Skip to main content
Download PDF

The biochemical and growth-associated traits of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by silver nanoparticles and silver

BMC Plant Biology volume 24, Article number: 92 (2024) Cite this article

This article has been updated

Abstract

Background

The biochemical and growth changes resulting from exposure of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) seedlings to silver nanoparticles and silver were investigated. Over a two-week period, seedlings were exposed to different concentrations (0, 40, and 80 ppm) of silver nanoparticles and silver.

Results

Our findings revealed that at concentrations of 40 and 80 ppm, both silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate led to decreased weight, root and shoot length, as well as chlorophyll a and b content. Conversely, these treatments triggered an increase in key biochemical properties, such as total phenols, carotenoids and anthocyanins, with silver nanoparticles showing a more pronounced effect compared to silver nitrate. Moreover, the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) rose proportionally with treatment concentration, with the nanoparticle treatment exhibiting a more substantial increase. Silver content showed a significant upswing in both roots and leaves as treatment concentrations increased.

Conclusions

Application of varying concentrations of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate on basil plants resulted in reduced growth and lower chlorophyll content, while simultaneously boosting the production of antioxidant compounds. Notably, anthocyanin, carotenoid, and total phenol increased significantly. However, despite this increase in antioxidant activity, the plant remained unable to fully mitigate the oxidative stress induced by silver and silver nanoparticles.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Nanotechnology explores material manipulation within the 1–100 nanometer range, with a notable focus on silver nanoparticles that have experienced substantial growth due to silver's compelling nanoscale properties. This advancement holds pivotal importance for enhancing consumer goods and medical products [1].

Silver nanoparticles typically consist of 20–15,000 silver atoms, and in contrast to their bulk counterparts, they exhibit unique physical, chemical, and biological properties, attributed to free dangling bonds and a significant increase in surface area [2]. The reduction of material size to the nanometer range induces alterations in physical and chemical properties, impacting characteristics compared to larger scales [3]. Various industries, including electronics, biomedical sciences, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, water purification, and catalytic systems, exploit silver nanoparticles for their distinctive properties [4]. However, a potential side effect is the release of silver nanoparticles into the environment, posing exposure risks for plants, the foundation of the ecosystem's food chain. Nanoparticles' physical characteristics, encompassing size, shape, chemical composition, surface alterations, reactivity, and concentration, profoundly influence their interactions with plants [5]. Beyond these, the impact of nanoparticles depends on factors such as treatment time, application method, nanoparticle type, plant species, and cultivar [6, 7].

In evaluating silver's effects on plant growth and biochemical content, both bulk silver and silver nanoparticles demonstrate beneficial and deleterious outcomes. Several studies highlight the positive impact of both forms on plant growth and physiological parameters [8, 9].

Yosefzaei et al. [10] reported that exposure to silver nanoparticles and silver led to increased proline and glucose contents, along with elevated activity of antioxidant enzymes like catalase and guaiacol peroxidase. Ejaz et al. [11] discovered that a concentration of 75 mg per liter of silver nanoparticles enhanced growth parameters in rice plants. In contrast, sorghum plants exposed to 1000 µM silver nanoparticles exhibited a significant increase in root length and catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities, while a similar concentration of silver nitrate caused a decrease [12]. Hashemi et al. [13] demonstrated that applying silver nanoparticles at concentrations of 40 and 80 ppm increased flavonoid content in wheat.

Despite reports on the beneficial effects of bulk silver and silver nanoparticles on plant growth and physiological parameters, adverse impacts have also been observed on various plant species [14, 15]. For instance, Brassica sp. seedlings treated with silver nanoparticles and silver at different concentrations showed decreased growth, protein content, and photosynthesis, along with increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16]. Similar adverse effects were noted in rice, where a decrease in root length, fresh weight, and chlorophyll and carotenoid content occurred after silver nanoparticle application [17]. Moreover, silver nanoparticles reduced plant growth, micronutrients absorption, and protein and amino acid content in wheat [18].

J. Jiravova et al. [2] observed elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) and ROS levels in potato plants influenced by silver nanoparticles. The destructive mechanism of silver nanoparticles on plants is not fully understood, but it is suggested that the phytotoxic effects may result from the high accumulation of silver and excessive ROS production in plant tissues [2, 19]. According to Dobias and Bernier-Latmani [20], silver nanoparticles can oxidize and release silver ions, leading to ROS production during absorption and mobility of silver particles.

ROS, unstable molecules with unpaired electrons, are continuously produced during plant cell metabolism [21]. Under normal conditions, a balance between ROS production and neutralization by antioxidants, such as anthocyanins and phenols, is maintained [22, 23]. However, under stress conditions, this balance may be disrupted, resulting in oxidative stress. Excessive ROS production can damage cellular macromolecules and lead to lipid peroxidation in plants [24, 25].

Antioxidants like phenols and anthocyanins are stable molecules that donate electrons to neutralize ROS, reducing their damaging capacity. The concentration of anthocyanins in plants varies based on growth stages, environmental factors, plant species, and varieties [25, 26]. Numerous studies confirm that molecules like phenols and anthocyanins enhance antioxidant capacity, particularly in plants belonging to the Lamiaceae family [27, 28].

The basil plant (Ocimum basilicum L.), a member of the Lamiaceae family, includes the Purpurascens variety known for its high concentration of anthocyanins and phenols [29, 30]. Despite the use of basil plant extracts as stabilizing agents for synthesizing zinc oxide nanoparticles [31], the impact of bulk silver and silver nanoparticles on this plant remains unexplored. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate the growth and biochemical parameters of the basil plant (O. basilicum var. purpurascens) treated with bulk silver and silver nanoparticles.

Results

Growth characteristics

As depicted in Fig. 1, the growth-associated parameters of the basil plant, such as root and shoot length and weight, decreased with increasing concentrations of silver particles and silver nanoparticles. Silver nanoparticles at 80 ppm induced a higher reduction in growth parameters compared to silver nitrate at the same concentration. Specifically, at an 80 ppm concentration, silver particles and silver nanoparticles reduced root length by 52% and 68%, respectively, in comparison to the control group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The effect of silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles on root length (a), shoot length (b), root fresh weight (c) and shoot fresh weight (d) of basil plants. Vertical bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters represent significant differences at 5% probability

Full size image

Plant pigments

Figure 2 shows how silver atoms and silver nanoparticles affect plant pigments. As the concentration of these nanoparticles increased, the levels of chlorophylls a and b decresed, whereas the levels of anthocyanins and carotenoids increased. The concentration of chlorophyll a and b in silver particles and silver nanoparticles did not differ at a concentration of 40 ppm. However, compared to silver particles, silver nanoparticles reduced these two pigments by a higher amount at an 80 ppm concentration. The silver particles and silver nanoparticles, at a concentration of 80 ppm, resulted in a 36% and 67% decrease in chlorophyll a, respectively, compared to control plants. Chlorophyll b decreased by 77% at a concentration of 80 ppm silver nanoparticles, compared to control plants.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The effect of silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles on the concentration of chlorophyll a (a), chlorophyll b (b), carotenoid (c) and anthocyanin (d) in the leaves of basil palnts. Vertical bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters represent significant differences at 5% probability

Full size image

Total phenols, MDA, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)

Figure 3 shows that an increase in the concentration of silver particles and silver nanoparticles led to an increase in biochemical parameters such as total phenols, MDA, and H2O2. In particular, silver nanoparticles caused a greater increase in these parameters compared to silver nitrate, especially at a concentration of 80 ppm. At a concentration of 80 ppm of silver nanoparticles, total phenols, MDA, and H2O2 increased by 17%, 20%, and 17%, respectively, compared to the control.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The effect of silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles on the concentration of total phenols (a), H2O2 (b) and MDA (c) in the leaves of basil plants. Vertical bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters represent significant differences at 5% probability

Full size image

Silver content

As the treatment concentration increased, there was a rise in silver content within both the roots and leaves (Fig. 4). The silver content in plants treated with silver nanoparticles exceeded that in plants treated with silver nitrate. Applying 40 ppm and 80 ppm of silver nanoparticles resulted in silver content increases of 23% and 35%, respectively, when compared to the control.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The impact of silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles on silver concentration in basil plants' roots (a) and leaves (b). Vertical bars indicate standard errors (n = 3). Columns with different letters indicate significant differences at a 5% probability level

Full size image

Discussion

Nanoparticles, defined as particles smaller than 100 nm, exhibit distinctive physical and chemical properties owing to their reduced size, unique structure, and surface characteristics, setting them apart from their bulk counterparts [32, 33]. Among the different types of nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles stand out as important elements used in various industries, particularly in medicine, due to their unique properties. However, the widespread utilization of silver nanoparticles results in their release into the ecosystem. This dissemination has consequential effects on plants, which play a vital role in the ecosystem [34].

The impact of silver nanoparticles on plants manifests in intracellular changes, influenced by the plant's sensitivity or tolerance to these nanoparticles [35]. Plant responses to nanoparticle exposure encompass a spectrum of morphological and physiological alterations. Key factors influencing the extent of these changes include the chemical composition, size, concentration, surface coating, reactivity of the nanoparticles, treatment duration, application method, and the type of plant species or cultivar [7, 36, 37]. Growth parameters and content of photosynthetic pigments provide insight into how plants react to stress caused by nanoparticles [38, 39]. Al-Huqail et al. [40] found that silver nanoparticles have the potential to inhibit chlorophyll production in leaves, consequently impacting a plant's photosynthetic capabilities. This aligns with the research conducted by Vishwakarma et al. [41], who observed a reduction in photosynthetic pigments in mustard plants due to the generation of ROS induced by silver nanoparticle treatment.

Growth and chlorophyll content have been observed to be negatively impacted by the presence of silver and silver nanoparticles in our experiment. The reduction was found to be more significant in the presence of silver nanoparticles compared to silver alone. The observed reduction in growth parameters appears to be linked to a decline in chlorophyll content induced by the treatment with silver and silver nanoparticles. The generation of H2O2, an example of ROS, coupled with an elevated absorption of silver ions, seems to contribute to the diminished chlorophyll levels in plants exposed to silver and silver nanoparticles. Consequently, the detrimental effects of silver nanoparticles, in comparison to silver, on both growth and chlorophyll content are more pronounced, likely attributed to the heightened absorption of silver ions and the increased production of ROS.

Furthermore, silver ions can impact photosynthesis by competitively displacing copper in plastocyanin. Plastocyanin is a soluble protein found in the lumen of chloroplast thylakoids that binds to copper. Electrons are transferred from cytochrome b6/f to PSI through plastocyanin as an electron carrier [42, 43].

Jansson and Hansson (2008) reported that silver ions have the capacity to inhibit the electron transfer process from plastocyanin to PSI [44].

When silver ions bind to plastocyanin and compete with copper for binding sites, they disrupt or inactivate the photosynthetic electron transport process, leading to the production of ROS [45]. Plant cells overproduce ROS due to the activation of silver nanoparticle and silver phytotoxicity, which causes oxidative stress. Multiple studies have shown that the formation of four distinct ROS in plants, including singlet oxygen, superoxide, H2O2, and hydroxyl radicals, is significantly increased when plants are exposed to silver nanoparticles and silver [46].

In organelles including chloroplasts, mitochondria, and peroxisomes, ROS is created naturally as a byproduct of normal metabolic processes [47]. However, under stressful conditions, an excessive amount of ROS is produced, and this ROS, through electron transfer, significantly oxidises plant biomolecules and cellular structures. Arruda et al. [48] reported that excessive ROS generation induced by exposure to silver nanoparticles might result in oxidative stress, which can induce cell death and impair plant growth. Oxidative stress may result in lipid peroxidation, protein damage, DNA damage, and permeability damage to cell membranes.

MDA is a significant byproduct of lipid peroxidation and serves as an indicator of the extent of lipid peroxidation in suboptimal growth conditions [49]. Our research revealed a direct correlation between the concentrations of silver and silver nanoparticles and the content of H2O2 and MDA. As the concentration of silver and silver nanoparticles increased, there was a corresponding rise in the levels of H2O2 and MDA. Notably, the increase was more pronounced in the case of silver nanoparticle treatment.

Silver nanoparticle treatment at 500 and 2000 ppm boosted the development of MDA in soybeans, as observed by De La Torre-Roche et al. [50]. Similar to this, Nair and Chung [51] found that exposing Arabidopsis plants to silver nanoparticle concentrations of 0.2, 0.5, and 1 ppm significantly increased lipid peroxidation. Further research revealed that exposure to silver nanoparticle concentrations of 0.5 and 1 ppm significantly increased the production of H2O2 and lipid peroxidation in rice shoots and roots [17].

Plants possess inherent antioxidant defense systems designed to counteract the detrimental effects of ROS. These defense mechanisms encompass both non-enzymatic antioxidants, such as thiols, ascorbate, glutathione, phenols, and anthocyanins, as well as enzymatic antioxidants, including ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. Together, these components work synergistically to neutralize and regulate ROS levels, safeguarding the plant from oxidative stress and maintaining cellular integrity [52].

Anthocyanins and phenols frequently act as a non-enzymatic antioxidant to combat ROS and chelate metals in stressful situations [53].

In our study, the plants treated with both silver and silver nanoparticles showed increased concentrations of anthocyanins, carotenoids, and total phenols compared to the control group. The increase in these antioxidant compounds was particularly pronounced in the treatment with silver nanoparticles, underscoring its greater impact on the accumulation of anthocyanins, carotenoids, and total phenols in the plants.

According to a study by Syu et al. [54], treating Arabidopsis seedlings with silver nanoparticles significantly boosted anthocyanin and phenols accumulation. Similar outcomes in terms of anthocyanin accumulation were seen in turnip after exposure to higher quantities of silver nanoparticles [55].

Additionally, anthocyanins, phenols, and other non-enzymatic antioxidants like carotenoids participate in plant antioxidant defence responses to silver nanoparticles. Carotenoids have the ability to stimulate antioxidant activity and may lessen the harmful effects of ROS. After being exposed to silver nanoparticles, rice showed a large increase in the level of carotenoids, showing that plants utilize carotenoids to mitigate the ROS effects induced by silver nanoparticles [56].

In this study, despite the presence of anthocyanin, phenol, and carotenoid antioxidants, the effective removal of ROS generated under the stress of silver and silver nanoparticles was not sufficient. Consequently, ROS induced damage to fatty acids, leading to the production of MDA, with higher MDA content observed in the silver nanoparticle treatment compared to silver.

Supporting these findings, Okaroum et al. (2013) proposed that the release and accumulation of silver from silver nanoparticles elevate ROS production in Lemna gibba [57]. In our study, the accumulation of silver in both roots and leaves of plants exposed to silver and silver nanoparticles increased, with a more significant rise observed in the silver nanoparticle treatment. Consistent with our results, Arabidopsis plants exposed to silver nanoparticle treatment also demonstrated a higher accumulation of silver compared to those exposed to silver alone [58]. These outcomes highlight the potential implications of silver nanoparticles in triggering ROS-related stress and silver accumulation in plants.

Conclusions

Our research investigated the impacts of silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles on basil (Ocimum basilicum var. Purpurascens) plants. The results revealed a significant decrease in growth-related traits such as root and shoot length, as well as fresh weight, following these treatments.

The decrease in growth parameters observed in both silver and silver nanoparticle treatments suggests a potential impact of oxidative stress on the plants. Specifically, the silver nanoparticle treatment triggered a stronger oxidative stress response than silver alone, as evidenced by the higher levels of H2O2 and MDA. This heightened oxidative stress in the plants treated with silver nanoparticles can be attributed to increased silver absorption and elevated ROS production.

Although non-enzymatic antioxidant responses were stimulated in the plants treated with silver and silver nanoparticles, the antioxidant activity proved to be insufficient to completely neutralize ROS. These results emphasize the potentially detrimental effects of silver particles, particularly nanoparticles, on the growth and physiological parameters of basil plants. In light of these findings, the authors recommend implementing measures to regulate the release and accumulation of silver and silver nanoparticles in the environment and emphasize the importance of environmental management in mitigating potential adverse effects on plant health.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and treatments

This study complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation of Iran. The seeds of plant material were obtained from Pakan Seed Company of Isfahan. No special permissions were necessary to collect samples. Otherwise, the plant materials used and collected in the study comply with Iran’s guidelines and legislation. The plant studied in this research was the purple basil plant and the variety used was Purpurescens.

The basil seeds were disinfected for six minutes with a 0.5% sodium hypochlorite solution. After being rinsed twice with distilled water, the seeds were sown in pots filled with perlite. They were then incubated in a greenhouse under controlled conditions, including a temperature of 25 ± 2 °C, a 16/8 light/dark cycle, a relative humidity of 60%, and a light intensity of 120 µmolm−2s−1light intensity. The seedlings were irrigated with Hoagland's solution for two weeks following germination. Then, therapies utilising silver nitrate (representative of Bulk Silver) and silver nanoparticles were used. According to the manufacturer's data, the average size of silver nanoparticles was 20 nm, and the nanoparticles were homogeneous. UV spectral analysis (using a Scan Drop-type product from Analytik Jena, Germany) and scanning electron microscopy (Model JSM 6390LV, JOEL, USA) of the nanoparticles confirmed the manufacturer's information. UV spectroscopy showed the absorption maximum at a wavelength of 383 nm, and the SEM image revealed that the nanoparticles were homogeneous (Figs. 5 and 6). This experiment was done based on completely randomized design with three replication.

Fig. 5
figure 5

UV–vis spectra of silver nanoparticles

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

SEM micrograph of the silver nanoparticles

Full size image

The Hoagland's nutritional solution was supplemented with solutions containing silver nitrate and ultrasonically sonicated silver nanoparticles (100W, 40 kHz, 30 min) at concentrations of 0, 40, and 80 ppm. After two weeks of treatment, the plants were selected for measuring growth and physiological characteristics.

Measurement of chlorophyll, carotenoid content and growth-associated traits

After being initially cleaned with distilled water, the samples had any extra moisture absorbed by filter paper. After the roots were cut off from the soil's surface, the weight of the plant's shoot and root was measured in gram. A ruler was also used to measure the root' and shoot' length in centimetre. Measurement of chlorophyll and carotenoid content in leaves was performed using the Arnon method [59] for chlorophyll and the Lichtenthaler method [60] for carotenoids. First, one gram of fresh leaf tissue was weighed and ground using a mortar and pestle. The resulting extract was then adjusted to a volume of 10 ml using 80% acetone. Subsequently, the extract was centrifuged for three minutes at 4 degrees Celsius and 5000 g. The absorbance of the mixture was measured using a spectrophotometer at wavelengths of 645, 663, and 470 nm after transferring a portion of the extract into a cuvette. Finally, the concentrations of chlorophylls a and b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoids were determined in micrograms per gram of plant tissue weight using the following formulas:

$$\mathrm{Chlorophyll}\;\mathrm a\;\left(\text{mg}/\text{gfw}\right)=\left(\left(12.7\times\text{D}663\right)-\left(2.69\times\text{D}645\right)\right)\times\text{V}/1000\times\text{W}$$
(1)
$$\mathrm{Chlorophyll}\;\mathrm b\;\left(\text{mg}/\text{gfw}\right)=\left(\left(22.9\times\text{D}645\right)-\left(4.93\times\text{D}663\right)\right)\times\text{V}/1000\times\text{W}$$
(2)
$$\mathrm{Total}\;\mathrm{chlorophyll}\;\left(\text{mg}/\text{gfw}\right)=\left(\left(20.2\times\text{D}645\right)+\left(8.02\times\text{D}663\right)\right)\times\text{V}/1000\times\text{W}$$
(3)
$$\mathrm{Carotenoids }\left({\text{mg}}/{\text{gfw}}\right) = \left(1000 \times {\text{D}}470 -1.82 \times \mathrm{chla }-85.02 \times {\text{chlb}}\right)/198 \times {\text{V}}/1000 \times {\text{W}}$$
(4)

Total phenolic compounds in leaves

The Sonald and Laima technique [61] was employed to determine the total phenolic content of the leaves. One gram of the sample was mixed with 5 ml of 95% ethanol and left in the dark for 24 h. Afterward, 1 ml of the extract was combined with 1 ml of 1N HCl and 1 ml of 5% sodium carbonate, then diluted with distilled water to reach a final volume of 5 ml. Following an hour in the dark, the absorbance of each sample was measured at a wavelength of 725 nm. The concentration of total phenolic compounds was then calculated in mg per gram of plant tissue weight using a standard curve.

H2O2 content

The H2O2 level was determined using the Velikova et al. [62] technique. Plant leaves were homogenised, then rinsed with 1.0% trichloroacetic acid. The extract was centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 min at 4°C using a refrigerated centrifuge (Centrifuge 5804R, Germany). Then, 5.0 ml of supernatant and 5.0 ml of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) were combined with 1.0 ml of 1 M potassium iodide solution. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 390 nm. The concentration of H2O2 in each sample was calculated and reported as micromoles per gram of plant tissue weight using the extinction coefficient of M−1cm−1 0.28.

MDA content

Measurement of Malondialdehyde (MDA) in whole leaf was performed using the Heath and Packer [63] method.

Anthocyanin content

The concentration of anthocyanins was determined using the Wagner method [64]. In a mortar, 1.0 g of the material was completely crushed with 10 ml of acidic methanol (pure hydrochloric acid and methanol in a volumetric ratio of 99:1). The extract was then put into test tubes with screw-on caps and left for 24 h at 25°C in complete darkness. The extract was centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min, and the supernatant's absorbance at 550 nm was measured. Using an extinction coefficient of 33000 M−1 cm−1, the concentration was estimated, and the results were given in micromoles per gram dry weight.

Silver content

To measure the silver content, the roots and leaves of control and treated plants (exposed to silver nitrate and silver nanoparticles) were collected and completely washed to remove silver nanoparticles attached to the root surface. The samples were then dried in an oven at 70°C for 72 h and digested in nitric acid in a microwave oven. After digestion, the samples were diluted and analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7500a, USA).

Statistical analysis

The experiment was conducted based on completely randomized design, with three replications. In each replication, measurements were made on five random samples and their average was considered as the average of that replicate. The mean values shown in the figures represent the average of these three independent biological replicates, with the associated standard error. The data were analysed using the ANOVA test and SPSS software. The Duncan's test was used to compare means at a 5% level of probability.

Availability of data and materials

The data of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Change history

  • 28 March 2024

    A typo error was found in Shahla Hashemi Shahraki's affiliation.

References

  1. Keat CL, Aziz A, Eid AM, Elmarzugi NA. Biosynthesis of nanoparticles and silver nanoparticles. Bioresources Bioprocessing. 2015;2(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jiravova J, Tomankova KB, Harvanova M, Malina L, Malohlava J, Luhova L, Panacek A, Manisova B, Kolarova H. The effect of silver nanoparticles and silver ions on mammalian and plant cells in vitro. Food Chem Toxicol. 2016;96:50–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cho K-H, Park J-E, Osaka T, Park S-G. The study of antimicrobial activity and preservative effects of nanosilver ingredient. Electrochim Acta. 2005;51(5):956–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Albrecht MA, Evans CW, Raston CL. Green chemistry and the health implications of nanoparticles. Green Chem. 2006;8(5):417–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Khodakovskaya MV, De Silva K, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarcia H. Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS Nano. 2012;6(3):2128–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Santás-Miguel V, Arias-Estévez M, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Arenas-Lago D. Use of metal nanoparticles in agriculture. A review on the effects on plant germination. Environ Pollut. 2023;34:122222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bijali J, Acharya K. Current trends in nano-technological interventions on plant growth and development: a review. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2020;14(2):113–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tymoszuk A. Silver nanoparticles effects on in vitro germination, growth, and biochemical activity of tomato, radish, and kale seedlings. Materials. 2021;14(18):5340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Guzmán-Báez GA, Trejo-Téllez LI, Ramírez-Olvera SM, Salinas-Ruíz J, Bello-Bello JJ, Alcántar-González G, Hidalgo-Contreras JV, Gómez-Merino FC. Silver nanoparticles increase nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium concentrations in leaves and stimulate root length and number of roots in tomato seedlings in a hormetic manner. Dose-Response. 2021;19(4):15593258211044576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yosefzaei F, Poorakbar L, Farhadi K. The effect of silver nanoparticles on morphological and physiological indexes of Ocimum basilicum L. Iran J Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;1(2):63–73 ((Abstarct in English)).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ejaz M, Raja NI, Mashwani ZUR, Ahmad MS, Hussain M, Iqbal M. Effect of silver nanoparticles and silver nitrate on growth of rice under biotic stress. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2018;12(7):927–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziotti ABS, Ottoni CA, Correa CN, de Almeida OJG, de Souza AO, Neto MCL. Differential physiological responses of a biogenic silver nanoparticle and its production matrix silver nitrate in Sorghum bicolor. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28:32669–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashemi S, Asrar Z, Pourseadi S, DehZeare M. Effect of biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles on growth characteristics and flavonoid contents of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Appl Field Crops Res. 2016;29(2):49–54 ((Abstract in English)).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tripathi DK, Singh S, Singh S, Srivastava PK, Singh VP, Singh S, Prasad SM, Singh PK, Dubey NK, Pandey AC, Chauhan DK. Nitric oxide alleviates silver nanoparticles (AgNps)-induced phytotoxicity in Pisum sativum seedlings. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2017;110:167–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. An J, Zhang M, Wang S, Tang J. Physical, chemical and microbiological changes in stored green asparagus spears as affected by coating of silver nanoparticles-PVP. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2008;41(6):1100–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Vishwakarma K, Shweta, Upadhyay N, Singh J, Liu S, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Tripathi DK, Sharma S. Differential Phytotoxic Impact of Plant Mediated Silver Nanoparticles (AgNPs) and Silver Nitrate (AgNO3) on Brassica sp. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1501.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nair PMG, Chung IM. Physiological and molecular level effects of silver nanoparticles exposure in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Chemosphere. 2014;112:105–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang J, Jiang F, Ma C, Rui Y, Rui M, Adeel M, Cao W, Xing B. Alteration of crop yield and quality of wheat upon exposure to silver nanoparticles in a life cycle study. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(11):2589–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Amooaghaie R, Tabatabaei F, Ahadi A. Alterations in HO-1 expression, heme oxygenase activity and endogenous NO homeostasis modulate antioxidant responses of Brassica nigra against nano silver toxicity. J Plant Physiol. 2018;228:75–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dobias J, Bernier-Latmani R. Silver release from silver nanoparticles in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(9):4140–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tiwari S, Tiwari S, Singh M, Singh A, Prasad SM. Generation Mechanisms of Reactive Oxygen Species in the Plant Cell. In: Reactive Oxygen Species in Plants. 2017: 1–22.

  22. Flanigan PM, Niemeyer ED. Effect of cultivar on phenolic levels, anthocyanin composition, and antioxidant properties in purple basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Food Chemist. 2014;164:518–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Phippen WB, Simon JE. Anthocyanins in Basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Agricultural Food Chemist. 1998;46(5):1734–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Das K, Roychoudhury A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Front Environ Sci. 2014;2:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pandhair V, Sekhon BS. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in plants: an overview. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;15(2):71–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang F, Chen J, Tang R, Wang R, Ahmad S, Liu Z, Peng D. Research progress on anthocyanin-mediated regulation of ‘black’ phenotypes of plant organs. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023;45(9):7242–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zheng W, Wang SY. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in selected herbs. J Agric Food Chem. 2001;49(11):5165–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee J, Scagel CF. Chicoric acid found in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) leaves. Food Chemist. 2009;115(2):650–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fernandes F, Pereira E, Círić A, Soković M, Calhelha RC, Barros L, Ferreira ICFR. Ocimum basilicum var. purpurascens leaves (red rubin basil): a source of bioactive compounds and natural pigments for the food industry. Food Function. 2019;10(6):3161–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Milić Komić S, Živanović B, Dumanović J, Kolarž P, Sedlarević Zorić A, Morina F, Vidović M, Veljović JS. Differential antioxidant response to supplemental UV-B irradiation and sunlight in three basil varieties. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(20):15350.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Abdul Salam H, Sivaraj R, Venckatesh R. Green synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles from Ocimum basilicum L. var. purpurascens Benth.-Lamiaceae leaf extract. Materials Letters. 2014;131:16–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(7):908–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Khan S, Hossain MK. 2 - Classification and properties of nanoparticles. In: Rangappa M, editor. Nanoparticle-Based Polymer Composites. Parameswaranpillai, Yashas Gowda, Siengchin, Seydibeyoglu: Woodhead Publishing; 2022. p. 15–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Anjum NA, Gill SS, Duarte AC, Pereira E, Ahmad I. Silver nanoparticles in soil–plant systems. J Nanopart Res. 2013;15(9):1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Du J, Tang J, Xu S, Ge J, Dong Y, Li H, Jin M. A review on silver nanoparticles-induced ecotoxicity and the underlying toxicity mechanisms. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;98:231–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Santás-Miguel V, Arias-Estévez M, Rodríguez-Seijo A, Arenas-Lago D. Use of metal nanoparticles in agriculture. A review on the effects on plant germination. Environ Pollut. 2023;334:122222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khodakovskaya M, Dervishi E, Mahmood M, Xu Y, Li Z, Watanabe F, Biris AS. Carbon nanotubes are able to penetrate plant seed coat and dramatically affect seed germination and plant growth. ACS Nano. 2009;3(10):3221–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sherin G, Aswathi KPR, Puthur JT. Photosynthetic functions in plants subjected to stresses are positively influenced by priming. Plant Stress. 2022;4:100079.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Chandrashekar HK, Singh G, Kaniyassery A, Thorat SA, Nayak R, Murali TS, Muthusamy A. Nanoparticle-mediated amelioration of drought stress in plants: a systematic review. 3 Biotech. 2023;13(10):336.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Al-Huqail AA, Hatata MM, Al-Huqail AA, Ibrahim MM. Preparation, characterization of silver phyto nanoparticles and their impact on growth potential of Lupinus termis L. seedlings. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018;25(2):313–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vishwakarma K, Shweta, Upadhyay N, Singh J, Liu S, Singh VP, Prasad SM, Chauhan DK, Tripathi DK, Sharma S. Differential phytotoxic impact of plant mediated silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) on Brassica sp. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:Article1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bohner H, Sandmann G, Böger P. Formation of silver plastocyanin in Scenedesmus. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 1981;636(1):65–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Li HH, Merchant S. Two metal-dependent steps in the biosynthesis of Scenedesmus obliques plastocyanin. Differential mRNA accumulation and holoprotein formation. J Biol Chemist. 1992;267(13):9368–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Jansson H, Hansson Ö. Competitive inhibition of electron donation to photosystem 1 by metal-substituted plastocyanin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics. 2008;1777(9):1116–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sujak A. Interaction between cadmium, zinc and silver-substituted plastocyanin and cytochrome b6f complex — heavy metals toxicity towards photosynthetic apparatus. Acta Physiol Plant. 2005;27(1):61–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mourato M, Reis R, Martins LL. Characterization of plant antioxidative system in response to abiotic stresses: a focus on heavy metal toxicity. In: Advances in selected plant physiology aspects. Edited by Montanaro, vol. 12. London, England: IntechOpen; 2012: 1–17.

  47. Møller IM, Jensen PE, Hansson A. Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:459–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Arruda SCC, Silva ALD, Galazzi RM, Azevedo RA, Arruda MAZ. Nanoparticles applied to plant science: a review. Talanta. 2015;131:693–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lin T-H, Huang Y-L, Huang S-F. Lipid peroxidation in liver of rats administrated with methyl mercuric chloride. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1996;54:33–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. De La Torre-Roche R, Hawthorne J, Musante C, Xing B, Newman LA, Ma X, White JC. Impact of Ag nanoparticle exposure on p, p′-DDE bioaccumulation by Cucurbita pepo (Zucchini) and Glycine max (Soybean). Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(2):718–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Nair PMG, Chung IM. Assessment of silver nanoparticle-induced physiological and molecular changes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:8858–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Kapoor D, Singh S, Kumar V, Romero R, Prasad R, Singh J. Antioxidant enzymes regulation in plants in reference to reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Plant Gene. 2019;19:100182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gould KS. Nature’s Swiss army knife: the diverse protective roles of anthocyanins in leaves. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2004;2004(5):314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Syu YY, Hung JH, Chen JC, Chuang HW. Impacts of size and shape of silver nanoparticles on Arabidopsis plant growth and gene expression. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2014;83:57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Thiruvengadam M, Gurunathan S, Chung IM. Physiological, metabolic, and transcriptional effects of biologically-synthesized silver nanoparticles in turnip (Brassica rapa ssp. rapa L.). Protoplasma. 2015;252:1031–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Mirzajani F, Askari H, Hamzelou S, Farzaneh M, Ghassempour A. Effect of silver nanoparticles on Oryza sativa L. and its rhizosphere bacteria. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013;88:48–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Oukarroum A, Barhoumi L, Pirastru L, Dewez D. Silver nanoparticle toxicity effect on growth and cellular viability of the aquatic plant Lemna gibba. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2013;32(4):902–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Geisler-Lee J, Wang Q, Yao Y, Zhang W, Geisler M, Li K, Huang Y, Chen Y, Kolmakov A, Ma X. Phytotoxicity, accumulation and transport of silver nanoparticles by Arabidopsis thaliana. Nanotoxicology. 2013;7(3):323–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Arnon DI. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase Beta Vulgaris Plant Physiol. 1949;24(1):1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Lichtenthaler HK. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes. Methods Enzymol. 1987;148:350–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Soland S, Laima S. Phenolics and cold tolerance of Brassica napus. Plant Agr. 1999;1:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant systems in acid rain-treated bean plants: protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci. 2000;151(1):59–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Heath RL, Packer L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1968;125(1):189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wagner GJ. Content and vacuole/extravacuole distribution of neutral sugars, free amino acids, and anthocyanin in protoplasts. Plant Physiol. 1979;64(1):88–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this article would like to express their gratitude to the Department of Biology, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran for the guidance and support provided during the experiments.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

    Shahla Hashemi Shahraki

  2. Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Science, Knowledge University, Kirkuk Road, Erbil, 44001, Iraq

    Tayebeh Ahmadi

  3. Department of Agriculture, Minab Higher Education Center, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

    Babak Jamali

  4. Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran

    Mehdi Rahimi

Authors
  1. Shahla Hashemi Shahraki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tayebeh Ahmadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Babak Jamali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mehdi Rahimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SHS and TA designed the research. SHS, TA and BJ performed the data analysis and wrote draft of the manuscript. SHS, TA, BJ and MR wrote, read, reviewed and edited. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shahla Hashemi Shahraki or Mehdi Rahimi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

"This study complied with relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation of Iran. The seeds of plant material were were obtained from Pakan Seed Company of Isfahan. No special permissions were necessary to collect samples. Otherwise, the plant materials used and collected in the study comply with Iran’s guidelines and legislation".

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahraki, S.H., Ahmadi, T., Jamali, B. et al. The biochemical and growth-associated traits of basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) affected by silver nanoparticles and silver. BMC Plant Biol 24, 92 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04770-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-024-04770-w

Keywords

BMC Plant Biology

ISSN: 1471-2229

Contact us