Skip to main content

Transcriptome data analysis provides insights into the conservation of Michelia lacei, a plant species with extremely small populations distributed in Yunnan province, China

Abstract

Background

Michelia lacei W.W.Smith (Magnoliaceae), was classified as a Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations (PSESP) by the Yunnan Provincial Government in both action plans of 2012 and 2021. This evergreen tree is known for its high ornamental and scientific value, but it faces significant threats due to its extremely small population size and narrow geographical distribution. The study aims to understand the genetic structure, diversity, and demographic history of this species to inform its conservation strategies.

Results

The analysis of transcriptome data from 64 individuals across seven populations of M. lacei identified three distinct genetic clusters and generated 104,616 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The KM ex-situ population, originating from Longling County, exhibited unique genetic features, suggesting limited gene flow. The genetic diversity was substantial, with significant differences between populations, particularly between the KM lineage and the OTHER lineage. Demographic history inferred from the data indicated population experienced three significant population declines during glaciations, followed by periods of recovery. We estimated the effective population size (Ne) of the KM and OTHER lineages 1,000 years ago were 85,851 and 416,622, respectively. Gene flow analysis suggested past gene flow between populations, but the KM ex-situ population showed no recent gene flow. A total of 805 outlier SNPs, associated with four environmental factors, suggest potential local adaptation and showcase the species' adaptive potential. Particularly, the BZ displayed 515 adaptive loci, highlighting its strong potential for adaptation within this group.

Conclusions

The comprehensive genomic analysis of M. lacei provides valuable insights into its genetic background and highlights the urgent need for conservation efforts. The study underscores the importance of ex-situ conservation methods, such as seed collection and vegetative propagation, to safeguard genetic diversity and promote population restoration. The preservation of populations like MC and BZ is crucial for maintaining the species' genetic diversity. In-situ conservation measures, including the establishment of in-situ conservation sites and community engagement, are essential to enhance protection awareness and ensure the long-term survival of this threatened plant species.

Peer Review reports

Background

Over thousands of years, species have acquired their ecological niches through adaptations to local phenological conditions and competition with other species [1,2,3]. With the advent of the anthropocene, the balance of competition among species has been disrupted. Unrestricted anthropogenic resource acquisition and environmental degradation have led to the extinction of thousands of species [4,5,6]. Furthermore, even where species have not gone extinct, populations have often experienced significant declines. Currently, more than 1 million of the world's species are at high risk of extinction [7]. For threatened species, long-term anthropogenic disturbances result in habitat fragmentation and reduced pollinator populations, leading to decreased inter-population communication and hindering the preservation of genetic diversity within species [8]. Moreover, prolonged intra-population gene flow due to human interference can lead to the accumulation of detrimental alleles [9, 10]. Under rapid climate change scenarios, isolated populations will be further disadvantaged in adapting to future environmental conditions [4]. Moreover, habitat fragmentation diminishes the population sizes of threatened species, resulting in heightened genetic drift, diminished heterozygosity among individuals, and reduced adaptability [11]. In order to effectively prevent the extinction of species due to genetic factors, it is therefore necessary to provide recommendations on the conservation of species at the molecular level.

The development of conservation genomics has greatly aided our understanding of the genetic background of threatened species, providing valuable insights for their conservation at the molecular level [12,13,14]. As high-throughput sequencing technology advances, the molecular markers utilized for analysis have become increasingly precise and specific. This enables us to acquire comprehensive data on gene loci for studies on gene function, population structure, genetic diversity, population history, and genetic vulnerability [15,16,17,18]. The use of the sequenced transcriptome as a reference genome allows the identification of accurate and comprehensive transcript sequences and expression information, making it a commonly used tool in conservation genetics analysis [19]. By analyzing high-quality transcriptome data, we can study the adaptive evolution of species, compare sequence functional information with the known genomes of other species, and compare gene expression differences within the same species [20, 21].

Michelia lacei W.W.Smith is an evergreen tree belonging to the family Magnoliaceae. There are more than 120 species of Magnoliaceae in China, mainly distributed in the temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions, particularly in the southwest and south of the country [22, 23]. The populations of M. lacei in China are mainly found in southeastern and western Yunnan province, in lower montane evergreen bread-leaved forest at elevations of 1,000 to 1,800 m [24]. However, no population have been found in the area between western and southeastern Yunnan. The species is also reported in Vietnam and Myanmar [24, 25]. Of the approximately 40 species in the genus of Michelia, fifteen (including M. lacei) are listed as Endangered (EN) in the China Biodiversity Red List-Higher Plants Volume (2020). Additionally, M. lacei was listed as one of the 101 plant species in urgent need of rescue and protection in the "List of Yunnan Protected Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations (2021)" [26]. Several researchers have conducted conservation biology studies on threatened species in the Magnoliaceae using datasets of SNPs (e.g. [18, 27,28,29]), but researches on M. lacei have been limited to population surveys and habitat assessment [24]. Therefore, this study aims to explore the conservation genetics of M. lacei by analyzing transcriptome data.

The objectives of this study are to (a) understand the current genetic structure and genetic diversity among different populations of M. lacei in China by using molecular markers; (b) investigate the gene flow that occurred during the formation of the current population structure of M. lacei, describe the demographic history of the species and suggest how it was affected by climate change; (c) explore the response of M. lacei to the current environment by screening for outlier SNPs; and (d) provide more targeted conservation recommendations for M. lacei based on the results obtained from the SNP data.

Results

Sequencing results and SNP calling

Transcriptome sequencing was performed on 64 leaf samples, generating approximately 6G data per sample, and resulting in a total of approximately 3.594 billion reads. Each sample was aligned to the whole genome of Magnolia sinica (also commonly use the name of Manglietiastrum sinicum in China), with alignment rates ranging from 97 to 99% (Table S1), indicating high alignment rates. After filtering, a total of 104,616 SNPs were obtained from the VCF, forming Dataset 1. Subsequently, 15,360 SNPs were obtained after Dataset 1 was subjected to 4DTv screening, forming Dataset 2 (putatively neutral dataset). After LD filtering was performed on Dataset 1, a total of 42,481 SNPs remained, forming Dataset 3.

Population structure and genetic diversity

To analyze the genetic structure of M. lacei, ADMIXTURE was used to analyze Datasets 2 (Fig. S1) and 3 (Fig. 1a). The best results were obtained when K = 3, with CV values of 0.60492 and 0.49150 for Datasets 2 and 3, respectively (Table S2). It was clear that the KM ex-situ population was distinct from the others. A clear geographical division exists, as the trees of KM ex-situ population originated in Longling County, Baoshan in western Yunnan, while the other populations were located in southeastern Yunnan. To further investigate the genetic structure, PCA analysis was also performed on Datasets 2 (Fig. S2) and 3 (Fig. 1b) using EIGENSOFT. The first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained more than 20% of the variance in both datasets, indicating a good explanation of the data variability. In the PCA plots, it was also evident that KM ex-situ population was distinct from other populations, while populations of MC, QCT, JP, PB, and BZ clustered together, suggesting a correlation or shared characteristics among these populations and agreeing with the ADMIXTURE results. The reconstructed phylogenetic neighbor-joining tree suggested that the samples could be grouped into three genetic units (Fig. 1c). The six populations in southeastern Yunnan mainly consist of two genetic backgrounds, with genetic mixing between them. The KM ex-situ population is relatively pure.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Population structure of Michelia lacei. a Genetic structure obtained in Dataset 3 when K = 3. Different colors represent different genetic backgrounds. b Principal components analysis scatterplots based on the PCA results obtained from Datasets 3, where each point represents one plant. c Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree constructed based on Dataset 2

All populations except PB were included in the calculation to assess genetic diversity. Computing values of genetic diversity based on Datasets 1 (Table 1) and 2 (Table S3) maintain essentially similar trends. For Dataset 1, the overall π ranged from 0.157 (KM) to 0.286 (MC). The HO ranged from 0.248 (MC) to 0.360 (KM), while HE within populations ranged from 0.556 (JP) to 0.676 (BZ). The values of FIS ranged from 0.150 (KM) to 0.298 (MLP), and Tajima's D values ranged from 0.536 (JP) to 1.246 (KM). The average π, Ho, HE, FIS, and Tajima's D calculated for all populations were 0.298, 0.190, 0.702, 0.358, and 1.090, respectively (Table 1). Population differentiation estimates (FST) were also derived from Datasets 1 (Fig. 2) and 2 (Table S4). In Dataset 1, the smallest FST value was 0.014, observed between JP and MC, while the largest FST value was 0.304, observed between MLP and KM. The Mantel test results indicate a strong correlation between geographical distance and genetic distance (IBD, R2 = 0.501, p = 0.001), as well as environmental distance and genetic distance (IBE, R2 = 0.519, p = 0.001). These findings suggest that differences in geographical and environmental factors can have a significant impact on the genetic differentiation between individuals (Fig. S3).

Table 1 Measures of genetic diversity for 63 Michelia lacei individuals from Dataset 1. N, number of individuals in the population; π, nucleotide diversity; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, heterozygosity within populations; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; Tajima's D, neutrality test statistics
Fig. 2
figure 2

Genetic distances (FST values) between Michelia lacei populations. The larger the circle, the larger the value, which ranges from 0–0.304

Population history inference and gene flow

The population history of M. lacei was inferred using Stairway Plot 2. The demographic histories were calculated for both Folded and Unfolded SFS. In the analysis using Folded SFS (Fig. S4), the KM lineage experienced two population declines, one occurring around 0.4–0.2 million years ago (Mya) and another during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM, 26–19 Kya) [30]. The OTHER lineage experienced a population decline during the Xixiabangma Glaciation (XG, 1.2–0.8 Mya) [31]. In the analysis using Unfolded SFS (Fig. 3a), both lineages experienced three population declines. In addition to the declines observed in the Folded SFS analysis, the KM lineage also experienced a decline around 0.8–1 Mya. Apart from this, the population histories were similar to those in the Folded SFS analysis. In both scenarios, after the Last Glacial Period (LGP, 110–10 Kya) [32], the population sizes remained relatively stable. From Stairway Plot 2, we predicted the effective population size (Ne) 1,000 years ago for the KM and OTHER lineages to be 85,851 and 416,622, respectively. The number of extant individuals today is far less than was predicted from this analysis, indicating that M. lacei numbers have been in constant decline since 1000 years ago.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Population history was inferred for two Michelia lacei lineages (KM, OTHER) based on Unfolded SFS. The 95% confidence interval for the estimated effective population size is shown in a light color, and the thick lines represent the median values. The light grey areas represent different glaciation events during the Pleistocene (XG, Xixiabangma Glaciation; LGP, Last Glaciation Period). b Relationships and gene flow between M. lacei populations, depicted as the maximum-likelihood tree produced in Treemix. The direction of gene flow is indicated by an arrow

When calculating migration events in gene flow, the best results were obtained when the migration event value was set to 12 (Fig. 3b). The output from TreeMix analysis showed arrows representing the direction of gene flow, with darker colors indicating stronger levels of gene flow. The strongest gene flow was predicted to have been mainly from BZ to PB, from MLP to QCT, and from PB to JP. Other gene flow between populations was also primarily observed within the six populations in southeastern Yunnan. No recent gene flow between KM (originating from Longling in west Yunnan Province, China) and other populations was observed in the TreeMix result.

Detection of outlier SNPs and GO annotations

Two methods, BayeScEnv and RDA, were used to filter SNPs related to the selected environmental factors (BIO3, BIO7, BIO13, BIO14). Following BayeScEnv filtering, a total of 173 SNPs associated with the above four environmental factors were retained, with 51 SNPs related to BIO3, 46 SNPs related to BIO7, 15 SNPs related to BIO13, and 129 SNPs related to BIO14. RDA detected a total of 636 SNPs related to the four environmental factors, namely 168 (BIO3), 248 (BIO7), 112 (BIO13), and 108 (BIO14) (Table S5). After merging and removing duplicates, a total of 805 SNPs related to climate adaptation were identified from both methods. These five populations exhibit variability in climate adaptation loci, specifically BZ (515), QCT (393), JP (448), MC (494), and MLP (438). To identify the genes with which these outlier loci were associated, the SNPs were matched to the annotation file from the Magnolia sinica genome, resulting in the localization of 666 genes. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was conducted to identify gene functions, and a total of 79 genes showed significance (P < 0.05), including 18 genes with P < 0.01 (Fig. 4, Table S6). Two genes were associated with “molecular function” (MF), three genes were associated with “cellular component” (CC), and the remaining 13 genes were associated with “biological process” (BP).

Fig. 4
figure 4

GO enrichment analysis of environment-associated genes (the combined data from BAYESCENV and RDA) in Michelia lacei (P < 0.01). Light blue, light red, and light orange represent “molecular function”, “cellular composition”, and “biological processes”, respectively. Green circles represent gene expression associated with environmental stress

Discussion

Genetic structures and genetic diversity of M. lacei

Geographic distance is considered to be an important factor in genetic differentiation between populations. Due to geographic isolation, gene flow between populations in different regions may be limited or absent, resulting in reduced genetic exchange. This can lead to the accumulation of genetic frequency differences, and thus genetic differentiation [33,34,35]. Furthermore, a significant biogeographical boundary called the "Tanaka-Kaiyong Line" (TKL) separates the populations in western Yunnan from those in southeastern Yunnan [36,37,38], and previous studies have found significant phylogeographic differentiation between Sophora davidii populations on opposing sides of the TKL [32].

In this study, three methods were used to analyze the genetic structure of M. lacei. All of these methods suggested three genetic units existed within the study individuals. Populations in the southeastern Yunnan province, with the exception of MLP population, exhibited a genetic structure that included multiple genetic backgrounds. The PB, BZ, MC, and QCT populations were genetically close, and both the structure and PCA analyses showed similar genetic compositions and evidence of gene flow between these populations. The low π value (0.157) in the KM ex-situ population suggests the potential for close kinship between individuals, possibly due to the same maternal parent or adjacent plant, resulting in low levels of nucleotide diversity. The values of Tajima's D for each population were more than 0, which indicates the presence of an excess of intermediate frequency alleles in the population, which may result from either natural selection or genetic drift. This suggests that certain genes provide an advantage for environmental adaptation, leading to an increased frequency of associated gene expression in M. lacei. [39,40,41]. FST values exceeding 0.25 between different populations within the same species indicate significant genetic differentiation [42]. In this study, the degree of the FST (0.170–0.304) between KM and other populations was relatively higher. Because KM ex-situ population originated from Longling in west Yunnan province, we speculate that long distances lead to increased genetic differentiation between populations over time.

The genetic diversity of M. lacei is high relative to several other threatened species, indicating that the endangered status of this species is not caused by inbreeding depression [17, 18]. Combining these data with the findings from our field work and observations, we speculate that the population size decline of M. lacei in recent generations is due to human activities.

Demographic history and gene flow reflect the formation of genetic patterns in M. lacei

Analysis of gene flow can determine the extent of genetic exchange between populations and allow prediction of the genetic connectivity between different populations [43, 44]. This study has shown that the KM ex-situ populations of M. lacei has not received any recent genetic flow from other populations. The lack of gene flow from other populations accelerates the rate of genetic loss, reduces population adaptability and survival capacity, and increases the risk of population extinction in the long term [45,46,47,48]. In southeastern Yunnan, genetic flow analysis in M. lacei populations indicates that past gene flow has occurred. However, due to human activities and habitat degradation, populations have become more isolated. Consequently, the decrease in pollinators has led to reduced gene flow between different populations [17, 18].

Studying the population history dynamics of a species can enhance our understanding of its origin, population expansions, and the differentiation processes between populations [49, 50]. Based on geographical differences between populations, two lineages (KM and OTHER) were identified. The results of our population history inference suggested that both lineages have experienced three bottleneck events. These bottleneck events occurred around XG, LGP, and LGM, respectively. Both the KM and OTHER lineages had a significant population size decline during XG (1.2–0.8 Mya). After the glaciation, the Ne recovered and the species entered a relatively stable period. However, just before entering the LGP, a second, more severe bottleneck event occurred, with the Ne of the KM ex-situ population being almost reduced to zero on the arrival of the glaciation. During the long glaciation period, there were several interglacial periods (warm periods between glaciations), which allowed a temporary recovery of Ne in different populations [32]. During the LGM, the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau was significantly affected by the glaciation, covering Tibet, Qinghai, and western Sichuan [30]. The KM ex-situ population was therefore more significantly affected by the LGM than the OTHER lineage, and experienced a further bottleneck effect during this period. After that, the Ne of all populations remained relatively stable for approximately ten thousand years. Other studies have also shown that the last glaciation has influenced the formation of different regional lineages in the eastern TKL, and Sophora davidii shows a similar pattern of bottleneck events to M. lacei [51]. Upon investigation, it was discovered that the actual number of M. lacei individuals is significantly lower than the calculated result. Our field investigation suggests that this discrepancy is primarily attributed to the following factors: (1) Construction of roads and buildings; (2) Cultivation of cash crops under the forest, impeding the natural regeneration of M. lacei; (3) Utilization of wood by local communities. These various factors are likely to have played a part in the significant decrease in the population of M. lacei individuals over the past millennium.

Local adaptation of M. lacei populations

In addition to geographic isolation, different environmental factors also play an important role in shaping the genetic background of different populations [20, 21, 52]. BIO7 has demonstrated the most significant impact on the survival of M. lacei among the four environmental factors. In all field populations, BZ has the highest number of adaptive loci, totaling 515, while QCT was the least frequent, with only 393. GO enrichment analysis revealed that several genes with a significance level of P < 0.01 were associated with biological processes (BP).

Furthermore, analysis of gene functions revealed that the significant expression of genes related to “polyol metabolic process” (GO:0019751), “miRNA-mediated post-transcriptional gene silencing” (GO:0035195), “cellular response to antibiotic” (GO:0071236), and “alcohol metabolic process” (GO:0006066) indicated that the plants were undergoing specific physiological processes, responding to stress, or engaging in specific metabolic regulation. Their expression may be a response of the plants to adapt to environmental changes or cope with biotic stresses.

In addition, four individuals from Longling, Baoshan, cultivated in the Kunming Botanical Garden (KBG) have been able to flower and bear fruits normally, and the other eight plants in KM ex-situ population are growing also in very good condition. This suggests that the species is able to thrive in the climatic conditions of Kunming, which is located much further north from Longling in West Yunnan. It also demonstrates its strong adaptability.

Guidelines for the conservation of M. lacei

The Magnoliaceae is one of the most important groups of plant species in China's subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests [53]. However, more than 76 species in the family, are currently assessed as threatened in China, accounting for more than 50% of the total species in Magnoliaceae in the country [54]. Of these, M. lacei, which has been prioritized as a PSESP in China, is in urgent needs of rescue protection. Therefore, based on the results shown in this study, we put forward the following suggestions for the conservation of M. lacei: (1) Seeds from individuals with varying genetic backgrounds should be gathered from wild populations to facilitate the reproduction of seedlings. This will enable the ex-situ conservation of seedlings from different genetic backgrounds in the KBG, thereby preserving the genetic diversity of the species. Specifically, populations such as MC and BZ, which exhibit distinct genetic backgrounds, should receive particular attention. (2) By collecting vegetative materials of individuals in KM ex-situ population to propagate young plants by cuttings or by tissue culture, and the rooted cuttings or young plants can be used for the population reinforcement and population restoration in its originated habitats in Longling of west Yunnan province. The FIS of the KM ex-situ population was the lowest of all the populations. However, to prevent the accumulation of harmful genes resulting from selfing and inbreeding in the ex-situ individuals' seeds, it is advisable to avoid using seedlings propagated from seeds of KM ex-situ individuals for natural population restoration. (3) All the original habitats of M. lacei outside the nature reserves should be well protected by establishing the in-situ conservation sites. For scattered individuals along the roadsides and by the villages, information dissemination projects should be conducted together with local communities for increasing the protection awareness of general publics.

Conclusions

The study provides a comprehensive genomic analysis of M. lacei, a plant species with extremely small populations in Yunnan Province, China. Through the use of transcriptome data, the research has elucidated the genetic structure and diversity within and among populations, revealing three distinct genetic clusters. The findings suggest that historical gene flow has shaped the current genetic landscape, with the KM ex-situ population showing a particularly unique genetic signature. The study also highlights the adaptive potential of M. lacei populations, as evidenced by the identification of outlier SNPs associated with environmental factors, which could be crucial for the species' resilience in the face of environmental challenges.

The demographic history inferred from the analysis indicates that M. lacei has experienced significant population declines during past glaciations, with a stabilization of population size around 10,000 years ago. However, the current population size is alarmingly low, with only 52 individuals known in the wild in China. This decline is likely due to human activities, including habitat fragmentation and degradation.

This study highlights the significance of conservation initiatives for M. lacei, stressing the necessity of ex-situ conservation methods, such as seed gathering and vegetative propagation, to safeguard genetic diversity and promote population restoration. The preservation of populations such as MC and BZ would guarantee the highest possible conservation of genetic diversity in M. lacei. Additionally, we calls for in-situ conservation measures, including the establishment of mini-reserves and community engagement to enhance protection awareness. The insights gained from this study not only contribute to the conservation of M. lacei but also serve as a valuable reference for the conservation of other threatened species within the Magnoliaceae.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and RNA extraction

Based on botanical field surveys of M. lacei in China, only six populations of PB, MLP, BZ, MC, QCT and JP were found, comprising a total of 52 individuals in the wild. Additionally, there are 12 ex-situ cultivated individuals from Kunming Botanical Garden (KM), which were propagated from seeds collected from the individuals in Longling County of west Yunnan in 1987. Unfortunately, we did not find wild individuals near Longling despite several recent field investigations. A total of 64 individuals of all available populations were collected for this study (Fig. 5, Table S6). We collected voucher specimens and recorded information about the flowers, fruits, leaves, and other characteristics of the plants in the field. Our samples of M. lacei were verified by Lei Cai as matching the descriptions in the Flora of China. The voucher specimens were deposited at the Herbarium, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences (code YL2022001–YL2022007, Table S6).

Fig. 5
figure 5

The distribution of Michelia lacei populations collected in this study (a) A M. lacei tree located in Bazhai Town, Maguan County with a brand of ancient and rare tree in Yunnan Province. b Geographic distribution of six (BZ, JP, MC, MLP, PB, QCT) wild populations and one (KM) ex-situ population. Note: Different colored circles represent different populations (Table S7), black dotted lines indicate national borders, and blue lines represent rivers (China standard map GS (2019) 1822, border without modification), Elevation (www.worldclim.org)

Fresh and insect-free leaves were collected from plants and were placed directly into liquid nitrogen tanks for preservation in the field. Upon returning to the laboratory, the samples were stored at -80 °C. To extract RNA from the leaves, leaves were ground in liquid nitrogen, and ≤ 100 mg of ground sample was added to centrifuge tubes. The modified CTAB method was used to extract RNA from each collected sample [55]. Agarose gel electrophoresis was performed to check for sample degradation, and the purity of the obtained RNA was assessed using a Nanodrop. RNA was quantified accurately using Qubit. After RNA samples had passed the quality control, random fragmentation was performed using a Covaris ultrasonic disruptor at BenaGen (Wuhan, China). RNA enrichment was then conducted, and the first strand of cDNA was synthesized using the extracted RNA as a template. Subsequently, the RNA was degraded, and the second strand of cDNA was synthesized using dNTPs. PCR amplification was performed, and after library construction, the samples were subjected to paired-end sequencing on the Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform, which provides higher sequencing data quality compared to single-end sequencing.

The raw data obtained were filtered using fastp v.0.21.0 [56] to remove reads with an N base content exceeding 5%, those with a low-quality base count reaching 50%, those contaminated with adapters, and duplicate sequences caused by PCR amplification. Subsequently, the filtered data were subjected to quality control using FastQC v.0.11.9 [57]. The results indicated good data quality, and the obtained clean reads were then used for downstream analysis.

Sequence alignment and screening of SNPs

To accurately identify SNPs in the transcriptome data, it is necessary to have a reference genome for sequence alignment. In this study, the chromosome-level genome of Magnolia sinica (BioProject ID PRJNA774088), was used as the reference genome. SAMtools v.1.9 [58] and BWA-MEM v.0.7.17 [59] were used to index the whole genome for subsequent alignment. The filtered clean reads were aligned to the reference genome of M. sinica using BWA-MEM v.0.7.17, and the alignment results were stored in binary format (bam) files. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, duplicate reads were removed using the MarkDuplicates tool in Picard v.2.20.3 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The alignment rate of reads was calculated using SAMtools' flagstat, where a higher alignment rate indicated higher alignment efficiency and sequencing data quality. The bam files were converted into variant call format (vcf) files containing genomic variation information, using HaplotypeCaller in GATK v.4.2.0 [60]. Then, the vcf files of all individuals were combined into one vcf file using CombineGVCFs in GATK v.4.2.0. Population-level variant detection was performed using GenotypeGVCFs, and the detected variants were filtered using VariantFiltration with the following parameters "window 35, cluster 3, FS > 30.0, QD < 2.0". Filtered SNPs were extracted using SelectVariants. To obtain high-quality SNPs, the dataset was then further filtered using VCFtools v.0.1.13 [61] with max missing < 0.5 and minor allele frequency (MAF) < 0.05. This resulted in a comprehensive dataset of SNPs (Dataset 1) suitable for subsequent analysis. Dataset 1 was subjected to fourfold degenerate sites (4DTv) filtering using SnpEff v.4.0 [62] to generate a collection of putatively neutral loci (Dataset 2).

Genetic structure and genetic diversity

To reduce redundant information introduced by highly correlated SNPs, Dataset 1 was subjected to Linkage Disequilibrium (LD) filtering using PLINK v.1.90 [63] before analysis. The parameters were set as "-indep-pairwise 50 5 0.4", resulting in a subset of SNPs constituting Dataset 3.

ADMIXTURE v.1.3.0 [64] was used to infer the population structure of M. lacei based on Datasets 2 and 3. The value of K was set to range from 2 to 5. The optimal K value for population structure partitioning was determined by selecting the value associated with the lowest cross-validation error. The results were visualized using Pophelper (http://pophelper.com/). To validate the population structure results, two additional methods were employed. First, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on Datasets 2 and 3 using EIGENSOFT v.6.1.4 [65] to provide a visual representation of the relationships between individuals and the overall structure of populations. Second, a maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of M. lacei was constructed based on Dataset 2 using the GTR + GAMMA model in RAxML v.8.2.9 [66]. The resulting tree was visualized using ITOL v.6 (https://itol.embl.de/).

Since the PB population consisted of only a single individual, it was not representative for genetic diversity analysis. Therefore, for the analysis of genetic diversity and population differentiation, only populations with ≥ 4 individuals were included. Pairwise FST values, nucleotide diversity (π), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), the inbreeding coefficient (FIS), and Tajima's D were computed for each pairwise comparison among populations using VCFtools v.0.1.13 with Dataset 1 and Dataset 2.

To explore the impact of geographic and environmental on the distribution and genetic structure of M. lacei, we conducted IBD test to examine the influence of geographic distance on genetic distance connectivity between individuals. Additionally, IBE test was performed to assess the effect of environmental distance on genetic variation among individuals. The relationship between these factors was evaluated using the Mantel test, with genetic distance represented by FST/(1-FST) for a more accessible and comparable measure of genetic distance.

Population history dynamics and gene flow

Stairway Plot 2 [67] is a statistical method based on genetic variation data that allows inference of population history and evolutionary processes by analyzing genetic variation within populations. The total 64 individuals were mainly divided into two lineages (KM and OTHER) based on their geographic origin, genetic differentiation and genetic structure (see above), these strongly support the separation of the KM ex-situ population from other populations. The analysis was conducted separately for the two lineages KM (ex-situ individuals propagated by seeds collected from western Yunnan province of China) and OTHER (southeastern Yunnan province of China, including PB, MLP, BZ, MC, QCT and JP populations). To infer the population history of M. lacei, the reference genome for M. sinica was used to construct the Site Frequency Spectra (SFS) of M. lacei, based on the “bam” files of the samples, using ANGSD v.0.921 [68]. Two types of SFS were obtained: Unfolded SFS, which considers frequency differences of all alleles and provides more detailed genetic information for population history and structure analysis, and folded SFS, which is used as a reference for convenience of calculation and analysis. The nucleotide mutation rate was estimated to be 4e-9 based on M. sinica as a reference. According to cultivation records from the KBG, it takes approximately 30 years for the M. lacei plants propagated from seeds, to reach the mature phase of flowering and fruiting [24]. These data were integrated and input into the Stairway Plot 2 script file for analysis.

TreeMix v.1.13 [43] was used to infer the amount and direction of gene flow between populations based on genetic data. Using Python v.2.7, the frequency information for the different alleles from the VCF of Dataset 2 was converted into a “freq” file and then transformed into a format suitable for TreeMix analysis. Migration events ranging from 1 to 15 were tested, and the explanatory power of each migration event was examined. Migration events with an explanatory power above 99.8% were selected as the optimal number of migration edges. A network of gene flow between populations was generated and visualized.

Outlier SNPs associated with environmental variables.

Bioclimatic variables

Climate data from 1970–2000 were obtained from worldclim (https://www.worldclim.org/), which includes 19 bioclimatic variables [69] (Table S7). The locations of 52 individuals in the field were filtered using ArcGIS v.10.8 [70], with only one site being retained within 10 km. The filtered sites were used for extracting climate variables. Correlations were calculated among the environmental variables, and MaxEnt v.3.4.3 [71] was used for weight analysis. Variables with correlation coefficient |r|> 0.7 and low contribution were excluded, and the remaining variables were used for the next analysis. Variance Inflation Factors (VIFs) were calculated for the selected environmental factors, and all retained variables had a VIF value less than 10 [72]. Finally, four unrelated environmental variables (including contribution degree) were selected for further analysis: BIO3 (Isothermality, 4.6%), BIO7 (Temperature annual range, 77.6%), BIO13 (Precipitation of the wettest month, 3.3%), and BIO14 (Precipitation of the driest month, 4.6%) (Table S8).

Detection of outlier SNPs

Two methods, BayeScEnv [73] and redundancy analysis (RDA) [74], were utilized to filter SNP sites related to the environment. Prior to conducting the BayeScEnv analysis, the vcf file containing SNPs was converted into GESTE/BayeScan format using PGDSpider v.2.1.1.5 [75]. The obtained environmental variables (BIO3, BIO7, BIO13, BIO14) were also standardized, and individual calculations were performed for each environmental factor with default settings. Additionally, RDA based on the vegan v.2.5.6 [74] package in R v.4.1.2 was conducted, demonstrating that the VIF values for all environmental factors were below 10, and indicating that no environmental factor needed to be discarded. To select environment-related SNPs, those falling within the tails of a ± 3 SD cutoff (two-tailed p-value = 0.0027) were identified as candidate SNPs. The SNPs identified by both methods were merged and then matched to the genome of M. sinica for candidate gene identification. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was performed using TBtools [76] to examine the functional annotations of the corresponding genes.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. 64 transcriptome data from this study have been submitted to NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and the accession number(s) can be found below: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1032160.

Abbreviations

PSESP:

Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations

SNPs:

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms

4DTv:

Fourfold degenerate synonymous site

PB:

Pinbian

MLP:

Malipo

BZ:

Bazhai

MC:

Miechang

QCT:

Qincaitang

JP:

Jinping

KM:

Kunming

PCA:

Principal component analysis

SFS:

Site Frequency Spectra

MaxEnt:

Maximum-entropy model

N:

Number of individuals

F ST :

Genetic diferentiation coefcient

π:

Nucleotide diversity

H O :

Observed heterozygosity

H E :

Expected heterozygosity

F IS :

Inbreeding coefficients

Ne:

Contemporary effective population size

IBD:

Isolation-by-distance

IBE:

Isolation-by-environment

References

  1. Derezanin L, Blazyte A, Dobrynin P, Duchene DA, Grau JH, Jeon S, et al. Multiple types of genomic variation contribute to adaptive traits in the mustelid subfamily Guloninae. Mol Ecol. 2022;31(10):2898–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Provost G, Brachi B, Lesur I, Lalanne C, Labadie K, Aury JM, et al. Gene expression and genetic divergence in oak species highlight adaptive genes to soil water constraints. Plant Physiol. 2022;190(4):2466–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sol D, Garcia-Porta J, Gonzalez-Lagos C, Pigot AL, Trisos C, Tobias JA. A test of Darwin’s naturalization conundrum in birds reveals enhanced invasion success in the presence of close relatives. Ecol Lett. 2022;25(3):661–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature. 2004;427(6970):145–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson CN, Balmford A, Brook BW, Buettel JC, Galetti M, Guangchun L, et al. Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science. 2017;356(6335):270–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Roux JJ, Hui C, Castillo ML, Iriondo JM, Keet JH, Khapugin AA, et al. Recent anthropogenic plant extinctions differ in biodiversity hotspots and coldspots. Curr Biol. 2019;29(17):2912–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lloyd NA, Keating LM, Friesen AJ, Cole DM, McPherson JM, Akcakaya HR, Moehrenschlager A. Prioritizing species conservation programs based on IUCN Green Status and estimates of cost-sharing potential. Conserv Biol. 2023;37(3):e14051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almeida-Rocha JM, Soares L, Andrade ER, Gaiotto FA, Cazetta E. The impact of anthropogenic disturbances on the genetic diversity of terrestrial species: a global meta-analysis. Mol Ecol. 2020;29(24):4812–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Dorado A. A simple method to account for natural selection when predicting inbreeding depression. Genetics. 2008;180(3):1559–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A. Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol. 2016;31(12):940–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson J, Kyriazis CC, Yuan SC, Lohmueller KE. deleterious variation in natural populations and implications for conservation genetics. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2023;11:93–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ouborg NJ, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V, Bijlsma RK, Hedrick PW. Conservation genetics in transition to conservation genomics. Trends Genet. 2010;26(4):177–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shafer ABA, Wolf JBW, Alves PC, Bergstrom L, Bruford MW, Brannstrom I, et al. Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol Evol. 2015;30(2):78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Allendorf FWFWC, Aitken SN, Byrne M, Luikart G. Conservation and the genomics of populations, 3rd. edition. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2022.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Ma YP, Wariss HM, Liao RL, Zhang RG, Yun QZ, Olmstead RG, et al. Genome-wide analysis of butterfly bush (Buddleja alternifolia) in three uplands provides insights into biogeography, demography and speciation. New Phytol. 2021;232(3):1463–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang YZ, Ma T, Wang ZF, Lu ZQ, Li Y, Fu CX, et al. Genomic effects of population collapse in a critically endangered ironwood tree Ostrya rehderiana. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ma YP, Liu DT, Wariss HM, Zhang RG, Tao LD, Milne RI, Sun WB. Demographic history and identification of threats revealed by population genomic analysis provide insights into conservation for an endangered maple. Mol Ecol. 2022;31(3):767–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang FM, Cai L, Dao ZL, Sun WB. Genomic data reveals population genetic and demographic history of Magnolia fistulosa (Magnoliaceae), a plant species with extremely small populations in Yunnan province. China Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:811312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(1):57–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jia KH, Zhao W, Maier PA, Hu XG, Jin Y, Zhou SS, et al. Landscape genomics predicts climate change–related genetic offset for the widespread Platycladus orientalis (Cupressaceae). Evol Appl. 2020;13(4):665–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang H, Li JL, Milne RI, Tao WJ, Wang Y, Miao JB, et al. Genomic insights into the genotype-environment mismatch and conservation units of a Qinghai-Tibet Plateau endemic cypress under climate change. Evol Appl. 2022;15(6):919–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dong SS, Wang YL, Xia NH, Liu Y, Liu M, Lian L, et al. Plastid and nuclear phylogenomic incongruences and biogeographic implications of Magnolia s.l. (Magnoliaceae). J Syst Evol. 2022;60(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang YB, Liu BB, Nie ZL, Chen HF, Chen FJ, Figlar RB, et al. Major clades and a revised classification of Magnolia and Magnoliaceae based on whole plastid genome sequences via genome skimming. J Syst Evol. 2020;58(5):673–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Linsky J, Sun WB. Magnolia lacei (W.W.Sm.) Figlar. In: Linsky J, Crowley D, Beckman Bruns E, Coffey EED, editors. Global Conservation Gap Analysis of Magnolia. Atlanta: Atlanta Botanical Garden; 2022. p. 122–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cai L, Dao ZL, Sun WB. Urgent protection is required for Michelia lacei (Magnoliaceae) in Yunnan. China Oryx. 2017;51(2):203–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun WB. List of Yunnan Protected Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations (2021 edn). Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang T, Meng J, Yang FM, Li X, Yin XP, Zhang J, et al. Genome-wide assessment of population genetic and demographic history in Magnolia odoratissima based on SLAF-seq. Conserv Genet. 2022;24:279–91.

  28. Tamaki I, Kawashima N, Setsuko S, Lee JH, Itaya A, Yukitoshi K, Tomaru N. Population genetic structure and demography of Magnolia kobus: variety borealis is not supported genetically (vol 132, pg 741, 2019). J Plant Res. 2020;133(4):599–599.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hernandez M, Palmarola A, Veltjen E, Asselman P, Teste E, Larridon I, Samain MS, Gonzalez-Torres LR. Population structure and genetic diversity of Magnolia cubensis subsp. acunae (Magnoliaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation and implications for conservation. Oryx. 2020;54(4):451–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yokoyama Y, Lambeck K, De Deckker P, Johnston P, Fifield LK. Timing of the Last Glacial Maximum from observed sea-level minima. Nature. 2000;406(6797):713–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou SH, Wang J, Xu LB, Wang XL, Colgan PM, Mickelson DM. Glacial advances in southeastern Tibet during late Quaternary and their implications for climatic changes. Quatern Int. 2010;218(1–2):58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thompson LG, Yao T, Davis ME, Henderson KA, MosleyThompson E, Lin PN, et al. Tropical climate instability: the last glacial cycle from a Qinghai-Tibetan ice core. Science. 1997;276(5320):1821–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rousset F. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F–statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics. 1997;145(4):1219–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang IJ, Bradburd GS. Isolation by environment. Mol Ecol. 2014;23(23):5649–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hanson JO, Rhodes JR, Riginos C, Fuller RA. Environmental and geographic variables are effective surrogates for genetic variation in conservation planning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114(48):12755–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Christensen R, Schantz H, Shapiro J. On the range of validity of the Mori-Tanaka method. J Mech Phys Solids. 1992;40(1):69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu H, Yan LC. A discussion on biogeographical lines of the tropical-subtropical Yunnan. Chinese Geogr Sci. 2002;12(1):90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Feng JM, Zhu YY. Tanaka Line and its bio-geographical significance: a further discussion. Chinese J Ecol. 2010;29(1):1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shapiro BJ, Polz MF. Ordering microbial diversity into ecologically and genetically cohesive units. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(5):235–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen H, Patterson N, Reich D. Population differentiation as a test for selective sweeps. Genome Res. 2010;20(3):393–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Krutovsky KV, Neale DB. Nucleotide diversity and linkage disequilibrium in cold-hardiness and wood quality-related candidate genes in Douglas fir. Genetics. 2005;171(4):2029–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang J. On the measurements of genetic differentiation among populations. Genet Res (Camb). 2012;94(5):275–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pickrell JK, Pritchard JK. Inference of population splits and mixtures from genome-wide allele frequency data. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1002967.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng W, Yan LJ, Burgess KS, Luo YH, Zou JY, Qin HT, et al. Natural hybridization among three Rhododendron species (Ericaceae) revealed by morphological and genomic evidence. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Robinson JA, Bowie RCK, Dudchenko O, Aiden EL, Hendrickson SL, Steiner CC, Ryder OA, Mindell DP, Wall JD. Genome-wide diversity in the California condor tracks its prehistoric abundance and decline. Curr Biol. 2021;31(13):2939-2946 e2935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang R, Liu YR, Chen JL, Lu ZY, Wang JJ, He W, et al. Limited genetic diversity and high differentiation in Angelica dahurica resulted from domestication: insights to breeding and conservation. BMC Plant Biol. 2022;22(1):141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kinzner MC, Gamisch A, Hoffmann AA, Seifert B, Haider M, Arthofer W, et al. Major range loss predicted from lack of heat adaptability in an alpine Drosophila species. Sci Total Environ. 2019;695:133753.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Papot C, Cascella K, Toullec JY, Jollivet D. Divergent ecological histories of two sister Antarctic krill species led to contrasted patterns of genetic diversity in their heat-shock protein (hsp70) arsenal. Ecol Evol. 2016;6(5):1555–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Yang YZ, Ma T, Wang ZF, Lu ZQ, Li Y, Fu CX, et al. Genomic effects of population collapse in a critically endangered ironwood tree Ostrya rehderiana. Nature Commun. 2018;9:5449.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ma H, Liu YB, Liu DT, Sun WB, Liu XF, Wan YM, et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly and population genetic analysis of a critically endangered rhododendron provide insights into its conservation. Plant J. 2021;107(5):1533–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Fan DM, Yue JP, Nie ZL, Li ZM, Comes HP, Sun H. Phylogeography of Sophora davidii (Leguminosae) across the “Tanaka-Kaiyong Line”, an important phytogeographic boundary in Southwest China. Mol Ecol. 2013;22(16):4270–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lin N, Liu Q, Landis JB, Rana HK, Li ZM, Wang HC, et al. Staying in-situ or shifting range under ongoing climate change: a case of an endemic herb in the Himalaya-Hengduan Mountains across elevational gradients. Divers Distrib. 2023;29(4):524–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Song YC, Yan ER, Song K. Synthetic comparison of eight dynamics plots in evergreen broadleaf forests. China Biodiversity Science. 2015;23(2):139–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Qin H, Yang Y, Dong S, He Q, Jia Y, Zhao L, et al. Threatened species list of China’s higher plants. Biodiversity Science. 2017;25(7):696–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chaparro-Encinas LA, Arellano-Wattenbarger GL, Parra-Cota FI. de los Santos-Villalobos S: a modified CTAB and Trizol (R) protocol for high-quality RNA extraction from whole wheat seedlings, including rhizosphere. Cereal Res Commun. 2020;48(3):275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen SF, Zhou YQ, Chen YR, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):884–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Andrews S. FastQC: A quality control application for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute Project page: http://www.bioinformatics.bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc; 2012.

  58. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20(9):1297–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(15):2156–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Cingolani P, Platts A, le Wang L, Coon M, Nguyen T, Wang L, et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin). 2012;6(2):80–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Chang CC, Chow CC, Tellier LC, Vattikuti S, Purcell SM, Lee JJ. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015;4:7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Alexander DH, Lange K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38(8):904–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Liu X, Fu YX. Stairway Plot 2: demographic history inference with folded SNP frequency spectra. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):280.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1):356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2017;37(12):4302–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. MacLean MG. Introducing Geographic Information Systems with ArcGIS; A Workbook Approach to Learning GIS, 3rd edition. Photogramm Eng Rem S. 2014;80(6):499–500.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008;31(2):161–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1(1):3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Villemereuil P, Gaggiotti OE, O’Hara RB. A new FST-based method to uncover local adaptation using environmental variables. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015;6(11):1248–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Dixon P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J Veg Sci. 2003;14(6):927–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Lischer HE, Excoffier L. PGDSpider: an automated data conversion tool for connecting population genetics and genomics programs. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(2):298–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Chen CJ, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He YH, et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Lie-Wen Lin, Zhi-Yong Yu, Zong-Li Liang, and Xing-Fa Yang for help during field work, Feng-Mao Yang and Li-Dan Tao for help in data analysis. We are also grateful to comments from Prof. Yong-peng Ma for improving manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Basic Resources Investigation Program of China (Grant No. 2017FY100100), the NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China) (Grant No. 32101407) and the NSFC (National Natural Science Foundation of China)- Yunnan Joint Fund (Grant No. U1302262).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL and LC wrote the manuscript; WS revised the manuscript, YL and LC contributed sample materials; YL analyzed the data; WS, LC and YL conceived and designed the research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weibang Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The collection of leaves and voucher specimens of M. lacei in this study was permitted by the Yunnan Jinping Watershed National Nature Reserve Management and Conservation Bureau, Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Yao Autonomous County of Hekou, Maguan County Forestry and Grassland Bureau and Malipo County Forestry and Grassland Bureau. The experimental research on plants complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The collecting of all materials complied with the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Wild Plants and the IUCN Policy Statement on Research Involving Species at Risk of Extinction, and the collection of all plant materials was conducted without posing any risk to other species in nature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Detailed sampling information of seven Michelia lacei populations in Yunnan. Table S2. The CV error values of the two datasets at values of K between 2–5. Table S3. Measures of genetic diversity for 63 Michelia lacei individuals from Dataset 2. N, number of individuals in the population; π, nucleotide diversity; HO, observed heterozygosity; HE, heterozygosity within populations; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; Tajima's D, neutrality test statistics. Table S4. Genetic distances (FST values) between Michelia lacei populations based on Dataset 2. Table S5. Number of candidate SNP loci under putative selection identified by BAYESCENV and RDA; the VIF values of the four environmental factors. Table S6. GO enrichment of environment-associated genes (the combined data from the BAYESCENV and RDA analysis) in Michelia lacei (P < 0.01). Table S7. Detailed sampling information of 7 Michelia lacei populations in Yunnan. Table S8. Environmental variables used in this study and the contribution of four selected environmental factors to M. lacei distribution. Table S9. Correlation between the selected environmental factors. Fig. S1. Genetic structure obtained in Dataset 2 when K = 3. Different colors represent different genetic backgrounds. Fig. S2. Principal components analysis scatterplots based on the PCA results obtained from Datasets 2, where each point represents one plant. Fig. S3. genetic distance represented by FST/(1-FST) (a) IBE: genetic distance and environment distance (R2 = 0.519, p = 0.001), (b) IBD: genetic distance and geographical distance (R2 = 0.501, p = 0.001). Fig. S4. Population history was inferred for two Michelia lacei lineages (KM, OTHER) based on Folded SFS. The 95% confidence interval for the estimated effective population size is shown in light colors, and thick lines represent the median value. The light gray areas represent different glaciation events during the Pleistocene (XG, Xixiabangma Glaciation; LGP, Last Glaciation Period).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Cai, L. & Sun, W. Transcriptome data analysis provides insights into the conservation of Michelia lacei, a plant species with extremely small populations distributed in Yunnan province, China. BMC Plant Biol 24, 200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04892-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04892-1

Keywords