funct. 2018;32:871–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Warren CR. Wheat roots efflux a diverse array of organic N compounds and are highly proficient at their recapture. Plant Soil. 2015;397:147–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Warren CR. Simultaneous efflux and uptake of metabolites by roots of wheat. Plant Soil. 2016;406:359–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tiziani R, Pii Y, Celletti S, Cesco S, Mimmo T. Phosphorus deficiency changes carbon isotope fractionation and triggers exudate reacquisition in tomato plants. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tiziani, R. et al. Unraveling plant adaptation to single and combined nutrient deficiencies in a dicotyledonous and a monocotyledonous plant species. Plant Sci. 2023;111793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111793.

  32. Tiziani R, et al. Root Handling Affects Carboxylates Exudation and Phosphate Uptake of White Lupin Roots. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Garrard LA, Humphreys TE. The effect of divalent cations on the leakage of sucrose from corn scutellum slices. Phytochemistry. 1967;6:1085–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT. Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1989;40(1):503–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hayes JM. Fractionation of carbon and hydrogen isotopes in biosynthetic processes. Stable Isot Geochem. 2001;43:225–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Phillips DL, Gregg JW. Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes. Oecologia. 2001;127:171–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. de Mendiburu F. agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2023. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/agricolae/agricolae.pdf [available 15.05.2024].

  38. Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_9.

  39. Maver M, et al. The interplay between nitrogenated allelochemicals, mineral nutrition and metabolic profile in barley roots. Plant Soil. 2022;479:715–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mimmo T, et al. Rhizospheric organic compounds in the soil–microorganism–plant system: their role in iron availability. Eur J Soil Sci. 2014;65:629–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Lesuffleur F, Paynel F, Bataillé MP, Le Deunff E, Cliquet JB. Root amino acid exudation: Measurement of high efflux rates of glycine and serine from six different plant species. Plant Soil. 2007;294:235–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Trevisan F, Tiziani R, Hall RD, Cesco S, Mimmo T. δ13C as a tool for iron and phosphorus deficiency prediction in crops. Plant Direct. 2023;7:e487.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tomasi N, et al. Nutrient accumulation in leaves of Fe-deficient cucumber plants treated with natural Fe complexes. Biol Fertil Soils. 2014;50:973–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jarrell WM, Beverly R. 6. The dilution effect in plant nutrition studies. Adv Agronomy. 1981;34:197–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Puschenreiter M, et al. Phytosiderophore-induced mobilization and uptake of Cd, Cu, Fe, Ni, Pb and Zn by wheat plants grown on metal-enriched soils. Environ Exp Bot. 2017;138:67–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Verma L Rumi, Sinha AK, Giri J. Phosphate deficiency response and membrane lipid remodeling in plants. Plant Physiol Rep. 2021;26:614–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Bewley JD, Bradford K, Hilhorst H. Seeds: Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4693-4.

  48. Wang F, et al. Characterisation of genes involved in galactolipids and sulfolipids metabolism in maize and Arabidopsis and their differential responses to phosphate deficiency. Funct Plant Biol. 2020;47:279–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Agnolon F, Santi S, Varanini Z, Pinton R. Enzymatic Responses of Cucumber Roots to Different Levels of Fe Supply. Plant Soil. 2001;241:35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Palmer CM, Guerinot ML. Facing the challenges of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:333–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Warren CR. Post-uptake metabolism affects quantification of amino acid uptake. New Phytol. 2012;193:522–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Fan TWM, et al. Comprehensive chemical profiling of gramineous plant root exudates using high-resolution NMR and MS. Phytochemistry. 2001;57:209–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pii Y, et al. Plant-microorganism-soil interactions influence the Fe availability in the rhizosphere of cucumber plants. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2015;87:45–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Anee TI, Fujita M. Glutathione in plants: biosynthesis and physiological role in environmental stress tolerance. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2017;23:249–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Czolpinska M, Rurek M. Plant glycine-rich proteins in stress response: An emerging, still prospective story. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:327614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Portes TD, Araújo BR, Melo HC. Growth analysis, photosynthate partition and nodulation in bean and soybean. Ciência Rural. 2022;52:e20210282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schmidt W. Mechanisms and regulation of reduction-based iron uptake in plants. New Phytol. 1999;141:1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Hamlen RA, Lukezic FL, Bloom JR. Influece of age and stage of development on the neutral carbohydrate components in root exudates from Alfa Alfa plants grown in a gnotobiotic environment. Can J Plant Sci. 1972;52(4):633–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Mimmo T, et al. Time and substrate dependent exudation of carboxylates by Lupinus albus L. and Brassica napus L. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011;49:1272–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lee YH, et al. AAP1 transports uncharged amino acids into roots of Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2007;50:305–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Rentsch D, Schmidt S, Tegeder M. Transporters for uptake and allocation of organic nitrogen compounds in plants. FEBS Lett. 2007;581:2281–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Fang XZ, et al. NRT1.1 Dual-Affinity Nitrate Transport/Signalling and its Roles in Plant Abiotic Stress Resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:715694.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Fischer WN, et al. Amino acid transport in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 1998;3(5):188–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Libera Università di Bolzano (UNIBZ) (Free University of Bolzano; CRC Call 2018 364 Numics—TN200E).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, 39100, Italy

    F. Trevisan, F. Waschgler, R. Tiziani, S. Cesco & T. Mimmo

  2. Competence Centre for Plant Health, Free University of Bolzano, Bolzano, 39100, Italy

    T. Mimmo

Authors
  1. F. Trevisan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Waschgler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Tiziani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Cesco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Mimmo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

TM, RT, FT, and SC designed the research. FT and FW performed the research. FT collected, analysed, and interpreted the data. FT, RT, and TM wrote the article and critically evaluated both the manuscript and the results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to F. Trevisan or T. Mimmo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Trevisan, F., Waschgler, F., Tiziani, R. et al. Exploring glycine root uptake dynamics in phosphorus and iron deficient tomato plants during the initial stages of plant development. BMC Plant Biol 24, 495 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05120-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-05120-6

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us